►
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
Okay,
so
if
you
could
be
part
of
any
world
record,
what
would
it
be?
It's
a
bit
of
a
tricky
question.
I
don't.
A
B
Oh
thanks
juan
I
mean
my
world
record
should
be
something
related
to
gaming.
I
guess
like
I
was
like
52
of
europe
in
a
video
game,
but
it
was
not
a
thing
it
was.
You
know
like
the
whole
base
of
the
game,
so
if
it
costs
just
to
be
one
thing
I
mean
I
have
no
idea,
like
probably
something
related
to
the
sport
right
now,
I'm
very
focused
on
doing
sport.
B
Every
day,
probably
I
mean
there's
much
people
that
do
you
know
more
pull
up
than
me,
but
something
related
to
that
like
doing
the
most
in
some
like
I
actually,
I'm
actually
very
good
at
holding.
You
know
like
in
a
position
and
should
hold
yeah.
B
That
would
be
a
thing
I'll
pass
it
to
chewy.
E
Thank
you
septim.
I
think
it
would
be
something
related
to
traveling
like
driving
or
flying
a
lot
or
like
the
most
airline
miles
on
ethereum
events
all
over
the
world,
something
like
that
or
or
yeah.
I
just
it
reminds
me
a
lot
of
pre-covet
world
and
I
think
I've
mentioned
this
story
a
few
times
but
like
in
2019,
I
drove
like
10
000
kilometers,
just
touring
with
bands,
and
it
was
super
fun
and
it
seems
like
it's
like
something
almost
impossible
to
do
nowadays.
So
I
really
miss
that.
E
I
would
really
like
to
set
a
record
on
something
that
has
to
do
with
traveling
and
and
working.
I
really
enjoyed
that
part
I'll
pass
it
to
lauren.
F
For
this
I
am
unequivocal
looking
at
world
records
and
I
found
one
that's
like
a
nature,
one,
it's
the
largest
tree
hug
and
they
had
4
620
people
in
india,
all
hugging
trees.
At
the
same
time-
and
you
know
I
could
do
that-
I
could
be
one
of
those
people-
I
don't
know.
I
like
my
first
thought
was
like.
Oh,
you
know
something
cool
like
like
like
the
longest
handstand.
F
That
would
be
cool,
but
you
know
I
have
so
many
other
things
that
I
want
to
do
that
I
I'll
like
get
a
pretty
good
handstand
and
like
hold
it
for
a
minute
and
that's
good
enough
and
then,
like
other
than
that,
it's
like.
I
want
to
focus
on
like
working
on
all
these
blockchain
for
good
projects,
so
maybe
we'll
just
hug
a
tree
all
together.
That's
such
a
grip.
B
G
Wanna
talk
through
yours,
okay,
sorry,
it's
just
trying
to
turn
on
the
video,
but
my
discord
is
so
weird
lately
I
I
would
probably
say
most
blockchain
for
good
projects
launched.
That's
that's!
So
that's
the
goal
most
blockchain
for
good
tokens
like
supporting
that
or
being
somehow
pushing
the
most
of
them
forward.
That's
definitely
what
I'm.
C
G
A
No
problem
so
there's
just
a
few
of
us
to
start
with,
so
I
thought
we'd
get
started
with
an
opening
question
and
it
turned
out
to
be
like
some
of
the
most
fun
answers
I've
heard
in
a
while.
So
the
opening
question
is,
if
you
could
be
part
of
any
world
record,
what
would
it.
D
D
Span
of
time
without
war.
A
And
I
guess
quantum,
would
you
like
to
share
if
you
could
be
part
of
any
world
record?
What
would
it
be.
C
Oh
yes,
as
I'm
concerned
about
this
global
warming,
I
would
be
part
I
would
be
glad
to
be
part
of
solar
panel
installment
world
record.
F
C
Yes
and
that
that's
my
idea
and
that's
that's
my
goal,
that's
my
goal
to
to
get
some
kind
of
tao
that
will
finance
the
solar
panel
installments.
A
Thanks
for
sharing,
as
I
was
trying
fantastically
to
think
of
what
I
would
do,
I
almost
thought
lauren
was
gonna
say
it
I
I
did
think
of
something,
and
it
was
something
just
like
world
like
connecting
the
world
and
it
was
like
the
longest
hand
held
chain
like
human
chain
like
that
would
be
pretty
cool
if
you
could
imagine
from
like
one
side
of
europe
all
the
way
to,
like
the
other
end
of
asia
like
just
humans
holding
hands.
A
A
A
A
Are
these
are
really
ambitious,
all
right,
so
normally
we,
this
is
more
of
a
a
discussion
group
than
it
is
like
a
practical
get
things
done,
but
I
think
because
of
the
coordination
for
working
group
funding,
I
think
we
need
to
actually
do
a
little
bit
and
then
we're
going
to
have
a
discussion
group
around
the
working
group
funds.
So
each
working
group
will
have
some
number.
Some
set
funds
for
some
it'll,
be
three
months
for
some
it'll
be
sort
of
six
months
of
runway
and
the
discussion
will
be
around.
A
Should
there
be
guidelines
on
how
it
can
and
can't
be
used.
What
do
we
think
about
ways
that
it
could
be
used?
Thanks
is
up
for
bringing
this
up.
I
think
it's
actually
great
for
us
to
talk
about
this,
but
first
I
want
to
see
if
well
maybe
I'll
frame
the
problem
and
griff
can
sort
of
wave
or
jump
in
if
he
thinks
that
I'm
framing
it
incorrectly
or
it
can
be
better
framed.
A
Essentially,
as
we
have
12
working
groups,
10
working
groups
now
that
will
all
be
seeking
proposals
for
funding
for
our
proposals
and
every
time,
hatchers
or
tec
token
holders
stake
their
tokens.
They
have
to
wait
for
the
proposal
to
pass
before
they
can
stake
it
on
another
proposal.
So
we
came
up
yesterday
in
the
stewards
group
about
how
we
could
coordinate,
putting
our
proposals
and
like
rallying
people
to
to
pass
them.
You
want
to
add
anything
graph.
G
It's
hard
enough
to
coordinate
discord,
muting
unmuting
and
we
don't
want
to
talk
about
core
name
for
puzzles.
We're
screwed,
guys
we're
screwed,
no
just
kidding
just
kidding
completely
it's
going
to
be
it's
not
going
to
be
too
hard.
I
I
think
it
can
be.
I
think
we
should
be
as
honest
about
it
as
as
we
can
and
maybe
coordinate
in
a
more
of
a
shelling
point
way
than
in
an
active
way.
So
I
said
flocking
because
it's
not
like
they're
all
talking
about
it
right.
G
They
just
kind
of
flock
together,
and
I
I
I
think,
having
that
kind
of
like
we're
in
it
together
without
discussing
it.
So
much
is
the
way,
and
so
it's
like
vote
how
you
want
to
vote
and
then
and
then
go
back
and
look
in
a
couple
days.
You
know
like
put
all
your
votes
behind
the
the
transparency
or
the
stewards,
working
group
or
whatever
project
you
like
the
most,
but
then
come
back
after
after
a
couple
days
and
see
where
it's
at
and
be
like.
G
G
What
we
want
right
and
everyone
put
all
of
their
tokens,
just
behind
one
proposal
and
then
and
then
kind
of
like
see,
which
ones
are
likely
to
pass
first
and
like
test
your
conviction
and
be
willing
to
flock,
and
I
I
don't
think
it
should
require
too
much
coordination
other
than
if
everyone
has
that
strategy,
and
we
flock
to
pass
because
the
the
thing
that
could
happen
is
oh
yeah.
Look
all
these
proposals
will
pass
in
21
days
and
none
of
them
pass
in.
G
G
A
I'll
just
share
one
thought:
I
almost
got
the
tec
working.
I
mean
the
stewards
working
group
proposal
up
and
then
I
was
like.
Oh
no,
I
need
to
buy
tc
so
right
after
this
call,
I'm
gonna
put
it
up.
I
feel
like
because
we're
compensating
the
stewards,
I'd
love.
If
we
could
pass
this
one
first,
because
then
the
that
compensation
for
stewards
will
be
locked,
and
I
think
that
each
of
the
other
funding
proposals
might
want
to
take
that
this
stewards
funding
already
into
account.
A
I
wanted
just
to
share
that
and
see
if
anyone
had
agree
or
disagree
with
that
point.
Actually.
A
Okay,
so
maybe
I
think
it's
maybe
worth
two
seconds
just
to
pass
around
so
share
your
thoughts
on
anything
that
just
came
up
around
coordinating
the
passing
of
working
group
funding
for
puzzles
and
maybe
I'll
pass
to
you
juan
carlos
again
to
the
start.
C
Yes,
tom,
well,
this
tuesday,
he.
H
I
C
A
distribution
of
the
roles
and
some
of
the
activities
but
like
that
information
hasn't
been
published.
So
I
need
some
time
to
polish
the
that
information
and
to
add
it
to
the
proposal
so
that
we
can
have
even
more
clarity
on
on
who
will
be
the
person
that
will
be
rewarded
with
the
with
the
with
the
proposal
and
yeah.
I
think,
maybe
this
friday
or
at
later
the
monday.
I
will
put
gravity's
proposal
in
the
in
the
gardens.
C
But
I
think
we're
we're
good.
I,
and
maybe
one
of
the
approaches
that
I
that
I
started
is
that
I
will
give
small
bounties
to
everyone
that
apply
to
the
roles
and
based
on
their
activities
and
in
based
on
their
engagement.
C
We
can
continue
like
being
more
more
effective
and
efficient
on
the
distribution
of
the
bounties.
A
C
I
will
update
the
proposal
too,
with
this
information
that
I
am
talking
that
is
like
actually,
who
will
be
the
people
that
will
be
operating
in
gravity
for
this
first
month.
A
Okay,
cool
and
then
maybe
we
pass
around
to
see
if
anyone
else
has
other
thoughts
and
if
not
so
much,
then
we
could
jump
to
the
next.
The
next
topic,
but
maybe
you
want
to
pass
to
someone
wonka.
B
You
juan
yeah,
I
mean
first,
I
think,
like
these
conviction.
Votings
are
so
great
at
the
beginning,
when
I
first
when
I
made
the
proposal
and
no
one
was
abstaining,
it
was
like
feeling,
oh
wait
me
and
I
we
can
just
pass
it,
but
then
people
start
to
stay
and
then
it
was
making
it
harder,
and
I
think
it's
it's
fine,
our
right
balance,
which
is
great
and
regarding
like
coordination,
I
mean.
B
Very
excited
about
you
know,
also
distribute
like
right
now.
I
just
distribute
them
into
the
what
proposals
there
are
right
now,
but
maybe
like
what
we've
just
said
like
this
is,
like
you
know,
let's
focus,
coordinate,
pass
and,
of
course,
pause
whatever
you
think
it's
important
to
advance
talking,
engineering
and
yeah,
I
think
that's
pretty
much
it
I'll
pass
it
to
grief.
G
Yeah,
I
I
think
it's
worth
noting
that,
like,
for
instance,
zepp's
proposal
for
transparency
working
group
is
five
days
away
from
vote
being
passed,
and
if
it's
something
that
you
want
to
pass,
we
could
probably
pile
in
on
that
right
now
and
pass
it
faster
with
more
votes.
You
know
and-
and
I
think
it
makes
sense
to
pass
some
of
these
smaller
proposals
quickly
over
passing
a
larger
proposal.
Like
don't
get
me
wrong
tim,
I
agree.
G
Had
I
don't
know
if
you
saw
the
picture
of
of
of
angela
angela
posted
on
twitter,
but
trent
was
about
like
20
or
30.
He
has
like
200
000
tc
right,
so
he
is
probably
you
know
if
you
can
get
if,
if,
if
a
whale
goes
somewhere
and
it's
a
proposal
that's
worth
going
pushing,
then
we
should
all
just
pile
in
on
top
to
to
get
it
to
go
through
faster
right
now.
The
the
next
one
to
pass
is
transparency,
so
I
I
I
think
we
should
pile
in.
G
I
think
we
all
want
transparency
to
pass.
So,
let's
vote
for
it
and
get
it
going
like
hatchbot
nft
in
metal.
I'm
not
so
like
it's
not
like
the
most
time
press
pressing
one.
So
we
could
probably
wait
a
little
bit
I'll
pass
it
to
lauren.
F
I
just
voted
on
transparency
because
it's
like
okay,
great
yeah.
I
agree
with
this
approach
of
like,
let's
just
try
to
put
them
in
order
and
move
them
along
efficiently.
So
it's
like
transparency
is
up
there.
First,
we
can
pile
in
then
it'll
pass
really
fast
and
then
like
by
the
time
the
next
one's
up.
We
can
just
like
pile
in
on
that,
so
I
think
like
if
we
just
like,
at
least
through
the
stewards
and
like
encourage
the
community
as
well
to
just
like
check
the
garden.
Maybe
we
could
even
like
tweet
about
it.
F
If
we
wanted
to
get
more
support
to
just
like
check
the
garden
with
some
regularity,
you
know
like
every
week,
we're
gonna
tell
people
to
look
at
the
garden
or,
if
there's
like
a
bunch
of
proposals
up
there,
make
like
suggestions
for
community
yeah
I'll
pass
it
to
camp.
A
E
Thank
you
tim
sorry.
I
I
I
got
cut
out
of
discord,
so
the
question
is
like
about
prioritizing
the
the
proposals
right.
A
Yeah,
it
was
more
about
sort
of
reflecting
on
the
conversation
that
we
had
about
that,
but
if
you
want
to
share
any
particular
thoughts
that
you
have
around
that-
and
I
can
see-
I
just
aped
into
transparency
so
hopefully,
hopefully
that
moves
the
needle
a
little
bit
and
yeah.
Maybe
you
want
to,
and
maybe
you
want
to
share
some
thoughts
about
it.
A
The
next
topic
that
we
have
is
going
to
be
around
funding
like
what
working
groups,
how
we
should
think
about
working
group
funding,
since
some
of
us
will
have
with
three
months
to
six
months
runway
and
how
we
can
use
that.
So
I
I
hope
we
can
keep
this
section
short
since,
like
we
kind
of
covered
most
of
it
already,
but
anything
you
want
to
add
to
it.
Please.
E
Well,
I
don't
think
that,
to
be
honest,
I
was
nervous
because
of
the
minimum
percentage
that
the
t
fundamentals
proposal
required,
but
then
it
just
like
took
off,
and
I
I
think
like
I-
I
started
like
seeing
like
that
that
whale
that
bought
a
bunch
of
tec
and
in
back
that
proposal,
and
I
think
it
was
trent
so
so
like
I.
E
I
really
feel
that,
like
the
enthusiasm
and
everything
like
worked,
really
really
cool,
and
I
mean
if,
if
there
are
proposals
that
are
like
requiring
more
than
50k
or
or
a
similar
situation
like
this,
I
feel
that
there
should
be
like
some
coordination
but
yeah
like
I.
I
personally
feel
that
it
wasn't
really
like
hard
to.
As
soon
as
the
t
fundamental
proposal
got
passed,
I
ate
into
transparency
as
well.
I
didn't
really
think
like.
E
There
was
like
some
priority
issue
with
sam's
proposal,
but
but
yeah
I
I
feel
it's
working
fine.
I
I
I
share
griff's
thoughts
about
like
going
with
it
and
if,
at
some
point
we
see
there
is
like
some
kind
of
like
stock
proposal
or
like
some
collective
action
that
is
required.
Yeah,
like
maybe
bringing
it
up,
but
it's
working
much
much
better
than
I
I
thought
in
the
in
the
beginning,
so
yeah
good,
good
vibes
for
passing
proposals.
D
A
You
cool
excellent,
all
right,
so
then
the
next
topic
is:
what
do
you
think
working
group
funds?
Should
there
be
some
guidelines
about
how
they
can
and
can't
be
used,
and
do
you
have
any
ideas
for
how
working
groups
can
use
them
productively
in
order
to
grow
the
funds
that
they
have
available
and
zep?
Do
you
want
to
kick
us
off
with
this
one.
B
Yeah
I
mean
one
of
my
biggest
concerns
is,
like
you
know,
like
people
can
just
yell
on
stables
or
not
doing
it
and
be
more
safe,
but
the
thing
is,
like
you
know,
like
people
who
is
willing
to
take
the
risk.
Are
they
you
know
like?
Are
they
going
to
be
compensated?
Somehow,
like
I
like
one
thing,
I
feel
it's
really
important
when
someone
applies
for
conviction,
voting
alex,
says:
okay,
I'm
going
to
get
recorded.
B
These
10
calls
and
no
matter
what,
like
you,
have
to
get
these
10
calls
recorded
and
then
what
you
know
how
you
use
the
funds
as
long
as
you
do
what
you
had
to
do,
then
that's
correct,
but
the
thing
is
you
know
like
this
is
like
a
bigger
scope,
because
we
have,
like
you
know
more
more,
like
normally
working,
you
have
a
lot
of
contributors
and
then,
when
you
use
you
know
when
you
generate
revenue
like
like,
you
should
keep
finding
this
working
group,
but
doing
it
you,
you
know
you
might
be
taking
some
breaks
in
order
to
try
to
help
the
working
group
more
and
then
yeah
like
how
we
balance
that
like.
B
Why
would
someone
will
to
take
the
risk
or
not
right?
Like
I
mean
you
can
farm
in
stables,
that's
great,
and
I
think
that's
also
like
kind
of
a
good
solution
but
yeah.
My
concerns
are
about
that,
like
you
know,
chris
risk
management
and
benefits
from
taking
the
risk,
besides
not
taking
any
risk,
and
if
we
want
to
incentivize
that
activities
or
not,
maybe
we
don't
want
to
and
that's
fine
too
sorry
I'll
pass
it
to
juan.
C
Yeah,
I
feel
I
don't
have
much
to
say
in
this.
I
I
would
like
to
hear
yeah
what
other
strategies
can
can
be
implemented.
I
think
that
what
what
we
need
to
do
is
to
actually
measure
the
risk,
but
if,
if
if
the
risk
is
is
not
so
high,
then
I
think
yeah
it
could
be
a
good
strategy.
I
will
pass
it
to
grief.
A
Can
I
also
just
add
one
thing:
I'd
like
to
specifically
hear
opinions
about
whether
there
should
be
some
guidelines
set
or
whether
there
should
not
be
guidelines
set,
so
should
the
working
should
every
working
group
just
be
able
to
do
whatever
it
is
that
they
want
with
the
funds
at
their
own
discretion,
or
should
there
be
some
guidelines
that
yeah,
that's
actually
a
really
important
point?
I
think
we
should
cover
as
well.
G
Yeah,
I
I'm
sorry
my
my
my
discord.
I
don't
know
what's
going
on,
but
I
would
say
that
the
guidelines
should
be
outlined
in
the
forum
post
that
you
make
for
the
funding,
and
you
know
that's
those
are
the
guidelines
that
you
agree
to.
When
you
get
the
money,
I
don't
think
that
we
can
or
should
be
too
prescriptive
on
what
people
should
do
other
than.
G
Of
course
we
have
our
mission,
vision,
values
and
and
they'll
be
upholding
those
and
the
covenant,
and
that's
where
the
guidelines
are,
the
guidelines
live
there
and
people
can
put
whatever
they
want
in
the
forum
post.
If
they
say
hey,
I
want
to
go
to
east
denver,
have
a
crazy
party
load
it
up
with
drugs?
This
is
going
to
advance
token
engineering.
I
swear
you
know
like
as
long
as
they
use
the
money
on
one
epic
party,
then
I
think
we're
good
to
go.
G
I
mean,
if
that's
the
will
of
the
people
I'll
I'll,
pass
it
to
nate.
Do
you
did
you
follow
this
question?
Or
did
you
just
hop
in?
Oh
no.
F
I'll
pass
it
to
you
an
afternoon,
I
I
don't
have
too
much
to
add.
I
I
think
that
yeah,
if
the
working
group
is
like
really
clear
and
they
make
their
own
guidelines
and
they
make
them
in
the
forum
post
and
then
that
is
like
what
people
are
voting
on
to
fund
in
the
garden.
That's
a
really
nice
way.
So
it's
like
maybe
like
our
like
collective
guideline,
is
that
it
needs
to
be
clear
like
what
they're
using
the
funds
for
when
they're
requesting
funds.
F
It's
not
like
an
after
the
fact
decision,
yeah
I'll
pass.
It.
B
To
nate,
can
you
say
one
thing,
but
the
thing
is
like,
for
example,
like
on
transparency,
we're
going
to
do
the
work
that
we
said
like
we're
going
to
do,
but
meanwhile
we
are
doing
it.
You
know
these
funds
are
quiet
and
stable
and
the
intention
is
like
you
know:
we
live
in
a
capitalist
society,
so
why
should
money?
A
Yeah,
I
wonder
if
the
question
is
not
clear
enough
and
I
apologize
for
that.
It's
it's
more
of
the
working
group
will
submit
a
proposal
for
funding
and
they
will
use
that
proposal
for
that
funding.
However,
rather
than
just
sitting
in
the
multi-sig
over
the
course
of
the
next
five
to
six
months,
they
use
that
runway
to
invest
to
gain
revenue
for
the
working
group.
A
So
the
idea
would
be
like,
rather
than
just
keeping
the
x
die
in
a
multi-sig
until
it's
used
for
those
purposes
is
to
invest
it
somewhere.
G
Yeah,
I
mean,
I
think,
that's
way
too
prescriptive
to
try
to
say
that
they
can
or
cannot
take
their
own.
You
know
treasury
management,
it's
it's
like.
We
shouldn't
micromanage.
If
and
we
also
in
my
opinion,
I
don't
think
we
should
also
be
like
diving
into
how
much
each
person
is
making
or
whatever
it's
like
hey.
We
give
you
this
much
raptex
time.
I
don't
care
what
you
do
with
it.
G
B
Yeah,
but
the
thing
is,
if
you
you
know
like,
if
you
have
this
money
like
the
intention
is
always
you
know,
provide
more
value
to
the
tc
like
actually
you
know
if
the
transparency
working
group
generate,
let's
say
2k
on
this
time,
then
the
next
proposal
it's
going
to
ask
the
same
but
less
2k
right.
So
it's
asking
less
money
from
the
common
pool
because
they
generated
some
revenue.
But
the
thing
is
what
my
biggest
concern
is
like.
B
And
then,
if
I
generate
this
2k
or
not,
it
doesn't
matter,
and
then
you
also
like
putting
the
risk-
and
you
know
like
because
you
have
to
get
the
done
anyway,
but
I
mean
after
what
you
just
said:
grief
like
it
seems
like
the
people
can
just
get
that
money,
and
I
don't
think
I
mean
I
don't
know
like
yeah
I
mean
the
intention
is
like
you
know,
don't
get
the
tc
money
quiet
and
you
know
like
give
it
back
to
the
tc
like
we
really
need
to
focus
on
how
to
generate
revenue
and
yeah.
D
Yeah,
I
just
I
think
I
agree
with
griff
except
there's
this
whole
ethical.
You
know
sort
of
thing
that
we
work
on
in
omega
and
so
on.
So
not
micromanaging,
but
you
know
within
the
boundaries
of
what
you've
agreed
to.
I
guess,
as
a
steward.
C
D
D
So
that's
just
my
only
sort
of
I
think
it's
useful
to
just
repeat
the
fact
that
yeah
we
are
kind
of
trying
to
work
in
an
ethical
framework
and
blah
blah
blah,
and
you
know
but
griff
said
because
griff
is
the
man
and
so
I'll
just
take
it.
You
know
I
don't
know,
I
just
don't
want
people
to
take
it
the
wrong
way.
C
Yeah,
I
was
also
thinking,
maybe
like
giving
ideas.
A
septie
was
saying
like
maybe
just
in
a
brainstorm.
Maybe
the
working
group
buying
some
tc
could
be
also
a
strategy
and
even
reward
their
with
dc.
But
the
thing
is
that,
as
I
understand
for
for
this
kind
of
of
payments,
it's
it's
better
to
manage
stable
coins,
because
otherwise
you
cannot
fulfill
everyone's
expectations
but
yeah
that
that
that
can
be
offered
like
as
an
alternative
for
for
for
the
contributors
on
a
working
group.
D
Also,
investments
are
not
sort
of
guaranteed
to
return
positives,
so
if
we
got
a
working
group
just
like
yeah,
I'm
gonna,
you
know
put
some
money
into
this
thing
it
they
could
lose
that
money.
So
you
know,
then
that's
that's
the
other
sort
of
half
of
that
too.
I
think
a
lot
of
times
when
we
talk
about
investing
the
money.
We're
also
talking
about
you
know
just
making
money
back
out
of
it,
but
that's
not
guaranteed.
A
And
I
think
that
would
be
a
most
interesting
case
to
sort
of
have
to
handle
if
there
was
a
working
group
that
made
a
poor
decision
and
ended
up
losing
the
funds
that
they
were
given
to
support
the
working
group
and
now
chewie,
do
you
wanna
share
any
thoughts
you
might
have
too.
E
Yes,
tom,
thank
you
honestly.
Once
we
get
funding
for
a
specific
purpose
personally,
it
makes
me
super
nervous
to
like
find
you
know
like
some
kind
of
like
yield,
return
or
or
something
like
that.
I
just
feel
like
it
starts
getting
like
these.
Like
shady
union
vibes,
I
don't
know,
but
I
mean
I
would.
I
would
probably
feel
more
comfortable
if
there
was
someone
that
could
like
guide
us
through
the
process
or
or
or
in
a
way
like
help.
E
The
working
group
like
educate
themselves
on
these
kind
of
topics,
that's
just
like
my
personal
view
and
and
also
following
a
little
bit
more
like
the
line
of
the
of
of
how
the
the
the
question
was
originally
misinterpreted.
E
I
was
actually
like
asking
myself
like
this
kind
of
stuff,
like
let's
say
that
we
put
together
the
one
hype,
trivia
right.
We
want
to
probably
give
out
some
prices
in
in.
In
the
tc
token,
it's
not
not
not
really
exited
so
that
people
can
have
like
some
engagement.
So
what
would
be?
What
would
be
the
process
of
of
of
that
case?
E
Right
manu
was
just
telling
me
like
hey,
like,
let's,
let's
assume
that
I
that
I
go
to
mexico
city
and
and
that
I
give
out
a
talk
in
in
tc
like
is
there
any
kind
of
way
I
can
get
like
support
for
like
lodging
expenses?
Something
like
that,
and
I
was
like.
E
Oh
that's
very
interesting,
like
I'm,
not
really
sure
about
how
to
approach
something
like
this,
but
but
I
do
feel
that,
like
this
might
happen
right
like
like
micro
expenses,
let's
call
them
or
or
or
something
like
this,
and
I
feel
that
they
it.
E
It
could
be
a
good
idea
if,
if
these
kind
of
of
like
unforeseen
stuff,
it
could
have
like
any
like
a
specific
process
for
not
maybe
going
through
the
full
like
advice
process,
but
in
a
way
like
reach
forum
for
seeing
if,
if
these
ideas
are
approved
by
most
of
the
community
members,
so
yeah
those
are
my
my
my
two
sets
on
the
matter.
I'll
pass.
It
nate.
I
Yeah
thanks
judy,
so
I
agree
that
I
believe
that
the
working
group
should
have
full
discretion
over
how
they
manage
their
budgets.
I
would
like
to
see
I
I'm
not
a
big
fan
of
us,
like
each
working
group
com
basically
competing
for
funding
among
among
the
community,
because
that's
exactly
what
we're
setting
them
up
to
do
right
now,
and
so
I
would
almost
prefer
that
we
would
all
just
say
hey.
I
This
is
the
agreed
budget
for
the
working
groups
as
a
total
and
we
distribute
it
equally,
and
then
we
force
the
the
working
groups
to
manage
their
their
budget
according
to
their
workload,
and
if
they
need
more,
they
can.
You
know,
coordinate
with
other
working
groups
to
get
extra
funding
and
it's
not
always
on
the
community,
and
there
are
conviction,
voting
modules.
I
I
think
this
gives
the
opportunity
for
for
working
groups
to
kind
of
manage
their
budgets
each
month
and
slowly
grow
and
possibly
like
you
know,
have
their
own
investments
and
if,
if
we
do
the
whole
investment
thing
like,
I
think
low
risk
stable
coins
within
the
working
groups.
And
then
we
have
our
say
multisig.
Who
does
a
little
bit
more
risky
investments
a
little
higher
return
yeah?
I
the
only
the
only
thing
I
just
get.
You
know
you
know
I
have
a
hard
time
justifying
saying.
I
Is
it
our
priority
to
fund
like
the
the
community,
the
teen
tao
working
group
like
if
they're
getting
70
000
rap
decks
die
for
this
three
months
and
transparency
is
only
getting
30,
000
rep
decks
after
these
three
months,
like?
Is
that
really
the
priorities
policy
that
we
want
to
establish
within
the
this
community,
and
is
that
technically
agreed
upon?
I
And
so
I
think
we
just
have
to
have
a
better
way
to
kind
of
filter
that
type
of
message,
if
that
makes
any
sense
and
yeah
those
are
like
my
thoughts
about
it.
So
I'll
pass
back
to
you
today.
F
Unless
okay
cool
I'll
ask
my
question
so
for
the
working
group
fundings
like
I
mean
it
was
really
interesting
to
me,
what
you
think
about
like
requesting
funds
for
the
one
hive
tribute.
Is
that
really
something
that
should
come
from
the
comms
working
group
like
through
their
funding?
I
feel
like
the
funding
for
working
groups.
Seemingly
the
intention
would
like
fund
the
things
that
the
working
group
needs
to
do
and
then
like
prizes
for
like
one
hive,
trivia.
That
could
be
like
a
separate
thing
that
goes
through
the
through
the
garden.
F
You
know
and
and
then
same
with,
like
somebody
wanting
to
go
represent
tc
like
at
an
event
like
I
feel
like.
Maybe
we
different
was
going,
so
that
would
also
be
like
its
own
package
proposal
that
would
go
through
the
garden
that
it's
like
fund,
the
tc
at
east
denver
and
then
it's
like
there's
a
certain
amount
of
funds
being
requested
to
like
bring.
F
However,
many
people
from
whichever
working
groups-
and
I
feel
like
I
don't
know,
keeping
things
like
more
modular
like
that
like
if
we
lump
it
all
in
tom's,
ability
gets
really
confusing
and
I
feel
like.
Maybe
the
working
groups
like
boundaries
should
be
more
defined
to
like
do
the
things
that
work
in
groups
like
need
to
do
like
fund
their
people
to
like
produce
content.
A
Cool
yeah,
I
think
that
there's
you
know,
I've
had
a
lot
of
thinking.
Maybe
I'll
just
share
my
point
of
view.
Now
too.
I
like
this
conversation,
because
I
think
it's
evident
and
just
unanimous
that
working
groups
should
have
as
much
autonomy
as
possible
to
to
use
the
allocated
funding,
how
they
see
fit.
A
Ideally,
a
lot
of
that's
actually
described
in
the
proposal
to
begin
with,
but
I
think
we're
certainly
going
to
have
cases
where
we're
going
to
see
what
we
had
planned
and
what
we
actually
need
after
the
proposal
passed
are
gonna,
be
different
right
because
we'll
have
different
contexts
and
such
so.
You
know
part
of
me
feels
that
there's
two
different
conversations
that
are
happening
at
the
same
time.
A
One
is
more
about
the
idea
of
like
what
the
priorities
are
for
the
working
group
and
what
they
deem
to
be
the
priorities,
and
the
other
is
like
speculation
with
the
treasury.
So.
C
A
Want
to
separate
those
two
things
away
right
like
what
the
working
group
decides
needs
to
be.
You
know,
bountied
or
compensated
is
one
factor,
and
then,
if
the
working
group
decides
hey
we're
going
to
take,
you
know,
30
000
of
our
objects
die
and
we're
just
gonna.
I
don't
know
we're
gonna
we're
gonna
farm
it
or
we're
gonna,
invest
in
an
nft
or
we're
gonna.
You
know
what
I
mean
like.
I
guess.
A
The
question
really
is
like
from
the
speculative
standpoint
like
what
is
acceptable
for
a
working
group
to
do
how
much
speculation
is
acceptable
for
a
working
group.
Is
it
100?
A
A
You
you
can
invest
in
a
you,
know,
a
140
yacht
club
or
something
and
then
flip
it
in
six
months
and
double
like.
I
guess
that's
really
what
I'm
trying
to
what
I'm
trying
to
express
here
and
I
would
say
for
how
working
groups
use
their
fund
use
their
funding.
I
think
that
will
impact
their
next
round
of
funding.
A
Very
importantly,
actually,
and
if
there
is
a
digression
with
a
community
of
priorities,
I
think
the
working
group
will
probably
find
that
there's
some
contention
the
next
time
they
go
to
to
to
request
funding
because
of
how
they've
allocated
the
funding
during
the
period
that
they
had.
Maybe
I
just
want
to
raise
that
point
about
this
side
of
that
that
conversation.
A
D
I
do
also
have
a
question:
just
is
there
any
way
to
to
maybe
just
make
some
guidelines?
So,
for
example,
there
are
certain
things
that
are
a
little
bit
out
of
the
scope
of
what
a
working
group
would
fund
like
lauren
was
mentioning
regarding
like
sending
a
representative,
because
even
though
I
might
show
up
and
say,
I'm
representing
gravity,
I'm
really
representing
the
entire
tec
in
that
situation
right,
so
it
might
be
good
to
just
have
some
guidelines
for
the
stewards,
so
they're
not
just
like.
Well,
I
don't
think
I'm.
D
This
is
going
to
pass
at
the
stewards
level,
so
I'm
just
going
to
take
it
out
of
my
own
budget
kind
of
thing,
because
I
want
to
send
somebody-
and
you
know-
maybe
everyone
else
doesn't
agree,
and
I
think
that
would
be
that's
an
interesting
thing
to
just
remain
engaged
with,
as
opposed
to
just
sort
of
giving
options
to
anybody
to
kind
of
do
whatever
they
want
in
certain
instances.
So.
C
D
C
B
What
happens
you
know
and
what,
if
we,
you
know,
lose
that
money?
What
happens
right
like
what
this
you
know
like
when
you
do
that
stuff?
Like
you
know,
you
know,
you
normally
take
a
risk
because
you
want
to
get
something,
but
then
what
you
know?
What's
the
reason
to
get
that
risk
and-
and
you
know
like,
if
you
do
it-
you
know
like
you,
you
can't
have
your
intuition
with
you,
okay,
I'm
I'm
providing
this
money
to
the
tc
and
if
I
lose
it,
okay
I'll
do
the
work
anyway,
but
then
yeah.
G
I
I
think
poor
fund
management
can
hurt
the
project
for
sure,
but
let's
say
that,
for
instance,
you
decide
to
take
33
of
your
holdings
and
just
always
keep
33
percent
adjusted
every
month
in
a
rap
dex
die
tec
pool
right
and
that's
it.
That's
your
treasury
management
and
then
all
of
a
sudden,
tc's
price
goes
down
a
lot.
I
don't
think
the
community
is
going
to
be
like
you
know.
I
think
the
community
will
understand
like.
Oh,
you
didn't
have
enough.
G
You
needed
to
ask
money
a
little
sooner
than
you
thought,
because
tc's
price
went
down
well.
We
appreciate
that
you
were
trying
to
provide
liquidity
with
your
ex's
capital
and
I
I
I
I
would
vote
to
give
you
money
faster
right
and
I
think
that's
the
thing
we're
just
you
know
we
can
set
precedence
and-
and
we
can
discover
what
people
care
about.
G
If
it's
like
you
know,
I
I
bought
a
bunch
of
pickle
dot
finance
and
was
de-gending
into
the
biggest
apr
pools
and
then
samsung
came
through
and
and
after
a
hack
and
oh
no,
you
know
I
lost
all
the
money.
Then
probably
people
were
like.
Oh,
you
don't
handle
the
treasury
management
well,
so
we're
not
gonna.
Give
you
more
funding
unless
you
find
give
us
a
reason
that
you're
not
gonna
screw
up
again.
G
You
know,
like
I,
I
think,
you'll
be
held
accountable
to
the
votes
of
conviction,
voting
and
and
the
token
holders,
and
if,
like
you,
screw
up
with
treasury
management,
it's
not
the
end,
maybe
be
like
yeah
this
time,
I'm
only
going
to
all
die.
I
swear
guys
and
that's
it.
You
know,
and
it'll
probably
work
out
is,
is
my
guess.
G
G
I
do
want
to
say
that
the
original
common
stack
design
was
that
you
would
get
tec
and
you
would
you
wouldn't
get
wrapped
x
die
and
then
you
would
be
expected
to
sell
some
right
away,
but
that's
okay,
because
it
wouldn't
actually
hurt
the
price,
because
the
common
pool
funds
would
go
by
tc
raise
the
price
on
the
bonding
curve
and
then
you
would
go
and
sell
and
then
lower
the
price.
But
it's
okay,
because
you
just
raised
the
price
you
know.
So
it's
like
it's
a
mechanism,
that's
expected.
B
Yeah
I
mean
somehow,
but
what
yeah
the
the
the
big
thing
for
me
is
like
we
are
going
to
have
like.
Like
you
know,
people
will
not
take
the
risk
because
you
know
it's
safer
and
it's
as
you
say,
it's
fine.
You
know
like
okay,
you
have
the
money
to
do
the
job,
you
do
the
job
and
that's
it
and
that's
great,
but
I
feel
like
we
are
going
to
have
as
a
community
a
lot
of
fans,
quiet
and
yeah
like
that
they
could
use.
B
B
I
mean
that's
the
thing
we
need
to
discuss
as
a
community
and
yeah
I
mean
my
only
concern
is
like
having
like
people
like
to
do
safe,
safe
stuff
and
be
safe,
and
you
know
that's
great,
but
then
we
also
like,
like
the
running
of
iron,
expected
to
generate
you
know,
revenue
for
funding
like
the
tc
for
10
years
or
20
years.
Maybe.
A
I
guess
to
share
maybe
a
conclusion
that
I'm
reaching
is
that
I
think
the
funding
group
working
group-
the
working
groups
themselves-
are
asking
for
funding
for
operations,
not
for
speculation
necessarily,
and
they
may
do
some
prudence,
treasury
management
that
is
deemed
accessible
and
low
risk
and
will
probably
not
harm
their
reputation
or
their
treasury
at
all
and
yeah.
I
guess
that's
where
that's
where
this
and
that
probably
we
don't
have
any
guidelines,
but
somehow
I
think
that
there
may
be
certain
acts
like
I
guess.
Here's
a
hypothetical
right.
A
Let's
say
that
there
is
a
disagreement
with
how
a
working
group
is
allocating
their
funds
like
how
does
how
does
that
end
up
being
resolved?
Is
that
resolved
in
the
working
group
itself?
Is
that
resolved
in
communities?
A
I
don't
know
fetching
on
the
forum
yeah,
that's
something
that's
coming
up
for
me.
Right
now,.
C
Yeah,
maybe
that
hasn't
been
the
use
of
gravity
until
now,
but
maybe
if
there
are
like
this
kind
of
communications
happening,
we
will
be
also.
We
should
also
be
prepared
for
for
mediating
this
for
mediating
in
this
kind
of
scenarios.
A
Pustavo
I'd
like
to
welcome
you
to
the
stewards
council.
I
don't
know
if
you'd
like
to
share
any
thoughts
that
you
have
about
the
conversation
that
we're
having
right
now.
Thank
you.
H
Thank
you.
Thank
you
yeah.
I
actually
you
know
this
is
my
my
first
time
involving
these
types
of
discussions,
but
I
have
a
feeling
that
this
seems
like
a
bit
about
maybe
dividing
how
funds
are
assigned.
Maybe
there
should
be
like,
or
an
idea
I
have
is.
H
Maybe
there
should
be
like
different
types
of
funds
like
like
a
fund
to
do
the
things
that
are
needed
to
be
done
to
comply
with
with
the
vision
and
the
mission
of
the
organization,
maybe
other
funds
that
you
can
take
a
risk
on
and
that
there's
no
like.
There's
no
like
a
bad
result
on
on
your
on
your
spending
on
that
budget.
H
If
something
goes
wrong
or
those
like
some
some
type
of
that
division,
because
I
feel
that
if
you,
if
there
there
is
like,
like
a
consequence
of
mismanaging
the
funds,
you
will
always
have
people
go
on
like
the
safe
side
of
things,
and
I
think
that
that
is
not
very
good
for
innovation,
like
I
think
that
trumps
innovation,
because
people
will
not
be
willing
to
take
risks,
because
if
they
lose
the
funds
or
they
misspend
them,
they
will
get
like
a
bad
result
on
them.
H
So
I
don't
know
you
know,
I'm
just
listening
and
that's
just
an
idea
that
that
crossed
my
mind
when
I
was
listening
to
the
different
arguments
you
guys
are
giving
but
yeah
and
I'm
not
sure
again
how
how
the
funds
are
distributed
like
how
how
how
each
team
gets
assigned
a
different
amount,
I'm
not
sure
how
that
happens,
but
but
yeah.
I
would
like
to
learn
more
about
that.
A
Sure
I'm
happy
to
explain
it
quite
quickly.
Actually
so,
there's
10
different
working
groups
now
and
each
of
the
working
groups
can
request
funding
just
for
the
operations
of
their
own
working
group.
So
the
discussion
is
really
about,
as
each
working
group
will
have
their
own
funding,
should
there
be
guidelines
about
how
that
funding
gets
spent
or
it
doesn't
get
spent.
It's
really
just
a
like
a
discussion,
an
open
discussion
about
that.
A
Okay,
so
I
feel
like
we've
pretty
much
wrapped
up.
To
be
honest,
I
know
we
still
have
six
minutes
left,
but
it
sounds
pretty
much
like
a
lot
of
what
we
will
see.
I
mean
we,
we
have
stewards
stewarding
for
a
reason
and
we
have
these
working
groups
and
we
will
make.
A
You
know,
put
our
faith,
that
decisions
will
be
made
wisely
and
prudently
and
then
yeah
see
actually,
and
I
think
the
consequences
of
poor
decisions
would
be
felt
pretty
quickly
actually
with
such
so
much
transparency
on
how
funding
is
getting
spent.
So
I'm
just
going
to
see
I'm
going
to
pass
around
for
closings
now.
Actually,
if
you
want
to
share
anything
else,
to
wrap
up-
and
maybe
I'll
ask
you
chewie,
if
you
want
to
get
us
started
on
a
closing
round.
E
C
That
there
should
be
a
lot
of
learning
and
also
that
we
should
always
be
like
seeing
what
the
other
groups
are
doing
and
iterating
with
that
because
yeah
it's
it's
that
mutual
monitoring
and
if
there
are
some
good
practices,
we
can
reproduce
them
and
if
we
identify
some
not
so
much
reproducible
practices
then
learn
from
them
and
and
have
some
information
for
that.
The
people
don't
make
the
making
the
same
mistake
in
the
future.
F
Yeah,
I
think
it's
a
really
interesting
discussion.
I
mean
that,
like,
as
we
iterate
on
things,
we'll
gain
experience
from
it,
but
I'm
really
interested
in
just
the
general
idea
of
like
working
group
working
groups
getting
funding
from
the
dow
and
raptek
site
and
then
buying
tc
tokens,
and
some
part
of
it
goes
back
into
the
back
into
the
dow.
I
think
that's
really
cool.
I
mean
yeah
anyway,
I'm
just
like
pondering
how
this
will
work
like
for
cases
like
this.
F
Like
one
high
trivia
thing
like
we
get
an
amount
of
funds
and
then
we
like
buy
tc
tokens
from
our
own
bonding
curve
and
the
price
goes
up.
I
don't
know
it's
cool,
it's
cool,
there's
a
lot
to
play
with
here
with
this
like
bonding
curve
having
wrapped
exercises
backing
instead
of,
like
the
tc
token
yeah
anyway.
Those
are
just
my
closing
thoughts
that
are
here
chris.
G
G
If
we
see
somebody
doing
poor
treasury
management
decisions,
it's
not
like,
we
can't
talk
to
them,
so
you
know,
I
think
I
think,
we'll
see
it's
a
wait
and
see
approach,
and
I
hope
that
different
working
groups
take
different
approaches
and-
and
we
see
what
works
best,
also
just
really
quick.
I
want
to
for
the
party
today
have
like
different
sections.
G
Where
we
talk
about,
you
know
making
proposals
to
the
dao
and,
like
you
know
what
we
launched,
convert,
dot,
t
commons.org,
adding
tokens
metamask,
you
know
the
reward
system
and
I
I
would
love
to
be
able
to
pass
to
people
to
take
on
different
little
presentations.
G
So
I
don't
know
if
anyone
wants
to
take
on
any
kind
of
thing
like
what
does
it
take
to
propose
to
a
dow
to
the
dow?
I
I
don't
know
is
that,
if
you'd
be
down
since
you
already
did
it
with
transparency-
and
you
could
talk
about
that
process-
and
you
know
someone
else
could
talk
about
like
I
can
take
convert.ecommerce.org.
A
G
See
if
I
can
get
gideon
to
to
take
that
on
because
he's
been
writing
this
post
and
great
call
and
then
yeah
and
if
there's
anything
else,
just
dm
me
during
this
next
hour
and
I'll
pass
it
to
nate.
I
Okay,
I'll
be
quick.
I
just
want
to
say
that
I
agree
with
having
autonomy
and
discretion
over
budgets.
However,
I
just
want
people
to
keep
in
mind
that
budgets
for
me
have
always
been
kind
of
this
moral
document.
This
kind
of
policy
decision
like
this
is
what
we
value
and
prioritize,
and
so
I
would
like
to
see
a
method
that
has
more
community
input
collective
community
input
on
that
those
types
of
decisions
rather
than
the
working
groups
deciding.
I
What
is
you
know,
ultimately
what
they
do
so,
like
those
things
kind
of
contradict
each
other,
but
yeah,
that's
just
kind
of
where
my
mind
is
I'll,
pass
it
to
anybody
else.
D
I
was
just
going
to
add
one
thing:
would
it
make
sense
to
maybe
make
some
kind
of
like
working
group
funding,
slash
proposal,
engine
ie
tool
so
that
you
can
have
some
standardized
way
in
which
one
goes
about
doing
these
things,
and
it
might
just
help,
because
I
know
in
gravity
we're
going
to
have
a
treasury
manager.
It
just
might
help
the
treasury
manager
work
efficiently
to
do
make
sure
nothing
is
skipped
and
nothing
is
left
out
and
there
aren't
lingering
questions
or
things
you.
C
D
Missing
or-
and
it
would
also
give
a
certain
amount
of
accountability
in
terms
of
the
decision
making
within
so
that,
if
something
does
go
wrong,
we
can
sort
of
work
our
way
back
and
figure
out
how
the
chain
of
events
happened.
So
that
might
be
helpful
in
terms
of
transparency,
accountability
and
mutual
monitoring
and
so
on.
So
I
don't
know
that
was
just
kind
of
an
idea.
A
Yeah,
just
in
response
to
that,
you
know
for
the
proposal
themselves,
there
is
a
template,
but
then
for
how
to
manage
the
there's.
It's
I
think
it's
very.
It's
gonna
be
up
to
every
each
working
group
to
sort
of
find
their
way
themselves,
and
I
like
what
wonka
said
earlier
today.
Maybe
I
just
want
to
reiterate
that
too
around
you
know,
I
mean
group
said
each
working
group
will
do
it
a
different
way.