►
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
We
opened
it
as
an
issue
and
talked
about
maybe
communitas
and
sampo
working
on
it
together
with
some
soft
gov
and,
of
course,
of
course,
all
of
the
stewards.
So
now
is
the
time
for
us
to
discuss.
How
do
you
see
the
tec?
What's
next
for
the
tec?
A
What
do
you
see
for
the
working
group
you're
contributing
to
specifically-
and
we
can
talk
about
this
in
terms
of
like
the
next
few
quarters-
right-
maybe
q3
q4,
especially,
and
what
do
you
see
for
the
tec
as
a
whole,
so
I'd
say
we
can
get
really
specific
and
and
add
some
specific
dates
and
targets,
and
maybe
we'll
just
give
a
few
people
a
little
more
time
to
join.
B
A
Okay,
cool
well,
maybe
we'll
get
started
as
we
are.
I
don't
know
if
anyone
else
is
joining
us,
so
I
will
love
to
pass
to
livia
you
first
to
get
us
started.
What
do
you
think
is
next
for
the
tec?
A
What
do
you
think
specifically
for
soft
gov
and
then
you
know,
I
think
this
is
redundant
and
then
maybe
be
specific,
with
some
dates
and
and
whatnot
we
don't
really
have
timers.
I
mean
I'll
set
a
timer
for
maybe
well
there's
so
few
of
us.
So
maybe
you
know
four
or
five
minutes.
Maybe
three
minutes
and
the
floor
is
yours.
Olivia.
C
Thanks
tim,
what
is
next,
for
the
tc,
I
think,
is
getting
closer
and
closer
to
our
mission
and
really
be
the
place
where
token
engineers
find
resources.
They
find
resources
of
all
kinds:
right:
financial
resources,
intellectual
resources
per
people,
resources
a
place
for
connecting
developing
projects
as
well
like
having
this
as
a
very
fertile
ground.
For
token
engineers,
too,.
C
C
C
So
I
think
there's
a
lot
on
like
there's
a
lot
that
feels
like
it's
incubated
and
it's
very
like
in
an
atomic
form
that
could
expand
so
much
and-
and
this
outreach
is
so
important,
I
think
and
based
on
the
retrospective
action,
I
think,
is
something
that
feels
very
nice,
that
it's
starting
to
be
developed
and
gideon
is
is
doing
great
work
with
that
and
for
soft
gov.
I
think.
C
Well,
my
biggest
ambition
is
to
have
this
ecosystem,
dow
health
dashboard.
Somehow
so
we're
starting
to
look
into
that
and
and
just.
C
Sorry,
yeah
we're
starting
to
look
into
that
into
the
in
the
t.
Guild,
stuff,
governance,
guild
and
and
andy
is
jumping
in
so
and
he's
a
great
data
science
scientist.
So
I
think
we
can
look
into
things
that
are
great
for
all
dows
and
that
has
been
the
purpose
of
the
governance
guild,
but
that
will
also
advan.
It
will
make
it
possible
the
the
health
dashboard
for
for
the
tc.
I
think
that
if,
if
softgov
can
handle
that,
then
I
think
it
could
like
end
the
working
group
and
become
more
of
a
discussion
place.
A
Cool,
so
a
bunch
of
a
bunch
of
people
have
hopped
on
and
I'm
just
gonna
go
through
the
beginning
again.
So
in
this
last
sprint
retrospective,
we
discussed
how
boosting
token
holder
and
contributor
confidence
with
an
outline
of
plans
for
what's
next
in
the
sprint
planning
we
sort
of
decided
that
it
would
be
a
joint
action
between
communitas
and,
of
course,
gideon
has
this
message
that
he's
already
drafted
for
token
holders,
but
to
get
a
really
round
perspective.
A
I'd
also
like
that
to
be
that
topic
of
our
or
I
thought
it
would
benefit
us
to
be
the
topic
of
our
council
today.
So
the
question
is,
I
think,
there's
gonna
be
like
three
minutes
I'll
set
a
timer
for
three
minutes.
What
is
next
for
the
tec?
A
What
do
you
see
for
the
working
group
you're
contributing
to
personally
and
be
specific,
add
some
dates.
Add
some
quarters.
Let's
try
to.
Let's
try
to
have
some.
You
know.
Fourth
thinking
come
out
of
this:
go
ahead,
livian
pass!
If
you
don't
mind.
D
You
pass
it
to
me
cool
yeah,
so
rewards.
The
biggest
thing
on
my
plan
is
to
incorporate
some
of
the
features,
improve
praise,
accuracy
and
start
selling
this
thing
to
other
orgs.
D
So
that's
my
that's
my
biggest
goal
right
now
for
the
rewards,
working
group
and
then
obviously
like
within
the
tc
itself,
just
like
the
the
regular
stuff
so
like
making
sure
that
we're
doing
quantification
sessions
that
rewards
are
going
out
and
that,
like
bugs,
are,
are
being
worked
on
and
that
the
the
whole
thing
is
stable
and
smooth.
D
D
I
mean
start
defining
products
and
services
that
we
can
sell.
That's
my
thing,
so
I'm
like
okay
gravity,
dao
team,
like
with
the
comms
I'm
in
the
reward
system.
I
mean
you
know
you
can
start
doing
like
token
engineering
and
like
comments,
consultancy
like
there's
all
these
avenues,
but
it's
a
question
of
like
like
putting
in
the
bandwidth
to
actually
do
them
and
then
actually
having
people
that
are
willing
to
like
pay
for
this
stuff.
So
you
know
twofold.
E
Sorry,
I'm
not
a
steward,
but
yeah.
I
just
gonna,
keep
you
know
I'm
trying
to
bring.
You
know
different
people
like
40
acres,
dow
into
the
common
stack
and
tec
groups.
E
You
know
so
that
there
could
be
some
more
diversity
and,
and
the
stuff
that
we
have
you
know
like
we
were
talking
at
the
beginning,
like
tec,
should
be
kind
of
a
model
for
other
dows,
and
I'm
really
trying
to
sort
of
push
that,
and
I
get
a
lot
of
them
to
do-
trusted
seed
and
they're
having
all
kinds
of
problems
like
echo,
a
lot
of
what
we're
doing
could
solve.
So
I'm
I'm
out
there.
You
know
working
actively
with
them
and
promoting
what
we're
doing
over
here
so
yeah.
E
I
do
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
meetings
with
them,
so
hopefully
you
know
they
can
participate
more
and
they
they
could
use
some
help
with
their
token
engineering
as
well.
So
anybody
see
those
guys
around.
You
know
kindly
welcome
them,
russ
and
and
vino,
and
you
know
these
guys
so
hugo
and
so
on.
So
that's
it
for
me.
E
Oh
has
griff
going.
B
Yeah
thanks
jorge
dawson
good,
to
see
you
man
yeah.
I
have
lots
of
ideas.
Of
course
I
agree
with
mitch
on
this
one
on
products
I
feel
like
having
a
few
tec.
Products
is
important
and
you
know
one
thing:
that's
interesting.
Like
the
reward
system,
praise
is
not
a
product
of
the
tc.
Tc
is
kind
of
a
free
free
guinea
pig
of
the
you
know,
first
user
of
the
reward
system,
but
that's
like
you
know,
I
don't
remember
seeing
any
tec
proposals
passing
to
support
all
the
people
who
are
working
there.
B
Unfortunately,
so
we
will
need
other
products
we'll
need
products
like
some.
I
really
love
what
gideon
is
talking
about
about,
like
connect
being
a
matchmaking
like
an
intake
form
for
token
engineers
and
building
out
that
system.
I
think
if
we
can
help
people
get
hired,
there's
we
can
create
job
boards.
I
mean
we're
going
to
discover
lots
of
ways
to
make
make
income
generation.
Out
of
that.
B
I
also
think
selling
nfts
like
gideon
and
I
were
spitballing
a
cool
nft
like
tc
hall
of
fame
thing,
where
they
could
use
an
augmented
bonding
curve
and
and
put
nfts
against
it
and
create
with
so
that
we'd
have
liquidity
for
nfts
and
also
current
curry,
more
favor
with
the
token
engineers
of
the
world.
B
So
that
would
be
really
interesting
and
I
think,
like
just
making
sure
that
we
have
like
one
or
two
projects
at
most
that
we're
really
focusing
on
and
pushing
in
those
products
unless
there's,
unless
there's
other
teams
that
come
in
and
they're
like
hey,
we
have
this
product
that
can
bring
sustainability
to
ec.
We,
I
think,
narrow,
narrowing
our
focus
will
be
really
important
so
that
we
can
not
get
too
distracted
by
a
butterfly.
Oh,
let's
do
this.
B
Oh,
let's
just
abandon
that
when
we
don't
have
the
resources,
you
know
really
focus
our
energy
as
far
as
working
groups
that
I'm
in
I
like,
I
it's
it's
really
sample,
and
I
kind
of
just
do
the
leftover
tech
stuff
that
needs
to
be
done.
There
isn't
really
a
whole
lot.
There
I
mean.
There's
some.
B
You
know
it
would
be
really
cool
to
figure
out
how
to
get
reputation
system
like
our
like
a
reputation
system
into
the
reward
system,
so
that
we
can
have
more.
You
know,
reputation-influenced
voting
through
conviction,
voting
and
other
systems
and
even
just
snapshot,
because
I
really
don't
yeah.
I
feel
like
that's
something
we're
really
missing
yeah.
B
We
lost
our
quadratic
voting
and
that's
kind
of
sad
yeah,
and,
and
so
if,
if
there
was
like
push
or
demand
for
pushing
that
direction
and
funding
from
the
tc
to
go
that
direction,
then
then
we
could
kind
of
figure
out
how
we
would
we
would
scope
it
and
and
what
we
could
do
there,
and
I
would
love
to
support
that
effort.
If
that,
if
that
came
about-
and
that's
probably
about
it
I'll
did-
I
did
I
miss
any
part
of
this
tam.
A
B
Gideon
would
be
better
with
the
target
dates.
He
has
a
nice
road
map
for
the
the
stuff.
I
assume
that
there's
no
target
dates
for
anything
else
that
I
mentioned,
that
he
wouldn't
know,
but
yeah
I'll,
throw
it
over
to
wonka.
F
Thank
you,
grief
well
in
gravity,
since
our
first
funding
proposal,
the
our
intention
has
been
to
to
work
with
the
aims
of
becoming
a
more
independent
organization
and
right
now
we
are
designing
the
page.
We
are
also
talking
about
possible
discords
offerings
and
our
idea
is
to
become
a
sustainable
organization
that
was
born
from
the
tec,
but
that
then
it's
an
independent
organization.
F
But
to
that
I
think
that
we
may
need
to
pass
one
other
proposal
right
now,
yeah
we
we
we
hope
to
to
only
submit
two,
and
I
think,
even
if
we
don't
win
the
the
the
the
commons
prize,
that
we
will
try
to
follow
the
commons
design
and
design
our
own
bonding
curve,
and
I
see
the
tc
in
a
mid-term
period,
opening
the
space
for
new
people
and
new
projects
to
come
and
benefit
from
the
commons.
F
I
I
really
resonated
with
what
we
talked
last
week
about
not
getting
stagnated
with
the
same
projects
and
and
the
same
people,
but
like
giving
the
opportunity
the
space
for
for
new
ideas
to
come.
That's
that's.
How
I
see
the
tcn
rotation
rotation
is
always
important
and
I'll
pass
it
to
gideon.
G
Thanks
welcome
so
yeah,
so
I
I
I
feel
like
I'll
break
it
into
like
short
term
longer
term.
I
I
feel
like
in
the
short
term,
things
are
gonna,
get
a
little
bit
uncomfortable
like
we're
a
little
bit
late
out.
The
gate
in
terms
of
thinking
about
revenues
and
building
demand
for
the
tc
token,
and
so
and
and
we're
kind
of
the
sample
work
is,
is
starting
to
really
build
right
now,
but
summer
is
coming
right.
G
So
it's
going
to
be
there's
going
to
be
this
period
where
it's
going
to
feel
like.
Oh
we're
not
doing
enough
we're
not
doing
enough,
and
so
you
know,
I
think,
that's
going
to
be
there's
just
going
to
be
some
natural
pressure
there
and
we're
going
to
feel
a
little
bit
uncomfortable
as
we
see
the
common
pool
funds
starting
to
drop
right,
but
I
do
feel
like
that
discomfort
is
actually
good.
Like
there's
a
constraint
there,
that's
like
it's.
Like
the
pressure
of
a
diamond,
it's
gonna
fall.
G
What
the
essence
of
this
commons
really
is-
and
you
know
I
I
don't
know
what
you
know-
we're
going
to
be
doing
a
lot
of
work
on
that
in
terms
of
like
defining
what
that
is,
you
know
as
a
community,
but
to
me
it
does
seem
like
expertise,
token,
engineering
expertise
is
at
the
core
of
it
and
that
it's
around
you
know
there's
like
knowledge,
token,
engineering,
knowledge
and
then
token
engineering,
people
right
and
it's
like
a
lot
of
the
services
are
gonna
kind
of
like
spin
around
those
two
core
assets,
and
so
you
know
we
have
so
much
opportunity
there.
G
There's
gonna
be
great
things
that
are
gonna
emerge,
I'm
so
confident
of
that.
But
it's
going
to
take
us
a
little
while
to
define
that,
and
so
we
just
have
to
have
faith
that
that
we're
going
to
build
the
momentum
to
get
to
that
stuff.
But
it's
going
to
be
a
little
bit
a
little
bit
rocky.
G
I
think
in
the
short
term,
as
we
get
there
as
for
sampo
this
summer,
we're
going
to
try
to
take
advantage
of
the
kind
of
the
lull
of
activity
to
do
a
lot
of
like
just
like
getting
some
plans
in
place,
but
we're
also
going
to
move
forward
on
on
on
a
few
things
pretty
quickly.
So
tan
tam's
been
super
excited
about
this,
we're
not
even
calling
it
matchmaking
anymore.
It's
more
like
how
do
you?
G
How
do
you
do
intake
for
consulting
projects,
token,
engineering,
consulting
projects
and
really
just
try
to
get
something
quick
out
the
door
so
that
we
can?
We
can
learn,
we
can
start
learning.
So
that's
the
first,
that's
the
first
priority
and
then
the
other
one
is
the
thing
that
griff
mentioned,
which
is
this
idea
for
a
token
engineering
hall
of
fame
nft
collection,
which
we
think
maybe
it'll
raise
some
money.
G
But
the
one
thing
that
I'm
pretty
sure
it
will
do
is
help
to
build
connections
with
like
strengthen
the
connections
with
existing
token
engineering,
folks
that
we
already
know,
but
then
also
expand
it
to
the
people
who
don't
even
think
of
themselves.
As
token
engineers
and
bring
them
into
the
fold-
and
so
I
I'm
really
excited
about
this-
I
think
that
there's
lots
of
potential
you
know
working
with
comms
and
chewie
on.
G
This
is
going
to
be
super
critical
like,
and
I
think
it
could
help
build
our
our
twitter
following
like
really
strengthen
the
network
there.
G
So
super
excited
about
that,
and
then
the
other
thing
last
thing
I'll
mention
is
that
I
think
that
as
a
community,
we
there's
a
lot
of
terminology
we
use
internally
without
thinking
about
it.
G
Things
like
shelling
point
and
even
token
engineering
that
are
just
not
terms
that
people
outside
of
this
community
really
understand,
and
so
part
of
the
job
for
us
in
the
short
term,
is
going
to
be
to
like
really
be
able
to
explain
those
things
to
the
next
wave
of
people
and
that's
going
to
be
critical
to
the
fundraising
that
we
do
starting
in
the
fall.
G
So
that's
that's
kind
of
the
the
priorities
you
know
the
the
first
ones
are
in
like
july
and
august,
getting
those
things
defined
and
then
in
september
is
when
we
really
hit
and
really
start
some
of
these
campaigns
and
actually
doing
some
of
the
fundraising
requests,
and
we
just
I
just
put
the
proposal
up
for
funding
for
the
sampo
season,
one
up
on
the
in
the
forum.
G
So,
okay,
I
will
pass
to
chewie.
H
Thanks
kaiden,
where
do
I
see
the
tc
in
the
next
six
months
later?
Let's
say
I
feel
that
maybe
we
underestimate
what
what
risks
or
or
decisions
we
already
took.
I
feel
that
there
there's
like
so
many
like
dice
rolling
at
the
moment,
like
the
t,
fundamental
scores,
the
consilience
library,
the
proposal
inverter
just
sample
by
itself.
H
As
a
working
group,
I
feel
that
there
are
many
things
that
we
still
we
are
yet
to
see
like
the
results
of,
and
I
feel
that
is
gonna
bring
like
a
lot
of
exciting
times
to
the
tec.
H
However,
when
I
come
to
like
the
less
optimistic
side
of
it,
that's
when
I
see
like
the
working
groups-
I
I
I
totally
agree
with
with
gideon.
H
There
are
some
uncomfortable
times
coming,
and
I
feel
that
comes
is
is
also
gonna,
be
like
in
the
in
the
spotlight,
so
for
many
like
decisions,
because
we
need
to
just
like
to
take
some
steps
back
in
the
next
six
months,
I
would
say,
and
just
reevaluate
how
we
are
providing
services
like
to
the
tc
by
itself,
and
how
can
we
just
make
more
efficient
collaborations
with
like
the
ones
like
the
one
that
we
have
with
the
token
engineering
academy?
H
There
are
some
amazing
results
of
of
the
last
six
months,
but
I
feel
that
there
is
still
like
a
long
way
to
go
and
this
context
is
gonna
require,
like
a
lot
of
just
just
coordination
in
an
organization
capabilities
from
the
team
and
in
taking
sometimes
like
just
tough
tough
decisions.
So
so
I
feel
that
the
next
six
months
are
going
to
be
like
a
lot
of
that,
but
but
yeah
I'm
I'm
also
gonna.
H
H
I
feel
that
this
just
like
action,
and
just
like
this,
like
taking
steps
back,
faces
necessary
for
for
moving
on
and
having
a
better
idea
of
how
to
do
it
I'll
pass
it
to
nate.
I
don't
know
if
you
went
for
it.
B
I
haven't
yet
so
yeah.
What's
next,
for
the
tec,
I
think,
is
just
kind
of
leaning
into
the
the
initiatives
that
we
do
have
for
the
stewards
working
group
in
particular.
I
think
my
big
focus
right
now
is
just
trying
to
get
as
much
documentation
as
possible
on
both
the
cultural
and
technical
components
within
the
tec,
as
well
as
helping
these
new
initiatives
document
and
and
try
to
help
with
comms
and
the
messaging.
B
I
see
that
as
being
timeline.
Timewise
is
you
know,
a
month
month
and
a
half
and
and
trying
to
get
as
much
documentation
out
there
as
possible,
trying
to
figure
out
what
the
best
medium
for
that
is
and
then
outside
of
that,
to
use
gris
metaphor,
I've
been
butterfly
chasing
some
some
different
ideas
around
tec
products.
B
I
think
there
are
a
lot
of
things
that
we
can
do
that
I
think,
are
in
high
demand
that
people
are
willing
to
pay
for
they're
kind
of
unconventional,
but
I
think
that
I
would
like
to
discuss
them
with
people
when,
when
the
time
is
appropriate
and
the
setting
is
appropriate
so
yeah
outside
of
that,
I
will
pass
it
on
to
mitch.
I
Thanks
tom
yeah,
I
mean
for
me
like
one
of
the
things
like
is
having
difficulty
on
our
economy
is
like
we
have
an
economy
around
public
goods,
and
then
you
know
the
income
is,
you
know
like
the
countries
got
taxes,
but
we
got
you
know
two
nations
or
you
know
the
hatch,
not
so
much.
I
I
feel
like
we
yeah
like
with
sample,
or
I
don't
know
like.
We
really
need
to
get
start
to
getting
some
revenue
and
then
for
transparency.
Like
the
way
I
see,
transparency
is
like
just
a
service
like
it's
doing
to
the
tc.
I
don't
feel
like
transparency
is
going
to
generate
any
revenue
to
the
tc
like
never
yeah,
it's
just
a
service
and
service.
I
You
have
to
pay
for
them
because,
like
I
feel
like
you
know,
if
bear,
for
example,
start
recording
for
another
like
the
dow
is
going
to
pay
better
and
that's
it
like,
I
don't
feel
like
you
know,
bear
should
give
some
money
to
or
or
anyone
I
don't
know,
go
some
money
back
to
the
tc.
Just
because
everything
does
they
also
doing
here
does
something.
A
Else
with
gravity,
this
is
less
about
generating
revenue
more
just
about
like
the
vision
for
maybe
transparency
working
group.
What's
ahead,
what's
next
for
the
transparency
working
group,
rather
than
how
does
transition.
I
Yeah
I
mean
the
goal
with
transparency
is
like
just
in
foster
like
motor
monitoring
in
the
community
and
yeah.
That's
it
like
you,
know
all
the
documentation
and
just
facilitating,
make
it
more
easy
for
the
community
to
monitor
each
other
and
then
yeah
like.
I
would
love
like
the
dc
funding.
You
know
more
initiative,
you
know
like
semi-trump
was
talking
about
osmotic
funding.
You
know
if
the
if
he
would
building
it
on
the
tc.
I
You
know,
then
it's
a
product
of
the
tc
and
then
it
you
know
it
doesn't
also
generate
any
revenue
to
the
tc,
but
it
generates
value
like
oh
look.
This
tool
is
built
by
them
because
yeah
that's
a
probably
good,
then
anyone
can
use
it,
but
again
like
what
I
was
saying
at
the
beginning,
like
I
feel
like
the
problem.
I
We're
facing
right
now
is
like
we
are
building
public
goods,
and
you
know
when
you're
building
public
goods
like
people
just
use
them
normally
and
they
you
know
like
if
someone
is
using
the
dashboard
or
anything
we
create
like
they
will
be
thankful,
but
you
know
I'm
using
obs.
I
never
pay
anything
for
using
obs
and
you
know:
there's
people
working
there.
Yeah
I
mean
again
like
I
feel,
like
you
know,
like
our
priority,
should
be
like
how
to
monetize
the
the
comments
at
some
point.
I
Maybe
you
know
maybe
like
the
commons
is
going
like.
I
see
like
you
know,
going
longer
and
longer
and
longer
less
than
will
be
less
money.
So,
let's
every
time
like
the
the
token
holders
will
be
more
tight
with
which
proposals
they
will
be
passing,
and
at
this
point
like
when
there
is
not
enough
money,
I
feel
like
the
only
things
being
funded
will
be
like
the
public
goods,
and
you
know
if
there
is
some
volume
at
some
point
there
will
be
like
some
hours.
I
There
will
be,
like
you
know,
money
in
the
common
pool.
Even
if
someone
sells
then
they're
paying
an
exit
tribute
or
someone
is
buying,
and
you
know,
there's
always
going
to
be
some
money
there.
Unless
we
do
something,
like
you
know,
using
tower
voting
and
get
all
the
money
away,
because
these
so
few
people-
I
don't
know
but
yeah
like
I
feel
like
our
goal-
should
be
like
funding
public
goods
and
get
the
name.
You
know
I
mean
okay.
J
Sure
so
I
personally,
I
feel
like
it's
more
towards
seeing
what
our
mission
is.
I
was
becoming
a
shelling
point
and
I
still
believe
that
it
would
be
really
beneficial
if
we
focus
on
that
aspect.
A
lot
like
we
have
more
educational
parties.
We
get
more
people
involved
into
the
system,
and
you
know
the
tec
reaches
a
place
where
we
are
able
to
earn
more
external
projects
and
right
now
I
think
we're
finding
a
lot
of
the
internal
working
groups
and
I
think
I
feel
like
it
will
be
a
really
great
jump.
J
J
So
for
rewards,
I'm
really
excited
about
praise
becoming
stable,
we're
planning
to
release
a
version,
one
that
is
completely
stable
in
around
first
july,
and
I'm
really
hopeful
that
you
know,
then
the
praise
development
can
move
away
from
the
tc
and
the
rewards
working
crop
is
like
more
quite
dirt.
I
guess
so.
It's
it's
slows
down
a
little
bit
because
then
it's
just
the
day
in
day
out
we're
just
we're
just
dishing
out
the
rewards.
It's
not
a
big
deal
for
communities,
I'm
really
excited
about
the
new
discussions.
J
We've
been
having
about
getting
better
and
at
onboarding
people,
especially
you
know,
there's
a
different
types
of
people
that
are
joining
in
and
I
feel
like
right
now
we're
not
utilizing
the
buckets
they
fall
into.
You
know
we
are
not
able
to
help
them
properly
and
I
like
to
see
this
kick
app
getting
resolved
and
you
know
about
the
funding
issue
that
we've
been
talking
about
for
a
while.
Now.
J
I
really
believe
that
you
know
it
would
be
really
great
if
we
create
funds
from
tea
and
services
or
products
that
we're
making
are
especially
things
that
benefit
e,
and
it's
not
just
products
that
we're
making
and
you
know
the
so
the
way
I
see
it,
it'd
be
really
great.
If
you
know
the
working
groups
start
making
products
and
they're
doing
products
and
they
somehow
sustain
themselves
and
the
tc's
the
t's.
The
way
tc
is
pointing
them.
J
You
know
decreases
and
that's
something
that
I
would
like
to
see
in
the
future,
and
you
know
around
next
year
it
will
delicate
if
people
see
tec
as
a
you
know,
as
as
a
place
where
you
can
outsource
your
decisions
for
your
dog
or
you
can
outsource
decisions
for
distributing
funding
like
can
we
make
a
community
that
can
decide
what
is
good
for
d,
and
then
we
go
to
organizations
that
want
to
distribute
funds
to
d
and
v,
ask
for
grants,
and
then
we
distribute
them
to
projects,
and
you
know
about
personal
roadmaps.
J
I've
I'd
be
really
excited
to
get
the
community
on
boarding
bot.
You
know
I'd
like
to
get
some
tracking
systems
inside
it
and
make
it
a
little
bit
better.
So
my
plan
is
to
launch
it
somewhere
around
november,
maybe
and
yeah-
that's
pretty
much.
It
there's
just
one
more
thing.
The
word
said
about
you
know
creating
funds
from
tea,
so
everyday,
if
we
can,
you
know
so,
for
an
example
would
be.
The
dc
is
great
at
the
documentation.
J
We've
seen
it
time
and
time
again,
we've
done
great
a
great
job
at
this.
All
you
could
do
is
like
approach
the
projects
that
struggle
with
documentation
and
there's
a
lot
of
them.
Even
libraries
there's
a
lot
of
lack
of
communication
going
on
there
and
we
they
can
outsource
those
things
to
the
tc
and
I'd
like
to
see
that
kind
of
value
exchange
happening.
J
Instead
of
just
you
know,
a
product
that
is
being
sold
and
yeah,
that's
pretty
much
it.
I
pass
it
to
nick.
K
Hi,
so
for
my
ideas
and
what's
next
for
the
tec,
more
public
goods
being
created
to
help
people
design
their
communities
or
economies
or
systems
less
reliance
on
calls
for
coordination
and
possibly
archiving
for
the
tec
like
a
way
to
collect
the
knowledge
dropped
on
the
channels
and
more
opportunities
for
people
to
practice
token
engineering
and
their
contributions
or
participation
within
the
cec,
perhaps
other
ways
of
minting
t
tc
tokens
than
just
paying
money
and
more
regenerative
workflows
for
tec
participants.
K
Sorry,
if
I'm
going
too
fast
I'll
slow
down
a
bit
having
as
many
people
knowledgeable
in
token
engineering
as
possible,
even
if
not
a
practicing
token
engineer
and
then
what
I
see
for
the
working
groups,
I
contribute
to
for
mega
continuing
with
alternative
workflow
experiments,
creating
or
sorry
designing
the
library
system
that
enables
value
stocks
such
as
connection
novelty,
transdisciplinarity
to
be
experienced.
K
And
then
some
more
focus
on
ethics,
research
initiatives
as
well
and
more
collaboration
with
other
working
groups
and
then
for
labs,
creating
more
opportunities
to
learn,
practice
token
engineering
skills
or
at
least
create
space
for
people
to
work.
On
their
personal
token,
engineering,
experiments
or
research
projects
and
helping
as
many
people
in
the
community
as
possible
to
become
knowledgeable
on
token
engineering.
L
Thank
you
nick.
So
what
I
say
like
I
like
to
say:
emphasis
on
product
and
services
of
the
future
of
tc,
so
I'd
love
to
see
how
tc
brings
value
to
itself
or
and
also
has
like
public
goods
through
product
through
providing
services
and
products
such
as
reward
system
being
used
by
other
communities
or,
like
pro
becoming
like
more
token
engineering
service
hub.
L
L
L
I
I
would
envision
omega
to
be
an
intellectual
of
where
people
who
is
interested
in
token
engineering
ethics
can
bring
their
own
research
and
creating
a
like
kind
of
kind
of
a
framework
so
that
when
people
comes,
we
come
with
ideas.
We
can
nurture
that
idea
through
space
and
providing
like
valuable
outcomes
from
that
research
and
signal
our
community
and
all
in
general,
the
bigger
token
engineering
community
that
these
practices
can
have
different
result
and
how
do
we
make
them
more
resilient
and
morally
responsible?
L
L
M
Yeah,
thank
you
tom,
so
I'll
try
to
be
quick,
so
in
a
really
general
way.
You
know
in
the
bigger
scope
I
can
think
about.
I
see
the
development
of
the
tc
like
in
in
two
ways.
M
M
I
think
that
we're
used
to
like
taking
the
example
of
like
traditional
organizations
and
I'm
pretty
sure
there
must
be
a
difference
between
the
two
on
how
to
do
things,
so
I
think
it
would
be
important
to
to
figure
out
that
line
or
that
differentiation
and
and
truly
find
like
really
interesting
business
models
that
can
that
can
work
to
become
sustainable,
but
also
that
are
like
ethical
and
really
aligned
with
the
values
of
the
tc
and
to
the
values
of
the
commons
and
on
the
other
way.
M
I
also
think
I
also
see
the
tc
development
as
a
dao,
because
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
work
there
too,
about
how
we
work
and
how
we
organize
ourselves
in
these
different
type
of
organizations
that
it
it's
never
been
done.
I
think
there's
also
a
lot
of
work
there
in
the
way
we
do
things
and
talking
about
the
working
groups
I
participate
in
yeah.
So,
for
example,
I
think
it's
exactly
that
you
know,
like
figuring
out
business
models
that
are
actually
aligned
to
what
are
pursuing
for
gravity.
M
That's
that's
one
of
another
thing.
You
know,
I
think
it's
gonna
be
really
interesting,
like
figuring
out,
what's
gonna,
be
the
relationship
between
you
know
like
the
mother
down
with,
like
future
children
doubts
you
know,
how
is
that
gonna
work,
how
it's
gonna
work
in
terms
of
service
in
terms
of
people
in
terms
in
terms
of
money,
I
think
that's
that's
gonna
be
really
interesting
and
a
conversation
that
is
definitely
coming
up
really
soon,
I
think
for
and
for
transparency
and
yeah.
I
think
it's
also
really
interesting.
M
I
think
this
relates
with
how
dials
work
and
how
does
structure
and
function.
So
how
is
transparency
gonna
have
to
evolve
so
it
it
can
keep
up
with
the
demand
of
transparency
that
we
will
need
if
we
want
to
maintain.
You
know
like
this
type
of
organization.
M
I
think
it
has
to
scale
and
we
need
to
be
prepared
to
be
able
to
handle
that
that
that
growth
so
yeah.
I
think
that's
that's
what
I
would
I
would
say,
and
I
think
that's
gonna
happen
you
know
like
during
this
year.
You
know
2022
a
lot
of
that.
A
lot
of
those
conversations
so
I'll
just
pass
it
to
edu.
N
Sorry,
I'm
late
and
I
am
missing
out
the
context.
Will
you
tell
me,
which
is
the
question.
A
Yes,
absolutely
so
you
know
our
retrospective
action
item
from
last
week
was
to
boost
token
holder
and
contributor
confidence
with
outlines
of
plans
for
what's
next,
and
so
I
know
that
in
the
sprint
planning,
we
discussed
this
being
a
collaborative
effort
between
communitas
and
but
of
course,
it's
a
good
time
to
get
the
perspective
of
all
the
stewards
and
active
community
members
who
are
joining
the
council.
A
So
what
is
it
that
you
see
next
for
the
tec
sort
of
big
vision,
and
what
about
the
specific
working
group
that
you're
contributing
to
and
if
you
have
dates
and
targets
in
mind,
feel
free
to
be
specific.
N
So
this
is
like
a
foresting
of
okay,
so
I
will
say
that
tricky
one.
I
will
say
that
regarding
this,
the
question
of
confidence
and
stakeholders
in
the
dc.
E
N
Do
I
see
it
in
the
future?
I
will
say
that
it
will
be
interesting
to
see
how
all
the
endeavors
that
are
started
as
working
groups
sort
of
scale
as
a
collective
like.
I
think
that
we
are
scaling
so
far
as
working
groups
and
we
are
achieving
certain
milestones
as
a
group,
but
we
have
yet
seen
the
results
of
the
cohesiveness
of
the
different
working
groups
like
working
together
and
I
feel
like
for
me.
N
What
would
be
interesting
is
to
see
that
scaling
coming
together
and
as
a
milestone
and
and
things
that
I'm
looking
forward
from
communities
working
group
and
soft
gov,
I'm
looking
forward
for
softcup
conversations
about
inclusivity,
rays
and
so
on,
and
how
we
can
you
know
the
next
layer
of
the
cultural
layer,
the
next
step
for
the
control
layer
and
then
in
communities,
and
I
guess
also
with
samples
it's
a
strategy
that
it's
it's
it's
better
focused
and
it's
more.
We
already
know
who
are
the
people
who
are
part
of
our
community.
A
Cool
and
so
we
have
some
people
who
don't
usually
join
our
call,
so
maybe
we
just
pause
for
a
moment
and
welcome
them.
Welcome
appan
one
fun
tam!
Oh,
that's
like
the
better
version
of
me
and
maki
zai.
A
If
you
want
to
take
a
moment
and
introduce
yourself
there
are.
This
is
a
conversation
we're
having
about
the
future
of
the
tec
but
I'll
pass
it
to
eppa
epan
one.
If
you
wanna
take
a
moment
and
introduce
yourself
you're,
welcome
too.
A
Of
course
you
don't
have
to,
if
you
don't
want
to,
and
okay
they've
all
gone,
I
scared
them
away.
Oh
no
see
I'm
not
the
fun
tam,
but
I
guess
it's
my
turn
now
to
go
so
I'd
say
so
for
stewards.
A
I
can't
take
the
notes
on
this.
Unfortunately,
if
somebody
doesn't
mind
doing
it
for
me
for
the
stewards,
I
would
say
it's
you
know
when
we
are
15
stewards,
we
are
12
to
14
working
groups,
now
we're
just
a
different
size
organization
than
we
were
even
just
six
months
ago
forget
about
a
year
ago,
so
I
think
the
evolution
of
stewardship,
the
evolution
of
coordination
like
that
the
time
is
now
in
some
ways.
A
It's
an
amazing
gift
that
the
stewards
were
funding
didn't
pass
because
it
really
forces
the
issue
for
us
to
to
decide
what's
most
important
as
stewards
and
what
service
the
stewards
provide
to
the
community
and
align
what
we
are,
what
steward's
role
is
with
the
value
that
we
provide,
and
so
I
think
the
evolution
I
I
know
that
nate
is
gonna,
be
able
to
work
with
this
on
me
a
little
bit
too
so,
but
I
think
that
we
can
come
up
with
a
good
proposal
for
the
evolution
of
stewards
as
a
working
group
and
then
have
a
a
funding
model
that
goes
with
it.
A
I
think
it's
yeah,
I
think
it's
just
going
to
be
radically
different
than
what
it
is
now.
I
think
that
you
know
the
stewards
should
always
have
been
sort
of
like
the
scrum
of
scrum
and
the
coordination
layer
should
be
in
each
working
group,
but
we've
been
trying
to
coordinate
the
working
groups
and
the
stewards
scrums,
and
I
think
that
a
lot
of
the
coordination
layers
have
to
be
you
know,
individually
in
each
working
group
and
then
roll
up
into
a
higher
level.
A
Coordination
of
stewards
with
this
many
working
groups
and
this
many
stewards
yeah
it's.
I
think
it's
the
only
way
forward,
and
then
I
would
say
you
know
also
there's
like
stewards
who
are
very
active
and
then
stewards
who
are
show
up
once
or
twice
a
week
and
it's
sort
of
like
differentiating
between
the
different
levels
of
stewardship
and
participation
in
the
tec,
while
still
retaining
the
the
varying
perspective
and
diversity
that
we
all
bring,
but
doing
it
in
a
way.
A
That
is
more
commiserate
with
the
the
amount
of
effort
that's
put
into
the
tec.
So
there's
there's
that
too,
and
then
I'd
say
for
the
communitas.
You
know
I
think
communitas
has
the
opportunity
to
be
the
onboarding
leader
of
dao's
to
set
the
example
and
to
to
show
other
dows
how
it's
done.
A
I
think
you
know
to
edu's
credit
he's
been
requested
in
other
communities
to
help
onboarding
practices
in
other
communities,
and
I
think
that's
a
testament
to
the
the
effort
that
he's
put
into
onboarding,
but
I
think
there's
something
more
and
I
think
I
think,
there's
something
bigger
for
communitas
there
too,
to
develop
repeatable
protocols
that
are
easy
to
follow,
and
I
think
that
that
can
that
can
be
a
really
really
interesting.
A
I
don't
know
like
public
good
that
comes
out
of
communitas
and
then
for
the
tec.
I
am
all
in
on
this
token.
Engineering
intake,
you
know,
being
able
to
quantify
like
the
struggle
that
the
token
engineering
consulting
companies
have
is
this
layer?
You
know
how
do
how
can
you
help
a
client
ask
the
right
questions
so
that
the
the
organization
knows
whether
they
can
actually
service
that
that
ask
or
not-
and
you
know
I've
had
a
few
conversations
already.
A
I
think
that
there
are
so
many
benefits
to
us
being
this,
this
oh
shoot,
I'm
so
sorry,
I
didn't
even
tie
myself,
I'm
just
going.
I
shoot
I'm
sorry.
I
should
have
had
somebody
for
help
on
that
too.
I
just
I
am
so
all
in
on
that.
I
honestly
think
that
it's
like
it
is,
it
is
like
we
have.
We
are
token
engineering.
You
come
to
tec
for
token
engineering.
If
anyone
needs
a
request
for
token
engineering.
This
is
the
first
stop
that
people
come
to.
A
This
is
the
shelling
point
for
token
engineering,
token
engineers,
but
also
token
engineering
services,
and
if
we
have
an
alliance
with
different
partners
that
we
can
work
with
long
tail
financial
block
science,
you
know
protocol
labs,
token,
econo
token
economics.
Dow
I
mean
we
could
we
can
create
an
alliance
of
organizations
that
we
work
with
and
provide
this
first
layer
intake
for
them,
bringing
their
token
engineers
into
the
token
engineering
commons
and
also
training
our
tec
folk
into
becoming
these
token
engineers
through
the
shadowing
of
these
projects
that
we're
connecting.
A
I
can
go
on
on
that
for
a
lot
longer
and
I
won't
I'll
I'll
spare
everyone,
because
I'm
sure
I'm
over
time
now
and
I
just
want
to
say,
welcome
again
mackie
zee.
We
are
you're
in
the
stewards
council
and
we're
so
happy
that
you've
joined
us.
Do
you
want
to
take
one
moment
and
introduce
yourself.
A
And
you
are
under
no
obligation
to
you're
welcome,
just
to
hang
out
and
and
listen,
and
if
you
want
okay
and
welcome
sir
cleve,
I
hope
I
pronounced
that
correctly.
Yeah.
Welcome
to
the
stewards
council
do.
Would
you
like
to
take
a
moment
and
introduce
yourself
you're
very
welcome
to
if
you
like
and
you're,
under
no
obligation,
if
you
would
not
like.
A
All
right,
so
we
are,
I
feel,
like
we've
reached
a
good
stopping
point.
We
have
seven
minutes
left.
I
think
this
was
super
interesting.
I
just
wonder
it's
prob,
maybe
a
good
use
of
our
time.
Now
I
don't
know
gideon
you
just
shared
this
for
feedback,
it's
related
to
what
the
retrospective
is
is
to
outline
plans
for.
What's
next,
I
don't
know
how
helpful
this
session
was
for
you
to
get
garner
new
ideas
and
or
perspectives
from
stewards
and
active
community
members,
and
if
you'd
want
to
take
some
time.
A
You
know
two
three
minutes
of
the
end
of
this
meeting
to
talk
about
this
draft.
Do
you
want
to
do
that?
I
know
I'm
putting
you
on
the
spot.
Gideon.
G
No
problem
tim
yeah,
I
think
that
you
know,
probably
the
best
thing
would
be
for
people
to
just
dive
into
the
document,
even
if
we
just
use
the
rest
of
the
time
like
people
can
dive
into
the
document-
or
you
can
do
it
later
today,
but
or
yeah.
This
is
I'm
hoping
to
get
this
done
by
like
next
week.
You
know
early
next
week
and
then
probably
work
with
edu
to
like
figure
out
the
distribution
plan
for
this
one.
E
G
Chat
channel
thanks
text
channel
so
yeah
feel
free
to
just
jump
in
had
some
comments
on
this.
One
of
the
things
that
we've
been
thinking
about
this
is
part
of
the
communitas
kind
of
next
season
proposal
is
some
type
of
communication
system
for
token
holders,
so
this
might
be
a
great
incentive
for
us
to
like
figure
that
out
sooner
rather
than
later-
and
maybe
this
is
part
of
the
token
utility
piece
like
some
of
the
initial
wave-
is
that
this
this
is.
G
You
know
this
goes
to
token
holders,
so
so
anyway,.
G
Get
your
feedback
on
this
could
be
high
level
could
be.
Details
could
be
don't
spend
too
much
time
on
doing
detailed
edits,
though
this
is
intentionally
rough
right
now
didn't
want
to
get
too
too
far
down
the
road
before
I
got
feedback,
so
I'll
just
be
quiet
at
this
point.
Can
maybe
is
it
okay,
damn
just
use
the
rest
of
it
for
people
to
just.
A
Yeah,
it's
absolutely
okay,
and
maybe
also
who
dropped
in
this
vitalik
wants
to
share
their
thoughts
and
thinking
about
it.
This
quote:
contradiction
between
my
desire
to
see
more
diversity
and
interesting
cultures,
and
my
realization
that
maintaining
a
culture,
that's
distinct
from
the
mainstream,
seems
to
often
require
some
kind
of
insanity
or
artificial
barrier
or
similar
thing
that
I
ideologically
dislike,
who
dropped
that
in
here.
A
Cool,
thank
you
all
right.
So
with
these
last
four
minutes,
anyone
who
wants
to
please
hop
into
this
letter
and
share
any
thinking
that
you
want
about
it
and
I'll
help
be
a
big
help
to
gideon
and
sampo
and
eduardo
and
our
token
holders,
and
so
then
that's
the
end
of
this
call
thanks
for
everyone's
time
today,.