►
From YouTube: W53 Softgov WG: Snapshot params and multisig
Description
TheSoftgov Working Group researches and applies best practices for governance, social collaboration and contribution rewards while implementing Ostrom’s 8 principles for governing the commons in its foundation.
We gather every Tuesday at 7pm CET.
Steward: Liviade
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
So
it
happened
to
be
a
big
topic
that
we
should
have
some
guidance
around
it
and
then
yes,
the
college
today
will
be
basically
that
I
think
good
to
open
space
for
discussion
and
just
sharing
a
little
bit
more
of
the
plan
we
have
for
for
the
commons
upgrade
and
making
sure
everyone
is
up
to
date
with
that
and-
and
I
would
love
if
everybody
takes
two
minutes
to
vote
on
snapchat
today.
We
have
two
days
left
for
the
vote
to
close
and
then
some
other
updates.
But
I
want
to
start
with
a.
A
I
want
to
start
with
a
cute
intro
game
today
I
want.
A
I
want
everyone
to
say
something
that
you
really
admire
on
yourself
and
then
pick
one
person
to
say
something
you
really
admire
on
them
and
it
can
be
very
simple
like
few
words
each
and
just
because
I
think
we
don't
appreciate
ourselves
enough
and-
and
it's
always
easy
to
appreciate
ourselves
when
it
when
we
appreciate
others.
A
B
Coming
in
strong,
I
don't
know
if
I
need
to
admire
anyone
else
in
order
to
admire
myself,
I've
had
like
a
strong
self-gratitude
practice
for
a
long
time
and
just
got
back
from
a
two-week
earth
building
trip
in
the
desert
and
with
my
little
team
of
three.
We
also
did
this
practice
of
self-gratitude
and
gratitude
for
each
other,
so
I
think,
but
it's
also
really
great
to
to
props
and
admire
people,
so
I
haven't
been
online
in
a
while,
but
I
feel
really
called
to
just
kind
of
rise
up.
B
B
A
C
C
I
still
have
some
of
those
sort
of
modes
of
talking
and
being
just
some,
some
of
which
is
from
autism,
but
I'm
really
grateful
that
I've
been
able
to
kind
of
take
up
the
subversion
concepts
for
myself
so
that
I
can
subvert
the
thing
you
know,
and
so
subversion
I've
come
to
understand
is
a
part
of
spirituality.
It's
part
of
social
life,
it's
part
of
ethical
life.
You
know
it's
all
part
of
that
and
I'm
in
that
kind
of
lives.
C
Inside
of
me
these
days,
so
not
being
an
individual,
I
think
is
super
important
so
to
I'm
not
successful
at
that
all
the
time-
and
I.
C
C
D
C
Engineering,
commons
frankly,
you
know
so
you
know,
there's
spiral,
dynamics,
groups
and
other
groups,
I'm
I'm
even
yeah,
so
I'm
in
a
lot
of
groups
now
that
seem
to
allow
for
that.
So
I'm
I'm
really
grateful
for
that.
So
I
guess
I'm
also
grateful
for
yeah
all
the
all
the
people
who
keep
coming
in
who
are
so
awesome.
C
You
know
I
mean
griffin
and
livy,
maybe
are
like
the
the
big
signposts
here,
but
also
juan
and
even
the
newer
folks,
writer
and
aloysius
and
and
yeah
I
mean
there's
too
many
to
name
nate
and
tam,
and
everyone
really
so
thank
you
all
for
creating
that
space
for
me
to
express
my
more
full
self
and
I'll
pass
it
to
griff
or
juan
sorry.
E
Yeah
I
like
about
myself
that
I
try
to
be
empathic
like
there's
people
that
sometimes
see
other
people
and
and
struggle
to
feel
what
others
are
feeling.
But
for
me,
when
I
see
someone
I
I
yeah,
I
I
like
to
place
myself
in
their
shoes
and-
and
I
don't
know
that's
something
I
like
about
myself
and
yeah.
E
I
I
share
with
durgas
that
there's
a
lot
of
respect
and
admiration
for
a
lot
of
people
here
and
that
I
really
like
that,
like
the
the
the
good
intentions
that
that
are
behind
all
these
and
that
sometimes
when,
when
you
have
like
a
very
innovative
idea
like
sometimes
you
can
be
like
become
frustrated
if
people
don't
understand
it,
but
I
feel
that
we
are
doing
a
really
good
job
at
communicating
and
and
giving
importance
to
communicate
and
to
explain
and
to
and
to
make
people
learn
about
what
we're
talking
about,
because
it's
not
just
like
okay,
I'm
right
and
being
stubborn
about
it,
but
but
also
to
have
like
the
compassion
to
to
to
to
teach
others
and
to
and
to
not
impose
anything
but
but
convince.
A
Before
before
you
get
it
just
to,
I
think
we're
derailing
a
little
bit
of
the
game.
Just
one
thing
that
you
really
admire
on
yourself
and
then
pick
one
person
to
say
one
thing
that
you
admire
on
on
them.
D
All
right,
thank
you,
wonka
and
thank
you
libby.
This
is
not
really
subscribe.
D
I
will
say
that
I
admire
my
positivity
and
resiliency
and
I'll
say
griff.
I
I've
always
admired
your
drive
and
I
think
that
is
something
that
I've
been
trying
to
to
adopt
myself.
So
thank
you
and
I
admire
that
and
I
would
say
griff
go
next,
but
I
think
you
should
go
last
again,
so
I'm
going
to
pass
it
to
10.
F
Okay,
just
one
I
feel
like
I
could
write
a
list,
but
I'm
gonna,
I'm
gonna,
I'm
gonna
pick
one,
and
I
think
it's
that
you
know.
I
think
it's
we
admire
about
ourselves,
things
we
admire
about.
We
admire
about
other
people,
things
we
admire
about
ourselves
and,
like
my
word,
is
so
solid,
like
if
I
say
I'm
gonna
do
something
like
that
is
not
gonna.
Not
get
done
like
the
world
would
have
to
end
before
that
thing
doesn't
get
done
so
I
feel
like
I.
I
really
appreciate
that
about
myself
and
other
people.
F
I
am
also
a
hustler.
I
love
that,
like
I
just
love
so
much
drive
and
energy,
and
it's
like
I
want
to
do
everything
and
I
I'm
just
I
feel
like
I'm
unstoppable.
I
love
that
too,
and
I'm
gonna
stop
saying
things,
but
I
I
there's
a.
I
think
it's
important
to
reflect
on
the
things
you
appreciate
about
yourself
and
then
your
flaws
too,
like
where
you
can
make
improvements
now,
should
I
say
something
about
somebody
else.
F
I
admire
everyone
in
here
those
that
I've
worked
with
very
closely,
of
course,
and
even
the
people
that
are
here
because
of
their
open
spirit
and
curiosity,
I
think
I'm
gonna
say
I'm
I
admire
eduardo.
I
really
appreciate
how
he
grows.
G
Thank
you
tim,
I'm
going
to
say
that
I
admire
writer,
my
homie
writer's
ability
to
anticipate
the
needs
of
the
people
around
them,
something
that
resonates
with
me
that
care
place.
I
appreciate
that
and
in
myself
I'd
say
I
appreciate
my
shadows.
G
I
don't
know
I've
been
through
a
lot
and
everything
that
I've
been
through
I've
chosen
to
learn
from
it.
So
that's
what
I
appreciate
is
my
curiosity
and
continue
to
like
keep
wanting
to
learn,
even
though
it's
painful.
H
Yeah
thanks
alicia
yeah.
For
me.
One
thing
I
admire
about
myself:
it's
like
I'm
very
chill
like
you
know.
If
there
is
a
bunch
of
things
to
do,
you
know
it's
like
one
at
a
time
and
yeah
I'm
pretty
chill
and
if
I
had
to
say
something
like
I
really
I
go
with
a
very
easy
one.
Like
I
really
admire
like
levy,
you
always
keep
like
every
decision
being
human-centered
and
yeah.
This
is
so
admirable
because
for
me
sometimes
it's,
like
you
know.
H
A
Thank
you
something
I
admire
myself.
I
think
I'm
very
brave
and
not
afraid
of
changes
like
I
I
don't
like.
I
don't
think
fear
is
a
big
thing
in
my
life
and
and
I
feel
very
content
about
that
and
someone
I
admire.
A
I
think
I'll
pick
mitch,
because
that
has
been
something
very
resonant
to
me
of
how
I
admire
your
with
how
simple
you
make
complicated
things.
Look
like
it
seems
like
you
get
like
a
big
beast
of
a
huge
something
and
then
like
in
the
end
of
the
day.
It's
done
and
that's
something
I
admire
a
lot
and
I
hope
I
can
bring
more
into
my
life
and
I'll
pass
up
a
secret.
I
So
something
I
admire
about
myself
is
my
ability
to
find
good
people
and
and
figure
out
what
they
like
to
do
and
put
them
in
a
place
to
succeed
or
like
in
in
a
way
delegation
kind
of
in
that
realm.
I
feel
like
I'm
doing
a
good
job
at
that,
and
it's
been
working
out
well
and
something
and
something
I
admire
about.
Septimus
is
like
just
reliability.
Actually
what
a
lot
of
the
stuff
tam
also
said
about
herself,
I
feel
like
septimus,
always
delivers
as
well.
I
You
know
and
something
that
both
of
them
are
incredibly
like
excel
at
it's
just
like
being
like
going
to
do
something.
Yes,
it's
going
to
happen,
I'm
going
to
do
it.
You
know
yeah
we're
going
to
have
every
call
recorded.
Even
I
have
to
do
it
myself
so
yeah
and
with
that
I'll
pass
it
to
eduardo.
J
J
What
I
admire
about
myself,
it's
the
capacity
that
I
have
to
be,
even
if
it
is
awkward
to
be
vulnerable
and
and
and
the
deconstruction
of
myself
that
lead
to
this
process,
because
coming
from
a
village
of
200
people
in
the
border
with
costa
rica,
race,
in
a
catholic
environment,
with
prejudice
and
blah
blah
blah
coming
to
a
virtual
space
and
being
able
to
be
vulnerable,
took
a
long
time
for
me
to
achieve
the
little
space
of
vulnerability,
and
I
like
that-
and
I
sort
of
keep
that
as
a
pride
to
myself
and
something
that
I
admire,
and
this
is
not
because
it's
payback
it's
because
it
happened
to
me
randomly
two
weeks
ago.
J
My
partner,
I
was
talking
to
him,
and
I
told
him
like
hey,
I
felt
I
felt
I
feel
that
in
the
past
month
I
have
learned
so
much
from
working
with
him
and
he
stared
at
me,
and
he
is
like
you
haven't
realized,
do
you
and
I'm
like?
No,
I
don't
know
what
you're
talking
about
and
he's
like.
You
are
starting
to
talk
like
her.
I
have
never
met
her.
J
K
Hi,
thank
you
so
something
I
learned
about
myself.
I
guess
I'm
endlessly
curious,
like
I
just
always
want
to
learn
more,
just
give
me
more
stuff
to
devour
and
learn
something
I
admire.
I
admire
griff's
energy.
That
was
one
of
the
big
first
things
I
noticed
in
the
dc
just
like
in
meetings.
It's
just
so
infectious.
L
Thank
you.
I
guess
something
I
admire
about
myself.
Is
that
I'm
a
generalist
of
sorts
so
usually
the
phrase,
the
jack
of
all
trades
master
of
none
is
denigrated
for
being
not
specifically
good
at
anything
hypothetically,
but
I
take
it
as
a
kind
of
a
point
of
pride
to
be
willing
to
try
anything
and
everything,
and
just
do
my
best
at
learning.
What
it's
about,
and
somebody
I
admire,
is
aloysius
for
her
perseverance.
L
When
you
know
it's
she's
made
us
aware
that
she's
has
like
some
particular
difficulties
being
autistic
and
I
and
she's
a
veteran
and
it's
a
it's
a
very
impressive
resume
that
they
have
so
yeah
appreciate
being
able
to
do
stuff
alongside
her.
A
Feel
free
to
jump
in
and
out
and
if
any
point
you
want
to,
you
want
to
talk
just
just
jump
in
and
now
mitch.
M
Thanks,
I
guess
something
I
admire
about
myself
is
when
I
encounter
a
really
frustrating
situation.
M
My
instinct
is
to
find
the
humor
in
it.
So
I
don't
know,
I
think,
there's
always
something
laughable
about
just
a
really
shitty
situation.
So
I
really
like
that
in
myself,
because
it
keeps
me
grounded
and
I'd
like
to
praise.
I
was
going
to
praise
griff,
but
I
figured
I
can't
let
that
get
to
his
ego.
M
You
know
all
this
praise,
so
I'm
gonna
praise
lauren
who's,
not
actually
in
this
call,
but
we
both
started
doing
all
this
stuff
around
the
same
time
and
we've
really
grown
a
lot
like
his
co-workers
and
friends,
and
so
it's
been
really
cool
about
like
how
we
learn
to
work
together
and
like
we're
so
similar
in
ways
that
we
often
butt
heads
but
then
similar
in
ways
that
we
feed
off
of
each
other's
energy.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
Thank
you,
everyone
so
getting
into
the
agenda
and
share
my
screen.
B
Quick
technical
question
before
we
start
as
a
confused
specific
timer
has
there
been
a
permanent
shift
in
european
time
that
has
shifted
the
whole
tec
calendar
reflecting
in
the
in
the
calendar
app
yet.
I
Even
better,
even
better,
only
some
shift
because
it
depends
on
who
makes
the
calendar
event
if
they
were
in
europe
when
they
made
it,
then
it
shifts-
and
oh
my
gosh,
even
better
time
zones
switch
for
the
the
us
people
next
week.
So
it's
probably
just
gonna
switch
back
for
you
for
me.
I
I
don't
know.
What's
going
to
happen,
I
don't
know
my.
I
B
A
Okay,
first
things
first,
so
maybe
I'll
just
go
into
this
other
topics.
First,
before
we
jump
into
the
debate
one
so
the
vote
on
snapchat.
Sorry,
this
is
a
poor
agenda.
Actually
I
could
have
done
a
better
job
here,
but
the
vote
on
snapshot.
Let
me
put
this
link
in
here.
A
We
have
two
days
left,
so
please
take
a
look.
There
is
a
little
tldr
in
here.
That's
all
I'm
proposing
inside
of
this
and
and
then
the
full
proposal
is
here
and
also
an
update
on
the
template.
So
I
tested
making
this
proposal
the
template
that
eduardo
made
and
it's
great.
There
was
just
a
few
changes
that
I
think
I
think
it
made
sense,
and
and
maybe
we
can
change
for
it
as
being
the
template
with
which
is
slight
changes.
A
The
main
thing
I
added
was
this
tldr,
because
I
think
it's
a
good
practice
for
us
to
have
like
something
that
briefly
explains
the
whole
thing
and
that
can
be
in
the
in
the
front
page
of
the
vote
on
token
log.
So
when
people
come
here,
they
know
everything
is
happening,
but
they
can
find
more
information
in
the
in
the
forum
and
then
I
looked
it
up
for
some
suggestions
that
we
had
last
week
about
creating
tags
on
this
course
and
it
is
possible.
A
I
had
to
get
in
a
call
in
the
middle
of
looking
into
that,
but
the
tags
are
possible
for
proposals,
so
we
can
restructure
the
forum
for
that
and
I
wonder
if
anyone
is
interested
in
taking
that
on
as
like,
how
can
we
make
the
forum
better
now
and
look
into
the
labels
and
reframe
like
the
templates
and
the
categories
we
have
there
now,
especially
in
the
voting
session.
J
All
right,
when
you
mean
to
improve,
do
you
mean
to
sort
of
sync
the
template
from
the
proposal
with
the
options
and
labels
that
are
on
the
proposal
forum.
A
So
here
here
is
where
somewhere
here
tags,
I
think,
but
then
we
can
this.
Does
it
sorry?
I
need
to
research
a
little
bit
better,
but
I
I
know
we
can
do
it,
but
then,
when
we
see
a
proposal,
for
example
here
in
the
proposal
section,
if
I
click
on
advice
process,
there
is
a
template
that
is
not
good
anymore.
A
J
So
you
mean
to
update
the
categories
and
those
three
or
four
categories:
we
will
keep
them
like
funding
proposal,
a
cultural
proposal
and
I
think
about
proposal
kind
of
categories.
A
A
J
For
a
matter
of
understanding
the
sections,
I
think
it
would
be
cleaner
to
have
the
three
kind
of
type
of
proposals
visible,
rather
than
only
tagged
just
because
people
can
see
it
and
immediately
click
on
it
and,
for
example,
a
category
where
it
says
conviction
voting.
They
can
see
all
the
proposals
that
are
tagged
on
the
conviction
voting
or
if
it's
a
technical
decision,
they
can
click
on
that
and
go
straight
to
there
also
to
advise
process.
J
I
think
visual,
the
concepts
and
and
the
description
by
itself,
of
the
name
of
the
of
the
category
of
the
proposal.
It's
so
self-explanatory
that
it
helps
people
to
navigate
this.
Otherwise,
a
little
bit
chaotic
space.
J
And
we
can
work
on
on
a
small
version
of
this
and
then
bring
it
to
the
next
soft
off
or
something
like
that.
Maybe.
F
D
Can
I
answer
a
question
about
the
current
snapshot
vote
yeah?
So
I
I
read
the
forum
post
and
I
like
everything
about
the
the
proposal,
but
I
was
just
curious
of
why
we
did
not
want
to
utilize
approval
voting.
H
H
It's
so
easy
to
understand
and
yeah
I
mean
it's
my
favorite
type
of
boat,
for
you
know
almost
everything
like
it's
good
for
multiple
choices,
but
it's
also
good
for
individuals
like
it's
only
bad
when
you
know
like
a
world
voting
is,
but
only
when
you
have
like
two
political
sides
and
one
is
represented
in,
like
you
know
three
or
four
proposals,
and
only
on
the
other
only
have
one,
then
it's
kinda
bad,
but
for
the
rest
is
yeah.
It's
my
favorite
yeah
back
to
uni.
D
A
So
I
have
some
updates
on
that
too.
Why?
First
answering
the
first
question,
at
least
my
motivation
and
I'm
open
to
be
challenged.
But
our
our
governance
structure
is
already
super
complex
because
we
are
going
on
the
on
the
polycentric
governance
route
and
and
having
multiple
ways
for
making
decisions,
because
there
are
multiple
decisions
that
deserve
specific
types
of
directions
and
processes
and.
A
A
So
thinking
about
our
use
cases,
I
was
chatting
about
this
with
griff
too.
He
gave
a
lot
of
good
ideas
about
having
using
quadratic
voting,
mainly
because
we
have
a
very
like
quite
an
equal
distribution
of
tokens
now
and
and
using
conviction.
Voting
using
quadratic
voting
would
just
make
things
a
little
bit
more
balanced
and
then
ranked
choice.
A
Voting
was
the
perfect
option
for
snapshot
runoff,
so
we
already
have
a
reason
to
pick
that
one
and
and
rank
choice
voting
can
also
be
used
for
the
same
reasons
that
approval
voting
would
be
used,
and
the
difference
is
so
small
that
it
would
like.
For
me
it
doesn't
justify
adding
one
more
point
of
complexity
and
then
the
route
we're
like
choosing
if
this
proposal
passes
is
that
we
would
create
a
type
of
voting
that
is
quadratic,
ranked
choice
voting.
A
So
both
voting
types
would
be
quadratic
and
to
execute
that
we're
talking
to
pedro
who
is
looking
into
it
and
see
if
we
need
to
create
if
we
can
create
a
new
strategy
that
gives
us
the
option
of
just
using
those
two
votings.
So
it
wouldn't
be
confusing
to
people
that
they
would
make
a
proposal,
and
they
would
see
five
types
of
voting.
We
would
just
have
those
and
and
looking
into
a
way
to
have
that,
like
integrated
in
snapshot.
I
I
have
a
quick
thing
on
the
ranked
choice:
quadratic
ring
choice,
voting
if
we're
going
to
try
to
use
that
for
multi-sigs
we
might
want.
I
I
work
like
let's
say
that
it's
seven
of
you
know
the
top.
I
I
just
think
we
might
want
to
test
it
and
make
sure
that
it
will
actually
work
for
that
use
case,
or
we
can
also
just
kind
of
be
like
well,
it's
just
actually
the
final
votes.
That
matter.
Who
cares
what
the
ranked
choice
algorithm
does
exactly
you
know
like,
because
ranked
choice
only
counts
gives
all
of
your
votes
to
the
first
place
folk.
D
Yet
it
didn't
get
any
type
of
consideration
and,
like
part
of
the
benefit
of
ranked
choice,
voting
is,
is
seeing
the
different
steps
of
like
who
passes
these
thresholds
of,
like
top
five
top
three
top
two
and
moving
on
and
forward.
But
you
don't
have
that
type
of
control
with
snapchat,
because
it
only
selects
the
winner.
I
A
I
see
so
maybe
okay,
I'm
open
to
approval
voting,
but
maybe
a
way
that
ranked
choice
voting
could
work
still
in
the
senses.
All
of
the
people
that
were
chosen
as
first
options
of
somebody
or
of
like
a
percentage
of
people
of
tokens
then
enter
in
the
thing.
D
I
L
D
A
I
I
I
think
you
could
basically
say:
hey
like
here's.
The
list
of
15
people
allocate
your
voting
power
as
you'd
like
and
it'd,
be
like
token
log
basically,
but
it'd
be
with
snapshot
with
quadratic
voting,
and
then
you
just
say:
oh
yeah,
you
know
this
much
of
this
person
this
much
this
person
you
get.
These
results,
top
seven
win.
A
I
Approval
voting,
you
can
vote
for
everyone,
you
can
say
I
have
it's
yes
or
no,
it
doesn't
give
it
doesn't
give
quantity
like
you
can't
say.
Well.
I,
like
this
person,
this
many
points
and
that
person
that
many
points
and
quadratic
voting
also
kind
of
incentivizes
you
to
spread
your
vote
out
amongst
people.
The
approval
voting
you're,
just
like
yeah,
this
guy's
good
enough.
You
know
they
passed
my
threshold,
so
you
get
a
little
bit
more
with
quadratic
voting.
You
get
a
you
get
like
more
of
a
vector.
I
I
F
I
guess
it's
also
worth
mentioning
that
the
education
that
we
need
to
do
for
the
community
for
how
to
vote.
Like
you,
have
this
many
tokens,
but
it's
quadratic
so
make
sure
that
you
multiply
by
two.
So
you
know
like
divide
by
you
know
what
I
mean.
I
just
I
feel
like
it's
it's
complicated
to
to
know,
to
share,
to
educate
the
community
on
how
they
would
vote
using
quadratic
when
what
they
want
to
do
is
rank.
F
A
A
F
I
think
we're
just
merging
ideas
together
and
the
the
latest
sort
of
epiphany
I
have
is
that
we're
all
looking
at
different
ways
of
selecting
the
multi-city
and
we're
also
starting
to
realize
that?
Not
only
would
this
process
defined
for
the
initial
buy
and
maybe
the
reward
system,
and
maybe
also
source
grid,
but
at
least
this
one
process
would
not
only
set
the
precedent
for
how
we
do
multi-sticks.
F
We
vote
multisigs,
but
it's
probably
also
going
to
define
the
protocol
for
selecting
community
multisigs,
so
the
community
multisig
like
just
so.
We
separate
it
from
individual
working
group,
multisigs
or
project
multi-sigs
and
just
say
if
there's
like
tokens
or
community
funds
or
something
that's
more
for
the
entire
community,
and
so,
as
you
know,
as
it's
sort
of
like
the
original
suggestion,
you
know
it's
like
okay,
maybe
it's
just
the
stewards,
then
another
suggestion
was
like
no,
it
should
be.
You
know
some
percentage
or
all
of
the
token
holders.
F
You
know
that
then
it
was
like
the
one
percent
of
token
holders
should
be
eligible.
Then
it
was
like
all
token
holders
should
be
eligible,
and
then
there
was
like
some
different
ideas
that
all
came
out
at
the
same
time,
and
I
think
what
I,
what
I
realized
is
that,
where
we
do
have
alignment
actually
is
the
community
should
probably
decide
this
like.
Maybe
it's
the
community
that
should
have
a
choice
on
what
is
the
way
that
we
want
to
select
the
multisig.
F
Is
it
that
we
want
to?
Have
it
be
stewards
or
do
we
want
to
have
a
nomination
process
so
that
anyone
can
nominate
or
self-nominate,
and
then
they
get
added
to
the
entire
list?
And
then
we
find
a
way
whatever
the
process
is
to
process
that
list,
or
do
we
want
to
nominate?
You
know
everyone
sort
of
nominates,
a
group
and
similar
to
the
way,
we're
selecting
these
parameters.
F
It's
sort
of,
like
think
about
the
reasons
why
you're
selecting
these
seven
people
and
then
you
propose
your
reasons
for
it,
and
then
you
have
the
the
parameters,
which
is
the
group
of
people.
This
is
the
list
and
then
you
have
your
rationale
and
then
those
go
up
against
each
other
in
sets.
F
So
I
I
think
that
all
three
of
those
ways
are
possible
actually
but
we're
making
the
decisions
sort
of
like.
Is
it
us
that
decides
or
do
we
just
say,
here's
option
one
option
two
option:
three,
maybe
there's
a
fourth
option
and
then
just
have
a
community
decide
which
way
they
want
to
to
want
to
see
the
tec.
F
H
Yeah
sure
I
mean
I
think
we
should,
for
example,
like
yeah.
This
multisig
is
because
it's
holding
so
much
fans
of
the
commons.
It
needs
to
be.
You
know
very
great,
but
I
think
like,
for
example,
working
group
multisig
like
they
are
not
going
to
hold
this
much
amount
of
funds,
so
we
shouldn't,
like,
I
feel
it's
okay
to
have.
H
You
know
the
working
group
leads
and
the
most
contributors
in
a
dial
or
whatever
the
working
group
decides
at
the
end
of
the
day,
I
see
working
groups
as
yeah
small
swarms
and
if
they,
if
the
working
group
do
not
present
results
or
do
something
wrong,
then
when
they
ask
again
for
funds,
they
are
not
going
to
get
them
so
yeah,
it's
it's
like
you
know
they
have
interest
and
do
things
right
and
yeah.
I
I
don't
know
if
I
should
just
talk
about
something
else,
but
yeah
I
feel
like
it's.
You
know
like.
H
I
don't
feel
we
are
going
to
have
like
a
lot
of
multi-six
like
I
feel
like
this.
One
is
probably
like
the
most
important,
and
I
think
also
like
this
multi-stick
should
be
for
a
period
of
time
like
I
feel
like
I
mean
from
what
I
understand
like
the
lp
tokens
should
be
vested,
so
you
know
once
they
are
there.
Maybe
we
don't
move
them
any
like.
Never
again,
maybe
we
decide
not
to
put
the
invested.
D
H
That's
something
I
like
and
then
the
partnerships
too
and
then
you
know
that's
done
and
then
the
multi-stick's
done
and
we
keep
decentralized
and
yeah.
That's
what
I
would
love
to
see.
H
H
A
H
D
Yeah,
but
I
guess
I
guess
I'm
asking
if
the
end
goal
is
to
have
responsible
people
who
are
dedicated
to
the
actual
commons
in
charge
of
a
large
pool
of
funds.
Then
then
that
should
be
the
end
goal
and
that's
what
we
should
cater
our
voting
strategy
towards,
rather
than
having
this
type
of
like
self-nomination.
D
H
But
the
big
holders
you
know
like
if
they
they
are
going
to
vote
whatever
is
best
for
the
economy
like
they
are
not
going
to
watch
like
they
are
not
going
to
vote
for
themselves
and
if
they
know
they
are
not
going
to
do
it,
because
if
you
know,
if
they
don't
do
it,
then
the
token
is
going
to
go
down.
And
you
know
the
economy
is
going
to
be
bad.
Like
they're,
going.
C
D
D
I
do
yeah
to
be
honest
with
you.
I,
like
the
the
entire
like
nomination
process
for
anybody
is,
is
really
flawed.
I
think
we're
gonna
end
up
with
something
that
we
don't
like
and
having
people
who
are
not
engaged
potentially
like
I,
you
know
this
is
just
hypotheticals
but
like
at
the
end
of
the
day.
You
want
to
eliminate
that
type
of
risk,
especially
when
we're
dealing
with
this
amount
of
funds.
A
Today,
tim
said
something
that
I
think
it's
a
good
category
to
have.
We
have
community
funds
and
we'll
have
working
group
funds
and
then
for
working
group
funds.
The
people
in
the
working
group
can
have
their
own
process
to
decide
who
is
going
to
be
in
the
multi-stakes
and
like
according
to
how
much
they
participate
and
the
better
people
to
decide
that
are
the
people
that
are
most
involved
in
the
working
groups
and
then
for
community
funds
that
it's
something
like
this.
It's
something
like.
D
Yeah,
so
this
is
the
last
thing
I'll
mention
about
this
is
that
you
know.
I
think
that
if
we
can
the
initial
buy-in,
where
we're
going
to
have
a
single
wallet,
custodying
200,
something
thousand
rap
decks
died
like
I
think
that
should
be
held
by
the
stewards
and
if
we
want
to
change
the
the
the
multisig
signers
after
that,
after
we
disperse
that
initial
and
and
kind
of
lessen
the
pot.
D
If
you
will,
then
then
I
think
we
can
move
towards
that,
but
like
I'm
very
much
against
throwing
a
ton
of
money
with
the
potential
of
having
somebody
not
not
with
a
vested
interest
in
in
managing
that
money
to
be
a
signer
at
the
beginning,.
F
Yeah,
I
want
to
say
that
that
was
the
original
thinking
too,
that
it
was,
and
I
think
that
at
the
end
I've
come
to
the
idea
that
why
do
we
decide?
Why?
Don't
we?
Why
don't
we
just
like
share
the
pros
and
cons
of
all
of
these
different
possibilities
and
let
the
community
decide
which
which
method
we
use
it's?
After
all,
a
decision
that
affects
the
community.
This
is
a
cult.
This
is
a
cultural
decision.
F
I
think
this
is
a
cultural
decision
that
affects
the
community,
so
I
feel
like
it's
something
that
we
shouldn't
actually
decide.
We
can,
you
know,
go
through
different
options
and
then
highlight
the
benefits
and
the
risks
of
each
option,
but
then
really
put
it
in
the
hands
of
the
community
to
decide
how
they
want
that
to
be
chosen,
how
they
want
to
choose
the
multisig.
F
I
I
also
think
that
there
hasn't
been
that
much.
You
know
it's
like
me.
Zep
and
mitch
were
commenting
on
the
forum.
There
has
there's
not
actually
that
much
community
really
coming
into
it,
so
I
also
think
creating
a
way
for
people
to
share
their
opinion
by
voting
on.
It
might
be
another
way
to
get
more
consensus
around
the
the
way
that
community
multi-stakeholders
are
selected.
J
Just
quickly
to
comment
on
what
justin
mentioned,
I
think
there
should
be
also
a
space
for
people
of
the
community
to
understand
what
a
multi-stick
is
like.
We
are
throwing
out
names
and
concepts
here
that
maybe
people
doesn't
understand,
so
that's
blocking
them
from
actually
engaging
in
the
forum
and
so
on.
So
I
will
suggest
that
along
the
lane
and
top
part,
we
could
have.
Some
kind
of
session
could
be
in
self
gov
that
people
can
be
explaining
these
concepts
and
maybe
get
a
grasp
on
it.
If
they
don't.
M
M
If
you
don't
know
what
a
multi-sig
is
like,
I
don't
know
if
you
should
be
responsible
for
signing
it,
then,
like.
A
You
bring
a
lot
that
perspective
of
like
oh
we're,
talking
about
this
for
so
long.
There's
people
that
don't
know
what
this
is
and-
and
I
think
it's
there
are
some
things
that
are
really
obvious
for
a
lot
of
people,
but
then,
when
they
are
explained
in
a
certain
way,
there
are
things
that
click
and,
I
think,
that's
important,
but
yeah.
I
think
the
focus
of
the
like.
We
need
kind
of
a
quick
solution
for
moving
forward
with
this,
because
we're
reaching
a
deadline
with
this
buy-in
proposal
and
what
I'm
hearing
yeah
go
ahead.
M
Well,
I
was
just
curious
because
we
tried
out
the
quadratic
voting.
What
did
you
notice.
A
Well,
I
I
think
this
works
well
it
it
has
like
this.
Like
grape
said,
you
have
an
ability
to
like
weigh
in
a
little
bit
better
and
in
here
there
were
like
five
nine
people
that
were
voted
on,
but
then
it's
easy
to
pick
the
top
seven.
H
H
There's
one
thing
I
don't
like
about
this
and
it's
you
know
like
it's
very
easy
to
just
vote
in
the
last
second
and
influence
the
voting.
Somehow,
like
you
know
like
okay,
this
is
the
top
seven.
I
like
the
guy
who's
in
the
nine,
then
I'm
putting
100
percent
of
the
tokens
online,
so
he
makes
to
the
seven
yeah.
I
don't
know
it's
a
weird
thing.
H
D
I
D
I
F
F
Just
in
the
last
minute
we
have
raised,
does
it
feel
weird
that
we
just
it's
like
a
little
bit
like
a
popularity
contest
like
a
bunch
of
names
and
you
get
to
choose
a
name.
Is
that?
Does
anyone
else
feel
that
it's
a
little
bit
like
it
might
cause
some
strangeness
in
our
community
and
in
our
relations
like
because
there's
like
winners
and
losers
now
and
they're
identifiable?
C
M
F
F
Well
there,
the
other
option
was
submitting
groups
right,
so
somebody
would
think
about
the
people
that
would
be
good
and
then
they
would
submit
a
group
and
that
and
the
stewards
at
least
it's
like
it
is
a
little
different,
but
it
is
like
then
there's
some
stewards
right
there's
you
know
you
know
it's
a
fixed
group,
I'm
not
necessarily
even
advocating
for
just
the
stewards
but
more
like
a
more
thought
through
way
of
like
how
do
we
make
sure
that
the
objective
is
achieved
and
that
there's
some
thinking
behind
who's
like
who?
F
Who
who
the
group
will
be?
Who
the
finished
seven
group
will
be,
and
some
rationale
some
description.
Why
did
I
choose
the
seven?
Well,
this
person
is
really
great
at
this
and
has
been
showing
up
a
lot
and
this
person's
on
our
discord
every
week,
they're
always
reliable,
they're,
always
dependable
they're.
You
know
I
just
I
feel
like
the
selection
should
be
more
understood
like
the
selection
should
be
better
understood.
Then
I
see
griff
a
lot.
So
he'll
get
my
votes.
A
Yeah,
I
I
agree
with
that.
I
was
advocating
for
the
groups
for
the
same
reason,
because
I
feel
like
it
creates
more
of
a
positive
intent
rather
than
a
negative
exclusion
and
having
like
thinking
about
the
holistic
group
as
well.
How
does
people
interact
together
and
not
only
for
this
multisig
but
for
for
others
as
well,
and
we
are
past
the
top
of
the
hour
and
there
is
graviton
training
starting
now.