►
From YouTube: W43 Softgov WG: Hatch DAO first proposals!
Description
TheSoftgov Working Group researches and applies best practices for governance, social collaboration and contribution rewards while implementing Ostrom’s 8 principles for governing the commons in its foundation.
We gather every Tuesday at 7pm CET.
Steward: Liviade
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
B
A
Let's
do
let's
do
like
one
minute.
I
think
it
should
be
enough,
hopefully
yeah,
so
the
question
I
wanted
to.
A
How
do
you
feel
with
being
a
leader?
A
I
assume
that
many
of
us
in
this
community
are
leaders
and
that,
if
we
arrive
to
the
positions
we
are
even
to
be
in,
this
call
is
because
we
have
some
level
of
leadership
skills
and
that
we've
been
navigating
communities
in
a
way
that
bring
us
to
a
point
that
we're
questioning
things
and
that
we
are
self-assigning
work
and
that
we
are
collaborating
with
others,
and
I
think
endows
this
relationship
of
of
someone
proposing
something
and
a
person
accepting
it,
and
vice
versa,
happens
a
lot
more
frequent
than
in
than
in
a
government
or
in
the
state,
for
example,
where
the
people
promoting
the
rules
are
usually
the
same,
and
the
people
adopting
the
roles
are
usually
the
same.
A
C
Thank
you,
libby
leadership.
I've
been
rediscovering
leadership
since
hcc.
To
be
honest,
I
had
never
realized
before
that.
Usually
leadership
has
a
great
like
charge
or
weight
of
to
be
like
competitive
right
like
who
is
a
better
leader
or
like.
C
Instead
of
of
this,
like
awareness
of
a
universal
like
leadership
capabilities
that
everybody
has
like,
I,
I
feel
that
anybody
can
be
like
a
a
leader
in
different
areas,
even
if
like
they're
more
like
introvert
or
extrovert,
and
I've
been
meditating
and
reflecting
a
lot
on
this
on
on,
like
there's
also
sometimes
like
toxic
leadership
right
so
yeah
I've
been
I've
been
thinking
about
this
and
yeah.
I
guess
like
that's
how
I've
been
feeling
about
leadership
I'll
pass
it
to
anne
marie.
E
Thank
you,
mary
leadership.
I
I
don't
believe
so
much
in
leadership.
I
believe
more
of
a
consensus
of
guidance,
and
I
think
leadership
is
something
that
it's
it's
constantly
evolving
and
changing,
and
I
think
you
are
a
leader
you're,
a
leader
as
much
as
the
one.
Next
to
you
is
also
a
leader,
so
I
feel
that
it's
a
community,
I
think
it's
something
that
gets
built
and
it
gets
shared
and
when
it's
shared
it's
also
it's
actually
when
things
actually
gets
moving.
E
F
Hey
so
I'd
say,
you
know,
I
think
I've
had
so
many
great
experiences
working
with
extraordinary
leaders
and
amazing
mentors
and
working
with
not
great
leaders
and
really,
I
see
so
clearly
the
difference
between
great
leadership
and
mediocre
leadership,
and
I
would
say
leadership
is
so
crucial
for
the
success
whether
it
is
self-leading.
F
You
know,
if
you're
from
a
small
or
like
a
small
group,
so
leading
yourself
or
leading
a
small
group,
even
if
it's
a
family
or
if
it's
a
small
group
of
friends,
doing
the
same
initiative
and
the
larger
that
that
group
gets,
the
more
important
leadership
is-
and
I
think
you
know
I
really
like
the
way
that
the
agile
framework
describes
the
scrub
master
as
a
servant
leader.
I
think
one
of
the
key
components
of
leadership
is
making
sure
other
people
shine.
F
G
G
Sometimes
they
don't
even
want
to
be
leaders,
but
they
do
emerge.
I
mean
like
they're
called
you
know
the
hero's
journey
kind
of
thing.
You
know
you
know
we
had
the
stewards.
What
was
the
hero
journey
there?
I
don't
know,
but
this
is
this-
is
kind
of
fun
to
think
at
and
I'll
keep
thinking
about
it
I'll
pass
you
I'll
pass
to
lauren
if
she
hasn't
gone.
Of
course,.
A
Yeah
I
was
gonna,
I
give
it
to
you
just
for
the
people
that
joined
recently,
so
we're
just
talking
about
leadership,
but
a
reflection
on
on
leader
on
how
leadership
resonates
to
you,
and
I
was
just
sharing
how
endows
or
in
like
self-governing
communities.
We
have
this
dynamics
of
rulers
and
ruled
happening
with
a
much
quicker
flip
than
in
the
state,
for
example,
where
the
same
people
are
always
ruling
and
the
same
people
are
always
obeying.
A
So
we
have
to
develop
some
type
of
leadership
skills
that
are
like
shared
between
like
a
large
group
of
people.
So
it's
a
lot
of
people
with
with
leadership
skills.
So
I
was
just
bringing
a
reflection
to
that
and
how
do
you
feel
about
your
personal
relationship
with
it.
H
Oh,
I
can
definitely
go
well.
I
think
I
mean
something
I
really
like
about
being
in
these
styles
and
and
sort
of
like
common
organizations
is
that,
like
leadership
often
arises
just
by
people
taking
initiative.
So
it's
like
where
there's
an
opportunity
like
if
someone
sees
an
opportunity
to
take
the
lead
on
something
or
they
think
they
can
do
something
or
they
think
something
needs
to
get
done.
Then
they're
often
one
of
the
best
people
to
actually
take
that
on
and
and
create
that.
H
So
I
think
that,
like
I
noticed,
yeah
like
these
leaders
come
up
in
some
aspects
and
then
like
move
into
other
things,
and
then
the
leadership
is
like
a
little
bit
more
dynamic
and
moldable,
which
I
think
is
like
really
really
natural
and
yeah,
and
I
like
it-
and
I
feel
like
this-
is
like
how
I
I
organize
myself
within
jazz
and
yeah.
I
guess
I'll
pass
it
to
griff.
I
Yeah,
I
I
would
I
I
would
agree.
I
love
the
duocracy
aspect
and
you
know
it's.
I
I
feel
like
what's
nice
is
leadership
is
like
you
know,
something
that
not
everyone
wants
to
do.
I
But
agency
is
something
that
everyone
really
appreciates,
and
I
feel
like
that's
where
that's
that's,
where
a
good
leader
can
shine
is
by
making
sure
that
the
people
who
are
actually
doing
the
work
have
agency
to
to
give
feedback
and
feel
feel
understood
and
that
that's
where
dows
really
shine
is
by
giving
individuals
that
want
to
participate
the
agency
to
do
it
in
the
ways
that
they
they
feel
best
and
I've
been
constantly
amazed.
You
know
the
stuff
that,
like
some
people,
think,
is
really
horrible.
I
I
I
don't
really
like
cleaning
toilets,
but
you
know
if
you
can
find
someone
who
loves
it
then,
and
they
have
the
agency
to
do
it
and
and
it's
cool
then
it's
great
and
I
think
that's
where
a
leader
can
really
shine,
is
by
making
sure
and
getting
feedback
from
the
people
that
they're
leading
like
do
you
like
what
you're
doing
and
and
how
can
it
be
better
and
making
sure
that
they
feel
appreciated
for
the
work
that
they
do
do
I'll
pass
it
to
nate?
Did
you
get
to
go.
J
I
have
not
thank
you.
Yeah
leadership,
that's
a
that's
a
good
one.
You
know
I've
worked
in
support
roles,
all
my
life-
and
you
know
I
don't
know-
I
don't
think
I've
ever
seen
a
leader
that
had
that
has
had
power.
J
Almost
all
all
the
leaders
I've
ever
met
in
my
life
have
been
people
with
no
power
at
all
and
they've
been
able
to
connect
and
create
relationships
with
other
people
and
empower
them
to
be
the
best
person
that
they,
you
know
who
they
are,
and
I
think
that's
something
that
is
just
characteristic
of
a
leader
whether
they
are
in
the
spotlight
or
not.
Because
yeah
I
mean
a
lot
of
times.
J
I
think
we
kind
of
you
know
fetishize
leadership,
to
a
point
where
it's
kind
of
you
know
not
productive,
and
I
think
that
we
kind
of
overlook
the
people
that
do
day
in
and
day
out,
build
relationships
with
every
single
person
in
the
community
and
making
sure
that
they,
you
know
everybody's
in
it,
has
nothing
to
do
with
work,
but
strictly
just
making
sure
that
the
best
is
those
people
are
valued
so
I'll
pass
it
to
sandy.
J
B
With
what
edu
and
lauren
were
saying
like,
for
example,
I
I
really
don't
like,
like
you,
know,
leading
something
like
by
myself,
and
it
feels
like
a
lot
of
pressure,
but
it's
it's.
It's
very
good.
On
the
dallas
place
like
you
can
easily,
you
know
like
get
with
someone
and
yeah
take
the
leadership
together
and
I
feel
like
leaders
yeah.
I
really
prefer
to
collaborate
than
to
lead.
I
also
with
nate.
B
I
I
think
I
have
more
like
a
supportive
role
and
and
yeah
like
when
you
see
something
like
you
want
to
see
it
done
like,
for
example,
acid
laser
like
he
saw
like
the
youtube
channel,
wasn't
looking
it
like.
The
content
was
organized
and
everything,
but
it
wasn't
like
the
design.
Graphics
were
not
like
he
wanted,
and
he
just
you
know
he
leads
it
and
he
did
it
and
he
make
it
happen.
So,
like
that's
good
about
those
and
I'll
pass
it
to
raider.
K
Part
of
me
wants
to
try
and
summarize
everybody's,
but
I
love
what
eduardo
said
about
kind
of
having
consent
to
be
a
leader
and
what
what
nate
said
kind
of
threw
me,
because
I
feel
like
he
expressed
an
opinion.
That's
not
like
of
the
dominant
that
I
hear
like
seeing
people
who
are
in
leadership
not
having
power,
because
I
think
that
that
confluence
is
really
common
or
people
see
like
leadership
and
power
is
the
same
thing
and
I
think
a
leader
actually
has
the
like.
K
Has
the
grace
to
understand
how
to
empower
others
and
break
down
their
power
constantly,
and
I
think
that's
what
like,
how
you
can
have
a
flow
of
like
empowerment
and
modeling
for
to
make
a
collaborative
group.
If
anyone
becomes
too
salient
in
their
power,
then
they
like
know
how
to
share
it
amongst
everybody,
and
then
we
get
to
continue
to
be
collaborative
and
not
focus
all
that
on
one
person,
do
you
feel,
do
you
feel
ready
anna
marie.
D
That's
great,
thank
you.
That's
beautiful
what
you
said:
yeah
really
interesting.
Listening
to
everyone.
You
know
I,
I
think
about
leadership,
quite
a
lot,
and
what
does
that
mean
to
me?
I
think
where
I'm
at
now
I
was
reading
charles
eisenstein's
more
beautiful
world
as
possible,
and
he
was
talking
about
how
we
can
never
know
the
impact
that
we
have,
and
I
was
thinking
that
leadership
is
a
lot
like
that.
We
never
really
know
how
people
view
us
or
the
impact
we
have.
D
I
think
that
leadership
probably
is
about
settling
into
ourselves
and
doing
the
work
that
we
believe
in
and
speaking
about
things
that
matter
to
us
and
being
ourselves
more
and
more,
the
more
that
we
can
do
that,
the
more
likely
we
will
impact
certain
people
in
ways
that
we
might
not
understand.
That
would
be
viewed
as
leadership.
D
That's
probably
where
I
sit
and
I
will
pass
to
anchor.
L
Thanks
anna
marie
yeah,
I
think
that
I
learn
about
leadership
every
day
by
seeing
others,
and
also
by
examining
my
own
behavior.
I
think
that
there
are
different
types
of
leadership
and
for
me,
something
that
struggles
a
little
bit
is
to
delegate.
L
But
what
I
like
about
leadership
is
that
you
can
promote
your
ideas
and
try
to
gather
people
that
think
similar,
so
that
you
can
multiply
the
impact
and,
like
I
was
thinking
on
on
this
spider-man
quote,
like
with
great
power,
comes
great
responsibility,
and
I
think
that
leadership
is
also
a
responsibility
because,
like
yeah,
I
am
the
gravity.
L
Steroid
people
sometimes
want
or
expect,
like
certain
confidence,
uncertain,
like
neutrality
and
sometimes
it's
difficult
to
like
always
be
neutral,
because
we
always
have
like
also
personal
interest
and
personal
positions.
L
But
you
have
to
like
try
to
not
only
talk
about
things
but
also
to
practice
them,
and
that
is
comes
related
also
to
non-violent
communication
and
of
conflict
management
like
it
wouldn't
make
any
sense
for
me
to
be
talking
of
conflict
management.
If
I
I'm
causing
a
lot
of
conflict-
and
I
think
that
can
be
applied
to
different
types
of
leadership
you
have
to
in
order
to
be
a
leader
first,
you
have
to
lead
by
example.
M
Hey
everyone,
I'm
kind
of
distracted.
There
is
like
a
storm
going
on
right
now,
but
I
agree
with
pretty
much
every
what
everyone
has
said
so
far.
I
just
wanted
to
about
something
like
a
little
thought
that
I
had
while
listening
to
you
all
that
there
are
some
organisms
in
nature
that
just
work
by
default,
because
every
everything
has
like
the
agency
as
grief
was
saying
to
act
like
a
leader
for
the
part
that
they
have
to
do
so.
M
I
I
believe
that
in
the
future,
all
of
these
organisms
will
have
multiple
leaders
that
make
everybody
in
the
system
shine,
and
I
think
that
is
a
beautiful
way
to
see
it.
I
know
that
the
human
part
makes
everything
complicated
and
sometimes
power
and
personality,
and
many
things
can
make
that
impossible
to
do,
but
I
think
that
eventually
that
that
natural
sense
of
leading
just
to
a
certain
goal,
because
all
the
organism
or
the
all
all
the
system
requires
it,
it
will
happen
eventually,
I'm
not
sure
who's
missing
katie
have
you
gone.
N
N
Also
really
I've
really
needed
to
utilize
this
skill
of
kind
of
helping
others
discover
their
own
agency
so
that
every
and
now
in
the
dao
space
and
with
all
of
you,
I've
been
learning
so
much
about
watching
that
agency
sort
of
shine
through
everybody,
as
we
all
take
on
these
different
roles
of
of
leadership
together,
so
collaboration
leadership,
turning
into
collaboration
and
yeah,
the
these
wonderful
words
that
are
being
passed
around
empowering
others
to
let
them
shine
and
making
impact
on
folks
in
ways
that
you
may
not
at
first
see
I
I
really
love
doing
that
myself,
creating
and
being
a
part
of
that
energy.
N
It's
wonderful!
I
will
pass
to
mafer
cordovas,
please.
O
Hi
sorry,
I
just
I
just
arrived,
but
I'm
very
intrigued
on
everything
going
on
with
the
tc,
especially
on
the
soft
gov
steward.
So
I'm
happy
to
be
here.
Yeah.
A
Well,
welcome
mafia,
so
we're
passing
around
with
this
question
of
how
do
you
feel
about
your
personal
relationship
with
leadership?
O
Well,
I
have
studied
a
lot
about
leadership
and
I
have
done
a
lot
of
programs,
but
what
everything
goes
in
common
is
that
a
leader
shares
the
values
with
the
with
the
team,
especially
because
a
leader
always
arises
with
with
the
sense
of
service.
O
So
a
leader
first
has
to
be
a
follower
in
order
to
become
a
leader
that,
for
me
it
has
become
a
little
bit
by
my
philosophy
in
terms
of
arriving
to
a
new
place
in
a
new
organization
and
community,
and
I
think
it
will
stay
with
me
for
the
rest
of
my
life.
A
Cool
thanks
thanks
everybody
for
the
very
inspiring
answers,
and
I
didn't
put
down
the
agenda
yet.
I
just
have
it
in
my
mind,
because
we
are
mostly
gonna
share
the
proposals
that
have
been
worked
on
for
us
to
have
a
brief
moment
of
sense.
Making.
I
know
how
it
can.
It
can
be
a
lot
to
have
like
a
lot
of
dense
proposals
to
read
through.
A
So
I
think
there
are
two
already
up
there
and
there's
two
more
that
tim
and
zaptonis
are
working
on.
So
what
about?
We
start
with
the.
B
Yeah,
definitely
we
we
with
time
we're
working
on.
Let.
A
A
A
Oh
no,
I
was
gonna
start
with
the
75
percent
governance,
give
back
that
was
proposed
already.
So
then
we
can
move
to
yours
and
tem
proposal
and
maybe
juan
or
griff.
You
guys
want
to
share
what
are
the
biggest
things
that
people
should
know
about
this
proposal
and
are
there
any
topics
to
be
discussed
or
how
to
bring
awareness
to
this
proposal?.
L
Yeah
for
sure,
well,
the
the
spirit
of
this
proposal
is
that
we
have
been
trying
to.
L
Make
the
best
reward
systems
and
it's
hard
to
to
work
and
to
mix
coin
voting
governance,
while
also
having
regular
payments
to
develop
the
tools.
So
people
that
were
that
were
paid
for
the
cultural.
Build
of
the
tec,
received
a
75
deduction
of
their
monetary
rewards
in
in
the
impact
hour
distribution.
L
L
Return:
governance
to
people
that
worked
really
hard
on
the
project
and
also
not
double
reward
them
economically,
and
the
vote
proposes
this.
This
vote
is
to
to
to
vote
yes
or
no.
If
we
are
going
to
have
this
75
governments
give
back,
but
the
technical
solution.
I
I
I
can,
I
can
continue
with
his
thought.
The
technical
solution
is
unknown,
exactly
what
we'll
do,
there's
two
solutions
and
and
they're
described
here.
The
first
is
like
honestly:
I
think
it's
the
one
that
we
will
likely
go
with,
because
it's
very
easy
to
implement
and
honestly
we
don't.
Our
dev
team
is
not
as
is
not
as
engaged
as
we
would
like.
I
So
it's
probably
the
easier
way
to
apply
this
if
it
passes,
then,
but
we
need
to
confirm
that
it
doesn't
cause
other
issues
and
that
is
still
under
investigation,
but
the
first
technical
solution
would
be
to
actually
just
mint
tc
tokens
at
the
commons
upgrade
and
put
them
in
a
vesting
contract
that
well,
the
vesting
contract
would
hold,
would
stop
them
from
being
transferred
forever
and
they
would
just
sit
in
someone's
wallet
in
these
people's
wallets
and
then
they
would
be
they
would
be.
I
They
would
have
the
tokens
in
their
wallet,
but
they
could
never
sell
them
or
move
them,
but
it
would
look
like
on
block
the
problem
with
that
solution
is
that
it
would
look
like
on
block
scout
that
they
have
that
they
have
this
money
in
their
wallet,
that
they
don't
really
have
it's
only
governance
rights,
but
it
would
look
like
it's
money
and
that's
not
pretty
the
and
it's
not
it's,
not
the
most
elegant
solution
as
it
doesn't
solve.
It
doesn't
solve
the
problem
for
everyone
in
gardens.
I
The
real
problem
is
that
conviction,
the
long-term
solution
which
will
be
pursued,
no
matter
what
is
making
it
so
that
you
can
vote
on
conviction,
voting
with
multiple
tokens
and
if,
if
there
is
progress
with
one
hive
and
trying
to
implement
that
that
solution,
we
might,
we
might
make
the
choice
to
not
take
the
quick
and
dirty
solution,
but
instead
hold
out
for
the
real
solution
but
which
would,
but
that
real
solution
would
take
many
many
months
to
design
build
test
review
and
we
will
lose
the
governance
rights
of
these
people
for
the
most
important
initialization
phase.
I
So
it's
it's
a
technical
decision
on
what
solution
we
choose.
What
we
need
more
than
anything,
is
signal
from
the
community
on
whether
or
not
it
even
matters
to
research.
This
we
have
other
work
to
do.
We
need
to
get
the
bombing
curve
out
hey
we
need
to
do
the
commons
upgrade
anyway
right,
come
on
guys
cut
us
some
slack
like
tell
us
we'll
we'll
we'll
finalize
the
research
right
now
next
week.
I
Brett
will
review
whether
or
not
the
quick
and
dirty
solution,
brett
who's,
doing
the
code
review
for
the
bonding
curve,
he'll
review,
whether
or
not
the
quick
and
dirty
solution
causes
other
issues
that
we're
not
aware
of
so
we'll
have
some
confirmation
on,
if
that's
even
an
option
next
week
and
then,
but
but
but
yeah.
D
So
can
I
ask:
why
would
it
matter
if
you
said,
was
it
block
on
block
something
if
it
shows
that
they
have
money
that
they
don't
really
have?
Why
does
that
matter
as
long
as
it
is
vested,
and
we
know
that
they're
going
to
be
sold
and
it
is
just
for
governance.
I
I
don't
think
it
matters.
I
don't
think
it's
a
big
negative
really
personally,
but
that
has
been
the
issue
that
has
been
brought
up
so
is
worth
expanding,
but
the
main
thing
is
just
confusion:
people
looking
in
their
wallet
seeing
money
that
they
don't
have
and
then
maybe
trying
to
sell
it
or
something
it's
better.
Well,.
N
I
Don't
personally,
I
think
that
we
get
too
hung
up
on
these
technicalities,
because,
like
is
the
irs
guy
going
to
look
up
your
block
scout
address,
I
mean
come
on,
he
doesn't
have
it
it's
like
if
you
report
it,
you
report
it.
If
you
don't
you
don't
and
like
you
can
explain
to
them
just
as
well,
where
the
money
is.
If
it's
there
versus
like
oh
yeah,
that
money
doesn't
count,
you
know
like
they,
they
don't
they're,
they
don't
know
what
we're
doing.
N
I
K
I
The
the
other
big
issue
is
just
from
a
technical
standpoint.
It's
a
little
bit.
The
math
is
less
elegant.
You
know-
and
this
is
where
sam
really
gets
a
little
bit
frustrated
with
this
solution,
because
we
we
are
really
kind
of
hacking.
The
bonding
curve
a
little
bit
and
like
the
the
beauty
of
the
bonding
curve,
is
kind
of
being
disgraced
in
this
in
this
quick
and
dirty
solution.
F
So
it's
it's
a
matter
mostly
jump
in
yeah.
It
sounds
like
maybe
another
option
is
like
do
the
short
term
easy
solution
and
then,
when
a
longer
term,
more
elegant
solution
is
available
migrate
to
that
solution.
Yes,.
I
I
think
I
think,
that's
absolutely.
If
we
take
the
quick
and
dirty
solution,
that's
absolutely
how
it
would
go,
we
would
we
would
later
upgrade.
The
real
thing
is
that
the
quick
and
dirty
solution
is
not
confirmed
to
be
an
option.
We
really
need
to
do
some
deep
code
review
and
make
sure
that
there
wasn't
there
isn't
any
problems
with
having
a
negative
number
in
in
the
code
base
somewhere.
I
I
And
the
other
thing
I
want
to
say,
there's
a
third
technical
option,
which
is,
I
don't
know
like.
Maybe
we
come
up
with
something
better
like
you
know,
when
we're
researching
these
things,
other
ideas
might
come
up
so.
I
It's
a
technical
thing.
I
don't
know
that
it's
worth
the
time
to
really
dive
into
it
here.
But
what
I
will
say
is
that
that's
that's
exactly
the
quick
and
dirty
solution
is
that
we
we
use
the
issuance
of
the
tokens
still
for
voting
in
conviction
voting.
It
really
has
to
be
in
their
wallet.
The
a
token
needs
to
be
in
their
wallet,
so
the
virtual
supply
doesn't
directly
solve
the
problem.
What
it
does
is
it
mitigates
the
effect
of
minting
the
tokens
on
the
bonding
curve.
I
But
again
you
know.
I
really
think
that
the
the
technical
solution
is
something
that
should
be
decided
in
a
working
group
context,
but
the
overall
like
scope
of
whether
or
not
we
want
to
provide
governance
rights
to
these
48
people
is
what
is
more
of
a
collective
decision.
L
Yeah
no,
I
was
only
saying
sorry
that
my
internet
connection
today
has
been
really
bad
but
yeah.
The
the
aim
of
this
proposal
is
to
improve
and
to
give
governance
right
rights
back
to
the
people
that
that
received
payment
but
yeah
without
affecting
the
the
bonding
curve
and
also
without
double
rewarding
in
in
economic
ways.
It's
just
to
to
yeah
to
improve
the
governance
rights
yeah
without
without
giving
monetary
rewards.
F
Yeah,
I
just
want
to
add,
because
I
don't
see
it
in
this
in
the
in
the
information
in
here,
the
number
is
actually
85
so
somewhere
between
50
and
85
of
governance.
Rights
were
deleted
from
the
people
who
had
their
impact
hours
affected.
I
You
can
see
the
exact
math
in
that
spreadsheet
there
if
you
click
that
spreadsheet,
so
zeptimus,
for
instance,
had
three
percent
of
his
total
impact
hours
deducted
because
he
was
only
paid
for
the
last
month.
So
really
it
really
does
vary
wildly.
Oh
no
does
it
not
link
to
the
actual
tab?
Oh
that's,
too
bad.
I
This
is
where
the
calculation
is
and
different
people
had
different
amounts
of
deductions
in
the
two
in
the
two
outcomes
and
what
we
did
is
we
just
total
up
the
actual
impact
hour,
deductions
that
were
that
were
that
were
present
for
each
person,
and
so,
if
you
scroll
down
like
if
you
find
zeptimus,
for
instance,
the
relative
amount
of
deductions
that
he
had
is
very
small
compared
to
the
total.
I
Yeah
compared
to
the
total
amount
of
impact
hours
that
he
had,
it
was
very
small
so
like
considering.
I
Last
two
months:
well,
that's
the
that's!
The
thing
is
that
it
varied
wildly
based
off
of
when
how
often
you
receive
payments
so
and
how
many
impact
hours
you
had
and
and
these
sorts
of
things
like,
for
instance,
gustav
fry's.
It's
just
a
complicated
thing.
It's
you
can't
simply
say:
oh
people
receive
50
to
85
percent
like
gustav
gf
fry's
at
the
bottom
actually
had
more
impact
hours
deducted
from
the
praise
mageddon
than
he
did
in
no
intervention.
I
So
each
there's
in
there
were
two
praise
distributions.
There
was
the
praise
distribution
with
no
intervention
which
had
very
standard
deductions
and
that's
column,
d
and
column
e.
The
praise,
mcgetting
deductions
are
a
little
less
obvious
because
the
way
they
were
calculated
was
was
based
off
of
the
amount
of
deductions
that
you
had
relative
to
your
relative
to
your
total
hours
earned,
and
so
it's
a
very
different
calculation.
I
And
so
basically,
we
just
derived
how
what
the
number
of
deductions
were
were
existed
for
each
impact
for
each
distribution
and
then
multiplied
the
deductions
by
52
percent,
for
knowing
intervention
and
by
48
for
praise
mcgenin,
and
that
gave
the
total
deductions
that
each
person
experienced
and
then
the
because
we
scaled
the
actual
impact
hours
numbers
so
that
we
could
match
the
25
percent.
Then
we
had
a
scale,
deductions,
column
and
column
g,
and
so
that's
the
that's.
I
The
actual
deductions
in
impact
hour
numbers
scaled
impact
hours
and
then
the
the
impact
hour
rate
for
everybody
was
actually
48.
If
you
scroll
all
the
way
to
the
right,
the
number
is
there.
48.19
was
the
value
of
impact
hours
in
tech
to
in
j1.
I
You
can
see
the
value
of
impact
hours
in
tech
and,
and
so
that
was
multiplied
by
the
scaled
deductions,
to
get
a
tech
equivalent
of
tokens
that
they
would
have
received
had
their
had.
They
kept
all
of
their
impact
hours
and
then
and
then
that
was
multiplied
by
75
and
you
can.
You
can
see
it
pretty
clearly
what
happened
here
by
clicking
all
of
the
cells
on
where
the
map
came
from.
E
I
asked
in
the
case
of
the
forum
post,
where
you
have
the,
for
example,
you
between
60
000
16
413.
That
number
is
b.
I
So
that
would
mean
that
I
would
be
minted.
16
000,
tec,
tokens
worth
of
governance
rights.
I
wouldn't
be
able
to
sell
those
tokens.
I
would
get
no
money
for
it,
but
that
would
it
would
be
like
in
my
wallet.
I
would
have
this
much
extra
governance
power
when
I
vote
on
things,
so
those
tokens
would
be
solid.
It's
not
like
a
percentage
of
the
total
vote,
but
it's
these
number
of
tokens
for
reference.
I
There
are
a
little
over
2
million
tokens
and
this
would
mint
about
nine
percent
of
that
total
supply.
However,
that
is
the
minimum
total
supply
that
will
be
out
and
then,
as
we
when
we
launch
more
tec,
tokens
will
be
minted
by
the
bonding
curve,
so
that
will
get
diluted
further
as
more
people
join
the
tec,
especially
during
the
token
freeze.
So
but
you
but
effectively,
these
governance
rights
are
displayed
by
the
number
of
tokens.
B
Yeah,
actually,
today
we
were
thinking
on
it.
We
have
one
of
them,
like
yeah,
ready
almost
to
go,
but
then
for
the
buying
into
the
bonding
curve.
We
were
chatting
with
them
and
yeah.
Initially
we
were
writing
it
about.
You
know
for
the
reward
system,
but
then
also
dan
rice
is
like.
B
B
Okay
yeah,
but
basically
so
some
people
lost
their
keys
or
they
want
to
change
them
and
yeah
as
a
human
central
community.
We
would
like
to
support
them,
especially
the
ones
that
lost
their
key,
and
we
would
propose
to
the
dao
to
burn
the
tokens
on
the
other
sides
that
are
lost
or
wanted
to
be
changed
and
instantly
meet
them
on
the
on
the
new
address
and
yeah,
and
that
could
be
done
in
one
transaction
together
with
paying
back
the
target
fee
thanks
to
evm,
crispr
and
yeah.
B
The
idea
would
be
like
me
and
tom:
if
someone
wants
to
get
their
addresses,
changed
or
or
they
lost
their
address,
they
would
contact
me
or
time,
and
then
we
would
create
a
a
sheet
with
all
the
addresses
that
we
will
send
to
dan
grief,
probably
time
to
and
yeah,
and
then
when,
when
after
this
process,
we
would
have
like
all
the
addresses
and
then
the
addresses
that
are
posted
on
the
forum
post
are
the
ones
that
are
going
to
go
on
the
on
the
hashtag,
and
actually
we
were
talking
yeah
and
yeah
same
stuff.
B
We
were
also
like
when
the
others,
for
example,
especially
the
ones
that
are
lost.
We
also
should
do
that
the
same
thing
for
the
cstk,
but
that's
something
that
common
stock
will
take
care
and
and
yeah
we
were.
We
wanted
to
get
to
this
call,
especially
for
some
feedback
on
the
on
the
dates
like
like
I.
B
Ideally
we
will
post
it
today
as
to
get
some
advice
process
on
the
on
the
forum
and
then
yeah
I
mean
within
concrete,
but
I
would
like
or
yeah
to
get
the
snapshot
boat,
maybe
next
week
and
yeah
and
the
hashtag
proposal.
We
we
with
time
we're
thinking
15
september,
but
we
would
like
to
hear
also
yeah
like
especially
for
the
pram
screw
like
how
would
that
affect
like
other
members,
like
especially
the
ones
that
do
not
got
the
keys
to
the
their
this
experience.
Who
would
that
affect
like
today
and
yeah?
B
I
By
september
15th,
that
line
is
a
is
a
deadline,
but
it's
also.
Maybe
they
will
rage
quit
and
I
don't
know
it's
not
the
only
but
they'll
be
able
to
they
should
be
able
to
if
they
get
it
by
september
15th.
There
will
no
be
not
be
a
negative
effect
of.
F
Yes,
you're
breaking
up
a
little
bit.
What
I
thought
I
heard
is
the
september
15th
date
doesn't
have
any
negative
consequences
for
the
people
who
lost
and
or
have
requested
address
changes.
Is
that
correct.
I
That
is
correct,
I'm
so
sorry.
I
stepped
away
from
my
starbucks
wi-fi
too
far,
but
yeah.
That
is
correct.
F
B
F
F
Yeah,
the
second
one,
there's
there's
a
lot
in
here
already,
but
I
think
we
should
maybe
take
a
step
back
and
question
whether
we
want
to
do
this
and
I'll
explain
what
it
is
in
a
minute
and
then
what
are
the
possible
uses?
We
could
use
these
tec
tokens,
for
the
idea
is
that,
at
you
know
the
first
fraction
of
a
millisecond
of
the
initialization
of
the
bonding
curve.
F
We
have
the
possibility
of
front
running
the
bots,
so
to
speak
and
being
able
to
acquire
tec
tokens
for
the
dow
at
the
lowest
possible
cost
the
cost
that
we've
set
the
initial
price
at
in.
Hopefully,
it's
the
lowest
price
that
it
should
be
the
lowest
price
with
which
the
dao
can
acquire
our
own
tokens.
The
idea
is
that
this
is
an
opportunity
for
us
to
acquire
tec
tokens
that
we
could
use
for
several
purposes.
F
So
I'm
thinking
that
the
first
step
before
I
don't
think
we're
ready
to
propose
anything.
I
think
we're
ready
to
sort
of
solicit
information
and
ideas
from
the
community
for
how
we
could
use
these
tokens,
and
then
we
can
make
a
decision
on
whether
it's
a
compelling
enough
case
for
us
to
do
it.
The
technical
feasibility
I'm
assuming
is
like
a
slam
dunk.
So
I
would
look
to
griff
on
that,
but
I'm
assuming
the
technical
feasibility
is
like
this
is
simple
easy
to
do.
F
There's
no
tax,
no,
no
additional
effort
on
the
common
swarm
team,
but
maybe
I'd
like
confirmation
that
that's
actually
true.
I
Yeah,
that's
true:
it's
it's
very
easy.
It's
like
it
would
basically
it.
If
this
vote
passes,
then
it
will
need
to
be
adjusted
as
part
of
the
for
the
params
as
well,
where
we
we'd
have
to
decide
how
much
money
we
want
to
pull
out
and
then
we
would
actually
have
it
and
then
we
we
would
have
to
like
when
we're
designing
the
bonding
curve
and
conviction
voting
allocations.
We
would
take
that
part
out
right.
So
that's
one
adjustment
that
we'd
make
and
then
for
the
common
swarm
on
technical
feasibility.
I
It
would
just
be
one
extra
line
in
the
in
the
in
the
commons
upgrade
where
we
buy
that
number
of
tokens
as
the
first
buy
after
the
bonding
curve
has
been
filled.
It
would
be
like
oh
yeah
put
money
in
the
bonding
curve.
Oh
yeah
issue
this
tokens
to
us.
You
know,
and
it's
just
like
an
extra
line
and
there's
no
technical
issues.
I
J
Q
First,
three
things:
where
do
they
cross
over
with
what
the
the
goal
is
of
having
the
common
pool?
The
common
pool?
Is
there
to
fund
the
tec
initiatives
so
buying
tec
tokens
and
then
putting
them
back
in
the
reward?
Dao
seems
kind
of
like
counterintuitive
to
this
comment,
pool
that
we're
setting
aside
for
ourselves.
A
Q
F
I
think
so
the
the
it's
a
great
question
actually
and
one
that
I
think
merits
a
lot
of
discussion.
My
way
of
seeing
it
right
now
is
that
it
would
essentially
mean
this
would
be
a
way
for
us
to
acquire
additional
tokens
at
the
lowest
rate
possible.
Essentially
before
the
price
of
the
tc
tokens
go
up
and
yeah,
I
mean
it's
sort
of
like.
Do.
We
want
that
extra
fund
for
different
purposes.
F
And
then
maybe
the
the
strategic
partnerships
or
venture
partnerships
would
be
definitely
not
from
our
pools
right.
That
would
not
be
from
our
from
our
reserve
right
now.
That
would
be
like
hey.
This
is
some
sort
of
swap
with
another
dao
or
or
other
partner.
J
Sorry
to
interrupt
you,
I
I
just
was
curious,
like
this
whole
thing
depends
on
like
how
much
how
much
funds
we're
talking
about,
because
you
know
if,
if
we're
talking
about
like
getting
strategic
venture
partners,
that
you
know,
that
probably
will
require
a
significant
amount
of
funds
and
that's
a
whole
different
topic
than
just
saying.
Let's
allocate
a
little
bit
to
the
reward
style
and
to
get
it
bootstrapped
and
so
yeah.
F
So
that's
why
I'm
saying
I
think
we
we're
at
the
very
we're
not
close
to
a
proposal.
This
is
like.
Well,
what
are
the
options?
Is
there?
Is
there
a
specific
partnership
that
we
have
in
mind
that
we
should
investigate
that?
We
should
look
at
some
terms
with
and
then
bring
it
to
the
community
for
our
vote.
A
I
think
this
is
a
good
stage,
though,
to
put
into
advice
process,
so
people
can
interact
with
it
as
it
is
now
and
and
give
and
give
ideas,
and
we
we
have
four
minutes,
left
three
minutes.
If
it's
okay,
I
would
just
want
to
go
through
the
reward
reward
system
proposal,
because
I
think
it
also
helps
informing
this
one
and
and
then
we
can.
We
won't
have
time
for
questions,
but
then
we
can
write
them
in
the
forum
to
just
share
my
screen.
A
So
that's
pretty
cool
and
our
mostly
addressing
the
problems
that
the
quantification
process
was
super
time,
consuming
that
only
a
few
people
were
volunteering
to
do
it
because
there
was
a
low
incentive
to
volunteer
the
data
set
was
dirty
and
the
data
analysis
only
took
so
long
because
we
were
looking
into
a
year
of
data
and
a
year
of
dirty
data.
So
there
was
all
that
process
to
clean
the
data
to
analyze
all
of
it,
and
it
was
the
very
first
analysis.
A
So
we
were
still
understanding
the
metrics,
and
this
is
a
topic
that
is
not
very
discussed
in
the
crypto
space
and
that's.
Why
we're
having
a
reward
reward
system?
Research
group
in
the
govern
outs
and
a
lot
of
that
will
inform
the
tec.
Moving
forward,
but
that
will
take
a
while,
so
we
need
some
solutions
for
now,
just
the
minimum
viable
solution
we
can
have
so
we're
proposing
to
have
a
quantification
process
that
works
async
and
to
have
one
short
meeting
to
chat
about
questions
and
reflections
of
the
async
process.
A
After
it
happens,
so
it
would
be
like
a
30-minute
meeting
instead
of
a
three-hour
meeting,
and
it
would
be
mostly
to
discuss
cultural
insights
and
that's
a
a
great
thing
to
have
happening
to
have
like
constant,
data-driven
cultural
insights.
So
we
could
have
report
the
analysis
and
the
distribution
after
two
weeks
every
two
weeks
and
distribute
it
via
reward
dao.
That
was
the
dao.
We
were
using
for
search
for
source
cred
and
do
it
using
tec
tokens.
A
So
this
will
help
our
economy
as
well
and
and
then
we
would
be
able
to
limit
praise
to
tasks
that
are
rewarded
by
source
cred
and
also
implement
alexandria.
That
is
the
bot
developed
by
johan
and
ltf
that
records
time
spent
and
calls.
So
we
wouldn't
have
to
praise
people
for
for
coming
to
calls,
and
there
are
all
the
details.
I
see
we're
on
the
top
of
the
hour.
A
It
was
again
very
short
time
to
discuss
all
of
these
difficult
things,
but
I
will
I'll
just
keep
explaining
for
until
the
end
of
the
proposal,
if
anyone
has
to
leave,
feel
free
to
leave
and
thank
you
for
coming
and
after
this
meeting
we'll
have
a
source
credit
meeting
just
to
work
on
a
little
bit
of
this
next
steps.
That
need
to
happen
here.
A
So
so
the
details
are
that
we'll
take
the
cvs
files
that
we
already
have
and
and
then
put
them
in
python
and
then
there's
all
of
the
technical
work
of
making
these
spreadsheets
work
in
separate
ways
and
to
be
automated.
So
it's
automated
that
it
randomly
addre
that
it
randomly
gives
the
people
that
were
down
to
do
the
quantification.
A
A
So
it's
easy
to
be
sent
often
and
it
can
be
sent
to
the
dow,
like
maybe
every
every
two
or
three
months
and
and
in
this
proposal
is
the
amount
for
all
the
rewards
to
be
distributed
and
also
for
paying
the
quantifiers.
A
Well,
then,
I'm
making
it
interoperable
with
source,
cred
and
alexandra
alexandra
is
the
call
bot
so
source
cred
captures
github
and
discourse
contributions
right
now
we
can
always
change
that.
Praise
captures
like
a
whole
bunch
of
subjective
and
objective
contributions
and
alexandra
captures
the
time
spent
and
calls.
A
So
if
we
had
an
integration
of
these
three
tools,
the
things
that
would
come
to
praise
would
be
very
reduced
and
those
would
need
a
cultural
guideline
and
training,
but
it
would
be
super
valuable
because
it
would
make
the
praise
even
more
specific
and
specific
to
subjective
contributions,
and-
and
I
think
this
is
a
very
special
characteristic
of
the
praise
tool
so
yeah
and
then
the
rewards
distribution
every
two
or
three
months.
A
A
We
could
transform
this
into
a
reward
system
committee
and
then
those
people
will
have
a
few
roles,
so
one
of
them
will
have
to
submit
the
proposal
to
to
the
tec,
and
then
something
that
we
need
to
discuss
is
tec
only
has
the
power
to
hold
one
token
now,
so
it
only
holds
wrap
decks
die.
So
we
would
have
to
change
that
for
tec
tokens.
A
If
we
want
to
have
this
economic
model
coming
from
the
reward
systems,
which
I
think
is
very
beneficial
because
it
empowers
people
in
with
governance
power
as
well,
so
we
would
need
one
person
to
swap
the
rap
tax
dive
for
tec
tokens.
This
is,
of
course,
a
trust
role,
but
since
we
would
have
that
happening
in
small
batches,
even
if
something
horrible
happens,
it
wouldn't
be
like
a
great
loss
for
the
tc
and
we
are
all
like
a
trust-based
community.
A
So
it
would
still
need
the
approval
of
the
tao
and
this
person
would
be
delegated
and
and
known
for
who
they
are,
and
it
would
work
similar
as
a
proposal
that
someone
submits
to
the
doubt
and
just
get
that
money
into
their
wallet
so
yeah.
That
is
mostly
what
is
being
proposed
and
then
just
the
summary
of
the
values
will
provide
to
the
community
is
a
continuous
stream
of
funding
to
all
tc
collaborators.
A
Quantifiers
would
work
on
their
own
schedule
and
finish
by
a
pr
predetermined
time
that
would
be
less
social
influence
of
quantifiers
on
each
other.
So
people
would
do
that
async
and
that
will
bring
a
better
result.
They
wouldn't
be
so
influenced
by
each
other.
The
analysis
would
be
instant
and
frequent.
So
in
the
in
the
technical
part
that
I
didn't
get
so
much
into
it,
we
would
have
an
automation
of
the
analysis
happening
every
quantification
process.
K
I
have
many
thoughts
and
I'm
excited
for
the
source
cred
meeting
after
this.
Thank
you
for
summer
for
getting
through
it
livvy
cause,
I'm
assuming
the
meeting
ends
up.
Does
it
end
at
11?
Technically.
K
K
My
first
time
so
I
just
it
was
a
lot
and
I
don't
have
it
in
front
of
me.
K
I
only
have
viewers,
so
I
can't
scroll
I'd
love
to
look
at
it
more
deeply,
but
the
quantifiers
that
I
believe
quantifiers
weren't
just
were
for
the
whole
system
as
far
as
like
having
more
than
one
person's
eyes
on
praise,
but
also
maybe
something
to
do
with
source
cray
allocations
as
well,
and
if
it
does,
my
question
is:
do
they
also
look
retroactively,
because
what
we've
noticed
is
that
a
credit
historian
would
be
a
really
great
role,
and
so
I
wonder
if
quantifier
is
a
parallel
of
that
and
if
so
I
want
to
add
the
the
like.
K
Yes,
they
should
do
things
you
know
proactively,
but
then
also
sometimes
we
look
back
and
we
go.
Oh
that
thing
you
know
that
got
all
that
cred
actually
was
way
more
tremendous
than
we
thought
it
was
going
to
be
so
people
can
those
credit,
historians
can
add
cred
or
subtract
kind
of
something
went
just
like
so
horrible
that
it
was
like
wow.
K
A
Yeah,
that's
a
really
cool
concept
of
somehow
like
retroactive,
retroactive
compensation
or
deduction,
and
maybe
that's
something
for
us
to
look
into
the
research
group
that
comes
out
after
because
it
feels
like
another
point
of
complexity,
but
it's
really
cool,
but
just
for
reference.
The
word
the
word:
the
way
that
quantification
works
is
that
every
praise
dished
goes
to
a
spreadsheet
and
then
that
spreadsheet
goes
through
this
quantification
process,
so
quantifiers
come
in
and
they
all
give
an
objective
value
to
a
subjective
praise.
So
I
praise
you
for
contributing
to.
A
I
don't
know
for
asking
this
great
question
and
then
how
what
is
the
value
of
a
great
question,
so
this
person
that
is
quantifying
will
give
just
an
objective
value
to
that
that
we
were
using
the
measure
impact
hours
and
then
those
impact
hours
turn
into
will
turn
into
tec
tokens
now.
But
the
impact
hour
is
the
average
number
of
the
quantification
that
three
people
gave.
A
A
So
it
happens
that
this
process
was
really
time
consuming,
because
every
person
had
to
go
through
all
of
the
phrases
and
what
we're
trying
to
do
is
separate
them
into
multiple
sheets
that
can
be
assigned
randomly
and
scrambled
around.
So
people
don't
have
so
much
reference
of
date
and
we're
thinking
also
to
take
out
the
name
of
who
did
something
or
to
have
more
of
like
just
the
the
thing
per
se
yeah,
so
that
just
for
understanding
how
that
worked.
B
N
A
B
Yeah,
I
think
we
will
also
you
know
it's
not
something
that
has
to
be
this
way
forever.
So
we
will
eventually
like
every
week
learning-
and
you
know
it's
not
the
same
when
the
price
system
leads
for
a
year
like
doing
changes.
It's
different.
Like
you
know,
oh
it's
a
week,
it's
you
know
it's
easier
and
you
know
it's
the
yeah
it's
much
easier
and
I
think
it's
good.
A
D
L
A
A
Guys
cool
so
for
for
source,
cried,
mateo
and
and
ryder.
It's
it's
great
that
you're
here
to
give
us
some
like
directions
on
how
we
can
like
what
are
the
easiest
ways
to
integrate
these
things
and
and
also
there
was
a
comment
from
ivy
in
the
chat
to
use
similar
to
like
to
fork
pollen
and
how
they've
been
working
and
collecting
addresses.
M
M
So
I'm
not
sure
if
that's
currently
what
we
need.
I
think
the
the
most
important
part
that
we
need
to
solve
for
all
of
these
proposals
that
you
were
mentioning
before
is
gathering
all
the
data
in
a
single
source
of
truth.
That
is
not
only
source
grid
because
source
credit
so
far
is
the
the
json,
the
b
json
that
is
being
hosted
in
github,
and
we
need
actually
to
merge
everything
into
one
information.
K
So
hi
mateo,
I'm
writer.
I
I
want
to
see
if
I
understand
it
sounds
like
you
were
talking
on
several
different
levels
like
you
were
talking
and
I
and
some
things
that
you
said
I
might
not
have
necessarily
unders
like
understood
completely,
but
I
heard
like
to
me
the
like
the
databases
and
the
pollen
bots
is
just
like.
K
You
know:
automating
admin
work
that
needs
to
be
done
like
merging
and
activating
accounts
and
opting
people
in
for
grain
and
those
types
of
things.
But
then
you're
also
talking
about
oh
and
something's
clicking
for
me,
but
then
we're
also
talking
about
integrating
like
praise
and
alexandra
con
like
contributor
evaluations
as
well,
and
there's
like
no
bot
for
that
right.
M
K
M
Play
that
sorry,
I
immersed
both
problems,
but
I
was
trying
to
say
that
the
bot
that
bayavi
brought
up
is
actually
the
the
thing
that
we
already
use.
It's
not
their
bot,
but
we
have
something
like
that:
merging
all
of
the
users
from
discord
this
course
and
github
and
yeah
yeah,
but
the
real
problem
is
to
actually
get
all
of
the
information
into
one
data
set.
That
I
think
is
going
to
be
the
main
asset
that
the
data
scientists
in
the
working
group
will
need
to
to
make.
All
of
this
happen
eventually.
K
M
A
A
K
K
Okay,
so
there's
too
many
there's
like
a
lot
of
there's
a
lot
of
agenda
items
that
we're
talking
about,
and
so
I
want
to
choose
one.
So
is
your
question
libby
related
to
how
the
bots
will
work
or
is
like.
H
K
Just
going
to
tell
a
little
bit
of
story
to
just
like
ground
me
in
this
and
like
what
I
can
offer,
I
am
from
source
cred,
we're
tiny
and
we
do
things
by
hand
and
also
we
did
this
for
maker
as
well.
We
put
out
a
google
form
and
we
said:
do
you
wanna
like?
Do
you
want
your
grain,
which
is
like
an
arbitrary?
You
know,
placeholder
thing:
do
you
want
your
grain
to
be
die?
Do
you
wanna
opt
into
this
process
that
we're
doing
do
you
want
to
opt
into
this
experiment?
K
What's
your
eth
address,
it
will
be
public
blah,
blah
blah
blah,
and
so
we
did
all
that
by
hand
and
we
went
to
our
own
little
database
and
we
went
into
our
source
cred
and
we
like
up
clicked
all
the
things
and
opt
everybody
in
so
and
then
we
do
distributions.
But
we
do
it
all
manually
right
and
there's
advantages
to
that,
because
you
can
really
see
the
gaming
from
the
beginning.
If
somebody's
trying
to
do
something
sketchy
right,
one
hive
has
all
of
that
automated.
K
I
have
not
done
that
process.
I
posted
all
of
the
bots
that
they
use
for
that
entire
workflow
in
source
cred.
Today
I
mean
in
your
source
cred
channel
today,
so
I
am
starting
to
work
with
this.
So
I
work
with
like
a
server
of
like
a
couple
hundred
people
and
I
I'm
jumping
to
pick
up
a
ball
that
somebody
dropped
in
a
server
with
over
ten
thousand
people
and
I'm
like.
K
K
In
that
I'm
not
like
a
bot
person,
so
I'm
like
I
can't
answer
your
questions.
Hernando
can
can
probably
answer
your
questions.
He's
he's
I
passed
on
what
he
had
publicly
mentioned
copy
and
pasted
to
my
dms
that
he's
available
for
questions.
So
if
people
want
to
dive
into
these
bots
or
do
something
together,
we
could
even
use
this
time
for
that.
If
somebody
want
to
do
that
and
share
their
screen
and
we
can
see
how
to
set
them
up
together
when
I
jumped
into
the
how-to
really
quick,
it
looked
pretty
simple.
M
A
K
Q
A
M
K
N
K
Until
distributions
mateo,
are
you
planning
on
working
on
this
today
or
is
there
a
way
we
could
sync
on
it
and
I
could
watch
you.
I.
K
That
would
be
amazing.
Okay,.
M
So
yeah
I
I
want
to
totally
check
on
that.
So
let's
say
our
first
step
is
to
automate
our
process
even
more,
because
I
think
that's
that's
our
first
goal
of
these
next
steps
for
software
living.
Or
what
do
you
think.
A
Yeah,
I
think
so
that
is
definitely
a
next
step
and
then,
depending
on
how
this
proposal
evolves,
because
we
don't
know
if
there's
gonna
be
I
mean
I
think
this
will
pass,
because
nobody
else,
I
don't
think
I
don't
think
nobody
else-
would
propose
something,
but
that
can
happen
and
but
in
yeah,
so
the
the
the
next
thing
would
be
finding
out
a
way
for
using
that
bot
to
collect
also
the
addresses
from
praise
and
and
alexandra.
M
So
we
don't
send
them
dirty
data
coming
from
all
of
these
sources,
so
I
think
that
that
should
be
a
dashboard
or
some
application
that
is
external
to
all
of
them,
just
to
gather
the
gathered
information,
I'm
not
sure
if
one
hype
is
working
on
something
like
that.
Yeah
definitely.
K
K
I
there's
so
much
sharing
of
service,
so
you're
not
talking
about
medigap.
K
A
A
So
I
I'll
be
spinning
a
research
group
there
that
will
kick
off
on
the
10th.
Yes,
that
is
you
told
me
about.
J
F
A
And
then
eugene,
that
is
from
madagav,
it's
also
with
us,
and
there
are-
and
there
are
other
people
involved
in
in
other
ways
and
we'll
probably
be
getting
inputs
from
from
zarghum
to
and
from
other
people.
A
But
that
will
be,
and
then
octopus,
I
don't
know
if
you
know
him
but
he's
an
amazing
data
scientist
that
has
been
helping
us
and
he
will
be
a
mentor
there.
So
we'll
have
a
different
process
that
will
be
longer
and
more
detailed.
That
probably
will
give
inputs
to
this
like
in
the
future,
but
then
now
because
we
need
a
solution
just
for
when
we
actually
launch
will
be
yeah.
We
have.
A
We
have
some
of
the
data
scientists
that
we're
working
on
for
this
proposal.
That
is,
octopus,
is
also
helping,
but
then
there
is
ygg
that
leads
the
labs
and
he
has
the
ltf
long
tail
financial
and
then
there
will
there's
more
people
there.
So,
okay,
the
idea
is
that
we'll
be
able
to
look
into
this
data
every
quantification
and
then
answering
your
question
mateo.
I
think
they
can
be
separate
and
it's
okay
and
then
like.
A
G
M
Yeah,
I'm
not
sure
about
modifying
the
same
source
dashboard,
but
I
know
that
santi
made
one
with
someone.
I
don't
remember
his
name.
I
get
getting
all
of
the
data
from
source
grid
and
showing
them
in
in
beautiful
graphs.
So
we
could
use
that
one.
M
K
I'll
put
a
link
to
our
gosh:
what's
it
called
credit
graphics
floor?
We
have
something
that
you
know
you
can
look
up
a
person
and
then
it'll
show
where
all
of
their
cred
came
from
every
specific,
like
instance
like
every
message,
every
emoji
what's
coming
and
going
it's
very
slow
to
load.
N
K
I
want
to
know
how
the
github
and
discourse
plugins
are
working
for
you
all
how
long
you've
been
using
them
and
where,
like
looking
at
the
discord,
where
is
source
cred?
Where
do
you
see
it?
Is
it
every
single
channel
or
is
there
a
props,
and
I
did
a
thing
or
is
it
your
completely
different,
take
on
it,
I'm
so
curious
how
it
will
appear,
how
exists.