►
Description
TheSoftgov Working Group researches and applies best practices for governance, social collaboration and contribution rewards while implementing Ostrom’s 8 principles for governing the commons in its foundation.
We gather every Tuesday at 7pm CET.
Steward: Liviade
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
Like
hey,
how
are
you
doing
type
of
thing
how's
your
day,
wait,
wait!
Is
there
something
that
you
want
to
share
with
everybody
I'll
pass
to
you
david,
because
it
looks
it
looks
like
excited.
B
I'm
so
excited
you
could
see
it
it's
true
body.
Language
is
so
revealing
much
more
so
than
words
and
text,
and
I'm
so
excited
because
my
friend
dear
gadas-
and
I
are
I
sense-
the
kernels
of
the
seed
of
an
idea
for
a
extended
work
party,
slash
meditative
session,
where
I'm
gonna
go
visit.
This
wonderful
individual,
perhaps
at
his
residence,
perhaps
within
the
month,
and
maybe
perhaps
help
him
with
some
construction
and
of
course
deepen
our
meditative
practices,
as
always
as
the
core
of
personal
growth
and
oh
we're
hatching
some
wonderful
ideas.
B
There
dergades
and
I'm
very
excited
about
it,
but
I
get
excited
easily,
I
think,
and
so
yeah
I'm
in
a
good
mood.
I'm
here
just
to
observe
and
listen,
I'm
not
a
core
soft
gov
member.
I
and
I
have
probably
been
to
one
or
two
meetings,
but
I
I'm
here
to
learn-
and
I
I
like
what
you're
about
and
I
really
think
without
soft
gov,
like
it's
just
too
hard,
we
need
the
softness,
it's
a
balance
and.
C
Thanks
I
mean
my
day
is
going
pretty
good
hanging
out
with
friends
up
in
the
mountains:
yeah
just
beautiful
scenery,
pacific
west
coast
and
yeah
I'm
moving
in
a
week,
I'm
moving
to
costa
rica.
So
I'm,
like
I'm,
super
excited
with
that.
C
D
Yeah,
I'm
I'm.
I
have
kind
of
a
serious
topic
to
bring
up.
I
I
feel
like
I
feel
like
we're
when
I
was
talking
before
about
maybe
talking
about
some
shadow
things.
D
The
reason
why
I
want
to
talk
about
the
shadow
thing
is
because
I
feel
like
there's
some
stuff
that
we're
ignoring
that's
really
golden
inside
of
that
shadow
and
then,
if
we
pull
that
stuff,
if
we
talk
about
the
shadow
stuff,
then
we'll
be
able
to
find
those
nuggets
of
things
and
then
that'll
make
people
more
excited
to
talk
about
it
in
the
hope
that
we
could
hopefully
find
those
things
out
in
the
future.
D
But
the
thing
that
I'm
observing
now
is
that
there
seems
to
be
in
the
headlong
rush
toward
you
know,
hatching
and
other
things
that
that
I
I'm
noticing
some
of
the
sort
of
underlying
sort
of
boring
system,
administration,
sort
of
work
and
stuff
is
kind
of
feeling
a
little
bit
neglected
in
terms
of
when
we're
trying
to
do
things
in
comms
or
whatever
we're
just
kind
of
running
into
a
bunch
of
roadblocks,
or
we
have
folks
who
are
sort
of
changing
passwords
to
things
and
then
not
updating
it
in
the
in
the
common
password
thing.
D
So
I
just
you
know,
would
like
to
maybe
talk
about
if
it's
possible
to
have
like
not
just
a
stewards
thing
but
like
a
like
an
administration
layer.
Inside
of
our
you
know,
governance
structure
so
that
there's
the
stuff
that
is
just
clear
and
and
complicated
and
isn't
all
about
pushing
the
tec
forward,
but
more
about
sort
of
laying
a
foundation
of
normalized
standard
operating
procedures.
D
Hopefully
that
stuff
can
sort
of
exist
and
be
treated
in
in
the
kind
of
almost
separate
way,
so
that
it
doesn't
fall
prey
to
what
I
see
happening.
A
lot
in
terms
of
the
token
engineering
comments
and
the
weird
relationship
between
token
engineering,
commons
and
common
stack
is
a
little
confusing
in
that
way
too.
So
I'd
sure
like
it,
and
maybe
this
is
a
little
bit
late,
but
I
do
feel
like
we're
missing
a
bit
of
an
administrative
layer
in
terms
of
that.
A
E
Yeah
for
me,
it's
super
interesting.
The
75
percent
governance
give
back
a
boat
it
closed
yesterday
and
the
percentage
like
meets
the
requirements
of
approval,
but
I
also
see
that
there
was
like
a
some
last
minute
signaling
and
I
I
feel
that
yeah
we
we
shouldn't,
ignore
that
signaling
and
try
to
incorporate
it
in
the
solution
and
also
yeah.
I
I
am
excited
about
everything
that
is
happening.
E
It's
it's
difficult
to
always
like,
like
please
everyone
in
in
this,
like
very
collective
and
and
big
context,
but
yeah.
I
for
sure
think
that
we
are
all
trying
to
do
our
best
and-
and
I
also
want
yeah
to
to
be
able
to
process
all
input
that
we
receive
in
the
system.
A
Just
things
I
want
to
share,
that's
the
that's
it.
I
want
to
share
that.
The
team
that
worked
to
get
the
vote
out
like
to
get
the
word
out
for
the
vote
did
an
exemplary
job.
I
still
don't
know
exactly
who's
responsible.
A
A
Yeah
david
and
chewie
yeah.
A
The
com
team
did
a
really
great
job,
that's
right,
and
there
was
some
individual
outreach
that
was
really
great,
so
I
was
just
overall,
very
impressive
and
then
I
just
see
all
these
really
cool
initiatives
happening
everywhere
and
it's
just
really
cool
to
see.
It's
really
cool
to
see
a
lot
of
very
motivated
individuals,
taking
initiative
having
agency
and
moving
initiatives
forward.
I
guess
that's
what
I
want
to
share.
That's
the
first
thing
that
came
to
mind
when
we
started
talking.
G
Yeah,
thank
you.
I
you
know
I'm
just
really
impressed
with
the
the
vote
turnout.
I
really
I
really
like
seeing
that
I
really
like
seeing
the
nose.
G
I
you
know
it's
good
to
have
a
diversity
and
it's
not
just
100
consensus
for
everything.
Like
you
know,
a
lot
of
decisions
are
going
to
be
difficult
and
it's
okay
to
have
those
no's
and
it's
healthy
and
productive,
and
it's
just
good
to
see.
I
I
think
that
sometimes
I
don't
know
with
what
wonka
was
saying
like,
maybe
there's
something
to
learn
from
it,
but
sometimes
maybe
there's
there's
not
there's
just
people
who
are
like
eh.
I
I
don't
want
to
agree
with
with
that
proposal
and
that's
fine,
but
yeah.
G
I
think
we're
doing
a
pretty
good
job.
I
think
that
you
know
I
I
agree
with
the
some
of
what
durgados
was
talking
about
in
terms
of
having
kind
of
this
administrative
layer,
especially
as
we
keep
growing
and
growing.
These
are
going
to
need
to
be
addressed,
otherwise
people
are
going
to
keep
running
into
obstacles
in
terms
of
decision
making
in
terms
of
discretion,
and
so
I
I'd
like
to
see
more
guest
guidance
and
documentation
around
that,
so
something
that
I've
been
trying
to
work
on
as
well.
G
So
I
will
I'll
take
a
stab
at
it
and
I'll
pass
it
to
zapdi.
Maybe
you
haven't
gone.
H
Yeah
thanks
nate
yeah.
I
went
I
went
to
it
yesterday,
so
I
cannot
move
my
mouth.
It's
still
sleeping
but
yeah
I
mean
I'm
really
happy
to
work
with
ivy,
she's,
amazing
and
yeah.
I
just
wanted
to
share
that
she's,
so
cool
I
mean
the
whole
community.
Is
super
cool.
Don't
take
me
wrong,
but
yeah
it's
I
don't
know.
I
just
feel
it's
super
good
to
work
with
her
and
I'll
pass
it
to
nick.
I
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you,
for
I
guess,
like
everyone,
who's
been
getting
feedback,
I'm
still
kind
of
figuring
out
how
to
like,
like
I'm,
still
not
sure
what
the
process
is
really
to
like
bring
ideas
to
your
teeth
and
get
advice
rather
than
reach
out
to
like
a
couple
people.
I
know
that
there
should
be
a
post
in
the
forum.
J
Hey
yeah.
J
Pretty
good
kind
of
settled
in
after
a
big
move
across
the
country,
so
I
kind
of
feel
what
you're
you're
up
to
mitch,
although
not
moving
to
a
completely
different
country.
So
best
of
luck
with
that
sounds
exciting.
I've
been
working
a
little
bit
on
the
glossary.
J
I
think
it's
in
just
kind
of
clean
it
up
a
little
bit.
There
may
be
some
more
content.
We
want
to
add,
but
yeah
that's
kind
of
what
what
I've
been
up
to,
but
overall
feeling
a
little
bit
more
settled
in
the
new
place
and
balancing
obligations
with
my
previous
job.
My
I
guess
current
job
and
trying
to
branch
out
into
doing
some
more
work
with
this
group
and
and
a
couple
others
so
yeah
I'll
pass
to.
K
Yeah
appear
on
creations.
That's
me.
I
just
wanted
to
say
hey
to
mitch.
I
hope
you're
going
to
do
some
kind
of
permaculture
stuff
like
out
while
you're
out
there
like
agriculture
or
some
tropic
forestering,
or
you
know
marine
permaculture
or
marine
aquaculture
hope
you
hope
you
dive
deep
into
all
that
stuff,
because
I
don't
know
I'm
in
here
for
tec
to
create
an
edge
between
permaculture
and
crypto,
because
you
guys
are
digital
ecosystem
creators
and
permaculturalists
are
real
ecosystem
creators.
K
I
think
there's
a
huge
you
know
edge
there
to
be
had,
but
yeah,
not
really
anything
to
say
about
the
voting.
I've
just
kind
of
been
a
lurker
for
a
long
time,
but
I'm
always
hanging
around
so
yeah
hope
everyone's
doing
well
and.
F
L
Thanks
lee
yeah,
I
thought
it
was
interesting,
the
the
comments
that
chew
erased
and
and
noggin
as
well
yeah,
just
working
on
a
lot
of
different
things
within
different
working
groups
and
on
another
dial,
I'm
yeah
just
enjoying
life
pretty
much
and
with
that
I'll
pass
it
back
to
you.
A
Cool
thanks
everybody,
so
I
put
some
topics
in
the
agenda
but
feel
free
to
add
some
more
topics,
like
those
ones
are
the
ones
you
guys
mentioned
now
in
the
intro
and
some
things
to
follow
up
on
and
also
I
just
wanted
to
share,
as
we
spoke
a
lot
about
it
on
the
last
meeting
of
having
like
rotative
stewards
and
how
that
could
be
interesting.
A
I
posted
in
in
soft
cup
chat
yesterday
if
anyone
wanted
to
lead
this
call
today,
but
just
to
put
that
invite
out
again
if
anyone
wants
to
lead
a
soft
feel
free
to
jump
in.
Maybe
we
can
bounce
ideas
around
or
if
you
have
something
already,
this
space
is
is
open
and
we
just
need
to
talk
in
the
chat
to
coordinate.
A
So
there
was
a
lot
of
things
I
kind
of
grouped
things
around
and
I
think
they
belong
to
multiple
working
groups.
So
there
are
some
things
that
are
like
in
the
steward
and
the
stuart
working
group
and
some
of
the
meeting
ideas
that
we
had
like
rotated
facilitation.
A
Like
I
mentioned
and
then
developing
new
meeting
formats.
I
think
this
can
come
together
with
rotated
facilitation
because
I
feel,
like
maybe
people
start
to
get
like
into
a
flow
of
like
the
cadence
of
the
meetings
they
facilitate
and
then,
if
someone
new
comes,
they
have
new
ideas.
I
think
is
totally
welcome
for
experimentation.
A
And
then
there's
one,
I
thought
it
was
interesting
too
inviting
contributors
to
facilitate
calls
with
specific
themes.
So
if
there's
something
like
the
gravity,
training
is
doing
now
like
inviting
someone
to
talk
about
a
specific
topic.
We
can
have
that
and
all
of
the
working
groups
and
the-
and
this
can
be
like
very
fruit
for
for
everybody
and
and
then
maybe
some
of
these
topics
we
can
discuss
more
in
the
stewards,
call
and
then
having
async
collaboration,
how
to
contribute-
and
this
maybe
goes
more
to
the
community's
working
group.
A
So
having
I
don't
know,
improving
the
calls
to
action
for
what
people
can
grab
to
work
on
async
having
the
onboarding
guide
that
you
guys
are
already
working
with.
So
this
is
already
in
process
a
guideline
for
bringing
ideas
to
reality.
I
think
nick
you
also
mentioned
that
today.
A
So
this
can
be
something
that,
if
someone
wants
to,
if
you
want
to
like,
take
this
nick
to
kind
of
develop
something
like
what
would
be
a
pathway
that
if
someone
has
an
idea,
how
how
does
that
move
inside
the
organization
like
maybe
it
goes
to
the
forum
and
then
and
then
people
can
like
give
other
ideas
to
it,
and
that
can
become
an
issue
or
I
don't
know
people
can
find
others
to
you.
Can
it
can
become
like
a
little
task
force
like?
B
That
was
me
asking:
how
can
we
get
community
in
involvement
in
suggesting
publications
and
then
vet
those
publications
with
the
community?
If
anyone
is
a
member
at
one
hive,
they
have
a
social
curation
channel.
That
does
that,
and
it
works
quite
well,
but
I
think
maybe
there's
a
lot
more
community
members
that
are
able
to
participate
in
it.
So
I'm
not
sure
if
we
have
the
the
size
of
the
people
who
would
like
to
be
involved,
but
it'd
be
great.
B
G
I
yeah
some
feedback
for
you
david.
I
okay,
I
think
I
I
like
that
idea
a
lot
and
I
think
that
giving
people
access
to
that
twitter
doc
that
we
do
have
the
csv
file.
G
I
think
that
if
anybody
wants
to
submit
one,
they
could
put
it
there
and,
like
I
don't
say
I
would,
instead
of
rather
the
community,
decide
on
a
decision
like
that
that
to
your
discretion
like,
I
think
that
you
know
it's
fitting
and
it
suits
the
narrative
at
that
point
yeah.
I
would
much
rather
have
that
decision
put
into
your
hand
rather
than
make
that
kind
of
a
an
obligation
or
burden
on
the
community,
but
that's
just
my
opinion
on
it.
So.
B
And
you
know
that's
how
the
old
system
used
to
work,
and
I
I
I
asked
if
anyone
used
it
and
they
said
yeah,
tam
and-
and
I
think
they
said
tam
and
libby
were
who
used
that
remind
the
community
that
it
exists,
and
if
this
is
not
related
to
soft
gov,
I
apologize.
I
I
I
thought
it
was
relevant.
Okay,
thanks
folks
for
the
feedback.
A
Yeah
no,
this
is
yeah.
This
is
definitely
a
comms
issue,
but
this
came
up
as
like
some
of
the
cultural
practices
or
some
things
in
our
culture
that
we
should
address.
So
I
think
it-
and
I
think
this
can
be
related
to
like
the
ideas
process.
B
If
we
see
input
a
lot
coming
through
the
existing
method,
I
can
expand
it
into
that.
A
I
will
assign
this
to
you
here,
just
like
very
informally
put
that
you're
taking
care
of
it,
and
then
maybe
you
can
make
an
issue
for
it
on
github.
That
would
be
great.
Okay,.
G
I
I
will
say
that
I
would,
I
would
really
love
to
see
a
polling
channel,
though,
within
our
discord,
I
really
do
think
the
benefit
of
having
access
to
polls
within
our
discord
channel
be
beneficial
to
people
who
are
making
decisions
individually
to
seek
feedback
that
doesn't
have
to
be
as
formal
as
a
forum
post,
but
can
be
like
just
a
quick
hey.
This
is
what
I'm
doing
do
we
have
any
objections
or
any
things
about
this,
and
if
not,
then
you
can
go
ahead
and
execute.
D
I
have
a
question
about
this
too.
I
think
I
think
there
is
a
kind
of
an
assumption
that,
and
this
kind
of
goes
into
calms
a
little
bit
too
in
the
sense.
Where
are
there
spaces
in
which
a
person
can
engage?
D
You
know
due
to
limited
bandwidth,
so,
for
example,
I
I
limit
almost
entirely
all
of
my
involvement
in
this
community
on
discord.
I
don't
I
don't
you
know
it's
continuously,
I'm
always
the
very
last
one
to
comment
or
vote.
I
always
take.
You
know
somebody
might
say
that
to
me
a
million
times,
but
my
bandwidth
is
not
so
great
that
I
can
go
look
at
the
thing
or
figure
out
where
it
is
on
the
forum
or
sort
it
out
and-
and
you
know
so-
I
just
I
just
limit
myself
to
this.
D
So
in
terms
of
communicating
you
know
it's
a
governance,
question
too
right,
because
everyone
is
so
inv
involved,
and-
and
so
I
do
so
much
contest
switching
as
it
is
so
I
I
tend
to
limit
my
my
my
involvement
to
the
discord.
D
So
if
I,
if,
if
it's
not
in
the
discord
or
if
they're
just
too
many
channels-
or
you
know
it's
just
there's
just
a
whole
lot
of
that
which
sort
of
defeats
my
ability
to
to
be
as
effective
as
a
as
a
contributor
as
I
could
be
in
some
of
these,
these
things
too.
D
So
I
think,
in
terms
of
when
we're
doing
campaigns
and
communicating
and-
and
it
like,
I
say
it
goes
down
to
governance
in
terms
of
informed
consent
that
we
should
be
communicating
things
in
you
know
in
in
in
parallel
as
much
as
we
can.
So
that's
just
another
thing
I
just
thought
of
that
were
out
of
by
what
somebody
else
was
saying.
A
Very
contained
like
the
idea
that
david
had
of
doing
something
like
oh
just
for
tweets.
There
is
this
polling
here,
it's
not
anything
mandatory,
but
it's
just
a
signaling
from
the
community
that
can
be
fun,
and
then
people
know
that
they
go
to
that
chat
because
there's
no
other
chat
that
they
can
go.
But
when
it
comes
to
proposals,
I
think
if
there
is
like
a
signaling
space
on
discord
and
another
one
in
the
forum,
and
then
there
is
that
tool
that
thing
that
just
my
senses,
that
it
would
become
chaotic
and
confusing.
A
I
think,
having
feedback
protocols,
guidelines,
feedback
practices
would
be
something
really
cool
something
I
I
brought
up
a
while
ago,
but
I
end
up
not
having
the
bandwidth
to
do
it
and
it
came
up
again
last
time,
so
I
think
it's
something
that
could
be
fun
if
someone
wants
to
take
it.
A
I
I'm
so
great
also
like
if
it
was
paired
with
like
personal
shadow
work,
so
that,
like
both
feedback
and
work
together,.
E
Maybe
I
don't
know
it's
an
idea,
but
it
would
be
good
to
do
it
like
without
names,
because
sometimes
yeah
you
can
say
like
okay,
I
didn't
like
the
feedback
coming
from
levy
and-
and
maybe
that
would
like
yeah
cause
certain
frictions.
Then
if
I
just
read
the
feedback
and
I
and
I
think
that
it's
just
from
the
community.
A
No,
I
think,
the
the
the
the
what
I
thought
it
would
be
that
it
would
be
very
individual
like
that.
This
process
would
be
like.
Oh
me,
having
a
moment
with
you
and
then
sharing
feedback
if
you're
open
to
it.
So
it
wouldn't
be
like
out
in
the
open
for
everybody
and
without
like
context,
but
but
it
could
be
and
then
and
then
and
then
it
could
be
anonymous.
That
would
make
more
more
sense,
but
maybe
that.
D
For
myself,
I
know
that
that
I
had
a
great
conversation
between
nate
and
I
the
other
day
just
talking
about
you
know
different
roles
and
the
tec
and
what
he
was
doing
and
and
so
on
and
and
it
it
felt
like
that
was
a
very
generative
sort
of
discussion.
So
I
do
wonder
if
there's
some
role,
that
we
as
gravitons
and
in
terms
of
us,
you
know
potentially
participating
in
other
taos
as
a
governance
thing
to
say
that
we
are.
D
We
have
like
an
office
hours
thing
where
we
say:
okay,
if
you're
having
a
personal
shadow
thing
and
we
we
listen
to
you,
you
know
what
I'm
saying
like
we
without
judging
and
without
you
know,
and
so
you
can
have
somebody
to
sort
of
talk
or
if
there's
just
somebody
you've
come
to
trust,
to
be
able
to
communicate
hey.
You
know
what
your
perspective
is
valuable
to
me
and
therefore
I'd
like
to
elicit.
D
You
know,
maybe
a
communication
that
would
you
know
you
know
work
and
to
sort
of
actively
encourage
that,
like
I
know
I
do
that
with
anybody
here.
That
I
feel
you
know
is
great.
So,
like
the
other
day,
I
said:
hey
livy,
I
love
your
hair
or
whatever
I'll
just
say
stuff
like
that
to
people,
but
not
everyone
might
feel
that
comfortable
to
just
say,
hey.
D
You
know
I
could
use
a
hand
reflecting
on
this
shadow
thing
that
I've
noticed
or
I'd
like
to
listen
feedback,
not
only
for
myself,
but
maybe
for
my
role
or
for
my
stewardship
or
whatever.
So
I
don't
know
you
know
one,
but
that
seems
like
it
would
be
a
cool
governance
thing.
I
know
that
we
generally
have
a
culture
that
allows
for
that,
but
but
it
could
be
that
we
could
create
some
kind
of
a
formalized
system
that
way
when
we
generalize
it
to
other
dows
that
might
not
have
this
kind
of
open
culture.
F
I
also
just
want
to
make
sure
that
there's
like
awareness
around
the
buddy
system,
that
fresh
shell
is
pushing
and
for
giveth
and
the
common
stacks
and
in
the
idea
so
like
I
don't
necessarily
think
anonymous.
F
Feedback
is
a
good
idea
for
sure,
because
it's
very
easy
just
to
disregard,
but
it's
nice
to
build
a
rapport
with
someone
and
then
have
a
have
a
continual
feedback
system
where
there's
like
you
know
space
for
that
idea,
and
it's
not
only
about
feedback
on
the
person,
but
it's
also
about
the
person
to
give
feedback
on
the
organization
and
the
direction
and
be
able
to
have
space
to
think
about
it
and
actually
take
that
take
that
space.
D
I'm
not
aware
of
that
buddy
system.
Can
you
maybe
tell
me
about
it?
Is
that
something
that
we've
set
up
here?
I
I'm
not
aware
of
it.
I'm
sorry.
F
F
He
just
fulfills
the
other
roles
of
a
manager
that
you
know
are
used
that
are
useful
still
in
a
flat
organization,
specifically
feedback
rounds
for
the
organization
and
for
the
person,
and
also
you
know,
having
space
to
be
a
friend
have
not
be
lost
so
like
within
general
magic
giveth
and
the
common
stack
we're
trying
to
implement
this.
F
It's
still
halfway
being
implemented,
so
I
don't
have
any
results
on
if
it's
good
or
not,
but
the
basic
idea
is
that
everybody
has
a
buddy
and
that
buddy
is
like
for
them
to
give
sp
repeat
like
to
have
space
once
a
month
or
on
a
regular
basis
to
like
just
like
you
know,
talk
about
the
organization
how
they
could
improve
and
and
how
the
organization
can
improve
and
have
these
general
discussions.
F
And
then
you
know,
there's
not
like
a
formal
structure
of
how
the
the
feedback
gets
into
organization,
but
if
it's
good,
you
know
and
the
and
their
body
feels
like
this
is
important,
then
you
have
two
people
who
are
like.
No,
we
need
to
make
this
change,
and
then
it
can
usually
be
pushed
through.
Is,
is
the
idea
or
addressed
up
at
the
very
least,
and
that's
that's
it?
It's
just
like
anytime,
someone
comes
in
and
and
takes
on
a
formal
role.
They
they
come
up
with.
F
A
Cool,
so
do
you
want
my
my
intention
with
opening
this
board
was
really
to
start
spreading
some
issues,
so
people
can
have
some
things
to
work
on
and
that
we
can
all
like
share
our
progress
in
the
in
the
chat
and
we've
been
having
this
feedback
of
like.
Oh,
it's
really
hard
to
find
something
to
do
so.
A
How
can
we
transform
these
ideas
into
issues
and
into
something
that
people
feel
excited
to
work
on,
so
I
I
had
the
sense
that
you,
nick
aperon
and
durga
das
are
excited
to
work
on
something
like
this.
Would
you
like
to
take
it
on
or
anyone
that
feels
particularly
like?
Oh,
I
want
to
leave
this
effort.
G
C
Go
ahead,
nate
now
I
said:
do
it
okay,
so
kind
of
coming
into
the
steward
role
and
like
learning
more
about
like
the
internal
goings-on
with
tec,
one
thing
I've
started
to
notice
is
like
the
struggle
between
inclusivity
and
efficiency.
C
So
it's
like
this
trade-off
of
like
how
do
we
include
as
many
people
as
possible
versus
how
do
we
actually
keep
the
org
value
aligned
on
its
roadmap
and
like
efficient?
So
the
problem
is:
is
that
we're
constantly
onboarding
people
and
trying
to
get
people
to
work
and
we're
just
giving
them
stuff
to
do,
but
we're
not
really
taking
a
step
back
and
looking
at?
How
does
this
contribute
to
the
mission
of
the
tec?
So
it's
like.
J
Yeah,
I
see
that
in
some
of
the
other
groups
you
know-
and
I
I
it's
like-
I'm
one
of
those
people
who's
kind
of
trying
to
find
a
role
in
trying
to
find
something
to
do,
but
I
never
want
it
to
like
take
away
from
the
overall
goal.
M
Yeah
and
yeah
I
just
wanna,
like
I
completely
understand
what
niche
contextualized.
I
feel
that
it
is
true,
but
at
the
same
time,
advancing
advancing
token
engineers
comes
as
a
result
of
certain
processes
being
developed
and
that
being
called,
for
example,
cultural,
build,
and
I
don't
think
these
processes
will
be
constantly
on
the
making.
They
will
be
more
like
constantly
implemented.
M
So
for
me,
it's
it's
interesting
to
have
a
constant
checking
of
these
processes
to
see
if
they
are
actually
a
process
that
we
can
evolve
or
it's
a
process
that
we
need
to
move
on
and
abundant
or
evolved
or
whatever,
but
keeping
in
mind
that
it's
a
process
that
will
help
advancing
tokyo
engineer.
So
I
think
it's
a
nice
exercise
to
filter
out
which
practices
probably
are
just
like
adopted,
because
by
default
we
start
doing
them
not
necessarily
for
productive
mean
to
it
but
yeah.
A
Yeah
just
quickly
sharing
on
that
too.
I
definitely
hear
you
and
I
think
we
have
a
lot
of
management
processes
that
are
troubling
now
and
that
we're
trying
to
clear
up
and
make
it
smoother
and
and
a
lot
of
the
the
negative
feedback
that
came
from
the
session
with
it.
And
the
last
call
was
was
about
this
and
about
how.
A
How
do
we
get
things
to
flow
and
not
get
like
so
stuck
on
processes
and
bureaucracies,
and
all
that?
But
then
I
started
to
have
some
like
interesting
experiences
with
that.
For
example,
the
agreements
that
anna
marie
took
to
work
on.
She
involved
a
lot
of
people
that
were
joining
to
work
with
her
and
that
evolved
to
a
good
point
like
way
better
than
he
was
before,
and
she
felt
great
about
it,
and
people
also
felt
good
about
it.
A
And
then
katie
had
had
this
idea
to
start
sharing
like
what
some
calls
for
action
that
people
could
start
working
on.
And
then
I
put
out
the
the
glossary
there
and
then
ben
took
that
on,
and
it
has
been
like
very
little
time.
Management
on
that
and
he's
been
like
going
for
it,
and
then
there
is
just
a
few
questions
that
are
easy
to
work
through
async.
A
So
I
think,
as
those
experiences
are
happening
like
more
things
are
being
delegated
and
then
sometimes
it
takes
a
lot
of
time
to
delegate
and
I
think
that's
what
you're
talking
about
like.
Sometimes
it's
more
difficult
to
pass
to
someone
to
do
than
doing
yourself
and
that's
where
things
get
clogged
a
little
bit.
C
Well,
building
on
that
point,
though,
the
thing
is
is
like
every
working
group
has
the
agency
to
decide
what
their
projects
are,
but
every
working
group
is
always
asking
for
a
budget
to
reward
people,
and
so
it's
like
almost
like
these
people
are
asynchronously
deciding
their
own
goals
and
they're
building
and
building
and
building.
But
there's
no
like
overall
sanity
check
of
like.
Is
this
value-aligned
or
is
this
useful,
but
people
are
going
ahead
and
doing
the
work
and
being
like?
C
D
D
I
that's
what
I'm
that's
part
of
the
reason
why
I
was
saying
you
know
in
terms
of
administrative
layer
like
I
know
the
stewards
are
there,
but
it
is
interesting
because,
like
the
question
that
we're
asking
goes
across
soft,
go
of
transparency
and
calms
when
you're
talking
about
some
of
these
questions
so
like
how
do
you,
what
are
the
things
that
connect
those
and
how
do
you
make
all
of
those
things
work,
because
if
you're
there's
a
security
thing,
you
want
transparency.
D
A
A
This
does
yes,
yesterday
with
92,
I
think
of
votes
for
it,
and
we
had
a
really
good
voting
turnout.
A
lot
of
people
participated
and
some
discussions
started
to
develop
in
the
forum
about
like.
Is
this
a
good,
a
good
way
to
go?
Is
this
not
a
good
way
to
go
and
two
things
about
this
that
we
need
to
work
on?
I
think
one
is
creating
a
more
clear
template
for
snapshot.
I
thought
that
was
clear,
but
it
was
not
clear.
A
There
was
a
little
bit
of
a
confusion,
so
I
think
more
work
has
to
be
put
there
to
have
like
just
a
very
like
if
I
need
to
submit
a
proposal.
That's
what
I
do.
This
is
the
information
that
needs
to
be
there
and
and
also
just
sharing
some
of
the
steps
of
moving
forward
from
here
and
juan.
Maybe
you
want
to
share
something
about
this.
E
Yes,
libby,
well
that
this
wasn't
an
easy
boat
and
this
boat
continued
the
implementation
of
the
proposals
that
we
voted
on
during
the
the
impact,
our
distribution.
E
I
think
that
it
was
really
good
that
we
have
had
a
lot
of
engagement,
but
also,
I
think
that,
even
though
that
the
signaling
discussion
happened.
E
Yesterday,
after
that,
or
during
the
last
hours
of
the
boat,
I
also
think
that
maybe
we
should
integrate
that
feedback,
and
the
other
thing
that
I
also
think-
and
that
I
also
saw
from
the
first
time-
is
that
I
see
that
there's
more
more
difference
around
the
way
that
we
could
implement
a
technical
solution
than
the
fact
of
returning
governance
to
core
contributors.
E
I
think
that
that
the
the
debate
right
now
is
is
more
centered
on
on
this,
on
the
technical
solution
of
of
what
would
be
like
the
best
way
to
do
that
without
like
taking
too
much
risk
or
or
do
like
making
something
that
that
wouldn't
be
like
well
received
by
all
the
community.
E
So
I
think
that
further
discussion
on
the
on
the
on
the
technical
solutions
should
be
held,
and
I
think
yeah
that
the
common
swarm
calls
are
going
to
be
super
interesting
because,
as
they
are,
the
ones
that
that
will
or
that
would
build
the
the
development
yeah.
It's
very
important
to
to
know
what
what
are
their
their
opinions
and
also
that
the
people
who
is
engaging
in
the
signaling,
then
they
can
engage
in
the
discussion
on
common
swarm
to
try
to
choose
the
best
solution.
M
If
I
may
say
something
for
me,
it's
I
felt
this
little
disconnection
from
the
effort
that
is
put
into
build
this
and
put
it
up
in
the
snapshot
from
the
aspect
of
letting
the
community
know
about
it.
So
I
felt
it
was
little
giving
attention
to
it
and
I
think
around
60
of
the
200
people
we
outreach
were
like.
Oh,
I
didn't
know
this
and
thank
you
so
much
because
there
was
like.
I
had
no
idea
about
this
going
on
so
there's
for
me.
M
That's
a
signal
of
again
the
same
effort
that
it's
put
into
this
kind
of
building
of
this
proposal
should
be
at
least
given
a
little
bit
to
the
process
of
distributing
the
proposal.
Otherwise
I
feel
we
are
doing
this
only
for
20
people
or
10
people
that
will
have
both
and
then
doesn't
make
much
of
a
sense,
because
then
it's
not
the
community.
F
M
F
A
Well,
but
that's.
F
A
A
I
think
we
should
be
like
proud
of
this
number,
like
everyone
involved
on
making
this
happening
and
respect
the
results
of
the
of
the
voting
and
the
the
meaning
of
this
voting
receiving
92
percent.
Almost
93
of
approval
is
that
we
are
moving
forward
to
the
iteration
of
this
technical
solution,
so
this
gave
the
green
light
for
the
common
swarm
team
to
research,
a
solution,
and
this
solution
will
be
proposed
to
the
hatch
down
because
it
has
to
because
it's
the
only
way
for
it.
A
That
solution
should
be
integrated
because
it
needs
to
touch
on
the
bonding
curve
and
on
the
the
coding
and
minting
and
burning
tokens
and
and
stuff
like
that.
So
those
are
the
three
steps
like
now.
They
will
start
developing
this.
You
will
go
to
the
hatch
dial
before
the
comments
upgrade
and
then
once
the
work
is
done,
we'll
submit
we'll
submit
it
again
for
funding
on
conviction,
voting
and
the
reason
we're
not
asking
this
funds
for
the
hatchdown
is
because
we
shouldn't
be
proposing.
A
So
many
things
to
the
hatchdown
like
it's
an
expensive
tokey
want
to
make
it
very
like
contained
to
proposals
that
will
be
critical
for
the
commons
upgrade.
So
it's
better
to
separate
these
things
and
not
ask
any
funds
from
from
the
dow
now
from
even
a
behavioral
perspective,
to
not
open
that
door
like
griff
mentioned
and
then
and
then
we'll
have
a
retroactive
funding
after
and
it
will
be
better
because
we'll
know
exactly
how
much
it
costed.
D
I
sure
wish
I
could
understand
any
of
this.
To
be
honest,
I
didn't
vote
seemed
like
this
thing
seemed
like
a
mistake
to
me.
D
It
seems
against
the
basic
principles
of
what
we
set
out
to
do
here,
and
that
was
a
bit
of
a
disappointment,
but
the
entire
I
feel
continuously
left
behind
by
everything
having
to
do
with
the
voting
process,
and
so
you
know
my
bandwidth
isn't
that
great
and
it
takes
a
lot
of
energy
and
effort
for
me
to
understand
this
seems
like
legal
ease
to
me.
You
know,
I
sure
wish
somebody
would
just
come
and
explain
these
things
to
me.
D
So
once
I
saw
that
I
was
like
well,
okay,
that's
the
senate
just
voted
to
give
itself
a
raise,
and
so
that's
just
what
I
heard
in
that.
So
I
don't
know
I'm
I.
I
continuously
struggle
with
my
involvement
here.
I
just
kind
of
show
up
and
say
what
I
say,
but
in
terms
of
governance
and
this
and
that,
like
I
don't
know,
it's
it's
a
constant
problem
for
me.
A
G
I
I
would
like
to
suggest
that
we
create
some
type
of
template
for
both
titling
these
proposals,
as
well
as
the
structure
of
of
the
actual
description
of
the
proposals,
because
I
do
think
if
we
do
not
really
reinforce
that
proposal
is
for
signaling
that
it
could
get
lost
on
some
people,
as
well
as
the
implementation,
the
process
of
implementation.
G
You
know
what
are
the
next
steps
for
this
proposal,
for
example,
if
it's
signaling
things
like
that,
I
I
do
think
should
be
included
because,
with
the
ambiguity
of
it
I've
you
know
I
look.
I
always
look
back
at
the
uniswap,
implement
infinity,
swap
decision
to
do
the
d5
fund
where
they
voted.
G
Yes
for
this,
this
proposal,
and
also
the
implementation
of
it,
was
completely
not
okay,
with
what
the
community
thought
was
going
on,
and
I
do
believe
that
you
know
we
need
to
have
as
much
information
to
to
do
that
with,
and
a
template
to
abide
by
is
is
the
first
step
for
making
sure
that
happens.
D
Yeah
and
see
for
me,
like
you
know,
people
are
talking
about
snapshot.
I
have
no
idea
what
that
means
to
be
honest
like
so,
I
thought
we
were
using
source
cred
or
that
we
were
using.
I
mean
we
have
all
these
different
platforms
and
every
time
there's
some
new
platform
like
what
the
hell
and
what
does
it
have
to
do
with
anything,
and
you
know
I'm
just
completely
so
you
know
I
just
I
don't
know.
Maybe
it's
just
me.
D
I
just
don't
have
the
you
know,
I
feel
like
an
old
granny
here,
but
I
just
wish
to
hell
that
I
could.
You
know,
be
involved
in
this
sufficient
that
I
could
have
enough
information
to
make
decisions.
F
All
I
can
say
is:
thank
you
jurgados.
This
is
great
feedback.
We
really
appreciate
it.
Man
yeah,
I'm
sure
you
remember.
I'm.
L
D
D
There's
so
much
that's
beautiful
about
this
particular
dow
and
the
way
that
we
do
things,
but
our
ability
to
externalize
that
narrative
is
atrocious,
and
so
I
you
know
I
I
I
get
that
that's
going
on,
but
I
just
I
it's
it's
I
feel
like.
D
I
can't
insert
myself
in
the
narrative
of
the
dao
when
I
meet
with
you
guys
it's
great
and
wonderful
and
awesome
and
you're
all
amazing
and
the
culture
of
the
token
engineering
commons
is
there,
but
there's
this
weird
shell,
that
kind
of
exists
around
it
that
that
would
would
not
seem
like
that
on
the
surface
and
it's
a
it's
a
constant
source
of
frustration
for
me.
A
Thanks
for
sharing
this-
and
I
think
yeah-
maybe
this
is
definitely
needed
to
have
some
time
to
grab
like
all
the
questions
and
and
just
have
a
run
to
try
explaining
all
of
them
with
time
and
calm
and
I'll
open
that
convo
on
softgov,
we
can
have
like
a
big
ama
and
please
everyone
that
is
in
this
call
just
shoot
all
the
questions
there
and
we
have
three
minutes
left
and
there
is
graviton
training
after
this.
A
If
anyone
wants
to
share
anything
last
words,
something
that
we
should
be
looking
at,
this
is
the
time.
M
I
just
wanted
to
thank
griff
because
I
actually
didn't
I
mean
I
don't
know
how
other
thousands
certainly
work,
the
the
sending
messages
privately
to
everyone.
So
I
I
this
is
a
completely
kind
of
new
thing,
but
yeah.
So
I'm
actually
happy
with
the
amount
of
people
who
vote,
even
though
my
my
opinion
was
the
opposite.
M
F
It
no,
I
love
that
idea.
You
know
it's
just
the
same.
It's
the
same
with
content
in
comms
right.
It's
like
you,
spend
all
this
time
making
the
content,
but
then
you
don't
spend
time
on
distribution
and
no
one
reads
it.
So
if
we
spend
all
this
time
making
the
votes,
we
should
spend
time
on
distribution
so
that
people
will
vote.
D
I
I've
noticed
that,
just
in
general,
among
companies
around
the
world
and
all
the
people
it's
there
is
a
spectacular,
shrinking
idea
about
how
long
it
takes
to
actually
communicate
and
distribute
these
things.
It's
a
it's
a
you
know,
three
things,
you
know
it's,
what
is
it
you're
trying
to
say
and
architecting
all
of
that,
making
the
message
beautiful
and
then
distributing
it
as
a
third-
and
we
often
forget
this
last
third
and
then
just
act
like
there
are
only
two
pieces.
D
A
Thank
you
durgatas,
and
thanks
so
much
eduardo
and
david
for
taking
on
pinging
people
about
this
vote
and
wonka
and
griff
that
worked
on
it
and
and
all
of
the
common
swarm
team
and
we're
gonna
move
on,
and
let's
all
help,
each
other
to
make
this
process
be
as
clear
as
possible.