►
From YouTube: Sampo - Treasury Initiative #2
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
I
would
suggest
like
before
we
start
like
hard
working
on
stuff
like
I
would
make
a
proposal
to
the
community
like
we
are
planning
to
move,
150k
or
whatever
and
make
a
vote,
and
let
the
community
decide
like
if
we're
gonna
do
that
or
not
because
if
we
start
working
and
then
it's
something
like
the
community
doesn't
want,
I
feel
like
we
will
be
wasting
resources.
So
I
really
encourage,
like
the
community
before
putting
up
work,
just
make
sure
like
the
community
wants
to
do
it.
B
C
A
C
D
A
Yeah
I
was
actually
like.
I
was
like
the
last
week.
I
I
said
like
I
was
going
to
do
like
some
research
on
people's
feelings.
What
tokens
are
safe?
You
know
safe,
you
know,
protocols
whatever,
like
you
know,
doing
research
on
people
and
then
some
people
say
some
protocols.
Then
some
people
say
some
tokens
but
like
like
a
core
amount
of
people
was
saying
like
die.
A
It's
I
mean
it
was
also
like
a
week
ago.
So
the
market
was
like
more
scary,
but
people
was
like
in
the
thai
mode
and
then
even
like
someone
was
saying
like
the
abc
is
a
no-touch
game,
which
I
also
agree
and
yeah.
D
Yeah,
actually,
would
you
like
to
co-write
it
like,
of
course
the
people
here
will
feel
free
to
join,
but
I
feel
like
I'm
kind
of
feeling
strong
about
this
opinion
and
I
feel,
like
you,
have
a
positive
connotation
as
well.
So
maybe
we
can
together,
like
with
this
group,
dive
in
on
in
a
google
doc.
Maybe.
A
If
he
turns
the
call
so
he
could
present
some
dates
but
yeah
I
didn't
have
the
chance
to
talk
with
him.
B
F
Yeah
that'd
be
like
there's
not
much
to
eat.
That
would
probably
be
like.
I
would
just
need
to
know
which
platforms
are
we
interested
in
in
using?
So
I
don't
spend
like
an
enormous
amount
of
time,
testing
stuff.
We
may
not
even
use.
F
B
So
yeah,
I
think,
maybe
because
nate
was
kind
of
like
taking
the
lead.
I
guess
part
of
the
plan
of
today
was
kind
of
like
presents
like
the
research
each
of
us
have
so
maybe
we
could
start
doing
that,
like
with
the
people
that
is
here
well,
septi,
maybe
kind
of
already
did
it,
but
maybe
we
can
do
that.
F
Okay,
well
I'll
spin
up
the
notes
on
clarity
and
start
taking
a
few
ones.
Oh,
they
need
just
one.
Second,.
B
Yeah,
that
would
be
great
because
I'm
my
computer
is
a
little
slow
right
now.
I
was
trying
to
open
it
up,
but
it's
taking
some
time.
F
Okay,
I'm
up
with
the
notes,
let's
just
get
in
one
second,
who
wants
to
go
first:
okay,
let's,
let's
start
back
up
from
the
beginning,
for
for
the
time,
I
think
we
can
also
escape
the
intentions
and
distractions,
and
so
I
think
we
can
start
with
any
relevant
update
that
we
may
have.
I
can
go
myself
quickly.
I
don't
really.
I
didn't
really
need
much
this
past
week.
F
I
I
offered
help
to
test
the
tools,
and
so
until
we
have
them,
I
don't.
I
don't
really
have
that
much
to
do
so.
Yeah
I'll
pass
it
over
to
you.
B
Yeah,
thank
you
auntie.
Could
you
maybe
share
the
screen.
B
Okay,
perfect
yeah,
so
like
on
my
side,
what
I
kind
of
did
was
thinking
about
different
possibilities
in
which
we
could
use
this
money
as
well,
and
something
that
I
came
up
with
was
this
idea
of.
F
B
B
G
B
C
C
C
Yeah,
okay,
I
was.
B
C
F
I'm
taking
notes,
I
don't
I
don't
think
you
can
see
my
screen.
I
don't
know
what's
why
it's
not
working
now
that
you're
here
gideon.
Could
you
hear
the
screen
please.
G
Yeah,
let
me
I'm
trying
to
get
to
that.
Are
you
taking
the
notes
in
google
docs?
Are
you
doing
it
on
sampo.
F
B
Yeah,
okay,
so
what
I
was
talking
is
that
I
was
looking
like
a
different
possibilities
of
using
the
money
and
and
something
that
I
I
was
thinking
about
is
maybe
it
can't
be
done
yet.
But
I
think
it
would
be
really
interesting
to
start
exploring
kind
of
collaborations
and
with
the
different
organizations
that
we
that
we
work
with
in
a
way
in
which
we
can
maybe
like
get
some
tokens
from
them
as
part
of
a
as
an
investment,
let's
say,
for
example,
aragon.
You
know
I
I
don't
know.
B
To
be
honest,
I
don't
know
if
they
have
a
token,
but
maybe
there
could
be.
You
know,
like
some
token
engineering
dynamic
with
them
in
which
we
could
get
like
part
of
part
of
some
tokens,
and
that
would
be
like
you
know,
like
betting
on
them
as
well
right
like
maybe
it
would
be
like
if
we
truly
find
projects
that
we
believe
are
are
safe
and
they
are
doing
a
good
work.
B
I
would
say
that
it
would
be
kind
of
like
low
risk
investment
kind
of
thing
and
we
could
do
that
like
with
any
type
of
dial
or
any
type
of
project
that
we
think
it's
worth
investing
in,
so
that
was
kind
of
like
like
the
idea.
I
was
also
thinking
you
know
there
are
other
closer
projects
like
token
engineering
academy,
or
you
know,
block
sciences
and
all
of
those-
maybe
they
don't
have
their
token.
Maybe
they
will
use
tech
talking
as
well.
B
B
A
Basically,
I've
been
chatting
with
many
people
in
the
community
about
this,
what
they
feel,
it's
a
safe
token,
a
safe
man,
a
safe
platform
like,
of
course,
like
people,
have
friends
opinions.
If
we
want
like,
we
could
list
them
all,
and
I
mean
I
also
didn't
dm
every
single
person
in
the
community,
but
I.
A
C
A
A
Therefore,
platform
was
more
scary,
like
people
is
like,
no
platforms
are
suffered
and
some
people
were
saying
like
balancer,
some
people
were
saying
funny
swap,
but
in
general,
like
platforms
were
more
scary
and
then
yeah,
then
there's
a
lot
of
people
actually
who
were
saying
like
they
feel
great
with
thai
and
then
also
like.
There
was
one
core
contributor
that
said
also
that
the
abc
is
a
no
touch
game
so
yeah.
A
My
conclusion,
after
talking
with
all
these
people
was
more
like,
maybe
like
we
should
first
to
like
before
even
doing
any
work
like
we
make
a
proposal
on
how
much
money
we
plan
to
take
over
the
common
pool
and
say
like
this
is
for
treasury
things
doesn't,
you
know,
doesn't
have
to
have
like
a
specific
roadmap
on
how
to
do
it,
but
at
least
just
have
a
signaling.
A
A
It's
an
eighty
percent
of
super
requirement,
ten
percent
forum,
so
it
has
to
be,
like
almost
eighty
percent
of
the
community
agree
on
doing
that.
More
than
eighty
percent,
so
yeah
and
since
and
especially
like,
since
most
of
the
people
were
comfortable
with
died
and
they
get
it
safe,
like
don't
risk
the
life
of
the
project
just
for
prof
and
another
argument
I
also
hear
is
like
even
if
you
take
150k
and
even
if
you
double
it
like
it's
not
like
you
solve
anything,
it's
just
150km,
okay,
more,
which
is
good.
A
G
I'm
sorry
can
I
just
interject
one
thing,
just
a
logistical
thing,
so
we're
using
the
notes,
the
like
the
the
chat
function
in
this.
If
people
have
like
comments
and
things
like
that,
well,
somebody's
talking
and
I
just
posted
a
link
to
the
agenda.
G
So
if
you're
going,
you
know
if
like
bear-
and
I
are
taking
notes
and
if
you
look
at
what
we're
saying
you
said
and
you
go,
that's
not
quite
right,
either
feel
free
to
go
into
the
notes
and
edit
it
yourself
in
clarity
or
just
clarified
in
in
the
notes
in
the
in
the
text
channel,
okay
and
we'll
change.
It.
E
Sorry
guys
go
ahead.
Oh
it's
all
good!
I
mean
that's
a
good
clarifying
point
yeah,
so
I
wasn't.
This
is
my
first
meeting
of
this
nature,
so
I
don't
have
any
follow-up
research,
but
I
did
look
up
after
bear
mentioned
aragon.
They
do
have
a
token
it's
currently
at
1
6,
the
value
of
its
peak.
Of
course,
that
peak
was
very
short,
but
in
that
respect
it
wouldn't
be
a
bad
time
to
get
in
so
to
speak,
and
if
some
of
that
work
could
be
done
with
actual
token
engineering
in
exchange.
E
For
their
token,
I
I
think
that's
a
great
idea.
I
really
like
that
and
the
idea
of
you
know
investing
in
communities.
It's
a
really
good
show
of
faith
as
well
to
be
actually
holding
tokens
of
projects
and
communities
that
we
believe
in.
So
I
like
that
direction
and
that's
pretty
much
all
I
got
thanks
guys.
C
G
I
haven't
so
my
focus
from
last
time
was
syncing
up
with
nate
on
just
like
how
we
want
to
organize,
and
he
and
I
have
not
been
able
to
connect
and
so
I'll,
we'll
we'll
try
again
but
yeah.
I
was
basically
looking
at
like
kind
of
the
big
picture
like
assessing
the
risk
and
working
with
nate
on
how
we
organize
the
proposal
and
then
also
about
how
we
organize
things
here
in
clarity
for
this
group.
G
I
guess
my
comment
on
your
all
your
comments.
Just
two
brief
ones.
One
bear
that
idea
of
holding
partners
or
getting
partners
to
hold
our
tokens
and-
and
maybe
even
doing
some
type
of
swap
at
least
part
of
that
is-
is
baked
into
the
project
that
tam
was
talking
about
yesterday.
G
That's
one
of
the
things
we're
thinking
is
in
order
for
clients
who
want
token
engineering
consulting
services
in
order
for
them
to
participate
that
they
would
be
required
to
hold
a
certain
amount
of
tec
in
their
wallet,
their
organizational
like
their
their
gnosis,
safe,
whatever,
whatever
account
they
have,
and
so
that's
one
idea
is
that
we
would
require
them
to
hold
the
tec,
and
that
may
be
the
same
thing
for
the
consulting
partners
too,
and
so
you
know
that
when
they
sell
that,
then
there's
a
tribute
fee
that
is
paid
to
us
and
even
just
getting
them
to
hold.
G
Using
that
the
augmented
bonding
curve-
and
that
seems
like
a
good
idea-
I
think
that
going
to
zeptimus's
point,
I've
had
a
couple,
people
say
the
same
thing
nate
and
I
were
kind
of
talking
about
this
and
septimus,
and
I
were
talking
about
this
too
he's
like
I.
G
I
think
that
this
is
gonna
be
a
fair
amount
of
work
and
there's
quite
a
bit
of
risk,
and
you
know
it
would
have
to
be
a
pretty
big
chunk
of
money
that
we
were
pulling
out
of
the
common
pool
in
order
for
this
to
matter,
especially
if
we're
doing
safe
investments
where
the
return
is
not
going
to
be
super
high.
So.
G
C
G
I
think
that
going
forward
nate
will
probably
end
up
driving
we'll
kind
of
like
end
up
leading
the
agenda
on
this.
But
since
he's
not
here,
I
will
I'll
take
it
for
today,
and
I
guess
you
know
my
so
what
I
would
suggest
we
focus
on
is
this
question
of
like
what
are
our
first
steps?
You
know
this
going
back
to
the
things
that
was
saying
and
that
I
was
just
echoing.
G
G
C
F
Well,
I'm
not
sure
I
guess
that's
more
on:
what's
the
like:
what's
the
average
market
return
and
how
much
do
we
take,
so
we
make
enough
revenue
to
bother
taking
it
out
in
the
first
place.
I
think
nate
said
last
week
that
it
was
around
150k.
E
Yeah
I'm
gonna
pass.
I'm
not
informed
enough
to
have
an
opinion
I'll
pass
to
bear.
B
So
sorry,
so
for
me,
I
think
it's
kind
of
going
back
to
kind
of
like
what
gideon
was
saying
as
well
about
this
new
service
that
it's
been
working
on
with
tam
like
for
me.
B
I
think
it
would
make
more
sense
right
now
to
put
like
all
the
focus
and
all
the
effort
into
something
like
that,
then,
and
then
these
type
of
initiatives
that
we
don't
really
that
we
that
we
know
that
they
require
a
lot
of
work,
a
lot
of
planning
and
that
at
least
for
now,
maybe
the
benefit
we
would
get
from
them.
It's
more
like
in
the
long
term
with
we.
B
If
we
want
to
get
like
a
good
yield
and
and
considering
the
amount
of
money
that
we
would
need
to
take
out
from
the
common
pool.
So
I
wouldn't
I
wouldn't
look
at
it
as
a
priority.
I
mean
I,
I
think
it's
great
to
have
this
idea
of
having
the
money
in
the
common
pool
working
for
ourselves
like
passively.
I
think
that's
great.
If
we
can
do
that
at
some
point,
I
think
that
would
be
awesome,
but
right
now
I
think
I
would
give
more
priority
to
other
things
and
yeah.
B
Just
like
about
my
my
update
that
I
that
I
gave
before
more
more
more
talking
about
the
how
we
can
use
tec
with
other
organizations.
I
was
referring
more
into
just
like
simply
buying
tokens
from
other
dials
or
other
projects
that
we
might
think
are
are
worth.
You
know
like
not
really
putting
into
play
like
power
talking,
but
just
like
getting
some
exposure
and
trying
to
build
a
portfolio
from
projects
that
we
think
are
are
worth
it
so
just
to
to
clarify
that
and
I'll
just
pass
it
to
safety.
A
Thanks
bear
yeah
for
me
like
putting
money
out
of
the
common
pool
and
having
eternal
music.
That
was
something
I
was
pretty
against
since
the
beginning.
I
I'm
a
true
believer
in
like
we
should
have
like,
like
having
all
our
treasure
and
die
for
me
like
it's
a
mistake,
but
that
being
said,
like
it's
a
mistake,
we
all
agree
when
we
vote
on
the
prams
and
for
me
like,
if
we
want
to
change
like
for
the.
A
How
the
economy
economy
flows
in
the
you
know
in
this,
like
it
should
be
in
the
system
like
it
should
not
be
like,
for
example,
like
at
some
point
sam
was
talk,
was
talking
about
like
having
the
reserve
with
some
kind
of
deal
with
arabi.
Thank
you.
We
didn't
do
that
because
we
all
know
what
happened,
but
you
know
have
something
like
that,
like
it's
in
the
system
itself
and
like
the
community
is
just
being
benefit
of
the
system
working
as
expected,
but
I
would
yeah
I
I
think
anything
we
do.
A
It
should
be
like
you
know.
You
know
I
think,
like
even
having
an
agent.
It's
also
a
possibility.
I
would
but
again
like.
I
don't
think
it's
even
worth
it,
but
yeah.
We
are
also
going
to
do
something
like
that
for
like
the
asian
is
the
way
to
go
yeah.
I
don't
think
we
should
pull
money
out.
We
should
change
the
system
work
on
the
system,
so
we
work
in
the
long
term.
G
We
we
need
to
fix
the
fact
that
having
all
these
funds
in
our
common
pool
is
expensive
right
like
and
even
our
reserve,
like
I
mean,
that's
kind
of
the
nature
of
a
reserve,
is
like
you,
don't
touch
it,
but
but
the
common
pool
like
ends
up
like
you
know
doing
doing
a
common
pool
is
not
free
right,
and
so
we
probably
need
to
fix
that
over
the
long
term
and-
and
I
think
what
you're
saying
is
optimus
is
yeah.
G
Let's
fix
that
by
building
the
system
so
that
it,
you
know,
building
our
common
pool
and
in
a
way
such
that
we
can
invest
those
funds
and
not
have
it
affect
our
voting,
but
taking
the
funds
out
right
now,
yeah
it
just
it.
So
I
I
probably
right
now,
if
somebody
were
to
like
force
me
and
say
like
either
make
a
decision
right
now
or
kind
of
like
chop
off
your
foot,
I
would
say:
don't
pull
it
out
too
much
work
and
not
enough
return.
C
G
I
guess
let's
see,
has
everybody
anti-went
yeah,
okay,
so
so
I
think
there's
a
general
sentiment
that
that
there's
a
general
question
here
and
I
I'm
I'm-
I
think
I'm
not
unfairly
portraying
nate's
view.
He
and
I
were
exchanging
some
back
and
forth.
I
think
he
has
questions
about
this
too.
G
G
If
we
were
to
just
go
back
and
say:
hey,
we
all
talked,
and
we
don't
think
this
is
a
good
idea.
So
we're
passing,
I
don't
think,
that's
doing
our
duty.
G
I
think
that
we
need
to
do
a
little
bit
of
analysis
that
shows
like
this.
Okay,
I'm
gonna
throw
out
an
idea-
and
this
is
me
just
I
just
thought
of
this
just
now,
so
don't
expect
greatness.
But
what
if
we
were
to
do
like
a
couple
of
different
scenarios?
G
G
Scenario
a
means
pulling
out,
250
000
x,
die
right,
you
know
all
at
once.
We
just
pull
it
out.
What
does
that
look
like
what
kind
of
a
return
would
we
get?
If
we
did,
you
know
high
risk
low
risk
medium
risk
over.
You
know
six
months,
one
year,
two
years
I
don't
know
that
would
be.
That
would
be
one
scenario.
The
second
scenario
would
be.
G
G
G
And
sorry,
let
me
just
add
one
more
thing
just
to
clarify.
I
think
the
reason
for
doing
this
would
be
to
kind
of
illustrate
our
recommendation
and
show,
like
you
know,
even
at
a
large
level.
You
know
if
we
did
at
a
large
level.
It
would
result
in
this,
and
this,
if
we
did
a
small
level,
would
be
this
and
this,
and
we
think
that
you
know
these
are
some
of
the
challenges
with
either
one
of
these.
F
I
think
that's
great
and
a
great
way
to
not
only
to
showcase
our
recommendation,
like
you
said,
but
also
to
get
a
more
proper
response
from
the
community
because,
like
you
said
as
well,
the
community
is
going
to
react.
A
lot
of
the
reaction
is
going
to
come
from.
How
do
we
phrase
or
all
of
this.
F
And
like
we
may
not
agree
in
requesting
for
money
right
now,
but
this
is
absolutely
needed
one
way
or
another
like
for
the
time
that,
for
when
we
start
having
some
revenue
we
should
be.
You
know
we
should
have
this
in
mind,
because
we
we
cannot.
F
We
I
mean
we
can,
but
we
will
not
grow
and
and
be
a
sustainable
in
the
long
term
if
we
don't
use
some
say
more
advanced
techniques
other
than
just
having
die
in
in
a
common
pool
and
yeah.
I
think
that
that's
a
great
first
signal
to
the
community
to
get
a
conversation.
B
Yeah,
I
also
agree
with
that,
especially
because,
like
if
you
look
at
the
funding
sample
funding
proposal
forum
post,
you
can
see
that
there
was
like
a
big
conversation,
especially
about
this
treasury
issue.
Right
so,
and
probably
that
was
one
of
the
reasons
that
we
started
doing
it,
because
we
felt
that
the
community
was
kind
of
like
trying
to
to
push
it,
but
maybe
they
they
didn't
quite
have
the
the
context
or
or
these
this
analysis
that
we
are
doing
here.
B
I
would
say
that
we
yeah,
if
we,
if
we
do,
that,
I
think
to
do
like
the
in
the
simplest
form
possible.
So
it
doesn't
take
us
lots
of
effort
on
time,
but
we
still
get
that
done
and
yeah.
I
don't
have
much
to
say
I'll
pass
you
to.
Oh,
I
don't
know
if
there's
anyone
else
that
would
like
to
comment
on
this.
A
Yeah,
I
need
to
think
like
normally
I'm
absorbing
the
information.
I
need
to
think
better,
but
yeah
like
especially
what
you
were
saying
of
you
know
doing
some
different
things
and
do
not
have
like
the
sentiments
and
let
like
the
numbers,
speak
from
themselves.
I
think
that's
something
like
I
designate
with
me,
but
I
I
need
to
think
deeper
on
those
things.
G
Okay,
I
think
this
would
be
something
later
today,
I'll
reach
out
to
nate
and
catch
him
up
with
what
what
we've
been
talking
about
here
and
see
if
he
has
some
thoughts
about
putting
together
some
type
of
like
analysis
that
that
shows
this
I
mean
okay,
so
so
here's
the
question
to
you
all.
If
we
do
go
down
this
path,
what
do
you
think
are
the
variables
that
we
should
consider
in
doing
this
kind
of
scenario,
analysis
it.
C
G
And
to
clarify
what
I
mean
by
that
is
like
well,
risk
level
would
be
one
clearly
like
you
know,
doing
high
risk
and
saying
like
well.
High
risks
include,
you
know,
like
you
know,
speculative,
you
know,
d5
protocols,
or
you
know
you
know
speculative
tokens
or
nfts
or
you
know,
like
they're
super
high
risk.
There's,
like
you
know,
I
don't
know
ethereum.
Where
is
that
sitting
there?
You
know
so
just
do
like
kind
of
a
very
quick
set
of
assumptions
about
like
here
are
the
different
variables
risk.
G
F
I
think
for
us
for
the
for
the
whole
community,
one
real
one
thing
may
be
about
conviction.
Voting
like
how
would
taking
x
amount
of
money
affect
the
conviction
because,
because
it's
like
you
know,
we
take
150k
and
proposals
are
going
to
need
x,
more
conviction
to
pass,
or
ideally
we
could
go
to
the
dashboard
and
sort
of
try
to
come
up
with
the
configurations.
B
B
Imply
to
and
another
variable
that
I
would
add,
is
benefit
and
return
of
of
these
strategies,
and
especially
kind
of
like
maybe
compare
them
to
some
other
alternatives
in
which
we
could
use
the
money.
You
know
like
kind
of
making
like
a
comparison
between
this
benefit
and
other
types
of
benefit
that
we
could
get
some
other
way.
H
Yeah
I
arrived
pretty
late
on
conversation,
so
I'm
just
getting
I'm
just
going
on
the
last
things
that
I've
heard.
What
I
can
say
from
these
last
points
on
risk
level
is
that
from
when
I
worked
at
algorithmic
trading,
you
know
ethereum
dap,
we
focused
on
we
created
a
market
making
a
market
maker
automated
market
maker
way
before
you
know,
dfi
had
all
these
protocols
and
yield
farms
and
it
was
it
was
pretty
profitable.
H
So
I
would
say
that
if
we
stayed
on
like
market
making
arbitrage
or
the
the,
if
not
riskless,
very
risk-averse
type
of
trading
strategies,
then
we
would
be.
H
H
I'm
sure
there
are
other
protocols
out
there
other
dials,
that
we
can
take
advantage
of
this,
so
that
those
are
really
my
two
cents,
there's
a
lot
of
inefficiencies,
and
we,
if
we
just
scavenge
for
them,
we
would
be
better
off
than
trying
to
compete
with
all
these
other
high
frequency
trading
firms
or
hedge
funds
that
are
trying
to
get
some
alpha
like
us
so
granted.
They
are
also
trying
to
do
arbitrage,
but
the
market's
pretty
inefficient.
So
I
think,
there's
enough
to
go
around.
G
Okay,
anybody.
G
G
Part
of
the
exploration
that
we
offer
yeah
yeah
got
it.
C
E
No,
I
just
think
it's
interesting.
I
just
wanted
to
note
partly
for
mount
manu's
sake,
that
it
seemed
like
the
general
direction
seemed
to
be
that
it
might
not
be
worth
it
from
the
people
that
were
here
and
then
I
think
it's
interesting.
That
manu
has
a
very
different
perspective
in
terms
of
yeah
how
that
could
be
very
worthwhile
for
funds.
So
it
seems
like
that,
there's
yeah,
more
conversations
that
need
to
be
had
there
and
mount
manu.
E
If
you
want
to
be
part
of
this
presentation,
certainly
two
people
in
terms
of
how
that
would
make
sense-
and
you
know
assessing
the
risk
level
and
all
of
that
I
think
that
could
be
very
useful
because
yeah,
the
sense
I
got
from
the
group
prior
to
your
arrival
was
sort
of
like
well.
We
want
to
present
it
to
the
larger
community,
so
they
can
assess
themselves,
but
everyone
was
questioning
if
it
was
worthwhile.
Given
the
return.
G
Yeah,
I
think
it's
going
to
be
important.
I
mean,
I
think,
broadening
that
even
more
is
to
say
it
would
be
worth
us
reaching
out
to
people
who
are
a
little
bit
more
bullish
about
this
opportunity.
I
I
talked
to
griff
about
this
too,
and
my
sense
was
he
he
was
kind
of
like
yeah.
G
It
just
doesn't
seem
like
there's
going
to
be
huge
returns
here
without
taking
on
a
lot
of
risk,
but
I
think
it
would
be
worth
I
mean
I
think
angela
it
was
pretty
bullish
about
it,
and
trent
was
definitely
bullish
about
it.
So
maybe
it's
worth
reaching
out.
I
don't
know
if
you
know
of
people
who
would
be
more
bullish
about
this
opportunity,
and
maybe
we
should
talk
to
them
specifically
to
kind
of
get
that
that
other
view.
H
You
mean
to
inform
them
or
to
to
inform
them
on
what
we
are
trying
to
do,
so
that
they
can
vote
more
intelligently
or
to
persuade
them
or
like.
What's
the
intent.
G
The
intent
is
advice
process
for
us
right
before
you
got
on
the
call.
Just
very
briefly
what
what
we
were
talking
about
is
that,
in
order
for
this
to
generate
significant
returns,
we
would
either
have
to
have
a
large
chunk
of
money
set
aside
or
take
some
very
high
risks
and
right.
C
G
Maybe
there's
some
other
ways
we're
just
not
looking
at
and
I
think
that's
part
of
what
you
were
expressing,
and
so
what
I'm
saying
is:
are
there
we're
running
out
of
time,
but
maybe
you
can
put
some
notes
in
the
sample
channel
if
there
are
people
who
you
think
might
be
more
bullish
about
the
upside
here?
That
would
be
worth
talking
to.
H
Okay,
where
is
the
link
for
this
screen
sharing
document?
I
try
to
look
for
it
on
the
sample
thread
to
there.
G
Yeah,
it's
if
you
look
on,
if
you,
if
you
bring
up
the
chat
in
this
in
this
conversation,
there's
a
link
there
and
you
might
have
to
join
the
the
fund
managers
group
before
you
get
to
that,
though,
let
me
see
if
you're
in
that.
G
Okay,
so
we
just
have
two
minutes
left.
G
Let
me
talk
to
nate
about
where
we
are
with
this,
and
it
feels
to
me
like
what
we're
kind
of
like
the
next
steps
are,
is
pulling
together
what
these
scenarios,
what
this
analysis
might
look
like
and
then,
in
figuring
out
what
the
advice
process
is
like
who,
who
should
be
involved
in
in
guiding
us
and
pulling.
G
No
okay,
all
right!
Well,
thanks
everybody!
Sorry!
I
was
a
little
bit
late.
Sorry
there's
a
little
bit
of
confusion
on
this
on
this
call
and
the
timing
and
stuff
like
that.
I
think
what
we
did
agree
last
week
is
that
we
weren't
gonna
do
this
every
week
that
we
were
gonna.
Do
this
more
as
ad
hoc
as
needed.
Isn't
that
wasn't
that.
G
Okay,
so
let's
do
this
then
we'll,
let
me
talk
with
nate
figure
out.
What
are
the
next
steps
are
on
this
in
terms
of
moving
this
forward,
and
then
we
will
hopefully
do
this
more
asynchronous,
so
be
on
the
lookout
for
some
notes
in
the
in
the
sample
channel,
we'll
we'll
ping
people,
maybe
that's
probably
the
best
way
to
keep
it
moving
in
terms
of
async
and.