►
From YouTube: W45 Softgov WG: Poligovernance, Agreements and more!
Description
Timecodes:
00:00 - 2 things you want to let go and something you want to welcome in?
17:29 - Poligovernance
26:03 - reard system
31:10 - 75% Governance
33:47 - Initial buy into the bonding curve
48:27 - Lost addreses
50:40 - Community covenant
50:51 - Agreements
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
This
week
that
I
was
off,
I
was
thinking
a
lot
about
how
much
what
what
are
the
images,
thoughts
and
concepts
that
inhabit
our
minds
and
that
have
an
influence
on
us
like
either.
We
want
it
or
not,
because
we
are
usually
so
busy
that
we
don't
have
that
perception.
Just
that
time
to
stop
and
observe
what
is
passing
around
and
what
are
we
interacting
with,
and
it
made
me
think
of
how
this
background
thoughts
actually
influence
in
our
decision
making
clarity,
power
and
just
our
ability
to
take
very
clear
and
informed
decisions.
A
So
I've
been
having
a
practice
myself
of
trying
to
detox
like
the
body
to
start
helping
the
mind
and
how
different
things
that
I
put
in
either
food
or
things
that
I
watch
or
things
that
I
pay
attention
to.
How
can
I
have
constantly
a
movement
of
things
that
are
coming
in
and
out
and
how
to
just
let
go
of
a
lot
of
spam
that
we
have
in
our
minds
and
especially
in
this
like
age
of
so
much
information
everywhere
and
us
being
so
distracted
by
so
many
things
all
the
time.
A
First
share
this,
so
maybe,
when
you
have
some
free
time,
you
can
be
more
mindful
of
the
of
everything
that
comes
in
and
and
develop
practices
to
for
for,
like
detoxing
and
also
yeah
just
propose
a
quick
exercise
of
two
things
that
you
would
like
to
remove
from
like
two
things
that
you
would
like
to.
Let
go,
and
one
thing
that
you
would
like
to
welcome
in
in
this
cycle,
so
I'll
start
passing
to
katie.
B
I
knew
you're
gonna
pick
me
wow,
that's
heavy
stuff.
The
trouble
with
these
questions
is
we
don't
get
a
chance
to
think
about
them
as
much
as
you.
B
Answer
but
I
just
got
finished,
building
a
bookcase
and
it
was
great.
I
turned
on
some
music
and
just
kind
of
zoned
into
the
process,
and
that
was
a
wonderful.
B
How
shall
I
say,
return
to
the
person
I
I
want
to
be
in
that
life.
You
say
where
we're
just
full
of
all
of
this
crazy
spam
and
I
think
part
of
the
this
lifestyle
with
the
pandemic
and
I
hate
even
to
bring
that
up
because
we
talk
about
it.
So
much
maybe.
B
Of
the
things
actually
to
just
kind
of
stop
worrying
about
things
that
we
can't
control,
perhaps
er
or
the
way
we
we
reminisce
over
the
day
on
trifle
conflicts,
for
example,
I'm
in
france,
so
there's
a
lot
of
those
on
a
regular
basis
like
arguments
with
the
at
the
grocery
store
at
the
post
office
or
wherever
it
might
be
so
trifling
kind
of
things
that
we
end
up.
Fixating
on
and
wasting
a
lot
of
mental
energy
on.
B
I
would
like
to
let
go
of
those
more
and
then
yeah
getting
back
to
inviting
more
time
for
music.
Actually,
I'm
a
huge
music
person
so
playing
music.
I
want
to
be
playing
music
again.
I
think
I'm
getting
ready
to
write
another
book
here
so
feeling
definite
some
detox
as
well
after
the
summer
and
getting
back
to
the
things
that
matter
some
peacefulness.
B
A
D
I
was
just
having
that
conversation
last
night
with
a
couple
of
of
doctors.
D
I've
been
teaching
them
like
the
basics
for
like
web
3,
and
they
were
just
talking
about
this.
This
topic
are
with
me
that
people
tend
to
associate
once
like
inner
reality
with
our
like
real
life
reality,
and
this
isn't
really
like
accurate
most
of
the
most
of
the
the
time,
because
we
can,
we
have
the
power
to
build
our
own.
D
Like
reality,
inside
of
our,
so
I,
for
example,
have
like
some
like
family
members
that
I
have
like
difficult
relationships
with,
but
they
were
just
telling
me
that
it's
like
it
like,
if
you
feel
that
you
can't
really
like
solve
it
around
you
or
in
real
life.
It
doesn't
really
have
have
to
be
the
same
thing
like
for
you
perceptively,
like
you
can
like
accept
this
and
and
and
it's
actually
like
easier
to,
let
it
go.
D
So
I
feel
that
not
only
for
me
but
like
for
a
lot
of
people
they
they
can
change
like
this,
like
reality,
when
it's
about
like
issues
with
with
people
around
them
and
actually
like.
D
I
I
would
like
about
what
I
would
welcome
in
it's
like
this
way
of
thinking
about
the
capacity
that
we
all
have
to
like,
establish
different,
like
realities
in
in
in
our
own
life
and
and
how
how,
if
you
see
it
in
a
certain
way
like
they
people
can't
make
you
change
it.
So
I
yeah
it's
a
it's.
It's
it's
a
recent
conversation.
So
thanks
for
bringing
it
up
I'll
craft
it
to
mitch.
E
Thanks
chewie
yeah,
two
things
I
want
to
let
go
of,
I
think
it's
like
big
thing
is
like
fixation
on
on
work.
It's
like
they're,
always
something
you
can
be
doing,
and
it's
really
easy
to
lose
track
of
time
and
budgeting
your
time
to
actually
go
and
like
get
outside
and
enjoy
your
life.
You
know
because
the
work
never
stops.
So
it's
like
you
kind
of
letting
go
of
it
and
being
able
to
draw
that
line
in
the
sand.
E
Definitely
is
something
I
want
to
let
go
of,
and
another
thing
I
just
read
the
question
now.
So
I'm
like
a
little
bit
behind
you
haven't
had
the
chance
to
think
about
it,
but
I
would
say
something
that
I
want
to
welcome
in
in
my
life
is,
at
the
same
time,
putting
more
of
my
personal
and
professional
time
aside
to
learn
more
things.
I
think
you
know
like
whole
new
things,
and
so
I
think,
there's
a
hesitation
because
I
feel
like
I
have
to
take
away.
You
know
it's
a
zero-sum
game.
E
You
only
get
so
many
hours
in
the
day
so
taking
time
away
to
learn.
Stuff
means
that
you
have
to
give
up
things
on
the
other
end.
I
can't
think
of
a
second
thing,
but
those
would
be
two
definite
things
that
I
would
let
go
of
and
add
in,
and
I
will
give
it
to
matteo.
F
Hey
guys
yeah,
I
remember
the
months
ago
where
you
were
asking
who
we
would
be
eating
on
our
team
that
was
simpler
times.
These
questions
are
way
tough,
maybe,
but
I
I
will
I
will
reply
for
in
my
case.
I
think
that
one
of
the
things
that
I
want
to
let
go
is
basing
my
thoughts
or
decision
making,
or
at
least
my
feelings
on
unconformism.
F
I
think
that
feeling
on
con
that
that
unconformism
plays
a
role
way
too
important
in
my
life
sometimes,
and
that
shouldn't
be
like
that.
So
if
I
want
to
have
a
decision,
make
a
decision
or
I
want
to
make
a
thought
of
something,
I
don't
want
to
do
that
through
through
the
discomfort
of
something
and
and
that's
something
that
I
have
noticed
a
while
ago
that
that
that
usually
takes
too
much
importance
in
in
the
way
I
am
living.
F
F
I
I
haven't
watched
a
movie
in
a
long
time
I
haven't
painted.
I
haven't
done
anything
artistic
in
a
while
and
I
miss
it.
So
I
think
that's
that's
going
to
be
worth
it.
If
I
can
welcome
it
again.
This
month,
alpacity.
G
Thanks
mateo
two
things
I
would
let
go
judging
and
being
insecure.
G
I
think
yeah,
like
sometimes
we
are
insecure
about
things
when
happened
to
us,
but
like
I,
I
feel
that
when
we
feel
strong
the
same
things
can
happen
to
you,
but
you
handled
them
better,
so
yeah
like
not
being
insecure
to
things
when
hap
when
they
happen,
but
facing
them
and
not
judging
others
because
of
their
actions
and
to
let
in
I
would
like
to
not
take
things
too
seriously.
G
I
think
that
coming
from
the
caribbean,
that's
something
that
we
see
in
the
culture
like
not
taking
things
too
seriously
but
like
in
them
in
the
world.
We
take
things
too
seriously
so
yeah.
I
want
to
like
embrace
that
culture
of
of
like
doing
things
like-minded,
and
I
will
pass
it
to
dan
knops.
H
Wow
interesting
question:
I
yeah,
I
don't
know
I
I'm
mostly
embracing
things
right
now,
instead
of
like,
but
it's
a
interesting
period
of
potential
changes,
so
I'm
very
much
like
preparing
to
potentially
let
go
of
some
things
and
making
changes.
Some
changes
in
my
life
and
right
now,
I'm
embracing,
like
I
very
much
enjoy
being
in
europe.
I
might
stay
down
here.
H
H
I
I
could
do
that
something
to
let
go
of
just
in
my
thoughts,
I'm
trying
to
process
the
end
of
a
three-year
relationship,
so
that's
like
yeah,
there's
a
lot
of
letting
go
and
turning
over
and
that
within
itself,
as
far
as
things
to
call
in
I've
gone
just
a
rabbit
hole
deeper
in
like
race
theory
and
just
like
how
I'm
viewing
the
world
and
I've
called
in
more
mentors
like
called
in
one
specifically,
but
I
got
three
in
the
process.
I
So
that's
that's
kind
of
like
what
I've
been
focusing
my
attention
on
lately
yeah
and
then
I
I
had
heard
something
about
not
wanting
to.
I
I
heard
someone
say
something
about
not
wanting
to
to
to
worry
so
much
or
care
so
much
or
whatever.
When
people
do
things-
and
I
just
wanted
to
say,
what's
been
helping
me
a
lot
when
people
do
stuff
and
for
me
to
not
like
be
angry
at
them,
it's
just
like
really
putting
my
attention
on
the
systems
and
like
the
ideals
and
beliefs
and
social
norms
that
make
people
the
way
they
are
like.
I
I
just
have
a
belief
that
so
many
people
are
actually
just
conditioned
by
their
environment,
like
I
can't
honestly
be
mad
at
someone's
ignorance
if
they
haven't
been
exposed
to
like
what
would
teach
them
in
a
moment
what
they
need
to
know.
You
know
so,
like
I
feel,
like
that's,
been
helping
me
a
lot
just
knowing
that
everybody
learns
at
their
own
pace
and
some
people
just
don't
get
the
exposure
they
need.
It's
the
only
thing,
that's
kind
of
helped
me
recently.
C
Thank
you
yeah,
and
I
like
what
else
just
had
to
say.
That's
really
awesome.
I
two
things
that
I
want
to.
Let
go
man,
you
always
bring
the
deep
questions.
Livie,
I
guess
yeah.
I
would
like
to
let
go
of
my
anxiety.
That's
for
sure
I
I
think
you
know
letting
go.
I
worry
so
much
about
all
these
things.
I
can't
control,
and
so
I'd
like
to
prevent
that
from
happening,
and
then
I
guess
another
one
is
and
same
with
letting
something
in.
I
guess
it's.
The
same.
C
Two
sides
of
the
coin
is
not
being
so
hard
on
myself
and
and
then
just
accepting
you
know
my
me
for
who
I
am
in
terms
of
like
my
mental
process.
The
way
I
think
in
the
way
I
do
things
and
and
not
having
a
problem
with
that,
and
so
just
kind
of
you
know
exactly
accepting
the
the
the
mind
that
I
have
or
the
way
I
approach
issues
that
I
am
really
hard
on
myself
for
the
most
part,
I'd
like
to
be
more
accepting
of
that.
J
Thanks
libby
yeah,
for
me
two
things
I
would
like
want
to.
Let
it
go
one
thing
is
it's
kind
of
like
me,
it's
like
I,
but
it's
not
only
with
work.
It's
like.
I
have
my
whole
day.
I
have
to
do
this
now
I
work
now
I
work
out
now
I
I
have
to
I
don't
know,
go
to
visit
my
parents
because
you
know
it's
like
I
have
to
instead
of
I
want
to
so
I
think
that's
something
you
know.
I
think
that's
answer
like
both
questions,
it's
something
like
I
want
to.
J
A
A
So
I
would
love
if
we
could
look
into
each
one
of
the
proposals
and
think
of
what
would
be
the
best
process
used
to
decide
each
one
of
these
proposals,
and
maybe
this
will
help
us
moving
forward
to
other
decisions
we
have
to
make
on
just
this
thought
process
of
like
what
are
the
questions.
A
We
need
to
ask
when
we're
looking
at
at
a
proposal
and
then
just
like
the
tools
that
we've
been
using
now
are
token
log
that
are
gonna,
be
used
for
the
params
in
a
very
similar
way
like
we
did
with
praise
and
and
the
with
the
mission
vision,
values,
and
then
we
have
snapshot.
That
is
a
new
tool
that
we've
been
experimenting,
and
it
will
probably
be
very
useful
for
these
following
proposals
that
are
down
there
and
then
snapshot
has
voting
types.
A
So
I
think
we
should
be
educated
in
what
each
one
of
these
voting
types
represents,
and
I
would
love
for
us
to
build
the
autonomy
of
each
person
that
is
submitting
a
proposal
would
choose
what
type
of
voting
process
she
used
based
on
their
own
discernment,
but
maybe
we
can
develop
and,
as
we
were
talking
with
zaptimis
and
ivy
huanka
and
a
call
we
had
one
month
yesterday
is
that
we
could
write
about
about
them
more
deeply
and
then
have
suggested
uses.
A
So
someone
that
doesn't
want
to
have
all
that
thought
process
could
easily
identify
which
one
is
best
for
what.
But
if
someone
wants
to
challenge
this
thought
and
and
find
the
best
solution
for
themselves-
and
they
could
also
do
that
and
then
advice
process,
I
think
there's
a
question
now
of
what
types
of
decisions
can
be
taken
only
by
advice
process
like
we've
been
using
it
a
lot
for
something
that
leads
to
another
decision
like
just
a
feedback
round,
that
we
incorporate
things
and
we
see
from
there
how
to
move
forward.
A
J
Yeah,
I
was
I
was,
I
was
thinking
on
decisions,
we
take
an
advice
process
and
I
I
think
it
should
be
like
the
same
decisions
like
you
know
like
we,
we
give
a
working
groups,
autonomy
and
I
feel
it
should
be.
Decisions
like
they
normally
would
do
by
themselves,
but
if
they
want
some
advice
process,
but
it's
always
something
that
not
affect
others
for
me
like
when
it
affects
others,
it
should
be
at
least
voted
somehow
some
signaling
yeah.
I
just
wanted
to
share
that,
but.
J
Yeah,
I
mean
decisions
inside
the
working
room.
How
do
in,
for
example,
incomes?
How
do
we
manage
twitter?
It
affects
others,
of
course
like
it
affects
like
or
branding,
but
it's
more
internal
like
we
give
them
the
autonomy
to
manage
twitter.
We
trust
them
to
manage
twitter,
so
I
think
I
mean
they
can
ask
advice,
and
instead,
david
was
asking
some
advice
on
the
twitter,
but
it's
not
like
it's
needed.
It's
it's
good
to
have,
but
not
needed,
like
david
could
be
working
on
his
own
and
yeah.
J
I
feel
like
we
should
trust
in
when,
for
example,
when
when
every
working
will
have
their
area
of
expertise,
and
we
should
trust
them,
and
but
it's
always
welcome
to
do
advice
process
and
these
decisions
that
are
in
inside
their
field
of
expertise,
I
feel,
should
be
the
ones
that
yeah
that
they
could
decide
without
the
boat
but
yeah.
That's
just
my
thoughts.
C
Yeah,
so
this
is
something
I
talked
about
would
be
about
and
we're
looking
to
implement
the
such
spot.
I
do
think
that
part
of
the
advice
process
is
that
you
don't
know
exactly
when
you're
making
decisions
who
it's
going
to
affect
an
impact.
C
Sometimes
you
make
a
decision
and
it
impacts
people
you
never
anticipated
impacting
and
so
that
the
whole.
I
think
there
should
be
two
different
methods
for
an
advice
process:
they're
like
a
more
formal
advice
process
where
you
go
through
the
experts
and
making
sure
that
something
is
implemented
correctly
and
the
other
one
is
just
kind
of
a
a
a
way
to
just
say:
hey.
This
is
what
we're
thinking
about
doing
and
kind
of
get
this
like
quick
on
the
fly
signaling,
because
you
know
a
lot
of
decisions.
People
want
to
make.
C
C
Are
there
anybody
who
objects
to
this
or
has
any
concerns
about
this
action
being
taken
and
and
having
a
kind
of
a
quick
way
to
like
you
know,
engage
with
that
that
subject
matter,
whether
it's
just
you
know
a
simple
small
task
within
a
working
group
and
and
it
kind
of
gives
a
public
a
public
platform
vehicle
for
people
to
say,
hey,
you
know
what
about
this?
Are
you
you're
missing
this
idea
or
you're
missing?
C
This
is
gonna,
hurt
these
people
or
whatever
it
may
be,
so
I
think,
implementing
two
different
methods
for
like
a
formal
advice
process
and
also
just
kind
of
like
hey.
This
is
a
quick
signal
that
we
don't
have
to
engage
with
too
too
harshly,
but
you
know
it's
accessible,
so
those
are
just
my
thoughts
about
it
because
I
do
think
there
are
a
lot
of
small
decisions
that
are
always
being
made
that
we're
super
hesitant
on
executing
on,
because
we
don't
know
who
it's
going
to
impact.
E
Sometimes
I
feel
like
if
you
are
the
expert
in
the
field
or
maybe
you're
the
most
knowledgeable
person
that
sometimes
you
just
have
the
agency
to
make
a
change.
You
know,
depending
on
the
scope
like
if
you're
writing,
documentation
and
you're
the
most
sure
person
about
it,
then
you
probably
have
the
agency
to
write
that,
without
going
through
a
thorough
advice
process.
A
Yeah,
I
think
this
is
something
good
to
to
look
into
when
not
to
use
advice
process,
and
that
would
clarify
a
lot.
The
other
points
above
too
cool
yeah.
So,
let's
think
more
about
that
moving
forward,
but
then
yeah.
I
also
wanted
to
just
look
into
the
proposals,
not
exactly
what
is
the
content
of
the
proposal?
I
think
we
all
here
have
somehow
familiar
familiarity
with
it,
but
just
understanding
how
how
we
would
make
this
decision
so
for
the
reward
system.
A
I
thought
we
should
vote
only
if
we
are
implementing
this
proposal
or
not,
and
then
how
this
is
going
to
be
implemented
doesn't
need
to
be.
Like
I
mean
there
is
a
level
of
a
step
by
step
there,
but
I
think
just
there
should
be
like
yes
or
no.
A
This
is
what
we're
doing
or
not
similar
to
this
is
a
proposal
that
could
very
much
go
to
the
dow,
for
example,
and
and
ask
for
funds
and
and
those
funds
would
be
to
implement
the
the
process
suggested,
but
since
we're
not
doing
it
to
the
dow
and
we
don't
need
the
funds
now
coming
from
the
tc,
I
think
we
should
just
propose
this,
probably
on
snapshot
just
as
a
yes
or
no
type
of
thing.
A
But
that
being
said,
I
don't
even
know
if
we,
if
we
really
need
to
vote,
because
I
feel
like
we
don't
have
that
many
options
now
other
than
implementing
this.
I
think
it
would
be
beneficial
for
everyone,
so
yeah.
This
is
one
case
that
I
feel
like
advice
process
would
be
enough,
for
example,
does
anybody
think
something
different
than
that.
J
Oh
yeah,
I
think
I
I
mean
I
was
reading
it
and
I'm
not
sure,
because
I
have
some.
I
didn't
post
it
on
the
forum
because
I'm
not
sure
what
I'm
and
I
I
think
like
like
what
you
just
say
is
this
idea
like
we
just
go
with
it
and
see
what
what's
good
what's
wrong
and
then
what's
good.
We
keep
what's
wrong
with
change
and
it
should
be
all
cool.
J
But
one
thing
I
was
thinking
and
I'm
not
sure,
like
it's
more
decentralized,
for
example
like
having
a
lot
of
quantifiers
and
I
think
it
should
be
like
I
I
do
not
remember
who
was
it
type,
but
anyone
who
wants
can
be
a
quantifier
or
or
is
it
or
you
have
to
have
some
kind
of
expertise
or
sometime
into
the
dao
and
yeah.
I
mean
the
more
complicated
you
you
make
it
it's
the
more
central
like
how
it
was
in
the
past.
J
J
C
A
Okay,
so
the
governance
give
back.
I
think
it
should
be
separated
in
two
steps
like
we've
been
chatting
about,
so
the
first
step
is
just
yeah.
So
yes
or
no,
should
we
move
forward
with
this,
considering
the
options
of
implementation
that
we
have
or
we
shouldn't
even
move
forward
at
all.
A
I
think
the
challenge
with
that
is
that
people's
opinions
could
change
depending
on
how
they
think
the
implementation
will
happen,
but
then
to
solve
that
we
could
have
two
steps
voting,
that
the
first
step
is
just
a
yes
or
no
on
snapshot,
and
then,
if
it
passes
yes,
then
we
develop
the
second
step
better
of
how
we
would
make
how
we
would
of
which,
which
type
of
implementation
we
would
use,
and
then
that
could
be
rank
choice
voting.
G
Well
in
this,
I
have
like
a
a
different
approach
and
I
also
made
a
forum
post
about
it,
and
I
think
that
this
can
be
done
in
just
one
boat,
because
the
technical
solution
was
primarily
like
a
debate
in
the
common
swarm
and
like
they
in
the
last
call
found
like
a
solution
that
was
that
had
like
more
or
less
consent
within
the
group.
G
So
I
think
that
the
common
swarm
can
can
like
take
the
implementation
of
the
technical
solution,
and
the
vote
should
be
only
if,
like
the
community
wants
or
like
approves,
the
75
percent
governance,
give
back.
A
G
Yes,
yes,
yes,
that
was
the
the
thing
that
was
was
discussed
yesterday
in
the
commons
farm
call,
and
I
think
that
helped
to
to
like
ease
this
boat.
G
Yeah
like
it
in
the
in
the
first
text
of
the
proposal,
there
was
like
the
third
unknown,
unknown
technical
solution
and
then
like
sam,
presented
it
yesterday
and
yeah.
G
It
sound
it
like
really
good
for
for
all
of
the
common
swarm,
so
yeah
that
that
side
of
the
boat
was
a
little
bit
more
cleared
out,
and
they
said
that
this
was
like
the
best
choice
for
the
midterm
and
yeah
that
the
the
boat
could
be
like
more
simple,
just
yes
or
no
on
the
governance
give
back.
Also
because
if
it's,
if
this
is
going
to
happen
before
the
commons
upgrade,
we
will
need
to
have
like
time
to
work
on
this
implementation
after
the
boat.
A
A
E
Yeah
sure
so
we
had
the
meeting
yesterday
and
just
seeing
like
what
both
parties
are
receptive
to
and
what
the
options
are,
and
so
I
made
those
poi
those
posts
with
just
lots
of
ideas.
Basically-
and
you
know
really,
it
depends
on
what
people
in
the
community
are
warming
up
to
and
just
really
lots
of
feedback
and
debate.
E
You
know
that's
what
I'm
really
looking
for
right
now
with
those
posts,
because
I
mean
it's
just
like
I
think
for
a
lot
of
it
really
came
out
of
left
field
us
talking
with
agave
and
you
know
seeing
what
they're
up
to
and
how
we
can
collaborate
with
them,
but
I
think
it
fits
in
very
nicely
with
what
the
topics
were
brought
up
in
in
the
original
buy-in
post.
I
think
a
lot
of
things
that
nate
bought
about
are
put
into
action
here
and
the
proposals
that
I
made.
A
I
feel
like
there's
somehow
a
consensus
that
we
should
do
this,
but
maybe
I'm
not
hearing.
I
never
heard
a
negative
opinion
about
this
first
buy-in.
A
I
feel,
like
the
the
conversation
has
been
more
about
like
how
we're
gonna
do
it
so
maybe
like
the
signaling
of
either
we're
going
to
buy
into
the
blending
curve
or
not
could
be
through
advice
process
and
and
then
feeling
the
signal
from
there
that
I
think
it's
positive
towards
it.
We
could
propose
a
vote
that
has
all
of
these
other
options
as
rank
choice
voting
and
then
maybe
we
can
go
about
the
two
top
voted
ones
or
or
then.
This
is
what
we
would
need
to
decide.
C
So
I
was
gonna
say
that
you
know,
with
with
this
being
such
a
big
big
topic,
that
it
does
need
to
be
voted
on,
even
though
we
like,
like
you,
said
I
I
haven't
seen
anybody
not
disagree.
You
know,
I
think
I
think
most
people
have
consensus,
but
with
it
being
you
know,
money
involved
of
of
substantial
amounts
that
it
should
go
through
a
yes
or
no
vote.
C
First,
as
a
as
an
initial,
an
official
capacity
vote,
and
if
it
passes
that,
then
I
think
that
the
next
step
would
be
to
establish
a
max
amount
of
funds
that
we're
willing
to
buy.
I
think
identifying
that
number
is
really
important
there,
so
we
know
exactly
how
much
we're
willing
to
buy
into
the
initial
buy
of
the
curve
and
then
justify
whatever
amount.
We
decide
on
making
sure
that
it's
under
that
cap
and
outside
of
that
you
know
the
process
of
those
outside
of
those
two
decisions.
C
I
think
the
process
can
take
a
life
of
its
own
through
the
advice
process
and
so
on
so
and
whatever
we
explore.
What
mitch
has
talked
with
agave
and
all
that
good
stuff.
So
but
I
do
think
we
should
have
an
official,
yes
or
no
vote
and
then
establish
a
max
amount
that
we're
willing
to
actually
buy
from
the
curve.
A
No,
I
was
just
gonna
say
that
even
how
much
funds
we
should
use,
may
it
should
start
to
be
debated
already.
E
Exactly
a
lot
of
it
depends
on
that,
and
you
know
these
three
things
of
just
talking
with
agave.
Whatever
like
this
is
just
the
start.
You
know
we
have.
This
is
just
to
get
the
conversation
going
and
probably
maybe
make
the
idea
of
buying
in
more
appealing
if
we
actually
have
some
ideas
of
what
we
would
do
after
that.
C
E
There's
no
number
exactly,
but
because
of
the
the
price
slippage,
so
how
far
the
price
is
going
to
move
as
you're
buying
more
it
might
become
a
bad
deal.
Actually,
you
know,
because
we
just
be
like
we're
paying
double
the
price
of
the
opening
price
at
some
point,
if
we
just
like
buy
a
huge
amount
all
at
once.
E
So
that's
something
to
consider
as
well.
We'd
have
to
figure
out
what
are
what
it
was
actually
going
to
be
in
the
reserve
balance
which
is
going
to
depend
on
what
we
decide.
As
our
commons
tribute.
So
there's
still
a
lot
of
parameters
that
need
to
be
decided
in
the
commons
so
that
we
can
get
an
actual
figure.
C
E
A
E
We
can
have
amount
of,
we
can
say
a
percentage.
You
know
we
won't
know
exactly
how
much
funds
we
have.
You
know
in
real
numbers
until
we
decide
the
commons
tribute.
You
know
which
is
going
to
be
the
percent
of
funds
from
the
hatch
raised
that
will
go
to
our
common
pool,
so
we
could
say
like
okay,
maybe
we
want
to
take
50
of
the
common
pool
and
use
it
to
buy
into
the
curve.
B
A
A
I
think
we
don't
need
to
vote
yes
or
no,
because
it
feels
like
it
would
be
inaccurate,
the
whatever
response
we
got
about
it.
I
think
we
should
vote
a
ranked
choice,
voting
to
get
a
signal
on
which
types
of
implementations
would
be
more
desirable,
and
maybe
we
can
have
a
choice
there.
That
is,
I
don't
want
any
of
this,
and
then
this
would
be
like
a
blocker
for
it
and
then
decide
some
parameters
that,
if
I
don't
want
any
of
this
is
the
has
an
ax
percentage
of
the
votes.
C
Yeah,
I
I
like
that
a
lot.
I
I
my
only
purpose
for
proposing.
That
was
just
because
I
I
it's
dealing
with
a
lot
of
money,
and
so
I
do
think
that,
before
the
official
vote
should
happen,
we
should
have
some
type
of
signaling
to
to.
You
know,
reinforce
the
actions
that
we're
taking
in
official
capacity,
because
it
is
a
lot
of
money.
A
A
A
So
like,
in
this
case,
the
advice
process
would
save
us
one
voting
one
one
voting
process
and
would
lead
us
to
a
more
like
specific
route
like
knowing
what
is
actually
that
we
need
to
decide.
C
I
would
just
say
that
it's
yeah-
I
I
don't
disagree
with
the
the
logic
behind
that
I
just
I
get
worried
about
people
who
you
know
are
reading
a
forum
situation
like
that,
and
they
see
the
overall
consensus
and
are
afraid
to
speak
out
against
it
or
you
know
it's
not
the
environment,
for
them
to
be
the
one
person
to
dissent.
I
want
to
make
sure
that
there's
a
vehicle
for
that
decision
to
occur
and
sometimes
voting,
provides
that
vehicle,
but
you
know
outside
of
that.
You
know.
That's
my
only
concern.
A
J
J
The
correct
information
is
on
the
proposal
on
the
snapshot
because
yeah
every
everything
was
set
up
there
actually
like
where
we
integrated
the
feedback
on
the
proposal
is
inside
yeah.
It's
there
yeah.
We
did
some
changes
like,
for
example,
chewie
was
concerned
about
people,
theft,
identity,
so
yeah.
The
idea
is
like
now:
we
had
a
new
thing
like
grief,
dan
and
tom.
All
of
them
are
going
to
speak
to
everyone,
so
we
have
like
three
confirmations
and
yeah.
A
A
J
A
A
So
just
to
like
follow
that
future
practice.
This
first
one
should
be
proposed
there
too,
and
then
we
only
have
a
few
minutes
left
but
septimus
and
I
started
to
talk
about
the
tec
agreements
and
even
having
very
small
agreements
should
be
changed.
How
should
we
do
that?
A
So
I
thought,
if
you
all
agree,
we
could
try
doing
that.
Just
for
that
one
small
issue.
We
had
zaptimus
because
I
feel
like
that
could
be
easily
solved
by
by
softgov,
and
then
we
can
try
to
elaborate
a
little
bit
more
on
how
other
agreements
should
be
changed
and
then
what
types
of
agreements
demand
more
attention
or
less,
and
we
can
incorporate
that
in
the
session
of
the
agreements
that
it's
already
happening.
That
annemarie
is
starting.
J
Yeah,
I
think
the
target
idea
have
like
different
agreements
with
different
levels
of
of
consensus
and
yeah.
C
J
J
Actually,
when
we
listed
our
agreements,
like
I
don't
know,
it
was
a
long
time
ago
we
were
saying
like
we
should
not
use
multiple
accounts
and
yeah
and
yeah
vitor
for
the
dashboard.
He
needs
to
create
another
account
and
so
he's
not
using
his
right
and
he
will
set
up
a
bot,
and
I
mean
yeah,
it's
that
easy
work
that
he
he
will
do.
But
the
thing
is
like
somehow
he's
relating
that
agreement
of
not
having
multiple
accounts
and
and
yeah.
J
A
A
Do
you
does
everybody
think
that
this
is
enough?
Context
should
just
have
a
quick,
yes
or
no
no,
and
we
can
pass
around.
F
J
A
Maybe
this
is
a
little
confusing
for
for
everyone,
just
in
the
end
of
the
yeah
of
the
call
now,
but
I'll
elaborate,
better
and
then
pass.
Maybe
next
call
we
can
start
with
just
just
a
yes
or
no
here
to
make
this
decision.