►
Description
The Softgov Working Group researches and applies best practices for governance, social collaboration and contribution rewards while implementing Ostrom’s 8 principles for governing the commons in its foundation.
We gather every Tuesday at 7pm CET.
Steward: Liviade
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
The
community
call
not
during
the
community
call,
but
also
on
a
thursday
and
using
a
similar
template
like
going
through
working
groups
and
just
having
people
share,
maybe
having
like
30
seconds
each
that
people
could
share
about
things
that
they
learned
in
the
working
groups.
A
Or
you
know
how
was
some
of
their
experiences,
and
then
I
thought
maybe
it
could
be
something
a
little
more
intimate
to
have
during
the
stewards
call
and
then
maybe
have
like
first
something
for
the
stewards
that
are
leaving
the
role
of
stewardship
and
and
have
a
celebration
for
that.
But
then
talking
to
tim
and
nate
about
it,
because
there's
already
some
type
of
an
off-boarding
ceremony
that
we
usually
do
and
then
maybe
from
there
seeing
how
it
could
be
nice
to
like
honor
some
of
the
contributors.
A
A
B
And
yeah,
I
think
like
having
having
you
know
that
a
ceremony
in
the
stewardship-
I
think
it's
great
and
also
you
know.
I
also
don't
think
we
we're
going
to
be
able
to
cover
everyone
on
the
community
call.
So
it's
great
if
we
can
separate
some
of
the
groups
or
follow
them.
A
A
A
Okay,
yeah
welcome
and
we've
been
talking
about
so
last
week
we
discussed
a
little
bit
about
a
transition
celebration
for
for
the
stewards
working
group
for
for
the
working
groups,
for
we
have
so
much
that
is
changing
lately
in
the
tc
so
having
a
moment
to
acknowledge
that
and
and
to
honor
what
has
passed
and
an
open
space
for
the
changes
that
are
coming
and
make
sure
everybody
feels
acknowledged
and
seen
and
and
that
there
is
a
nice
transition.
A
So
let
me
share
my
screen.
I
was
just
suggesting
we
could
do
one
thing
during
this.
The
stewards
call
to
just
invite
well,
do
the
the
normal
stewards
off-boarding
ceremonies
that
we
do
and
then
also
invite
stewards
to
think
of
contributors
and
contributions.
C
What
I
was
thinking
is
that
acknowledging
for
for
one
instance,
what
they
feel
about
this
change,
because
what
it
is
is
a
change,
and
but
I
was
thinking
about
activities
that
could
bring
that
up,
and
I
could
only
come
up
with
a
circle
of
sharing
and
I
was
also
thinking
about
acknowledging
their
participation,
because
maybe
they
don't
end
the
participation
just
like
that
and
want
to
contribute
more,
even
though
the
grand
what
is
not
there,
but
maybe
they
keep
participating,
maybe
not
doing
like
something
like
a
little
batch
of
participation
or
you
were
here
or-
or
you
have
been
here
and
like
I
don't
know,
it
could
be
like
a
treasure
hunt
or
something
like
that,
where
each
one
tells
their
experience
of
the
valuable
things
that
they
brought
here,
like
I
experienced
that
you
brought
this,
and
so
we
add
things
to
their
to
their
chest
of
treasure
and
and
then
do
a
little
bit
of
a
batch
or
something
like
that.
A
Yeah,
thank
you.
That
sounds
great.
We
do
have
a
badge
for
stewards,
but
I'm
thinking
it
could
be
nice
to
have
a
badge
for
everyone
that
ever
ever
received
contributions
from
the
tc
that
are
no
longer
receiving,
so
maybe
looking
into
all
of
the
people
that
were
compensated
through
proposals.
A
C
No,
I
didn't
think
of
that.
I
was
thinking
about
something
general
about
everybody
that
it's
not
longer
with
a
role
with
a
structured,
structured
role
anymore,
and
it's
like
everyone
that
is
in
that
situation.
C
A
C
A
B
Concerns
from
the
people
in
the
cold,
a
lot
of
us
weren't
stewards
of
the
attendance
and
innate
suggested
that
we
probably
discuss
further
present
any
concerns,
and
maybe
we
redo
the
snapshot.
Voting.
A
B
Okay
yeah,
so
we
chatted
for
pretty
much
the
whole
hour
about
the
transformation
proposal
and
a
lot
of
us
had
some
concerns
about,
like
it
overall
seemed
pretty
good,
but
you
know
some
just
some
details
and
nate
suggested.
You
know
we
just
discuss
it
more.
B
Ask
questions,
make
recommendations
whatever
and
depending
on
how
it
goes.
We
may
or
may
not
do
the
snapshoot
boat
again,
because
he
also
mentioned
something
of
you
know
like
there
are
only
11
boats,
and
you
know
I
don't
know
it
passed
with
only
11
people.
So
probably
it's
either
a
lot
of
the
people
here
isn't
aware.
I
wasn't
really
aware
so.
A
I
feel
like
redoing,
like
it's
kind
of
a
matter
of
who's
present
and
and
how
to
communicate.
If,
if
the
communication
we're
using
is
not
reaching
people
who
were
rather
interested,
but
they
didn't
know,
I
guess
that
some
some
some
of
those
questions
are
in
the
poll.
I'm
happy
that
50
people
have
answered
the
poll.
A
I
did
a
last
call
now
and
I'll
close
it
tomorrow
for
for
us
to
share
the
results
during
the
community
call,
but
I
think
some
of
those
questions
will
will
emerge
too
because,
like
if
we
had
50
people
answering
this
poll,
but
there's
11
people
voting
on
snapshot.
You
know
maybe
there's
a
signal
there
too,.
A
A
B
Yeah,
my
only
personal
concern
was
about
mostly
about
the
name,
the
comms
stewards,
because
well
I'm
I'm.
I
was
really
happy
to
see
the
advisory
stores
because
I
think
that's
first
of
all,
something
we
were
doing
it
like
more
input
from
more,
I
guess
relevant
people
or
people
that
play
today
in
the
industry.
B
So,
oh
because
I
I
oftentimes
get
the
feeling
that
we
are
almost
in
a
bubble,
but
then
for
the
common
stewards.
I
don't
know
I
I
had
the
sense
that
those
stewards
would
be
better
off
as
contributors
to
these
keywords
working
group
rather
than
because
it
seems
like
it
is.
It
is
expressed
as
a
separate
group
that
is
only
elected
by
stewards
and
stuff,
like
it
seems
too
political.
B
In
my
opinion-
and
I
don't
know
I
I
I
yesterday
I
used
the
example
of
nade
that
he's
not
a
working
group
lead
but
he's
sort
of
on
top
of
everything
and
stuff.
I
would
rather
have
him
as
a
contributor
to
this
dual
working
deal,
which
can
have
certain
amount
of
accountability,
and
you
have
a
single
proposal
for
all
steel
related
stuff
and
he
still
gets
compensated
et
cetera,
but
he
doesn't
have
to
engage
in
any
sort
of
politics
to
be
on
border
or
of
border.
A
B
A
Onboarded
officially-
and
there
was
all
that
so
I
don't
think
he's
a
good
example,
but
I
think
the
comms
people
were
fine
too.
I
talked
to
acid
laser
and
he
said
they're
good,
they're
feeling
good
and
they've
been
sharing
updates
about
their
proposals,
and
he
said
he
would
share
a
new
one
soon
and
chewie's
back
so.
B
I
don't
know
right
now:
I'm
kind
of
lost
not
necessarily
in
a
bad
way,
but
you
know
I'm
just
waiting
till
we
have
some
something
more
concrete.
B
B
A
A
Yeah,
but
to
that
point
auntie
yeah,
I
think
that's
also
gonna
come
up
in
the
poll,
but
there
was
also
a
question
about.
Should
we
continue
funding
t
projects
or
should
we
stop
until
we
have
a
revenue
model?
A
I'm
of
the
opinion
that
we
should
continue
funding
and
I
know
a
lot
of
people
disagree,
but
I'm
happy.
There
is
a
token
engineering
proposal.
Now
I've
been
chatting
for
some
time
too,
with
the
token
economics
now
folks
and
it's
cool
to
see,
they're
also
collaborating
with
ltf,
and
there
is
a
proposal
there.
A
D
I
actually
have
a
question,
that's
relevant
and
I
guess
it
applies
to
the
to
the
to
the
reply
to
your
tweet
libya.
Again,
I
meant
not
disrespect
I
just
wanted
to.
D
I
want
to
create
a
space
for
dialogue
and
yeah,
so
my
question
is:
I
was
reading
the
I
was
reading
the
handbook
and
under
the
under
the
value
section.
It
says
that
for
me,
it's
okay,
so
I'm
gonna
read
it.
It
says
our
comments
operates
from
a
pro
social
human
center
perspective
and
prioritizes
the
advancement
of
token
or
short-term
profits.
D
So
to
me,
it's
like
that
wording
is
somewhat
it's
somewhat
incongruent,
because
I
think
in
in
the
short-term
profit,
it's
maybe
conflating
short-term
profit
with.
You
know:
income
and
salaries
right,
there's
no
mention
of
salaries
anywhere
in
our
values.
So
I
assume
that
by
short-term
profit
it
is
meant
you
know,
income
and
salaries
as
well.
I
think
most
people
here
are
not
profiting
in
the
sense
of
you
know.
D
Maybe
the
way
it
was
meant
on
this
statement,
which
was
maybe
buying
into
early
in
the
token,
in
the
bonding
curve
and
then
selling
after
investing
period,
or
I
don't
know
the
arbitrage
opportunities
or
whatever
it
is
meant
by
by
profit.
But
I
think
there
is
a
sort
of
like
an
incongruence,
because,
if
we're
operating
from
a
human-centered
perspective,
then
how
can
we
prioritize
the
advancement
of
a
science
over
both
livelihoods?
And
this
is
the
question
for
right
now
like?
Should
we
stop
like?
D
Should
we
stop
funding
projects
so
that
you
know
we
can
keep
some
of
the
roles?
And
again
I
understood
that
we
had
a
bloated
budget,
I'm
not
against
diminishing
that,
but
I
do
think
that
the
statement
makes
it
so
that
we
are
prioritizing
the
advancement
of
a
science
over
people
and,
if
we're
doing
that,
we're
not
human-centered,
which
is
I
mean
it's
it's
just
a
way
of
going
right.
D
Maybe
we
have
a
mandate
and
our
mandate
is
more
important
than
you
know
the
income
that
we
generate,
and
that
was
fine
for
me
for
a
while,
when,
especially
when
we
were
receiving,
you
know
payment
from
common
stack,
because
that
was
enough,
but
at
least
it
was
enough
for
living
in
the
global
south.
It's
not
enough
if
you're
in
the
north,
such
as
us
uk
europe.
So
right
now
with.
D
I
guess
I
guess
I
thought
salaries
were
going
to
go
up
eventually
like
after
a
couple
years
of
experience
and
et
cetera,
and
it
turned
out
that,
because
of
the
bear
market
and
because
of
the
suggestion
of
majority
token
holders,
we
decided
to
stop
anything
that
was
not
generating
income.
So
we
it
seems
that
we
were
true
in
a
way
to
our
value,
in
that
we,
the
advancement
of
tokening
over
income,
which,
again
maybe
by
short-term
profit.
It
does
not
mean
income.
D
A
It's
opening
yeah
so
well.
First
of
all,
the
the
mission,
vision
and
values
were
decided
collectively,
and
it
was
an
interesting
iteration
process
to
find
what
is
the
the
final
like?
It
was
almost
like
building
a
frankenstein
kind
of
thing.
You
know
like
a
lot
of
people
sharing
opinions
and
then
proposing
full
phrases
out
of
them.
A
I
should
somehow
contemplate
all
the
all
the
views
being
shared,
but
I
my
opinion
here
is
that
everything
is
talking
about
token
engineering
as
a
feud
that
can
a
feud
that
has
this
ethical
ethical
concerns
in
its
core,
like
how
could
the
discipline
of
token
engineering
be
beneficial
for
humans,
how
token
engineering
can
be
human
centered
and
how
this
commons,
this?
That
is
advancing
this
the
economy
that
will
support
this
discipline?
A
How
can
it
be
focused
on
the
long-term
development
of
the
discipline,
rather
than
on
gains
that
people
could
have
through
this
economy?
That
won't
advance
the
mission
that
this
commons
is
supporting?
A
I
don't
know
if
that's
clear,
but
I
can
see
your
concern
on
not
having
something
that
mentions
like
work,
ethics
and
our
values,
and
I
think
this
is
a
challenge
for
the
dow
space
in
general,
like
we
mentioned
last
week,
and
I
think
is
a
challenge
for
token
engineering.
So
if
we
are
creating
new
economies,
how
can
this
new
economies
behave
with
its
people
and
I
feel
like
that's
a
lot
of
what
omega
is
touching
on,
like
what
are
the
ethics
of
token
engineering.
D
Yeah
for
me,
like
I've,
I've
been
operating
under
the
assumption
that
we
were
the
proof
of
concept
for
a
new
type
of
programmable
economy
that
would
transcend
the
self-sacrifice
of
non-profits
and
the
self-interest
of
for-profits
into
a
third
type
of
option.
That
would
allow
for
the
funding
of
a
new
discipline
while
offering
fair
compensation
to
the
builders
behind
it,
and
this
might
very
well
come
true
tomorrow,
but
it
is
not
true.
D
Today,
at
least
for
me-
and
I
understand
that
right
now,
the
the
position
is
that
our
mandate
takes
precedence
over
our
livelihood
and
I
commend
everyone
who
is
as
selfless
as
to
take
part
in
that
and
I
used
to
be,
but
not
anymore.
I
did
it
I
mean
given
given
where
we
went
after.
D
You
know
what
happened
with
mayor
market
and
the
declining
price
of
our
token
and
how
we
are
not,
in
my
opinion,
we're
not
aggressive
enough
in
terms
of
generating
income,
and
the
implication
of
that
is
that
we're
just
going
to
keep
relying
on
low
salaries
or
low
compensation
and
and
fewer
roles.
And
that's
just
precarious.
In
terms
of
the
people
who
are
who
are
employed
here
and.
D
Yeah,
that's
it's
it's
something
that
it's
really
it's!
It's
really
bugging
me,
so
I
just
don't
think
it's
fair,
but
again
I
might
be
operating
under
an
incorrect
assumption.
Maybe
we
are
you
know
we
are.
We
are
focused
on
advancing
talk
engineering
at
the
expense
of
our
own
contributors
and
there
may
be
some
people
who
are
okay
with
that.
But
I
am
not.
B
Oh,
may
I
or
I
don't
know
I'll,
say
something
new
yeah,
okay.
Well,
I
honestly
I
just
kind
of
just
responding
slash
continuing
on
manus
statement.
I
do
agree
with
the
overall
with
his
overall
statement.
I
think
some
some
some
things
like.
I
don't
necessarily
agree
with
some
specifics,
but
well
I
think
it's
a
time
that
I
say
why
what
I
didn't
wanted
to
touch
on
last
week
at
first.
B
B
So
the
issue
I
touched
on
last
week
was
about
the
relationship
between
the
academy
and
the
tc,
because,
like
one
of
the
biggest
projects
we
were
sort
of
pushing
on
for
the
tc
was
this
request
board,
but
angela
didn't
seem
to
be
very
happy
with
it
and
we
are
sort
of
just
freeze
because
she
doesn't
want
to
talk
either
until
the
fundamentals
is
live
and
that's
going
to
be
mid
october.
B
And
so,
while
I
do
agree
with
like
I
can,
I
can
discuss
some
specifics
from
manus
statement,
but
I
wouldn't
be
able
to
you
know
to
just
dismiss
it
in
any
form
and
connecting
the
dots.
B
I
think
the
biggest
problem
we
have
is
the
relationship
with
the
tc
in
pretty
much
everyone
else,
because,
like
we
are,
I
see
I
sense
that
we
are
sort
of
suffering
from
the
charity
of
the
commons
like
we
are
here,
and
everyone
is
welcome
and
stuff,
but
then
every
time
we
have
to
do
something
we
have
to
ask
someone
else.
B
You
know,
like
I've
heard
multiple
times.
We
can
do
this,
because
this
is
the
academies
we
can
do
that
because
that's
I
don't
know
you
know
magics
or
common
stacks
and
stuff,
and
then
it's
like
okay.
So
what
can
we
do
fun?
Everyone
else
and
you
know
not
like
they
are
not
providing
value,
but
it's
just
not
sustainable,
because
that
value
is
not
necessarily
material
or
at
least
not
in
the
in
the
time
frame
that
we
would
need
it
to
be
so
that
we
can
just
continue
and
yeah.
B
B
In
the
say,
the
overall
industry,
but
I
just
don't
see
anything
happening
about
that
and
that
I
think,
is
our
biggest
constraint
to
just
move
forward
and
come
to
the
point
where
that
dtc
was,
you
know
brought
out
to
be,
and
I
just
I
don't
think
that
you
know.
I
said
before
that.
B
I
do
agree
that
we
have
to
continue
funding
t
projects,
and
I
said
we
should
probably
you
know,
have
more
rigid
terms
or
something
more
requirements
or
a
cap
on
the
amount
of
money
we
can
spend
for
a
tea
project
and
get
that
goes
to
the
with
hands
to
what
man
is
saying
that
we
can
fund
as
much
as
we
want.
But
like
there's
a
lot
of
tension
between
the
members
and
there's,
I
believe
more
than
half
of
the
members
on
the
of
the
tc.
B
Don't
know
if
they
are
even
going
to
keep
receiving
any
feasible
money
for
the
next
few
months,
and
so
we
we're
in
the
state
of
like,
if
we
don't
address
that
if
we
don't
address
the
situation
of
the
ttc
in
the
overall
ecosystem
in
the
situation
of
the
members
within
the
tc,
we
we
are
going
to
be
into
big
problems
really
soon.
At
least
in
my
in
my
opinion,
and
that's
everything
I
have
to
say
for
now.
A
B
I
will
have
to
slightly
disagree
there
because
I
mean
it's
true
and
I
I
agree
with
the
statement,
but
I
do
think
all
of
us
know
that
there's
there's
a
lot
of
downsides
in
risks.
B
B
What
I
think
is
more
irresponsible
is
the
estate
that
we
have
put
dtc
in
again
with
particularly
with
the
relationships,
because
I
think
that's
the
biggest
bottleneck
because,
like
I've
been
a
bit
upset
about
that
like
we
have
been
talking
about
the
relationship
of
the
tc
with
others
for
a
long
while
now-
and
we
know
that's
a
big
issue,
but
I
don't
know
what's
happening
with
that,
you
know
I
bring
that
up.
I
I
have
been
lately
bringing
it
up
in
almost
every
call
and
I'm
trying
to
do
my.
B
You
know
to
put
my
grain
of
salt
there,
but,
like
everyone
agrees,
but
there's,
no,
I
don't
I
mean
it's.
It's
also
my
fault,
because
I
don't
know
how
to
act
on
that
case.
But
I
would
imagine
that
if
we
agreed
that
that's
a
big
issue
that
we
would
put
more
efforts
into
coordinating
towards
solving
them,
because
I
don't
know
the
academy
now
has
been
unresponsive
for
almost
two
months,
because
they
are
working
on
the
fundamentals
with.
B
But
we've
known
that
issue
pretty
much
since
I
entered
the
tcu
in
february
march
and
if
we
were
having
more
smart
about
that,
we
would
have
addressed
that
before
this
happened.
B
And,
like
I
don't
know
we're
going
to
in,
if
that's
the
case
with
everything
we
want
to
do
that,
that
there's
someone
walking
we're
going
to
keep
spending
money
because
we
have
to
cover
some
expenses
to
just
stand
up
here
and
talk
randomly
on
all
calls,
and
you
know
try
to
solve
problems.
We
don't
have
the
answers
to
because
there's
someone
there's
a
higher
entity
that
we
have
to
respond
to.
A
A
Oh,
maybe
some
of
the
services
being
offered
here
are
also
something
that
the
t
academy
is
working
on
and
maybe
a
product
of
developed
here
was
paid
by
the
common
stack,
and
so
I
think
there
is
this
intricacies
on
on
how
groups
are
interconnected
and
and
in
a
moment
where
everyone
is
in
need
of
revenue,
and
I
feel
like
that's
something
to
something
to
pay
attention
and
something
that
probably,
like
all
organizations,
should
come
together
and
speak
about
things.
A
I'm
hoping
this
is
going
to
happen
during
devcon
that,
like
in
person,
everything
can
flow
better
and
te
academy
is
going
to
be
launching
their
course
and
they're
going
to
be
some
space
for
like
bringing
some
of
those
issues
to
the
table.
A
A
There's
still
such
a
huge
lack
of
funding,
and
I
think
it's
a
it's
an
economic
challenge
that
it's
not
only.
I
think
that's
what
I've
been
trying
to
say
that
it's
not
only
like
an
issue
of
this
organization.
That
is
understanding
that
some
of
the
economic
models
we've
been
designing
are
just
not
sustainable,
which
is
very
ironic
for
token
engineering
projects,
so
yeah.
E
A
E
I
was
trying
to
encourage
us
to
if
the
the
way
the
steward
thing
is
gonna
work,
we're
gonna
be
transitioning.
You
know
that
maybe
transitioning
from
you
know,
stewards
who
do
most
of
the
work
to
stewards
who
are
much
more
about
facilitation.
You.
A
A
E
A
E
A
Thank
you,
durgadez
yeah,
I
think,
are
some
discussions
on
if
there
is
still
time
to
add
things
to
the
proposal
because
it
feels
like
maybe
there
was
not
enough
participation.
E
A
C
B
Yeah,
I
also
wanted
to
thank
you
and
everyone
else,
because
I
know
I've
been
granting
more
than
usual
in
the
last
few
polls
on
not
only
softball
voices,
other
working
groups
and
I
guess
apologize
if
I
did
use
any
incorrect
term.
Oh
but
yeah,
I'm
I'm
optimistic
anyways,
but
I
guess
that's
the
reality.