►
From YouTube: TEC Transformation Strategy and Planning 14 - Coordinating Work Beyond the Coordination Team & More!
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
Where
well,
my
family
is
very
easy
because
I
live
with
my
grandmother.
So
all
my
family
come
home
on
Christmas
Eve,
that's
one
of
my
favorite
moments
of
the
year,
because
all
the
families
together
without
problems
and
yes
just
eating
together,
remember
the
old
times,
also
with
my
little
nephews
that
all
that
are
they,
like
the
the
hair
I
know
like
the
inspiration
to
be
together.
You
know,
see,
kids,
happy,
it's
pretty
cool
and
that's
it.
A
There
are
many
changes
in
my
family,
everyone's
getting
married
and
all
that
stuff.
But
it's
cool
to
have
like
a
like
a
peaceful
bargain
in
the
day
of
the
year
and
yeah.
That
is
that's
it
and
I
can
pass
it
to
to
Bianca.
B
Thank
you
I
said:
that's
very
sweet
yeah,
like
I,
said
I'm
gonna
be
with
my
grandma.
She
usually
do
Christmas
dinner
there
in
Christmas
Eve
and
then
it's
midnight
we
eat
all
the
good
food.
So
I'm
very
excited
about
that.
B
So
so
my
aunt's
birthday,
so
they
kind
of
do
everything
together
and
I'm
super
excited
that
after
three
years
long
distance
relationship
I'm,
finally
going
to
be
with
my
fiance
for
Christmas,
so
I'm
gonna
send
it
all
back.
It's
gonna
be
special
and
yeah.
It's
gonna,
be
it's
gonna,
be
fun
I'm
excited
about
it.
B
Thank
you
for
all
the
hearts.
That's
very
sweet,
I'll,
pass
it
to
Tim.
C
Yeah,
those
are
two
sweet
stories:
I,
don't
know
how
to
go
after
it
actually
I'm
based
on
you,
I'm
American,
but
I'm
based
in
Europe,
and
my
the
father
of
my
children
are
Italian
and
the
kids
are
so
much
closer
with
their
Italian
family.
So
traditionally
every
Christmas
we
go
to
Italy,
but
since
I've
been
divorced
for
many
years
now,
the
kids
go
to
Italy,
with
with
Pierre
Stefano
and
hang
out
with
the
grandparents
and
it's
super
lovely,
but
so
most
Christmas
holidays.
I
am
alone.
C
Last
year,
I
went
to
Vegas
and
then
did
New
Year's
in
Seattle.
With
my
best
friend
this
year
we
just
moved
into
a
new
house,
so
this
year
I've
decided
to
like
hunker
down
and
do
some
fixing
UPS
around
the
house.
So
and
almost
everyone
I
know
is
not
here.
Most
people
live,
so
it's
going
to
be
a
little
bit
very
monastic.
C
I
guess
I'll
be
very
focused
on
the
things
that
are
that
I
I
guess
I
want
to
do
and
for
New
Year's
I
do
have
some
friends
who'll
be
back
in
town,
so
I
think
that's
it's
kind
of
a
very
mellow
but
kind
of
low-ish
holiday
I,
usually
don't
stay
where
I
am
because
I
don't
like
that.
That's
why
the
last
few
years
I've
been
traveling,
but
this
year
I
decided
just
to
stay
because
there's
just
so
much
that
needs
to
be
done
around
the
house
and
I'll
pass
to
bear.
D
E
You
Tim
well
for
me:
I
use,
I
just
came
back
from
from
Mexico
and
I'm
now
in
back
in
Canada,
but
I'll
probably
spend
the
Christmas
with
the
family
that
I
have
here.
That
is
my
my
uncle
my
aunt
my
little
cousin,
unlike
their
their
family,
like
from
from
their
side
and
near
my
parents,
they
stayed
in
Mexico
for
now
they
will
be
coming
here
later,
so
yeah
I
think
it
will
be
more
of
a
smaller
Gathering,
but
will
be
pretty
nice
too
yeah.
E
F
I
I
have
a
big
family,
Four
Brothers
like
three
nephews
and
like
a
lot
of
presents
for
for
to
give
and
then
I
think
after
that,
the
24
and
after
the
24
there's
a
friend
that
he's
like
a
singer
and
he's
he's
making
like
he
will
make
like
a
concert
that
they,
the
25
so
yeah,
I
I,
think
that's!
That's!
That's
my
holiday
plan
and
the
same
will
go
on
the
31
for
for
New,
Year's,
Eve
I,
don't
know
who
who
who's
missing
Nate?
Did
you
go.
G
Ahead,
yeah
so
yeah
I'm
kind
of
hunkering
down
with
my
wife
and
my
eight-month-old
son
and
our
Christmas.
You
know
we're
not
visiting
my
family,
so
it's
it's
usually
entails.
You
know
a
lot
of
FaceTime
calls
with
family
from
all
over
the
place.
So
it's
a
lot
of
fun
and
eight
months
is
a
really
strange
age
right
now
for
his
first
Christmas,
but
we're
excited
about
it
just
because
he's
more
interested
in
the
wrapping
paper
than
whatever's
inside.
So
it's
pretty
cool
but
yeah
outside
of
that
I'm.
G
H
That's
super
sweet
thanks
for
sharing
all
these
stories.
Everybody
we're
I,
have
two
sons
one's
in
a
senior
year
at
school
and
the
other
is
working
in
New,
York
and
they're,
both
coming
back
and
so
they're.
Coming
back
in
the
next.
H
All
gonna
head
down
to
go
hang
out
with
my
dad
and
my
two
sisters
and
all
their
family,
so
that'll
be
in
Northern,
California
area,
so
looking
forward
to
that,
that
should
be
really
fun.
Yeah,
that's
about
it
here.
It's
no
I
just
mentioned
this,
but
it's
really
starting
to
snow
hard
here
in
Seattle,
which
is
kind
of
unusual
and
exciting.
H
Okay,
so
I've
got
there's
just
like
a
few
quick
updates
and
then,
if
you've
got
other
topics
that
you'd
like
to
add
at
the
at
the
bottom
of
the
list,
please
go
ahead
and
and
add
them
in
so
just
to
start
off
with
just
a
couple
things
last
week
in
the
last
Thursday
call,
we
just
basically
decided
to
alleviate
some
ambiguity
around
terms
and
making
a
distinction
between
contributors
and
coordinators
and
I.
Think
I
think
everybody
was
there
for
that.
H
But
basically
this
short
version
of
it
is
contributors.
Is
anybody
who
contributes
to
the
TC,
regardless
of
whether
or
not
they're,
you
know
paid
with
like
some
type
of
salary
or
they're
paid
through
they're
compensated
through
praise
can
take
many
different
forms.
It's
just
a
much
more.
It's
a
more
general
term
coordinators
is
the
is
the
coordination
team,
so
this
is
just
to
like
distinguish
it.
So
we're
not
confusing
ourselves.
H
H
So
this
is
intended
to
be
a
much
wider
meeting
and
we'll
keep
the
topics
a
little
bit
higher
level,
whereas
Thursday
is
much
more
in
depth
and
Nitty
Gritty
any
questions
or
thoughts
comments
about
that
before
we
move
on
okay,
this
first
part
we're
going
to
keep
fairly
quick
and
just
like
basic
updates.
One
also.
H
H
And
then
Nate
do
you
want
to
just
give
a
we
just
had
the
first
meeting
call
for
the
like
the
first
interest
group
Nate.
Do
you
want
to
just
give
a
quick
update
like
how
that
went.
G
Yeah
so
the
first
we
we
did
it
with
the
voting
systems,
interest
group,
which
is
really
interesting.
G
We
discussed
a
lot
about
how
the
meeting
would
be
structured
and
exactly
how
we
promote
these
interest
groups.
What
we
do
in
terms
of
when
we
hit
capacity,
what
were
the
options
in
terms
of
moving
from
Discord
to
zoom
and
things
of
that
nature
and
for
the
most
part
we
want
this
to
be
kind
of
an
organic
development
for
each
interest
group
themselves
to
create
their
own
rules
and
create
their
own
style
of
approach
of
agenda
setting.
G
What
we
wanted
to
contribute
to
to
the
GE
field,
which
is
a
kind
of
a
voting
framework
of
that
different
types
of
voting
and
when
to
use
them
and
what
they're
good
for,
and
so
when
we
look
at
the
grand
scheme
of
things
and
Rex,
has
his
te
data
coming
up
as
well?
G
I
think
that
at
the
end
of
the
day,
we
want
to
be
able
to
promote
these.
So
if
you
have
an
individual
interest
group
that
you're
interested
in
I
would
encourage
everybody
to
participate
in
at
least
one
interest
group.
G
If
you
want
to
create
your
own,
there
is
a
form
that
bear
created
that
we're
going
to
use
to
apply
for
creating
your
own
interest
group
that
will
kind
of
walk
you
through
teach
you
how
to
use
a
curation
services,
so
you
can
teach
others,
and
that
way
we
start
to
integrate
this
interest
groups
with
the
curation
service
and
get
people.
You
know
get
this
place
a
shelling
Point
again,
so
that's,
basically
what
we
covered
and
yeah
I,
don't
know
if
you
had
anything
to
add
to
that
Gideon,
but.
H
No
just
wanted
to
just
yeah
give
a
shout
out
to
that,
and
also
to
note
that
you
know
we
on
the
call
last
Thursday
Nate
has
stepped
forward
to
God
he's
going
to
be
the
coordinator
for
the
interest
groups.
So
if
people
have
questions
or
thoughts
about
how
to
shape
that
going
forward,
he's
the
guy.
So
there
are
other
people
who've
expressed
interest
in
advising
on
that
too.
H
So
I
think
NT
Rex
myself
bear
yeah,
so
feel
free
to
to
Ping
Nate
if
you've
got
ideas
or
or
ideas
for
specific
interest
group
or
if
you
just
want
to
know
more,
give
some
advice
on
how
those
are
going
to
unfold,
so
we're
gonna
be
so
this
is
more
just
a
heads
up
on
Thursday.
One
of
the
topics
we're
going
to
be
talking
about
in
the
more
detailed
call.
Is
accountability
systems
like
how
what
are
we
gonna?
H
How
are
we
going
to
handle
accountability
within
the
coordination
crew
right
like
how?
What's
that
going
to
look
like
both
in
terms
of
accountability
to
each
other,
making
sure
that
we,
you
know
when
somebody
says
they're
going
to
do
something
and
they're
going
to
actually
do
it,
and
you
know
other
people
aren't
left
having
to
to
do
to
do
that
and
cover
other
people's
work,
but
also
more
just
like
generally
like.
How
do
we
make
sure
that
the
things
that
the
coordination
team
says
they're
going
to
do?
H
To
be
a
pretty
big
Focus
for
a
Thursday
to
call
had
an
interesting
being
talked
with
Griff
last
week,
where
he's
telling
me
a
little
bit
about
the
buddy
system
that
they
use
at
giveth.
So
we'll
talk
a
little
bit
about
that.
We're
just
going
to
explore
some
different
options
for
for
doing
this
in
a
way
that
isn't
just
replicating
kind
of
like
power,
hierarchies
and
kind
of
traditional
management
structures.
H
So
so,
if
you're
interested
in
that
you're
welcome
to
to
join
us
on
Thursday
and
then
last
quick
update
is
the
the
partnership
with
the
academy
is
starting
to
pick
up.
Speed
pick
up
some
some
steam
I
should
say,
and
so
basically
starting
in,
like
January
February
I.
Think
what
we're
going
to
try
to
do
is
get
some
Synergy
between
thinking
through
that
partnership
and
how
we
want
that
to
look
and
some
centers
between
that
and
then
also
the
strategic
planning
process
that
we're
going
to
be
starting.
H
Then.
So
if
there's
anybody
who's,
particularly
interested
in
this
partnership
with
the
academy,
let
me
know
we
can
either
do
it
here
or
just
ping
me
or
you
know,
or
just
mention
it
in
the
the
contributors
Channel
but
like.
If
there's
anybody
right
now,
you're
interested
in
this
and
would
like
to
be
in
the
advice
process
on
it
just
raise
a
hand.
Maybe
right
now.
E
D
H
Okay,
great
all
right,
I'm
gonna,
just
I'll
note
that
and
then.
H
Okay
and
of
course
we'll
be-
you
know
like
this
will
be
it.
This
will
be
something
that
we'll
be
working
on
for
probably
a
while,
and
it
will
be
probably
a
big
Topic
in
these
calls.
So
just
because
you're
not
like
actively
involved
on
in
that
project
doesn't
mean
you
won't,
have
an
opportunity
to
to
weigh
in
and
give
give
your
thoughts
okay.
H
So,
let's
move
on
there's
really
just
one
kind
of
meaty
topic:
I
wanted
to
talk
about
it's
it's
kind
of
disguised
as
this
idea
of
issues,
but
it
it's
really
getting
at
like
how
do
we
want
to
make
it
easy
for
the
Tec
to
continue
to
continue
to
get
contributions
from
people
who
aren't
just
on
the
coordination
team?
Okay,
so
this
is
something
that
came
up.
H
There
were
a
lot
of
questions
about
this
when
we
were
pulling
the
proposal
together
for
the
coordination
team-
and
we
didn't
have
the
answers,
then
we
had
some
thoughts,
but
now
we're
going
to
need
to
get
into
kind
of
more
the
specific
of.
What's
what
that's
going
to
look
like
the
reason
that
this
is
important,
I'm
just
going
to
frame
a
couple
things
and
then
outline
some
thoughts
that
bear
and
I
have
been
pulling
together?
H
I
mean,
obviously
the
reason
that
this
is
important
is
that
if
we
want
the
commons,
if
we
want
the
Tec
to
grow
over
time,
probably
not
going
to
be
that
easy
to
do
that
with
just
five
people
doing
all
the
work
part-time
right.
So
that's
that's
not
scalable.
So
we've
got
to
figure
out
good
ways.
H
H
Team,
that's
that's
doing
a
lot
of
stuff.
We've
already
talked
about
and
outlined,
but
like
ways
for
other
people
to
be
able
to
easily
come
in
and
plug
in
and
contribute
and
and
and
participate
in
building.
This
comment
so
so
this
kind
of
is
kicking
off
with
like
something
that's
very
specific
with
which
is
this
idea
of
issues.
So
this
was
just
like
a
side
comment
that
Griff
made
a
couple
weeks
ago
in
one
of
these
calls
was
like
Hey.
H
It
would
be
great
to
have
a
place
where
we
can
just
like
post
issues
that
we
see
you
know
we
don't
know
what
to
do
with
them,
but
like
a
place
that
where
we
can
just
put
them
someplace
like
he
was
thinking,
maybe
like
a
doc
like
a
Google
doc
or
something
like
that,
and
what
we've
decided
is
that
just
to
make
this
super
easy?
H
If
you
look
under
the
coordination
category
in
Discord
at
the
very
top
there's
a
channel,
that's
just
called
issues
with
a
question
mark
on
it,
and
what
we're
thinking
is
that
we
just
want
to
make
it
very
easy
for
people.
H
To
put
you
know
if
you
see
something
that
needs
fixing
or
you
see,
or
you
have
like
a
topic
that
you'd
like
to
have
raised
at
one
of
the
upcoming
meetings
or
you
know
any
general
issue,
you
can
post
it
there
in
that
channel
and
then
mention
the
person
who
you
think
is
most
likely
responsible.
And
if
you
don't
know
you
can
you
can
tag
me
there
and
we'll
we'll
find
the
right
person
and
then
the
idea
would
be
that
we
on
the
coordination
team
got.
H
Whoever
that
person
is,
is
basically
putting
it
into
clarity
and
so
that
we
can
track
it
and
we'll
just
mark
it
with
a
little
check
just
so
that
whoever
posted
the
thing
knows
that
it's
actually
in
the
system
and
that
that
we're
tracking
it
can
be
like
for
those
of
you
who
are
familiar
with
Clarity.
This
might
be
something
pretty
small
like
something
that's
pretty
easy
to
just
knock
out,
and
that
will
be
a
task.
H
H
This
could
also
be
like
a
way
for
you
to
add
if
you've
got
if
you've
got
items
for
an
agenda
like
an
upcoming
one
of
these
Tuesday
calls,
if
it's
just
a
small
thing,
then
just
like
we're
doing
right
now,
it's
just
like
you
just
tag
it
at
the
end
of
the
you
know.
If
it's
something
that's
just
going
to
take
a
couple
minutes,
just
just
add
it
into
the
agenda.
H
You
don't
need
to
turn
it
into
an
issue,
but
if
it's
something
that
you
think
is
going
to
take
a
while
to
discuss
and
you'd
like
to
get
some
input
on,
then
just
treat
it
as
an
issue
and
post
it
up
there
and
then
and
tag
it
as
like.
An
agenda
item
say
you
know
just
mentioned
that
you'd
like
to
add
it
to
the
agenda
and
then
we'll
put
it
on
on
a
call.
H
So
the
idea
and
then
I'll
stop
here
for
a
sec
just
to
kind
of
like
make
sure
this
is
all
clear.
What
bear
and
I
are
talking
about
is
like
we
don't
really
want
to
have.
Everybody
have
to
learn
Clarity,
so
the
idea
is.
This
is
like
a
simple
way
for
people
to
interact
with
the
system
to
be
able
to
post
stuff
in
there
and
we'll
be
able
to
like
pull
reports
and
things
like
that,
but
that
way
we're
not
having
to
Train
everybody
on
how
to
use
Clarity.
H
Of
course,
if
you
want
to
learn
Clarity
we're
happy
to
to
to
give
you
some
training,
it's
a
pretty
cool
project,
pretty
cool
tool,
but
you
know
no
need
for
everybody
to
learn
everything
right.
So
let
me
just
stop
there
and
see
if
there
are
any
comments
or
questions
or
thoughts
about
just
this
process.
G
I
guess
my
my
question,
for
this
is
like
what
what
do
we
consider
an
issue
because
I
know
you
know
the
we
do
have
some
things
that
we
can
say
are
vague
and
maybe
they're
more
like
epics,
where
we
have
multiple
issues
within
that
epic
and
and
that,
and
should
those
things
be
allowed
within
that
issues
Channel
or
do
we
need
to
be
extremely
specific
about
what
issues
we
Post
in
there
and
not
open-ended
tasks
or
if
they're,
just
like
hey?
These
are
short-term
specific.
H
I've
got
some
thoughts
on
that
barrier.
You
might
have
some
too
I
think
that,
while
we're
figuring
this
out,
I
think
it's
you
know
No
Holds
Barred,
just
you
know
it's
more
like
a
catch-all
so
that
it's
easy
for
people
to
just
catch
things.
H
Catch
problems,
catch
issues,
you
know
what
we're
going
to
get
into
next
is
some
of
the
constraints
around
this
about
how
we
prioritize
things
and
categorize
things,
but
because
you
know,
obviously
we
have
some
some
real
resource
constraints,
but
but
I
would
say
that
for
for
now
you
know,
I,
don't
think
that
people
should
have
to
worry
too
much
about
dimensionalizing
it.
You
know
trying
to
figure
out
whether
it's
a
project
or
you
know
something
big
like
a
like
a
milestone
or
season
or
whatever
Eric.
E
Okay,
yeah
yeah,
I
I
think
I
would
agree
with
that.
Yeah
I
think
for
this
initial
State,
keeping
it
open
and
see
how
people
feel
and
interact
with
it
will
be
will
be
good
to
know
and
then,
probably
after
I
think
it
will
also
help.
Okay.
E
Let
me
let
me
think
I
think,
once
we
have
more
more
work
done
in
other
fronts,
like
strategic
planning,
like
all
of
these
bigger
scope,
initiatives
that
we
have
still
to
do,
then
I
think
this
channel
will
kind
of
like
find
its
its
real
purpose.
That
at
least
the
way
I
am
seeing.
It
is
yes
like
having
it
or
be
focused
on
like
really
specific
or
really
tangible
outcome
outcomes
issues
right,
but
maybe
for
these
initial
stage,
I
think
that
it
should
be.
E
It
should
be
fine
and
and
yeah
you
just
have
it
like
a
net
for
everyone
to
to
share
anything
and
be
able
to
to
catch
it
like,
like
you,
said
yeah,
so
yeah,
I
I,
agree
on
that.
I
H
H
Wanted
to
get
into
as
more
of
a
discussion,
so
let's
hold
off
on
that
for
a
second,
because
that's
kind
of
the
meat
of
this
conversation
yeah,
that's
a
good
question.
H
H
This
becomes
even
more
important
like
it's
like
a
little
one-off
task.
No
problem
like
we
can
usually
get
those
done,
but
if
the
issue
that's
being
surfaced,
is
something
that's
like
really
big
or
actually
even
more
difficult
is
if
it's
something
that
requires
ongoing
processes
right,
then
that's
something
that
in
a
world
where
we
have
kind
of
constrained
resources
in
terms
of
people
and
and
money,
then
that
probably
is
going
to
mean
looking
at
all
the
stuff
that
we're
doing
right
now
and
weighing
whatever.
H
The
new
thing
is
against
what
those
existing
commitments
are
and
making
some
prioritization
decisions
about.
Can
we
do
the
new
thing?
If
so,
can
we
do
the
new
thing
and
still
keep
doing
the
old
things?
And
if
not,
then
what
of
the
old
things
do
we
have
to
let
go
of
either
by
automating
them
or
by
just
letting
go
of
them
or
by
finding
a
way
to
have
volunteers?
Do
them
and
have
them
be
compensated?
In
Praise
is
one.
H
That's
one
thought:
the
I
think
that
the
default
assumption
that
we've
had
going
into
this
is
that
at
least
I
shouldn't
say
we
I'll,
say
I
my
default
assumption
going
into
this
is
that
it's
going
to
be
really
important,
that
we
do
enable
this
to
be
permissionless
but
coordinated
in
the
sense
that
it
you
can
anybody
can
jump
in
and
if
they
want
to
take
on
a
task
they
can
do
so,
and
it's
just
that.
H
You
need,
like
a
buddy,
probably
on
the
coordination
team,
to
just
make
sure
that,
like
we're
tracking
it
at
least
and
I
guess,
the
other
thing
is
is
that
the
thing
that
we
know
we
can
do
today
is
praise
like
we
know
that
that
works,
and
we
know
that
that's
a
way
of
of
recognizing
people's
contributions,
whether
it's
going
to
get
recognized
adequately
financially.
I
think
that's,
that's
an
open
question,
but
I'll
and
then
we've
tried
some
Bounties
in
various
groups
with
mixed
results.
H
I
would
say
so:
I'm
gonna.
Let
me
just
open
this
up
just
for
people's
thoughts
on
best
approaches
and
just
specifically
what
I'm
talking
about
is
for
projects
and
tasks
that
you
know
cannot
be
done
within
the
roles
of
the
the
paid
coordinators.
E
Yeah
I
think
it's
a
it's
a
great
conversation
that
we
can
have
in
here.
Some
of
the
thoughts
that
I've
had
first
in
relation
with
with
praise
specifically
I,
think
this.
This
has
been
said
probably
a
couple
of
times
already
in
regards
with
saying
that
praises
not
much
of
a
compensation
system
but
more
of
a
kind
of
like
recognition
system
right
because
it
was.
E
It
was
clear
that
praise
wasn't
enough
for
contributors
to
to
be
like
an
actual
like
an
actual
income
source
for
them
to
to
actually
get
paid
accordingly
and
substantially
to
to
the
work
they
are
doing.
But
it
was
more
like
in
recognition
and
in
in
acknowledgment
of
of
the
efforts.
E
So
if
we
take
that
that
assumption,
if
that's
the
case
as
well,
I,
don't
know
how
would
that
fit
in
with
this
model
of
trying
to
compensate
new
contributors
and
with
this
type
of
issues,
I
think
it
would
be
still
worthwhile
trying
it
out
and
see.
What's
the
response
to
be
able
to
kind
of
like
report
it
and
and
experiment
with
it,
also
in
terms
of
the
adjustments
that
the
praise
has
had
in
terms
of
percentages
for
distribution?
Maybe
that
helps
as
well
so
I'd
be
still
curious
to
see
that.
E
But
then
another
thought
that
I've
had
is
that
yeah
I
think
this
is
a
great
chance
to
be
able
to
try
to
bring
some
utility
to
a
token.
So
in
a
way
like
yes
use
it
to
to
compensate
people,
but
maybe
it
could
be
also
in
parallel
to
praise.
Maybe
we
Define,
if
we
Define
the
purpose
of
Praise,
being
more
of
recognition,
governance,
participation
in
a
way,
but
not
specific,
specifically
compensation,
and
we
could
have,
for
example,
I'm
thinking
and
I'm.
Still,
a
big
fan
of
it.
E
I
think
coordinate
could
be,
could
be
an
interesting
way.
Maybe
to
instead
of
like
distribute
die,
we
could
distribute
TC.
We
could
maybe
take
a
small
amount
from
the
laser
tag-
phones,
for
example,
and
create
some
type
of
pool
with
TC
tokens
for
these
type
of
issues,
and
then
they
could
be
distributed
according
to
according
to
the
coordinate
system,
right
that
it.
E
Basically,
you
have
the
ability
to
to
assign
whatever
amount
of
tokens
that
you
think
the
the
other
person's
work
is
worth
it
right,
so
it's
kind
of
like
in
a
decentralized
way.
It's
it's
not
Bounty
basis,
specifically,
but
I,
don't
know.
This
is
also
just
like
some
really
initial
thought.
I.
Think
more
thought
would
need
to
be
given
to
these,
but
I
feel
that
it
could
be
an
interesting
alternative
too,
to
play
around
with.
G
I'm,
a
I'm,
a
big
fan
of
penguin
PEC
for
these
types
of
like
bounties
and
I,
think
it's
a
really
good
practice
and
gives
people
the
option
of
whether
they
want
to
tell
them
to
you
know:
accumulate
governance
within
the
PEC
and
or
compensate
themselves
either
way,
I
think
having
the
practice
of
putting
it
into
our
budget,
purchasing
minting,
PEC
and
then
Distributing.
It
is,
is
a
really
important
thing
that
we
should
be
doing.
I
do
have
questions
around
like
you
know.
G
If
we
do
have
these
types
of
roles
where
we
have
these
contributors
coming
in,
do
we
need
to
have
some
type
of
onboarding
process
for
for
these
contributors,
and
do
we
separate
these
contributors
from
like
just
general
volunteers
who
may
maybe
like
want
to
do
a
one
of
you
know
once
every
couple
months
to
contribute
to
the
Tec
when
they
have
free
time
versus
somebody
who's
like
you
know,
going
to
be
consistently
looking
at
those
issues,
lists
and
and
and
contributing
as
much
as
they
possibly
can
in
an
effort
to
to
participate
more?
G
Do
we
distinguish
between
those
two
types
of
participants
and
do
we
compensate
them
differently?
So
I
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
really
good
questions
to
be
had
here.
I
just
I'm,
not
not
sure
what
the
solution
would
be.
I
do
I
do
firmly
believe
that
Tec
tokens
should
be
used
as
the
method
of
compensation,
but
minting
them
is
going
to
be
something
that
we
have
to
do
within
our
you
know
quarterly
budget
or
whatever
it
may
be
so
yeah
just.
C
The
two
main
reasons
is
two
main:
what
I
think
are
disadvantages
to
using
coordinate
for
this
type
of
work?
Is
that
one,
the
person
doing
the
work
wouldn't
know
what
their
compensation
was
until
afterwards
and
then
two
it's
very
subjective
subjective
to
the
people
that
are
deciding
what
the
work
is
valued
after
the
work
has
already
been
done.
C
You
know
when,
when
I
think
about
this
I
mean
the
original
design
of
using
scrum
and
using
zenhub
in
order
for
people
to
open
issues
and
drop
issues
and
reply
to
issues.
All
of
that
was
very
intentionally
designed
and
I.
Think
that
doing
something
similar
makes
a
lot
of
sense.
You
know
the
issues
Channel
there'd
be
like
once
a
week
or
every
10
days
or
whatever.
The
number
is
some
sort
of
like
intake
process
to
go
through
the
issues
and
then
to
prioritize
what
ones
even
make
sense
to
do.
C
You
know
we
might
get
something
like
redesign
the
website.
You
know
the
website's
out
of
date
and
that's
great,
but
that's
its
own
project,
so
that
sort
of
goes
into
a
different
bucket
and
then
any
pieces
of
work
that
are
priority
but
not
able
to
fit
into
this
foreseeable.
You
know,
let's
say
the
next
Sprint
or
two
sprints
or
the
next.
You
know
two
weeks
or
four
weeks,
maybe
create
bounties
to
see
if
there's
people
with
the
right
skill
set,
that
can
pick
them
up.
C
I
guess
the
most
important
thing
is
that
it's
very
visible
for
people
to
see
what
needs
to
be
done
and
that
it's
written
in
a
way
that
is
autonomous
and
clear
and
can
be
picked
up
by
somebody,
who's
who's
involved
in
the
Tec
and
maybe
doesn't
need
to
know
so
much
context.
What
we've
really
found
to
be
the
most
difficult
with
or
in
the
past.
C
What
we
found
at
the
TT
to
be
the
most
difficult
was
like
creating
these
issues,
that
anyone
can
come
and
pick
up
is
that
you
usually
need
enough
context
about
the
Tec
to
be
able
to
execute
the
piece
of
work
so
oftentimes.
It
was
somebody
who's
already
within
the
TC
contributing
who
is
better
suited
to
do
the
piece
of
work,
but
we
had
Small
Things
issues
like
translations
ended
up
being
really
good
pieces
of
work
that
anyone
could
pick
up.
This
was
before
there
was
a
translations
team.
C
H
Thanks
Tim
welcome
haptivist
you're
you're
in
a
weekly
meeting
of
the
the
token
engineering
Commons.
This
is
the
contributors
team
meeting,
and
would
you
like
to
just
introduce
yourself
say:
hi
Maybe.
D
One
good
to
be
here
kind
of
dropping
in
happenstance,
so
I'll
just
kind
of
try
and
listen.
H
Thanks,
bye,
well,
you're,
very
welcome
to
stay
and
nice
to
have
you
here
so
yeah.
So
these
are
all.
These
are
all
really
good
points.
Tim.
Your
point
about
context
seems
very
tied
into
part
two.
What
Nate
was
talking
about
about?
How
do
we
is
there
some
kind
of
onboarding
process
to
ensure
people
have
that
kind
of
context
and
I
I
guess
one
thing
that
I'd
love
to
hear
some
thoughts
on
is
right.
H
Now
we
have
kind
of
a
fixed
budget
in
terms
of
number
of
hours
that
we're
paying
for
out
of
the
coordination
team.
H
So
if
we
were
to
set
up
some
sort
of
additional
funds
to
pay
for
additional
work,
that
would
probably
need
to
be
something
that
we
budgeted
for
and
maybe
set
aside
a
specific
pool
or
something
like
that
for
some
TBD
way
of
Distributing,
whether
it's
like
some
type
of
coordinate
thing
or
whether
it's
bounties
or
whether
it's
just
basically
trying
to
figure
out
figure
out
a
way
to
continue
to
boost
praise.
H
But
let's
just
focus
in
on
that.
Does
that
seem
like
that,
like
that,
we
would
need
to
actually
set
aside
some
dedicated
funds
for
this.
F
Thank
you,
I
think
yeah.
It's
it's
always
good
to
have
like
additional
funds,
because
we
may
end
up
always
having
things
that
we
cannot
like
predict.
F
There's
always
risk,
there's,
always
a
an
attack
of
like
opportunity
or
something,
and
we
always
need
to
be
prepared
and
and
yeah
in
case
there.
There
needs
like
to
be
a
like
an
emergency
plan
or
or
something
to
act.
If,
like
yeah,
something
is
needed.
G
Yeah
I
I
would
say
that
having
a
like
a
kind
of
a
monthly
or
bi-monthly
budget
of
you
know
these
issues
where
we
say
hey,
we
have
a
you
know
a
thousand
two
thousand
Tec
tokens
that
we
can
distribute
for
extra
work,
and
then
you
know,
people
on
the
coordination
team
should
be
able
to
prioritize
what
what
are
these
issues
that
we
have
posted
are
the
priority
and
what
we?
What
we
need
to
actually
have
fulfilled
I
think
would
be
a
really
good
idea
to
say
Hey.
G
You
know
if
we
only
have
this
amount
and
we
want
to
compensate
for
these
tasks.
These
are
the
priorities
and,
and
we
offer
that
to
the
community
to
participate
and
not
just
have
it
kind
of
open-ended,
where
we
have
a
ton
of
contributions
and
not
sure
exactly.
You
know
how
much
money
we're
going
to
be
spent
in
on
a
monthly
basis
based
off
of
just
open
issues
and
needs,
but
based
off
of
a
budget.
E
Yeah
I
would
I,
would
yeah
I
I
think
that'd
be
the
best
option
to
to
get
some
specific
phones,
some
and
a
specific
budget
for
for
these
type
of
issues,
I'm
wondering
also
again
for,
for
example,
if
it
would
be
possible
to
get
those
TC
tokens
from
the
laser
tag.
If,
if
there's
still
no
like
real
purpose
for
those
tokens,
maybe
that
that's
something
that
can
help.
G
H
Yeah
I
mean
there
may
be
that
you
know
what
we
do
is
for
the
next
proposal
for
the
coordination
team,
which
we'll
probably
be
doing
in
February.
Basically,
we
do
some
type
of
allocation
of
TDC
and-
and
maybe
what
we
do
is
we
work
with
Mitch
to
basically
kind
of
split
it
in
half
and
do
part
of
it
for
boosting
praise
and
part
of
it
for
some
type
of
Bounty.
H
Like
I,
don't
know
we
gotta,
we
got
to
think
a
little
bit
more
about
how
the
Bounty
thing
would
work,
but
yeah.
It
seems
like
there's
something
here
like
some
fixed
budgeted
amount
of
TC
that
we
draw
from
a
laser
tag,
and
so
that
would
that
would
not
be
a
conviction.
Voting
thing
that
would
probably
be
another
type
of
I
mean
a
different
type
of
boat,
because
it
would
just
be
moving
funds,
it
wouldn't
be
taking
it
out
of
the
pool.
H
A
A
One
Twitter
translations,
the
academy
and
marketing
yeah,
so,
in
my
opinion,
I
think
that
was
a
very
good
idea.
A
new
form
to
do
that's
to
do
the
work,
and
also
the
one
of
the
biggest
achievements
I
saw
was
that
we
had
a
lot
of
new
people.
A
lot
of
new
people
here
in
DC,
especially
in
the
translation
theme,
I,
think
there
was
like
10
new
people,
and
everyone
was
going
to
the
calls
and
the
community
calls,
and
that
was
amazing.
A
A
Just
a
few
teams
up
there
were
successful
because
maybe
the
gear
organization,
with
the
with
the
money
and
yeah
we
could.
We
had
some
some
deceptions
there,
especially
with
the
translations,
the
academy
just
for
just
for
a
some
confusing
stuff
that
we
had
there.
But
yes,
the
the
biggest
problem
was
the
organization
by
the
leader
of
each
each
team,
but
it
was
a
really
good
idea,
the
bounties
more
because
the
work
give
you
all
to
do
this.
It's
very
easy
to
use
it.
A
It
gives
you
all
the
tools
to
do
it.
I
think
the
bounties
are
a
good
way
to
bring
new
people
there.
I
remember
I,
remember
when
I
was
starting
with
three,
the
bounties
was
the
first
option:
I
have
in
one
hype,
In
Agave
and
here
in
DC,
which
we
and
yeah.
If
we
want
new
people
that
that
could
be
a
really
good
option,
I
don't
know
if
it's
still
using
the
work.
I,
don't
know
if
there's
any
PL
there's
another
platform
for
for
for
that.
A
But
boundaries
are
good,
just
just
to
have
like
a
great
leader.
Persons
really
focused
on
on
that
bounties
section
and
how
is
people
making?
How
is
people
going
and
going,
especially
because
we're
talking
about
bonding
so
it's
very
important
to
to
to
be
present
and
I?
Think
that's
it.
H
That's
great,
thank
you
for
that
that
background
asset
yeah
bear,
do
you
want
to
mention
just
like
I
mean
we
did,
you
did
some
experiments
with
setting
up
bounties
and
Clarity,
and
we
did
run
it
for
a
little.
While
what
are
your
thoughts
on
that.
E
Yeah
yeah,
that's
that's
a
good
question.
I
was
just
about
to
ask
Cassie
if,
if
he
thinks
yeah
based
on
that
experience
and
based
on
what
we're
talking
here
right
now
and
and
all
of
this
coordination,
if
he
thinks
that
with
a
little
more
organization
and
having
this
coordination
layer
beneath
this
bounty
system,
those
he
thinks
he
could
ask
you.
Do
you
think
this
could
work
better?
Do
you
think
we
could
improve
that
system
that
you
guys
had
and
and
actually
make
it
work?
Yes
for
sure.
A
With
us
special
group
focus
on
the
bounties,
maybe
from
accountability
or
something
like
that
it
would.
It
will
work
break
yet,
but
just
be
in
touch
with
with
the
person
with
the
people
yeah,
but
it
will
work
yeah.
E
Okay,
nice
yeah
I
think
that's
that's
good
to
know,
because
yeah
what
you
were
saying
even
on
Clarity,
for
example,
we
try
that
out.
I
think
it
I
think
it
worked
well.
E
I
feel
like
we
probably
neither
I'll
do
more
more
time
to
to
run
it
and
to
see
and
probably
more
people
right,
because
I
think
we
we
only
have
like
one
or
two
months
of
of
operating
with
bounties,
with
with
Auntie
and
Rich's
work,
so
I
feel
that
we
probably
needed
more
more
time
trying
that
out,
but
yeah
I
I
think
I
also
share
what,
as
it's
saying,
I
think
there
must
be
one
reason
why
bounties
are
so
popular
in
the
web:
3
space
right
and
and
like
as
it
was
saying,
yeah
I,
I,
I,
I,
agree
with
that.
E
I
I
also
came
here
through
that
way.
I
think
boundaries
are
usually
like.
The
first
touch
point
that
you
have
in
a
lot
of
organizations
and-
and
they
are
really
exciting,
because
they
they
you
see
them
like
as
the
first
opportunity
to
be
able
to
contribute
and
to
to
meet
people
and
to
provide
some
value
now.
E
On
the
other
hand,
I
I
do
feel
that
you
can
have
that
like
in
two
different
ways
right
like
the
people
that
actually
want
to
contribute
and
bring
value
and
participate
in
the
community,
and
then
you
have
the
people
that
are
probably
more
like
Bounty
Hunters
that
are
just
looking
for
to
make
to
make
some
money
right.
You
know
judging
any
of
those
but
I
think
they
have
like
different
purposes.
E
I'm,
probably
we
should
just
have
like
the
these
coordination
and
this
structural
layer
really
well
defined,
so
we
try
to
prevent
or
probably
not
prevent,
but
at
the
end
the
end
goal
is
to
bring
as
much
as
value
as
we
can
to
the
TC
right.
So
if
we're
able
to
do
that,
then
the
people
that
that
can
bring
that
value
can
be
all
kinds
of
people,
I,
think
and-
and
another
really
critical
thing
to
this-
is
the
accountability
practices
right.
E
These
ideas
that
we've
been
working
on
that
would
definitely
need
to
be
incorporated
into
these
Bounty
structure,
I'm.
Also
thinking
with
what,
as
is
with
us,
it's
common,
we
would
probably
need
like
a
role
like
an
ongoing
role
of
someone
taking
charge
of
these
Bounty
section
of
the
Tec
right
for
them
to
be
able,
like
the
the
accountable
the
responsible
for
the
operations
and
and
and
everything
right
and
and
really
be
able
to
yeah
to
keep
each
other
accountable
in
that
regard.
E
But
have
that
that
sense
of
organization
and
coordination
with
with
everything
done
so
I,
don't
know,
yeah
I
think
it's.
It
could
work.
Also
yeah
I,
don't
know
if
I'm
thinking,
May
I've
also
heard
that
the
viewer
has
been
improving
a
lot.
So
I
was
thinking
right
now.
E
Maybe
there's
a
way
to
incorporate
that
into
Clarity,
for
clarity
being
like
kind
of
like
the
center
for
all
coordination,
and
then
the
work
being
like
the
specialized
platform
for
using
bounties
I,
don't
know
or
we
can
use,
we
can
do
them
still
on
Clarity,
so
I
I,
don't
know.
I
think
this
would
be
more
of
a
technical
part
of
it
and
see
what's
the
best
choice
but
but
yeah
I'll
I'll
stop
talking
now.
H
H
Have
is
you
know
when
it
comes
to,
let's
say
that
we
had
like
2
000
TC
a
month
available
for
these
kinds
of
bounties.
If
that's
the
direction
we
end
up
going,
how
would
we
decide
what
you.
H
That
it's
like
okay,
you
know
this
is
what
we're
gonna
do
right,
or
is
that
more,
like
I,
think
I
think
this
kind
of
comes
to
a
bigger
question
of
prioritization
of
work
and
what
I'm?
What
I'm
for
seeing
is
that
it
would
be
great
to
have
this
more
open.
This
bigger
call
on
Tuesdays
be
kind
of
for
those
bigger
picture
questions
about
prioritization
of
Commons
resources,
so
I
just
wanna,
that's
a
that's
kind
of
a
fuzzy
thing
to
say,
but
conceptually
do
people
get
what
I'm
talking
about
there
like
you
use.
E
Yeah
100
for
me
and
I
I,
just
wanna,
say
that
I
think
that,
once
we
have
also
these
strategic
planning,
part
Dawn
or
more
like
on
its
way,
I
think
it
will
be
way
easier
to
be
able
to
realize
and
prioritize
different
issues
or
initiatives.
We
will
because
we
will
have
like
a
long-term,
a
long-term
and
medium-term
objectives
that
we
just
need
to
align
to
right
right
now.
It
feels
like
well
how
do
how?
How
would
we
prioritize
things
and
that's
still
not
clear
and
same
thing
with
with
people?
E
Is
the
coordination
team
going
to
prioritize
things,
I
think
at
the
end,
what
we
want
to
do
would
be
to
align
to
those
objectives
that
we
assign
in
the
long
term,
and
if
everything
in
this
short
term
is
aligned
to
that,
then
we
can.
We
can
do
it.
That's
like
the
that
would
be
kind
of
like
the
filter.
G
Yeah
I
I
agree
with
there
on
that
one,
because
I
I
do
think.
If
we
have,
you
know,
articulated
objectives
that
we
have,
even
if
it's
like
you
know,
get
more
token
Engineers
involved
in
the
Tec
Community.
You
know
having
a
certain
issue
to
each
you
know
round.
G
If
we
will,
if
you
will
that's
like
hey,
we
want
somebody
to
do
a
model
of
this
token
system
using
CAD
cat
or
whatever
I
think
that
would
be
a
really
interesting
bounty
to
have
you
know
and
to
get
token
Engineers
involved
and
so
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
things
that
we
can
do,
but
having
those
objectives
that
we
want
to
align
with
are
really
important
to
articulate
I
do
think
the
coordination
team
should
be
responsible,
for
you
know,
curating
that
list
of
issues
that
need
to
be
done,
that,
along
with
those
objectives.
H
Okay,
we
have
two
minutes,
so
any
last
word
who
wants
the
last
word:
anybody,
if
not
we'll
wrap.
A
Thank
you,
I
just
upload,
a
tweet
about
showing
the
new
Advanced
page.
If
you
want
to
take
a
look,
I
will
I
appreciate
it
and
yeah,
and
that's
it.
Thank
you.
H
H
Okay:
okay,
let's
take
a
look
and
see
all
right,
everybody!
Thank
you.
Oh
last
thing,
jeez
I
almost
forgot
so
I'm
not
gonna,
be
here
next
week,
I'm
gonna
be
out
with
family.
So
what
what's
the
sense
do
people
would
somebody
else
like
to
lead
this
call
next
week
or
should
we
take
a
should
we
take
a
break.
H
Let's,
let's
do
this:
if
you
think
we
should
take
a
break,
do
fire
sign
and
if
you
think
we
should
continue,
we
should
meet
next
week.
Do
like
a
thumbs
up.
H
H
Okay,
well,
I'm
gonna.
Take
that
right
now
as
take
a
break
next
week,
I'll
I'll,
yeah,
okay,
okay,
there's
a
lot
of
fire
and
a
lot
of
fire
and
thumbs
up.
Okay,
I
think
that
that's
I
think
that's
somewhat
of
a
consensus,
all
right.
Okay,
everybody
have
a
good.
So
then
have
a
good
break.