►
From YouTube: W1 Soft Gov WG: Onboarding WG, Ostrom's Principles, Conflict Res, Accountability - TE Commons
Description
Check out our notes here: https://miro.com/app/board/o9J_kkC0kIM=/
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/DDr5kYU
or say hello on Telegram http://t.me/CommonsStack
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/CommonsStack
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
B
A
Give
an
overview
of
the
of
what
we're
aiming
to
do
today,
that
is
the
onboarding
working
group
updates
and
then
after
principles.
So
our
working
group-
it's
not
as
objective
as
the
comms
one.
Unfortunately,
so
I
spent
a
lot
of
time
in
this
board
this
week
and
researching
how
we
can
move
forward
with
the
amount
of
data
we
have.
A
C
C
It's
making,
let's
say
try
to
make
the
most
out
of
what
we
can
do
during
the
course
and
then,
let's
say,
put
the
scenarios
on
the
table
and
then
start
the
process,
of
course,
to
discuss
it
with
tech
and
legal
and
culture
and
comms
and
see
okay,
how
we
can,
how
can
we
funnel
it
towards
the
best
solution
for
tea
commons
right?
So
this
is
the
just
to
give
you
some
context
here
and
I
I
told
them
hey.
There
are
limitations,
but
don't
try
to
fit.
Two
limitations.
C
C
D
D
It's
sort
of
like
a
mix
of
stakeholder
boards,
plus
some
some
sketching
out
of
the
crypto
economic
scenarios,
we're
imagining
and
then,
in
terms
of
our
progress,
we're
finalizing
some
questions
to
send
out
for
stakeholder
interviews
to
sort
of
test
our
assumptions
about
the
crypto
economics
so
far,
so
we'd
love
anyone's
feedback
on
that
and
we're
gonna
try
to
have
them
sent
out
basically
as
soon
as
possible.
But
I
can
give
you
a
more
specific
date
shortly.
E
C
D
D
G
C
D
H
So
in
general,
I
think
the
biggest
challenge
we
had
with
this
process
is
to
specify
what
the
t
commons
is
gonna
be
actually
used
for,
for
instance,
in
the
stakeholder
document,
angela
and
others
added
multiple
scenarios
where
it
could
go,
how
inclusive
or
exclusive
dte
commons
might
be,
and
so
on.
So
our
challenge.
There
has
been
a
lot
of
work
about
the
vision
of
te
commons.
H
So,
in
the
end,
after
the
interviews,
we
can
inform
our
stakeholder
boards
our
expectations
with
this,
because
we
started
out
with
doing
portrays
and
then
we
realized
we
don't
want
to
speculate
on
what
people
actually
want.
You
want
to
first
go
into
these
interviews
and
then
and
inform
with
the
material
of
the
interviews,
this
research
and
so
in
general.
What
we
have
been
doing
till
now
is
generally
brainstorm
and
map
out.
C
C
Yes
and
give
me
any
signal
if
you
can
see
my
screen:
okay,
brilliant,
so
I've
tried
to
collect
the
question
on
an
executive
layer
pop
up
when
I
was
reviewing
okay,
what
should
stakeholders
do?
What
can
we
do
with
technical,
the
technical
setup
we
have
at
the
moment
with
voting
and
distributing
funds?
Then
there
is
still
something
that
jessica.
I
guess
phrased
like
okay.
C
We
should
take
a
look
at
so,
for
example,
an
interface
to
outsiders
for
signing
service
contracts
to
non-members
of
the
community.
This
could
be,
for
example,
if
we,
if
we
are
ever
able
to
have
a
local
event
again
and
we
we
want
to
organize
it
and
then
also
have
a
location.
Then
you
always
have
some
service
contracts
who
should
be
able
to
sign
such
contracts
or.
C
Is
it
okay?
Can
you
find
it?
Let
me
know:
okay
for
holding
keys,
like
accounts
credentials,
rights
for
community
infrastructure,
like
the
discord
server
like
social
media
accounts
like
wallets,
then
for
holding
assets
like
the
twitter
account
as
a
like
an
asset
with
all
the
communities
we
collected
the
youtube
with.
I
guess
at
the
moment,
650.
C
Registrations,
the
web
domains
platforms
also
like
the
token
engineering
academy
than
for
preparing
votes,
putting
together
all
information
required
to
take
a
decision,
for
example.
Okay.
Now
we
are
mostly
focusing
on
proposals
like
what
do
we
want
to
fund,
but
there
might
be
also
proposals
how
to
how
to
take
the
next
step
in
the
smart
contracts
for
decision
making.
Now
in
case,
we
require
specific
expertise.
C
I
call
it
community
maintenance,
so
those
tiny
little
things
like
the
website
is
down
or
price
doesn't
work
or
a
logo
is
not
available,
tiny
tasks
that
nobody
is
fond
of,
taking
care
for
perhaps
too
tiny
to
push
it
to
community
voting
or
take
emergency
decision
when
a
quick
reaction
is
required
in
case
of
a
hack
or
a
bug
of
our
bonding
curve
for
conflict
resolution
and
enforcing
community
rules.
Another
aspect
as
a
custodian
if
he
needed
holding
funds
in
feared
and
crypto
as
representatives
of
community
members.
C
If
community
members
are
lacking
bandwidth
or
taking
care
that
proposals
are
executable,
so
are
there
any
policies
to
make
sure
that
it's
not
only
that
the
end
of
a
voting
process
is
not
the
voting
itself
but
delivering
on
proposals,
and
I
all
these
tasks
it's
a
list.
Perhaps
it's
not
it's
not
even
complete.
C
The
thing
is
I've.
I
found
that
many
people
at
the
moment
are
just
assuming
that
there
will
be
some
management
of
the
community,
but
this
kind
of
some
management
is
just
not
growing
out
of
thin
air.
We
have
to
make
decisions
here
and
I
just
wanted
to
highlight
that
these
are
areas
where
I
see
a
need.
It
might
not
be
one
layer,
so
not
three
people
responsible
for
all
those
tasks.
We
might
have
different
entities
taking
over
such
responsibilities,
but
I
guess
it's
worth
yeah
it's
worth
discussing.
It.
E
E
Oh
executive
branch
of
the
government-
and
that's
not
necessarily
what
this
looks
like
to
me:
it's
not
a
monopoly
on
all
execution
like
we
have
in
normal
governance
governments,
but
it
instead
it's
a
lot
of
small
autonomous
departments
that
at
least
know
their
role
and
know
that
things
need
to
be
done,
and
I
think
that's
that
makes
sense.
We
just
have
to
call
out
power
dynamics
because
that's
what
executive
layers
do
is
they
create
a
power
dynamic?
B
G
The
second
question
is:
I
know
that
common
stack
work
with
holocracy
or
holocracy,
or
so.
If
that
is
true,
then
can
we
have
like
a
maybe
a
way
of
replicating
that
approach
here,
so
that
we
play
we,
we
work
with
roles,
define
circles
and
so
on,
like
in
my
personal
opinion,
I
believe
that
there
is
not
coming
people
that
say:
oh
no,
this
needs
to
be
completely
decentralized.
G
So
my
approach
on
this
is
to
have
these
executive
layers
and
to
have
people
that
take
decisions
that
are
in
the
place
to
take
the
decisions
like
they
know
how
to
take
decisions,
but
at
the
same
time
that
anybody
that
is
a
trusted
person
can
say,
hey,
hey,
I
that
that
vote
or
that
decision,
I
think,
is
not
that
way,
so
that
can
argument
against
any
decision
taken,
but
that
would
be
like
the
specific
cases,
but
for
default.
Let
the
people
that
know
and
that
work
to
take
decisions.
E
C
E
A
E
C
Three,
can
you
hear
me
jess
check?
Okay,
I
hope
it's
fine
yeah.
So
what
I
don't
want
to
do
is
just
taking
these
scenarios,
put
it
up
for
voting
and
that's
it
I'd.
Rather,
then,
if
we
have
the
scenario
settled,
go
into
a
discussion,
align
it
with
comms
tech
further
also
legal
and
soft
culture,
so
that
we
yeah
so
that
we
have
a
solid
result
supported
by
all
working
groups
and
not
randomly
voting
on
scenarios.
I
A
A
Just
added
tokens
then
number
two
rules
to
need
to
feed
local
circumstances.
This
is,
I
think,
where
we
have
most
open
right
now,
because
what
are
our
local
circumstances?
We
are
the
centralized
crypto
community,
so
the
local
circumstances
are
very
broad
and
and
what
are
the
rules
that
we
are
building
and
how
they
can
be
enforced
after
the
lunch?
A
This
is
an
issue
that
I
had
in
a
past
community
that
I
was
a
part
of,
and-
and
I
see
in
other
communities
too,
is
how
can
we
enforce
soft
governance
because
once
voting
is
there
once
other
processes
that
are
on
chain?
Are
there?
It
becomes
very
hard
to
track
all
the
collaboration
we're
having,
especially
when
we're
scaling.
A
So
I
would
love
to
hear
more
inputs
in
in
in
number
two
and
then
number
three
participatory
decision
making.
We
have
the
advice
process
and
one
question
is:
would
we
like
to
keep
it
after
lunch?
I
think
is
important
and
it
falls
back
into
number
two.
It's
a
soft
governance
rule.
Let's
say
that
I
don't
know
how
we
would
be
able
to
enforce
it,
but
I
think
it's
very
healthy
for
the
ecosystem
to
have
some
type
of
process
for
the
proposal
making
before
the
voting
and
then
conviction
voting
is
participatory
decision.
A
Making
two
will
have
once
relaunched
number
four
commons
must
receive
legal
recognition
and
jurisdictions
where
they
operate.
The
trusted
seed
like
grief,
was
explaining
in
the
comms
working
group
is
somehow
a
part
of
this
legal
structure
and-
and
we
definitely
need
more
so
this
will
come
with
the
legal
working
group
that
we
should
start
iterating
on.
So
if
you
guys
are
interested
on
starting
a
legal
working
group,
if
you
know
crypto
lawyers,
that
would
want
to
come
play
with
us.
A
Let's
start
this
conversation
number
six
sanctions
for
violations
should
be
graduated
juan,
is
making
amazing
progress
with
the
conflict
resolution
process,
and
he
will
jump
into
it
very
soon
to
show
a
bit
more
of
how
grounded
it
is.
It
became
from
a
complexity
of
many
ideas
to
very
simple
steps
that
are
very
realistically
aligned
with
the
with
the
the
commons
that
we
are
building
and
then
five
rules
are
enforced
by
effective
and
accountable
monitoring,
so
how
to
enforce
mutual
accountability.
A
I
think
this
has
a
lot
to
do
with
what
angela
was
just
speaking
about
and
with
having
a
place
where
we
can
see
all
the
tasks
from
the
community,
who
are
the
owners
of
those
tasks
once
one
source
of
truth
document
and
that
we
can
all
track
progress
from
there,
and
this
creates
mutual
accountability
and
yeah.
I
think
that's
what
I
meant
by
workflow
charts
and
the
number
eight
comms
should
be
nested
ecosystems
within
larger
commons.
A
We
are
inside
of
the
ethereum
net
ecosystem
and
we're
also
developing
dow
to
thou
relationships
which
will
create
ecosystems
inside
of
ecosystems,
and
we
can
create
a
mutual
support
relationship
from
there
and
also
the
sub-dials
that
will
be
funded
from
the
token
engineering,
commons
and
then
conflict
resolution
should
be
easily
accessible
and
low
cost.
So
part
of
one
conflict
resolution
practice
is
to
have
experts
training
on
conflict
resolution
towards
community
members.
A
So
so
we
can
have
local
mediators
and
I've
been
studying
about
how
that
is
way
more
effective
than
having
external
conflict
mediators
to
at
least
be
the
first
point
of
contact.
So
people
feel
like
they
are
talking
to
someone
they
understand
and
that
understand
the
conflicts
where
they're
coming
from
and
then,
if
this
doesn't
provide
any
solutions,
then
we
can
bring
to
dispute
with
external
parties
like
like
claros
or
aragon
court
or
other
types
of
external
dispute
parties
that
we
can
think
of
so
I'll
open
for
questions,
comments
now
and
yeah.
A
J
K
Yeah,
I
think
that,
yes,
we
can
because
well
to
this
week,
we
can.
We
were
in
a
in
a
blockchain
and
crypto
law
lab,
and
that
was
a
big
question
like
what
is
the
difference
between
social
law
and
traditional
law
and
like
after
much
discussions,
at
least
the
the
the
concept
that
I
that
I
think
I
built
is
that
there
is
no
difference
between
social
law
and
traditional
law.
I
mean
like,
as
as
in
as
in
a
sport
game.
K
There
are
laws
that
are
only
applied
to
that
sport
and,
if
you're,
not
playing
that
sport,
that
rule
don't
apply
to
you.
So
it's
like
when
people
act
it
gets
into
our
community,
they
have
to
accept
the
rules
that
are
are
are
marked
and
that
everyone
has
consensus
on
them
like
like
yeah.
You
cannot
disrespect
another
another
member
or
something
like
there
are
these
basic
rules
that
that
that
can
that,
with
consensus,
can
be
legitimate.
A
I
agree
100
and
the
challenge
is
okay.
We
have
these
rules,
but
then
anybody
can
submit
a
proposal,
let's
say
and
and
the
and
the
higher
governance
is
is
open
in
a
sense.
So
if
I
go
there
and
I
submit
a
proposal-
and
I
don't
know
of
the
soft
governance
rules
of
this
community
and
and
maybe
other
people
will
vote
in
this
proposal
like
what
would
make
community
members
not
vote
in
a
proposal
of
someone
that
is
not
aligned
with
the
soft
governance
rules.
E
I
think
that's
the
big
difference
between
social
law
and
regular
law,
regular
law,
it's
all
written
down
and
there's
specific
people
that
are
appointed
to
judge
whether
it's
right,
whether
it's
true
or
not,
and
there's
a
whole
system
in
place,
whereas
social
law,
it's
sort
of,
I
don't
want
to
say
mob
rule
but
sort
of
right
like
where
there's
a
general
understanding
and
people
can
see
this
vote.
This
proposal,
for
something
that
they
know,
is
not
part
of
the
mission
of
the
of
the
token
engineering
commons
and
they
can
confidently.
E
You
know
a
vote
against
it
or
even
right
in
the
forum.
This
is
against
the
proposed,
like
like
rules,
and
if
you
really
want
to
do
this,
then
here's
the
system
of
how
to
change
the
rules,
because
that's
one
of
the
eleanor
ostrom's
main
thing
is
that
one
of
the
principles
is
that
the
participants
of
the
systems
have
to
be
able
to
change
the
rules.
So
sometimes
something
that
is
against
the
rules
might
be
important
to
do.
For
our
mission,
yeah
santi.
L
L
K
E
M
M
Yeah
I
hear
my
echo
so
somebody
hear
me
so
so
so
basically
you
want
to
have
have
a
fairly.
You
know
explored
understanding
of
what
principles
you
want
to
be
guided
by
you
know
it
doesn't
mean
that
it
needs
to
be
like
regular
law
that
everything
needs
to
be
nailed
down
in
detail,
but
you
want
to
have
some
kind
of
referent
of
what
principles
that
you're
guided
by
also
when
you,
when
you
grow,
you
know.
M
Basically,
you
know
what,
if
this
group
is
at
some
point,
only
making
up
a
small
majority
minority
of
like
a
much
larger
pool,
and
you
want
to
be
able
to
change
the
rules
because
you
want
to
be
able
to
adopt
for
future
unforeseen
circumstances.
But
you
want
to
be
sure
that
this
is
done
in
a
safe
way
and
that
it's
not
arbitrary.
You
know,
suddenly,
you
know
a
large
porsche.
A
large
group
comes
in
and
starts
to
derail
the
thing.
M
So
these
are
very,
very
subtle
and
delicate
topics,
and
I
just
wanted
to
kind
of
put
a
little
bit
of
emphasis,
because
I
agree
with
what
you
say
in
nature.
But
when
you
deal
with
the
real
world
it
may
quickly
get
like
like
quite
a
bit
more
challenging
than
it
may
initially
look
like,
but
I'm
very
curious.
What
you're
going
to
share.
A
K
So
if
anyone
wants
to
join
the
document,
the
link
to
the
document
is
in
the
mirror
board
is
in
the
discord
and
basically
well
the
the
name
of
the
proposal
that
I've
been
thinking
about,
and
I
heard
that
the
people
like
it
is
gravity
as
the
energy
that
keeps
matter
together
when
things
start
like
pushing
away
from
each
other
and
yeah
like.
I
think
that,
in
human
logic,
the
veracity
of
something
is
related
to
an
earlier
presumption
of
truth,
so
the
dynamic
that
is
suggested
has
to
be
legitimated
as
a
common
agreement.
K
C
I
have
a
question
regarding
rotation
and
avoid
centralization
of
power
in
whatever
area,
conflict
resolution
or
others
enforcing
rules.
Whatever
my
experience
in
communities
is
not
only
that
you
have
people
who
who
are
who
want
to
stick
to
their
role
and
their
power.
It
can
also
be
the
other
way
around
that
you
don't
have
anybody
who
wants
to
take
over
responsibility.
C
So
what
can
we
do
here?
Just
imagine
we
have.
We
start
with
a
conflict
resolution
group
and
have
I
don't
know
three
people
and
in
the
course
of
six
months
those
three
people.
Well,
don't
have
the
bandwidth
anymore
and
just
quit,
and
we
end
up
with
having
anybody.
Is
this
also
somewhere
covered,
or
are
there
ideas
how
to
deal
with.
K
I
think
that
some
of
these,
like
parameters,
are
arbitrary,
like
maybe
we
can
have
a
rotation
like
every
three
years
and
like
people,
the
the
the
person
that
that
past
these
three
years
cannot
join
the
group
for
a
period
of
time
and
then
he
can
join
again.
I
mean
these.
These
are
things
that
should
be
like
agreed
between
between
us,
because
that's
what
gives
legitimacy
to
them.
A
I
think
in
this
sense
I,
like
the
approach
of
training
members
of
the
community
to
to
become
conflict
resolutors,
because
and
and
maybe
there
could
be
a
reward
for
that
and
an
incentive
for
people
to
participate
in
these
courses,
because
then
it
touches
into
the
intrinsic
motivation
of
like.
Maybe
there
is
a
conflict
that
people
feel
somehow
closer
to
that
they
would
like
to
solve,
and
then
this
would
naturally
gravitate
between
multiple
people
and
not
be
just
one
centralized
group.
M
We
also,
we
also
have
certain
examples
where
this,
where
we
can
draw
from
from
the
real
world,
for
example,
historically
the
the
first
nations
they
had
the
the
mechanism
of
well.
Essentially,
they
were
vibe
watchers,
so
they
basically
had
a
group
of
people.
They
were
just
they
had
a
rule
where
one
of
their
basic
rules
were
that
you
had
to
come
from
a
place
of
peace
right.
M
For
example,
that's
fine,
they
just
need
are
required
to
basically
take
care
of
their
own
centered
states
so
that
they
can
be
back
from
a
pure
state
act
again.
So
that's
probably
on
the
milder
version
where
we
basically
just
temporarily
inhibit
and
suspend
people.
Then
if
we
go
across
the
spectrum
towards
more
conflict
resolution,
where
things
can
be
more
agitated,
you
probably
need
more
more
specialized
mechanisms
where
you
appoint
people
or
have
some
kind
of
almost
like
a
framework
to
to
to
evaluate
and
in
a
wider
sense
judge.
What
is
it?
M
What
is
an
adequate
response
and
if
you
push
it
further,
then
this
is
something
we've
been
discussing
over
the
past
few
days
in
the
in
the
context
of
a
future
law.
It's
like
what
happens
if
you
really
have
criminal
conduct
and
you
actually
need
to
basically
decide
with
with
some
kind
of
response
to
to
basically
either
prevent,
inhibit
or
or
take
some
kind
of
action.
M
G
F
F
That
is
a
fact
that
you
are
doing
something
wrong
and,
in
my
experience
with
sometimes
what
it
help
is
not
like
punish
people,
but
sometimes
people
just
need
to
talk
like
I
need
a
medium.
Like
a
media,
I
don't
know
how
to
say
that
in
english,
like
a
third
medium
person
who
who
can
talk
with
both
persons,
that's
something
that
helps
a
lot
like
just
tell
people
like
when
I
they
are
fighting
in
a
slack
just
like
hate
you
and
and
as
a
third
person
talk
with
them.
A
A
So
thinking
about
that-
and
the
answer
is
that
we
had
in
this
board
of
the
accountability,
what
is
the
main
block
for
accountability?
The
main
things
that
came
up
were
personal
things
of
not
feeling
like
your
work
is
valuable
or
not,
feeling
included
or
not
feeling
important.
So
many
things
feeling
emotions
related,
and
this
brought
me
to
think
that.
E
C
L
Well,
I
want
to
thank
everyone.
It's
it's
awesome
to
see
all
the
information
that's
being
created
here
on
the
group
and
trying
to
catch
up
with
everything
just
resonating
from
libya's
last
words,
I
think
one
of
the
one
of
the
things
that
we
could
do
to
try
to
create
more
more
trust
between
the
the
groups
is
to
maybe
every
once
in
a
while.
I
know
that
everyone's
got
a
tight
schedule,
but
we
are
like
running
all
the
time
and
and
doing
all
these
meetings.
Work
meetings.
L
K
F
D
B
N
O
Hey
thanks,
optimus
good
job
yeah.
I
just
wanted
to
say
a
good
positive
reinforcement
to
everyone.
I
think
this
is
the
right
track.
This
kind
of
workflow
that's
been
established
and
the
working
groups
and
the
channels
everything
seems
very
focused
and
yeah,
like
you
said
we
can
all
come
together
and
get
out
of
our
bubbles
together.
So
yeah
I
just
want
to
give
everyone
a
pat
on
the
back.
O
It's
easy
to
be
hard
on
ourselves
and
because
there's
such
a
big
impact
to
what
we're
doing,
but
I
don't
think
we
can
go
wrong.
This
sort
of
weekly
progress
like
every
meeting
I
made
and
then
the
data
collection
too,
like
there's
always
documents
being
produced,
there's
always
everything's
being
crystallized
into
sort
of
actionable
takeaways.
So
I
just
want
to
say
good
job.
Everyone.
G
Thanks
yeah,
I'm
really
excited
about
everything
that
is
going
on
here.
It's
dance
has
been
amazing
and
it's
a
great
team.
So
let's
keep
the
the
goodbye.
I
was
also
doing
the
linkedin.
I
also
I
just
shared
it
to
jessica,
so
she
can
look
at
it
and
later
we
can
give
the
authority
of
their
representation
of
linkedin
to
anybody
that
wants
it.
I
A
pastor
jess
thanks,
libby
yeah,
I
just
wanted
to
say
there
were
two
things:
what
livia
said
about
the
human
side?
I
we
have
been
having
many
discussions
and
I'm
very
interested
in
finding
ways
so
for
the
rituals
and
one
of
which
I'll
mention
as
a
sneak
preview,
but
we're
not
quite
there.
We're
planning
a
happy
praise,
giving
celebration
for
aligning
with
american
thanksgiving
week
so
we'll
be
sending
something
soon,
so
we
can
have
like
a
year
in
review.
State
of
the
non-state
and
people
can
sing.
I
I
want
to
hear
some
like
latin
songs.
I'm
hoping
people
will
not
be
shy
and
bust
out
their
guitar
and
just
like
sit
around
and
share
what
people
have
been
doing
this
year
and
praising
people,
and
also
letting
people
share
poems
or
have
some
time
for
this
open
sharing,
because
santi
also
what
you
were
saying.
I
think
this
is
important
and
it
is
a
challenge
and
what
we
have
to
figure
out
in
virtual
communities,
how
to
feel
like.
I
Well,
we
are
together,
jeff's
brother
got
married
virtually
last
weekend
and
it
inspired
me
that
we
can
do
these
things
and
feel
like
we're
there.
So,
with
those
two
things
being
said,
I'm
happy
to
hear
everything
happening
and
we're
so
lucky
to
have
the
newcomers
and
the
te
academy
and
dolce
the
fact
that
you're
running
a
slack
with
10
000
people.
We
can
learn
so
much
from
you.
So
thanks
everybody
and
so
grateful
for
all
of
your.
E
M
All
right
sure
yeah.
So
I
again
a
lot
of
amazing
content
in
here,
I'm
very
much
down
for
the
legal
group
that
was
brought
up
and
juan
also
like
pursuing
that
direction.
You
know
if,
if
there's
any
way
any
way
to
contribute
to
participate,
I
feel
that's
very,
very
valuable
and
very
down
for
that.
I,
like
the
idea
of
of
hanging
out
to
gain
familiar
familiarity
and
kind
of
develop
that
kind
of
social.
It
was
brought
up
in
the
context
of
trust
and
that's
really
wonderful.
M
I
do
believe
that
there
are
additional
layers
required
to
kind
of
make
trust
scalable
from
a
structural
point
of
view
and
because
we
have
to
understand-
or
at
least
I
believe
that
for
trust
to
emerge,
there
needs
to
be
a
certain
degree
of
vulnerability,
and
I
mean
this-
you
know
in
the
wider
sense
as
a
kind
of
exposure.
So
technically
we
can
almost
think
of
the
opposite
of
an
llc
right.
M
M
You
know,
sometimes
almost
bordering
kind
of
towards
a
paranoid
approach
of
like
making
everything
super
safe,
and
then
that
creates
this
extreme
isolation,
which
is
necessary
for
some
very
critical
cases,
but
it
needs
to
be
balanced
and
and-
and
so
there
are
kind
of
probably
new
designs
that
need
to
emerge
and
be
developed
to
create
a
social
kind
of
exposure
so
that
we
have
a
network
of
trust
that
can
be
experienced
anyway,
very
glad
to
be
here
and
yeah.
I
hope
I
think
I
was
the
last
otherwise
next
please
go.
J
Yeah,
I
don't
have
so
much
to
add
I'm
very
happy
here,
it's
a
very
interesting
and
community
with
a
lot
of
potential,
because
there
are
a
lot
of
interesting
communities,
a
lot
of
beautiful
and
pleasable
present
communities.
But
this
is
about
interesting
with
potential,
so
I'm
very
excited
about
the
future,
and
I
was
happy
about
this
present.
I
was
just
thinking
that
everybody
I
want
to
make
an
intervention.
J
I
say,
like
you
know
it's
it's
too,
it's
a
it's
a
too
much
big
thing.
We
need
to
something
more
concrete,
because
I'm
very
like
people
excited
about
things
and
get
too
much
in
the
long
run,
and
so
it
came
to
mind
to
me
that
could
be
nice
in
the
soft
god
group.
That
is
the
group
about
the
governance
of
the
world
community,
to
know
our
personal
defects
and
to
communicate
it
to
the
others.
J
For
example,
when
I'm
hungry
I
tend
to
get
nervous
very
early,
so,
for
example,
I
know
if
you,
if
you,
if
I
respond
badly
to
you,
don't
care
too
much
about
it.
Okay,
something
like
that
beyond,
as
we
are
doing
to
praise
ourselves
and
be
grateful
for
our
contributions,
also
to
know
our
personal
recurrent
die
effects.
I
think
it
would
be
nice
because
I
don't
know,
maybe
someone
is
too
local
like
or
someone
is
the
opposite
of
being
tutor
ethics,
like
a
super
concrete-
and
I
don't
know
just
a
tough
and
nothing.