►
Description
The Sampo working group develops and grows the value of the economic layer of the Token Engineering Commons. It aligns this micro-economy with the TEC mission and the collective success and individual benefit of its token holders.
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
Have
to
disagree
with
the
overall
statement.
First
of
all,
Rick
said
something
about.
You
know
we.
We
talked
a
lot
about
being
open
all
the
way,
and
you
know
you
have
we
have
to
be.
We
have
to
remember
that.
A
We
are
really
aware
of
that
and
that's
why
the
content
that's
there
is
like
we
discussed
this
a
lot
like
we,
we
weren't
going
to
date
any
education,
because,
for
example,
the
academy
is
making
a
lot
of
efforts
into
keeping
it
open,
yeah
and
all
that,
but
the
reality
is
as
open
as
we
are.
There
are
things
that
we
you
have
to
request
access
to.
Anyways,
there's
like
like.
You
cannot
edit
a
lot
of
the
documents
you
need
to
be
given
access
to
a
lot
of
stuff
and
we
are
just
figuring
out.
A
What
else
is
that
that
we
could
get
that?
The
token
would
be
the
ideal
way
to
get
it?
It's
not
like.
We
are
trying
to
cover
anything
important
and
like
again,
we
are
pretty
much
aware
of
that
and
as
far
as
they
come
cost
again,
I
don't
think
the
the
token
holder
channel
the
current
local
folder
Channel
itself
is
the
end
game.
A
But
there's
a
lot
of
cool
stuff
that
you
know
that
we
can
plug
in
like
access
management
like
the
creation
service
using
the
token
and
all
of
the
stuff
that
it's
you
know,
I,
don't
I,
don't
see
why
there's
such
focus
in
pullback
against
the
tool,
because
it's
a
tool
we
we
just
have
to
use
whatever
way
we
decide
to,
and
so
far
we
haven't
made
any
decision
that
goes
against
any
of
the
values
and
missions
of
the
TUC.
C
I'd
like
to,
but
it
gives
it
gives
it
gives
that
sorry
it
does
give
that
it
gives.
It
does
give
us
very
much
the
chance
too,
and
it
in
terms
of
radically
open.
It's
I
I,
tend
to
just
look
at
an
open
source
license
and
see
how
those
sorts
of
things
work
in
the
same
way
that,
as
in
code,
we're
trying
to
do
the
same
with
information.
So
even
though,
being
radically
open
doesn't
mean
having
access
to
edits
any
any
edit.
The
comments
it
means
having
access
to
to
view
it
right.
C
That's
what
open
source
is
about
and
the
token
gate
goes
very
much
against
open
source
as
a
concept
it
is.
It
is
closing
the
source
in
order
to
do
that,
and
it's
a
very
fine
line
as
to
how
much
value
we
put
in
one,
how
much
value
we
put
in
the
other
and
at
what
point
some
people
agree
with
it,
and
some
people
don't
I'd
like
like
it's
a
very
fine
line
that
we're
trading
with.
B
Right
my
perspective
is
that
it
feels
like
a
kind
of
echoing
a
little
bit
of
what
Auntie
said.
Many
things
will
actually
still
be
quite
open.
This
is
more
just
for
people
who
are
I,
guess
focused
on
I
guess
like
actually
voting
on
on
the
direction
of
where
the
TC
goes,
and
it's
just
more
for
very
specific
purposes.
I
guess
and
I
think
like
it's.
D
Okay,
yeah
sorry
I
had
to
switch
off
of
my
the
Wi-Fi
so
I'm
just
on
a
phone
right
now,
yeah,
you
know
here's!
Here's
the
thing
I
think
that
this
is.
This
is
a
new
world
that
we're
moving
into
and
the
there's
a
difference.
You
know
like
what
we
mean
by
open,
I,
think
we're
we're
defining
that
and
we're
a
Commons,
and
so
a
Commons
is,
is
a
little
bit
different
and
I
think
we're
we're
still
learning
what
that
means.
D
You
know
one
of
the
things
that
I
think
is
a
very
important
concept
for
this.
Commons
is
permissionless
right,
so
it's
like
anybody.
It's
open
in
the
sense
of
anybody
can
join
as
long
as
they
agree
to
the
terms
of
the
community.
That's
that's
one
definition
of
open,
but
that's
not
the
same.
As
you
know,
free
in
the
sense
of
like
free
beer.
D
You
know
it's
even
open
source
licenses
have
terms
that
you
have
to
agree
to
so
I
think
that's
one
of
the
things
that
we're
playing
with
and
we're
going
slow
intentionally
with
this,
so
that
we
don't
make
some
decisions
down
the
road
that
hurt
our
the
culture
and
hurt
the
the
brand
in
a
way
like
the
the
name
of
the
Tec.
So
I
agree
with
Risha
that
it's
I
think
it's
too
early
to
have
very
strong
opinions
about
this
is
my
perspective.
D
I
think
we've
got,
we've
got
to
Define
what
we
mean
and
I
think
I.
Think
the
other
thing
that's
really
important.
I
just
really
want
to
convey
this
to
everybody
is
that
this
is
not
like
a
corporation.
You
know
we're
not
putting
up
a
payroll
that
is
going.
You
know
to
like
increase
profits,
or
you
know
returns
for
some
shareholders
that
are
somehow
out
there
right
like
this
is
somehow
increasing
the
economic
value
that
we're
accruing
into
this
Commons.
D
That
is
jointly
held
by
all
of
the
the
shareholders
of
this
Commons
and
the
work
that
we
have
before
us
in
terms
of
making
sure
that
that's
Equitable
is
about
how
we
make
those
tokens
accessible
to
everybody,
who's
contributing
so
I
I,
don't
know
I
that
that's
my
my
caution
back
to
you
to
all
of
the
people
who
are
worrying
about
this
is
I.
Think
it's
good
to
worry.
It's,
maybe
not
good.
To
worry.
It's
good
to
ask
questions.
I!
Think
it's!
D
It's
really
important
that
we
ask
questions
about
this
and
we'll
check
ourselves
as
we
move
forward
and
I
think
we
need
to
remain
open
and
we
need
to
experiment.
That's
that's
my
perspective,
but
who
else
any
other
thoughts
on
this
yeah.
E
Yeah
on
that
note,
I
think
so.
Regarding
regarding
what
Rex
said,
I
was
just
reading
an
article
that
gave
some
clarity
on
the
parrot.
It's
called
it's
titled,
the
Paradox
of
now
profitability
and
there's
a
quote
that
says
that
a
public
goods
ethos
you
sometimes
applied
to
things
that
aren't
public
goods
which
stalls
Revenue
generation,
I.
Think
the
token
gated
channel
will
be
a
club
good.
So
it
will
be
non-rival
routes
like
public
goods,
but
it
will
be
excludable
and.
E
Yeah
such
as
like
satellite,
TVs
or
private
parts
or
movie
theaters
type
of
thing,
so
I
think
it's
an
important
distinction.
I
think
we're
experimenting
with
not
only
public
goods
which
require
funding
and
are
hard
to
monetize,
but
Club
Goods.
E
On
that
note,
the
I
think
the
token
gated
idea
is
a
step
in
the
right
direction,
but
I've
been
doing
some
research
and
we
don't
necessarily
need
to
be
the
ones
developing.
There
are
other
tools.
I
recently
went
on
a
call
with
one
called
Dao
lens,
which
they
have.
They
have
an
onboarding
bot
and
an
aggregator
of
roles
and
bounties
and
and
the
positions
offered
within
the
within
the
community
and
also
they
have
very
easy
way
to
create
token
gated
channels.
E
They
give
you
it's
not
only
a
bot,
but
they
they
have
integrated
that
with
an
interface
on
like
a
web,
app
like
a
website
page
and
you
can
very
easily
there
create
the
channel
or
give
different
access
to
different
people.
Some
channels
are
going
to
be,
for
admins
only
are
going
to
be
public,
there's
nothing
wrong
with
that.
So
I'd
be
happy
to
start.
You
know
exploring
that
with
you,
Gideon
I,
have
you
know
a
demo
I
I
went
through
a
demo
with
them.
E
They
gave
me
a
video
of
the
demo.
They
have.
They
have
developed
this
solution
with
they're
working,
hundreds
of
dials
and
yeah.
So
that's
that
and
something
else
is.
E
You
know,
there's
I've
been
working
on
a
scraping
bot
for
the
longest
time
it
got
stalled
because
the
engineer
had
some
family
issues
and
had
to
quit
the
project.
E
However,
I've
encountered
someone
who
can
help
me
with
it
and
so
I
think
we
can
offer
that
that
content
on
the
talking
gated
channel,
so
how
it
would
work
is
we
would
that
the
Twitter
scraping
bot
would
mine
over
hundreds
of
profiles
of
influential
people
and
organizations
within
the
web,
3
or
token
here
in
space
Cloud
leaders
all
around,
and
we
would.
It
would
allow
us
to
present
all
that
unstructured
data
into
a
spreadsheet
so
that
a
person
a
human
can
read
over
it
see.
E
You
know
the
engagement
that
that
tweet
had
you
know
the
the
actual
tweet.
How
many
shares
it
got,
how
many
likes
and
from
that
we
can
get
a
finger
on
the
polls
of
what
are
the
things
that
are
being
talked
about
in
the
space
and
from
then
we
can
do
this
type
of
crowdsource
content
creation,
so
that
would
that
would
really
allow
us
to
inform
ourselves
on
what
people
are
talking
about,
what
they
need.
What
are
some
pain
points
and
we
can
be
ahead
of
the
curve.
E
In
that
sense,
we
can
start
writing
articles
for
that
we
can,
then
you
know,
publish
those
articles
on
a
togulated
channel
and
I
think
that
would
be
a
really
good
use
instead
of
just
depending
on
people,
I
mean
I'm,
sure,
I
I,
don't
know
the
full
I,
don't
know
the
full
thinking
behind
like
what
do
we
expect
people
to
post
on
the
talking
talking
at
a
channel
so
that
it's
valuable
enough
to
be
behind
a
paywall,
but
this
would
be
something
valuable
and
you
know
yeah
I,
think
I
think
it's
it's
something
that
we
could
put
in
there,
and
so
those
are
two
things:
I,
don't
think
I,
don't
think
we
can
all
right
I,
don't
think
we
can.
D
D
E
D
So
one
thing
on
the
medical
grade:
Channel
I
thought
it
would
be
good
for
you
to
look
at
The,
Guild
XYZ
tool.
That's
not
something
that
we
built
it's
very
similar
to
what
you're
talking
about
and
it's
used
by
hundreds
of
organizations
and
I
think
it
has
similar
functionality.
So.
D
No,
not
what
I'm
saying
is
Guild
XYZ
has
very
similar
functionality.
It's
not
something
that
we
built
it's
a
tool
that
we're
just
using
from
somebody
else,
and
it
has.
It
sounds
like
it's
pretty
similar.
Maybe
what
you
can
do
is
check
in
with
NT,
and
he
can
show
you
what
it's
like
from
what
you're
just
explaining.
It
sounds
somewhat
similar
to
what
you're
describing
to
Dallas
so
because
antibacterial
process,
a
couple
months
ago,
going
through
and
like
analyzing,
all
these
different
token
getting
tools
and
ended
up
picking,
Guild
XYZ.
D
So
we
can.
We
can
look
at
the
other
ones.
I
think
we
should
always
be
open
to
stuff,
but
at
the
same
time
also
we
did
go
through
this
process
and
made
a
decision
and
like
if
you
so
talk,
maybe
you
and
NT
can
follow
up.
If
it
looks
like
this
other
one
is
like
way
better
then
sure
we
should
switch
over.
But
at
this
point,
I'd
hate
to
kind
of,
like
reverse
a
bunch
of
work
that
NT
has
already
done
doing
that
analysis.
D
The
other
that
particular
scorpion
tool
sounds
interesting,
like
that
might
be
something
that
we
could
actually
sort
of
end
with
the
the
curation
to
a
lower
working
on.
So
maybe
what
we
could
do
is
you
can
give
a
pointer
to
that
there.
There
are
some
existing
tools
that
are
out
there
right
now,
too
they're
they're
kind
of
like
that.
It
sounds
like
similar,
but
maybe
a
little
bit
different.
So
if
you
could,
maybe
you
can
just
provide
a
pointer
in
the
sample
Channel
and
we
can.
A
Just
like,
like
a
like
a
nice
last
node
I'm
thinking,
we
should
stop
calling
calling
it
The,
Talking
gay
child
more
like
a
I.
Don't
know
like
something
like
a
focus
Channel
or
something
because,
like
the
reasoning
behind
doing
it
with
one
TC
and
just
provide
relevant
information
for
talking
holders
is
because
we
have
no
way
to
concentrate
any
talking,
holder
message
and
I.
Remember
the
other
day,
I
think
Gregor
yell
complained
because
we
use
the
add
everyone
way
too
much,
and
now
we
just
have
another
option.
A
We
I
think
we
should
look
it
that
way.
Guild
is
just
an
access
tool
and
we
are
building
access
Solutions,
one
of
them
that
I
think
is
was
necessary,
was
a
solution
for
token
holders
to
know.
What's
up
and
that's
you
know,
and
the
information
is
available
elsewhere.
But
if
you
are
talking
holder
that
doesn't
have
much
time
you
just
you
just
you
can
just
go
there
and
you
have
everything
pretty
detailed
without
any
other
noise,
and
that's
it.
F
I'll
just
point
out
that
my
objections
are
not
that
that
token
getting
is
inherently
bad,
in
fact,
we're
architecting,
a
varying
gated
setup
for
Gravity
right,
but
we're
we're
saying
we're
doing
that
right
from
the
beginning.
We're
saying
we're
doing
these
things
right
from
the
beginning
of
our
Dao
right
and
so
we're
being
very
transparent
about
how
we're
doing
it
and
we're
doing
it
for
security
purposes
and
for
Content
purposes
and
for
for
money
generation
purposes.
You
know,
because
we
actually
have
clients.
F
We
have
people
who
are
going
to
pay
us
to
do
certain
things,
so
we
have
to
give
them
access
so
so
for
security
purposes.
Primarily
it's
totally
fine
with
me.
You
know,
so
my
objection
is
not
that
you
know
we're
doing
it
at
all.
The
question
is
just
that:
we've
had
such
a
radically
different
ethos
in
took
an
engineering
comments,
so
you
know
the
token
gating
the
term
itself
just
has
maybe
a
bad.
F
G
Yeah
and
not
having
to
recommend
my
feedback
here
as
well.
I
think
that
the
first
thing
that
that
we
should
focus
on
is
building
the
value
first
before
we
decide
to
create
this
token
gated
channel
for
valuable
things
to
get
built
on
I,
I
think
I.
G
Whatever
products
we
eventually
do
have
in
a
token,
gated
channel
would
be
stronger
if
we
get
feedback
from
everybody
on
it
first
and
we
make
it
an
open
product
first
and
be
able
to
to
get
everybody's
feedback
and
have
have
everybody
who
wants
to
use
it,
be
able
to
use
it
so
that
we
can
really
identify
whether
this
is
a
real,
valuable
product
or
not,
because
getting
the
biggest
tester
set
possible
would
help
first
of
all,
the
product
be
as
strong
as
possible
and
get
feedback
from
from
an
entire
Community.
G
Instead
of
just
limiting
the
the
feedback
in
trial
and
error
process
development
process
to
justify
the
few
people
that
have
tokens
I
think
the
that
would
definitely
speed
up
the
development
process.
If
we
launch
whatever
products
that
we
think
are
valuable
publicly
on
the
commons
first
and
then
once
we
identify
them
as
viable,
then
we
can
took
and
get
it.
G
G
For
the
token
data
channel
is
kind
of
have
somebody
or
allow
the
token
holders
to
highlight
messages
that
get
posted
across
the
entire
Commons
channel,
that
we
have
there's
a
lot
of
different
messages
in
a
lot
of
different
channels
here,
and
it's
it's
hard
for
anybody
to
really
keep
up
with
everything,
let
alone
identify
which
messages
are
are
like
valuable
or
might
contain
alpha,
or
have
opportunities
for
members
to
to
gain
value
from.
G
So
if
we
could
have
a
token
gated
channel
that
that
saves
members
time
by
highlighting
the
most
important
messages
that
that
could
be
very
valuable
one
downside
of
that,
though,
would
would
be.
It
would
probably
make
it
a
little
bit
more
difficult
for
new
members
to
get
onboarded
and
and
easily
like
see
all
of
the
top
messages
and
most
important
messages
to
keep
up
with.
G
In
the
Commons,
although
we
could
separate
the
two
things,
we
could
have
like
one
public
open
channel
for
a
new
member
on
onboarding
to
get
a
good
idea
of
what
the
comments
is
all
about.
And
then
this
Toten
get
a
channel
would
focus
more
on
opportunities
for
members
to
get
value
from.
D
So
a
couple
quick
things:
the
it's
probably
worth
just
mentioning
the
way
that
this
content
curation
service
is
going
to
work,
because
it
will
be
open
to
everybody
to
post
content
and
to
interact
with
other
people's
content.
You
know
to
basically
give
feedback
on
stuff
that
you
think
is
good.
D
The
token
gated
channel
is
really
just
an
experiment
with
like
taking
some
of
the
kind
of
the
greatest
hits
and
putting
that
in
the
token
gate.
In
that
token,
let's
call
it
token
holder,
Channel
instead
of
token
gated,
just
as
a
as
a
first
step
towards
kind
of
repositioning
this
to
the
Token
holder,
Channel
and
the
first
phase
of
that
is
basically,
you
know
using
the
in
the
collective
intelligence
of
the
community
for
sharing
posts
right
like
articles
and
things
like
that.
D
But
one
of
the
things
that
the
common
sense
team,
who
we're
working
with
on
on
this
is
interested
in
is,
is
using
that
for
what
you're
talking
about
Zach,
which
is
kind
of
like
Community
signal
like
governance,
types
of
things
like
that
because
it
is,
it
is
so
noisy
in
Discord.
So
it's
kind
of
like
you
know
it
doesn't
have
to
just
be
shared
links
and
things
like
that.
D
It
can
be.
You
know,
proposals,
it
could
be
lots
of
things,
but
that's
not
the
initial
Focus,
but
yeah
we
could.
We
could
do
that
over
time
for
sure
and
then
the
other
thing
I
was
just
going
to
just
respond
to
I.
Think
that
you
know
during
us
one
of
the
the
challenges
that
we
had
when
we
started
it.
It
is
true
that
the
having
like
a
token
holders
you
know
restricted
Channel,
is
different
from
some
of
what
we
were
saying
early
on,
but
I
think.
D
One
of
the
challenges
we
have
is
that
in
the
initial
phases
you
know
when
we
were
launching
the
Tec
we
weren't
really
thinking
about
economic
sustainability
and
how
we
can
continue.
You
know
like
that.
There
was
this
idea
that
we
would
raise
a
bunch
of
money
and
somehow
we
would
have
like
some
way
of
replenishing
that
common
pool
and
but
it
wasn't
really
specified
how
we
would
replenish
the
common
pool,
and
so
I
do
think
that
it
is
going
to
be
important
for
us
in
the
next.
D
You
know
several
months
to
redefine
some
of
our
terminology
around
this,
so
that
we
can
remain.
You
know
open,
but
in
a
way
that
allows
us
to
also
be
economically
sustainable,
because
if
we
don't
figure
out
this
economic
sustainability
question,
then
it
won't
matter,
because
the
whole
thing
will
will
go
away.
D
So
that's
some
of
the
work
that
I
think
we
have
before
us
in
the
next
six
months
is
you
know,
figuring
out
how
we
can
be
very
clear
about
the
need
to
be
sustainable,
the
need
to
come
up
with
economic
models
and
I
think
that
starts
with
to
go
back
to
the
thing
you're
saying
Zach.
D
It
all
starts
with
being
of
service
like
if
we're
not
creating
value,
then
we're
not
going
to
attract
people,
we're
not
going
to
be
the
shelling
Point,
and
if
we're
not
the
shelling
point,
we
don't
attract
people
and
we
don't
attract
people
to
the
services
and
the
economy.
The
TC
economy
doesn't
really
take
off.
So
that's
why
this
curation
service
is
so
important.
Is
it's
kind
of
the
first
step
for
us
in
showing
that
the
TC
does
have
a
path
towards
becoming
this
shelling
point?
D
D
Okay,
well,
these
conversations
are
there
were
two
other
things
that
we
were
going
to
cover
today,
so
we'll
only
get
to
one
I
guess
what
we'll
do
is
next
week.
So
so
what
I
would
like
to
do
in
the
in
the
remaining
time
is
talk
about
how
we
handle
projects
where,
where
was
the
locus
of
our
coordination
around
projects
and
then
next
week?
What
I
want
to
come
back
to
is
this
question
of
what
does
the
field
of
token
engineering
really
need?
D
Because
that's
going
to
be
a
really
important
question
for
these
ideas,
the
shelling
point
and
I'll
we'll
come
back
to
that
next
week.
So
what
I'd
love
to
get
feedback
on
is
we've
been
having
we've
been
doing
a
lot
of
work
in
Clarity
and
what
we've
been
seeing
is
that
Clarity
is
really
good
for
doing
project
management
and
keeping
us
on
track
with
stuff.
D
It's
that's
like
it's
the
key
to
making
async
collaboration
work,
but
it's
not
as
good
as
Google
docs
for
doing
kind
of
like
commenting
and
things
like
that,
because
it's
very
easy
to
overwrite
somebody
else's
contributions
within
they
don't
have
the
same
kind
of
like
permissioning
and
and
commenting
and
those
kinds
of
things
that
you
have
in
things
like
Google
Docs,
so
we've
been
trying
to
figure
out
bear
has
has
been
trying
to
figure
out
the
right
way
of
doing
this
bear
should
I.
D
H
The
easiest
way
would
be
maybe
just
to
to
show
an
example
of
what
we
could
do.
So,
let's
see
I
think
there's
one
project
that
we
already
have
finished.
H
Well,
if
not,
we
can
just
take
a
look
at
it.
Do
this
one
right,
so
this
is
like
the
the
goal
that
we
have
in
sample
for
the
content
curation
service
right.
So
this
goal
is
under
the
roadmap
like
the
overall
roadmap.
You
can
scroll
the
way
here
to
Services
roadmap,
and
we
have
here,
like
the
the
token
holder,
Communications,
that
it's
more
like
the
the
token
holder
Channel
and
here's
the
content
curation
service.
If
we
click
on
that,
then
we
can
see
like
these
I
would
call
it
call
it.
H
Maybe
like
a
preview
or
like
an
overview
of
like
all
the
plan
that
we
could
have
and
my
thought
on
how
to
incorporate
the
Google,
Doc
and
Gideon
also
mentioned
this.
This
was
maybe
I
think
we
could
just
like
link
the
the
documents
we're
using
here
at
the
top
of
of
of
this
section,
and
just
like
you
know,
simply
like
write
the
title
of
what
it
is
and
just
link
it
to
there.
H
So
then,
if
you
go
there
like
people,
can
collaborate
and
communicate
yeah
easier
like
in
an
easier
way
and
then
once
you
have
all
your
work
and
all
your
planning
done
in
those
type
of
documents,
then
it's
pretty
easy
to
start
like
becoming
more
like
convergent,
I
I.
This
is
something
that
the
clarity
people
explained
and
when
they,
when
they
did,
did
really
really
made
me
understand
the
platform
better,
just
going
to
to
Divergent
thinking
to
convergent
thinking.
So
we
started
like
with
brainstorming
documents
like
planning
documents.
H
H
Maybe
you
will
need
some
Google
docs
to
add
as
well,
so
you
can
add
them
here
at
the
top
and
then
again
you
go
from
this
Divergent
to
convergent
thinking
that
can
finish
up
like
in
creating
tasks
right
and
you
can
assign
tasks
and
really
go
into
more
granular
work
of
product
product.
Managing
whatever
you
you
are
doing
so
yeah
I,
think
that
would
be
something
that
could
really
help
and
I'm
really
hoping
that
we
can
make
these
Discord
and
integration
work.
H
I
think
it's
gonna
be
really
helpful,
especially
for
people
that
are
not
like
super
familiar
with
Clarity,
but
that
it's
still
important
for
them
to
be
on
the
loop
of
things
and
and
getting
like
constant
updates
on
the
on
the
work
we're
doing
so.
Basically,
what
this
is
gonna
do
is
like
for
any
goal
or
even
any
project
that
you
have
on
Clarity.
H
You
can
just
like
start
the
thread
on
the
Discord
and
then,
if
you
go
like
for
the
to
the
sample,
Discord
Channel,
a
thread
will
be
created,
Created
automatically
for
this
specific
project
and
then,
once
you
do
any
change
here
on
Clarity,
let's
say
create
a
task
assign
someone
change.
The
dates
add
a
tag
change
the
status
you
know
like
whatever
you
do
here.
It
will
be
reflected
on
on
Discord
right.
H
H
So
yeah
I
think
this
could
be
an
idea,
at
least
to
start
experimenting
with
it
and
getting
feedback
on
on
how
people
are
thinking
if
it's
too
confusing
or
if
it's
making
sense,
I
think
this
git
couldn't
Grant
a
project.
I
think
will
help
for
that
like
to
to
analyze
this
process
and
see
see.
How
can
we
improve
I,
don't
know
if
it
was
kind
of
clear
or
if
you
guys
have
any
questions.
H
B
H
Yeah
for
sure
yeah
I
think
that
would
be.
That
would
be
a
good
idea.
Maybe
we
can
plan
like
like
kind
of
like
on
boarding
station
or
guiding
station
for
the
clarity
platformer
on
the
workflow,
some
project
management
processes
we
could
have
for
anyone
who
is
interested
in
like
learn
learning
more
about
this
definitely
yeah
good
idea,
region.
B
H
Yeah,
that's
a
good
point.
I've
always
wondered
if
they're
gonna
add
at
some
point,
like
a
calendar
feature
where
you
can
see
like
on
a
calendar
on
by
week
or
by
date,
what's
happening,
I,
don't
think
they
have
it
yet,
but
for
now
here
and
specifically,
for
example,
we
created
like
on
the
roadmap,
these
division
of
monthly
goals
that
we
have.
These
are
more
likely
specific
to
the
goals
we
we
had
in
the
funding
proposal.
So
you
know
it's
kind
of
like
a
starting
point,
but
I
think
we
could.
H
B
D
How
about
this
since
we're
at
the
top
of
the
hour?
Why
don't?
If,
if
people
have
additional
thoughts
on
this,
you
can
drop
a
note
to
bear
questions
or
thoughts,
just
drop
a
note
to
him
in
Discord
or
bear
I,
don't
know
if
you,
if
you've
got
a
section
in
in
Clarity,
where
you're
outlining
this.
If
so,
maybe
you
can
put
a
link
to
that
in
Discord
or
people
can
just
comment
and
Discord
in
the
sample
Channel
too,
all
right,
everybody!
Well,
hey!
D
Thank
you
for
the
call,
sorry
for
the
technical
difficulties
on
my
end
and
we'll
see
you
all
next
week.