►
From YouTube: W2 Soft Gov WG: Fractal Communication, Post-Hatch Transition, Decentralization, Conflict Resolutions
Description
In our recent call, we discussed the issues we need to address as we move forward, especially after the hatch:
• Language barriers
• Reward structures and praise quantifications
• Power distribution
• Decentralization and accountability
• Conflict resolutions
Let us know your thoughts in the Comments section below!
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/DDr5kYU
or say hello on Telegram http://t.me/CommonsStack
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/CommonsStack
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
C
E
C
I
don't
know
if
you
prepared
anything
at
all
and
if
you
didn't
no
problem,
we
talked
about
maybe
starting
with
a
with
an
ice
breaker
question
that
you
had
from
from
the
website
that
you
sent
me
that
we
wouldn't
have
time
for
the
whole
process.
So
maybe,
if
you
had
just
one
question
that
we
can
pass
around.
E
E
That
way
like
he
makes
fun
a
little
bit,
but
also
it's
just
like
it's
not
that
he's
making
fun
of
the
people
like
they're.
Just
that
weird
and
interesting
like
how
did
they
end
up
in
antarctica
and
they
all
have
like
crazy
travel
stories
and
what
draws
people
to
this
like
weird
thing
that
looks
like
another
planet
on
our
planet,
so
highly
recommend
encounters
at
the
end
of
the
world.
I'll
drop
a
link
in
the
soft
gov
telegram
if
you're
interested
it's
really
like
trippy
and
funny
and
fascinating.
G
Oh
hello,
sorry
I
just
kind
of
fallen
in
this
discord
like
very
recently.
I
don't
really
know
anybody,
but
something
that
I've
watched
recently
that
I'd
like
to
recommend
to
everybody.
I
was
watching
it
last
night
was
requiem
for
the
american
dream
if
anybody's
not
seen
it
because
it's
like
unbelievable
and
then
chomsky's
like
one
of
my
heroes,.
D
G
D
C
Okay,
this
is
the
first
thing
that
comes
to
my
mind,
because
I
watched
it
last
night.
I
don't
know
if
it's
really
recommendable,
but
I
watched
borat
too
and
it
just
it's
very
fascinating
to
me,
the
the
twist
on
the
narrative
to
present
an
outcome.
It's
like
from
a
completely
yeah
from
a
completely
twisted
point
of
view.
That
brings
you
to
something
that
blows
your
mind
at
some
point:
they're
like
oh
wow.
How
did
that
connected
to
this
and.
H
Yeah
she's
frozen
I'll,
just
I'll
just
grab
it.
Actually,
I
started
watching
the
mandalorian
because
juan
recommended
it,
but
I
I
I'm
gonna
kind
of
change
the
strategy
here,
a
little
bit
and
be
more
practical.
I
really
like
box
mining
as
a
youtuber
around
like
defy
investing
and
stuff
like
that.
I
think
he's
giving
really
cool
and
interesting
information
him
he's
like
my
more
practical
one.
H
A
A
And
so
now
the
stock
exchange
is
all
automated
and
is
a
and
so
yeah.
It's
very
interesting,
I
think
the
same
dynamics
we
are
seeing
in
the
blockchain,
and
so
I
think
we
are
the
people
that
make
it
more
human
and
less
western
and
male
so
yeah.
The
history
of
trunk
trading
is
very
interesting.
If
you
have
a
chance
to
read
about
it,
I
passed
through
the
optimus.
Did
you
already
talk.
I
I
I
don't
know
how
to
say
it,
but
the
thing
is
like
I
mean
I
don't
want
to
do
spoils,
but
what
I
love
about
this
anime
is
like
they
wanna
do
what
they
they
wanna
reach,
what
they
want
to
reach,
but
on
their
way
to
reach
it.
They
want
to
help
the
other
people
and
that's
amazing,
of
them
like
these
attitudes
of
edward.
Alright,
it's
amazing.
I
just
wanted
to
point
out,
and
I
think
only
tonga
is
the
one
lasting
right.
So
I
pass
it
to
him.
J
J
J
B
J
Nothing,
I'm
really.
I
I
think
the
discord
in
the
one
half
community
made
it
much
much
much
better
than
before,
because
it's
like
much
faster,
I'm
very
happy
with
with
everything
it's
like.
I
found
something
that
really
catches
my
attention,
so
nothing
I'm
I'm
open
like
in
all
the
related
topics,
I'm
open
most
of
the
time
to
talk
and
engage,
and
I
guess
grief
continues.
I
don't.
B
Started
rereading
this
book
perusing,
I'm
sure
many
of
you
are
familiar
with
it,
medical
markets.
It's
an
interesting,
read
it's
it's
some
deep,
thought-provoking
stuff
in
there,
and
so
I
would
recommend
it
to
anyone.
It
seems
to
fit
in
with
this
group
is
doing
absolutely
so.
Thank
you
and
sorry
for
the
connection.
B
H
K
F
Okay
and
well
the
book
that
I
read
lately
that
I
liked
a
lot
was
1984
from
george
orwell.
I
think
it's
very
related
to
like
what
we
don't
want
to
happen
with
these
technologies
and
a
tv
show
that
I
recommend
is
a
100
days
to
fall
in
love.
I
like
put
the
link
in
the
in
the
soft
chat,
because
it's
very
light,
but
it's
very
funny
and
I
like
the
the
the
characters.
C
E
E
C
We
had
the
deadline
for
the
27th
that
is
today,
so
I
think
there
is
a
lot
that
we
covered
and
I'm
happy
to
see
that
a
lot
of
what
we
we
said
we
were
going
to
do.
We
did
it
a
lot
of
those
topics
with
the
touch
base
on
and
there's
still
a
lot
of
questions
that
came
up
from
the
work
we
did
and
there's
a
lot
of
information
still
in
this
board
that
we
can
work
more
into
this.
C
What
are
the
things
that
you
think
are
missing
here,
that
we
should
be
focusing
more
into
so
one
thing
I
was
talking
to
angela
today
that
we
met
for
the
onboarding
working
group
is
how
how
can
we
have
fractal
communication?
So
one
of
the
things
that
we
are
building
now
is
some
type
of
executive
structure
as
she
calls
it
or
the
the
community
stewards
and
the
contributor
these
relationships
between
the
roles
that
we
are
creating
and
and
how
we
would
how
we
would
expend
that.
C
C
So
this
is
one
of
the
challenges
that
came
up
that
we
thought.
Okay,
how
to
maintain
decentralization
with
active
boundaries
is
to
have
a
fractal
communication
between
all
this
executive
nuclear
structures
that
exist.
So
now
we
are
seeing
that
happening
within
the
working
groups.
We
kind
of
have
many
nuclear
points
that
are
communicating
between
each
other,
and
I
wonder
if
this
is
a
structure
that
we
want
to
continue
after
the
hatch
and
even
promote
more
working
groups
and
to
have
this
as
an
ongoing
process.
That
is
always
happening.
C
H
H
As
far
as
maintaining
communication,
I
think
there's
a
always
this
inherent
challenge
that
not
everyone
cares
about
everything
going
on.
So
we
just
have
to
have
a
good
organizational
structure
and
from
what
I've
seen
the
dows
that
communicate
the
best
really
lean
on
the
forum
posting
and
the
forum
structure,
because
people
that
want
to
know
what's
going
on,
they
go
to
the
forum
and
then
they
look
at
the
topics
that
they
care
about.
E
So
if
we
can
maintain
that
and
then
also
I
like
what
somebody
said
here
about
like,
instead
of
trying
to
like
impose
coalitions
or
groups
within
groups
that
we
just
like,
have
a
little
more
receptive
approach
of
like
seeing
how
it
naturally
flows
and
what
emerges
I
think,
having
this
balance
and
maybe
more
like
feminine
approach
in
looking
at
more
groups
developing
rather
than
for
this
process,
it
was
important
that
we,
the
ground
up.
We
developed
the
groups
and
dictated
the
groups
like
what
they
were,
but
maybe
that
will
switch
once
the
hatch
patches.
D
E
We
can
have
language
stewards
who,
like
a
few
people,
who
speak
multiple
languages
and
can
be
like
the
cultural
and,
like,
I
guess,
yeah
language,
stewards,
something
like
this
and
have
some
people
who
are
willing
to
contribute
time
and
then
maybe
we
have
like.
I
don't
know
what
we
want
to
call
them.
I
guess
for
one
have
you
know
you
could
have
like
different
groups
around
language
and
form
as
a
start
steward
level
like
a
layer.
C
Yeah,
I
think
that
was
the
purpose
of
the
their
the
air
table
too,
that
we
can,
oh
all
of
the
languages
that
people
speak
and
then,
if
there
is
some
restriction,
people
can
reach
out
straight
to
the
ones
that
speak
their
language,
and
maybe
that
is
a
chance
of
becoming
fractal.
There
could
be
like
groups
of
people
that
only
speak
a
certain
language
and
that
there
is
ways
to
breach
with
other
groups
that
they
might
be
intersectional
to
that
people
speak
two
languages
that
could
do
the
bridge
there
and
yeah.
I
agree
with
you
jess.
C
I
think
it
was
more
in
that
sense
that
I
was
speaking
to
not
so
much
comes
in
the
sense
of
platform,
but
what
it?
What
is
the
structure
boundaries
of
our
system
that
we
are
designing,
so
we
can
can
ensure
that
communication
happens
in
a
very
in
in
a
more
seamless
way.
So,
for
example,
we
have
our
community
steward
sync
and
there
we
can
understand
what
is
happening
in
the
working
groups,
that
we
are
all
leading
and
that's
a
structure
that
have
been
working
so
far.
C
And
if
this
is
an
interesting
boundary
for
us
to
think
of
as
a
soft
governance
rule
in
the
sense
that
this
is
the
roles
that
we
are
assuming
and
that
we
want
to
continue
rolling
with
them
and
that
maybe
for
other
roles
to
come
in,
we
would
need
some
type
of
a
process
like
the
decision-making
process
or
if
we,
I
think
it
has
been
working.
The
roles
that
we
have
so
far,
and
I
don't
see
a
reason
why
we
wouldn't
have
them
after
hatch.
H
H
The
biggest
issue
there
is
the
reward
structure
so
like
we
have
a
the
praise
and
the
acknowledgement
that
that
can
continue
after
hatch,
but
post
hatch,
there
is
a
there
is
no
funding
for
the
rewards.
So
if
we
want
to
just
continue
this,
I
imagine
that
we
would
just
need
to
create
a
proposal,
probably
before
the
hatch
is
over,
to
fund
some
sort
of
praise
quantification
to
continue.
H
So
that
would
be
relatively
easy.
I
mean
the
cool
thing.
Is
we
have
this
very
solid,
baseline,
decentralized
structure,
where
it's
conviction
voting?
You
can
propose
anything
and
then,
if
it's
voted
on
that
those
funds
can
go
and
be
structured
to
reward
anything.
So
we
would
just
probably
want
to
have
some
proposals
for
soft
gov
to
continue
this
trend
to
be
ready
before
the
hatch
sitting
there
on
the
forum.
You
know,
with
with
lots
of
discussion,
to
continue
the
processes
that
we
believe
we
want
to
continue
after.
After
that,.
E
Because
not
everybody-
and
this
call
was
on
our
call
yesterday-
I'm
going
to
be
starting
some
work
this
week
on
the
initial
observations
from
like
one
hive
and
other
communities
how
they're
using
source,
cred
and
maybe
start
yeah,
start
a
forum
discussion
surrounding
how
much
of
the
rewards
do.
We
want
automated
how
much
will
be
like
human
quantified
and,
of
course,
yeah.
E
C
C
A
F
I
also
think
that
there
should
be
this
like
continuing
of
of
the
work
around
self-governance,
even
after
the
hatch,
because
that's
what
we've
been
talking
about
that
self-governance
maybe
appear
that
is
not
so
important,
but
then,
when
issues
start
to
happen,
it
becomes
really
important.
So
I
think
that
we
shouldn't
wait
for
issues
to
happen.
In
order
to
to
appreciate
this
and
like
keep
like
supporting
this
this
this
this
team,
as
maybe
in
some
time
it
will
prove
its.
A
Work
can
I
jump
in
I'm
sorry
if
I
repeat
something
that
has
been
said
or
if
I
forgot
something
about
the
documents
I
tried
to
to
read
them
all.
Okay,
I
think
that
the
basic
thing
I
should
I
I
would
like
to
see
in
this
governance
layer
is
that
is
not
too
much
decentralized
in
the
sense
that
there
are
people
that
are
responsible
for
the
governance
here,
which
doesn't
mean
that
they
are
the
people
who
decide,
but
they
are
like
for
the
spiral
model.
A
I
don't
know
one
responsible
for
every
like
100
people,
and
that
is
something
of
a
work
for
them
and
they
have
a
sort
of
salary
for
for
doing
that,
because
it's
a
serious
issues
and
then
there
is
the
level
of
contribut
giving
rewards
and
compensation
for
every
person
that
that
give
efforts
to
the
project.
But
the
core
thing
should
be
to
have
people
that
are
accountable
and
formally
responsible,
at
least
to
to
take
the
voice
and
start
the
process
of
resolution
and
governance.
I
We
have
emotions
and
that
stuff
and
and
sometimes
we
we
think
we're
doing
good,
but
we
don't,
and
if
it's
more
decentralized,
it's
going
to
help
more
to
to
avoid
that
one
person's
emotions
and
like
what
I'm
trying
to
say
is
when,
when
little
people
have
control
it
can
I
mean
sometimes
it
helps,
but
it
can
also
be
wrong.
It's
it
depends.
I
C
H
No,
I'm
actually
talking
more
about
conflict
res
and
I
mean
rewarding
the
people
who
are
going
to
take
on
some
of
these
as
angela
calls
them
executive
roles,
but
looking
at
different
soft
governance
requirements,
especially
along
the
eleanor
ostrom's
principles
and
making
sure
we
have
solutions
that
are
ready
to
ensure
that
those
eight
principles
are
going
to
be
upheld,
post-hatch,
maybe
making
sure
that
we're
actually
upholding
them
prehatch
as
soon
as
we
can
and
then
extending
them.
Post
hatch,
you
know,
like
juan,
has
a
proposal.
H
That's
pretty
much
handling
like
three
of
them
in
one
fell
swoop,
and
then
there's
there's
a
few
other
proposals
that
we
might
need.
Some
soft
or
a
few
other
awesome
principles
that
we
might
need
some
soft
governance
work
on
and
trying
to
implement
the
the
ostrom's
principles
as
soon
as
we
can
and
then
okay
and
then
they'd
be
funded
with
impact
hours,
but
then
having
them
also
be
extended.
H
Don't
think
we
need
to
pick
fights,
I'm
sure
they're
already
there.
A
lot
of
conflicts
are
just
micro
conflicts
and
the
real
challenge
is
monitoring
and
making
sure
that
people
feel
good
about.
Like
saying
yeah,
you
know
I
had
this
conversation
with
griff
and
it
just
didn't
work
out
as
well
as
I
thought
he
was
kind
of
rude
and
it
wasn't
a
big.
It
wasn't
a
big
deal,
but
I
want
to
just
like
say
that
my
my
relationship
with
griff
just
took
a
hit.
H
You
know
like
minus
three
points
on
our
relationship
score
and
like
making
it
really
easy
for
that
to
to
grow
and
having
a
group.
That's
monitoring
the
relationships
of
the
community
to
see
if
the
vibe
is
going
down.
Five
is
going
up,
not
about
punishing
griff.
For
being
you
know,
tired
or
hungry,
when
he
was
in
that
call,
but
just
like
having
some
awareness
of
like
how
the
how
things
are
flowing
within
the
community
so
that
we
can,
you
know,
monitor
the
relationships.
E
I
guess
can
I
can.
I
share
an
example
that
came
up.
It's
like
someone
came
to
me
and
said:
like
hey,
I
was
a
little
like
discouraged
because
I
wanted
to
present
something
in
a
like
a
meeting
and
I
feel
it
wasn't
given
time
and
then
I
kind
of
went
in
and
did
this
a
little
bit
already
because
I
didn't
know
if,
like
how.
E
Things
can
usually
be
handled
one-on-one
like
hey.
I
know
that
wasn't
the
intention,
and
maybe
you
know
we
can
give
you
the
space
here.
We
just
didn't
have
the
space
there,
so
I
feel
like
I've
done
this,
maybe
once
or
twice
just
kind
of
on
my
own
and
most
of
it's
one
to
one.
So
at
what
point
do
you
want
that
to
be
brought
to
others
or
like?
E
I
guess
it
would
be
helpful
to
understand
more
like
what
is
an
escalation
pattern,
because
most
of
it,
I
think,
can
be
solved
very
easily
and
even
like,
for
example,
I'm
sure
libby
won't
mind.
Libby
came
to
me
the
other
day
and
said
like
hey,
I
felt,
like
you
were
doing
this,
and
I
said,
oh
that
wasn't
my
intention
and
oh
there
was
a
big
miscommunication.
E
E
To
even
say
that
is
hard,
so
an
online
community
which
also
oh,
these
people
are
avatars
and
I
only
meet
them
online.
So
maybe
I
wouldn't
say
something
you
know
in
person
to
your
face,
but
online
there's.
Also
this
like
barrier
where
people
we
can
hide
behind,
but
also
like
okay
to
be
vulnerable,
is
to
feel
safe.
H
Yeah
juan
has
wanna
have
a
whole
document
dedicated
to
managing
this.
I
think
the
the
the
great
thing
is
that
when
people
do
feel
comfortable
to
talk
to
each
other
about
and
be
vulnerable
to
each
other,
we
don't
need
any
monitoring
or
conflict
res,
because
that's
not
the
because
that's
already
happening
with
each
other
and
people
are
solving
them.
But
it's
those
times
when
they're
not
making
sure
that
there's
like
the
insurance
contract,
which
is
the
soft
gov
cultural.
H
You
know
like
how
are
things
you
know.
I
want
to
tell
you
that,
there's
these
issues
that
you
don't
even
know
about.
You
know
in
the
way
that
you
work
and
thank
god,
that
you
can
have
this
feedback
opportunity
and
most
people
when
it's
still
small
and
early,
it's
not
a
big
deal,
but
as
those
problems
become
uncommunicated
for
a
long
time,
they
they
make
challenges.
H
For
for
something
that
could
be,
I
mean
we're
going
to
have
to
have
it
no
matter
what
around
like
kicking
people
out
of
discord
that
are
spamming.
You
bad
links,
you
know
and
he's
different.
There
are
going
to
be
like
there's
just
real
issues
that
we
have
to
deal
with,
no
matter
what
for
sanctions,
so
we
can't
avoid
all
punishment
and
illinois
strongly
recommends
that
we
don't.
H
We
have
to
have
some
things
in
place,
but
we
have
to
also
call
out
the
power
dynamics
and
make
sure
that
all
all
these
things
are
clearly
documented.
Who
has
these
powers?
Why
and
examples
for
use
of
these
powers
and
these
sorts
of
things
clear
guidelines
around
that,
and
ideally
my
whole
point
was
ideally
we
start
before
the
hatch
so
that
we
can
understand
some
of
these
issues
better
by
applying
them
yeah
one
yeah.
F
Well,
I
don't
want
to
like
say
that
everything
is
solved
with
loss,
but
I
think
that
there's
been
like
this
recent
discussion,
where,
where
people
have
sent
like
constitutions,
so
I
don't
know
like
how
it
would
be
seen
or
how
is
the
the
the
community
like
seeing
the
the
possibility
of
of
writing
or
making
a
wrong
constitution
that
states
and
and
makes
like
a
a
factible
agreement
between
between
every
member?
So
I
don't
know
it
may
be
in
in
this
text.
F
D
D
There
are
some
people,
that's
been
cheating
on
their
source,
cred
system
and
they
they
are
discussing
how
to
deal
with
that
if
they
have
to
kick
them
out
of
the
distribution,
if
they
have
to
leave
them
there,
their
their
whole.
The
whole
source
credit
system
is
suffering
because
some
people
is
using
it
improperly
and
as
they
don't
have
a
guideline,
they
don't
have
nothing
put
as
a
soft
governance,
they're
they're
they're,
even
discussing
to
put
it
down
for
a
few
weeks.
D
E
So
would
we
want
to
handle
this
type
of
situation
in
the
same
way?
Yeah?
Maybe
just
having
a
few
use
cases
also
to
identify
like
yeah,
the
obvious
ones
would
be
like
spam
and
the
forum
as
well.
I
already
saw
all
these
like
things
in
the
back
end
and
settings,
and
I
was
like,
oh
god
I
was
just
thinking.
You
know
like
spamming
for
messaging
and
then
like
a
potential
conflict.
Conflicts
mostly
arise
over
like
funding-
or
maybe
you
know,
god
forbid,
knock
on
wood.
E
The
tech
team
is
amazing,
but
god
forbid,
you
know
something
with
the
token
comes
up
like
we
can
anticipate
based
on
what
has
happened
with
other
dows,
so
maybe
having
some
use
cases
and
potential
processes
for
how
those
would
be
escalated
up
the
chain
or
who
would
have
the
say.
Do
we
want
certain
cases
to
be
open
all
the
cases
to
the
whole
community
or
certain
cases
go
to
like
some
kind
of
steward
layer
or.
F
Jessica,
I
would
love
if
you
can
review
a
little
bit
the
the
document
I've
been
putting
together
around
conflict
resolution,
because
I
think
that
it
lacks
a
lot
of
polishing
the
idea,
but,
like
the
the
the
main
idea
of
it,
it's
it's.
I
think
it's
good
and
it's
like
the
best
case
of
graduate
sanctions
that
I
can
think
of
is
sports
like
if
every
time
a
a
player
makes
a
fall
in
its
in
in
sports.
F
If
every
time
every
a
player
makes
a
time
in
sports
like
we
take
too
much
time
to
deal
with
it
or
or
we
wonder
what
to
do,
then
we
are
losing
the
pace
of
the
game
but
like
if
we
have
these
clear
sanctions,
then,
like
disputes
can
be
solved
within
a
few
minutes
like
by
saying
okay,
this
sanction
is
equal
to
this.
This
bad
behavior
is
equal
to
sanction
and
like
having
like
yellow
cards
like
when
a
player
receives
a
yellow
card
in
a
game.
F
F
More
more
help
in
in
this
proposal,
because
I
think
that
I
have
this
idea,
but
I
still
don't
know
how
to
polish
it
in
order
in
order
to
make
it
a
full
proposal
to
the
organization.
So
it's
like
idea
an
idea
of
like
having
these
these
rules
and
and
that
are
equivalent
to
sanctions
and,
and
that
can
be
like
like
that,
can
be
accumulated
for
for
the
bigger
sanctions
so
so
yeah.
F
I
think
my
idea
is
just
that
that
we
can
work
the
the
these
basis
that
I,
like
proposed,
of
of
having
like
like,
like
this
mammals
like
they
having
sports.
That's
like
saying
what
what
compartment,
what
behavior
deserves,
what
type
of
sanction
and
have
that
like
clear
and
yeah,
make
a
proposal
for
the
for
the
dec.
I
H
I
want,
I,
I
think
it's
important
for
the
community
to
have
input
on
what
sanctions
are
reasonable
for
different
levels
of
violation.
I
think
that's
really
important
the
the
details
of
exactly
where
the
community's
involvement
comes
in
on
enforcement
is
another.
No
is
an
interesting
topic
that
has
a
lot
of
research
around
it,
and
and
so
there's
data
out
there
that
we
can
look
at
that.
It's
not
like
we're.
We
we
shouldn't
be
making
anything
up
here,
we're
not
really
doing
anything
new.
H
I
C
So
we
have,
we
have
three
minutes
left.
I
think
I
think
the
discussion
on
conflict
resolution.
Maybe
we
need
to
yeah
work,
work
more
closer
into
that
this
week.
One
maybe
I
append
and
do
a
little
bit
this
last
week
and
we
can
shape
that
into
a
proposal
to
submit
probably
on
friday.
That
would
look
good
and-
and
I
think
the
next
points
are
yeah-
creating
delineating
the
rules
a
little
bit
better.
What
are
the
rules
that
we
identify?
C
My
computer
just
shut
down
completely.
I
don't
know
what
happened,
but
in
the
mural
board.
Beside
the
austrian
principles,
I
outlined
a
little
bit.
What
are
the
soft
governance
rules
that
I
I
see
that
we
have
so
far,
and
maybe,
if
you
could
give
a
signal
now
of
like
one
minute
use
this
time
to?
Are
these
rules?
Do
you
agree
with
these
rules?
A
Yeah,
I
am
available
to
help
and
I
think
that,
like
tomorrow,
we
should
decide
what
is
feasible
up
to
friday
to
do
and
then
in
the
next
two
days
to
deliver
it
so
yeah,
I'm
I
mean
not
aspiring
at
producing
too
much,
but
doing
what
is
doable
in
three
days
that
we
have.
You
are
speaking
about
this
friday.
Yeah.
C
F
C
G
I
mean
I'm
totally
confused
right
now,
but
I
mean
it's
it
I
I
don't
think
I
know
enough
about
what
this
community
is
doing
or
like
how
I
can
contribute.
Yet,
if
that's
okay,
I
mean
I'm
just
trying
to
like
get
an
idea
of
the
vibe
and
I've
posted
a
link
to
like
a
like
a
phenomenal
talk
in
the
soft
of
things
by
a
friend
of
mine,
called
moritz,
and
his
friend
basically
like
talked
about
a
theory
of
how
schisms
happen
and
how
to
unschism
and
like
why.
J
H
H
I'm
really
excited,
though
I
think
this
is
the
only
dow
that
I
know
of
that's
putting
in
this
kind
of
effort
into
making
sure
we
have
really
good
soft
governance
protocols.
So
I
think
we're
already
ahead
of
the
game
and
other
dials
are
being
successful.
So
I
imagine
this
will
be.
This
will
be
huge
and
I'll
pass
it
to
santi.
Did
you
get
to
go.
D
No,
I
don't
know
yeah.
I
agree.
I
think
we've
touched
most
of
the
topics
that
are
really
important
during
these
weeks
and
we
should
just
focus
on
the
ones
we
wanna.
We
wanna,
explore
and
expand
during
this
pre-hatch
phase
and
and
test,
and
and
and
that's
what
we
should
propose
friday
and
have
this
period
before
before
december,
to
to
put
or
evolve
as
much
as
possible
that
we
consider
our
key
hatch.
All
my
important
first
there's
a
certain
amount
of
time
and
they
go
to
to
to
some.
B
E
Yeah,
I
think
this
is
really
helpful,
just
to
have
the
space
to
talk
and
not
necessarily
have
such
a
tight
goal
for
the
meeting,
and
when
I
hear
all
of
you
speaking
and
sharing,
it
helps
to
put
everything
in
context
and
yeah.
Just
it
helps
so
much
with
the
work
that
I'm
doing
and
yeah
I've
started
this
document
and
I'm
going
to
work
pretty
quickly
and
share
that
for
some
feedback.
E
I'm
gonna
pull
over
some
examples
from
one
hive
and
even
you
can
go
and
look
on
their
github
like
repo
to
see
how
they're
awaiting
different
actions
and
yeah
just
sharing
some
of
the
issues
that
they've
had
which
hopefully
we
can
solve
with
defining
sanctions
and
things
so
yeah.
We'll
have
that
document
soon
and
appreciate
the
time
together
and
I
will
pass
to
craig
if
his
internet
is
working
at.