►
From YouTube: W5 Sampo WG: Mission Statement, Expertise & Interests, Unifying Treasury Report Update & More!
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
So,
hey
libya,
okay,
let's
let's,
let's
jump
in
to
I'm
gonna
share
my
screen
did
I
am
I
sharing
it.
Nope
share
my
screen
and
basically
today
we're
gonna.
Do
a
quick
check-in
do
update
on
the
strategy
update
on
analysts,
then
I'd
like
to
just
do
like
a
little
jam
session,
where
there's
a
doc
that
I've
put
together.
A
That's
just
like
a
place
where
everybody
can
just
kind
of
put
their
interests
and
like
specialties,
their
expertise
and
stuff
like
that,
and
then
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
sample
manifesto,
and
that
should
be
plenty
for
today,
I'm
guessing,
but
any
other
things
that
people
feel
like
wow.
We
need
to
talk
about
this
today.
A
No
okay,
all
right!
Well,
let's
see,
I
know
I
was
gonna.
Do
one
other
thing:
oh
yeah,
I
know
what
I
was
gonna
do
so
zach.
Do
you
want?
Do
you
want
us
to
call
you
cryptozac
or
zac,
or
what?
What
exactly.
A
Okay,
crypto
zach,
so
do
you
want
to
read
the
sample
the
weekly
reading
at
the
top?
Let
me
can
you,
can
you
see
that
all
right
is.
C
Sampo
is
the
finished
mythic
horn
of
might
be
it
symbolizes,
the
working
group's
purpose,
mission-driven,
community-owned
and
governed
capital
to
advance
the
field
of
token
engineering.
We
focus
on
financial
management
income
generation
in
the
economic
development
that
builds
demand.
For
the
tec
token.
A
Cool
thank
you,
and
this
may
be
the
last
week
of
that
particular
phrase
because
we're
going
to
get
into
in
the
manifesto
one
of
the
things
I
want
to
talk
about
is
there's
a
couple
of
different
versions
of
the
mission
and
I
think
it's
time
to
lock
it
down.
So
that's
part
of
what
we
want
to
talk
about
today.
A
So,
let's
open
it
up,
here's
the
check
in
question
the
term
capacity
building.
What
does
that
mean
to
you?
If
anything
and
I
will
start
olivia,
can
you
take
it
off.
A
B
D
Capacity
building
for
me
is
like
you
know,
I
think,
of
like
a
battery
right
and
I
think
of
like
making
the
battery
bigger.
So
maybe
it's
not
a
perfect
analogy,
but
that's
what
I
think
of
you
know
it's
just
like.
Okay,
how
do
we
make
a
bigger
battery
that
can
charge
more
things
and
I'll
pass
it
to?
Yes,.
D
Think
it's
some
sort
of
like
regeneration.
B
I'll
pass
it
to
bear
100.
E
Yeah,
thank
you
so
for
me
and
for
what
I've
understand
so
far.
I
think
it
has
to
do
with
more
like,
like
personal
development
and
and
growth
in
in
terms
of
in
terms
of
skills
and
in
terms
of
knowledge
and
in
terms
of
relationships
yeah,
everything
that
could
fall
into
the
scope
of
capacity.
I
would
say,
yeah
it's
it's
kind
of
tricky,
but
yeah,
that's
what
I
would
get
I
got
distracted,
so
I
don't
know
who
to
pass
it
to.
A
Sure
I'll
pass
it
for
you
rex,
do
you
want
to
go.
F
Sure,
I
guess
in
the
spirit
of
analogies
I'll
say,
capacity
building
is
like.
F
Kind
of
re,
redistributing
our
efforts
to
towards
actions
or
the
way
we
do
things
in
order
to
kind
of
yeah
grow
into
a
a
better,
bigger,
more
sustainable
comments.
C
So,
to
me,
capacity
building
is
a
combination
of
what
griff,
rex
and
lydia
were
talking
about,
where
it's
the
ability
to
do
more
of
the
things
that
you
want
to
do
kind
of,
like
with
proof
of
work
mining
with
bitcoin
you,
you
have
mining
farms,
build
capacity
by
expanding
their
amount
of
miners
that
they
can
fit
to
increase
the
maximum
amount
of
proof
of
work.
I
I
think,
in
contrast
to
that,
is
probably
capability
building,
which
is
more
broad.
Expanding
your
ver,
your
horizontal
skill
set
compared
to
the
vertical
capacity
that
you
can
have.
A
Great,
thank
you
yeah.
I
I
I'm
always
curious
what
people
think
about
terms
like
this
when
they're
like,
when
it's
kind
of
a
new
term,
this
is
the
term
that
the
nonprofit
and
the
philanthropic
world
uses
all
the
time
so
yeah
it's
and
what
they
mean
by.
It
is
like
the
ability
to
invest
in
the
financial
sustainability
of
an
organization,
but
also
its
ability
to
deliver
on
its
mission.
Those
are
kind
of
like
you
know,
money
and
mission,
but
I
like
these
analogies,
I
I
really
like.
A
I
really
like
that
battery
one.
Actually,
that's
cool!
That's
a
that's
a
nice
simple
way
of
thinking
about
it,
okay!
So
here's
the
update
on
the
strategy,
the
sample
strategy
document's
gotten,
some
some
good
feedback
from
folks.
A
I
presented
just
kind
of
a
relatively
quick
overview
to
the
stewards
council
on
thursday
and
and
then
got
some
advice
from
the
stewards
this
morning
about
how
to
get
broader
feedback
from
folks
on
this
like.
Basically,
this
is
like
pushing
this
out
now
to
like
the
maximum
feedback
process.
The
advice
process
in
the
in
the
tec,
so
olivia
actually
suggested
just
you
know
like.
Let's
take
it
out
of
the
document
on
the
google
doc
and
just
put
it
on
the
forum.
So
that's
what
I'm
doing
I've
got
it
mostly
done.
A
A
I
just
basically
took
out
like
all
the
key
ideas,
there's
like
20,
something
of
them
23
of
them-
and
I
just
put
them
in
this
polish
sentiment-
analysis
that
some
of
you've
seen
here,
but
some
have
not,
and
so
it's
just
really
cool,
very
powerful
tool
for
kind
of
like
looking
at
where
there's
consensus
within
a
community
or
within
a
group
of
people,
and
I
will
share
next
week
I'll
share
the
results
of
what
comes
from
this
poll.
A
A
So
we
stop
there
any
any
questions
or
comments
or
thoughts
about
what
else
we
need
to
do
on
that
front.
A
Okay,
cool
all
right,
so
we'll
just
we're
going
to
just
keep
trucking
along
on
that
and
then
how
about
the
analyst?
You
know
the
the
reporting
update
rex.
Do
you
want
to
give
us
and
bear
two?
You
have
you
probably
have
some
thoughts
on
this
too.
So
can
you
guys
just
give
us
like
an
update
on
what's
happening
there.
F
Cool,
do
you
do
you
want
to
pull
up
the
some
panelists
work
products
thing
or
do
you
think
that's
not
not
necessary.
A
F
No,
no
just
the
word
products
on
yeah
this
one
yeah
yeah,
that's
right
so
I've
from
since
last
week.
I
think
yourself,
zeptimus
and
I
met
and
and
bet
two
on
kind
of
what,
how
we've
all
been
working
on,
how
this
is
going
to
work
and
we've
kind
of
set
up
the
process
here
in
this
document
as
to
kind
of
how
we
can
go
about
this
financial
report
and
to
have
a
list
of
requirements
that
we
can
work
against,
because
I
thought
it
was
a
bit
broad.
F
So
it's
the
oh,
the
unified,
oh,
the
unified
treasury
report's,
been
moved
to
that.
What's
it
if,
oh,
the,
I
think
the
unified
treasury
report
has
been
moved
on
to
that
task.
That's
hashtag,
34,
at
the
very
top.
F
That
hashtag
yeah,
okay
yeah
there
we
are
okay,
so
yeah,
so
we
kind
of
set
out
a
two
to
three
project
and
within
the
unified
treasury
report.
So
you
can
see
that
the
goal
is.
The
goal
of
the
report
is
to
include
the
minimum
essential
information
necessary
to
determine
the
worst
case
scenario.
What
has
happened
since
the
tc
started
spending
and
what
happens
if
we
don't
do
anything
we
could
extrapolate
legally
or
put
in
some
other
caveats,
if
you,
if
you
wish.
F
F
F
Depending
on
you
know
how
conviction
work,
voting
works
and
its
limitations,
I
believe
there's
the
11
limitation
on
proposals
and
funding
per
month
and
it'd
be
interesting
to
see
some
of
the
other
ones.
F
The
process
that
we
kind
of
figured
out
would
be
to
determine
what
visualizations
are
desirable
analyze
the
data
in
in
dune
and
bears
been
doing
some
great
work.
I'm
sure
you
can
talk
about
it
on
kind
of
doing
it
through
spreadsheets,
and
so
I've
been
working
somewhat
with
ana.
F
I
think
he's
got
quite
busy,
so
the
timelines
that
we
set,
each
other
didn't
go
out
and
I
kind
of
picked
up
the
slack
as
far
as
I
can,
but
we've
begun
work
on
the
dune
dashboard
shared
some
of
the
visualizations
trying
to
copy.
F
Well,
generator
bears
work
on
dune
and
we've
got
some
other
ideas
that
we
haven't
planned
out.
Yet
there's
some
questions
in
one
of
these.
I
believe
either
point
one
or
point
two
as
to
kind
of
what
questions
you
want
to
see
answered
from
this
report.
It'd
be
great
if
like,
if
some
more
of
you
gave
feedback
to
that
one
and
specified
kind
of
if
we're
missing
anything.
A
Hey
rex,
so
yes,
is
it
fair
to
say?
Is
this
the
fair
summary
that
basically
we're
kind
of
like
mocking
things
up
in
the
spreadsheet
and
then
and
then
you're
going
to
try
to
basically
render
that
in
doom,
not
in
the
main
dune
dashboard,
but
on
kind
of
a
side
dashboard
so
that
when
we
get
something
done,
zeptimus
can
then
take
if
they
want.
They
can
take
this
thing
and
integrate
it
into
the
main
dashboard.
Is
that
safe.
F
Yes,
basically
so
I've
been
creating
all
of
the
yes
yeah,
that's
that's
the
as
succinctly
as
it
is,
as
one
can
put
it.
A
Okay,
cool,
so
hey,
maybe
the
thing
to
do
is
we
can
take
that
first,
one
that
you've
got,
which
is
like
the
visualizations
and
just
work
that
in
the
spreadsheet,
like
the
stuff
that
bear
has
done.
Maybe
that's
our
next
step
is
just
try
to
nail
that
and
then
can
we
take
that
and
bring
it
back
to
the
group
next
week
to
just
get
some
feedback
on
that.
F
Okay,
I
I
would
like,
if
anybody
in
the
group
wants
to
like
fill
out
some
more
requirements
or
some
questions
that
aren't
being
answered.
I
think,
if,
if
I
look
at
the
one,
I
I
think
within
some
of
these
actions,
there's
the
specific
questions
that
we
want
to
analyze
and
unless
they're
kind
of
on
there,
or
I
won't
I'm
not
sure
if
we'll
aim
to
kind
of
do
them,
unless
we
kind
of
just
figure
them
out
just
out
of
the
blue.
E
Yeah
not
not
really
yeah,
I
think
that's
pretty
much
the
work
I
I've
been
just
like
getting
into
the
data
with
the
dune
analytics
you
know
and
trying
to
understand
it
better
and
based
on
the
feedback
you
you've
been
providing
gideon
with
having
like
really
simple
stuff.
You
know
clear
stuff
that
anyone
can
understand.
E
I've
been
trying
to
to
to
make
that
doom
dune
data
into
something
more
digestible
and-
and
I
think
that
was
something
that
maybe
it
was
missing
like
some
like
overall
analysis
of
the
the
expenses
that
all
the
working
groups
are
having,
although
it's
in
dune
it's
kind
of
hard
to
read
and
hard
to
understand
so
yeah,
I
think
it's
all
about
like
rearranging
that
info
and-
and
I
think
the
work
that
rex
is
doing
now
of
taking
this
all
back
to
do
now.
E
So
now
it
can
be
like
more
automated
and
it's
all
there
in
one
dashboard.
I
think
that's
also
gonna
be
great,
but
yeah.
I
think
it's
just
a
great.
I
think
it's
just
a
good,
a
good
resource
to
have
to
have
a
better
understanding
of
the
position
of
all
the
working
groups.
A
E
E
So
maybe
it's
also
part
of
this
idea
of
categorizing
the
different
expenses
and
the
different
multisigs
and
fonts
that
the
tc
is
using,
because
also
when
I
was
doing
this,
I
found
a
little
confusing
that
in
the
same
table
in
the
dune
analytics,
you
could
see
the
laser
tag
and
also
the
rewards
board.
Although
they
are
not
working
groups,
they
are
just
multi-six.
E
Maybe
it
would
be
nice
to
have
them
differentiated
in
different
dashboards.
You
know,
and
then
so.
My
idea
was
also
like
once
we
have.
This
part
figured
out
about
the
working
groups
and
the
operating
part
of
the
tc.
E
I
think
it's
also
important
to
have
an
even
more
general
and
bigger
overview
of
the
whole
tec
right,
including
that
including
the
laser
tag,
including
the
rewards
board,
including
a
lot
of
different
other
projects
that
I
found
that,
like
cat
cat
or,
like
you
know,
different
proposals
that
have
passed
that
are
not
directly
related
with
any
working
group,
but
that
they
are
still
taking
funds
from
the
common
pool
and-
and
I
think
it's
it's
important
right,
because
all
these
analysis
is
just
based
on
the
working
groups
and
just
taking
consideration
the
working
groups,
we're
already
spending
a
lot
of
money
right.
E
A
Okay,
all
right
so
we'll
we'll
talk
in
a
couple
days,
but
to
just
kind
of
look
at
what
this
mock-up
is
going
to
look
like
get
the
next
round
of
feedback
on
that
and
bring
it
back
to
everybody.
Does
anybody.
F
A
F
So
it's
interject.
If
you
click
on
number
one
there,
you
should
be
able
to
see
kind
of
the
questions.
There's
all
the
questions
that
we're
trying
to
that.
We
thought
of
for
this
report.
B
I
don't
know
if
it
if
this
is
the
right
place
for
this
thought,
but
I
was
thinking
something
challenging
about
conviction.
Voting
is
that
you
submit
a
proposal
like,
for
example,
the
comms
proposal
that
is
about
to
pass
now,
as
you
were
saying
today
graph.
I
was
thinking
about
this,
so
it
will
pass
probably
in
five
days.
But
what?
If
I
am
against
that
proposal,
but
I
am
in
favor
of
another
proposal
passing
so
I
don't
want
to
add
to
abstain,
because
I
don't
want
to
slow
down
the
whole
process,
but.
A
D
By
voting
on
your
other
projects,
you
are
slowing
down
that
other
one
for
money,
so
like
voting
on
abstain
is
when
you
don't
like
any
of
them.
But
if
you
vote
every
time,
you
vote
you're
increasing
the
number
of
voters,
so
that
slows
down
the
project
like
if
you
vote
on
for
the
other
project
or
you
vote
for
abstain
project
fee
that
you
don't
like,
would
be
slowed
down.
The
exact
same
amount.
B
B
Yeah
what
I
thought
that
could
be
a
solution
for
that
in,
like
more
culturally
embedding
in
this
process
with
sample
could
be
for
us
to
map
out
the
state
of
advice
process
and
then
bring
a
little
bit
more
weight
to
those
five
days
where
proposals
are
in
the
forum
for
advice
process.
And
maybe
if
there
is
like
a
heavy
like
no,
for
this
should
be
posted
during
advice
process.
B
Yeah,
I
don't
know,
I
don't
know
if
that
can
turn
into
something
real,
like
a
policy
like.
Oh,
if
there's
enough
people
saying
no
an
advice
process,
this
shouldn't
be
submitted
to
conviction
voting
because
it
will
be
challenged,
or
you
know,
I'm
just
thinking
how
we
could
make
a
little
bit
of
a
bigger
filter
before
it
gets
into
the
situation
of,
like
things,
are
kind
of
passing
slowly.
D
I
think
the
challenge
is
the
conviction.
Voting
in
itself
is
meant
to
allow
minority
voters
to
pass
votes
eventually
right,
so
they
come
in
with
this
like
veto
approach
is
like
has
been
excluded
by
the
design
with
intention,
of
course,
we
can.
We
can,
we
could
say,
like
what
we
could
do
is
we
could
say
unless
it's
been
approved
by
this
board
and
have
that
in
the
covenant,
then
like
then
it's
okay,
we
can.
D
We
can
make
these
external
these
extra
rules,
but
we'd
have
to
make
them
in
the
covenant
and
then
challenge
or
we
we
can
also
in
the
back,
and
we
can
limit
who
is
allowed
to
sub,
create
proposals
right
now.
It's
only
the
proposal
deposit
that
limits
it
right,
but
we
could
also
change
that
and
make
it.
So
only
one
group
can
create
proposals,
but
both
of
those
approaches
are
kind
of
antithetic
like
they're,
not
really
the
go
with
the
vibes
of
conviction.
Voting
yeah.
B
A
One
one
thought,
as
we've
been
wrestling
with
this
over
the
last
week,
and
especially
given
some
of
the
feedback
in
the
council
last
week.
One
of
the
things
that
you
said,
olivia
actually
is,
is
now
resonating
more
deeply
with
me,
which
is,
I
think
our
best
process
is
going
to
be
just
showing
what
good
looks
like
like
developing
some
proposals
that
are
like-
and
this
is
part
of,
what's
guiding
my
what
I'm
trying
to
do
with
the
sampo
proposal.
A
It's
like
making
things
really
lean,
really
trying
to
explain
exactly
what
we'll
get
from
each
one
of
these
proposals
and
like
if
we
can
demonstrate
with
a
couple
of
these
proposals,
like
some
some
ways
of
really
selling
it
and
keeping
it
lean
and
small
for
this
new
reality
that
we're
in
that
might
be
a
good
way.
It's
kind
of
just
modeling.
E
Yeah,
I
would
also
like
to
to
say
that
part
of
the
concern
that
I
have
is
that
now
that
I'm
starting
to
understand
better
how
conviction
voting
works.
I
think
the
real
concern
is
not
that
we
run
out
of
funds
like
right,
like
the
common
pool,
won't
get
to
zero
for
how
it
works,
but
we
will
reach
the
point
where
proposals
simply
just
don't
pass
right
like
and
and
when
is
that
moment
coming?
E
E
So
that
means
that
when
we,
then
we,
when
the
common
pool
gets
to
450k,
then
that
11
will
be
around
the
50k
of
a
proposal
that
that
would
be
able
to
pass
so
having
this
in
mind
and
with
a
current
balance
of
the
common
pool
and
the
current
expenses
of
the
working
groups.
Just
considering
the
working
groups
like
in
april,
the
spending
of
all
the
working
groups
was
50k
and
it's
been
increasing
since
february.
E
E
We
won't
be
able
to
probably
pass
any
more
proposals,
because,
because
that's
how
that's
that's
the
that's
like
the
limit
right
so
how
to-
and
I
think
it's
a
really
short
time
right,
because
we're
only
considering
the
spending
from
the
working
groups
if
we
consider
everything
else,
it's
probably
less
than
five
months
so
from
how
I
see
it
and
if
I'm
not
missing
any
other
factor
that
could
change
this
situation.
E
I
think
it
all
goes
back
to
the
idea
of
finding
ways
to
generate
revenue
if
we
want
to
keep
passing
all
the
proposals
that
we
want
in
the
faster
way
we
want
and
the
most
efficient
way.
I
think
we
need
to
generate
revenue
as
soon
as
possible
to
at
least
be
even
with
the
expenses,
not
even
even
maybe
we
could
just
slow
down
the
spending
rate.
I
think
that
would
be
a
great
advancement.
A
Yeah,
okay,
just
a
couple
comments
on
that
one
is.
The
other
factor
is
that
you
know,
starting
in
july,
some
portion
of
people's
tec
holdings
that
were
locked
up
will
start
to
become
available,
it'll
be
slow,
but
that
is
another
factor
too
that
will
cut
into
the
comment
pool.
A
So
I
think
I
I
just
one
overview
thought
and
then
griff
I'd
like
to
ask
you
a
question
related
to
this
too.
My
overview
thinking
on
this
is
that
the
revenue
side
it
needs.
We
need
to
start
that
as
soon
as
possible,
but
because
that's
a
because
there's
like
time,
it's
gonna
take
time
to
actually
spin
that
up.
You
know
we
may
get
a
few
thousand
die
here
and
there
from
like
getting
gravity
consulting
with
some
place
or
you
know,
but
to
get
significant
revenues.
A
It's
going
to
take
us
a
little
while
it's
probably
going
to
be
fundraising.
That
will
be
the
thing
that
will
first
enable
us
to
get
some
money
in
the
door
rather
than
actual
revenues.
Revenues
will
probably
take
you,
know
nine
months
a
year
to
like
start
showing
up
significantly.
A
So,
from
my
perspective,
right
now,
I
feel
like
the
biggest
lever
that
we
have
is
actually
slowing
spending
down
in
a
way
that
doesn't
hurt
us
in
the
long
term.
How
do
we
just
become
way
more
effective
in
the
way
that
we
spend
the
funds
that
we
have
so
that
that's
that's
what
is
kind
of
my
philosophy
or
the
kind
of
way
that
I'm
taking
this
right?
Now?
I
don't
know
what
other
people
think
about
it.
D
D
I
feel,
like
that's
already
been
done
honestly
and
just
making
sure
that's
repeated
and
and
then
focusing
on,
because
there's
that
it
is
self-regulating,
and
so
as
long
as
we
culturally,
you
know
get
it
into
people's
head
and
maybe
make
some
kind
of
clear
like
I
think
it
helped
to
say:
hey
we
would
we'd
sample
working
group
recommends
x,
number
of
a
die
are
spent
on
every
month
and
work
within
that
budget.
Guys,
like
I
feel
like
that,
would
have
like
a
really
strong
cultural
impact.
D
But
beyond
that,
I
really
think
that
conviction,
voting
is
meant
to
regulate
itself
and,
and
it
does,
and
it
has
been
because
it's
very
slow
to
as
as
we
run
low
on
money,
it's
very
hard
to
get
money
out,
so
things
are
working
as
expected
and
yeah,
and
then
let's
see
what
we
can
focus
on
for
income
and
I
think
just
having
having.
D
If
we
can
show
that
there
will
be
revenue,
I
mean
look
at
every
tech,
startup,
that's
ever
existed,
none
of
them
had
revenue
for
many
years.
Amazon
spent
decades
not
having
revenue
right
or
something
like
that
at
least
a
decade,
not
having
revenue
and
just
spending
on
growth
spending
on
growth
spending
on
growth,
but
because
these
people
saw
the
potential
they
bought
amazon
stock
right
and
I
think
we're
in
a
similar
place.
Unlike
most
non-profits,
they
don't
have
a
stock
people
can
buy.
D
We
don't
have
to
actually
produce
revenue,
because
we
also
have
a
token
I
mean
we
do
have
to
have
the
potential
to
produce
revenue,
but
we
have
a
stock
effectively.
So
we
can
play
the
same
game
that
apple
and
amazon,
and
these
other
large
organizations
play
which
is
like
how
do
we
gain
shareholder
attraction?
How
do
we
you
know?
How
do
we
show
that
there
will
be
future
revenue
and
yeah?
I
feel
like
that's
almost
as
important
as
having
actual
revenue.
D
I
don't
know.
I
don't
know
if
that
was
a
coherent
response
to
your
to
your
question,
though,.
A
Okay,
I
think
we
need
to
move
on.
This
is
a
super
important
topic
and
I
think
next
week
maybe
we'll
have
a
little
bit
more
progress
on
the
the
financial
reporting
stuff.
So
we
can,
then
we
can
dive
into
a
little
bit
more.
A
But
one
thing
that
we'll
follow
up
with
you
on
later
grip
is
you
mentioned
last
week
you
might
have
some
ideas
about
doing
some
projections,
even
in
the
uncertainty
of
conviction,
voting
about
like
spending
so
we'll
we'll
just
we'll
come
back
to
you
later
and
see
if
you've
got
some
thoughts
on
that
fair.
D
Can
you
can
you
give
me,
can
you
so
you're
looking
for
what
exactly
are
you
looking
for.
A
Yeah,
so
this
was
last
week
we
were
talking
about
looking
at
our
spending
and
kind
of
the
outflow
of
funds
or
the
the
usage
of
funds
and
how
it's
actually
really
tied
up
in
the
speed
with
which
proposals
are
passed
and
that
that's
actually
getting
harder
and
harder.
So
we
can't
just
do
a
linear
projection
of
like
oh.
This
is
you
know
in
april,
may
we
were
spending
this
level
like
it's
not
going
to
be
a
linear
projection.
D
Yeah
so
you're
looking
for
that
projection
like
well
like,
let's
say
that
we
are
full
on
the
gas
trying
to
spend
money.
How
fast
could
we
even
deplete
this
thing
or
yeah.
D
F
So
it's
at
what
point
does
the
technical
limitations
of
of
how
the
pool
works?
How
conviction
voting
works,
means
that,
like
we
can't
like
some
proposals,
won't
be
passed
like
we
can't
keep
on
like
increasing
our
spending
like
what
what's
the
limit
to
which
we
can
spend,
and
we
can
increase
our
spending
or
maintain
our
spending.
Given
these
the
mechanics
of
conviction
voicing
in
the
pool
is
that
kind
of.
D
A
How
about
this?
How
about
we
will
meet
in
the
next
day
or
so
to
try
to
just
nail
this
question
so
that
it's
super
crisp
and
clear
and
then
come
back
to
you
with,
like
here's?
Here's
what
we'd,
like
your
help
on
in
terms
of
thinking
about
doing
a
forecast
with
conjunct
with
conviction,
voting:
okay,
okay,
okay!
Let's
do
that
just
because
I
I
wanna
I
wanna,
keep
us
moving
forward
so
in
the.
E
Sorry,
just
to
finish
that
just
a
quick
comment,
I
think
also
maybe
part
of
that
projection-
is
this
idea
of
of
of
five
months.
You
know,
I
think
that,
based
on
the
spending
that
we
have
that
we
actually
been
having
that's
like
the
projection,
based
on
nate's
analysis,
I
don't
know
if
that
could
take
part
of
grief's
analysis
also
or
if
it's
a
different
thing.
Maybe
I'm
misunderstanding.
A
Yeah,
I
think
I
think
some
of
that
is
in
nate's
document,
so,
let's,
let's
just
because
we've
ended
up
using
a
big
chunk
of
this
meeting.
This
is
super
important,
but
I
feel
like
we
need
to
actually
just
let's
take
this
part
offline,
get
a
little
bit
more
clear.
What
exactly
we're
trying
to
show
in
this
report
and
then
come
back.
A
I
think
we're
close,
but
I
think
we're
not
quite
there
yet
but
we'll
get
there.
Okay,
the
other
thing
that
I
really
would
like
us
to
in
the.
If
you
look
in
the
text
channel,
there's
a
link
to
a
document.
A
And
yes,
you
may,
I
think
I
may
have
to
send
you
invitation
to
get
into
the
sampo
working
group,
but
you
actually
should
be
able
here
I'm
going
to
give
you
another.
I'm
going
to
put
another
link
in
there.
A
You
shouldn't
be
able
to
use
this.
Oh
no,
I'm
gonna
have
to
follow
up
with
you
afterwards.
Yes,
can
I
just
follow
up
with
you
separately
to
send
you
an
invitation.
A
So
what
I'm
hoping
we
can
do
is
just
use
this
document
as
a
place
where
people
can.
You
know
just
put
your
name
and
then
like
the
kinds
of
expertise
that
you
have,
that
you
think
is
relevant
to
sample
as
we're
as
we're
ramping
up
the
work
that
we've
got
to
do
and
the
areas
of
interest
like
the
things
you
like
doing
and
think
you
can
contribute.
B
A
A
A
Okay,
did
you
see
in
the
channel
the
link?
That's
there.
A
Good
and
welcome
is
it:
how
do
you
say
your
name
is
zero
to
andreas
andreas.
Okay,
welcome.
A
Okay,
yes
and
andreas
I've
sent
you
invitations
to
declare.
I
just
sent
you
invitations
to
the
clarity
base,
so
you
should
be
able
to
edit
documents
at
this
point
too,
once
you
accept
that,
let
me
know.
B
A
That's:
okay,
there's
a
link
in
the
text
channel
that
if
you
just
follow
that
it'll
takes
you
to
a
page
where
we're
just
basically
inputting
the
expertise
and
then
interest
that
we
have
that
we
think
will
be
relevant
to
sampo.
B
A
So
we're
just
going
to
take
like
one
or
two
more
minutes.
I
really
just
wanted
to
kick
start
this
in
this
call,
rather
than
you
chew
up
the
call
doing
all
this
stuff,
but
if
you
you
all
have
just
a
few
minutes
afterwards
to
just
finish
up
with
whatever
you
want
to
add
into
this
that'd
be
great.
A
Okay,
let's
let's
wrap
up
here
and
like
I
say
you
can,
you
can
come
back
if
you
want
to
add
to
it
over
time.
You
know
where
this
document
is
now
that
you're
all
into
clarity
at
this
point,
if
you
just
look
over
on
the
left
hand
side,
you
can
see
my
seen
by
cursor
you'll
see
that
this
is
where
all
like.
The
main
documents
are
sample.
A
Meanings
is
always
at
the
top,
so
you
always
be
able
to
get
to
our
agenda
and
look
at
past
agendas
or
down
below
document
library
is
we'll
be
building
this
over
time
so
like
this
is
external
documents,
so,
like
nate's
document
is
here
and
then
there's
a
bunch
of
earlier
stuff
that
that
actually
was
before
sample
was
even
formed,
is
in
here,
so
we'll
just
be
adding
to
this
over
time.
You
know
what
just
like
this.
Why
sample?
A
And
then
this
is
the
thing
I
want
to
focus
on.
Just
with
the
remaining
time
we
have
is
the
sample
manifesto,
so
this
is
just
still
in
progress
at
this
point,
but
this
is
like
our
next.
Our
next
focus
the
thing
I'd
like
to
just
try
to
nail
is:
can
you
just
all
look
at
these
options
for
the
mission
and
look
at
these
three
and
let's
just
hear
what
everyone
is
quit.
B
C
B
Okay,
if
I
go
to
vicky,
I
can
see
the
list
of
all
okay.
A
B
A
So
I'm
just
going
to
read
these
out
loud.
Let's
just
get
a
vibe
check
on
this,
so
sample
working
group
supports
and
develops
economic
layer
that
funds
and
aligns
and
organizational
incentives
with
the
mission
of
the
token
engineering
commons,
the
sample
second
option.
The
sample
working
group
develops
manages
mission
driven
community
owned
and
governed
capital
to
advance
the
field
of
token
engineering
and
then
the
third
one
is
the
latest
one,
which
is
the
sample
working
group,
develops
and
grows
the
value
of
the
economic
layer
of
the
engineering
commons.
A
A
A
Okay,
I'm
gonna
move
on
we'll
come
back
to
you
in
a
sec.
How
about
you
one
two
three.
A
Okay,
yes,
how
about
you.
B
Yeah,
for
me,
number
three
is
also
very
concrete
and
success
so
voting
for
that.
One
too.
A
Okay,
how
about
griff?
How
about
you.
D
Yeah,
I
think
I'd
go
with
three.
I
really
like
advance
the
field
of
token
engineering
from
number
two
but
yeah
other
than
that
three
three
nails
it.
C
So
just
add
on
to
this,
it
seems
like
the
reason
for
these
three
options
is
because
you're
trying
to
have
a
balance
of
powers
between
different
stakeholders
in
the
ecosystem,
which
is
important
and
by
if
you
have
to
connect
engineering
experts
and
took
up
experts
that
are
crafting
these
these
these
methods
and
utilities.
For
the
token
it
might
be
hard
for
the
people
on
the
other
side
who
balance
the
power
to
understand
that.
But
I
think
that
balance
of
powers
is
very
important
and
and
should
happen
here
in
this
ecosystem.
C
But
what
number
three
is
talking
about
is
expertise
with
employing
tokenomics,
and
so
it's
if
we
can
figure
out
a
way
to
balance
powers
with
to
economic
experts
and
those
who
are
aligned
for
the
long-term
success
of
tec.
I
think
that
would
be
ideal.
A
Okay,
cool
all
right,
thank
you
all
for
your
feedback
feel
free
to
I'm
gonna.
I'm
gonna
follow
up
with
one
or
two
of
you
to
just
see,
what's
happening
with
these
permissions,
something
something's
off
here,
maybe
something
I'm
doing
with
clarity
okay
for
next
week,
just
so,
we
can
wrap
up
right
now,
the
focus
for
next
week.
A
What
I'd
like
to
do
is
return
to
the
manifesto,
the
other
parts
of
the
manifesto
that
are
in
the
same
document
and
then
turn
to
the
funding
proposal,
the
sample
funding
proposal,
because
I
want
to
get
that
out,
so
we
can
actually
start
moving
on
things
a
little
bit
faster.