►
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
Just
like
some
really
good
thinking
about
how
we
can
move
this
move
this
forward.
I
I
really
appreciate
I,
really
appreciate
all
your
contributions
there,
but
in
particular
like
with
stuff
like
this.
It's
really
good
at
helping
people
to
kind
of
work
through
these
kinds
of
things.
So
thank
you.
A
What
we
were
so
yesterday
I
think
everybody
was
on
that
call.
So
we
don't
really
need
to
do
that.
Much
of
a
recap
in
Maxwell
I
in
the
sample
call
we
talked
about
it.
A
A
A
But
we
decided
to
hide
that
because
we
didn't
want
to
overly
influence
like
we
wanted
to
start
from
scratch
and
get
like,
like
the
an
unfiltered
assessment
from
everybody
and
then
bear
started
to
think
a
little
bit
more
and
kind
of
has
like
a
different
approach
for
for
doing
this
and
I'm
gonna
I'll
allow
I'll
just
let
him
do
that,
but
what
I
was
thinking
for
the
overall
thing
is
once
we
get
done
with
this
urgency
and
importance,
mapping
exercise
that
we
would
talk
about
something
that
Nate
has
been
asking
a
lot
about,
which
is
like
how
do
we?
A
How
do
we
keep
this
moving
forward?
You
know:
should
we
should
we
just
basically
adopt
the
stewards,
calls
as
a
way
to
keep
this
moving
forward?
What
would
be
the
trade-offs
of
that
like
the
pluses
and
negatives
of
doing
that?
And
if,
if
that's,
not
a
good
idea,
then
how
else
might
we
keep
this
going
forward?
A
You
know
meeting
wise
and
stuff
and
then
also
just
like
ending
on
Olivia's
point
about
like
if
we
are
transitioning
to
some
new
kind
of
like
process
meeting
the
structure
or
something
or
whatever,
how
do
we
honor
the
past
contributions
of
the
stewards
and
actually
you
know
through
some
type
of
ritual
to
Mark
like
some
a
passage
here,
so
those
were
the
things
that
I
thought
of
and
and
the
bear
you
know,
and
the
the
I
think
the
bulk
of
the
time
will
be
with
this
exercise
and
then
just
like
a
little
bit
towards
the
end
for
these
other
points.
B
I
just
want
to
give
a
quick
comment
on
that
on
the
transition
that
I
just
had
a
call
with
Chewie
now,
and
he
had
a
great
idea
to
have
a
a
moment
for
all
the
stewards
to
share
learnings
from
our
mistakes.
So
I
think
this
could
be
the
start
of
this
transition.
We
thought
of
doing
we're.
Gonna,
put
some
questions
together
and
invite
everyone
for
this
call
on.
We
thought
next
Thursday
or
Friday,
because
there
are
some
comms
contributors
that
are
on
vacation,
so
either
Thursday
or
Friday
next
week
or
the
following
week.
B
C
C
So
also
go
to
to
share
what
we
think
went
right
or
what
our
successes
were
not
to
just
to
focus
on
what
went
wrong,
but
to
sort
of
balance.
The
two,
because
I
think
we
learned
just
as
much
from
what
we
did
right
as
we
can
from
what
we
did
wrong.
A
Awesome,
that's
great
I'm,
taking
notes,
there's
a
doc
in
there.
I
didn't
know
whether
I
didn't
know
where
to
put
these
notes
from
yesterday.
So
there's
a
doc
that's
in
here
and
we
can
just
move
it
over
to
I,
don't
know
where
we
should
put
it,
but
we've
got
it
here,
so
I'm
taking
notes,
please
feel
free
and
actually
I'll
share.
A
I'm
gonna
share
my
screen
in
just
a
sec
that
will
point
to
the
figma
map.
Anybody
have
any
other
things
that
would
be
important
to
discuss
before
we
Dive
In.
A
Okay,
so
Auntie
just
dropped
it
a
little
before
he
forgot.
He
has
a
dentist
appointment,
so
he
can't
make
it,
but
he
wanted
yeah.
He
was
sorry
he
said
he
said
to
say
sorry,
but
you
know
proceed
so
I
will
I
will
turn
it
over
to
you.
Bear.
D
Yeah,
thank
you
yeah,
so
things
yesterday
during
the
sample
call
all
the
group
we
were
trying
to
think
on
what
would
be
like
the
the
best
way
to
to
proceed
and
to
continue
the
the
conversation
and
now
taking
like
a
next
step
into
what
I
think
is
really
important
of
prioritizing
what
we
want
to
do
right
yesterday,
we
were
feeling
kind
of
like
well.
Where
do
we
start?
First,
you
know
there.
It
looks
like
there
are
so
many
things
that
need
to
be
done
and
they'll
seem
relevant
at
some
point.
D
So
how
do
we
decide?
So
what
we
need
is
to
to
try
to
practice
this
exercise
of
prioritizing
with
Stars
and
Hearts,
the
Stars
being
like
the
most
urgent,
immediate
and
and
kind
of
like
important
functions
that
that
we
thought
we
would
they
will
have
to
be
covered
and
being
and
being
the
hearts
being
important,
as
well
being
as
relevant,
but
more
like
longer,
term
or
medium
term,
things
that
maybe
can
wait
kind
of
like
in
a
bucket
for
things
to
do
so.
D
That
was
basically
like
the
initial
idea,
the
video
that
we
had
in
the
call
and
then
after
that,
I
just
I.
Just
we
kept
thinking
about
it
and
and
I
just
came
up
with
these
like
quadrant
that
I
think
it
could.
It
could
help
us
with
this
exercise
kind
of
like
following
the
same
yeah,
the
same
framework,
but
now
just
kind
of
like
having
four
different
options.
D
That
I
think
in
my
mind,
based
on
the
exercise
we
did
yesterday,
I
think
everything
all
the
functions
that
we
listed
are
really
focused
into
into
our
needs
and
into
the
current
state
of
the
TC,
trying
to
to
make
things
simple
and
and
minimal.
So
I
think
if
all
of
those
functions
or
most
of
them
should
fall
into
the
first
two
quadrants
into
the
important
and
Origins
that
is
represented
by
the
star
and
the
important
known
origin
that
is
represented
by
the
heart.
I.
D
Think
that
the
other
two
it
will
be
interesting
if
something
falls
under
there
for
for
a
signaling
on
what
we're
doing
on
or
what
we're
thinking.
So
they
don't
really
have
a
sticker.
We
don't
have
a
sticker
for
that,
but
I
think
yeah.
If
the
if
at
the
end
we
have
some
Post-its
with
with
with
non-steakers
on
them,
then
we'll
be
able
maybe
to
to
put
them
over
there
or
we
we
can
see,
we
can
see
them
so
yeah.
Basically,
the
idea
is
to
to
take
a
couple
of
minutes.
D
I,
don't
know
how
much
would
be
appropriate.
Maybe
we
can
just
start
them
when
we
see
that
people
kind
of
like
slow
on
the
on
the
engagement
with
the
board,
we
just
stopped,
but
the
idea
is
just
to
go
on
through
each
one
of
the
Post-its
and
just
Mark
with
the
start.
What
do
you
think
it's
basically
important,
an
urgent
and
with
a
hardware
it's
important,
non-origent
and
yeah?
You
can,
of
course,
only
the
one
sticker
per
post
it,
but
you
can
mark
all
the
posts
that
you
want
at
the
end.
D
That's
basically
that's
basically
part
of
the
what
we
were
thinking
on
doing
so
I,
don't
know
if
we
have
any
questions
that
we
would
like
to
raise
before
starting
I.
Don't
know
if
I
was
clear.
D
A
No
just
look
at
the
cursor
here:
the
state
I'm
assuming
everybody
knows
how
to
get
to
the
stamp,
but
it's
just
that
little
that
little
thing
down
there.
You
just
click
on
you
know
the
heart
and
then
you
can
just
start
stamping
away
and
click
on
the
star
and
it
starts
damping
away.
D
What
do
we
mean
with
urgency
right
urgency
in,
like
this
month,
like
November
like
end
of
the
year
like
they
come
in
six
months,
I
think
there
can
be
different
types
of
origins
in
in
regards
with
timeline.
So
I,
don't
know
what
you
guys
think
or
again.
What
do
you
think
if
we
should
kind
of
like
Define,
maybe
a
timeline
before
starting?
So
we
kind
of
like
refer
to
that
in
our
minds,
or
should
we
leave
that
after
the
actual
voting
or
the
exercise.
D
E
C
A
Yeah
I
was
also
thinking
just
kind
of
like
urgent.
Is
we
don't
do
it?
Things
start
to
break
you
know,
and
some
things
can
break
and
they're
not
important,
and
that's
okay
but
like,
but
you
know,
I
I
think
it's
I
think
it's
okay
to
kind
of
leave.
It
I
mean
you
know,
things
will
break
at
various
times.
A
If
we
stop
doing
them.
So
you
know,
maybe
we
just
keep
a
little
bit
loose
like
Libby
sand
and
and.
A
D
F
D
E
C
D
Yeah
I
think
that
was
that
point
was
something
that
Rex
added
yesterday.
I
also
don't
know
exactly
what
he
means,
but
I
guess
he's
just
like
some
type
of
solution
for
addressing,
like
the
multistig
management.
A
Yeah
I
think
that's
good.
You
know
yesterday
I
added
something
to
one
of
the
only
downside
on
that
is
that
you
know
it
may
not
get
the
accurate
reading
on
stars
because
people
may
not
see
it
until
afterwards,
but
I
think
it's
better
to
try
to
clarify
and
capture
stuff
that
you
know
that's
important,
so
yeah.
C
G
B
G
C
D
So
right
now
there
is
no
sticker
for
that
one,
but
maybe
if
you
wanna
just
bring
one
that
you
think
it's
a
good
fit
for
them
or
also
like,
if
we
usually
with
blank
and
actually
no
one
puts
a
star
or
a
heart.
Maybe
we
can
also
move
them
board.
But
if
you
feel
that
you
want
to
see
nearly
then
just
like
you
can
just
pick
a
any
any
sticker,
you
you'd
like
living.
I
D
No,
it's
it's
all
good.
As
long
as
you
have
used,
you
know
like
one
sticker
per
post
it
that
should
be
fine,
but
you
can
use
as
many
as
you
want
we're
using
like
the
start
for
important
and
Origins
they're
hard
for
important
and
non-origent,
and
if
there's
any
other,
any
other
functions
that
you
find
non-important
and
Urgent
and
non-important
known
Origins.
You
can
also
like
Mark
them
with
with
a
sticker
that
you
prefer
or
or
just
leave
it
blank
and
and
we
can
just
like
organize
it
after.
D
J
A
A
So
Circle,
for,
can
you
say
it
again
bear
one
more
time.
I
I
H
D
Yeah
sure
yeah
so
right
now,
I
was
thinking.
I
think
it
would
be
interesting
to
listen
how
everyone
felt
during
the
exercise
and
and
like
looking
at
the
I.
Think
it's
really
good
like
to.
If
you
look
at
everything
like
in
a
skim
out
in
a
bigger
picture,
to
see
where
the
stars
and
all
the
parts
are
I,
think
it's
really
interesting.
D
So
maybe
we
can
get
like
a
maybe
first
impression
of
what
you
guys
are
looking
any
any
comments
that
you
have
and
then
maybe
I
think
it
would
be
good
just
to
then
start
like
going
by
going
on
each
area
and
then
starting
just
maybe
to
to
move
things
to
the
to
the
to
the
quadrants
down
there,
but
maybe
first
you'd
like
soon
some
comments
that
people
would
like
to
would
like
to
I
don't
know
if
anyone
would
like
to
start.
D
Maybe
first
just
like
overview
comments
and
then,
after
that,
I
think
we
could
start
with
with
the
direction
strategy.
F
J
Yeah
I
I
can
start
off.
I
guess
I.
Think
there's
a
lot
of
really
interesting,
I'd
like
to
see
what
we
did
yesterday
just
to
compare
but
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
different
priorities
expressed
today.
J
I
personally
still
have
the
one
big
one
with
in-game
stuff,
I
still
haven't
heard
any
kind
of
reassurance
on
the
inevitable,
depending
of
die.
So
I
I
think
this
is
an
important
conversation
to
have,
even
though
it's
not
like
you
know
a
couple
years
off.
But
if
we're
gonna
have
this
conversation
we
shouldn't
have
it
no,
but
rather
than
later
so
that's
the
only
thing.
That's
on
my
mind,
I'll
pass
them
into
something
else.
I
Yeah
I
I
agree
with
that.
I
was
there
yesterday
and
I
think
that,
and
there
are
a
different
set
of
pro.
There
are
many
similar
priorities
which
I
think
are
calls
to
the
the
urgency
of
some
of
these
Post-its
over
all
this,
but
there
are
some
which
could
have
differed
between
when
we
did
the
exercise
at
sample
and
we've
done
it
today.
E
I
F
F
I'm,
mostly
observing
during
this
call,
since
the
last
time
that
we
worked
in
the
city
just
having
some
yeah
like
trouble
like
catching
up
with
with
some
of
the
stuff.
To
be
honest,
so
yeah
I
think
I'll
just
pass
to
someone
else
to
hear
other
kinds
of
comments:
I'll
press
to
10th.
C
Thanks
Chewie,
so
it's
interesting
I'm
glad
that
we
made
a
comparison
between
the
priorities
of
the
sample
working
group
last
night
and
then
the
wider
group
today
when
I
looked
at
so
what,
if
I
just
started,
looking
at
what
this
group
had
prioritized
so
four
or
five
stars
or
more
as
urgent
as
the
most
urgent?
It's
really
about
like
completing
the
transition
making
sure
our
calendar
is
clean,
so
people
know
what's
happening:
the
multi-sig
working
groups
returning
funds
to
the
multi-sig,
multi-sig
management.
C
There's
you
know
credentials
management
which
is
basically
just
to
make
sure
any
attack.
Vectors
are,
are
reduced
and
that's
so
it's
like
it
feels
to
me
like
yeah.
Those
are
burning
hot,
like
it's
finance
and
security
and
then
transitioning.
So
it's
it
seems
kind
of
reasonable
actually
and
then
the
other
things
are
hey,
they're,
also
really
important.
C
But
if
we
were
to
focus
on
what
to
do
tomorrow,
what
should
we
start
focusing
on
I
actually
really
liked
what
we
came
up
with
on
today's
board
and
I
see
just
in
you
know
in
the
sample
board.
I
also
really
like
it,
but
you
know
I'll,
give
you
an
example
for
why,
like
org
development
and
Partnerships
I
didn't
put
a
star
on
and
I
put
a
heart
on,
even
though
they
got
more
Stars
last
night,
it's
like
wow.
Those
are
big
things.
C
You
know,
I
didn't
feel
like
I
could
I
could
say
those
are
burning
and
urgent,
because
orc
development
is
such
a
long
list
of
things
and
then
the
Partnerships
is
like
okay
yeah.
We
need
to
do
it
but
like
if
we
don't
do
it
today
and
you
know
the
way
Gideon,
just
nothing
will
break
right,
it's
like.
Maybe
if
we
do
it
in
two
weeks,
you
know
we
can.
We
can
do
it
in
two
weeks,
but
oh
I
almost
fell
off
my
own
chair,
but
things
won't
break.
C
If
we
don't
start,
you
know
nailing
that
stuff
today,
so
I
I
actually
see
the
that
you
know
there's
a
lot
of
congruity
between
these
two,
the
two,
the
two,
even
though
I
think
today's
is
more
focused
on
I.
Don't
know
if
the
same
wording
was
used
yesterday,
so
maybe
we're
a
little
bit
primed
of
like
hey.
What
will
break
if
we
don't
if
it's
if
we
don't
start
working
on
it?
If
it's
not,
you
know,
tagged
urgent,
and
so
so
certainly
that
was
would
I
and
maybe
a
few
other
people.
C
Why
I
am
a
few
other
people
really
focused
on
finances,
security
of
our
credentials
and
then
this
transition
plan.
That's
it
sorry,
I
think
I
took
too
much
time
to
say.
Not
so
much
I
will
pass
to
getting
in.
You
have
a
gun.
A
Thanks
Dan
yeah,
I
kind
of
echo,
a
lot
of
what
you're
saying
you
know,
I
think
part
of
what
explains
some
of
last
night
is
that
we
or
yesterday
was
like
in
the
partners
thing
we
were
putting
some
start
at
least
I
was
putting
some
Stars
next
to
specific
Partnerships,
like
the
academy,
was
one
that
seemed
like
that
was
urgent
and
The
Common
Sense
folks
with
the
curation,
but
so
I
think
some
of
that
may
explain
some
of
the
differences,
but
I
I
do
see
yeah
some
pretty
strong
patterns
here
as
well
like
the
these
kind
of
nitty-gritty
kind
of
like
practical
things
that
have
to
do
with
security.
A
I
have
to
do
clearly
like
the
transition.
I.
Think
that's
like
a
big
one.
That's
on
people's
minds,
I
guess!
A
The
other
thing
I
would
say
is
that
I
think
when
it
comes
to
the
nitty-gritty
things,
we
all
pretty
much
understand
what
those
are
and
I
think
that
the
hearts
are
going
to
be
a
little
bit
more
difficult,
because
those
are
bigger
issues,
and
so
we
all
may
be
carrying
different
interpretations
of
what
that
means,
which
would
then
lead
to
different
assignments
of
importance
to
that
I
think
I
will
pass
to
let's
see
Maxwell.
Do
you
have
any
thoughts.
H
Yeah
largely
kind
of
echoing
and
apologies
I
had
to
drop
for
another
conflict,
but
I
jumped
in
a
little
bit
ago.
So
I
will
Echo
largely
what
what
you
know
I
just
heard
and
and
say
that
you
know
on
the
operation
side,
Finance
side,
you
know
transition
side.
Those
are
those
are
obvious
things
that
also
you
know
if
something
does
Break.
H
It
is
a
major
issue
right,
whereas
a
lot
of
the
hearts
I
see
are
things
that
even
if
they
get
delayed
or
something
goes
wrong,
they're
less
concrete
and
less
you
know
the
the
impact
and
and
consequences
of
something
breaking
you
know
are
a
little
less
defined
and
probably
a
little.
You
know,
there's
chances
to
work
around
them,
whereas
the
stars
are
like
hey.
H
H
Who
has
not
gone
yet
I
apologize,
I
missed
some,
so
I
don't
know.
Is
there
a
good
person
to
pass
it
to.
B
You
haven't
gone
sorry,
my
computer,
overheated
and
I
missed
some
of
what
people
said,
but
yeah
I
think
the
transition
being
the
highest
priority
will
actually
carry
a
lot
of
the
other
important
things
with
it
like
if
we
start
looking
at
what
we
need
to
make
this
transition
I
think
even
like
security,
credential
management
with
the
multi-6.
A
A
I'm
sorry
I'm
actually
juggling
a
few
things
right
now,
so
I'm
trying
to
catch
up
on
notes,
but
there
you
know
one
thing
that
might
be
good
with
notes.
Is
you
know
if
you
see
that
your
your
ideas
were
not
captured
accurately,
just
please
jump
directly
to
that
dock.
That's
above
here
the
TC,
functional
Ops
discussions
and
just
please
type
it
feel
free
to
type
it
in
yourself
like
what
what
you
kind
of
the
core
of
what
you
were
saying
where.
A
It's
right
above
here
in
the
chat,
I'll
paste.
It
again.
A
Okay,
so
bear
should
we
move
to
I
think
everybody's
gone
at
this
point
right
yeah,
so
do
you
want
to
go?
Should
we
go
to
the
next
stage
of
like
moving
them
into
the
quadrants.
D
I
I
started
copying
and
pasting
the
ones
that
were
like
pretty
obvious
that
people
were
saying
like
basically
I
I've
noticed
that
kind
of,
like
the
the
threshold
is
like
having
four
stars
at
least
I
think
there
are
a
couple
with
four
stars:
those
were
the
ones
I
I
copy
and
pasted
into
the
important
audience
and
then
the
rest
I
think
it
would
be
good
to
maybe
go
now
into
each
individual
section,
maybe
starting
with
directions
and
strategy
and
and
yeah
I,
don't
know.
A
Well,
what
if
we
just
for
just
to
kind
of
keep
the
momentum
of
this
exercise
going,
do
the
same
thing
like
with
the
hearts
like
take
the
ones
that
are
the
top
ones
and
put
those
Into
the
Heart
quadrant
yeah
I
mean
basically
just
do
that
and
then
I
think
that
will
I
think
that'll
help
us
to
like
Focus
the
conversation.
A
D
That
was
for
stars
for
hearts.
I,
don't
know,
I,
guess
it's
kind
of
hard
to
tell
right.
G
D
A
J
J
So
we're
starting
with
the
important
urgent
as
we're,
adding
the
notes
to
the
hearts
to
start
talking
about
it.
I
I
mean
I
can
start
with
an
easy
one
right.
Technology
support,
it's
easy
for
me.
The
I
do
think
we
need
some
more
understanding
as
to
what
to
cut
and
what
to
keep
and
that
we
had
an
initial
I
I.
Wasn't
there
in
communities
I
think
there
were
some
efforts
to
to
do
them,
but
for.
I
I
I
Thank
you
that
there
may
be
some
a
what's
the
word
that
we
might
need
to
establish
a
different
sort
of
Arrangement
and
idea
on
how
we
do
that
properly.
Rather
than
having
to
rely
on
one
person,
which
was
we've
done
so
far.
A
Sorry,
I'm
I'm,
still
like
moving
stuff
over
with
bear
I
I
ended
up
with
some
of
these,
taking
it
to
a
threshold
three
for
some
of
the
categories
bear.
Hopefully
that
doesn't
mess
you
up.
D
I,
don't
know
yeah
I
think
that's
good,
that's
actually
something
that
I'm
I'm
noticing
like,
for
example,
we
have
in
the
in
the
people,
coordination
there's
one
that
I
think
is
really
interesting.
Like
the
user
experience
Discord
server
restructure,
it
has
two
stars:
one
heart
and
two
circles
right,
so
I
feel
that
there's
a
really
interesting
conversation
to
happen
there
and
right
now
we're
not
moving
that
posted
anywhere.
So
I
feel
that
there
could
also
be
a
risk
for
just
letting
some
functions
without
a
quadrant
that
I
think
we
we
shouldn't.
D
Well,
I
think
if
it
sounds
good,
maybe
yeah
I
was
also
kind
of
like
distracted
with
coping
and
pasting
stuff,
but
yeah.
Maybe
we
can
serenade
go
back
with
the
important
and
origin
and
try
to
maybe
to
focus
on
on
continuing
the
conversation
there.
You
just
give
me
just
two
seconds
to
finish
this
and
we
can
do
it.
J
I
guess
I'll
continue
with
that,
like
I.
Think
of
these,
the
credential
management
is
really
really
important,
but
it's
also
kind
of
it's
got
a
lot
of
granular
issues
that
we
need
to
discuss.
I
think
you
know
we
have
things
like
HubSpot.
Do
we
need
it
anymore?
Do
we
want
to
kind
of
purge
everyone
and
then
start
start
fresh
with
with
the
platforms
that
we
do?
J
Have
it's
really
hard
when
we
have
this
kind
of
mass
transition,
where
we
have
so
many
old
folks
moving
out
Newton
folks
moving
in
you
know
what
is
the
best
process
for
actually
going
through
this
credential
management
transition
process
and
really
you
know,
kind
of
respecting
the
old
but
also
like
bringing
in
the
new
and
giving
giving
powers
out
to
that
because
I
I
do
agree,
you
know
live
IV,
we
relied
on
him
for
Discord
for
such
a
long
time
and
then
I
noticed
Rex
started
implementing
some
Bots
here
and
the
the
Tec,
and
so
you
know
we
need
to
really
kind
of
build
out
that
type
of
infrastructure
to
have
for
Missions
and
making
sure
that
we
have
trust
built
in
and
yeah
I.
J
Think
credential
management
is
is
one
of
those
like
most
important
urgent
things
that
we
need
to
get
done
as
well
as
the
multi-cigs.
The
multi-sig.
One
is
really
interesting
issue
to
me,
because
I
think
there's
the
conversation
that
we
can
have
about
what
what
to
do
with
the
tokens
that
we
have
in
multisig
I've
heard
a
lot
of
people.
J
You
know
suggest
that
we
should
send
it
back
to
the
common
pool,
but
I
also
think
it
would
be
really
beneficial
to
just
go
ahead
and
use
that
to
purchase
Tec
tokens
for
the
community
to
use
whether
it
be
for
the
reward
system
or
for
other
options
or
opportunities,
but
that
I
think
that's
open
for
discussion
for,
like
kind
of
an
overview
of
like
what
our
plans
are
for
the
new
the
new
structure
so
outside
of
that
yeah.
J
The
the
cleaning
up
of
the
calendar
is
really
important
to
me,
like
I,
think
that
we
have
to
have
some
type
of
cadence
new
Cadence
to
really
start
getting
people
in
the
pattern
of
expectations
and
some
type
of
consistency
week
to
week
to
understand.
You
know
what
our
meetings
are
going
to
be.
Like
how
is
how
it's
going
to
be
structured,
what
are
Sprint
planning
is
going
to
look
like
what
of
our
spirit.
Retrospector
is
going
to
look
like
so
on.
J
So
I
think
these
are
all
very,
very
important
and
has
a
lot
of
room
for
discussion
and
I
will
pass
it
on
to
someone
else.
C
I'm
just
caught
up
in
something
in
the
middle
I
am
listening,
but
maybe
I'll
speak
after
a
few
other
people
go.
Can
I
pass
to
you
Olivia.
B
H
Yeah
sure
I
was
gonna
chime
in
so
so
I
think,
looking
at
that
important,
urgent
quadrant,
it
kind
of
just
feels
like
the
transition.
Reorg
piece
is
almost
fundamental
to
having
the
other
discussions
right,
because
we
can
talk
about
multi-sig
management.
We
can
talk
about
technology.
We
can
talk
about
all
that
stuff,
but
until
we
understand
how
we
want
to
until
we
understand
the
kind
of
future
end
date,
they
don't
know
that.
H
Do
we
understand
how
we're
going
to
get
to
a
consensus
on
on
what
technology
we're
going
to
keep
what
technology
we're
going
to?
You
know
Sunset,
who,
how
we're
going
to
manage
the
multi
Sega
it
all.
It
kind
of
feels
like
that
transition
is
almost
a
prerequisite
for
everything
else,
maybe
not
everything,
but
a
lot
of
it,
especially
for
the
things
about
how
we're
gonna.
You
know
how
we're
gonna
manage.
H
You
know
X,
Y
or
Z,
going
forward
right
so
like
the
stuff
on
the
right
or
the
the
upper
right,
quadrant
important
non-urgent.
H
A
lot
of
that
stuff
feels
like
there
could
still
be
good
discussions
that
are
happening
without
that
that
transition
happening,
but
it
feels
like
everything
in
the
upper
left
quadrant
is
dependent
on
that
transition,
and
maybe
that's
just
me
not
understanding
how
some
of
those
things
are
working,
but
that's
how
it
at
least
feels
to
me
any
any
additional
context
that
I
might
be
missing
around
how
we
manage
those
things
today
and
kind
of
where
we're
going.
H
D
Foreign
yeah
I
totally
agree
with
with
what
you're
saying
Maxwell
yeah
I
think.
If
we,
if
we
think
about
it,
I
think
all
the
Post-its
could
become
points
under
the
transition
to
new
structure.
I
think
all
the
operations
Post-its.
They
are
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
them.
Coming
from
the
from
what
happened
with
transparency,
you
know
and
and
having
this
transition
from
that
group
kind
of
like
closing
into
now.
How
are
we
gonna
deal
with
these
different
functions
and
and
in
that
process,
rethinking
on
on?
How
are
we
gonna?
D
Do
it
based
on
the
new
structure
that
we
want
to
take?
That
is
yet
to
be
defined
right.
So
I
agree
that
again
this
this
idea
of
transition
to
new
structure
kind
of
like
is
the
base
or,
like
the
the
fundamental
part
for
other
things,
to
to
start
being
resolved
same
thing
with,
like
the
the
community
meetings
right,
the
calendar,
it's
kind
of,
like
all
related
with
with
the
same
stuff,
so
yeah
I
mean
I.
D
Think
it's
it's
good
that
we
have
it
here,
because
I
feel
that
we've
kind
of
like
come
into
the
realization
that
right
now,
the
most
important
thing,
important
thing
to
figure
out
from
all
of
this
quadrant
is
to
actually
come
up
and
and
figure
out.
How
are
we
gonna
create
this
new
structure
and
how
are
we
gonna
transition
into
it
and
yeah
I
think
I.
Think
from
that
idea,
lots
of
other
ideas
that
might
not
be
included
here
in
the
points
can
be
added
as
well,
especially
I.
D
Think
there
are
like
two
fundamental
questions:
right
I
think
for
me
is
the
The
Who
and
the
and
the
how
right
who
who
is
going
to
take
the
transition?
D
How
are
we
going
to
take
the
transition
and-
and
it
seems
like
the
Watts-
a
lot
of
the
watts
are
already
coming
here
and
might
be
easier
to
to
come
up
with,
but
I
think
it
would
be
also
important
to
to
try
to
find
an
answer
to
the
other
two
questions
in
order
to
become
more
productive,
I
think
to
to
become
more
efficient
with
our
times
throughout
the
weeks
and
and
and
I.
Think
now
might
be
also
a
good
good
moment
to
start
thinking.
D
Okay,
so
these
this
transition
to
a
new
structure
that
we
Define
it's
important
and
Urgent.
How
urgent
it
is,
you
know,
are
we
thinking
on
trying
to
reach
this
new
structure
by
the
end
of
next
month
and
by
the
end
of
the
year?
I
think
that
would
be
also
some
some
of
the
good
questions
to
answer
and
I.
Don't
know,
I'll
pass
it
to
you.
C
I
Go
afterwards,
oh
so
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
just
looking
at
the
cards,
there
are
a
lot
of
them
that
are
being
kind
of
important
and
non-urgent,
and
it
might,
however,
difficult
be
a
good
idea
to
go
through
with
them
again
and
kind
of
you
know
try
to
reduce
that
one
further.
I
I
C
Yeah
I
mean
I,
guess:
I,
wouldn't
I
wouldn't
disagree
with
that
either
to
go
through
and
maybe
select
certain
things
in
on
one
or
two
Post-it
notes
that
might
be
important
or
urgent
and
I.
Think
I
think
non-urgent
is
almost
almost
under
values.
The
importance
I
think
it's
important,
but
it
is
less
urgent
than
urgent
rather
than
non-urgent.
If,
if
that
makes
sense,
it's
I
think
many
things
in
this
important
to
non-urgent.
C
You
know
this
this
trend,
so
many
of
these
things
will
depend
on
the
where
we
land
after
the
end
of
the
transition
and
I.
Think
that
that's
why
the
transition
to
the
new
structure
is
in
both
the
sample
and
in
this
this
group's
categorization,
one
of
the
one
of
the
most
important
urgent
priorities
that
we
have
yeah
I
I,
think
that's
all
I
mean
I.
Think
if
we
were
to
take
apart
some
of
these
categories,
we
would
find
that
individual
pieces
of
them
would
belong
in
different
quadrants.
C
C
D
Yeah
just
to
add
into
into
that
yeah
I
think
that
would
be
also
an
interesting
exercise,
because
I
agree
like
on
the
important
non-origin.
There
are
a
lot
of
things
that
could
we
could
go
into
more
detail
and
they
might
become
Origins.
What
I
will
also
make
like
this
kind
of,
like
reflection,
that
I
think
it's?
It's
also
might
have
also
to
consider
I
think,
ideally,
as
as
an
organization
and
as
a
Commons,
I
think
whatever
functions
we
have
whatever
activities.
We
have
I.
D
Think
the
the
ideal
scenario
is
that
we
always
remain
in
the
important
non-origent.
Quadrant
I
think
that
if
we
have
right
now
more
functions
over
there,
I
think
that's
actually
a
good
sign
to
me,
because
I
feel
that
when
something
becomes
urgent
is
that
that's
happening,
because
something
not
really
good
happened
right,
maybe
some
mismanagement.
There
were
some
like
conditions
that
made
these.
These
functions
become
urgent
and
and
become
really
really
active.
D
So
I
think
if,
if
we
kind
of
like
see
the
the
important
non-origent
as
as
as
a
as
a
better
pathway
for
the
commons
to
constantly
be
on
that
quadrant
I
think
that
would
be
really
good
right.
Because
then
we
can
look
at
this
with
time.
We
plan
with
planning
with
vision
and
and
things
just
don't
become
urgent
right.
They
they
can
just
like
be
in
their
own
in
their
own
time,
according
to
to
whatever
we're
doing
so.
Yeah
I
just
wanted
to
throw
that
that
thought.
A
I
think
that's
really
good.
I'm
gonna
go
right
now
too,
I
I
think
that's
a
really
good
Insight,
actually
operating
from
important
from
the
important
non-urgent
quadrant.
It's
really
where
we
want
to
be
ultimately-
and
you
know
I'm
I'm-
also
thinking
about
like
how
do
we
get
this
done?
You
know
how
do
we?
How
do
we
start
to
move
into
solving
this
right?
So
I
do
think
that
part
of
this
is
going
to
come
down
to
developing
some
new
roles.
A
What's
pretty
clear
is
that
there
are
there's
at
least
one
role
or
maybe
some
combination
of
roles,
there's
like
some
functional
tasks
that
definitely
need
somebody
who's,
gonna
be
paid?
Who
can
actually
keep
track
of
those
things?
So,
like
the
stars
thing,
if
you
look
in
that
bucket,
that
quadrant
I
think
those
are
kind
of
like
signals
of
like
these
are
some
roles,
and
these
are
roles
that
we
probably
shouldn't
spend
a
whole
bunch
of
time
like
months,
like
figuring
out
who's,
you
know
what
what
those
role
responsibilities
are.
A
I
think
we
should
like
Define
those
pretty
quickly
and
and
just
lock
those
in
and
you
know,
figure
out.
Like
we
kind
of
know,
I
mean
we
could
get
all
fancy
in
terms
of
like
voting
and
recruiting,
and
things
like
that.
But,
like
the
people
who
are,
this
is
duocracy,
you
can
kind
of
see
the
people
who
are
here
right
now
and
passionate
about
those
issues
seem
like
those
are.
The
people
are
probably
going
to
be
able
to
step
up
and
do
them.
So
that
to
me
seems
like
defining
those
roles.
A
First
seems
like
it's
probably
a
good
place
to
start,
and
then
I
agree
with
what
pretty
much
everybody's
saying,
which
is
these
these
things
that
are
in
the
heart
quadrant.
A
It's
actually
hard
to
make
progress
on
those
until
we've
got
this
road
map
or
kind
of
like
high
level
strategy
that
that
first
one
the
transit
we're
calling
transition
to
the
new
structure,
but
in
some
ways
it's
also
like.
If
you
actually
look
at
what
those
bullets
are
it's
like.
You
know,
these
are
a
lot.
I
mean
there's
a
mix
in
there
like
some
of
them,
like
the
merge
with
the
academy.
That's
like
a
big
strategic
question.
Tc
is
value,
aggregator
I'm,
not
sure
exactly
what
that
means,
but
you
know
reduce
operations.
A
These
are
like
there's
kind
of
a
mix
of
things
there,
but
I
think
what
what's
in
that
area
is
like.
What's
our
roadmap?
What's
the
direction
we're
going
in
and
that
will
help
us
to
then
prioritize
the
quadrants
I
mean
the
stuff.
That's
in
the
heart,
quadrant,
that's
that's
my
sense
and,
and
last
thing
is,
it
does
seem
like
what
we
could
do
is
you
know
get
a.
This
is
what
I'm
hoping
we'll
talk.
We'll
have
some
time
to
talk
about.
A
Next
is
that
we
could
get
a
Tempo
going
with
some
meetings
where
we
could
like
knock
out
these
first
ones,
these
the
important
urgent
stuff
and
get
those
roles
to
find,
and
then
start
to
turn
to
this
question
of
what
the
roadmap
is.
What
are
these
kind
of
big
strategic
questions
that
will
then
allow
us
to
prioritize
the
heart
Quadra.
C
I
I
I
do
think
that
that
needs
to
be
more
than
just
these
meetings
and
these
meetings
some
some
of
these,
for
example,
with
credentials
management.
There
needs
to
be
the
time
taken
care
of
and
the
and
the
discussion,
maybe
don't
not
everybody
that
there
needs
to
be
a
separate
discussion
just
to
cover
with
those
and
then
in
these.
These
meetings
can
be
slightly
higher
level.
I
I
feel
otherwise
we're
moving
at
a
snail
space.
C
I
agree
with
that
too,
but
the
the
the
there's
a
few
hours
every
week
actually
for
these
so
I,
don't
know
that
we
need
to
use
all
of
them
for
the
higher
level
strategy,
but
we
could
use
whichever
ones
make
the
most
sense
in
the
calendar.
So
the
people
who
need
to
attend.
I
A
Well,
I
I
think
it
would
be
good
to
just
get
some
feedback
from
what
Tam
has
just
suggested,
which
is
using
I,
mean
I.
Think
we've
kind
of
been
talking
about
this
idea
of
maybe
transforming
the
stewards
we
haven't
been.
Maybe
talking
about
this,
we
have
we
in
the
last
call
that
came
up,
and
even
the
call
before
that
you
know,
Olivia
was
suggesting
like
having
some
kind
of
actual
ritual
to
Mark
some
type
of
transition.
So
can
we
shift
into
that
part
of
the
conversation
like
what?
A
A
To
focus
specifically
on
driving
this
process
forward,
what
do
people
think
about
that.
J
I
think
it's
a
really
good
idea,
I
think
using
it,
as
you
know,
maybe
renaming
it
to
like
transition
meetings
or
whatever
it
may
be.
But
you
know
kind
of
purging
the
rest
of
the
calendar
and
just
saying
hey
we're
going
to
use
these
few
meetings
a
week
and
even
though,
if
it's.
F
J
Know,
even
if
it's
slow
at
first,
you
know
it's
all
about
building
momentum
and
building
that
Cadence
and
so
I
think
it's
really
really
important
that
we
do
this,
even
if,
even
if
it
is
slow
at
first
I,
do
think
it'll
pick
up
and
we'll
get
into
a
pattern
of
of
meeting
behavior
and
we'll
set
up
our
own
types
of
you
know
what
purpose
for
each
meeting
I
think
having
purpose
for
each
meeting
is
really
really
important
and
that
we
we
structure
our
meetings
to
kind
of
you
know,
focus
on
one
or
two
areas
of
of
the
roadmap
and
then
set
it
up
to
where
you
know.
J
We
we
eliminate
a
lot
of
the
sense
making
that
is
required
for,
like
things
like
Sprint
planning,
I,
think
that
when
it
comes
to
Sprint
planning,
it
should
be
like
hey,
let's
identify
the
tasks
that
need
to
be
done
and
let's
go
do
them
rather
than
you
know,
discussing
what
happens,
and
then
you
know,
having
you
know
an
hour
hour
worth
of
sense,
making
yeah
I
think
it's
I
think
it's
really
important
that
we
have
a
lot
of
purpose
and
we
stick
to
a
kind
of
a
pattern
within
our
meetings.
But
yeah.
C
Yeah
and
to
throw
out
something
else
out
there
too,
we
don't
have
to
stick
to
the
steward
schedule.
I
mean
the
the
calendar
is
our
oyster.
We
can
choose
any
any
day
of
the
week
any
time
of
the
week
that
works
for
to
the
people
in
this
room
or
the
people
that
need
to
be
in
those
meetings.
C
So
I'm,
not
I'm,
not
even
suggesting
that
we
need
to
use
these
I
think
that
it
does
make
sense
and
I'd
love
to
hear
some
other
opinions
on
this
for
us
to
cancel,
for
example,
the
scrum
events.
Until
we
decide
we
want
to
re-initiate
them.
If
we
decide
we
want
to
re-initiate
them,
so
the
Sprint
planning
the
retrospective
and
the
the
call
was,
of
course,
the
Sprint
review.
C
The
community
call
was,
of
course,
this
program
review
and
then
the
you
know,
even
the
council
and
the
weekly
meeting
we
can
replace
with
a
few
weeks
or
more
of
transition,
planning,
I
think
the
transition
planning
should
supersede
or
does
supersede
at
this
point
any
of
the
stewards
coordination
calls.
This
is
what
we
are
coordinating
on
right
now,
so
I
think
transition
planning
should
should
just
be
our
Focus
for
now
until
it's
until
it's
finished
really
what
I
mean
is
like
until
it's
until
we've
executed
the
plan
that
we've
made.
B
Yeah
I
agree
with
that.
I
was
talking
to
Chewie,
also
before
how
and
and
also
replying
to
the
post
Rex
made
on
on
praise
and
activity
and
value
creation.
I
think
one
perhaps,
but
somehow
a
mistake
was
that
our
everything
was
very
stewards
focused
so
most
of
our
important
meetings.
B
Let's
say
our
coordination
meetings
for
like
stewards,
Consul,
stewards,
weekly
meetings,
Sprint
plannings
that
were
for
stewards
and
their
working
groups,
and
then
the
working
groups
were
being
led
by
stewards
and
the
community
call
was
also
stewards
sharing
updates
about
the
working
groups.
So
I
think
we
created
this
like
extremely
stewards,
focused
operations
and
and
the
visibility
of
the
TC
really
became
very
much
centered
on
that.
A
Yeah
I,
so
I
think
that's
I.
Think
that's
a
really
good
point.
I
think
all
of
the
steward-centric
nature
of
this
ended
up
putting
tremendous
pressure
on
a
handful
of
individuals,
particularly
when
it
came
to
calendars.
A
You
know
people
are
just
so
busy
trying
to
book
appointment,
trying
to
book
calendars
with
each
other.
It's
so
tough
right
because
we're
just
in
so
many
meetings
so
yeah.
If
we,
if
we
could,
you
know
it
seems
to
me
like
if
we
had
two
it
first
of
all,
if
we
were
reducing
the
some
of
the
other
meetings
like
the
working
group
calls,
and
we
were
transforming
stewards
calls,
you
know
we
could
definitely
have.
A
We
could
easily
have
two
calls
a
week
that
would
keep
us
moving
forward
on
this
work
and
benefit
from
having
maybe
a
little
bit
more
time
to
plan
those
meetings.
You
know
without
like
running
from
meeting
to
meeting
and
so
that
we
could.
We
could
structure
these
things
so
that
we
could
prioritize.
You
know
one
thing
as
Nate
was
saying
you
know
like
prioritize
this.
You
know
we're
going
to
focus
on
this
this
this
and
then
at
the
end
of
the
call.
Maybe
like
go
okay.
A
J
J
This
is
one
of
the
outcomes
that
we
want
to
have,
and
this
is
what
we
want
to
plan
for,
and
no
more
kind
of
like
the
whole,
you
know
coming
into
to
a
meeting
and
then
just
setting
the
agenda
as
we
go,
I
think
I.
Think
having
that
planning
session,
where
we're
saying
hey,
what
are
the
agenda
for
the
next
two
meetings
and
what?
What
are
the
things
that
we're
going
to
be
covering
would
be
a
really
important
process
to
establish.
D
Yeah
I
I,
agree
on
that
and
also
I
was
thinking.
Maybe
right
now
it's
a
good
opportunity
with
with
lots
of
stewards,
maybe
not
all
of
them,
but
some
of
these
towards
being
in
this
school.
Maybe
we
can
just
like
take
a
look
at
the
at
the
calendar
for
next
week
or
the
two
coming
weeks
and
and
you'll
see
like,
for
example,
I'm
thinking.
D
You
know,
like
the
transparency
working
group,
call
that
one
is
isn't
happening
anymore,
they're
like
so,
we
can
just
like
I
think
delete
it
right,
so
we
can
freeze
some
space
same
thing
with
communitas,
I
I,
don't
really
know.
What's
the
the
current
status
of
it
well,
I
think
it
would
be
important
to
to
clarify
it
and
and
see
if
we
can
free
that
space
as
well
so
yeah
yeah.
Maybe
we
can.
D
We
can
do
that,
take
some
time
to
to
clear
up
the
the
calendar
and
then
start
like
scheduling
the
the
new
codes
for
for
next
week.
D
J
I
think
everything
else
can
be
removed
unless
we
want
to
keep
gravity
on
the
Tec
calendar
I'm,
not
sure.
If
that's
something
over
there
was
a
comment
in
in
this.
This
figma,
not
funding
I,
don't
want
to
call
anybody
out
and
I'm
just
you
know,
I'm
just
actually
curious
to
know
the
thoughts
around
that
I,
don't
think
the
THC.
J
B
Yeah
that
was
that
was
my
comment.
I
think
I've
been
vocal
about
it
for
some
time,
I
feel
like,
and
that's
why
I
pray,
also
in
the
list
of
non-priorities,
the
incubation,
TUC
sub-dos
projects
I
feel
like
I,
would
love
to
talk
with
Juan
with
care
and
invite
him
to
this
conversation
and
I.
Think,
of
course,
gravity
is
welcome
to
be
in
the
calendar
of
the
TC,
but
I
think
he
has
I.
B
Think
gravity
has
a
body
and
substance
enough
now
for
kind
of
like
walking
its
own
path
and
for
the
TC
to
benefit
from
services
from
Gravity
like
it's
something
that
I
don't
know.
Maybe
in
the
future
we
could
see
if
there
is
a
budget
for
that
or
it
could
be
like
Case
by
case
kind
of
thing
like.
How
can
we
continue
to
have
conflict
resolution
at
a
low
cost
for
TC
members,
but
to
not
have
like
this
whole
organization
being
totally
attached
to
the
TC.
J
And
in
terms
of
the
the
actual
calendar
and
stuff
dude
I,
guess
that
my
question
would
be
is:
do
you
see
it
as
being
open
for
people
to
use
that
are
Loosely,
Affiliated
or
Affiliated,
or
should
we
close
it
up
a
little
bit
more.
B
B
I
guess
on
how
to
manage
that
who
has
access
if
we
leave
it
open
for
everyone,
and
there
is
just
like
a
weekly
management
of
the
events
that
were
added
if
they
are
like
compatible
or
not,
or
what
is
the
metrics
to
decide
that
I
think
it
introduces
like
a
whole
thing,
but
I
feel
like
the
TC
calendar
should
be
more
a
t
calendar.
A
So
one
thought
is:
I
I've
been
describing
this
more
as
like
interest
groups,
but
you
know
or
Community
organizing.
You
know
it's
like
what
you're
describing
Libby
to
from
from
my
perspective
is
like
the
calendar
that
is
the
calendar
of
the
community.
You
know
it's
like
the
the
community.
A
You
know
we
make
it
open
for
people
to
self-organize
around
things
that
they're
interested
in
and
provide
places
like
the
curation
service
and
others
for
them
to
plug
in
and
but
I
think,
that's
all
kind
of
part
of
like
a
bigger
strategy
that
we
need
to
still
talk
through,
but
what
I
think
would
be
so
so
I
guess
what
I'm
saying
is
actually
I
agree
with
that
like
having
some
way
of
opening
some
things
up
and
then
actually
closing
down
some
other
things,
and
so
the
closing
down
would
be
like
as
we're
looking
at
consolidating
the
working
groups.
A
These
meetings
are
actually
a
key
benefit.
Reducing
the
complexity
of
all
these
meetings
is
a
key
benefit
that
would
free
up
this
Core
Group
here
so
I
think
it's
I
think
it's
useful
to
just
kind
of
keep
going
through
these
meetings
and
and
really
just
I
mean
what
we've
said
is
that
rewards
needs
to
keep
meeting
right
seems
like
stewards
were
willing.
Transparency
is
that
is,
is
gone,
stewards
we're
talking
about
transforming
that
sample.
We
could.
We
could
just
move
sampo
into
this
as
well.
A
Communitas
I
can
give
just
a
quick
update
on
that.
Like
basically
has
has
told
us
that
she
is
leaving
so
and
Costa
is,
is
stepping
back
too
so
those
the
last
couple
weeks.
The
community
house
calls
have
just
not
been
really
happening,
so
I
think
we
could
fold
those
up
soft
govs
Libby.
What
is
what
you're
thinking
about
softgub.
B
Yeah
I
wrote
a
message
in
the
stewards
chat,
but
I
realized.
It
didn't
write
in
an
open
chat,
but
I
feel
like
there
needs
to
be
a
break
from
southgov
and
maybe
having
just
specific
like
special
meetings.
Whenever
there
is
the
need
so,
for
example,
this
that
I
was
talking
to
Chewie
to
have
this
like
learnings
from
the
cultural
build
from
a
more
General
perspective
than
to
be
under
soft
gov,
but
not
as
a
weekly
meeting.
B
Just
as
we
see
the
necessity
and
also
everyone
being
able
to
use
that
space
in
terms
of
like
if
there
is
anything,
people
are
thinking
about
culture
or
governance,
governance
like
the
non
-technical
sides
of
governance
self-governance,
then
to
bring
it
up
and
to
open
a
meeting
and
to
advertise
with
more
time.
I
think
this
could
be
a
good
practice
for
like
many
topics
that
if
we
see
the
importance
of
something
we
organize
that
and
then
promote,
and
then
there
is,
you
know
time
for
people
to
prepare
to
come
to
that
space
intentionally.
C
I
just
want
to
interject
some
thoughts.
I
really
appreciate
how
many
of
the
working
groups
are
phasing
out
at
sunsetting
and
I.
Think
if
we
did
it
in
a
rather
than
at
this
moment
right
now,
taking
taking
dates
off
the
calendar.
I
think
that
it's
really
up
to
the
response.
It's
the
responsibility
of
the
steward
to
Sunset
their
working
group
to
phase
out
really
modeling.
C
After
how
Eduardo
did
it
for
the
Hatcher
Outreach
working
group,
we
sort
of
set
a
precedent
for
how
we
Sunset
a
working
group
and
it's
not
it's
taking
it
off
the
calendar.
But
it's
there's
many
different
sort
of
touch
points
where
we
have
where
we
have
listings
of
working
groups.
It's
the
Discord,
it's
the
website.
It's
welcome
messages,
it's
many
different
places
and
we
could
use
the
sort
of
checklist
to
create
a
working
group
to
sort
of
make
sure
each
working
groups
go
through
the
checklist
to
Sunset
the
working
group.
C
A
Going
back
to
the
thing
the
other
thing,
Olivia
said:
what
are
people's
thoughts
about?
The
Community
call
right
now
putting
that
on
Hiatus
as
we
work
through
this
transition.
I.
C
I'm
on
a
fence,
I'm
on
a
fence,
I
mean
I.
Guess
the
question
is:
what's
the
purpose
of
the
community
call
and
if
the
purpose
of
the
community
call
is
to
keep
the
Tec
Community
token
holders
up
to
date
on
what's
Happening
I
think
maybe
we
do
that
right
now,
it's
bi-weekly!
So
it's
twice
a
month
and
you
know
worst
case
scenario.
Maybe
we
say
once
a
month
we
update
the
Tec
community
and
token
holders
and
what's
going
on,
but
I
feel
very
I
feel
a
lot
of
resistance
to
the
idea
of
just
no
community.
C
No,
no
Community
call
at
all
and
I
think
if
we
slow
it
down,
we'll
probably
see
fewer
people
showing
up
but
I,
think
that's,
probably
okay,
so
I'm
I'm
a
little
on
a
fence
I
would
lean
toward
having
some
Community
update.
Even
if
it's
like
hey
this
is
we're
not
doing
it.
The
way
we
used
to
do
it
anymore,
it's
going
to
be
completely
different.
Here's
our
current
thinking,
here's
here's
the
direction,
we're
taking!
C
Here's
how
you
can
help
share
your
point
of
view
or
feedback,
because
many
of
the
people
in
our
community
aren't
hanging
out
on
our
Discord
server.
They
are
catching
up
on
the
recording
of
the
community
call
and
I
and
I
think
we
sort
of
owe
it
to
the
people
that
can't
hang
out
on
our
Discord
server
to
let
them
know
what's
going
on
and
what
we're
thinking
but
I
would
say
we
don't
have
to
keep
the
same
format
that
we've
had
before.
G
H
H
That
usually
just
means
that
you
just
get
a
lot
less
involvement
from
the
community
and
so
I
would
support
changing
the
format
of
it
or
shortening
it
or
or
you
know
doing
something
with
it
other
than
canceling
it
entirely
right.
If
we,
if
we
want
to
have
it
less
often,
whatever
the
case
is,
but
I
would
hesitate
to
support
completely
canceling,
it
and
I
guess
depend
I
mean
if
it's.
H
If
we're
talking
about
canceling
one
Community
call
that's
different
than
talking
about
canceling
Community
calls
for
you
know,
however
long
it
takes
to
to
get
through
some
of
these
things,
but
yeah
I
I
have
seen
when
Community
calls
get
canceled
in
other
communities.
Usually
it
just
signals
a
a
severe
dip
in
engagement
from
the
community.
B
So
what
I
thought
is
I
think
this
transition
will
bring
a
lot
of
other
opportunities
of
structures.
We
could
have
that
are
much
more
engaging
and
communicative
to
the
community
that
are
not
so
Steward
Centric,
but
it
feels
like
there's
some
time
required
to
do
that.
I,
don't
know
like
we
are
discussing.
You
know
following
up
with
what
is
coming
up,
what
is
coming
up
now,
what
if
we
could
have
like
a
newsletter
or
like
an
information
that
is
every
week?
B
Okay,
it
could
be
even
in
the
in
the
end
of
one
of
these
meetings,
that
we're
having
the
strategy
meetings
that
we
share
with
stakeholders
via
email
like
this
is
what's
happening
in
the
community.
This
week
is
how
you
can
engage,
or
even
we
take
that
as
the
agenda
for
the
community
call
for
having
like
a
short
sharing
of
what
is
happening.
I
I
It
doesn't
mean
that
you
know
you
have
to
start
back
up
for
-20,
so
try
and
get
some
sort
of
Engagement
onto
that
community
golf
and
just
from
other
things,
I've
done
so
it
would
make
sense
to
almost
have
the
very
overview
level
progress,
report
and
kind
of
seeing
where
we
can
speak
but
who
attends
the
community
course
in
enlightened
me.
I,
don't
know
at
least
because.
J
We
do
get
a
lot
of
people
for
the
community
calls
I,
just
you
know,
like
I,
don't
think
like
I
If,
We
Had
a
community
call
next
week,
I
really
don't
know
what
we
would
give
updates
about.
Most
of
the
working
groups
are
being
dissolved,
and
so,
during
this
transition
phase
you
know
the
most
we
can
say
is
we're
working
on
the
transition
that
and
that's
about
it.
J
I
think
the
newsletter
would
be
a
much
more
effective
way
to
keep
our
token
holders
updated.
So
you
know
that
would
have
to
be.
We
would
need
to
make
that
a
kind
of
a
urgent,
important
thing
right
now
to
do
that.
J
A
Who
are
not
us
and
I
mean
if
you
really
go
back
and
look
at
the
recordings
you'll
see
that
that's
pretty
much
true,
so
I
think
that
I
I
would
love
I
love.
The
community
calls.
That
was
one
of
the
things
that
Drew
me
here
and
that,
but
that
was
back
when
there
were.
There
was
a
lot
more
people
and
a
lot
more
energy,
and
so
it
feels
to
me,
like
you
know,
doing
it.
A
I
I,
agree
that
if
you
put
it
put
it
on
hold,
it's
gonna
be
hard
to
get
it
back
up
again.
I
think
that's
definitely
true,
but
maybe
it's
like
doing
it
once
a
month
like
what
what
Tam
is
suggesting.
Maybe
it's
like
once
a
month,
but
then
don't
just
make
it
a
routine
thing.
A
You
know
like
actually
make
it
like
really
plan
it
out,
have
like
some
interesting,
exciting
things
and
that
try
to
actually
promote
it
like
Ping
people
and
try
to
get
people
there,
which
you
know
lately
we
haven't
been
doing
but
I
think
that
would
I
mean
I
I'd.
Much
rather
have
like
a
really
exciting
energizing.
You
know
one
call
a
month.
K
K
On
top
of
that,
so
we
want
to
push
forward
and
so
I
guess
we
are
going
to
need
some
kind
of
community
strategy
for
decoration
service,
because
it's
like
community
service
and
that's
probably
that
probably
fits
into
the
community
calls.
K
But
I
agree
with
with
what
you
said
now
that
it
it
has
to
be
a
community
called
now
that
is
equal,
and
so
just
in
the
open
I
wonder
if
there's
any
chance
to
like,
maybe
instead
of
having
a
community
called
per
se,
we
sort
of
double
down
on
the
intro
to
T
that
the
academy
does
or
I
don't
know,
explorers
do
with
some
other
people
to
make
it
a
clear,
Community
call
and
then
have
the
newsletter
or
weekly
or
by
weekly
post
on
the
Forum
about
updates.
I.
K
Think
it's
it's
also
very
important,
but
as
much
as
we
want
to
wind
down
stuff,
if
we
are
going
to
keep
doing
say
the
curriculum
service.
In
this
case,
we
also
have
to
have
that
in
mind,
because
we
we
I
guess
we
still
have
to
keep
some
Community
efforts,
even
though,
even
if
they
are
at
the
Birmingham.
G
A
A
This
is
something
that
Nate
was
has
been
saying
for
this
past
week
or
so
is,
let's
figure
out
the
new
rhythm
and
I
guess
the
question
is:
do
we
just
it
seems
to
me
that
it
would
be
good
to
have
like
at
least
two
meetings
a
week
where
we
can
keep
this
moving
and
have
those
on
fixed
days
and
and
just
chug
along
and
just
and
and
then
you
know
like
do
some
planning
and
and
then
you
know,
I
guess,
let's
come
back
to
the
format
of
those
things,
but
do
we
have
agreement
that,
like
having
two
meetings
a
week
to
keep
this
moving
forward?
H
Okay,
I
see
okay,
some
things
in
chat
yeah,
but
it
makes
sense
to
actually
pull
up
the
calendar.
H
As
we've
talked
about,
like
hey,
we'll
repurpose
this
this
meeting
or
that
meeting,
but
would
it
make
sense
to
just
pull
up
the
calendar
and
say
hey
we're
gonna
pick
these
two
time
slots.
A
Sure
here
let
me
share
hold
on
just
one
second.
A
C
I
can
I
suggest,
rather
than
trying
to
match
to
the
stewards
I
mean
so
the
stewards
timing
is
very
convenient
because
it
takes
into
account
West,
Coast,
U.S,
all
the
way
to
Europe
and
but
I
think
we
we
can
choose
anytime.
We
want
I,
don't
know
that
we
need
to
choose
those
times.
The
stewards
weekly
and
the
stewards
Council
are
both
bi-weekly
as
well
as
the
retrospective
and
planning.
A
Okay,
let
me
saying
why
should
we
change
it?
The
only
reason
Libby
is
that
that,
because
there
are
different
rhythms
for
its
stewards
like
each
week
and
I
think
it
would
be
good
to
have
like
this
be
twice
a
week
every
week,
but
it's
like
so
it's
the
same
every
week
until
we
can
make
progress
on
this.
C
So
maybe
we
can
take
a
quick
pull
in
the
call
now
in
the
chat
and
I
know,
we
don't
have
it
next
week,
but
7
P.M
on
Tuesday,
sorry,
7,
PM,
Central,
European,
Time
and
6
p.m.
On
Thursday
Central,
European
Time.
Do
those
two
sound
like
two
Good
Times
during
the
week?
Is
there
anyone
here
who
cannot
make
those
times
during
the
week
and
we
would
change
those
to
every
week
instead
of
making
them
bi-weekly
and
change
the
name
to
transformation
planning
instead
of
the
stewards
call.
Does
that
sound
good
Gideon.
A
I
mean
that
works
for
me
and
actually
I'm
all
for
like
trying
to
get
this
locked
down
here.
If
we
can.
G
C
C
Would
this
actually
override
the
the
sampo
working
group,
Gideon
yeah.
A
I
mean
I
think
it
could.
You
know,
like
I,
think
I
think
sample
could
fold
up.
You
know
I
I
want
to
talk,
maybe
talk
that,
through
with
you
a
little
bit
more
Tim
but
I.
Think
let's,
let's
do
that
for
now
and
if
sample
wants
to
like
do
something
I
mean
we've
got
the
curation
calls
going
on
Wednesday.
So
that's
the
thing.
That's
the
main
thing
we're
pushing
so
I
think
I
think
we
could
do
that.
Yeah.
C
C
H
H
Yeah
two
yeah
six,
a
Tuesday
works
for
me.
I,
don't
I
mean
I,
don't
want
to
move
it
just
for
me,
but
if
seven
and
seven
worked
for
everyone
else,
obviously
that
I
can
be
there
on
Tuesdays
it
would
just
be
Thursdays.
That
would
be
a
little
questionable.
I
I
The
6
p.m,
central
eastern
time.
That's
that's
fine!.
G
C
G
C
But
6
PM,
Tuesday
and
Thursday
for
a
Transit,
CTC
transformation
strategy
and
planning
meeting
and
I
will
remove
the
Tec
stewards,
weekly
stewards,
Council,
Sprint,
retrospective
and
Sprint
planning.
C
We
may
always
add
them
back
if
we
want
to,
and
I
will
send
a
message
on
the
storage
Channel
now.
Is
there
any
reason
not
to
do
that?
Does
that
sound
good
to
you.
C
Cool
yeah,
most
everyone
has
confirmed
in
the
chat
and
Nate
I,
don't
see
you,
but
you
oh
yeah,
it
works.
For
me
too.
We
got
YouTube,
okay,
I'm
doing
it.
A
Okay,
so
so
just
so
that
we
can,
we
can
wrap
up
this
call.
Maybe
what
we
do
is
for
the
first
one
on
Tuesday
put
together
just
like
a
rough
agenda
and
put
that
out
on
Monday
and
see
if
we
can
get
some
agreement
and
some
feedback
on
that,
so
that
on
Tuesday,
where
you're,
just
like
we
fire
off
on
all
cylinders.
A
J
C
A
Okay,
so
how
about
this?
Why
don't
we?
Why
don't
we
Jam
in
the
stewards,
Channel
I
I,
feel
like
one
thing
that
came
out
of
this
was
like
the
Urgent
and
important
stuff.
We
should
probably
because
it's
urgent-
we
should
probably
start
there
so
I'm
gonna,
throw
that
out
as
like
a
starting
place
for
Tuesday
and
then
maybe
what
we
do
is
we
just
like
on
Monday,
do
a
little
bit
of
jamming
in
the
stewards
channel
about
that?
A
Okay,
so
I
think
we've
got
like
a
pretty
good
chunk
of
folks
here,
willing
to
just
do
that.
So
maybe
what
we
do
is
we
just
do
some.
You
know
jamming
in
the
channel
about
like
the
priorities
and
get
a
doc
get
a
document
up,
that
we
can
use
and
brainstorming
the
document
and
try
to
get
some
agreement
on
Monday
and
then
on
Tuesday
we
can.
We
can
just
get
going.