►
From YouTube: W18 Softgov WG: Manifesto/Roadmap update and sourcecred.
Description
Timecodes:
00:00 - Manifesto/Roadmap update
09:00 - What's your favorite game?
21:55 - Sourcecred hack sesh
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/DDr5kYU
or say hello on Telegram http://t.me/CommonsStack
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/CommonsStack
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
A
A
A
So
we
can't
contribute
anymore,
but
you
can
see
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
data
and
a
lot
of
inputs
that
we
had
in
the
first
iteration
of
this
working
group
that
was
yeah.
It
was
mostly
we
were
working
on
this
board.
So
all
of
the
things
in
blue
are
things
that
we
accomplished
already,
and
this
board
also
like
there's
a
comment
here
for
things
that
are
in
progress.
A
So
this
is
cool
to
check
it
out
when
you
have
the
time
and
how
will
this
benefit
the
tc
community,
it's
mostly
from
ensuring
a
safe
transition
from
the
cultural
build
phase
to
the
launch
commons
by
having
like
a
strong
culture
that
will
resist
the
winds
of
a
token
being
launched
and
what
is
considered.
Success
should
have
a
contribution
reward
system
such
as
praise
or
source
credit,
or
both
that
continues
to
reward
self-governance
contributions.
A
And
then
this
session
is
a
little
bit
not
so
like
in
order
and
that's
why
I'm
gonna
show
the
the
road
map
of
what
are
the
clear
milestones.
So
I
have
have
forum
posts
and
github
issues
for
those
items
that
are
brainstorming
contribution
reward
systems.
So
we
have
done
that
already
and
now
we're
in
the
phase
of
actually
like
working
on
it
and
then
the
principle
one
and
two
that
are
the
rules
and
boundaries
propose
a
written
agreement.
A
So
once
the
code
of
conduct
git
book
is
finished,
then
we
will
propose
that,
and
that
will
be
the
disagreement
if,
if
we
think
these
are
the
boundaries
of
the
tc
and
then
three
experiment
the
advice
process
in
the
forum
as
part
of
submitting
a
proposal,
that's
also
there
and
we've
been
talking
more
about
how
to
use
the
advice
process
in
in
general,
not
only
when
submitting
proposals
and
then
syncing
with
the
legal
working
group.
That's
happening,
it's
pretty
much
done
and
then
the
brainstorm
of
accountability
methods.
A
Transparency
came
came
up
like
amazingly,
and
it's
taking
care
of
this
part
and
we've
been
working
together.
Sync
with
conflict
management,
working
group
and
all
the
work
that
you
guys
have
been
seeing
from
gravity
and
then
ensuring
our
fractal
configuration
towards
the
community
stewards
working
group.
C
A
This
this
beautiful
roadmap
is
props
to
tamara
and
that
organized
us
into
having
like
all
of
this
multiple,
so
many
things
happening
and
sorry
tam.
I
moved
something
here
that
doesn't
look
that
great,
but
so
the
phase
that
we
are
at
with
softgov
right
now
is
working
on
proposals
for
working
groups.
So
if
anyone
has
needs
help
to
propose
anything,
you
can
talk
to
me
and
we
can
ensure
that
the
process
is
is
happening
and
it's
flowing,
and
if
there
is
any
problem
we
can
change,
it
figure
it
out.
A
This
is
the
time
and
it
has
been
working.
So
there
are
proposals
once
in
a
while
in
the
forum,
and
we
have
the
three
sessions
and
we've
been
creating
this
culture
of
voting
mostly
on
the
weekend.
So
people
know
that
always
like
friday
saturday
sunday
is
the
day
to
like
check
out.
If
there's
any
proposals
open
for
voting
in
the
forum
and
then
during
the
week
it's
when
those
proposals
are
posted
there.
A
So
we
can
create
this
flow
and
then
the
cultural
agreement
is
the
handbook,
like
I
said,
and
the
reward
system
and
praise
integration
is
the
source
grant
and
what
we're
working
on
right
now
so
yeah.
I
just
wanted
to
share
with
you
guys,
because
we
haven't
done
that
in
in
this
call,
and
then
I
want
to
jump
to
this
intro
question
since
we're
talking
about
source
cred
and
I
think
there's
so
much
about
game
design
and
things
that
we
can
learn
with
with
games
with
reward
systems
with
punishment
mechanisms.
A
D
Griff
my
favorite
game,
and
why
man,
that's
so
tough,
I
don't
know
I
used
to
I
used
to
love
tetris.
I
don't
know
I
really
like
tetris
and
why
just
nostalgia,
probably
I
had
like
a
we
used
to
play
it
in
math
class,
like
on
our
calculators
and
have
like
secret
competitions
for
high
scores,
I'll
pass
it
to
olivia.
A
That's
not
fair,
I
didn't
think
it
would
come
to
me.
I
think
one
of
my
favorite
games
is
chess.
Just
because
I
started
it
was
the
first
game,
maybe
not
the
first
but
one
of
the
first
games.
I
learned
how
to
play
my
mom
used
to
work
in
this
in
this
square
that
had
a
a
library
in
front
of
it
and
every
time
I
was
born
in
her
work.
E
I'm
busy
answering
some
some
things
here.
Thank
you,
santi.
Well,
my
favorite
game
definitely
is
heroes
of
the
storm.
I
was
actually
competing
on
this
game.
The
most
interesting
feature
is
like
you
are
on
a
team
with
five
with
four
other
guys,
and
you
have
like
this.
This
same
goal
and
you
work
together
so
hard
and
yeah.
Just
the
team
sharing
is
awesome
and
yeah
it's
kind
of
competitive,
so
I
was
having
so
much
fun
I'll
pass
it
to
check.
A
G
F
God,
okay!
Well,
I
was
just
saying
that
I
didn't
really
play
video
games,
but
I
did
really
like
the
god
of
war
series.
I
thought
that
was
fun.
Kratos
was
fun
but
honestly,
like
one
something
we
used
to
do,
we
always
went
out
a
lot.
You
know
like
like
outside
remember
when
kids
would
go
outside,
but
yeah
so
we'd
go
up
in
the
horseshoe
mountains
and
while
we
were
getting
stoned
and
we
would
catch
rattlesnakes,
so
the
trick
about
catching
a
rattlesnake
is
one
person's
gotta.
F
F
You
know,
bite
your
nose
but
like
you're
getting
pretty
close
and
you
gotta
you
gotta,
lock
eyes
on
it
and
just
stare
at
it
dead
in
the
eyes,
and
you
can't
move
and
that
snake
will
just
sit
there
and
do
the
same
thing
and
it's
just
rattling.
And
then
your
body
comes
up
from
way
back
around
and
sneaks
right
up
behind
it
and
the
snake
won't
know
because
it's
just
locked
on
you
and
then
your
body
grabs
it
and
then
we
catch
rattlesnakes.
F
G
F
G
G
G
All
right
well
on
the
jake
theme,
after
years
of
riding
horses
that
no
one
else
would
get
on
along
country,
roads
and
through
fields
and
such
like,
with
no
fences
etc.
My
favorite
game,
my
favorite
game,
it
it's
been
tetris
and
it's
been
oh
dang.
I
forgot
the
name
of
it.
Now
it
doesn't
matter.
My
favorite
game
is
blossom
blast
saga
where
you
connect
three
or
more
flowers
and
they
explode
in
this
juicy
thing,
and
I
like
it
because
it
just
stimulates
my
color
receptors
and
that's
all
I've
got
about
it.
H
So
I'm
like
olivia,
I
grew
up
playing
chess
and
I
really
loved
chess
and
when
I
was
younger
in
my
early
20s,
I
lived
on
sullivan
street
and
it's
three
blocks
away
from
washington
square
park,
where
you
could
pick
up
a
lot
of
games,
mostly
speeches
almost
exclusively
speeches
and
there's
two
great
chess
shops
on
thompson
street
around
the
corner.
For
me
where
I
spent
a
lot
of
time,
so
I
spent
a
lot
of
time
playing
chess
and
I
would
say,
probably
for
a
good
10
years.
H
I
spent
most
of
my
time
playing
chess.
I
really
loved
it
and
I
haven't
played
in
a
very
long
time.
So
now
my
favorite
game
is
poker.
I
really
enjoy
poker
and
I
think,
both
of
them,
because
they're
very
psychological
games
with
a
little
with
a
little
bit
of
like
strategy
on
top.
Like
so
they're
like
it's
like
strategy
and
math,
and
those
like
combined
really
nicely
together
and
santa
you
look
like
you're
ready
to
fall
past.
You.
I
B
Was
a
kid
so
I
used
to
play
pinball
I
was
the
people
king
and
then
you
know
what
happened.
Spazing,
batters
came.
So
that's.
Why
that's
the
game
I
was
playing
and
that
was
about
it.
I
became
older.
I
went
to
college
and
I
never
really
got
into
gaming.
I
played
a
little
bit
here
then
my
kid
was
born
and
he
was
chasing
me
to
play
mario
karts
with
him
and
I
was
unable
to
play
at
all.
He
had
to
play
his
game
and
my
game.
At
the
same
time,.
G
J
One
hey
guys
so
for
me:
there
yeah
that's
a
tie
between
the
legend
of
zelda
and
chrono
trigger
because
they
marked
my
my
infants
in
my
childhood
that
those
were
the
games
that
made
me
fall
in
love
with
computing.
Actually,
so
that's
a
funny
story
because
I
didn't
have
access
to
a
nintendo
or
a
console,
a
gaming
console,
so
I
had
to
find
a
way
to
play
and
by
those
years
there
were
emulators
running
on
pc.
J
So
the
only
way
I
had
to
play
those
games
were
running
in
a
not
so
legal
way,
a
pirate
version
of
those
those
games
so
yeah
and
I
loved
it
because
there's
something
really
cool
about
rpgs
and
nostalgia
and
those
in
particular
the
music,
the
storytelling
the.
How
the
the
puzzles
that
you
need
to
solve.
I
don't
know
I
I
really
love
it,
so
I
I
think
that's
that's!
It
alba
said.
K
Thanks
matteo,
I
think
I
love
soccer
because
it's
like
just
one
team
is
made
of
11
players
and
er.
All
of
them
have
to
like
play
in
sync
and
it's
a
lot
of
like
teamwork,
but
also
like
there
is
a
lot
of
individuality,
and
I,
like
I,
love
how
it
is
seen
from
so
many
different
angles
to
analyze
each
play
and
yeah.
I
think
it's,
it's
amazing.
C
L
Yeah,
so
I'm
I'm
a
big
fan
of
what
tam
was
talking
about
earlier.
I
was
a
big
fan
of
strategy
games,
things
like
poker
and
magic,
the
gathering
and
so
on,
but
I
think
my
favorite
one
of
all
time
was
definitely
a
sega
genesis.
Game
called
lion
king
and
I
don't
know
why
I
just
have
so
many
fond
memories
of
playing
that
video
game,
and
it
was
just
amazing
so
I'll
put
that
one
as
my
favorite.
M
Yeah,
so
I
was
thinking
I
don't
know,
maybe
my
my
favorite
game,
but
I
really
enjoyed
watching
it
as
as
a
kid
it
was
called
supermarket
sweeps,
and
I
was
thinking
about
it
recently
because,
as
we
move
into
a
world
of
programmable
money,
I
just
think
it's
fascinating.
The
way
in
it
was
both
a
quiz
show
of
like
trivia,
and
then
you
would
have
this
opportunity
to
go
crazy
in
a
supermarket,
and
you
had
to
pick
out
the
most
expensive
stuff,
which
was
shocking.
A
A
B
B
B
J
Sorry
in
a
second,
I
wanted
to
mention
something
cool
that
I'm
not
sure
if
I
missed-
or
it
was
a
really
cool
update,
the
source
spread
guys
did
and
it's
work.
It
helped
us
really
nice
for
us
today,
because
if
you
hover
your
mouse
in
the
title
of
the
interaction,
it
shows
you
a
little
pop-up
explaining
in
better
words
what
that
means.
So
I
think
they
made
a
better
work
in
that
trying
to
explain
it
than
me,
because
I
didn't
go
into
much
detail
between
those.
J
So
when
we
are
going
to
each
one
of
them,
I
I
think
we
can
read
the
paragraph
that
they
put
in
there
and
and
try
to
analyze
how
much
the
value
should
be
that
that's
just
something
I
wanted
to
mention
before
here
in
the
document,
because
it's
really
cool.
If
you
go
to
the
to
the
source
explorer,
you
can
now
see
it.
I
J
B
B
Anyone
who
wants
to
can
go
into
this
window.
The
link
is
in
the
document
and
we
are
probably
going
to
be
able
to
show
that
document.
Can
you
share
it
already
on
on
the
channel
on
the
subgovernment
channel,
so
anyone
can
can
open
it
up
if
they
want.
So,
if
you,
if
you
go
to
this
explorer,
this
is
where
all
the
configurations
are
set
up,
and
this
is
what
that
can
be
changed.
All
right.
B
So,
what's
important,
is
that
anyone
who
wants
understands
exactly
what
are
the
actions
that
have
some
somehow
some
power
right
now
they
are
not
zero,
okay
and
and
if
you
have
any
issue
against-
or
you
need
a
specific
explanation
on
that,
because
you
don't
really
understand
what
it
means
just
request
it
to
us.
We
think
this
is
fine
to
start,
there's,
no
good
or
bad
way,
there's
no
good
or
bad
parameters.
We
just
have
to
experiment.
We've
been
experimenting
for
quite
a
while.
B
Any
of
those
parameters,
so
the
idea
is
that
you
understand
that
we're
going
to
go
through
the
github
ones
with
temera,
which
is
the
one
that
is
more,
might
be
able.
We
might
be
able
to
switch
two
or
three
on
the
github
area
that
that
are
now
the
way
you
see
them
and
and
after
that
we
will
create
the
post
on
the
forum
to
request
for
voting
to
launch
okay.
B
So
today
is
your
time
to
ask
any
any
questions
on
any
of
those
that
you
may
that
you
may
think
you
don't
really
understand
what
the
actions
are
and
and
or
or
you
don't
think
or
you
don't
understand
exactly
the
weight.
You
know
you
every
every
one
of
those
levels
can
go
from
0
to
32
and
it's
not
really
the
amount.
It's
the
comparison
between
the
others.
B
J
Okay,
so
the
main
difference
is
the
ones
up.
Here
are
the
main
actions
of
the
platform
so
that
there
you
can
see
the
whatever
actions
that
happens
through
the
repository
through
the
issue.
The
pull
request
for
request,
review
comments
commits
and
the
bots,
so
this
means
that
this
is
the
whole
value
that
is
going
to
be
given
to
the
to
this
kind
of
interactions
that
are
more
explicitly
described
below.
J
So,
for
example,
in
this
moment
we
are
only
giving
a
thread
to
the
pull
request,
interactions
and
the
pull
request
reviews
the
pull
request
so
far
is
getting
a
forex
for
multiplier
and
the
review
is
getting
one
multiplier
for,
for
the
credit,
do
you
guys
think
we
should
give
more
value
to
another
kind
of
interactions?
Like
comment
commits
repository
before
we
jump
in
and
and
check
the
interactions
that
describe
it.
H
So
pull
requests
may
be
appropriate
for
the
software
development
projects,
but
they
are
used
exactly
zero
times
for
any
of
the
working
groups,
for
example.
So
it
sort
of
depends
the
behavior
that
we
want
to
encourage.
If
we
want
to
encourage
people
to
open
issues
and
close
issues
and
that
are
related
to
the
working
groups,
then
these
parameters
wouldn't
make
sense
today,
although
that
might
make
sense
for
the
work
for
the
software
development
streams.
So
the
sources
so
anyone
who's
developing
software
and
is
actually
merging
from
the
project
management
perspective.
H
We're
not
merging
code,
we're
just
opening
issues,
planning
them
in
our
sprints
and
then
closing
them.
I
would
say
of
any
of
them
in
this
sort
of
top
the
top
section.
The
only
two
that
would
have
any
relevance
to
the
working
groups
would
be
the
issues
and
commit
sorry
and
comment,
and
I
guess
my
question
would
around
issue
would
be.
What
does
that
actually
entail?
Is
that
somebody's
assigned
to
the
issue
or
somebody
opens
an
issue
or
somebody
closes
an
issue
or
any
action
with
a
state
change
of
the
issue.
H
J
A
little
bit
more
more
described
below
because
in
his
hope
there
is
something
particular
that
almost
every
action
in
the
platform
has
the
same
inter
kind
of
interactions.
For
example,
you
can
give
a
heart
to
a
pull
request
or
a
comment
or
an
issue,
so
everything
that
you
make
there
has
the
same
kind
of
interactions.
J
H
Yeah,
we
could
forget
all
of
the
emojis
because
we're
we're
using
a
different
layer
that
we're
using
zenho.
So
we
don't
have
that
to
date
in
zenhub
we
don't
use
the
emojis,
so
you
can't
like
or
heart
particular
issues
but
like
if
I
try
to
to
go
through
an
exact
case.
Let's
say
comment
references
so
comment
reference.
It
let's
say
I
I
mentioned
mateo
in
a
comment.
Is
that
the
equivalent
of
comment,
and
then
the
edge
case
you
know
alpha
references
beta?
Is
that
what
that
would
represent?
That.
J
J
You
need
to
like
check
what
what
is
being
given
the
value
in
what
direction.
So
that's
what
alpha
and
beta
is
representing
the
nodes
in
the
graph
and
the
interaction
is
what
whatever
is
happening
through
the
edge.
So
in
most
cases,
alpha
and
beta
is
just
trying
to
to
set
a
particular
flow
in
one
direction
and
the
other
one
is
regularly
ignored,
for
example
in
the
references.
J
H
And
does
that
apply
to
these
one
two,
three,
four:
five:
six:
do
the
edge
weights
apply
to
the
five
nodes
above
there's
node
weights
and
edge
weights,
so
the
node
weights?
I
guess
I'm
trying
to
see
like
I
guess,
I'm
trying
to
unders,
it's
still
very
theoretical
for
me
and
I
guess
maybe
more
tangible,
just
to
see
what
action
would
cause
some
some
credit
to
be
gained
or
awarded
or
grains
to
be
awarded.
J
J
You
you
have
a
complete
weight,
the
forex,
let's
say,
and
if
we
consider
every
interaction
between
one
eighth,
one,
fourth,
one
and
a
half
that
should
be
contemplating
only
the
four
that
that
the
interaction
is
is
is
having
right
at
the
moment
if
a
commit
or
both
has
zero
x.
Everything
everything
below
in
here
is
completely
ignored
because
it
won't
multiply.
J
J
B
So,
as
I
understand,
if
let's
say
someone,
someone
creates
an
issue
and
that
issue
is
created
and
it
has
a
4x,
because
issues
has
forex
the
way
they
are
right
now
and
then
that
once
that
issue
is
created,
we
we
see
that
there's
the
author
on
the
on
the
lower
on
the
lower
group
of
actions.
There's
the
there's
the
author,
so
the
author
gets
one
x
out
of
that
four
x
that
was
created
because
it's
a
it's
the
author
of
the
issue.
B
Okay,
then,
if
there's
a
if
there's
what
else
can
we
think
of
on
an
issue
like
a
reference
if
reference
had
something,
then
right
now
is
zero.
But
if,
if
you
would
refer
someone
on
an
issue,
you
would
get
something
okay,
so
you
you
have
to
think
on
actions
have
specific
power
and
the
top
ones
are
actions,
and
those
are
there's
many
things
you
can
do
with
those
actions
you
can
put
so
the
amount
that
an
action
is
given
it's
distributed
between
all
the
all
the
different
behaviors.
H
B
H
Specifically,
specifically
on
github,
I
would
love
that
actually,
but
can
we
try
changing
the
settings
now
like
drop,
pull
request
and
pull
request,
review
to
zero
and
lead
issue
and
comment
at
four
or
whatever
you
think
is
saying
there
and
then
from
the
bottom
draw
I
mean
just
drop
all
of
the
emojis
to
zero
because
I'm
100
sure
those
won't
be
used,
and
then
it
would
be
great.
If
we
could
do
this
and
then
we
could
see
the
results,
and
I
think
that
will
make
things
a
lot
more
clearer.
If.
B
We
could
okay.
Do
you
think
it's
gonna
be
easier,
it's
go.
Do
you
think
it's
gonna
be
easier
to
keep
all
the
actions
at
times
one
and
or
or
is
it
better
to
keep
some
with
a
higher
percentage
than
others
to
try
to
see
the
outcome?
You
think
it's
going
to
be
easier
to
measure
if
we
keep
them
all
on
the
same.
H
I
P
H
B
You
know
what
I'm
gonna
try
to
do.
I
I
don't
know,
I
don't
think
I'll
have
time
this
week,
but
if
we
change
them
next
week,
I'm
gonna
try
to
work
on
the
huge
data
file
that
gets
generated
every
six
hours.
I
think,
and
let's
let's
experiment
you
can
you
can
experiment
with
your
with
your
user
and
then
I'll
try
to
graph
all
the
info
from
your
user,
and
we
can
both
check
all
that
information.
B
Okay,
I
I
I
will
have
to
just
you
know
fight
with
that
fire,
because
it's
it's
it's
huge,
but
I'll,
try
to
get
it.
If
I
don't
succeed,
I
may
just
ask
for
help,
but
I'll
try
to
get
it.
If
I
get
it,
then
we
can
just
dive
into
absolutely
everything.
That's
there
and
see
if
it's
reacting
the
way
we
expect-
and
you
expect
that
react
and
and
and
then
from
there
we
we
will
be
for
sure.
You
know
that
everything's
going
on
the
direction
that
we're
expecting.
J
As
soon
as
we're
done,
I
save
it
and
when
we
decide
to
put
it
live,
I
just
update
the
instance
with
it,
but
I
wanted
to
mention
that,
with
this
current
configuration
we
can.
I
haven't
tried
this
really
much,
but
if
we
recompute
the
credit,
we
can
check
it
out
right
now.
As
a
for
me
of
simulation,
it
is
not
implying
that
the
source
code
is
being
changed
right
now,
so
when
it
ends,
I
think
we
can
check
out
again
the
the
values
and
see
how
much
they
they
could
have
changed
yeah,
but.
B
The
problem
is
that
you
have
you:
have
the
total
of
credit.
You
don't
have
every
single
action
impact.
That's
the
thing.
You're
gonna
see
that
maybe
tam
from
changing
the
parameters
instead
of
getting,
I
don't
know,
3.5
is
going
to
get
4.5,
but
you're
not
going
to
go
you're
not
going
to
know
where
that
difference
is
going.
It's
coming
from.
B
L
So
tim
I
was,
I
was
going
to
ask
real
quick.
Instead
of
changing
the
the
you
know
the
emojis
to
zero,
would
it
would
it
not
be
better
to
actually
just
change
our
procedures
up
to
accommodate
for
source
cred
in
the
short
term
and
then
adjust
accordingly
later
on,
because
I
I
know
you've,
you
know
I
I've
done
like
some
work,
but
I
I
don't
really
necessarily
follow.
You
know
the
github
issues
like
you'll
pull
a
github
issue
for
me,
but
it's
not
necessarily
I'll
close
it
out
or
anything
like
of
that
nature.
L
However,
if
we
you
know
if
it's
like
this
is
the
procedure
of
how
you're
supposed
to
do
this,
to
make
sure
that
you
get
the
source
credit
that
you
need
to
get,
then
we
can
utilize
those
functions.
I
know
that
you
may
you
said
that
the
emojis
don't
really
work
within
github.
Is
that
what
I
understand
yeah.
H
H
B
O
O
P
Yeah,
I'm
completely
allergic
to
github
and
zen
hub
both.
So
I,
the
only
way
in
which
I
contributed
all
is
via
this
discord
and
conversations,
and
so
I
just
makes
it
think
that
that
there's
a
whole
bunch
of
things
about
what
I'm
doing,
I'm
not
doing
much
recently,
I
know,
but
that
in
the
past
I
had
been,
and
none
of
that
was
on
github,
and
none
of
that
was
on
xenhub.
So
I
just
wonder
how?
How
does
that
work.
B
Yeah
we,
we
are
still
going
to
be
keeping
the
praise
rewards,
because
we
understand
that
there's
things
that
we
can
get
from
source
cred
that
it's
hard
to
catch
on
on
the
praise
reward
system
that
we
have
right
now
and
the
opposite.
So
it's
not
that
one
is
going
to
replace
the
other
we're
going
to
keep
on
both
for
a
while
see,
of
course,
we're
going
to
keep
seeing
how
we
can
improve
and
we
can.
B
L
It
and
santa
I
have
one
more
question
for
you
in
terms
of
the
the
parameters
for
for
the
source:
cred.
Are
there
going
to
be
justifications
that
are
defined
over
time
of
like
what?
What
type
of
value
you
know
you
know
which
each
of
these
edge
weights
have
and
each
of
these
node
weight
weights
have
and
are
they
updatable
as
we
go
on.
B
They
are
updatable
anytime.
My
idea
and
that's
my
personal
idea,
and
we
have
to
reflect
that
on
on
some
forum
post
for
everyone
to
vote-
is
that
we
set
up
a
procedure
where
anyone
in
the
community
can
raise
the
hand
and
say
hey.
I
think
we
should
give
credit
to
the
emojis,
because
now
we're
using
github,
okay
and
then
the
community
boats,
and
if
the
boat
passes
we
just
switch
it.
It's
just
a
matter
of
doing
it,
it's
mateo
or
me,
or
whoever
has
power
on
that
and
that's
another
issue
that
we
have
to
discuss.
B
Do
we
create
a
group
that
takes
care
of
this,
because
if
we
we
cannot
give
control
to
these
two
many
people,
okay
and
within
that
group,
probably
we're
gonna
need
consensus
too.
So
there's
gonna
be
two
or
three
levels
of
you
know
of
stages
that
we
will
have
to
go
through,
but
these
parameters
are
there
to
be
changed
because
the
community
is
gonna
change.
Now
we're
using
zenhub,
we
may
switch
to
github
and
beat
up.
You
know,
brings
more
functionality
that
works
for
us.
B
You
know
even
getting
rid
of
source
cred,
because
maybe
after
a
few
months
we
decided
okay.
This
is
not
what
we
expected.
Let's
forget
about
subscribe
and
you
know
and
kill
it.
So
my
idea
is:
is
that
we
launch
we
monitor,
we
start
giving
away
cred,
because
once
you
start
giving
money
real
money,
things
start
behaving
slightly
different
than
when
you're,
playing
or
testing
and
and
then
have
a
procedure
established
that
anyone
on
a
really
relatively
quick
manner,
especially
if
there's
cheating
that
we
appreciate
we
can
switch
right
away.
B
You
know,
or
at
least
stop
or
freeze
someone
until
we
can.
You
know
quickly
check
what
happened
there
and
and
discuss
internally.
If
you
know
if
it
was
worth
or
not,
we
can
free
someone
for
a
week
or
for
a
period
and
without
we
have
doubts
and
we
have
to
meet
with
that
specific
person
and
ask
you
know
for
for
any
explanation
of
the
behavior,
because
we
think
that
it's
not
you
know
reasonable
and
and
after
and
after
their
explanation,
we
it's
our
mistake
and
then
we
just
activate
it
again.
B
So
these
parameters
are
there:
they
can
be
switched
any
single
time.
It's
just
a
matter
of
really
understanding
how
they
are.
Sometimes
it's
better
to
look
at
the
wider
picture.
You
know
these
are
very
a
bunch
of
levels
if
you
perceive
that
you're
contributing
and
you're
getting
what
you
expect,
and
you
always
have
to
check
that
compared
to
the
others.
Okay,
I've
been
more
active
this
week,
especially
on
github.
I've
been
doing
all
this
work
and
I
haven't
got
any
questions.
I
haven't
noticed
any
difference
between
last
week.
How
come
my
actions
are?
B
A
Yeah,
I
think
I
think
it's
good
to
see
this
as
a
data
collection
mechanism
to
improve
our
system
of
rewards
and
of
participation
and
if
it
works
as
like.
The
main
thing,
that's
awesome,
but
if
not
it's
a
win-win
situation,
because
we're
gonna
be
understanding
so
much
about
how
our
contributions
work
from
this.
B
Right,
the
first
of
us
sorry,
the
first
point
nate
is
to
is
to
compensate
contributions,
but
the
the
you
know
the
side
benefit
is
what
libby
mentioned.
We
can
analyze
how
the
community
is
behaving.
Are
we
using
github
as
much
as
we
should
be
using
it
or
not?
Do
we
push
this
level
a
little
bit,
so
people
start
putting
the
issues
when
they
have
to?
You
know.
I
know
it's
not
probably
the
best
way
to
give
rewards,
but
it's
a
way
to
improve
if
it's
a
way
to
improve
and
and
it
works.
H
H
Are
we
do
we
want
to
to
encourage
those
same
behaviors
at
the
same
scale
as
what's
said
for
discourse
right
now,
which
I
see
we're
only
setting
likes,
but
not
posts
or
topics?
And
I
wonder
if
that's
what
we
we
don't
want
to
encourage
posting
it
seems.
Or
do
we
want
to
reward
post
people
posting
or
are
we
afraid
that
that's
going
to
become
a
spammy
action?
If
that's
one
of
the
one
of
the
settings.
B
B
You
know
my
intention
is
that
whoever
posts
is
because
that's
the
medium
of
communication
in
the
community,
and
I
think
and
that's
a
personal
sense,
that
it
shouldn't
be
rewarded,
because
it's
the
voice
of
the
group
he's
working
on
or
the
action
that
it's
just
a
way
of
communicating
to
the
community.
What
we're
doing
we
need
to
vote.
We
need
to
show
you
what
we're
doing
so.
It's
part
of
my
work,
I'm
working
on
legal.
If
I
have
to
put
something
related
to
legal,
that's
that's
the
place
where
I
put
it.
I
shouldn't
be
compensated.
B
I
get
compensated
for
working
on
legal,
not
for
posting
what
I'm
doing
on
legal,
okay,
but
that's
the
way.
I
say
it
again.
This
is
it's
here
to
to
discuss
and
and
to
test
and
to
measure,
and
if,
after
two
weeks
of
measurements,
we
see
that
we
have
a
bunch
of
spam,
we
just
put
it
to
zero
again
and
we're
just
gonna
post
those
that
really
think
that
need
to
be
those
things
that
really
need
to
be
posted.
F
Well,
speaking
of
the
post,
I
mean
that
could
be
a
moderator's
job
as
well,
because
if
somebody
that
isn't
actually
paid
and
is
contributing
and
is
going
out
of
their
way
to
specifically
write
something
about
bonding
curves,
that's
not
really
just
something,
and
I
would
like
to
be
able
to
see
that
individual
that
spent
the
time
to
write
in
a
way
others
could
understand
it
actually
rewarded
for
his
time
but
being
a
moderator.
As
I
am
I'm
an
admin
of
the
of
the
forum,
then
I
mean
I
could
simply
you
know.
F
B
B
B
I
F
B
I
want
to
see
is
that
I
contributed
for
what
I
think
is
my
contribution
to
the
community
and
pivotal.
You
know
if
you're
gonna
have
to
be
dealing.
If
this
is
half
I'm
gonna
give
a
like
or
I'm
gonna
post
here,
I'm
gonna
post
there,
I'm
not
here
to
mess
around
with
you
know
all
these
leveraging
source
cred
I
get.
I
don't
know
one
impact
hour.
B
Fine,
I
don't
see
anyone
that
has
complained
any
time
about
the
impact,
hours
and
they're,
far
away
more
subjective,
and
if
any
of
you
ever
does
one
of
those
sunday
you
know
sessions,
you
will
realize
so
why?
Because
you
contribute,
you
see
you're,
getting
rewarded,
you
you
think
it's
fine
great,
of
course.
B
If
you
reward
a
lot
and
you
see
that
you
don't
get
contribution
for
the
amount
of
effort
you
put
in,
you
may
just
raise
your
hand
and
try
to
see
what's
going
on
there
and
that's
what
we're
gonna
try
to
put
there.
Try
to
analyze
the
data
a
little
bit
deeper
than
what
the
guys
at
source
credit
are
doing.
They
don't
have
any
tools
to
do
that.
We
we
are
starting
to
create
them
and
we
will
try
to
use
them
to
measure,
or
at
least
try
to
get
the
information
as
accurate
as
possible.
H
Yeah
sure
I
would
like
to
make
the
case
for
adding
post
and
assuming
people
are
innocent
until
proven
guilty,
and
if
we
see
it
being
abused,
then
we
can
take
it
off
because
we
do
want
people
to
post
and
if
it's
something
that
they
know
that
will
have
some
sort
of.
You
know
that
it's
that
we
show
our
appreciation
for
them
taking
the
time
to
post.
Then
I
think
it's
it's
beneficial
to
us
and
if
we
find
that
it's
being
abused,
we
can
always
change
it
afterwards.
B
That's
great,
I
think,
we're
on
the
top
of
the
hour.
We
can
continue
tomorrow
on
the
meeting
that's
already
scheduled.
I
invite
anyone
to
join
us
tomorrow
for
the
meeting
we're
going
to
focus
expressly
on
on
this
and
and
it's
fine
if
someone
posts
the
wrong
way,
we
have
jake.
That
knows
how
to
deal
with
these
snake
rattles
and
he
can
probably
use
one
of
those.