►
From YouTube: W56 Softgov WG: Miro board soft gov games! :D
Description
TheSoftgov Working Group researches and applies best practices for governance, social collaboration and contribution rewards while implementing Ostrom’s 8 principles for governing the commons in its foundation.
We gather every Tuesday at 7pm CET.
Steward: Liviade
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
Is
it's
been
really
hard
to
reach
out
to
snapchat
for
support?
I
wrote
them,
pedro
wrote
them
and
it's
not
working,
but
today
I
got
a
name
of
someone
that
can
help
so
I'll
try
again.
But
what
happened?
Was
he
created
a
strategy
that
transforms
the
rank
choice
into
quadratic
ring
choice,
but
then
everything
else
got
quadratic
too
so
quadratic
voting
now
is
actually
like
to
the
root
of
four.
A
B
So
I
mean
I'd
like
to
know
like
what
do
you
like?
We
have
a
nice
view
here
like
should
we
vote
for
the
multisig
now?
Should
we
wait
yeah,
I
don't
know
what
do
you
think,
for
example?
I
don't
know,
I
believe
in
say.
A
C
A
Well,
just
to
summarize,
when
we
jumped
in
quickly
before
before
the
beginning
of
the
call.
But.
A
A
A
So
so
maybe
we
just
take
a
moment
today,
some
point
of
the
day
to
send
a
sweet
message
to
griff
and
my
question
for
actually
I
was
not
even
gonna
go
in
the
agenda
today,
but
to
the
mirror
board.
I
have
a
few
things
for
us
to
do
and
reflect
on
having
a
lot
of
ideas
from
coming
from
the
reward
system.
A
A
A
So
we've
been
using
this
graph
here
in
the
rewards
group
to
to
think
about
contributions
that
happen
in
this
different
quadrants
of
the
ecosystem,
but
I
want
us
to
think
of
where
we
are
personally
in
this
quadrant
and
understanding
that,
like
this
awareness
of,
are
we
either
fast
and
so
social
or
technical
and
slow
or
social
and
slow
or
you
know.
Where
are
we
in
in
this
in
this
intersection
like?
A
How
far
are
we
like
super
social
and
fast
or
we're
kind
of
like
social
and
how
fast
or
I
think,
having
this
awareness
of
where
we
stand,
what
types
of
contributions
are
we
offering
can
help
us
to
deal
with
each
other
in
a
way
that's
lower
on
expectations?
You
know
like
we
know
where
each
person
is
so
it's
easier
to
to
set
expectations
on
things
that
we
say
we're
gonna
do
or
contributions
that
we
want
to
work
on
and
so
on.
A
D
It
is
very
cool
to
think
about
each
working
group
doing
this
yeah
right.
It
gives
context
yeah
and
how
different
it
would
show
how
different
it
would
look
for
each
tiny
ecosystem.
You
know
within
the
whole.
A
D
You
know
olivia,
you
just
described
something
I'm
in
the
lab
too,
and
I'm
really
realizing
that
livia
just
described
it,
and
now
I
understand
it
better
than
I
did
in
the
lab
so
libra.
Maybe
you
could
like
go
through
it
a
little
bit
and
give
just
an
example,
because
I
was
like
I
was
very
stuck
in
the
lab
on
it
just
being
about
welcoming
new
people,
and
I
was
like
that's
what
this
whole
section
is
about.
It
looks
like
other
people
might
be
confused
too,
so
maybe
you
could
do
a
little
walkthrough.
A
A
A
When
we
were
discussing
about
this
in
preparation,
he
said
well,
my
contributions
to
the
the
ecosystem
are
technical
and
slow,
like
I
analyze
data,
so
that
takes
time
and
that's
very
technical,
so
having
something
so
so
his
contributions
would
be
like
in
that
quadrant,
but
for
use
optimus,
for
example,
you
record
a
lot
of
calls
and
and
the
things
you
like
to
do
like
I
would
say
that
you're
like
in
the
intersection
of
social
and
technical
and
that
you're
fast
you
know,
you're
always
have
like
a
speed.
F
A
That
you
want-
and
I
don't
know
just
a
self
reflection
on
like
where
do
we
see
our
contributions
being
like?
Are
we
like?
Are
we
in
the
intersection
of
things?
Are
we
very
slow?
Are
we
very
fast?
Are
we
very
social,
very
technical
or
in
the
middle
and
and
then
we
can
just
talk
about
what?
Let's
do
this?
Let's
not
put
our
names
in
there.
Let's
just
give
around
and
talk
about
it
like
with
this
reflection.
C
Can
I
also
recommend
that
maybe,
rather
than
use
a
name-
and
you
know
pegging
someone
to
one
quadrant,
you
know
we
all
do
different
tasks
and
some
of
our
tasks
will
fit
in
one
quadrant
and
other
tasks
will
fit
in
another.
So
maybe
sort
of
a
role
or
a
piece
of
work
that
you
do
would
fit
in
a
quadrant
better
than
a
person
in
their
entirety.
Would.
D
C
Well,
let
me
let
me
maybe
just
can
I
can.
I
just
give
a
description
so
there's
certain
pieces
of
work
that
I
do
that
are
you
know
fast
and
social
lots
of
responses
on
discord
and
then
there's
pieces
of
work
that
I
do
like
writing
a
manifesto,
that's
slow
and
technical
and
so
like.
I
can
operate
in
these
different
modalities
and
depending
on
the
ta,
the
task
fits
into
the
quadrant,
but
I
don't
fit
into
one
quadrant
or
another.
I
just
have
tasks
that
fall
into
different
quadrants,
sometimes.
D
The
purpose
right,
yeah
so
you're,
putting
your
tasks
on
post-its
and
they're
being
generated
from
you,
you're,
not
putting
yourself
on
a
post-it
yeah.
Yes,
oh
that's
what
I
think
I
heard
the
naming
as
just
like,
so
we
know
who's
who
I
didn't
see
it
as
like
we're
going
to
put
ourselves
as
an
entity.
D
G
Yeah,
so
I
guess
my
question
is:
is
what
is
the
application
from
from
this
information
that
we
were
getting?
You
know
like
tam
said
each
function
is
going
to
fall
under
different
categories
that
just
to
make
sure
that
we
have
a
reward
system
that
matches
each
of
these
types
of
activities.
A
A
D
Oh,
I
see
those
fast
technical
things
that
people
do,
but
I
don't
see
those
slow
social
things
or
like
you,
don't
really
know
how
we
all
we
don't
none
of
us.
No,
no,
no
individual
knows
how
we
all
affect
the
ecosystem,
so
I
feel
like
this
is
just
really
bringing
a
lot
of
visibility
to
rewards.
I
hope
that
people
will
put
their
praises
in
there
too,
because
I
think
it's
cool
how
people
do
praises
so
differently
like
for
some
people.
D
E
For
me,
it's
interesting
the
concept
of
technical,
being
sort
of
the
opposite
of
social
or
in
another
spectrum
of
social.
E
I
do
not
completely
agree
on
that
characterization,
so
it's
interesting
to
see
how
it
will
come
out
because
yeah,
I
feel
that
we
have
found
out
that
are
some
cultural
processes
that
are
or
social
practices,
social
processes
that
are
actually
quite
heavy
and
technical
to
pull
out
so
yeah.
So
for
me,
it's
interesting
this
exercise
for
this
kind
of
awareness,
as
you
mentioned.
Yes,.
C
H
So
as
as
I
normally
do
when
I'm
looking
at
quadrants,
the
way
that
I'm
seeing
this
is
that
my
slow
social
thing
is,
is
that
I
kind
of
sit
back
and
observe
what
the
needs
of
people
are
and
then
the
slow
technical
part
is.
I
develop
graphics
and
you
know,
study
mental
models
and
things
that
may
or
may
not
be
appropriate
for
what's
going
on,
and
then
I
have
a
fast
technical
thing
where
I
might
then
see
how
something
you
know
in
that
contextual
framework,
then.
H
H
Having
listened
to
all
of
your
different
responses
to
this,
I
I
was
just
wanting
to
suggest
that
it
might
be
helpful
to
see
it
as
something
that
you're
actually
doing
in
terms
of
you
know.
You
know
slow
and
fast,
observing
and
responding.
Please,
and
thank
you
that
type
of
thing,
so
I
don't
know
if
that
helps
anyone,
but
that's
the
way
that
I
started
thinking
about
this.
E
E
The
fact
that
in
snapshot,
a
lot
of
dials
are
used
in
the
concept
of
temperature
check
or
getting
opinion
out
of
the
community
for
things
that
sometimes
here
we
call
it
signaling.
So
I'm
just
curious
to
understand.
For
me,
temperature
check
was
something
that
I
would
have
used
for
something
more
cultural
and
subjective
and
signaling
for
something
more
technical
and
objective,
but
I
have
seen
other
uses
of
the
same
wording
around,
so
I
was
just
interested
to
know
people's
opinions
about
it.
That's
it
just
a
simple
question:.
D
I
need
to
know
how
to
like
format
the
post
and
it's
a
really
slow
process
for
me,
because
I'm
not
familiar
with
it
so
and
and
I've
like
gone
through
several
like
drafting
processes
with
people
but
then
didn't
get
follow
through
with
like
onboarding
onto
that
particular
technical
writing.
This
is
not
a
complaint
by
the
way,
I'm
happy
with
how
it's
all
going,
I
don't
mind
but
like,
but
for
someone
damn,
I'm
just
going
to
use
using
at
least
for
someone
like
tam.
D
C
B
A
So
yeah,
I
just
wanted
to
give
an
opportunity
for
us
to
chat
about
this.
I
think
we
went
a
little
overtime
already,
but
I
haven't
heard
from
most
of
you
in
the
call.
So
do
you
have
anything
you
want
to
share
about
this
little
exercise
or
otherwise
we
could
jump
into
the
next
one,
but
it
would
be
cool
to
hear
some
reflections.
I
I
I'll
make
an
intervention,
a
quick
because
there's
a
lot
of
noise
here.
Sorry
again
this
I
find
it's
really
really
interesting.
I
I
don't
know
if,
like
it,
it
brings
me
a
lot
to
durgados's
kinephrim
framework
and
and-
and
I
feel
that
this
is
this-
is
going
to
help
a
lot
comes
contributors
to
like
know
the
differences,
because
I
I
find
it
very
interesting
that
some
social
stuff
seems
technical
and
vice
versa,
and
and
now
that
it's
being
put
here,
I
I
I
think
that
there
are
many
differences
that
could
enable
people
to
try
some
new
stuff
without
having
to
do
like
a
a
deeper
dive
into
technical
stuff.
E
Yeah
I
mean
I
like
the
idea
of
where
the
proposal
I
don't
know
if
the
sticker
is
there
just
for
placing
it
somewhere
else
or
is
it
there?
By
not
coincidence,
I
added
myself
I
added
the
one,
the
proposals
just
at
the
bottom,
the
most
corner
option
possible
of
the
technical
and
slow,
because
I
felt
that
the
proposal
thing
process
it's
something
that
is
correct,
like
whoever
put
it
in
the
middle
of
everything.
E
It's
such
a
such
a
process
that
involves
so
many
layers
that
it's
slow,
it's
it's
not
fast
by
no
means,
or
at
least
in
our
community,
has
not
been
fast,
and
so
it's
interesting.
I
I
found
that
appealing
to
sort
of
more
than
more
than
seeing
the
stickers.
E
I
would
like
to
know
the
reasoning
of
some
of
these
stickers
and
trying
to
understand
why
why,
for
that
person,
for
that
someone
that
sticker
meant
that
something-
and
I
think
it
would
be
really
helpful
for
certain
working
groups
to
see
this
also
as
an
option
to
sort
of
help
other
per
help.
Someone
else
to
make
it
less
low
or
to
make
you
know
to
have
to
just
certain
stickers
could
be
actually
understood
in
a
way
that
can
be
a
call
to
action
for
certain
things
right.
That's
it.
G
H
J
H
A
Yeah,
so
just
for
who
joined
recently,
we
were
doing
a
mapping
of
the
contributions
that
and
that
we
work
on
or
the
contributions
that
we
see
in
the
community
of
like.
Where
do
they
stand
on
this
x?
Are
they
either
social
or
technical
or
fast
or
slow?
And,
of
course,
there's
all
the
degrees
in
between
that?
A
So
yeah
really
really
cool
to
see
all
the
ones
that
were
here
already
and
then
the
other
thing
I
thought
about
today
was,
I
think
we
could
start
not
wrapping
up
but
like
coming
to
a
certain
conclusion
of
the
softcove
working
group
in
terms
of
like
looking
into
looking
into
it
from
the
cultural
build
perspective,
and
now
that
we're
getting
super
close
to
the
commons
upgrade
and
that
we're
going
to
be
like
a
fully
functioning
comments.
A
A
A
A
A
E
It's
funny
that
I
don't
know,
if
I
don't
know
if
you
are
still
in
costa
rica
or
is
the
topic
that
makes
us
think
very
similar,
but
I
was
thinking
on
this
of
it
could
be
really
nice
for
orientation.
Call
mainly
that
we
speak
about
austrian
principles,
but
there
is
we.
E
There
is
no
a
pin,
like
a
point
like
like
a
a
specific
example
of
how
the
dc
used
sales
from
principles
on
the
boundaries
and
all
these
all
on
all
the
principles
that
it
could
be
that
it
could
have
been
really
nice
to
sort
of
have
either
either
an
illustration
or
either
a
sort
of
like
hey.
This
is
a
practical
approach
of
this,
something
that
is
so
conceptual
sometimes
in
us
terms,
explanation
the
principles,
so
I.
A
A
C
No,
it
actually
feels
like
a
really
spectacular
exercise.
I
think
we
can
continue
to
work
on
this
and
that
yeah.
I
actually
really
like
this
exercise.
I
know
we've
thought
about
it.
A
few
times
we've
talked
about
it
in
some
of
the
case
studies
discussions,
but
this
feels
really
nice
to
have
such
a
large
group
participating
and
doing
this
and
have
so
much
different
yeah.
So
much
different
examples,
and
some
repeat
examples,
but
I
just
I
think
those
are
the
ones
that
are
just
like
super
clear
to
everyone.
C
G
Yeah,
thanks
tim,
so
I
I
second
that
I
think
this
is
an
amazing
exercise.
However,
I
I
do
kind
of
question
whether
or
not
some
of
these
things
are
actually
representative
of
ocean's
principles
or
not.
G
G
You
know
people's
opinions
on
some
of
these
examples
as
being
implemented
in
the
tec,
whether
it's
actually
reflective
of
ocean's
principles
or
just
something
that
we
kind
of
hope
it
is
and
maybe
not
in
practice
or
maybe
not
sustainable
over
the
long
term
yeah.
G
Those
are
just
my
initial
thoughts,
and
so
that's
just
something,
I'm
kind
of
critical
about,
but
yeah
outside
of
that.
I
think
this
is
a
really
good
exercise
and
something
we
should
keep
keep
doing
and
and
keep
monitoring
ourselves
on
so
yeah
I'll
pass
it
to
to
mitch.
J
Yeah
I
kind
of
jumped
in
full
tilt.
I
didn't
get
a
chance
to
start
working
on
the
second
row,
but
I
like
this
exercise
because
it
really
made
me
think
critically
about
each
principle
and
like
having
to
go
back
and
like
read
it
and
then
think
about
how
to
how
it
can
apply
to
ideally
what
we're
trying
to
create.
J
But
again,
like.
I
only
had
enough
brain
power
to
get
around
to
half
of
this
exercise.
But
I
thought
it
was
really
cool
I'll
pass
it
to
aloysius.
F
Thank
you,
I'm
still
downloading
into
my
brain.
What
exactly
all
of
the
principles
are?
I
can't
seem
to
get
unobsessed
with
collective
choice
arrangements
and
trying
to
figure
out
how
that
can
actually
be
a
thing
in
every
single
category.
So
that's
kind
of
what
I've
been
like
sitting
and
thinking
about.
F
K
Thanks
aloisius
yeah.
The
idea
that
I
have
to
add
is
that
I
pasted
ostrom's
work
below
the
tech
examples,
implementation
and
I
think
that
we
can,
with
the
metrics
think
of
a
criteria
like
if
we
have
three
met
metrics
to
measure
this
principle,
then
it's
robust.
K
But
if
we
have
like
one
metric
to
measure
the
the
the
a
principle,
then
it's
like
fragile,
fragile,
like
yeah.
Maybe
we
can
have
a
criteria
around
the
metrics
to
to
actually
see
how
is
like
the
robustness
of
of
of
the
application
of
of
the
principle,
and
I
will
pass
to
logo
note.
B
F
B
I
No
not
yet
septi.
Thank
you.
I
I
I
just
like
I.
I
really
love
this
exercise.
I
I
love
right
at
this
point,
the
the
perspective
it
brings.
I
I
don't
I
don't
think
I
can
add
much
to
what
has
been
said,
but
I
I
I
do
echo
safety
with
trying
to
do
this
more
often
and
and
yeah.
It
just
comes
like
got
a
great
point,
especially
with
new
outcomes,
contributors
to
be
able
to
explain
this
part,
which
sometimes
doesn't
seem
as
a
priority,
but
I
think
it's
the
most
important
thing
in
our
community
I'll
pass
it
to
cesar.
L
Everyone
yeah,
I
just
I'm
gonna
echo
what
everybody
said
great
tool.
It
reminds
me
of
a
tool
that
I
use
it's
called
objectives
and
cube
results
and
I'll
share
it
on
the
chat
for
anyone.
L
That's
interested
but
yeah,
I'm
still
getting
familiar
with
the
principles
themselves,
and
so
I
have
assigned
some
homework
for
myself
to
learn
like
what
is
each
principle
trying
to
achieve,
and
so
I'll
probably
contribute
more
once
once
I
have
a
better
understanding,
but
but
this
helps
me
a
lot
to
you
know,
learn
about
more
of
the
the
about
the
comments
so
great
exercise.
L
Let's
see
who
can
I
pass
it
to
sorry,
I'm
on
my
phone.
I
can't
see
anyone
can
olivia.
Can
you
pick
someone
who
hasn't
gone
yet.
A
No,
no
yeah,
sorry
we're
having
some
problems
hearing
you
feel
free
to
type
in
the
chat
too.
If
you
have
something
to
share
and
musashi
welcome,
you
got
in
the
end
of
the
call,
but
also
if
you
want
to
jump
in
the
board
and
contribute.
However,
you
you
can
feel
free.
We
were
just
looking
into
astrum's
principles
and
what
are
some
metrics
for
success
and
how
we
have
been
implementing
them
on
tc,
with
examples.
M
A
A
K
I
will
be
speaking,
I
prepared
a
case
to
have
a
role
play
and
we
will
be
talking
about
the
pops
that
yeah.
There
was
a
small
issue
about
it,
but
yeah.
We
can
talk
about
that
in
the
indigo.