►
From YouTube: W12 Stewards Council: Squd DAOs Using TEC, WGs with external facilng revenue and more!
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
You
know
it's
a
tiny
bit
weird,
but
if
you
had
to
take
take
a
bath
in
a
food,
what
food
would
it
be
and
maybe
nate
you
can
get
us
started.
B
Oh
wow,
a
food,
I'm
gonna,
go
I'm
gonna
prioritize
the
feeling
of
warmth
and
be
cozy.
If
I'm
having
to
be
dunked
in
food,
so
I'm
gonna
say
a
nice
thing
of
chili.
You
know.
D
Oh,
I
was
about
to
cheat
searching
on
google.
What's
the
best
food
to
have,
I
have
no
idea,
maybe
some
no
breathing
your
sticky.
Oh
them.
Could
it
hide
so
hard
cafe?
Probably
it
removes
your
dirty.
Even
if
you
look
dirty
but
then
you
are
clean,
somehow
probably
cafe.
Yeah
alpacito.
A
C
E
E
C
G
D
G
H
Idea,
yeah
lychee.
C
I'll
pass
it
to
chewie,
oh
by
the
way
chewie
we
are
asking
like.
What
would
you
be
if
you,
if
you
were
to
be
a
foot
which
one
would
you
be?
That's
a
question
right:
town,
you're,
muted,
if
you
had.
H
I
would
go
for
a
giant
sushi
bowl
or
a
giant
taco
bowl,
I'm
good
with
either
and
you
get
different
ingredients
so
yeah
I'll
pass
it
to
nate.
Have
you
gone.
C
A
Yeah
I
like
this
one.
I
I'm
gonna
go
with
bubble
tea,
which
my
kids
drink
a
lot,
and
it
just
feels
like
those
tapioca
balls
would
be
like
a
kid's.
You
know
like
play
pit.
You
know
like
one
of
those
ball
pits
that
seemed
like
really
fun
and
wonka.
I
mean
eddie
and
you
I.
I
can't
wait
to
hear
your
answer.
G
This
will
be
a
very
short
long
answer,
but
at
the
same
time,
lauren
and
grief
took
me
to
a
chocolate
factory
in
costa
rica,
and
I
will
be
that
chocolate
for
sure
because
of
the
place
where
it
is,
it's
an
amazing
place
and
they
have
these
indigenous
cups
that
are
for
ceremonial
chocolate
cacao
things.
So
I
will
definitely
be
I
mean
I'm
already
brown,
so
I
will
like
sort
of
disappear
in
the
morning.
G
I
will
be
that
ratio
welcome.
We
are
asking
everyone.
If
you
will
be
a
food
to
bath
in
what
food
will
you
get
bath
in.
A
Cool.
Okay,
thanks
for
humoring,
my
opening
question
guys
and
now
on
to
the
subject
of
our
discussion
group.
A
Our
stewards
council,
olivia,
came
up
with
our
questions
today
I
threw
this
one
on
because
it
was
the
end
of
the
stewart's
call
and
it
was
like
the
last
minute
and
it
started
running
over,
but
it
seemed
as
if
we
needed
to
continue
the
discussion,
but
I
think
I'm
gonna
pass
to
you,
libya,
because
these
are
all
related
to
each
other
actually,
and
I
think
I'll
say
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
include
this
one
but
I'd
rather
you
introduce
these
and
get
the
discussion
group
going
thanks
thanks,
olivia.
E
Tim
yeah,
this
is
definitely
part
of
it
like
what
are
products
that
did
that
the
working
groups
are
creating.
Has
the
tc
created
any
product
that
can
be
branded
tc?
How
are
we
building
the
narratives
on
the
things
we're
creating
together
and
what
are
some
of
the
working
groups
with
external
facing
revenue
models?
So
I
know
gravity
has
one
that
starting
to
do
work
with
other
communities
tom's
also
with
the
whole
comms
team
has
also
been
creating
services
that
could
be
used
for
other
dao's.
Other
communities.
E
Communities,
I
think,
has
the
onboarding
process
that
has
been
becoming
kind
of
a
product,
and
I
just
left
that
as
an
open
question
for
if
anyone
thinks
their
working
group
has
some
type
of
product
like
params
for
sure
the
dashboard
the
reward
systems,
there
is
yeah.
So
much
so
we
had
a
really
long
discussion
like
in
the
whole
softcup
call
yesterday,
tuesday,
and
some
of
the
most
interesting
things
that
came
up
were
squad
dows
using
tc
tokens
for
service
provision.
E
Like
could
this
be
a
solution
that,
even
though
services
are
not
being
provided
to
the
tec,
could
the
services
be
paid
in
tc
tokens?
So
there
is
this
income
to
the
treasury,
but
then
there
are
some
challenges
that
come
with
this,
that
the
governance
spreads
with
people
that
might
not
be
value
aligned
and
what,
if
there
is
conflict
of
interest.
E
I
don't
know
there
could
be
a
range
of
second
order
effects
that
it's
good
to
have
in
mind
and
then
one
possible
solution,
nate
nate
suggested
and
we
fleshed
out-
is
what,
if
we
had
like
a
token
engineering
consortium
for
service
so
having
some
type
of
a
boundary
around
who
can
access
services
as
long
as
they
are
mission
and
value
aligned,
and
maybe
there
could
be
many
projects
like
token
engineering
academy
block
science-
I
don't
know
balancer
or
vitadao
or
some
of
the
projects
that
already
shared
their
process
in
our
tea
spotlight.
E
So
this
is
some
of
the
solutions
that
we
were
discussing
and
some
of
the
approaches
we
could
have
and
that
would
have
a
positive
feedback
loop
into
our
treasury
and
community
because
it
would
be
it
would
be
people
that
are
value
aligned
and
then
should
we
raise
this
question
of
what
happens
if
working
groups
find
better
sources
of
revenue
in
other
dows
and
this
is
possible
and
then
we
thought
of
well.
E
This
wasn't
this
wouldn't
be
necessarily
too
bad,
because
other
groups
can
rise
and
offer
similar
services
more
people
in
the
tc
can
rise
up
and
create
just
different
bodies
that
can
also
do
comps.
That
can
also
do
gravity.
That
can
also
do
all
sorts
of
things.
And
how
would
we
keep
this
flow
healthy
and
make
sure
that
the
needs
of
the
tc
are
being
are
being
attended
and,
and
then
yeah
just
thinking
of
this
nested
enterprises
concept
of
how
much
overlap?
E
I
don't
know
many
many
organizations.
H
E
C
D
I
just
wanted
to
say
like
we
could
be
dangerous
if
we
only
accept
people,
you
know
we
know
and
probably
projects
that
can
also
be
aligned,
but
we
don't
know
them,
then
yeah
they
could
be
excluded,
even
if
sometimes
like
these
people
could
be
more
aligned
than
some
people
that
we
know,
but
the
others
are
just
there,
because
they're
known.
E
Yeah,
I
don't
think
it's
about
no
yeah,
I
don't,
I
don't
think
it's
about
being
known
or
not,
but
just
being
being
aligned
with
our
mvv,
and
maybe
we
could
have
some
type
of
process
to
check
that
or
like
how
yeah.
How
do
we
have
clarity
on
what
is
should
be
aligned
with
the
mvv.
G
C
G
G
So
whenever
you
feel
you're
going
to
provide
a
service
to
or
any
kind
of
service,
you
just
go
through
this
checklist,
and
you
notify
this
to
your
working
group
text
channel
or
the
working
group
notified.
This
story
like
hey,
we're
going
to
provide
these
services
and
this-
and
this
goes
through
this
checklist.
So
I
think
it's
a
transparency
matter
of
how
we
we
are
only
know
that
these
exchanges
are
happening
outside
the
working
group,
because
I
kind
of
join
all
the
working
groups
to
know
that
you're
providing
a
service.
G
But
it
could
be
interesting
that
we
just
the
same
mechanism
that
we
have
for
requesting
funds
to
get
reimbursed
and
and
for,
for
example,
cunitas
or
stewards
could
be
applied
for
services.
So
we
can
have.
We
can
have
a
channel
dedicated
to
it
or
we
can
do
it
in
stores
or
whatever
it
is
to
just
share.
Hey
I'm
providing
this
service
or
my
work
or
this
working
group
from
this
service
to
this
dial.
G
It
will
start
from
this
time
to
this
time,
and
this
is
a
checklist
we
went
through
and
it
passed
so
we're
gonna
do
it.
I
think
it
will
help
to
the
community
to
be
aware.
This
is
going
on
and
for
everyone
about
what's
going
on,
and
the
second
thing
is
that
I
feel
that
the
the
idea
of
native
pc
tokens
for
service
provision
is
one
of
the
more
circular
and
interesting
ideas
we
have
had
regarding
how
you
know
how
this
becomes.
G
How
this
makes
sense-
and
this
is
something
I
will
encourage
to
sort
of
do,
because
you
know,
even
even
if
the
if
the
service
or
or
the
dollar
you're
providing
the
service
seems
a
little
bit
far-fetched
by
providing
the
service
and
paying
dc
will
probably,
you
know
advanced
engineer,
because
we
will
that
person
will
would
purchase
these
tokens
and
all
this
stuff.
G
So
I
think
it's
a
very
interesting
idea
that
I
would
add
to
this
checklist
of
things
like
hey
check
that
you
have
all
these
values
online
when
you
run
the
service
and
check
that
this
person
agrees
in
advance
that
they're
gonna
charge
or
pay.
With
this
token,
so
for
me,
it's
a
matter
of
how
we
organize
this
workflow
and
that
most
of
these
services
follow
a
certain
guideline
that
can
everyone
is
comfortable
with.
F
For
me,
it's
super,
interesting
and
and
super
enriching
to
have
like
clear
boundaries
to
know
like
yeah,
until
which
point
and
what
activities
can
we
offer-
and
this
is
something
strange
that
happens
with
conflict
management
and
that
conflict
management
turns
out
to
be
a
funnel
for
other
things
and
like
people,
maybe
request
support
with
conflict
management
for
for
a
personal
issue
or
some
coordination
issue
within
an
organization.
F
But
we
are
and
in
the
focus
of
gravity
we
only
don't
try
to
to
to
like
turn
out
the
fire,
but
to
also
offer
some
prevention,
alternative
and
prevention
paths
so
yeah.
I
I
think
also
that.
F
We
we
we
could
like
get
to
a
line
where
we
say:
okay,
we
can
suggest
some
kind
of
prevention
until
this
point,
but
there
are
other
things
that
we
cannot
provide
and
for
that
it's
better
to
go
to
this
or
this
other
organization
and
yeah.
I
also
think
that,
as
I
support
the
the
thing
of
of
receiving
dc
as
a
way
of
payment
from
other
organizations,.
F
Yeah,
I
think
it's
super
interesting
and
that,
through
conflict
management
I
have
seen
like
because
we
have
a
type
form
that
is
open.
Not
only
the
people
in
the
tec
have
used
that
type
form
and
sometimes
yeah
I
have
I
I
haven't
like
gotten
into
a
deep
mediation
in
other
organization,
but
we
we
have
been
offering
like
yeah
some
some
support
to
people
that
just
say
that
they
are
requesting
support
in
the
type
form
and
I
think
yeah.
F
It
would
be
not
good
if
we
somehow
exclude
someone
that
is
requesting
support
because
of
not
being
in
an
organization.
We
know,
but
it's
some
also
something
that,
because
we
haven't
talked
about
it
yet
I
I
have
been
like
doing
something,
but
I
think
that
if
we
agree
to
something,
I
can
also
respect
the
agreements
that
that
we
reach.
In
this
point.
A
May
I
just
share
some
thoughts
too,
so
the
thing
that
I
think
is
most
compelling
to
me
from
this
is
that
all
of
the
services
that
the
tec
provide
would
benefit
from
the
knowledge
and
experience
and
the
you
know
collective
intelligence
of
all
of
the
stewards
and
it
I
think
it's
really
important
that.
A
That
somehow
it
gets
brought
to
the
either
the
stewards
working
group
or
weekly,
or
probably
our
weekly,
isn't
a
good
place
to
bring
it
up
just
to
put
it
on
the
radar
of
all
the
other
stewards
who
will
always
have
in
you
know,
perspectives
and
ideas
of
how
to
even
make
that
service
better.
A
So
I
really
like
the
idea
of
having
some
way
like
super
low
process.
You
know
look
like
low
procedural,
simple
way
to
just
make
sure
that
the
services
that
we're
starting
to
think
about
providing
for
other
dows
is
something
that
go
like
goes
through,
that
that
is
transparent
to
all
the
stewards
and
sort
of
has
an
opportunity
for
for
people
to
have
their.
You
know
some
perspective
on
it
as
well
yeah.
I
think
it's
really
interesting,
and
I
think
it's
happened.
A
You
know
with,
I
think,
we're
doing
it
a
little
bit
in
our
sprint
planning.
You
know,
wonka
will
talk
about
the
kind
of
outreach
that
he's
doing
with
other
communities,
and
the
comms
will
talk
about
the
planning
that
they're
doing
for
it
for
te,
so
we've
had
a
little
bit
of
it,
but
I
think
it's.
A
It's
going
to
be,
you
could
add,
like
a
little
more
process
to
it,
just
so
that
it's
something
I
don't
know,
maybe
we
can
even
create
some
sort
of
area
on
our
git
book,
where
we
have
services
that
we
are
providing,
and
you
know
we
can
keep
something
something
some
documentation
around.
What
it
is
that
we're
working
it's
it's
actually
good
for
our
visibility
too,
and
then
I
just
like,
because
I
want
to
say
this
idea
of
using
tec
tokens
nate.
If
you
came
up
with
that,
that's
a
really
cool
idea.
A
A
Yeah
yeah,
I
really
like
that
a
lot
too.
Actually
it
it
has
a
sort
of
commitment
built
into
the
to
the
agreement.
E
E
Are
they
aligned
with
our
mission?
It
could
be
a
submission
of
a
proposal
and
then
the
projects
that
are
out
of
the
scope.
I
wonder
if
we
even
need
to
have
that
communication
coming
into
the
tec
like
does
this
need
to
be
part
of
our
sprint
plannings?
Does
this
need
to
be
integrated
at
all,
or
this
is
the
part
of
that?
Where
that
overlap
of
of
boundaries
kind
of
it
leaves
a
little
bit
our
edge.
B
I
think
that's
really
important
what
you
said
about
the
boundaries
in
terms
of
like
what
leads
into
the
tec
and
what
is
isolated
to
the
individual
working
groups
and
the
potential
services
they're,
providing,
because
I
think
that
you
know
most
of
the
conflicts
of
interest.
Will
it's
one
of
those
things
like
we'll
cross
that
bridge
when
we
come
to
it
and
right
now,
I
think
it's
really
important
for
each
working.
B
Really
understand
the
services
that
they
can
provide
and
what
type
of
services
token
engineering
projects
need,
and
I
would
like
to
see
more
information
around
that
because
you
know
I
look
at
a
lot
of
te
projects.
Long
tail
financial,
you
know
even
prime
down
stuff
they're,
so
you
know
they
have
a
large
group
of
people
who
are
working
on
token
engineering
advancements
but
they're
so
like
a
lot
of
them,
are
bogged
down
with
managing
the
community,
doing
their
own
twitter.
B
I
Yeah,
I
just
want
a
second
that
nate
speaking
from
experience
being
on
the
inside
of
long
tail.
It's
100
the
case.
You
know,
I
think
what
the
dao
ecosystem
offers
is
an
opportunity
for
specialization,
deep
specialization
from
from
each
dao.
So
at
long
tail
really
we
just
want
to
be
a
team
of
data
scientists
working
in
token
engineering
building
models
and
providing
services.
I
But
there
is
all
this
other
overhead
that
comes
along
with
having
a
community
having
a
twitter
presence,
and
you
know
doing
marketing
and
onboarding
and
all
of
this
kind
of
stuff.
So
I
just
really
resonate
with
what
you're
saying
that
I
see
that
vision
of
daos
offering
specialization
and
then
all
of
the
other
common
infrastructure
is
something
that
tec
can
really
incubate
like
reusable
services
to
provide
so
yeah.
I
think
that's
a
really
great
the
way
you
outline
that.
E
And
we
also
saw
cad
cad
proposal
recently
to
grow
their
community
and
how
that
could
impact
the
tc,
and
I
really
like
this
vision
of
having
the
tc
as
this
common
ground.
That
supports
all
token
engineering
projects
in
this
many
ways
and
the
infrastructure
we
have
created
is
so
robust.
Now
that
it
could
really
be
that
force
to
be
shared.
I
And-
and
I
think
it
can
close
the
feedback
loop,
I
think
we
can
create
the
feedback
loop
where
tec
is
supporting
these
initiatives
and
it
can
just
become
normal
commonplace
for
these
initiatives.
To
give
back
to
the
tec,
like
we
were
talking
in
the
stewart's
call
yesterday
the
proposal
inverter,
if
there's
some
sort
of
revenue
or
fee
system
or
tipping
system
it.
I
would
love
to
see
a
portion
of
that
automatically
mint
tec
tokens
on
the
bonding
curve.
I
I
think
that's
super
cool,
I
think,
with
longtail
financial
providing
token
engineering
services,
there
should
be
a,
and
this
is
what
I've
been
pushing
in
long
tail,
and
I've
talked
to
griff
about
this.
A
little
bit
long
tail
should
commit
10
of
revenue
to
minting
tec
tokens
and
holding
them
in
the
treasury.
Something
like
this.
I
think
it
creates
this.
I
I
Provide
liquidity
things
like
that,
and
this
crew
then
creates
a
feedback
loop,
where
the
more
that
tec
supports
other
organizations,
the
more
that
those
organizations
will
hopefully
mint
tc
tokens,
maybe
hold
them
in
their
treasury
or
whatever
they
do
with
them.
But
that
creates
the
sort
of
flywheel
that
then,
I
think,
would
activate
speculators
if
speculators
see
that
oh,
this
is
a
growing
ecosystem
that
is
sort
of
feeding
back
on
itself.
F
I
also
want
to
say
from
from
gravity
that
is
my
experience.
What
happens
is
that
we
tend
to
centralize
some
information
that
can
be
sensitive,
so
our
proposal
is
that
we
can
provide
the
service
to
to
to
to
thous,
but
with
with
our
registry.
F
But
if
any
organization
wants
to
have
their
own
registry
and
have
the
the
agency
to
manage
their
own
sensitive
information,
we
we
offer
that
that
iteration
and
that
training
on
the
tools
that
we
are
developing
and
also
if
an
organization
tries
to
implement
conflict
management,
but
they
don't
have
policies
around
it.
F
We
also
have
to
say,
like
hey:
it's
not
only
to
have
like
this
personal
mediation
between
two
people,
but
it
it's
also
some
policies
that
you
have
to
build
and-
and
we
also
wanted
to
have
to
offer
that
service
of
helping
to
build
those
policies
around
conflict
management
but
yeah.
I
I
I
would
really
restrict
that
that
offering
towards
conflict
management
and
and
not
to
any
other
type
of
advice
regarding
things
that
are
not
our
competence.
F
Like
token
engineering
or
stuff
like
that,
I
think
it
would
be
good,
as
I
am
saying
that
gravity
somehow
acts
can
act
like
a
funnel
to
to
also
provide
this.
This
portfolio
of
services
that
that
and
each
working
group
can
can
also
provide
this
this
portfolio
of
services
that
each
of
the
dows
are
providing
and
yeah.
I
am
a
hundred
percent
into
also
giving
back
to
the
tc.
I
feel
yeah,
that's
that's!
That's
the
idea
and
the
circle
so
yeah.
That's
what
I
wanted
to
say.
B
I
mean
perhaps
we
should
talk
a
little
more
about,
because
I
feel
like
gravity.
Your
gravity
is
a
difficult
service
and
a
difficult
product
to
kind
of
I
don't
want
to
say
to
monetize,
but
to
bring
utility
for
in
terms
of
like
I
don't
know,
because,
because
you
have
individuals,
we
want
to
have
as
many
gravitons
in
this
space
as
possible,
and
that
broadly
applies
to
not
just
token
engineering
projects,
but
all
dials,
and
so
the
the
potential
upside
of
utility
of
gravitons
is
massive.
B
And
so
I'm
not
really
exactly
sure,
like
some
of
us,
like
with
the
community
toss
or
like
comms,
is
a
little
bit
more
clear-cut
to
me,
but
with
other
working
groups.
The
services
that
we
provide
or
the
products
that
we
we
produce
and
and
and
how
we
bring
utility
to
the
tec
token
is,
is
very
difficult
for
me
to
understand,
and
so
I'm
not
sure
if
we
can
figure
out
a
way
to
have
more
space
to
have
these
conversations
about
how
to
go
about
doing
it.
I
think
that
would
be
really
beneficial.
E
G
For
me
gravity
it's
one
of
these
cases
that
I
feel
is
more
of
a
part
of
common
stock
that,
because
I
feel
it's
more
on
the
spectrum
of
commons
around
the
spectrum
of
token
engineering.
Of
course
it
will
help
the
engineers,
but
I
feel
it
falls
in
the
category
of
a
common
stock
kind
of
spectrum
of
things
rather
than
necessarily
a
tc
service.
B
I
tend
to
agree
with
that
as
well.
Although
yeah
I
I
I
do
see
the
potential
of
using
gravity
of
producing
products
like
conflict,
mana
or
conflict
statistics.
B
What
are
the
most
common
types
of
conflicts
that
happen,
producing
educational
materials,
around
conflict
management
and
possibly
productizing
that
in
some
way
but
yeah.
I
just
want
to
throw
that
out
there
as
well.
I
I
just
want
to
say
I
think
the
tec
is
the
ultimate
onboarding
platform
for
community
and
culture
in
token
engineering,
of
course,
but
then
that
kind
of
bleeds
into
like
the
greater
the
greater
sort
of
web,
3,
d5,
crypto,
space
and
yeah.
I
just
want
to
emphasize
this
concept
that
the
tech.
I
Is
the
onboarding
node
and
we
don't
always
talk
about
that?
You
know
like
we
talk
about
okay,
you
know
we're
doing
gravity,
gravity's,
amazing,
we're
doing
token
engineering
we're
building
out
things
like
the
reward
systems,
but
I
just
want
to
give
credit
and
praise
to
the
onboarding
this
this
space
here.
This
discord
server
attracts
a
lot
of
people
that
end
up
really
getting
engaged
and
participating,
and
it's
kind
of
like
a
training
grounds.
I
mean
this.
I
This
is
a
you
can
hop
in
this
server,
basically
24
hours
a
day
at
any
point
and
find
someone
to
talk
to
you
can
hop
into
a
voice
channel.
I
mean
there's
meetings
like
eight
hours
a
day,
so
it's
really
easy
to
find
people
to
talk
to
and
get
oriented.
So
this
is
sort
of
like
the
orientation
station
for
token
engineering
and
I
think
that's
a
huge
plus.
I
So
it
creates
like
a
breeding
ground
for
these
sub-dials
to
spawn
and
generate,
and
it
could
be
like
a
formal
or
not
not
formal,
but
it
could
be
a
standard
process
that
we
just
acknowledge
that.
Yes,
the
purpose
of
the
tec
is
the
support
and
funding
of
token
engineering,
public
goods,
but
hey.
It's
also
just
an
amazing
attractor
to
for
people
to
get
oriented
in
the
space
and
they
end
up
working
on
really
cool
projects,
and
we
also
support
those
projects.
I
And
so
it's
kind
of
like
a
talent
generation
place
and
also
could
be
a
project
incubation
space
not
to
go
too
extreme
on
those
ends
and,
like
always
come
back
to
the
mvv,
but
just
embracing
what
we
have
like
accounting
for
what
we
do
really
well,
which
is
attracting
people
to
the
space
and
getting
them
oriented.
And
then
even
like
training,
people
join
working
groups
and
they
they
figure
out
how
it
works
and
how
to
get
involved.
How
to
contribute,
how
to
make
forum
posts,
how
yeah
how
to
contribute.
I
E
E
Yeah,
so
it's
no
doubt
that
gravity
has
used
within
the
tc.
No
doubt
no
doubt
that
all
the
working
groups
are
super
useful
for
the
health
of
our
economy
and
our
community,
but
then,
once
we
are
not
only
relating
with
the
tc
once
we're
not
like
100
nested
within
these
boundaries,
how
do
we
communicate?
Do
we
continue
to
carry
the
branding
of
the
tc?
Do
we
want
do
we
continue
to
use
the
funding
from
the
tc?
Do
we
like
just
what
are.
A
I
I
think,
I'm
I'm
hearing
what
you're
saying
and
I'm
gonna
try
to
put
it
into
different
words
too,
and
I
I
think
it's
it's
almost
like
there's
no
one
one
rule
fits
them
all.
I
think
it's
sort
of
a
case-by-case
basis
and,
as
you
know,
and
at
a
you
know,
like
a
runtime
decision
like
you
have
to
figure
it
out
as
it's
happening
there,
you
know
there's
a
lot,
there's
a
lot
of
there's
a
lot
of
things
that
the
tec
is
doing
really
well,
so
we
attract
attention
and
the
other
organization.
A
Other
organizations
were
like
hey,
we'd
love
to.
Can
you
help
us
with
onboarding?
Can
you
you
know?
How
do
you
guys
do
it?
How
do
you
guys
do
this
so
well?
How
do
you
guys
handle
conflict
resolution,
so
we've
heard
so
much
about
gravity
this
praising
we
want
praising
for
us,
so
it
just
it
feels
like
you
know
the
even
the
the
discord
the
onboarding
experience
this
these
bots,
that
by
has
developed
with
communitas,
to
create
sort
of
this
like
nice,
landing
onto
a
discord
server.
A
A
Can
you
help
us,
and
so
I
feel
like
we're
getting
a
lot
of
the
we're
feeling,
a
lot
of
requests
to
replicate
the
the
processes
or
the
the
tools
that
we
use
and
other
places,
and
I
guess
you
know
one
of
the
question
marks
that
I
have
is
you
know
if,
if
there's
a
group
of
people
who
want
to
help
another
community,
do
it
in,
and
I
guess
this
is
where
we're
going
like?
A
Are
they
doing
it
is
tec
or
are
they
doing
it
as
like
just
a
group
of
people
who
want
to
help
another
organization,
you
know
build
tools
that
are
similar
and
or
exactly
the
same
as
all
of
the
open
source,
open
source
tools
that
we
have
here,
and
I
think
that
it's
interesting
because
it's
very
in
some
ways-
entrepreneurial,
like
oh,
we
can
like.
We
can
do
this.
A
We
can
take
these
products
and
help
another
organization
implement
it
there
and
in
some
ways
it's
also
maybe
missing
out
on
the
the
bigger
you
know,
future
roadmap
of
of
the
products
that
are
being
built.
I'm
not
I'm
not
like,
I'm
not
sure
if
I'm
explaining
that
well
enough
either,
but
I
I
see
that
there's
some
sort
of
like
how
do
we
make
sure
that,
when
we're
helping
other
organizations
or
what
one
should
we
be
helping,
other
organizations
deploy
these
tools
and
two
when
we're
doing
it?
F
Yeah,
it
was
on
something
that
stood
on
my
mind
since
I
heard
it,
and
it's
like.
F
I
really
feel
like
what
really
brought
gravity
through
to
life
was
the
implementation
of
austrian
principles,
because
somehow
ostrom's
principles
validate
with
three
principles:
the
importance
of
conflict
management
so
like
that
fits
very
well
in
the
common
stack
framework
and
the
common
struct
framework
is.
It
was
also
the
framework
we
used
in
the
dc.
F
So
I
feel
like
this.
This
has
been
the
fertile
soil
and
the
concrete
soil
for
this
project
to
to
to
to
have
a
space
in
the
web3
space
because
other
people
they
don't
care
about
this
thoughtful
implementation
of
principles
on
a
community
and
because
of
that
they
also
easily
miss
conflict
management.
F
So
I
think
that
yeah,
we
really
respect
and
honor,
and
we
are
very
grateful
for
the
common
stack
framework,
because
that
was
the
validation
that
we
needed
to
have
a
project
talking
about
conflict
management
in
the
space.
G
And
going
back
to
your
to
the
question
time
I
feel
like
I
feel
like
we
are
like.
We
are
not
a
you
know
huge
corporation.
We
we
meet
every
week.
We
are
contacting
each
other
constantly,
so
there
is
no
reason
for
us
to
experiment
also
with
this
process
and
also
like
set
clear
certain
things
like
paint
ac
tokens
or
stuff.
G
We
just
could
count
on
transparency
on
notification
and
communication
regarding
the
service
and
certain
boundaries
like
paying
thesis
again
just
to
say
as
an
example,
and
with
this
then
we
give
certain
freedom
not
to
officialize
the
partnership,
but
to
rely
on
the
working
groups
and
the
stewards
to
officialize
a
partnership
or
that
services
to
be
provided.
G
So
it's
not
up
to
someone
to
officialize
this,
but
up
to
the
community
or
the
stewards
or
the
working
group
to
decide
whether
this
potential
service
will
be
given
or
not,
and
there
there
should
be,
of
course
like,
for
example,
this
this
happens
to
me
a
few
weeks
ago
where
I
was
in
a
community
call
of
dns,
and
they
were
talking
about
the
cut
of
conduct,
and,
I
said,
like
hey:
tc,
have
a
nice
kind
of
conduct
and
they
suddenly
fork
the
tec
card
of
conduct
and
they
now
ems
kind
of
conduct,
it's
very,
very
similar
to
a
kind
of
conduct.
G
But
then
do
we
charge
them
for
that
or
you
know,
this
is
the
kind
of
things
that
if
I
have
a
question,
I
have
to
go
back
to
to
the
source
of
truth,
let's
say
in
a
way
or
the
community
for
collective
intelligence,
but
I
don't
feel
we
have
enough
information
right
now
to
come
to
an
answer
to
that
question.
Where
how
do
we
handle
this
in
a
very
detailed
detail
way
because
we
don't,
we
haven't,
provide
many
services,
I
believe
so.
There
is
not
enough
information
too
yeah.
B
Yeah-
and
I
just
want
to
clarify,
like
the
difference
between
replicating
processes
versus
providing
services
and
or
producing
products,
I
think
that
you
know
the
products
that
we
produce
and
the
processes
that
we
we've
created.
They
are
there
for
anybody
to
take
whether
we
take
part
in
helping
them
implement
that
I
don't
think
that
is
in
our
remit,
and
so
I
think
that
is
one
of
the
things
that
will
naturally
just
expand
and
the
benefits
of
of
people
coming
to
us
and
copying.
B
Our
processes
will
return
to
us
tenfold,
maybe
not
in
a
direct,
tangible
way,
but
we'll
have
the
the
respect
and
notoriety
and
the
reputation
within
the
system.
That
is
worth
that
type
of
thing
occurring,
and
so
I
think
the
services
that
we
provide,
though,
are
something
that
we
can
do
and
that
we
can
start
to
start
to
develop
and
and
the
great
thing
about
the.
B
If
we
provide
services-
and
we
start
to
you
know,
if
we
go
into
block
science
and
say
we
want
to
help
you
with
comms-
and
you
know,
they
may
have
one
or
two
people
that
are
in
their
comms
team
right
now
and
you
incorporate
them
into
the
fold
of
the
processes
that
we've
established,
and
so
you
start
adding
these
specialized
individuals
into
this
broader
organizational
structure
around
communications
and
you
start
to
get
experts
start
to
emerge
in
these
specialized
fields
and
all
of
a
sudden,
we
have
this
really
well
operating
comms
group
that
can
can
produce
these
things.
B
Twitter
management,
newsletters
things
like
that
and
and
the
more
more
talent
you
get
aggregated
into
one
body,
the
better
the
product
will
become
or
the
service
will
become
and
the
more
services
we
could
provide.
I
think
the
one
thing
that
libby
was
reaching
about
was,
like
you
know.
If,
if
a
working
group
can
become
self-sustainable,
I
think
that's
a
good
thing.
I
think
if
they
don't
need
to
rely
on
the
tec
treasury
to
manage
their
operations
to
compensate
the
people
that
are
doing
the
work
for
them.
B
B
People
you
know
as
as
chewie's
coms
team
keeps
growing
and
growing,
and
you
get
people
who
are
not
necessarily
aligned
with
the
values
of
the
tec
or
rom
prioritize.
The
mission
of
the
tec
id
prevents
the
work
that
is
being
done
from
absolutely
abandoning
the
goals
of
the
the
tec
mission
for
something
else,
and
so
yeah.
E
Yeah
on
that
note,
I
think
something
that
would
be
very
important
to
have
is
just
when
things
are
happening
unrelated
to
the
tc,
to
not
carry
on
the
tc
branding,
and
that's
where
transparency
would
be
very
welcome
to
like
have
a
differentiation
of
okay.
This
project
is
incubated
in
the
tc
is
part
of
the
foundation
of
the
tc.
E
A
B
I
always
like
think
about
sushi
swapping
the
vampire
attack,
just
simple
incentives.
I
mean,
if
you,
if
you
were
to
provide
let's
hypothetically,
say
that
comp's
team
does
a
really
good
job
of
aggravating,
really
good
talent
and
they've.
Providing
this
really
good
baseline
of
services-
and
you
know
currently
they're
getting
paid
x,
amount
of
compensation
and
a
protocol
comes
and
says
hey.
We
want
to
hire
your
entire
team
and
we
will
pay.
B
You
handsomely
to
abandon
your
mission,
to
abandon
everything
that
you're
focused
on
right
now
to
work
up
with
us
and
basically
we're
just
going
to
buy
a
really
good
public
goods
service,
dow
and
and
and
use
it
for
our
own
ends,
and
so
that's
the
one
I
always
think
about,
because
I
do
think
it's
worth
it.
It's
low
cost
and
you
get
the
human
capital
and
the
talent
that
you
need
to
actually
execute.
On
that
end.
E
There
was
a
case
with
gravity,
for
example,
that
not
gonna
mention
the
name
but
like
quite
a
random
project
that
doesn't
seem
to
be
mission,
aligned
at
all
approaches
to
solve
a
certain
conflict
and
then
has
an
expectation
to
receive
like
some
advisory
from
the
tc,
because
they're
hiring
gravity.
That
is
a
working
group
that
has
been
branded
as
tc
and
then
therefore,
it
feels
like
it's
connected
and
that
the
service
being
provided
would
entitle
some
type
of
connection
here.
A
Okay,
I
guess
it's
something
like
the
common
scenario.
I
mean.
If
that
happens,
that
happens.
That's
we
don't
really
prevent
that.
Actually
you
know,
but
the
the
gravity
example,
maybe
is
yeah.
I
guess
worth
questioning
is
worth
maybe
worth
questioning.
Sorry
I'll,
go
back
to
you
and
then
you'd
be
wonka,
wants
to
share
it
too.
H
I've
been
thinking
during
this
call
about
this
idea,
because
I
feel
that
the
animation
team
right
now
is
in
that
situation,
where
we're
being
able
to
discuss
it
and
accept
that
the
tec
is
right
now
under
a
specific
circumstance,
where
we
just
couldn't
get
the
most
like
out
of
it
as
they
are
capable
of
of
delivering.
H
So
we're
trying
to
look
for
other,
like
sources
of
of
revenue,
but
just
for
the
team
itself,
so
we're
starting
to
talk
to
t
wells
about
maybe
like
improving
some
of
the
animations
involved
in
one
hive
and
stuff
like
that.
But
at
the
same
time,
like
the
the
the
difficult
situation
and,
at
the
same
time,
something
that
I
was
being
more
patient
on,
because
I
wanted
to
observe
how
discussions
like
this
were
developing.
H
It's
like
I
mean
we're.
Gonna,
we're
gonna,
submit
a
proposal,
and
this
proposal
is
gonna.
Have
a
retroactive
bonus
for
kind
of
like
developing
what
are
like
the
grounds
and
and
just
the
the
the
roots
of
the
team
itself
like
to
work
as
a
unit.
So
I
I
I
didn't
really
have
a
had
a
clear
idea
about
like
okay.
H
So
how
can
we
give
back
to
the
tc
in
that
sense,
and
I'm
just
starting
to
think
that
maybe
the
tc,
maybe
getting
tc
tokens
and
pay
them
in
tc
could
be
like
one
of
these
situations
where
we
can
benefit
or
give
some
kind
of
like
benefit
back,
but
I
mean
I'm
still
trying
to
work
around.
That
idea
like
how
could
it
work,
but
it's
it's
something
that
I
just
don't
want
to
like
leave
like
I.
H
I
I
believe
that
there
should
be
ways
in
which
this
team
can
give
back
to
the
tec,
for,
in
a
way
being
like
the
platform
and
providing
resources
to
develop
this
workflow
that
they're
gonna
be
using
for
what
they
do
so
so
yeah.
I
just
wanted
to
share
that
idea,
but
probably
still
good
to
call
it
a
work
in
progress.
I
Yeah
I
wanted
to
thanks
chewie
for
that.
I
wanted
to
jump
in
and
comment
on,
something
I
think,
there's
an
alternative
mindset
to
the
working
groups
being
self-reliant
and
it's
this
idea
that
we
can
all
grow
collectively,
the
tec,
simply
by
minting
tec
tokens
like
I
think
we
should
make
shirts
that
say,
mint
tech
and
just
get
everything
every
dow
in
the
ecosystem
can
benefit
from
the
tec
growing
and
continuing
to
nurture
the
the
furthering
of
token
engineering
public
goods,
and
they
can
all
do
that
by
minting
tec.
I
So
if
again,
it's
like
a
cultural
norm,
I
think
we
like
almost
like
a
marketing
challenge
where,
if
someone
forks
our
code
of
conduct,
that's
fine,
it's
open
source,
but
it's
nice.
If
they
feedback
credit,
you
know.
If,
if
if
they
want
to
support
us,
they
can
mint
tech
so
and
then
we
this
is
all
blockchain,
so
it's
all
public,
so
we
can
look
at
each
dow.
You
know:
gnosis
has
hundreds
of
millions
of
dollars
like
all
these
dows
can
mint
tech
and
hold
them
in
their
treasury,
and
it's
all
public
information.
I
We
can
track
that.
So
there
should
be
pressure
on
on
big
organizations
if
they
want
to
support
token
engineering
public
good,
they
should
mint
tech
and
they
should
hold
in
their
treasuries
and
and
if
we're
providing
services,
I
think
it'd
be
a
cool
form,
it's
harder,
because
it's
harder,
it's
less
predictable
than
just
like
getting
a
payment.
But
if
we
provide
services-
and
we
say-
listen,
just
mint
tech-
that's
how
you
support
us,
just
mint
tech
and
then
do
whatever
you
want
with
it.
I
You
can,
you
can
sell
it,
we're
still
going
to
get
the
tribute
better.
Yet
you
could
hold
in
your
treasury
or
better.
Yet
you
could
provide
liquidity
and
it's
sort
of
a
more
of
a
collective
growth
mindset
than
each
working
group
just
being
self-uh,
sustainable
and
then
there's
probably
a
happy
medium
of
both
of
those
approaches.
F
Yeah,
I
wanted
to
say
that
what
I
have
seen
when,
when
I
receive
cases
from
organizations
is
that
there
is
very
low
infrastructure
in
in
those
communities
and
the
first
thing
they
they
the
first
approach
that
they
have
when
they
come
or
request.
Conflict
management
is
like
turning
out
the
fire,
but
what
I
come
to
see
when,
when
I
get,
I
at
least
make
a
first
approach
to
those
organizations
is
like.
F
F
So
you
need
to
build
policies,
and
sometimes
I
also
see
communities
that
that
they
don't
have
a
very
strong
community.
So
some
of
the
things
that
I
say
is
like
hey
look
at
the
tc:
they
they
care
a
lot
for
the
community
and
for
the
culture
and
that's
something
that
that
you
could
also
do
but
yeah.
My
intention
is
not
to
to
offer
things
that
it's
not
on
our
on
our
ground
really,
but.