►
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
C
D
A
D
Recording
in
the
place
of.
A
And
I'll
do
the
the
formal
introduction.
So
so,
let's,
let's
start
and
welcome
to
the
rewards
working
group
meeting
of
december,
the
8th.
A
We'll
start
get
started
right
away
with
the
status
updates
and
start
with
the
rewards
record,
startup
and
libby.
B
Then
we
have
the
manifesto,
nobody
was
against
it.
It's
in
the
forum
we
have
ours,
light
for
the
community
call.
I
think
it's
all
albert.
A
Let
me
see
if
we
had
something
else.
I
think
it's
only
small
things.
A
Yeah
yeah
yeah.
That
probably
will
do
it.
Definitely
we
need
to
create
this
form
category
and
do
a
post
in
the
forum.
C
Yeah,
so
we
had
our
first
sink
last
friday
me
zepty,
ms
and
ryle.
I
can't
remember,
I
think
he
was
the
third
person
there,
and
so
we
delegated
some
important
tasks
like
creating
the
quantifier
onboarding
document.
C
So
I
don't
think
there's
really
many
blockers
left
for
this.
Some
of
the
ideas
we're
having
is
just
having
a
nice
template
because
there's
going
to
be
time,
commitments
that
are
needed
from
the
reward
board
and
we
want
to
avoid
a
situation
where
the
same
reward
board
members
are
having
to
do.
These
synchronous
calls
with
quantifiers
so
for
for
onboarding
and
for
doing
the
review
calls
right.
C
That's
what
we
decided
on
so
just
creating
like
a
simple
template
agenda
so
that
it
seems
really
easy
for
reward
board
members
to
just
like
jump
in
and
facilitate
a
call.
C
So
that's
in
the
works
we
talked
about.
Chewie
has
like
an
animation
team
that
be
coming
together
in
january,
so
post
mvp,
we
can
create
like
an
animated
tutorial,
that'll
be
post
first
quant.
The
reward
board
is
set
up.
I
think
it's
done
with
24
hour
voting
vote
duration.
C
So
we'll
have
to
do
that
as
a
group
and
then
the
other
point
about
recruiting
quantifiers.
I
think
I
need
to
kick
it
up
a
notch
and
maybe
at
the
community
call
we
can
when
we
we
present
to
the
rewards
group
already
or
we'll
be
doing
it
right
in
the
call.
C
Okay,
cool
so
yeah.
I
think
it
would
be
good
to
have
a
call
to
action
during
the
community
call
and
explain
to
people
that,
like
we
need
new
members
like
any
new
members
like
if
you
want
to
be
onboarded
and
learn
how
to
participate
in
the
reward
system
by
doing
quantifying
it'll,
be
like
a
minimum
time.
Commitment
so
like
an
hour
to
two
hours,
bi-weekly
or
for
like
a
whole
two-week
period,
will
take
about
two
hours
and
you
can
help
make
the
reward
system
awesome
by
providing
valuable
user
feedback.
C
So
a
nice
call
to
action
for
new
members
and
seasoned
members
as
well
sounds
great
yeah.
Apart
from
that
yeah
like
configure
source
cred
and
there
we
go
and
then
we
just.
E
C
Working
prototype
to
start
filling
out
the
tutorial
and
a
trial
run.
A
Yeah,
I
I
just
want
to
point
you
that
that
configuring
source
credit
will
be
a
thing.
I,
I
guess
more
than
just
writing
about
the
parameters
that
there
is
material,
feel
free
to
jump
in
here,
but
I
guess
that
we
would
need
to
have
sort
of
a
deeper
discussion
about
the
the
source
credit
configuration
parameters,
because
you
have
the
option
of
how
you
reward.
If
you
have
this
sort
of
this
immediate
reward,
or
this
more
long-term
reward
and
or
calculation
grain
calculations.
F
Yeah,
I
wanted
to
add
that
maybe
it's
important
to
give
some
time
extra
time
to
set
the
parameters
like
and
check
if
they
are
working
or
not,
because
it's
not
like
we
change
the
parameters
and
next
week
we
know
if
they
work.
We
need
like
at
least
one
month
or
two
months
to
see
if
they
adapt
to
our
necessities.
A
Yeah
and
I
think
we
would
like
to
to
check
with
the
source
cred
the
people
from
within
the
source,
credit
community
or
people
that
have
been
using
source
credit
for
a
longer
time,
so
that
we
are
sure
to
use
best
practices
that
stuff
that
they
know
that.
This
is
a
good
idea
to
configure
it
this
way,
and
then
we
can
tweak
for
our
our
own
needs,
of
course,
but
to
start
up
with
the
with
the
template
that
is
sort
of
well
proven.
B
So
maybe
we
think
of
like
setting
up
source
cred
as
a
maybe
like
a
three
month
process
with
like
one
check
every
month
like
seeing
what
was
all
the
data
collected?
How
is
that
talking
with
praise
what
is
being
double
rewarded,
what
is
not
being
rewarded
at
all
and
then
by
the
end
of
this,
like
third
iteration?
A
That
is
the
way
I've
understood
it
also
that
it
takes
some
time
to
to
trim
it.
A
Cool
move
on
to
to
next
section
source
credit
meeting
tracker
bot
iv.
E
So
the
progress
over
there
has
been
slightly
slow,
as
played
mostly
because
of
source
grid,
and
you
know
figuring
out
how
to
make
plugins
work
in
source
grid.
I
did
get
like
a
fork
of
their
external
web
and
documentation,
which
kind
of
works.
E
I'm
just
a
bit
unsure
about
how
we
are
going
to
manage
identities
like
do
we
associate
the
calls
with
their
with
the
discord
identities,
or
do
we
make
a
new
identity
for
the
call
remember
because
the
second
case
is
easier,
I'm
not
sure
how
to
make
the
first
case
work,
which
is
something
that
I'd
have
to
maybe
contact
someone
who
knows
more
about
the
internals
of
block
engine
source
grid,
maybe
has
maybe
maybe
see
now
if
they
have
the
time
to
sync
up
yeah.
That's
the
progress
on
that.
E
However,
like
one
thing
that
I
have
been
thinking
about
for
a
while
is
like,
if
this
is
something
we
can
like,
make
a
fork
of
the
official
discord,
plug-in
and
add
this
functionality
inside
that
itself,
so
that
I
don't
have
to
deal
with
identity
creation
and
you
know
managing
different
like
identity
analysis
and
the
skin.
This
is
something
that
we
can
like,
probably
add
to
source
grid
itself.
E
However,
it
would
like
not
be
something
that
everyone
wants,
so
I'm
not
sure
if
it
is
going
to
be
a
good
proposal,
but
can
be
something
we
can
work
on,
especially
considering
like
not
all
communities
are
going
to
be
using
the
events
system
that
we
are
using
and
maybe
they
would
want
call
tracking
or
whatever
so.
E
A
Yeah,
I
agree.
I
think
it
also
was
an
interesting
idea
to
to
sync
up
or
to
add,
maybe
add
this
functionality
to
the
core
discord.
Plugins
is
this
is
a
core
discord,
feature
the
events
announcing
and
doing
immense
tracking
and
not
tracking
but
planning,
but
let's
see
how
that
that
plays
out.
That
will
be
interesting
to
hear.
A
And
for
the
pollenbot.
A
Maybe
I
should
mention
something
there
or
no
matter
you
are
here.
Sorry,
please,
go
ahead.
F
Yeah,
sorry,
I'm
not
available
completely,
but
I
can't
jump
in
that
aspect.
Yeah
I
was
talking
with
hc
and
the
pollen
is,
I
think,
almost
done
it's
just
that
we
were
requiring
the
the
token
from
github.
So
there
was
a
security
issue
that
there
is
not
a
token
for
a
repository.
Only
the
the
token
implies
access
to
all
of
the
repos
from
the
user.
So
basically
we
have
to
create
a
dummy
user,
essentially
only
for
the
for
this
purpose.
F
A
Yeah,
so
that's
great
one,
one
more
work
stream
that
we
can
close
down
quite
soon
and
and
let
people
know
that
they
also
can
start
self
administering
their
the
source,
credit
profiles,
or
maybe
we
should
wait
with
that
until
the
the
system
is
up
and
running,
there's
like
no
need
of
doing
that
beforehand.
A
A
Which
means
that
we
need
to
discuss
how
we
deal
with
the
the
the
trial
quant.
But
let's,
let's
take
that
after
that
discussion
after
the
status
updates.
G
Yeah
so
this
week
I
finished
the
video
screen
details
for
that,
but
with
dummy
data,
as
you
don't
have
backing
for
that,
and
we
had
a
few
more
issues,
three
or
four
that
was
fixed
and
right
now,
I'm
working
on
endless
scroll
on
the
main
page
for
praises
and
after
that
we
can
use
this
feature
on
all
screen
if
needed.
A
Yeah,
so
we
try
to
move
forward
with
the
front
end
as
best
we
can
without
having
the
big
parts
of
the
the
back
end
accessible,
but
I'm
confident
that
we
will
get
it
done
just
a
little
bit
later.
A
And
for
the
allocation
or
we,
we
came
up
with
the
name
for
for
the
dashboard
rad,
the
rewards,
aloe,
location
and
distribution
dash,
dashboard.
H
I
can
hop
in
here
christopher
so
first
off
with,
with
it
being
called
rad.
I
want
to
do
like
a
bunch
of
totally
tubular,
memes
and
gifs
and
stuff
so
I'll
make
sure
to
throw
that
out
there.
So
nuggen
has
a
good
working
version
of
my
binder
going.
I
hit
christopher
before
there's
just
an
issue
or
two,
but
I'll
support
him,
and
the
goal
is
that
for
the
next
call
so
next
week,
we'll
actually
do
a
live
demo
and
walk
through
of
the
analysis
and
everything
going
on
there.
H
A
H
Done
I
really
want
to
give
a
shout
out
to
nugget
and
octopus
on
that
I've
kind
of
just
been
like
a
support
for
it,
but
from
a
workload
perspective,
noggin
noggins
really
been
running
with
it,
and
octopus
has
been
a
wealth
of
knowledge.
So
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
they
get
the
appropriate
credit.
So,
and
I
just
just
I'm
playing
as
much
of
a
passive
supportive
role
as
possible.
A
A
And
I'd
say
what
we
had
planned
was
to
do
to
start
the
trial
quant
and
then
do
the
the
post
quant
analysis
on
the
22nd.
If
I
remember
correctly,
and
if
we
push
that
a
week
forward,
which
I'm
I'm
not
certain
that
that
that
is
enough
for
us
to
get
the
the
back
end
done,
then
we
are
getting
into
weird
territory
and
sort
of
in
between
christmas
and
new
year.
And
I
don't
know
how
the
crypto
sphere
works
during
that
time.
A
If
you
plan
big
things
in
those
in
between
days
or
if
we
should
try
to
actually
to
push
it
into
the
first
week
of
january
and
any
ideas
and
any
voices
on
this.
A
So
my
my
suggestion,
my
proposal
would
be
to
to
move
the
trial
quant
into
january
and
maybe
to
do
to
then
do
the
trial
quant
on
the
fifth
and
plan
the
the
post
quant
analysis
that
on
the
12th.
A
A
Yeah,
that's
what
what
I
thought
as
well,
that
we
should
keep
them
quite
closely
together
in.
A
And
I
I
added
to
to
the
agenda
this
other
topic
of
work
group
funding
proposal.
Is
this
something
we
need
to
discuss
further
or
do
we
because
we
have
the
reward
board?
Have
a
stream
of
funding
and
the
quantifiers
have
a
stream
of
funding
through
the
the
periodic
quantifications?
But
but
the
the
rest
of
the
work
group
work
is,
is
not
funded
and
there
is
no
proposal
made
for
that
question
is
how
much,
except
for
the
weekly
or
bi-weekly
rewards
work.
A
A
Yeah,
that
is
the
open
question.
What
will
the,
how
will
the
work
group
work?
Look
after
yeah
after
the
upgrade
is
done
and.
C
A
C
A
No,
no!
No,
but
maybe
we
don't,
maybe
because
the
the
that
work
that
the
reward
the
board
does.
It
is
covered
already
by
the
the
funding.
You
know
the
fixed
amount
of
funds
for
each
price
period,
so
so
the
work
that
is
within
the
reward
board
shouldn't
be
covered
again
from
from
some
some
other
fund.
So
it's
more
like.
If
there
is
large
amounts
of
work
outside
of
the
reward
board,
then
we
should
consider
making
a
funding
proposal.
A
Then
I
I
know
that
tam
and
others
say
that
every
work
group
should
make
one
if
they're
so
so
that
all
work
groups
have
an
idea
how
they're
planned
to
fund
themselves.
But
but
our
proposal
could
be
is
like
most
of
the
work
like
95
of
the
work
will
be
inside
the
reward
board.
So
for
now
we
don't
need
to
make
the
proposal.
D
I
would
like
to
suggest
maybe
thinking
of
a
bounty
spool.
That
would
be
good,
because
maybe
there
are
some
things
that
we
don't
think
of
them
right
now,
but
that
are
small
things
that
can
be
incentivized
through
bounties
and
that
one
thing
that
some
of
us
have
been
following
for
the
funding
proposals
is
to
continue
with
that
rate
of
19
die
per
hour.
D
So
yeah.
Maybe
if
there
are
gonna,
be
some
fix,
you
can
use
that
numbers
or,
if
you
think
that
maybe
just
having
a
pool
for
bounties
yeah,
it's
up
to
you.
C
B
Yeah,
I
agree
I
like,
I
think
it
it
stays
clean
if
we
use
this
percentage
model
that
we
have
now
for
funding
all
of
the
reward
board
that
we
have
already
the
responsibilities
outlined
for
it
and
then,
if
we
need
something
like
of
a
technical
development,
that's
a
very
easy
proposal
to
make
to
the
dow
it's
not
a
huge
amount
of
funds
and
there's
a
clear
purpose
there
and
and
it's
quick.
A
B
A
It
so
basically,
then
we
will
not
make
a
funding
proposal
for
the
work
group
just
now.
That
is
the
conclusion
sort
of
cool
and
when
it
comes
to
to
praise
version,
one
the
upgrade
there
or
the
the
continuation
of
that
project,
then
that
is
not
necessarily
a
tec
project.
It
could
also
be
like
a
joint
common
stock
tc
giveth
project,
because
the
all
those
communities
will
be
using
it
so
yeah
that
could
be
run
just
partly
within
the
rewards
work
group
or
outside
of
it.
A
Cool
the
the
last
thing
I
don't
know
if
this
is
a
discussion
quest
the
topic
I
just
sort
of
I
just
saw
that
I
think
septi
asked
us
to
discuss
this
somehow
to
today
tonight.
Did
he.
A
Yeah,
I
just
thought
I
saw
him
mention
it
some
somewhere.
I.
H
B
B
H
B
H
A
B
C
One
thing
I
don't
feel
clear
on
is
how
we're
gonna
go
about
picking
all
of
these
parameters.
B
A
A
No
sorry
best
would
be
if
someone
someone
within
the
reward
board
feels
that
that
they
own,
like
the
source,
credit
parameters
that
the
way
I
I
feel
that
I
own
the
the
praise,
praise
parameters
and
I
I
can
drive
that
discussion
and
there's
for
for
the
pace
parameters.
There
are
only
four
and
it's
quite
simple
and
and
the
in
this
mate,
if
you
feel
like
you,
you
would
like
to
to
drive
that
discussion.
I
agree
with
with
mitch
that
it
would
be
good
to
start
that
discussion.
A
Asynchronously
like
listing
like
these
are
the
current
parameters
and-
and
I
don't
know
what
needs
to
be
changed.
That
is
because
I
haven't
haven't,
looked
at
them.
I
I
don't
know
that
much
so
so
the
person
driving
that
discussion
would
have
to
sort
of
highlight
what
needs
to
be
looked
at
and
consider
yeah.
C
I
think
what
would
help
is
if
we
had
the
an
exhausted
lifts
of
all
the
parameters
like
I
made
one
at
the
beginning,
I
think
with
the
reward
system
v2,
but
I
don't
think
I
got
everything
so
having
a
nice
table
like
that
with
each
category
and
then
the
the
parameter
that
needs
to
be
changed,
and
then
we
can
just
pin
it
somewhere.
We
can
make
a
thread
and
then
like
we
can
get
it
going
like
that,
and
then
I
agree
like
a
synchronous
meeting,
will
be
very
helpful
at
some
point.
F
A
Let's
start
that
document
and
we'll
add
the
source
parameters
and
the
price
parameters
and
the
sort
of
the
general
parameters,
such
as
the
funding
amount
or
the
the
budgeting
for
for
the
first
price
period,
or
so
we
bring
all
the
parameters
together
into
one
document.
C
A
And
I'd
like
to
bring
in
a
source
credit
experience
into
this,
so
aloisius
or
writer,
or
athena
or
all
three
or
someone
else
it
is
that
that
has
configured
if
this
chord
is.
The
this
course
is
the
the
thing
we
are
thinking
about.
Most
someone
that
has
experience
in
configuring
that.
F
B
Yeah
so
I
invited
yeah.
C
Oh
okay:
well
then
I'll
finish
this
one,
so
I
I
can
just
I
can
take
on
and
I
can
just
post
the
table
and
I'll
make
a
thread
if
we
want-
and
I
can
post
the
table
that
we
have
currently
and
pin
it,
and
maybe
we
can
start
to
restructure
it
from
there.
B
Thank
you
yeah
and
that
that
would
be
very
helpful
actually
to
have
the
table
now.
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
I
invited
aloysius
to
come
today
to
share
the
results
of
a
survey
they
did
for
the
praise
and
it
has
very
very
interesting
results
and
I
think
we
have
some
time
left
so
maybe
we
could
jump
into
that.
G
A
I
Cool,
so
I
had
curiosities
about
the
human
experience
on
the
other
side
of
praise,
our
team.
We
were
struggling
with
our
time
zones
and
everything,
and
I
wanted
a
science
still.
So
we
came
up
with
a
plan
to
create
a
survey
to
give
ourselves
a
data
set,
so
we
could
still
kind
of
be
messing
around
with
this
and
yeah.
One
of
the
first
questions
I
asked
was
like
how
long
people
had
been
exposed
to
the
prey
system.
I
I
A
lot
of
folks
felt,
like
their
praise,
was
consistent
with
the
effort
that
they
put
into
tech.
The
next
slide
is
about
value,
and
I
can
go
back
and
forth
between
the
two.
Just
to
see
the
difference.
Do
you
feel
like
the
level
of
praise
you've
received,
is
consistent
with
the
actual
value
you
think
you
deliver
this
one's
a
little
a
little
even
around,
and
then
the
previous
one.
I
These
charts
were
a
lot
different
and
I
don't
have
a
way
of
like
I
couldn't
tell
who
was
if
the
people
coming
in
were
new
and
had
been
a
while
or
had
been
around
for
a
while
or
had
not
been
around
for
a
while,
and
I
also
don't
know
how
to
like
present
these
things.
So
at
any
point
in
time,
interrupt
me
ask
questions
something,
because
I
can't
see
anybody-
and
I
don't
know
what
I'm
doing
this
is
about
whether
or
not
their
praise
fluctuated
over
time.
I
So
because
some
of
the
questions
I
thought
people
might
be
able
to
give
us
some
insight
too.
This
was
one
of
the
questions
we
asked
if
it
fluctuated
over
time
and
they
were
open
to
saying
more,
could
they?
The
common
theme
is
most
folks
realize
that
when
they
showed
up
more,
they
received
more
praise.
So
a
lot
of
people
associate
the
receiving
more
praise
to
showing
up
in
the
space.
I
This
was
fun
if
it
fluctuated
over
a
certain
a
specific
time.
Can
you
track
it
to
events?
I
wish
I
would
have
done
a
fault.
This
is
the
one
question
that
taught
me
something
about
this
survey.
This
one
is,
I
should
have
asked
a
question
on
this
is
to
ask
people
what
that
thing
was.
I
believe
that
I
would
have
gotten
multiple
answers
for
what
people
thought
was
the
impact
of
why
their
praise
or
what
these
specific
events
were.
I
think
it
would
have
been
different
things.
I
I
think
it
would
have
been
changes
in
the
commons,
maybe
conflict
that
happened
in
parts
of
the
project,
but
I
think
there
would
be
various
responses.
I
This
one's
for
me,
because
I'm
watching
stick,
would
you
say
it's
a
stimulating
experience.
I
had
to
ask
if
it
was
positive
and
negative,
because
I
know
that
I've
experienced
both
and
we
got
33
32
said
that
they
had
a
positive
and
a
negative
experience.
I
I
This
question
was
considering
the
possibility
of
people
being
left
out
like
expecting
to
when
they
participated
in
something,
and
maybe
folks
not
knowing
that
they
were
a
part
of
it.
I
I
I
I
We
had
a
lot
on
that.
Does
your
day-to-day
mood
in
your
work
environment
affect
your
ability
to
acknowledge
the
works
of
those
around
you
and
affect
your
ability
to
offer
praise
70
of
people
acknowledge
that
their
day-to-day
environment
affects
their
ability
to
operate
with
the
system,
so
my
brain
was
like
yeah.
We
still
need
more
mental
health.
I
I
think
that
has
a
lot
to
do
about
the
physiological
safety
of
our
ecosystems
and
just
how
people
relate
and
the
saturation
of
time
we
spend
together,
but
let's
see,
and
then
we
just
got
some
extra
any
extra
things
that
people
might
want
to
share.
I
love
phrase.
Criticism
is
that
collaborative
work
is
hard
to
achieve
and
a
lot
of
done
in
isolation,
tasks
that
cut
across
multiple
working
groups
are
much
less
recognized
than
tasks
centered
on
a
single
working
group.
I
I
E
My
guess
I
I
don't
really
understand
this,
but
my
guess
is
as
good
as
yours
is
probably
that
they're
trying
to
mention
that
you
know
specifically
outlining
praise
like
this
seems
weird
because
you're
like
super
appreciative.
So
it's
like
constructed
that
you're
forced
to
appreciate.
E
So
that's
something
that
some
individuals
might
not
like
at
the
same
time
like
present
like
something
that
you
need
to
participate
in,
particularly
like
you
don't
have
to
necessarily
praise
people,
it's
part
of
the
culture,
but
if
you
don't
want
to
you,
don't
have
to
and
that's
irrespective
of
you
getting
placed.
As
far
as
I
am
aware,.
A
It
seems
like
people
have
the
the
general
opinion
about
praise
like
like
that.
Is
that
you,
you
you
you
can
you
can
use
it,
but
you
don't
have
to
you're
happy
when
you
get
praised,
but
you're
not
really
super
sad
when
you
don't
get
it
so
you're,
not
counting
on
it.
You're,
not
counting
on
it
as
being
like
the
like
the
base
of
the
is
the
base
reward
for
for
your
you
know,
monthly
salary
or
you
like.
I
I
I
earn.
A
H
The
survey
gave
me
an
interesting
thought
too,
when
I
had
gone
through
it.
So
a
prime
example
is
actually
what
I
was
saying
about
nuggen
earlier,
where
I
might
get
basketed
into
praise
with
someone
else,
and
then
there
isn't
really
like
a
statistical
weight
of
proportion
of
how
much
effort
somebody
put
into
that,
and
I
I
almost
feel
like.
H
Sometimes
if
I
receive
praise
I'm
receiving
more,
like
there's
more
value
being
put
to
me
when
really
it
should
go
to
somebody
else,
because
I
was
more
passive
in
that
scenario
then-
and
I
thought
so-
it's
actually
a
flip
where,
like
I
got
praised,
but
I
don't,
I
almost
feel
bad
getting
the
praise
right,
because
I
I
want
it
to
go
more
heavily
to
the
people
who
really
put
a
lot
of
work
into
it.
B
E
Yeah,
I
think
we
can
set
that
up
so
in
the
v2
of
place,
maybe
like
with
reactions
or
buttons,
where,
like
you,
can
pass
on
your
place
to
other
individuals
in
that
call.
In
that
dimension,.
A
Yeah,
it's
super
interesting.
It
becomes
sort
of
like
an
extra
and
an
extra
dimension
to
to
praise
that
is
I
praise
and
in
an
individual
and
then
that
individual
can
also
make
a
statement
or
have
an
opinion
about
whether
that
person
was
was
deserving
of
the
appraiser
would
like
to
pass
it
on
it's
that
it's
then
it
becomes
multi-dimensional
and
even
more
interesting
to
analyze
as
well.
What
I
think
is
cool.
H
About
that
perspective
too,
christopher
is
it
could
actually
end
up
passing
in
the
scenarios
where
people
feel
like
they
got
passed
over
with
praise,
because
the
people
who
were
closely
working
on
that
situation
that
got
the
visibility,
but
maybe
it
was
somebody
else
that
they
would
pass
it
to.
You
might
actually
see
a
more
fair
distribution
and
allocation
in
those
cases
for
the
people
who
felt
well
otherwise,
yeah.
B
E
An
interesting
like
point
shared
by
the
survey
is
that
many
contributors
would
not
be
noticed
if
they're
not
actively
like
coming
to
calls,
and
I
think
that
also
like
reflects
how
present
a
compensation
model
is
much
more
of
an
intentional
reward,
because
if
you
like
look
to
how
it
has
been
for
a
while,
like
right
now,
like
contributors,
have
been
financed
by
the
common
stack
so
far,
where,
like
common
stack,
is
paying
them
some
amount
based
on
the
number
of
hours
they
spend
working
and
that's
irrespective
of
the
price
they
get
yeah.
E
That's
always
like
that.
Dimension
of
you
know
get
not
getting
enough
proportional
governance
tokens,
but
I
guess
governance
is
relative
to
how
much
you're
interacting
with
the
community.
E
So
I
think
it's
pretty
fair
standing
if
we
somehow
form
as
like
a
tertiary
system,
that's
like
depend
on
the
working
group
or
something
similar
to
that
like,
for
example,
coordinate
can
be
an
option
in
which,
like
specific
working
groups,
divide
their
budgets
between
the
members
based
on
the
projects
they're
working
on,
in
which,
like
people,
can
get
more
recognized
and
get
the
funding
they
want,
and
I
think
praise
is
like
a
bonus
on
top
and
it's
like
something
that
you
get
for
interacting
with
the
community
so
yeah.
A
B
I
I
I've
been
noticing
that
with
like
yeah,
just
like
who
our
praise
givers
are
by
habit
and
I've
been
noticing
how
I
can
like
I
don't
know
this
might
be
an
assumption,
but
I
can
see
the
trends
and
behavior
patterns
of
the
people
who
use
the
prey
system.
I
can
see
when
they're,
using
it
less.
I
I
can
like
literally
tell
by
their
text
and
their
writing
if
they're
like
more
excited,
less
excited
about
life,
just
by
the
way,
they're
using
praise
and
like,
I
think
that
that
could
be
a
health
like
a
way
to
gasp
like
a
health
metric.
If
you
wanted
one
for
the
people
who
are
intrinsically
motivated
to
do
this
sort
of
thing
like
I
am
a
gratitude
person,
I'm
huge
on
morale
yeah.
I
I
love
praise
just
because,
like
that
stuff,
that
I've
like
done
training
people
and
leading
people
like
it's
good,
and
I
also
know
how
the
people
who
use
that
like
are
affected
and
how
it
differentiates
in
them.
So
like
yeah,
just
something
to
be
mindful
of
when
we're
like.
Looking
at
the
data
and
stuff.
My
goal
is
that
eventually,
we'll
all
start
valuing
not
content,
people
are
creating,
but
we'll
start
valuing
ourselves
and
start
putting
the
the
the
the
all.
I
A
Yeah
and
you,
you
can
quite
easily
also
gauge
the
the
the
health
of
the
community
as
a
whole.
You
just
and
that
I
mean
you
just
by
doing
like
really
crude
analysis
of
praise.
This.
The
like
sentiment,
analysis
like
are,
are
the
words
being
used:
are
they
mostly
positive,
or
mostly
negative
or
just
graphing,
that
over
time,
that
will
actually
tell
you
something
about
what
is
the
mood
within
the
community?
A
How
does
it
yeah?
Does
it
thrive,
or
is
it
downhill.
A
Cool,
maybe
unless
we
have
any
other
voices
that
would
like
to
say
something
well,
then
we'll
finish
a
bit
early
today,
five
minutes.
F
I
I
just
wanted
to
add
next
week
we're
gonna
start
to
have
weekly
things
with
the
animation
team.
So
any
kind
of
like
notes
that
are
around
like
the
the
like
the
the
tutorial
video
for
quantifiers,
would
be
really
really
helpful
because
they
have
experience
in,
like
writing
the
script
and
animating
and
everything,
but
what
they
want
to
communicate.
A
Thanks
is
that
it
for
today.