►
Description
Timecodes:
00:00 - Reflection on decision making
26:28 - Sourcecred
29:38 - Glossary Hack
30:23 - Hatch PARTY ='D
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
To
propose
today,
I
feel,
like
we've,
been
talking
a
lot
about
governance
and
about
how
your
economy,
your
choice,
how
decision
making
is
so
important,
but
I
have
a
sense
that
we
haven't
talked
so
much.
Why
decision
making
is
so
important
and
it
might
seem
obvious,
but
but
then
you
realize
it's
not
and
that
a
lot
of
people
are
not
used
to
the
concept
of
making
decisions,
and
I
even
started
to
tried
listing
out
what
are
things
that
we
usually
take
decisions
in
a
daily
basis
like
what
are
you
gonna
eat?
A
Where
do
you
leave?
Who
do
you
spend
time
with?
Where
do
you
spend
your
money
at
and
all
of
those
decisions
that
seem
very
like
over
the
head?
We
don't
even
think
about
them.
We
just
go
in
a
flow,
but
why?
We
don't
think
about
them.
I
think
there
is
and
a
weight
of
the
responsibility
that
decisions
can
lead
to.
A
A
A
So
why
do
we
have
so
many
decision
making
tools
in
the
tc,
because
we're
talking
about
different
resources
and
different
capabilities
of
self-governing
ourselves?
So
some
tools
make
it
easier.
Some
tools
are
a
little
bit
harder
and
then
we
can
navigate
with
our
understanding
of
the
responsibilities
we
do
want
to
take
and
then,
while
building
the
the
forgiving
culture.
A
So
I
just
wanted
to
ask
like
more
in
an
open
reflection
and
let's
try
to
keep
it
to
a
minute,
each.
The
answers
in
an
open
reflection
of
what
is
your
comfort
zone
on
taking
decisions
and
what
are
decisions
that
you
that
you
would
rather
delegate
or
that
you
feel
intimidated
by
the
responsibility
they
might
lead
on
you
and
yeah
it's
kind
of
open,
but
you
can
also
just
reflect
on
the
decision-making
process
you've
been
having
in
the
tc
or
in
your
life.
B
Well,
sorry,
I'm
finishing
up
an
apple.
I
really
like
this
question
and
I
don't
I'm
gonna
give
it
like
a
knee
jerk
reaction,
because
I
haven't
really
had
enough
time
to
think
about
it.
I'd
say
the
decisions
that
I'm
very
comfortable
making
and
our
decisions
that
I
you
know
I
have
experience
with.
I
know.
Well,
I
know
the
outcome.
B
But
I
there's
a
trusted
person
that
I
know
that
I
could
delegate
to,
and
those
are
the
first
things
that
come
to
mind.
I
like
making
decisions
for
myself.
I
should
say
that
I,
like
I,
I
prefer
making
a
decision
over
having
decisions
made
for
me.
So
generally,
it's
worth
spending
the
time
to
understand,
understand
the
implications
and
the
the
pros
and
cons
of
the
decision.
We're
making
and.
E
E
So
I
also,
I
always
think
that
it's
nice
to
have
the
liberty
to
to
have
the
decision
of
choosing
to
delegate
it
or
actually
keep
a
decision
for
yourself
in
in
impulse
or
wanting
the
best
outcome
possible,
so
yeah.
I
always
like
to
think
that
decisions
that
are
that
I
have
made
or
had
experience
in
the
the
previous
time
are
easier
today,
because
you
have,
I
really
learned
for
experience
of
course,
that
what
may
be
the
outcome
of
it
so
yeah,
it's
it's
a
hard
context.
E
Concept
that
I
have
heard
vitalik
and
other
people
talk
about
that.
That
is
you,
turkey,
that
you
leave
the
decisions
for
prediction
markets
or
just
to
like
a
gamble,
because
you
can
see
the
probability
of
what
the
outcomes
of
previous
decisions
made.
You
can
see
or
wait
for
the
future
outcome
of
our
decision
now
so
yeah.
I
think
that
is
very
interesting,
too,
to
be
able
to
delegate
decisions
to
a
machine
even
or
to
other
people
I'll
pass
it
to
one.
F
If
you
do
something
good
and
even
though
it's
hard,
you
have
to
keep
that
way.
If,
if
your
internal
evaluation
tells
you
that
that
that's
what
you
wanted,
but
if
the
outcomes
of
your
decisions
are
different
of
what
you
wanted,
then
you
should
have
like
mechanisms
to
change
and
to
like
address
that
that
unwanted
situation
and
I
passed
to
bilbao.
G
I
would
I'm
interested
in
the
concept
of
collective
intelligence
like
this.
You
know
this
when
you
have
a
conversation
and
with
people
there's
always
like
three
people
that
have
the
same
thoughts
at
the
same
time,
but
only
one
tells
it
there's
some
kind
of
a
collective
intelligence
that
it
would
be
interesting
to
see
how
that
could
be
put
into
a
into
a
decision-making
process.
So
it's
even
though,
if
it's
a
dictatorship
that
the
collective
itself
kind
of
agrees
with
that
one
person
there's
there's
something
hidden
behind
there.
H
Thank
you,
celeste
yeah,
I
I
agree
with
with
with
juan
carlos
in
in
incepti.
There
is
like
the.
There
is
also
like
a
a
process
in
which
you
like
evaluate
the
the
range
of
of
how
your
participation
affects
the
final
outcome,
and-
and
I
also
feel
that
that
this,
like
empathy,
this
empathy
towards
because
a
lot
of
times,
people
make
decisions
without
realizing
that
it's
gonna
affect
others.
I
J
Sorry,
it
takes
me
a
second
to
find
the
unmute
on
my
telephone.
I
have
to
make
a
lot
of
decisions,
and
I
I
like
that.
Other
people
aren't
making
decisions
for
me,
but
it's
also
like
kind
of
a
pain
in
the
butt
to
have
to
make
decisions,
and
my
biggest
thing,
I
think,
is
just
learning
how
to
make
the
best
out
of
whatever
situation
comes
up
and
the
decisions
that
I
am
not
comfortable
making
for
other
people.
J
I
have
to
do
with
design,
especially
color,
and
this
is
based
on
my
experience
on
projects
and
I
don't
like
to
have
to
make
decisions
about
other
people's
money
or
the
amount
of
money
that
a
project's
going
to
put
into
something
like
I'll
advocate
for
something.
But
I
don't
like
and
I'll
vote
on
it
that
kind
of
thing,
but
I
wouldn't
be
comfortable
being
like
the
sole
person
making
financial
decisions
and
chewie
went.
I
feel
like
libby
went,
eduardo,
went.
L
Thank
you,
mr
verde.
I
like
taking
risk
I've,
always
loved
taking
risk,
and
I
like
taking
responsibility
of
deciding
for
everyone.
That's
around
me
on
any
venture
that
involves
risk.
I
I
like
being
transparent
and
I
like
sharing
anything
that
I
love
that
I'm
getting
involved
in
and
and
of
course
it
has
consequences,
but
I
think
that
if
you're,
transparent
and
you're
clear
on
what
can
happen,
everyone
is
old
enough
to
decide
by
themselves.
I
value
transparency,
I
value
being
fair
and,
being
you
know,
sharing
everything
so
yeah,
sometimes
things
don't
go.
L
The
outcome
is
not
what
you
expect,
but
if
everyone
knows
the
game
they
are
playing,
I
feel
being
fair.
I've
been
you
know,
taking
the
decisions
I
had
to
and
and
it's
fine
that's
that's
that's
how
I
approach
decisions
when
they
involve
everyone
else.
When
they
just
involve
me,
I
don't
give
a
I
just
whatever
I
think
I
don't
know
who
is
missing.
Livy
I'll
pass
to
you.
A
I
We
it's
so
easy
to
decide
things
when
it's
just
about
yourself,
but
I
like
this
idea,
sebastian
collective
decision,
possibility
that
you're
talking
about
tam
sent
me
this
article
from
regenerative
teams
that
I
found
super
interesting.
The
idea
of
the
cost
of
sense
making-
because
I
was
thinking
about
this
in
terms
of
deciding
hatch
params,
the
the
cost
of
being
able
to
understand
something,
the
learning
curve
and
being
being.
How
do
we
say
not
obligated
but
requested
to
decide
something
that
you
don't
feel
ready
for.
You
don't
feel
comfortable
about.
I
M
M
I
really
don't
like
making
decisions
about
like
exactly
how
to
communicate
things
like
basically
in
general,
there
are
things
that
I
don't
feel
confident
about
my
my
past
history
of
making
decisions,
like
you
know,
on
aesthetics
and
different
things
like
that,
so
it's
really
nice
to
be
able
to
make
decisions
on
competition,
things
that
I
feel
competent
to
make
decisions
on
yeah.
That's
probably
it
now
I'll
pass
it
to
dan
and
did
he
go.
N
N
So
why
not
like
one
of
the
things
that
I
one
of
the
things
that's
always
comes
to
mind
that
I
told
one
of
my
teens
like
keep
this
in
mind
whenever
you
do
x
anyway.
So
basically,
I
tell
them
to
value.
I
value
I
value
things
get
getting
done
instead
of,
like
you
know,
like
waiting
for
me
to
make
a
asking
me
to
make
a
choice.
So
I
value
you
know
going
ahead
and
I
told
them
like
basically
when
they
do
something.
N
If,
if
advances
us
towards
having
like
this
idea
of
a
triumph
for
all
of
mankind,
you
know
making
something
amazing
for
all
of
mankind,
then
we
are
in
the
right
path.
So
I
don't
know
that
helps
them
and
puts
a
lot
of
pressures
in
them,
but
it's
been
fun
so
far,
like
that's
one
of
my
favorite
spaces
to
collab-
and
I
was
thinking
about,
I
was
part
of
this
civic
innovation
lab
where
we
tried
league
of
democracy.
N
When
somebody
offers
you
80
million
or
something
like
that
and
saying
no
because
they
come
from
corruption,
you
know
choices,
choices,
decisions
so
yeah.
I
think
a
lot
about
this
and
the
ethical
implications
of
decision
and
the
importance
of
you
know
just
giving
trust
to
people
that
had
the
you
know
the
right
qualities,
ideas,
mindsets,
expertise
besides
what
you
got
so
anyway,
just
rambling
so
I'll
pass
nate
did
you
go?
I
didn't
hear
you.
O
A
O
O
The
ones
that
I
am
more
comfortable
with
making
are-
probably
you
know,
like
the
other
aspect
of
it,
where
I'm
comfortable
with
my
knowledge
and
trust
that
that
I'm
the
best
person
for
that
decision
so
really
just
seeking
out
who's
who's
most
well
suited
for
that
particular
set
of
decisions.
So,
and
that's
about
it
I'll
pass
the
tea
back
to
you.
A
P
P
P
An
interesting
definition
of
leadership,
the
person
was
saying
that
leadership
nowadays
has
come
to
be
some
sort
of
like
dodgy
self-interest
disguised
as
service
to
others.
But
what
it
really
is
is
is
being
a
guardian
and
that
just
changed
the
way.
I
I
look
at
making
decisions
and
and
and
conducting
myself
in
a
manner
that
that
is
congruent
to
to
being
a
leader.
P
I
make
a
lot
of
the
more
more
important
decisions
I've
made
in
my
life,
I've
taken
from
dreams
like
I,
there
was
a
point
in
my
life
where,
where
I
was,
I
could
control
my
dreams.
So
I
could
ask
my
subconscious-
and
I
think
I
always
sure
make
decisions
from
like
a
higher
knowledge
and
not
just
like
the
limited
perspective
of
my
conscious
mind.
So
I
look
into
my
subconscious.
P
P
I
I
take
decisions,
even
though
I
know
there's
a
high
probability
that
it
might
go
wrong,
but
I
value
knowledge
and
experience
when
it's
just
for
me
when
it's
for
others
again
I
ask
for
counsel
and
and
and
the
criteria
is
service
service
and
creating
value,
and
usually
when
I
create
a
value
for
others,
there's
a
way
to
transfer
that
into
do
some
monetary
gains,
not
at
least
time.
I'm
I'm,
you
know
helping
the
people
around
me.
Q
Well,
I
think,
there's
probably
a
bit
of
me
at
times.
That's
all
of
everything
that
everyone
has
said
at
this
time,
but
most
yeah,
I
resonate
a
lot
with
tam
at
the
start.
I
think
it's
a
balance
to
me
of
what's
the
impact
with
what
do
I
know
and
what's
the
context
and
how
important
is
that
decision?
Am
I
the
right
person
naked,
but
I
really
enjoy
decision
making.
I
really
enjoy
the
process
of.
Do
I
have
a
gut
feeling
about
this.
Do
I
know
something
about
this?
A
A
Although
we
have
this
understanding
of
the
committee
that
a
smaller
group
of
people
were
making
these
decisions
because
it's
well,
there
is
more
information
about
it
in
the
proposal,
but
it's
very
sensitive
data
that
we're
going
to
be
dealing
with.
So
it's
not
the
type
of
thing
that
should
be
like
so
available
to
everyone.
A
This
ready,
mateo
will
manually
add
everything
to
the
the
source,
cred
instance
and
then
we're
gonna
decide
the
first
distribution
and
we
were
thinking
of
a
very
small
number
like
10
impact
hours
just
to
test,
because
if
anything
goes
wrong,
it's
just
10
impact
hours.
Do
you
guys
have
anything
to
add
santi
or
mateo.
L
L
I
don't
want
to
say
wild,
but
we
may
enter
some
kind
of
you
know,
weird
things
or
little
little
things,
it's
important
for
you
to
check
and
to
you
know,
figure
out
if
you
feel
comfortable
with
outcome
that
you
get
from
source,
cred
and
income
that
you
get
from
the
distribution.
If
you
see
any
anomaly,
just
let
us
know
and
that's
why
we
are
testing
and
and
that
we
are
open.
We
love
to
get
as
much
feedback
as
possible.
L
A
Thank
you
and
then
I
just
put
the
glossary
hack
here,
because
we
had
a
hack
session
this
week
and
a
lot
of
people
jumped
into
it,
and
I
think
all
of
you
realized
how
much
work
it
is.
Is
it's
very
like?
Sometimes
you
can
spend
maybe
15
minutes
in
just
one
description,
because
it
it's
like
how
to
make
something
complicated
simple,
so
it's
there
feel
free
to
jump
in.
A
A
You
can
just
fork
another
one
that
already
exists,
and
that's
another
like
really
cool
point
that
maybe
you
see
someone
that
you
that
you
do
trust
on
their
opinion
and
it's
like.
Oh,
this
kind
of
looks
good,
but
maybe
this
thing
I
just
want
to
change
a
little
bit
and
it's
very
like
easy
and
the
responsibilities
for
making
those
choices
are
going
to
be
shared
among
us
all,
because
we're
all
going
to
be
voting
into
it.
M
M
This
might
look
a
little
intimidating,
but
if
you
click
that
link
above
that
said,
vote
on
blah
blah
and
go
to
the
token
log
vote
on
configuration
submissions,
you
can
see
the
other
top
voted
proposals
now
right
now,
there's
only
three
really
that
have
been
voted
on,
because
you
know
we
just
started
this
and
it's
just
about
to
go,
but
you
can
see
like
there's
the
default,
the
just
straight
up,
the
defaults
that
vtor
chose
for
this.
This
is
the
technocracy,
so
our
economy,
the
technocracy's
choice.
M
You
know
it
can
be
fun.
The
technocracy
has
its
place,
but
the
other
choices.
I
think
it's
good
to
leave
this
open
right
on
those
charts.
Actually,
it's
perfect
yeah
and
then
I
you
can
click
the
other
two
as
well.
So
the
first
one
is
a
design.
That's
really
focused
on
trying
to
raise
a
lot
of
money,
and
so
the
parameters
were
chosen
with
a
goal
of
reaching
10
million
dollars
and
then
the
other
pro
the
other
one
is
a
small
cap,
that's
a
little
more
biased
towards
the
builders.
M
This
is
like
saying:
hey
the
people
who
were
here.
They
should
have
most
of
the
governance
power
and
we
don't
need
to
raise
so
much
money.
I
think
the
cap
here
is
like
three
mil
yeah
three
mil,
and
so
you
can
actually
look
at
these
charts
and
you
can
compare
them
and
see.
Oh,
like
you
can,
like
the
the
pie
chart
at
the
bottom
is
the
blue.
The
blue
space
is
how
much
tokens
are
controlled
by
the
builders
people
with
impact
hours,
and
so
you
can
see.
Oh,
it
gets.
M
M
So
you
can
kind
of
see
that
this
this
one
is
a
little
more
like
social
minded
and
egalitarian,
and
it's
like
focused
on
the
community,
whereas
the
backer,
the
one
that's
trying
to
get
all
the
money,
it
has
a
different
situation
and
yeah,
and
so
all
of
these,
and
if
you
scroll
down
to
the
the
other
chart,
there's
another
table,
it's
a
picture
and
zoom
in
this
has
a
lot
of
interesting
information
that
was
the
table.
This
has
a
lot
of
interesting
information
as
well.
M
If
we
raise
a
million
dollars,
then
one
impact
hour
will
be
worth
72
dollars
on
this
one
yeah,
if
you
zoom
in
a
little
more
so
on
this
one
and
scroll
over.
So
if
we
raise
a
million
dollars
at
the,
then
then
it'll
tell
you
what
the
impact
rate
will
be.
It'll
tell
it'll,
let's
say
three
million
dollars
or
let's
just
stop
moving
the
screen.
M
So
I
can
read
the
screen,
but
I
so
it'll
tell
you
the
impact
hour
rate,
which
is
like
the
value
of
one
impact
hour
and
then,
if
you
can
zoom
in
a
little
bit
more,
I
should
have
been
scaring
the
sharing
screen.
So
the
total
supply
by
builders,
which
is
the
percentage
of
tokens
that
the
people
with
impact
hours
get
the
non-redeemable
amount.
This
is
the
stuff
that
is
like
guaranteed
to
move
forward.
M
Assuming
the
commons
upgrade
happens,
can't
be
rage
quit
out
the
backers
rage,
quit
percent,
which
is
kind
of
like
a
a
symbol
of
how
little
risk
there
is
like,
if
you
put
in
a
hundred
dollars
into
this
thing,
and
things
don't
work
out
for
some
reason,
you
don't
like
the
tc
anymore.
You
can
actually
rage
quit
and
take
out
86
at
the
mingle
1.5.
So,
there's
a
lot
less
risk
for
people
who
want
to
put
money
in
based
on
this,
and
so
there's
just
a
there's,
a
lot
of
data
here
for
sure.
M
But
I
there's
also
a
lot
of
context
and
I
think,
if
you
guys
read
through
the
one
of
these
results,
just
read
through
all
three
of
these
results
and
you
can
read:
read
the
text
if
you,
if
you
actually
read
the
text
and
I
I
hope
that
you'll
be
able
to
understand
kind
of
the
main
points
and
of
these
three.
You
could
probably
pick
one
and
click
and
if
you
scroll
down
a
little
bit
more
like
all
the
way
to
the
end.
Basically,
there's
like
this
giant
table
with
all
the
links.
M
So
if
you
click
click
that
it'll
auto
populate
the
dashboard
with
your
with
these
parameters,
so
this
one
is
like
hey:
let's
go
for
big
money:
let's
go
for
big
money,
let's
get
10
million
dollars
in
this
bad
boy
right,
and
so
certain
choices
were
made
to
make
it
favorable
to
backers,
to
get
this
much
money
and-
and
then
the
you
know
in
the
hatch,
that's
what
you're
deciding
is
who
gets
tokens
right?
It's
important!
It's
an
important
decision-
and
this
is
this-
is
the
yeah.
M
And
so
in
the
explanation
for
this
one,
the
the
person
chose
a
very
high
support
required
because
they
let
in
a
bunch
of
degens
into
the
into
the
the
hatch-
well
not
degens,
but
they
made
it
really
easy
for
anybody
for
people
to
buy
into
it.
So
they
might
not
be
as
engaged
so
they
had
a
low
quorum
with
one
percent,
but
they
wanted
to
avoid
issues.
So
they
also
made
a
support
required
of
95
so
that
if
people
see
that
this
vote
is
bad,
it's
really
easy
to
cancel
it.
M
M
Well,
if
the
hatch
is
going
for
a
lot
of
money,
then
we
want
this
kind
of
decision
making
process
if
the
hatch
has
just
a
bunch
of
builders
in
it
and
they
have
a
lot
of
voting
power.
Well,
these
are
the
engaged
people.
We
can
have
a
higher
quorum
percent
and
we
can
reduce
support
required
and
and
have
different
interactions,
so
yeah,
that's
kind
of
the
my
my
brief
explainer.
M
I
guess
the
most
important
thing
is
the
why
this
is
the
first
time
that
I
have
ever
heard
of
where
an
economy
was
I
designed
from
the
bottom
up,
it's
the
first
time
in
the
history
of
humanity.
Okay,
like
every
economy,
we've
ever
participated
up
until
this
point
has
been
a
top-down
decision-making
process
and
crypto
made
it
way,
cooler
because
before
economies
were
top
down
and
then
forced
on
people
now
it's
top
down
with
crypto,
it's
still
top
down.
There's
the
technocracy
designing
there,
but
at
least
you
get
to
opt
in
right.
M
So
there's
like
external
validation
on
that
economy,
but
this
is
the
first
time
ever
where
the
community
before
launch,
gets
to
actually
have
input
on
how
the
economy
is
created.
So
you
know
this
could
be.
This
could
be
a
an
opportunity
for
you
to
become
a
token
engineer
like
full
on
and
actually
design
your
own
economy
and
participate
in
something
pretty
huge.