►
Description
Question of the week: What are you grateful for?
Timecodes
00:00 - Question of the week
12:36 - Goals of the call
13:55 - SourceCred Implementation
15:27 - Demo begins
31:40 - Daithi discusses the chatbot
35:45 - Structure for softgov WG - One Ostrom principle per WG
40:22 - Round of sharing
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/DDr5kYU
or say hello on Telegram http://t.me/CommonsStack
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/CommonsStack
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
B
I
can
start
okay.
I
am
grateful
today
because
I
have
a
home
because
I
have
a
family
because
I
know
there
is
people
that
is
having
a
rough
time
today
and
today
I
have
my
all
my
meals
and
I
have
a
feeling.
So
I
am
very
grateful
about
that
and
I
passed
it
to
libya.
A
Thanks
juan
thanks
for
bringing
up
the
question
today,
I'm
grateful
for
for
mexico
for
the
time
I
had
here
for
for
my
friend
that
was
living
with
me
for
my
partner
for
the
amazing
weekend.
I
had
for
all
of
the
the
beautiful
things
that
I
lived
in
here
since
I'm
about
to
go.
I'm
also
grateful
to
have
a
place
to
to
go
next
and
to
be
traveling
so
much
in
this
in
those
last
few
months
and
I'll
pass
to
santi.
C
Today,
I'm
grateful
for
finding
this
magnifica
group
of
people
that
I
found,
I
think
was
about
two
months
ago,
and
I
remember
my
first
meeting
when
I
jumped
in
and
you
guys
were
deciding
who
wanted
to
be
a
steward
and
who
wanted
to
be
a
contributor,
and
I
didn't
even
know
what
I
was
in
and
since
then
I've
been
enjoying
the
growth
of
the
community
and
the
growth
of
the
work
of
everyone.
C
So
that's
that's
what
I'm
thankful
for
and
I'll
pass
it
to
sen.
D
D
I
I
don't
know
how
to
explain
that,
but
it's
it's
some
science
behind
them
behind
it.
D
D
D
D
B
B
F
Yeah
I'm
grateful
to
have
a
nice
peaceful,
quiet
space
here,
nice
workspace.
I
really
cleaned
up
my
room
over
the
weekend
and
I
got
my
new
pc
build
running
linux,
so
I
just
have
this
like
really
nice
workspace
now.
So
I'm
really
grateful
for
that.
The
ceiling
likes
been
mentioned
a
few
times
and
just
a
nice
dry
warm
workspace
where
I
can
focus.
I'm
really
grateful
for
that
and
I'll
pass
it
over
to
zeptimus.
G
Thanks
john,
I'm
actually
grateful
because
right
now
in
my
life
I
always
have
something
to
do
like
never
boring
like
I
yeah
like
when
I'm
sometimes
I'm
working,
sometimes
I'm
doing
sports.
Sometimes
I'm
on
tech,
sometimes
like
yeah.
I
I
always
have
something
to
do,
and
that's
amazing
and
I'll
pass
it
to
30.
Did
you
go
oh
yeah
and
I'll
pass
it
to
atta?
That's
just
john.
H
Hello,
everyone,
my
internet,
is
also
very
bad,
but
I
hope
you're
hearing
me
yeah.
Okay,
I'm
grateful
for
this
week
because
I
took
the
decision
to
go
back
to
new
york
and
I
was
really
bored
of
my
life
back
in
my
home
city
stuck
in
my
room
and
I
I
really
miss
new
york.
So
knowing
that
I
will
be
back,
makes
me
really
excited
and
energized
yeah,
so
anyone
that
can
get.
C
E
Okay
yeah,
so
I'm
I'm
also
really
grateful.
I
I,
I
feel
a
very
good
feeling
in
this
group.
It
feels
like
like
like
you,
we
are
all
human,
I
don't
know,
that's
it.
I'm
I'm
really
grateful
for
all
of
you
and
who
can
help
us
to
yg.
I
Hey
guys
happy
to
be
here
grateful
for
so
many
things,
but
in
particular
right
now,
I'm
grateful
because
I
finally
got
to
reunite
myself
with
my
family
in
my
hometown.
You
can
see
my
background
is
different.
That's
why
and
yeah
after
10
or
11
months
included
in
my
little
apartment
in
barranquilla.
I
came
back
to
my
hometown.
I
I'm
really
thankful
for
that,
because
all
of
my
family
is
really
healthy
and
we're
happy
together
and
hope
to
to
keep
being
like
that
for
a
long
time
so,
but
grateful
for
so
many
things,
but
in
particular
right
now
for
that
and
to
be
part
of
this
amazing
community
and
working
with
you
guys
and
trying
to
offer
as
much
value
as
as
I
can
so
I'll
pass
it
to.
I
J
J
I
haven't
written
since
september.
So
yes
and
I
have
been
feeling
a
bit
dissatisfied
with
myself,
so
this
is
a
good
reminder
of.
Maybe
why
and
some
I
really
appreciate
your
sharing
and
saying
that,
because
it's
so
true,
I
think
it's
like
eckhart
tolle
says
like
abundant
or
the
feeling
of
abundance
is
the
foundation
for
like
having
this
in
your
life.
So
I'm
gonna,
I
guess
yeah,
I
mean
the
easiest
thing
for
me
to
be
grateful
for
is
just
feeling
like.
J
I
have
friends
yeah
like
the
warmth
like
a
few
people
said
and
being
in
this
community.
It's
really
cool.
I
don't
feel
like
there's
a
screen
between
us.
I
just
feel
like
we're
hanging
out
and
we've
become
more
like
a
family,
and
so
I
feel
like
even
if
no
matter
what
happens
in
the
day
or
I
just
am
like.
Oh
yeah,
I
get
to
go
and
it's
like
the
most
healthy
happy
working
environment.
J
So
it's
really
nice
to
experience
and
thanks
everybody
for
always
showing
up
and
sharing.
I
don't
think
has
I
think
I
missed
reuben-
did
ruben
go
yet.
K
No
I'm
grateful
for.
K
That
I'm
also
kind
of
on
the
way
of
going
to
see
my
family
soon
same
as
mateo
in
a
week.
So
I'm
glad
that
process
is
on
yeah
or
it's
in
the
process
and
yeah
that
I
kind
of
yeah
what
what
just
also
mentioned,
the
the
working
environment
within
the
token
engineering
commons
and
all
the
people
that
are
kind
of
fuel,
intrinsic
motivation.
I
would
say
which
I
find
very
beautiful
yeah
and
did
everybody
go
or
is
there
some
new
people
and
there's
some.
L
Hi
yeah,
I'm
thankful
f
that
I
have
a
day
quasi-free
day
to
catch
up
on
all
the
tec
action
because
there's
been
so
much
of
it
and.
L
Thankful
for
time
away
from
family
and
work,
two
other
things,
I'm
also
very
thankful
for
so,
if
I'm
last
I'll
pass
it
back
to
libby.
M
Oh
yeah,
I
can
go.
I
miss
the
the
you
guys
yeah,
I
I
don't
know
I
I
I'm
very
grateful
kind
of
like
human
experience
as
a
whole,
because
in
the
different
spaces
and
groups,
collectives
and
teams
and
all
in
all
different
communities,
I'm
part
of
there
is
like
a
a
very
good
energy
and
shared
purpose
about
an
emerging
future
and
that
everybody's
working
for
that
from
different
perspectives.
M
L
A
Thanks
everyone,
that's
very
sweet.
We
all
got
that
that
family
mom
reminder,
I
hope
everyone
says
hi
to
their
moms
today
and
yeah.
So
we
have
quite
a
full
agenda.
It's
in
the
chat
in
the
soft
graph
channel.
If
anyone
can,
if
everyone
can
jump
in
so
just
going
over
quickly,
what
we're
gonna
go
through.
We're
gonna
have
a
little
talk
about
the
source,
cred
implementation
with
mateo
and
santi.
I
hope
we
can
do
that
in
like
max
10
minutes
or
so,
and
then
is
daiichi
here.
A
J
Me
to
poke
him
see
if
he
forgot.
A
Her
thank
you
if
he
jumps
in
we'll
talk
about
that
as
well.
If
not
we'll
move
forward
to
participatory
decision
making
is
vital
principle.
Three
now
we'll
be
discussing
this
more
in
depth
today
in
the
book
club,
because
it's
part
of
the
the
first
chapter,
but
also
is
a
very
present
for
us
now,
because
we're
talking
a
lot
about
decision
making-
and
we
just
had
this
one-
that
that
brought
up
a
lot
of
discussion
in
the
weekend.
A
So
we're
going
to
go
more
in-depth
there
I'll
pass
to
matteo
and
santi
to
go
over
source
crab
and
if
you
can
keep
it
like
as
short
as
possible,
that's
very
appreciated,
but
it's
very
important
that
we
go
through
it.
So
yeah
take
the
time
you.
I
I
Okay,
so
I
was
having
a
discussion
with
with
santi
previously
this
morning
and
we
are
trying
to
set
up
and
like
a
little
balance
between
what
what
kind
of
data
we
get
moving
around
the
little
the
weights
in
the
different
sources
in
our
software
implementation
before
we
actually
set
up
and
deploy
and
start
using
it
to
to
to
compare
with
with
what
we
have
before
the
the
next
pre-hatch.
I
Let's
say
so.
There
is
not
really
right
now
a
current
balance
with
what
what
should
be
working
right
now,
but
I
can
show
you
guys
the
the
same.
What
I
tried
to
explain
the
the
last
time
I
think
last
thursday,
and
maybe
give
you
a
little
more
context
on
on
what
what
is
right,
what
what
is
going
on
really
with
the
source
credit.
I
So
there
are,
there
are
three
main
sources
in
our
source.
Of
course,
that
is
the
github,
the
discourse
and
the
discord.
Let
me
see
how
the
white
configuration
and
show
you,
so
everyone
in
here
has
their
reputation,
let's
say
their
great
allocation.
That
is
redistributed
every
part,
a
partial
time,
let's
say,
source
credit
in
the
deployment.
I
Those
and
gather
all
of
the
data
and
the
information
every
six
hours
and
makes
the
recalculation,
based
on
the
weight
that
we
we
configured
previously
so
in
this
example.
These
are
the
three
main
guys,
but
all
of
these
roles
are
merged
into
the
three
main
platforms,
discord,
discourse
and
github.
We
can
filter
and
such
say,
which
one
got
the
most
likes
or
what
posts
are
having
more
more
weight
in
our
graph,
etc.
I
So
in
the
weights.
There
is
a
lot
to
be
discussed
that
that's
going
to
be
santi's
work
where
he
will
try
to
to
to
set
a
middle
point
where
the
balance
of
the
weight
distribution
that
that
is
happening
between
all
of
the
interactions
that
that
goes
through
through
every
every
platform
is
is
actually
working,
is
actually
a
really
reliable
data
that
that
will
let
this
be
automated
in
the
in
the
future
yeah.
I
So
so
this
is
the
default
configuration
that
that
source
provides,
and
mainly
it
says
that
you
make
a
a
discord
message
and
there
are
certain
reactions
like
a
thumbs
up
a
heart
or
whatever
you
use
you,
you
sustain
more
more
source,
more
credit.
Sorry,
more
and
more
amount
of
value
in
this
course
is
the
likes.
If
you
make
a
post-
and
you
get
a
lot
of
likes,
we're
trying
to
let
this
show
like
yo,
you
get
4x
of
the
weight
of
the
credits.
I
These
below
are
like
the
interactions,
if
a
goes
to
reply
to
b
etc.
Who
is
going
to
get
more
more
credit,
because
it's
not
only
the
the
owner
of
the
post
or
or
whatever
it
was
created,
but
the
people
that
interacts,
because
a
graph
is
is
structured
by
nodes
and
edges,
but
the
edges
also
allows
to
to
get
more
value,
etc.
I
So
that's
the
main
complexity
of
this
system
and
for
ground
zero.
We
are
trying
to
something
will
help
me
because
he
he
already
do
it.
Does
it
with
well,
let
me
see
you
can
show
you
can
send
the
same
graph
or
no,
you
already
show
it
every.
I
How
do
what
did
you
tell
me
every
week,
every
15
days
where
all
the
praise
are
already
in
a
table
so
so
yeah
but
yeah?
I
think
that's!
That's
like
the
most.
I
can
tell
you
right
now.
We
are
working
on
it
and
and
expect
for
at
least
next
week
to
to
bring
a
little
more
of
a
of
a
real
example
or
more
a
balance
that
we
can
start
discussing
between
everyone
and
and
decide
which
weights
are,
are
more
valuable
or
or
if
we
want
to
create
a
special
movie
in
the
discord
or
whatever.
I
I
also
try
to
contact
with
people
from
one
hive.
Santi
recommended
me
to
get
in
contact
with
er
I'm
bad
with
names.
I
forget
every
time
with
sandpiper
sandpiper
sandpiper
made
an
awesome
implementation
for
for
one
hype,
so
I'm
trying
to
to
get
in
touch
with
him
and
ask
him
for
help.
So
so
we
can
make
some
some
real,
a
real
great
interview,
implementation
of
of
the
token
engineers,
but
the
other
part
is
not
the
technological
part,
but
what
we
actually
do
weekly
monthly
or
what
we
decide
to
to
use
this.
I
For
because
I
remember
something
mentioned
we
are
so
far
a
little
group.
We
are
not
more
than
20
30,
I'm
not
sure
how
much,
but
but
there
is
not
so
much
people
whenever
we
grow,
it's
gonna
be
really
messy.
So
it's
gonna
be
this
this
couple
of
weeks
or
maybe
a
month,
it's
going
to
be
a
really
great
experiment
to
see
how
this
goes
so
yeah.
That's
the
the
big
update.
If
you
have
any
questions,
I'm
open
to
answer.
J
Just
a
quick
mention.
Obviously
there
are
a
lot
of
questions.
This
is
amazing.
I
can't
believe
what
you
guys
have
done
in
just
like
a
couple
weeks,
just
to
mention
that
we
are
working
on
a
discord
and
we
are
going
to
separate
from
te
and
have
our
own
tec
for
the
hatch
and
chris
he
was
on
the
comms
call.
J
A
Yeah,
that's
really
amazing,
and
also
we
have
craig
made
that
list
recently
he's
been
updating
that
for
us
and
that's
really
awesome,
and
now
we
have
155
contributors
that
that
are
receiving
impact
hours.
A
J
C
Well,
yeah:
the
idea
is
to
try
to
adjust
a
little
bit
the
levers,
so
we
get
something
some
result
that
it's
a
little
bit
closer
to
what
we
have
right
now
from
the
impact
hours
and
start
from
there.
That
should
be
our
baseline
still
it
with
you
guys
and
from
that
initial
baseline
decide
what
little
changes
we
do
to
start
testing
and
have
several
weeks
of
testing
comparing
what
we
are
getting
from
the
impact
hours
and
what
we
are
getting
from
source
credit.
C
There
there's
every
single
tool
can
be
can
be
added.
Okay,
we
could
have
different
ways
of
adding
of
adding
value
or
measuring
how
we
are
all
adding
value.
We
could
absolutely
keep
having
the
impact
hours
and
have
source
credit.
The
only
thing
we
have
to
take
care
is
that
you
know
whoever
is
receiving
praise
from
one
side,
doesn't
receive
praise
for
the
same
thing
on
the
other
side,
but
but
there
is,
there
is
no
reason
not
to
have
more
than
one
source
of
value
measure
and
we
know
source
credit.
C
It's
a
tool
that
works.
We
gotta
be
careful,
because
when
the
community
grows,
there's
gonna
be
some
gaming
and
luckily
the
guys
from
one
hive
have
already
been
suffering
from
that
and
they've.
You
know
added
some.
You
know
some
measures,
which
is
something
that
we
should
keep
an
eye
on
and
get
ready.
C
But
but
you
know,
the
good
thing
is
that
you
can
react
very
quickly
and
they
can
you
know
they
can
game.
N
C
For
a
few
days
or
a
couple
of
weeks,
but
but
after
that,
you
can,
you
know,
put
measures
there
and
try
to
you
know
avoid
that
that
stuff,
but
again,
there's
there's
other
tools
and
I'm
sure
there
could
be
other
tools
or
other
groups
may
implement
other
stuff
that
we
we.
I
think
we
always
have
to
keep
an
eye
on
what's
out
there
and
what
can
be
interesting
to
implement
on
on
our
community.
C
Right,
the
the
first
thing
that
the
guys
at
one
hype
did
was
to
get
some
of
the
account
ban,
some
of
the
accounts
that
were
abusing
from
the
system
so
right
away
in
the
next
weeks.
They
didn't
get
cred
because
they
were,
you
know,
banned
from
from
you
know
the
graph.
That's
the
first
measure
you
can
have
there's
other
measures
that
you
can
implement
like
people,
that
was,
they
were
posting
emojis
one
another.
So
they've
implemented
what
they
call
the
the
synthotic
measure.
C
C
That
you
put
one
or
two
so
things
like
that,
which
is
great
because
they
they've
been
suffering
it
because
they've
grown
really
really
fast
and
because
of
the
faucet.
They
had
a
bunch
of
people
jumping
in
just
to
try
to
catch.
You
know
whatever
they
could
and
and
that's
those
are
lessons
that
that
we
we've
seen
from
them
and
we
can
implement
in
our
in
our
system.
C
C
There's
been
some
issues
there,
people
like
mentioning
that
they
are
joining
with
their
kids
and
their
family,
and
the
father
is
dealing
with
all
the
kids
accounts,
because
you
know
just
to
get
faucet
accounts.
I
think
our
community
is
not
going
to
have
a
faucet
so
that
kind
of
behavior-
it's
probably
not.
We
won't
have
to
take
care
of
that.
C
D
And
I
I
just
wanted
to
add
that
the
the
measurement
that
we
get
from
source
credit-
it's
just
a
way
to
see
things,
but
it
doesn't
include
everything,
for
example,
in
people
who
is
designing.
You
usually
don't
get
too
much
cred,
because
their
work
is
is
done
behind
the
scenes
and,
for
example,
and
people
who
who
develops
github
has
its
own.
D
Plugin
in
inside
sources,
but
people
who
is
designing
with
sigma-
they
don't
get
it.
So
it's
it's
very
important
to
understand
that
it's
it's,
it
doesn't
get
everything
and
it's
just
one
measure
more
and
also
it's
a
quantitative
measure
which
it's
very
difficult
to
quantify.
The
word
people
is
doing
and
because
it's
a
very
subjective
thing-
and
we
see
that
in
in
the
prices.
D
From
my
perspective,
I
I
think
that
we
we
we
need
still
to
give
price
to
two
people.
I
think
that
it's
one
of
the
best
things
that
I
I've
seen
in
in
the
in
the
communities
that
I
have
been
like.
It
feels
really
good
to
be
prized
by
somebody
who
you
respect
in
the
community
and
search
click.
This
can
provide
us
with
a
different
point
of
view,
but
this
is
what
it
is
it
is.
It
is
a
way
to
quantify
contributions
in
one
hive.
D
It
has
been
played
most
of
it
because
we
were
I
I
I
was
not
in
the
in
the
pollen
team.
So
I
I
am
not
sure
what
is
is
going
on
there,
probably
something
else
more,
but
from
my
point
of
view,
probably
what
is
is
missing.
Everything
is
that
people
is
getting
money
for
receiving
likes.
D
So
this
is
what
makes
everything
messy
if
we
are
using
source
crit
in
order
to
understand
who
is
our
community?
We
probably
won't
have
that
problem,
but
I'm
not
sure
which
is
the
the
idea
behind
it.
Are
we
going
to
give
credit
and
pc
for
people
who
obtains
grain
or
not?
That
is
something
I
I
don't
know.
A
I
think
those
are
really
interesting
points
that
we
should
continue
in
the
in
the
forum
discussion
about
it.
We
started
like
three
weeks
ago
and
we
can
go
back
there.
I'm
sure
these
points
are
in
the
note
stock
thanks
jess,
so
much
for
taking
notes-
and
I
do
agree
that
it's
very
valuable
to
have
a
mix
of
the
praise
and
source
cred
to
not
abandon
the
praise,
because
I
think
it
does
fit
in
places
that
are
not
being
held
by
by
source
crime,
and
this
is
an
awesome
discussion.
I'm
so
sad.
A
O
O
I've
kind
of
been
updating
it
and
I
did
a
bit
of
reverse
engineering
on
what
actually
gets
deployed
in
the
gardens
template.
I
stuck
out
all
the
functions
there
as
well,
but
there's
a
table
and
partly
at
the
top
of
it.
If
anybody
has
any
ideas
that
will
be
handy,
I
put
a
few
down
already
hard
to
get
total
proposals
and
get
the
pill
and
get
details
for
a
proposal.
Yeah,
that's
it.
I
am
so
don't
really
have
anything
to
demo.
So
very
quick,
five
minutes.
O
Nothing
really
just
to
get
if
anything
comes
to
mind
to
anybody
and
that
that
would
be
handy
to
have
jotted
down
in
that
document
here.
Besides
that,
no,
no,
I
have
everything
I've
kind
of
built
it
out
as
well
to
be
open
to
do
ocean,
so
it
was
that
it
should
be
easy
to
then
just
extend
it
for
other
other
probable
cause,
but
at
the
moment
it's
working
off
of
aragon.
A
Just
to
clarify
to
to
everyone,
and-
and
you
can
probably
correct
me
and
compliment
what
I'm
saying,
but
I
think
the
idea
of
the
dow
chat
box
is
to
have
a
point
of
contact
for
the
community
where
people
can
interact
with
proposals.
I
can
ask
questions:
do
you
want
to
talk
a
little
bit
more
about?
What
is
the
intention
of
the
chat
box.
O
Yeah
that'd
probably
be
a
good
idea
and
that's
basically
it
so.
If
you're
in
one
of
the
chat
groups
and
the
bot
is
activated
on
it,
then
you
would,
for
you
would
like
forward
slash,
say:
pc
dell
get
proposals
and
it
would
return
a
list
of
proposals
or
you
could
check
how
much
and
mistake
on
a
proposal
I
am.
There
is
also
some
interesting
functions
in
the
smart
contracts.
I
might
be
able
to
get
it
to
another
site
thing.
O
I'm
going
to
try
and
do
is
get
it
to
predict
the
conviction
box,
so
you
would
type
if
you
wanted
to
check
like
how
much
of
a
change
a
particular
ball
would
make,
and
so
that
would
be
those
other
things
that
that
would
be
the
intent.
Then
it
would
be
like
our
own
api,
but
it'd
be
open
source
as
well,
so
it
would
work
with
anything
at
the
moment.
It
should
work
with
anything
on
the
aragon,
any
organization
to
play
to
the
aragon
and
protocol
yeah.
D
A
So
I
hope
that
soon
we'll
have
a
proposal
for
for
the
boundaries
and
rules
and
and
for
for
the
source
grad
and
for
all
the
soft
gov
rewards
for
contributions
that
we're
having
and
also
now
this
week
we
had
this
big
discussion
in
comms
and
the
points
that
jazz
brought
in
and
what
is
the
decision-making
process
we're?
Having?
Is
it
being
effective?
A
How
are
we
going
to
make
this
transition
from
discord?
Emoji
vote
to
conviction
voting
now
that
the
platform
is
starting
to
get
ready
and
that
we
have
the
test
that
we
can
already
put
some
proposals
up
and
now
we
have
the
forum.
So
we
can
also
use
that
space
to
start
moving
proposals
there,
and
it's
not
only
about
the
content
of
how
we
are
adding
the
proposals,
but
what
types
of
decision
making
process
we
want
to
have
going?
A
Do
we
want
to
have
some
types
of
decisions
being
made
only
in
the
forum
like
perhaps
some
decisions
don't
need
to
be
on
chain
or
we
want
all
the
decisions
to
be
on
chain.
We
want
some
type
of
advice
process
to
go
with
it.
So
initially
we
proposed
to
have
an
advice
process,
and
this
technically
is
still
fun
now,
since
it
was
decided
through
a
vote
in
the
beginning
of
the
cultural
build,
and
we
still
didn't
change
that.
A
So
we
had
that
going
for
a
while
and
now
I
feel
like
it
is
flowing,
but
more
in
a
more
informal
way
that,
like
a
proposal,
goes
out
and
we
post
in
a
forum
or
we
post
on
discord
and
we
have
a
discussion
around
it.
But
we've
been
having
a
difficult
time,
as
it
was
stated
in
comms,
to
have
like
people
really
participating
on
something
that
it's
going
to
affect
them.
A
We
don't
need
to
have
like
everyone
voting,
but
it
would
be
very
interesting
to
have
everyone
feeling
like
they
can.
They
can
give
opinions,
but
they
can
change
that
if
they,
if
they
need
to-
and
one
last
thing
that
I'll
I'll
add
before
opening
for
sharing
around
this.
All
of
these
topics
is
there's
a
very
interesting
quote.
A
From
the
first
chapter
of
governing
the
comments
that
says,
I
would
rather
address
the
question
of
how
to
enhance
the
capability
of
those
involved
to
change
the
control.
The
constraining
rules
of
the
games
of
the
game
to
lead
to
outcomes
other
than
remorseless
tragedies,
so
she's,
basically
saying
that
if
we
have
the
capability
to
change
the
rules
in
which
we
are
involved
in,
we
will
have
we'll
have
freedom
in
that
system.
We
won't
be
like
jailed
constraint
and.
A
But
I
also
want
to
open
to
hear
from
all
of
you.
That
was
a
lot
of
information
at
once,
but
maybe
we
can
have
a
round
of
sharing
to
hear
to
hear
about
this
question.
So
do
we
want
to
use
the
forum
instead
of
conviction,
voting
for
any
types
of
proposals,
and,
if
so,
which
ones
and
do
we
have
to
have
an
advice?
Do
we
want
to
have
an
advice
process
so
I'll
pass
to
to
santi
to
there.
C
I
think
it's
great
to
have
a
and
to
have
a
tool
to
to
vote
on
the
rules
of
governance
like
the
vandalian
boating
that
we
will
have.
I
mean
most
of
the
time
when
you
launch
a
project
and
start
moving
forward.
You
forget
that
you
can
change
the
boundaries
of
that
project.
You
forget,
you
are
so
focused
on.
C
What's
going
and
what's
taking
place
that
that
you
don't
realize
that
there's
there's
a
way
to
you,
know,
work
on
the
initial
rules
and
then
make
changes
there
and
that's
something
that
we
we
should
always
keep
in
mind,
especially
when
we
see
that
the
the
initial
I
don't
want
to
say,
restrictions
but
boundaries
that
we
set
it
you
know
are
not
are
not
helping
us
to.
C
You
know,
grow
or
be
more
inclusive,
with
new,
with
new
people,
new
members,
new
new
new
options
that
we
may
have,
and
that
should
be
something
that
we
we
always
had
to
keep
in
mind.
So
it's
it's!
It's
not
just
the
ongoing
daily
proposals
through
conviction,
voting,
which
is
what's
going
to
be
happening
once
after
launching,
but
also
keeping
in
mind
the
rules
that
we
can
quick
here
and
there
through
dandelion
voting,
and
that
that's
that's
something
that
we
show.
We
should
always
be.
A
D
Hello,
I
think
that
the
tool
is
not
the
important
thing.
I
think
that
the
decision
must
be
taken
as
a
community
as
an
uninformed
decision
and
and
then
we
will
see
which
tool
we
use
and
that
will
that
is
giving
a
lot
of
of
interesting
information,
because
we
are
going
to
have
many
ways
to
decide
what
we
want.
D
D
D
We
we
don't.
I
I
I
don't
know,
maybe
if
you,
if
you
find
that
it's
not
useful,
please
tell
and
say
so,
because
this
is
something
that
has
not
been
used
before
for
for
this
kind
of
community,
and
we
only
have
used
it
for
for
commentary
stack
in
order
to
say
which,
in
order
to
order
the
priorities
on
on
the
on
bitcoin
who
to
the
net
person
and
have
a
list
of
of
the
priority
grants,
but
it's
pretty
much
something
that
is
experimental.
D
So
I
don't
know,
and
as
scientists
said,
dandelion
voting
specifically
is
very
interesting
in
order
to
change
the
boundaries
of
the
community
and
what
we
are
working
during
this
week
and
the
next
is
to
make
that
completely
true
and
in
order
to
be
able
to
migrate
to
a
new
house
when
we
are
finished
with
the
with
the
one
that
we
have.
We
are
going
to
begin
with
an
initial
doubt
and
the
most
important
thing
for
that
initial
dow
is
to
go
out
from
the
dow
to
another,
one
that
we
decide.
D
That's
that's
a
hashtag.
Actually,
it's
it's
an
egg.
Now
that
we
are
going
to
hatch
it
and
then
move
the
token
and
the
and
the
fans
to
somewhere
else
that
we
can
decide
what
it
is
and
we
will
be
able
to
repeat
that
process
as
many
times
as
we
want,
which
means
that
dandelion
voting
is
the
way
we
can
break
the
the
constraints
and
create
new
ones.
F
Hey
thanks
yeah.
I
just
want
to
put
forward
this
idea.
I
don't
know
if
it's
been
discussed
or
if
it's
actually
covered
in
ostrom's
writings,
because
I
haven't
reviewed
that
in
a
while,
but
I'm
wondering
about
like
incentivizing
voting,
so
just
like
we're
getting
impact
hours
and
praise
and
these
systems
like
if
we
could.
I
guess
this
is
on
my
mind,
because
we're
reviewing
the
source
cred
platform
there.
F
So
I'm
wondering
if
we,
if
it's
been
discussed
of
this
idea
of
like
incentivizing
voting
or
some
way
of
like
mobilizing
everyone
in
the
community,
so
that
we
get
really
large
numbers
on
votes.
Does
anyone
have
any?
Has
that
been
discussed
before
or
but
does
anyone
have
thoughts
on
that.
P
I
think
there
is
a
really
good
idea,
because
you
can
see
that
there's
a
lot
of
apathy
capacity
in
voting
in
many
protocols.
One
of
them
is
maker.
However,
I'm
a
big
concern
on
you
know:
incentivizing
people
just
to
vote
without
getting
informed
and
just
voting
just
for
the
fact
of
being
incentivized.
P
So
it's
something
that
we
really
need
to
understand
if
it's
gonna
help
us
and
also,
if
they're,
really
making
decisions
based
on
information
that
they
have
consumed
and
not
just
clicking
around
and
that's
it
yeah.
That's
my.
G
Take
I
was
also
thinking
like
on
the
signaling,
it's
good,
because
when
you,
when
you
are
using,
that
represents
also
the
amount
you
have
the
skin,
you
have
in
the
game
so,
for
example
like
if,
like
he
just
managed
to
tell
like
someone
who
is
like
doing
it
for
the
sake
of
getting
praise.
G
Like
you
can
take
out
the
wrong
decisions,
but
if
you
take
decisions
based
on
on
how
you
contribute
in
the
community,
then
it
also
like
I
was
reading
this
weekend
and
when
you
feel
inside
the
project,
then
you
take
motivations,
taking
care
of
the
project,
not
not
as
much
individual.
J
And
just
to
add
a
few
thoughts,
maybe
it's
worth
I'd
like
it
would
be
amazing
to
have
kind
of
a
data
driven
approach
and
even
develop,
maybe
a
kpi
around
what
voter
turnout.
I
think
the
average
in
blockchain
projects
is
like
three
percent
or
something
like
this
and
there's
a
lot
of
research
about
voting
psychology.
J
So
I
think
if
anybody
has
bandwidth
at
some
point
to
do
like
a
bit
of
research
around
what
are
the
best
practices
to
encourage
voter
turnout
and
yeah,
of
course,
virtually
it's
different,
and
I
have
also
had
a
few
discussions
about
like
incentivizing
voting
and
yes,
it
can
be
gamified,
but
maybe
there's
like
you
could
do
a
quiz.
But
then
this
is
like
so
much
energy
around
you
know,
but
how
yeah?
J
I
bet,
there's
research
already
existing
and
maybe
also
like
polling
our
community
like-
and
I
think
also
accepting
that,
like
a
certain
portion
is
just
gonna
hold
tokens
and
not
really
be
that
engaged
in
kind
of
like
concentric
circles.
You
know,
but
I
feel
like
we
are
on
the
forefront
of
developing
and
innovating
on
figuring
out
a
way
and
yeah.
I
think
als
as
we
as
livy
has
brought
up
in
a
big
dialogue
before,
like
intrinsic
motivation,
is
the
most
powerful.
So
how?
J
How
do
we
invoke
or
how
do
we
inspire
people
to
be
motivated
to
engage
with
the
community,
and
maybe
that's
like
a
survey
and
finding
out
the
answer?
So
it
is
interesting,
but
just
not
to
feel
like
bad
and
just
recognize
that
we're
on
the
forefront
of
experimenting
and
how
do
we
increase
engagement
in
virtual
communities
and
right
now
the
bar
is
three
percent
and
I'm
pretty
sure
we're
going
to
be
able
to
do
better
than
that.
But
yeah
having
a
goal
is
always
helpful.
F
Just
one
final:
so
I'm
just
thinking
about
combining
what
you
said
jess
and
what
zeptimus
said
so
now.
My
mind
is
going
to
instead
of
like
tokenized
incentives
for
voting,
maybe
like
some
sort
of
reputation
stake
or
if
it
was
like
transparent
on
for
each
member
of
the
community,
like
how
many
what's
the
percentage
of
votes,
they've
engaged
in
or
even
if
it's
not
like
their
actual
vote,
but
have
they
commented
on
a
forum
post
or
have
they
sort
of
touched
if
it
could
be
yeah
like
a
data-driven
approach?
F
What
percentage
of
decision-making
processes
is
each
community
member
getting
involved
in
and
then
that
could
be
an
example
of
like
a
non-token
based
incentive,
because
you
want
to
show
that
you're
you're,
you
have
skin
in
the
game
like
septimus
said,
and
you
want
to
feel
this
sort
of
connection
and
ownership
with
the
community.
So
just
a
way
of
making
it
like
transparent
of
how
involved
someone
is
could
be
like
a
reputation
based
incentive
moving
more
towards
the
intrinsic
alignment.
F
A
I
want
to
add
something
to
that
too,
because
that's
kind
of
the
purpose
of
the
advice
process
and
the
initial
idea
why
we
thought
about
it,
because
it
incentivizes
people
that
are
being
affected
by
that
proposal
and
people
that
are
experts
on
that
field
to
to
participate.
So
in
theory,
they
would
already
have
an
intrinsic
motivation
to
do
so
because
they
are
being
affected
and
because
it's
something
they're
passionate
about
if
they
are
experts
on
it.
P
P
So,
if
we
can,
for
example,
establish
okay,
we're
gonna
vote
during
the
weekends,
for
example,
so
we
know
already
that
every
weekend
we
should
be
looking
at
all
the
different
proposals
and
just
creating
a
culture
around
it.
I
think
it's
really
really
important,
because
having
this,
you
know,
having
this
type
of
liquid
democracy
at
all
times
is
really
really
difficult
to
follow
and
more.
If
you're
involved
with
a
lot
of
projects.
J
Sorry
there
was
a
delay
before,
but
yeah
sam.
I
was
going
to
ask
from
a
tech
perspective
with
conviction
voting.
This
may
be
another
thing
we
can
play
with.
Can
we
put
a
delegate
vote
picture
where,
like
I,
you
know,
jeff's
really
busy?
He
can
delegate
his
votes
and
the
staking
power
of
his
tokens
to
me
or
something
like
this
and
start
to
play
with
what
a
delegation
system
could
look
like.
D
Not
yet
that
that's
a
good
idea
well-
or
I
guess
that
we
can
discuss
about
it-
the
aragon
voting
application
already
includes
that,
but
dandelion
voting
and
commission
it's
it's
not
implemented.
D
D
This
is
the
first
time
that
we
discussed
this
and
I
would
like
if,
if
that's,
I
have
not
much
more
thoughts.
D
I
I
think
that
it's
it's
better
to
put
this
idea
out
there
and
see
if
people
is
tested
and
if
there
is
enough
interest
over
this
idea
on
this
idea
over
other
ones,
that
could
be
cool.
The
other
idea
that
it's
it's
out
there
that
kinds
of
tries
to
solve
something
regarding
that
is
quadratic
conviction,
voting,
which
is
allowing
people
who
has
less
tokens
to
be
more
voting
power
just
because
they
are
individuals.
D
D
D
A
We're
on
the
top
of
the
hour,
and
I
have
to
jump
into
the
book
club-
you
guys
are
welcome
to
continue
the
discussion.
Just
please
add
notes,
so
I
can
see
what's
going
on
after,
if
you
do
and
I'll
update
the
forum
and
whoever
wants
to
jump
in
the
in
the
book
club
can
follow
me
and
I'll
see
you
guys
I'll
see
you
guys
soon
in
the
next
calls.
Thank
you.
A
It's
in
the
it's
in
the
dow
book
club
server,
the
address
the
link
to
it
is
in
the
tc
comments
in
the
general
chat
and
also
in
the
soft
content.
P
Guys
thanks
everyone.
I
had
another
question.
I
was
wondering
if
I,
if
it's
possible,
to
delegate
voting,
for
example,
if
I
say
yeah,
I
would
like
to
delegate
voting
for
tech
to
david,
for
communications,
to
jessica
and
for
governance
to
juan
and
so
on.
You
know.
B
I
think
sam
already
answered
that
and
that
it
would
be
cool,
but
it
it
still
it's
not.
We
are
not
yet
on
this
in.
On
that
point,
no,
no,
not.
D
The
delegated
voting
is
just
one
address
and
they
did
a
very
good
job,
but
it's
just
probably
it's
it's
very
useful
when
you
have
one
address
that
having
a
cold
wallet-
and
you
don't
want
to
be
boating
with
that,
but
you
can
delegate
the
boats
on
one
or
another,
one
all
the
boats
so
that
you
can
do
with
that
address
you
delegate
it
we
in
another
one.
If
you
have
different.
D
D
We
could
manage
different
delegations
that
that
would
be
an
idea,
but
this
is
the
this
is
working
for
normal
voting
in
arab,
which
is
going
to
be
very
cool.
Actually,
if
we
do
an
update
later
of
the
dao
to
use
the
disputable
applications
that
will
be
included,
we
we
still
have
to
see
there.