►
From YouTube: W82 Softgov WG: TE Flower Session
Description
The Softgov Working Group researches and applies best practices for governance, social collaboration and contribution rewards while implementing Ostrom’s 8 principles for governing the commons in its foundation.
We gather every Tuesday at 7pm CET.
Steward: Liviade
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
I
feel,
like
capitalism
is
very
good
on
valuing
very
tangible
and
material
things,
and
I
feel
like
a
lot
of
the
subtle
realms
that
have
a
lot
of
the
subjective
value
have
been
ignored
because
of
this
culture,
that
you
can
only
trust
what
you
see
what
you
can
touch,
so
I
wanted
to
just
start
opening
this
talks
about
like
what
is
what
are
people's
relationships
with
the
invisible.
B
I
think
this
is
a
this
is
maybe
it's
an
overreach
for
my
part,
but
I
feel,
like
you,
have
a
very
deep
sort
of
spiritual
connection.
That's
pretty
true.
B
You
have
maybe
it's
a
spiritual,
but
you
have
like
a
sort
of
a
deep
connection
with
the
invisible
in
the
sense
of
they
add
the
way
you
move
and
the
way
like
it
feels
like
there
is
a
connection
with
something
else
that
is
not
tangible,
at
least
I'm
not
seeing
on
your
videos,
I'm
not
like
it's
more
of
a
something
that
it's
within
you
or
around
you
or
that
you're
perceiving.
B
A
B
A
B
Yeah,
I
will
say
that
you
know
there.
There
was
this.
I
remember
one
of
the
feedback
from
like
maybe
three
retrospective
ago,
which
was
like
we
can
have
short
calls
and
it's
okay
like
there
is
no.
B
There
is
no
such
thing
as
a
hurry,
so
I
would
rather,
for
example,
have
answered
this
question
between
us
and
then
maybe
just
have
a
small
conversation
about
the
data
stuff
that
we
talk
about
and
and
then
just
hold
on
until
the
next
week
and
then
do
a
proper
summon
for
people
to
do
the
exercise
in
collective
intelligence.
D
E
A
Yeah
so
yeah,
let's
just
start
with
this
question,
we
can
take
like
a
minute
or
so
to
answer,
and
just
for
you
zap
that
you
just
joined
the
question,
and
today
is
what
is
your
relationship
with
being
visible,
so
just
in
general,
like
maybe
it's
good
to
contextualize
like
I
just
did,
but
I
think
in
in
a
capitalist
system
is
very
easy
to
identify.
Like
capitalism
is
very
good
to
value
very
tangible
things,
material
things
things
we
can
touch
and
hi
chewie.
A
So
how
can
yeah?
We
I'm
just
explaining
the
intro
question.
What
is
your
relationship
with
the
invisible?
So
I
think
capitalism
is
very
good
with
valuing
tangible
and
material
things
and
talking
about
value
and
how
to
perceive
other
types
of
value
and
bring
the
subjectivity
in
how
can
we
expand
our
our
view
for
not
only
trusting
like?
Maybe
we
have
this
belief
from
from
this
system?
You
know
that
we
can
only
trust
what
we
can
see
what
we
can
touch,
so
I
just
want
wanted
to
hear
from
everyone.
A
Maybe
I
can
start
to
shape
it
a
little
bit,
but
of
course
anyone
can
go
as
wild
as
you
want,
but
for
me
I
think
I
always
had
a
lot
of
visions
and
dreams
and
sensorial
experiences,
since
I
was
very
little
so
and
I
think,
as
a
kid
imagination
is
so
wild
that
you
don't
really
put
things
into
a
category
like
that's
just
how
you're
experiencing
the
world
and
there
is
a
magical
and
fantastical
world
that
is
just
part
of
your
day
by
day
and
until
you
grow
older
that
you
start
to
understand
like.
A
A
Different
types
of
spirituality
of
religious
practices
and
non-religious
practices
and
just
trying
to
investigate
what
is
there?
What
are
the
things
I
feel,
and
I
can't
touch
what
are
the
things
I
see
and
I
can't
describe-
and
I
think
art
has,
that
within
itself
too.
Art
is
a
form
of
ritual
and
I
feel
like
every
person
that
approaches
art
has
a
doubt
instinctively
of
like
wanting
to
be
a
part
of
a
ritual
wanting
to
get
in
contact
with
some
type
of
divinity,
even
even
in
the
most
profane
form
of
it.
A
F
Thanks
yeah,
this
is
something
that
I've
been
like.
I
think
this
is
kind
of
the
same
thing
that
I've
kind
of
been
exploring
lately
through,
like
reading.
Has
anyone
read
the
in
his
emissary
like
the
ian
mcgill
crest
book
on
basically
like
left,
brain
right,
brain
divide
and
like
societal
impact?
F
Basically,
his
idea
is
like
we
have
like
a
conception
of
the
right,
brain
and
left.
Brain
as
like
left
is
very
analytical,
and
right
is
like
the
more
like
subconscious
stuff,
and
his
kind
of
thesis
is
that
the
the
right
brain
is
like,
in
the
background,
doing
stuff
a
lot
of
the
subconscious
stuff
like
all
the
bodily
cognition,
we're
doing
and
things
like
that,
and
then
the
left
brain
is
like
taking
that
and
creating
a
representation
so
that
it
can
manipulate
it
and
do
like
analytical
stuff
with
it.
F
It's
like
a
static
image
that
can
be
described
in
language
that
we
miss
so
much
of
the
subconscious
and
that's
kind
of
like
where
religion
and
art
has
some
utility
is
like
or
like.
We
put
religion
in
art
in
these
kind
of
unreasonable
categories,
but
really
like
they're
this
deeper
way
of
knowing
that
we
we
don't
quite
have
language
for
yet
so
like
by
doing
those
things
where
we're
like
kind
of
reaching
into
this
space.
That
is
hard
to
articulate,
but
like
that's
how
we
communicate
it's
like
through
art,
and
things
like
this.
F
So
I'll
pass
to
zepty.
D
Thank
you
bench.
Actually,
I'm
quite
the
opposite.
I
actually
do
not
value
so
much.
The
invisible
and
I'm
very
pragmatic
dude
like
I
need
to
see
it
value
and
then
going
what
libby
was
mentioning
about
art.
It's
something
like
it
happens
to
me,
like
you
know,
I
see
all
those
nfts
and
I'm
like
or
even
the
art
you
know,
like
I
see
like
very
big
pieces,
you
know
like
people
is
paying
millions
and
I'm
like
I
don't
understand
like
I,
you
know
it's
like
it
treats
me
like.
D
G
Thank
you
sophie,
oh
boy,
at
the
beginning,
when
you
started
saying
that,
because
I
was
very
touched
by
what
what
vince
mentioned
and
then
you
started
talking
about
that,
and
I
was
like.
Oh
my
god,
septi
like
how.
How
could
you
say
something
like
that
and
then
I
was
like
no
like.
It
actually
makes
a
lot
of
sense
like
for
me
personally.
G
So
so
this
is
why
why
your
comment
started
making
so
much
sense
to
me
simply
because
I
I
do
reject
like
this
like
reality
where,
like
oh
expensive,
art,
yeah,
yeah,
whatever
like
this,
is
the
only
art
that
gets
validated
in
in,
and
I've
always
like,
lived
in
a
way
where,
where
I
I
feel
very
related
to
when
these
invisible
forms
are
of
value,
are
shared
like
knowledge
or
just
like
sense
of
belonging
anywhere.
G
So
these
past
few
months,
just
like
what
I've
been
getting
back
from
understanding
like
where
the
tc
is
and
and
what
we
actually
mean
you
know
it's
just
like
always
in
in
and
probably
more
people
can
feel
related
to
this.
But
when
you
take
two
steps
back
and
remember
like
the
tc
and
how
far
we've
come
and
the
so
many
things
that
we've
tried
already
it's
it's
already
like
so
so
different
to
what
our
environments
con
constantly
in
like
to
where
our
environments
constantly
try
to
push
us.
G
So
I
don't
think
I
I
have
an
answer
to
when
when
it
comes
to
like
translating
other
forms
of
value,
but
what
I
can
say
is
that
I've
always
felt
very,
very
connected
to
sharing
it
to
just
like
the
joy
of
we
did
something
super
fun
and
it's
just
like
you
cannot
translate
it
to
money.
You
know
it's
like
one
of
those
jokes
that
you
are
in
the
situation
and
then
you
tell
it
after,
but
it's
not
that
funny.
G
B
Thank
you,
sri
welcome.
The
question
is
about
what
is
your
relationship
with
the
invisible?
So
in
my
case
it's
a
quite
a
complex
question.
B
When
I
was
around
six
seven
years
old,
I
use
my
parents
live
in
a
country
house
that
is
surrounded
by
nothing
and
I
was
on
on
the
guest
room
one
day
and
that
room
goes
has
a
window
that
goes
into
a
field,
and
I
remember
vividly-
and
I
have
verbalized
this
very
few
times
in
public-
and
I
remember
being
in
that
room
and
watching
it
was
around
probably
10
90
pm,
and
I
watched
the
window
of
that
room
and
suddenly
there
was
this
light.
B
This
woman
figure
in
the
middle
of
the
field
just
like
looking
at
me,
and
it
just
lasts,
probably
five
seconds
and
I
didn't
feel
anything
I
didn't
feel
like
it
was
such
such
an
overwhelming
sensation
at
the
moment
that
I
have
never
even
tried
to
process
or
like
try
to
access
what
it
meant
I
just
sort
of
assumed
it
happened
and
that's
it
and
that
sort
of
made
me
valued
invisible
in
different
ways
like
that's.
B
That
experience
made
me
understood
that
if
there
is
a
weather
change
and
my
mood
changes,
I
should
honor
that
and
respect
that
a
certain
level-
and
I
come
from
a
background
of
my
grandparent-
was
an
archbishop
archbishop
and
my
mother
is
a
deeply
religious
woman
and
I
sort
of
abstract
from
that
heavily.
B
I
I'm
not
a
religious
person,
and
for
many
years
I
consider
myself
not
a
spiritual
person,
because
I
was
not
religious
and
then
I
found
my
own
way
to
you
know
make
that
distinction
from
one
thing
to
the
other
one
and
then
the
reason
why
I'm
bringing
this
is
because
the
contrast
of
this
very
strong
emotional
spiritual
situations
was
bring
back
brought
back
to
me
a
few
weeks
ago
I
was
in
london
and
with
the
silliest
the
silliest
thing
I
have
ever
that
has
ever
happened
to
me.
B
I,
on
the
on
the
airplane,
I
just
watched
a
tv
show
called
hearthstopper,
which
is
about
you,
know
two
young
queer
persons
in
high
school
and
how
they
relate
to
each
other,
and
I
got
hit
by
that.
B
I
got
like
I
got
extremely
sensible
after
watching
that
and
then
my
whole
experience
in
london
and
after
back
was
realizing
how
unattached
I
was
for
the
past
years
from
my
emotional
spiritual
part
and
how
sort
of
the
attach
I
was
from
experience,
giving
me
a
space
to
experience
my
emotions
that
are
not
visible,
that
they
are
just
laying
around
myself
or
within
me,
but
I'm
not
giving
them
space,
and
that
came
that
that
immediately
reminded
me
of
this
same
feeling
that
I
felt
when
I
was
five
six
years
old
watching
that
window.
B
You
know
this
overwhelming
feeling
of
I
don't
know
what's
going
on,
but
I
know
that
there
is
something
going
on
and
I
should
either
embrace
it
or
acknowledge
it
or
do
something
about
it.
Nate
you're,
my
welcome
your
mic.
It's
fun
and
sorry
no
worries
so
so
yeah.
So
I
feel
like
my
relationship
with
invisible.
It's
it's
a
self-discovery
process.
H
Great
question
yeah:
I
think
that
we
only
can
perceive
with
our
senses
a
small
portion
of
reality.
H
So
I
think
that
there
is
a
lot
of
energy
in
the
invisible
that
we
can
maybe
not
perceive
so
easily
with
our
senses,
but
that
it's
there,
for
example,
we
cannot
see
the
wi-fi
waves,
but
they
are
all
over
us
and
they
are
transmitting
a
whole
bunch
of
information.
H
So
I
think
that
if
we,
if
we
want
to
see
everything
with
with
our
senses,
we
like
take
away
a
big
portion
of
reality,
because
there
are
a
lot
of
things
that
we
cannot
perceive,
and
it
doesn't
mean
that
they
are
not
there.
So
I
give
a
lot
of
value
to
to
the
invisible
to
like
energies
intentions.
H
I
I
was
even
thinking
the
other
day.
Why
does
someone
when
you're
looking
at
them?
They
feel
that
you're
looking
at
them
and
they
like
look
at
you
and
why
do
we
feel
that
other
person
is
looking
at
us?
Maybe
if
they
are
not
even
saying
something
or
they
are
far
away,
you
can
just,
I
don't
know,
feel
it,
and
I
think
there
are.
There
is
a
lot
of
of
of
yeah
of
value
in
in
what's
invisible,
and
I
tend
to
open
myself
to
that
and
I'll
pass
it
to
nate.
C
Thanks
yeah,
so
my
relationship
to
the
invisible,
I
will
say
that
I
don't
really
like
things
that
are
invisible
things
that
are
invisible.
I
would
like
to
make
visible
and
if
they
don't
impact
me,
I
usually
just
keep
moving
forward
so
without
acknowledging
their
existence
but
yeah.
So
that's
that's.
To
sum
it
up,
I'm
sorry!
I
can't
give
you
any
more
detail
response
than
that.
A
B
All
right,
hello,
durgars,
you
arrive
just
in
time,
so
we
are
gonna.
Do
one
of
this
exercise
that
you
like
so
much?
I
feel-
and
I
hope
so
on
the
softgov
channel.
I
have
shared
a
figma
file,
I'm
not
only
I'm,
not
ivy,
so
don't
expect
that
background
design
for
this
sigma
file.
So
basically
I
will
provide
some
context
before
we
start.
B
The
idea
of
this
comes
from
the
realization
that
we
sometimes
have
hard
times
explaining
to
others.
What
are
the
things
that
we
are
currently
working
on?
We
usually
tell
them
in
a
very
abstract
level,
so
sometimes
it's
hard
to
take
it
from
a
more
granular
level
or
from
a
general
level
first.
Secondly,
we
would
like
to
also
understand
from
the
own
community
perspective.
What
are
we
actually
building
right
now
at
this
at
this
present
and
thoroughly?
B
Is
this
idea
to
update
the
te
flower
that
we
currently
have
and
see
how
we
can
how
it
will
reflect
the
the
current
situation
of
the
dc
if
it
reflects
the
current
situation,
tc
and
then,
based
on
this,
we
will
do
a
process
that
will
be
replicated
in
the
boarding
process
and
the
user
journey,
because
we
are
trying
to
create
areas
of
interest
for
people
rather
than
profiles
or
roles.
B
So
in
order
to
achieve
that,
we
need
to
map
out
first,
which
are
these
areas
of
interest
that
exist
on
the
tc
based
on
what
we
have,
so
the
first
exercise
will
be
to
map
out
so
on
the
figma
file.
What
we
want
to
do
so,
I
will
just
probably
time
it
out
for
two
three
minutes
and
basically,
on
the
first
exercise,
we
will
take
10
15
minutes
to
each
exercise.
The
first
exercise
will
be
on
the
current
te
flower
that
you
see
here,
which
are
the
representation.
B
The
actual
representations
right
now
of
this
petal,
for
example,
philosophy
and
decision
science
could
be
omega
working
group
philosophy.
Sorry,
that's
philosophy.
Psychology
could
be
conflict.
Resolution
could
be
trust.
Building,
of
course,
gravity
if
you
have
economics,
game
theory,
which
are
the
options
so
just
duplicate
the
frame
and
if
you
don't
have
enough
space
just
add
another
frame,
but
let's
do
that
for
five
minutes.
I
will
take
time
and
we
can
start.
Does
anyone
have
any
question
before
we
start
five?
Four?
Are
they.
B
G
Any
other
questions
yeah,
yes,
I
do
is.
Is
it
okay?
If
I
I'm
just
an
observer
for
for
this
exercise,
no
problem?
Okay,.
G
B
There
is
on
the
top
on
the
top
of
your
screen.
There
is
a
black
menu
that
has
the
t
that
embrace,
that
is,
for
text.
B
It
could
be
anything
let's.
We
are
not
going
to
put
boundaries
on
this,
so
whatever
you
think
represents
currently
the
tec
on
any
of
these
pedals.
B
B
B
So
the
idea
is
to
represent
current
work
streams
or
current
projects
or
current
examples
of
these
pedals
in
the
dec
it
doesn't
mean
that
we
have
created
them
or
owned
them.
Okay,.
D
B
All
right
time's
up,
if
you
need
to
still
keep
writing,
keep
writing.
Don't
worry!
It's
not
a
stopping
game
process.
So
any
initial
thoughts
from
this
exercise
that
anyone
would
like
to
share
bye.
Four,
yes,
one.
Let's
start.
H
Yeah,
this
is
something
that
I've
been
thinking
for
some
time
and
I
pasted
the
images
in
the
right
upper
corner
and
when
I
see
the
crypto
economics
flower,
I
see
what
can
be
seen
as
the
seed
of
life.
That
is
the
this
small
circle
that
is,
that
is.
H
A
hole
in
itself,
but
at
the
same
time,
this
small
circle,
that
is
the
seed
of
life,
can
fit
inside
the
flower
of
life.
So
what
I
think
is
that
when,
when
we
see
this
crypto
economics
flower,
we
are
just
seeing
like
the
inner
petals
of
the
whole
picture,
but
that
there
are
a
lot
of
petals
that
are
not
being
represented
in
the
image
as
it
is
right
now
and
there
are.
There
are
some
other
sciences
that
are
complementary
that
are
not
listed
there.
H
That
are
also
important,
like,
for
example,
anthropology
or
psychology
that
are
some
things
that
maybe
can
be
included
a
little
bit
in
the
side
of
like
psychology
or
maybe
decision
science
yeah.
Actually,
there
is
psychology
and
decision
science,
but
there's
no
like
anthropology
or
other
sciences
that
can
be
included
inside
this,
so
yeah.
I
I
am
also
not
for
this
topic
today,
but
it
would
be
really
cool
to
think
of
what
other
pedals
do
we
want
to
include
in
the
flower
so
that
we
can
turn
that
seed
into
a
full
flower
and.
B
I
Yeah,
it's
interesting.
I
think
my
comment
was
oh.
That
was
just
let's.
Let
me
watch
the
stream
again
yeah.
I
was
seeing
that.
I
Yeah
I
I
notice
how
how
what
do
you
want
to
say
like
it
seems
to
me
that
things
like
psychology
and
decision
science
should
be
fundamental
to
all
groups.
Do
you
know
what
I
mean
like?
There
should
be
some
some
fundamental
competency
in
in
that,
because
we're
dealing
with
humans
and
so
same
thing
with,
like
you,
know,
philosophy,
law
and
ethics
right.
So
there's
there's
just
a
certain
amount
of
that
which
you
know
I
feel
like.
So
I'm
just
observing
that
oftentimes.
C
I
Like
how
a
given
working
group
would,
what
are
the
different
petals
in
which,
like
word
system,
for
example,
would
connect
right?
So
this
is
an
interesting
exercise,
but
I'm
also
just
wondering,
as
a
kind
of
like
a
poll
in
in
how
many
different
petals
of
this
flower
are
is
a
given
working
group.
You
know
dealing
with,
I
think,
would
be
an
interesting
question.
So
that's
all
I
really
had
to
say
about
it.
B
Thank
you
so
much
for
getting
us.
Yes,
the
idea
we
sort
of
combined
with
what
juanka
mentioned
at
some
point
is
to
have
this
flower
multi-layer
flower.
That
is
not
only
about
these
areas,
but
have
different
layers
to
that,
and
one
of
the
things
that
you
mentioned
is
also
to
surface
to
surface
a
little
bit
of
this,
not
conflicts,
but
maybe
opportunities
of
where
we
see
currently
the
tc
and
how
things
could
be
improved
on
more
than
psychology
or
any
other
sciences.
B
The
cross-coordination
between
working
groups
is
something
that
we
can
see
how
it
overlaps
or
not
here.
Does
anyone
else
have
any
other
comment
on
this
exercise
before
we
continue
five
or.
A
Thank
you.
I
was
thinking
how
we
could
refine
a
lot.
These
examples
and
I
felt
a
little
difficulty
to
it,
wasn't
so
easy
to
think
of
very
like
specific
examples
for
each
thing,
and
I
feel
like
maybe
that's
what
we're
missing
in
the
tc.
C
Okay,
yeah,
I
I
think
that
a
lot
of
the
things
that
we've
described,
you
know
they're
part
of
a
crypto
economic
system,
and
so
naturally
they
they
overlap
into
multiple
realms
and
categories,
and
I
can
see
a
lot
of
these
things
being
considered
in
almost
all
of
them,
and
so
I
think,
at
the
end
of
the
day,
like
looking
at
what
we
have
is
nice,
but
I
think,
looking
at
what
we're
missing
is
also
really
important,
and
I
I
think
categorizing
them
is
really
important,
but
I
I'm
not
sure
exactly
like
the
end
game
of
this
kind
of
meme
is
you
know
like
is
this
just
kind
of
this
is
to
describe
it
just
the
interdisciplinary
nature
of
crypto
economic
systems
and
just
reinforce
that
or
is
it
for
other
purposes,
and
so
I
think,
just
kind
of
evaluating
it
from
that
macro
level
is
really
important
to
do.
C
H
I
I
feel
that
I've
learned
so
much
around
that
and
I
don't
know
if
that
could
fit
either
in
the
pedal
of
philosophy
or
in
psychology
or
if
that
would
be
a
different
battle
like
leadership
and
human
development,
but
yeah
I
don't
know,
maybe
maybe
I
I
also
agree
on
nate's
question
and
if
this
is
only
descriptive.
H
To
show
the
complexity
of
a
crypto
economic
system,
then,
within
the
intention
of
the
flower
itself,
it
it.
It
has
the
the
idea
that
there
is
more
to
this
image
that
we
cannot
see.
B
Correct
got
a
bingo,
so
let's
scroll
down
a
little
bit
and
then
we
will
do
the
second
part
of
exercise,
which
is
a
little
bit
of
nate,
huanka
and
rugas
mentioned,
which
is
we
are
missing
stuff
if
we
are
missing
stuff.
So
let's
try
to
fill
one
per
block
and
just
type
anything
that
you
feel
that
is
not
represented
on
the
flower
or
things
that
you
think
we
should
have.
Maybe.
B
But
let's
try
to
keep
it
to
what
we
have
at
the
moment
of
things
or
sciences,
fields,
areas
that
we
are
not
covering
or
that
we
are
missing
from
the
flower
and
then
you
just
type
in
five
more
minutes
and
then
again
exactly.
A
A
Looking
into
that,
and
at
least
from
my
perspective,
I
think
it's
important
to
map
that
out
for
us
to
see
what
are
the
things
we
are
like
within
the
paddle,
not
even
like
building
new
paddles
yet,
but
within
those
battles,
what
are
the
things
we're
missing
in
the
tc,
considering
that
we
are
a
token
engineering
project
and
that
there
are
maybe
a
lot
of
potential
in
those
fields
that
are
already
present
in
there
that
we
are
not
exploring
and
then
mapping
out
would
give
us
some
type
of
awareness
of
like
what
could
we
be
exploring
more,
and
maybe
this
is
the
whole
thing
with
subject
matter
experts
and
inviting
people
who
have
more
knowledge
that
might
not
be
present
at
the
moment
from
all
those
aspects
like
hey.
A
B
Right,
thank
you,
I'm
awfully
explaining
myself.
So
then,
let's
jump
into
the
second
part
of
the
exercise,
I
will
start
the
countdown
to
5
minutes.
C
I
think
that
we've
entered
this
age
of
mummifying
messaging
and
communications,
and
so
I
think,
that's
a
really
huge
part
of
a
crypto
economic
system,
because
well
I
mean
you
have
this
kind
of
decentralized
architecture
that
allows
for
many
people
to
participate
and,
as
you
scale
mimetics
become
a
really
important
form
of
communication
that
we
take
for
granted
as
just
being
silly
jpegs,
but
that
they
do
convey
a
lot
of
information,
and
I
think
that's
really
a
really
important
characteristic
of
modern
culture
and
technology.
So
yeah.
I
think
that's
really
important.
H
H
I
wrote
history,
because
I
also
think
that
history
is
something
transversal
to
anything
that
we
do
and
that
if
we
don't
know
history,
we
may
repeat
it.
So
it's
very
important
to
know
about
the
compared
story
of
other
people
in
the
past,
so
that
we
can
know
that
we
are
maybe
not
the
first
ones
with
some
ideas
and
that
we
can
learn
from
them,
and
I
also
wrote
human
development
and
leadership
and
art.
H
I
don't
know
why,
like
art,
is
such
a
big
thing
for
humans,
like
not
saying
one
specific
art
but
any
type
of
art,
that
creativity
is
something
that,
when
you
know
how
to
be
an
artist
and
to
be
creative
with
some
art,
then
you
can
be
creative
in
other
environments
of
of
of
your
life.
So
it
would
be
good
to
to
foster
the
creativity
of
people
with
art
and
that
they
can
then
then
reflect
that
art
into
their
crypto
economic
systems.
B
All
right
before
passing
on
and
the
last
minutes
that
we
have
there
are
some
stars
below
the
question
that
I'm
copy
and
pasting
at
the
moment.
Can
you
pick
which
of
these
ones
that
we
just
wrote
are
for
you
the
most
important
or
the
most
relevant
and
yeah
one
minute
to
do.
A
For
me,
I
also
realized
how
I
have
way
more
questions
than
suggestions
and
just
reading
at
this.
His
names
like
what
is
actually
controlled
theory.
Do
I
know
about
it.
Where
do
I
learn
about
it?
What
is
the
computer
science
glossary
for
token
engineering?
What
are
what
are
the
terms
everyone
should
know?
C
Yeah,
that
is
a
really
complex
topic.
I
I
remember,
I
think
I
talked
with
jeff
about
it,
because
he
was
talking
about
control
theory
and
then
he
was
talking
about
reverse
control
theory,
and
I
was
like
I
don't.
This
is
a
lot
and
so
there's
a
lot
of
concepts
like
that
that
yeah
I
agree.
We
need
to
refine
a
glossary
for
that
type
of
thing.
B
All
right,
okay,
everyone
just
pick
one
or
people
pick
more
than
one.
B
Let's
roll
with
that,
so
with
that
being
said,
we
will
sleep
on
this.
Ideally,
what
we
will
do
is
to
try
to
see
if
from
any
of
the
things,
there's
any
representation
in
the
dc
on
on
any
of
these
areas.
If,
if
any
and
then
we
will
come
up
with
a
follow-up
exercise
for
this,
but
so
far,
this
is
to
the
point
where
I
wanted
to
take
it.
B
C
Yeah,
I
do
sorry
I
out
of
all
these.
I
think
I
do
think
identity
and
demography
are
are
topics
that
we
do
not
do
well
within
the
tec,
and
I
think
they
do
have
really
huge
impact
on
crypto
economic
systems,
because
if
you
were
to
just
say
okay,
this
is
a
cryptoeconomic
systems
made
for
a
specific
type
of
community,
those
that
that
those
characteristics
could
fall
along
the
lines
of
identity
and
demographics,
and
I
think
that
is
really
important
consideration
to
keep
in
mind
but
yeah.
So
I
just
wanted
to
add
that.
B
C
I
would
also
like
to
add
just
that
I
think
it'd
be
a
really
cool
exercise
just
to
explore
kind
of
what
we
all
perceive
our
our
collective
identity
and
demographics
are
as
a
whole,
whether
we're
kind
of
like.
Oh,
are
we
just
a
big
group
of
altruists?
Are
we
a
big
group
of
you
know
whatever
it
might
be
just
to
see
if
we
have
any
type
of
rough
consensus
on
that
it'd
be
just
an
interesting
experiment?
Sorry,.
B
No,
no
by
no
means
don't
don't
cut
yourself.
Thank
you.
I
didn't
take
notes
on
the
agenda
so
sorry
about
that.
Well,
this
is
recorded,
so
I
can
translate
yeah
transcribe
later.
Does
anyone
else
have
any
other
comments?
You
would
like
to
share
any
feedback.
B
Three
two
one
all
right
with
that
being
said.
Thank
you
so
much
everyone
who
jump
into
this
improvised
exercise.
There
will
be
a
follow-up,
so
I
will
probably
thank
you
and
mention
you
when
I
update
this
figma
file.
Thank
you
so
much
for
joining
today
and
I
look
forward
to
see
you
this
week.