►
Description
Timecodes:
00:00 - Skill to master
08:30 - Sourcecred updates
33:15 - Mapping
35:28 - MVV session
49:06 - Handbook processes
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
What
skill
would
you
like
to
master
because
there's
this
book,
I'm
reading
that
talks
a
lot
about
how
something
you
would
like
to
master
is
what
will
give
you
the
highest
level
of
engagement
and
just
thinking
of
like
I
don't
know
how
how
we
get
engaged
with
things?
How
how
we,
like
naturally
gravitate
between
one
thing
or
the
other
and
yeah
just
curious
to
hear
from
you
all
and
I'll
pass
to
zaptimist.
B
Oh,
that's
a
pretty
tough
question.
I
mean
there's
money
skill
I
actually.
I
always
want
to
improve
on
let's
like
a
bit
of
everything,
so
I'm
not
only
dependent
on
one
thing,
but
lately
what
I'm
focusing
a
lot
is
to
improve.
My
body.
Skills,
like
you
know,
be
more
healthy,
more
flexible,
like
yeah
biological
things
and
for
the.
B
C
D
D
But
with
that
I
mean
a
more
more
about
time
management
and
see,
what's
really
priority
for
yourself
to
keep
a
really
good
life
healthy
life
in
all
aspects
in
this
psychological
level,
the
healthy
level
and
physical
level.
So
I
want
to
know
how
to
manage
my
time
to
to
have
a
good
exercise
routine,
to
grab
a
good
book
and
read
and
get
the
work
done
of
the
day
and
be
with
my
family
and
all
of
that
in
24
hours.
D
E
I
think
that
I
am
more
or
less
like
good
at
sustaining
relationships
with
people,
but
I
find
this
some
something
really
interesting
that
I
would
like
to
to
be
better
at
because,
like
I
feel
that
I
can
learn
from
everybody
and
like
I
would
like
to
to
to
be
a
master
in
learning
from
people
and
being
able
to
to
bring
out
the
best
of
people.
I
think
that's
amazing
and
I
will
pass
to
nate.
C
G
Thank
you,
nate.
I
wish
I
had
a
chance
to
learn
everything
I
wish
to
learn
all
the
time.
There's
so
many
things
I
wish.
I
could
learn
and
I
don't
have
the
time
or
or
I
just
don't
have
the
knowledge
or
both
of
them.
So
that's
that's
something.
I'd
love
to
and
also
I'd
love
to
be
able
to
sometimes
separate
a
little
bit.
G
You
know
ledger
from
work,
sometimes
too
too
deep
into
work
that
I
forget
about
the
rest
and
it's
good
to
be
able
to
every
once
in
a
while
when
you,
when
you
say
ledger
ledger,
you
know
not
ledger
physically,
but
your
head
keeps
running
and
running
and
running.
So
I
wish
I
could
do
that
I'll
pass
it
to
10.
H
I
just
can't
do
I
don't
know
how
to
do
it
and
I
I'm
always
sending
these
emails
like
I'm.
So
sorry
I
haven't
in
six
months.
I
apologize
that
and
man.
I
would
love
to
master
that
I
would
love
to
master
staying
in
touch
with
people.
That
means
so
much
to
me
and
I
bound
you
so
much
in
my
life.
I
would
love
to
master
that
god.
I
would
love
to
master
that
and
I'll
who
didn't
go
I'll.
Pass
back
to
libya.
F
I
would
like
to
master
this
kind
of.
Maybe
this
is
a
cop-out
in
some
ways,
but
I
really,
I
really
would
like
to
master
creating
economies.
That's,
and
I
I
I
feel
like
that's
what
I'm
set.
That's.
What
I'm
trying
to
do
is
like
master,
this
art
of
creating
economies
and
the
common
stack
is
my
goal
to
do
that
so
and
and
really
to
support
other
people
in
creating
their
own
and
because
that's
at
least
that's
how
I
think
mastery
will
will
arise
yeah.
C
Yeah
I'll
take
a
stab
at
it.
I
guess
I
one
thing
that
I've
always
wanted
to
be
better
at
I've.
I
I
like
participating
in
community
organizing-
and
I
I
just
I
it's
very
difficult
to
ask,
especially
if
you
don't
have
the
network,
and
I
really
I
would
like
to
master
the
methods
of
community
organization.
C
A
A
It's
like
the
for
me
feels
like
the
base
knowledge
of
all
like
the
source,
knowledge
or
something,
and
he
feels
I
feel
so
far
from
it.
But
it's
a
yeah,
it's
a
big,
it's
a
big
passion
that
it
always
feels
like.
It
will
happen
sometime
and
then
I
keep
putting
like
there
into
the
future,
but
hopefully
I'll
get
better
at
it.
G
G
G
D
A
G
C
G
Corresponds
to
the
orange
and
the
orange
here
corresponds
to
the
blue.
It's
a
little
a
little
thing
we
have
to
change,
but
basically,
what
you
see
here
is
the
overall
credit
that's
been
given
to
all
users
and
the
overall
grain,
which
is
the
distribution
we
haven't
distributed.
Anything
that's
why
it's
flat!
Okay!
G
G
G
G
G
There
we
go
there,
we
go
okay,
so
right
here
is
where
all
the
information
gets
gets.
Seen
right
now,
as
you
see
on
the
slider
up
here
on
the
top
left,
I
have
decided
to
see
only
the
five
top
one
users
with
source
cred
and
that's
what's
shown
here
tomorrow
is
in
one
great
is
the
second
jessica's.
The
third
marco
is
the
fourth
and
libya
is
the
fifth
okay.
Let's
say
I
want
to
see
myself
and
I
don't
know
where
I
am
so.
I
just
like.
G
Starts
with
the
letters
I
start
typing,
I
just
select
it,
and
hopefully
let
me
just
try
to
see
if
it
updates
it
should
have
paid
and
show
me
my
position
compared
to
the
first
top
five.
Whenever
this
wants
to
update-
and
I
don't
know
why
it's
not
updating
now,
it
should
be
updating
anyway,
you
would
see
the
colors
slightly.
G
D
G
J
G
G
Of
course,
the
more
I
put
here,
the
more
it's
gonna,
the
tougher
is
gonna,
be
for
me
to
see,
and
probably
what
I'm
gonna
suggest
santiago
is
to
have
an
app
for
each
one
of
these
charts,
so
we
can
see
them
on
a
bigger
and
a
bigger
image
now
this
chart.
This
is
the
data
that
is
recreated
in
this
line
chart,
and
this
is
just
a
bar
chart
representing
just
the.
C
G
G
So
here
it's
telling
us
that
where,
where
the
flow,
where
the
credit
is
coming,
the
plug-in
edges,
this
is
probably
going
to
be
github
one
and
and
the
and
perform
the
other
one,
and
this
tells
us
how
much
credit
flows
from
the
edges
and
how
much
credit
flows
from
the
from
the
nodes.
Okay,
remember
that
when
we're
checking
that
the
page
official
you
know
page,
we
had
the
nodes
and
we
had
the
edges.
G
Playing
with
the
edges,
and
then
we
got
a
suggestion
from
the
guys
from
one
hive
not
to
touch
the
edges
so
basically
right
here.
Most
of
the
flow
is
coming
from
this
course.
That's
what's
telling
us
from
the
edges,
and
most
of
the
flow
also
comes
here
on
the
notes
comes
from
this
course
right.
So
what
we
see
here
is
that
most
of
the
engagement
we
get
is
from
the
forum,
and
if
we
want
to
play
a
little
bit
more
with
github,
we
should
try
to.
G
G
This
is
what
we're
getting
from
from
this
course,
and
this
one
is
from
this
course
posting
post,
I
think,
and
so,
if
you
hover
over
the
bars,
you
see
what
they
are,
where
they
are
getting,
what
what?
What?
What
is
the
credit
being
distributed,
which
actions
is
the
credit
being
distributed
for
and
which,
which
actions
are
not
taking
into
account?
So
this
is
a
this
is
a
way
to.
G
For
us
to
decide,
okay,
do
we
want
to
incentivize
some
specific
actions,
because
we
think
they
are
important
for
the
community
and
if
we
incentivize
them,
hopefully
people
is
gonna,
you
know,
try
to
use
them
more
and
if
that's
what
we
want.
So
that's
that's.
Basically
what
this
dashboard
is
for.
Okay,
we
have
to.
We
is
just
the
basic,
the
basic
first,
you
know
iteration,
and
we
have
to
get
deeper
into
the
data.
C
G
G
Those
are
the
actions
that
are
being
captured
by
the
system,
okay
and
if
we
and
if
we
want,
for
instance,
this
action,
that's
getting
zero
that
corresponds
to
whatever
it
says
here.
Let
me
see
so,
let's
square
this
course
secret
secrets
like
or
secrets
sports.
We
I
have
check.
We
have
to
check
all
these
actions
and
basically,
what
this
is
telling
us
is
that
this
is
where
the
system
is
getting.
G
G
Basically,
what's
happening
already
is
the
is
the
credit
distribution?
Okay,
there's
remember,
there's
two
measurements:
okay,
one
is
the
credit
which
is
giving
away
the
the
percent
touch
of
everyone's
contribution
upon
the
the
actions
that
we
have
configured
from
source
cred,
and
this
is
what
is
represented
here.
This
is
the
credit
okay.
Now,
if
we
distribute
right
now
today,
this
is
the
amount
of
credit
that
the
top
five
have.
If
we,
if
we
go,
you
know
and
represent
the
top
to
end.
G
It's
gonna
show
me
some
more
here:
okay,
whenever
the
the
chart
updates.
So
this
is
what
the
credit
is
right
now
from
all
the
history
and
from
remember
that
we
had
one
basic,
a
parameter.
That
was
how
much
consideration
we
give
to
the
previous
periods
and
how
much
consideration
we
give
to
the
actual
period.
Okay
and
that's
the
main,
the
main
parameter
on
the
source
grid
system.
G
So
from
all
that
information
that
we've
been
capturing
in
the
past
week
since
basically
mid
or
october,
if
we
were
gonna,
give
some
if
we
were
gonna
make
a
distribution
today,
okay,
the
one
that
would
get
the
most
would
be
tamer.
Second,
would
be
grief,
third
would
be
jessica,
fourth
would
be
levi,
marco,
then
livid
and
sam
source
threat
remember
number
seven
source
cred.
This
is
the
five
percent
that
the
system
automatically
gives
away
to
the
guys
from
source
cred
from
using
the
tool.
G
G
Well,
we
can
distribute
whatever
we
decide.
Okay,
the
first
thing
we
have
to
decide
as
a
group
is:
what
do
we
want
to
distribute
and
how
many
of
those
we
want
to
distribute
for
how
many
years,
how
many
distributions?
Let's
say
we
want
to
distribute-
I
don't
know
20
hours
every
week
using
source
credit,
then,
every
week,
whenever
we
make
the
distribution,
those
20
impact
hours
are
going
to
be
given
away
according
to
the
to
the
weight
of
every
single
one
of
us
that
has
been
measured
over
time.
G
D
G
And
the
rest
is
going
to
be
distributed
among
all
the
members
of
the
community.
According
to
the
you
know,
the
contribution
that
they
have
made
throughout
time.
That's
that's
one
of
the
reasons
why
let's
say
some
member
decides
to
take
two
months
of
vacation
and
he's
not
contributing
in
two
months.
He's
still
gonna
get
some
cred,
because
we
consider
his
contribution
from
the
past
from
all
the
past.
Okay,
of
course,
he's
gonna
get
less
and
less
it's
similar
to
the
conviction.
Voting.
G
You
stop
giving
your
vote,
but
there's
some
conviction
there
left
and
it,
and
it
takes
some
time
to
reach
zero
because
you
were,
you
were
voting
for
that
specific
proposal
for
quite
a
while.
So
it's
similar
to
that,
but
we
haven't
distributed
anything
yet
because
we
have
to
decide
what
we
want
to
distribute
and
when
do
we
want
to
distribute
it.
D
Yeah,
that's
also
important
to
note
that
I
make
manually
the
distributions
of
grain,
but
so
far
grain
is
degrad
test
tokens
it's
meaningless.
So
for
now
I
have
made
monthly
a
distribution
that
you
can
see
in
the
dashboard,
but
those
are
only
the
the
presentation
of
the
of
the
cred
turned
into
into
grain.
D
So
every
month,
by
the
time
that
I
manually
make
the
distribution
for
the
source
thread
implementation
and
we
have
to
say
well
this
time
we're
going
to
give
away
impact
hours
or,
let's
say
x,
die
and
we
set
the
the
amounts
corresponding
to
that
decision,
which
will
be
also
important
to
know
what's
the
percentage
given
for
the
instant
contributors
or
the
historical
ones
that
something
was
mentioned.
So
that's
still,
everything
is
manual,
so
we.
D
D
The
last
part
I
was
going
to
mention
is
that
maybe
our
life
is
made
easier
if
we
choose
like
if
it's
going
to
be
monthly
or
every
two
weeks
source
credit
automatically
turns
the
grain
and
the
credit
to
the
grain
that
we
decide
to.
So
we
would
only
need
to
get
that
number
and
make
the
distribution
manually,
as
I
would
decide
if
it's
x
die
or
input
hours
or
whatever.
G
As
matteo
said
we've
been
manually,
distributing
you
know,
useless
tokens
just
to
see
that
the
grain,
which
is
the
distribution,
that's
how
it's
called
was
working
properly
all
right.
So
we
we
have
everything
together,
we
have
the
ranking.
All
we
have
to
decide
is:
when
do
we
want
to
distribute
and
how
much
do
we
want
to
distribute
and
then
start
testing.
A
H
I
want
to
jump
in
and
just
say
one
thing:
I
don't
think
this
is
the
session
where
we're
actually
sanity
checking
the
parameters.
Now
that
we
see
the
results,
I
think
we're
still
going
to
do
that,
and
I
just
want
to
say
my
one
you
know
orange
flag,
maybe
not
quite
red,
is
that
I
think
the
objective
of
this
is
to
shape
to
help
encourage
a
participation
and
engagement
in
our
discourse.
G
G
H
Yeah,
I
I
do
think
before
we
start,
I
mean
we
should
maybe
go
through
the
you
know
run
through
the
process,
just
to
see
that
the
distribution
works
and
we
can
still
set
those
parameters.
But
I
think
we
should
maybe
go
back
and
see.
Is
this
encouraging
are
the
parameters
as
they
are
the
parameters
as
they're
set
today
encouraging
the
behavior
that
we
want,
which
is
more
contributor
engagement?
H
I
don't
know
that
I
should
be
the
leader
in
this
in
this
particular
instance,
so
maybe
we
want
to
tweak
it
so
that
it's
actually
people
contributing
from
the
community
more
than
you
know
the
person
who's
in
charge
of
github
and
make
sure
everything
is
up
to
date
all
the
time.
I
wonder
if
there's
a
way
that
we
can
sort
of
balance
that
better
and
I
looked
in
I'm.
H
H
G
Completely
agree
with
you
tom,
I
completely
agree,
but
keep
in
mind.
Source
cred
doesn't
have
all
the
tools
we
wish.
It
had
to
be
able
to
tweak
one
thing
and
tweak
the
rest.
Everything
you
touch
affects
everything,
because
it's
a
graph
all
right.
First.
Second,
that's
why
I
suggest
to
give
away
as
a
whatever
way
and
see
okay,
because,
although
you
may
see
that
you're
a
first,
maybe
the
difference
between
the
first
and
the
second
is
a
penny,
not
even
a
penny.
G
Okay,
it
all
depends
on
the
distribution
we
can
play
with
some
of
the
levers,
and
you
know,
and
once
we
start
giving
away
something
we're
gonna
see
we're
gonna,
we're
gonna,
see
exactly
who
gets
what
and
then
we
can
start
tweaking
a
little
bit
not
too
much
on
a
second
iteration
and
see
how
that
change
completely
change
the
distribution
little
by
little,
because
if
we
touch
two
or
three
different
things,
there's
no
way
we're
gonna
go
we're
gonna
know
why
that
happened,
because
it's
very
it's
very
difficult.
Everything
is
integrated.
H
A
Thanks
for
that
good
feedback
yeah,
we
still
have
a
few
other
things
to
go
through,
but
yeah.
I
think
it
would
be
very
helpful
to
set
up
this
this
hack
session,
where
it
would
be
the
start
of
the
committee
right
that
was
approved,
and
maybe
it's
a
good
timing.
Now,
since
we
have
this
data
to
move
forward
with
this
and
and
hello,
christopher
and
andy,
if
you
want
to
follow
us.
C
A
A
A
So
today
we
had
a
call,
and
we
had
the
idea
to
make
a
puzzle
so
we'll
put
all
of
the
all
of
the
pieces
in
the
mirror
board
and
and
have
a
session
that
each
one
can
make
their
own
puzzle
of
the
community,
and
I
think
this
will
be
like
a
great
insight
for
how
our
different
perspectives
shape
the
interaction
that
we
have
with
the
system.
So
we'll
have
multiple
perspectives
of
this
same
puzzle,
creating
different
images.
A
A
If,
if
everyone
can
jump
into
this
doc
or
just
follow
me
here,
I
started
to
put
up
to
to
put
this
together
to
be
the
the
forum
post
about
it.
So
tldrs
that
we
are
revisiting
the
mission,
vision,
values
and
proposing
news
using
tokenlock
to
pick
the
ones
and
everyone
can
participate
in
a
c-style
impact
holder
and
then
a
brief
explanation
of
what
we
did
in
the
past.
F
G
I
F
I
F
A
It
makes
sense,
so
so
I'll
add
them
here
and
then
the
next
question
I
had
was
for
jake,
but
he's
not
in
this
call,
but
I
sent
him
on
telegram
if
we
could
create
a
template,
so
people
will
get
into
token
log
we'll
have
a
repository
that
will
be
connected
to
github
and
they
just
click
on
new
issue,
and
I
was
hoping
that
this
new
issue
could
have
a
template,
a
specific
template
on
github
just
for
this
with
mission
vision,
values
and
then
people
submit
there.
I
think
that
shouldn't
be
that
hard.
A
F
Yeah,
they
won't
they'll,
never
be
anonymous,
but
that
doesn't
mean
we
need
to
have
their
name
in
the
title,
but
maybe
maybe
just
like
the
vision
or
a
top
value
or
or
maybe
we
let
yeah-
I
mean
I
don't
I
don't
know
I
don't
have.
I
don't
have
something
short,
though
the
vision's
supposed
to
be
short
right.
F
F
A
Okay,
the
only
reason
I
thought
to
put
the
name
the
name
on
it
is
because
we
were
talking
about
forking.
So
so
I
thought
what
if
someone
sent
like
a
mission
and
values
I
like,
but
I
want
to
change
the
vision,
then
I
would
copy
and
paste
their
mission
and
values
and
give
them
the
credit
we
discussed
briefly
on
the
last
call
how
it
would
be
cool
to
like
credit
people
by
by
their
submission.
A
If
I'm,
if
I'm
kind
of
forking
it
and
then
the
other
idea
was
to
like.
If
I
want
to
change
something
small
or
just
a
wording,
then
I
could
leave
a
comment
in
the
issue
and
the
owner
might
want
to
incorporate
or
not
and
if
they
incorporate,
then
I
don't
need
to
submit
another
one
and
if
they
don't
incorporate,
then
I'm
encouraged
to
submit
my
my
own
thing
with
fork
in
the
title
and
referring
to
their
proposal.
K
K
F
F
D
K
Yeah
yeah
yeah,
the
idea
I
had
it
would
would
have
been
cool
to
be
able
to
visualize
it
as
more
more
of
a
a
tree
like
this
is
a
this
is
the
initial
issue,
and
then
these
are
the
variants
of
that
actual
issue
which
would
be
possible.
I
guess
if
you
could
follow
the
you
could
reference
the
issues
and
an
an
issue
from
another
issue
in
in
the
text.
A
B
One
thing:
what
about
if,
instead
of
doing
a
fork,
let's
say
you,
you
maybe
make
a
a
proposal
and
I
talk
with
you
and
yeah.
We
tweak
something
and
because
like
if
I
just
do
my
fork
with
yeah,
I'm
just
brainstorming
like
if
it
would
be
like.
Maybe
I
think
differently,
and
I
just
want
to
take
some
parts
and
make
my
fork,
but
maybe
we
both
agree
and
like
you
would
want
to
include
my
feedback
there
or
or
is
it
just
better
just
to
fork
it
on
and
yeah.
A
Okay,
so
last
topic
was
the
handbook
processes
nate.
I
I
incorporated
your
feedback
of
how
we
don't
really
have
I
mean
I'm
in
the
middle
of,
but
we
didn't
really
have
all
our
processes
laid
out
and
talking
to
tim,
we
had
a
document
before
that
was
the
onboarding
guide
and
there
was
a
few
of
the
the
processes
there
that
I
think
he
was
already
more
elucidating.
A
C
A
B
A
C
Okay,
yeah,
that
makes
sense.
I
I
think
that,
under
the
tec,
boundaries
and
agreements,
instead
of
it
being
a
section,
it
should
be,
should
be
have
it
have
its
own
page
with
the
all
the
agreements
as
a
subsection
and
then
have
the
tec.
Boundaries
and
agreements
have
a
kind
of
an
explainer
page
of
what
these
things
mean,
because
just
looking
at
you
know,
transparency
or
gravity
or
conviction
voting
under
the
agreements.
You
know,
I
see
the
the
action
or
outcomes
required.
C
A
A
E
I
I
think
that
what
I
understand
of
why
and
it's
like
to
have
a
shared
writing
and
to
have
like
and
unified
yeah
a
common
framework
for
action
so
that
that
is
like
my
take,
and
I
I
think
it
it
yeah.
It
makes
sense
to
have
it
like
in
the
first,
because
it's
like
okay,
because
we
have
agreements
is
because
it
is
the
reason
that
we
can
build
things
over
our
agreements,
because
if
we
don't
have
agreements,
maybe
that
we
build
can
change.
E
B
A
J
J
J
I
J
Not
as
much
of
a
passive
voice
in
that
way
plus,
I
think
we
need
to
to
also
say
about
setting
expectations,
because
it
is
we're
all
agreeing,
but
we're
also
setting
expectations,
and
I
don't
know-
maybe
that
doesn't
make
sense
to
anyone
else.
But
I
think
the
term
setting
expectations
also
is
something.
People
are
familiar
with.