►
Description
The Softgov Working Group researches and applies best practices for governance, social collaboration and contribution rewards while implementing Ostrom’s 8 principles for governing the commons in its foundation.
We gather every Tuesday at 7pm CET.
Steward: Liviade
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
B
Nice,
thank
you
for
coming
you
all.
I
am
feeling
inspired
with
a
lot
of
the
things
that
are
happening,
feels
like
fun
projects
working
on
and
hungry,
it's
7
p.m,
and
I
haven't
eaten
today.
Yet
this
is
horrible.
Should
never
do
that
again.
B
Food
is
coming
and
I've
been
in
a
little
bureaucratic
loop.
That
has
been
distracting
me
a
lot.
I
things
don't
work
in
egypt,
I
need
a
vpn
and
then
my
vpn.
It
doesn't
work
with
the
extension.
I
need
to
download
the
app
and
then
I
forgot
my
icloud
password
and
I'm
locked
out
of
that.
So
I
can't
download
the
app
and
then
with
that
I
can
access
my
exchange
in
brazil
and
I
can
get
money
to
buy
my
ticket
to
go
to
kenya.
It's
all
like
it
feels
like.
C
How
is
the
grassroots
economic
commons
going.
B
It's
really
exciting.
It's
such
a
different
work
than
than
the
tc,
though,
and
it's
this
moment
of
like
really
reflecting
also
on
the
choices
we
made
in
the
tc
and
what
could
be
different
and
and
just
working
with
a
project,
that's
so
established
for
so
long.
B
B
I
think
that's
the
challenge
of
advice
process
is
like.
Oh,
when
you
know
that
someone
can
help
you
with
something
you
can
go
directly
to
them,
but
then
limiting
the
scope
of
who
could
give
opinions
into
something
it's
also
challenging.
But
then
also
we
have
the
forum
that
has
so
much
stuff
in
there
and
not
enough
participation.
B
It
feels
like
the
stewards
are
the
people
who
are
most
active
in
the
community
and
and
then
the
stewardship
is
changing
how
to
accommodate
for
new
people
that
are
stepping
up
like,
like
you,
bear
and
kojak
and
like
how
to
have
a
more
fluid
stewardship
style,
and
I
think
that's
being
discussed
in
the
stewards
working
group
and
how
to
not
be
so
closed
off
and
to
hear
more
like
signal
from
the
community,
and
I
think,
with
the
feedback
we've
been
getting
lately,
is
like
there
is
a
division
between
the
tec
community
and
the
token
engineering
community,
and
I
mean
there's
a
few
reasons
of
why
that
happened.
B
B
I
think
it's
a
delicate
moment
that
we're
all
working
to
like
create
the
the
best
outcomes
possible
and
understand
our
financial
sustainability
and
also
the
challenges
that
we
have
in
creating
a
sustainable
economy
for
public
goods
and
how
this
is
something
that
nobody
has
figured
out
and
how
can
we
collaborate
more
with
projects
in
the
space,
so
yeah
having
a
sentiment.
Analysis
from
the
large
community
is
going
to
be
very
important
for
us.
B
I
think
in
this
moment,
and
I
thought
of
doing
a
form,
but
then
police
was
suggested
and,
and
then
there
was
this
controversy
with
like
is
polis,
giving
us
the
results
we
need
is
the
form
going
to
give
the
results.
We
need
what
information
we're
actually
looking
for,
and
how
can
we
achieve
that
in
the
best
way
possible
which
people
will
engage
and
will
have
information
that
can
help
us.
B
D
Okay,
so
the
the
tc
makes
me
feel
valued
for
my
contributions
to
the
token
engineering
space.
We
should
continue
to
fund
token
engineering
related
proposals.
We
should
stop
funding
proposals
until
we
have
sustainable
income.
The
tc
could
collaborate
more
with
token
engineering
projects.
I'm
satisfied
with
the
tone
and
narrative
the
tc
uses
in
social
media.
D
D
D
D
I
know
how
to
create
a
sustainable
model
for
a
public
goods
focus
economy.
The
tc
has
made
significant
contributions
to
the
field
of
token
engineering.
I
think
the
tc
extracts
more
value
than
it
provides.
I
believe
the
tc
is
going
to
be
successful
in
funding
token
engineering
public
goods.
I
am
a
token
engineer
as
a
stakeholder
I
feel
represented
by
tec
communities
towards.
B
So
one
thing
that
we
were
questioning
the
stewards
yesterday
was
like:
how
can
we
get
a
meaningful
feedback
about
how
the
working
groups
are
doing
and
and
the
stewards
are
doing
in
the
face
of
the
community,
and
if
this
statements
as
they
are,
would
offer
any
type
of
insight
that
we
could
work
with.
D
So,
like
my
first
kind
of
like
opinion
on
this
is
that
a
lot
of
these
are
really
important
questions
that
I
don't
think
might
be
just
like
have
a
simple
answer
or
like
a
yes
or
no
kind
of
answer
right,
I
think
through
the
police,
you
probably
could
get
some
sentiment
but,
like
I
would
say,
like
pretty
pretty
basic,
I
think
a
lot
of
these
questions
need
more
of
of
of
a
reason
as
an
answer
you
know-
and
I
don't
think
police
would
be
able
to
probably
provide
that,
but
maybe,
as
a
first
step,
it
would
be
good
because
I
think
they
are
all
important
topics
like
really
important
questions
to
be
asking
ourselves.
D
You
said
something
about
relationship
with
a
token
engineering
academy
that
there
was
some
kind
of
like,
I
think
you
said,
separation
between
the
tc
and
I'm
talking
engineering.
So
I
think
those
are
like
super
important
things
to
to
discuss
them
that
we
could
probably
add
here
as
well.
I
don't
know
those
are
like
my
first
impressions
right
now.
B
A
Yeah
are.
B
A
B
Yeah
I
mean
this
is
being
looked
at
and
sample
working
group
is
working
a
lot
on
that,
and
there
is
this
investigation
on
the
utility
of
the
tac.
But
this-
and
I
I
would
say,
is
somehow-
and
I
mean
I
think
there
is
a
general
dissatisfaction
with
the
compensation
model,
but
I
would
say
it's
somehow
an
assumption
that
to
function
we
need
well.
A
Yeah
utility,
one
point
which
I
I
mean
I
tried
making-
is
that
the
value
which
is
being
created
within
the
dec
community
and
the
potential
for
value
creation
is
extremely
high,
and
the
tragedy
seems
to
be
that
token.
Engineering
is
supposed
to
be
able
to
convert
that
issue
with
token
engineering
is,
is
basically
about
being
able
to
use
mechanism
design
to
convert
that
value
into
financial
incentives.
A
D
Yeah,
no
yeah,
it's
yeah,
we,
we
are
kodak.
There
are
some
projects
that
are
starting
to
come
up
as
a
simple
iteration.
First,
something
part
a
part
of
the
principles
of
sample
you
know
is
just
to
deliver
something
simple:
deliver
some
something
simple
and
start
iterating
on
it
to
improve
it
over
time.
So
we
have
a
couple
of
projects.
Like
these
token
token,
holder
channel
within
the
discord
channel
that
only
tc
holders
will
be
will
have
access
to.
D
So
maybe
it's
something
pretty
small,
pretty
simple,
but
it's
kind
of
used
like
a
starting
point
for
finding
token
utility,
and
we
also
have
these
other
token
engineer-
request
board.
D
This
is
another
project
that
would
like
to
incorporate
the
token
utility,
while,
basically,
how
would
work
is
that
the
tc
could
become
like
the
the
point
in
which
projects
could
find
token
engineers
or
token
engineer
groups
that
could
take
in
on
those
projects.
So
we
would
be
like
kind
of
match
making
projects
with
token
engineering
suppliers,
let's
call
them
and
we
would
have
some
token
utility
dynamic
within
that
within
that
collaboration.
D
D
A
D
In
terms
of
here,
leave
the
the
what
you
were
saying
something
else
to
add
here
on
the
financial
section.
Maybe
I
would,
I
would
add,
like
compensation
as
kind
of
like
a
bigger
topic
and
maybe
the
reward
system
under
that,
because
then
you
have
like
salaries
right.
You
have
bounties
different
models
that
could
be
applied,
that
all
maybe
fall
under
compensation
structure.
A
Yeah
I
mean
in
in
my
particular
model
it's
like
having
a
currency
for
this
particular
ecosystem,
like
the
sense
that
you
know
any
type
of
activity
could
be
sort
of
incentivized
like
people
could
be
incentivized
for
doing
any.
I
mean,
like
I
help
you
create
a
presentation
or
you
take
input
from
me.
A
You
could
reward
me
so
actually
that
actually
catalyzes
the
whole
ecosystem,
because
there's
so
much
of
value,
which
is
being
actually
I
mean,
there's
so
much
of
value
potential
and
if,
if,
if
you're
talking,
if
you
talk
about
token
engineering,
then
this
is
what
it
is
all
about.
The
real
point
is
that
how
why
are
we
not
capitalizing
on
it.
A
The
idea
is
to
start
off
with,
with
you
know,
with
small
experiments
hydrate,
but
it
should
be
iterated
against
a
very,
like
a
very
large
framework,
a
large
framework
which
actually
solves
all
the
all
the
problems
I
mean
it
can
solve
all
the
problems.
A
B
If
you
were
answering
the
form
we
are
creating,
you
would
say
probably
what
you're
saying,
but
now
we
are
like
a
step
behind
of
trying
to
find
the
questions
of
gathering
inputs
like
yours
from
everyone
in
the
community.
So
I
would
love
to
focus
on
that
and
we
can
move
forward
with
this
with
this
form.
Maybe
it
is
better
to
have
as
a
forum
and
not
as
polis,
and
then
we
can
gather
community
feedback
like
what
you're
giving,
which
is
super
important.
B
But
if
we
structure
this
in
the
best
way
possible,
then
we
can
get
from
many
people
and
have
a
consistent
way
of
analyzing
the
the
feedback.
So
is
there
anything
else
under
financial
that
we
could
consider?
So
maybe
those
are
topics
to
which
we
would
have
questions
for
so
conviction,
voting
and
like
the
access
to.
D
Yeah,
I
was
maybe
something
to
do
with
kind
of
like
reporting
and
kind
of
like
accountability
of
financial.
D
Issues
and
maybe
like
even
planning
as
well
yeah,
maybe
that
would
go
into
organizational
right,
because
I
think
accountability
could
be
like
either
in
the
work
and
the
operations
of
the
different
contributors,
but
also
accountability
in
terms
of
funding
right
of
the
of
the
money
that
working
groups
have.
So
I
don't
know
how
would
you
like
organize
you
there,
but
just
bringing
that
point
out.
B
Yeah
yeah
that's
important,
because
I
think
how
to
be
accountable.
It's
a
matter
of
like
management
right
like
how
are
we
getting
that
accountability.
B
D
D
This
is
used
across
some
some
type
of
organizations
like
teal
organizations.
I
don't
know
if
you
guys
have
heard
about
it,
but
it's
it's
an
interesting,
interesting
concept,
because
it
really
brings
like
the
the
essence
of
the
project
or
of
the
organization
into
a
really
simple
massive
transformative
purpose.
You
know
kind
of
like
an
interesting
concept
that
might
be
interesting
to
explore
and
add
it
into
this
into
this
narrative.
A
Yeah
I'd
like
to
also
possibly
fill
in
there
saying
that,
against
I
mean,
like
you
know,
almost
any
sort
of
an
initiative
can
be
framed
against
a
massively
transformative
purpose.
A
And
you
know
which
which,
which
accomplishes
you
know
a
large
purpose
of
of
the
organization,
and
they
within
this
particular
massively
transformative
purpose.
A
You
can
have
a
moonshot
which
releases
the
what's
called
the
exponentiality
of
the
purpose,
of
course,
and
you
have
milestones
to
this
particular
moonshot
and
basically
the
idea
is
to
fund
these
tiny
milestones
or
you
know,
focus
on
or
on
these
milestones,
and
once
you
achieve
one
or
two
sequential
milestones,
then
the
confidence
in
achieving
the
moonshot
and
also
the
purpose
actually
increases,
and
it's
massively
invigorating
for
the
organization
it
actually
draws
in
funding.
A
You
know,
that's
you
know
people
like
to
work
for
a
cause,
not
just
a
tiny
project
and
anyway,
what
what
really
drives
me
is
the
cause
of
the
te
commons.
More
than
anything
else,.
B
D
Relationship
with
tec
holders.
D
Well,
he
comes
back,
maybe
in
relational
we
could
have
partnerships
as
well.
B
A
A
D
D
That
makes
it
easier
and
simpler
to
to
answer.
But
again,
I
think
those
some
of
these
are
not
simple
answers,
so
maybe
a
mix
between
different
different
ways
of
asking
questions,
and
also
it
was
gonna.
I
was
gonna
comment
that
maybe
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
input
that
we
could
add
into
here
could
come
from
the
swot
analysis
board
from
the
figma.
Now
that
I'm
thinking
about,
I
think.
D
A
Yeah,
in
fact,
what
oh
you,
the
figma,
and
what,
on
the
top,
I
mean
what
all
the
topics
have
done.
A
A
Yeah,
in
fact,
if
you
see
my
post
in
the
software
in
the
soft
governance,
basically
what
I've
said
is
using
the
the
spot
analysis
which
we
have
done.
A
We
have
basically
arrived
at
a
kind
of
a
strategy
for
tackling
the
problems
of
of
of
the
you
know:
tc
ecosystem
now,
figma,
sorry,.
A
B
B
I
think
we
should
just
have
something
a
little
more
like
a
link
or
something
that
we
can
send
to
people
that
we
could
collect
this
and
I
think
it
could
be
anonymous
or
not.
People
could
give
to
have
the
option
of
being
anonymous
or
not.
A
No,
are
you
saying
I
mean
what
you're
doing
is
actually?
Are
you
preparing
a
kind
of
a
question
which
can
be
sent
to
everybody.
B
A
A
B
Cool
yeah,
if
you
want
to
work
on
that,
that
sounds
good
and
then
we
can
integrate
whenever
we
have
something,
and
for
this
do
you
think?
So
what
do
you
think
juan
haven't
heard?
Much
from
you.
C
Yeah,
I
think
that
the
the
statements
are
are
good.
C
I
also
think
that
that
issue
that
kojak
is
mentioning
is
something
that
not
only
the
tc
is
experimenting
and
that
it's
like
the
real
question
that
that
we
are
still
questioning
and-
and
I
also
think,
like
the
token
engineering
field-
is
still
a
very
nascent
field
and
that
we
don't
have
like
perfect
answers.
C
It
would
be
really
cool
if
we
could
meet
the
promise
of
of
being
the
house
being
the
future
of
of
work
and
of
human
coordination,
but
we
still
are
in
this
gray
area,
where
there
is
still
a
lot
of
financial
instability
and
a
lot
of
of
of
processes
that
are
still
like
getting
into
a
standard
and
yeah.
I
I
also
understand
how
difficult
it
is
to
to.
C
To
to
make
everyone
feel
that
that
their
their
contribution
is
is
fairly
rewarded,
but
I
also
financially,
but
I
also
agree
with
levy
that
just
participating
in
these
environments
also
gives
us
certain
rewards
that
are
not
only
financial
but
like
socially.
C
But,
like
I
yeah,
I
think
that
we
still
don't
have
a
magic
thing
that
we
can
do
for
us
and
reproduce
to
everyone,
we're
still
figuring
out,
and
I
think
that
also
some
of
the
things
that
we
are
struggling
are
are
not
just
because
of
us,
but
are
because
of
of
a
macro
environment
like
yeah.
C
We
are
seeing
in
in
the
whole
web
3
movement
that
we
still
have
a
lot
of
volatility
and,
like
we
still
see
ourselves,
impacted
a
lot
by
what
we
call
like
bear
and
bull
markets,
and
it
would
be
it
is.
It
is
a
strange
because
also
I
I
think
that
it's
it's
different
timings
that
that
things
have
and
like
right
now
we
are
thinking
on
how
to
make
financial
revenue,
but
within
a
a
market
that
it's
in
crisis.
C
But
I
think
that,
by
the
way
that
we
are
structured
and
by
by
just
the
right
timing,
when
the
market
conditions
are
better,
we
will
also.
C
Feel
a
better
condition
in
from
from
from
from
what
we're
able
to
reward
our
contributors.
C
I
feel
that
yeah,
maybe
sometimes
we
want
things
to
move
fast,
all
the
time
and
sometimes
like
we
move
fast,
and
then
we
stop
a
little
bit
and
then
we
and
then
we
have
to
see,
look
back
and
revalidate
and
yeah.
I
also
think-
and
I
agree
with
kojic,
that
all
of
the
working
groups
that
we
have
have
created
value,
but
sometimes
we
we.
We
also
have
to
wait
for
other
people
to
recognize
the
value.
C
B
Yeah,
thank
you
for
sharing.
So
concretely,
how
can
we
make
this
happen?
Are
we
simple
question?
Are
you
we
using
a
form
or
or
at
the
police
it
sounded
like
people
were
more
drawn
to
the
polis,
because
it's
faster,
it
requires
less
engagement
and
maybe,
with
this
structured
a
little
bit
better,
we
could
come
up
with
statements
for
each
one
of
these
topics,
and
maybe
we
could
use
the
statements
that
already
exist,
but
now
thinking
better,
I
think
they're,
not
that
good.
B
D
B
C
Should
we
write
them,
follow
like
next
to
the
word
or
below
the
the
list.
B
I
think
below
the
list.
Let's
see.
D
So
as
we're
adding
statements,
I
wanted
to
ask
you
a
question
living
regarding
the
trial
through
and
policy
document,
and
that
was
the
intent
was
to
ratify
it.
Through
snapshot
should.
B
D
D
B
D
D
So
right
now
I'm
not
able
to
to
write
anything
down,
but
I
might
do
it
after.
If
that's
okay.
D
Well,
so
right
now,
maybe
I
was
just
thinking
more
on
the
the
ones
you
already
wrote.
Maybe
where
would
they
fit
in?
I
think
there's
some
like.
I
think
you
had
some
for,
for
example,
for
the
working
groups
that
are
like
pretty
basic,
that
I
think
they
should
be.
D
B
Yeah,
that
was
a
question.
Actually
we
discussed
a
little
bit.
What
would
be
the
best
way
to
get
insights
into
the
working
groups?
And
I
don't
know
if
this
is
a
good
metric
like
just
knowing
how
many
people
know
about
what's
happening
on
them
or
not
or
if
we
have.
We
should
have
a
different
statement.
D
I
think
it's
an
important
statement.
Actually
today
I
came
across
well,
I
think
native,
an
answer
to
him,
a
post
from
innovator
kind
of
like
a
little
concern
about
like
newcomers
coming
to
the
to
the
server
and
really
not
knowing
what's
happening.
So
I
guess
that's
really
related
with
this.
With
this
statement.
D
Yeah,
no,
I
I
think
I
would
share
that
feeling
as
well
yeah.
I
think
it
would
be
delicate,
but
might
be
kind
of
like
a
hard
question,
but
maybe,
like
the
answers,
bring
up
something
that
that
it's
hard
too
hard
to
tell.
I
don't
know
yeah
it's.
Maybe
it
needs
more
advice
from
other
people
or
opinions,
but
I
don't
think
it's
a
bad
idea
to
include
them
or
maybe
more
about
the
the
role
of
the
working
group
like
if
they
feel,
because
you
know
sometimes
it
feels
like
they're.
D
Some
of
them
are
more
like
focus
on
building
like
services
and
kind
of
like
more
work,
and
then
there
are
others
that
are
more
like
bond
by
like
an
interest
or
like
a
certain
discussion
that
emerges
from
there
more
like
surrounded
by
the
community
that
share
like
some
interest
and
they
they
discuss
about
it.
D
D
I
think
there
there
would
be
like
working
groups
that
that
their
work
is
more
like
direct
to
achieving
the
thesis
mission,
but
then
there
might
be
other
working
groups
that
their
work
and
their
purpose
might
not
be
as
direct,
but
it's
still
important
for
the
community.
You
know
kind
of
like
that
difference,
but
I
don't
know
how
would
how
to
state
it.
Let
me
think.
B
B
And
maybe
understanding
the
perspective
people
have
of
that
like?
If
we
have
a
signal
like
let's
say,
softgov
might
not
be
important
for
the
directly
for
the
tc
mission,
but
it
has
an
organizational
or
like
or.
D
Exactly
yeah
and
for
example,
sometimes
I
feel
like
just
for
the
fact
of
being
a
working
group.
You
are
kind
of
like
expected
to
accomplish
certain
things.
For
example,
like
a
funding
proposal,
you
know,
like
every
working
group
should
have
a
funding
proposal
at
some
point.
Maybe
that's
not
the
case
right.
D
Maybe
there
are
some
groups
that
they
don't
actually
need
a
funding
proposal
or
they
don't
need
funds
to
actually
fulfill
its
its
its
purpose
or
its
mission
right
or
maybe
in
a
different
way,
right
or
or
it's
kind
of
expected
that
all
working
groups
need
to
build
something
need
to
build
a
service
or
a
product.
Maybe
that's
not
the
case
either
kind
of
like
expectations
for
working
groups.
B
Expect
but
then
that
would
be
like
a
quest.
How
can
we
put
that
into
a
statement.