►
From YouTube: W59 Softgov WG: Closing proposal vote!!
Description
TheSoftgov Working Group researches and applies best practices for governance, social collaboration and contribution rewards while implementing Ostrom’s 8 principles for governing the commons in its foundation.
We gather every Tuesday at 7pm CET.
Steward: Liviade
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
So
we
are
just
wrapping
up
this
vote
and
we'll
follow
on
understanding
what
is
the
best
setup,
so
I'm
gonna
go
ahead
and
lock
this
vote.
A
So
first
maybe
let's
go
around
and
decide
how
many
proposals
do
we
think
it's
a
good
number
to
follow
up
with,
so
we
have
five
proposals
that
are
somehow
very
close
to
each
other
and
I
think
from
this
ones,
as
you
were
mentioning
griff
just.
A
I
think
they
have
a
good
diversity
between
them,
so
I
don't
know
if,
if
we
pick
the
the
top
three
ones,
are
we
leaving
any
anything
that
it's
super
unrepresented.
B
C
D
B
C
B
C
B
A
No,
the
mathematics,
forks
are
all
like
very
down
low.
A
But
to
be
fair,
mathematics
wasn't
there.
Until
today
it
was
a
recent
proposal.
B
B
A
A
E
Yeah,
I
agree
with
five.
I
think
just
the
numbers
make
sense.
It's
sort
of
the
cutoff
point
from
a
real
jump
between
a
proposal
and
another
I'll
pass
to
wonka.
F
Yeah,
I
think
five
is
is
good
too,
and
I
think
that
these
top
five
proposals
represent
the
variety
and
and
the
signaling
of
the
community
and
I'll
pass.
The
grief.
B
G
All
right,
cool
yeah.
I
agree
that
seems
like
the
natural
breaking
point
and
thanks
for
letting
me
provide
it,
but.
H
Sounds
good
to
me
and
we're
going
to
be
using
rank
choice,
voting
on
this
okay.
I
All
of
you,
I
think
it
makes
sense
to
have
the
five
of
them
if
they
don't,
if
they
are
not
similar
to
each
other.
E
I
don't
know
if
this
is
the
right
place
to
do
it,
but
maybe
the
next
actions
that
we'll
take
around
the
creation
and
such.
A
Yeah,
so
I
think
it's
good
that
we
have
already
this
sheet
that
nate
made
and
I
think
you
were
using
a
different
one
right
griff
or
was
it
just
the
same
one
with
a
different
view.
A
I
can
go
ahead
and
post
the
vote
right
now
on
snapchat
for
for
the
runoff
and
then
and
then
people
can
start
voting.
Do
you?
Okay?
This
is
a
question.
Do
you
think
we
should
open
for
people
to
vote
already,
or
we
should
wait
for
the
pamphlets
to
have
a
more
structured
voting
session.
B
A
E
I
think
the
date
that
we
commute
communicated
is
the
7th
of
january,
the
7th
to
13th
and
yeah.
It's,
I
think,
the
more
I
think
about
it.
The
more
it
makes
sense
to
do
that
like
just
to
get
people
to
vote
to
do
it
for
the
next
three
weeks
would
be
exhausting
for
people
and
they'd,
get
tired
of
hearing
us
say
vote,
but
if
we
just
have
it
for
those
few
days,
I
feel
like
we
can
make
a
concentrated.
H
So
there's
one
thing
that
I'd
like
to
like
maybe
talk
about
or
just
point
our
attention
to,
is
that
the
unique
voters
for
this
of
this
award,
like
it's
29
and
what,
if
like
in
future,
we
want
to
aim
for
more
turnout
like
because
I
think,
there's
a
lot
of
more
a
lot
more
people
involved
in
our
community.
H
I
don't
know
as
a
long-term
goal.
Maybe
more
people
should
be
involved.
This
is
my
personal
opinion.
A
H
Cool
yeah
that
sounds
all
right,
but
yeah,
maybe
I'll
just
grab
this
data
and
try
to
just
maybe
analyze
the
data
a
little
bit
and
see
you
know
just
check
some
things
just
to
be
safe
and
yeah.
This
was
hard
people's
store.
A
A
Do
you
have
nice,
do
you
have
it
sounds
like
you
have
a
vision
for
it
already
tim?
Do
you
want
to
share
a
little
bit
of
what
you're
thinking
a
vision
for
the
pamphlets.
E
I
don't
have
so
much
a
vision
in
my
mind.
Actually
I
don't
know
why
it
sounds
like
I
have
a
vision.
I
mean,
I
guess
the
the
important
point
is
to
it's
exactly
what
nate
already
did.
E
Actually
it's
to
you
know
each
by
each
compare
and
contrast
the
the
selections
of
the
parameters
and
then,
in
the
words
you
know
not
necessarily
need
to
be
the
like
the
person
who
wrote
the
proposal
to
to
summarize
the
rationale
for
those
decisions,
so
it
sort
of
be
like
I
mean
I
could
imagine
it's
the
you
know
the
parameters
and
then
why?
What's
why?
Why
were
those
chosen?
Why
is
it
important
and
then
compared
to
each
of
the
other
ones,
really
very
similar
to
what
nate
did
in
the
article.
D
Yeah-
and
so
I
I
talked
with
ben's
already
about
this-
and
he
was
wanting
to
help
with
the
pamphlets
and
and
help
to
rise
and
like
my
vision,
for
this
would
be
to
actually
solicit
kind
of
the
pros
and
cons
from
different
people
on
the
proposals
to
have
like
this
kind
of
list
of
like
why
people
like
certain
proposals
and
why
people
don't
like
certain
proposals
that
that
are
in
the
runoff
and
have
those
kind
of
like
a
kind
of
this,
like
quote
version
of
the
pamphlet
and
then
like
kind
of
a
breakdown
of
of
each
of
the
modules,
but
just
to
kind
of
give
this
kind
of
insight
from
different
people
within
the
community.
D
Just
having
the
proposals
themselves
all
listed
out
and
then
having
like
the
pros
and
cons
based
from
the
community
perspective
like
like
from
community
members
like,
I
don't
like
you,
know,
the
reserve
ratio,
because,
because
it
has
such
a
high
reserve
ratio
or
the
excamp,
it
has
too
short
of
a
token
freeze,
different
different
perspectives,
like
that,
just
simple
statements,
simple
quotes
that
can
be
used
to
give
an
overall
vibe
about
each
one
so
like
having
five
pro
statements
and
five
con
statements
for
each
proposal
and
then
setting
out
the
actual
titan
cool
stuff.
D
I
mean
we
can
have
an
objective
analysis
along
with
that.
I
think
I
just
think
it's
really
important
to
get
the
concerns
of
community
members
about
certain
proposals
exposed
that
would
normally
be
illustrated
within
like
an
objective
analysis
and
like
I
think
I
think
I
can
do
what
I've
done
with
the
the
actual
proposals
before
but
then
having
just
the
inside.
I
just
like
having
the
the
the
words
of
community
members.
D
I
think
it
does
it's
kind
of
similar
to
how,
like
the
state
of
california,
does
theirs
like
we
get
a
voting
pamphlet
and
we
get
the
the
amendment
or
the
proposal,
and
we
get
all
these
different
opinion
pieces,
but
they
they
kind
of
capture
the
the
extreme
versions
of
like
why
they
don't
like
it
or
why
they
do
like
it,
and
I
think
it's
very
informative,
but
I'm
open
to
anything
that
those
are
just
my
initial
thoughts.
J
To
keep
it
as
objective
as
possible,
instead
of
like
pros
and
cons
that
are
more
like
this,
is
you
know,
along
those
lines
more
like
balancing
those
trade-offs,
because
if
you
kind
of
frame
it
in
the
trade-offs,
it
is
a
little
bit
more
objective
and
it's
kind
of
clear,
like
you
know
this
one
would
be
more
volatile
under
these
circumstances.
J
Things
like
that
so
summarizing
the
parameters
and
a
little
bit
more
of
that,
like
narrative
form
to
kind
of
translate
it
and
that's
kind
of
and
like
relative
to
other
ones
as
well.
I
think
kind
of
the
format
that
was
used
in
the
debate
today
was
actually
really
good.
So.
A
So
you're
saying
that
it
shouldn't
be
a
opinionative
points
that
should
be
more
specific
points.
J
I
think
kind
of
what
nate's
saying
like
getting
feedback
from
the
community
helps
form
and
kind
of
like
draw
attention
to
what
some
of
those
trade-offs
might
be.
But
if
you
know
instead
of
scrambling
it.
J
A
E
E
But
I
think
I
would
stop
short
of
having
you
know,
soliciting
positive
and
negative
for
each
proposal
and
then
somebody
deciding
which
ones
to
put
in
for
which
to
associate
with
which
proposal.
I
think
that
we
should
have
forms
for
discussions
so
that
the
community
can
share
that
for
sure,
even
in
the
in
the
forum
where
it's
visible
to
everyone
not
just
live
on
a
call.
D
So
so
my
my
next
question
for,
for
the
pamphlet,
is
actually
centered
around
what
what
kind
of
vehicle
are
we
talking
about
like
when
I
think
of
pamphlet,
I'm
thinking
like
opening
up
and
reading
something,
but
when
we're
talking
about
digital
pamphlets
like
are
we
talking
about
a
single
sheet,
a
blog
post,
like
what
form
is
it
gonna?
Take.
A
I
think
if
we
could
coordinate
with
comms
to
have
some
type
of
design
for
it
like
something
that
actually
looks
like
a
pamphlet,
maybe
having
like
things
that
people
could
compare,
you
know
put
side
by
side
or
look
at
it
individually.
I
think
that
would
be
ideal.
F
And
are
we
going
to
continue
having
debates
for
this
runoff
or
not.
A
A
H
All
right
what
we
would
have
in
the
pamphlets
right,
so
I
think
it
would
make
sense
to
like,
since
objectivity
was
discussed,
mechanic
list
out
what
the
main
like
effects
of
having
that
proposal
would
be
like,
instead
of
just
what
the
what
the
choice
is
made
by
the
proposal,
we'd
specify
what
the
intention
was
and
what
can
be
the
effect
and-
and
I
think
we
might
have
to
do
some
sense,
making
one.
What
would
be
the
effect
of
doing
it
and
you
know
future
alternatives.
H
And
then
we
need
down
the
problems
with
this
proposal
and
yeah.
That's
what
we
have
in
the
pamphlets
and
I
think
we
could
maybe
have
some
secondary
form
of
information
where
we
have
like
a
comparison
of
one
proposal
against
the
other.
H
D
Yeah,
so
I'm
still
on
the
fence
about
it.
I
I
personally
like
the
subjectivity
of
it.
I
think
it's
very
important.
I
think
it's
good
to
have
opinions.
We
have
a
ton
of
informational
resources
about
the
technical
trade-offs
and
different
documents
and
different
places
everywhere.
I
feel
like
if
you
want
a
concise
pamphlet,
that
you
know
is
objective
about
all
the
trade-offs
and
goes
through
kind
of
a
deep
dive
into
each
of
the
modules
like
that.
It's
gonna
take
a
lot
more
space
than
what
a
pamphlet
would
deserve.
D
I
think
that
it's
just
a
lot
of
information
and
I
think
it's
we.
We
have
it
in
a
bunch
of
different
places
between
the
blogs
and
the
forum.
I
think
it's
really
hard
to
get
a
concise
document
that
kind
of
engages
with
our
voters
on
on
different
different
aspects
of
the
proposals,
without
drowning
them
in
words.
D
So
when
we
talk
about
a
pamphlet,
I
just
I'm
thinking
of
like
a
concise
one-pager
for
each
proposal.
You
know,
but
I
I
think
it's
it's
kind
of
difficult
when
we
have
to
go
into
depth
about
the
different
trade-offs
and
what
it
means
and
certain
implications
for
it.
So
those
are
my
only
thoughts
about
it,
but
I'm
willing
to
go
in
any
direction.
E
I'm
going
to
say
I
just
really
trust
nate's
opinion,
but
I
want
to
maybe
we
could
find
a
compromise.
Maybe
we
have
a
pamphlet,
that's
like
objective
and
then
we
could
have
like
related
materials
which
is
like
this.
Not
you
know
like
then
have
in
some
other
way
gather
the
community's
feedback
and
perspective
about
the
different
proposals,
but
have
it
be
separate
than
that
core
pamphlet.
E
That's
maybe
my
my
my
trying
to
make
these
things
match
trying
to
make
all
of
them
work.
I
don't
think
it's
a
bad
idea
to
have
a
subjectivity.
E
I
just
feel
like
its
place,
isn't
necessarily
in
that
core
pamphlet,
where
maybe
people
want
to
make
their
own
opinion
and
not
be
influenced
by
different
opinions
from
the
community,
and
maybe
people
want
to
hear
what
other
people
said
and
then
they
have
that
resource
to
go
to
too.
E
L
Think
the
first
I
think
the
first
module
is,
is
the
easiest
to
get
and
and
regarding,
like
vesting
periods.
I
I
think
I
think
that
is
something
that
is
that
it
won't
need.
Like
a
lot
of
explanation,
and
I
like
what
was
presented
today,
like
a
comparison
between
reserve
ratios
and
and
and
yeah,
I
I
feel
that
there
should
be
like
a
selection
of
maybe
like
six
to
ten
parameters
that
could
be
part
of
like
a
comparison.
D
L
Yeah
that
those
are
some
like
ideas,
on
top
of
my
mind
and
I'll
pass
it
back
to
libby.
I
don't
know
who
has
gone.
A
Thank
you
I'll
pass
to
sdgs.
K
K
K
So
I
was
thinking
you
know
and
to
keep
it
simple,
maybe
just
broken
up
into
the
different
categories,
because
there's
so
many
sub
components
to
the
total
package,
so
it's
nice
to
break
it
down
into
sort
of
the
way
the
pages
are
structured
in
the
params
configuration
and
then
maybe
just
pros
cons,
policy,
trade-offs
and
some
page
limit
to
keep
it
punchy
and
so
that
people
really
have
to
be
concise.
Those
are
my
points.
I
will
turn
it
over
to
zeppy,
who
I'm
not
sure
yet
yeah.
C
I
was
thinking
one
idea
and
I
could
support
like
the
design
team
or
whatever
and
imagine
like
having
all
this
a
graph
where
okay
we're
talking
about
opening
price
and
research
ratio,
and
then
we
say
what's
good
in
one
in
one
extreme,
what's
good
in
other
stream
and
and
then
we
run
like,
for
example,
like
one
half
one
between
one
and
ten
one
have
five,
then
it's
in
the
middle
and
then
the
other
proposal
is
three
like
and
you
place
all
the
proposals,
and
you
do
that
for
like
the
four
models
yeah.
C
C
Like
imagine
like
we're
talking
about,
I
don't
know
the
best
thing,
which
is
one
of
the
easiest
one.
Then
you
put
in
novesting
on
top
and
say:
okay,
this
allows
people
to
be
free
and
interact,
and
you
know
we
trust
the
hatchers
blah
blah
and
then
in
the
bottom,
one
when
a
longer
vesting.
You
say
this,
I
put
a
price
floor.
This
allows
people
to
try
like
to
join
the
community.
F
I
would
also
say
that
it
would
be
interesting
to
like
have
some
like
test
buys
and
test
cells
that
we
can
apply
to
to
all
the
the
proposals
to
see
what
would
be
the
the
behavior
of
the
bonding
curve.
Like
yeah.
Like
an
example
like
10
10
million
dollars
enter
into
the
bonding
curve.
How
many
tokens
would
be
minted?
F
G
Thanks,
it
seems
to
me
that
the
purpose
of
the
pamphlets,
the
target
audience,
is
the
people
outside
of
the
30
to
50
that
voted
in
this
round
and,
given
that
it
seems
like
it
should
be
simplified,
even
a
layer
further,
maybe
combining
concepts
that
vi
and
nate
spoke
about,
which
is
some
plain
language
statements
and
more
focus
on
the
outcome
of
a
set
of
parameters,
as
opposed
to
you
know,
contrasting
specifics,
and
in
that
one
page
blast,
you
know
it's
full
of
links
that
nate
already
mentioned,
where
the
technical
sort
of
details
are
spelled
out
more,
but
I
just
it
seems
like
the
30
people
that
voted,
don't
really
need
a
pamphlet,
and
so
what
do
the
people
that
did
not
vote
actually.
A
D
I'm
down
to
the
if
necessary,
I
know
bins
was
interested
as
well.
I'm
not
sure
if
that's
still
the
case
but
but
yeah,
I'm
definitely.
J
Down
yeah,
I'm
still
interested.
I
think
this
is
really
interesting
and
I
think
it's
a
good
way
to
learn
about
it
too,
hands-on.
So
yeah.
F
I
don't
know
if
maybe
it's
a
conflict
of
interest,
because
I
I
am
standing
for
one
of
the
proposals
but
yeah.
I
I
want
to
hear
an
advice
on
on
this,
we'll
make
sure
to
keep
you
in
check
one.
Okay,
that's
great.
E
I
think
that's
a
great
point
and
juan
carlos.
I
think
you
can
be
very
objective
for
this.
I'd
also
like
to
be
involved-
and
I
think
nate
you'd
be
a
great
person
to
drive
this
forward
and
bends
and
hold
us
together.
D
A
It's
tricky
because
of
the
holidays
now,
but
if
we
could
have
them
for
the
first
week
of
january,
where
that's
gonna
be
so
if
the
votes
start
on
the
seventh
and
the
first
monday
of
the
year
is
the
third,
we
would
have
solid
five
days
to
to
use
the
pamphlets
and
yeah
just
promote
it
and
have
the
baits.
A
D
Okay,
and
so
what
I'll
do
is
try
to
set
up
a
meeting
at
ben
septie,
tam
and
wonka
if
we
can
set
up
a
meeting
sometime
this
week
or
next
week
to
get
the
ball
rolling,
preferably
this
week.
If
we
can,
that
would
be
really
nice.
E
A
L
Yes,
of
course,
I
I
tried
to
speak
a
little
while
ago,
but
I
was
having
some
connection
issues.
I
would
also
like
to
support
this,
and
I
can
I
can
coordinate
with
acid
laser
to
whatever
information
we
put
together,
make
a
nice
visual
for
it
that
we
can
distribute,
and
I
feel
that
we
can
even
make
it
like
before
the
the
holidays,
so
so
yeah
as
soon
as
as
we
put
it
together,
we
can
jump
on
that
and
I'll
I'll.
A
D
And
I
will
say
that
I
think
that
we
should
definitely
have
different
different
approaches
towards
it,
like.
I
think
that
we
should
definitely
use
this
time
to
actually
use
our
newsletter
through
hubspot
and
as
well
as
have
like
a
twitter
campaign
built
around
it.
So
I
don't
know
if
that's
something
that
chewy
you
could
help
coordinate
on
your
end,.
L
Yes,
yes,
if,
if
this
is
something
that
we
can
do
like,
even
even
though
we
have
like
some
some
of
the
limitations
like
by
cup
spot,
we
can.
We
can
help
spread
this.
This
design
with
the
current
mailing
list.
A
D
J
J
D
Yeah
we
can
would
the
12
p.m
after
the
main
party,
where.
C
We
do
it
earlier,
like
it's
christmas,
what
about
like
before,
or
even
when
legal
or
before.
D
It's
before
legal
is
6
a.m.
For
me,.