►
From YouTube: TEC Sprint 17 Planning: Party in denver and worry less
Description
Timecodes:
00:00 - Critical to Commons Upgrade
12:40 - Transparency
16:44 - Legal
25:30 - Params
30:52 - Common Swarm
32:26 - Gravity
40:30 - Soft Gov
42:25 - Comms
52:48 - Stewards
01:05:43 - Onboarding and operations
01:44:47 - Boardroom
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
A
A
And
if
you
want
to,
if
you
have
like,
maybe
we
can
go
around
robin
and
we
can
go
through
everyone,
and
you
could
say
what
are
the
issues
in
your
working
group
that
you're
aware
of
that
are
that
are
critical
to
the
commons
upgrade
either
must
have,
or
it
would
be
really
nice
if
we
could
do
it.
But
if
we
don't
do
it,
we
could
still
do
the
commons
upgrade
and
I'll
pass
to
griff
first.
Actually,
because
I
feel
like
you'll
have
plenty.
B
A
A
So
maybe
I'll
even
put
all
these
key
proposals,
you
know
I
was
thinking
about
the
75
governance
and
I
was
thinking.
Oh,
we
don't
have
to
have
that
before
the
commons
upgrade
in
theory,
we
could
vote
after
and
then
I
checked
myself
and
realized.
No,
it
absolutely
has
to
happen.
We
have
to
vote
before
the
commons
upgrade
because
after
the
commons
upgrade
will
be
not
hatchers,
they
will
so
it's
really
a
hatcher
decision,
not
a
hatcher
plus
anyone
else
who
participates
to
ech
tokens
decision.
A
B
D
B
B
You
know,
because
the
technical
solution,
if
can
be
added
in
various
ways
but
like
do
they
want
to
give
these
people
governance
tokens
or
not
like
that's
what
I
I
would
really
love
to
focus
in
on
that,
because
that's
something
we
can't
answer
and
the
technical
solution
is
like
it's
kind
of
like.
Should
the
community
be
deciding
what
courses
you
put
in
the
gravity
training,
I
I
just
don't
think
so.
You
know
like
we
should
be
able
to
figure
out
the
right
technical
solution
without
without
the
community,
but
honestly.
D
E
A
G
F
Yeah,
but
I
mean
like
there's,
there
should
be
rules
around
like
you
know,
if,
if
it
has
to
pass
the
88
threshold
through
snapshot
before
it's
even
considered
on
on-chain
type
of
transaction,
so
like
I,
I
think
we
should
map
everything
out
in
terms
of
what
types
of
voting
do
you
use
when
and
there's
going
to
be
multiple
rounds
with
the
proposals
of
the
commons
configuration
dashboard.
So
there's
there's
a
bunch
of
different
things
that
need
to
be
discussed.
E
A
E
A
G
A
Okay,
maybe
we'll
start
going
around
the
board
and
seeing
if
people
are
ready
for
their
their,
I
mean
if
everyone
I
mean,
if
everyone's
ready
to
plan
their
sp
the
sprint
and
as
things
become,
as
we
noted
note
that
things
are
critical
path,
we
can
drop
them
on
the
mirror
board.
Maybe
we'll
sort
of
do
it
the
two
at
the
same
time,
so
I'll
go
just
through
the
retrospective
actions
from
the
retrospective,
which
is
everyone
should
participate
at
least
once
per
week
in
the
forum
really.
A
The
message
here
is
like
participate
more
in
the
forum,
although
I
do
have
to
say,
even
though
this
was
the
winning
action,
I
really
feel,
like
the
forum
has
a
life
now
you
know
it
used
to
be
really
dead,
but
now
it's
alive.
So
I
I
actually
really
like
to
see
that,
even
though
I'm
definitely
one
of
the
people
who
aren't
making
enough
time
to
participate,
it
just
takes
a
lot
of
time
to
read
and
write
at
all
and
then
reminders.
A
One
issue,
one
assignee
and
don't
overload
three
to
four
hours
and
really
our
focus
today
is
critical
to
commons
upgrade.
So
those
are
the
things
we're
probably
we
are
most
I'll
say
concerned
with
this
sprint,
other
things
too,
but
I
think
between
now
and
hitting
that
upgrade
that's
going
to
be
our
full
focus.
A
G
Yeah
well,
we
saw
today
like
the
suga
on
one
contributed,
like
the
price
board.
Message
is
misleading,
like
still
talking
about
impact
hours
in
the
hatch
so
yeah.
Maybe
we
should
change
it
and
ivy
is
going
to
to
lead
it
and
yeah.
We
can
work
together,
of
course,
but
she's,
leading
and
and
then
yeah
also
we're
going
to
work
on
the
type
of
both
of
the
snapshots
like
I
ideally
like.
We
like
nate,
was
saying
before
like
half
an
structure,
but
the
first
thing
it
would
be.
I
I'm
thinking
like
doing.
G
If
we
are
in
a
hurry,
maybe
we
cannot
do
it
like.
We
did
with
a
code
of
conduct
for
audits
for
admins,
but
yeah.
The
idea
is
to
get
all
the
type
of
votes
and
when
to
use
when
and
be
clear
with
the
community.
I
feel
like
when
to
use
when
it's
more
like
a
soft
task
like
it's,
because
it's
governance
but
make
it
available
to
the
community.
So
everyone
understands
its
transparency,
so
I
think
yeah.
We
should
collaborate
on
that
which.
E
A
E
G
To
work
so
hard
and
and
then
also
mitch,
is
leading
the
treasury
management.
We
also
started
to
talk
with
the
agave
team.
There
are
some
like
there
are
some
technical
things
that
are
still
not
I
mean
the
the
their
money
is
held
by
a
multi-sig.
So,
of
course
we
don't
want
to
put
the
money
on
a
multi-sig.
They
are
working
to
operate
to
a
gardens
but
yeah
they.
The
really
important
thing
for
me
with
the
treasury
management
is
like.
We
do
not
create
privileged
positions
and
bureaucrats
so
yeah.
G
My
intention
there
is
to
be
close
to
mitch
and
see
how
it
works.
Do
some
research
on
how
other
house
work
and
and
yeah
and
try
to
make
a?
I
really,
I
know,
like
everyone,
not
everyone,
but
some
work.
Good
like
there
is
some
thinking
behind
making
a
working
group.
I
I'm
I'm
really
against
that,
and
sean
had
a
very
good
idea
today
on
the
legal
call
having
like
a
discord
room
to
chat
about
it,
a
forum
section,
of
course,
like
we
can
go
and
chat
on
the
voice
channel.
E
G
A
Yeah
I
mean
for
from
my
point
of
view,
it
sounds
like
what
we're
really
doing
is
like
a
feasibility
study,
now
we're
just
trying
to
understand,
what's
possible
and
what's
best
of
the
possibilities
which
one
will
be
best
for
the
tec
yeah.
So
it
sounds
like
you're
starting
work
in
that
direction,
which
is
great.
E
A
E
There
is
not
too
much
nothing
critical
for
the
upgrade
we
just
as
septie
mentioned.
I
just
got
back
from
the
previous
days.
I
was
off
and
we
we
just
confirmed
that
we
closed
the
legal
discussions
on
the
covenant
which
I
just
closed
and
we
we
also
closed
the
discussions
on
the
treasury
for
the
subgroups,
and
we
had
a
long
discussion
today
on
the
legal
meeting
concerning
the
legal
implications
of
the
treasury.
If
we
ever
decide
to
do
anything
with
the
treasury,
we
ended
up.
E
Sean
is
going
to
create
an
initial
draft
document
and
whatever
we
end
up
deciding
as
a
dao,
even
if
we
decide
not
to
do
anything
with
the
treasury
because
of
the
government
governance
implications,
make
it
hard
or
or
we
consider
that
it's
not
the
best
way
to
move
forward.
We
think
that
it
should
be
included
in
our
in
our
documents,
so
anyone
that
joins
later
on
and
may
pose.
This
question
may
have
an
answer
to
that
questions.
E
The
proposal
there
was
a
proposal,
legal
document
that
we
created
yeah.
We
should
take
a
look
at
that-
I
think
that's
probably
finished,
but
but
yeah,
let's
create
an
issue
there
make
sure
that
everything
is
fine
and
if
not,
we
just
can
finish
it
up.
That's
the
probably
the
only
critical
stuff
that
I
may
think
of
for
the
commons.
B
E
B
A
A
B
E
E
E
A
E
E
E
E
A
E
E
This
other
question
is
more
about.
How
do
we
deal
from
the
legal
standpoint
point?
How
do
we
do
it
with
a
revenue
stream
that
gets
created
from
something
that
the
dow
is
doing?
Let's
say
we
provide
consultancy
for
other
dollars
to
create
and
they
you
know
they
pay
it
for
it.
They
pay
for
that
service.
That's
going
to
be
a
direct.
A
A
And
then
just
to
go
back
to
the
issue
about
the
terms
and
conditions
for
receiving
funds.
I
am
closing
the
issue,
but
I'm
just
leaving
a
note
in
and
tagging
libya
just
to
keep
in
mind
like
this
is
probably
something
from
sopka.
I
think
like
a
social
agreement
with
the
with
the
proposals
that
are
receiving
funds,
it
doesn't
have
to
be
legal,
but
it's
something.
I
think
that
we
would
still
have
reputation
or
something
like
that.
A
A
B
Yeah
I
mean
there's
no
shortage
of
I
gotta
do
it's
like
the
prams
is
obviously
the
biggest
blocker.
We
have
to
continue
to
do
user
testing
on
the
on
the
dashboard
and
get
it
done
so
people
can
vote
for
like
a
month
and
we
can
collectively
design
our
economy
our
economy,
our
choice,
but
we
gotta
build
the
like
the
tools
and
then,
when
that's
so
we'll
be
also
running
the
pram
parties
and
making
sure
that
everything's
really
fun
and
exciting
and
awesome.
B
B
B
B
I
think
so
too,
and
it
should
be
a
really
easy
one.
It
might
be
a
fun
one
to
delegate
if
you
know
someone
who
wants
to
do
it,
because
it's
a
really
easy
one:
okay,
if
they've
ever
conviction,
voting,
yeah
and
then
qa
on
the
lock
up,
qa,
almost
all
the
qa
ones,
except
for
the
bonding
curve
and
all
the
dev
ones,
except
for
the
bonding
curve.
B
A
B
A
Okay,
we
don't
have
to
talk
timelines
here,
but
just
as
I
was
thinking
about
sort
of
params
and
like
the
critical
like
the
interdependencies
between
params
and
comms
and
the
other
working
groups,
let's
say
the
dashboard
is
ready
and
then
there's
some
number
of
days
for
community
members
to
uat
and
to
incorporate
fixes
and
then
there's
the
campaigns
to.
Let
people
know
that
the
dashboard
is
almost
ready.
Some
sort
of
like
campaign
around
here
is
the
here
are
the
next
dates
for
the
votes.
A
Then
there's
some
amount
of
time
for
the
primaries,
all
the
debates
that
we'll
be
hosting
some
amount
of
days
for
the
runoff,
the
debates
that
we'll
be
hosting
and
then
a
few
days
to
test
and
implement,
and
then
a
launch
so
very
high
level
ignore
these
dates.
But,
like
that's
the
sequence
of
events
that
will
bring
us
to
the
commons
upgrade
and
then
we
can
sort
of
flush.
These
out,
okay,
okay,
that's
gonna
sort
of
be.
A
B
B
It'll
be
cool
to
have,
but
we
could
we
don't
need
it
so
yeah
and
so
we'll
explore
the
bonding
curve
modification
this.
This
turns
my
goal
with.
That
is
to
appeal
to
authorities
to
talk
some
sense
into
stem,
because
I
think
that
we
can
add
it.
But
so
I
have
to
go:
get
the
people
who
wrote
this
smart
contracts
because
he
said
even
if
brett
thinks
it's.
Okay,
it's
not
enough
so,
but
he
did
say
that
he
would
consider.
E
D
D
And
yeah,
I
wrote
some
some
advances
on
the
promote
and
start
the
nbc
study
club.
This
is
a
new
one,
and
this
is
because,
as
the
graviton
training
is
going
to
happen
on
tuesdays
after
softcup,
the
time
slot
after
tuesday,
thursday's
community
call
will
be
used
to
have
a
nbc
study
club
and
the
initial
proposal
is
to
have
these
calls
on
the
dow
book
club
server
so
that
after
the
tc
community
cost,
the
dc
server
is
available
for
making
spotlights
for
proposals
and
projects.
A
D
Yeah
finishing
the
second
growing
training
study
plan.
I
think
that
the
study
plan
is
ready.
We
finished
it
yesterday,
but
the
next
move
is
to
post
it
on
the
forum,
and
I
think
I
could
do
it
this
weekend
or
starting
this
the
next
week
and
I
didn't
go
to
the
legal
call
of
today,
but
I
don't
know
how
are
they
on
the
code
of
conduct
for
admins?
I
gave
like
my
comments
on
the
on
the
document,
but
I
don't
know
how
are
they
right
now?
D
G
A
E
D
Yeah,
I
read
it
and
made
some
comments,
but
we'll
try
to
see
what
kind
of
what
else
can
I
do
on
that
so
yeah?
I
can
put
it
on
spring
backlog,
the
making
the
pops
that's
very
advanced.
I
think
that
the
only
thing
that
we're
missing,
because
we
have
the
designs
and
we
have
the
the
events
created-
we
we
are
only
missing
to
integrate
the
bot
with
the
server
and
like
make
the
the
the
passwords
so
that
people
can
claim
their
pops
and.
D
D
I
have
one
idea
and
I
am
going
to
post
it
here
in
the
in
the
cenhop
before
posting
it
in
the
forum
to
have
some
advice
process,
because
I
was
thinking
that
maybe
we
could
have
like
multiple
alternatives
and
like
that
way,
we
can
somehow
have
the
boat,
like
considering
multiple
paths
that
people
can
have
on
on
and
dividing
the
two,
the
two
aspects
of
the
boat
that
are
like
the
governance
side
and
the
technical
solution.
So
yeah.
D
A
A
A
The
make
no
changes
proposal
and
I
do
feel
like,
rather
than
making
it
more
complicated,
we
should
be
trying
to
make
it
less
complicated
and
should
just
stick
with
what
was
voted
by
the
community
and
see
if
the
like,
we
we
did,
or
it
was
saying
the
proposal
was
group's
proposal.
They
did
say
that
it
would
come
to
a
vote
later
in
the
community,
and
I
think
that
the
time
is
to
do
the
vote,
but
not
to
then
change
the
parameters
of
what
we're
voting
on
just
to
keep
with
what
we
said.
D
Yeah,
I
think
I
I
was
like
blocking
it
in
in
a
little
bit
in
in
my
mind,
but
I
am
going
to
try
to
like
give
it
a
twist
on
my
understanding
and
yeah.
I
am
going
to
have
an
advice
process
and
like
continuous
talking
to
luke.
How
would
be
the
better
the
best
way
to
handle
this
and
yeah
go
forward
with
it.
A
C
A
C
E
A
C
E
C
A
C
A
C
A
Sorry
about
that,
it's
okay
and
I
think
we'll
just
move
on
from
softcup
you.
I
know
that
there's
a
lot
of
critical
commons
upgrade.
Can
you
also
tag
the
ones
in
soft
gov
that
are
critical
to
commons
upgrade
and
we
can
have
a
review
of
all
of
the
criticals
to
commons
upgrade
on
wednesday
on
our
next
stewards
meeting
and
then
maybe
we
can
also
have
some
more
discussion
around
it:
okay,
chewie.
How
are
you
feeling
about
calms.
E
C
E
E
E
E
A
A
E
And
what
I
was
just
about
to
add,
but
I
don't
know
if
it's
going
to
be
under
the
the
funding
proposal,
is
just
a
contributor
index
like
who
do
we
have
like
what
are
they
doing,
even
if
they're
spending
like
an
hour
per
week,
just
to
have
like
a
like
a
better
idea
of
how
many
contributors
we
have?
I
feel
that
it's
gonna
help
out
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
the
organization
side
of
it.
But
would
you
consider
this
critical
for
commons
upgrade.
E
A
A
A
Okay,
I'm
gonna,
try.
The
criteria
for
commons
upgrade
critical
to
commons
upgrade
is
really.
If
this
piece
of
work
isn't
done,
we
will
not
upgrade,
and
if
this
piece
of
work
is
done,
that
means
we
can
continue
to
upgrade.
We
can
continue
to
the
upgrade,
so
I
don't
know
where
the
index
falls
in
for
you,
but
if
it's
something
that
can
happen
after
the
commons
upgrade,
then
it's
probably
a
nice
to
have
and
not
critical
to
commons,
upgrade.
A
I
did
have
a
question
that
I
posted
in
the
tec
stewards
we
used
to
keep
track
of
how
many
contributors
we
had
active
contributors
we
had
and
we
used
to
do
that
by
how
many
people
we
praised
and
we've
stopped
doing
that,
and
I
wonder
if
maybe
craig
or
ivy
have
any
ideas
about
our
zeptimus,
how
we
can
estimate
how
many
active
contributors
we
have
now
I
mean
it's
probably
still
through
praise,
but
we're
not
doing
it.
Bi-Weekly
like
we
used
to.
E
B
A
B
A
A
A
I
would
really
love
to
update
the
high
level
to
ec
roadmap,
but
I
think
it's
going
to
be
the
sprint
that
it
gets
built
in
and
zeb
for
our
for
our
two
votes.
I'm
gonna
leave
them
in
the
sprint
backlog
until
we
just
resolve
them.
We
know
that
they're
ongoing
and
there's
new
steps,
but
I'll
just
I'll
leave
them
here
until
we
finally
can
close
these
issues.
Okay,.
A
G
G
F
A
A
A
A
F
A
F
A
F
E
E
B
A
So
the
objective
of
this
is
like
make
it
easier
for
hatchers
to
find
snapshot,
because
that
way
they
can
vote
on
proposals
and
nate
is
it
can?
Can
I
assign
this
to
you?
Do
you
want
to
take
this
and
sort
of
come
up
with
a
few
different
things,
and
then
we
can
work
on
how
you
put
it
on
the
website
and
whether
it's
christopher
that
can
do
that.
F
Yeah
definitely
and
my
original
idea
for
it
was
to
start
using
boardroom,
but
I
I
kind
of
got
some.
You
know
pushback
on
it,
but
I
don't
know
if
how
people
feel
about
the
use
of
boardroom
or
if
we
should
go
ahead
and
move
forward
with
it
or
because
it
does
have
an
interface
for
snapshot
as
well
as
forum
proposals
so
yeah.
I
just
want
to
hear
your
thoughts
on
that
before
as
well.
F
A
Okay,
if
not,
we
get
added
to
the
agenda
for
the
next,
the
next
sprint.
The
next
stewards
call
by
the
way
I
had
an
epiphany.
I
think
I
don't
know-
maybe
I
can
get
some
opinions
here
too.
I
think
that
every
I
think
I'm
gonna
separate
the
coordination
from
like
the
stewards
council,
where
we're
like
talking
about
big
subjects
and
every
week
would
be
the
wednesday
would
be
the
coordination,
the
stewards,
coordination
and
then
every
other
thursday.
A
Where
we're
not
doing
the
retrospective,
we
would
have
more
like
a
council
where
we
we
can
really
dig
into
like
deep
questions
and
have
long
discussions
and
hopefully,
at
the
end,
have
resolutions
like
we're
going
to
take
this
action
about
this.
But
I
feel
like
we're
trying
to
do
both
in
the
same
one
hour
period
we
have
weekly
and
it's
getting
squished
we're
not
getting
to
the
coordination
part.
A
A
So
you
also
want
to
talk
about
website,
redesign
or
website
improvements.
Do
you
want
to
open
an
issue
for
that
and
we
could
start
tracking?
It
is
that
is
that
something
it
seems
like?
We
have
a
lot
going
on
this
sprint
nate.
Is
it
something
that
you
heal
is
high
priority
and
needs
to
be
done?
This
sprint.
F
I
I
don't
think
it's
high
priority.
I
think
it
really
needs
to
have
consensus
on
how
we
want
to
approach
the
website,
because
I
would
like
to
see
the
website
integrated
within
hubspot
as
well,
but,
like
I
said,
access
has
been
a
problem,
and
so
you
know
if
we
want
to
do
the
embed
with
the
forum
as
well.
That
would
be
really
nice
then
and
to
have
the
snapshot
along
with
it
would
be
great,
but
that's
not
a
immediate
thing.
F
A
A
I
christopher,
I
don't
know
if
christopher
will
continue
to
do
the
website
for
the
tec.
So
if,
if
he
can't,
then
we
should
just
find
somebody
else
who
maybe
can
and
if
he
can,
then
we
can
sort
of
ask
when
he's
available
to
do
it.
I
didn't
realize
that
there
was
any
issue.
Was
there
something
that
didn't
happen
that
needed
to
happen.
F
A
Website
bug
fixes
so
here
sort
of,
like
just
seems,
like
everything's
closed
already
and
then
there's
yeah.
I
I
just
I
think
I
don't
know.
Maybe
we
need
to
have
like
a
more
a
tighter
sink
on
that
like.
If
there
is
something
to
do,
then
I
think
he
might
be
able
to
do
it,
but
yeah,
I'm
not
100
sure
actually,
right
now,
but.
C
F
Be
already
in
there
and
something
that
should
be
associated
with
all
of
our
images
and
text
and
stuff
like
that,
any
type
of
disability
you
know
protocol
that
should
already
be
a
part
of
the
website,
and
it's
not
we
need
to.
We
need
to
make
that
a
priority.
I
know
alois
just
mentioned
it,
and
maybe
one
of
the
stewards
calls
before,
and
so
I
do
think
that
is
a
high
priority.
Yeah.
A
C
A
B
C
Katie,
let's
see
yeah,
I
think
that
the
faq
is
something
that
I've
been
doing
sort
of
slowly
by
going
through
various
existing
posts,
so
that
can
still
be
on
the
radar.
But
it's
not
top
of
the
list
honestly,
because
I'm
doing
other
things-
and
I
think
more
important
right
now-
are
some
other
things
related
to
creating
a
working
group
and
actually
creating
video
this
one,
the
zen
hub
friendly.
A
A
C
C
A
C
Yes,
yes,
in
fact
that
was
steve
wright,
I
think
nate
he
which
very
cool
he.
He
wanted
to
sync
with
you
in
person,
which
I
thought
was
really
cool
nate,
just
as
an
aside
but
okay
great,
that's
the
idea
to
catch
new
contributors,
who
can't
make
it
to
meetings
and
also
it
could
be
a
video
we'll
put
on
potentially
on
the
website.
I
don't
know,
but
at
least
on
youtube.
That
would
be
a
good
reference
point.
A
A
A
H
Yeah,
the
idea
for
also
it's
exactly
what
sugar
mentioned.
I
added
a
few
points
to
the
issue
just
to
understand
the
point:
three,
four
and
five
just
to
sort
of
have
like
all
the
initiatives
that
we
have,
that
could
be
related
to
community
building,
to
take
in
consideration
that
we
can
integrate
it
better
in
a
way
that
we
we
make,
or
we
try
to
make
everyone
involved
in
the
things
it
could
be
for
params.
H
C
Yeah
and
of
course,
as
you
said
at
the
end,
our
first
interest
right
now,
which
I
think
is
quite
pressing,
is
new
members,
of
course
right,
but
also-
and
I
wanted
to
ask
you
this
all
meeting
long,
so
I'm
excited
to
get
to
ask
this.
Is
it
critical
to
the
upgrade
to
for
us
to
create
this
working
group?
Is
that
something
that
technically
needs.
A
A
So
my
feelings
that
it'd
be
nice
to
have
nice
to
do
before,
but
I
don't
think
if
it's
not
done,
we
would
say
no
we're
not
going
to
upgrade
yet.
So
it's
a
new
idea,
a
new
working
group,
I'd
love
we're
we
do
have
a
little
time.
So
I
don't
want
to
do
round
robin
and
give
everyone
two
minutes,
because
that
would
be
30
minutes,
but
maybe
I'd
love
to
open
the
floor
for
some
more
thoughts
and
ideas
and
around
community.
D
So
I
am
saying
if
anyone
wants
to
carry
that
flag
today,
it
would
be
great
to
to
to
have
the
the
tc
lounges
and
also
I
I
want
to
praise
chewie
for
the
common
stop
proposal.
I
have
been
reading
it
and
I
think
it's
really
good
and
I
think
it
it
would
be
super
useful
for
all
the
working
groups,
so
yeah
great
work,
judy.
G
G
E
I
think
the
skin
be
neat
and
I
think,
since
a
hatchet
outreach
has
been
dissolved,
maybe
like
the
the
community
worker
group
can
step
up-
and
you
know
with
regard
to
onboarding,
it
can
also
help
in
keeping
track
of
people,
maybe
like
who
is
available
when
or
something
like
that.
I
think
that
also
comes
under
community,
so
that
you
can
have
like
easier
communication
and
collaboration.
I
think
that
is.
That
is
also
something
that
this
working
group
could
handle
and
the
meme
parties,
I
think
sometimes
I
think
always
griff
leads
them.
E
A
H
Just
one
last
thought:
sorry,
it's
the
same
with
for
me,
as
I
mentioned,
the
the
params
september
and
certain
other
things
that
has
aroused
simple
stuff
like
handling
the
swag
tokens
and
so
on.
I
think
there
will
always
an
execution
part
of
relationships
with
people
of
the
community
that
needs
to
be
taken
sometimes
individually,
sometimes
in
groups
or
any
other
form
that
comes,
I
think,
sometimes
cannot
handle
because
of
the
it's
just
execution.
It's
not
necessarily
a
strategy,
and
it's
more
personal
rather
than
through
social
media
or
media
channels.
A
A
E
If
people
have
time,
I
couldn't
maybe
have
a,
we
could
have
a
sync
up
with
whoever
is
willing
to
edit
these
messages.
I
could
demonstrate
that
or
I
have
written
some
documentation
in
the
repository
where
this
is
hosting.
That
can
also
be
read
up.
I
think
I
didn't
remove
the
hatch
out
reshooting
recall,
but
I'll
do
that
now.
A
A
I
know
we
have
a
sync
coming
up
and
if
we
could
do
it
together,
then
then
I
could
put
it
somewhere
where
I'll
remember
to
to
point
to
it
later
or
maybe
and
get
books,
not
the
right
place.
I
don't
know
what
the
right
place
is
for
this.
It's
sort
of
like
administrative,
something
like
infra
administrative.
E
I
think
we
need
to.
We
need
a
git
book
for
handling
things
in
the
dc,
such
as
platforms
and
services.
I
think
we
could
also
write
down
things
specific
things
like
say:
who
has
access
to
a
certain
multi
sec
or
who
has
access
to
a
certain
dow
that's
controlling
takes
in
the
tc.
I
think
we
could
all
document
all
of
that
information
in
one
place
so
that
in
future,
it's
easier
for
everyone
to
use
it.
C
F
So
I
just
want
to
say
that
I
I
have
I've
been
using
my
tec
source,
which
is
my
own
little
git
book
that
I
have
for
active
documents
within
the
tec,
as
well
as
like
things
like
the
access
documents,
I
was
hoping
we
could
maybe
just
transfer
it
over
to
the
token
engineering
git
book
side,
but
as
a
separate
page,
and
that
way
we
can
have
just
like
a
start
using
it.
I
I
think
it's
very
useful.
A
A
E
A
A
A
A
A
Oh
yeah,
we
finished
your
things
in
orientation.
Okay,
let
me
see
that
there's
some
more
there's
also
hatcher
relations,
which
is
a
new
issue.
Let's
see
what
we
have
here,
airdrop
to
village,
okay,
so
we
have
an
issue
I'll
explain
it
and
I
think
we'll
bring
it
into
the
sprint.
People
who
have
participated
in
building
the
tec
but
haven't
participated
in
the
funding,
didn't
receive
a
swagtech
airdrop
because
of
the
mechanism
that
we're
using
to
determine
the
hatchers.
A
We
were
using
the
the
hatched
app
itself
spitting
out
the
addresses
so
we'll
take
a
look
at
a
list
and
merge
it
with
a
list
of
hatchers
and
and
anyone
that
has
techh
tokens
that
hasn't
gotten
a
swagtech
airdrop.
Yet
I'm
suggesting
actually
that
when
we
look
at
the
builders
list
that
haven't
received
a
a
swagtech
airdrop,
we
maybe
have
some
sort
of
like
off
for
the
long
tail.
So
you
know
maybe
it's
you
know
20
and
up.
I
mean
impact
hours
or
something
like
that.
A
A
A
E
A
H
H
A
A
F
A
That
I
don't
know
what
it
is,
but
I
think
we're
very
close
to
wrapping
this
up
and
can
we
leave
leave
it
to
the
boardroom
and
seshbot
as
a
topics
for
at
the
end
of
when
we
finish,
because
I
think
we're
going
to
finish
with
time
for
both
of
those
subjects:
nate,
that's
good
other
languages
and
operations,
okay,
oh
other
languages.
This
was
a
iv
initiative.
E
Yeah,
just
to
give
you
an
update
what
we
talked
three
times,
I'm
just
gonna
open
an
issue
for
this
and
it's
gonna
be
open
for
contributors,
but
I
still
have
to
choose
the
maybe
at
least
three
articles
that
we
want
to
be
translated
and
I'm
gonna
check
that
on
the
content
map
that
julian0
is
developing
and
then
yeah.
Maybe
I
can
get
some
advice,
bro
some
advice-
if,
if
this
are
the
best
articles
that
we
want
to
be
translated
and
maybe
place
them
on
git
book.
E
A
A
A
I've
started
talking
about
this
with
both
angela
and
ygg,
especially
around
people
who
are
already
investing
in
the
token
engineering
academy,
who
might
be
very
useful
not
only
to
to
be
to
have
more
skin
in
the
game
with
the
tc,
but
who
would
also
be
very
value
aligned.
So
there's
just
seems
to
be
some
thinking
left
to
do
a
lot
of
thinking
left
to
do
around
this
and
feeling
out
whether
or
not
they're
interested
in
participating.
A
So
that's
in
progress,
soft
and
oh
nice
mitch,
so
I'm
gonna,
I'm
gonna,
take
this
I'd
love.
If
anyone
has
other
ideas
around
who
the
tec
would
like
to
have
as
early
investors,
because
not
only
I
mean,
I
think
we
should
also
start
thinking
about
not
only
just
sort
of
making
like
you
know,
publicity
around
this
new
token,
but
also
to
strategically
try
to
bring
people
into
the
tec
once
we
go
live
so
there's
just
a
lot
of
more
thinking
to
do
around
there.
A
Yet
you
can
see
it's
not
really
fully
formed
in
my
mind,
but
the
idea
of
this
initial
buy
attracting
early
investors
got
me
thinking.
Oh,
we
should
be
focusing
some
effort
and
energy
there
anyway,
at
least
the
same
kind
of
effort
or
similar
energy
that
we
forward
that
we
output
for
bringing
hatcher's
into
the
tec.
H
I
don't
know
if
it's
a
community
decision,
I
don't
know
if
it's
a
hatchet's
decisions.
I
don't
know
if
it's
the
worst
decision
to
outline
these
boundaries
in
order
to
outreach
possible
investors,
but
I
think
it
could
be
a
nice
conversation
and
a
nice
community
exercise
to
have
at
least
to
see
how
do
we
feel
about
it?
And
if
we
want
to
have
this
conversation
of
course
or
like
a
pitch.
A
Yeah
yeah,
I
think
that
there's
well
there's
two
sides
to
it
right.
There's
like
are
we
interested
and
are
they
interested
so
they're
sort
of
like
feeling
out
both
at
the
same
time
like?
Are
we
interested
how
interested
well
so
there's
two
things
right:
there's
the
initial
buy,
but
then
there's
just
like
early
bonding
curve
right,
like
so
encouraging
people
to
interact
with
the
bonding
curve
earlier
rather
than
later.
If
you
know
what
I
mean
so
there's
two
there's
two
angles
for
the
question
of
the
initial
buy
it's
sort
of
like.
A
We
need
to
see
how
interested
we
are.
We
need
to
see
how
interested
there
are.
Other
early
investors
might
be
and
then
sort
of
see
if
there's
a
match
but
in
but
in
any
case
we
should
have.
You
know,
start
thinking
about
the
material,
for
you
know
pitching
the
tc's
not
necessarily
there,
but
maybe
it
is
the
right
way
to
phrase
it.
A
You
know
if
you,
if
you
look
at
other,
I
mean
there's
many
token
sale,
one
pagers
that
you
could
look
at
that
have
a
sort
of
idea
for,
like
very
short,
summary
of
what
the
tec
is
and
the
the
people
that
are
working
on
it
and
the
projects
that
are
associated
with
it.
So
there
might
be
yeah.
I'm
thinking,
there's
a
use
in
that
for
attracting
early
investors,
and
it
might
be
something
that's
interesting
for
a
wider
audience
as
well.
A
I
don't
know,
no,
I
don't
know,
there's
no
answer
to
that
question.
Yet
it's
like
it's
it's
a
decision
that
has
to
be
made,
but
the
early
investors
I
just
want
to
maybe
make
it
very
very
clear.
It
started
with
this
idea
of
this
initial
buy.
But
let's
say
the
community
says
we
don't
want
to
attract.
We
don't
want
to
do.
We
don't
want
to
have
agreements
with
particular
strategically
aligned
investors.
They
can
buy
it
on
the
bonding
curve.
A
A
F
Yeah,
my
feeling
is
that
just
a
lot
of
things
are
feel
like
conversations
are
happening
behind
the
scenes
rather
than
with
the
community,
and
so
like
with
this
issue
in
particular,
and
so
like.
I
would
like
to
see
more
transparency
around
it
and
understand
you
know:
who's
who's,
asking
and
who's
interested
and
all
that
good
stuff.
A
Yeah,
so
right
now,
there's
no
news.
So
that's
why
you're
not
seeing
anything
there's
you
know
I
I
asked
angela
if
she
was
if
she
had
injured.
Angela
was
the
one
who
sort
of
brought
up
this
idea
of
having
investors
in
the
tc
in
the
hatch
which
we
ended
up
not
doing,
and
she
shared
that
it
could
be
interesting
to
people
that
are
supporting
the
token
engineering
academy.
They
have
a
new
initiative
to
do
foundations
course,
and
I
thought
wow
that'd
be
great.
A
B
If
we,
if,
if
we
want
to
do
this,
I
I
think
it
would
be
best
to
be
like
to
do
the
initial
buy
and
then
hold
for
a
month
and
see
who
the
coolest
people
are
like.
I,
I
wouldn't
necessarily
commit
to
people
right
away,
because
the
tc's
price
is
actually
like
mathematically
guaranteed
to
worst
case,
be
the
same
or
better,
then.
Well,
then,
what
we
buy
it
at,
so
it's
more
valuable
to
give
it
to
sell
it
to
people
later
at
a
profit
at
a
small
profit.
B
Whereas
so
it's
a
win-win.
You
know.
If
this
idea
is
palatable
to
the
community,
then
I
just
I
won't
even
try
to
get
the
partners
in
advance.
It'd
be
like
we're
going
to
set
aside
x
number
of
dollars
to
in
into
a
partnership
dao,
and
that
dao
is
going
to
go,
find
people
who
were
missed
out.
You
know
and
then,
and
it's
and
find
strategic
a
strategic
partnership
down
right,
but
I
I
don't
think
we
should
try
to
find
exactly
who
it
is
or
put
that
to
the
community.
H
So
I
have
a
question
exactly,
as
you
mentioned,
the
working
group
decision.
So
if
that,
if
things
like
this
will
affect
the
community,
where,
where
is
the
point
where
a
working
group
sort
of
makes
a
decision
or
where
is
the
point
where
we
have
to
go
back
to
the
community
and
make
a
consensus
on
it
like?
H
Is
there
any
guideline
on
this
kind
of
processes,
because
I
feel
there
will
be,
they
will
be
coming
certain
things
that,
probably
let's
say
imagine
community
working
group
will
take,
will
take
strategies
for
for
outreaching,
other
communities
or
reaching
investors.
I
don't
know
who,
but
then,
when
that,
if
that
decision
or
that
the
result
of
that
decision
affects
the
community,
I
think
it's
a
little
bit
unfair
for
the
community
to
not
be
at
least
aware
of
this.
So
I
don't
know
like
how
do
we
handle
these
kind
of
things.
B
The
transparency
I
I
I
really
want
to
caution
everyone
here,
because,
like
micromanaging
organiz,
you
know
the
decisions
through
a
doubt
doesn't
work
like
it
just
will
never
work.
We
can't
have
so
many
details
in
our
large
decisions.
We
need
to
push
the
decision
making
pro
the
details
to
the
edges
and
just
talk
about
the
bigger
scope
in
our
in
our
in
our
macro
economic
decisions.
B
We
don't
tell
we
don't
tell
david
what
to
tweet
on
our
twitter,
you
know,
and
but
we
also,
but
we
control,
where
funds
go
and
and
when
and
to
who,
and
then
we
trust
them
to
actually
engage
and
be
transparent
about
it.
We
build
structures
around
it
so
that
there's
accountability
and
trust.
We
could
say
we
could
build
a
system,
that's
proposed,
you
know
what
would
be
preferred
if
there's
a
strategic
partnership
dow.
B
What
I
would
say
is
there's
got
to
be
someone
or
a
group
of
people
who
are
leading
it
and
they
propose
something
like
hey.
We
buy
into
the
bonding
curve,
we
sell
it
for
10
profit,
all
the
money
goes
into
the
funding
pool
and
we
find
the
best
partners
that
we
can
find
that
we
think
are
strategically
aligned
with
the
tc
and
that's
it
and
then
they
find
out
who
those
partners
are.
They
talk,
they
make
negotiations
and
you
know
it'll
be
like
a
balancer
or
maybe
the
t
academy
itself.
B
Who
knows
you
know
but
yeah?
I
and
I
don't
think
it's
I
don't
necessarily.
I
don't
know
if
it's
a
good
idea
or
a
bad
idea
to
do
it
all.
But
what
I
do
know
is
that
if
we
start,
if
we
set
precedent
with
like
all
these
details
in
our
decisions,
we're
going
to
we're
going
to
go
down
the
wrong
path
for
dao's.
A
Good
food
for
thought,
my
one
of
my
thinking
is
that
it's
hard
to
you
know
without
knowing
who
the
the
funds
might
be
or
who
the
partners
might
be.
I
feel
like
it's
hard
for
a
community
to
approve
a
decision
like
that
like
if
we
said
it
was
ocean
protocol
or
it
was
balancer,
it
was
one
of
you
know
like
I
feel
like
people
would
be
like
yeah.
We
really
want
them
affiliated
and
we
want
them
participating
and
we
want
them.
B
The
problem
is
that
if
we
allocate
it,
if
we
try
to
find
a
partner
now
and
they'll,
they
won't
make
a
deal.
If
we
we
don't
even
know
what
the
price
is.
I
mean
we
can't
so
and-
and
we
also
don't
know-
I
mean
it
would
be
better
if
it
were
more
competitive
like
what,
if
the
group
said,
makes
a
promise
of
at
least
10
profit
on
the
purchase
right
and
then
it
goes
to
a
strategic
partner,
and
then
you
know
they
they're
they
shop
around
and
they
find
there's
a
lot
of
demand.
B
A
All
right,
I
didn't
mean
for
this-
to
take
up
so
much
time,
but
it
was
an
important
subject.
So,
thanks
for
that,
there's
another
one.
So
I'm
I'm
really
interested
in
continuing
to
have
these
conversations
and
to
ask
these
questions
and
to
go
through
advice
process
and
to
sort
of
hear
lots
of
different
thoughts
on
it
and
it
starts
with
like
this
initial
buy,
but
it
I
think
it
also.
The
scope
is
greater
than
the
initial
buy.
Now.
A
A
A
F
Boardroom's
more
important-
I
just
want
to
get
some
clarification
around
that
because
I
I
wasn't
sure
if
people
would
be
interested
in
that
type
of
interface
to
use
for
snapshot
and
for
I
set
it
up.
So
it
shows
all
of
the
the
forum
thread
for
the
proposals
and
our
snapshot.
The
question
is:
will
we
use
it?
The
problem?
F
One
of
the
blockers
is
that
multi-safe
is
not
currently
in
hasn't,
currently
integrated
xdi,
so
we
can't
use
any
type
of
multi-sig
for
it
and
if
we
did
use
a
treasury
for
it,
you
know
that's
kind
of
the
big
use
case
for
boardroom
as
managing
a
treasury,
and
I
think
that
you
know
if
we're
using
alternative
solutions,
then
maybe
not
going
forward
with
it.
But
I
just
wanted
to
hear
other
people's
opinions.
C
C
It
feels
like
it
feels
like
an
extra
process
that
maybe
doesn't
need
to
be
there,
so
it
would
be
cool
to
maybe
talk
about
this
nate
and-
and
maybe
it
can
be
one
of
the
topics
of
soft
gov
like
what
are
the
things
that
we
actually
need,
and
how
are
these
tools
helping
us
in
a
way
that
everything
is
aligned
with
each
other
like
things
are
connected,
instead
of
like
things
creating
more
steps
than
than
our
attention
capacity?
Can.
F
Yeah,
I
agree
with
that.
I,
the
only
reason
I
got
really
excited
about
boardroom
is
because
I
know
that
gnosis
is
really
dedicated
to
creating
this
kind
of
governance,
interface
for
dallas
and
they're,
using
boardroom
for
that
and
developing
on
it,
and
I
think
that
in
the
future
it
will
be
the
the
place
for
for
governance
for
dallas
to
have
to
occur,
and
I
I
just
really
like
what
they're
doing
and
I
think
in
the
future,
it'll
be
a
the
tool
that
we
use.