►
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
We'll
give
you
know,
we'll
have
a
couple
minutes
for
people
to
show
up
as
well,
but
yeah.
I
I
just
want
to
go
ahead
and
start
that
conversation.
Does
anybody
have
the
kind
of
ideas
of
what
they
think
are
priorities
for
the
commons?
I
don't
really
want
to
emphasize
the
the
love
that
the
commons
level
of
things
that
you've
seen
things
that
we
need
to
improve
on
things
that,
like
initiatives,
that
we
should
focus
on
this,
this
upcoming
sprint.
A
B
I
I'm
still
I'm
still
working
on
the
specifics,
but
generally
it
goes
on
to
it
uses
the
concept
of
the
holon,
which
is
hololens,
are
like
atoms,
molecule
cells,
and
it's
it's
a
thing
that
are.
They
are
autonomous
and
independent
units,
but
must
always
be
aware
of
other
units
around
them.
So
they're
they're,
both
part
and
a
whole
right
and
the
like.
B
A
collection
of
hololens
is
a
hierarchy,
and
so
it's
biomimetic
in
that
sense,
and
so
what
I'm
exploring
is?
Okay,
how
can
we
based
it
on
a
book
called
the
hellonic
revolution,
hold
on
hilarchies
and
colonic
networks
in
the
production
machine,
and
so
what
I'm
trying?
What
I'm
trying
to
explore?
B
And
it's
it's
barely
it's
early
stages,
but
I'm
thinking
that
if
we
frame
ourselves
as
holons
like
each
one
of
us
and
also
like
the
working
units,
they're
both
like
a
part
and
a
hall
and
each
individual
contribute
is
both
a
part
and
a
hall
and
in
itself
like
the
tc,
is
both
a
park
and
a
hole.
B
If
we
take
into
account
the
broader
ecosystem,
you
know
with
we're
with
the
academy
and
common
stock
and
one
hive
and
whatnot,
and
so
what
I'm
trying
to
do
is
I'm
I'm
theorizing
that
if
we
find
a
way
to
integrate
like
the
critical
tasks
that
we
have
to
perform,
which
we
have
some
some
data
from
the
proposals
and
the
roles
that
they
proposed,
even
the
ones
that
did
not
pass
or
the
roles
that
got
eliminated.
B
So
we
got
some
feedback
there
that
we
can
use
and
moving
forward
with
that,
taking
that
into
account
taking
that
taking.
B
You
know
the
the
current
active
contributors
that
we
have
also
take
into
account
the
limitations
or
the
constraints
for
treasury
and
coming
up
with
some
sort
of
like
complex
adaptive
system
model
that
takes
all
that
into
account
and
as
love
would
have
it.
I
think
it's
something
that
can
be
modeled
with
khadgar.
B
B
Another
research
is,
I'm
doing
is
going
into
value
theory
like
there's
the
term
value
gets
thrown
around
a
lot,
but
I
think
we
to
really
break
it
down
into
there's
value
in
there
there's
value
in
economics,
which
I
think
what
we
often
refer
to,
but
there's
also
value
in
sociology,
which
we
have
that
with,
let's
say
the
praise
ritual
right,
there's
value
in
philosophy,
there's
value
and
all
these
other
things.
B
So
maybe
if
we
not
only
provide
a
value
economically
but
also
provide
other
types
of
value,
people
will
be
more
receptive
towards
receiving
a
a
salary
that
is
within
our.
C
B
But
you
know
aggregated
onto
the
other
things,
it
would
be
a
pretty
good
offer
for
them.
So,
but
that's
something
that's
valid
theory
in
terms
of
call-ons,
I'm
just
basically
trying
to
tile
that
together
and
I'll
see
how
you
know
how
we
take
into
account.
Also,
the
the
new
income
generation
tools
that
we're
working
on
be
that
the
token
gated
channel
and
the
twitter
scraping
bot
that
we
can.
B
You
know,
prepare
in
certain
format
and
then
present
to
the
community
and
maybe
charge
or
make
it
token
gated.
You
don't
introduce
it
in
the
initiative
that
we're
currently
working
on,
but
I
think,
if
we
solve
this
problem
of,
you
know
moving
away
from
bounties
into
a
system
that
is
more
holistic.
Integrating.
B
You
know
the
active
contributors,
maybe
in
the
hours
that
they
want
to
work,
the
roles
that
that
are
critical
for
the
functioning
of
the
commons
and
the
limitations
of
the
of
of
the
treasury
and
somehow
put
all
that
in
in
a
model,
maybe
help
us
with
with
cad
cat
to
somehow
come
up
with
a
solution
for
it
again.
B
I'm
still
working
on
on
on
these
specifics
and
and
all
that,
but
I
do
think
that
if
we
solve
that
problem
for
ourselves,
like
you
said
yesterday,
that
the
thing
about
coming
up
with
utilities
that
that
hasn't
been
solved-
and
this
wouldn't
be
solving
that
utility,
but
it
would
be
solving-
I
think
it
would
help
in
the
sense
of
integrating
the
integrating
all
the
components
of
a
value
production
network
within
a
dial
and
maybe
even
also
from
the
broader
ecosystem.
I
don't
know,
but
I
don't
know
if
I'm
making
sense,
I'm
I'm
it's.
B
It's
still
abstract,
because
I'm
still
beginning
to
research
it
I
just
from
what
I
know
and
again
it's
biomimetic
it.
It
agrees
with.
You
know
the
the
tenets
of
common
stack
in
a
way
and
and
other
things
that
that
we
all
agree
is
the
right
way
forward.
So
in
theory
it
ought
to
work
in
practice.
You
know,
I
don't
know,
I'm
still
working
on
it,
but
I
don't
did
that
somehow
make
sense.
Nate.
A
No,
it
does
like
and
that's
the
thing
it's
like.
If
you
know,
if
we
get,
if
you
throw
an
idea
out
and
we
you
know,
we
vote
on
and
say
hey,
this
is
what
we
want
to
try
like.
I
want
to
be
able
to
experiment
it
within
these
planning
processes.
I
don't
want
it
to
just
be
like
normal
here.
You
know:
here's
the
constant
thing
we're
going
through
so
yeah.
A
Thank
you
for
that
or
auntie
did
you
want
it?
You
guys
have
an
idea,
ideas
for
prioritization
of
and
I'm
using
this
document.
I'm
gonna
start
building
this
document
up
to
have
kind
of
this
ideation,
so
we
can
start
building
epics
out
of
them,
and
then
I
mean
using
them
from
ideas
to
build
epics
around.
So
this
is
kind
of
the
way.
I
I
imagine
this
going.
So
if
you
are
interested,
please
do
what's
up
chewie,
hey
true.
C
Again
atm
everybody:
oh
I
wanted
to
jump
in
there.
I
have
two
or
three
things:
the
first
one
expanding
on
what
manu
said,
because
we
were
just
chatting
about
it.
I
don't
know
if
you
remember
nate
when
a
few
months
ago,
when
I
shared
the
synchronous
management,
hacking,
the
big
small
document
they
did
that
you
said
something
about.
C
We
us
having
contributors,
sort
of
just
really
spread
out
and
doing
a
lot
of
things
and
if
we
and
like,
if
they
were
more
focused
on
just
one
working
group
or
so
we
would
probably
be
better
off-
and
I
think
that's
most
important,
now
more
important
now
and
finding
a
way
to
I'm
assuming
that's
prob,
that's
going
to
be
through
compensation,
but
finding
ways
to
make
contributors
just
try
to
focus
and
deliver
as
much
value
as
possible.
C
On
a
specific
thing,
because
I
I
sense,
I
see
a
lot
of
people
in
a
lot
of
things
and
I
sense
that's.
First
of
all,
making
all
of
us
like,
we
are
losing
focus,
and
then
it's
probably
making
also
management
a
bit
expensive
because
there's
a
lot
of
micro
management
to
do
with
bounties
hours,
etc
and
that
costs
money
anyways.
So
that's,
that's
that's
that
and
then
I
don't
know
how
we
would
work
towards
this.
C
But
this
week
on
software,
we
chatted
about
the
recent
changes
and
how
these
are
probably
going
to
affect
our
culture
and
the
people
that
spend
time
here,
whether
that's
just
hanging
out
or
or
working,
and
I
guess
just
making
sure
that
everyone
is
comfortable
in
preventing
and
sort
of
working
on
a
prevention
to
not
fall
into
a
moment
where
we
start
not
being
as
kind
to
each
other,
because
at
least
in
my
personal
experience
in
other
projects,
when
we
start
to
when,
when
you
know,
when
the
economics
are
scarce-
and
I
start
constantly
to
get
to
like
we
are-
we
aren't
clear
as
to
when
are
we
going
to
make
money?
C
And
so
I
believe
there
may
be
a
point
where
we
just
have
enough
for
one
idea
or
two
and
we
can
get
into
a
heavy
discussion
from
competing
ideas,
and
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
when
that
time
comes
we
are
in
you
know,
we
know
how
to
handle
that.
D
Yeah,
I
have,
I
have
a
couple,
a
couple
of
ideas,
but
I
think
personally,
what
I've?
What
I
put
what
I
would
feel
most
relevant
in
this
moment
is
this
revisiting
of
or
maybe
creation
of,
the
of
the
narrative
of
the
tc.
D
I
think
this
is
something
that
has
been
discussed
before
and
and
I
I
do
still
believe
that
it's
it's
relevant,
because
it's
basically
what
what
drives
us
right,
what
would
drive
all
the
contributors,
all
the
contributions,
all
the
initiatives
they
are
all
based
on
on
a
narrative
and
and
maybe
as
a
as
a
first
approach
on
doing
this.
It's
also
maybe
like
revisiting
the
the
mbv
the
mission,
ambition,
values
of
the
tc
and
really
nailing
it
down.
D
You
know
like
really
clarifying
and
being
really
precise,
with
definitions
with
concepts
with
ideas
with
of
of
ideas
of
like
of
what
we
are
right,
because
I
feel
like
sometimes
there's
this
confusion
and
misconception
of
you
know
like
we
are
a
company,
but
we
are
a
commons
but
we're
an
organization,
but
we're
a
community
right.
So
really
like
getting
consensus
on
that.
I
think
that
would
give
us
like
a
really
strong
basis
of
of,
in
order
to
take
like
further
steps
right,
yeah.
I
think
that
that
would
be.
D
That
would
be
something
and
then
another
thing
because
you
know
like.
I
think
this
is
like
a
big
thing
and
according
to
what
you're
mentioning
nato,
I
I
think
the
idea
is
great.
You
know
like
people
showing
up
here
in
the
sp
spring
planning
and
working
together
towards
a
specific
pick.
I
think
that's
a
that's
a
great
idea,
I
just
I
just
I
wouldn't
be
sure
if
this,
like
narrative
creation
and
mvv,
would
be
something
that
we
could
maybe
like
do
just
like.
D
Like
that,
you
know,
I
don't
think
it
would
be
that
simple.
So,
but
again,
this
is
just
like
one
of
the
ideas
and
then
the
other
idea
is
more
about
simplifying
things.
Simplification
of
things
I
remember
livi
during
a
one
soft
call.
She
mentioned
that
she
heard
somewhere
something
that
really
gave
her
comfort
about.
You
know
trying
to
make
things
simpler.
D
You
know
like
not
over
complicate,
and
you
know
try
to
make
things
really
complex,
but
just
like
try
to
to
make
things
easy
to
understand
for
everyone,
you
know
so
maybe
there
there
could
be
a
simplification
process
and
structure
for
the
whole
tc,
and
we
can.
We
could
talk
about
like
the
working
groups
that
we
have
or
this
idea
of
having
interest
groups,
and
how
can
this
play
out
with
with
the
with
the
whole
organization
and
maybe
even
like
the
restructuring,
the
the
discord
server
right?
Maybe
there
are
ways
to
make
it
simpler.
D
You
know
having
less
channels,
less
information
being
more
concise.
Being
more
precise,
you
know
just
like
making
things
simpler
in
in
all,
in
all
terms,
even
for
contributors
themselves
right
trying
to,
I
think
here
what
you're
doing
of
like
trying
to
give
it
a
purpose
to
the
sprint
planning
and
how
are
we
gonna
use?
Sennhofen.
D
A
No
thank
you
very.
That
was
really
great
and
chewie.
You
are
me,
and
you
are
the
last
one.
So
true,
if
just
explain
what
we're
doing
here
coming
up
with
ideas
on
what
the
epic
for
this
sprint
planning
is
going
to
be.
E
Yes,
nate.
Thank
you.
E
I
think
that
you
know
like
the
the
like
there's,
I
wouldn't
collect
like
current
situation,
really
because
it's
been
going
on
for
for
like
many
months,
so
I
feel
that
by
now
there's
like
a
new
like
reality
around
the
tc,
and
I
do
think
it
is
necessary
that
probably,
as
I
started
like
reapproaching
everything
and-
and
you
know
like
getting
an
idea
of
of
how
everything
is
running,
I
would
like
to
have
initiatives
to
you
know
like
maybe
see
how
we
can
bring
down,
comes
to
probably
like
four
or
five
people
and
just
make
like
one
like
core
team,
because
I
I
I
think
that
teams
has
been
like
a
learning
experience.
E
I
mean
some
really
cool
things
like
came
out
of
it.
Some
other
things
didn't
really
work,
so
I
would
feel
very
comfortable
with
having
this
approach
where
we
can
optimize
resources
for
at
least
the
next
year.
I
do
think
that
we
have.
The
resources
is
just
a
matter
of
of
revising
them.
E
Personally,
I'm
I'm
I'm
trying
to
I
mean,
and
this
again
like
comes
back
to
like
the
whole,
like
funding
and
and
challenges
that
the
tc
is
going
through
as
like,
as
as
most
of
you
remember
like
for
the
part
of
stewardship
I
requested
like
funding
until
the
month
of
november,
but
after
the
first
month,
and
because
I
was
also
working
in
other
projects,
I
wanted
to
delegate
this
to
manuel
in
acid
laser
in
different
functions.
E
I
feel
that
this
experiment
was
also
like
that
really
put
a
light
on
on
on
just
like
ways
in
in,
in
which
we
can
diversity
diversify
our
function,
so
so,
based
on
on
on
this,
I
think
that
we
have
the
means
to
you
know
like
bring
it
down
to
what's
necessary
to
keep
running
in
the
next
in
the
next
months
and
at
the
same
time
like
in
in
going
back
to
like
this.
E
Like
personal
point
of
view,
I
I
want
to
explore
and
find
ways
in
which
I
can
still
contribute
like
as
a
steward
in
in
the
tc,
but
not
creating
more
dependence
around
the
tc.
E
So
so
I
think
that
most
stewards
are
like
in
this,
like,
let's
say
like
like
mindset,
and
it
took
me
a
little
bit
longer
to
adapt
to
that,
but
because
of
how
things
have
been
going
in
the
past
a
few
months,
I
see
like
income
opportunities
in
in
in
other
areas
in
which
I
can
still
contribute
in
in
the
in
the
tc
and
have
a
functional
com,
communications
team
and
also
like
keep
doing
outreach
to
different
different
communities
as
well
as
as
well
as
promotion.
E
But
there
needs
to
be
a
conversation
and
just
like
a
general
assessment
of
what
did
we
learn
with
the
teams
experiment,
and
just
like
I
mean
I
don't
want
to
like
speak
generally.
Of
course,
I
would
love
to
do
like
temperature
check
with
the
different
teams,
but
I
would
really
like
to
you
know
like
just
see
like
how
does
it
feel
you
know
like?
E
This
idea
about
just
taking
like
teams
to
the
next
level,
and
maybe,
if
that,
if
that
consists
of
you,
know
like
putting
an
end
to
it
and
just
like
changing
the
the
the
structure,
I
feel
that
it's
the
right
time,
but
I
would
really
like
to
have
as
much
input
as
possible
from
the
teams
a
contributor,
so
I
mean
I
I
feel
I
feel
good
about
what
auntie
and
bear
were
saying,
and
I
do
feel
that
it
brings
us
to
a
similar
place.
E
I
may
be
wrong
about
it,
but
it
was
really
like
good
to
see
like
all
of
these
points
before
I
share
this
opinion,
because
I
already
had
this
in
my
mind
so
so
yeah
this.
This
is
what
I
can
say
about
this.
A
Thanksgiving
yeah,
and
so
I
guess
I'll
go
now.
I
think
the
I've
got
two
big
areas
where
I
think
this
I
think
was,
would
be
really
good
to
focus
on
and
the
upcoming
kind
of
sprint,
and
that
is
education
is
one
of
those
things.
I
would
really
like
to
see
as
providing
a
service
for
the
dao
space
in
terms
of
educating
individuals
on
how
to
work
in
a
dow
how
to
operate
a
dao.
A
B
Yeah
I
just
like
on
that
note
I
think
in
terms
of
providing
education
service.
I
agree,
and
it
was
something
that
I
was
gonna
say
it
was
something
that
sampo
I
don't
know.
If
we
talked
about
this
yesterday.
Certainly
I
did
privately
with
with
some
other
people
yeah.
B
In
the
context
of
course,
of
token
engineering,
but
we
approached
angela
to
sort
of
like
ask
her
if
we
could
like
if
there
was
any
overlap
with
with
t
academy
like
sort
of
like
and
and
she
asked
us
not
to-
or
she
asked
us
to
wait
or
well.
She
she
asked
gideon
to
wait
and
she
didn't
quite
explain
her
her
reasoning,
how
she's
pro
it's
her
prerogative.
B
So
I
think
in
that
sense,
like
there's,
there's
somewhat
of
a
blocker
there
that-
and
I
I
said
this
yesterday-
look,
I
don't
think
we're
gonna
be
cannibalizing
or
it's
a
blue
ocean
market.
We're
in
like
there's
enough
space
for
two
whales
to
operate.
B
I
I
I
also
brought
to
gideon
the
fact
that
on
udemy
there's
a
course
there's
there
are
no
courses
in
token
engineering
if
you
type
on
this
on
the
search
bar,
there's
one
course
that
pops
up-
but
it's
like
very
so
it's
web
3.,
it's
sort
of
like
just
explaining
web
3
and
blockchain
crypto
on
a
very
basic
scale,
and
that
has
thousands
of
I
think
it
had
like
2
000
students
and
based
on
what
it
was
asking
for.
B
What
it
what
the
course
went
through
it
was
like
it
generated
an
income
of
several
thousand
dollars,
and
so
that
was
like
whoa
like
there's,
there's
really
good
opportunity
to
get
her
income
here,
and
it
seems
that
gideon
already
thought
about
that.
She
asked
angela
and
she
didn't
want
to
so.
Like
I
don't
know
like
do
we
need
like.
E
A
B
A
Mean
when
it
comes
to
the
actual
token
engineering
courses,
I
think
yes,
but
I'm
I'm
more
focused
like
on,
like
a
kind
of
like
a
how
to
dow
type
of
situation.
Education
course
where
we
can
educate
people
on
what
we
know
and
what
we
do
on
a
daily
basis
and
then
that
accents
that
her
token
engineering
efforts,
and
so,
if
there's
like
a
bunch
of
token
engineering
courses
that
are
there,
we
can
say
hey.
You
know
how
to
dow
go.
A
Now
you
can
go
work
in
a
project,
but
look
come
come,
learn
how
how
it
works
in
a
dow
how
we
operate,
how
you
can
expect
if
you
go
to
bank
list
now
how
you
can
expect
things
to
operate,
what
things
to
look
for
how
to
look
for
documentation,
how
to
understand
voting?
How
to
understand
all
these
different
aspects
that
you
are
going
to
use
your
token
engineering
education
and
apply
it
to
it
and
understand
the
environment
that
you're
going
to
be
working
in
and
so
like.
A
I
think,
having
that
type
of
like
how
to
doubt
education
would
be
really
interesting
and
necessary
for
not
not
just
token
engineering
but
just
individual
contributors
that
are
entering
into
the
web
3
space,
and
so
that's
kind
of
my
big
idea
for
that
and
having
you
know
that
that
can
kind
of
be
an
offering
that
the
tec
has
and
it'll
bring
human
capital
into
the
space.
You
know,
and
if
people
want
to
stay
stick
around,
they
can
help
contribute
to
the
tec.
A
But
at
the
end
of
the
day
I
would
love
for
everybody
who
comes
through
that
type,
of
course,
to
go
to
another
dow
to
go
work
at
another
town
to
go
to
go
to
bank
list
to
go
to.
You
know
gnosis,
to
go
to
any
other
dow
that
exists
and
say
hey,
I,
you
know
I
was
trained
at
over
at
the
tec
on
how
to
dial.
Maybe
I
I
I
you
know
we
have
certain
education
areas
and
like
columns
or
whatever
it
may
be,
or
like
community.
A
Yeah
and
so
like
building
building
a
comprehensive
education
program
here
in
the
tec,
where
we
have
cohorts,
you
know-
and
we
do
this
like
monthly
education
thing,
I
think-
would
be
a
really
big
start
to
actually
bringing
in
human
capital
and
it
could
really
kind
of
jump.
Start
the
tec
discord
again
and
making
sure
that
everybody's
we
have
a
lot
of
action
going
on
outside
of
that
the
outside
of
the
education.
A
B
Yeah
on
the
education
like
before
we
go
to
another
point.
I
I
met
on
on
on
eat
mexico.
Doing
some
networking.
I
met
this
company
called
blockchain
acceleration
foundation.
They
were
sponsoring
an
event
near
a
cafe
by
by
where,
where
they
did
the
hackathon
and
basically
I
they
have
sort
of
like
the
system
that
they
have
is
they
provide
an
interface
to
students
within
a
university
for
them
to
learn
about
web3
right.
B
So
the
problem
is
that
students
want
to
learn
about
web3
and
crypto
and
even
token
engineering,
but
the
the
universities
are
not
offering
the
courses
right.
So
they
go
to
the
university
and
they're
like
hey.
You
know
we
can,
you
know,
help
you
if
you
partner
with
us,
you
know
you
know
if
you
partner
with
us,
give
us
some
money
for
us
to
teach
the
course.
B
We
can
teach
your
students
and
we
can
structure
it
in
a
way
that
that
you
can
actually
like
there
can
be
credits
for
it,
like
you'll,
be
a
legitimate
way
for
your
students
to
learn
and
there
can
be
credits
that
can
go.
That
can
work
towards
the
diploma
that
that
your
students
are
learning,
and
so
usually
I.
F
Will
I'll
just
point
out
that
there
are
some
universities,
like
antioch
university?
F
I've
taught
a
master's
course
in
autism
to
to
one
person
because
they
actually
had
the
ability
for
whoever
it
is
to
just
choose
who
they
wanted
to
teach
them
in
whatever
topic.
So
you
might
want
to
look
out
there.
There
are
other
universities
around
I'm
just
letting
you
know
that
antioch
university,
specifically,
is
one.
I've
done
work
with
already
and
you
could
actually
get
college
credit
for
that,
and
so
maybe
we
could,
you
know,
do
create
a
working
group
to
try
to
find
groups
like
that.
B
Yeah
that
that's
what
they
were
doing
and
I
was
like
wow-
that's
something
we
could
do
because
they're,
actually,
they
get
paid
a
lot
for
for
them
to
teach
to
their
students
right
and
so
what
they
do.
Is
they
partner
with
student
organizations
as
a
sort
of
like
compromise,
because
maybe
the
at
university
they're,
like
I
don't
know
like
it's
sketchy
like
I
don't
know.
If
we
want
to
teach
our
students,
I
don't
know
if
the
industry
is
ready
yet
whatever,
and
so
they
partner
with
student
organizations
and
they
get.
B
I
think
what
they
did.
Is
they
partnered
with
student
organization
and
they
had
polygons
sponsor
the
course
and
of
course
they
teach
about
web
3
and
how
to
how
to
dial
and
all
they
actually
teach
about
layer,
2
and
polygon,
how
to
build
a
polygon
right.
So
I
think
we
could
take
a
page
out
of
that
and
do
that.
A
Sure
so
so
one
of
the
aspects
of
this
is
that
you
know
if
we,
if
we
did
something
like
this
it
I
think
cohorts
would
be
work
really
well
and-
and
this
would
require
this
would
be
very
similar
to
how
the
ieee
operates
their
their
organization.
A
A
We
could
have
those
types
of
things
where
we
have
this
initiative
for
newcomers
who
are
just
learning
how
to
down
how
to
learn
how
to
work
with
each
other
within
this
one
month,
time
frame
and
and
set
out
those
agendas
and
objectives
for
them.
And
then.
F
I
think
we
just
need
to
be
sure
that
we're
not
confusing
token
engineering
with
how
to
dow
those
are
two.
F
F
I
think
we
should
do
what
we're
talking
about
now
create
a
a
culture
handbook,
for
you
know.
F
For
people
so
not
just
onboarding
to
token
engineering
but
onboarding
to
why
is
it
daos
exist
at
all?
Do
you
know
what
I'm
saying?
What
is
the
cul
underlying
cultural?
C
Yeah,
I
have
something
real
quick
on
the
education,
I'm
starting
to
feel
a
bit
skeptical
about
that
for
various
reasons.
C
C
I
remember
in
one
call
we
weren't
talking
about
like
a
proper
education
program,
but
we
were
talking
about
the
tc
instead
of
sharing
and
sharing
about
how
we
operate
the
dao
and
all
culture
and
stuff-
and
someone
said
well,
that's
common
stacks.
C
C
Oh
well,
yeah!
That's
that's
probably
another
point.
So
probably
I
like
the
idea
of
the
education
and
it
could
be
sort
of
disguised
as
an
on-boarding
process
where
we
teach
people
as
a
means
to
onboard
them.
But
as
far
as
education,
education,
we're
going
to
be,
we
have
our
hands
tied
in
a
lot
of
things,
not
only
education
and
a
lot
of
projects.
We've
been
trying
to
work
on
because
we
don't
have
or
like.
A
B
A
Let's
be
respectful
of
like
their
efforts
and
their
initiatives,
we
don't
we
do
not
want
to
be
extractive
of
their
efforts.
That's
for
sure,
like
I,
I
wouldn't
want
to
start
any
education
that
is
focused
on
token
engineering,
specifically
because
I
know
for
a
fact
that
token
engineering
academy
is
focusing
on
in
that
area,
but
when
it
comes
to
other
education
like
dows
and
stuff,
like
that,
that's
fine!
Let's
do
that.
Let's,
let's,
let's
start
building
these
initiatives,
I
I
think
tiptoeing
correspondence.
F
A
You
know,
and,
and
so
right
now,
this
document
that
I
have
right
now.
These
are
the
ideas
that
we've
put
forward
and
if
we
can
go
around
real,
quick-
and
I
just
want
everybody
to
quickly
just
say
a
pro
and
a
con
about
each
one
of
those
and
just
state
your
ideas
for
those
so
preventing
cultural
conflicts
is
going
to
be
the
first
one
gravity
yep.
A
So
what
is
its
when
it
comes
to
pros
like
what
is
it
something
tangible
that
we
can
do
and
cons
is
like
why
this
shouldn't
be
a
priority?
Does
anybody
want
to
take
a
stab
at
it.
C
I
can
so
a
pro
or
a
way
we
could
approach.
It
is,
of
course,
gravity
as
like
I
said,
but
also
monitoring
how
we
interact
and
making
sure
any
there's
no
discussion
that
escalates
to
the
point
where
it
you
know
it
becomes
an
issue
and
a
con
would
be
that
we
may
not
need
it
right
now
and
we
can
probably
use
the
time
for
other
stuff
well,
but
you
know
the
the
the
time
to
prevent.
That
is
unclear.
So
that's
probably
a
con.
I
don't
know.
A
E
Okay,
so
preventing
cultural
conflicts.
I
feel
that
sticking
to
like
similar
processes
isn't
a
bad
idea.
E
E
You
know
like
budgets
and
stuff
like
this,
so
sometimes
it's
kind
of
of
tough,
but
I
do
feel
that
this
by
itself
should
be
like
a
topic
of
conversation
with
the
rest
of
the
community,
because,
assuming
that
preventing
cultural
conflicts
is
invaluable,
I
personally
think
it's
a
mistake,
because
if
the
community
decides
it
together,
that's
like
one
thing,
but
but
if
people
think
that
cultural
conflicts
in
preventing
them
are
are
valuable,
it
should
be
up
to
to
like
everyone
else.
E
So
I
do
feel
that
if,
if
people
think
that
this
is,
this
should
be
a
priority,
I
would
be
like
okay
with
it,
although
I
do
feel
that
it
falls
like
on
kind
of
like
shaky
grounds
when
it
comes
to.
You
know
like
deciding
on
what
needs
to
like
keep
moving
forward.
A
Yeah
we
can
actually
just
go,
go
ahead
and
go
to
the
next
topic,
so
I
I'm
going
to
break
it
into
these
four
different
topic
areas,
because
these
are
all
kind
of
similar.
So
the
next
one
is
creating
a
creation
of
the
tec
narrative
and
revisiting
the
mvv.
E
Pros,
I
feel
that
it
helps
us
explore
different
ideas,
especially
around
samples
work
cons.
Definitely
not
something
like
convenient
at
this
moment
because,
like
narrative,
is
also
like,
in
a
way
a
public
good
and
there's
value
around
public
goods.
However,
like
the
the
like,
I
I
don't
think
it's,
I
don't
think
it
could
be
like
a
good
moment
for
you
know
like
deciding
like.
Oh
yeah.
We
want
to
change
like
the
core.
We
want
to
change
the
very
thing
that
has
been
keeping
us
here.
E
You
know
like
for
for
for
so
long,
so
I
feel
that
doing
it
in
times
like
this
might
be
a
little
bit
overwhelming
and
just
like,
like
a
community
burnout
in
general,
so
I
think
it
might
might
not
be
the
better
moment
I'll
pass
it
to
someone
else
just
so
that
someone
else
gets
like
the
chance
to
talk,
and
then
I
can
come
back
to
the
last
two
topics.
If
that's
okay,.
A
That's
perfect:
let's
do
the
first
two
topics,
so
you
can
go
past
it
too.
B
Thanks
chewie,
are
we
still
in
the
first
two
topics.
A
Yep,
so
if
you
want
to
go
through
all
four,
we
can
go
through
all
four.
The
entire
purpose
of
this
is
just
to
kind
of
get
all
of
our
arguments
out
on
what
we
should
prioritize
and
then
once
we
have
the
the
arguments
out,
then
we'll
kind
of
vote
on
which
ones
that
we're
going
to
focus
on
and
then
we'll
build
the
the
epic.
B
Yeah
try
to
be
concise,
so
I
can
go
through
all
four
of
them.
So
in
terms
of
preventing
cultural
conflicts,
the
pros
is
that
we
already
have
gravity
doing
that
and
it
is
generating
income
from
other
dollars.
Consulting
with
us
and
seeking
training
with
us,
and
maybe
even
hiring
gravitons
it'd
be
interesting.
B
I
guess
on
the
side
would
be
if
it'd
be
interesting
if,
as
other
working
groups
get
ways
to
generate
income,
if
maybe
the
majority
of
that
income
goes
to
that
working
group
multisig,
but
a
small
fraction
of
it
goes
sort
of
like
into
the
common
pool
either
to
fondler
projects
or
to
fund
other
working
groups.
That'd
be
interesting,
but
I
mean
that's:
that's
I
guess
a
conversation
for
another
time.
Cons.
B
It
it
it
doesn't
tackle
the
maybe
indirectly,
but
it
doesn't
tackle
directly
the
issue
of
economic
scarcity
and
generating
more
resources
for
us
to
either
quicken
our
pace,
pay
more
to
contributors
or
just
do
more
work
and
become
faster.
B
So
it's
it's
like
yeah.
It's
focusing
on
the
culture
aspect
which
I
I
don't
want
to
diminish
but
like
at
this
time,
maybe
like
the
cultural
aspect
is
suffering
because
of
economic
issues.
That
perhaps
ought
to
be
addressed
so
that
they
trickle
down
onto
cultural
climate.
So
that's
that
the
creation
of
dc
narrative
and
revisiting
of
the
mbv
pros
is
that
I'm
somehow
already
working
on
that
with
the
the
video
that
I'm
doing
for
for
the
marketing
team
within
comms.
B
Somehow
the
is
in
sort
of
like
a
shelling
point
kind
of
way
I
took
the
the
title:
is
the
revolution
will
not
be
tokenized
and
sort
of
like
the
conclusion
is
that
it
will
not
be
tokenized
because
it's
not
a
revolution,
it's
evolution
and
it
is
really
taking
a
page
out
of
graves
talk
at
barcelona,
but
it
throws
a
curveball
on
people
because
there's
a
lot
of
articles
out
there
on
revolution
will
be
tokenized
like,
and
it's
also
placed
on
the
television.
The
revolution
will
not
be
televised.
B
You
know
the
very
famous
spoken
word
poem
from
the
70s,
but
I
guess
the
product
would
be
that
I'm
already
work
like
I'm
already
working
on
that
and
creating
like
an
emotional
narrative
that
that
goes
deeper
than
just
the
technical
aspect
of
bonding
curves
and
and
and
and
and
conviction,
voting
and
protocols,
and
that
so
the
cons
would
be
that
again,
it's
not
as
yeah
like.
I
would
agree
with
you
like,
not
convenient
right
now
or
not
as
impactful.
In
terms
of
the
current
issues
that
we
have
to
implication
of
process.
B
Communication
structure
reduce
comes
to
a
core
team
optimized
resource
allocation.
New
compensation
mode
for
contributors,
yeah,
well
the
process.
I
already
have
a
theory
for
it
that
I'm
working
on
a
research
that
unfortunately
truly
means
my
monologue,
but
I
think
we
can
really
be
use
biomimicry
or
biomimicism
and
look
at
how
nature
organizes
their
their
value
production
networks
and
taking
the
idea
of
hololens
and
holidays
and
how
they
are
both
a
whole.
And
apart,
that's
our
bodies.
You
know
that's
how
they
manage
resource.
B
You
know
you
have
you
have
a
cell
and
it
can
be
it's
its
own
thing.
But
if
it's
a
cell
within
within
the
heart,
then
it's
part
of
the
heart,
but
it's
something.
So
I
think
we
can
limit
that
from
contributors
from
working
groups
and
from
our
from
our
dao
they're,
both
holes
and
parts
of
a
larger
ecosystem
and
and
if
we
integrate
all
of
that
into
a
model,
and
we
even
can
use
cad
cat
as
a
tool
to
model.
B
You
know
the
value
that
we're
producing
in
terms
of
maybe
income
generation
or
increasing
demand.
For
the
token,
the
constraints
that
we
have
in
terms
of
the
treasury
that
the
hours
that
that
active
contributor
have
to
offer,
I
would
say
that
it's
the
most
impactful
the
problem,
that
it's
not
the
most
impactful
and
if
we
solve
it
for
ourselves,
we
can
provide
that
service
to
other
dials
and
we
can.
It
can
generate
income
right.
So
really
the
the
problems
or
the
challenges
that
we
have.
B
If
we
solve
them
or
if
we
progress
onto
them,
we
can
we
can
sell
that
knowledge
or
we
can
use
that
knowledge
to
to
derive
income
and
wouldn't
that
be
poetic,
justice
right.
B
The
cons
is
that
it's
it's
easier
said
than
done
right
like
again,
it's
just
a
theory,
and
you
know
there's
a
lot
of
things
within
dials
or
technology
that
might
not
be
akin
to
nature.
So
will
it
work?
I
don't
know,
I
think
it's
worth
a
shot,
though
so,
realistically
yeah
the
cons
would
be
yeah,
it's
complex,
it's
complex
and
and
there's
no.
B
Yeah
so
the
cultural
handbook
from
boarding
to
web
3.00
education
offering
from
the
tc
in
the
financies
partnerships.
B
The
education
offering
from
the
tc
again
it
would
generate
income
and
it
would
it
would
be
sort
of
like
the
the
happy
future
between
dj
and
region,
in
a
way
that
that
we
would
be.
We
will
be
keeping
true
to
our
mission
vision,
values,
maybe
advancing
top
engineering
through
education
through
an
education
product
or
service
and
at
the
same
time
we
would
be
preserving
ourselves
or
addressing
the
the
economic
scarcity.
B
That
right
now
is
trickling
down
into
cultural
aspects
and
and
lack
of
people
contributing
and
and
slower
pace,
cultural
handbook,
yeah,
the
cultural
handbook.
I
mean
one
of
the
things
we
pr
pride
ours
ourselves
in
was
the
cultural
build
right
and
the
rituals
that
we
have,
such
as
praise,
and
things
like
that.
So
we
would
be
staying
true
to
our
founding
principles.
B
In
spite
of
the
bear
market
and
the
the
economic
issues,
you
know
that
are
playing
us
right
now:
defining
tc
partnerships,
yeah.
I
think
I
was
actually
thinking
about
expanding
sort
of
like
the
marketing
team
into
also
business
development,
because
maybe
in
theory,
communitas
was
doing
some
of
that
in
terms
of
outreach
to
people
our
token
holders.
But.
B
We're
not
doing
like
proper
business
development
as
as
I
think
we
could
be
doing,
and
that
would
imply
defining
the
partnerships
and
delimiting
like
okay,
like
phrases
from
general
magic.
How
can
we
monetize
it
or
can
we
not?
You
know
this
is
from
common
stack?
Can
we
do
something
about
it?
Can
we
not
t
academy
like?
Can
we
like?
How
can
we
provide
some
token
hearing
service
without
you
know,
with
that,
without
sort
of
like
going
into
your
lane
and
somehow
cannibalizing
your
your
product
or
whatever
so
khan,.
F
F
I
would,
I
would
want
to
basically
train
all
of
the
the
people
who
want
to
be
stewards.
You
know,
because
I
think
what
we
were
talking
about
was
sort
of.
F
The
idea
of
stewardship
to
be
more
like
people
were
facilitators,
and
so,
if
we're
gonna
do
that,
then
we
need
to
increase
people's
facilitation
skills.
So
creation
of
the
tec
narrative
everything
else
falls
underneath
the
creation
of
the
tec
narrative
so
revisiting
the
mvv.
That,
for
me,
is
just
the
is
like
the
evolution
of
how
we
deal
with
each
other.
We've
got
curated
material.
We've
worked
through
that
curated
material,
now
we're
in
a
bear
market,
and
we
have
to
to
revise
that
right.
F
So
again,
I
made
a
graphic
for
that
that
actually,
you
know,
speaks
to
how
that
whole.
F
That
whole
deal
works.
I
don't
know
if
you
guys
have
seen
this
before,
but
the.
F
So
you
know
it
just
seems
like
we're
we're
here.
Looking
at
you
know
how,
whatever
we'd
previously
you
know
outlined
and
promoted
and
dealt
with,
is
isn't
working
for
us
anymore,
so
we
gotta
redo
it
right.
So
we've
got
to
go
through
the
process
of
of
iterating
or
evolving
right,
and
we
in
order
to
do
that,
we
need
you,
know,
participation
and
co-creation
so
anyway.
So
then.
F
The
cons
are
yeah,
it's
a
cultural
thing.
People
actually
have
to
learn
things
you
you
have
you
know,
so
I
think
that
the
cons
of
all
of
these
really
are
that
it's
it's
going
to
require
education
and
for
the
people
who
have
been
leading
up
to
now
to
become
willing
to
change
and
and
be
different
internally
to
make
all
of
these
things
sort
of
go
so.
F
The
cultural
handbook,
a
pro
for
that
would
be,
you
know
it's
increases
attraction
potentially
as
a
revenue
source,
especially
if
we
I
know
when
I
taught
the
course
with
antac
it
was.
You
know
I
made
750
out
of
that.
So
you
know
if
we
could
have
you
know
revenue
source
from.
F
F
The
con
is
you,
you
have
to
actually
pick
the
right
people
right.
So
so,
if
you
got
you
know,
somebody
who's
got
a
limited
viewpoint
or.
F
You're
mostly
focused
on
the
money
or
the
engineering
or
something
right.
Maybe
that's
not
you
know
the
best
thing
so
I'm
I
don't
know
is:
is
cultural
handbook,
education
and
defining
tec
partnerships?
All
of
those
are
the
same
thing.
A
Yeah,
it
kind
of
in
the
same
realm
yeah,
so,
okay
yeah,
all
right,
we'll
further
define
it.
If
focused
is
the
area
we
want
to
focus
on.
F
Okay,
so
yeah,
that's
I
for
me.
The
defining
characteristic
of
our
thing
is
the
culture
right,
so
that,
for
me,
is
always
going
to
be
the
thing
that
you
know
we
should
be
promoting,
but
you
know
I
understand
that
token
engineers
might
feel.
F
Yeah
nt.
D
Yeah,
thank
you
so
for
the
first
one
I
don't
know
if
it
would
be
like
a
pro
or
a
con.
Maybe
it's
just
more
like
a
like
a
comment
for
utilizing
cultural
conflicts.
D
I
think
maybe
it
would
be
important
to
just
as
we
are
thinking
about
like
analyzing
and
reassessing
our
partnerships
with
the
academy
with
external
organizations,
maybe
to
do
the
same
thing
with
gravity
and
his
relationship
with
the
tc
and
and
how
is
that
going
to
look
like
right
now
in
the
present,
but
also
like
in
the
future?
According
to
the
plans
they
have
of
expanding
and
and
becoming
their
own
thing,
their
own
dao
right.
D
D
You
have
more
clear
boundaries
and
bases
yeah,
similar
to
what
miners
said,
also
about
in
terms
of
the
of
the
money
right
on
of
the
phones
that
some
of
the
working
groups
use
here
and
then
they
use
to
expand
and
become
their
own
thing.
How
is
that
relationship
going
to
affect
the
tc
in
the
future?
So
that
would
be
that
for
for
that
one,
the
first
one,
then
the
creation
of
the
tc
narrative
yeah.
I
still
I
keep
thinking
that.
D
If
we
don't
set
like
a
clear
base
on
these
things,
everything
we
build
upon
that
might
not
be
as
strong
as
it
could
be.
I
think
there's
still
a
lot
of
confusion
and
with
the
concepts
and
and
these
ideas,
for
example,
like
of
a
shielding
point
right.
D
I
I
think,
like
a
lot
of
people
might
not
know
what
it
is
and
then
the
people
that
know
they
might
just
have
like
a
particular
idea
of
what
it
is
right.
Like
different
definitions
for
that
so
yeah.
I
think
it
it's
really
important
to
to
do
this
in
order
to
the
following
projects
and
initiatives
that
we
have.
D
For
example,
if
we
decide
to
go
for
this
educational
offering
that
is
really
aligned
to
what
we're
saying
in
our
mbv,
and
that
is
really
following
the
narrative
that
we've
traced
right,
because
you
know
this
is
gonna
be,
and
this
is
kind
of
like
a
con
for
me
like
for
the
educational
offering
for
onboarding
to
web
three.
It's
like.
We
are
the
tc
token
engineering
commons,
but
people
will
come
here
not
to
get
education
on
token
engineering,
but
on
how
to
dial
right.
I'm
not
saying
it's
wrong
right.
D
I
think
it's
it's
good
and
we
should
offer
that.
But
then,
then
that
might
require
maybe
an
adjustment
on
on
the
narrative
and
on
the
mbv
of
of
what
we
are
actually
offering.
Maybe
our
offering
is
is
changing
right,
so
so
adjust
according
to
that
and
and
also
to
because,
if
we
don't
revisit
this
and
create
the
narrative,
I
feel
that
then,
is
really
easy
for
projects
and
initiatives
to
come
up
and
just
like
take
a
different
path.
D
You
know,
and
and
this
is
something
that
had
happened
right
before
that
is
like
they
just
go
in
their
own
path
and
they
don't
really
are
aligned
with
what
the
tc
is
looking
for.
So
I'm
I'm
afraid
that
if
we
don't
like
set
this
this
way
strong
that
could
keep
happening
again
and
again
so
yeah
that
I
as
a
cons
in
that
part
yeah.
I
don't
think
it's
easy.
I
would
disagree.
That
is
not
a
convenient
moment.
D
C
D
It's
gonna
get
even
harder
to
get
consensus
and
to
get
everyone
on
board
with
the
same
with
the
same
narrative
and
with
the
same
mbv,
but
at
the
same
time
we
also
need
to
involve
the
community
in
in
this
decision
right.
So
it's
kind
of
like
a
it
is
a
complex,
complex,
complex
task,
but
I
think
it's
completely
worth
it
the
import
for
the
simplification
of
processes
and
and
all
of
these
yeah.
I
think
it's.
D
D
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
work
to
do
that
that
w
probably
like
a
con
that
it's
a
lot
of
work
and
a
lot
of
complex
decisions
to
be
taken,
but
as
a
pro,
I
think
it's
needed
right
either.
We
do
it
right
now
or
we
do
it
later.
I
think
the
sooner
we
do
it
will
be
easier
and
better
for
for
the
community,
so
yeah,
that's
that's
a
priority,
and
for
the
last
one
yeah,
I
think
it's
it's
a
great
idea,
I
think
yeah.
I
don't
think
we
should
be.
D
We
should
be
stopped
doing
things
because
others
are
doing
something
similar
or
more
the
same.
We
shouldn't
just
restrict
ourselves
from
trying
on
new
things
and
yeah
I
mean
I'm.
I
think
it's
a
it's
a
great
idea
to
have
this
and
start
working
on
this
education
and
education,
offering.
I
think
the
the
how
to
dial
is
one
idea,
but
also
yesterday
in
the
sample
conversation.
I
heard
this
I
think
durga
does
mention
this,
maybe
like
a
course
or
like
a
program
on
on
how
to
be
a
steward
right.
D
I
think
that
would
be
also
a
really
really
interesting
course,
educational
offering
that
we
that
we
could
have
and
the
cons
is
that
yeah
for
me,
like
it,
wouldn't
be
like
the
super
priority.
I
think
I
would
take
the
two
previous
ones
before
then
than
this
one,
but
I
mean
if
we
could
do
it
all
at
once,
it
would
be
great
right,
but
yeah
that
would
be.
That
would
be
for
me.
I
don't
think,
there's
anyone
left.
Maybe
I
pass
it
back
to
you
nate,
for
your
comments.
A
Yeah,
and
so
we
have
bfa
and
rather
mercurial
here,
and
I
really
want
to
just
state
that
I
want
to
appreciate
everybody
for
taking
part
in
this
kind
of
experimental
process
that
I'm
trying
to
establish,
and
I
think
that,
if
we
can
kind
of
further
define
this
later
on,
to
make
it
more
a
little
bit
more
focused
and
for
the
next
sprint,
I
think
that'll
be
really
good.
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
give
my
pros
and
cons
right
now
and
then
I'll
pass
it
the
bfa
and
rather
mercurial.
A
If
you
have
any
comments
on
these
topic
areas
and
what
should
be
prioritized
the
pros
and
cons
of
each
then
please
share
that
with
us.
So
the
ritualizing
cultural
conflicts,
I
think,
is
a
really
good
idea.
I
think,
having
a
space
for
conflict
kind
of
getting.
You
know
it's
a
tough
time
for
a
lot
of
people
and
there's
a
lot
of
uncertainty
and
being
able
to
answer
those
questions
and
those
concerns
for
people
is
really
important
and
holding
a
space
for
that
is
really
important.
A
And
so
I
think
it's
a
really
good
idea
and
I
believe
that
they're
gonna
mention
facilitating
skills
among
our
stewards
is
something
that
we
should
prioritize
the
cons
we
do
have
you
know
other
priorities
at
the
moment.
I
I
don't
know
if
it's
a
priority
for
me
as
well,
the
next
one
creation
of
tec
narrative
and
revisiting
mvv.
I
think
this
is
probably
the
most
important
thing
we
can
do
at
the
moment.
A
Yep,
thank
you.
This
is
where
we
can
be
aligned.
The
cons
for
this
is
that
you
know
everybody
there's
a
lot
of
people
on
vacation
and
and
to
do
it
within
this
next
sprint.
It
would
require
community
input
and
involvement,
and
I
don't
think
it's
kind
of
a
doable
thing.
It's
implication
of
process
and
kind
of
our
organizational
structure.
How
we
can
remain
sustainable
from
that
perspective
is
highly
important.
A
I
think
the
pros
for
this
is
that
we
can
start
to
redefine
how
we
work
with
each
other.
I
think
that's
kind
of
the
process
that
we're
looking
at
and
as
tui
mentioned
in
comms,
how
we
can
have
a
core
team,
but
the
the
cons
to
this
is
like:
how
do
we
do
this
and
stay
permissionless?
A
How
do
we
get
contributors
and
keep
them
engaged,
and
the
last
one,
of
course,
is
the
education
aspect
which
I'm
a
big
fan
of,
but
it's
a
it's
a
big
task.
It's
not
an
easy
thing
and
defining
defining
these
tcc
partnerships
is
a
huge
plus
in
that
area,
so
I'll
pass
it
to
bfa.
If
you
have
any
comments
or
thoughts
on
these
topics,
please
do
share.
A
All
right
give
you
five
four
three,
two
one
bfca,
if
you're
talking
you're
on
mute,
if
not
I'll,
pass
it
to
rather
material.
If
you
have
any
thoughts,
please
share.
A
C
C
I
I
think
the
the
points
are
are
really
great
points
and
I
believe
we
should
do
that.
I
am
a
bit
skeptical
as
well
to
his
point
on
on
the
moment
and
burst
said
something
about
times
being
quiet,
but
that
also
means
that
we
will
have
less
input
and
we
will
probably
have
like
you
know
like
this,
really
wide
view
of
the
tc
from
all
the
people
that
should
have
a
saying
in
that.
C
So
that's
probably
a
con
on
the
timing
or
I
don't
know
simplification
processes,
and
this
comes
to
our
core
team
composition,
bottles
in
focus.
I
think
that's
that's
great
too,
and
we
we
needed
for
what
I
said
at
the
beginning
of
the
call.
I
think
there's
many
benefits
to
that
as
far
as
budget,
especially
because
we
we
are
trying
to
spend
as
little
as
possible,
but
also
the
stability
of
the
people
contributing
here
and
the
deficiency
of
of
the
people
here
too,
for
the
education,
that's
the
one.
C
I
wanted
to
talk
to
touch
the
pause.
Well,
I
believe
it's
a
nice
initiative
overall
and
define
tc
partnerships.
I
think
it's
probably
top
priority,
just
after
the
revisiting
the
mbb.
C
The
cons
is
that
I
don't
like,
as
as
grace
as
great
as
it
is.
I
wouldn't
want
ourselves
to
have
or
to
start
or
to
just
spread
themselves
in
initiatives
that
aren't
directly
tied
to
talking
engineering,
because
I
think
that
we
often
times
want
to
do
everything,
and
we
are
here
for
a
special
purpose,
and
if
there
is,
if
there
are
limited
resources,
we
should
you
know,
focus
on
on.
C
What's
our
priority,
which
is
talking
engineering,
and
I
was
also
going
to
say
that
I
don't
I'm
not
sure
in
which
point,
because
I
think
there's
an
overlap
to
a
few
of
them,
but
I
find
really
surprising
that
we,
we
don't
have
casual
talking
engineers,
our
community,
not
like
working,
but
I
don't
think
we've
made
we've
built
a
space
where
talk
engineers
talking
engineers
can't
just
hang
out.
I
don't
think
there's
much
for
for
them
to
just
be
on
the
tc
and
spend
time.
C
In
contrast
with,
for
example,
I
think
here
the
academy
has
been
doing
a
great
job
where
a
token
engineer
can
either
participate
in
a
study
group
or
can
host
a
study
group,
and
we
should
probably
do
better
on
you
know
having
more
into
input
from
top
engineers
having
more
top
engineers
just
participate.
Just
I
don't
know
something
in
here
for
them
and
that's
it,
but.
A
Unique,
no,
thank
you.
That's
really
awesome.
So
the
way
I
envision
this
going
is
that
we
each
kind
of
have
a
vote
so
I'll
start
with
bear,
and
what
I
would
like
you
to
do
is
just
say:
what
is
what
is
what
topic
area
do
you
want
to
prioritize
this
on
the
sprint.
D
Yo,
I
use
the
questionnaire
so
this
print.
How
long
is
it
gonna
be
like
the
two
weeks
as
usual.
A
D
D
Not
in
terms
of
timing
and
planning
exactly
okay,
okay,
so
for
me,
like
number,
one
would
be
like
number
two:
there,
like
creation
of
the
tc
narrative
revisiting
the
mbv.
That's
priority
number
one
for
me:
number
two,
simplification
of
processes
and
the
third
point
number
three,
probably
the
cultural,
ritualizing,
cultural
conflicts
and
really
like
specifics
about
that.
I
think
and
then
on
fourth
place,
the
the
educational
offering
and
well
partnerships.
I
think
I
would
move
it
maybe
to
a
more
priority.
One.
A
D
A
And
I'm
doing
it
the
opposite!
Just
because
that's
how
many
points
this
one
gets
so,
okay,
how
about
how
about
you
empty.
C
Okay,
well,
I'm
thinking
the
tc
partnership
should
go
on
the
second
section,
because
I
think
that's
probably,
and
so
I
guess,
depending
on
how
is
it,
I
would
probably
put
point
number
two
as
the
first
one
and
then
let
me
see
number
three,
no
yeah
number
three
would
go.
Second
number
one
will
go.
Third
and
four
will
go
last.
E
Just
to
add
in
like
really
really
quick
points
of
view
regarding
number
three
and
four,
I
like
what
what
they're
gonna
mention
resonated
a
lot.
However,
when
he
says
that
he
considers
that
a
con
to
that
it
requires
education.
I
actually
feel
that
it
could
be
a
pro
because
it
can
be
something
like
challenging
something
that
takes
some
of
the
community
members.
Out
of
you
know
our
comfort
zones,
so
actually,
I
would
rate
number
three
as
the
first
one
about
number
four.
E
I
I
do
agree
with
like
the
partnerships
part,
but
I
feel
that
the
cultural
handbook
and
all
of
this
like,
even
though
it's
something
pretty
valid,
that
we
have
to
say,
I
feel
that
it's
just
like
you
know
like.
I
feel
that
the
whole
purpose
of
the
tc
is
going
to
be
much
much
clearer
once
we
have
like
a
first
generation
of
token
engineers
that
you
know
like
this
is
like
their
shelling
point,
which
is
like
our
objective,
but
in
the
meantime
I
feel
that
exploring
these
things
may
be
a
little
dispersed.
E
E
Yes,
okay
yeah,
my
my
third
priority
would
be
number
one
and
in
the
last
number
two.
D
E
I
mean,
but
is
it
great
like
first
like
number
one
is
the
most
like
the
first,
you
know
like
order
or
the
last
one.
A
No
so
it'll
be
the.
This
is
basically
a
point
system,
so
your
first
choice
will
have
the
most
okay.
B
I,
like
I,
like
the
rephrasing
of
instead
of
I
think,
managing
cultural
conflict
was
the
first
one
ritualizing.
B
So
yeah
yeah
number
one
would
be
the
the
second
one
and
the
second
one
would
be
yeah
like
that.
A
Okay
and
then
I
will
go,
and
I
think
the
narrative
one
is
really
important.
I
will
say
three
on
this
one
and
then.
A
And
rather
mercurial,
if
you
have
a
vote,
you
can
prioritize
this
if
you'd
like,
please
do
speak
up
if
you
would
like
to
oh,
I'm,
not
a
dull
member,
I'm
just
here
to
listen.
Thank
you,
though,
appreciate
it.
A
A
All
right
so
now,
let's
talk
about
it
within
this
current
sprint,
we're
going
to
create
an
epic,
and
I
just
want
to
tasks
that
will
inch
us
closer
to
executing
on
these
ideas.
A
So
right
now,
I
just
kind
of
want
to
have
everybody
just
kind
of
go
around,
throw
out
some
ideas
on
what
are
some
tasks
that
we
can
accomplish
that
are
realistic
within
the
next
two
weeks.
A
A
E
By
setting
up
a
core
team,
different
functions
talk
to
transparency,
about
how
we're
gonna
be
handling
the
funds,
maybe
reduce
it
to
less
multi-sig.
For
the
simplicity
of
it.
I
know
that
monthly
payments
are
already
a
decision
that
has
been
made
during
the
last
week,
so
it
would
be
pretty
much
just
restructuring
it
around
that,
but
instead
of
you
know
like
serving
the
the
team's
payments,
the
weekly
or
bi-weekly
payments,
we'll
just
go
to
like
monthly
payments
for
contributors
for
the
communications,
core
team.
A
Okay,
yep,
so
how
about
is
there
any
other
tasks.
D
I
have
two:
will:
they
are
kind
of
related.
One
could
be
organizing
roles
in
discord.
I
think
that
could
be
really
easy
and
could
have
an
impact,
and
part
of
that
is
like
maybe
reorganizing
the
discord
server
as
a
whole
like
restructuring
it
and
re-planning
it,
maybe
that's
kind
of
like
a
more
complicated
thing,
but
maybe
we
could
initiate
with
like
a
clean
up
of
some
sort
yeah,
just
like
maybe
defining
purposes
for
the
channels
yeah,
I'm
basing
basing
that
basing
on
that.
Like
start,
the
the
restructure.
A
C
I
have
something
to
well
as
far
as
comes
one
thing
that
I
believe
they
could
do
is
sort
of
fork
sample,
because
I
think
sample
has
a
good
documentation.
As
far
as
you
know,
the
structure
and
setting
up
rules
and
stuff
for
the
for
their
core
team
moving
on
other
stuff
that
we
could
do.
I
believe
we
can
have
a
look
at
the.
C
We
can
do
over
research
so
for
payments
and
stuff,
and
we
can
have
a
look
at
how
others
other
communities
compensate
people
to
move
away
from
bounties
and
stuff,
and
also
we
can
have
a
look
at
the
master
sheet
to
see
how
is
flow.
C
How
is
the
flow
of
money
moving
and
if
we
agree
that
that
flow
of
movement
is
appropriate
and
if
there's
anything
to
change
about
it
and
overall
just
check
a
lot
of
the
working
groups,
because
I
believe
there
are
a
few
that
can
do
a
bit
better
with
a
lot
of
things
overall.
B
I
just
have
a
question
in
terms
of
a
forking
sample
for
other
working
groups.
Do
you
imagine
that
would
imply
that
we
adapt
that
we
adopt
clarity,
because
I
mean.
C
C
Well,
I
would
encourage
everyone
to
use
clarity,
because
I
really
like
it
as
a
tool,
but
I
guess
it's
highly
dependent
on
the
word
that
it's
going
to
be
made
by
the
working
people
because,
like
for
example,
transparency
does
not
do
an
amount
of
work
that
requires
such
a
tool.
You
know
so
probably
I
I
think
for
comms
moving
forward.
It
may
be
beneficial
because
you
know
you
can
set
up
tasks
and
you
can
have
notes
and
load
that
in
the
same
place
and
but
again
depends
on
the
strategy.
A
Yeah
so
I'll
add
a
couple
of
mine
you're
going
to
be
revisiting
documentation.
A
A
The
second
thing
that
I
think
would
be
really
important
in
this
area
is
creating
a
list
of
newcomer
new
newcomer
tasks.
This
is
something
that
we've
been
wanting
to
do
for
a
while,
so
each
working
group
having
a
kind
of
a
a
list
of
simple
tasks
that
newcomers
can
do
to
just
get
engaged.
So
when
somebody
comes
to
your
working
group
and
wants
to
participate
in
some
way,
they
have
something
to
do
and
something
to
guide
them
on,
and
this
is
something
that
we
really
need
to
focus
on.
A
D
Go
ahead,
yeah
I
have
two
more,
maybe
creating
a
list
of
the
different
stakeholders
of
the
tc.
Maybe
one
of
them
could
be
like
a
list
of
active
contributors
like
to
kind
of
have
an
idea
of
like
the
the
size
of
the
active
community
of
the
tc.
I
think
that
could
really
that
really
help
and
then,
like
a
list
of
possible
partners
like
a
list
of
organizations
in
the
ecosystem.
You
know
I
have
different
lists
of
the
different
people.
D
I
forgot
oh
yeah
revisiting,
like
the
calls
like
the
amount
of
calls.
We
have
the
type
of
calls
we
have
yeah.
You
know
just
like
scheduling
yeah
on
on
purpose,
again
purpose
of
of
each
of
the
calls
and
trying
to
make
it
simpler
right,
trying
to
make
it
simple.
That
would
be
it.
B
Yes,
the
the
research
that
I
worked
on,
the
one
that
I
suggested
about
it
would
be
framing.
B
Framing
our
tao
as
a
hellonic
network
would
be
it
really
be
like
not
only
the
dao
but
also
the
contributors,
the
working
groups
and
and
also
the
larger
ecosystem
of
other
dials.
That
were
closely
associated
with
such
as
one
hive
academy.
Such
things
like
that.
But.
B
A
All
right,
I'm
just
I'm
going
each
one
and
kind
of.
A
Describing
what
type
of
task
it
is
yes,
and
that
way
we
have
kind
of
this.
D
I
have
two
more
yep,
one
is
from
gideon
that
I
think,
maybe
would
be,
would
be
possible
to
start
exploring
these
these
difference
between
a
working
group
and
an
interest
group.
I
think
that
would
be
really
interesting
to
explore
that.
D
Maybe
not
all
working
groups
have
as
a
purpose
to
like
actually
do
some
work
and
generate
income
or
like,
but
maybe
we
have
some
other
working
groups
that
are
there
more
for
like
these
spaces,
for
people
to
join
and
to
discuss
ideas
and
to
share
a
particular
interest
right,
so
maybe
to
start
exploring.
That
would
be
something
interesting
and
the
other
one
also
might
be
complicated.
D
Maybe
not
I've
been
thinking
a
lot
about
it
and
I
think
we
could
get
to
to
an
mvp
to
start
iterating
on
it
of
reputation,
systems
of
some
sort.
You
know
like
including
badges
and
I've
heard
that
there's
some
efforts
in
community
tests
with
anti,
I
think
he's
working
on
something
with
to
with
the
membership
of
the
tc.
D
C
Yeah,
I'm
supposed
to
be
having
a
look
at
other
space
in
the
upcoming
weeks,
which
is
a
soul
bone
talking
kind
of
thing
for
reputation.
But
I
wanted
to
have
something
like
small
note
on
the
organization
disco
server
that
I
think
that
I've
been
thinking
about
for
a
while,
which
is,
I
think
we
could
really
use
role,
gated
channels.
C
So,
like
I
don't
know,
for
contributors
and
stuff
that
just
select
the
working
groups
they
are
in
and
whatever,
and
that
you
see
those
those
channels
and
some
more
clean
and
better
information,
but
also
as
well
for
people
that
may
not
be
interested
in
working
but
more
hanging
out.
And
they
don't
have
to
be
to
see
all
of
that
medicine.
C
A
A
No,
that's,
that's
really
awesome,
so
does
anybody
else
have
any
thoughts
or
ideas
before
we
move
forward?
I
will
say
this,
for
example,
for
other
working
groups.
I
think
this
is
something
that
I
want
to
challenge
right
now,
just
because
I
think
you
know,
as
it's
been
said
before,
other
working
groups
will
have.
A
You
know
we
want
them
to
be
completely
autonomous
to
operate,
how
they
like
and
how
they
fit
the
context
of
what
their
the
work
their
work
is,
and
so
sampo
is
a
great
mission,
but
I
think
that
you
know
there's
some
universal
practices
like
the
manifesto
and
the
documents
that
we
can
really
focus
on
rather
than
you
know
that
area.
So
I'm
going
to
delete
that.
If
that's
okay,
I
think,
bear
you,
you
mentioned
it
or
it
was
an
empty.
C
It
was
me
I
I'm,
I
guess
it's
okay,
but
to
delete
it,
but
I
think
it's
important
that
they
keep
it
present.
It's
not
like,
for
example,
like
copy
sample,
but
I
think
we
have
also
to
take
advantage
of
the
knowledge
that
we
that
we
have
built
on
the
ttc
and
if
they're
working
upon
restricting
comms
there's
a
lot
of
things
they
can,
they
can
learn
from
from
how
sample
operates.
A
C
Yeah,
I
guess
gideon's
been
doing
a
really
good
job
on
on
just
operating
the
the
working
group
and
also
chewing
said
something
about
a
core
team,
and
so
sample
has
these
great
documentation
on
roles
and
what
are
the
limits
of
the
roles?
And
you
know
I
think
that's
that's
some
stuff
that
can
be
looked
into
and
really
be
used
to
their
to
their
advantage,
instead
of
having
to
start
from
zero
just
thinking
about
how
are
they
going
to
keep
up
with
co-team
and
other
structures?
C
A
Yeah,
so
so
we
have
a.
We
have
a
large
group
of
ideas
here
and
there's
you
know.
Each
of
us
are
here:
let's
see
one
two,
three,
four:
five,
okay,
so
there's
five
of
us,
so
I
I
really
want
us
to
choose,
maybe
just
one
one
that
you
would
like
to
execute
on
or
one
that
you
want
to
do
for
the
sprint
at
least
one
but
yeah.
A
If
you
want
to,
if
you
feel
like
you
have
time
to
execute
on
two
of
them,
I
I
don't
want
anybody
to
select
things
that
they
they
don't
they're,
not
going
to
have
time
for,
because
at
the
end
next
week
or
the
next
two
two
weeks
at
the
sprint
retrospective,
I
really
wanted
to
go
over
and
see
what
else
needs
to
be
worked
on
but
yeah.
So
this
is
kind
of
the
thing
I'm
going
to
open
up
our.
A
Okay
and
then
so,
if
you
want
that,
okay.
A
So
it
I
would
like
for
each
of
you
to,
I
can
actually
add
this
later
select
select
the
one
you
want
to
execute
on
so
we'll
start
off
with.
I
don't
know:
mono
is
there
one
that
you
want
to
execute
on
or
two
that
you
want
to
execute
on.
B
Yeah,
of
course,
the
proposed
model
for
compensation
more
from
bounties
and
evaluate
how
the
flow
of
money
and
allocation
of
resources.
I
think
I
could
cover
both
in
in
a
forum
post.
A
So,
okay,
so
this
one's
the
first
one,
and
so
so
what
is
the
forum
post
going
to
be
on
so
give
me
some
details
on
exactly
what
you
plan
on
putting
forward.
F
B
On
utilizing
the
concept
of
hololens
polar
keys
and
hollow
networks
and
applying
that
to
how
our
dao.
F
A
A
Gotcha,
okay-
and
you
said
you
had
another
one
here
in
this
list,.
B
Yeah
the
the
evaluate
how
the
money,
how
the
flow
of
money
and
location
of
resources
they
it
goes
into
the
first
one
sort
of
like
the
the
the
hold
on
solar
keys
and
helonic
network
like
that
model
of
of
production.
It
it
ties
into
both
okay
yeah,
I
mean,
if
you
validate
how
the
flow
of
money
and
how
you
allocate
resources,
then
it's
also
a
model
of
compensation
and
the
finalities
to
move
away
from
bounty.
So
both
of
them
are
yeah.
A
Right
cool
all
right:
how
about
bear.
D
Maybe
I
could
take
on
the
stakeholders
list.
I
think
I
I
could
take
on
that
one
and
in
regards
to
the
organizing
roles
in
discord,
I
think
I
heard
iran
that
she
might
be.
I
don't
know
if
she
already
started
or
she
might
be
starting
to
work
on
that.
I
could
also
maybe
follow
up
on
that
with
her,
and
I
guess
this
is
going
to
be
really
related
with
a
community's
working
group,
so
maybe
just
like
follow
up
and
follow
up
on
that
with
hair
and
and
that
team.
D
I
could
do
that,
and
I
guess
it's
like
an
initial
step
for
their
organizing
the
discord
server
as
a
whole
right.
So
I
guess
it
would
be
like.
Like
part
of
that
project,
I
guess.
A
Yeah
and
so
we'll
keep
that
outside
of
the
realm
of
of
that.
So
with
the
organizing
rules
and
discord,
you're
gonna
meet
with
iran,
follow
up
with
the
community
task
group
and
execute
on
defining
what
roles
there
are
in
discord
and
then
the
stakeholders
of
the
tec
list.
What
is
what
is
the
the
tangible
thing
that
you're
going
to
produce
here?
Just
the
list
of
active
contributors
or.
D
Yeah,
I
think
right,
I
I
think
I
would
need
to
give
it
more
of
a
thought,
but
I
think
one
would
be
a
list
of
active
contributors,
a
list
of
partnerships
that
we
currently
have
or
potentially
could
have,
and
that's.
C
A
Could
I
add
a
task
to
that
yeah
sure
just
to
kind
of
develop
ideas
on
what
to
do
with
these
lists.
A
Okay,
how
about
20.
C
C
I'm
keen
to
checking
out
also
the
the
structure
of
the
discord
server,
at
least
specifically
the
what
I
said
about.
You
know
gated
channels
with
rules
and
stuff
which
is
kind
of
similar
to
what
I
did
for
the
talking
gate
channel.
So
I
believe
I
can
use
a
lot
of
the
same
research.
I
did
and
I'm
keen
to
look
at
a
few
other
things,
but
I
I
don't
feel
comfortable.
A
Yeah,
you
know,
keep
it
simple,
you
know
how
you
want
it
so
in
these
two
realms,
you
have
exploring
reputation
systems.
Do
you,
so
you
want
to
do
this
as
a
forum
post
right.
It's
is
that
okay
kind
of
like
proposal
of
like
how
we
should
or
kind
of
like
an
idea
for
how
we
should
implement
a
reputation
system
through
badges,
co-ops,
etc.
C
I
mean
I
can
do
the
forum
post,
but
this
project
is
already
sort
of
under
sample
slash
community,
so
I
would
probably
have
to
you
know,
chat
with
gideon
and
see
how
we
do
it.
But
there's
going
to
be
something
a
node
on
clarity
or
impose
so.
A
Okay
yeah,
so
the
the
thing
is
like
the
part
of
the
sprint
planning
as
being
separate
than
our
individual
working
group
is
to
kind
of
include
include
the
the
rest
of
the
community.
So
even
if
we
can
like
share
the
idea
with
with
the
rest
of
the
community
through
the
forum,
that
would
be
really
great,
but
that
is
completely
up
to
you
I'll.
Let
you
decide
how
you
work
with
that
this.
This
sprint.
A
A
C
I
would
probably
go
first
for
them
for
the
advice
process,
because
the
work
I
did
was
specifically
for
the
token
holder
channel
and
I
I
didn't
thought
of
messing
with
the
whole
server
and
I
guess
the
device
process
is
more
appropriate
and,
as
far
as
executing
these
things
are
usually
quite
easy
but
require
admin
access
to
the
server
which
I
don't
have.
So.
On
that
point
I
would
probably
need
some
someone
else
involved.
A
Okay,
all
right:
how
about
you
chewie.
E
Yes,
nate,
I'm
gonna
take
the
first
one.
Restructuring
comes
I'll,
take
the
lead
on
that
and
also
revisiting
the
documentation
yeah.
I
think
it
might
be
a
good
time
for
a
new
manifesto
and
just
like
documents
around
communications
in
in
general.
A
And
for
this
one
will
you
have
okay
yep
and
then
so
the
documentation,
one
where's
that
so
this
one
yeah.
So
do
you
want
to
apply
this
to
do
you
want
to
go
to
make
sure
every
working
group
revisits
it.
E
E
Just
two
words
manifesto,
so
I'll
try
to
base
it
off
something
that
is
a
little
bit
fresh
since
most
of
the
documentation
around
communications,
it's
just
older.
A
B
A
Okay,
cool,
okay
and
then
I'm
going
to
do.
A
And
then
I'm
going
to
do
where's
the
other
one.
A
Okay,
so
that
is
the
list
we
have.
I
will
go
through
and
add
this
to
our
tec,
epic
board.
I
will
tag
each
of
you
in
in
those
those
tasks,
and
this
is
kind
of
yeah.
C
A
Is
the
sprint
that
we're
doing
this
this
time
around
and-
and
I
really
want
to
thank
you
for
partaking
in
this
experiment
with
me-
I
know
this
wasn't
as
clean
as
it
could
be,
but
it's
it's
one
of
those
things
where
I
think
as
because
we
did
this
like
the
next
sprint.
I
think
we
could
improve
on
this
design,
and
so
how
do?
How
does
everybody
feel
about
this
process?.
C
I
can
compare
it
with
how
other
spring
plannings
were
made,
because
I
didn't
attend
a
lot
of
like
out
of
10,
probably
one
or
two,
but
I
really
like
this,
I
feel
like
we
made
some
concise
progress,
some
tasks
that
we
can
execute
an
opponent,
things
that
are
easy
and
that
we
feel
like
are
really
necessary
for
the
community.
So
yeah
feeling
great
thanks.
Nate
yeah.
A
B
Yeah,
if
you
go,
if
you
scroll
a
little
bit
down.
B
Yeah
on
the
first
actually,
the
first
bullet
point
of
that
page:
it's
choice,
one
yeah;
no,
no!
No!
The
the
first
sentence
of
the
second
page.
B
Revisit
documentation
yeah
any
value
my
face
manifests
and
I
didn't
document
I
I
gotta
update
the
the
marketing
the
marketing
one
so
yeah
into
evaluating
the
manifesto.
It's
gonna
come
up
that
I
ought
to
update
it,
so
I
just
rather
get
it
out
of
the
way
or
put
it
put
it
there
and
write
to
be
accountable.
Yes,
actually.
E
Like,
let's,
like,
let's
work
on
the
same
document,
because
I
feel
that
if
we
can
consolidate
it
into
a
same
manifesto
for
all
of
the
communications,
it's
gonna
fall
more
under
like
a
core
team
rather
than
marketing
teamwork.
You
know
like
this
like
specialized
way
of
organizing
things
that
that
we
were
doing.
B
A
And
this
is
one
of
the
things
that
I
think
we
can
cover.
You
know
we'll
cover
within
the
sprint
retrospective
for
these
types
of
things,
so
we'll
go
over
each
task
that
was
taken
on
by
us
during
the
sprint
and
we'll
say
you
know
what
we'll
evaluate
like
what
else
needs
to
be
executed
in
order
to
achieve
the
goal
that
we
have
within
this
idea
and
we'll
keep
building
on
to
it,
so
that
that
is
the
concept
of
it
so
like.
A
If
you,
you
know
we'll
evaluate
like
exactly
what
we
did.
What
went
wrong?
What
are
the
challenges,
the
obstacles,
all
that
good
stuff?
So
I
think
this
is
a
a
really
important
aspect
of
it,
but
I
really
yeah
if
you,
if
anybody,
has
any
feedback
on
this
process.
Let
me
know
because
this
is
one
of
those
things
where
like.
A
D
Yeah,
first
of
all,
just
to
thank
you
nate
for
taking
like
the
initiative
of
reimagining,
the
the
planning.
I
think
it
was
really
needed
and-
and
I
really
really
enjoyed
enjoy
the
call-
because
it
was
really
it
felt
more
proactive
like
it
was
not
just
like
listening
to
what
others
had
to
say,
but
I
I
felt
like
really
involved
and
really
aware
of
of
the
work
and
the
ideas
that
were
being
discussed.
D
So
I
think
that
just
make
things
more,
more
efficient,
more
productive,
more
fun
as
well
right
at
the
end,
I
feel
more
motivated
to
start
working
on
this
and-
and
I
think
you
were
able
to
really
get
us
from
like,
like
big
concepts
or
big
big
issues
that
we
had
to
tackle
and
then
just
like
really
nailed
it
down
into
really
specific,
achievable
tasks.
So
I
don't
think
that's
always
easy
to
to
do
as
a
facilitator.
D
So
yeah.
I
really.
I
really
give
you
that
yeah,
maybe
something
like
as
a
feedback
that
I
could
provide.
Is
I
don't
know
if
you
have
some
ideas,
or
maybe
this
is
more
like
on
our
own-
that
maybe
there
are
some
of
these
tasks
that
we
might
be
interested
in
in
helping
the
other
person
or
like
the
the
let's?
Let's
call
it
like
the
leader
or
like
the
assignee
on
that.
D
Maybe
we
want
to
support
them
or
or
like
contribute
or
somehow
so
maybe,
but
maybe
that's
more
like
to
do
it
in
our
own
right.
So
just
that
and
also
no,
let's
just
leave
it
at
that
right
now,
yeah.
I
think
that
would
be.
A
That's
great
feedback.
I
really
appreciate
that
yeah.
If
anybody
else
has
anything,
let
me
know
yeah
otherwise,
we'll
end
the
call.
B
Yeah,
I
just
I
guess
I
want
a
second
that
I
myself,
that
I've
helped
tam
lead
or
hold
some
of
the
screen
planning.
I
think
you
did
a
great
job
nate
and
it
was
very
yeah.
I
think
we
we
made
a
lot
of
progress
on
a
short
amount
of
time
and
yeah
you
sort
of
like
went
from
a
general
approach
and
abstract
ideas
to
very
specific
tasks
and
accountability
to
each
of
the
person
I
got
assigned
to
them
so
yeah
great
job
yeah,
and
thank
you.
Thank
you.
A
Well,
no,
no
worries,
I
you
know
I
I
just.
I
think
we
need
to
not
be
afraid
of
experimenting
with
this
type
of
thing
and
I
want
people
to
have
ownership
over
what's
going
on
and
I
think
that's
the
most
important
part
of
this,
especially
for
restructuring
into
kind
of
a
different
pace
and
a
different
style.
I
just
wanted
to
kind
of
explore
this
this
area.
So
thank
you
for
all
for
participating
and
bearing
with
me
on
that.
So
I
will
improve
on
the
next
iteration
and
we
will
go
from
there.
A
So
I
look
forward
to
the
sprint
retrospective
and
if
anybody
needs
help
with
anything,
let's,
let's
talk
to
each
other.
So
thanks
guys.