►
From YouTube: W24 Softgov WG: Mission, Vision and Values
Description
Timecodes:
00:00 - MVV model thoughts
22:20 - MVV Breakdown
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
Yeah
so
anyway.
Well,
I
think
we
can
even
just
get
started
with
the
with
the
intro
question,
because
I
been
having
a
little,
not,
I
wouldn't
say
a
twitter
war,
but
you
know
something
I
I
made
this
tweet
to
see
if
there
was
some
other
group
that
has
ever
voted
on
mission,
vision,
values-
and
I
got
an
interesting
answer
from
pat
who
basically
said
you
know,
does:
does
it
really
matter?
A
A
Is
it
really
necessary
if
everyone
else
agrees
that
these
people
should
be
deciding
the
mission,
vision,
values
and,
and
then
he
challenged
us
with
well,
did
anyone
else
even
propose?
Did
anyone
outside
the
core
contributors
vote
were
values
adjusted
in
any
meaningful
way
to
accommodate
the
census?
This?
This
is
what
we'll
explain
if
it's
theater,
so
that's
my
question
to
you
guys
is:
are
we
performing
governance
theater
with
the
mission
vision,
values
or
are
we
actually
making
better
mission
vision,
and
obviously
I
have
my
own
opinion
that
it's
obvious.
B
Yeah
I
mean
I,
I
think
it's
amazing-
that
people
even
consider
that
that
that
that
we
are
doing
theater
and
it's
like.
B
I
I
I
would
say
it's
absurd,
but
it's
like
a
real,
a
real
concern
that
people
outside
from
the
community
can
have,
and
I
would
say
like.
I
think
this
is
super
important,
but
I
think
we
we
we
haven't
had
like
a
session
to
properly
discuss
like
our
own
point
of
views.
B
A
Durgadas
you're
still
needed.
If
you're
trying
to
talk
there,
we
go.
D
C
The
governance
theater
would
be
a
concern.
I
actually
think
that
everybody
here
is
really
invested
and,
frankly,
a
lot
of
that
investment
is
invisible
to
me
just
because
I'm
in
and
out
so
much
so
it's
difficult
for
me
to
make
that
kind
of
determination.
C
I
trust
all
the
people
who
are
a
lot
more
involved
in
this
and
than
I
am.
E
E
F
No,
I
don't
think
we
are,
and
I
think
I
think
it's
actually
like
would
you
say
like
with
the
with
all
the
suggestions
on
the
mission,
vision
and
values
like
everybody
has
its
own
voice
and
I
think
it's
actually
a
great
opportunity
for
everyone
to
rethink.
You
know
what
the
vision
and
what
the
mission
is
and
what
our
values
is
are,
and
you
know,
give
their
own
kind
of
add
their
own
flavor
at
their
own
thinking.
F
But
you
know
we
did
a
lot
of
brainstorming
earlier
and
you
know
everybody's
had
their
own
voice
and
eventually
we
came
to
conclusion,
but
I
thought
I
don't
think
it's
a
theater
at
all.
I
think
it's
actually
great
for
me.
For
me
it
was
a
good
experience,
so
so
I'd
say
I'd
say
it's
good.
F
On
so
yeah,
that's
the
only
question
but
but
yeah.
I
think
it's
good
and
I
pass
it
on
to
jake.
G
Dude
I
love
these
tweets
because
this
is
fantastic.
I
I
love
this.
I
almost
wanted
to
jump
in,
but
I
think
it's
great
that
this
happened
because
dallas
have
sucked
and
there's
been
a
lot
of
theater
and
there's
a
lot
of
good
reason
for
people
to
be
like
very
skeptical,
and
you
know
I
mean
it's
it's.
I
really
appreciate
this
because
it
gives
us
a
great
opportunity
to
not
do
that
and
actually
do
this
right.
G
That's
what
this
really
is.
We
literally
are
given
a
springboard
by.
I
don't
know
if
he's
truly
being
antagonistic,
because
I
don't
know
the
guy,
but
it
really.
It
really
is
like
awesome
that
this
happened,
because
it's
it's
a
perfect
constructive
criticism
for
us
to
actually
do
something.
Well,
because
gals
have
honestly
sucked-
and
you
could
say
a
lot
of
theater
has
gone
on
for
all
kinds
of
different
aspects
and
that's
why
it's
only
been
a
handful
of
people
making
all
the
decisions.
A
H
I
don't
think
so
I
mean
it's,
it's
not
a
if
it
were
a
matter
of
like
answering
like
yes
or
no
like
these
are
the
ideas.
What
do
you
think,
but
pretty
much
everyone
is
able
to
like
speak
their
minds
about
it.
So
I
I
think
it's
I
mean
from
the
moment
like
someone
say
something
and
it
like.
H
If
it
has
to
be
discussed,
I
think
it's
yeah,
it's
I
I
I
wouldn't
relate
it
to
theater
at
all,
like
if
you
have
like
a
minimum
idea
of
what
goes
on
and
how
we
discuss
ideas
and
bounce
them
around.
It's
yeah,
I
just
yeah.
I
don't.
I
don't
share
his
opinion.
F
Yeah,
I
just
I
just
wanted
to
add
like
it's
like
you
know,
normally
like
the
mission
and
the
and
the
vision
and
the
values
like
come
from,
one
person
who's
the
leader
and
like
who's,
the
I
don't
know
a
founder
of
something,
and
you
know
everybody
is
like
agrees
to
accept
that
mission
and
vision
and
so
on
and
so
forth,
but
like
in
our
case,
it's
like
you
know
it's
it's
a
group
of
people
right
who
creates
this
so
we're
all
in
this
together.
F
It's
not
like
it's
like
for
the
first
time,
actually
that
that
that
this
is
created
this
way
right,
it's
not
coming
from
one
person.
Of
course
we
got
you
know.
Maybe
you
know
a
few
people
who
you
know
took
the
lead.
You
know
and
said:
okay,
we're
gonna,
do
this
and
everybody
jumped
on
the
wagon
and
like
yeah,
I
would
agree,
but
now
we
can
build
it
together.
So
I
just
like
wanna.
I
just
wanted
to
point
it
out
like
that.
F
It's
that
we
can
consider
all
ourselves
within
this
group
to
be
that
one
person
who
creates
that
mission.
F
H
I
Hey
yeah
yeah,
I
don't
know
I
this
concept
of
like
governance
theater.
I
don't
even
know
like
what
this.
What
is
what
is
being
implied
necessarily
there,
but
I
think,
like
everybody
working
on
and
like
voting
on
the
mission,
vision
of
values
and
everyone
being
able
to
have
a
say
like
creates
a
sense
of
ownership
of
like
oh,
we
created
this
and
then
we
all
become
aligned
in
what
we're
creating,
and
I
think
it's
like
it's
like
an
iterative
process.
I
J
Hey
so
I'm
coming
with
a
little
bit
of
context,
I
I'm
not
sure
if
I
have
a
lot
to
say
regarding
that,
but
in
my
opinion,
if
you
are,
if
he's
comparing
it
or
if
we're
going
to
compare
it
with
the
theater,
everybody
is
having
their
play.
We
are
having
a
story
to
follow,
but
that's
not
quite
it
really,
because
everybody
is
here
for
a
reason,
so
nobody's
being
paid
to
play
around
and
being
an
actor,
because
an
actor
is
a
faker
and
we
are
not
taking
it.
J
So
I
think
that's
the
main
thing
that
we
should
avoid
yeah.
Somebody
else
is
seeing
it
as
a
theater
because
yeah,
I
think
we
are
playing
by
our
rules,
because
we
are
playing
the
game
that
we
want
to
play.
But
eventually,
if
anybody
in
the
outside
wants
to
play
around
with
those
same
game
rules,
they
are
free
to
join
us.
So
that's
not
like
yeah.
We
don't
have
rules,
we
don't
have
a
closure
in
that
aspect.
J
So
if
it's
going
to
be
a
theater,
it's
going
to
be
a
a
really
nice
play
that
everybody
is
able
to
join
and
act
if
they
want.
But
it's
not
it's
not
like
it's.
It's
very
missionless,
so
everybody's
free
to
come
and
I
can
play
the
the
play
they
want
to
do
so
yeah.
I
I
I
say
that
with
a
little
context,
but
I'll
pass
it
to
panka.
I
don't.
K
I
can
go
yeah,
okay,
so
I
do
not
think
this
is
governance.
Theater.
K
However,
I'd
say
that
the
the
most
I
don't
I
don't
know
if
theatrical
is
the
word,
but
the
thing
I'd
be
the
most
concerned
about
is:
how
are
the
legacy
institutions
going
to
react
to
us
changing
the
way
the
game
is
played
right?
So
how
are
we?
K
How
are
we
gonna
deal
with
the
innovators
dilemma,
right,
we're
innovating
and
the
people
that
we're
producing
software
and
and
product
solutions
infrastructure
for
it's
gonna
take
a
while
for
them
to
to
realize
the
benefit,
whereas
the
people
who
who
were
taking
the
whole
pie
from
or
or
a
slice
are
going
to
be
instantly
affected.
K
So
I
mean
we
already
have
the
the
the
swedish
association
to
protect
yourself
legally,
but
the
only
thing
that
I'd
say
is
no
we're
not
doing
governance
theater,
but
we
need
to
be
more
weary
of
of
legislation
that
could
sabotage
or
try
to
impede
our
progress
moving
forward.
Perhaps
this
is
not
something.
Do
we
think
about
right
now?
I
believe
it
is-
and
I
say
this
because
I
I
was-
I
was
working
at
a
crypto
startup.
K
I
was
raided
by
the
sec
and
the
fbi,
so
I
like
these
are
the
things
that
that
you
know
you
kind
of
have
to
think
about
moving
forward
after
that
that
experience,
so
I
mean
if,
if
this
experience
my
experience
can
serve,
everyone
would
be.
How
are
we
gonna
react
to
you
know,
institute
the
legacy
institutions
reacting
to
us.
You
know,
that's
those
are
my
five
cents.
G
Dude
you're,
brilliant.
I
love
you
jake
did
you
go
already
yeah?
I
did
I
mean
I
can
chime
in
a
quick
few
things
too,
but
other
people
haven't
okay.
L
Thank
you
jay.
I
just
think
that
the
whole
process
proves
that
this
is
not
theater.
If
it
was
theater,
we
just
type
something
there
mission
begin
values,
that's
it
everyone
would
take
it.
No
one
would
discuss
it
and
it's
gone
we're
just
going
through
the
process
of
inviting
everyone
to
post
their
mission,
vision,
values
and
then
select
together
as
a
group
which
is
the
one
or
which
are
the
ones
that
we're
going
to
take
as
the
final
ones.
L
So
just
just
this
whole
process
proof
that
that
we
are
doing
this
as
a
group
and
and
it's
real
it's
not
it's,
not
theater.
So
that's
my
take
I'll
pass
it
to
suga.
E
Yes,
hi,
I
missed
a
whole
bunch
because
for
some
reason
I
did
I
didn't
hear
anything
but
I'll
just
ditto.
What
folks
are
saying
it's
it's
the
real
deal.
It
is
the
real
deal.
This
is
not
theater.
I
don't
know
where
I
didn't
hear
the
part
of
the
origin
of
the
comment
of
the
governance
theater.
But
but
I
mean
it's,
it
doesn't
feel
it.
It
has
no
significance
here.
I
I'm,
as
you
know,
I'm
I
knew
and
what
I've
seen
has
already
it's.
Just
it's
substantial.
It's
substantiated,
it's
substantial
and
it's
it's
not
theater.
E
C
I'm
sorry,
I
do
think
part
of
governance
is
theater,
it's
just
true,
and
so
we
have
to
recognize
that
that's
true,
and
that
may
be
a
shadow
thing
or
something,
but
that's
the
reason
why
we
have
people
like
griff
and
jessica
and
other
people
is
because
they're
they're
over
there
actually
doing
the
doing
the
thing
not
only
for
us,
but
also
for
for
people
on
our
behalf,
so
in
some
way,
I'd
like
to
just
appreciate
the
weight
that
they
carry
with
respect
to
dealing
with
that
that
theater
and
and
and
helping
us
in
that
sense.
C
At
the
same
time,
I
think
it's
important
to
recognize
what
they're
actually
doing
with
power
right.
So
if
you
have
some
kind
of
power,
you
know
the
truest
the
truest
determinator
of
your
character
as
a
person
is
to
give
you
some
power
and
see
what
you
do
with
it,
and
it
seems
to
me
that
the
people
who
are
in
our
in
our
governance
and
who
are
in
some
ways
performing
theater
on
our
behalf,
are
doing
it
with.
With
this
in
mind,.
D
M
Haters
gonna
hate.
No,
you
know
I
agree
with
jake
that
there's
a
lot
been
a
lot
of
governance
theater
within
the
dow
space
in
general,
and
it's
kind
of
hard
to
not
be
perceived
as
having
it.
Just
because
there's
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
crap
there
in.
D
M
Of
governance,
where
they
give
you
this
illusion
and
it
is
governance
theater,
but
I
do
appreciate
our
process.
I
think
it's
one
of
the
first
things
I've
seen
as
far
as
like
having
community
input
about
basically
a
mission
statement.
I
think
it's
incredibly
important
and
my
only
critique
of
this
process
is
actually
the
funny
thing
is.
M
I
had
the
same
critique
of
pat
when
he
was
at
dalstack
was
that
you
know
you
lack
anonymity
during
the
mv
mvv
process,
and
you
know
you
know
grif
you,
you
hold
charismatic
authority
like
you,
you
do
have
that
power,
and
so,
when
I
read
yours,
I'm
like
oh,
should
I
even
bother
competing
with
that.
You
know
like
it's
kind
of
a
hesitation
aspect
to
it,
and
so
I
think,
having
that
anonymity
only
strengthens
it,
but
there's
this
is
so
far
away
from
you
know:
governance
theater!
A
N
Yeah,
I
have
a
lot
of
things.
First
yeah.
I
really
agree
with
what
lauren
and
marco
say
about
like
it
give
something
like
ownership,
and
it
makes
you
more
connected
with
the
mission
mission
values.
But
my
concern
is
what
happens
about
the
new
members
who
come
after,
like
we
decided
yeah,
I
don't
know
they
have
this
feeling
we
have
like
the
people
who
build
it
hard
and
yeah.
My
other
concern
is
like
yeah.
N
The
community
is
pretty
huge
and
not
everyone
is
talking
engineers
so
like
who
we
align
that
the
mission
vision
values
are
going
through
the
the
right.
The
right,
I
don't
know
the
word
like
the
right
track,
but
yeah
like
I
I
mean
I
really
like
the
idea,
and
I
I
feel
it's
like
super
fun,
but
yeah.
I
just
have
those
two
concerns
and
yeah
back
to
your
grief.
O
Hello,
everyone,
I
kind
of
agree
with
the
with
pets,
mostly
because
they,
I
think,
like
we
see
the
same
faces
and
we
carry
like
a
lot
of
pieces
from
how
we
do
things
and
when
we
are
supposed
to
be
doing
something
for
the
common.
I
think
we
should
give
a
lot
of
space
to
dissident,
distant
opinion
and
also,
to
other
things,
other
ways
to
approach
like
it's
like.
O
We
would
have
like
different
people
like
coming
like
more
gradually
like,
and
so
I
think,
there's
a
lot
of
there's
a
lot
of
truth
in
how
this
is
like
about
the
perception
like
we
can
perceive
inside
that
it's
working
well,
but
it's
it
for
the
people
from
outside,
and
I
think
that
should
be
an
approach
to
get
out
of
our
comfort
zone
like
in
in
the
way
like
this
is
how
we
are
doing
things
and
we
have
legitimacy
from
our
own
side
group.
O
So
we
are
basically
creating
like
a
system
that
doesn't
have
like
a
negative
feedback
system.
So
I
think
it's
important
to
recognize
it
and
maybe,
like
active
activity,
active
try
to
to
get
those
dissident
voices
to.
If,
like
it's
something
for
the
commons,
I
think
we
should
actively
get
or
try
these
distant
voices
and
onboarding
people.
That
would
do
things
like
in
a
different
way.
A
Yeah,
I
thank
you
so
much.
I
believe,
that's
everyone
right.
I
want
to
give
special
shout
out
to
nate
and
rafa
on
this
one
because,
like
you
know,
it's
really
hard,
I
I
kind
of
like
set
it
up.
Like
is
this
governance
theater?
You
know
an
almost
trolly
way,
but
you
know
what
there
and
durgados
as
well.
There
is
a
lot
of
theater
here
like
there
is.
There
is
like,
but
hopefully
it
actually
creates
a
better
mission
vision
value
right.
This
is
the
the
most
way
that
it's
theater.
Is
it's
fun?
A
That's
why
it's
that's
the
the
key
ingredient
of
the
theater
here
so
and
the
goal
of
today
is
to
have
space
to
actually
work
on
mission
vision,
values,
I'm
going
feel
free
if
you
already
know
how
to
do
it
and
what
you
want
to
do
feel
free
to
dive
in
I'm,
going
to
give
a
quick
like
five
minute
breakdown
of
how
I,
how
we,
when
we,
when
we
deployed
this,
how
we
expected
people
would
interact
with
it
just
to
make
it
easy
for
you.
A
But
you
know
if
you
already
have
some
ideas
on
how
to
interact
with
it.
Go
for
it,
I
get
us,
I
saw
you
on
muta,
do
you
do
you
have
something
you
want
to
share.
C
Oh,
I
was
just
hoping
to
grab
a
link
to
that
that
vmv
thing
so
that
I
could
have
a
quick
look
at
it.
While
it's
ready.
A
Yeah
so
so
olivia
made
a
great
post
that
kind
of
gives
kind
of
the
overview
of
it
and
then
mitch
made
a
really
good
post
as
well,
that's
more
of
like
a
walk
through
or
more
more
of
like
a
how-to,
without
without
so
much
of
the.
Why
and
that's
I
just
posted
in
soft
gov
channel
and
I'm
just
gonna
go
through
this
and
and
go
pretty
quick
unless
anyone
else
has
any
comments.
A
Okay,
so
token
law,
quadratic,
voting,
scary
stuff
right.
No,
it's
not
scary
at
all!
Go
to
this
link
and
mitch
walks
you
right
through
everything
you
can
just
click
token.
Log
and
you'll
have
to
actually
connect
to
token
log
so
to
connect
to
token
log,
I'm
already
connected,
oh,
but
look
check
your
web3
provider.
This
needs
to
be
on
xdi,
okay.
So
now
I'm
going
to
connect
to
xdi.
A
A
So
once
you've
connected
to
xdi
you'll
actually
get
a
mix,
you'll
get
some
voting
power.
Token
and
oh,
let
me
connect
okay,
so
I
have
a
lot
of
voting
power,
just
a
spoiler
alert
and
oh,
this
is
the
wrong
one.
This
is
the
coordination
repo,
so
we
want
to
go
to
soft
guy.
So
where
is
that
that
must
be
here.
A
So
I'm
connected
it's
on
xdi.
It
says
I
have
no
voting
power.
Oh
there,
it
is
see.
I
have
a
lot
of
voting.
Powerpoint
point.
Eight
percent,
not
bad,
but
these
voting
power
points
are
your
actual
voting
tokens
so
you'll
have
a
fifty
percent,
wait
for
c
stack
tokens,
which
is
where
I
get
all
my
voting
power
and
also
a
50
wait
for
impact
hour
tokens.
A
So
when
you
come
in
here
and
you're,
like
oh
cool,
there's
some
things,
I
could
vote
on
you
to
actually
see
what
you're
voting
on
you
want
to
click
this
this
little
number
here.
So
this
is
my
proposal
and
maybe,
as
you're
looking
at
it,
you're
like
tec
will
advance
token
engineering,
cementing
it
as
a
legitimate
field.
Cementing
kindness,
I
don't
like
the
cement
word.
A
So
I'm
just
going
to
make
a
comment:
hey
I
don't
like
cement.
You
know
so,
okay!
Well,
you
know
what,
but
the
rest
of
the
vision
is
great.
So
I'm
going
to
take
it,
I'm
going
to
put
it
in
my
google
doc.
My
iteration
and
you
said,
consolidate
the
tc
will
advance
what's
a
good.
What's
a
good
word
for
instead
of
cement.
L
A
So
I
really
lean
on
google
here,
okay
cool,
so
this
is
my
new
new
vision.
Now,
maybe
there's
another
one,
I
I
remember
really
liking
livia's
values,
so
I'm
gonna
go
in
here
and
be
like.
Oh
yeah.
You
know
here's
this
okay!
This
is
see
I
really
like
this,
but
maybe.
A
J
A
A
A
A
A
And
actually,
there's
one
more
little
trick,
we're
just
gonna
go
like
this
and
click
edit
and
steal
all
the
markdown
stuff,
that's
already
there,
so
I
don't
have
to
think
about
it.
A
A
A
A
A
But
coming
up
with
the
name
is
is
really
hard
and
then
you
just
click,
submit
new
issue.
A
A
So
I
I
forked
the
vision
from
here,
so
you
notice
that
I
already
voted
for
my
own
submissions.
So
now
to
add
these
extra
votes.
It
costs
a
lot
of
votes
to
add
four
votes
to
my
submission
because
I
already
voted.
It's
gonna
cost
2
800
geez.
Okay,
maybe
I
don't
want
to
vote
I'll
just
give
it
one
all
right
give
that
one
a
lot
and.
A
So
it
tells
you
right
here
when
you're
voting
this
this
number.
A
I
still
have
a
lot
because
I
have
eight
percent
of
all
voting
power,
I'm
kind
of
a
whale,
I'm
not
gonna.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
I
know
so
cool
but
but
yeah
you
can
see,
even
though
I
voted
already
for
a
bunch
of
things
voting
one
voting
for
jake's
right
here,
because
I
haven't
voted
it
on
it.
Yet
two
votes
cost
four.
A
A
A
So
adding
that
those
votes,
I
already
voted
for
libya's
yeah
and
that's
that's
the
game.