►
From YouTube: W7 Sampo WG: Funding Proposal Adjustments, Treasury Role, UTChart Update & TEC Financial Dashboard
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
Okay,
so
I
don't
have.
Unfortunately,
I
don't
have
internet
access
in
my
house
or
in
our
neighborhood,
so
I'm
doing
it
on
the
phone,
so
I'm
gonna.
So
let
me
ask
this
actually
bear.
Do
you
have
access
to
the
clarity
page
right
now
I
mean.
Are
you
in
there.
B
A
Okay,
if
not,
maybe
somebody
else
can
do
it
too.
I
I
printed
out
our
itinerary
for
today,
because
I
had
a
feeling
our
internet
would
not
be
back
up
so
bear
with
me.
Today
it's
going
to
be
a
little
bit
more
rocky
than
usual,
just
because
yeah
having
to
work
off
paper
so,
and
can
you
let
me
know,
bear
when
you
have
that
that
up
usually
for
people
who
are
not
regulars,
hey
welcome,
so
for
folks
who
are
not
regulars.
A
One
of
the
traditions
that
we've
gotten
into
is
just
starting
off
by
somebody
reading
the
sample
mission
and
just
because
of
the
technical
difficulties
today,
I'm
just
going
to
do
that
today.
I
don't
usually
do
this,
but
I
will
do
it
right
now
so
sample
mission,
the
sample
working
group
develops
and
grows
the
value
of
the
economic
layer
of
the
token
engineering
commons.
It
aligns
this
micro
economy
with
the
tec
mission
and
the
collective
success
and
individual
benefit
of
its
token
holders.
Oh
awesome,
that's
great!
A
Thank
you
bear
so
that
took
us
a
couple
of
iterations.
The
tagline
is
shorter.
It's
basically
sample
grows
the
economic
layer
of
the
token
engineering
commons,
so
I
had
originally
as
like
our
check-in
prompt,
what's
the
most
meaningful
ways
to
acknowledge
your
contributions
in
a
team
like
sample,
but
I
think,
given
that
we
have
a
slightly
larger
crew
today
and
given
kind
of
like
the
attention
that
the
sample
proposal
has
gotten
on
the
forum.
A
I
want
to
switch
it
to
another
question
and
maybe
we'll
do
that
one
next
week,
so
my
prompt
today
would
be.
How
are
you
feeling
about
the
conversation?
That's
happening
on
the
sample
funding
proposal
in
the
forum
right
now
and
I'm
gonna
pass
it
to
somebody
in
a
sec.
But
if
you
haven't
read
that
post
or
the
comments
then
just
feel
free
to
pass
or
if
you
just
want
to
say
something
about
the
sampo
funding
proposal
in
general
feel
free
to
do
that
too.
A
So
I'm
going
to
pass
it
to
jean
first
and
let's,
let's
see
if
we
can
each
limit
this
to
like
no
more
than
like
a
minute
and
a
half
okay,
gene.
C
Yeah
seems
like
there's
some
consensus
around
the
need
to
earn
on
some
mechanism
immediately
through.
I,
I
guess
we've
decided
and
in
some
way
that's
yield.
Farming
is
our
best
first
best
option
based
on
the
funds
that
we
already
have
established
so
but
there's
some
controversy
that
feels
like
oh
there.
So
it's
a
little
bit
hot
a
little
bit
cold.
I'm
really
not
sure
how
to
read
it.
C
Yet
I've
reached
out
to
a
couple
of
people
to
see
if
I
can
speak
to
them
individually
and
and
see
if
I
can't
find
something
closer
to
what
their
their
feelings
are
versus.
Just
relying
on
the
the
forum.
I
went
and
did
some
research
at
yearn
to
see
if
we
can't
establish
that
is
the
basis
for
for
the
yield
farming.
C
I
left
a
message
on
tea's
tec
channel
to
see
if
I
can't
get
a
little
bit
of
a
support
group
or
treasure
management
going
so
yeah,
but
I
I
feel
like
it's
it's
good
and
bad.
So
that's
poor
answer,
but
that's
what
it
feels
like
and
I
will
pass
to
there.
A
And
let
me
just
first
welcome
angela,
hey
angela
and.
B
Yeah,
thank
you
gene
yeah,
so
I
I
think
I
haven't
even
finished
rebel
comments,
but
so
far
what
I've
read
is
that
I
I
I
do
feel
like
these
con.
There
are
many
concerns
like
coming
from
different
people
around
the
community
and
you
notice
that,
like
in
the
forum
post,
but
also
like
throughout
the
different
calls
that.
D
B
Happening
so
yeah,
I
think
it
becomes
really
relevant
to
start
asking
ourselves
the
right
questions
in
order
to
find
the
the
information
that
we
need.
So
I
think
that's
a
fundamental
part
of
it
and
then
I
think
what
we're
doing
in
sample
here,
like
with
the
funding
proposal
to
like
adjust
on
the
different
deliverables
that
we're
gonna,
have.
I
think,
that's
really
good.
I
think
that's
exactly
part
of
the
advice
process
so
yeah.
I
think
it's
great
and
I
think
just
that.
B
E
E
I
do
think,
however,
that-
and
I
mean
at
some
point
it
has
to
be
said
like
especially
for
for
the
stewards
we
should
all
be
like
thinking
in
in
in
different
solutions,
and
also,
I
feel
that
and
embracing
that
this
is
like
all
like,
like
concern
from
everybody
and
like
talking
talking
openly
about
it
again
at
the
same
time
like
address
this
thing
that
gideon
says
about
you
know
like
putting
like
a
lot
of
pressure
on
the
expectations
around
the
working
group.
E
When
I
feel
that
in
a
way
we
can
all,
you
know,
like
think
creatively
around
different
solutions
and
and
participate
in
this
discussion,
so
yeah
I'll
pass
it
to
libby.
A
Okay,
let's
see
so
let
me
pass
it
to
and
for
those
who
just
jumped
in
the
prompt
was.
How
are
you
feeling
about
the
conversation
on
the
sample
funding
proposal
on
the
forum
right
right
now,
so
kryptos
act,
you
want
to
take
it
and
if
you
haven't,
if
you're
not
familiar
with
what
has
been,
if
you
haven't
looked
at
the
forum,
then
just
feel
free
to
comment
on
the
proposal
itself
or
pass
if
you'd
like.
A
That's
gonna
be
too
long
to
go
into
right
now,
it's
the
proposal
that
we
talked
about
last
week.
It's
it's
now
up
on
the
forum,
so
you
can
also
feel
free
to
pass
or
if
you
just
have
a
comment
about
what
we
talked
about
last
week,
that's
fine
too.
G
Yeah,
I'm
gonna,
I'm
gonna
pass
this
one
I'll
pass
it
to.
Let's
see
hold
on
I'm
on
my
phone.
This
is
kind
of
tough
jeff.
Have
you
gone
yet.
C
Yeah,
I
can
jump
in
I
I
did
read
the
forum
post
from
last
week.
C
There
may
be
a
few
or
from
a
couple
weeks
ago
there
may
have
been
a
few
replies
that
I
that
I
haven't
seen
yet
all
in
all,
though
I'm
I'm
supportive
of
the
sample
working
group
finding
these
sort
of
economically
beneficial
collaborations
for
the
token
engineering
commons-
and
I
I
feel,
like
I'm
sort
of,
I
get
a
lot
of
requests
or
I
see
a
lot
of
requests,
whether
it's
in
you
know
the
cad
cad
community
or
you
know
some
of
the
other
forums.
I'm
a
part
of.
C
I
see
a
lot
of
groups
that
kind
of
need
token,
engineering
services,
whether
that's
modelers
or
token
engineers
themselves-
and
you
know
various
client
projects,
presumably
from
from
paying
clients.
So
I'm
I'm
really
interested
in
sort
of
brokering.
These
sort
of
connections
between
groups,
that
need
token
engineering
services
and
the
token
engineering
commons-
and
I
see
angela's
here
as
well.
Basically
using
the
you
know,
token
engineering
academy
model
of
bringing
in
you
know
paying
clients
and
connecting
them
with.
C
You
know
upskilling
token
engineers
or
cad
cad
modelers,
and
I
have
a
feeling
there's
there's
a
lot
of
sort
of
fertile
area
to
explore
in
bringing
some
some
economic
benefit
to
the
the
tec,
and
that
may
not
just
be
you
know
straight
payments
from
from
clients.
It
could
also
be
you
know
mutual
investments
and
holding
tec
or
or
minimum
amounts
for
you
know,
collaborating
in
various
ways,
so
yeah
interested
to
explore
all
that.
C
But
I
I
don't
want
to
go
into
too
much
detail
now
and
I
think
angela
is
the
last
person
to
feedback
on
the
forum
post
so
I'll
pass
it
over
to
her.
H
H
I
guess
if
we
that's
probably
because
also
at
te
academy,
I
I
had
to
take
a
look
at
at
the
funding
situation
now
with
the
bear
marking
market
kicking
in
and
I
had
to
react,
and
I
had
to
cut
down
our
spendings
and
and
that's
probably
why
it
doesn't
feel
strange
to
me
to
do
that,
and
maybe
also
that
that
I
know
that
sometimes
you
have
to
react
quickly
and
I
guess
if
we
are
too
slow
in
finding
a
new,
you
know
adapt
to
this
situation.
H
This
won't
be
beneficial
to
anyone
to
those
who
are
hoping
to
get
their
proposal
through
and
we
slow
it
down.
I
mean
they
also
want
to
know
what's
next
for
us
in
the
next
two
months,
three
months,
six
months
and
also
for
tec
overall
and
that's
why
why
I
guess
I'm
I
keep
on
pushing
to
be
fast
and
to
be
radical.
F
I'll
go
since
I
haven't
had
a
chance,
yet
I
might
be
the
last
one
though
amara
sorry,
I
didn't
know
no
problem.
I'd
say
so
just
thoughts
and
feedbacks
is
that
I
think
everyone
agrees
on
the
objective,
but
there's
some
contradictions,
some
contradictory
paths
to
get
there
and
I
think
that's
one
of
the
the
challenges
that
gideon
is
taking
on
sort
of
you
know,
consolidating
and
and
and
helping
choose
a
collective
or
collectively
choosing
a
decision
on
which
direction
to
take
or
which
path
to
take
to
get
there.
F
F
Is,
I
also
think,
really
important
and
not
something
that
I
think
has
been
discounted
by
the
the
the
upcoming
proposals
for
some
of
the
working
groups.
Stewards,
notably
and
the
communitas
working
group
are
two
that
have
or
really
have
shifted
their
their
compensation
for
the
these
two
working
groups,
and
then,
I
think,
out
of
the
out
of
the
stewards
weekly
that
we
just
had
two
hours
before
this.
F
There
was
sort
of
a
sentiment
for
not
having
the
stewards
design
proposal
like
a
policy
for
spending,
but
rather
letting
the
mechanisms
take
their
take
natural
and
take
the
like
execute
the
way
they
were
designed
to
execute
so
conviction.
Voting
would
get
harder
to
pass
more
proposals,
as
our
spending
goes
down
rather
than
having
there
be
a
policy
about
spending
that
we
share
that
we
give
proposal
makers.
F
D
We
are
written.
That
goal
was
quite
some
different
and
the
idea
was
you
know
if
we
want
to
make
proposals
harder,
it's
not
like.
We
just
wait
and
they
become
harder
and
because,
if
we
have
something
like,
we
want
to
save
money
like
what
we
should
do
as
a
community
is
just
change
those
connections
about
the
parameters
we
have
right
now
and
make
those
that
benefit
the
mission
or
the
purpose
we
want
to
do.
D
For
me,
it's
very
critical
and
we
are
not
talking
so
much
like
yeah
we're
talking
like
treasury
management
and
sending
the
funds
to
someone
some
multisig,
and
this
is
very
controversial
because
the
then
our
treasury
wouldn't
be
owned
by
the
token
holders,
but
some
group
of
people-
and
this
is
always
so
controversial-
and
especially
what
happens
with
the
press
lately
like
people,
were
not
able
to
even
sell
the
impact
hours
or
anything,
and
now
tokens
are
vested.
So
it's
like
people
have
like.
D
A
Okay,
thank
you.
We've
got,
I
think,
just
two
people,
three
people
who
haven't
gone
yet
auntie
nt,
do
you
want
to
go
next.
I
Oh
I'll
be
quick,
I
don't
really
have
like
any
particular
opinion
outside
of
what
everyone
has
said.
I
think
time
was
really
spot
on.
Unlike
we
are
looking
for
the
same,
we
just
haven't
got
to
agree
on
how
to
do
it,
and
but
I'm
happy
that
the
conversation
is
happening
in
probably
a
time,
a
timely
manner.
I
don't
think
it's
too
late
and
I'm
sure
we'll
figure
that
out
and
I'll
pass
it
over
to
rex.
I
think
he
hasn't
got
yet.
J
I
think
the
other
mic
wasn't
working.
So,
yes,
I
think
so
bear
and
I
have
kind
of
been
trying
to
do
some
analysis
to
the
to
the
kind
of
finances
right
over
the
last
a
couple
of
weeks.
So
we'll
have
the
the
kind
of
the
dune
chart
showing
how
much
our
funding
has
gone
down
by
our
pools
have
gone
down
by
since
we
started.
J
But
I
do
think-
and
I
guess
it's
to
some
extent
reiterating
what
others
have
said-
that
the
that
what
I'm
predominantly
hearing
is
that
you
know
the
austerity
part
of
sampo
needs
to
happen
much
more
comprehensively
than
we
were
originally
planning
when
we
were
doing
it
ourselves.
K
Can
you
state
the
question
again.
A
Oh
sorry,
I
thought
I
was
speaking
I
had
I
had
my
mute
on.
I
was
just
saying
that
the
prompt
I
changed,
the
prompt
and
it's
so
it's
now.
How
are
you
feeling
about
the
conversation
on
the
sample
funding
proposal
up
in
the
forum.
K
Good,
I
think
you
know,
I
think
the
conversation
is
going
well.
I
do
think
that
you
know
outside
of
the
the
funding
proposal
itself.
There
are
a
lot
of
things
that
we
all
need
to
kind
of
get
aligned
on.
K
I
think
that
the
decisions
we
make
cover
a
lot
of
different
working
groups
overall
strategy
for
the
tec,
and
I
think
this
is
you
know
we're
kind
of
searching
for
this
quorum
threshold
to
move
in
one
direction
or
another,
and
I
think
we're
in
like
kind
of
this
static
area
where
we're
looking
at
all
these
different
ideas
and
I'm
not
sure
where
to
go,
and
so
I
think,
that's.
K
I
think
that
the
there's
some
core
questions
that
need
to
be
answered,
and
I
think
that
we
need
to.
In
my
opinion,
I
I
think
the
the
whole
point
is
just
to
figure
out
how
to
make
the
abc
work.
That
is
the
fundamental
problem
that
I'm,
I
think
we
should
be
trying
to
solve
and
yeah
outside
of
that.
I
think
you
know
we'll
make
individual
decisions
and
group
decisions
and
it'll
work
out
nicely,
but
getting
those
fundamental
questions
answered
are
really
important.
A
Okay,
thanks
and
bob
welcome
to
the
sample,
call
the
question,
and
you
know
you
can
feel
free
to
pass
if
this
doesn't.
If
you
don't
know
the
answer
to
this,
but
the
question
is:
how
are
you
feeling
about
the
conversation
that's
happening
on
the
sample
funding
proposal
in
the
forum.
E
A
Wow,
thank
you,
yeah.
It's
just
working
off
the
phone,
so
my
just
a
couple,
quick
thoughts,
so
I'm
feeling
a
fair
amount
of
pressure
right
now.
It's
coming
on
kind
of
two
fronts.
A
The
first
is
this
question
of:
how
do
we
deal
with
our
spending,
and
I
I
really
do
feel
like
this-
is
something
that
is
more
of
a
a
stewardship
and
governance
question
and
so
we're
working
that
through
in
today
on
the
call
in
steward's
stewardship
group.
That
was,
I
I
don't
know
if
we
really
landed
anywhere.
A
That
is
different
from
where
we
were
going
in,
except
that
I
do
think
there
was
this
this
idea
of
maybe
changing
the
proposals,
and
I
think
zepty
that
may
have
been
what
you
were
referring
to
is
like
changing
some
of
the
kind
of
the
evaluation
so
that
we
really
highlight
how
this
proposal
will
really
add
to
the
value
of
the
of
the
community
and
the
commons,
and
then
the
second
thing
that
I
think
we're
trying
to
work
through,
and
this
is
something
if
we
have
time
at
the
end.
A
I'd
like
to
get
some
thoughts
on
is
you
know
we
are
going
to
have
lots
and
lots
of
ideas
about
how
we
generate
money
and
so
one
of
the
challenges.
I
think
that
this
group-
and
this
I
do
think
is
more
of
a
sampo
challenge,
is
how
do
we
deal
with
you
know,
keeping
it
open
and
keeping
kind
of
a
marketplace
of
ideas
going,
but
without
getting
sidetracked
and
constantly
changing
our
our
our
path.
A
So
I
think
that's
going
to
be
an
important
question
that
we're
going
to
need
to
get
to
over
the
next
few
weeks.
That's
just
like
preview
of
coming
coming
attractions.
So,
okay,
at
this
point,
what
I'd
love
to
do
is
just
give
a
couple
of
updates.
We
know
that
the
sample
strategy
and
the
manifesto
built
up
on
the
forum
got
a
fair
amount
of
comments
on
on
the
proposal.
That's
also
up
there.
A
The
other
thing
just
the
other
update
that
would
be
great
is
rex.
Can
you
share
your
screen
and
give
us
a
look
at
the
unified
treasury
chart.
J
I
J
Me
understanding
the
quirks
of
dune
and
kind
of
making
this
chart,
so
this
chart
represents
the
balance
per
working
group
and
in
total
over
time
since
the
more
since
the
first
transaction
recorded,
which
I
believe
was
some
was
the
19th
of
january
2022
and
it
includes
both
tc
and
xdi.
So
that's
why
it's
the
tc
converted
into
xdi,
so
quite
a
bit
of
the
full.
J
Not
all
that
you're
seeing
is
the
drop
in
the
tc
value.
If
I
take
out
the
common
reserve,
because
you
can
kind
of
separate
them
out
and
see
how
the
funding
has
gone,
and
so
yes,
this
is
not
sure
if
you
have
any
questions,
basically
started
at
one
and
a
half
million
at
the
start,
and
now
we're
at.
J
So
I
I
can
change
the
scales
actually
now
that
I'm
looking
at
it
so
I'll
change
the
scale,
so
you
could
see
more
so
it
has
more
than
like
every
five
hundred
thousand.
But
yes
not
sure.
If
you
have
any
questions,
I
think
the
the
dune
things
on
so
the
moon
is.
A
Okay,
awesome.
Thank
you
rex
yeah,
I
mean
if
people
have,
if
you
have
some
comments
on
this
or
questions
on
or
or
ideas
on,
how
you'd
like
to
see
this
developed
just
for
people
who
are
new
to
this
call,
because
we've
got
a
bunch
of
new
people.
A
The
idea
here
was
to
get
a
unified
view
of
all
of
the
wallets
all
the
multi-sigs,
and
so
it's
not
just
looking
at
the
common
pool,
but
we're
looking
at
the
common
pool
and
all
of
the
working
groups
and
the
laser
tag
and
everything,
and
just
so
we
can
see
a
unified
view,
and
so
rex
has
been
off
we're
working.
A
This
he's
learned
doing
analytics
on
his
own
and
has
been
pulling
this
together,
so
yeah
so
feel
free
to
comment
on
the
the
post
that
he's
put
into
the
sample
channel
and
bear
do
you
want
to
share
your
screen
and
show
the
the
thing
you're
working
on
on
the
accounting
side
and
also,
I
should
say,
for
people
who
people
who've
been
on.
These
calls
know
this,
but
you
know
most
of
this
work
is
going
to
end
up
moving
anything
that
we're
doing
here.
B
Yeah,
thank
you
gideon,
so
just
to
clarify
you
want
like
the
the
accounting
sheet
that
we're
doing
in
transparency
right.
A
Yeah,
if
you
can
show
that
I
think
just
that
dashboard
mostly,
but
if
you
want
you
can
show
just
like
a
couple
pages.
I
just.
I
think
it
would
be
good
to
just
do
like
you
know,
maybe
three
to
five
minutes.
B
Yeah
yeah,
because,
like
in
transparency,
what
we've
been
working
on
is
more
of
a
it's
a
different
document.
It's
a
it's
actually
like
a
standard
for
working
groups
to
record
their
different
transactions.
Maybe
septi
or
rex
could
also
show
it
or
expand
on
that
and
what
I've
been
working
on,
or
maybe.
J
G
J
Out
so
this
one
is
trying
to
get
to
an
accounting
standard
so
that
we
can
we'll
be
more
transparent
within
the
working
groups
and
see
where
the
spending
is
actually
going,
and
this
is
the
first
working
group
that
we've
turned
into
said
standard,
which
is
gravity
and
well.
It
has
a
it's
quite
a
few
columns,
but
most
of
these
kind
of
filler
parts.
Well,
quite
a
few
of
these
fill
up
automatically
from
these.
J
You
then
have
dashboards
which
are
automatically
generated
from
the
transaction
sheet,
and
it
gives
us
insights
into
where
the
money's
going,
which
I
think
is
something
that
we
haven't
had
yet
beside
the
original
budget
and
for
for
gravity
you
can
see,
got
all
the
money's
going
into
administration
operations.
J
Yeah,
there's
cash
flow
per
token,
that's
agree
because
it
has
categorization
and
then
on
the
individuals
and
who's
getting
who's.
Getting
that
said
money,
but
yes,
that's
one
that
yeah
which
we're
trying
to
get
all
of
the
working
groups
onto
the
standard.
I'm
sure.
Perhaps
you
can
talk
more
about
the
process
than
I
can
how
we're
going
to
go
about
this,
but
this
is
baz.
That's
what's
about
you
want
to
take
the
lead.
B
Yeah,
thank
you
rex,
yeah,
so
just
in
case,
I'm
also
sharing
my
screen
with
this.
So
what
I
started
with
it
was
actually
working
on
the
working
group
month
expenses
a
couple
of
weeks
ago,
but
then
my
plan
was
to
actually
be
able
to
get
like
a
general
overview
of
the
the
whole
tc's
financials.
B
B
If
you
want
to
comment
and
have
any
questions,
if
you
would
like
to
see
something
here
that
maybe
I'm
missing,
please
please
do
share
that,
and
basically
what
I,
what
I
did
is
just
a
couple
of
graphs
based
on
different
tabs,
that
I've
been
working
on
each
of
these
talking
about
different
things.
Maybe
you
can
go
into
more
detail
and
take
your
time,
but
basically
here
I
I
can
explain.
B
Maybe
the
graphs
this
one
talks
about
the
the
the
different
distribution
that
we
have
in
in
the
tc
like
where
the
money
is
at
the
moment,
the
different
expenses
that
working
groups
are
having
on
a
monthly
basis.
B
Here
is
the
common
pool
balance.
Maybe
I
would
say
that
some
of
these
graphs,
like
this
one,
is
kind
of
similar
to
what
it's
in
doing,
but
I
just
felt
like
for
more
practicality
in
interacting
with
information
and
with
data.
I
just
thought
it
was
good
idea
to
include
it
here.
Then.
You
can
also
see
like
the
total
monthly
spending
of
the
tc,
including
working
groups,
different
projects
or
external
projects
that
have
been
funded
and
some
other
expenses
that
are
maybe
still
yet
to
to
categorize
and
here's
another
interesting
graph.
B
This
is
the
percentage
of
funds
that
working
groups
are
actually
are
actually
using
from
their
fundings
proposals,
and
these
were
the
last
two
that
I've
been
working
on.
Gideon
told
me
that
it
would
be
interesting
to
project
based
on
the
balances
that
each
working
room
has.
How
many
months
could
they
run
without
having
to
ask
another
funding
proposal?
So
you
can?
You
can
check
that
on
here
with
the
different
working
groups
and
also
this
one
is.
It
relates
with
this
one
right.
B
I
I
I
based
this
one
on
nate's
document
I
didn't
know.
I
I
learned
that
there
that
there's
an
11
spending
cap-
maybe
that
has
changed.
So
that's
what
I'm
telling
you.
This
is
like
a
work
in
progress,
but
based
on
that
spending
cap.
This
is
like
the
projected
balance
of
the
common
pool
and
how
the
spending
cap
will
also
decrease
over
time
from
now.
I
think
it's
june
all
the
way
to
december.
B
So
I
think
it's
also
an
interesting
exercise
that
that
is
good
to
to
show
and
yeah
yeah
I'll.
Just
I
think
I'll
just
leave
it
there.
If,
if
you
have
any
questions,
feel
free
to
to
comment
on
the
document
or
if
you
want
to
ask
me
anything,
please
do
so
and
yeah
I'll.
Just
I
don't
know
if
anyone
has
any
questions
right
now
or
I'll,
just
give
it
back
to
gideon.
A
I
think
that,
for
the
sake
of
time
in
this,
if
people
could
direct
your
questions
into
the
sample
channel,
that
would
be
that'd
be
great,
and
you
know
I
just
want
to
thank
both
of
you,
guys,
both
rex
and
bear
for
this
work.
A
It's
really
good
work
and
I
think
it's
it's
an
example
of
working
groups
being
able
to
partner
together
in
some
some
really
good
ways,
and
I
love
it
and
I,
and
that
dashboard
bear
is,
is
not
only
beautiful
but
like
there's
some
really
good
information
in
there
that
that
is
new.
For
me
at
least
I
hadn't
I
hadn't
seen
I
mean
there's
going
to
be
some
really
good
insights
that
come
out
of
that.
I
think
all
right
next
topic
is.
A
I
think
that
what
I'd
love
to
do
is
for
that
part
of
it.
If
you
could
post
it
in
the
channel,
that
would
be
great.
A
Oh
awesome.
Okay,
that's
great!
I
didn't
even
thought
about
that,
okay,
so
the
next
topic
is
treasury,
and
you
know
this
is
so
so.
The
first
thing
to
note
is
that
yesterday
I
went
through
and
updated
our
funding
request
and
I
want
to
share
some
of
the
assumptions
with
you
all
on
this,
because
I
want
to
update
our
proposal
and
then
get
it
basically
put
on
to
conviction
voting
and
so
that
we
can.
A
We
can
actually
start
moving
forward
with
this,
so
thanks
to
angela
and
trent
and
actually
a
few
other
people.
You
know
this
question
of
the
treasury
and
kind
of
yield
farming
and
how
do
we?
How
do
we
take
advantage
of
all
this
money
that
we're
sitting
on
top
of
right
now.
A
A
Okay,
so
basically
the
these
changes,
I'm
talking
about
basically
push
the
price
tag
for
the
proposal
up
by
2300
die
and
what
I'm?
What
I'm
proposing
here
is
that
we
basically
had
a
part-time
fund
manager
for
five
hours
per
week
and
that
would
be
heavily
front
loaded.
A
So
this
person
would
be
spending
more
time
in
the
first
month
or
so
first
month
and
a
half
of
this
three
and
a
half
month,
funding
proposal
and
figuring
out
some
of
the
things
we're
gonna
talk
about
in
a
second
and
then
also
800
die
for
basically
researchers
fund
researchers
in
in
bounties,
and
this
would
be
kind
of
doing
analysis
on
different
investment
opportunities.
A
So
the
the
challenge,
one
of
the
reasons
that
we
didn't
get
into
this
early
on
was,
I
think,
just
an
oversight.
On
my
part.
I
had
assumed
that
we
could
not
get
access
to
the
money,
that's
in
our
reserve
and
or
the
money
that
was
in
our
common
pool
and
in
talking
to
griff
and
mitch
they
said
well,
actually,
that's
not
not
technically
true.
We
could
do
that
and
so
one
of
the
first
things.
A
I
think
we
probably
if
we're
trying
to
get
at
significant
money,
then
the
first
place
is
the
first
place
to
look-
is
a
way
of
taking
some
out
of
the
common
pool
without
compromising
our
ability
to
do
conviction
voting.
So
there
are
a
couple
ways
of
doing
that.
I
don't
know
if
we
want
to
get
into
that
right
now,
but
the
point
is
that
doing
that,
for
the
reserve
fund
would
be
much
more
technically
challenging
to
do
so.
A
Let
me
so
so
that
so
what
this
is
proposing
is
that
the
first
job
would
be
to
figure
out
like
technically
and
then
also
functionally
like
in
terms
of
operationally
how
we
would
do
this
in
a
way
that
that
wouldn't
compromise
our
ability
to
actually
do
conviction,
voting
and
then,
after
that,
assuming
we
can
do
it,
which
I
think
we
can.
Then
the
question
becomes.
A
All
right
is
more
traditional,
like
treasury
management,
kinds
of
stuff
fun,
you
know,
which
is
like
investment
policies,
strategies
and
then
processes
for
making
investments,
particularly
around
risk
and
return
kinds
of
questions,
and
you
know,
governance
process
processes
which
gets
to
the
point
that
you're
raising
zepty
about
you
know
where
you
know
having
these
funds
having
this
many
funds
in
a
multi-sig
account.
What
would
that
mean?
A
So
I'm
going
to
stop
here
and
turn
this
over,
because
I'd
love
to
hear
comments
from
people
on
just
this.
I,
the
the
funding
proposal,
like
this
idea
of
a
fund
part-time
fund
manager
with
some
bounties
for
research
and
then
overall
kind
of
what
I've
just
been
talking
about.
K
However,
the
the
decision
space
is
so
vast
right
now
that
it,
you
know,
there's
such
a
vested
interest
by
almost
every
stakeholder
on
what
we
do
within
the
sample
working
group,
and
so
I
think
this
is
something
that's
going
to
be
magnified
under
you
know
a
magnifying
glass
and
that
almost
every
decision
will
have
to
be
escalated
to
a
community
vote,
and
so
it's
going
to
be
really
challenging
to
narrow
down
the
decision
space
and
I
think,
that's
really
important
to
state
and
that's
all
all.
I
wanted
to
contribute.
H
This
needs
to
happen
pretty
quickly
so
to
set
this
up
in
a
way
that
it
can,
you
know,
is
able
to
act
and
react
on
on
what's
going
on
on
the
market,
we
need
a
somebody
who
pays
attention
every
single
day,
so
this
needs
a
role,
a
dedicated
role
and
second,
this
meets,
let's
say
an
amount
where
we
accept
a
fast
and
an
independent
decision
like
so,
for
example.
Okay,
you
have,
I
don't
know,
x
amount
spending
limit
at
your
own
discretion,
because
it's
it
will
never
be
fast
enough.
D
H
H
D
Yeah,
but
my
question
is
like:
are
we
trying
to
create
a
system
that
you
know
it's
regenerative
and
sustainable
like
by
itself
or
we're
just
trying
to
get
a
trading
body
that
takes
money
for
us?
Then
yeah?
He
give
us
some
money
just
because
he's
trading
I
I
think
this
is
not
what
we
meant
to
create.
G
Yeah,
I
don't
think
that
we
should
have
any
traders
manage
this
money.
One
option
is
to
deposit
it
with
a
centralized
custodian
such
as
gemini,
who
could
provide
a
fixed-rate,
apy
or
variable
rate
api.
I
think
they're
paying
around
eight
percent
interest
on
usdc
right
now.
H
But
then
this
still
requires
somebody
paying
attention.
I
wouldn't
feel
comfortable
with
just
trust
that
there
will
won't
be
any
problems,
never
and
we
can
just
sit
and
wait
without.
G
Yeah
well,
for
if
we
keep
the
treasury
in
usdc,
I
don't
think
that
we
really
need
somebody
paying
attention
day
by
day
to
what's
going
on
in
uscc,
because
if
there's
a
problem
with
uscc,
the
whole
industry
is
going
to
know
about
it
pretty
much
immediately,
because
that
will
be
shared
and
go
viral.
If
there
is
any
problem
with
uscc.
H
K
K
I
think
that's
a
good
idea
to
have
a
single
person
to
manage
the
aggressive
funds
to
to
actually
try
to
create
some
revenue
from
that
in
trading,
but
I
do
think
we
should
set
boundaries
for
that
person
and
so
there's
there's
a
lot
of
layers
that
we
need
to
to
regulate
in
a
lot
of
ways
in
order
to
make
this
work-
and
I
do
think
we'll
have
those
type
of
staple
coin
options
where
we
have
a
small
portion
of
our
treasury
invested
in
stable
apys.
B
Yeah
I'll
be
it
will
be
quick
and
see.
So
I
think
it's
a
good
idea
to
start
talking
about
this
treasury
treasury
person
or
group
this
initiative.
B
The
only
question
that
I
have
is
that,
if
we're
talking
about
a
low
risk,
investment
like
crypto
sex,
said
eight
percent
apy,
how
much
in
fact
impact
is
that
gonna
have
in
our
actual
and
current
expenses.
I
don't
think
it's
like
a
really
short-term
solution
for
what
we're
facing.
I
think
it's
it's
great.
I
think
we
should
have
it,
but
it's
not
it.
It
might
be
more
of
a
parallel
effort
in
my
in
my
opinion,
because
I
don't
see
it
as
a
as
a
solution
for
the
short-term
circumstances
that
we
have.
I
D
J
Comfortable
with
it
being
just
one
person
either
to
be
honest
with
you,
I
think
that,
in
the
spirit
of
diversification,
it
should
be
multiple
different
people.
There
should
be
restriction
and
x
percent
of
the
pool
or
the
reservoir
etc.
A
Okay,
are
there
any
other
thoughts
on
this?
Let
me
I'll
just
share
just
a
couple
of
quick
thoughts
on
this.
I
think
that,
as
I
mentioned
the
beginning,
I
think
the
first
thing
is
a
is
a
technical
question,
because
if
we
until
we
solve
that,
we're
not
getting
anything
so
once
we
solve
that,
then
I
think
that
the
next
natural
thing
will
be
to
actually
put
together
a
proposal
and
that
that
proposal
I
mean
this
is
a
big
decision
right
because
we're
putting
our
funds
at
risk.
A
L
And
on
that
note,
I
do
have
a
comment
related
nate.
I
I
think
the
objectives
of
this
should
be
determined
at
the
community
level
like
what
do
we
actually
want
out
of
this?
What's
the
goal,
if
we
were
to
take
this
money
and
generate
yield
on
it,
okay,
cool?
How
much
can
we
realistically
generate,
and
what
do
we
want
to
do
with
that?
How
much
of
the
money
do
we
want
to
be
generating
yield
or
what
are
any
other
objectives
that
we
might
identify
with
this?
L
I
know
mike
demello
performs
these
services
at
long
tail
financially
his
background
in
economics,
and
he
just
loves
this
stuff
so
getting
him
in
on
this
discussion,
it's
going
to
be
interesting,
but
I
think
there's.
My
main
point
is:
there's
those
two
levels:
the.
What
are
the
goals
of
this
and
that's
like
at
the
community
level
and
then
the
whole
implementation?
Is
it
something.
D
Actually,
I
also
want
to
comment
on
the
technical
side.
I
think
like
I
actually.
I
was
chatting
yesterday
with
sam
about
what
nate
talked
about
making
our
token
entrance
hour,
and
I
was
like
same.
Is
that
even
possible
and
he
was
like
yeah
with
him
crispy.
You
could
even
have
like
the
same
token
address
so
for
any
technically,
like
I
think,
like
you
should
contact
them
and
lost
blobs
and
they
are
actually
pretty
and
they
are
the
ones
who
will
this
come.
Also.
B
A
Man-
these
are
all
great
comments.
I
think
that
we
will
be
able
to
pull
something
together
on
this
and
ygg
welcome.
I
hadn't
had
a
chance
to
welcome
you
to
the
call,
welcome
it's
good
to
have
you
here.
A
Yeah,
okay,
so
I
think
that
I'm
gonna
go
ahead
and
modify
the
proposal
and
get
it
you
know
put
it
back
up
on
the
forum.
I
talked
to
libby
about
this
and
she
was
like
it's.
It's
been
up
there
for
five
days
and
that
it's
fine
to
modify
and
not
have
that
reset
the
the
counter
on
it.
G
D
C
One
next
on
my
side,
I
noticed
I
noticed
next
week.
Are
we
having
the
notes
next
week?
A
discussion
on
you
know,
service
consulting
intake
process,
and
I
know
most
of
the
conversation
thus
far
has
been
around
sort
of
like
treasury
management
strategy.
I'm
I'm
also
really
eager
to
sort
of
ramp
up
the
revenue
production
in
terms
of
yeah
other.
C
For
you
know,
community
consultation
and
bringing
in
other
groups
like
long
tail,
financial
or
block
science
or
curve
labs
or
et
cetera,
et
cetera
yeah.
So
I'm
eager
to
sort
of
explore
some
of
the
the
revenue
bringing
capabilities
for
the
tec
as
well
aside
from
just
managing
resources
that
or
treasury
that
we
already
have
so
excited
for
those
conversations
when
they
come
up.
A
A
L
I
would
love
to
provide
modeling
be
on
a
sort
of
a
model.
We
have
a
lot
of
open
source
cache,
discounted
cash
flow
models
on
open
source
on
the
long
tail
org,
so
it'd
be
fun
to
throw
these
at
this
problem.
G
K
I
I
just
want
to
make
a
statement.
I
I
think
going
into
the
reserve
is
a
really
really
bad
idea,
and
so
I'll
just
leave
that
there.
A
Yeah,
I
think
so
too,
I'm
not.
I
don't
even
know
that
it's
technically
possible,
and
if
it
is
it
would
require
a
lot
of
work
besides
being
a
kind
of
a
dangerous
precedent,
probably
but
yeah
okay,
who,
who
else
gene?
Did
I
see
you
flash
your
mic
there.
A
Okay,
anybody
else,
so
I've
got
ygg
zepty
zach
jean
anybody
else
interested
in
this.
A
Okay,
that's
probably
good.
Okay,
all
right
thanks
everybody
for
that.
That's
a
lot
of
good,
a
lot
of
good
input.
We
have
five
minutes
left
on
this
call.
A
I
yeah
the
the
I
just
wanted
to
give
a
quick
update
on
the
services
part
of
this
conversation,
the
the
one
of
the
the
first
area
that
we're
digging
into
and
tam
has
been
leading
the
charter
so
far,
but
I'm
starting
to
dig
into
it
too,
is
really
it's
like
a
consulting
intake
service.
Basically,
we
get
a
lot
of
requests
for
services
and
so
we're
looking
at
how
to
do
that
in
a
very
lightweight
way.
A
That's
realistic
and
there's
some
challenges
with
this
particularly
related
to
the
fact
that
there's
way
more
demand
than
there
is
supply
for
token
engineering
services,
but
we
still
think
that
there's
something
here
and
that
it's
good
to
get
started
on
this,
even
if
we
may
not
make
a
ton
of
money
in
the
beginning,
we
will
learn
and
we
will
eventually
make
money
here.
I
think
so.
A
That's
the
first
one,
the
second
area
that
we're
starting
to
look
at
I've
been
talking
to
santi
about
an
nft,
some
kind
of
cool
ideas
for
an
nft
campaign
that
would
hopefully
make
some
money
in
the
short
term
as
we're
ramping
up
on
some
of
these
services
and
being
able
to
tell
our
story
about
these
services,
and
it
would
also
spread
awareness
about
and
understanding
about
token
engineering.
A
So
we'll
talk
more
about
that
maybe
next
week,
but
it
has
to
do
with
this
idea
of
a
token
engineering
hall
of
fame
and
building
like
nft
collections
around
people
who
know
that
they're
token
engineering
professionals
and
also
people
who
are
token
engineering
professionals,
even
though
they
may
not
call
themselves
that
so
more
on
that
later
and
as
for
for
next
week.
The
things
that
I
I
have
down
already
in
terms
of
things
we
want
to
talk
about
are
one
clarity
which
is
the
for.
A
Those
of
you
who
are
new
clarity
is
the
kind
of
project
management
and
wiki
tool
that
we
use
for
organizing
ourselves
here.
They
are
tomorrow,
doing
a
major
release,
update
and
so
we're
going
to
be
doing.
Some.
Rework
and
the
kind
of
the
way
we
handle
project
flow
here
and
we'll
be
hopefully
talking
about
that
next
week,.
A
A
One
of
the
things
that's
in
the
manifesto
we
haven't
talked
about
yet,
but
it's
like
what
is
the
style
or
philosophy
of
working
in
sampo,
and
I
have
some
ideas
that
I
would
like
to
explore
with
you
all
next
week
around
that,
because
I
I'd
like
to
use
sampo
as
kind
of
a
a
lab
for
experimenting
with
some
some
some
new
approaches
for
making
it
like
that
makes
this
like
a
real
example
of
permissionless
workflow,
so
that
it's
very
easy
for
people
to
come
in
and
plug
in
and
find
work
to
do
as
volunteers
be
able
to
reward
them
using
praise
and
then
be
able
to
kind
of
help
people
develop
and
then
eventually
you
know
get
into
bounties
and
and
then,
if
they're,
if
they
really
prove
themselves,
then
be
able
to
actually
longer
term
when
we're
starting
to
make
money,
be
an
organizer
who's,
actually,
maybe
drawing
a
salary,
longer
term
part-time
and
maybe
full
time
longer
longer
term.
A
So
I
just
want
to
talk
about
some
of
the.
I
want
to
get
your
input
on
some
of
these
ideas
for,
like
accountability
and
those
kinds
of
things
so
we'll
be
talking
about
that
next
week
and
if
anybody
has
in
the
fa
in
the
last
minute,
if
there's
anything
that
people
think
we
should
add
to
the
agenda
for
next
week.
G
L
To
rex
I
I
wasn't
sure
about
this
when
you're
presenting,
but
I
was
just
doing
some
background
research,
the
flows
coming
off
the
common
pool.
I
didn't
see
the
proposal
inverter
in
there,
which
was
30
000
wrapped
x,
die.
I'm
wondering
why
it
not
might
not
be
included
if
that
was
automatically
generated
or
if
you
had
to
go
in
there,
one
by
one
and
add
proposals-
or
maybe
I
misunderstood
the
the
chart-
probably
not
enough
time
to
answer
that
but
feel
free.
A
So
we
can
wrap
up
on
time
because
it's
too
long
right
now,
if
you
can
just
rex,
maybe
you
can
reply
in
the
channel.
That
would
be
great.
Thank
you.
Everybody,
hey
thanks!
So
much
very
lively
call.
I
appreciate
you
all
taking
time
to
come,
especially
those
of
you
who
are
showing
up
when
it's
very
late.
Your
time.