►
From YouTube: TEC Sprint 44 Retrospective
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
B
C
C
Yeah
I
think
next
week
will
be
better
I
guess
that
many
people
will
will
come
back
so.
B
Yeah
I
think
so
too.
My
instinct
is,
we
will
not
have
the
right
people
to
make
progress
on
that
and
that
probably
would
just
be
better
like
canceling
the
Sprint
planning,
rather
than
making
decisions
on
behalf
of
other
working
groups,
you
know
I
feel
like
we
should
have
the
working
groups
represented
when
we're
having
those
discussions
and
not
not
in
the
absence
of
them.
A
B
Yeah,
well,
why
don't
you
take
a
shot
at
putting
together
the
agenda
and
people
that
can
be
there
for
the
for
that,
and
otherwise
it
doesn't
seem
like
something
that
would
be
a
good
use
of
two
hours
of
many
people's
times.
Then
we
could
cancel
it
for
for
this
friend,
okay.
That
sounds
and
find
a
time
for
that
discussion
with
the
the
group
of
people
who
it
affects.
Okay,.
E
Yeah
I
I
I
can
maybe
make
it
but,
like
I,
said
I'm
I'm
up
in
Vancouver
in
Canada
on
vacation
so
and
helping
CJ's
mom
out
so
I.
Don't
know
if
I'll
be
able
to
make
that.
But
for.
A
Whatever
that's
worth
we're
just
discussing
whether
we
should
have
it
at
all
with
everybody
at
Devcon
and
just
the
kind
of
in
between
State
we're
in
right
now,.
A
Okay,
I'll
go
ahead
and
put
an
agenda
together
and
see
who
shows
up?
If
not,
we
can
just
have
it
canceled.
So.
B
I
mean
get
confirmation
for
me
who
will
show
up
yeah,
okay,
yeah
I.
Don't
want
us
to
end
up
having
you
know
three
or
four
people
all
spend
two
hours
and
not
you
know
what
I
mean
like
all
show
up,
but
then
we
don't
have
like
if
we
can
use
that
time,
if
we
don't
or
if
we,
if
that
time
isn't
going
to
be
productive,
I
think
we
should
allow
people
to
use
it
for
other
stuff
too.
Okay,
that.
E
B
Yeah,
no,
it's
I
also
think
that
there's
three
of
us
and
I
my
question
would
be:
is
it
worth
you
know?
Do
we
even
have
the
quorum
to
do
a
retrospective?
If
it's
just
neat
acid
neat,
four
of
us
sorry,
acid
Nate
is
up
and
I.
So
maybe
we'll
put
it
to
asking
those
here,
maybe
zap.
How
do
you
feel
about
doing
it
with
four
of
us.
B
All
right,
so,
let's
do
it
I,
just
maybe
I'll
just
share
the
wonderful
artwork
of
the
inimitable.
Oh
I
can't
share
my
screen.
Oh
sorry,
I
just
quickly
share
the
artwork
of
you
know.
Ivy,
who
does
our
Sprint
boards
still
does
our
Sprint
boards
and
has
this
nice,
like
stars
of
I,
guess
celebration,
which
I
thought
was
really
cute
to
see
today
we
could
use
it
for
our
next
Sprint
retro
and
then
to
zep's
question.
Is
there
anything
that
is
worth
us
discussing
in
place
of
a
retro
today.
B
C
A
D
The
transparency
proposal,
like
you,
know
the
teachers
that
we
want
to
keep
them
like
should
I.
You
know,
prepare
vegan,
put
them
on
Sample,
or
is
it
going
to
be?
I
mean
I'm
preparing
better
anyway,
for
what
the
community
is
not
like.
We
want
to
keep,
but
I
mean
the
only
thing
left
would
be
like
yeah
go
to
action
on.
You
know
who
are
very
good
resistance.
B
Yeah
may
I
say
it's
maybe
a
little
early
still
exactly,
but
some
of
the
sheep.
The
thing
the
thing,
especially
in
light
of
you,
know
the
five
stewards
who
are
off-boarded
and
maybe
now
we
have
one
two,
three
working
groups
that
don't
have
stewards
and
Olivia's
thinking
around.
You
know
pausing
soft
gov
or
transforming
that
into
something
else,
and
so
it's
starting
to
look
like
the
kind
of
you
know.
B
The
word
one
team
sort
of
come
is
is
popping
up
a
lot
of
the
you
know,
things
that
the
working
groups
absolutely
have
to
do
might
be
better
in
one
team
working
together
to
do
these
things
rather
than
having
separate
working
groups
sort
of
focused
on
their
own
work
streams.
B
You
know
one
of
the
things
that
really
resonated
with
me
when,
in
our
discussion
the
stewards
this
week
or
that
I
think
is
really
related-
is
how
difficult
it
is
for
the
working
groups
to
be
very
tightly
aligned.
You
know
I.
Think
comms
was
an
example
of
that,
but
not
the
only
one
and
the
idea
of
you
know.
If
we're
paring
down
a
lot
of
the
scope
of
the
working
groups,
then
one
team
working
together
tightly
together.
B
D
C
About
about
the
the
thing
you
said
the
other
day
about
marriage,
self-gov
and
Community
tests,
yeah
I
think
there's
some
theme
that
we
can
merge
there,
the
subgroup
and
culture.
You
know
that
name
I
like
it.
So
something
like
that
working
groups
will
be
nice.
B
Yeah,
it's
I
I
didn't
hear
that
yet
actually,
but
they're
dead
I
mean
it's
it's
the
idea
that,
like
there's,
there's
something
there's
a
benefit
to
these
to
merging
some
of
the
working
groups
together
or
maybe
let
me
phrase
it
another
way.
B
There
doesn't
seem
to
be
a
need
for
all
of
the
working
groups
to
be
completely
separate.
You
know,
especially
as
their
scope
is
winding
down
like
soft
gov.
B
It's
it's
a
really
cool
group
and
it's
a
topic
that
a
lot
of
people
come
to
the
TC
to
find
out
more
about,
but
the
working
group
itself
isn't,
you
know
I
feel
like
Olivia's
feeling
a
little
burnt
out,
because
it's
it's
just
sort
of
hap
there's!
No
there's
no
strong!
You
know
need
for
what
soft
gov
is
doing
in
the
Tec
anymore.
It's
it's
almost
like
it's
his
own
research.
Now
you
know.
B
The
governance
group
was
a
great
example
of
one
of
the
working
groups,
spinning
off
into
like
a
research
team,
and
it
seems
as
if
soft
gov
could
still
be
a
research
team
and
not
necessarily
a
working
group
that
doesn't
have
exact
work
to
do
in
the
Tec.
From
a
operational
standpoint,.
E
Yeah
I
think
the
other
thing
and
I
I
haven't
heard
what
Libby's
Olivia's
take
on
this
is
I,
think
she's
digesting
it,
but
the
idea
of
trying
to
turn
some
of
these
working
groups
into
more
outward
facing
you
know,
interest
I,
don't
know
what
we
would
call
it,
but
I've
been
just
calling
it
interest
groups,
but,
like
you
know,
so
that
we
still
have
people
coming
together
around
governance-
let's
say,
but
it's
not
really
to
talk
about
like
all
of
the
government,
all
the
governance
needs
of
the
Tec,
because
those
are
like
a
lot
of
those
have
been
set
this
time
of
saying
but
like
we
can
still
convene
people
who
are
really
interested
in
governance,
right
and
and
Libya
is
like.
B
E
Good
at
facilitating
those
kinds
of
conversations,
and
that
would
be
a
way
that
we
could
start
to
breathe
some
life
back
into
that
topic
here
in
the
TC
by
like
bringing
in
people.
She
knows,
and
we
know
to
talk
about
governance
and
get
you
know,
conversations
going
there
and
and
having
the
curation
service
be
a
place
where
people
are
sharing
good
resources
and
knowledge
about
governance,
and
things
like
that.
So
it
could
be
that
that's
one
of
the
one
of
the
paths
forward.
E
For
some
of
these
you
know
what
we've
been
calling
working
groups.
A
Only
other
thing
that
I
am
concerned
about
is
things
that
are
Lost
In
transition
things
you
know
I
I'll
make
it
was
up
to
you
tomorrow
to
talk
about
what
aspects
of
transparency
need
to
be
transferred
over
in
terms
of
who's,
monitoring,
the
Tec
access
channels,
the
emails,
the
all
the
all
the
good.
A
You
know,
access
points
for
all
of
our
platforms,
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
little
minute
things
that
we
may
be
missing,
that
it
I
think
it'd
be
really
important
to
kind
of
go
over
who
who
has
control
of
Twitter?
Where
is
it?
What
do
we?
What
are
plans
for
that?
What
are
we
doing?
The
multi-cigs
there's
a
lot
of
transition,
things
that
we
really
need
to
take
care
of.
If
you
know,
I
don't
want
to
I,
don't
want
to
miss
out
on
things
like
that,
because
I
do
think.
A
Even
with
soft
gov
like
there
were
elements
of
keeping
us
accountable
towards
Ocean's
principles
and
all
those
good
things
in
terms
of
our
economy,
I
think
that
are
really
important
to
still
keep
in
into
consideration
and
so
I
I
just
kind
of
I.
Don't
know
if
anybody
has
any
thoughts
on
that.
But
it's
something
I
do
think.
It's
really
important
to
discuss.
E
Yeah
and
I
would
say
that
there's
kind
of
like
even
in
those
two
examples
you
just
gave
Nate
there's
like
two
types
of
these
transition
topics
like
one
is
like
very
logistic,
Logistics
oriented,
you
know
like
access
to
tools
and
services,
and
then
you
know
things
like
also
like
you
know,
I'm
looking
at
like
Gardens
and
I'm,
getting
a
little
bit
concerned
about
that
right
now
about
our
vulnerabilities
with
that
you
know
it's
like
this.
E
One
is
an
example
of
something
that
goes
beyond
just
tools
and
into
like
things
that
we
need
to
like
keep
our
eye
on
in
terms
of
vulnerabilities
for
the
Tec,
and
then
you
know
in
that
same
bucket,
so
that
so
there's
like
very
logistical
kind
of
like
factual
logistical
kinds
of
things
that
we
can
just
track
and
like
put
into
documents
and
things
like
that,
and
then
there
are
these
things
that
are
like
more
topical
kinds
of
things
that
we
need
to
have.
E
You
know
discussion
on
over
time
so
like
some
of
our
tool
dependencies
like
the
website
Gardens
things
like
that,
but
then
also
things
like
you
know:
how
do
we
keep
Muslims
principles?
Front
of
mind,
you
know
like
what
are
the
practical
ways
that
we
actually
Implement
that
and
make
sure
that
we
get
going.
That
seems
like
that's
like
another
class
of
problem,
but
I
think
we
should
yeah
it'd
be
great
to
have
like
a
list
of
all
these
things.
A
A
You
know
conveying
to
the
rest
of
the
the
community
where
we're
heading
and
where
people
can
start
to
fit
in
or
find
new
avenues
of
participation,
because
I
think
you
know
it's
kind
of
waiting
on
this
overall
Narrative
of
of
what
what
things
are
going
to
look
like
here
in
the
next
six
months
and
the
short
term
I
I
really
do
think
we
need
to
Hammer
that
down
in
the
next
couple
weeks,
I
plan
on
submitting
to
you
all
my
my
vision
for
it,
but
I
hope
we
can
maybe
have
a
conversation
or
get
a
bunch
of
people's
Visions
for
it,
but
it
might
be
a
good
opportunity
to
not
not
just
like
do
an
MVB
but
like
what
are
the
tangible
things
that
we're
going
to
execute
on
in
the
next
six
months.
E
Yeah
I
totally
agree:
yeah
I,
don't
know
it's
it's
something.
E
There
are
a
couple
of
issues
that
we're
trying
to
like
work
through
that
Tam
and
I
were
talking
about
yesterday
that
but
but
I
think
we
can
I
think
we
could
start
to
maybe
paint
some
of
the
kind
of
General
things
like
some
of
these
other
ideas
of
like
interest
groups
and
the
curation
service,
like
where
that's
headed,
that
that
would
be
not
that
hard
to
do.
A
Yeah
I
mean
in
terms
of
like
Sprint
planning,
I,
think
that
is
a
really
huge
barrier
that
you
know.
If
we
don't
have
that
Vision
set
out
it's
really
hard
to
to
organize
people
around
common
goals,
and
so
yeah
just
wanted
to
mention
you
yeah.
E
I
mean
I,
I,
guess,
there's
this
question
of
like
structure
that
Pam
and
I
were
talking
about
and
that
she
was
referring
to
and
then
there's
the
question
of
like
what
are
we
doing,
and
you
know
what
we're
doing
over
the
next
a
couple
months
like
the
thing
that
is
I
think
most
pressing
right
now
is
really
trying
to
like
get
this
curation
service
off
the
ground
and
like
use
it
as
a
way
to
build
some
tutor
engagement
and
build
some
engagement
on
the
server
in
an
easy
way
where
we
don't
have
to
build
a
bunch
of
custom
roles
for
people.
E
It's
like
when
you
come
in.
If
you're
interested
in
this
topic,
you
know
start
curating,
creating
conversation
in
the
in
the
Forum,
like
those
are
some
simple
things
that
we
can.
We
can
articulate
over
this
next
week
or
two
and
just
to
give
a
little
bit
of
clarity
in
terms
of
like
what
are
what
what
are
we
trying
to
do
in
the
short
term
to
generate
excitement,
and
you
know
yeah
build
build
some
enthusiasm
for
the
TC
and
and
for
all
of
us.
So
we
know
what
we
can.
E
Actually
be
doing
over
the
next
couple
weeks
in
the
next
month
or
so
so
that
that
I
think
that's
yeah,
the
org
stuff
I
think
is
a
little
bit
more
complicated,
but
there
shouldn't
be
any
reason
to
like
stop
and
have
a
lack
of
clarity
around
what
we're
doing
so.
I
think
that's
I,
think
that's
a
good
point.
A
And
in
terms
of
interest
groups,
I
think
this
is
another
area
that
I
think
we
can
really
get
to
start
going
start
start
getting
going,
because
I
do
think
that
we
do
have
the
the
personnel
with
you
know.
A
You
know
Griffin
Libby
and
Tam,
and
you
know
everybody
who's
got
really
good
Network
within
this
industry
to
really
find
the
right
people
to
start.
Having
kind
of
these
broad
overview
conversations
and
maybe
invite
them
into
our
Discord-
and
you
know,
say:
hey-
have
a
have
a
round
table
once
a
month
on
the
subject
of
that
you're
interested
in
maybe
it's
governance.
Maybe
it's
you
know
token
engineering
security.
Maybe
it's
solidity
development.
Maybe
it's
nfts!
A
You
know
we
have
these
little
interest
groups
and
then
we
invite
the
general
te
Community
to
come
and
listen
into
these
types
of
round
tables
or
interest
groups
and
start
having
conversations
within
within
our
Discord
Channel.
We
could
even
have
it
token
gated,
but
but
it's
just
those
things
that
like,
if
we
have
this
kind
of
like
a
longer
term
Vision
established
of
what
we
the
ideal
vision
of
what
we
want
to
see
about
it.
We
can
start
to
and
have
these
kind
of,
incremental
Milestones
to
start
building
and
start
to.
E
Yeah
I
I,
agree
and-
and
you
know,
I
I've
just
been
talking
to
I-
think
I've
mentioned
this
to
you,
Nate
and
maybe
to
cam
too,
but
I've
been
just
kind
of
poking
around
with
a
few
potential
partners,
just
about
like
the
curation
like
getting
them
involved
in
some
of
the
curation
efforts
and
and
and
I
mentioned
this
idea
that
if
the
curation
takes
off
then
maybe
it
could
turn
into
like
a
an
interest
group
like
a
like
just
like
a
channel
on
our
server,
and
you
know
the
D5
safety
folks,
like
they're
like
one
of
the
big
players
around
Dubai
safety,
they're
they're.
E
They
were
definitely
intrigued
and
they're
they're
kind
of
talking
amongst
themselves
about
it,
just
mostly
about
the
curation
side
of
it
like
whether
they
would
come
in
and
just
like
help
us
to
curate
that
topic.
We
were
to
turn
it
into
a
category
and
then
I
talked
to
lovis
at
tokenomic
style.
He
was.
A
E
Excited
about
it,
and
so
so
yeah
so
I
think
I
think
that
you
know
there's
like
internally.
We've
got
folks
who
can
help
to
kind
of
like
spur
that
stuff
kind
of
community
organized
those
kinds
of
things
and
I
think
there
are
people
out
there
who
are
potential
Partners.
Who
would
be
interested
in
helping
us.
A
I
think
that
sounds
good
and,
like
you
know,
if,
if
anybody
here
like
is
up
to
you
and
that's
what
those
are
getting
into
him
like,
if
you
guys
want
to
help
I
think
I
might
just
hold
a
meeting
sometime
next
week.
That's
independent
of
the
meetings
that
we
have
in
our
calendar
and
to
actually
kind
of
identify,
different
areas
that
we
can
start
building
towards
and
and
possibly
a
road
map
can
start
to
develop
out
of
that.
But
I
do
think
we
need
to
get
this
started,
get
the
ball
rolling
with
it.
D
B
I
just
want
to
share
one
thing:
you
know
not
to
introduce
more
delays,
but
timing
is
really
important
for
these
kinds
of
things,
and
you
know
one
of
our
key
stakeholders
that
took
an
engineering
Academy
has
been
she's,
not
really
able
to
participate
in
conversations
until
the
launch
of
TC
fundamentals,
which
just
happened,
yay
so
I
think
to
try
to
build
a
road
map
that
doesn't
involve
their
perspective
as
a
stakeholder
might
be
premature,
but,
starting
from
you
know
the
next
week
and
the
week
after
conversations,
there
will
start
so
I,
just
I
guess
you
know
in
my
mind
it's
sort
of
been.
B
We
want
to
build
a
road
map
that
includes
all
our
stakeholders
and
really
you
know
the
token
engineering
Academy
is
one
of
the
most
important
organizations
in
token
engineering
and
have
been
living.
The
Tec
motto
of
advancing
token
engineering,
so
yeah,
that's
the
only
thing
I
would
say
is
I
think
that
if
we
waited
to
have
more
information
on
what
our
collaboration
will
look
like,
we
will
have
a
road
map.
That's
more
accurate
and
realizable.
A
B
A
That
subject
like
I
I,
agree
and
I
disagree
I,
it's
one
of
those
things
where
you
know.
I
I
think
that
the
Angela
and
the
T
academy
group
should
definitely
be
in
the
fold
them
things.
But,
like
you
know
at
what
point
do
we
say
you
know?
A
A
If
if
they
come
and
say,
hey,
no
don't
do
this,
then
you
know
we're
gonna,
keep
having
the
stagnation
and
Community
D
evolvement.
It's
just
I!
Don't
know
it's
one
of
those
things.
I
get
kind
of
frustrated
with
because
I'm
like
we.
We
have
these
meetings
open,
they're.
More
than
welcome
to
come.
We
can
invite
them
if
they
don't
go
up.
What
what
else
can
we
do?
B
Think
it's
been
pretty
clear:
it's
been
pretty
clear
since
the
you
know
July
time
frame
that
the
timing
was
always
going
to
be
after
the
tea
fundamentals.
Launch:
okay,
I,
don't
think
that
I
don't
think
that
they
have
shifted
significantly
at
all
about
that.
To
be
honest,
okay,
it's
not
I,
don't
feel
like
yeah
I,
don't
know
if
it
feels
like.
Maybe
it
feels
like.
Oh,
are
we
being
strong?
It
doesn't
feel
like
that
at
all,
it's
just
the
the
communication
from
the
beginning
has
been
very
direct.
B
You
know
all
hands
on
making
sure
the
fundamentals
course
is
successful
and
then
anything
else
you
know
anything
else
that
they
have
to
do
comes
after
and
I
think
the
Tec
is
a
priority,
but
you
know
it's
we
I
think
was
it
yesterday
that
the
course
launched
so
was
it
today?
You
know
like
we
just
we've
reached
that
point,
and
now
now
it's
now
I
think
conversations
in
Earnest
start
so
I'm
really
excited
about
that.
I
think
that's
actually
a
really
exciting.
You
know
it's
it's
an
exciting.
It
is.
B
A
I
agree
I,
just
it's
one
of
those
things
where
I'm.
Just
like
hey,
yeah,
I,
don't
know
we
just
need
to.
D
C
E
Guess,
I
I
think
that
we've
waited
this
long
and
you
know
it's
not
like
we've
just
been
at
a
standstill,
we're
we've
been
moving
forward
like
the
curation
service
and
all
that
kind
of
stuff
is
moving
forward
and
Nate
to
your
point,
I
understand,
like
not
everybody
in
the
TC
understands.
You
know
it's
been
more
incubating
in
the
sample
group,
but
I
think
I.
Think
we've
been
pretty
good
about,
like
sharing
that
and
I
think
we're
we're.
You
know
we're
making
progress
on
that
front.
E
This
I
think
we'll
be
releasing
it
in
the
next
two
weeks.
Probably
just
had
a
bug,
but
I
guess.
The
point
is
that
we,
you
know,
we've
been
moving
forward
and
I
think
just
waiting
like
another
couple
weeks
to
just
get
some
of
this
feedback
from
the
academy.
E
You
know
I
think
it's
it's.
Sometimes
you
have
to
kind
of
go
slow
to
go
fast
and
like
particularly
with
a
really
important
partner
like
this,
making
sure
that
we're
like
all
in
sync
in
the
beginning-
and
you
know
we
had
some
stumbles
over
the
summer
with
them-
and
you
know,
including
me
and
I,
think
you
know
it's
like:
let's
reset
that,
let's
really
try
to
kind
of
like
come
together
and
then
and
then
I
have
a
feeling
like
what
Tam's
saying
that
things
will
start
to
move
much
faster.
A
And
I,
don't
I
don't
disagree
with
that
I
guess
my
my
biggest
hesitation
or
problem
with
this
whole
thing
is
that
is:
is
it
a
problem
to
even
just
have
Community
conversations
or
about
ideation
and
collecting?
You
know
different
concepts
that
we
can.
You
know
avenues
that
would
be
possible
to
move
forward
to
kind
of
set
the
agenda
for
when
the
tea
Academy
is
ready
to
have
that
conversation.
C
E
E
And
I
think
I
think,
like
the
interest
group
idea,
like
I,
think
there
are
there's
a
lot
of
work
to
do
to
try
to
articulate
that
idea
in
more
detail
and
like
what
would
that
actually
look
like
and
what
would
be
some
of
the
categories
and
I
feel
like
we
could
start
to
try
to
articulate
or
explore
that
stuff
and
just
know
that,
like
that,
there's
a
possibility
that,
with
the
conversations
with
the
academy
that
some
of
that
stuff
and
we're
like,
oh
no
well,
that
doesn't
quite
make
sense.
E
E
B
B
A
My
whole
thing
I
just
you
know,
I,
wanted
to
make
sure
that
you
know
we
have
a
lot
of
community
members
that
have
been
sticking
around
through
you
know
through
this
process
and
they
may
have
different
Visions
that
we
haven't
thought
about,
or
maybe
ideas
that
could
be
cultivated
and
added
to
the
to
the
agenda
in
the
conversation
with
our
partners
and
stakeholders
that
we
haven't
had
a
chance
to,
or
get
some
space
to
hear
yet
so
I
think
that
would
be
really
really
important
to
kind
of
just
have
that
empowerment
for
them
to
have
a
say
so
and
yeah
I
think
that
you
know
we
have
two
Avenues
right
now
and
that
is
interest
groups
and
curation
service,
and
that
is
a
good
chunk
of
of
time
and
work
that
we
need
to
focus
on.
A
But
there
might
be
also
other
opportunities
that
we're
not
exploring
and
I.
Think
it's
worth
having
that
conversation
or
giving
space
for
it.
E
I
think
so
too,
and
I
guess
my
only
my
only
concern
is
we're
just
getting
low
on
people
and
resources,
and
so
I
just
hope
that
whatever
we
do,
we
don't
get
too
fragmented.
Again.
You
know
like
that.
We
can
really
focus
and
just
do
a
really
good
job
at
what
we're
setting
out
to
do
like
come
together
as
a
community
and
really
prioritize
around
a
few
things,
and
do
them
really
well
and
figure
out
ways
where
everybody
can
get
involved
in
rowing
in
the
same
direction.
E
And
you
know-
and
that
doesn't
mean
like
lock
down
any
Innovation
or
you
know
bubbling
up
of
stuff
but
like
I,
think
we
have
to
figure
out
a
way
where
we
can
all
row
together
and
like
do
execute
really
well,
while
leaving
room
for
Innovation
on
the
on
the
sides
to
to
be
able
to
spring
up,
and
then
that
becomes
kind
of
the
next
thing
that
we
focus
on.
You
know
what
I
mean.
A
Yep
yeah
there's
one
one
last
topic
that
I
just
wanted
to
to
present
before
we
wrap
this
up.
Is
this
separation
from
the
technical
development
groups
that
have
historically
helped
us
whether
it
be
within
Gardens,
whether
it
be
our
Discord?
A
D
D
A
A
E
I
mean
I
think
that
one
of
the
first
steps
and
I
I
was
actually
talking
with
Auntie
about
this
in
the
context
of
the
curation
service.
But
then
we
started
talking
more
broadly,
like
curation
service
like
to
be
honest,
we
don't
know
this
development
team
that
well
right
and
so
I'm
really
looking
right
now,
like
quality
of
the
work
you
know
I'm,
starting
to
as
we're
starting
to
see
the
product.
E
Now
I'm
like
asking
a
lot
of
hard
questions
and
I
think
we
need
a
framework
for
being
able
to
Steward
our
relationships
with
people
who
who
are
building
code
for
us.
You
know
people
who
are
building
functionality
for
us.
We
need
like
some
good
practices
for
what
that
looks.
Like
you
know,
knowing
what
questions
to
ask
knowing
what
kinds
of
dependencies
we
need
to
you
know
are
okay
and
which
ones
are
not
very
healthy.
You
know
and
and
then
I
think
it
would
be
very
worthwhile.
E
Looking
at
all
of
our
dependencies
from
a
technology,
you
know
from
like
a
technology
perspective,
whether
it's
websites
Gardens
even
the
augmented,
bonding
curve
itself.
E
You
know
they're
all
these
things,
praise
I
mean
ever
all
these
tools
and
we
have
dependencies
on
them
and
so
I
think
having
just
like
one
as
a
start
listing
where
all
those
dependencies
are,
and
then
two
Bots,
you
know
like
the
Bye
by
V
Bots
right
listing
the
dependencies
and
then
just
having
some
thoughts
about
how
we
manage
those
risks,
because
every
technology
comes
with
those
kinds
of
risks,
and
so
that's
that's,
even
just
the
risk
management
side
of
it
and
then
there's
the
thing
that
you're
getting
at
Nate,
which
is
if
we
want
to
add
functionality.
E
What
does
that
look
like?
Do
we
have
to
pay
for
it
every
time?
What
are
the
rates
we
have
to
pay
like?
How
do
we?
How
do
we
decide
who
we
turn
to
for
that
kind
of
stuff
like
the
website,
is
a
perfect
example
of
I.
Think
many
of
us
believe
that,
having
like
a
proprietary
website
is
probably
not
the
best
idea
and
then
much
better
practice
in
terms
of
content
management
system.
How
would
we
do
that?
How
would
we
you
know,
pay
for
that?
How
would
we
project
manage
that?
A
100
agree:
I
think
that
is
having
a
framework
for
that
is,
is
very
important
as
we
move
forward.
A
C
No
I
think
there
there
are
too
many
questions
and
we
need
to
solve
together
and
yeah.
I
I
have
been
feeling
that
we
need
to
solve
many
things,
but
we
are
very
stuck
in
how
to
solve
it,
but
I
think
in
this
right
moment
we
are
open
our
eyes
to
start
making
things
for
the
horrible
and
make
good
changes
and
and
now
feel
good
about
it
now
and
I'll
figure
that
many
people
want
to
solve.
C
This
kind
of
situations
like
like
me
and
yeah
I'm,
into
to
to
solve
with
you
these
these
problems,
but
I
I
have
no
questions
right
now.
A
Yeah
I
agree
yeah
any
any
last
thoughts
from
is
that
detail.
Kitty.
D
B
A
lot
of
this
stuff
is
not
that
complicated,
actually
and
is
very
manageable,
and
you
know,
for
you
know,
for
just
take
an
example
of
development
pieces.
If
we
just
write
a
clear
brief
on
what
needs
to
be
developed,
we
could
bring
it
to
General
magic.
The
great
Guild,
independent
developers,
I
just
I,
feel
like
some
of
these
things
feel.
B
Actually
so
I
I
get
the
sense,
yeah
I,
guess
I'm
wondering
you
know:
I,
guess,
I
I,
guess
I
just
want
to
caution
us
for
making
things
sound,
feel
or
like
sound
a
lot
more
complicated
than
they
have
to
be,
but
I
appreciate
the
attention
and
I
don't
know,
maybe
at
the
to
conclude
this
call
we
can
even
say
who
will
do
what
by
when,
as
the
end
of
this
conversation,
if
there's
certain
things
Nate
that
you
wanted
to
take
on
or
that
you
want
to
maybe
describe
as
tasks
that
should
be
taken
on,
but
if
not
by
you,
then
maybe
we
could
ask
other
people
who
can
do
it,
but
it's
a
very
long
conversation
where
I
think
a
lot
of
things
were
shared
and
maybe
the
next
step
is
not
to
let
this
conversation
go
to
waste
but
have
a
clear
Clarity
around
who
was
doing
one
by
one.
E
A
Lot
of
the
multi-stick
issue,
we
have
a
lot
of
multi-cigs,
very
little
oversight,
and
so,
in
order
to
execute
on
this,
though,
like
we
need
to
have
consensus
that
this,
you
know
what
is
the
right
thing
to
do
in
this
scenario.
C
B
Mean
I
think
I
think
the
you
know
I.
If
the
problem
statement
is
we
have
I,
don't
know
what
is
it
15
multi-cigs
across
you
know,
X
number
of
working
groups
I
think
that's
pretty
like
we're
like
phrased
that
way.
It's
like
yeah.
That
seems
really
weird
that
we
have
so
many
multi-cigs.
Maybe
we
should
you
know
condense
them
and
what
the
advantages
would
be
of
consolidating
them
or
what
what
we
do
with
them.
E
I
need
to
I
need
to
run
right
now,
but
I
I
would
just
say
just
a
couple
of
couple
quick
things.
One
I
think
the
multi-sig
thing
is
the
symptom
of
having
a
lot
of
working
groups.
So
I
think
that
it's.
E
I
do
think
the
technology
thing
yeah,
we
I
think
we
could
over
complicate
it
and
over
strategize,
but
I
do
think
we.
We
have
a
few
areas
where
you
know,
like
we've,
seen
the
the
bot,
the
Discord
bot
failing
right
or
like
doing
things
we
didn't
wanted
to
do.
We
can't
update
it.
A
lot
of
those
are
the
kinds
of
things
the
website
is
also
very
painful,
so
I
think
it's
just
like
it's
really
just
like
an
inventory
and
and
NT
has
already
I.
Think
he's
already
started
that
so
Nate.
E
That
might
be
good
for
you
to
just
check
in
with
him.
If
that's
something
you
have
passion
around
I
I
think
it's
not
a
lot
of
work.
It's
just
nice
to
have
like
a
place
where
we
know
what
these
things
are
and
over
time
we
can
keep
coming
back
to
it
and
go
like
okay.
How
important
is
this
not
that
important?
E
Okay,
you
know
how
about
this
one,
how
you
know
like
it,
helps
us
to
longer
term
plan
and
then
finally,
I
would
just
say
like
the
thing
about
the
interest
groups,
you
know
like
I
I,
think
that's
probably
a
conversation
like
even
we
could
facilitate
I
mean
we.
We
were
talking
about
that
in
one
of
the
sample
calls
and
we
could.
We
could
use
some
of
that
time
like
next
week
to
talk
about
that.
E
If
you
wanted
to
use
that
time,
you
know
we
could
do
that
or
you
could
call
a
separate
meeting,
but
I
think
I
think
just
like
being
able
to
kind
of
brainstorm
on
that
would
would
would
help
a
lot.
You
know
and
take
notes
and
like
use
that
as
kind
of
a
way
to
make
some
progress.
B
So
is
there
is
that
a
wrap
for
us
too
I
have
nothing
left
really
to
contribute
to
the
conversation.