►
Description
TheSoftgov Working Group researches and applies best practices for governance, social collaboration and contribution rewards while implementing Ostrom’s 8 principles for governing the commons in its foundation.
We gather every Tuesday at 7pm CET.
Steward: Liviade
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
Today,
we're
gonna
finish
the
mirror
board
that
we
almost
finished
last
week,
so
there's
just
three
more
principles
to
go
and
uncheck
the
metrics
and
the
intro
question
I
have
is
what
was
a
pivot
point
in
your
life?
A
Can
you
think
of
something
that
either
something
that
happened
or
a
teaching
or
a
thought
that
you
read
something
that
you
received
that
you
can
trace
like?
Oh,
that
was
a
turning
point.
Something
changed
directions
changed
completely
at
that
moment,.
B
Yeah
I
was
thinking
in
two
moments.
One
was
when
I
decided
to
change
my
my
career
in
the
university
from
philosophy
to
political
sciences,
because
it
it
was
also
in
another
city
and
the
other
one.
When
my
brother
read
binay's
gupta's
article
and
he
said,
hey
ethereum
is
great
and
we
have
to
jump
into
this
and
yeah.
That
was
that
was
like
another
great
moment
that
now
I'm
here
and
I
will
pass
it
to.
C
Okay,
hi
I'm
also
kind
of
new.
Here
I've
been
working
with
gibbous,
but
now
I'm
I'll
be
helping
levied
with
and
nate
with
the
case
studies
for
the
tc
so
nice
to
meet
everybody.
What
was
a
pivotal
point
of
my
life,
probably
similar
to
juan's
story?
C
I
was
doing
my
master's
on
ai
and
women
and
then
I
read
about
like
cryptocurrencies
and
bitcoin,
and
I
just
became
obsessed
with
it,
and
I
just
decided
to
change
my
thesis
to
blockchain
and
then
I
went
to
pursue
my
phd
on
it,
and
here
I
am
right
now.
This
is
what
brought
me
to
the
tec
and
yeah.
I'm
happy
to
be
here,
and
some
things
are
meant
to
be
yeah,
so
I
will
pass
it
on
to
tam.
D
40
of
them
came
to
mind.
At
the
same
time
I
mean,
I
think
so
many
so
many
people
I've
met
that
have
changed
my
life
forever,
so
many
decisions
I
made
that
have
changed
my
life
forever.
Having
children
is
like
that's
the
thing
you
don't
you
don't
never
on
break.
You
never
undo
that
you
know
like
changed
every
change
the
course
of
everything.
D
So
there's
just
so
so
many.
I
think
sorry,
I
you
know,
god
I
don't
know
where
I
wouldn't
even
know.
I
think,
like
a
difficult
I'll,
tell
you
a
difficult
one
like
a
really
difficult
one
was
I
had
to
make
a
decision
like
pretty
young.
D
You
know
as
a
young
adult,
to
isolate
myself
from
my
family
and
that
was
really
hard
to
do,
but
they
there's
like
and
like
that
made
me
need
to
create
a
whole
other
family
for
myself,
so
sort
of
in
my,
like
you
know,
late
teens,
early
20s,
I
created
this
whole
other
family
who's.
Now
still
my
family,
but
like
having
to
make
that
decision
because
it
was
super
unhealthy
was
like.
D
So
I
hope
that's
not
too
sad.
My
family's
great,
the
the
one
I
built
is
really
amazing,
I'll
I'll
pass
to
I'll
pass
to
a
kenny.
A
Hi
kenny
welcome.
I
think
it's
the
first
time
you're
joining
swapkov
great
to
see
you
here.
So
we
have
an
intro
question.
That
is
what
was
a
pivot
point
in
your
life
that
you
want
to
share.
A
E
Oh
hi
guys
yeah,
it's
my
first
time
here,
I'm
very
excited
about
it.
Just
like
I
talked
about,
becomes
trying
to
learn
more
and
be
more
integrated
into
tc.
E
What
was
that
it
was
my
secondary
school
days,
so
my
grandmother
had
died,
so
my
grandma
from
the
matanov's
side,
it's
really
jovial
and
fun,
and
almost
more
fun
than
my
dad
or
my
mom
they're,
very
strict
and
disciplined.
So
whatever
is
run
away
to
my
grandmother's
house,
because
the
house
is
just
like,
oh
come
and
have
whatever
you
want
and
you
know
be
free
and
then
she
died
and
I
was
still
in
high
school
that
it
broke
me
down.
E
I
almost
repeated
a
class
because
I
was
so
attached
to
her,
so
I
started
learning
how
to
stay
but
not
stay
too
attached
yeah.
I
think
that
that's
it.
So
I
I
I
started
building
walls
around
my
commitment
with
people.
I
really
do
care
about
because
when
they
are
not
there,
I've
noticed
it
breaks
me
and
I
don't
want
to
be
down
down
anymore.
E
So
that's
it
I'll
pass
to
you.
Libya.
A
Thanks,
I
think,
but
the
the
strongest
one
for
me
was
so
I
was
an
actress
for
since
I
was
a
kid
and
then
I
wanted
so
much
to
do
cinema.
It
was
my
dream
like
I
wanted
to
like
leave
of
that.
Do
so
much
cinema
and
I
was
doing
a
theater
most
of
the
time
and
then
I
did
one
feature
and
then
started
to
open
doors
for
other
invitations.
A
So
someone
invited
me
to
do
this.
This
feature
film.
It
was
going
to
be
a
small
participation,
but
it
was
like
a
very
important
one
and
it
was
a
crew
that
I
was
so
excited
about
and
then
at
that
same
time
I
was
kind
of
starting
my
relationship
with
dylan
and
he
invited
me
to
dreamweed
in
california.
A
Am
I
like
going
going
with
someone
that
I'm
in
love
to
the
total
unknown
of
life,
dream
weed
in
california
or
I'm
gonna
stay
here,
and
and
do
this
participation
in
a
movie
that
will
probably
like
open
a
lot
of
doors
for
me,
and
I
chose
to
go
with
him
to
california
and
and
then
that
movie?
It
was
a
funny
coincidence
that
the
day
I
was
gonna
shoot,
it
was
actually
the
day
I
got
married
and
then
that
movie
ended
up
going
to
ken
to
the
official
official
selection.
A
F
Thanks
libby
mine
is
kinda
similar,
like
with
tom
but
yeah.
My
parents
were
when
I
was
22,
they
were
going
back
to
ui
and
I
was
like.
I
don't
want
to
go
back
and
my
parents
were
like
I
mean.
If
you
don't
want
to
come
back,
then
you
have,
you
know
to
make
your
life
and
do
your
own
things
by
yourself
and
I
was
like
you
know.
I
was
not
so
sure
because
I
I
at
that
moment
I
was
never
getting
income
from
you
know.
I
was
from
my
parents
and
then
yeah.
F
I
mean
that
moment
at
that
point
was
a
bit
hard
like
I
had
to
you,
know
start
getting
calm
and
yeah
do
a
lot
of
stuff,
but
you
know
at
the
same
time
I
think
that
was
the
biggest
learn
I
had
in
my
entire
life
yeah
I'll
pass
it
to
pence.
G
Hey
yeah,
I
would
say
maybe-
and
this
is
probably
cliche
but
about
a
year
ago,
just
like
kind
of
trying
to
ask
more
questions
about
like
why.
We,
we
can't
address
issues
or
like
why
just
things
generally
suck
sometimes
and
I
was
kind
of
like
burnt
out
from
work
and
just
yeah.
I
kind
of.
G
Deleted
all
social
media
and,
like
kind
of
just
started
from
square
square,
one
and
yeah,
that's
kind
of
how
I
got
where
I
am
is
just
through
starting
over
and
trying
to
curate
some
of
those
voices
and
and
try
to
figure
out.
What's
what
and
ways
to
make
sense
of
the
world
and
kind
of
looking
at
web
3
crypto
through
a
different
lens
that
I
had
previously
only
seen
like
the
financial
side
of
was
really
influential
just
this
past
year.
G
For
me,
so
I
will
pass
to
has
miguel
gone.
H
Hi,
it
was
a
time
when
I
was
like
very
confused
and
I
don't
know
like
what
to
do
in
my
life.
So,
like
I
decided
to
live
the
school
and
like
I'm,
I'm
a
musician.
H
I
went
like
to
mexico
city
like
to
know
you
know.
Mexico
city
is
very
big
in
all
the
the
big
industries
there
and
I
like
I.
I
only
want
to
see
what
happens
so.
I
went
to
mexico
and
I
meet
there
like
a
lot
of
people
that
I
still
have
like
a
very
strong
relation
right
now,
so
and
and
and
then
in
in
all
aspects
like
those
people
like
that,
I
knew
that
I
meet.
There
are
like
persons
like
very
important
right
now
and
yeah.
I
think
that
changed
like
a
lot.
I
Nice,
thank
you
wow.
I
always
man
lots
of
deep
important
things.
I
always
feel
weird
telling
the
story,
but
it's
like
for
sure.
The
pivotal
point
was
when
the
seattle
supersonics
left
seattle,
this
nba
team-
that
I
was
like
really
obsessed
with-
and
I
was
the
community
manager
for
the
the
organization
that
was
trying
to
keep
them
in
seattle.
You
know
save
our
sonic's
organization
and
we
rallied.
I
We
did
a
great
job
and
we
were
going
to
keep
them
there
and
then
there
was
like
a
court
case
where
they
would
have
had
to
fulfill
two
more
years
of
the
lease
and
the
day
the
judge
was
supposed
to
give
the
verdict.
The
mayor
held
a
press
conference
and
signed
some
paperwork
and
said:
don't
worry
about
a
judge,
they
can
just
have
the
team.
They
give
me
some
money
and
it
was
just
like
you're
kidding
me.
What
do
you
mean?
I
I've
been
working
for
two
years
and
this
community
grassroots
community
trying
to
get
something
done
and
with
one
stroke
of
a
pen,
a
mayor,
just
signs
away
everything
you
know,
and
so
I
broke
like
I
broke
my
mind
broke.
I
was
I
was
over
and
I
I
you
know
I
was
on
a
path
of
like
just
working
for
courtside
seats
as
a
chemical
engineer,
sliding
away
slaving
away
in
a
cubicle.
I
I
Maybe
this
isn't
you
know
hippie
that
the
like
anarcho-capitalist,
leaning
right
and
then
I
was
like
full
on
it's
like
this
whole
thing
is
done
eventually
look
I
I
actually
asked
to
be
laid
off
and
did
had
a
whole
change
in
my
world,
because
layoffs
were
coming
with
2008
and
I
was
like
I
don't
have
costs,
don't
worry
about
it.
I
These
other
people
have
kids
pick
me,
you
know,
and
so
then
yeah
and
then
I
became
full
on
nomad,
got
really
into
eventually
got
into
crypto
and
went
on
a
totally
different
journey
than
if
the
seattle
supersonics
were
still
existing
in
seattle.
It'd
be
like,
I
would
just
be
a
very
pro,
very
likely
very
boring
normal
dude
in
a
cubicle
doing
the
thing
so.
J
Yeah
I
mean
in
terms
of
my
life
I
think,
they're
sort
of
before
ashram
and
after
ashram.
That
was
all
brought
about
by
a
terrifying
relationships
that
I
was
in,
and
it
was
really
like
the
slap
that
heard
around
my
life.
I
was
trying
to
get
some
distance
from
the
argument
that
I
was
having
with
a
partner
of
mine
and
she
she
came
in
and
hit.
K
J
And
I
I
literally
I
had
been
sort
of
visiting
these
people
in
what
I
thought
was
an
ashram
at
the
time
and
the
moment
that
happened,
I
I
just
literally
was
like
you
know
I
just
switched
off
and
walked
down
the
thing
and
went
into
a
monastery.
J
It
was
literally
one
thing
to
the
other,
so
I
you
know
my
ex-wife.
She
hit
me.
J
All
of
that
just
resulted
in
I
stopped
paying
for
anything,
and
I
took
all
the
money
out
of
my
bank.
Account
gave
it
to
my
teacher.
I
they
repossessed
my
car
at
the
ashram
like
they,
like
literally
gave
up
everything.
I
lived
in
a
six
foot
by
four
foot,
shed
with
no
heater
electricity
for
four
years
and.
L
J
So
there's
yeah
the
before
and
after
of
my
life,
my
life
in
the
ashram
and
subsequently,
and
so
everything
else
that
I've
done
once
you
know
yourself
and
then
then,
later
on,
when
I
was
40,
I
learned
that
I
had
autism
and
that
was
kind
of
another
fundamental.
J
And
so
now
I
I
have
all
these
sort
of
crazy
expansive
ideas.
You
guys
hear
about
all
the
time.
So
that's
comes.
You
know
from
knowing
myself
as
a
sort
of
subjective.
You
know
agent
of
the
universe
in
a
way
you.
K
J
And
so
yeah,
that's
kind
of
my
my
before
and
after
story.
L
My
turn
I
want
to
turn.
I
want
to
turn.
I
got
stories
I
plus
plus
five,
the
the
sentiment
of
tam,
like
of
like
turning
points
into
turning
points
and
the
the
two
that
are
the
most
salient
I
I
can
only
narrow
down
to
two,
I'm
sorry
I'll
I'll,
try
and
be
better,
but
the
two
that
are
the
most
salient
is
the
the
introduction
to
a
former
partner
that
led
me
to
the
netherlands.
L
Just
on
a
wing
and
a
prayer
we
met
in
february,
and
by
july
I
had
moved
I'd,
sold
everything
packed
up
all
my
crap
and
just
two
suitcases
basically
and
moved
in
with
her
in
the
netherlands,
and
that
was
13
years
ago
and
the
the
big
turning
point,
though,
within
that
turning
point,
was
this
sentiment
that
I
had
the
first
six
years
I
was
here
was
just
sort
of
like
trying
to
find
my
place
and
sort
of
fit
in.
I
was
like
really.
L
K
L
Jeremy
you're
here,
that's
so
great.
We
were
waiting
for
something
like
you
and
the
moment
that
I
I
abandoned
that
as
a
fantasy
and
just
figured
oh,
the
only
way
I'm
gonna
find
a
place.
That's
actually
my
shape
and
size
is,
if
I
just
start
grabbing
people
and
dragging
them
around
me,
and
then
hey
look
perfectly
conformed
to
this
size
and
shape
that
actually,
that
moment
did
actually
happen.
I
walked
into
the
cafe
so
just
metaphorically
speaking
and
found
the
space
that
was
just
oh
wow.
This
is
where
I
I
do.
L
A
Thank
you
in
ac,
justin,
welcome
and
we're
a
little
bit
late
on
time.
But
if
you
want
to
share
in
30
seconds
like
a
turning
point,
that
happened
in
your
life.
K
This
was
a
big
pic
thanks
yeah,
I
would
say
that
my
father
passed
away
like
two
years
ago
and
that
was
for
sure,
like
the
biggest
pivot
point
of
my
life,
but
despite
the
fact
that
it
was
really
painful
that
experience.
A
Thank
you
thanks
everyone
that
was
great
to
get
to
know
you
a
little
bit
better
and
there's
two
things
we
want
to
cover
today.
So
I'll
go
through
this
twitter
discussion
really
quick,
because
I
think
I
should
talk
more
about
this
with
chewie.
I
was
hoping
that
maybe
he
was
going
to
come
to
this
call,
but
I
was
just
thinking
about.
Let
me
see
if
this
is.
A
So
just
this
proposal
caught
my
attention
and
I
just
wanted
to
bring
this
reflection
to
everyone
and
see
if
there
are
any
thoughts
so
along
with
the
pe
fundamentals
course,
our
transparent
transparency
working
group
joins
the
list
of
past
proposals.
A
A
I
think
we
shouldn't
have
an
opinion
about
how
proposal
outcomes
should
go
and
and
trying,
like
the
the
most
possible
to
not
be
persuasive
when
it
comes
to
proposals,
resolutions
and-
and
this
brings
the
question
of
like
oh-
we
think
we
are
doing
this
because
we
need
engagement
and
if
we
need
engagement,
what
are
other
ways
to
promote
proposals
that
are
not
persuasive,
so
maybe
just
like
having
a
weekly
share
of
this
are
the
proposals
that
are
on
conviction
voting
or
would
we
want
to
have
like
rounds
of
voting
like
other
dows
do
so?
A
B
Yeah,
I
agree
that
maybe
it
says
like
our
next
subject
objective
is
to
pass
the
steward
funding
proposal
and
yeah.
I
I
think
that
somehow
sounds
like
like
we
are
influencing
on
the
vote
of
people,
maybe
yeah.
We
could
have
some
better
creation
and
better
narrative
on
on
the
tweets.
B
I
I
agree
with
you.
Libby
and
also
gravity
proposal
is
up
and
we
also
made
a
tweet,
but
I
tried
only
to
say
like
if
you
want
to
support,
then
the
proposal
is
up.
The
the
tweet
is
a
little
bit
higher.
F
F
Yeah
I
mean
back
in
the
days
when
david
was
having
twitter.
He
was
suggesting
like
something
like
one
hive
like
they
have
a
discord.
You
know
like
they
put
tweets
and
then
people
reacting
with
emojis,
and
then
we
like
the
community
in
on
discord,
decides
what
goes
on
twitter
and
whatnot.
A
So
curation
on
twitter,
first
to
on
the
discord
first
to
what
even
gets
to
twitter.
F
Yeah
I
mean,
if
you
know
like,
if
we
put
this
to
it
on
on
twitter,
maybe
people
block
it.
Maybe
people
accept
it
and
then,
whatever
you
know,
it's
the
community.
It's
saying
I
mean
it's
not
the
token
holder,
which
would
be
like
the
best
option,
but
yeah
like
at
least
you're
getting
some
community
signaling,
because
maybe
you
know
maybe
there
are
some
proposals
that
the
community
want
to
promote
right
and
you
know
even
if
it's
like,
like
I
don't
I
I
I
get
your
point
and
I
think
also
like
it's.
F
A
I
think
I
yeah,
I
think
all
I'm
saying
is
that
we
shouldn't
be
like
we
shouldn't
try
to
convince
people
to
vote
on
proposals
through
the
tec
voice,
if,
like
people
want
to
personally
support
proposals
and
signal
that
they
will
vote
on
that,
I
think
it's
something
different.
F
A
I,
like
I,
like
that
idea
of
having
a
curation,
but
that
maybe
will
take
some
time
to
be
implemented
and
full
like
working.
If
that's
a
way
we
want
to
go
towards,
but
just
if
we
want
to
post
all
proposals
to
just
say,
like
this
proposal
is
available
on
on
conviction,
voting
and
maybe
paste
the
tldr
of
the
proposal
or
give
a
short
description.
Something
like
this.
You
know,
but
not
like
you,
should
support
this
kind
of
thing.
F
K
J
Yeah,
I
agree
and
I
think
to
this
end,
I'm
I'm.
I
propose
in
the
last
comms
meeting
that
we
do
like.
I
was
gonna
try
to
do
like
a
narrative,
deconstruction
sort,
of
course,
where
we
actually
talk
about
like
a
website
or
a
tweet
or
something
and
then
deconstruct
the
narrative
so
that
you
can
understand
how
that
narrative
constructed
and
to
figure
out
what.
K
J
It's
using
and
who
it's
intended
for
and
so
on.
So
this
would
be
a
wonderful
thing
for
you
to
attend,
given
the
acting
thing
requires
so
much
of
that
kind
of
narrative,
construction
and
deconstruction
thing.
So
I
just
wanted
to
alert
you
to
the
fact
that
we
were
thinking
about
that
and
I
think
there
was
a
sort
of
parallel
effort
about
editorial.
J
You
know
things
which
also
are
very
concerned
with
voices
and
that
type
of
thing,
so
I
think,
there's
a
lot
of
coalescing
about
needing
to
have
a
coherent
voice
for
the
tec
and
to
make
decisions
like
that,
and
I've
actually
created
a
bunch
of
narrative
frameworks
just
to
try
to
focus
us
on
that
type
of
thing.
So
yeah,
I
think
that's
ripening,
pretty
quick.
A
Yeah
sounds
great.
Keep
me
posted
whenever
you're
gonna
have
that
session.
I'm
I'm
double
booked
with
comms
calls
until
march,
but
but
if
we
another
time,
I'm
I'm
totally
down
to
participate
or
async
too
and
okay,
so
just
in
the
interest
of
time
I'll
change
to
our
mirror
board.
So
we
can
finish
looking
into
the
mattress
so
for
who
wasn't
here
last
call.
A
A
We
were
just
missing
number,
six,
seven
and
eight,
so
I
think
we're
wearing
a
flow
that
was
working
last
week
to
just
read
them.
So
what
are
the
implementations
in
the
tc
and
what
are
some
metrics
and
then
discuss
the
metrics,
and
I
think
this
one
is
particularly
challenging
for
conflict
mechanisms
and
graduated
sanctions
that
also
we
spent
quite
some
time
so
ask
to.
A
Can
everyone
access
this
board?
Let
me
paste
the
link
in.
A
A
So
is
there
anyone
already
in
the
board,
okay
durga.
Does
I
see
you
here?
Do
you
want
to
read
for
us
what
are
the
implementations
of
conflict
of
conflict
resolution
mechanisms
so
just
a
quick
blurb
about
like
what
this
ostra
means
about?
This
is
just
she
talks
about
having
conflict
resolution
at
low
cost
so
having
it
like
easily
accessible
to
everyone
that
is
part
of
that
community
and
and
having
it
like,
either
free
or
at
a
very
low
cost.
J
Okay,
so
yeah,
so
we
have
the
the
gravity
working
group
plus
from
a
high
level.
We
have
an
understanding
of
the
sort
of
dualistic
nature
of
that,
so
you
can
either
create
trust
proactively
or
you
know
you
can
handle
conflict
reactively.
We
should
have
mechanisms
for
both
and
we
do
so
graviton
roles
and
accessibility
to
them.
J
The
graviton
trainings
promotion
of
non-adversarial
positions,
nbc
prevention,
culture,
trust
creation,
as
I
mentioned
before,
easy
access
to
agents
and
processes
active
gravitons,
meaning
that
we
have
not
only
people
who
have
taken
the
graviton
training
but
from
there
then
participate
in
in
gravity
actions
and
conflict
resolution.
J
But
that's
another
process
that
we
have
a
technical
process
with
some
software
behind
the
scenes
that
can
help
us
to
deal
with
that
and
then
how
many
conflicts
have
been
solved
using
what
type
of
technique.
J
So
yeah
you
do
need
to
have
some
understanding
of
what's
going
on
there
having.
J
A
J
And
then
the
value
people
give
to
their
rewards
as
close
to
the
value
given
by
the
community.
I
think
that's
yeah,
it's
an
interesting
question
because
they
there
needs
to
be
a
kind
of
proportionality
and
when
people
think
feel
like
the
proportionality
is
missing,
there's
a
kind
of
feeling
of
unfairness,
which
then
speaks
then
to
the
trust
and
legitimacy
of
the
mechanisms
involved,
and
so
yeah,
just
trying
to
inventory
and
proactively
understand
where
trust
and
legitimacy
are
built
and
you
know
conflict
is
you.
K
J
Generally,
the
result
of
us
ignoring
something
so
by
paying
attention
to
that,
we
can
go
a
long
way.
A
Yeah,
thank
you
yeah,
so
it
was
just
how
like,
but
the
metrics
are
always
challenging
because
they
imply
having
some
type
of
quantification
or
something
that
we
can
like
easily
measure,
and
some
of
these
things
are
not
so
easy
to
measure.
A
I
avoided
putting
numbers
of
conflict
that
existed
and
and
tried
to
think
more
of
numbers
of
conflict
that
were
solved,
but
maybe
conflicts
that
were
solved
versus
in
reference
to
conflicts.
Existing.
J
K
K
J
J
E
G
I
think
you
should
definitely
track
the
number
of
conflicts,
but
I
I
don't
think
it
should
be
like,
like
the
main
metric,
because
you
know
conflicts,
change
in
number
of
conflicts
can
mean
that
there
was
actually
more
conflict
or
it
could
mean
that
we're
doing
a
really
good
job
and
people
are
comfortable
reporting
things
or
like
bringing
them.
G
But
then
again,
just
like
durgados
said
it
could
mean
that
we're
doing
a
really
good
job
of
just
having
an
open
dialogue
before
anything
needs
to
come
to
that
too.
So,
but
I
think
for
like
normalizing,
like
numbers
resolve.
That
might
be
important
if
you
really
want
to
look
over
time,
so
I
would
have
it,
but
just
not
be
careful
about
like
how
we
interpret
it.
A
Do
you
think
this
addresses
what
you're
saying
how
many
conflicts
have
been
solved
in
reference
to
existing
concepts.
A
J
For
me,
it
would
just
be.
I
mean
conflicts
see
like
there's
this
there's
a
sort
of
fictional
idea
that
you
can
solve
a
conflict.
I.
K
J
Conflict,
if
you
learn
something
from
it,
if
you
you
know
what
I
mean
so
like,
we
can
solve
a
conflict
where
nobody
feels
angry
anymore,
but
did
we
actually
put
together
a
trust
creation
mechanism
that
would
proactively
avoid
that
issue
in
the
future?
I
think,
is
a
more
useful
metric
from
my
perspective,
but
that's
just
me.
G
Yeah,
maybe
like
maybe
a
better
metric,
might
be
like
post.
G
Post
mediation
like
satisfaction
and
maybe
like
where
the
where
both
parties
needs
met
and
like
maybe
something
else
like
do.
You
feel
like
you,
trust
this
process,
so
that
it's
more
like
it's
quantitative,
but
it's
like
the
actual
metric
we're
looking
at
is
like
the
the
quality
of
the
conflict
resolution.
L
Yeah
return
on
time
invested
could
be
an
effective
metric
for
that,
so,
just
you
know
has
on
a
scale
of
one
to
five.
Has
engaging
in
the
process
been
a
good
return
on
the
time
that
I
invested
in
it
is
qualitative
enough.
I
would
also,
in
the
broader
trend
sort
of
gently
nudge
back
on
this
idea
that
qualia
qualities
can't
be
sort
of
also
measured
a
soft
survey
of
what
is
the
vibe.
L
L
That's
like
super
extreme,
but
if
you
want
to
go
for
it,
it's
definitely
insightful.
I
would
also
put
forward
reflection
after
the
fact,
so
in
a
lot
of
dispute
resolutions
or
conflicts.
You'll
have
some
form
of
agreement
as
an
output
of
that
process.
All
right.
So
we
have
learned
this,
and
maybe
we
will
try
and
do
wxyz
some
reflection
after
the
fact
on
that
could
also
be
really
useful.
As
far
as
you
know,
are
people
sticking
to
their
commitments
you
know:
did
it
did
it
actually
matter?
As
time
goes
on.
B
Yeah,
I
I
wrote
a
variety
of
tools
offered
when
requesting
support
like,
and
this
is
something
that
that
I've
been
thinking
a
lot
since
a
while.
But
I
think
that
it
will
be
executed
in
the
following
months
and
is
that
right
now
we
only
have
one
tool
and
it's
mediation,
but
it
would
be
really
cool
to
have
a
portfolio
of
different
tools
that
can
be
used
for
different
types
of
conflict.
Not
like
mediation
is
a
broad
tool,
but
it's
not
a
one.
B
Size
fits
for
all,
and
it
would
be
that
I
think
that
would
be
one
of
the
desired
outcomes
from
this
first
phase
of
research
and
practice
groups
to
try
to
have
like
other
toolings
that
can
be
applied
and
like.
If
maybe
someone
is
better
in
in
or
more
experienced
in
in
other
tooling
than
in
mediation,
they
can
actually
be
a
better
fit
for
certain
types
of
conflict
than
others,
so
yeah.
B
I
think
that
it
would
be
like
a
desired
outcome
of
gravity
to
be
able
to
have
like
a
portfolio
of
toolings
so
like
when
people
come
to
us
requesting
support,
we
can
say
like
okay,
would
you
prefer
to
have
a
mediation,
or
would
you
prefer
to
have
another
process
that
we
can
yeah
put
in
practice?
So
I
think
this
will
be
something
that
we
can
be
working
on
in
the
next
months.
A
So
maybe
a
metric
could
be
that
people
are
using
like
x.
The
number
amount
of
people
used
x
equals
like
having
a
diversity
on
how
many
tools
are
used.
Maybe
this
has
to
be
better
formulated,
but
just
so
we
have
time
to
cover
the
next
two
I'll
pass
to
minimum
recognition
of
rights.
To
organize
tim.
Do
you
want
to
read
this
one.
D
A
We
won't
have
an
authority
that
will
shut
down
that
that
there
is
no
authority
that
has
that
is
capable
to
shutting
down
what
we're
doing
at
least
minimal,
and
that
we
are
minimally
prepared
for
this,
that
we
have
like
the
mvp
first
for
a
structure
that
is
resilient
and
that
can
be
shut
down
by
bigger
authorities
like
the
government,
for
example.
A
Does
anyone
has
thoughts
if
there
is
something
we
need
to
add
here
or
there
or,
if
there's
any
other
implementation
in
the
tc,
so
the
trusted
seed
for
our
initialization,
the
covenant
that
is
kind
of
like
our
ins,
our
constitution,
the
legal
working
group.
B
A
D
B
Yeah,
but
also
it
can
be
applied
to
tc
in
like
in
a
wider
picture,
because
that's
the
way
we
organize
and
the
way
we
say
how
are
we
going
to
use
our
resources?
B
A
Any
other
thoughts
on
the
metrics,
so
number
of
individuals
who
had
to
use
the
trusted
seat
legal
shield.
I
think
it's
a
good
metric
for
like
if
this
is
happening.
Maybe
there
is
a
certain
number
that
if
we
reach
that
number,
it
means
that
we
are
in
danger
or
that
we
should
like
review
our
minimum
rights
to
wreck
right
to
to
organize
something
like
that
and
then
number
of
attacks
the
tc
suffered
and
does
what
could
also
put
us
could
put
all
the
agreements
that
we
have
internally
in
risk.
A
I
posted
the
link
in
softgov
or
maybe
jeremy
you
can
go.
I
just
gave
you
access
now.
F
Nested
enterprise
sources,
integration
snapshot,
integration,
param
parties
in
other
communities,
test
build
from
one
hive:
tea
academy,
tea
partnership,
working
group
becoming
dallas
proposal,
inverting
and
blockchain
for
good
communities
and
number
of
partnerships.
They
want
the
metric
to
quantify
a
number
of
interconnected
community
events.
A
Nasa
enterprises
is
just
that
we
are,
but
the
name
is
very
self-explanatory,
just
that
we
we
are
part
of
other
communities
and
that
we
are
interconnected
with
other
communities
and
even
that
within
our
group
we
have
nested
enterprises
that
are
like.
The
working
group
is
a
nested
enterprise
of
the
dao
when
it
starts
to
become
like
a
sub-dial
kind
of
thing.
F
L
I'm
I'm
challenged
to
think
about
how
it's
possible
to
easily
measure
this,
but
I
think
the
crossover
of
participation
from
different
contexts
and
communities
because,
of
course,
the
tec
can
host
an
event
that
is
in
collaboration
with
another
scene,
but
there's
also
a
lot
of
organic
crossover
that
could
be
a
soft
metric
as
a
result
of
those
relationships.
G
K
D
A
J
So,
just
looking
at
so
if
I'm
overlaying
like
let's
say
connection
with
ostrom's
principles,
if
I
take
a
look
at
what
osram's
principles
are
all
doing
all
of
them
in
in
some
way
or
another
assume
that
the
movement
between
the
complex
area
of
the
connection
framework
into
the
complicated
area
of
the
connection
framework
is
an
enabling
constraint
versus
a
governing
constraint
right
and
most
people
assume
that
all
constraints
are
governing
constraints,
but
typically
they're.
J
Not
so
for
those
of
you
who
don't
know
what
I'm
talking
about,
I'm
happy
to
maybe
share
my
screen,
and
I
can
kind
of
show
you
what
I'm
talking
about.
J
Some
of
you
have
heard
me
talk
about
this
stuff
before,
but
so
what
we
do
here
is
very
complex,
but
when
we
go
to
constrain
those
things,
then
we
move
into
the
realm
of
the
complicated.
J
If
you
make
it
a
governing
constraint,
then
typically,
what
you're
doing
is
you're
trapping
all
successive
generations
of
of
evolution
into
the
complicated
and
the
clear-
and
this
is
the
this-
is
how
we
end
up
with
centralized
systems
right.
So,
in
order
to
sort
of
prevent
that
thing
from
happening.
K
J
To
make
sure
that
the
the
constraints
that
we're
putting
in
our
enabling
constraints,
which
will
then
later
on
not
prevent
us
from
moving
back
from
the
complicated
when
we
reach
the
limitations
or
the
evolution
of
what
we
have
going
on
back
in
the
complex
so
that
we
can
re-experiment
with
what's
going
on
and
create
a
new
set
of
enabling
and
governing
constraints
that
get
us
there.
J
So
I'm
I'm
basically
suggesting
that
ocean
was
very
wise
in
that
sense,
where
I
think
she
understood
that
the
basic
problem
here
is
that
the
moment
you
constrain
people
and
and
the
the
fundamental
way
to
sort
of
prevent
that
is
to
to
not
just
make
governing
constraints.
Only
right.
And
so
I
just
wanted
to
point
that
out
as
a
relationship
that
I've
observed
for
those
of
you
who
are
familiar
with
this
model
and
for
those
who
are
familiar
with
ostrom's
principles.
But
I
don't
see
that
really
well
described
in
in
the
mirror
board.
J
So
I
just
wanted
to
sort
of
put
that
as
an
additional
kind
of
narrative
understanding,
perhaps
that
we
might
consider
when
we're
considering
this
kind
of
thing.
So
and
for
those
of
you
who
don't
know
the
complicated
is
the
realm
of
the
expert
and
the
clear
known
and
familiar,
is
you
know
the
bucketized
standardized
stuff?
And
then
you
know
automation
that
comes
on
the
back
of
that.
But
at
the
same
time
you
know
we
go
ahead.
A
It's
just
that
we
are
on
the
top
of
the
hour,
so
if
anyone
wants
to
leave,
thank
you
for
for
joining,
and
I
think
this
is
super
interesting.
I
would
be
keen
to
continue
to
listen.
Okay,
just.