►
From YouTube: TEC Sprint 25 Planning
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
Yeah,
cool,
okay:
let's
go
through
them!
So
what?
If
we
got
in
communitize
for
this
sprint?
So
the
next
two
weeks!
Basically
it's
this
week
and
the
week
where
the
vote
happens
and
then
the
week
following
that.
B
Yeah,
so
the
one
that
I
didn't
create
because
I
just
thought
about
it
was
about
communicating
to
hatcher's
the
result
of
the
vote.
I
think
that
is
important
for
us
as
a
last
outreach
to
them.
That's
what
I
will
have.
That
is
what
I
will
do.
That
is
just
not
created,
because
I
just
thought
about
it,
but
yeah
that
one
and
and.
A
I
might
also
want
to
say
I
just
want
to
add
that
we're
going
to
be
announcing
the
tec
token
is
live.
I
just
want
to
you
know
start
thinking
about.
Are
our
guides
in
place?
Is
everyone
ready
to
maybe
have
a
deluge
of
new
interested
parties
hitting
our
discord?
I
think
communitas
is
going
to
be
crucial
in
and
sort
of
like
having
the
foundation
already
so
that
the
week
of
it's
either.
I
guess
the
24th
or
28th,
where
we'll
announce
the
bonding
curve
goes
live
and
the
tec
token
is
available.
B
Finishing
the
process
for
guides,
I
think
that's
one
of
the
priorities
I
had
in
mind.
I
lay
out
the
process
on
the
github
issues
of
training
guides.
It's
in
the
latest
comment.
A
I
don't
know
why
I'm
not
finding
it.
Let
me
just
oh
thanks:
I'm
trying
to
do
not
baseball
caps.
A
B
Yeah,
I
think
I
think
we
still
need
some
tweaking
and
some
more
practices
on
certain
stuff,
but
it's
getting
there
and
yeah
so
yeah.
I
think
it's
it's
yeah.
I
think
it
will
work.
C
A
A
All
right
anything
else.
B
Besides
that,
I
I
added
a
note
to
the
main
concept
of
making
sent
hub
friendly
for
contributors
regarding
a
translator
issue
that
we
had
with
it's
not
an
issue.
It's
a
translator
situation
that
we
had
with
shui
if
we
can
tackle
about
it
and
find
a
way
to,
because
I
have
there's
a
few
people
who
has
reached
out
to
me
asking
for
being
a
translator,
so
I
send
them
over
shui
and
it
seems
we
have
a
overflow
of
transposed
potential
translators,
so
yeah
I
wanted
to
just
don't
forget
it.
D
Chewie,
it's
it's
going
good,
it's
getting
there,
but
to
be
honest,
like
that,
there
have
been
like
some
race
issues
that
I
think
are
very
valid,
and
the
thing
is
that
once
like
we
open
up
so
that
everyone
can
contribute,
translations
are
always
like
a
big,
a
big
part
of
it.
D
But
unfortunately
there
are
also
many
like
bad
actors
in
the
space
and
eskenorek
has
been
like
providing
a
lot
of
feedback
with
this,
because
for
the
past
year
and
a
half
he's
worked
with
one
hype
on
their
translation
and-
and
he
just
gets
like
you
know
like
sometimes
like
unknown
people
to
the
community,
will
just
like
claim
a
bounty
and
run
it
through.
D
Google
translate,
maybe
tweak
it
a
little
bit,
wait
for
three
days
and
then
submit
it
as
if
something
that
that
they
translated-
and
I
find
this
very
risky,
especially
considering
the
cultural
build
in
in
in
the
tc.
So
I
know
it's
it.
It
might
be
a
little
bit
controversial
in
some
way,
but
for
translators.
D
Specifically,
we
are
asking
for
people
to
be
integrated
for
at
least
like
three
months
with
the
tec
and
and
with
the
culture
and
have
like
some
kind
of
recognizement
and
follow-up
from
from
stewart.
This
is
something
that
doesn't
really
happen
with
other
or
with
other
stuff,
but
with
translations.
It's
just
like
an
extra
measure
that
we've
been
taking
and
and
yeah
I
mean
it's.
D
It's
also
probably
the
wrong
wording,
but
this
has
proved
to
be
an
effective
filter
for
for
people
that
are
just
like
counting
translation,
bounties
and
that
don't
really
have
like
any
intentions
for
integrating
with
with
the
community
and
yes,
so
yeah
we
we
are.
We
are
not
even
like
being
strict
with
this,
but
at
least
we
are
asking
them
for
a
previous
translation
experience
and
just
some
previous
work
that
we
can
check
and
and
yeah,
so
we're
trying
to
make
it
easy.
D
But
at
the
same
time
we
are
trying
to
take
some
extra
measures
so
that
we
can
have
quality
translations,
not
not
not
just
like
google
translated
and
then
tweaked
a
little
bit.
So
we.
D
On
on
the
standard,
which
is
11
cents
per
words,
we
are
doing
this
for
all
languages,
so
we
are
trying
to
be
fair
for
for
people
that
are
going
to
be
contributing
to
this.
But
at
the
same
time
we
are
trying
to
be
very,
very
picky
on
on
who
who
these
people
are
in,
how
they
relate
to
the
to
the
community.
A
Yeah,
I
think
we
introduced
a
new
problem
by
introducing
the
bounties,
so
I
hope
that
we
can
move
forward
where
we
have
a
translation
services
that
you're
leading
that
maybe
a
selects,
specific
things
and
works
under
this
there's
a
bounty
and
there's
this
three
month.
You
know
period
that
you
have
to
be
involved
the
tec,
but
we
don't
block
people
who
have
intrinsic
motivation
to
donate
their
skill
set,
which
happens
to
be
translation
and
that
we
keep
one
of
those
issues
open.
That's
like
here's,
five
articles,
you're
new
to
the
tec.
A
You
want
to
do
something.
You
know
another
language,
just
intrinsic
motivation,
unpaid,
not
a
bounty.
This
is
a
this.
Is
a
donation
to
the
tec,
to
learn
about
the
tec
and
to
learn
about
token
engineering
commons.
A
So
I
hope
we
keep
those
these
two
systems
in
place
so
that
we
don't
block
people
from
translating
we're
not
trying
to
gatekeep
that,
but
that
there's
certain
things
that,
as
you
said,
we
would
want
to
maintain
a
high
quality,
but
that
people
who
have
that
skill
and
can
execute
like
that
still
has
the
opportunity
to
do
that
without
without
any
barriers.
D
D
Okay,
so
maybe
like
attend
the
meeting
and-
and
you
know
like
sync
with
the
team
and
if
people
can't
really
like
get
past-
that,
I
just
feel
that
it's
like
already
like
saying
something
so
so
yeah
I'll
I'll
I'll
try
to
be
thinking
with
with
the
all
of
the
stewards
on
this,
because
I
I
really
don't
want
this
to
fall
in
in
unfair
circumstances
or
exclusive
kind
of
decisions,
but
but
yeah.
D
We
are
concerned,
especially
because
I
think
it's
like
the
most
the
most
like
solicited
kind
of
contribution
or
bounty,
and
and
we
really
feel
that
we
should
aim
to
for
for
quality
translation.
So.
A
A
I
was
also
I
just
wanna
say
I
also
think
people
that
come
and
want
to
do
it
and
aren't
expecting
a
bounty
for
it
because
they
want
to
do
it
because
they
want
to
learn
because
they
want
to
contribute,
are
probably
going
to
do
the
best
quality
other
than
like
paid
translation
services.
You
know
like
people
who
do
that
for
a
living,
so.
A
These
both
going
like,
maybe
we're
just
anyone
who
wants
it.
Here's
five
articles,
anyone
any
language,
no,
no
rule
like
no
constraints
there
and
then
there's
also
this
translation
services
where
they
have
more
stories-
and
you
know
maybe
content
from
from
other,
maybe
a
twitter
channel
and
can
do
other
kind
of
translation
services
outside
of
these
few
articles
that
are
selected
for
the
intrinsically
motivated,
maybe
that's
sort
of
like
we
can
have
that
dual
system
so
that
you
know
if
people
want
to
start
a
new
twitter
channel
in
I
don't
know
spanish
or
portuguese.
A
Like
there's
like
some
quality
control
that
the
tc
maintains
over
that,
but
if
somebody
just
wants
to
translate
an
article
into
russian,
they
could
do
it
tonight.
They
don't
have
to
wait
for
a
meeting.
They
don't
have
to
wait
to
ask
somebody
if
it's
okay
for
them
to
do
it.
You
know
it's
just
like
there's
this
thing
come
pick
it
up.
Do
it
submit
it,
and
it's
done
you
know.
D
Okay,
so
so
for
next
monday,
we
are
going
to
be
reviewing
like
the
index
that
translators
have
prepared
so
far.
Would
everyone
here
agree
that
maybe
there
are
some
evergreen
content
that
we
could
submit
in
this
way,
just
like
something
free
that
people
can
just
like
go
ahead
and
translate
without
a
specific
bounty,
and
it
might
be
like
a
good
first
step
for
for
the
more
like
technical
translations.
D
But
would
everybody
agree
on
on
and
maybe
doing
doing
it
this
way
like
evergreen
content
for
starters
and
then
more
technical
content
for
just
more
advanced
translators.
B
Yeah,
I
think
it
would
be
really
helpful
and
I
think
at
the
same
time
it
is
a
nice
kind
of
I
don't
want
to
say
entry
barrier,
but
it's
like
a
nice
way
to
sort
of
see
commitment
commitments
of
people's
time.
The
issue
that
I
was
having
with
this
and
the
reason
why
I
brought
this
up
is
because
I
had
a
few
contributors,
what
interested
into
techniques
or
when
translated
to
other
languages-
and
I
was
like
I
don't
know
how
to
handle
this
if
it
goes
to
translation
team
or
you
can
live
by
yourself.
B
A
It's
also
kind
of
like
a
little
nibble
like
hey.
You
want
to
translate
here's
a
few
things
you
could
translate.
Also
we
have
a
whole
translation
team
and
they
offer
bounties.
You
know
this.
Is
this:
you
get
rewarded
in
praise
for
these
self-intrinsically
motivated
people
who
might
want
to
do
it
tonight
and
if
you
still
want
to
continue,
then
liaise
with
the
translation
team,
who
has
a
bigger
project
that
their
their
bigger
ambitions.
F
D
Yeah
the
way
we're
trying
to
approach
that
is
having
two
translators
per
language,
so
so
so
yeah,
it's
it
it's
one
of
the
things
that
we're
doing
for
languages
that
we
don't
really
dominate
in
the
in
the
in
in
the
tec
already.
D
But,
for
example
like
if
we
have
like
a
portuguese
translation,
we
are
considering
like
maybe
asking
like
hey
lady
like
when.
Are
you
ready
like?
Do
you
think
you
could
like
review
this,
and-
and
we
are
also
considering
reviews
by
stewards
that
speak
other
languages
but
yeah
the
the
way
we
these
these
by
the
way,
are,
are
also
handled
by
two
translators
but
yeah
for
for
those
languages
that
we
don't
speak.
D
We
are.
We
are
also
assigning
two
translators
and
and
just
trying
to
have
like
people
of
confidence
to
that
to
the
community
that
we
can
ask
for
maybe
like
peer
reviewing
or
some
or
any
kind
of
feedback
after
they
deliver.
A
Yeah
exactly
it's
a
very
good
point
zap,
and
I
think
that
it's
easily
solved
by
just
saying,
hey
somebody
who
speaks
the
same
language.
Can
you
take
a
look
at
this?
This
is
say
something
other
than
what
we
expect
and
it's
not
like.
There's
going
to
be
like
10
a
day
and
it's
a
lot
of
work.
It's
like
once,
you
know
once
a
week
would
seem
like
a
lot
actually
so
in
different
languages.
A
You
know
or
do
something
with
the
article
that's
been
translated.
We
have
a
process
to
review
and
there
is
this
issue
already:
it's
904
the
evergreen
articles
for
the
tec,
there's
two
articles.
That
was
the
token
engineering,
commons
analysis
of
stakeholders.
So
it's
the
sherman's
article
and
then
the
engineering
ethics
in
web
3,
so
zargham's
article,
and
you
know
the
idea
that
somebody
can
come
and
do
this
tonight
and
submit
it
as
a
gesture
of
like
a
donation.
You
know
to
the
tec
or
contribution
to
the
tc
and
get
rewarded
in
praise.
A
It's
super
clear
that
that's
what's
happening,
and
maybe,
if
you
want
to,
we
can
add
some
language
in
this
article
around.
I
mean
in
this
issue
around
how
to
reach
out
to
the
translation
team.
If
you
want
to
do
more
and
receive
bounties
for
the
translation
work
and
that
sort
of
will
funnel
people
into
the
translation
team.
For
you.
D
Yes,
yes,
and,
and
also
with
with
teamwork,
this
would
be
something
pretty
easy
to
do
and
also
transparent
like
if,
if
it's
up
to
contributors
expecting
some
kind
of
compensation
for
this,
we
could
definitely
implement
it
and
always
keep
just
one
or
two
articles
under
our
sleeve
that
we
can
give
out
for
people
that
are
interested
and
and
just
not
be
like
so
attached
to
like
the
quality
control
side
of
it
so
yeah.
I
I
agree
with
everyone
thanks
thanks
for
for
this,
we
were.
D
B
Yeah
sorry,
yes,
the
next
thing
that
I
did
it's
a
culinary
for
orientation.
I
created
currently
with
its
issue
number
one
yeah
great.
B
So
I
did
that
and
I
I
added
a
comment
that
I
think
it
could
be
nice
that
every
guide
will
have
their
own
because
having
a
sync
calendar
with
all
the
guides,
timing
could
be
a
little
bit
tricky,
so
I
think
it's
better
to
adjust
to
each
individual
personal
assignments.
So
I
I
created
a
template.
I
added
a
description
to
the
to
the
meeting
and
today
so,
for
example,
if
you
click
on
it,
you
will
see
the
the
topics
that
will
be
or
are
able
to
be
covered
during
the
meeting.
B
A
Okay,
yeah:
let's
move
on
to
the
planning.
Sorry
I
have
some.
I
have
some
thoughts,
but
maybe
we
just
move
on
to
the
planning,
because
it's
not
the
priority
sure
I
think
we
might.
B
A
Okay,
cool
other
things
over
these
two
weeks,
oh
yeah,
I
think
nate,
you
are
doing
this
reimagining
medium.
I
don't
know
if
this
is
something
that
we
would
say
is
ongoing.
Okay,.
B
Then,
for
the
next
two
weeks,
yeah
besides
these
two
communications
that
you
mentioned
regarding
the
launch
of
the
token
and
the
results
of
the
boating,
I
I
cannot
think
of
anything
else
that
we
need
to
sort
of
cover.
Besides
the
guide
the
guides
and
the
survey
update
that
bye-bye
we
we
talked
about,
I
hope
that
it
makes
making
the
the
survey
part
of
the
part
of
the
validation
bot.
A
Manual
click
of
the
search,
okay
got
it
and
then
maybe
we
are.
B
B
Okay,
ms
ms
part
on
the
life
cycle.
A
Yeah,
I
think,
there's
a
bunch
of
things
in
here
that
that
I
don't
see,
so
I
wonder
if
it's
just
a
matter
of
us
cleaning
and
creating
some
new
issues
in
here,
I
added
preparing
for
the
deluge,
because,
honestly,
I
feel
like
that
these
next
two
weeks,
preparations
for
the
launch
of
the
tec
token
and
making
sure
that
the
guides
and
our
processes
are
are
as
robust
so
that
we
don't
end
up.
You
know
chasing
our
tails
a
little
bit
or
just
being
very
reactive
to
what's
happening.
A
All
right
cool
and
then
there's
a
bunch
of
repeating
this
is
yours
zap!
Oh,
this
is
transparency
too.
That's
why
okay,
the
orientation
call,
I
don't
think
manu,
did
the
working
group
wiki
update,
but
maybe
we
didn't
have
a
sprint
last
week.
So
that's
why
scanning
new
members
and
reaching
out
to
them?
Okay,
okay,
cool
who
wants
to
go
next
and
edward?
I
know
you
have
to
have
a
great
great
weekend.
H
Okay,
yeah,
I
am
creating
a
new
issue,
but
I
will
open
send
up
word
in
our
tab
so
that.
H
Perfect,
oh
sorry,.
H
Okay,
so
the
issue
that
that
says,
regain
momentum
in
gravity
coordination
calls.
I
think
it's
it's
good
to
have
this
this
sprint
and
I
updated
it
because
we
have
like
a
temptative
schedule
that
the
funding
proposal
will
be
posted
in
the
forum
by
the
11th
of
january
and
we
will
open
applications
to
the
roles
of
until
the
20th
of
january.
H
And
then
we
will
have
a
review
process
for
the
applications,
and
I
will
ask
support
from
some
of
the
tc
stewards
to
have
like
a
review
process
and
like
more
or
less
a
selection
process
until
the
25th
of
january
5th
of
january
and
between
the
25th
of
january
and
the
28th
of
january.
H
Our
idea
is
to
share,
like
that,
with
the
gravity
working
group
and
to
have
feedback
to
see
like
if
everybody
feels
comfortable
with
the
roles
and
the
distribution
and
to
have
like
this
collaborative
design
of
the
structure
so
that
the
we
aspire
to
propose
the
gravity,
funding
proposal
on
conviction,
voting
by
the
30th
of
january
or
the
first
days
of
february.
H
Also
on
the
side
of
continue
delivering
the
graviton
trainings,
we
have
like
the
list
of
the
of
of
gravitons
from
turning
21,
but
we
haven't
sent
the
last
pop.
This
is
something
that
it's
a
small
thing,
but
it
needs
to
be
done
also
durgades
and
I
had
a
call
where
we
made
a
a
roadmap
for
gravity,
a
one-year
roadmap
and
we
divided
it
in
phases.
H
So
I
am
gonna
share
the
screen
just
to
show
to
show
it
and
the
idea
is
to
to
be
able
to
then
communicate
this
and
to
have
like
more
feedback
on
this.
Like
phase
one
phase,
two
and
phase
three,
I
one
year,
roadmap,
where,
where
the
idea
is,
is
like
these
two
phases
are
funded
with
proposals
to
the
tc
or
other
dows,
and
this
phase
three.
We
also
want
to
have
like
our
own
token
design,
so
it
would
be
really
cool.
A
A
Can
I
put
that
on
the
agenda
because
I'd
love
to
see
more,
I
think,
but
I
also
think
all
the
stewards
would
love
to
know
more
about
it.
So
maybe
we
we
just
carved
some
time
there.
H
Yeah
for
sure,
and
also
this
make
a
graviton
get
together
also
to
share
the
the
application
on
the
rows,
because
one
of
the
things
that
we
are
doing
is
that
we
are
designing,
like
a
google
form,
to
allow
all
the
gravitons
to
to
to
propose
themselves
and
there
we
can
also
ask
and
solve
how,
like.
H
How
does
people
feel
better
contributing?
Because
there's
been
this,
this
thing
of
like
not
not
all
gravitons
want
to
be
actual
mediators,
and
maybe
in
that
in
that
meeting
and
through
that,
the
coordination
like
we
can
have
more
clarity
on
who
does
what
and
to
make
everyone
feel
comfortable
with
with
their
contribution.
H
Yeah
and
on
the
back
clock,
this
outreach
to
to
other
communities
and
like
forest
from
giveth
is,
is
helping
on
on
the
implementation
and
leading
like
the
conflict
management
side
on
that
community,
and
I
have
been
making
follow
ups
with
with
her
like
once
a
month
or
twice,
but
yeah.
F
I
can
take
it
it's
pretty
short
yeah
yeah.
Basically,
we
get
done
with
the
transparency
flows
on
the
proposal
and
actually
this
spring
we're
probably
going
to
do
the
update
the
t-score
and
medium
analysis
and
then
there's
one
thing.
Actually
I
want.
I
would
like
to
discuss
here
like
in
the
processes
when,
when
we
created
this
giving
credentials
to
other
people,
we
type
like
we
need
like
anonymous
from
the
stores,
but
we
didn't
type.
What
happens
if
we
don't
you.
F
Once
you
are
blocked
access
from
one
contributor
and
then
yeah,
the
thing
is
what
I
just
in
my
head.
Right
now
is
like
maybe
like
what
we
could
do
is
like
the
person
who
said
no
says
why
not
and
then
we
vote
again
but
yeah.
F
An
issue
to
get
that
done
like
by
early
next
week
for
a
life
giving
credentials
process,
but
I
mean
I
would
like
to
if
what
I
just
say.
It
makes
sense
like
some
quite
quick
advice
process
here,
because
when
I
type
it
into
the
forums
normally
it
doesn't
get
any
feedback
so
yeah.
If
we
can
get
some
quick,
but
now
it
looks
great.
E
I
I
think,
the
the
the
vote
that
you
do
is
great
and
then,
if
someone
votes
no
like
they
should
dm
you
basically
and
tell
you
why
and
then
and
then
discuss
it
with
them.
A
A
I
think
that
these
proposals
for
credentials
could
look
a
little
more
like
you
know
not
like
a
full
proposal,
but
we're
requesting
x
for
y
for
z
reason
you
know
like
what's
the
reason
we're
requesting
access
and
I
feel
like,
maybe
that
will
also
prevent
some
no
votes,
because
maybe
they
don't
understand,
I
didn't
vote
in
either
of
them,
and
I
apologize
for
that,
but
I
also
felt
like
I
now
I
have
to
go:
ask
chewie
hey!
Why
are
you?
Why
do
you
want?
A
F
Okay,
I'll
make
a
quick
after
we
enter
spency
on
on
the
boat
and
we
say
like
if
private,
tm
or
public
dm
and
then
we
vote
there
just
to
us
and
whatever
we
say
there
is
that
and
then.
B
F
Just
realized
the
forum
thread
and
I
think
we
good
to
go
yeah.
Thank
you
and
yeah.
I
I
think
that's
it
for
this
week,
actually
like
yeah
those
analysis
this
I
also
I'm
working
on
the,
but
it's
not
transparency,
but
I
now
that
christopher
showed
the
demo.
I
can
just
pull
out
the
pictures
and
finalize
the
the
quantifiers
role
on
the
forum.
Now
it's
it's
on
the
rewards.
A
Oh
cool,
okay!
Well,
let's
we
could
jump
to
that
one
too,
with
olivia
here
I
just
wanted
the
transparency
survey.
Is
this
still
going?
This
is
done.
F
Not
really
I
I
mean
I
will
listen
to
your
feedback
and
maybe
she's
trying
to
push
on
on
a
forum
post
instead
of
a
survey.
Okay,
I
guess
that's
just
not
a
huge.
It's
not
a
priority.
A
C
There's
the
first
quantification
happening
this
week.
I
mean
next
week.
C
And
create
onboarding
process
for
quantifiers
mitch
was
working
on
that.
I
don't
know
what
is
the
status,
but
I
think
it's
almost
ready.
C
Configure
source
cran:
this
also
has
to
happen
in
this
print
configuring
source,
grand.
I
I'd
sure
like
to
know,
what's
involved
in
that
that
maybe
somebody
can
talk
to
me
about
that
offline.
I
Oh
I'm
sorry
I
was
saying
I'd
sure
like
to
know
what
the
deal
is
with
the
quantifiers.
Maybe
somebody
can
explain
that
to
me
offline
or
I
can
look
at
something.
C
A
Cool
okay,
just
chewy,
I
don't,
I
just
dropped
for
some
reason
I
was
like.
Oh,
this
is
in
the
icebox.
The
animated
tutorial
for
quantifiers
was
in
the
icebox
it.
I
know
it's
not
getting
done
this
spring
for
sure,
and
maybe
that's
why
you
put
it
in
the
ice
box,
but
is
it
something
that
is
like
six
months
from
now
or
something
that's
like
eventual?
You
know
in
the
coming
weeks
we
would
want
to
pull
into
a
sprint.
D
I
would
say
that
it's
most
likely
going
to
be
the
first
project
for
the
animation
and
video
production
team,
so
yeah
it's
it's
gonna,
be
like
our
pilot
to
get
familiar
with
the
production
process.
A
Okay,
cool,
that's
great
so
with
the
it's
yeah,
then
I'll
leave
it
in
the
product
backlog
so
that
it's
sort
of
on
the
forefront
of
people's
mind.
When
we
see
it,
the
ice
box
is
kind
of
like
put
it
in
the
freezer
and
look
at
it
again
in
three
months
or
six
months
like
that.
Best
box
is
really
like
long
long,
long
long
long
time
from
now
so
like
when
people
I
I
almost
like
just
leave
it
closed.
D
Okay,
okay,
yeah
yeah.
Definitely
we
can.
We
can
put
it
in
the
product
backlog
and
it's
like
yeah.
I
think
in
the
last
sprint
planning.
We
didn't
really
have
like,
like
an
idea
of
where
everything
was
going,
but
I
feel
that
by
now
we
can.
We
can
start
considering
this
in
the
near
future.
So
yep.
I
I
I
do
wonder
since
we're
going
through
a
large
number
of
transitions
and
there's
a
lot
of
pressure,
and
so
on
just
wanted
to
maybe
remind
everybody
that
gravity's
here
you
know
for
you
guys
and
that's
you
know
what
we're
here
for
so.
I
know,
for
example,
teams
going
through
a
transition,
a
lot
of
different
teams.
I
People
are
negotiating
and
there
are
some
things
so
just
trying
to
be
mindful
of
the
fact
that
there's
a
fair
amount
of
pressure
and
things
you
know
popping
off
at
this
moment,
so
just
trying
to
remind
people
you
know
about
us
and
that
we're
here
to
try
to
help
if
there
are
struggles
along
that
way.
So
thanks.
D
Yeah,
I'm
actually
finishing
the
the
issue
with
what's
needed
to
finish,
setting
that
up
setting
it
up
so
yeah.
It's
just
I'm
almost
ready.
I
The
the
the
guy
who
started
it
and
he
was
asking
about
what
we
needed
and
so
on.
I
told
him
we
needed
you
know
weekly
or
monthly
payouts
and
he
was
like
we're
working
on
it.
So
you
know
just
so.
I've
got
a
bit
of
a
direct
line
with
him,
so
if
folks
wanna,
I
don't
know
if
other
people
have
been
contacted
by
him,
but
I
just
wanted
to
let
you
guys
know
that.
D
C
D
Share
with
you
that
document
to
just
have
you
in
the
loop
of
some
of
the
suggestions
that
we've
been
giving.
I
Yeah-
and
I
think
I
might
also
be
the
recipient
of
a
bounty
here
through
that
to
do
you
work
pretty
soon,
so
I
just
I'll
have
more
feedback
once
I've
been
through
that
process
as
well.
So.
A
Oh
very
cool
good
to
know
chewie.
Can
you
loop
me
into
I'm
super
curious?
I
don't
have
so
much
bandwidth
to
do
much,
so
I'm
so
glad
that
you're
really
moving
this
forward,
but
I'd
be
very
curious
to
to
sort
of
understand
the
capabilities
and
the
strengths
and
a
little
more
about
it
as
well.
D
Sure,
yeah,
sorry
that
I
haven't
been
able
to
do
that
demo
for
for
all
of
the
stewards
in
a
more
formal
way.
It's
just
that!
I'm
I'm
almost
done
with
my
laptop
it's
almost
back
to
life
and-
and
I
kevin
think
my
my
main
ethereum
account
with
with
this
computer.
D
So
so
yeah.
That's
that's
what
I'm
having
that's!
Why
I'm
having
trouble
like
logging
in?
But
basically
it's
it's-
it's
like,
as
if
this
central
board
have
integration
with
metamask
and
gnosis
safe
and
discord.
So
let's
say
that
we
have
just
an
an
issue
with
for
communications
like
get
the
the
work
platform
to
work,
so
the
discord
bot
would
be
sending
a
notification
to
every
communications
related
group
in
this
course
for
any,
like
status,
changes
that
there
are
on
these
issues
and
also
like.
D
Let's
say
that
one
of
these
is
a
bounty.
You
can
have
the
amount
in
where
the
source
of
the
of
the
payment
is
coming.
So
let's
say
that
you
point
it
at
a
gnosis
safe
that
the
team
controls,
so
you
can
submit
a
bounty
in
and
assign
like
a
specific
amount
and
once
it
gets
to
the
to
the
done
or
or
close
what
would
be
the
closed
issue
column.
It
automatically
submits
the
transaction
to
the
noses
safe.
D
So
it
it
pretty
much
like
takes
all
of
the
all
of
the
follow
through
until
everyone
has
to
sign
so
that
people
can
get
paid
for
for
the
bounties
or
or
whatever
recurring
activity
there.
They
are
doing
so.
So
it's
like
a
bunch
of
tools
that
we
already
use,
but
it's,
but
but
it's
like
integrating
everything
in
one
and
what
I
feel
like.
What
also
gave
me
a
lot
a
lot
of
confidence,
it's
precisely
loneliness
being
so
much
in
contact
and
being
able
to
fix.
Like
some
stuff
like.
D
I
originally
gave
him
some
feedback
on
on
roles
like
administrator
roles
and
contribute
contributor
roles,
and
they
implemented
that
in
like
a
day
so
that
that
stuff
has
been
just
like
falling
into
its
place
really
well
and
but
but
yeah.
It's
it's
basically
like
senkov,
with
just
with
more
integration.
H
Yeah
that
I
I
could
share
a
screen
for
chewy
if
you
want
yeah.
A
A
Sorry,
it
doesn't
sound,
very
cool.
I
did
look
at
the
demo
as
soon
as
you
shared
it
with
me,
and
I
mean
not
the
the
d-work
demo
that
they
have
on
on
d-work,
and
I
mean
it
looks
very
interesting,
so
I'm
super
compelled
to
see
the
results.
Actually
after
one
or
two
groups
start
using
it
and
and
sort
of
see
how
it
you
know
it
works
out,
but
definitely
incredibly
promising.
A
A
Okay
and
then
the
legal,
it's
just
the
a
b
and
c
right
and
that's
waiting
for
well
that'll,
be
done
next
sprint.
How
exciting
the
one
blocking
issue
in
legal?
Is
there
anything
else
if
I
think
you're
the
one.
E
A
E
I
mean,
I
didn't
add
anything
to
it,
but
there
are
no
yeah.
It's
all
there.
There's
create,
I
think,
ad,
for
the
sprint
backlog.
I
I
think
that
we're
gonna
try
to
get
the
terms
and
conditions
check
boxes.
I
mean
it's
a
gardens
issue,
but
I
I
hope
that's
done
this
sprint.
Gabby's
all
gabby
seems
to
be
on
top
of
it
mostly
pushing
through
the
giveth
side,
but
I
I
would
put
in
the
sprint
backlog.
I
expect
to
close
it
this
sprint
and
then.
E
E
A
Cool:
okay,
chewy:
how
are
you
feeling
about
comms.
D
I'm
still
not
done
adding
some
issues,
but
we
can
go
through
it.
I
already
closed
some
and
and
updated
some
others.
A
Okay,
maybe
I'm
hoping,
if
we
have
time
left
over
in
this
meeting,
we
can
all
do
some
hatcher
outreach
together
to
encourage
people
to
get
informed
about
the
proposals
and
vote.
A
H
We
can
start
boating
now,
like
there
are
only
two
boats
in
the
snapshot
and
like
it
would
be
really
cool
if
we
can
have
one,
even
if
it's
early.
A
A
All
right
cool
so
comes.
D
Okay,
so
tc
spotlight
on
one
hype,
tv.
We
just
had
a
really
really
nice
talk
with
t
wells
this
morning
and
the
one
hype
tv
team
and
we
discussed
on
what
would
be
the
best.
What
would
be
the
best
route
to
promote
like
the
the
tec
around
its
launch
like?
Should
we
take
a
strategy
for
for
maybe
like
generating,
like
some
expectation
before
the
launch,
or
maybe
we
should
take
more
of
like
the
giveth
strategy
that
once
it's
launched
like?
D
Let's,
let's
go
with
with
everything
and
just
like
keep
covering
it
and
keep
it
as
relevant
as
as
possible
after
the
launch
and-
and
I.
D
Wanted
to
ask
feedback
from
from
from
the
from
the
stewart
just
to
listen
to
any
of
your
ideas,
but
we
were
basically
planning
on
doing
like
different
short
segments
rather
than
like
a
big
episode.
A
big
episode
could
be
like
after
we
launch
but
prior
to
the
launch.
D
We
were
wondering
if
we
could
have
like
some
super,
like
short
insights
in
into
each
some
of
the
working
groups,
so
we
for
for
these
working
groups,
we
picked
so
far-
stewards
gravity,
subgov
and
community
for
oh
and
also-
and
also
transparency,
just
to
like
put
just
like
to
put
like
more
of
the
spotlight
on
on
like
some
some
work.
That
is,
that
serves
like
a
more
general
purpose.
D
In
this
way,
people
can
get
the
tc
like
in
a
much
easier
way
than
just
like
straight
saying,
like
oh
yeah.
We
want
to
advance
token
engineering
so,
rather
than
than
going
that
way,
we
want
to
explain
step
by
step
the
culture
and
then,
after
this
is
clear,
try
to
bring
up
like
okay.
So
this
is
how
we
advance
token
engineering.
D
This
would
be
happening.
I
think
they're
gonna
start
planning
it
and
we're
gonna
keep
discussing
this,
but
we
are
aiming
to
start
putting
content
through
one
height
tv
by
the
last
week
of
january,
so
somewhere
like
around
the
launch.
This
should
be.
This
should
be
ready
to
go
and.
A
D
Yeah
yeah
that
came
up
on
the
on
the
call
this
morning
so
so
yeah,
it's
it's
it's
kind
of
like
what
what
shapeshift
is
is
doing,
but
I
would
say
that
even
a
little
bit
shorter,
so
they
are
all
like
very
happy
with
the
result
and
and
I'm
sure
it's
gonna
help
us
bring
extra
attention
around
the
launch.
A
D
Yes,
yes,
yes,
this
would
be.
This
would
be
like
this
would
be
like
a
base
also
content
like
in
like,
along
with
these,
like
smaller,
like
episodes
or
or
clips.
This
would
be
part
of
like
this,
like
pre-launch
kind
of
a
spot
like
to
the
tv.
Oh.
D
Yeah
yeah,
just
in
a
just
in
a
way
that
makes
sense
with
the
rest
of
the
content.
So
so
it's
not
like
only
putting
it
out
there
like
next
week,
but
also
having
a
way
to
follow
up
with
that
is
that.
A
D
D
Okay,
and
let
me
let
me
check,
oh
I'm
getting
some
trouble
with
this.
D
After
that,
we
have
the
now
the
orientation
video
I'm
gonna,
bring
that
to
the
to
the
product
backlog.
A
A
D
D
Okay
and
also
okay,
so
the
the
funding
proposal,
also
I'm
bringing
this
to
the
to
the
spring
backlog.
D
Oh,
yes,
the
1078
retroactive
public
funding.
It's
not
really,
it's
not
really
communications
related,
but
this
is
this.
As
you
know,
it's
pretty
much
done
and
I
just
added
like
comments
here
before
closing
the
before
closing
the
issue.
Just
like
I
wanted
to
ask
if
we
should
put
this
0.8
ether
in
in
maybe
the
laser
tag,
multitake.
D
F
D
Just
just
somewhere
that
that
that
can
be
more
a
kind
of
accountable,
transparent,
I
mean
I
can
I
can
hold,
I
can
hold
on
to
it.
I
don't
mind,
but
I
would
just
rather
have
this
yeah
just
like
being
a
more.
E
I
I
would
say,
send
it
straight
to
the
laser
tag,
multisig
and
then
I
think
it's
a
great
idea.
At
least
this
is
what
giveth
is
gonna.
Do
basically
any
money
we
have.
We
just
make
an
lp
out
of
it
and
put
it
on
next
day
and
it's
like
boom
now,
there's
a
liquidity
pool
for
us,
and
I
think
that's
that's
also
with
the
the
get
coin
money
that
I
have
on
my
wallet.
I
think
that's
also
just
the
best
idea
of
what
to
do
with
that.
Just
make
an
lp
pull.
E
If
you'd
like
you
could
just
send
me,
the
ether
and
I'll
send
the
wrapped
eth
on
x.
I
can
be
a
bridge
and
just
save
you,
the
gas.
D
E
E
D
I
I
miss,
I
miss
all
of
my
my
one-on-ones
with
all
of
you,
so
it's
been
a
while
okay,
so.
A
E
Yeah
so
it'll
be.
I
think
this
will
be
another
one
where
it's
like.
Let's
just
find
a
human
who
wants
to
receive
these
funds,
probably
me
and
then
you
know,
convert
them
into
something
and
we
at
least
like
record
and
make
it
transparent
or
something
is
that
maybe
maybe
that
maybe
we
could
do
that.
Maybe
chewy
zep
and
I
all
got
on
a
call
and
we
record
the
the
the
you
know,
passing
of
the
of
the
funds
raised
before.
E
D
Yeah,
I'm
I'm
down
for
this
this
sprint.
Let's
do
it.
A
D
Token
listings
still
yeah
still
still
getting
there.
We
put
that
on
on
standby,
because
we
didn't
really
have
a
lot
of
of
stuff
to
move
forward,
but
now
that
we
are
close
to
launching
the
the
bonding
curve,
I
feel
that
it
just
might
be
a
better
time
to
reach
out
to
to
some
of
to
some
of
the
the
people
that
we
were
talking
to.
D
Also
maybe
I'll
I'll
add
for
for
the
coin.
Gecko
listing
I'm
gonna
just
have
see
if
we
can
check
in
with
the
giveth.
B
D
And
yeah
they're
more
familiar
with
the
process
by
now.
F
B
F
D
Okay,
perfect,
should
we
include
this
in
the
sprint,
though,
or
should
we
wait,
maybe
until
yeah
yeah,
I
think
by
sprint
26
it
it
might
be,
it
might
be
more
more
close.
E
B
F
A
D
E
D
Just
I
I
have
a
like
a
a
big
doubt
here.
What
should
we
do
with
the
with
with
the
website
after
the
comments
upgrade
like
what
what
are
gonna
be
or
or
what
would
be
like
a
a
good
or
or
damn?
That
means
a
word.
What
would
be
the
right
process
for
for
any
updates
that
the
web
the
website
needs
like?
D
Should
we
integrate
this
more
to
teams
and
make
it
more
like
just
make
it
more
accessible
for
for
communications,
or
is
it
like?
It's
is
everything
happening
in
a
way
that
we
can
maybe
like
reach
out
to
christopher
every
time
that
we
need
an
update
or
what
would
be
the
best?
The
best
course
of
action
with
website
updates.
A
I
mean
I
can
give
my
thinking,
there's
two
things
right,
there's
just
the
content,
you
know
and
there's
like
a
cms
in
the
background
and
then
there's
like
the
structure
of
the
website
so
for
content
updates.
I
think
we
definitely
don't
go
to
christopher
because
I
don't
think
he
wants
to
be
the
person.
A
That's
doing
the
content
update
every
time,
but
it's
totally
reasonable
for
a
bunch
of
people
to
in
teams
to
have
access
to
that
to
be
able
to
update
content,
but
for
some
structural
change
then
that's
something
entirely
different,
so
I
don't
know
yeah
rather
sorry.
I
just
want
to
say
that
I
think
that
there's,
like
limitations
on
what
content
can
be
updated
and
anything
beyond
that.
I
I
was
just
pointing
out:
I've
been
in
several
conversations
with
people
about
hubspot
and
we
really
do
need
to
get
a
lot
of
this
use
of
type
forms
and
other
kinds
of
forms
from
from
whatever
it
is
that
we're
currently
using
to
be
hubspot
forms.
So
we
can
gather
better
information
and
that
would
require
some
website
editing.
You
need
to
put
some
code
on
the
site.
I
I
don't
know
if
putting
code
on
the
site,
according
to
you
guys,
is
a
structural
change
versus
a
content
change,
but
you
know,
I
think
something
that
we've
been
stuck
on
a
little
bit.
I've
had
a
whole
bunch
of
meetings
over
months
about
hubspot
and
that
question
has
come
up
literally
every
one
of
those
meetings,
so
just
fyi.
F
G
D
Can
you
let
me
know
of
that
one
just
to
join
you
guys
and
yeah.
G
No,
it's
okay!
I
I
just
you
know
the
the
website
is
something
that
you're
gonna
us
is
right.
We've
been
talking
about
for
a
while
now
and
really
like.
I
I
just
kind
of
I'm
not
sure
why
we
don't
make
it
kind
of
the
focal
point.
G
You
know
the
first,
the
first
informational
piece
of
tec,
that
we
offer
people
and
and
have
that
type
of
you
know,
introduction
to
newcomers,
but
that
would
require
structural
changes
as
well,
because
you
know
right
now
we
have
a
couple
people
maybe,
and
it
feels
a
little
bit
gated
and
maybe
we
can,
I
don't
know,
have
I
have
a
working
group
developed
around
it
as
well,
but
I
just
feel
like
there
does
need
to
be
more
integration
within
the
commons.
G
I
A
marcom
standpoint,
hubspot,
whatever
you're
doing
in
terms
of
inbound
or
outbound
marketing
and
the
website,
are
identical
processes
and
need
to
be
integrated,
and
so,
if
you've
got
different
processes
for
gatekeeping
your
website
versus
different
processes
for
gatekeeping
for
your
hubspot,
those
things
are
out
of
alignment
in
terms
of
the
the
actual
needs
of
mark
the
marketing
communications.
Part
of
the
thing
so-
and
it's
felt
an
awful
lot
like
that
for
an
awful
long
time.
So
I
just
want
to
bring
it
up
again.
A
D
D
I'm
also
thinking
about
maybe
bringing
nick
nick
to
the
to
the
hubspot
team.
I
think
she
could
really
be
like
that
more
technical
arm
of
of
that
team
that
could
give
us
a
lot
of
support
with
it.
So
I
I
could
talk
to
her
in
and
check
if,
if
she's
available
to
do
this
and
yeah,
I
mean
at
least
any
kind
of
changes
or
modifications
that
we
need
to
do.
Won't
cut
us
off
guard.
I
Yeah,
it's
just
my
view
that
you
know
whatever
you're
doing
on
the
website,
whatever
you're,
promoting
whatever
you're
doing
those
two
things
have
to
go
hand
in
hand
right.
So
it's
you
know
just
different
fingers
of
the
same
hand.
Really.
You
know.
A
A
D
Or
I
I
think
what
durga
does
mean
in
in-
and
I
agree
with
this-
is
that
pretty
much
anything
that
gets
managed
under
like
the
crop
spot
like
perspective,
should
also
take
in
and
accompany
updates
that
apply
to
the
website
directly.
So
this
should
all
like
be
decided
and
happen
in
the
same
place
so
that
they
can
be
consistent
and
coherent
with
each
other.
I
A
And
I
don't
know
how.
D
Yeah,
I
don't
I
mean
I
I
I
would
like
to
specifically
issue
11.39
I'll,
keep
it
in
the
in
the
product
backlog
and
I'm
also
adding
a
comment
here
to
bring
all
of
these
efforts
to
the
same
place
it
might
yeah.
It
might
even
be
like
a
right
move
to
rename
the
hubspot
team
in
in
in
a
I
think,
in
a
couple
of
sprints,
so
that
we
can
cover
more
ground.
With
with
this.
I
C
C
D
A
A
G
C
C
C
C
So
that
she
just
said,
there's
a
word
of
challenging
the
proposal
and
committing
an
equivalent
amount
of
tc
tokens.
Oh.
E
C
I
put
already
in
this
print
backlog,
just
the
upstream's
metrics
for
measuring
ecosystem
health.
So
I
put
a
few
steps
there
so
set
a
list
of
examples
of
implementations
in
the
tc
define
at
least
one
metric
for
each
principle.
Setup
pays
for
revision
with
transparency.
Then
I
added
to
zaptimize
and
ivy
as
accountability
bodies.
There.
A
Okay,
yeah.
That
is
a
lot.
That
is
two
very
big
things.
Let's
see,
okay,
all
right,
so
the
one
that
we
didn't
do
is
stewards
and,
like
I
said
in
the
beginning,
I'm
not
prepared.
A
Have
the
time
to
actually
change
to
update
it
now,
but
let's
see
so
what
absolutely
has
to
be
done
this
one
I
can
just
close.
A
A
Actually,
let
me
ask
him
if
he
doesn't
mind
if
I
do
that.
First,
let's
see
the
other
thing
I
want
to
do
is
note
none
of
these
okay,
oh
yeah,
this
I
do
want
to
do
for
the
funding
and
sort
of
timelines.
One
of
our
sprint
outputs
is
so
we're
all
comms.
I'm
sorry,
I
should
have
gone
over
the
retrospective
actions
in
the
beginning.
A
The
retrospective
actions
from
yesterday's
were
all
comms
and
the
one
from
sprint
24
that
we
skipped
a
sprint,
is
to
have
a
future
road
map,
so
not
to
be
so
reactive,
and
I
think
this
one
speaks
to
that
and
it's
pretty
fair
that
we
should
each
working
group
should
have
a
roadmap
that
consolidates
into
one
larger
roadmap.
E
Yeah-
and
I
didn't
even
really
with
the
fact
that
we're
doing
it-
two
dust
test
deployments-
that's
that's
on
the
board,
but
really
it's.
Maybe
there
should
just
be
an
issue
like
launch
the
commons
safely
and
part
of
that
is
doing
lots
of
testing,
but
there's
a
yeah
common
swarm.
So
there's
some
things.
I
need
to
tell
you
guys
about
this
one
yeah
both
of
those
let's
open
up
either
of
those
ones
1172
yeah.
E
So
I
need
help
who
wants
to
help
me
write
this.
I
don't
have
the
focus
to
do
this,
but
if
I
was,
if
we
I
had
a
hack
sesh,
I
have
to
write.
We
have
to
write
two
snapshot
proposals.
Ideally
today
this
first
one
is,
I
talked
about
in
the
community
call.
E
You
know
it
sucks
like
we're,
just
not
going
to
have
the
exact
numbers
to
match
the
proposal.
Last
time
this
happened
for
the
hatch
too,
but
it
was
like
well,
we
have.
We
know
what
people
want
and
the
devs
just
decided
here.
It's
it's
too
complicated,
and
so
I
want
to
write
a
post
that
basically
says
why
holding
the
reserve
ratio.
Constant.
E
Might
you
know
that's
the
shape
of
the
curve,
opening
the
opening
price,
constant,
that's
opening
price,
that's
necessarily
free,
fairly
straightforward.
Having
the
initial
buy
constant
is,
you
know,
helps
keep
some
things
the
same.
Basically
the
amount
that
goes
in
the
common
pool
and
the
amount
that
goes
into
the
funding,
pool
and
the
reserve,
and
so
or
do
we
just
vary
all
three?
I
need
someone
to
help
me
write
this.
I'm
not
gonna
be
able
to
do
it.
F
Just
before
I
was
thinking
on
taking
like
rewatch
the
yesterday
community
call
where
you
say
more
or
less,
what
do
you
want
and
then
I
type
from
here
and
then
then
we
don't
have
to
do
two
things
I
think
like
then
I
just
sing
with
you
unless
oh
yeah,
this
looks
good.
Sir.
I'm
posting.
E
I
could
even
just
leave
you
a
voice
message
on
telegram
or
something
cause.
There
are
there's
some
certain
pieces
that
I
really
want
in
there
and
I
just
can't
I
won't
be
able
to
I
can.
I
can
get
it
started,
but
I
need
someone
to
finish.
You
know.
E
E
Yeah
seriously,
okay,
so
can
you
assign
that
to
zeptimus?
I
didn't
want
to
assign
it
myself,
because
that's
just
where
issues
go.
G
To
die
so
can
can,
can
I
ask
how
that's
going
to
work
in
terms
of
we're
going
to
have
a
certain
amount
of
time
for
the
rage
quitters
to
quit,
or
is
it
simply
up
until
the
the
bonding
curve
is
implemented?
And
that's
the
challenge.
E
E
Yeah
and
there's
the
the
fourth
option
is:
do
it
to
the
best
possible,
but
maybe
maybe
the
best
possible
might
piss
people
off.
If
actually,
everyone
cares
about
the
opening
price?
You
know
or
everyone
cares
about
the
shape
of
the
curve
or
everyone
cares
that
you
know.
There's
250k,
that's
going
to
the
you
know,
that's
going
to
the
initial
buy
and
so
like
I
don't
know
it's
just
it's
kind
of
a
mess
and
it's.
E
If,
if
we
want
to
keep
any
one
of
those
constants,
that's
fine
and
then
we
then
the
no
matter
what
the
devs
are
going
to
have
to
the
dabs
me,
sam,
paulo
vitor
and
nugget,
we're
going
to
have
a
hack
sesh
to
figure
out
how
to
get
it
nudge
it
to
the
best
possible
solution.
But
if
you
guys
can
give
us
some,
you
know
guidance
at
the
very
least.
It
would
feel
a
little
cleaner.
G
E
We
can
record
it,
but
like
it's
some
pretty
complicated,
you
know
it's
not
like
it's
like,
oh
yeah,
yeah.
Okay,
we
can
tweak
this
and
you
know
was
like
we'll
do
our
best,
but
I
don't
know
that
it's
useful
to
have
more
cooks
in
the
kitchen
than
we
already
have
fair
enough.
Yeah.
G
A
Can
you
explain
the
the
correlation
with
the
initial
buy,
so
more
rage,
glitters
lower
initial
buy,
that's
it.
So
we
start
at
like
exactly
what
I
don't
remember.
We
have
68k
or
something
like
that
250k
and
as
this
number
goes
up,
this
number
goes
down.
That's
the
relationship.
E
You
know
so
like
we,
because,
because
we're
also
changing
the
number
of
tokens
that
exist,
which
the
initial
buy
can't
fluctuate,
but
the
initial
buy
fluctuating
in
the
initial
buy
can
account
for
some
of
the
rap
decks.
E
That's
taken
away
or
yeah
increasing
the
initial
buy,
if
not
very
many
more
people,
rage
quit,
but
also
things
but
like
I
want
to
you
know
we
can
look
at
how
many
people
have
rage
quit
already
and
see
right
now
that
we
would
actually
add
a
little
bit
money
of
money
to
the
initial
buy,
which
of
course,
would
be
a
good
thing
right,
probably
maybe
maybe
not,
maybe
that
money
should
go
to
the
funding
pool
and
to
the
reserve.
A
E
The
thing
is:
if
we
keep
the
initial
by
constant,
if
we
keep
any
one
of
these
things,
constant,
the
other
two
will
change
and
we
will
have
to
vary
it.
We
will,
we
will,
we
will
vary,
one
will
vary
the
opening
price
and
the
reserve
ratio
to
try
to
get
them
both
to
be
where
they
need
to
be.
A
E
So
if
we
have
less
raft
it
like,
I
I
let
me
just
say
I
agree
option.
Three
is
probably
the
last
one
it
should
you
know
it's
the
one
that
no
one
should
vote
for.
I
think,
but
in
the
end,
it's
something
that
we
we
will
change
these
three
variables
to
make
the
bonding
curve
as
close
as
possible.
So
I
I
think
at
least
having
it.
There
also
adds
it
to
the
conversation.
A
And
what
does
for
number?
Four
look.
Like
number
four
looks
like
there's
just
the
session
where
these
the
decision
is
made
to
the
best
of
the
ability
of
everyone,
who's
participating
and
then
there's
no
final,
like
sign
off
from
the
community.
It's
like
we
just.
We
say
we
trust
this
group
to
make
the
the
best
that
they
can
based
on
getting
as
close
as
possible.
E
But
if
we
have
all
three
variables
loose,
then
we
can,
you
know,
get
all
three
of
them
kind
of
close
to
where
they
were
supposed
to
be
and-
and
it's
not
and
the
thing
that
sucks
is
it's
not
about
the
variables
it's
about
the
outcomes
of
the
variables
right.
So
what
is
the
minting
price?
After
we
add
the
exit
entry
tribute,
you
know,
like
you
know,
that's
so
yeah
the
opening
price
might
be
63
cents,
but
no
one
cares
that
it's
63
cents
we're
going
to
change
that
so
that
the
you
know
actual
impact.
E
But
yeah,
that's
the
other
thing
that
we
could
tweak
would
be
the
virtual
supply
and
virtual
balance,
but
we
might
we
might
we
might
adjust
if
I
can
get
sam
and
paulo
to
be
down
with
that.
We
might
be
able
to
use
that
to
adjust
to
make
the
reserve
ratio
closer,
but
it's
just
too
those
those
variables
are
so
complicated.
E
This
one's
this
one's
along
the
same
lines,
it's
not
as
clean,
but
at
least
it's
cleaner
to
understand
so
it'll
be
an
easier
vote
to
have
basically,
hey
guess
what
token
freeze,
when
is
the
token
free
start,
does
the
token
freeze
start
when
the
results
come
in
and
we
make
the
hatched
out
vote
or
does
it
start
six
days
later,
when
conviction
voting
opens
or
does
it
start?
You
know
five
to
eight
days
later
when
the
abc
opens
or
do
sem
nugget,
paulo
vitor,
and
I
just
tell
you
when
it
starts.
E
E
C
B
E
A
A
A
E
A
E
I
know
I
for
one
feel
uncomfortable
just
being
the
dictator
on
this
decision.
You
know,
so
I
would
love
a
signaling
proposal
and
if
someone
wants
to
help
me
write
this,
I
think
this
one
is
relatively
simple
and
straightforward.
E
H
But
do
you
think
like
this
quest?
These
boats
should
be
at
the
same
time
the
with
the
commons
upgrade
boat
or
it
should
have
like
a
different
voting
time.
The
same
time.
E
The
same
time
and
this
one
technically
could
be
later,
we
don't
need
it
at
the
time
of
the
hashtag
vote,
the
other
one
kind
of
need
at
the
time
of
the
I
guess
technically,
both
of
them
could
be
later.
E
C
C
The
vesting
period
is
being
decided
in
the
proposals
and
then
we're
talking
about
a
hypothetical
date
of
something
that
hasn't
been
decided.
Yet.
I
feel
like
that,
sounds
very
confusing
for
people
that
are
having
to
make
a
decision
on
on
the
total
fasting
period.
What,
if
like,
since
the
proposals,
have
different
vesting
periods,
why
this
can't
be
a
given
and
and
then
based
on
this?
Given
people
decide
on
this
other
variables,
instead
of
having
two
things
that
are
like
in
the
air
and
simultaneously.
E
You
know,
okay,
we
picked
the
parameters
the
freeze
starts
now
or
oh,
the
token
is
launched.
The
free
starts
now
and
people
can
vote
in
conviction.
Voting,
oh
actually,
the
token
issuance
mechanism,
the
bonding
curve
starts
now
and
now
there's
a
publicly
traded
market
for
it.
So
now
the
freeze
starts,
I
think
all
three
are
very
legitimate
options
and
I
I
don't
feel
comfortable
as
like
saying
one
is
a
given
versus
the
other.
C
Yeah,
I
agree
with
them
that
it
makes
sense
that
it
starts
when
the
when
the,
when
the
token
is
created-
and
I
feel
like
that's
very
easy
for
everyone
to
understand
also
and
then,
if
it
just
feels
like
you
would
give
like.
I'm
just
thinking
like
how
can
people
have
an
easier
time
making
a
decision
and
then
and
then
the
fasting
period
that
they
could
analyze
like?
E
What
I,
what
I
would
say
is
that
if
you
pick
number
two,
then
the
people
who
buy
tokens
like
let's
say
it's
bolshevik's
gambit
right,
which
has
a
12-week
freeze,
so
the
people
buy
tokens
who
the
external
people
buy
tokens
and
effectively,
there's
only
an
11-week
freeze
if
they
buy
tokens
on
the
first
day.
So
for
our
external
parties,
the
freeze
is
11
weeks
instead
of
12.
E
Yeah
but
it
applies,
but
the
external
people,
external
people,
people
who
want
to
buy,
who
didn't
participate
in
the
hatch.
Let's
say
all
the
all
the
like,
like
the
reward
system,
for
instance,
doesn't
get
tokens
until
number
three.
So
let's
say
that
we
wanted
to
reward
all
the
people
with
tokens
right.
E
And
when
I'm
voting
on
this,
I'm
like
you
know,
I
want
to
make
sure
that
there's
time
for
the
mark,
for
us
as
a
community
to
you,
know,
pass
proposals
and
stuff
before
the
market
has
a
chance
to.
You
know,
recover
or
whatever
so
like.
I
feel,
like
both
perspectives,
have
value
and-
and
I
don't
think
it's
as
clear-cut
as
as
you
as
it
as
you
think,.
H
But
then,
like
on
the
communication
strategy,
should
we
promote
the
three
votes
this
weekend.
E
I
think
I
mean
I
think
we
can
just
say:
go
vote
on
t.
You
know,
snapshot,
slash,
t
comments,
there'll
be
three
votes
there,
but
if
you
know,
if
I'm
alone
on
this,
if
everyone
else
in
here
says
that
if
they're
gonna
vote
for
number
two,
then
let's
not
do
this
vote,
let's
cut
scope.
E
You
know
if
there's
like
two
dissenters
in
this
call,
I
you
know
like
there's
a
lot
of
voting
power
in
this
call
right
now.
So
if
there's
two
dissenters,
then
I
want
to
make
then
I
want
to
make
this
vote
that
does
that
makes.
Does
that
sound
fair,
because
I
would
also
vote
for
number
two
just
so
you
know
like
I'm,
not
I'm
not
against.
Like
your
vision,
you
guys,
you
know
olivia
and
tam.
I
actually
agree,
but,
like
you
know,
I
don't
want
to
make
more
work
if
it
doesn't
need
to
be
made.
E
We
got
one
vi:
do
you
have
an
opinion.
C
A
C
A
I
mean,
I
guess
the
way
I'm
looking
at
this
is
like
it's
really
outstanding
to
allow
these
decisions
to
be
made
by
the
community.
However,
it's
so
technical
and
complex
that
to
understand
this.
You
almost
have
to
be
in
this
call
right
now
right.
So
it's
almost
like
here
community
vote
on
this
thing
that
you're
not
going
to
understand.
E
A
We
all
looked
at
it
and
now
we've
been
talking
for
20
minutes
about
the
differentiations
of
each
so
I
mean
so
it's
sort
of
like
what
impact
does
it
have
if
it's
the
cv
versus
the
abc,
and
what
does
that
mean
for
the
external?
So
it's
sort
of
like
I'm
not
against
us.
Putting
this
up
to
vote
and
seeing
what
happens,
but
it
is,
it
can
be
more
confusing
than
less
confusing
for
the
community.
A
That
signal
that,
like
these
are
community
decisions
to
make
not
developer
decisions,
I
guess
to
make.
C
Yeah-
and
I
guess
learning
from
the
past
experience-
maybe
we
should
just
have
a
post
with
the
pros
and
cons
of
each
one
and
put
it
for
community
vote.
If
this
has
been
like
a
controversial
topic
in
this
call
so
far,.
E
D
I
would
support
number
two,
maybe
I
don't
I
mean
I
like
I'm
like
70
sure
but
yeah
like.
If,
if
there
is
gonna,
be
like
more
discussion,
I
I
would
also
be
open
to
considering
other
possibilities
but
yeah
like
70
sure
number
two.
A
B
A
And
whether
or
not
we
need
to
make
more
work
or
not,
I
would
be
okay
with
it
being
number
two.
A
I
would
I
jumped
in
late,
so
I
didn't
hear
all
of
the
context.
But
when
I'm
like,
oh,
when
cv
opens-
and
I
just
like
think
about
it
off
the
top
of
my
head,
it
seems
appropriate.
But
I
would
read
the
forum
post
and
maybe
change
my
mind,
but.
H
I
think
that
we
have
made
like
a
big
effort
to
educate
the
community,
for
the
comments
upgrade
both
and
like
making
this,
at
least
without
the
same
education
effort
or
an
educational
effort
could
be
not
so
good.
So
I
think
like
if
we're
gonna
do
the
vote,
maybe
the
other
week,
but
if
we're,
if
we
are
to
to
decide
now,
I
would
say
two
option
number
two:
I
think
it's
good.
I
Well,
I'm
really
interested
in
this
number
four
option,
so,
if,
if
you
guys
are,
if
is
it,
is
it
griff,
sam
and
and
apollo
and
nuggen
and
vitor,
you
guys
are
the
one
who
built
this
whole
thing.
The
fact
is
I'd
like
to
know
where
these
people
weigh
in
on
this.
You
know
what
is
the
consensus
among
that
group
about
this
thing
right?
I
Is
there
a
consensus?
Are
these
three
options
coming
from
the
fact
that
you
guys
don't
agree
on
which,
which
thing
that
is
right?
So
that's
what
I'm
trying
to.
E
Do
it
definitely
came
out
that
we
were
talking
about
it
and
it's
like
oh
yeah,
good
point?
When
does
it
start?
Does
it
start
when
the
abc
opens,
or
does
it
start
when
the
vote's
over?
We
didn't
even
really
think
about
the
cv
opening
we
weren't
sure
if
it
started
on
the
13th
or
the
24th,
because
it's
completely
like
in
the
code,
it's
just
a
completely
like
we
just
say
the
dates
that
the
free
signs
and
the
and
the
thought
ends.
So
we
just
pick
the
dates.
I
A
I
I
guess
what
one
would
want
to
vote.
You
know
on
the
first
three
really.
E
Okay,
okay,
it
sounds
okay,
I
feel
enough
advice
process.
I
would
like
to
go
forward
with
trying
to
make
this
forum
post
and
wonka
you're
gonna
help
me
write
that
out.
E
Okay,
great
the
other
things
that
I'm
working
on
are.
Oh,
this
other
one's
really
important
crap.
We
only
have
two
minutes
left
and
then
the
debate
starts,
but
please
zeptimus.
I
would
love
to
no,
not
the
abc
front
end.
There's
a
it's!
The
it's
actually
not
comments
form
its
parameters,
zeptimus
the
doodle.
I
just
gave
a
check
to
the
doodles
and
there's
one
that
everyone
likes
and
and
yeah
cat
hurting
the
setpram
party
calendar.
E
Can
you
open
it?
It's
lower
first
winners.
There's
a
I'm
gonna
host
one
on
monday
at
6,
00,
pm
and
zeph.
I
don't
know
if
you
can
do
tuesday
morning.
E
It
was
on
your,
I
think
it's
3pm.
E
Okay,
so
that's
and
then
I
would
love
it
if
we
could
like
announce
those
dates
and
also
like
tweet,
the
the
doodles
with
it
and
saying
hey,
you
know
we're
we're
trying
to
be
diverse,
and
you
know
here's
one
one
tweet
that
says
like
hey:
are
you
in
the
eu
or
asia
and
like
it's
hard
to
meet
the
other
times
for
the
debates
come
to
this
fireside
chat
and
if
you
want
to
help
us
pick
the
next
one
vote
on
this
doodle
right
and
same
for
each
of
them.
E
I
really
love
that,
because
not
very
many
people
are
voting
on
these
other
two
doodles
for
picking
times
for
fireside
chat
outside
of
eu
us
hours
and
then
the
other
thing
on
that
is.
I
need
people
who
will
agree
to
sponsor
the
proposals
in
on
monday
for
the
debate
on
monday
right
now.
I
only
have
one
person
signed
up.
E
A
Yeah,
I
would
love
if
somebody
else
could
defend
420.
I
have
school
pickup
and
I
already
skipped
it
today
to
do
the
ama,
so
it's
gonna
be
really
tough.
For
me
all.
E
Just
just
put
it
up
on
the
there's:
a
spreadsheet
linked
in
this
issue
make
sure
to
put
your
name
on
the
spreadsheet.
Okay.