►
From YouTube: Vision Distillation - TE Commons
Description
Here is our Miro board: https://miro.com/app/board/o9J_ko8MJkI=/
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/DDr5kYU
or say hello on Telegram http://t.me/CommonsStack
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/CommonsStack
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
C
A
A
I'm
hoping
my
intention
for
this
call
is
that
within
45
minutes
we
have
one
sentence
to
propose
to
the
group
that
of
what
is
the
t,
commons
mission
or
vision,
and
if
not,
then
we
actually
at
least
have
someone
who's
going
to
take
on
that
role
or
a
group
of
three
that
will
finish
it
today
and
and
distracted
distractions.
I'm
not
distracted
by
anything
I'll
pass
it
to
olivia.
C
Hi
everyone,
my
intentions,
for
this
call,
are
that
we
succeed.
We
succeed
in
coming
up
with
a
line
of
a
vision
statement
for
the
t
comments
and
I'm
I'm
also
here
to
help
one
with
miro.
If
that's
an
issue-
and
my
distractions
is
that
I
leave
in
egypt
and
internet
here-
sometimes
really
a
problem.
So
I
I
am
getting
a
bit
like
trying
to
get
in
the
board
right
now
and
I
will
pass
to
angela.
D
C
B
Hi
so
shepnam
invited
me
to
the
call
and
for
me
my
intention
is
to
get
to
know
this
space
and
you
all
a
bit
bit
better
and
to
start
participating
more
after
the
te
value
flow
course,
and
my
distraction
is
that
I
will
be
co-facilitating
the
holochain
death
camp
right
after
this
call.
So
I
might
be
a
bit
anxious
and
jumping
off
at
3
pm
thanks
and
so.
E
Vasily
hi
all
yeah,
I'm
just
a
guest
on
this
call,
so
I
was
invited
by
sebium
and
I
want
to
contribute
somehow,
if,
if
I
can,
but
first
of
all,
I'm
just
a
guest
and
want
to
you
know
dive
deep
inside
and
understand
how.
I
think
it's
getting
on
and
take
comments
at
the
moment
and
my
main
distraction
is
that,
right
after
this
call,
I
have
one
more
call,
but
it
is
not
distract
me
so
seriously.
So
I
think
it
was
okay.
F
F
H
Yeah
goodbye,
so
so
it's
just
me
yeah.
So
my
intention
is
to
yeah
just
listen
what
you
guys
have
inputted
and
already
digested
from
from
the
token
engineering
community
with
respect
to
values,
and
I
want
to
basically
get
a
hint
of
what
it
is
that
most
of
us
want
to
achieve
and
whether
the
projects
that
we
picked
up
are
already
in
line
or
not
probably.
A
A
A
Livia
put
it
really
nice
and
organized
in
this
beautiful
board,
and
if
you
want
to
play
with
it,
you
can
copy
and
paste
the
board
beneath
the
board,
and
you
can
make
your
own
little
world
that
you
can
yeah
just
like
that
and
that
you
can,
you
know,
mess
around
with,
and
this
top
one
is
locked.
But
our
goal
here
is
to
read
all
of
these
notes
and
then
try
to
come
to
a
consensus
on
what
the
what
the
consensus
answer
is
to
questions
three
four
and
five.
A
So
you
will
write
your
own
answer
that
that
tries
to
be,
as
you
know,
as
inclusive,
but
also
you
know,
like
don't
be
afraid
to
put
your
own
opinion
in
there
slightly
on
what
the
like
group
consensus
is
for
questions
three
four
and
five,
and
then
after
that,
we're
going
to
do
the
exact
same
thing
together,
you're
going
to
read
what
your
answers
were
for
questions
three
four
and
five,
and
then
we're
going
to
try
to
quote
collaborate
and
have
a
conversation
about
what
our
question.
What
our
answer
is
together
or
five.
A
A
How
did
the
token
engineering
commons
bring
about
that
change
and
what
is
your
vision
for
the
te
commons
values,
funding,
culture
and
out
of
scope
are
providing
context
for
us
to
really
understand
the.
What
is
the
consensus
answer?
Oh
thank
you
olivia
for
these
pink,
these
pink
questions
and
then,
after
that,
everyone's
gonna
read
what
they
thought.
I
D
F
D
H
A
Engineering
exactly
so
there
were
in
in
funding
culture.
It
was
kind
of
like
there's
funding
to
e
projects
that
provide
a
public
good
and
then
there's
in
general
for
society
or
you
know.
I.
I
think
that
the
question
was
a
little
confusing,
so
I
don't
know
what
everyone
really
thought
of
it,
but
it's
more
of
a
mission-focused
question,
so
it
provides
context.
A
B
C
C
H
H
A
C
A
A
H
H
A
A
C
I
C
C
F
A
D
A
I
A
F
H
A
A
F
F
F
A
G
A
E
E
E
A
A
A
I
D
A
A
A
A
F
C
F
To
it,
okay,
cool
so,
first
the
funding
culture.
I
I
think
it's
found
mostly
te
focus
project.
I
provide
a
public
good.
That
was
the
answer
from
everyone
more
or
less.
Then
what
is
out
of
scope?
I
think
it's
funding
anything
that
isn't
open
source
or
will
not
benefit
the
tea
community
so
that
if
we
find
something
that
is
open
source
but
does
not
benefit
okay,
so
it's
an
end.
Actually,
it's
not
or.
F
F
Then
the
fourth
one,
how
the
t
command
can
bring
about
that
change.
Research
on
education-
that's
pretty
much
the
same
as
angela
said,
but
I
think
it
sums
up.
It
sums
it
up
pretty
well
and
then
what
is
your
vision
for
like
the
the
vision
for
the
comments,
I
think
it's
funding
and
policies
that
was
very
like
the
hardest
one,
but
I
think
it's
like
how
do
we
like
the
long-term
vision?
F
H
A
H
A
H
H
Useful,
so,
basically,
how
will
the
world
changed,
and
literally
I
just
went
through
all
of
it
and
picked
up
what
I
think
belongs
together,
but
couldn't
come
up
yet
with
with
a
synthesized
word
for
every
star,
but
literally
the?
How
will
it
change
the
world
will
be
more
humane,
self-sovereign,
empowered
communities?
H
H
That
was
super
clear
in,
in
my
view,
from
what
I
read
and
what
is
the
vision
for
the
t
comments
that
certainly
needs
another
round,
but
obviously
it's
interesting
that
many
people
also
see
it
it's
beyond
crypto
reaching
through
others.
I
would
even
go.
You
know
digital
economies
or
digital
information
societies
how
to
bootstrap
a
disneyland
or
or
this
labor
output
attention
funding,
labor
that
that
is
kind
of
self-sustaining,
something
right
so
and
it
is
bootstrap
meaning.
H
A
D
D
I
was
thinking
about
first
t
comments,
only
funds,
but
then
I
thought
yeah
and
this
should
be
also
about
aligning
incentives
and-
and
then
I
thought,
okay,
what
does
that
mean?
And
I
think
this
tiny
little
difference
really
can
make
a
huge
difference
when
it
comes
to
te
commons
activities,
definitely
not
sure,
yeah
and
last
one
there.
I
was
struggling
a
little
bit
and
I
decided
then
to
go
okay
for
the
actually.
What
yeah?
I'm
not
really,
I'm
not
sure
if
this
is
a
vision,
but
I
I
I
was
trying
to
collect
what's.
A
A
A
A
A
Okay,
well,
I
would
love
if
okay,
I
will
go
really
quickly
and
then
the
people
with
the
heart
stop,
please.
Please
speak
up
and
and
go
next.
Okay.
So
for
me
the
the
how
the
world
will
change
because
of
the
tc
basically
felt
like
the
vision,
and
I
I
I
said
that
the
world
will
be
more
accessible
to
all,
with
safe
and
well-designed
financial
infrastructure
as
a
public
good.
B
Yeah,
so
I
have
the
same,
I
think
the
same
approach
I
cheated
in
conflating
question
number
three
and
number
five
and
still
get
to
distill
that,
but
for
me,
what
was
standing
out.
The
most
was
the
kind
of
healthy,
democratic
and
equitable
public
infrastructure,
allowing
for
less
dependence
on
the
extractive
parts
of
private
or
state
sector
and
encouraging
more
interdependence
or
independence
or
healthy
interdependence
and
value
sovereignty
and
yeah.
I
would
still
need
to
make
it
a
more
digestible.
I
A
Okay,
okay,
so
now-
and
I
understand
you
have
to
leave-
I'm
really
sorry
for
going
over-
I'm
not
too
surprised
that
we
weren't
able
to
get
through
all
this
in
time,
but
now
now
we
have
to
try
to
get
it
to
one
card
and
it
seemed
like
three
and
five
really
both
need
to
be
distilled
into
one
thing:
what
what
did
you
guys
like?
Maybe
should
we
do?
How
do
you
yeah?
Do
you
have
yeah.
A
H
So
so
I
think
I
don't
know
why,
but
I
think
jakub's
last
summaries
of
three
and
five
distilling,
those
and
also
there
were
repetitions
of
the
most
important
catchphrases.
I
think
makes
sense
that
that
the
distillation
of
three
and
five
into
a
vision
statement
could
work
out
and
the
how
is
pretty
clear
like
adding
yeah
so
yeah,
probably
you
will
need
to
have
another
round,
but
I
think
now
it's
easier.
A
E
E
I
think
that
the
main
change
will
be
that
people
will
create
their
own
economic
systems
and
mechanisms
that
are
independent
from
state
corporations
and
are
tied
to
real
values,
because
a
lot
of
things
in
our
present
economy
is
not
tied
to
railways.
For
example,
oil
futures
are
tied
to
those
very
simulated
prices,
so
we
are
living
in
in
the
world.
We
have
bananas,
it
is
a
real
value
and
we
have
stocks.
E
This
is
not
railway,
but
our
life
is
affected
by
you
know
some
bubble
value,
so
I
think
this
will
be
the
change,
so
how
the
comments
will
bring
that
change.
I
think
here
we
have
two
pieces,
tech
infrastructure,
because
majority
of
people
don't
understand
anything
and
they
just
want
a
product
to
use
it
for,
from
my
point
of
view
and
from
education,
because,
for
example,
if
you're
in
in
africa-
and
you
want
to
sell
iphone
to
some
people
who
don't
know
anything,
you
need
to
sell.
E
This
iphone
need
to
describe
them.
That
this
is
super
high
tech
stuff,
that
it
is
cool
that,
for
example,
you
will
be
most
like
coolest
person
in
your
family.
If
you
have
a
iphone,
so
you
need
to
go
to
their
brains
and
sell
them.
Then
they
have
another
approach
to
make
some
stuff,
so
education
and
tech
infrastructure.
And
what
is
my
vision
for
token
engineering
commons?
E
It
is
a
system
that
promotes
and
supports
social
and
economic
changes
and
for
me
the
most
important
example
is
from
private
goods
to
public
goods
and
from
aren't
extraction
to
rent
using
inside
the
community,
because
the
majority
of
businesses,
at
the
moment
they
just
extracting-
aren't
from
economic
processes
to
to
the
stakeholders,
and
so
they
dry
economy.
They
take
out
the
rapidity,
and
I
think
that
a
very
important
thing
is
to
keep
this
around
all
this
surplus
inside
the
community
and
to
help
them
to
grow,
grow
and
grow
the
economy.
D
Can
you
hear
me
yeah,
okay,
I
I
have
to
leave
now.
I
have
actually
scheduled
another
conversation
with
chapman.
I
think
what
what
I,
what
might
be
important
I
realize
now
is,
is
the
verbs?
What
what
is
the
t
ecoms
commons
actually
doing?
Is
it
funding?
Is
it
governing?
Is
it
aligning
incentives?
Is
it
offering
whatever,
because
I
think
that
makes
the
difference
for.
H
I
B
And
I'm
sorry,
I
also
also
will
have
to
have
to
jump
and
perhaps
last
comment
I
wasn't
on
the
first
around
and
what
I'm
finding
that
I'd
like
to
see
a
bit
more.
I'm
not
sure
if
in
this,
like
this
whole
conversation,
but
more
emphasis
on
what
might
be
the
threats
actually,
because
what
I'm
finding
that
kind
of
every
digital
infrastructure
of
this
kind
gets
co-opted
at
some
point.
H
I
A
F
F
So
I'm
sorry
I
just
yeah.
I
was
waiting
for
my
devs
to
call
me
and
they
are
calling
me
now
so
I'm
gonna
have
to
jump,
but
thanks
a
lot
for
organizing
that,
and
maybe
we
should
do
like
a
follow-up
call
on
the
distillation
process,
because
we
we
did
a
super
good
job
of
kind
of
putting
all
together.
Now
we
just
need
to
sift
through
it.
You
know.
A
Yeah
the
the
goal
is
that
we
we
will
come
out
with
once
with
the
sentence.
It's
probably
going
to
be
a
long
one
and
then
post
it
and
then
hopefully,
on
thursday.
We'll
have
another
call
where
we
oh
well,
asynchronously,
we'll
debate
it
and
then
on
thursday,
we'll
solidify
it
and
then
talk
about
mission
and
values.
A
F
E
A
Yeah,
I
I
have
to
agree
that
crypto
is
means
to
an
end.
You
know
it's
like
we
don't
talk
about
air,
we
don't
talk
about
the
airplane
when
we
say
we're
going
to
fly
to
spain.
You
know,
like
you
know
it's
just
like
the
yeah
that
that's
part
of
the
infrastructure,
but
that's
not
the
the
goal
is
to
get
to
spain.
E
E
E
Yeah
and
for
example,
when
I'm
talking
about
independence
from
states
and
corporations,
it
is
also
about
safe
infrastructure,
because
if
you
use,
for
example,
fiat
system,
you
are
tied
to
all
risk.
So
you
you
make
your
own
solution
like
fintech
solution
on
fiat
infrastructure,
but
but
you
carry
all
risks,
for
example,
that
your
bank,
a
respondent,
will
be,
will
have
more
debt
that
he
can
provide
payments,
and
you
know
so
on.
So
when
you
like
make
a
border
between
your
system
and
this
big
and
like
poisonous
system,
you
eliminate
a
lot
of
risks.
E
A
E
So
grief,
I
I
have
a
proposal.
Maybe
we
can
add
to
the
to
bring
a
safe
infrastructure.
Maybe
we
can
add
something
about.
You
know
social
changes,
because
these
systems
are
are
different
from
the
existing
ones
and
it
is
a
great
shift
in
mind
to
use
them
so
and
you
need
not
only
bring
infrastructure.
You
need
to
bring
new
mindset
to
the
people.
A
E
Yeah
yeah,
it
is
question
four
about
education,
but
about
what
is
the
vision
for
talk?
Engineering
commons?
It
is
not
only
about
infrastructure.
I
think
it
is
also
about
social
change,
so,
for
example,
blockchain.
It
is
about
tech
significantly
about
tech,
but
a
lot
of
about
new
social
changes
about
your
new
mindset
because
a
lot
of
people
they
cannot
understand
bitcoin.
Even
if
they
work
in
banks
and
like
investment
banks,
they
need
maybe
months
to
understand
why
it
is
completely
new
asset
class.
E
Would
so
the
mindset
that
is
now
in
maybe
99
percent
of
people
minds
is
that
in
every
process
there
is
a
particular
person
or
entity
that
can
answer
so
the
bank,
the
state,
the
corporation,
you
go
and
said
your
product
is
bad
for
my
money
lost
and
they
give
you
this
money
back.
You
can
go
to
the
court
and
when
we
are
talking
about
automated
token
engineering
systems,
often
you
don't
have
a
master
key
all
right.
So
it
is
a
really
centralized
system
and
to
shift
the
mind
it
is
social
change.
A
E
I
E
A
E
A
A
A
C
A
E
A
E
You
know,
I
think
I
think
that
the
the
fifth
one
is
so.
I
already
said
that
it
is
like
technical
side,
the
system
from
technical
side
and
social
economic
changes
from
the
you
know
human
side,
but
I
think
maybe
your
your
definition
can
be
more.
You
know
more,
not
so
generalized
with
some
particular
stuff,
because
mine
is
too
generalized.
I
think.
A
E
E
A
E
So
I
think
that,
for
example,
if
you
didn't
use
bitcoin-
and
you
start
use
bitcoin
in
common
life,
it
is
really
a
big
social
change.
In
your
mind,
it
is
how
I
consider
it
is
so,
for
example,
if
previously
you,
you
know,
kept
all
your
money
in
fear
and
some
you
know
stocks
I
mean
fear,
centralized,
feared
stocks,
and
now
you
keep
your
mind
in
bitcoin,
ethereum
and
maybe
a
token.
E
So
it
is
also
big
social
change
and,
for
example,
if
you
worked
in
you
know
just
private
business
and
get
your
salary
or
now
you're,
working
in
like
cooperative
and
you're
how
it
will
be
sorry.
So
for
me,
the
you
know,
economic
change
is
when
you're
transiting
from
private
owned
firm
to
cooperative,
where
all
are
equal,
where
all
can
get
a
share
of
share
of
value
that
is
produced
by
this
cooperative,
where
we
don't
have
entity
that
extracts
rent
so
trouble,
we
make
a
lot
of
stuff,
we
sold
it.
E
We
have
a
lot
of
money,
but
nobody
will
take
it
out
and
we
will
be
poor
next
day.
So
we
will
like
allocate
this
money
to
new
production.
Part
of
mind,
if
we
will
allocate
to
the
people,
so
it
is
like
a
dao
right
so
as
for
me,
the
dao,
it
is
like
a
cooperative
model
and
private
owned
firm,
which
is
not
a
doubt
at
all.
So.
A
E
E
E
Yeah,
yes,
so
the
reason
why
I
why
I
wrote
independent
from
the
state
and
from
corporations
and
tied
to
real
values,
because
when
you
are
tied
to
you
know
traditional
financial
system,
you
are
tied
to
some
derivatives
to
some.
You
know:
you're
not
tied
to
real
value,
so
even
the
money
on
your
bank
card.
It
is
not
a
minus
a
debt.
I
think
you
know
you
understand
things
so.
E
And
when
you
have
tokens,
it
is
absolute
value.
So,
like
a
coin
of
gold
and
the
token
it
is
like
a
physical
value
but
an
electronic
in
digital
representation.
So-
and
I
think
it
is
like
one
of
best
value
proposition
of
crypto
that
you
are
working
not
with
some
derivatives,
not
with
some
air.
You
work
every
minute.
You
work
with
physical,
but
digital
good,
yeah,.
C
E
A
E
G
E
A
E
Yes,
so
I'm
asking
this
because
a
year
ago,
when
panvala
was
introduced
so
a
year
ago
I
was
I
had,
I
had
a
free
time
to
make
some
reviews.
So
I
made
a
review
of
physics
protocol
and
find
economic
vulnerability
and
also
I
made
a
review
of
panwalla
and
I
highly
criticized
them
because
there
was
no
liquidity
and
there
were
risks
that
you
will
get,
for
example,
one
thousand
dollars
and
take
out
five
hundred
dollars,
because
you
know
the
price
slippage
so,
but
it
really
works.
E
A
Mean
you
I
we
we
received.
I
think
it
was
like
five
somewhat
very
close
common
stack
received
five
thousand
dollars
from
pinball
about,
and
I
think
we
turned
it
into
four
thousand
die
so
definitely
major
slippage.
We
were
the
big
we
were
the
biggest
group
funded
though
as
well,
and
then
we
cashed
out-
and
what
I
should
have
done.
Honestly,
though,
is
done
an
otc
trade
to
myself
and
just
bought
the
bought
the
tokens
from
myself
instead
of
destroying
the
market.
E
I
regret
doing
that
honestly
yeah,
so
because
you
know
I'm
really
don't
like
value
transfer
tokens
at
all,
because
I
think
why
you
use
parabola
tokens
when
you
can
use
die
and
directly
fine,
so
the
funding
distribution
mechanism.
I
think
it
is
great,
but
you
know
like
selection
of
a
token,
with
no
real
value
and
value.
Only
from
demand
of
supporters
is
not
good.
E
A
It's
a
that's
the
that's
the
I.
I
think
that
there's
like,
I
think
it's
like
that's
the
most
critical
piece
is
that
you
have
supporters
that
have
value,
but
it
doesn't
have
to
be
the
only
piece
there
can
be
other
other
incentives
for
for
using
the
system
right.
There
can
be
other
demand,
use
cases
for
the
token,
and
so
what
pembala
did
to
generate
this
demand
use
case
was
they
said:
hey
if
you
donate
in
pan,
then
you
get,
then
the
people
receiving
the
donation
get
extra
pan.
A
E
A
E
A
Yeah,
well,
isn't
it
so
so
like?
What
I
would
say
is
that
the
pyramid
mechanic
is
present
for
every
financialized
like
if,
whether
it's
onions
or
pen
vola
tokens,
like
the
people
who
generate
the
who
farm
the
onions,
are
selling
it
to
the
next
sucker
who's,
the
distributor
that
then
sells
it
to
the
next
doctor,
who's
the
grocery
store.
Who
then
sells
it
to
the
next
sucker?
Who
is
the
the
person
who
eats
the
onion
right?
Like
yes,.
E
Constantly
but
but
but
from
the
current
point
of
view,
we
have
a
significant
difference
between
onions
and
pan
volatiles,
because
first
of
all,
onions
are
snack.
Thai
is
good,
so
it
is
like
you
know,
like
a
crude
oil,
so
it
is
a
good
with
real
value
with
already
established
market
and
the
market
is
really
huge,
but
so
I
think
well.
E
Coming
to
assets,
you
know
that
onions.
It
is
like
a
stable
corn
that
provide
you,
onions,
so
yeah,
but
you
guarantee
that
you
will
have
an
onion,
that's
true,
because
you
can
turn
it
onion
to
another
yeah
and
and
pan
tokens
you
don't
have
anything
behind
it.
So
so
onion
is
tied
to
real
good
at
real
value
and
fun.
Doesn't
it,
and
also
but
bitcoin,
has
a
big
big
market
with
a
lot
of
buyers,
with
a
lot
of
use
cases
and
with
real
economic
activity
and
funnel
and
not.