►
From YouTube: W8 Stewards Council: Powers dynamics on the TEC
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
No
problem
so
I'll
just
do
another
intro
again
sorry,
so
I
just
want
to
say
one
thing
is
we.
I
just
got
off
the
I
left
early,
a
fireside
chat
for
colonel
block.
Five
and
vitalik
was
the
guest.
This
of
this
fireside
chat
and
one
of
the
unexpected
things
was
that
he
was
asked.
What
do
you
think
power
is,
and
how
do
we
understand
power?
So
I
thought
it
was
actually
fascinating
because
it
was
like
right
before
this.
A
He
also
shared
his
opinion
about
what
power
is
and
where
it
comes
from,
and
so
I
thought
well.
I
had
already
planned
this,
but
the
opening
question
for
our
council
today
about
power
dynamics
will
be
like.
Where
does
power
come
from
and
then
under
there
are
just
some
questions
to
open
up
a
discussion
feel
free
to
add
questions
that
you
think
are
relevant
for
people
to
reflect
on
and
to
be
mindful
of
in
the
conversation
that
we
have
this
hour.
A
Is
that
good
nate
eduardo.
B
Yes,
thank
you
so
much,
I
think
power
for
me.
B
It
could
come
from
a
social
construction,
a
social
dynamic
that
we
assume
or
agree
to
and
power
can
come
also
from
whatever
we
give
value
to
and
whatever
we
assign
value
will
they
then
have
power
over
us
or
power,
or
we
will
have
power
over
that
for
me,
and
I
think
if
we,
if,
if
I
think
about
the
dec
or
most
of
maybe
web
3
spaces,
I
think
the
power
comes
from
sometimes
what
we
thought
about,
who
has
the
knowledge
and
who
is
in
a
position
of
knowledge
and
that
unconsciously
creates
a
system
of
power
and
which
is
not
a
problem
for
me
as
soon
as
long
as
these
structures
are.
B
We
are
aware
of
these
structures
and
we
are
actively
working
towards
taking
down
the
structures
and
and
so
on
so
yeah,
that's
my
two
cents
on
that.
I
don't
know
who
to
pass
on.
So
I
will
pass
back
to
you
tim.
C
The
most
choices
we
can
make
and
the
widest
types
of
environments
reflect
how
much
power
we
have-
and
I
think
this
gives
this
awareness
of
social
of
class
primarily
and
of
privilege
so
yeah.
I
think,
understanding
the
the
difference
like
not
not
how
many
choices
I
have
in
comparison
to
someone,
but
how
impactful
my
choices
are
in
relation
to
someone
else's
choices
and
then,
since
we
have
a
complex
system
with
so
many
people
and
relationships
involved,
how
does
that
map
look
like
what
are?
D
Man,
I
have
a
lot
of
thoughts
on
this.
I'm
gonna
try
I'll
try
to
keep
it
short,
though
power.
So
like
there's
power
in
physics,
right
power
is
in
physics,
is
pretty
cool.
I
think
this
is
the
ideal
of
power.
The
idealistic
version
would
be
work
over
time.
Would
that's
that's
what
power
is
classically
right
in
in
in
physics
and
and
for
like
engineers,
and
so
it's
kind
of
a
derivative
of
time
versus
work?
D
I
think
that's
super
cool.
You
know
force
force
and
effort
over
a
space
for
a
given
amount
of
time.
That's
the
ideal
of
what
power
is,
but
that's
not
really
what
power
is
in
cultural
terms,
of
course,
but
I
think
that's
what
we
want
power
to
be.
I
really
liked
swinging
a
vitalik.
D
He
had
a
really
cool
blog
post
about
legitimacy
that
that
came
up
in
the
praise
debates
and
I
think
in
that
blog
post
he
talks
about
like
how
legitimacy
is
is
acquired
and
what
is
legitimacy
and
that
I
feel
like
a
lot
of
it
is
analogous
to
power
right.
So
there's
like
the
legitimacy
by
brute
force
like
power
by
brute
force.
D
You
know
you
can
just
take
power
right
or
you
gain
power
and
and
legitimacy
via
continuity
if
you've
been
doing
it
for
a
long
time,
power
also
can
be
derived
from
a
community
via
just
being
fair.
Everyone
has
a
voice.
You
can
give
power
in
a
systemic
in
a
systemic
way
through
fairness,
there
there's
power
through
process.
I
think
that's
kind
of
the
same
thing
you
can
like
have
a
you
know.
We
all
have
this,
these
tokens
that
have
so
much
power.
There's
power
through
performance.
D
For
instance,
I'm
looking
for
someone
who's
going
to
help
do
curation
who's
going
to
do
curation
systems.
I
want
to
give
them
the
power
to
manage.
Give
us
curation
system
that
we
want
to
build.
I
I'm
totally
down
to
give
people
power
over
that
if
they
worked
for
amazon
managing
the
curation
system
that
they
built
right.
That
would
be
amazing
if
it's
just
some
community
member,
I
probably
wouldn't
want
to
give
them
as
much
power,
because
they
don't
have
the
history
of
performance
and
then
power
through
participation
being
there.
D
E
Thanks
rave
yeah.
For
me,
the
power
is,
you
know,
as
we
also
said,
like
the
power
of
choice,
the
the
option
to
choice
and
the
most
important
thing
like
I
think
you
know
I
I
think
you
know
power
doesn't
have
to
be
equal
to
everyone
like
it's,
it's,
okay,
to
have
differences
of
power.
As
long
as
it
comes
from,
you
know,.
E
You
know
who
is
who
is
benefiting
more
the
commons
in
the
long
run,
should
yeah
it's
trying
to
get
more
power,
and
I
mean
for
what
I'm
seeing
what
I've
seen
the
tc
is
like
the
two
different.
You
know
the
two
powers
like
it's
like
social
recognition,
and
then
you
know
the
amount
of
tokens
you
can
have
like.
So
so
yeah
I
mean,
and
both
of
you
know
if
those
two
fonts
of
power
come
from
democracy.
G
I've
heard
it
again
pass
it
out
to
somebody
else.
H
Here,
because
of
the
premises
that
have
that
we
have
had
in
the
past-
and
some
of
there
are
legacies
that
we
carry
and.
H
Yeah,
I
think
power
are
like
the
premises
that
build
our
understanding
of
reality,
but
coming
from
the
past
yeah,
I
I
I
think
that
maybe
it's
a
little
abstract,
but
I
think
that-
and
I
think
also
that
some
different
type
of
power
that
we
are
having
in
the
tc
is
that
people
that
came
after
the
hatch
hasn't
been
able
to
vote,
and
we,
even
though
that
we
have
seven
months
after
the
hatch,
only
still
the
hatcher's
and
the
and
the
buyers
from
the
building
are
the
only
ones
that
can
participate
and
also
the
participation
from
those
people.
H
Yeah
should
be
completed.
Sorry.
A
No,
it's
okay,
because
I
think
it's
really
important
and
I
feel
like
that's
a
place
for
what
for
the
broader
discussion
and
but
maybe
if
we
just
go
around,
everyone
has
a
chance
to
speak
about
where
power
comes
from
and
then
we
could
we'll
go
around
and
everyone
just
takes
their
time.
There's
no
time
limits
here
actually,
but
I
wanted
to
sort
of
keep
it
focused
on
this
one
opening
question
and
then
move
to
the
product
discussion.
Yeah.
H
Sorry,
sorry
yeah,
then
I
will
pass
to
sol
sista.
I
The
ability
to
do
things
so
and
that
certainly,
first
and
foremost
comes
from
within.
I
It's
it's
quite
interesting.
I
believe
it
power
comes
from
the
mindset
that
is
more
about.
You
know:
control
having
control
having
power
property
ownership.
That
was
also
something
like
there
are
different
worldviews
and
I
believe
that-
and
I
see
or
I
live
in
those
worlds
where-
and
these
are
virtual
worlds
actually.
I
So
when
I'm
back
in
back
in
the
real
world
located
in
munich,
I
know
where
a
lot
of
power
comes
from,
so
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
that.
A
J
Great,
I
think
all
social
power
is
borrowed
from
the
autonomy
and
agency
of
its
participants,
and
I
think
that's
an
incredibly
important
structural
point
we
often
forget
about
is
that
all
social
power
is
borrowed.
So
basically
we,
if
we're
talking
about
social
power,
it's
it's
a
seems,
like
a
game
of
trying
to
convince
a
person
to
give
up
some
portion
of
their
autonomy
and
agency
to
sort
of
aggregate
power
in
some
way
in
into
the
social
fabric,
away
from
the
individual's
own
autonomy
and
agency.
So
yeah.
J
So
from
my
view,
social
power
is
is,
is
all
sort
of
borrowed
from
the
autonomy
agency
of
its
participants,
I'm
not
sure
who's
going
next,
because
I
became
a
little
late.
K
K
So
this
may
also,
as
we
said,
this
may
come
from
social
recognition,
but
also
from
crude
force.
For
example,
in
tec,
stewards
are
like,
let's
say,
leaders
of
the
working
groups
there.
They
have
social
recognition,
so
they
have
some
other
powers
because
they
have
some
more
will
than
some
other
ones,
but
it's
coming
from
social
recognition,
but
in
some
cases
this
is
coming
from.
Let's
say:
scared,
scared,
society
etc.
A
Hey
craig,
if
you
can,
if
you
are
at
a
good
place
where
you
can
speak
the
opening
questions,
so
the
topic
for
today
is
power
dynamics
and
in
the
agenda,
there's
a
list
of
some
questions
for
reflection
and
mindfulness
about
just
to
start
a
conversation.
Everyone's
welcome
to
add
questions
if
they'd
like
to
and
the
opening
question
that
we'll
start
with
before
we
go
into
the
to
the
larger
discussion
is:
where
does
power
come
from?
If
you'd
like
to
share
your
thoughts,
craig.
F
Yeah
hi
tim
thank
you,
so
I'm
on
mobile
and
I'm
driving
and
I'm
finding
this
just
joining
this
conversation
fascinating,
but
I'm
gonna
have
to
pass
and
yeah.
Oh
yep,
yep,
bye.
A
Sure
what
about
ratio
13?
L
I
want
to
be
simple,
I
think
I
think
power
is
inherited
acquired
given.
F
Thank
you.
Well,
I
think
power
sort
of
goes
down
to
value
resources
like
I
think
poverty
is
what
you
do
with
with
what
you
have,
whether
you
as
an
individual
or
perhaps
social
networks
or
whatever
you
have.
F
F
F
Welcome
hi,
I
agree
with
durga
das
and
that
power
is
borrowed
from
others.
I
mean
just
looking
sorry.
We
can
hear
my
brother
in
the
background,
but
just
looking
from
my
personal
experience,
you
know
like
every
time
I
make
a
decision
or
take
any
action
or
say
anything
within
the
tec
on
my
own
in
a
way,
I'm
kind
of
taking
away
other
people's
power
to
say
something
about
it
or
make
decisions
about
something
you
know
I
mean
so
I
think
it
is
borrowed
from
others,
especially
if
you're
part
of
a
collective.
A
Okay,
thank
you
and
I
don't
think
I
missed
anyone.
So
please
holler
if
I'm
wrong-
and
I
found
these
super
interesting,
I
thought
a
little
about
it
myself
and
I
see
there's
different
kinds
of
power
as
well.
I
mean
I
to
go
back
to
what
sulcista
said
about
the
the
root
of
the
word
that
to
be
able
to
do
things
which
sort
of
corresponds
nicely
to
what
lydia
said
around
like
you.
A
Can
you
have
a
choice,
the
power
to
be
able
to
choose
the
choices
aren't
made
for
you,
which
just
goes
like
circles
around.
A
A
You
know,
there's
this
kind
of
power,
you
take
power
and
you
force
people
to
do
something
against
their
will
or
like
another
kind
of
force
is
leverage,
so
financial
incentive
or
another
kind
of
incentive
could
be
another
way
of
having
power
over
others
like
a
control,
this
kind
of
power,
and
then
I
think
that
there
is
this
other
kind
of
power,
which
is
a
much
more
healthy
kind
of
power,
and
it
comes
from
trust.
A
You
know
you,
you,
people
who
you
trust,
have
a
certain
power
with
you,
people
in
your
family,
people
that
you
admire
and
have
come
to
be
able
to
count
on.
I
think
that
they
acquire
a
certain
like
power
with
you
and
skills
and
knowledge
as
well.
I
think
people
that
are
very
skilled
in
knowledge
have
a
power
in
a
particular
domain.
A
You
know,
I
don't
think
of
powers,
like
all
you
know,
omnipotence
everywhere,
all
the
time,
but
more,
like
really
focused
in
certain
areas
where
you
can
acquire
those
powers
because
of
the
skills
or
knowledge
or
trust
that
you've
built,
and
so
how
I'm
thinking
it
about
it
right
now.
A
Okay,
so
there's
a
lot
of
questions
here
and
I'd
love
us
to
get
more
focused
on
the
tec
now,
actually,
if
we
can
talk
about,
where
is
power
exerted
in
the
tec?
Where
do
you
see
it
exerted
and
you
can
share
whether
you
think
it's
healthy
or
unhealthy
or
like
how
it
can
be
improved
ways?
People
are
empowered
in
the
tdc.
So
how
do
we?
A
How
do
we
empower
others
to
to
feel
the
ability
to
choose
the
ability
to
do
things
and
then
checks
and
balances
in
the
community
checks
and
balances
the
stewards
have
in
place
and
any
feedback
loops
so
I'll
pass
it
around?
We
don't
really
have
a
time
we
have
about
a
little
under
40
minutes
left.
A
So
I'd
like
people
to
really
sort
of
dig
into
this
as
they
as
they
want
to.
I
guess
we'll
pass
it
around
to
and
I'm
gonna
say
answer
as
many
or
as
few
of
these
questions
as
you
feel
like
you
are
comfortable
doing
and
I
think
I'll
love
to
pass
to
you,
soul,
sister,
to
get
us
started.
I
Thank
you.
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
I
might
jump
out
early,
and
one
question
is
what
also
made
me
come
here
is
the
second
last
questions.
What
checks
and
balances
do
stewards
have
in
place,
or
do
they
even
need
it
again?
Since
I
said
in
my
world,
we
also
how
I
perceive
tech
or
any
of
these
systems
that
we're
building
these
power
dynamics
like
we
have
the
agency
to
build
and
rebuild
and
improve
such
that
we
don't
feel.
I
I
Yeah
ethical
yeah,
I'm
a
bit
drawn
off,
so
that's
the
question
like
how?
How
did
we
even
get
there
like?
What
are
it
feels
like
those
power
dynamics
somehow
creep
in
into
these
systems
that
you
know
we
are
defining
our
economy
by
the
participants?
This
is
what
we
are
talking
about
right
and
we
are
doing
that
like
literally
work
overtime.
That
has
been
all
of
it.
I
So,
where
do
these
power
dynamics
do
creep
in,
and
that
would
be
one
thing
I
would
love
to
learn
or
if
we
get
to
that
point
sometime
and
really,
if,
though,
you
know
stuart,
that's
then
you're
just
misusing
the
word
yeah.
If
you
have
really
power
legislative
or
whatever
you
know,
if
you're
just
doing
playing
the
same
games,
then
we're
just
using
other
words
for
the
same
game
and
same
roles.
I
A
Okay,
do
you
want
to
pass
it
along.
F
Well,
I
think
I'll
probably
pass
in
this
one,
because
you
said
it
was
more
focused
on
the
tc
and
I
just
don't
know
enough.
H
Yeah,
thank
you,
yeah.
I
also
think
that
somehow
power
is
the
capacity
to
participate
and
the
ability
to
do
the
same
that
that
others
can
do
so.
That's
why
I
bring
that
into
the
table
like
we
are
already
working
with
the
gardens,
but
there's
people
that
have
been
participating
in
the
project
over
six
six
or
seven
months,
and
they
are
still
like
not
being
able
to
be
included
in
that
phase
of
of
managing
the
commons.
H
So
I
think
it's
important
yeah
to
to
try
to
give
a
lot
of
relevance
that
the
reward
system
is
is
is
a
key
piece
for
the
power
balance
in
in
our
organization
and
yeah.
H
There
are
always
checks
and
balances,
and
I
I
also
think
that
power
like
has
a
lot
of
premises,
and
it
all
goes
also
into
how
much
do
we
question
those
premises,
and
how
much
are
we
yeah
sometimes
carrying
some
things
without
questioning
them,
because
we
have
seen
them
in
in
other
spheres
of
our
life
and
how
much
are
we
trying
to
build
things
from
from
from
yeah
from
the
best
of
ourselves?
H
Yeah?
I
think
it's
it's,
it's
also
very
difficult,
but
it's
a
challenge
that
we
all
face
to
to
be
conscient
with
our
communication
and
also
with
our
behavior
but
yeah.
We
are
all
human
and
I
will
pass
to
mert.
K
Thank
you,
so
I
wanted
to
add
actually
on
top
of
one
for
something
about
in
what
ways
people
are
empowered
in
tc.
Of
course,
you
are
empowered
by
your
tokens,
your
governance
power,
but
also
empowerment,
I
think,
will
should
come
from
the
cultural
build
as
well
fully.
For
example,
we
we
shall
create
a
cultural
will
that
appreciate
hard
work
and
like
leadership
within
the
working
group.
K
So,
for
example,
in
my
experience
like
I
don't
have
any
voting
power,
but
I
feel
empowered
within
tc
through
time,
because
I've
been
participating
in
my
working
group
like
people
were
recognizing
that
I'm
doing
something.
So
they
were
appreciating
me,
they
were
giving
me
more
jobs.
So,
in
a
way
the
cultural
will
that
is
created
is
also
empowering.
K
G
Thanks
mark,
so
I
I
just
want
to
start
out
by
saying
that
I
don't
think
power
is
inherently
bad
or
negative,
or
any
of
that
you
know.
If
I,
if
I
have
power-
and
I
exercise
that
power,
I
exercise
it
only
because
you
grant
me
that
power
and
in
a
way,
every
time
I
exercise
my
power,
I'm
risking
that
power,
and
so,
if
we
look
at
it
from
that
perspective,
a
lot
of
times
power
in
the
natural
sense
is
a
form
of
reputation,
and
that
is
risks.
G
Every
time
you
make
a
decision
or
you
put
put
something
on
the
line,
and
so
this
is
also
interesting
because
it
can
be
deceiving
as
well,
because
blind
trust
and
that
power
is
a
huge
problem
that
we
can't
afford
to
let
creep
into
the
culture
or
any
aspect
of
interpersonal
relationships
with
all
that
being
said,
the
tec
has
very
interesting
power
dynamics.
In
my
opinion,
I
think
the
stewards
in
particular
have
both
social
and
and
and
functional
powers
over
how
things
are
done.
G
A
lot
of
this,
I
think,
is
to
blame,
is
that
is
because
we
have
centralized
tooling
it
it.
It
allows
us
to
be
gatekeepers
of
certain
things
like
the
forum
or
discord
or
the
hubspot
or
zenhub,
and
this
kind
of
naturally
creeps.
G
I
think
slowly
into
the
the
social
realm
and-
and
this
is,
I
think,
what
kind
of
dergados
was
speaking
to
the
other
day
about
the
the
baseline
security,
where
you
know,
if
we
can
have
a
system
where
we
don't
have
to
trust
anybody,
I
think
the
the
role
steward
would
be
less
perceived
with
this
type
of
power
than
it
actually
is,
and
so
I
think
these
types
of
structural
dynamics
that
we
have
in
the
tec
kind
of
lend
themselves
to
to
the
perception
of
more
social
power
and
blind
trusts
that
should
probably
not
exist
but
yeah.
G
Those
are
just
my
observations
so
far,
but
I
think
it's
a
very
difficult
subject
and
I
don't
think
it's
inherently
bad.
I
just
think
we
have
to
really
focus
on
how
to
approach
it
and
be
aware
of
the
power
that
we
hold.
A
G
You're,
not
technically
gatekeeping,
but
you
can
limit
you.
Can
you
have
you
have
powers
over
others
that
others
don't
have.
A
I
A
But
then
discord
and
zen
hub
are
the
other
two
things
that
are
very
open
to
anyone.
So
in
theory
anyone
should
be
able
to
join
our
discord
and
say
most
things,
but
I
I
see
what
you're
saying
there's,
maybe
not
access
to
the
orientation
data,
for
example.
So
there's
a
different
level
of
access
to
information.
G
Pass
it
on
to
to
to
the
griff.
D
Thank
you.
Maybe
maybe
I
need
one
more
person
before
me
to
to
this.
I
just
got
a
little
distracted
in
real
life
here.
Can
I
pass
it
to
olivia.
A
C
I'm
really
excited
about
the
analysis,
part
of
the
reward
systems,
because
I
think
this
will
show.
So
I
think
what
we're
missing-
and
I
was
talking
to
tim
about
this-
the
whole
thing
before
and
we
were
thinking
like
what
are
the
important
questions
to
raise
the
points
that
are
actually
missing
and
I
think
a
feedback
loop
that
we
are
missing
is
one
that
shows
all
of
the
contributions
that
we
have,
what
types
of
contributions,
how
they
are
distributed,
what
value
they
received,
who
is
working
with
who?
C
What
are
the
relationships
in
the
system
and
all
this
will
be
able
to
see
in
the
in
the
analysis,
dashboard
and
that's
what
I'm
focusing
most
of
my
time
with,
with
with
the
reward
systems
like
thinking
how
to
understand
health
of
the
ecosystem
like
what
are
what
are
metrics
for
health?
I
just
I
just
had
a
call
today
with
with
the
bitcoin
crew
that
is
making
the
karma
app
for
them.
So
bitcoin
developed
this
this
reputation
system
to
access
a
health
of
individuals,
so
we're
trying
to
understand
what
makes
someone.
C
What
is
what
is
healthy?
What
is
healthy
for
a
person
in
in
tc
how?
How
do
we
know
that
contributors
are
healthy
and
that
the
ecosystem
is
healthy
and
that
the
relationships
that
coming
from
from
this
are
healthy
and
I'm
really
excited?
Actually,
I
see
I
see
a
bright
future
for
this,
like
we're,
yeah
we're
brainstorming,
a
lot
of
interesting
things.
C
It
takes
a
lot
more
effort.
So
I
think
I
want
to
share
that.
I
I
think
a
lot
of
people
are
doing
this
effort
a
lot
more
than
we
imagine,
and
maybe
there
is
a
an
issue
with
visibility.
Maybe
the
contributions
of
the
stewards
are
the
ones
most
visible
to
everyone
and
that's
a
point
where
we
need
to
improve
to
leverage
all
the
other
contributions
to
a
like.
A
similar
level
of
exposure.
E
Thanks
libby
yeah,
I
pretty
much
agree
with
what
everything
said.
Only
thing
also
like
you
can
lose
power
by
not
doing
nothing
like
not
only
you
need
to
exercise
it
to
lose
it.
You
can
also
use.
E
You
know
you
step
away,
and
then
you
know
after
time,
your
social,
you
know
you're,
not
so
much
in
the
loop,
so
people
can't
trust
you
less
and
then
I
wanted
to
say
another
thing
yeah
like,
and
you
know
like
right
now,
just
from
being
on
this
meeting
like
the
stores
are
being
rewarded
and
other
people
not
so
much,
and
I
mean
this,
isn't
you
know
like
it's
it's
the
way
we
work
like.
We
make
those
proposals
in
the
forum
in
the
garden
and
then
we
you
know
we
set
up
the
team.
E
I
don't
know
like
another
way.
You
know
to
decentralize
because
I
feel,
like
you
know,
everyone's
opinion
is
the
same
valuable
in
this
meeting
and
yeah,
and
this
was,
I
just
been
rewarded.
I
know
there's
not
but
yeah,
it's
the
only
thing.
I
can
share
right
now,
I'll
pass
it
to
grief.
E
Like
I
mean,
like
you
know,
just
for
assisting
those
goals,
and
but
you
know
but
like
one
of
you
know,
the
students
are
getting
a
monthly
salary
just
for
being
stewards,
you
know
taking
all
the
coordination.
This
goal
is
one
of
the
jobs
that
the
stores
are
thinking.
You
don't
have
to
be
here
like
to
get
that
compensation,
but
you
know
most
you're
getting.
C
D
I
think
I
understand
thank
you
cool
I'll
snag
it
thanks
up,
so
I'm
just
gonna
go
back
to
some
of
these
questions
too.
I
really
liked
what
what
really
everyone's
had
to
say,
but
especially
olivia's
thoughts
around
reward
systems.
I
feel
like
we're
really
missing
the
reward
system,
and
I
you
know
I
wish
that
we
could
have.
D
D
People
don't
feel
like.
I
feel
like
there's
a
really
there's
a
huge
benefit
to
the
reward
system
at
a
psychological
level,
too,
of
feeling,
like
the
praise
being
like
gamified,
in
a
way
where
it's
like.
Oh,
yes,
I
am
making
progress.
I
feel
that
I
have
more
power
than
I
had
before,
because
my
number
went
up
a
little
bit.
You
know
and
having
that
number
go
up,
mentality
feels
like
you're,
making
progress
in
the
game
and
and
that
game
making
progress
in
the
game.
I
think,
gives
you
the
ability
to
make
more
power.
D
Also
like
what
steph
just
said,
you
know
it's
like
the
people
who
end
up
getting
salaries
to
do
this
work.
They
have
the
ability
to
to
take
more
power
and
have
more
have
more
time
to
you
know.
If
power
is
like
work
over
time,
they
can
put
more
work
in
less
and
and
more
time
in
so
they
can
have
more
power
and
then,
like,
I
think,
tec
power
has
exerted
a
lot
in
calls
and
in
decisions
on
get
on
get
on
github
board.
D
I
think
we
do
an
amazing
job
at
decentralization
honestly
compared
to
most
groups,
but
but
we
can
always
do
better.
D
Of
course,
powers
exerted
in
in
voting
with
tec
tokens
and-
and
I
think
people
are
empowered
to
kind
of
I
mean
when,
when
the
reward
system's
back,
I
think
giving
people
praise
is
actually
you
know
in
many
ways
giving
people
power
and
I
would
love
to
see
us
create
some
kind
of
reputation
like
non-transferable
token,
to
be
distributed
along
with
the
tc,
so
that
the
power
is
not
also
so
that
reputation
is,
is
given
and
not
just
monitor
something
that's
transferable,
because
having
impact
hours
and
having
the
non-transferable
like
hatch,
tokens
allowed
us
to
do
so
much
so
many
cooler
things
with
voting
and
distributing
decision
making
power.
D
So
I
I
hope
that
we
can
bring
that
back
to
some
extent,
maybe
even
like
connected
to
when
people
buy
tokens
to
the
augmented
bonding
curve.
We
also
issue
them
a
reputation
token,
but
not
when
they
buy
it
on
the
market.
Things
like
this,
you
know
we
can.
I
think
we
can
be
creative.
I
do
think
that
power
and
reputation
come
hand
in
hand
and
that
we
really
should
bring
in
some
kind
of
reputation.
D
Connection
for
like
especially
to
enable
feedback
loops.
You
know
and
enable
people
to
have
a
voice
and
not
just
be
able
to
buy
their
power.
The
being
able
to
buy
power
is
not
something
that
is
very
exciting.
I
think
that
it
makes
a
lot
of
sense
when
you're,
when
you're
exerting
power
over
a
collection
of
funds.
D
You
know
if
you,
if
you
like,
if,
if,
if
you're
putting
money
into
a
pot
and
one
person
puts
in
twenty
dollars
and
one
person
puts
in
a
million
dollars,
the
person
with
twenty
dollars
should
have
much
less
of
a
voice.
Now
I
don't
know
if
it
should
be
twenty
to
a
million.
I
really
like
quadratic
voting
for
that.
D
You
know
that
you
can,
you
know,
reduce
the
power
distribution
and
still
in
a
way,
empower
people's
individual
perspective
and
take
that
into
account
as
well,
but
in
the
end,
plutocracy
makes
a
lot
of
sense
when
you're
governing
a
pot
of
funds,
it
doesn't
make
sense
when
you're
governing
the
direction
of
advancing
token
engineering.
D
It
makes
much
less
sense
there,
and
so
we're
going
to
need
to
find
a
way
to
to
mitigate
these
dynamics.
I
think,
but
I
think
I
think
I
really
love
the
conviction,
voting
dynamic
and
the
power
through
tokens
to
distribute
funds
there,
and
I
think
that's
I'm
excited
to
see
how
we
can
improve
that
and
nail
that
but
and
yeah
checks
and
balances
on
stewards.
D
I
think
I
think
one
of
the
things
that
we've
been
missing
a
lot
is
feed
these
feedback
loops
and
that's,
I
think,
that's
on
a
cultural
level
just
a
great
way
to
grow.
D
D
So
I
do
think
that
we
need
checks
and
balances.
Stewards
do
have
power,
the
power
comes
from
legitimacy
and
people
listen
to
stewards
over
others,
so
I
even
think
people
will
start
be
eventually
will
spin
up
the
delegation
thing
in
in
in
our
garden
and
that
will
even
bring
more
checks
and
balances
needed
to
stewards.
I
mean
you
saw
the
stuff
with
brantley
here.
D
It's
really
interesting,
you
know,
brantley
got
kicked
out
of
ens,
basically
for
his
catholic
views
and
his
like
homophobia,
views
and
and
very
very,
like
you
know,
tradition,
traditional
and,
and
I
don't
know
like
old
world
views
and
and
yet
he's
still
the
number
one
ens
delegate
he's
actually
still
number
one
he
and
his
delegate
after
all
that
drama.
D
At
least
he
was
a
couple
days
ago,
and
so
now
they're
like
oh
wow,
I
guess
it's,
maybe
it's
gas
costs
and
they're
like
going
to
subsidize
gas
costs,
but
in
the
end
one
especially
with
crypto
stuff.
You
know
when
you
accumulate
power,
it
kind
of
gets
stuck
in
you,
you
can't
even
take
it
away.
So
I
think,
having
some
checks
and
balances
built
in
is
something
that
we
should
really
consider
yeah,
and
I
don't
sorry
for
that
long
rant
I'll
pass
it
to
mert.
A
L
Yeah,
I
definitely
am
not
going
to
take
long.
Only
I
can
say
is
that
it's
hard
to
determine
what
the
power
dynamics
are.
Unless
there's
transparency
complete
utter
transparency
and
that's
yeah,
that's
pretty
much
all
I
got.
I
don't
want
to
take
any
more
time.
I've
been
here
long
enough
to
really
form
an
opinion.
That's
just
a
generalized
opinion,
I'll
pass
it
on
to
dergados.
J
So
if
you
start
with
the
premise
that
that
social
power
is
borrowed,
then
the
stewardship
idea
should
automatically
be
one
of
service,
but
I
think
it's
important
that
we
understand
that
there
are
sort
of
three
sections
of
things
that
we
need
to
deal
with.
One
is
everybody
here
has
participated
in
an
abusive
system
forever,
and
so
their
general
way
of
dealing
with
things
is
being
used
to
being
asked
by
every
system
they've
ever
interacted
with
to
give
up
their
power
to
them
so
that
they
can
acquire
that
power
from
them.
J
So
they
don't
really
know
what
true
autonomy
agency
or
decentralization
is
like
at
all.
So
all
of
their
behaviors
are
going
to
be
informed
by
the
abusive
system
that
they've
come
from.
So
I
think
we
need
to
recognize
that
as
a
starting
point
for
most
people
and
that
most
people
are
just
not
going
to
be
comfortable
with
autonomy
or
agency
or
the
simple
fact
of
using
decentralization
as
their
their
ground
floor.
J
So,
in
order
for
them
to
be
able
to
do
that,
we
have
to
put
them
through
an
educational
process
by
which
they
can
actually
begin
to
feel
that
autonomy
and
agency
and
to
feel
it
okay.
So,
instead
of
being
anti-centralization,
which
is,
I
think,
what
most
people
view
decentralization
as
we
get
to
actually
use
decentralization
as
the
starting
point.
J
J
Bureaucracy,
ideas
instead
of
actual
decentralization,
and
so
I
think
that
has
to
be
educated
away
and
if
I
think
we're
going
to
call
ourselves
a
dao,
we
have
to
just
recognize
the
fact
of
that
actual
need
to
educate
people
in
in
that
side
of
the
picture
and
to
appreciate
that
when
we're
making
decisions
that
a
person's
going
to
be
coming
from
the
legacy
cultural
code
base,
as
I
call
it,
which
is
centralization,
giving
up
your
power
talking
your
way
out
of
things,
you
behave
your
way
into
all
of
this
stuff,
you
know,
is
all
just
a
part
of
the
the
previous
abusive
system.
J
J
So,
for
example,
I
have
a
bunch
of
specific
examples
in
terms
of
the
way
we
deal
with
this
in
the
tec.
So
we're
like
hey,
we
don't
want
to
have
the
technocracy,
and
yet
we
aggregate
a
bunch
of
different
unrelated
sets
of
concerns
into
a
single
voting
proposition
right.
So
that's
literally,
you
know
an
example
of
how
we
just
shot
ourselves
in
the
foot.
J
So
we
we
have
a
lot
of
legacy
cultural
code
based
structural
issues
that
are
created
through
these
kinds
of
you
know:
unconscious
bias,
confirmation,
bias,
sunk,
cost
fallacies,
all
these
different
kinds
of
things,
and
so
I
just
think
that
that
that
we
need
to
inventory
that
stuff
and
and
do
what
we
can
to
put
in
structures
that
liberate
us
or
create
enabling
constraints
versus
the
perpetually
choosing
governing
constraints
which,
which
is
the
the
the
tool
of
the
abusers
abusive
systems
that
we
came
out
of,
and
I
I
will
also
say
that
that
the
the
problem
with
the
steward
model
is
that
is
that
it
works
really.
J
Well,
if
decentralization
is
your
your
psychological
base,
okay,
but
it
doesn't
work
really
well
if
you
came
from
the
legacy
cultural
code
base,
and
so
where
you're
I've
talked
to
people
who
were
talking
about
my
situation
and
some
people
apologized
to
me,
because
their
habit
was
to
become
to
be
bystanders
rather
than
to
actually
inform
me
that
there
were
things
going
on
yeah.
There
are
just
people
who
who
will
just
have
more
social
power
and
beautiful
thing
about
the
token
engineering
commons
is.
J
I
think
there
are
a
lot
of
people
here
who
really
do
a
great
job,
trying
to
give
away
the
power
that
they
have
when
people
try
to
put
it
on
them.
So
part
of
the
reason
why
somebody
like
griff
is
really
admirable
or
livy
is
because
they
actually
really
try
hard
to
deflect
the
the
legacy
cultural
code
based
stuff
that
they
get
from
other
people
and
and
in
that
sense
there
are
really
good
sort
of
benevolent
dictators
you
know,
but
they
they
really
don't
want
to
be
those
things.
J
J
What
I'm
saying
is
that
we
as
a
as
a
culture,
I
don't
think,
do
a
good
as
good
a
job
at
that
as
some
of
the
people
who
are
you
know
who
founded
that,
and
I
I'd
like
to
see
us
put
in
things
like
liberating
structures
to
actively
in
every
single
meeting
deflect
or
disperse
that
power
that
they've
accumulated
by
that
previous
legacy
cultural
code
base
by
convincing
people
that
it
is
okay
to
give
up
or
outsource
all
of
their
governance
and
power
and
money
and
structural
stuff,
and
I
just
think
we
need
to
be
really
really
clear
when
we're
when
we're
doing
things
for
convenience
or
because
of
our
previous
thinking
versus
truly
not
behaving
in
a
decentralized
fashion.
J
So
I
have
a
million
more
things
to
say
on
this,
but
I
feel
like
I
could
go
on
forever.
I
have
tons
of
examples
and
other
things
and
if
you
guys
want
to
unpack
that
with
me,
we
could
do
that
in
some
other
form.
But
I
think
I've
said
enough.
As
a
summary.
Thank
you.
A
Thanks
durgadass
and
I'd
love
to
hear
more
about
it
personally
and
well.
The
next
few
weeks
are
going
to
be
quite
packed,
but
hopefully
in
march,
I'd
love
to
talk
to
you
a
little
bit
more
about
it,
but
eduardo
hasn't
had
a
chance
to
go
yet.
So
we
have
three
minutes
left.
B
Thank
you
tim.
I
won't
take
long
for
me,
the
I
will
go
straight
to
the
questions,
the
type
of
power
that
we
have
here.
I
think
we
have
a
token
holder
power
and
we
have
a
social
construct,
power
or
cultural,
our
cultural
related
power,
where
we
have
assigned
probably
a
certain
power
socially
to
people
in
what
places
its
power
exerted
in
the
dec.
B
I
feel,
as
excepti
mentioned,
the
stewards
council
all
the
stores,
even
though
it's
an
open
space
for
everyone
to
join,
not
everyone
joins,
and
it
happens
quite
often-
and
I
think,
as
long
as
we
do
not
structure
in
a
way
that
people
are
clearly
engage
in
these
decision-making
spaces,
then
we
are
actually
exercising
power,
unconsciously,
probably
and
unwillingly,
but
we
are
exercising
power
and
it's
not
very
balanced,
because
we
are
not
open
enough,
so
people
don't
get
more
involved.
In
that
sense,
what
check
and
balance
does
the
store
have
in
place?
B
I
think
a
grief
idea-
and
we
talk
about
this
with
him
at
some
point-
to
give
mutual
feedback,
in
my
case,
for
example,
the
feedback
I
received
from
from
grief
back
in
the
day.
B
It
was
really
helpful-
and
I
feel
this
this
very
simple-
nothing,
too
complicated
approach
to
things
and
in
a
human
level,
it's
very
grounding
and
it's
very
helpful
to
improve,
and
I
think
it
should
be
mutual
like,
even
if
you
work
at
common
stock,
even
if
you
are
not
a
store
like
this
just
pick,
someone
who
you
work
close
to
and
make
yourself
accountable
and
and
make
yourself
open
to
receive
feedback
and
improve
from
that
in
the
community,
which
checks
and
balance.
B
I
I
for
me
and
all
the
other
questions
are
related
to
accessibility.
It
doesn't
matter
how
many
power
balancing
options
we
have
if
the
community
is
not
aware
that
they
exist,
and
I
think
this
is
something
we
could
make
more
of
an
effort
on
on
making
sure
that
people
are
out
the
community.
It's
aware
talking
holders
are
aware
that
these
things
are
open
like
if
you
want
to
the
proposal
to
take
whatever
decision,
making.
You
think
it's
better.
You
have
to
you,
have
the
power
to
do
it.
B
If,
if
you
just
do
it,
so
I
think
accessibility,
it's
something
we
could
help.
It
could
help
the
balance
power
that
that
is
happening
here
in
the
dc,
so
I
wouldn't.
I
will
give
you
the
last
minute
time
back
to
you.
A
Cool
thanks
everyone
for
sharing
that
such
a
great
and
diverse
and
different
opinions.
I
really
appreciated
hearing
it.
I
just
maybe
we'll
share
you
know
30
seconds,
because
we
are
at
the
top
of
the
hour.
I
think
mostly
the
most
important
thing
is
that
people
are
empowered
in
the
tec
and
of
all
these
questions.
I
think
that's
the
one
that's
most
important
to
to
to
focus
on,
and
I
would
say
similar
to
what
durgados
was
saying
about
empowering
others.
I
do
look
at
stewardship
as
civil
servants.
A
I
look
at
our
our
organization
in
this
role
as
servant
leadership
and
that's
why
active
and
present
servant
leadership
in
the
know.
I
was
like
it's
one
of
the
most
important
three
things
to
be
a
steward
is
that
we
empower
the
people
around
us
rather
than
dictating
what
the
other
people
around
us
should
do,
and
I
think
it's
really
probably
more
important
for
us
to
have
more
concrete
ways
where
we
can
practice
that
I'd
say.
I
think
servant
leadership.
A
Maybe,
in
my
mind,
is
not
the
same
for
everyone
else
in
their
minds,
and
maybe
an
interesting
thing
that
we
could
do
with
the
stewardship
is
to
actively
practice
servant
leadership,
practices
and
something
that
I
am
keeping
in
my
mind
to
see
how
we
can
incorporate
that
more
more.
You
know,
I
was
gonna,
say
hard
code,
but
more
formally,
and
we.