►
From YouTube: TEC Sprint 37 Retrospective
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
B
A
Hello
nate,
we
are
just
jumped
into
the
board
and
the
timer
is
up
for
six
minutes.
You
still
have
four
minutes
left.
If
you
want
to
jump
into
it,.
A
C
Yeah
sorry,
I
was
just
cramming
in
one
more
hold
on
just
one.
Second,
so
is
that
matt
that's
mateo
onboarded
as
dev
for
the
abc
advance
page
gideon,
shucks
gideon's
leadership
within
the
sample
working
group
has
been
amazing.
That's
nice
feeling
momentum
around
the
te
services
board
working
name,
not
final.
The
pieces
are
coming
together.
C
C
Rodris
designs,
a
token
holder
message
posted
to
the
forum
nate,
taking
lead
on
treasury,
more
nate
in
the
tec,
feeling
less
tired
and
more
focused
livia.
Looking
at
cultural
impact
of
token
gating
sorry
hold
on
just
a
sec
started.
Sending
the
message
to
hatcher's
things
seem
less
chaotic
and
more
organized
sampo
is
taking
shape.
Sample
discussion
thread
keeps
getting
great
posts.
Token
holder
message
is
the
kind
of
pr
marketing.
We
need
more
of
good
progress
on
consulting
intake
service,
ideation,
olivia's,
back
first
orientation.
C
C
Okay,
I
need
to
understand
what
that
is.
Nate
and
livia
are
back
reward
system
feels
steady,
ivy,
prepares
the
sprint
agenda
and
the
sprint
board
every
single
week
without
fail
for
37
sprints.
Now
wow
interesting,
polis,
insights
on
stewardship,
unified
treasury
chart
done
edu
covered
two
community
calls
and
one
working
group
meeting
for
soft
gov.
I
feel
very,
I
feel
very
supported.
The
poll.
Tam
did
for
stewards
was
very
insightful
good
conversations
about
te
membership,
zep's
vacation,
excel
spree
spreadsheet
is
great
to
see
and
I
think
that's
it.
A
All
right,
we
would
like
to
share
your
initial
thoughts.
We
will
have
two
minutes
for
each
one.
C
C
But
yeah
it
seems
like
well,
it
seems
obvious
that
nate
and
oliv
and
olivia
have
been
very
missed.
That's
very
clear:
I
think
that
yeah,
the
polish
thing
a
lot
of
comments
on
the
polis
thing
and
the
insights
that
came
out
of
that
and
tam's
leading
that
that
conversation.
A
C
A
C
Thanks
for
that
reminder,
yeah
I
mean
I
I
just
I
feel
like
things
are,
are
starting
to
kind
of
accelerate
like
it
feels
like.
There's
traction
happening
on
multiple
on
on
many
fronts
and
also
like.
I
can
feel
a
lot
of
synergy
building
between
working
groups
that
maybe
I
just
didn't,
detect
as
much
before,
but
you
know
like.
C
Maybe
I
wasn't
close
enough
to
it,
but
it
feels
like
there's
more
synergy
coalescing
around
certain
things
like
you
know,
for
instance
the
membership
thing
and
the
the
token
gating
thing,
and
you
know
they're,
just
yeah.
There
seems
to
be
like
synergy
and
a
lot
of
integration.
That's
starting
to
happen.
Yeah
I'll
leave
it
at
that.
I
will
pass
to
myrt.
D
Yeah
the
highlight
of
last
spring,
probably
was
sample,
is
actually
going
interesting.
Like
there's
lots
of
discussion
going
on,
I
I
really
like
I'm
really
curious
about.
I
will
be
the
first
action
for
like
the
strategies
so
on
that,
but
I
think
everything
is
going
well
like
nate
has
been
also
taken
part
of
the
job.
So
that's
I
feel
like
that's
one
of
the
positive
of
the
last
sprint
and
also
in
general.
I
feel
like,
even
though
there's
like
bad
market
condition,
lots
of
discussion
about
financial
etc.
E
Thank
you
very
much
yeah
for
me
like
this,
the
the
most
exciting
thing
is
like
the
advanced
page
is
getting
shaped
like
mateo
is
getting
on
board
through
this
design
are
almost
finished.
E
It's
looking
very,
very
good,
and
then
yeah
like,
of
course,
like
nathan
and
levy,
are
amazing
and
back,
and
I
wanted
to
clarify
like
the
is
not
mine.
I
just
paste
it
from
someone
else
in
the
comment.
Stack
and
yeah
I'll
pass
it
to
tom.
A
Before
passing
that
time
welcome,
maki
see
to
spring
retrospective,
we
are
going
through
if
you
can
see
the
share
screen,
we're
going
through
as
chrome
board,
where
we
are
currently
dialoging
about
what
went
well
in
our
latest
print.
So
after
we've
finished
the
round,
if
you
have
any
questions,
please
let
me
know
back
to
you
then.
B
Retrospective
board,
which
is
part
of
the
scrum
framework,
and
it's
where
we
spend
some
time
to
reflect
on
the
things
that
went
well,
things
that
have
could
could
have
been
done
better
and
then
to
brainstorm.
Some
actions
to
the
things
that
could
have
done
better
keeps
us
adaptive,
transparent
and
in
that
introspective
state
of
mind.
B
Okay,
I
feel
super
excited
personally
about
where
this
token
engineering,
I'm
gonna,
call
it
shilling
point
services,
because
I
really
love
that
that
name
from
gideon,
but
I'm
sort
of
just
sort
of
coalescing
around
this
idea
of
like
a
services
board,
is
going.
I
think
there
is
because
I
just
think
there's
so
much
potential
and
there's
you
know
I
feel
a
lot
of
energy.
I
feel
very
energized,
so
I
hope
yeah.
B
I
hope
that
this
continues
to
have
the
same
kind
of
momentum
that
it
did
this
week
was
in
particular
what
I
thought
was
like
a
launching
pad
for
for
these
for
this
concept
to
take
shape
and,
of
course,
like
really
happy
that
nate's
starting
to
come
more
and
more
back,
I'd,
say
and
olivia.
Of
course,
it's
really
nice
when
she
comes
back
when
she's
back
from
vacation.
I,
like
you,
know
zep
shared
the
abc
designs,
which
those
are
looking
really
nice.
B
B
Thank
you,
yeah.
I
felt
very
warm
and
loved
with
all
the
comments
in
the
board.
Thank
you
and
I
also
feel
excited
of
the
direction
sampo
is
taking,
and
just
all
of
the
things
that
are
kind
of
grounding
with
that
it
feels
like
sample,
was
a
core
piece
that
is
bringing
other
work
that
was
kind
of
floating
around
into
a
network
of
things
that
need
to
be
connected
to
happen.
B
So
I
started
drafting
the
the
reputation
thing
this
week,
based
on
the
things
I
was
hearing
about
the
membership
and
some
solutions,
samples
thinking
and
then
we
talked
about
the
token
gated
thing
and
there's
a
lot.
It
feels
like
a
lot
of
interesting
things
are
started
facing
and
they
wouldn't
be
if,
if
sample
wasn't
there,
so
that
feels
really
good
and
also
about
ivy
consistency.
I
thought
about
this
today
when
I
saw
the
like
stewards,
kindly
update
your
slides,
like
oh,
my
god,
this
is
yeah.
Thank
you.
F
No
yeah,
thank
you.
So
three
things
that
really
stood
out
to
me
during
the
sprint-
and
that
I
just
wanted
to
mention
here
is
tim.
Your
public
use
of
the
advice
process
has
been
absolutely
phenomenal
to
watch.
F
I
think
it's
a
really
sets
a
really
good
example,
and
we
don't
get
really
many
opportunities
to
do
this
kind
of
community-wide
advice
process
and
the
way
that
you
have
performed
it
and
using
polis
and
all
these
other
new
tools
really
set
the
example
for
that,
and
I
just
really
appreciate
watching
that,
and
then
second
is
edu
your
leadership
in
this.
This
past
sprint
has
been
phenomenal.
F
I
mean
you're.
You've
done
such
an
amazing
job,
stepping
up
to
all
these
different
working
groups,
and
then
the
third
is
the
sample
working
group
and
get
in.
I
appreciate
all
the
things
that
you've
done
in
terms
of
just
kind
of
getting
everybody
aggregated
into
a
single
vision
and,
and
so
it
it
goes
a
long
way,
and
so
I
think
those
are
the
three
major
highlights
of
this
past
sprint
that
I've
seen
so
far
and
I
will
pass
it
over
to
mac-
is
zai.
F
If,
if
you
would
like
to
participate
in
the
sprint
retrospective,
anything
that
you've
looked
at
these
past
couple
weeks,
that
you're
impressed
with
please
please
do
share.
E
Okay,
hello.
Everyone
thank
you
for
having
me
basically
I'm
new
here,
so
I'm
correctly
observing
a
lot
so
nothing
much
to
say.
Thank
you.
G
Thank
you
ado.
I
was
still
loading
the
the
retrospective
board
because
I
wanted
to
read
all
of
this,
but
didn't
make
it
on
time.
However,
I
really
I
want
to
echo
what
nate
mentioned
about
the
efforts
that
educam
and
and
gideon
have
been
just
putting
into
the
community
and
and
through
this
face
and
and
yeah.
I
I
feel
that
we're
starting
like
to
like
be
a
little
bit
like
more.
G
I
don't
know
if
efficient
is
the
word,
but
maybe
we're
starting
to
be
like
a
little
bit
motivated
based
on
on
the
like
the
actual
the
current
situation,
which
demonstrates
a
lot
of
our
capacity
to
evolve
and
adapt.
So
I
feel
that's
overall
what
really
stood
out
for
for
me
in
in
in
this
sprint
in
I'll
pass
it
back
to
you
edu.
A
Thank
you
on
my
case,
I
I
felt
that
a
lot
of
the
conversations
that
we
have
had
on
the
past
two
weeks
were
kind
of
energizing,
and
there
is
this
granular
capacity
that
we
have
achieved
through
time.
A
I
feel,
and
then
the
conversations
gets
like
very
to
the
point
and
very
productive,
even
if
they
are
short-
and
I
like
I-
I
have
become
more
aware
of
this
lately
and
for
me,
what
went
well
is
this
click
that
we
made
with
gideon
on
last
friday
regarding
membership
and
how
it
could
be
achieved
and
actually
the
idea
of
having
this
concept
of
membership
being
deployed
in
other
communities.
A
You
know
you
can
only
have
a
member
if
that
member
agrees
to
whatever
is
important
to
our
community
and
make
that
a
process,
so
that,
for
me,
became
sort
of
like
a
light
at
the
end
of
the
tunnel
so
or
a
lighthouse.
If
that's
because
there
is
no
tunnel
but
a
lighthouse
on
on
the
road.
So
that,
for
me,
was
something
very
interesting
and
I
couldn't
like
we
couldn't
like.
A
I
couldn't
have
like
get
or
find
a
conclusion
if
it
was
without
the
collaboration
of
gideon
and
this
work
that
we
have
been
working
on.
So
for
me
that
was
something
quite
energizing
all
right
with
that
being
said,
we
can
move
to.
The
next
part
could
do
better.
C
B
A
G
A
Hello,
craig,
we
are
on
the
retrospective
board
on
my
screen.
If
you
can
see
it
and
we
are
going
through
what
could
do
better
feel
free
to
add
anything,
you
feel
like.
A
All
right
times
up
hello
mitch,
we
are
about
to
go
into
reading.
What
could
do
better
for
this
retrospective
so
get
ready
for
thinking
about
those
things
tam.
Would
you
like
to
read
for
us.
B
Yes,
I
would
love
to
zero,
engage
on
the
forums
for
crucial
topics.
This
is
fun.
I
never
get
to
do
this.
This
is
so
great.
Our
focus
is
not
only
on
essentials,
yet
we
should
get
in
front
of
that,
the
need
for
it
to
be
between
market
conditions,
tec
conditions
and
summer
vacations.
There
is
a
slow
slowness
that
I
think
we
are
unfamiliar
with
great
time
to
build.
B
It
feels
like
we
are
in
an
awkward
and
painful
transition
moment
until
token
engineering
picks
up
more
discussions
on
token
thought
and
the
potential
impacts
for
tec
economy,
better
communication,
around
sample
expectations
and
risks
associated
with
treasury
management,
more
partnerships,
more
integration
of
tec
and
other
communities,
not
conveying
the
long-term
expectations
of
the
tec.
This
is
a
process.
B
How
many
stewards
are
on
this
call:
it's
voluntary
work.
Now
working
groups
are
compensating
stewards.
That
was
the
short
thread.
Steward's
off-boarding
feels
delicate
noticing
how
many
token
engineers
are
actually
engaging
here
in
tec.
Sorry,
how
few
token
engineers
seconds
comments
on
that
not
making
progress
and
understanding?
Why
not
sure
we're
fully
digesting
the
economic
challenges
we
face?
Plus
one
te
fundamentals
is
something
still
down
the
road
and
we're
not
attracting
enough
to
ease
to
our
community.
B
Some
processes
seem
to
lack
speed,
would
love
to
find
more
engagement
outside
of
the
same
20
people.
We
need
better
ways
of
recruiting
and
retaining
various
forms
of
contributors.
We
are
doing
work
that
have
a
high
chance
not
to
pat.
We
are
doing
work
that
have
high
chance
to
not
pass
doing
very
little
amount
of
advice.
Process
with
hatchers
feels
like
calls,
could
be
shorter
and
optimized,
but
don't
really
know
how
to
propose
change
hard
to
find
hatchers
on
discord.
Sometimes,
better
communication
of
our
core
value
propositions.
B
B
H
E
Then
in
the
course,
like
some
people
say
one
thing
and
they
know
they
say
they're
expecting
others
and
I
feel
like
we
are
not
using
our
tool
like
it's
the
forum
and
everything
should
be
there
and
then
yesterday,
like
we
were
doing
some
work
in
the
treasury
thing
and
then,
since
the
forums
seemed
like
there's
not
enough
engagement,
I
was
doing
some
research.
E
What
people
feel
like
it's
a
safe
token,
and
then
I
really
had
the
feeling
of
the
core
contributors
that
says
like
even
just
they
die,
don't
touch
ivc
and
it
seems
like
we're
doing
work
from
what
I
saw
in
the
chats
like
it
seems
like
it's
not
even
going
to
pass,
so
I
don't
know
like
it
feels
like.
We
should
first
get
clarify
what
we
want
to
do.
Advice
process
then
do
not
the
other
way
around
and
pass
it
to
libya.
B
Thanks
that
it
feels
like
a
lot
of
our
problems
are
attached
to
the
state
of
tokyo
engineering
at
the
moment,
and
then
it
feels
like
an
awkward
weight
game
that
we
have
to
play
because
there's
like
education
catching
up
more
people
coming
into
the
field,
and
it
feels
like
the
people
who
are
getting
into
this
educative
process
would
then.
H
D
Thank
you.
Libya
yeah,
like,
as
you
said,
so
I
understand
most
of
the
concerns
regarding,
like
token
engineers
are
not
very
engaged
with
the
community,
but
again
the
question
arrows
like
who
is
the
cooking
engineer
and
like
it's
a
very
new
field
and
I
think
there's
very
few
people
that
you
can
just
pinpoint
as
like
token
engineers.
So
that's
another
problem.
Maybe
it's
not
a
problem
per
se
like,
but
it's
a
problem
that
we
may
try
to
solve
through
funding
common
public
groups.
D
That
may
have
may
help
people
to
become
a
token
engineer,
but
my
like
the
most
biggest
biggest
concern
is
that,
like
I
don't
know
what
will
be
the
long-term
expectation
from
the
pc
and
like
okay
yeah,
we
will
be
discussing
new
strategies
for
fundraising,
but
how
they
will
change
the
structure
of
this
like
will
it
be
more
like
a
service,
dog-ish
structure?
D
F
Thanks,
bert
yeah,
so
I
guess
two
things.
The
first
thing
is
at
one
point
early
on
in
our
organization.
We
had
this
conversation
around.
Who
was
a
token
engineer
and
for
the
most
part
we
were
surrounded
by
consensus
that
almost
everybody
in
this
room.
F
My,
in
my
opinion,
is
to
really
convey
that
you
know
the
the
initial
talks
around
this
topic.
Were
you
know,
sampo
is
going
to
be
kind
of
the
saving
grace
or
going
to
help
rescue
the
the
tec
economy
in
the
short
term,
and
I
think
this
is
a
very
dangerous
language
to
use,
and-
and
it's
not
realistic
to
to
do
it-
it
has
a
lot
of
risk
associated
with
it.
F
There's
a
lot
of
processes
that
need
to
be
hashed
out,
and
this
is
something
that
needs
to
take
it's
going
to
take
time
and
it's
not
something
we
can
move
fast
on
and
for
the
large
portion
of
the
community
that
expects
this
to
have
speed
and
and
to
be
executed
on
and
to
generate
revenue
in
the
short
term.
We
need
to
manage
those
expectations
in
my
opinion,
and
so
those
are
the
the
two
things
that
have
hopped
out
in
my
mind
and
I'll
pass
it
over
to.
I
do.
A
Thank
you
nate.
I
will
pass
it
back
to
mitch.
H
Wow,
where
do
we
start
we're
unpacking?
Probably
six
months
of
conversation?
You
know
in
this
call
yeah
I
mean
the
the
lack
of
token
engineers
becomes
evident
because
we
see
this
stuff
happening
in
the
ta
and
we're
like.
Oh,
we
should
be
doing
that
and
then
it's
not
happening.
We
don't
have.
We
don't
have
cad
cad
modelers.
We
don't
have
data
scientists
like
in
mass,
we
kind
of
like
we're
outsourcing
stuff
to
ltf
to
the
token
engineering
academy,
and
then
we
realized,
like
that's
kind
of
the
stuff
that
we
wanted.
H
So
when
we
come
to
the
discussion
of
funding
and
then
we
realize
we
don't
have
any
products
or
services
or
utility,
we've
got
giant
administrative
bloat
that
we're
sending
out
as
stipends
to
stewards
and
like
we're
not
really
sure
what
we're
doing
or
what
we're
creating
value
for-
and
you
know
this
is
where,
where
all
this
starts
coming
out
and
there's
just
so
many
things
in
here
that
resonate
with
me,
but
I
think
there
was
a
lot
of
oversights
in
the
beginning
that
are
coming
to
slap
us
in
the
face
now
and
I
don't
really
know
how
to
get
into
anywhere
specific.
H
Or
I
don't
know
if
this
is
the
right
time
for
it
but
yeah.
This
is
the.
This
is
a
general
overall
sentiment
and
it's
not
great
so
I'll
pass
it
back
to
edu.
C
Yeah,
this
is
a
super
interesting
conversation.
C
I
really
resonate
with
what
nate
is
saying
actually
with
what
you're
saying
too
mitch.
I
I
guess
where
I
would
start
is
I'm
not
sure
that
we
fully
have
grasped
just
the
urgency
of
the
economic
situation
that
we're
in
I
it
this
is
this
is
this
is
like
a
we
are
facing
a
difficult
time,
and
you
know
I
I
actually
have
huge
faith.
C
We're
going
to
get
like
your
tc
is
still
going
to
be
around
and
it's
going
to
be
great
right,
but
it
we're
going
to
this
is
going
to
be
a
tough
time,
and
you
know
at
the
next
point
I
think,
like
I
feel
a
ton
of
pressure
to
like
hurry
up.
Let's
get
like
where's
the
money,
where's
the
money
and
it's
it's
just-
doesn't
work
that
way
right
and
we
were
talking
specifically
about
treasury
management.
C
Like
there's
all
these
expectations
like
hey,
you
know
we
can
get
20,
you
know
10
yield
and
we'll
get
this,
and
you
know
like
no.
You
know
that
comes
with
risk
and
there's
all
of
these
things
that
have
to
be
thought
through,
so
that
we
don't
end
up
destroying
the
treasury
treasury
that
we
do
have
so
you
know
with
that
said.
I
I
think
that
there
are
things
that
we
can
do
and
I
think
one
of
the
things
that
is
going
to
be
really
important.
C
It
feels
like
there's
a
lot
of
weight
on
too
few
shoulders
in
in
this
community
right
now,
like
figuring
out
ways
where
we
can
start
to
kind
of,
like
co,
co-op
some
of
the
community
organizing
models
that
are
out
there,
because
we're
going
to
be
going
into
some
tighter
budgeting
times,
and
so
how
do
we
really
do
a
good
job
of
engaging
volunteers?
There's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
people
who
are
going
to
be
looking
for
things
to
do
interesting
things
to
do
in
the
coming
months
and
probably
the
coming
year?
C
So
you
know
looking
for
ways
of
engaging
those
people
and
really
sharing
the
load
and
and
and
doing
that.
Well,
I
think,
is
going
to
be
very
important.
Yeah
stop
there.
I
will
pass
to.
C
B
A
Yeah
and
it's
still
left
to
go
so,
let's
honor
that
and
if
you
have
time
left
after
the
last
selection
of
starts,
we
can
talk
about
this.
Would
you
like
to
go.
G
Yeah,
thank
you.
I
have
a
number
of
concerns
that
I'm
asking
myself
if
I
should
like
share
them
at
this
point,
because
I
also
like
can't
think
of
any
solutions
other
than
patience
or
you
know
like.
Maybe
we
still
need
to
have
a
conversation
about
how
like
flexible.
We
are.
G
You
know
like
going
through
these
times,
because
I
mean
I'm
in
a
very
like
specific
position
for
for,
like
my
working
group
and
how
the
stewarding
is
working
there,
and
I
mean
I'm
willing
to
do
a
number
of
options
because
I'm
interested
in
this
and
also
I'm
confused,
because
at
this
point
I
feel
like
that's
like
a
big
part
of
what
I
can
do
to
like
lift
some
weight
of
samples
shoulders,
and
I
do
agree
with
gideon
that
there's
a
lot
of
weight
on
very
few
shoulders
at
this
point.
G
A
Thank
you
craig,
so
we
can
start
with
the
last
part.
Wait.
B
Okay,
I
mean
there's,
there's
a
bunch
of
things
that
resonate
with
me
too.
I
guess
the
two
things
I
want
to
say
to
share
is,
I
think
the
most
important
thing
here
is
the
one
that
says,
I'm
not
sure
we're
fully
digesting
the
economic
challenges
we
face.
B
I
I
think
that
that
is
a
hard
thing
to
face,
but
needs
to
be
addressed
and
faced,
and
I
think
focusing
on
things
that
are
essential
for
tec
is
probably
something
we
need
to
start
sooner
rather
than
later
and
be
proactive
rather
than
reactive
and
then
second
around.
You
know
this
idea
of
not
having
enough
token
engineers
or
we're
waiting
for
fundamentals
to
have
more
token
engineers.
I
appreciate
what
nate
said
as
well,
but
I
also
think
we
should
set
our
own
expectations.
B
What
are
you
expecting?
What
have
you
done
to
include
token
engineers
in
our
community,
especially
if
you're
a
steward?
So
I
think
that
there's
a
little
bit
of
rather
than
just
saying
you
know,
oh,
we
don't
have
enough
token
engineers.
We
don't
have
enough
circuit
engineers
being
a
little
bit.
You
know
aware
of
what
your
expectations
are.
Our
expectations
are
and
what
things
we
are,
what
actions
we're
taking.
B
Also,
I
think
you
know
the
token
engineering
commons
having
token
engineers
is
definitely
a
bonus
but
and
took
an
engineering
projects,
and
you
know
the
initiative
that
angela
and
libya
have
with
the
governance
is
really
important
and
it
took
an
engineering
project,
and
you
know
some.
Some
of
the
ideas
that
ygg
is
working
on
with
the
cad
cat
community
could
be
another
interesting
opportunity,
but
maybe
we
are
all
should
be
a
little
more
responsible
than
for
if
this
is
something
we've
been
saying
since
forever.
A
All
right
so
actions
improve
thoughts,
four
minutes
and
then
pick
the
actions
to
improve.
H
Sure
tc
gated
channels
coordinate
with
block
science
and
token
spice
communities
to
bring
modelers
into
the
tc
and
give
them
a
platform
praise
token
engineers.
If
a
tec
tokenomics
study
circle
started,
I'd
have
some
ideas
to
share.
How
can
we
replicate
give
praise's
success
with
their
next
tool?
The
proposal
inverter?
H
Oh,
I
can't
see
that
kazeps
thing
is
blocking
it
add
contributor
factor
to
rewards
distros,
bring
ltf
into
praise
reward
system,
thought
experiment.
If
tec
has
no
funds
left,
what
does
that?
Look
like
push
more?
Our
best
service
praise
plans
for
encouraging
te
fundamental
students
to
join
tc,
everyone.
Think
of
one
action
to
engage
with
tec
biddle
cool
tools
like
we
used
to
tc,
never
built
tools,
visit
our
local
universities,
comments,
forum
and
params,
we're
not
tc.
I
don't
get
it.
We
need
a
list
of
resources
to
help.
Someone
understand
token
engineering.
H
This
question
is:
who
is
a
tc
who
is
not
seems
stagnant,
now,
start
developing
partnerships
with
mission,
align
projects,
define
tec
membership
and
implement
processes
to
support
it
explain
what
of
a
minimal
viable
tc
is
might
look
like
as
exercise
in
what
matters
most
accesso.
H
Let's
use
the
forum
for
governance
proposals
and,
let's
refocus
using
discord
as
a
debate
place
te
academy
have
a
product.
We
have
a
community
processes,
let's
stop
dividing
efforts.
Let's
join
again
tokonomics
exploration
series.
A
All
right,
everyone
pick
a
star
and
pick
your
favorite
one
and
we
have
centimeters
left
so
does
anyone
have?
Does
anyone
want
to
start.
G
G
Go
ahead,
these
ideas
about
like
the
tokenomics
exploration
series
and
and
like
study,
group
or
or
something
like
this,
I
feel,
could
be
a
good
idea.
It's
just
like.
Lately,
I've
been
just
like
exploring
a
lot
into
like
tokenomics
myself.
G
I
mean
I,
I
don't
consider
myself
a
token
engineer,
but
I
take
what
nate
was
mentioning
that
in
a
way
because
we're
all
here,
we
maybe
are
in
a
much
better
position
than
the
average
person
outside
the
community
to
you
know
like
start
to
experiment,
so
I
feel
that
this
is
something
that
we
already
have
like
the
community
and
our
experience,
and
maybe
we
could
explore
this
and
and
just
like
advertise
it
as
it
is
like
tokenomics
conversations
within
the
tec,
so
in
case
anybody
asks
we
can
send
them
there
and
start
from
there
with
what
we
have.
G
I
feel
that's
a
cool
idea,
so
yeah
those
are
my
two
sets
I'll
pass
it
to.
Whoever
wants
to
take.
It
is
fine.
I
don't
know
if
more
people
have
something
to
say.
B
So
I
think
I'd
say
sorry
unless
you
want
to
say
anything
else
about
that
match.
It's
I
think,
that's
what
was
saying
too.
B
Okay,
so
I
guess
what
I
want
to
say
is
I
love
this
idea
of
the
minimal
viable
tec
like
okay,
we're
gonna
hit
a
point
where
we
don't
have
funds.
So
if
we
look
at
what
that
looks
like
now,
we'll
have
an
idea
of
what's
going
to
happen
to
us
in
six
weeks,
eight
weeks
a
month
two
months,
so
I
think
that's
something
we
should
do
with
urgency
for
sure.
I
think
the
tec
and
tea
community
are
tightly
aligned
and
getting
closer.
B
So
I'm
not
sure
I
understand
this
one
I,
while
in
principle
I
agree
for
it.
I
think
it's
already
happening,
and
I
guess
the
other
thing
I
would
say
is
or
just
the
other
ones
yeah
that
actually
that's
it.
It's
just.
I
think
I
think
us
now
understanding
what
it's
going
to
look
like
when
funds
are
not
flowing
is
of
crucial
importance.
Maybe
I'll
just
that's
just
the
most
important
thing
to
me
and
I'll
pass
back
to
you.
A
I
will
say
yeah,
I
I
feel
we're
trying
to
solve
a
token
engineering's
large
financial
situation
without
not
necessarily
the
right
tools
to
do
it,
and
that's
why
my
suggestion
to
refusing
with
token
academy
is
there,
because
I
feel
we
have
a
community.
I
feel
we
have
processes
and
they
have
the
people
and
they
have
very
specific
knowledge
that
could
help
us
directly.
So
I
feel
like
it's
just
a
matter
of
you
know
taking
the
next
step
and
just
acknowledge
our
weakness
and
and
see
how
we
can
improve
them.
A
So
that's
a
little
bit
of
explanation
of
joining
the
efforts.
It's
not
about
partners,
this
goal
beyond
partnership,
we
are,
we
are
aiming
at
the
same
thing.
The
academy
is
aiming
at
the
same.
If
you
all
see
the
expectation
of
angela
for
the
next
time
for
the
next
period
of
time,
she's
expecting
us
to
fishing
again
and
we
are
sort
of
on
the
edge
of
hesitation
and
and
for
me
it's
just
like
it's
a
clever
thing
to
do.
A
B
Wanted
to
comment
on
the
I
wanted
to
comment
on
the
on
what
nate
was
saying
that,
are
we
token
engineers
and
are
not?
I,
I
have
a
feeling
that
this
discussion
has
developed
into
so
many
ways,
and
I
just
wanted
to
resonate
with
mitch
said
that
I
think
we
don't
have
enough
hard
skills
of
token
engineering
here,
people
doing
simulations
of
data
scientists
that
are
willing
to
collaborate
based
on
the
incentive
structures
that
we
have.
B
So
unless
common
stack
or
another
institution
is
paying
for
work,
we
don't
have
like
a
community
of
token
engineers
and
I
feel
like
the
resources
we
have
are
more
like
soft
skills,
token
engineering
and-
and
we
could
do
a
better
job
on
balancing
that
out
and
there's
a
lot
of
resources
out
there.
That
I
feel
like
most
of
us,
haven't,
read
yet
and
understanding
like
what
does
it
go
into
like
each
battle
of
the
token
engineering,
flower
and
all
that
stuff?
A
All
right,
we
are
on
top
of
the
hour,
we'll
have
one
minute
left.
I
think
the
winner
here
here
is
the
economic
exploration
series.
I
think
it's
a
winner
in
this
case.
It's
a
time.
That's
that's
up
here
in
your
alley,
so
you
pick
that.
B
Oh
cheers:
okay,
yeah.