►
Description
Timecodes:
00:00 - What does it mean to be a pluralistic community?
16:50 - Organize the path
31:27 - How to funnel signaling proposals?
47:12 - Sharing voting flow
51:16 - Closing with a review of onboarding ideas
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/DDr5kYU
or say hello on Telegram http://t.me/CommonsStack
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/CommonsStack
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
B
D
D
Collet
individuals
call
it
groups,
call
it
whatever
and
I'll
pass
it
to
something.
E
I
I
think
it's
all
the
same,
but
on
top
of
welcoming
everyone
is
also
a
community
that
looks
to
welcome
to
la
plus
reality.
Not
only
just
welcomes
whoever
wants
anyone
who
wants
to
join,
but
also
tries
to
to
have
a
diversity
of
members
from
all
over
to
who
have
different
points
of
view,
so
that
enriches
the
community
and
makes
it
much
much
much
more
opacity
to
tonga.
F
G
G
Pluralist
societies
place
strong
expectations
of
on
the
integration
of
members
rather
than
expectations
of
assimilation,
and
that
last
line
is
what
really
got
me
where
it's
like:
it's
not
about
trying
to
get
like,
for
instance,
immigrants,
to
learn
english
and
like
be
like
everyone
else.
You
know
it's
more
about
like
everyone
else
being
like
man,
they
make
really
delicious
food.
You
know
we
need
more
of
that.
We
wow
what
else
do?
Oh
man,
that's
really
cool,
too.
Why
aren't
these
things
more
popular,
you
know
and
so
being
having,
I
think,
just
deriving
off.
G
That
is
this,
this
concept
of
finding
each
different
little
subculture
inside
of
the
community,
to
have
value
in
itself
and
to
celebrate
that
value
and
encourage
everyone
else
to
learn
from
it
and
sing
kumbaya
together
as
they
walk
through,
you
know,
sit
around
the
fire.
That
kind
of
a
thing
and
and
more
than
just
respect
people's
differences
like
look
for
ways
that
those
differences
can
be
incorporated
into
the
dominant
culture,
I'll
pass
it
to
ata.
H
Yeah,
I
was
also
thinking
that
in
pluralistic,
like
pluralistic
community
would
be
accommodative
to
people's
different
backgrounds
and
also
to
provide
kind
of
common
spaces
where
dialogue
between
different.
H
Subgroups
can
happen
and
they
can
peacefully
coexist
for
this
context.
It
is
like
token
engineers
people
from
tech,
space
people
from
more
soft
cow
approach
like
people
from
coms.
You
know
people
with
different
backgrounds
and
different
kinds
of
ways
of
working
being
able
to
live
together
and
respect
each
other's
space
yeah.
H
A
I
think
you're
just
joining
just
the
question
is:
what
does
it
mean
to
be
a
pluralistic
community,
and
so
it
seems
that
it's
not
such
an
easy
word
and
griff
just
googled
it
so
I'll.
Just
I
would
just
post
a
meaning
in
the
in
the
notes,
but
I
mean
yeah,
plural
comes
from
plural.
I
Community
is
the
question
yeah
yeah,
I
guess
for
me
I'd
say
I'm
like
racking
my
brain
from
my
old
university
poli-sci
courses.
Yeah.
I
think
it's
just
welcoming
diversity,
diverse
voices,
I
think
for
me
it
means
a
lot
like
I've
been
in
projects
where
there's
a
kind
of
group.
Think
and
people
fall
into
this
tendency
of
thinking.
That
always
agreeing
is
good,
and
I
think
that's
why
it's
so
awesome.
I
We
have
juan
who's
like
putting
so
much
work
in
conflict
resolution
and
even
having
intention
and
awareness
around
us
as
being
a
discussion
is
like
in
any
in
relating
in
any
sense
like
personal
relationship
or
whatever
I
mean
you're,
not
going
to
see
eye
to
eye.
So
welcoming
diverse
opinions,
I
would
say,
is
part
of
a
pluralistic
community
and
finding
ways
to
integrate
all
of
this
like
perceptions
to
finding
the
highest
truth
for
everyone
and
I'm
not
sure
who's
gone
so
I'll
pass
it
back
to
you.
Lydia.
J
Hi,
okay,
olivia,
please
feel
free
to
cut
me
off,
because
I'm
gonna
try
and
do
my
best
to
get
this
out
as
quick
as
I
can
so.
Once
upon
a
time
I
wrote,
I
read
a
book,
it
was
by
russell
bourne.
He
is
a
professor
at
brown
university.
It
was
called
gods
of
war
gods
of
peace
and
how
religion
shaped
the
early
native
americas.
J
So
something
I
think,
is
really
interesting
about
what
you're
actually
asking
about
is
the
algonquin
nation.
J
The
algonquin
nation
was
at
its
prime
at
its
peak
over
2
million
strong,
and
this
is
what
actually
scared
europe,
because
they
came
here
and
found
a
collective
of
people
that
were
very
different.
All
the
tribes
that
made
up
the
algonquin
nation
and
no
one
historically
knows
how
many
there
actually
were.
J
But
there
was
many
I
mean
there
was
hundreds
and
hundreds
of
various
tribes
and
even
within
that
there
were
ones
that
were
in
different
levels
compared
to
the
others.
For
instance,
the
mohawk
made
up
a
very
war-like
military
idea
of
the
algonquin.
They
were
the
protectors
they
fought
within.
They
all
thought
they.
They
had
struggles
and
conflicts,
but
they
did
have
a
center.
There
was
a
tribal
council
that
wasn't
exactly
centered,
it
wasn't
like
a
government,
but
they
did
have
a
way
of
life
and
twice
a
year.
J
These
tribal
leaders
that
were
respected
throughout
the
entire
algonquin
nation
would
meet
and
would
kind
of
like
decide,
different
things
that
were
going
on
for
their
entire
area.
There
were
so
many
different
groups,
a
part
of
this
that
collectively
always
had
a
center
and
just
lived
their
way
of
life
together.
J
They
were
always
open
to
whatever
this
tribe
did
or
that
tribe
did
they
didn't
the
the
the
the
lesser
details.
You
know,
as
you
would
state
they
didn't
matter.
They
had
this.
They
had
this
profound
understanding
that
the
whole
work
together
for
the
benefit
of
what
they
were
doing.
J
So
even
this
individual
tribes,
like
their
their
way
of
life,
might
have
just
been
about
fishing
and
and
and
or
sowing
or
something
right
like
that
would
have
been
their
life
or
like
that's
what
they
did
really
well.
I
should
say
that's
what
they
did
really
well,
so,
when
they
traded
with
other
tribes,
they
were
really
good
at
fishing
and
they
were
really
good
at
making
clothes.
J
Okay,
that
was
what
they
provided
and
and
then
the
mohawk
may
have
came
in
and
they
needed
clothes
and
they
were
really
good
well,
they
were
really
good
at
killing
people
so
like
we're
killing
animals
really,
which
was
with
their
big
theme
until
until
the
europeans
showed
up.
So
they
were
really
good
at
hunting.
So
then
they
would
have
showed
up
and
like
we
need
these
clothes
and
well
here,
here's
all
of
this
here's
all
of
this
neat!
Okay,
you
know
what
I
mean
and
there
wasn't
like
there
wasn't
all
of
these
fights
like
that.
J
J
Now
they
did
have
ink
battles
that
went
on
due
to
different
beliefs
in
gods,
but
it
wasn't
nearly
anything
like
we
see
today
and
they're
and
they're,
like
their
council,
really
held
them
together.
So
you
could
kind
of
think
of
decentralized
trusted
seed
as
kind
of
like
their
council,
okay
and
the
tc.
J
So
we
have
all
of
these
different
people
from
all
over
the
world,
hopefully
like
like
beyond
you
know
and
and
we're
all
different,
and
we
have
like
little
subgroups
like
little
working
groups
of
our
own
little
tribes
that
all
make
up
this
bigger
piece.
You
know
what
I'm
saying
and
and
then
we
we're
all
just
like
cooperating.
J
If
you
don't
know
much
about
the
algonquin
nation,
you
should
google
that,
because
it's
really
actually
pretty
incredible
and
that's
actually
what
really
scared
the
british.
That
was
the
reason
for
the
boston,
tea
party
and
everything
else,
because
this
this
massive
2
million
strong
thing
was
actually
here.
Okay,
that's
it
who
hasn't
gone.
K
A
A
How
to
how?
What
does
it
mean
to
be
a
pluralistic
community.
K
Pluralistic
community,
I
guess
it's
kind
of
that,
one
in
many
and
many
in
one,
it's
kind
of
the
I
guess
when
in
terms
of
a
community,
I
would
say
you
know,
individuals
playing
multiple
roles.
K
H
D
A
A
F
E
A
A
A
Yeah,
those
are
great
answers.
I
didn't
think
we
would
go
that
long
with
that
question.
So
thanks
everyone-
and
I
was
in
a
in
a
similar
place
to
jeff
to
jazz
today
thinking
about
how
to
organize
the
the
path
of
the
working
group
now
that
it
feels
like
there
are
a
few
lockers
for
us
to
move.
So
we
had
a
session
last
week
to
work
on
the
code
of
conduct
of
the
multiple
channels
and
on
the
cultural
agreements.
A
So
that's
a
document
that
it's
progressing,
but
it's
a
beast
of
a
document,
so
it's
gonna
take
a
little
bit
of
time
and
thanks
so
much
zaptimus
for
filling
your
session
and
juan
also
put
some
work
into
it.
A
That's
awesome
to
see
that
there's
progress
there
already,
and
so
we
have
the
the
agreements
and
they
are
one
of
the
principles
and
and
there's
a
lot
of
work
there
and
there's
they're,
also
tied
to
legal,
so
we're
moving
also
to
gravity
and
conflict
management,
so
we're
kind
of
moving
slowly
there
and
also
the
mutual
accountability
I
was
talking
to
one.
Today
we
made
some
progress
in
the
type
form
and
in
the
structure
of
of
the
conflict
management
flow,
but
mutual
accountability.
It's
also
more
than
that.
A
We
kind
of
have
to
understand
and
to
have
those
agreements,
so
I
feel
like
there's
a
lot
of
things
in
tangoed
in
one
another
right
now,
and
there
is
the
proposal
structure
that
needs
to
move
forward.
So
I
guess
it
would
be
helpful
also
to
have
a
sense
making
around
what
is
the
directions
we're
taking,
and
I
was
looking
into
the
mirror
board.
A
A
So
this
was
the
the
mural
board
that
we
started,
so
this
is
a
type
form
that
many
people
filled
out
and
there's
like
many
answers
here.
So
we
had
sessions
to
distill
these
answers
into
this
other
boards
and
and
have
some
big
challenges
and
open
questions
and
some
of
the
fronts
that
we
were
gonna
face.
A
So
it
was
actually
really
nice
to
look
into
this
board
today
and
see
that
we
here
we
basically
didn't
really
have
a
culture.
We
were
like
starting
to
move
with
all
of
the
working
groups
and
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
people
were
starting
to
come,
so
it's
awesome
to
see
that
we
actually
implemented
so
many
of
these
ideas-
and
I
was
looking
into
the
big
challenges
and
all
of
these
things
came
from
the
board,
so
a
system
designed
by
unilateral
thinking,
I
feel
like
this
is
a
challenge
that
we
put
aside.
A
A
It's
hard
to
know
when
is
appropriate
to
take
the
lead
initiative,
while
also
not
stepping
on
people's
toes
and
knowing
how
the
power
structures
work
open
to
feedbacks
here.
But
I
also
feel
like
we
created
a
structure,
so
this
wouldn't
happen
with
the
roles
and
the
working
group
leads
and
having
this
very
open.
Anyone
who
wants
to
lead
a
working
group
can
take
the
initiative
making
this
into
a
democracy
that
everyone
can
feel
like.
They
have
the
agency
to
take
decisions
and
to
propose
any
type
of
work.
A
When
we
are
remote,
it's
easy
to
have
a
negative
experience
association
with
someone
or
something
then
stop
engaging
and
does
never
rebuild
positive
associations
or
evolve,
because
you
are
around
the
person
and
have
to
continue
as
comrades
getting
through
daily
life
together.
Well
also,
the
sexism
is
real.
A
Some
someone
anonymous
wrote
this
in
the
forum
and-
and
I
think
we
are
addressing
all
of
those
issues
with
gravity,
and
I
like
I'm,
really
happy
to
say
that
I
don't
feel
like
we
are
a
sexist
community,
and
this
is
really
important
and
accountability
that
we
also
went
through
a
lot
of
sense.
Making
around
accountability
and
ostrom
also
talks
about
this
in
the
book.
A
How
a
lot
of
accountability
comes
from
trust
and
building
trust
among
each
other,
and
I
feel,
like
we've,
been
also
building
a
culture
of
trust
that
has
been
evolving
with
time,
and
this
is
definitely
helping
into
the
accountability.
I
feel
like
many
of
the
tasks
that
many
of
us
took.
We
did
finish
and
move
forward
with
it
or
ask
each
other
for
help.
A
So
I
wanted
to
bring
this
up
and
and
share
this
board,
so
everyone
can
jump
into
it
and
and
see
like
where
we
are
and
also
there
are
so
many
ideas
here
that
we
can
still
apply
them.
So
there
are
tasks
that
can
be
picked
up
and
I'm
talking
for
a
long
time
now,
but
I
just
wanted
to.
B
B
I
have
this
term
in
in
my
mind,
because
of
the
chapter
of
today's
book
club
and
it's
a
quasi-voluntary
compliance
and
it
it
is
when
people
like
voluntarily
follow
the
rules
because
they
somehow
like
agree
to
them,
recognize
them
and
and
know
that
those
rules
are
to
serve
the
better
of
the
whole.
B
So
I
think
that
that
is
something
that
we
are
aiming
and
somehow
it
it's
like
a
goal
to
achieve,
because
that
that
is
the
way
that
that
we
can
have
people
in
the
community
to
not
feel
obligated
to
do
stuff,
but
to
feel
that
there
are
just
some
rules
on
on
on
how
can
they
collaborate
but
that
they
are
free
to
collaborate
and
that
and
that
we
are
not
impo
imposing
anything
but
more
than
imposing,
we
are
just
giving
legitimacy
to
social
agreement.
B
So
I
I
think
the
the
experiment
of
soft
gob
is
is
very,
very
good
for,
for
the
whole
purpose
of
the.
A
Thanks
juan
yeah,
so
I
I
I
guess
I
just
wanted
to
understand
if
they're
to
hear
from
you
guys,
if
there
is
something
that
you
think
it's
it's
missing
now
that
we
are
moving
these
pieces
of
these
big
pieces
that
are
moving
a
little
bit
slower
and
kind
of
interdependent
to
each
other.
J
I'm
just
gonna
quick
jump
in
the
the
espanol,
the
the
the
other
language
that
you
know
the
center
in
and
branda
off
to
an
entirely.
You
know
such
a
giant
group
of
people
that
that's
really
really
awesome,
and
that
would
involve
so
much
of
this
incorporating
with
what
we're
trying
to
do.
You
know
that
that
would
that
that's
communication,
language,
that's
that's
it!
You
know,
you
know
that
that's
all
we
got
so
that's
really
really
really
cool.
J
I
I
think
if
we,
if
we
worked
on
that,
you
know
like
matteo,
just
brought
up
in
the
in
the
previous,
you
know
meeting
that
would
be
really
really
cool.
L
F
F
I
Oh
sorry,
I
wanted
to
respond
to
your
question
and
say
I
actually
feel
like
the
culture
is
fantastic
like
I
I
I
don't
think
we
can
be
doing
anything
more
in
regards
to
the
culture
building.
I
think
it's
been
beautiful
experience.
I
know
like
the
last
thing
is
just
like
making
sure
one
can
take
off
like
and
giving
him
the
support
to
really
launch
that.
I
Otherwise,
I
would
say
for
me,
I
think,
what
needs
energy
and
attention
and
maybe
because
we're
fresh
out
of
the
other
meeting.
I
do
think,
like
the
discussions
around
governance
and
continuing
the
praise
system
after
the
launch
could
use
some
attention
and
how
that
could
look.
For
me,
those
are
the
two
areas
to
kind
of
transition
to
maybe
now
after
the
holidays,
I
feel
like
yeah,
you've
been
doing
a
fantastic
job
and
leading
everyone
and
everybody
that
comes
to
these
meetings.
Every
week,
like
all
the
work
you've
put
in,
is
really
like.
A
A
How
to
funnel
signaling
proposals
and
what
type
of
proposals
we
want
to
guide
to
the
forum
or
to
conviction
voting,
because
we
will
have
this
function
of
conviction,
voting
that
you
can
both
fund
proposals,
and
you
can
also
just
make
a
proposal
without
requesting
any
funds
and
and
this
proposal
can
still
be
voted
and
can
be
approved
and
if
it's
approved,
even
if
there's
no
funds,
it's
signaling,
something
or
it's
making
some
type
of
cultural
agreement.
A
So
I
think
we
and
we
can't
prevent
people
from
submitting
a
proposal
either
to
the
forum
or
to
conviction
voting.
But
how
can
we
organize
and
funnel
to
have
at
least
a
direction
for
people
to
understand
where
to
go,
so
we
can
start
to
build
a
cultural
practice
around
this,
like
what
are
the
best
types
of
proposals
to
go
to
signaling
proposals
to
go
to
conviction
voting
and
what
are
the
best
types
to
go
to
the
forum?
I
Before
we
jump
into
that,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
everybody
has
one
piece
of
context
and
that's
if
we
have
a
lot
of
signaling
proposals.
This
affects
the
token
supply,
and
that
means
people
will
be
staking
tokens
on
signaling
proposals,
so
that
will
basically
inherently
slow
down
funding
coming
out
of
the
dao.
G
At
least
every
implementation
of
conviction
voting
so
far
besides
aragon's
one
on
mainnet
that
no
one
voted
on,
because
gas
was
like
100.
I
think,
besides
that
one,
the
one
hive
specifically
especially,
has
a
lot
of
money:
people
a
lot
of
people
voting
on
abstain
in
general
to
adjust
the
speed
of
funding.
G
It's
been
actually
a
difficult
thing,
with
conviction,
voting
that
it's
usually
too
easy
to
fund,
but
it
is
worth
but
you're,
absolutely
right
when
you're
voting
on
a
signaling
proposal.
That
means
you
can't
vote
on
a
funding
for
you.
You
only
have
so
many
tokens
and
they're
they're
competitive.
A
So
maybe
it
would
be
interesting
to
have
like
a
funnel
that
starts
in
the
forum
and
then
like.
A
Let's
say
if
we
want
to
change
the
code
of
conduct
like
if
we
want
something
that
is
important,
that
it
would
start
in
the
forum
and
have
a
few
processes
like
start
with
the
advice
process
and
then
have
a
voting
session
in
the
forum.
Perhaps
a
polling
to
have
an
idea
of
how
the
community
is
feeling
and
then
from
there
elaborate
a
proposal
like
a
final
proposal
that
goes
to
conviction
voting,
and
that
would
be
the
like
more
serious
one.
Let's
say.
I
I
think
also
like
examining
why
why
would
you
need
conviction?
Voting
versus
the
polling
like
a
polling
is
basically
like
a
one-for-one
that
is
easy
to
cast
versus
you
know
in
conviction
voting
you
have
to
stake
over
time,
so
you
have
to
feel
very
strongly
it's
real
time,
like
preference
signaling,
so
like
at
what
point?
Would
that
really
become
necessary
to
kind
of
get
this
real-time
sensing
for
the
strong
opinions
and
this
kind
of
like
waiting
in
a
preference
with
skin
in
the
game
versus
like?
I
I
can
just
go
and
signal
with
like
one
vote
on
a
poll,
so
I
guess
exploring
like
what
would
be
a
decision
and
maybe
yeah
it's
like
how
important
is
it
I
mean
some
people
like
for
me.
I
would
be
fine
to
vote
on
the
code
of
conduct,
as
a
poll
like
I
don't
feel
like.
I
need
to
like
stake
tokens
on
that,
for
me,
that's
fairly
like
straightforward,
but
people
may
feel
differently.
G
I
was
going
to
wait
to
see
if
anyone
else
has
something
to
say,
but
I
think
that
the
general
consensus
has
been
in
the
dow
space
that
we
vote
too
much,
or
we
expect
to
vote
too
much
a
lot
of
times,
it's
better
to
have
small
little
groups
that
are
focused
on
these
issues
that
then
are
held
accountable
to
their
decisions
by
the
larger
and
so
that
you
don't
vote
voting
is
something
that
happens
at
the
edges
with
the
people
who
are
informed
and
affected
by
the
by
the
decision
being
made.
G
So,
for
instance,
code
of
conduct
should
probably
be
maintained
by
the
gravity
working
group.
The
gravity
working
group
gets
funding
from
conviction
voting,
so
every
working
group
should
stay
transparent
and
talk
about
the
decisions
they're
making
over
the
code
of
conduct
in
the
forum
and
maintaining
these
things.
So
you
know
I
I
I
think
in
general
there
shouldn't
be
too
much
voting.
G
You
know
we
shouldn't
lean.
We
should
go
the
other
dire.
What
most?
Maybe
the
dow
space
is
overcorrecting
right,
but
projects
like
colony
and
and
some
criticism,
criticisms
of
people
who
are
in
dallas
right
now
or
is
like
I'm.
I
have
other
things.
I'm
doing.
I'm
not
gonna
pay
attention
to
the
code
of
conduct
who's
paying
attention.
You
do
it.
J
I
I
want
a
second
that,
like
you
know,
being
in
crypto
too,
like
that's
a
big
thing
to
dowse.
There's
way
too
much
voting,
there's
voting
on
this
there's
voting
on
that.
There's
this
that
and
people
just
ignore
it
and
it
just
it
really
gets
complacent
and
it
just
gets
subjective
and
it's
a
problem
and
like
dude
like
just
more
like
it
really.
J
I
really
wish
everybody
would
read
that
book,
because
this,
like
the
algonquin
there's
so
much
similarities
like
and
how
that
was
a
real
physical
thing
like
this
was
a
time
in
history
that
existed
and
and
and
it
was
real
and-
and
it
went
on
for
a
long
period
of
time
you
know
and
and
then
and
then
the
europeans
show
up
and
they're
look.
They
got
scared.
J
They
got
scared
as
hell
when
they
saw
how
organized
they
really
were
like
they.
This
wasn't
this
whole
term
savage
or,
as
they
said,
it's
a
french
word,
savage
which
means
wild.
You
know
wild
people
savages
and
no,
they
weren't.
That
was
all
propaganda.
They
weren't
they
weren't
wild
people.
They
were
very
organized
people
and
that's
why
they
had
to
dock.
J
They
had
to
kill
them.
You
know,
I
don't
want
to
try
and
run
down
this
dark
road,
but
there
really
is
a
lot
of
similarities
like
they.
They
really
had
an
ability
to
create
a
collective
and
on
a
very,
very
large
scale,
they
had
problems,
but
they
made
it
work
and,
like
griff
said
too,
to
reiterate
that
point:
there
wasn't
a
bunch
of
voting.
There
wasn't
a
bunch
of
like
town
hall
meetings,
there
wasn't
a
bunch
of
this
or
that
there
there
was
just
an
understanding,
and
then
there
was
a
specific.
J
I
I
I
hope
we
can
explore
and
I
was
talking
with
some
about
maybe
some
time
we
can
come
to
the
point
endows
where
we
can
delegate
our
votes
to
people
that
we
trust
so
that
we
don't
have
to
keep
up
with
every
single
thing
going
on
and
we
don't
have
to
like
micromanage
ourselves,
and
our
decisions
like
griff
is
saying
even
me
like
I
was
like:
oh
should
we
have
a
vote
for
like
our
brand
and
I'm
like
wait
a
second,
no
like
it's
undercom's
working
group
and
yeah.
We
make
decisions
under.
I
G
K
In
terms
of
you
know
what
what
decisions
that
are
being
made
need
to
be
voted
on
and
what
type
of
voting
mechanism
is
being
used
for
those
types
of
decisions,
and
so
you
have
a
lot
of
decisions
that
are
being
being
made
with
the
wrong
voting
mechanism
and
a
lot
of
times
when
that
occurs,
you
get
the
wrong
information.
A
A
Good
point
that
sometimes
it's
not
even
accurate,
the
the
information
that
comes
out
because
the
voting
process
was
was
not
the
best.
The
best
one
yeah
one.
B
That
I
I
I
didn't
have
thought
what
grief
said
until
now,
but
a
great
suggestion,
because
that
way
we
can
have
accountability
making,
because
when
the
decision
is
taken
by
the
whole
community
like
when
we
try
to
see
its
accountability,
then
it
relies
on
the
whole
community
and
at
the
same
time,
almost
to
no
one.
B
So
it's
good
that
they
that
they
have
this
kind
of
of
capacity
to
take
decisions
and
that
they
were
held
accountable
because
the
the
idea
of
the
working
groups
is
that
the
people
inside
the
working
groups
are
experts.
B
I
mean
today
I
was
in
the
rams
call,
and
I
mean
I
am
not
an
expert.
So
maybe
my
participation
in
in
that
wouldn't
like
contribute
as
much.
If
I
just
let
people
that
is
an
expert
in
that
topic
like
take
the
best
decisions
and
then
to
to
like
a
review
test
and
like
yeah,
learn
and
from
from
the
the
the
decisions
that
that
people
who
is
expert
in
that
topic
they
take.
So
I
think
it's
its
position.
C
Maybe
we
could
have
like
an
event
to
both
like
very
small
things
and
like,
for
example,
like
decisions
the
daily
are
taking,
but
those
people
are
accountable
ability,
people
but
then
like
we
do
events
and
we
just
revise
and
we
if
we
want
to
decide
some
changes
or
whatever
that
maybe
might
be
interesting
and
another
thing
I
related
to
the
jake's
story:
how
that
people
like
the
trips
and
like
they
were
organized,
but
I
I
keep
thinking
like
it's
like
the
warriors
were
imposing
the
others.
C
J
Okay,
well,
that's
a
whole
nother
conversation
zep
like,
but
that
doesn't
have
to
do
with
the
comments.
Okay,
because
that
just
gets
into
more
ideological
historical
precedence,
it's
okay,
but
like
yeah,
you
want
to
talk
about
that.
I
can
talk
about
that,
but
that
don't
yeah.
A
A
Thanks
yeah,
I
just
want
to
share
that.
Actually
we
haven't
made
many
decisions
in
in
four
months.
We
only
made
17,
we
only
had
held
17
voting
sessions
and-
and
I
think
it's
it's
a
good-
it's
kind
of
a
good
flow
like
all
of
the
decisions
that
we
did
put
up
for
voting,
and
there
is
a
lot
that
happens
in
the
working
groups
without
the
need
of
a
voting
a
voting
session,
because
there
is
enough
coordination
happening
already
and
and
we've
been
sharing
so
much.
A
I
agree
with
with
everything
that
has
been
said
that
we
created
a
transparency
culture,
so
anyone
can
can
voice
their
if
they,
if
they
block
any
type
of
movement
at
any
time,
because
information
is
available.
G
A
A
So
I
think
there
is,
I
felt
like
there
is
a
consensus
that
at
the
least
amount
of
votes
to
go
to
cv
the
better
and
the
ones
that
we
can
decide
the
forum
in
the
forum.
We
should
do
that
and
the
ones
that
we
don't
need
to
decide
in
the
forum
should
be
decided
in
the
working
groups.
So
that's
kind
of
the
the
flow
of
like
community
collective
coordination
sense
making.
A
Then,
if
there
is
something
that
needs
to
be
agreed
on
to
go
to
the
forum
and
if
there's
and
if
the
forum
doesn't
seem
enough,
then
it
goes
to
cv
as
a
last
resource.
I
I
think
that
could
be
something
we
put
on
the
github
board
as
an
issue
to
start
to
draft
and
have
having
that,
like
guidance,
maybe
within
the
proposal
forum
section
itself
on
what
decisions
are
made
where
so
people
have
an
idea
of
how
the
so
that
we
have
this
like
transparent
view
into
how
things
are
governed.
A
A
Okay,
so
last
five
minutes,
I
just
wanted
to
come
back
to
this
board
and
we
had
some
onboarding
ideas,
solutions
here
and
also
education,
and
I
feel
like
some
of
this-
could
still
be
implemented,
like
maybe
coming
back
with
a
weekly
onboarding
call
to
just
like
be
there
and
then,
if
someone
wants
to
drop
in
and
hear
about
what's
happening,
they
can
having
like
a
few
other
mediums
of
information
that
are
not
just
in
the
forum
or
reading
like
an
ama
session,
could
be
really
cool.
A
C
A
A
A
A
A
I
E
Say
I
think,
a
video,
maybe
an
ama,
video
or
just
a
video
explaining
whatever
we
want
to
transmit
for
anyone
who's
on
boarding,
is
a
great
tool.
I
kind
of
remember
the
interview
that
that.
E
Grief
was
done
by
what's
the
name
of
the
the
name
of
the
yeah
the
man
made
to
griff
and
it's
on
on
on
one
of
those
boards,
and
that's
a
video
that
I
would
suggest
any
newcomer
to
watch
to
get
a
little
understanding
of
what
we're
doing
and
we
could
produce
one
or
two
more
of
those
and
and
that
anyone
who's
intending
to
understand
what
we're
doing
and
willing
to
join.
E
G
Yeah,
I
would
love
to
see
that
video
cut
up
into
questions
that
would
be
pretty
powerful
because
I
don't
think
people
necessarily
want
to
watch
a
half
an
hour
video
that
they
don't
understand.
What's
going
to
tell
them
what
it's
going
to
tell
them.
But
if
the
title
is
some
question
and
the
video's
length
is
three
minutes
like
oh
I'll,
take
three
minutes
to
understand
the
answer
to
the
question.
I
Just
yeah
just
so
you
know
it's
not
on
the
board
but
eduardo,
and
I
were
discussing
when
we
did
the
forum
I
would
do
like
mini
videos.
Welcoming
people
also
like
a
face
is
nice,
but
certainly
that's
a
great
idea
about
repurposing,
manu's
video
and
I
know
zeptimus.
You
said
you
had
been
interested
in
some
video
editing,
so
maybe
we
can
scope
that
out.
I
If
you're
willing
to
work
on
that-
and
at
least
it's
a
post
on
the
forum
as
a
placeholder
until
we
are
able
to
work
on
we're,
definitely
doing
an
onboarding
video
for
the
app.
But
we
need
some
other
videos
as
well
and
they're,
actually
so
much
quicker
than
writing
for
me.
So
I
would
love
to
focus
on
that
as
well.
In
addition
to
high-level
narrative
to
like
getting
some
videos
on
the
forum,
so
maybe
we
can
bring
it
up
in
comms,
again
january
5th.
Awesome.
A
I
A
A
I'll
have
so
sorry,
zap
I'll,
just
I'll
just
go
to
the
dow
book
club
and
you
guys
can
continue
talking
here.
If
you
need
more
time.
A
Sorry
for
the
unorganized
call
it's
a
lot
of
sense
making
to
do
around
these
things
and
thanks
so
much
for
all
the
ideas
and
the
support,
and
I
think
we
move
forward
on
on
the
clarity
for
the
proposal.
So
that's
great
and
I'll
do
some
more
work
on
that
mirror,
board
and
reshare
when
it's
in
a
in
a
better
space
for
us
to
understand
what
can
still
be
like
used
from
there.
So
thanks
so
much
everyone
we'll
be
in
the
book
club
channel
right
now
see
you
there.
A
C
I
I
just
wanted
to
add
during
the
week
I
could
rewatch
that
video
of
manual
grief
and
just
add
timestamp
at
least
so.
We
have
like
a
fast
thing,
a
fast
solution,
but
then
we
also
we
work
on
the
onboarding
videos
that
it
will
take
more
time.
But
at
least
we
have
this
with
startups,
and
people
can
just
go
and
watch
what
they
are
interested
in.
G
Yeah,
I
think
a
forum
post,
that
is
the
question
and
then
a
time
stamped
video
would
be
more
than
enough.
You
know
it's
not
the
it's,
not
the
easiest
thing
to
navigate
like.
Oh,
it's
on
youtube.
Three
minutes!
Okay,
that's
you
know,
there's
a
lot
of
decisions
that
get
made
like
that,
but
like
quick
and
dirty-
and
we
really-
I
I
think
that
most
of
our
direction
for
onboarding
needs
to
be
will
be
more
impactful.
G
Getting
people
to
watch
videos
or
read
documents,
there's
just
nothing
that
can
beat
a
one-on-one
conversation
with
someone
who
has
the
answers
and
and
then
that
just
that's
what
will
really
cap
move
this
hatch
forward.