►
From YouTube: W83 Softgov WG: Follow Up on TE Flower Session
Description
The Softgov Working Group researches and applies best practices for governance, social collaboration and contribution rewards while implementing Ostrom’s 8 principles for governing the commons in its foundation.
We gather every Tuesday at 7pm CET.
Steward: Liviade
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
Had
intended
for
today
was
an
exercise
following
up
the
last
week,
exercise
to
just
map
out
a
little
bit
about
the
things
that
we
spoke,
but
the
question
just
to
we
can
start
with
the
question
and
then
we
can
see
if
someone
else
joined
and
we
get
into
this.
So
the
question
for
today
is
what
is
a
question
you
wish
you
will
get
asked
more
often
nate.
Do
you
want
to
start.
B
Oh
question
that
I
wish
I
got
asked
more
often
I
guess
it
would
revolve
around.
B
B
It's
just
something
that
I
I
been
thinking
about
for
a
very
long
time
and
I
have
a
lot
of
thoughts
and
critiques
and
ideas
and
so
on.
So
I
think
that's
a
fun
area
that
I
wish
I
was
asked
more
questions
about,
but
will
you.
B
Yeah,
just
kind
of
you
know
evaluating
like
the
augmented
bonding
curve
as
like
a
resource
system
and
applying
it
to
ocean's
principle.
I
think
is
really
interesting
to
do
a
really
interesting
exercise,
and
so,
if
we
look
at
it
from
that
perspective,
having
kind
of
like
and
applying
it
to
the
tec,
like,
for
example,
looking
at
the
tec
as
strictly
as
a
token
economy
and
not
something
that
needs
to
be,
like
necessarily
managed,
I
don't
know,
there's
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
complexity
there.
B
But
I
think
that
the
way
we
have
things
organized
right
now
can
be
a
lot
different
than
than
working
groups,
and
so
I
just
think,
there's
different
structures
that
we
can
explore
that
actually
focus
on
the
economy,
the
tec
economy.
Rather
than
having
like
this
traditional
organizational
setting
but
yeah
I
can,
I
can
speak
all
day
on
it,
but
they
can't
just
don't
no
worries
yeah
stuff,
like
that
yeah.
C
Sometimes
especially
when
I'm
very
very
like
diving,
deep
into
like
a
topic
or
a
project
like
from
time
to
time,
I
come
across
people
that
ask
me
like
how
are
you
and
you
know
it's
like?
Oh
it's
like
awesome
with
all
of
these
things
like
you
know
like
going
on
and
I'm
very
excited
about
this
personal
project
and
from
time
to
time
like
I
come
across
people
that,
like
take
the
the
question
beyond
that,
and
it's
like
no.
But
how
are
you
like?
C
Not
what
you're
doing
you
know
and
it's
like
this
reminder
of.
We
are
not
like
necessarily
what
we
like
do
and
I've
been
reflecting
on
that
a
lot
lately.
C
So
I
I
I
wish
I
just
get
asked
that
more
often
because
it
like
sometimes
it
really
really
cuts
me
like
off
guard
and
it's
interesting
to
be
in
that
position
and
to
ask
like
myself
like.
Am
I
really
like
doing
good
like
do?
I
do?
C
I
have
like
what
I
need
in
in
like
a
most
like
in
in
a
more
like
human
level,
so
so
yeah,
I
I
I
wish
I
could
have
it
be
asked
that
more
often
and
yeah
like
about
like
a
more
general
like
question
in
like
regarding
the
the
agenda.
Well,
I
was
just
talking
to
you
about
it,
like
I'm
trying
to
find
a
way
in
which
I
like
detach.
C
You
know
like
some
of
the
incentives
that
are
tying
us
to
the
community
was
a
very,
very
like
unbiased
and
neutral
idea
or
initiative
to
have
a
discussion
about
like
what
are
the
best
decisions
that
we
can
take.
C
I
feel
those
are
some
new
grounds
and
I'm
very
excited
to
explore
those,
but
not
only
in
a
practical
level,
but
also
in
a
more
like
community
and
emotional
level.
I
don't
know
if
emotional
is
the
word
that
I
was
looking
for,
but
but
yeah
like
see
pretty
much
like
how
everyone
feels
about
these
changes
in
a
more
like,
transparent
and
and
just
honest
way,
I'll
pass
it
back
to
you.
A
Yeah,
I
agree
with
you
like,
and
I
would
like
a
combination
between
your
question
and
hate
like
in
my
case,
I
wish
we
will
get
like
ask
more
often
how
we
are
or
how
are
we
as
an
organization
as
an
individual
as
a
public
good
or
as
an
economy
like
I
feel
like
it's
a
very
simple
like
we
used
to.
We
tend
to
ask
this
on
communities
like
every
two
weeks.
We
ask
that.
A
How
are
you,
but
really,
how
are
you
and
but
on
the
on
the
community
level
I
feel
like
we
sometimes
are
into
automatic
mode,
and
this
question
sort
of
is
a
stopper.
A
It
helps
you
to
sort
of,
you
know,
go
back
to
the
center
or
at
least
have
a
little
bit
of
perspective,
and
I
feel
like
we
don't
ask
that
question
quite
enough,
and
and
sometimes
we
just
roll
until
something
stops
us
and-
and
I
feel
that's
a
question
I
would
like
to
get
asked
more
often
like
how
are
how
are
we,
how
are
our
working
groups
in
a
more
human
level?
Even
you
know
it
has.
It
has
many
layers.
A
You
could
ask
this
in
a
human
level,
on
a
professional
level
on
an
organizational
level,
but
in
any
matter
I
feel
like
that's,
we
will,
we
will
have.
We
will
catch
so
many
things.
If
we
just
ask
that
question,
that's
how
I
feel
so
we
don't
have
enough
quorum,
I
feel
so
I
will,
if
even
I
don't
know
if
you
agree
with
these
guys,
we
can
leave
this
exercise
for
next
week,
so
I
will
just
explain
it
and
if
you
want
to
provide
feedback,
it
will
be
more
than
helpful.
A
So
this
is
the
result
of
the
last
week
pedals
analysis
that
we
did,
and
I
categorized
I
categorized
what
everyone
mentioned
based
on
three
aspects.
If
it
is
a
working
group,
if
it
is
a
process
or
if
it
is
a
tool-
and
I
add
the
label
te
for
just
for
the
sake
of
understanding,
if
there
is
something
in
that
focus
on
token
economics
specifically-
and
the
idea
of
this
would
be
to
sort
of-
I
livi
mentioned
the
idea
of
having
more
questions
regarding
this.
A
For
example,
if
we
all
know
what
game
theory
is,
if
we
all
agree,
if
we
all
understand
what
does
this
mean
within
this
pedal
and
for
example,
if
the
names
of
the
pedals
are
correct,
if
we
need
to
change
it,
if
you
think
it
established
a
good
name
for
that
and
then
at
the
end
there
was
this
question
of
we
selected
three
like
disciplines
that
we
think
we
should
add
to
the
tec,
identity
and
demography,
linguistics
and
semantics
and
history.
B
B
I
guess
one
of
the
things
that
I
like
been
thinking
about
with
this
exercise,
which
I
think
is
a
really
really
important
exercise
to
do-
is
not
only
like
labeling
what
they
are
and
where
they
fall
underneath,
but
like
what
are
the
source
like
who
is
responsible
for
producing
these
processes
and
who's
responsible
for
providing
those
tools
and
and
really
looking
at,
like
you
know
how
many,
how
many
you
know
if
there's
only
like
a
small
handful
of
developers
providing
the
tools-
and
you
know
the
majority
of
of
the
community-
falls
into
only
like
one
category.
B
I
think
that's
something
to
look
at
and
analyze
and
say
hey.
Maybe
we
should
be
getting
more
more
more
vehicles
for
for
participating
in
these
different
categories
that
don't
allow
you
know
like
we
can
have
like
industrial
and
system
engineering
and
most
of
the
people
there
are
going
to
be.
You
know
the
developers
are
contributing,
but
what
about
the
people?
Who
who
design
and
and
help
with
like
the
administration
of
industrial
and
systems,
engineering
and
things
of
that
nature?
B
And
so
like,
there's
not
really
a
place
for
those
people
in
these
categories,
and
so
I
I
don't
know,
I
just
I
think,
there's
certain
demographics
of
people
where
we
could
have
better
vehicles
for
them
to
participate
in
and
not
feel
so
kind
of
forced
into
one
of
these
boxes
or
another.
A
Yes,
it
does.
What
about
you
any
feedback
regarding
this.
C
C
C
C
A
Yeah
it's
one
of
the
things
that
we
want
to
do
so
if
this
is
the
flower
or
the
traditional
flower,
I
remember
this
what
cuanca
provided
you
know
like?
If
you
see
this
on
the
screen,
you
will
see
that
there's
like
two,
but
if
you
put
them
together,
it
becomes
one.
So
the
idea
is
to
do
something
very
similar
with
this
flower,
which
is
to
update
it
and
then
half
layers,
and
then
within
these
layers
you
will
have.
Who
is
the
people
who
is
working
on
this?
A
A
We
have
way
more
things
in
psychology
and
decision
science
than
in
cryptography
just
as
an
example.
So
we
can
sort
of
you
know,
sort
of
have
a
global
view
about
what's
going
on
and
at
the
same
time
be
more
conscious
about
where
the
efforts
should
be
put
on
and
who
are
the
people
who
are
putting
this
effort
on
if
there
is
any,
but
we
will
leave
the
yeah.
So
I
don't
know
if
that
makes
sense.
B
It
does
yeah.
I
just
realized
that
that's
a
huge
pedal
that
we're
missing
is
education.
I'm
not
sure
why
I
didn't
think
of
putting
that
down,
but
education
should
for
sure
be
on
that
battle.
Yeah.
C
Sorry
I
was
muted,
yes,
I
I
agree.
I
feel
that
education
could
be
it
like.
Even
even
you
know
like
what
answers
this
question
about,
how
we
are
communicating,
what
we
want
to
say:
yeah
yeah,
I
feel
education
also
gives
a
great
place
in
in
a
very
specific
purpose.
To
like,
for
example,
everything
around
token
engineering
academy,
yeah
yeah
education
is
definitely
another
battle.
A
And
I
will
say,
for
example,
show
your
own
section:
branding
and
marketing
is
not
also
in
the
flower,
and
you
cannot
have
an
economy,
I
mean
you
can
have
an
economy,
but
there
should
be.
There
is
a
small,
an
old
project.
There
is
a
small
effort
put
into
marketing
and
branding
at
least,
and
that
is
not
also
included
in
the
economic
system
like
it
doesn't
like
you
just
create
a
product
and
the
pearl
will
brand
itself.
Naturally,
you
know
that
doesn't
happen
like
or
you
create
a
product
and
the
product
doesn't
need
any
marketing.
A
That
doesn't
happen
that
you
don't
create
a
token
economic
system
without
you
know
telling
spreading
the
word
about
it.
I
believe.
C
Yeah,
like
even
even
I
mean
it's,
it's
probably
like
a
more
broad
pedal
but
communications
just
by
itself,
I
feel
cover
branding
marketing
and
it
could
be
like
next
to
the
education
one,
because
I
I
do
feel
that
it's
like
it's
it's
it's
something
not
that
you
put
it
that
way.
I
do,
but
but
yeah
like
communications
in
general
is
just
like.
How
do
we
take
the
rest
of
these
pedals
and
tell
you
know
something
about
it:
yeah,
yeah
kind
of
like
a
so
what
follow-up
question.
A
Correct
all
right:
okay,
there
is
some
work
to
do
if
any
of
you
guys
want
to
do
some,
adding
some
thoughts
on
this
async
on
on
this
labeling.
There
is
a
certain
confusion
for
me
regarding,
for
example,
cert,
if,
like
there
are
certain
areas
that
overlap
in
between
each
other
and
then
for
example,
if
this
is
a
classification
that
is
good,
for
example,
a
process,
a
tool
or
a
working
group,
meaning
more
of
a
technology
when
it's
a
process,
one
is
a
technological
tool
and
the
other
one.
A
It's
a
human
kind
of
process
or
framework,
even
they
added
a
label
framework
for
some
of
these
things,
for
example,
reward
system
and
phrase
is
not
only
a
tool,
but
it's
also
engineer
system,
but
it's
also
a
framework
because
it
has
a
culture
on
it.
So
if
you
want
to
provide
any
feedback
on
the
document
and
any
suggestion
of
how
we
can
classify
this,
I
think
probably
rather
than
tools,
processes
and
and
te
will
leave
more
something
alone
around
cultural
layer,
governance,
layer
or
you
know,
like
a
broader
contextualization.
A
That
is
easier
to
understand.
I
don't
know
what
you
guys
think.
B
A
There
is
an
angle
to
this,
so
the
so
the
idea
to
part
you
know
that
when
we
started
the
onboarding
process,
we
were
only
focused
on
the
beginning
of
the
user
journey,
so
the
idea
would
be
to
expand
and
now
in
the
second
term
of
communities.
A
So
starting
from
that
point,
we
will
sort
of
expand
sort
of
a
more
a
sort
of
a
narrative
regarding
this
flower
and
the
drug
engineer
and
how
it's
applied
here.
Does
that
make
sense.
C
Yeah,
I
also
really
like
the
approach
about
people,
picking
like
their
own
roles,
instead
of
expecting
them,
I
feel
like
just
like
on
boarding.
Why
is
that?
That
changes
the
game.
A
Yeah,
but
in
order
for
us
to
do
that,
we
need
to
first
sort
of
map
out
the
community
and
we
thought
that
using
collective
intelligence
with
the
tea
flower
that
exists,
it
was
going
to
be
the
the
sort
of
the
more
consensus
smarter
way
to
approach
it.
Any
feedback
regarding
this
is
welcome.
Of
course,.
A
But
yeah
all
right,
we
will.
I
I
have
nothing
else.
I
would
like
to
talk
is:
is
there
something
you
guys
you
would
like
to
discuss
or
talk?
If
not,
we
can
close
early.
A
All
right,
I
see
sure
that
you
are
unmuted,
but
there's
no
audio
coming.
Oh.
C
Yeah
yeah,
I
was,
I
was
just
gonna,
say
the
same
thing
as
made
that
thanks
thanks
for
this
call.
A
All
right,
thank
you
guys
for
joining,
and
I
will
see
you
next
tuesday.
It's
wednesday
take.