►
Description
The Sampo working group develops and grows the value of the economic layer of the Token Engineering Commons. It aligns this micro-economy with the TEC mission and the collective success and individual benefit of its token holders.
Steward: Gideon
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
As
a
signal
that
maybe
there's
room
for
an
interest
group,
so
I'll
just
give
a
quick
update,
we
heard
back
from
on
Wednesday
yesterday
that
they
are
the
common
sense
team
has
has
made
good
progress.
They're,
actually
they've
changed
the
underlying
architecture
a
bit
in
a
way,
that's
going
to
be
really
good.
That
will
make
it
much
more
flexible.
A
So
the
way
that
the
architecture
worked
before
was
that
we
had
a
bot
that
would
basically
extract
the
Emoji
responses
from
post
within
Discord
and
then
aggregate
them
into
a
database.
And
then
there
was
this
kind
of
custom
UI
made
up
made
from
this
development
framework
called
Django,
and
so
we
were
interacting
with
that
and
then
the
idea
would
be
then
take
that
and
kind
of
export
it
to
air
tables,
airtable
databases.
A
So
what
they've
moved
to
is
basically
just
kind
of
obviating
the
need
for
that
Django,
UI
and
they're
just
moving
it
straight
into
an
air
table.
What
that's
going
to
do
is
give
us
a
lot.
A
First
of
all,
it'll
be
a
lot
cleaner
because
the
UI
that
they
had
before
was
a
little
bit
a
little
bit
clunky,
and
so
what
this
will
allow
us
to
do
is
just
run
all
kinds
of
our
own
filters,
just
using
the
power
of
airtable
to
be
able
to
sort
and
filter
and
do
all
kinds
of
stuff,
so
that
this
is
really
good.
A
The
other
thing
that
they're
going
to
be
doing
is
making
it
pretty
easy
to
tag
a
particular
Channel
within
the
Discord
server,
so
that
we
know
that
we
can
recognize
posts
that
are
coming
from
a
particular
channel.
So
right
now
the
only
thing
we
have
set
up
is
the
it's.
A
It's
really
just
the
knowledge
sharing
form
Channel
that
is
set
up
to
be
able
to
receive
the
the
curation
signals,
but
with
this
new
change
that
they've
got
coming,
we'll
be
able
to
add
other
channels
if
we
want
to
right
so
yeah
I've
been
talking
with
shabnam
about
doing
something
for
ethics
opening
engineering
ethics.
So
this
would
allow
her
to
just
basically
either
just
keep
it
in
a
regular
channel
and
just
be
able
to
like
pull
posts
that
are
get
a
lot
of
Engagement
into
their
own.
A
You
know
their
own
version
of
this
database
filtered
just
for
them,
and
you
know
interest
groups
could
do
the
same
thing
right
so
so,
if
Libby
wanted
to
set
up
like
a
governance
working
interest
group,
she
could
do
that
pretty
easily
and
be
able
to
curate.
A
The
other
thing
that's
interesting
is
that
this
new
design
will
also
allow
us
to
take
in
data
from
other
servers.
So
the
cooking
engineering
Academy
decided
that
they
want
to
be
able
to
adopt
this.
They
could
do
that
and
then
we
could
have
a
unified
back
end
where
we
could
have
just
views
that
are
just
unique
to
their
server
or
our
server.
So
all
of
a
sudden,
this
opens
up
a
lot
of
the
possibilities
that
we
were
hoping
to
be
able
to
have
in
several
months
from
now.
A
We
could
have
like
in
several
weeks
from
now
like
pretty
soon
so
so
that
opens
up
a
whole
bunch
of
possibilities.
So
that's
that's
kind
of
where
things
are
with
that
in
terms
of
timing,
they're
hoping
to
get
the
next
release
that
has
this
stuff
in
it
by
the
end
of
next
week,
so
that
we
can
begin
real
testing
on
it
like
doing
some
real
stress
testing
and
which
we
haven't
really
been
able
to
do
so
far.
A
A
So
we
talked
on
Wednesday
as
a
group
and
what
we
decided
is
that
in
early
November
is
when
we
will
start
to
so.
Asset
is
going
to
be
working
with
us
too
build
some
tweet
threads
so
that
we
can
start
to
promote
this
and
I
think
that
the
first
Focus
will
be
trying
to
kind
of
appeal
to
people
who
are
like
interested
in
doing
curation
and
kind
of
want
to
understand
that
aspect
of
what
we're
doing
kind
of,
like.
A
Maybe
the
geek
factor
of
like
being
able
to
experiment
with
the
TDC
in
a
new
service.
And
you
know
we
would
frame
it
as
like.
A
beta
launch,
but
then
over
time,
like
over
the
next
few
weeks,
I
think
that's
where
we
get
into
the
opportunity
to
actually
maybe
launch
some
verticals.
You
know
like
launch
some
like
specific
Outreach
around
particular
categories,
which
is
kind
of
getting
close
to
what
the
interest
group
thing
would
be.
C
Thank
you
for
sharing
that
I
I
kind
of
I
got
I
dropped
off
there
for
a
second,
so
I,
don't
know.
If
you
can
hear
me,
I
just
want
to
confirm
that
yeah
we
can
hear
you,
okay,
cool,
yeah
yeah,
so
the
interest
groups
in
particular,
so
the
first
side
idea
that
so
just
to
clarify
it.
One
more
time
make
sure
I
didn't
miss.
Anything
is
that
you
want
to
have
people
who
are
more
interested
in
the
actual
curation
process.
C
A
Yeah
I
mean
this
is
just
a
working
hypothesis,
but
the
first
the
first
wave
of
tweets.
What
we
were
thinking
is
that
it's
kind
of
more
focused
on
like
hey,
look
at
this
cool
new
feature
or
service
that
the
TC
is
launching,
and
so
we
kind
of
like
promote
like
the
use
of
forums,
because
you
know
I,
don't
know
how
many
servers
are
using
the
form
feature
very
actively
right
now,
yep
so
promote
that
and
promote
the
the
the
service
itself
like
because
it's
a
cool
idea
right.
A
D
A
Of
the
ones
I
think
actually
that
we
could
get
a
lot
of
traction
on
is
d-soc
like
decentralized
Society,
because
a
lot
of
the
Common
Sense
team
themselves
are
really
interested
in
this
and
they're
they're
tracking
stuff
already
and
they've
agreed
to
start
shifting
some
of
that
curation
over
to
this
to
the
service,
so
I
think
that's
and
there's
just
it's
like
a
Hot,
Topic
Soul
bound
top
tokens,
and
you
know
dids
and
all
that
stuff
is
like
that's
pretty
hot
right
now.
C
Yeah,
so
when
it
comes
to
like
the
the
verticals
and
these
like
subtopics,
one
of
the
thoughts
that
I
was
having
like
in
terms
of
you
know
how
to
make
this
as
as
effective
as
possible,
would
be
to
kind
of
highlight
different.
C
You
know
there
are
certain
individuals,
especially
within
the
industry,
that
are
more
prominent
than
others
and
on
certain
aspects,
and
so
you
have
people
that,
like
I,
follow
on
Twitter,
for
example,
that
are
very
into
policy
and
regulations
and
I
think
having
those
individuals,
you
know
contacting
them,
having
kind
of
this
Roundtable
approach,
rather
than
this
just
kind
of
general
interest,
where
we
just
have
a
call
that
you
know
maybe
a
little
bit,
you
know
who
knows
how
it'll
turn
out
but
to
rather
have,
like
you
know
the
equivalent
of
Twitter
spaces
within
the
Tec
and
I
guess.
C
My
big
question
is:
if
we,
if
we
do
decide
like
with
to
go
with
this
interest
route,
this
interest
group
route
with
these
verticals,
do
we
want
to
have
the
professionalism
and
and
have
like
the
top
minds
and
try
to
kind
of
gather
them
to
have
these
type
of
round
tables,
rather
than
just
have
a
group
of
people
who
are
talking
about
it?
You
know
almost
haphazardly
and
so
and
then
the
other
thing
was
is:
do
we
want
to
have
these
interest
groups
conversations
token
gated?
That
is
my
other
question.
A
D
A
I
think
that
my
my
question
right
now,
this
kind
of
gets
to
some
of
the
bigger
questions
that
the
PC
is
facing
right
now,
but
one
of
the
things
that's
weighing
pretty
heavily
on
me
right
now
is
you
know.
I
mentioned
this
in
the
last
call,
but
Rex
has
been
going
through
some
of
the
engagement
data
on
our
Discord
server
and
it's
a
little
bit
Bleak
right
and
you
can
see
it
like
if
you
look
just
like
scroll
through
the
channels.
A
You
know
like
there
are
a
few
new
people
who
are
showing
up,
but
not
many,
and
so
it's
going
to
be
it's
it's
getting
the
curation
service
to
bear
that
weight
of
like
attracting
people.
Again,
it's
a
it's
kind
of
a
heavy,
it's
kind
of
a
heavy
burden.
So
this
is
one
of
the
things
that's
just
kind
of
like
trying
to
figure
out
how
we
think
about
this
and
the
relationship
with
the
academy
like.
A
D
A
Paying
off
and
they're
getting
a
lot
of
engagement
right
now,
and
so
you
know,
there's
one
strategy
with
the
curation
service,
which
is
like:
let's
use
it,
to
try
to
re-engage
and
rebuild
the
community
here
in
the
Tec
like
a
broad-based
community,
the
selling
point
and
there's
another
strategy
which
is
like.
Let's
take
the
shelling
point
to
where
the
activity
already
is.
A
You
know,
like
you,
work
with
these
existing
communities
that
are
already
having
like
their
engagement,
didn't
drop
off
so
and
there's
a
hybrid
strategy
which
is
like
we
do
both
right
and
so
my
sense
is
right
now,
no
matter
what
we
need
to
test
this
service
and
we
need
engagement
in
order
to
do
that.
So
I
think
that
that
means
that
we
need
to
like.
A
We
need
to
build
some
real
engagement,
pick
a
couple
categories
and
I
think
to
answer
your
question
like
you're,
going
to
the
longer
term
question
of
like:
can
we
get
some
more
professional
folks
who
really
know
what
they're
talking
about
and
actually
turn
this
into
some
events?
I
guess,
my
question.
The
reason
I
went
down
that
whole
thread
is
I,
don't
know
like
if
they
would
come
here
based
on
the
amount
of
Engagement
that
we
actually
have
right
now,
I,
don't
know
what
do
you
guys
think.
C
I
mean
I,
think
you're,
probably
right
I
think
that's!
You
know,
that's
something
that
we'd
have
to
earn
basically
and
I.
Think
there's
baby
steps
before
that,
but
I
do
think
you
know
we
have
that
problem
where
it's
like.
How
do
we
bring
them
in
bring
people
in
and
then
how
do
we
sustain
like
keep
them
here
and
engaging
with
the
service
actually
and
so
I
think
that
you
know
if
we
can
get
professionals
to
come
through
and
say:
hey
just
use
our
space
to
to
host
this
conversation
around
this
topic.
C
For
the
sake
of
token
engineering,
maybe
get
them
value
aligned
behind
what
we're
trying
to
do
with
the
project.
I
think
it's
worth
a
shot
like
I
I,
really,
don't
think
that
we
should,
you
know
several
like
if
we
can
shoot
her
shot
with
with
the
you
know,
big
big
folks
and
big
projects
like
I
think
we
should
do
it.
C
C
But
yeah
I
I,
agree
that
we
need
to
make
sure
the
First
Foundation
thing
is
to
make
sure
that
we
can
get
this
curation
service
consistent
and
and
working
properly
and
easier
to
use,
but
yeah
outside
of
that
I
really
do
think
we
should,
you
know,
shoot
or
shot
and
and
see
if
we
can
gather
like
really
make
this
a
shelling
point
for
not
only
token
engineering
but
for
a
lot
of
topics
that
that
will
kind
of
enhance
the
the
product
that
we're
creating
with
this
curation
service.
E
I
have
a
couple
of
a
couple
of
thoughts,
because
I've
also
been
thinking
about
the
this
idea
of
the
interest
groups
at
first
I
think
it's
really
interesting.
What
you're
mentioning
Nate
about
trying
to
bring
professionals
and
and
the
way
I'm
right
now,
I'm
thinking
about
it
is
that
I
mean
I
I
think
we
could
have
both
things
right.
E
If
we
think
about
it,
I
think
that
the
only
group
or
or
or
probably
the
most
active
group
right
now
in
the
TC
is
actually
the
Omega
working
group
I.
Think
if
you
see
their
calls
every
week,
There's
still
like
meeting
they're
discussing
stuff,
they
are
talking
about
stuff.
Their
chat
is
also
really
active.
They.
E
Exactly
so
so,
in
a
way,
I
feel
that
we
already
in
a
way
have
an
interest
group
happening
right
there,
and
it
has
a
lot
of
traction
and
a
lot
of
energy,
so
maybe
it
might
be
good
to
find
a
way
in
which
we
can
support
them
and
maybe
take
if
they
take
this
into
like
a
Next
Step,
maybe
with
some
communication
efforts
to
try
to
bring
more
and
new
people
into
this
interest
group
and
and
try
to
yeah
I
think
it
would
be
a
really
good
opportunity
to
try
and
to
work
with
them
in
in
this
regard.
E
You
know:
I
also
see
that
they
have
like
three
different
sessions
happening
throughout
the
week.
Talking
about
different
topics,
you
know.
So
if
ethics
is
their
big
thing,
maybe
we
could
we
could.
We
could
call
call
it
that
way
or
I,
don't
know
we.
It
would
be
good
to
to
work
this
through
with
them,
but
I
think
that's
that's
something
really
good
good
idea
to
explore,
and
that
could
happen
right
now.
E
These
situation,
with
the
academy
and
more
on
how
can
we
support
the
efforts
and
how
can
we
in
a
way
partner
and
and
help
each
other
and
I've
been
just
going
through
the
through
their
Discord
server
and
I
and
I?
Think
it's
really
neat
I
think
it's
really
clear
because
they
it's
pretty
basic,
pretty
easy
to
understand.
E
E
This
group,
around
the
specific
course
of
the
academy
is,
is
providing,
but
something
an
idea
that
came
to
my
mind,
is
that
I
was
going
through
and
I
have
the
the
impression
or
like
the
feeling
that
there's
also
space
there
to
explore,
because
I
feel
that
I
was
also
in
a
call
of
one
of
the
solid
groups.
Yesterday,
it
feels
like
there
are
also
certain
topics
within
the
course
that
they
have
that
people
would
like
to
continue
talking
about,
and
just
not
specifically
continue.
Just
with
a
with
a
course
structure.
E
E
Yesterday
I
was
in
one
of
the
the
study
group
calls
and
it
was
really
interesting
because
one
of
them
was
they
were
in
in
one
of
the
modules
and-
and
he
was
like
asking
oh,
you
know,
I
feel
that
in
this
module
they
are
not
talking
enough
about
bonding
curves.
E
You
know
you
wanted
to
talk
more
about
bonding
curves
and,
and
then
after
that
comment,
more
people
started
like
talking
about
it
and
and
and
like
raising
questions
and
trying
to
to
have
a
conversation
about
it,
and
then
you
it
was
really
easy
to
see
how
the
the
conversation
it
was
kind
of
like
deviating
from
the
actual
course
to
this
specific
topic
about
bonding
curves
right.
So
maybe
we
could
bring
that
conversation
into
the
TC.
E
These
could
kind
of
also
become
some
type
of
service
or
support
that
we
could
offer
to
the
academy,
and
that
could
be
really
interesting
for
them
too,
to
also
to
also
have
right
and
to
to
work
with
us.
So
yeah
I,
don't
know
what
you
guys
think
this.
These
were
some
of
the
ideas
that
I
that
I
have
I.
C
Think
that's
awesome.
I
I
was
also
in
a
study
group
a
couple
days
back
and
saw
the
same
thing.
You
know
like
there's.
You
know
they
were
all
working
on
one
module
and
you
know
half
the
group
was
probably
really
focused
on
just
trying
to
figure
out.
You
know
how
to
answer
the
questions
for
the
exam
at
the
end
of
the
module,
and
then
there
are
other
ones
that
were
really
interested
in
diving
a
little
bit
deeper
into
the
topics
that
the
module
you
know
presented,
and
they
just
you
know
they
didn't
have
time.
C
So
they
had
to
follow
the
format
of
of
the
study
group
and
whoever
you
know
the
ones
of
whoever
was
hosting
it,
and
so
that
that
to
me
is
a
little
bit
of
a
weakness
in
terms
of
the
study
groups
that
we
could
definitely
fill
the
Gap
in.
For
that
because
you
know
I
think
a
big
part
of
that
is
really
understanding
the
format
of
how
these
interest
groups
will
operate.
C
You
know
if
we
want
to
incorporate
the
curation
service,
for
example,
it
would
be
interesting
to
say:
hey,
let's
you
know
the
the
interest
group
meeting
would
would
be
something
like
you
know.
First,
10
minutes
everybody
shares
some
some
article
or
some
some
piece
of
information
or
something
interesting
regarding
that
specific
topic,
and
then
they
just
go
through
and
discuss
it.
What
was
interesting
about
it?
You
know
what
they've
learned
from
it.
C
What
is
what
are
some
potential
developments
that
could
you
know
or
innovations
that
could
be
had
in
that
particular
realm,
but
I
do
think
the
format
is
really
important
to
get
down
and
it
be
uniform
across
across
all
the
interest
groups.
C
So
I
think
there's
some
things
to
think
about
in
terms
of
how
we
actually
Implement
these
interest
groups
and
I
I,
really
kind
of
would
like
to
start
seeing
that
maybe
we
can
use
omega
as
a
kind
of
a
trial
and
error
system
and
I'm,
not
sure
if
you
know
sub
them
and
I
they're
so
diffuse,
like
that
entire
group,
because
there's
some
people
who
meet
strictly
for
like
the
ethics
things
and
some
do
like
the
participatory
research
and
the
concealings
librarian.
C
A
Had
a
really
good
conversation
with
something
about
this
and
and
Merc
too,
so
it
was
the
two
of
them
and
yeah
they're.
Both
I
mean
they're,
both
very
enthusiastic
about
it
and
I
I.
A
At
the
time,
I
told
him
it's
not
something
we
could
get
to
hey
Rex,
we're
just
talking
about
curation
service
and
kind
of,
what's
happening
with
that,
and
then
interest
groups,
and
so
we're
talking
about
potentially
partnering
with
the
Omega
group
as
like
a
first
interest
group
to
roll
this
out
in
and
I
was
just
saying
that
so
so
we
had
this
conversation
and
at
the
time
you
know,
I
didn't
think
that
we
would
have
this
functionality
to
be
able
to
roll
it
out
to
other
channels
as
soon
as
we
do,
but
I
think
we
will
have
it
in
the
next
two
weeks,
hopefully
so
so
I
think
she's
she's
interested
now.
A
Here's
the
complexity
is
that
you
know
there.
They
have
this
vision
for
the
consilience
library,
which
is
really
big.
It's
like
a
very
big
Vision.
That's
like
you
know
it's
not
limited
to
epics.
So
it's
like
all
curation.
You
know
it's
like
looking
at.
All
of
the
places
in
the
token
engineering
flower-
you
know
AI
governance,
ethics
like
everything
right
and
like
how
those
topics
touch
each
other
and
I
was
like
that's
going
to
be
hard
like.
A
That
would
be
the
whole
curation
service
like
not
only
for
here
but
like
for
all
of
the
other
servers
right
and
so
I
was
like.
Maybe
there's
a
way
if
this,
if
we
succeed
in
rolling
this
out
to
many
different
servers
that
you
can
help
play
a
role
in
like
building
a
nice
UI
for
it
or
something
like
that
and
so
they're
thinking
about
that.
But
the
thing
that
I
asked
her
point.
A
Blank
is
well,
but
would
you
be
interested
in
taking
a
more
narrow
look
at
just
ethics
and
doing
some
curation
around
that
and
she
said
yeah
yeah
I
think
so
she
so
she
had
to
think
about
a
little
bit
and
so
I
think
she's
kind
of
thinking
about
what
that
might
look
like,
but
I
think
they
have
a
lot
of
different
things
going
on.
A
I
think
you
know,
like
you,
know,
Nate.
If
you
wanted
to
take
the
lead
in
and
bear
I,
don't
know
how
like
interested.
You
are
in
this
yourself,
but
like
certainly
like
Nate,
if
you
reached
out
to
her
and
said,
like
hey
I'm,
just
following
up
from
you
know,
get
in
have
this
conversation
with
you
and
it
looks
like
you
know.
We
might
have
this
functionality
a
little
earlier.
A
You
know,
do
you
wanna?
Do
you
wanna
experiment.
C
It'd
be
really
interesting
to
to
kind
of
have
each
of
us
maybe
kind
of
look
at
an
area
that
we
can
own.
You
know,
I,
don't
know,
bear
if
you're
like
interested
in
the
whole,
like
maybe
once
everything's
cleared
up
with
the
tea,
seeing
about
engaging
with
like
study
groups
and
offering
those
types
of
services
as
well,
but
I
would
really
like
to
reach
out
to
septum
and
see
if
we
can
get
kind
of
a
subgroup
of
the
Omega
working
group
to
actually
participate
in
this.
C
A
I
mean
what
I
would
say:
Nate
is
that
in
this
case
like
it's,
you
know
it's
fair,
saying
it's
already
there,
so
you
know,
and
and
a
month
or
so
like
a
month
or
so
ago,
a
month
and
a
half
to
make
yeah
something
like
that.
A
I
talked
to
said
nothing
about
this
and
she
was
like
I
haven't
mentioned,
the
idea
of
an
interest
group
versus
a
working
group
and
she's,
like
oh
I,
really
like
that
idea,
because
for
her
that
means
like
less
pressure
to
like
try
to
like
monetize
and
sustainable
like
have
a
budget.
It's
like
you
can
just
basically
have
like
Reddit.
You
know
like
it's
Reddit
and
you
know,
but
with
like
better
curation.
So
and
you
know,
live
conversations
so
anyway.
A
I
think
she's,
she's,
definitely
open
and
I
think
maybe
what
we
could
do
is
just
treat
it
as
a
beta
and
and
just
have
like
a
very
rough
plan
for,
like
you
know,
we
want
to
test
this
out
for
the
next
three
months
and
see
like
how
well
it
goes
and
then
learn
from
that.
You
know
and
then
incorporate
it.
C
In
terms
of
like
promotion
and
branding
like,
is
there
something
we
can
do
to
work
with?
Maybe
acid
laser
to?
Actually
you
know
once
we
have
a
couple
of
rounds
under
a
belt
with
the
interest
group,
can
we
see
how
we
can
promote
it
and
see
if
we
can
get
some
outside
engagement.
A
Yeah
I
mean
I
I
feel
like
this
is
how
we
start
to
build
tutor
engagement.
Backup
right
is
you
you
focus
on.
A
You
know,
yeah,
you
focus
on
the
the
curation
service,
the
fact
that
we've
got
a
bunch
of
people
who
are
like
curating,
like
really
good
content
around
this
topic
and
then
there's
good
conversations
that
are
happening,
and
then
you
tweet
it
out,
and
you
recognize
the
people
in
the
field,
the
people
who
shared
the
content,
name
them
and
you
get
them
to
forward
it
and
stuff.
You
know
like
it,
and
then
you
mentioned
the
people
we're
talking
about
the
works.
A
C
A
Would
probably
be
pretty
easy,
because
those
are
people
who
probably
don't
get
a
lot
of
attention
anyways,
you
know
like
it's
not
like
you
know
it's
not
like
getting
metallic
or
something
you
know
it's
like
these
are
people
who
are
probably
looking
for
people
to
pay
attention
to
what
they're
saying
and.
C
In
terms
of
you
know,
using
the
curation
service,
the
one
thing
that
I
think
that
we're
probably
going
to
need
with
these
interest
groups
is
like
no
I,
won't
I,
won't
say
a
tutorial,
but
like
kind
of
people
who
can
walk,
who
are
you
know
who
are
who
are
like
the
whoever's
leading
the
interest?
Groups
should
probably
be
trained
in
how
to
use
the
curations
service
and
I'm
not
sure
if
we
can
start
on
building
informational
infrastructure
for
things
like
that,
but
I
think
it'd
probably
be
really
beneficial.
D
A
I
would
say
that
we
could
probably
do
some
lightweight
stuff
on
that.
It's
you
know.
My
guess
is
that
it's
going
to
be
changing
a
lot
over
the
next
few,
as
we
as
we
reiterate
on
it.
So
you
know
I
I,
my
general
view
on
stuff
like
this
is
like
when
it's
a
lot
of
people
who
need
to
be
trained
and
do
documentation
and
spend
the
time
to
do
good
documentation.
But
if
it's
just
like
one
or
two
people,
then
just
train,
you
know
like
yeah,
okay,.
D
So
I
don't
know
yeah.
E
In
regards
with
the
curation
service,
I
I
have
like
this
question
on:
how
would
it
work
with
the
inters
groups,
let's,
let's
say
Omega,
and
how
would
it
look
like
like
in
the
actual
server
are?
We
are
we
thinking
on
like
creating
like
another
forum
that
would
be
called
I,
don't
know
like
Omega,
ethics
sharing
or
I,
don't
know
whatever
the
name.
It
is,
and
then
having
that
as
a
separate
channel
to
the
knowledge
sharing
that
we
actually
currently
have
or
or
how
would
that?
E
How
would
that
look
like
like
I'm
trying
to
think
about
like
what's
the
package
for
the
interest
group?
Does
that
mean
like
a
forum
Channel,
with
a
with
a
curation
service
set
up
there
and
also
like
a
boys
Channel
where
they
can
meet?
Is
that
is
that
how
the
the
package
would
look
like.
D
A
Gets
buried
like
our
our
inner
organs
of
how
we
work
and
all
that
kind
of
stuff,
like
you
know,
we've
got
a
smaller
crew,
we're
not
trying
to
actively
like
recruit
all
kinds
of
people
and
be
contributors,
we're
just
trying
to
consolidate
that
so
like
that
can
go
down
lower
and
you
know
so
so
the
working
groups-
it's
not
like
this
featured
thing,
that's
like
at
the
very
top,
but
that
you
know
you'd
have
like
the
community
section
as
it
is
right
now
and
then
you'd
have
you
know
within
that
would
be
the
the
main
forum
for
knowledge
sharing
and
then
you
go
down
there
might
be.
A
You
know
right
now
it
says
working
group
text
but
like
maybe
it
would
be
interest
groups
and
to
start
it
might
just
be
this
one
right.
Ethics
took
an
engineering,
ethics
and
yeah.
What
I
was
envisioning
is
basically
a
you
know,
chat
like
General
conversation,
chat,
an
audio
Channel
and
then
a
forum.
A
C
Was
also
going
to
ask,
do
you
think
we
should
and
with
the
changes
that
are
going
to
happen
with
Discord,
for
this
type
of
structure?
Should
I
make
some
changes
to
the
actual
discourse
forum
to
to
mimic
that.
D
A
So
I
think
the
thing
is
is
that
we
still
have
some
work
to
do
in
terms
of
this
whole
working
group
thing
like
this
is
like
I'm
I've,
never
run
into
anything
more
complex
than
DC
I'm,
saying,
like
I've,
managed
I'd
be
in
lots
of
jobs.
This
is
like
the
most
complicated
thing
I've
ever
dealt
with,
but
yeah
like
I
I.
It
feels
like
we've
got
to
navigate
this
whole
relationship
with
the
academy
and
like
figuring
that
out.
A
So
it's
like
we're
very
clear
about
like
who's
doing
what
kinds
of
stuff
and
how
we
relate
to
each
other.
A
A
So
these
things
are
happening
simultaneously,
like
we
can't
wait
to
do
that
for
the
Academy
relationship
to
be
clearer,
so
we
kind
of
have
to
like
move
simultaneously
these
tracks,
and
so
what
my
sense
is
that,
like
the
the
kind
of
like
changing
discourse
and
changing
Discord
like
I,
think
we'll
get
to
that.
But
I
think
we've
got
to
make
these
decisions
first
and
and
get
the
shift
so.
C
And
so
yeah,
so
that's
the
big
thing
that
I
just
I'm
waiting
on
Clarity
with
because
I
want
to
kind
of
just
working
on
draft
for
a
post
that
explains
the
the
transition
from
having
multiple
working
groups
to
kind
of
a
core
unit
with
interest
groups.
C
But
you
know
when
to
present
that
to
the
the
community
is
I.
Think
the
timing
is
important,
so
yeah,
just
yeah,
if
you,
if
you
know
when
we're
ready,
then
let
me
know
and
yeah.
A
C
This
is
whatever
we
do,
we're
going
to
have
to
present
it
to
the
community.
It's
like
one
of
those
things
where
I'm
like
yeah,
let's
yeah,
make
sure
we
have
our
ducks
in
a
row.
Yeah.
A
I
just
think
it's
you
know,
it's
probably
gonna,
take
the
form
of
like
two
things,
probably
like
a
cultural
thing,
and
then
they'll
probably
have
to
be
a
proposal
right.
That's
like
funding
proposal,
fun
this
group
and
actually
try
to
like
bring
back
some
of
the
funding
from
various
working
groups.
Yeah.
A
All
that
out,
like
you
know,
I,
think
you
know
how
we
structure
the
proposal
and
stuff
like
that.
'd
be
great
to
get
your
help
on,
but
like
one
of
the
one
of
the
things
I'm
just
trying
like
trying
to
I'm
trying
to
push
on
multiple
fronts
at
the
same
time
and
like
I,
think
we're
getting
closer.
A
C
A
Okay,
yeah
I,
think
yeah
I
mean
one
thing.
A
And
this
is
just
me
kind
of
like
spitballing
here
or
just
kind
of
like
throwing
out
an
idea,
but
you
know
there:
there
are
kind
of
like
two
fundamental
visions
like
two
fundamental
Visions
for
the
tec's
future,
and
you
know,
there's
probably
some
hybrid
of
of
the
two
of
these,
but
you
know
and
one
of
them
it
looks
like
we're:
rebuilding
engagement
right
or
using
the
interest
groups
and
using
curation
service
we're
trying
to
basically
turn
things
around
right,
Drive,
more
engagement,
you
know
more
new
people
showing
up
simpler
roles
and
kind
of
turnaround
thing
with
that.
A
I
call
that,
like
again
like
we
had
originally
so
that's
one
vision.
The
other
vision
is
where
it's
like.
A
Well,
we
instead
focus
more
on
being
like
running
a
common
pool
and
and
working
with
partners
to
fund
services
that
they
can
use
in
their
communities
where
that
engagement
is
already
thriving.
So
like
the
academy
and
tokenomic
style
and
others,
you
know
defy
safety
and
much
others
right
who
have
pretty
active
servers
already.
A
You
know
they've
done
a
lot
of
work
to
build
that
up,
like
the
smart
contract,
Research
Forum
and
trying
to
basically
work
with
these
entities,
many
of
whom
had
not
tokenized
yet
to
use
some
of
these
services
like
praise
and
curation
service
and
denominate
them
in
the
Tec
all
right
and
and
give
them
ownership
right.
So
when
they
are
contributing
to
engagement
around.
B
A
Services,
it's
it's
building
demand
for
the
TCC
and
it's
also
building
like
shared
knowledge
for
the
whole
Commons
right
they
own,
like
everybody,
shares
that
you
know
so
it's
figuring
out
what
those
resources
are
that
are
held
in
in
Commons,
but
that
strategy
is
like
what
I
would
describe
more
as
like
a
b
to
B
like
business
to
business
type
relationship
versus
consumer
right.
We
started
off
with
this
idea
that
huge
community
and
then
we
kind
of
lost
our
way
and
we
started
because
we
for
various
reasons
right.
A
So
the
question
is:
do
we
try
to
do
we
try
to
reset
that
and
build
another
b2c
strategy?
It's
like
trying
to
build
a
big
audience,
a
big
Community
again,
or
do
we
say?
Actually
what
we
really
are
trying
to
do
now
is
just
focus
on
Partnerships
really
use
the
you
know,
use
our
token
to
build
like
an
economic
challenge
rather
than
a
Discord
challenge.
Does
that
make
sense
the
difference
between
these
two.
C
I
I
think
that
you
know
the
interest
group
and
the
the
curation
Services
kind
of
like
the
first
self-created
utility
for
the
Tec
token
that
we
can
have
to
really
kind
of
generate
Buzz
around
it
and
maybe
incorporate
it
with
another
communities
and
other
partners.
But,
like
you
said
at
the
end
of
the
day,
the
entire
point
of
the
Tec
is
the
economy.
C
We
have
to
get
this
economy
working
it.
You
know
we
have
to
have
that
jump
start
if
we
can
start
generating
funds
for
the
common
pool
and
start
funding
projects
that
incorporate
the
te
so
Tec
token.
As
a
gesture
is
saying:
hey
you
don't
need
to
launch
your
own
token.
Just
use
ours,
we'll
continuously
fund
you.
As
long
as
you're
progressing
our
mission.
We
become
the
economy
for
that
token,
engineering,
product
project
and
the
other
ones
that
wish
to
further.
C
You
know
public
goods
within
the
te
space
I
think
that
is
the
core
function
of.
Why
we're
here
not
so
much
for
the
internal
operations
and
Community
like
we
need
to
make
this
work
I
do
think.
The
initiative
with
the
curation
service
is
really
important,
though,
in
order
to
jump
start
that
so
those
are
my
thoughts
but
I'll
pass
it
on
today.
D
Yeah
I
I
agree
in
that
I
think
that
it
kind
of
building
up
a
point
to
the
to
the
TC.
That
does
make
sense,
otherwise,
where
we'd
be
only
playing
in
that
negative
game
for
for
the
Tec.
But
of
course
it's
a
positive
for
the
whole
economy,
but
it'd
be
negative
negative
for
the
TC
rather
than
in
neutral
the
game.
D
If
that
makes
sense,
so
there
needs
to
be
some
some
basis
to
the
TC
under
which
you
know
we
can
actually
say
we're
youthful
and
we're
good
people
extending
the
extending
the
breadth
of
of
token
engineering,
not
not
just
a
common
pool
which
gives
out
money,
because
the
minute
that
I
can
pull
depletes.
People
leave,
as
has
happened,
then
the
community
would
just
leave
us
too.
So
it
needs
to
be
some
sustainability
point
to
us
as
well.
Yeah.
D
A
D
D
E
Gift
for
for
me,
I
think
it
would
be
also
like
the
the
two,
the
two
options
you
know,
I
I,
think
if
we
want
to
become
an
economy
as
in
Partnerships
or
they
have
to
be
there.
E
A
Yeah,
okay,
thanks
so
so
Marathon,
mind,
I,
don't
know
if
you
were
you
caught
the
beginning
of
that
and
Griff
that
basically
I,
just
kind
of
like
sharing
some
of
the
some
of
the
questions
that
were.
You
know
we're
thinking
about
right
now,
like
in
terms
of
one,
it's
very
important
that
we
figure
out
a
way
to
partner
with
the
academy,
and
so
that's
some
of
the
conversations
that
are
happening.
B
Yeah
sorry
I
was
not
part
of
most
of
the
call.
I
was
just
on
another
call.
I
just
got
back
told
me
to
be
part
of
the
you
know
conversation.
So
that's
how
I
started
to
get
into
the
call,
but
then
I
got
another
call
and
I
I
I,
don't
see
her
here
as
well,
so
I
had
an
orientation
call
with
her
and
and
then
we
spoke
about
you
know,
I
saw
we
spoke
about
writing
for
Tec.
B
So
that's
what
I
do
I
write
on
a
freelance
basis,
so
she
asked
me
to
part
of
the
call,
but
then
you
know
I
couldn't
make
most
of
the
call.
I
just
got
back
no.
B
A
B
Easier
yeah,
traditional,
you
know
from
a
background,
yeah
and
I
came
into
web3
and
I
started.
Writing
that's
what
I
do
know
right
now.
B
A
Okay,
well,
we're
welcome
I
reckon
we
can
follow
up
later.
I
mean
basically,
this
is
the
sample
is
the
is
the
working
group
that's
focused
on
developing
the
economic
layer
of
the
token
engineering
Commons,
and
so
that's
what
we're
we've
just
been
talking
about,
like
the
various
services,
like
the
the
initial
service
that
we're
rolling
out,
which
is
Education,
Service.
B
A
B
You
can
DM
if
the
I
think
I
did
go
through
all
the
you
know:
Docs,
okay,
yeah
I,
just
completely
went
through
I
I
started
it
all
the
different
and
then
just
got
a
bit
off
in
past
week.
I
just
got
back
today
with
the
you
know,
I
thought
I'll
get
into
a
call
and
then
I
got
into
the
car.
Okay
great
well
welcome!
Yeah!
Thank
you.
So
much.
A
Yeah
so
so
I
think
we're
probably
not
gonna
have
time
to
go
in
or
details
right
now,
but
I
think
the
main
thing
is
we.
You
know
we're
gonna
be
going
through
some
of
the
transition
where
we're
basically
trying
to
like
focus
and
simplify
things,
and
and
and
you
know
how
do
we
do
that
and
then
progress
right,
take
the
food
off,
not
the
gas,
so
I!
Think
actually
you
know
so
the
curation
service
will
be.
A
A
Cool,
actually,
in
the
last
in
the
stewards
call,
we
decided
collectively
that
we're
gonna
cancel
the
call
the
community
call
today,
as
we
so
Nate
and
others,
and-
and
maybe
me
too,
will
be
like
we're
looking
at
potential
reformatting,
the
community
call,
and
so
that's
so
we
just
felt
like
there
wasn't
enough
energy
today.
D
No
worries
no
worries,
I'm,
sorry,
I
couldn't
I.
Oh
now,
there's
a
giveth
there's
a
important
call,
unfortunately
conflicting
what
the
story.
It's
called
for
me
now
so
I
don't
know,
but
yeah
we'll
also
put
into
play.
Then
I'm
happy
to
be
the
host.
You
know
I
of
these
calls
if
you'd
like
when
they
get
started
back
up.
C
Yeah
we'd
love
that
I
think
that'd
be
awesome.
I
think
we're
gonna,
do
a
pretty
radical
change
in
the
format
and
we're
gonna
bring
back
the
spotlight,
so
nice
yeah,
so
great
major
energy,
yeah.
A
I
mean
it's
like
basically
trying
to
make
it
a
little
bit
more
celebratory
and
more
focused
on
the
work
rather
than
our
work.
You
know
what
I
mean
like.
D
Cool
super
cool,
well
yeah.
Well,
keep
me
in
the
loop
I
guess:
where
does
the
talk
on
this
happen?
Probably
in
the
stewards,
disco,
Channel
yep
for
sure,
okay,
perfect,
I'll,
I'll
I'll
keep
a
close
watch
in
there
and
and
see
what's
up.