►
From YouTube: W10 Stewards Council
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
B
I
think,
and
actually
I
mean
yeah
I
think
we
can
like
if
we
talk
all
everything
that
we
need
to
talk
and
then
yeah
we
can.
You
know
if
we
keep
it
under
an
hour,
then
we
can
also
keep
discussing
another
stuff
actually,
like
the
main
focus,
was
on
how
to
use
the
money,
not
so
much
in
the
debate
that
was
generated
in
the
forum,
but
then
I
also
think
it's
it's
worth
talking,
especially
at
the
beginning.
B
So
yeah,
like
the
intro
question,
is
like
how
do
you
envision
laser
tag,
or
what
do
you
under
understand?
What
do
you
think
laser
tag
is
doing
and
then
yeah?
How
do
you
see
it
in
in
the
long
run,
and
then
an
intention
is
also
to
keep
it
under
a
minute
so
yeah
for
me
laser
tag
it
was
like
just
you
know.
I
think
that
must
was
needed
just
because
we
didn't
have
like
how
to
dow
it
right
now
we
have
an
agent,
so
it
shouldn't
be
necessary
anymore,
so
yeah
for
a
mission.
B
C
Yeah,
I
think,
there's
a
lot
of
options
that
we
can
use
for
the
the
laser
tag
wallet
I
just
one
of
the
aspects
is
that
I
just
think
it
needs
to
be
strictly
defined
and
making
sure
that
there's
some
kind
of
accountability
towards
it,
because
I
know
that
a
lot
of
the
people
on
the
laser
tag
wallets
are
not
interacting
with
the
day-to-day
aspects
of
of
the
tec,
and
so
that
is
a
little
bit
of
concern
for
me,
but
yeah
outside
of
that.
C
I
think
there
are
a
lot
of
options
that
can
be
explored
so
pass
it
to
libya.
D
What
are
the
best
options
for
what
are
even
the
more
ethical
options
of
how
to
manage
the
funds
so
in
this
proposal,
with
the
give
token,
for
example,
I
think
it's
a
great
idea
to
generate
like
together
projects
that
are
that
are
partners
that
are
closed
and
then
start
to
create
a
revenue
out
of
that,
and
then
how
could
we
include
other
projects
are
there.
It
feels
like
starts
to
open
up
for
like
partnership,
conversation
and
and
give
giveth.
Of
course
it's
like
really
close
to
us,
but
are
there?
D
E
Thank
you
libby.
I
feel
the
same
like
you
like
yeah,
I
don't
have.
I
don't
have
a
clear
opinion.
I
actually.
A
E
E
E
Thanks
manuel
yeah,
and
in
my
case
and
also
to
be
honest,
I
haven't
been
following
this
conversation.
It's
just
something
that
I
haven't
had
like
the
bandwidth
to
cover
so
yeah.
I
thought
that
attending
the
council
today
was
gonna,
be
a
great
opportunity
to
also
be
a
listener,
and
yeah
definitely
have
like
90
messages
to
catch
up
with
on
telegram-
and
I
know
that
probably
this
is
just
attracting
a
lot
of
different
opinions,
so
yeah
I'm
here
to
listen
as
well
I'll,
pass
it
to
safety.
A
Yeah
go
got
well,
I
guess
I'd
say
that
I'm
also
in
many
ways
here
to
listen
to,
so
I'm
so
glad
that
zeptimus
is
hosting
this
and
that
what
I
think
laser
tag
or
I
envision
for
it
in
the
long
run-
is
that
I
think
it's
a
way
for
us
to
have
some
access
to
liquid
tec,
basically
or
tec,
that
we
can
then
use
for
liquidity,
pools
or
partnerships,
and
I've
also
haven't
really
had
the
bandwidth
to
make
any
proposal
for
it
or
to
even
fully
understand
what
some
of
the
proposals
were.
A
I
think
that
the
proposal
from
mitch
was
pretty
clear
for
the
ex-diet
tec,
but
I
didn't
fully
understand,
I
think,
the
other
one
there's
another
proposal
for
a
honey
tec
liquidity
pool.
So
I
think
what
I
would
hope
to
get
out
of
this,
maybe
is
some
sort
of
like
you
know,
cost
benefit
around
like
the
proposals.
The
proposals
are
very
can
be
easy
to
understand
what
what
the
execution
is,
but
I
think
what
people
are
more
are
interested
in.
Understanding
is
what
is
the
benefit
or
what
is
the
risk?
A
So
I
think
that
we
would
have
more
more
people
able
to
vote
for
proposals
of
using
the
tec
tokens
that
we
have.
I
think
it's
like
118
000
now,
if
we
could
help
people
understand
the
benefits
and
the
risks
associated
with
the
the
proposal
on
the
table,
and
I
yeah-
I
guess
that's
what
I
want
to
say.
I
guess
I'm
not
as
worried.
I
don't
really
have
any
concerns
about
the
multi-sig
or
that
you
know
I
think
half
or
more
than
half
people
are
incredibly
active,
zargham.
A
Okay,
maybe
he's
not
active
but
he's
extremely
invested
as
well
as
paul
and
gabby.
So
I
feel
like
I
don't
have
so
many
concerns
about
the
multi-sig
holders
themselves.
Also,
as
zeptimus
fought
hard
for
the
multi-sig
holders
are
just
the
executors
of
the
proposals
that
passed
by
the
community
so
as
well.
I
don't
think
that
any
of
us
would
be
derelict
of
duty
on
that
front
and
then
I'll
pass
back
to
uzep.
If
we've
all
went.
If
we
welcome
already.
B
Yeah,
thank
you
tom.
I
actually
want
to
say
like
for
me,
like
you
know
like
having
the
multisig,
you
know,
having
trends
are
not
not
trend
but
yeah.
These
people,
who
is
like
tall
that
they
are
not
very
active
as
long
as
they
pick
the
bottom.
I
think
that's
actually
the
best
thing,
because
you
know
like
I
feel
like
if
in
the
multisig
the
people
who's
more
active
is
in
there
like.
If
I
it
was
me
mitch,
I
don't
know
a
time
or
everyone
who's
very
active
in
laser
tag.
B
I
feel
like
it's
it's
dangerous,
so
I
actually
like
the
way
it
is,
and
then
yeah
and
then
at
the
beginning.
I
I
I
feel
like
this
yeah,
so
there's
some
some
mis
and
not
misunderstanding,
but
I
feel
like
it's
necessary
to
explain
like
the
three
ways
we
have
to
to
handle
like
like.
We
have
this,
give
stc
that
already
passed
for
20k
and
then
this
money
could
either
be
on
laser
attack.
It
could
go
to
the
agent
that's
controlled
by
the
dao
and
then
also
you
know
like
we
can.
B
Also
I
mean
we
have
to
reach
an
agreement.
We
give
it
what
that
we
didn't
need,
so
it's
not
for
this
proposal,
but
for
future
ones
like
we
could
also,
you
know
make
permanent
liquidity
would
means
like
we
could,
for
example,
have
tc
bright
tokens.
Then
we
burn
the
lp
tokens.
Then
this
liquidity
is
there
in
honestly
forever,
but
no
one
can
touch
the
the
funds.
B
That's
a
bit
more
radical
but
yeah.
I
would
like
to
explain
also
like
the
three
you
know,
for
example,
like
the
benefits
I
see
having
laser
attack
over
the
agent
would
be
like
you
know
it's
easier:
we
don't
have
steps,
it
would
make
sense,
then
the
age
like
because
the
agent,
what
the
agent
does
is
like
all
the
decisions,
are
going
to
be
made
by
the
doll.
B
But
then
this
agent
needs
like
sam,
build
this
agent
for
this
purpose,
but
then
it's
missing
some
permissions
that
we
should
add
them
and
then
and
then
yeah
the
agent
would
would
work
like
with
tow
boating.
So
you
know
if
we
would
like
to
access
funds
from
this
agent.
B
Laser
attack
functions,
or
this
give
or
wherever
we
are,
and
we
we
should
do
it
with
tow
voting
and
yeah.
I
mean
right
now,
like
the
constancy
for
the
engine
is
like
we
need
mitch
to
do
it.
Otherwise
I
don't
know
anyone
that
can
do
it
for
us
in
the
tc,
and
if
I
mean,
if
we
had
to
ask
more
paolo,
they
would
probably
charge
quite
a
money.
B
So
yeah,
that's
the
cons
I
see
in
the
agent
and
then
in
permanent
liquidity.
It's
like
yeah,
it's
like
agreement
for
the
whole
life.
You
know
like
forever
and
then
what
would
happen
in
this
case,
for
example
like
if
you
have
the
tc
and
the
gif,
and
then
you
burn
those
those
lp
tokens.
What
would
actually
happen
is,
like
you
know
this
lp
token,
that
is
there
that
no
one
can
access
there.
B
It
would
be
generating
fees
that
would
be
staying
in
this
lp
that
no
one
can
access,
so
it
would
actually
create
some
demanding
supply
from
tc
and
give
it,
which
is,
which
is
good.
In
my
opinion,
like
some
tokens
would
be,
you
know,
every
every
time
would
be
less
easy.
Accessible
for
the
market,
which
makes
like
yeah
actually
like
a
good
thing,
I
don't.
C
Sorry,
I
was
gonna
say
I
feel
like
that
would
be
a
good
idea.
If
it
wasn't,
you
know
the
token
wasn't
on
a
bonding
curve
and
it
didn't
have
a
limitless
supply.
You
know
if
we
had
a
cap
on
the
supply
of
the
token,
then
that
would
make
a
lot
of
sense
to
me
because
you're
reducing
the
amount
of
circulating
supply
and
that's
that's
good,
but
I
think
having
the
the
agent
itself
being
an
autonomous
manager
of
of
that
those
funds.
C
I
think
what
mitch
was
saying
before
is
that,
if
we
do
that,
there's
no
way
we
can
remove
those
funds
that
lp
ever
again.
So
if
we,
for
example,
hypothetically
wanted
to
move
to
a
different
chain
or
whatever
it
may
be
like,
we
would
lose
those
funds
and
we'd
have
to
start
liquidity
provision
all
over
again
and
so
having
the
laser
tag
manage
those
funds
allows
them
to
move
it
in
and
out,
and
I
think
that
makes
a
lot
of
sense
but
yeah.
C
Those
are
just
my
thoughts
around
it,
but
I
do
think
that
before,
like
anything
like
I'm,
not
so
much
concerned
with
the
people
that
are
managing
the
the
laser
tag,
more
so
like.
What
are
we
supposed
like?
What
is
the
scope
of
the
laser
tag?
Wallet
like
what
what
is
it
going
to
be
managing?
Is
it
going
to
be
doing
it
for
partnerships
and
liquidity?
C
B
B
If
you
want
to
go
to
polygon,
we
can
do
it
with
laser
attack
and
also
with
agent
the
we
cannot
do
that
if
we
do
permanent
liquidity
like
if
we
burn
the
lps,
then
there's
no
way
like
we
can
access
to
those
ones
anymore,
but
it
doesn't
mean
like
they
are
lost
like
their
die.
Anyone
could
you
know,
get
these
scenics
die
and
then
bridge
it
to
polygon,
which,
in
my
opinion,
is
not
that
bad.
A
Can
I
just
interrupt
just
to
see
if
we
all
understand
what
the
concept
of
the
agent
is,
because
I
only
heard
about
it,
maybe
like
when
you
and
mitch
started
talking
about
it
in
a
forum
post?
So
this
agent
is
very
new
to
me
and
I
don't
know
if
everyone
else
feels
the
same
way
or
if
they
fully
understand
what
an
agent
was
is
so
can
we
can?
Can
you
maybe
zeptimus
or
somebody
define
this
for
us.
C
It's
part
of
the
aragon
framework,
and
so
it's
basically
a
autonomous
agent.
If
you
will
that
manages
different
wallets
and
can
perform
different
on-chain
actions
that
the
dow
wants
to
dictate.
So
you
can
tell
the
agent
I
want
to
move
funds
from
this
wallet
to
this
wallet.
An
agent
will
do
it
on
the
dow's
behalf.
A
Can
I
ask
maybe
a
dumb
question,
then
it's
part
of
aragon,
but
does
that
mean
that
gardens
is
using
some
of
the
aragon
code
base
or
I
guess
it
is
using
all
of
the
arizon
code
base?
Is
that
correct?
Do
you,
okay,
that.
A
Is
optimistic,
you
said
that
sem
created
the
agent,
so
it
helped
me
square
that
out.
B
We
have
three
agents
in
the
in
the
deci
garden,
like
we
have
one,
that's
holding
the
gardens
fans
one
on
the
bonding
curve,
and
then
this
other
one.
That
said,
let
it
there
for
the
operations
like
these
ones.
We're
doing
hey
mitch,
actually
actually
like
what
we
did
just
now
like
we
just
had
an
intro
question
on.
How
do
we
envision
the
laser
tag
in
the
long
run?
B
So
if
you
could
say
like
how
to
envision
it
in
the
long
run,
and
then
also,
I
was
explaining
a
little
bit
like
the
difference
like
you
know
how
to
manage
those
lp's.
What's
the
difference
like
the
pros
and
the
cons
for
using
it
on
the
laser
tag,
agent
and
permanent
liquidity,
so.
F
Yeah,
well,
I
think
it's
just
a
just
a
multi-sig
that
can
hold
basically
all
of
these
funds
that
we
acquire,
maybe
from
lping
just
by
a
group
of
tc.
B
F
And,
like
we
said
before,
like
this
is
just
just
doing
what
we,
what
the
community
says
via
snapshot,
so
it's
just
like
a
safe
place
to
park
stuff,
not
necessarily
to
like,
sell
it
or
that
the
group
is
going
to
like
manage
the
funds
independently.
F
The
important
thing
is
that,
like
permanent
liquidity,
the
way
that
I
understood
that
you
explained
it
is
not
a
good
idea
like
having
funds
that
can't
really
be
managed,
might
hurt
us
in
the
long
run
because
realistically,
like
stuff,
always
changes,
and
we
end
up
having
to
manage
this
stuff
anyway.
F
B
F
E
B
E
Quorum
and
sorry,
can
I
ask
a
dumb
question
before
you
keep
going
that
road?
Can
I
can
you
clarify
why
we
like
what
is
the
difference
punctual
into
a
into
a
monkey
sick
and
an
agent
one
is
automatic
and
the
other
one
not
basically.
B
We're
saying
that
the
community
decides,
but
the
community
is
not
like
if
the
seven
people
in
the
last
attack
want
to
sell
the
phones,
they
can't
do
it.
It's
not
like
no
like
we
couldn't.
We
would
have
all
these
phones.
In
my
wallet-
and
I
say
oh,
I
will
do
whatever
the
community
says,
but
you
know
I
could
not
do
that.
A
Can
I
just
have
a
counter
point
if
the
people
on
the
laser
tag
multisig
decide
to
use
the
funds
in
a
way
that
is
not
approved
by
the
community?
We
have
a
much
bigger
problem
in
the
dec,
because
you
know
I.
I
think
that
I
think
that
it
would
be
an
exceptionally
like,
in
fact
I
it
would
be
it'd,
be
an
exceptional
circumstance
for
that
half
to
have
to
happen.
A
It
would
basically
being
every
everyone
who
has
invested
years
in
the
tec
suddenly
deciding
to
abandon
the
tec,
and
I
I
would
agree
with
mitch
on
this.
I
wouldn't
say
that
the
the
the
multi-sig
holders
are
the
custodians
for
the
community,
but
they
don't
make
the
decisions
they
execute.
The
decisions
of
the
community.
C
With
that
being
said
that,
because
zepty
is
technically
correct,
like
there
can
be
collusion,
and
yes
that
would
be
a
bigger
problem
than
just
the
multisig
and
all
that.
C
However,
if
we
do
give
the
discretion,
which
gives
us
more
flexibility
in
managing
the
funds
which
I
agree
with,
then
we
need
to
to
really
establish
the
scope
of
what
the
the
laser
tag
funds
can
be
used
for
and
how
they
are
used,
because
I
don't
know
if
we
have
any
documentation
around
what
can
be
used
and
what
the
purpose
of
that
wallet
is,
and
I
think
that's
very,
very
important
to
establish
if
we're
going
to
give
those
seven
people
discretion
over
that
that
amount
of
funds.
B
But
the
thing
is
also
like
technically,
like
you
know,
the
laser.
A
B
F
But
I
mean
it's
easier
to
get
seven
people
to
like
sign
a
transaction
like
the
thing
is
it's
just
like
the
the
delay
of
action
creates
like
weird,
weird
anomalies.
You
know
like
we
have
this,
this
vote
duration
that
can
take
several
days
up
to
a
week
versus
like
getting
a
few
people
to
like
sign
and
hit
quorum
to
like
do
something.
That's
already
been
agreed
upon
by,
like
a
larger
group,
so
like,
for
example,
like
to
to
do
the
lp
and
token
swap
like
there's
like
three
or
four
transactions
that
have
to
happen.
F
In
order
for
this
to
to
be
done,
and
so
it's
like,
if
each
one
had
to
go
through
a
decision
vote
that
would
that
would
take
like
a
month.
You
know,
whereas
it's
like,
we
can
decide
that
this
thing
needs
to
happen
and
then
the
blockchain
stuff
can
happen,
and
it
can
be
done
like
within
a
day,
hopefully,
but
two
days
max.
C
B
A
B
B
C
You
know
that
there's
there's
layers
of
decentralization
there
like
mitch
said
that
I
think
are
valid
and
and,
as
dan
said,
if
we'd
make
a
decision
as
a
community
through
snapshot
and
say
we
want
this
to
be
done
with
our
multi-sig
wallet
and
they
go
and
do
something
different.
Then
we
have
huge
problems,
and
you
know
I
I
don't
think
an
agent
is
going
to
be.
The
use
of
an
agent
would
avoid
that
issue
either.
F
F
Wrong,
there's
like
there
is
a
compromise
that
I
thought
of
here
and
so
realistically,
like
doing
all
this
transaction
stuff
to
get
the
lp
token
like.
That
needs
to
be
done
by
like
a
group
of
humans.
You
know,
but
holding
the
lp
token
doesn't
really
need
anything
special
to
happen
and
so
like.
There
is
a
way
where
the
lp
token,
once
it's
done,
could
be
held
by
the
agent
and
if
we
ever
need
to
manage
it
like
it
has
to
be
sent
to
laser
tag
or
some
other
entity.
That's
actually
like.
F
If
something
happens,
and
we
have
to
manage
it
or
migrate.
It
then
like
that,
can
take
place
there
and
so
like
this
is.
This
is
the
the
in
between
that,
I
think,
can
work
and
like
sending
the
tokens
from
the
agent
to
anywhere
else
would
have
to
pass
the
decision
vote,
and
so
it
would
become
manageable,
but
then,
like
the
community
would
need
input
in
order
to
decide
like
to
send
it
somewhere
to
be
managed.
Does
that
make
sense,
yeah.
B
F
E
This
is
this,
is,
I
think,
a
little
bit
of
what
gravity
was
talking
the
other
day
about
prevention
rather
than
reaction.
E
I
think
we
should
prevent
this
by
the
culture
that
we're
building-
and
this
will
sort
of
you
know,
avoid
these
conflicts
with
the
multisig
rather
than
choosing
the
automatic
option,
because
it's
the
one
that
will
you
know
is
that
easy
one,
but
at
the
end
it's
the
most
difficult
one
and
it
will
prevent
us
to
create
this
culture
so
yeah,
I'm
I'm
more
in
favor
of
creating
a
culture
that
prevents
a
movie
stick
to
do
this,
rather
than
going
for
the
automatic
option.
Let's
say
in
a
way.
A
A
Even
if
it
is
a
five
of
seven
multisig.
I
actually
forgot
what
it
is.
I
think
it's
a
five
of
seven
multi-facing,
so
the
risk
is
that
five
of
the
seven
people
in
the
multi-sig
may
collude
and
we
want
to
mitigate
the
risk
of
five
of
the
seven
laser
tag.
Multi-Sig
holders
colluding
is
that
the
correct
problem
we're
solving
for
by
proposing
an
agent.
C
I
think
so
I
think
the
trade
it's
like
do
we
want
to
have
the
trade-off.
Do
we
want
to
rely
on
structure
or
culture
and
that's
the
question.
B
Actually,
yeah,
that's
that's
correct
and,
I
think
like.
We
could
also
keep
this
discussion
in
the
forum,
because
what
my
goal
for
this
call
was.
Actually
you
know
how
to
use
that
money,
because
I've
been
talking
with
some
dolls
and
this.
You
know
this
agent.
Laser
tag
thing
came
up
in
the
in
the
forum
when
mitch
suggested
like
to
save
the
funds
on
on.
B
After
doing
you
know,
the
lp
save
the
function,
laser
tag,
and
I
was
also
suggesting
using
permanent
liquidity
and
then
a
meal
middle
ground
is
also
the
agent,
but
I
think
we
can
keep
the
discussion
in
the
forum
because
we
already
use
half
of
an
hour
of
the
call
so
yeah
on
the
second.
Like
I
mean
unless
someone
wants
to
say
something.
C
What
do
you
call
it?
Contestability
disputability,
sorry,
so
if,
if
there's
an
action
that
the
majority
of
us
want
and
it
put
votes
through,
there's
no
way
to
dispute
that
for
anybody
who
just
agrees
within
the
community,
and
so
we
remove
that
type
of
function
away
from
community
members.
I
don't
know
if
that's
a
problem
for
anybody,
but
I
do
see
that.
C
F
You
know:
well,
I
wanna,
I
wanna
push
this
so
I
mean
in
my
head
there's
a
way
that
we
can.
We
can
have
both
and
that's
like
laser
tag,
doing
all
the
blockchain
stuff
and
transactions
and
then
like.
We
could
send
it
to
the
agent
this
this
third
agent
we
can-
or
I
can,
set
up
the
permissions
that
it's
it's
managed
by
decision
voting
or
dow
voting
and
so
like
sending
the
agent's
tokens
or
executing
actions
through
the
agent
would
be,
would
have
to
pass
a
decision
vote
and
so
like.
F
B
F
F
F
Yeah
so
like
when
you,
when
you
make
an
lp
like
in
any
circumstance,
there's
like
there's
a
lot
of
work
like
you
have
to
send
the
tokens
to
the
community
that
you're
doing
the
swap
with
you
have
to
get
it.
You
have
to
approve
the
spend,
you
have
to
create
the
lp.
So
there's
like
three,
maybe
four
transactions.
I
think
there's
only
three
and
so
to
do
this
using
an
agent.
F
F
We
send
it
to
this
third
agent
that
that
zepti's
talking
about,
and
so
the
agent
is
holding
it.
We
can
set
up
this
agent
so
that
it
can
be
controlled
by
dow
voting
and
then
effectively
like
we
have.
This
community
managed
liquidity,
but
if
we
ever
need
to
do
anything
with
it
in
the
future,
it
can
still
be
sent
somewhere
where
it
can
be
managed
efficiently.
A
A
Okay-
and
we
could-
we
could
stop
delving
into
this
if
you
want,
but
I
just
have
a
question,
so
I
think
maybe
some
of
us
are
getting
our
heads
wrapped
around
it
for
the
first
time.
So
I
I
like
zepty's
idea
of
continuing
this
on
the
farm,
but
I
would
say
I
guess
the
only
disadvantage
is.
If
there
needs
to
be
a
move
fast,
then
it
requires
the
dow
voting
and
then
a
snapshot
vote
for
the
laser
tag
to
actually
do
something
with
the
lp
tokens
right.
A
F
C
F
E
D
F
All
right,
not
the
tc
and
giveth.
We
have
a
separate
aragon
agent
that
manages
just
just
to
give
backs.
F
B
Okay
and
actually
like
right
now,
we
had
one
proposal
that
already
passed,
so
we
are
going
to
do
this
swap
with
giveth
for
20k,
but
then
we
also
still
have
like
340k,
and
then
I
also
was
reaching
out
to
nazis
to
do
like
a
50k
like
initial
proposal
of
50k
proposal,
50k
from
tc
50k
from
gnosis,
and
then
yeah
then
also
when
I
made
that
also
the
right
community
reached
out
to
me
that
they
would
also
be
interested
in
doing
some
swaps
and
then
there's
also
the
other
proposal
that
mitch
was
suggesting
to
have
liquidity,
but
now
with
other
with
those,
I
don't
know
if
that
still
makes
sense,
but
guys
it's
also
there
and
then
there's
also
a
a
proposal
that
one
hive
is
doing
with
water.
B
It's
it's
yeah.
I
don't
know
how,
like
some
have
like
something,
many
things
that
he
don't
like
about
the
water
who
is
being
done
but
yeah
like
the
idea
behind
water
is
like
having
you
know
like
you
have
one
hand
and
they
decrease
the
number
before
it
was
200k.
Now
it's
100k,
so
we
could
have
like
100k
of
tc
worth
of
water.
B
Then
100k
worth
of
honey
worth
of
water
and
then
you
create
like
an
index,
so
everyone
shares
liquidity
with
everyone
inside
the
water
community,
token,
whatever
and
but
then
yeah.
Like
one
thing,
I
really
don't
like
about
the
water
system.
It's
like
it's
been
controlled
by
a
multisig,
so
you
know
like
it's
like
one
multi,
one
member
or
two
members.
They
still.
B
I
mean
this
is
a
very
new
thing,
so
it
is
still
under
discussion,
but
it
would
be
something
like
one
or
two
members
from
tc
one
or
two
members
from
honey
and
one
hive,
one
or
two
members
from
rarity
there
was
yeah.
There
was
like
eight
communities,
I
think
if
it
was
also
there
yeah
and
then
yeah
like
I
would
like
and
then
yeah.
We
also
have
this
money
like.
I
would
like
to
like,
like
if
everyone
can
just
like
you
know.
B
If
that
was
your
money,
how
would
you
spend
this
money
between
those
projects?
Maybe
like
you
don't
want
to
put
on
any
of
those,
so
you
could
also
say
like
save
money,
and
then
you
know,
like
you
know
also,
this
could
be
like
other
partnerships
like
we
still
do
not
know
so
also
save
some
money,
but.
C
So
I
I
just
want
to
ask
real
quick,
because
I
I
looked
into
it
a
little
bit,
but
I
still
have
a
hard
time
understanding
the
concept
of
what
water
provides.
What
I
assume
it
is
is
kind
of
like
a
subsidized
liquidity
provision
that
is
collectively
done
by
all
projects
within
the
gnosis
ecosystem.
Is
that
correct?
B
Yeah
and
then
another
thing
that
I
do
not
really
like
about
water,
it's,
like
you,
know
like
we
put
100k
of
tc,
then
100k
of
water
is
created
from
nothing.
So
we
have
200k
liquidity,
you
know,
but
then
I
feel
I
I
don't
fully
understand,
but
I
feel
it's
like
you
know.
B
Being
I
don't
know
if
any
of
you
did
trading
anytime,
but
hope
people
leverage
like
yeah
you're,
leveraging
your
funds,
which
means
like
okay,
when
you
you
know
when
your
community
is
doing
good,
you
know
the
it
generates
more
money,
but
then
when
it's
doing,
but
it
goes
faster
down,
so
that's
a
risk
yeah.
I
just
wanted
to
mention
that
regarding
water
I
feel
actually
like.
C
G
It
could
actually
be
a
good
thing,
because
the
volatility
of
the
tec
token
should
always
maintain
within
the
margins
of
the
mint
and
burn
gap
on
the
bonding
curve.
So
if
the
leverage
drives
the
price
down
on
these
secondary
markets,
then
it
just
encouraged
people
to.
G
C
B
It's
on
the
one
hive
forum
and
then
I
made
also
a
forum
on
the
tc,
which
is
linked
to
the
one
hive
forum
and
yeah.
I
mean
you
know.
B
Water
can
be
awesome,
but
I
also
want
to
mention,
like
also
can
be
super
dangerous,
because
if
water
fails,
you
know
like
all
the
gardens
are
there,
so
it
could
hurt
all
our
economies
we're
creating.
So
that's
why
we
need
to
be
very
careful
like
with
everything
that's
going
on
in
in
water.
I
I'm
not
saying
like
you
know,
we
should
not
go
there,
that's
what
it's
probably
we're.
Not.
We
should
get
to
know.
G
I
I
hear
why
it's
potentially
a
good
idea.
It
does
just
generating
liquidity
and
it's
kind
of
like
a
utility-
that's
used
across
space
like
if
everyone's
doing
this,
then
it
kind
of
makes,
but
I
do
understand
zeppy
like
also,
if
everyone's
doing
this,
then
it's
kind
of
a
central
point
of
failure,
I'm
hearing
all
the
risks,
but
overall,
I
still
understand
that
this
sounds
like
a
good
idea.
It
sounds
like
an
opportunity.
C
B
Yeah
there
are
many
discussions
in
the
dms.
I
was
just
looking
at
them
because
sam
was
around
but
yeah
I
mean
it's,
it's
a
very
new
thing.
I
you
know,
I
I
also
see
the
potential
and
you
know
if
everyone
is
there.
I
think
it's
also
nice.
You
know
not
to
be
exclude
from
what
the
community
other
communities
are
doing,
but
then
there's
also
all
those
risks
like
you
know.
It
also
depends
how
they
end
up.
Building
this
this
world.
A
B
Like
if
we
you
know,
if
we,
even
if
we
go
to
their
forum
and
say
like
we
like
the
idea,
but
we
don't
like
you,
know
this
multi-things
or
this
stuff
or
making
this
leverage
thing
like
you
know
our
opinion
also
matters.
So
I
think.
C
A
So
I'm
kind
of
reading
this
for
the
first
time
am
I
reading
it
that
these
dow
tokens
would
be
basically
collateral
for
water
like
the
underlying
collateral
for
the
water
token,
and
then
people
would
die
to.
As
I
see
her
bid
on
x,
down
a
discounted,
vesting
stream
of
water.
B
B
It
would
generate
like
a
lot
of
liquidity
like
if
you
know,
if
you
have
tc
that
has
very
low
liquidity.
I
don't
know
with
xdi,
then
you
know
you
just
say
in
the
in
the
honeysuckle.
I
want
to
get
some
x
drive
from
my
tc
and
then
what
the
with
water,
like,
you
know,
you're
swapping
your
dc
from
water.
What
is
it
swapping
to
honey,
give
it
or
whatever
that
have
more
liquidity
with
x
y
and
then
x?
I
and
then
you
get
x.
I
on
your
wallet,
even
if
dc
have.
C
B
B
B
Awesome
yeah,
I
don't
know
like
I
I
I
would
actually
love
like
if
you
guys
could
jump
on
the
agenda
and
you
know
start
typing
some
numbers.
How
to
put
you
know
how
much
actually,
how
much
money
would
you
like
to
put
into
bright
dc
or
would.
E
B
F
B
Buy
x
die
to
get
excite
tc,
actually
like
yeah,
some
signaling
or
and
how
much
money
you
know
like.
Actually
I'm
talking
with
those
communities,
so
I
need
to
tell
them.
You
know
how
much
money
we
want
to
put
there.
I
was
talking
with
the
adam
from
bright,
and
then
he
was
telling
me
like
they
normally
do
100k
swaps
with
other
communities-
and
I
told
I
told
him,
like
our
fans-
are
not
that
high.
We
only
have
300
so
yeah,
I
don't
know
we
could
start
with
bride.
C
Part
of
me
feels
like
we're
moving
really
fast
on
these
types
of
partnerships
and
these
swaps,
even
with
the
give
token
like
I
know
it's,
you
know
a
partner
and
we're
very
value
aligned,
but
I
I
just
want
to
ask
you
this
simple
question:
it's
like
what
is
the
benefit
of
providing
liquidity
for
a
give
tec
liquidity
token,
rather
than
just
tec,
because
xdi
just
don't
understand
like
what.
What
is
the
benefit
of
having
that
over
just
straight
x,
die.
B
Actually,
for
us,
is
you
know,
having
this
partnership
with
kevith
benefits
the
tc
so
much
because
in
order
to
get
t6i,
you
have
to
get
your
tc
sell
dc
and
then
you
know
you
also
are
dumping
a
little
bit
the
price,
not
so
much.
That
would
worry
anyone
because
of
the
bonding
curve,
but
then
you
know
like
with
100k:
you
have
100k
liquidity
with
50k.
B
So
you
know
it
makes
the
route
of
you
know.
If
you
want
to
get
extra
with
your
tc,
if
you
have
sharing
liquidity
with
ebet,
it's
going
to
be
much
healthier
and
the
easily
patch
is
going
to
be
quite
lower.
C
C
B
Yeah
and
for
me
also,
it's,
like
you,
share
this
liquidity
and
then
you
know,
for
example,
like
tc.
If
the
dollar
collapsed,
then
tc
were.
B
Bad
but
by
you
know
by
die.
So
if
we
have,
you
know
some,
you
know:
partnership
with
giveth
priority,
like
our
tokens,
are
actually
exposed
to
the
market,
which
you
know
if
the
market
goes
up
like
right.
You
know
like
then
give
is
also
linked
with
ether.
Then
brightest
house,
you
know,
and
then
you
are
more
exposed
to
the
ecosystem,
but
it's
also
a
control
risk
because
you're
not
putting
the
all
the
money
you
are
just
putting
there
the
amount
of
money
you
are
comfortably
risking.
C
And
and
if
so
hypothetically,
if
if
water
becomes
a
real
thing
and
we
decide
to
provide
liquidity
for
multiple
tokens
right
now,
we
provide
liquidity
in
the
short
term,
but
we'll
have
to
undo
all
of
that.
If
we
decide
to
go
the
water
route,
is
that
correct?
Because
there
would
be
no
real
point
in
doesn't.
B
You
still
have
more
more
liquidity
and
actually,
like
you
know,
I
I
feel
like
it's
healthier
also,
you
know
like
having
these
partnerships
than
having
no.
No.
If.
B
A
B
C
C
Bright
id,
oh
okay,
yeah,
so
I
don't
know
it's
it's
one
of
those
things
where
I'm
like.
How
many
tokens
do
we
need
to
have
for
liquidity
provision
and
what
are
the
minimums
for
the
partnerships
and
like?
Why
is
it
50k?
Why
is
it
you
know?
I
don't
know,
there's
there's
a
lot
of
details
that
are
seem
kind
of
arbitrary.
B
Yeah
I
mean
yeah.
This
goal
is
just
to
get
some
point
like.
Actually
all
these
things
are
negotiations,
so
you
negotiate
with
other
dollars.
You
know
how
much
you
are
willing
to
put
there,
but
then
the
first
you
know
before
negotiating
with
anyone
like
you.
We
first
need
to
know
from
us
like
how
much
money
do
we
want
there?
Do
we
want
any
money,
and
then
you
know,
then
it's
easier
to
keep
the
talk
with
with
them,
but
actually
actually
like
bright
id
was
what
I
know.
B
At
least
it's
like
they
were
like
the
whales
are
most
are
chatting
about
that
so
yeah
like
actually,
if
we
push.
C
I
guess
just
this
just
goes
back
to
like
the
original
topic
of
the
laser
tag,
funds
and
the
purpose
of
the
laser
tag.
Funds.
Is
it
strictly
to
provide
liquidity?
Do
we
have
scope
around
what
laser
tag
is
supposed
to
be
doing
with
those
funds?
What
it's
supposed
to
be
used
for
is
it
for
partnerships?
Is
it
strictly
for
liquidity
provision?
Is
it
for
the
reward
system?
Is
it
for
you
know,
I
think
that
we
really
need
to
define
what
laser
tag
funds
are
supposed
to
be
used
for
and
what's
beneficial
for
them.
B
To
like
it
was,
you
know,
like
you
know,
if
we
have
someone
you
know
like
it
would
get
a
lot
of
dc
cheaper,
like
you
know
what
we
call
that.
A
Yeah,
I
dropped
the
initial
forum
post
in
the
agenda,
but
there
were,
there
were
two
things:
one
was
strategic
partnerships
and
the
other
was
secondary
market
liquidity
and
there
were
some
pretty
good
examples
that
were
given
in
there.
Although
now
is
the
time
to
go
beyond
the
examples
and
try
to
figure
out
what
we,
what
we,
what
we
want
to
do
with
it,
I
am
yeah.
I
guess
what
I
am
looking
for,
for
the
options
on
the
table
is
really.
What
is
the
expected
benefit
to
the
tec?
A
Is
it
revenue
generation
and
then,
like
you,
know,
ballpark
estimation
of
what
that
could
look
like?
Is
it
yeah?
I
guess
I
I
guess
what
I
would
look
for
is
like.
How
does
this
benefit
the
tec?
And,
probably
you
know,
liquidity
and
revenue
are
going
to
be
the
two
main
ways.
These
proposals
will
benefit
the
tec.
B
Actually,
the
ones
that
are
in
the
table
now
I
see
them,
like
you,
know,
strategic
partnership
and
at
the
same
providing
liquidity.
They
any
of
those
that
are
in
here
provide
any
revenue
because,
like
they
are
not
going
on
a
yield
farm
or
anything
like
they
just
provide,
you
know,
they're,
just
strategic
partnerships
that
provides,
at
the
same
time,
liquidity.
A
A
B
B
Like
the
criteria
should
be,
you
know
what
everyone
you
know,
like
my
opinion,
your
opinion
and
everyone's
opinion,
and
then
you
know
have
some
some
kind
of
agreement
in
between,
but
I
think
like
it's
for
everyone.
B
F
G
I
think
there's
a
so.
I
think
we
could
benefit
from
like
a
scoring
criteria,
so
we
could
take
like
a
data
driven
approach.
So
just
say:
okay,
what
you
know
start
with
our
mvv
and
what?
What
is
the?
What
are
the
values
of
our
community
and
what
is
our
mission
was
vision
and
given
opportunity
for
partnership?
G
How
does
it
score
in
terms
of
moving
our
mission
and
our
vision
forward
and
aligning
with
our
values?
So
maybe
we
could
have
like
five
criteria
and
we
could
evaluate
so
we
get
this
sort
of
data
quantitative
approach
and
then
I'm
even
seeing
this
from
like
a
mechanistic
standpoint,
I
mean
imagine,
the
dao
is
a
big
machine
right
and
we
have
this
like
adapter
port.
We
have
like
a
standard
interface
to
other
dows,
and
so
I
think
it
starts
with
the
scoring
criteria.
Does
does
this
dow
align
with
our
mission?
Are
they
moving
us
forward?
G
What
are
the
benefits
and
then
how
do
we
plug
in?
How
do
we
connect
and
what
we're
seeing
here
is
a
very
mechanistic
way
of
connecting
the
mutual
liquidity,
the
lp
revenue,
so
we
can
have
a
mechanistic.
G
These
are
kind
of
the
two
ends
of
the
spectrum,
like
what
zepti
said,
and
the
snapshot
approach
is
like.
What's
everyone's
opinions
like,
let's
hear
it,
let's
get
it
all
out,
what's
the
culture,
but
on
the
other
end
of
the
spectrum,
we
could
start
thinking
about
a
data-driven
approach
to
this
and
yeah
and
while
I'm
on,
I
also
just
want
to
say
major
praise
to
zepty
nate
mitch.
Tamara
for
leading
this
conversation
is
really
not
easy.
G
C
Yeah
I
do
too,
but
outside
of
the
mechanistic
aspects
of
it
and
the
social
alignment
which
I
think
a
lot
of
projects
are
already
socially
aligned
with
us,
especially
within
the
gnosis
ecosystem.
C
Is
that
it
comes
down
to
value
in
terms
of
of
the
tec
token
versus
the
value
of
other
tokens
that
we're
pairing
with,
because
you
know,
if
I
look
at
a
product
like
bright
idea,
yeah
long
term,
I
see
it
as
being
a
very
valuable
token,
but
in
the
short
term
I
do
not,
and
so
when
it
comes
to
maintaining
the
value
of
the
tokens
that
we
do
hold
there
help
generating
revenue.
If
possible,
then
the
liquidity
provision,
especially
if
it's
short
term,
and
that
that
we
evaluated
on
that
that
basis.
C
But
that
is
just
one
perspective,
and
so
I
I
just
would.
Rather
you
know
unless
we're
saying
we're
providing
liquidity
provision
with
another
grouping,
we're
not
going
to
move
that
lp
at
any
time.
I
would
hate
to
see
a
valuable
tec
token
go
up
and
then
have
the
bright
id
token
just
be.
You
know
10
15
cents
a
year
and
a
half
from
now
and
and
we
lose
out
on
the
value
of
the
token
that
we
have.
B
But
this
is
always
limited
to
the
amount
you
put
in
the
lp
like.
If
you
put
10k
20k
100k,
you
can
only
lose
no.
A
G
B
You
know
like,
if
how
much
you
do
you
want
to
be
exposed
to
the
ecosystem?
Is
it
you
know?
Actually,
if
the
ecosystem
grows
a
lot,
and
you
know
the
tc
will
have
actually
like
unless
we
stop
the
vending
curve,
it's
not
you
know
very
easy
to.
It
grows
pretty
slow
compared
with
other
tokens
that
they
have.
I
think.
E
I
think
there
should
be
at
least
made
of
of
whatever
this
is
looking
to
get
and
shared
liquidity,
because,
like
pretty
much
all
the
all
the
ideas
for
examples
here,
some
like
valid
points,
but,
for
example,
if
you
look
at
the
giveth
red
id
lp
and
honey,
swap
they
have
like
more
than
100
000
dollars
of
liquidity.
But
the
volume
is
close
to
zero
and
so
like
it
checks.
One
point
which
is
the
alignment.
E
I
guess
you
get
well
you
you're
sort
of
tied
to
to
the
price
of,
in
this
case
giveth
and
bride,
but
it
doesn't
actually
provide
any
utility
because
seems
like
no
one
is
really
interested
to
go.
The
the
gibbeth
right
crowd.
So
I,
like
the
ydg
data
driven
way
and
see
if
we
can
sort
of
make
the
best
out
of
the
tc
develop
c.