►
From YouTube: TEC Transformation Strategy and Planning 7 - Coordination Team Proposal Final Review & More!
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
B
I
feel
good
I
think
we're
making
progress.
I
think
we're
heading
forward.
B
Just
because
of
well,
for
example,
that
this
the
discovery
organization
has
been
on
standstill
for
two
weeks
and
that's
just
one
one
thing:
that
kind
of
I've
been
doing
async
and
hitting
roadblocks
essentially
and
there's
a
number
of
things
just
like
that
that
we
haven't
even
considered
yet
and
that
need
care,
we're
not
giving
it
that
care.
C
I
think
I
see
I
am
not
I
feel
like
I'm,
seeing
a
lot
of
progress
happening
around
that
I'm,
really
glad
that
we
I
believe
have
now
a
final
proposal,
which
I
think
is
great
something
that
Gideon
brought
to
my
attention
today,
which
I
feel
like
is
like,
like
wow.
What
a
Miss
was
that
the
TC
transformation
proposal
didn't
receive
Quorum
and
I
just
feel
like
cop
smacked
by
that,
because
that's
a
big
Miss
I'll.
C
You
know
on
my
part,
but
on
on
all
of
our
parts
that
just
didn't
yeah
I
guess
it
would
passed
and
then
it's
like.
Oh
it
passed,
but
it
did
it
really
pass
and
then
I
guess
it's
just
something
that
reminded
me
that
they
we
need
a
process.
C
You
know
a
more
Clean
Pro,
a
more
transparent
process
that
would
have
followed
and
tracked
it
and
then
ensured
that
the
Quran
was
met
too,
and
that's
just
what
Mike
immediately
I'm
like.
How
can
we
fix
that?
How
can
we
make
it
better
so
just
to
maybe
bring
that
into
what
we're
doing
going
forward
is
the
the
checks
of
of
the
the
cultural
votes,
the
snapshot
votes.
C
Maybe
having
like
a
little
checklist
to
make
sure
that
it
goes
through
and
then
publishing
something
at
the
end,
but
I
think
we're
making
really
nice
progress.
I
know
it
does
feel
a
little
slow
I
can
I
can
relate
to
that
Rex,
but
I
think
it's
not
slower
than
it
needs
to
be
in
order
to
do
it
right
and
bring
everyone
together
forward.
F
Thanks
yeah
I
can
relate
to
what
Rick
said,
for
example,
but
I'm
feeling
happier
than
a
more
confident
that
when
I
was
feeling
proud
of
the
last
the
last
week
or
two
weeks
being
more
I've
been
more
into
the
creation
service
and
stuff
I'm
happy.
That
seems
like
next
next
week.
We
will
finally
get
that
that
Colleen
and
so
yeah
just
really
excited
to
to
see
something.
E
Thanks
Auntie
yeah
I'm
feeling
better
now,
actually
more
because
I
have
been
thinking
with
with
anti-nate,
regular,
the
the
Mondays
and
and
that
it's
helping
the
the
project
and
and
the
team
and
things
that
I'm
going
are
going
better
and
I'm
watching
Mexico's
game
in
the
World
Cup,
so
I
might
can
be
distracted,
but
but
I'm
here
and
I
don't
know
who's
left,
maybe
bear.
Are
you
there.
G
Yeah,
Gideon
and
I
spent
like
three
hours
hacking
in
this
proposal
yesterday,
and
there
was
so
much
surfaced
on
things
that
used
to
be
addressed
in
the
TC,
so
it
was
inspiring
and
also
clarifying
to
see
paths
to
move
forward
and
I'm
excited
to
share
this
proposal
today
and
I'll
pass
back
to
you
Gideon
or
Marathon.
Mind.
Do
you
want
to
say
hi.
A
Marathon
mod,
we,
if
you're
speaking,
we
can't
hear
you
do
you
want
to
check
your
system
and
then
we
can
Circle
back.
A
Okay,
well,
I'll
go
yeah.
I
am
feeling
pretty
optimistic
right
now,
so
I
I
feel
good
and
I'm,
not
gonna,
break
out
into
song
like
Rex,
because
it
might
not
be
too
good
for
you.
All.
I
would
say
that
at.
A
Of
all
the
stuff,
that's
on
our
plates,
it's
that
is
frustrating
to
hear
about
the
Discord
reorg,
taking
so
long
Rex.
So
I
think
you
know,
one
of
the
things
we've
got
to
do
is
just
like
be
able
to
walk
and
chew
gum
at
the
same
time.
So
it's
like
moving
this.
These
kinds
of.
A
Thank
you,
yeah,
okay,
I
think
we're
gonna,
we're
gonna,
keep
going
and
sorry
about
that.
I'm,
not
sure
what's
happening
with
your
audio,
so
the
thing
I
was
saying
is
I.
Think
there's
been
one
of
the
things
that
we've
been
using.
A
The
sample
call
to
kind
of
like
be
the
place
where
we're
just
moving
the
kind
of
logistical
issues
through,
and
so
one
of
the
decisions
we
came
to
last
week
is
to
really
try
to
to
reserve
that
time
to
just
make
progress
on
some
of
these
more
pressing
issues
and
not
really
talk
about
the
transformation
process.
A
So
that
seems
to
be
a
good
solution
to
try
to
keep
us
moving
forward
and-
and
you
know,
we'll
free
up
some
time-
I
think
pretty
soon
to
be
able
to
start
to
figure
out
how
we
can
begin
the
process
of
tackling
some
of
these
bigger
issues.
But
first
we've
got
to
pass
this
proposal
before
that.
I
see
that
empty.
You
put
something
in
there
about
the
curation
service,
or
was
that
you
asked
it?
Do
you
want
to
talk
about
it?
Yeah.
F
Sure
so,
for
those
who
are
not
aware,
we
are
targeting
the
soft
launch
of
the
creation
service
for
next
week
and
so
I'm
thinking
that
something
that
could
be
great
is
to
have
some
time
all
of
us
or
everyone
that
can
make
it
to
sort
of
go
through
the
creation
surveys.
I
know
some
people
doesn't
quite
get
how
to
use
it
or
what
is
it
for
exactly
and
so
just
running
it
running
through
what
it
is?
How
can
we
use
it?
F
How
can
we,
how
is
it
useful
for
the
T
and
TC
so
that
we
can
prepare
for
if
there's
any
any
people
coming
from
outside
the
community
asking
questions
or
whatever
we
are
all
able
to
to
assist
in
that
in
that
front,
and
so
there's
a
little
bit
in
there
deadline
to
put
up
to
put
everyone's
hours
is
probably
tomorrow
around
12
p.m.
F
Et
or
something
like
that
and
after
that,
I'll
take
one
hour
and
just
try
to
have
as
much
people
as
opposed
to
going
there
and
a
small
thing
in
in
that
same
line
is
that
we're
also
planning
to
do
some
sort
of
community
goal
or
Community
activity.
However,
we
want
to
call
it
the
first
week
of
December
to
invite
people
from
multiple
communities
to
get
Hands-On
on
the
creation
service
and,
hopefully
incentivize
a
bit
of
movement.
It's
movement
there
as
well.
F
That's
pretty
much
it
I,
don't
know.
If
there's
any
question
but
yeah.
E
Yeah
and
we're
working
in
some
threats
for
the
lounge.
These
threats
are
for
presentate
the
creation
service,
also
how
to
use
it,
what
is
create
and
that
kind
of
stuff,
so
people
can
understand
it
better
and
and
the
tweets
are
going
to
be
up
the
next
week.
A
I
know
we
will
I
had
a
great
call
yesterday
with
Angela
too,
to
talk
about
whether
there's
an
opportunity
for
the
token
engineering
Academy
to
use
the
curation
service,
so
basically
I
just
it
was
me
just
demoing
it
to
her
and
getting
some
feedback
from
her
on
on
the
service.
So
she's
I
think
she.
She
seemed
to
really
like
what
we're
doing
and
and
so
she's
thinking
about
it
like
how
she.
A
To
just
use
it
for
you
know
to
just
for
the
sake
of
using
it
so
she's
thinking
about
how
they
might
actually
use
it
like
what
would
the
scenarios
be
and
one
of
the
things
that
we
talked
about
The
Common,
Sense
team,
who
were
our
partners
on
this?
They
see
us
as
design
partners,
and
so
I
was
also
offering
that
we
could
extend
that
same
roll
to
the
academy
too,
so
anyway,
she's
thinking
about
that
and
that's
encouraging
okay.
So,
let's
move
into
this
proposal.
A
Really
express
my
appreciation
for
for
Olivia
on
this
whole
process
and
just
like,
maybe
your
your
dedication
to
this
Mission
and
to
the
spirit
of
what
we're
trying
to
do
here
is
just
so
obvious
and
so
strong
and
it's
actually
pretty
inspiring.
So
you
know
and
yeah
yeah
so.
A
Is
better
as
a
result
of
the
work
we've
done
over
this
last
week
and
a
half
or
two
weeks
and
I.
A
Easier
to
pass
so
there's
a
link
in
the
document
and
I
recommend
that
everybody,
maybe
just
open
it
up
and
scan
it
right
now
to
just
get
a
sense.
I
mean
it
hasn't
changed
that
much
Libby.
A
How
about
I
was
just
going
to
point
out
a
couple
of
places
where
it
did
change
and
actually
I'm
going
to
just
share
my
screen
and
then
and
then
I'll
turn
it
over
to
you
Libby
to
just
see
if
you
have
some
additional
thoughts
you
want
to
share
and
then
also
like
what
the
next
steps
are.
A
So
most
of
what
you
see:
okay,
I'm,
just
going
to
scroll
to
the
top
and
most
of
this
stuff
up
here
is
really
just
us
integrating
and
simplifying
the
the
two
proposals.
So
my
for
my
original
fork
and
then
also
Libby's,
Fork
and
you'll,
see
you
know.
We've
we've
kept
the
the
colors
in
here.
So
the
blue
is
the
my
the
differences
between
my
Fork,
my
own
Fork
of
my
original,
and
then
the
red
stuff
is
Libby's
and
then
there's
some
stuff
that
we
ended
up.
A
Deleting
one
of
the
big
questions
right
now-
and
this
came
up
last
week-
is
how
much
this
will
end
up
costing
and
basically,
what
we've
come
up
with
thanks
to
bear
for
this,
some
good
analysis
of
just
trying
to
kind
of
simplify
for
this
interim
period.
A
It
would
be
about
10,
000
X
die
a
month,
and
so
this
this
is
kind
of
the
determining
factor
of
how
long
this
interim
period
will
go
this
and
then
one
other
factor,
which
is
how
much
money
we
actually
have.
H
A
Group
and
from
the
communitas
working
group-
and
we
are
waiting
to
hear
how
much
if
any
of
the
columns
working
group
remaining
funds
will
end
up
coming
into
this
and
the
answer
to
that
we'll
determine
whether.
H
A
Interim
period
where
this
group
is
operating
before,
we
have
to
submit
a
a
formal
proposal
to
conviction
voting
whether
that
period
is
going
to
be
just
the
end
of
December,
which
is
what
it
is
right
now
or
whether
if
the
comms
funding
comes
in
we'll
have
a
little
bit
more
breathing
space
and
we'll
be
able
to
go
through,
like
the
probably
the
first,
probably
second
week
of
February,
so
we're
waiting
to
hear
back
from
Chewie
on
that,
and
so
most
of
this
has
remained
the
same.
A
So
the
the
thing
I
wanted
to
call
out
is
this
section.
Here:
team
goes
for
the
transition
period,
so
these
are
some
of
the
issues
that
were
identified
through
the
feedback
process,
so
Community
accountability
and
team
accountability
systems
like
how
do
we?
How
do
we
make
sure
that
we
are
doing
what
we
say
we're
going
to
do
both
as
team
members
to
each
other
so
that
we're
responsible
to
each
other
like
this
is
kind
of
the
idea
of
a
self-directed
work
team?
What
does
that
look
like
and
then
also
Community
accountability?
How
do
we?
A
How
does
the
community
hold
this
team
accountable?
And
then
there's
clarifying
some
of
our
project
management
and
governance
processes,
and
then
you
know
so
this
is
kind
of
like
what
stewardship
looks
like
in
a
way.
You
know
the
the
Sprints
and
things
like
that.
What
is
that
going
to
look
like
going
forward?
How
much
of
that
is
going
to
change?
A
And
then
this
is
another
thing
that
came
out
is
the
clarifying
the
relationship
between
voluntary
contributions,
recognized
by
praise
and
then
paid
contributions
among
the
coordination
team
and
maybe
others
as
well,
and
then
the
final
area
is
given
that
the
stewardship
Steward
transformation
process
did
not
actually
get
enough
of
a
quorum.
G
G
It
seems
like
there
is
an
agreement
to
send
the
funds
from
the
remaining
funds
from
coms
to
this
transition
process.
So
we'll
have
approximately
three
months
of
funding
before
we
have
to
submit
a
proposal
for
conviction,
voting
and
yeah.
We'll
have
we'll
have
the
final
budget
today
still
so
the
next
step
will
be
to
submit
this
to
snapshot
and
notify
stakeholders
that
this
proposal
is
there
that
we're
going
through
this
transition
I
think
there
was
something
there
around
the
the
stewards
transformation
like
do
we
want
to
have.
G
How
are
we
doing
this
final
transition
from
the
stewards?
Is
the
stewards
dissolving
completely,
so
all
of
the
things
I
think
it's
important
to
communicate
to
stakeholders
and
it's
all
addressed
in
this
proposal.
So
the
the
vote?
Duration
is
four
days
and
once
this
passes,
the
team
will
we'll
get
together
to
work
on
the
next
steps
that
are
that
are
expressed
there
as
well,
so
understanding
the
roadmap.
G
What
is
more
or
less
the
roles
that
each
person
is
taking
and
I
think
this
is
already
kind
of
decided.
I
mean
the
the
team
has
been
working
on
all
of
the
stuff
already
and
yeah
then
executing
weekly
on
on
what
is
proposed
and
what
is
going
to
continue
to
be
proposed.
So
that's
part
of
the
accountability
process
that
we
were
suggesting
that
there
is
this
feedback
from
Community
every
month
and.
A
Okay,
thank
you
so
so
does
this.
This
goes
up
on
the
Forum
first
and
then
that's
up
for
four
days
and
then
goes
to
the
to
the
vote.
Or
how
can
you
remind
me
again
Olivia
how
that
works.
G
Yeah
I
think
technically
it
should
have
been
in
the
Forum,
but
I
feel
like
we
did
open
a
lot
of
space
for
for
advice,
for
this,
like
the
purpose
of
being
in
the
Forum
is
that
people
have
the
chance
to
give
advice,
but
we've
we've
been
on
such
a
like
deep
advice
process
with
this.
That
I
would
yeah
that,
from
my
understanding,
I
think
is
ready.
I,
don't
I,
don't
know
if
we
need
to
like
Post
in
the
Forum
just
for
a
formality
but
I'm
open
to
here.
If
anyone
thanks,
we
should.
A
That's
great
thanks
for
clarifying
that
I
would
I.
Wasn't
I,
wasn't
clear
about
that,
but
it
does
seem
like
we've
done
a
lot
of
advice
process
on
this
so
well
does
anybody
else
have
thoughts
on
that.
G
I've
does
well.
This
proposal
is
going
going
to
be
proposed
in
the
Forum
anyways
because
we
need
to
post
the
Forum
link
on
Snapshot,
but
the
question
is
like
based
on
our
process.
We
should
leave
the
proposals
at
least
five
days
in
the
Forum
before
they
go
to
any
other
voting
process,
so
they
can
receive
advice
but
I
feel
like
we
have
worked
so
much
on
the
advice
process
of
this
proposal
we
had
Forex.
There
was
like
calls
about
it.
G
F
I,
don't
think
that
post
any
directly
into
snapshot
is
is
fine,
something
like
anyways.
The
document
is
sort
of
a
formality
as
well
in
the
whole
process,
because
we
are
in
in
a
lot
of
other
ways
already
working
under
us
most
of
the
premises
of
the
document
and
so
yeah.
F
A
Well
here
here's
an
alternative
view
on
this:
I
mean
I
I.
Believe
me,
I
really
would
like
to
get
this
done
as
quickly
as
possible,
but
I
think
since
we're.
A
Let's
put
it
this
way,
if
we
thought
that
this
putting
it
up
for
the
remainder
of
this
week,
because
I
think
that's
what
it
would
be,
it
would
mean
like
just
putting
it
up
on
Monday
into
the
for
the
vote,
but
maybe
what
we
could
do
is
put.
B
Following
some
previous
proposals,
some
script
to
be
productive.
B
We're
not
really
going
to
have
this
done
until
like
past
until
next
Monday,
whether
we
post
it
on
Snapchat
now
like
effectively
I
mean
for
the
sake
of
these
calls.
These
transformation
calls.
So
if
we
do
the
math,
then
I.
My
understanding
is
that
we
can
put
it
up
for
the
forum
for
two
days
and
just
be
a
bit
more
pragmatic
about
it
without
any
impact
on
the
operations
of
the
group,
but
yeah
I
I,
don't
care
honestly,
I!
B
Think
everybody
that's
wanted
to
have
a
seat
has
hard
to
say
and
I
feel,
like
we've
already
gone
at
that.
So
if
we,
if
we
want
to
leave
it
for
two
days
as
a
formality,
then
by
all
means.
Please.
A
H
A
Do
this
so
that
we're
not
spending
a
whole
bunch
of
time
just
on
this
thing,
so
why?
Why
don't
we
just
follow?
Follow
the
you
know
the
guidelines
and
then
just
have
the
team
not
get
hung
up
on
this
and
like
get
to
you
know
just
basically
turn
everybody's
attention,
I
think
to
two
things.
One
is
just
like
getting
the
work
done
like
turning
back
to
Discord
and
figuring
out
what
those
things
are
for.
A
You
know
like
refocusing
on
on
those
efforts,
curation
service
and
stuff,
and
then
also
probably
next
week
once
this
has
been
up
on
the
Forum
and
in
the
broader
group
of
the
you
know,
the
broader
Community
has
had
a
chance
to
see
it
then
I
think
doing
some
Outreach
to
just
make
sure
that
this
actually
gets
Quorum.
You
know
because
I
think
that
that
would
really
suck
as
if
we
did
all
this
work,
and
then
we
didn't
get
enough
people
actually
voting
on
it.
So.
A
A
Be
I'll
like
this
will
be
from
both
of
us,
so
I'll
just
I'll
label
it
as
such
on
on
there,
but
I'll
I'm
happy
to
I'm
happy
to
post
it
up
there,
okay,
well
good!
Oh,
it
feels
good
feels
really
good
all
right.
So
the
next
thing
is:
let's
see,
wait
actually
I
think
I
just
need
to
take
a
break
or
take
a
little
breath
of
just
to
recognize.
H
H
H
A
I
feel
like
we
should
have
some
celebratory
music
or
something,
but
that
might
take
a
little
bit
yeah.
H
A
I,
just
you
know,
I
actually,
I
just
think
it's
it's
good
to,
like
you
know,
make
some
space
and
one
of
the
other
things
Libby.
Speaking
of
making
space
one
of
the
things
that
we
talked
about
a
while
ago.
This
is
not
on
the
agenda,
but
we
talked
about
making
some
space
in
one
of
these
calls
in
the
next
few
weeks
to
do
some
type
of
ritual
recognition
for
all
the
contributions
that
the
stewards
have
made
and
I
think
I
think
that's
a
really
important.
A
Do
so
we
don't
have
to
talk
about
that
today,
but
I
I
would
like
I,
think
I
think
we
should
maybe
next
Tuesday.
Or
can
we
talk
about
that
next
Tuesday
like
how
how
to
do
that.
A
A
Awesome
so
maybe
the
three
of
us
can
just
like
put
our
heads
together
and
see
see
the
best
way
to
do
that,
because
it's
it's
actually
really
cool
like
we're.
Seeing
ygg,
like
just
out
of
the
blue,
just
made
this
proposal
in
the
communitas
channel
I'm
not
going
to.
H
C
A
All
right:
well,
let's
get
going
then,
let's,
let's
move
on
to
the
next
topic,
all
right,
so
Libby
had
offered
to
provide
us
with
a
walk
through
just
kind
of
like
a
reminder
of
like
the
framework,
the
governance
framework
which
I
feel
like
we
could
all
probably
use
at
this
point,
especially
for
those
of
us
who
weren't
here
and
the
founding
of
the
of
the
TC.
So
let
me
let
me
turn
it
over
to
you.
G
Thank
you,
yeah
I
noticed
that
the
governance
process
was
kind
of
buried
in
the
form,
and
not
many
people
had
seen
it
or
that
maybe
looked
too
overwhelmed
and
the
feedback
we
got
in
the
session.
We
did
a
couple
of
weeks
ago
was
yeah
that
there
was
not
so
much
Clarity
around
it.
So,
okay
I
wanted
to
walk
through
on
what
our
our
steps
of
governance.
G
What
is
advice
process
why
we
have
each
one
of
these
things
or
we
thought
of
them,
and
also
clarify
that
anyone
can
propose
a
change
to
the
governance
process
using
the
the
framework
we
have
now
so
starting
on
advice
process
like
I.
Think
first
misconception
is
that
advice
process
is
not
a
consensus
tool,
it's
actually
quite
the
opposite
of
that.
It's
like
if
we
don't
want
to
lose
time
on
reaching
consensus.
G
What
is
a
process
that
we
can
use
so,
and
this
was
a
suggestion
from
Tim
that
we
divided
them
in
in
three
sections
of
small
impact:
medium
impact,
large
impact,
so
understanding
first,
what
is
the
impact
of
the
decision
you're
going
to
make
and
a
good
way
to
kind
of
gauge?
That
is
how
many
people
are
going
to
be
affected
by
my
decision
and
how
many
people
probably
have
expertise
or
something
to
say
on
on
what
I'm
doing
so,
maybe
a
blocker
for
us
has
been
how
do
I
know?
G
Who
are
these
people
so
I?
We
had
a
thing
called
subject
matter
experts
that
was
a
role
that
never
really
took
off,
but
that
in
this
transition,
something
that
would
be
great
to
think
of
like
who
are
the
advisors
that
could
be
reached
out
to
when
we
need
advice
process.
G
So
small
impact
is
Yeah,
just
something
you
need
to
move
forward,
quick,
there's
one
or
two
people
that
can
help
you
with
or
that
will
be
affected
by
that
and
then
medium
impact
decision
is
we
used
to
think
of
like
oh
and
something
affects
a
whole
working
group
and
it's
within
the
boundaries
of
that
working
group.
G
Then
you
can
just
add
something
to
the
agenda:
bring
up
in
a
call
ask
the
people
who
participate,
often
in
that
work
stream
for
them
to
advise,
and
then
you
can
move
forward
and
and
that
means
that
not
everybody
in
the
working
group
or
everybody
that
is
joining,
that
call
in
that
day
need
to
have
a
say
it's
people
that
could
be
strategic
about
what
is
needed
to
move
forward
and
then
large
impact
decision.
G
It's
something
like
this,
for
example,
that
we're
doing
now
it's
it's
likely
going
to
affect
the
whole
community,
so
we're
Shifting,
the
org
design
or
thinking
of
a
transition
that
my
like
shift
roles.
So
that's
why
it's
important
to
post
on
the
Forum
to
tag
people
that
could
collaborate
with
that
and
that's
why
I
suggested
the
fork
idea,
but
I
think
it
was
poorly
suggested,
so
I
apologize
for
that,
but
that's
kind
of
like
okay
advice
process.
G
How
can
we
move
with
things
without
needing
consensus
and
a
point
of
improvement
to
it
is
understanding
who
can
advise
where
how,
when
and
following
your
own
discernment,
so
there's
something
also
about
advice
process.
That
is
this
like
Dynamic
creation
of
proposals,
if
you
have
an
idea,
if
there's
something
you
want
to
do,
you
can
create
a
proposal
for
that
and
move
forward
with
it.
Just
like
considering
the
opinion
of
these
people,
you're
requesting
advice
from
and
as
the
owner
of
The
Proposal,
you
have
the
you,
you
have
the
permission
to
move
forward.
G
You
you
have
the
discernment
to
integrate
something
and
not
integrate
something
else,
for
example,
and
then
other
people
can
submit
other
proposals
if
they
like
have
a
strong
opinion
in
another
Direction,
so
yeah.
This
is
advanced
process
and
then
there's
a
few
links
from
here.
So
we
have
this
as
like
the
base
for
how
we
propose
things
and
if
it's
a
large
impact
decision
we
consider
three
things
is
being
largely
impactful.
One
is
something
that
is
requesting
funds.
So
if
funds
come
out
of
the
common
pool,
they
will
affect
the
whole
community.
G
So
you
post
on
the
Forum,
receive
advice,
integrate
and
then
submit
to
conviction
voting
if
it's
a
cultural
decision
or
if
you
need
Community
signal
for
something
that
is
really
big
like
we
did
with
laser
tag.
For
example,
it
was
a
community,
a
community
signal,
cultural
decision
that
we
were
gonna
move
forward
with
that,
even
though
we
weren't
taking
funds
out
of
the
the
common
pool,
so
you
post
in
the
Forum
and
then
you
bring
it
to
snapshot
to
have
that
like
yes
or
no
decision
to
understand
okay,
this
is
happening.
G
The
community
is
aware
of
this
and
is
an
acceptance
of
this
and
on
Snapshot
we
have
two
measures
of
Quorum
one
is
we
need
at
least
10
people
voting
in
the
proposal
and
at
least
10
percent
of
the
token
of
the
total
token
Supply
voting
in
The
Proposal.
G
So
to
keep
track
of
this,
we
had
this
decision
tracking
list
that
I
was
taking
was
tracking
all
of
the
proposals,
all
of
the
decisions
that
passed
on
all
of
our
voting
processes-
and
there
was
a
mistake
here
on
the
single
choice
that
the
Quorum
wasn't
considered
so
I
think
it
was
just
yeah
it
passed
unnoticed
and
the
stewards
working
group
proposal
should
should
have
208
thousand
tokens
to
pass
because
that's
ten
percent
of
the
token
Supply
and
it
didn't
so.
You
see
this
other
proposal,
the
water
one.
G
We
understood
that
Quorum
was
enriched
here,
but
it's
not
in
this
list.
But
the
conversation
happened
at
that
time
and
then
here
it
just
fell
out
of
of
everyone's
attention,
so
just
to
ratify
that
the
stewards
working
group
proposal
didn't
pass
and
that
this
Quorum
should
be
just
a
little
more
clear
to
everyone
and
then
towel
voting
is
all
of
the
decisions
that
will
change
the
DNA
of
the
Dow.
G
So
if
we
want
to
implement
adapt
if
we
want
to
include
adapt
on
Gardens,
for
example,
so
conviction
voting
had
to
be
included
on
guidance
through
Tau
voting,
so
the
bonding
curve,
also
through
Tau
voting.
So
if
any
anything
needs
to
be
modified
in
the
in
the
technical
side
of
the
Dow,
it
should
go
to
Tao
voting.
G
And
then
this
has
its
own
Quorum
and
parameters
that
were
decided
during
the
hatch
in
the
Commons
upgrade.
And
it's
also
available
in
this
proposal
that
you
can
see
and
the
details
and
then
token
log
we
use
when
we
want
a
crowd.
We
want
participation
of
the
crowd.
So
we
want
many
many
proposals
to
be
submitted
and
token
log
serves
as
a
curation
tool.
So
people
can
vote
quadratically
it's
off
chain
but
uses
our
tokens
and
it's
quadratic
and
the
top
proposals.
G
The
most
voted
ones
will
yeah
will
stay
on
top
and
then
we
usually
follow
up
with
a
runoff
vote
on
Snapshot
to
ratify
the
decision
of
token
log.
So
maybe
there's
like
five
top
proposals.
They
go
to
the
runoff
using
ring,
Choice
voting
and
and
then
a
clear
winner
is
decided
like
one
one
proposal
out
of
the
many
that
went
through
this
curation
process.
So
this
is
our
governance
framework.
I
Okay,
thanks
for
going
over
the
I
guess
my
my
biggest
question
that
I
have
is
regarding
the
advice
process
in
relation
to
snapshot,
as
you
said,
is
the
most
confusing
part
where
I've
seen
the
most
confusion
is
when
you
know
we're
going
through
the
advice
process,
whether
we're
using
snapshot
to
actually
ratify
something
or
we're
using
snapshot
to
actually
signal
something
and
I
think
that
gets
really
confused
and
I'm
wondering
if
there's
something
that
we
can
do
to
distinguish
between
those
two
objectives.
H
H
B
Why
would
this
fit
like
I
would
assume
that
so
the
vice
versa,
that
I
was
thinking
for
it
was,
and
it's
a
first
get
Quorum
in
this
in
this
transformation
group
and
then
identify
specific
members
of
the
community
that
represent
every
other
functioning
aspect
right.
So
I've
asked
members
from
Omega,
Rewards
and
gravity
to
corroborate,
and
like
say
yes,
all
these
working
groups
are
happy
and
then
but
I,
don't
I,
don't
see
it
going
anywhere
here.
So
how
rigid
is
this
and
what
I
think
like?
Would
that
be
sufficient.
I
Yeah
I
think
I'd
consider
that,
like
a
medium
intact,
rather
than
a
large
one
I
like
I,
don't
know,
maybe
somebody
else
has
a
different
distinguishing
thing
when
I
think
of
large
impact
I,
think
of
like
the
community
and
all
stakeholders
involved,
even
even
the
token
holders
who
are
kind
of
passive,
it
affects
them
and
and
Discord,
for
example
like
that
wouldn't
affect
you
know.
You
know
the
Casual
token
holder
who's,
not
in
our
Discord
very
often,
but
that's
yeah.
C
Yeah
I,
just
I,
also
want
to
add
to
that
I
consider
the
Discord
server
and
navigation
on
our
Discord
server,
something
to
be
work
stream
under
one
working
group
and
yes,
it
might
have
impact
on
the
people
who
join
the
Discord
server,
but
that
doesn't
mean
that
anyone
who
joins
the
Discord
server
necessarily
needs
to
vote
on
it.
I
think
that's
really
that
allows
each
working
group
The
flexibility
to
manage
their
own
work
streams
in
the
best
way
for
the
Tec.
G
Yeah
I
agree
with
that.
Just
the
fact
that
you
said,
oh,
not
everyone
at
on
a
snapshot
is
using
this
board.
It
already
makes
a
medium
impact.
I
think
we
should
probably
change
that
graphic
to
be
like,
since
we're
changing
a
little
bit
our
structure
of
working
groups
to
be
something
else,
so
not
necessarily
ask
a
working
group
but
yeah,
something
that
is
like
less
people
than
the
whole
community.
B
B
Have
we
ever
used
small,
so,
okay,
so
the
sublimental
experts
on
Discord?
If
we
haven't
made
use
of
those,
do
we
need
to
reconsider
whether
that
role
is
useful
or.
H
G
Something
Gideon
and
I
were
chatting
about,
and
that
I
know
is
also
intense
proposal
for
this.
The
Stewart's
transformation
is
to
have
a
more
formal
group
of
advisors,
so
I
think
in
the
in
the
in
the
stewards
proposal.
Correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
Tim,
they,
it
was
kind
of
yeah
having
like
certain
individuals
that
would
be
invited
to
be
in
this
Advisory
board
or
or
something
like
that
and
I
was
thinking
yesterday,
that
we
could
continue
improving
and
engaging
advisors
through
our
Partnerships.
G
So
having
this
more
like
out
facing
focus
in
the
TC
and
starting
to
talk
more
with
token
engineering
projects
and
understand
who
are
the
people
that
would
like
to
be
in
contact
with
the
Tec
more
often
and
invite
them
to
be
advisors,
so
tell
them
what
that
entitles
that
people
might
reach
out
to
them.
When
are
they
comfortable
that
people
reach
out?
A
So
I
think
yeah
I'm
I'm
excited
about
this,
because
I
think
this
also
helps
us
to
be
more
outward
facing,
which
is
great
I,
for
the
sake
of
making
sure
that
we
can
get
to
the
last
two
items
that
Tam
added
I'm
going
to
recommend
that
we
keep
moving
unless.
E
C
Yeah,
maybe
I
just
I
want
to
add
one
thing:
maybe
you
know
I,
don't
I,
don't
think
it
was
ever
designed
to
be
very
strict,
stringent
rigid.
It
was
really
meant
to
serve
as
a
guideline
to
help
us
make
the
best
decision
and
use
common
sense
to
to
sort
of
guide
us
as
well
as
this
guide,
so
I
I
think
it's
I
think
it's
really
helpful,
but
people
who
sort
of
come
in
and
are
new
to
it
might,
you
know,
might
have
questions
I.
B
Yeah
I
I
would
agree
with
that
too.
With
anybody
wanting
to
engage
in
I
guess
operations,
maybe
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
stuff
going
on
there
with
maybe.
B
A
Okay-
and
you
know
this
is
one
of
the
areas
that
we
outlined
in
The
Proposal
the
revised
proposal
as
an
area
that
is
going
to
need
some
work.
So
this
is
this
topic
is
not
over,
so
we're
gonna
be
coming
back
to
this
over
the
next
couple
months.
A
Okay,
so
real,
quick
Thursday
is
Thanksgiving
here
in
the
U.S
and
if
I
join
a
call
on
Thursday,
then
I
might
be
served
up
for
Thanksgiving
myself,
so
Libby
and
I
were
talking
about
what
to
do
about
that
Olivia.
What
was
your
suggestion?
You
have
done
something
in
the
past
tradition.
Can
you
talk
about
that.
G
What's
up
not
not
I
But,
like
everyone
and
Jess,
organized
that
initially
to
have
a
praise
giving
it's
when
we
had,
the
community
calls
every
Thursday
I
think
there
is
a
many
Americans
in
the
in
the
community.
I
don't
know
if
we
need
to
if
we
have
time
to
organize
a
whole
thing,
but
we
could
like
take
it
as
a
celebratory
day
and
maybe
jump
into
praise
like
crazy
and
really
be
grateful
for
each
other
and
have
a
moment
to
share
that.
E
A
C
G
A
So
so
one
thing
I'll
just
throw
out,
is
you
know,
I
I
think
the
last
thing
we
want
to
be
doing
is
making
work
for
folks
right
now.
So
you
know
I
think
the
options
are
we
don't
meet
on
Thursday
or
we
meet
on
Thursday
and
somebody
else
comes
up
with
the
agenda
and
I'm.
Just
not
here.
That's
totally
like
that's
totally
normal,
like
that.
We
should
that
that
should
work
or
we
do
something.
You
all
do
something.
A
A
A
Don't
meet
on
two
years
meet
on
Thursday
and
somebody
else
pulled
together.
An
agenda
and
three
is
keep
it
more
celebratory
and
focused
on
praise
and,
and
but
you
know,
just
amongst
This
Crew.
F
I
have
one
question:
do
we
have
like
anything,
super
urgent
to
speak
on
Thursday,
because
that's
that's
if
not
I
will
go
with
one,
but
if
we
have
I
would
probably
want
to
out
of.
B
It's
gonna
be
the
idea
of
so
credentials,
wardens
so
I
haven't
we
haven't,
they
and
I
haven't
set
out
the
client,
but
that
can
wait
until
next
Tuesday.
B
But
the
idea
would
be
that
we
have
a
specific
person
which
is
the
warden
and
in
charge
of
maintaining
the
document
just
so
that
it's
not
but
maintaining
the
document
for
that
platform
because
I
we
can
see
if
it's
just
one
person
we
can't
keep
track,
but
anyway
yeah
that
can
wait
until
next
Tuesday,
so
I,
don't
think
I,
don't
think
so,
and
just
a
quick
one
before
we
leave
has
everybody
seen
that
Discord
Miro
and
taking
a
look
at
it
and
like
so.
We
have
Quorum
in
this
group.
B
A
Before
so,
I
feel
bad
because
we're
now
knocking
out
Tam's
items
that
she
put
on
the
agenda
so
Rex
can
we,
maybe
you
guys?
Can
you
like
talk
about
that
on
the
sample
call
on
Thursday
about
like
how
to
move
that
forward,
because
I
don't
think
we're
gonna
have
time
to
like
really
address
that
in
two
minutes.
A
And
Rex,
can
you
just
post
that
one
more
time
in
the
channel
I'll
provide
feedback
to
you,
async,
so
Tim
I'm,
sorry,
I,
think
we've
run
out
of
time.
Can
we
talk
about
this
on
next
Tuesday?
Let's.
C
Just
use
this
one
minute:
if
that's
okay,
because
I
really
think
it's
important,
we
have
a
very
successful,
ambitious
impactful
token
engineer
excited.
She
started
took
an
engineering
working
group.
He
was
the
steward
of
the
labs,
and
now
he
wants
to
bring
Simon
who
wrote
all
of
our
smart
contracts
and
we
I
think
we
should
encourage
this
to
happen
and
I
just
wanted
to
know
if
there
was
any
immediate
thoughts
of
why
we
wouldn't
want
this
to
take
place
on
the
on
the
Tec.
C
You
know,
I
I
saw
empty
and
Rex
both
responded
and
bear
responded
to
everyone.
You
know
we've
all
we,
you
guys
have
all
responded
and
it
seems
like
we're.
Super
positive,
I
think
it'd
be
great
and
I
I
think
that
we
should
encourage
ygg
and
Sam
to
start
meeting
and
doing
some
token
Engineering
in
a
in
a
group
in
Tec.
A
I'm
sorry
I'm
gonna
have
to
run
one
thing:
I'll,
just
throw
out
is
whether
maybe
there's
a
way
to
Pilot
this
as
an
interest
group
too.
So
it
doesn't
have
to
have
as
much
overhead
I,
don't
know
what
that
would
mean,
but
throw
that
out.
So.
A
To
another
call,
but
thank
you
guys
this
and
Tam
I,
don't
want
to
leave
that
hanging.
So
maybe
can
we
just
encourage
them
and
then
follow
up
onto
on
Tuesday
on
this
just
say:
we're
really
interested
and
we
just
want
to
like
get
together
and
figure
out.
What's
the
best
way
to
do
it.
C
Yeah,
my
leanings,
is
we
just
sort
of
get
out
of
the
way
and
to
see
what
what
emerges
naturally
and
what
you
know,
what
what
works,
but
yeah
we
can
I,
don't
even
know
if
we
need
to
say
Tuesday
I
think
we
just
you
know,
encourage
the
things
that
make
sense
and
are
positive
for
the
te
see,
and
it
seems
like
one
of
the
most
clear-cut
amazing
things
that
can
happen
for
the
TC.
B
C
Yeah
yeah
I,
like
that
a
lot
I
think
some
really
amazing
things
can
end
up
starting
to
build
and
the
Tec
if
we
just
sort
of
get
out
of
the
way
of
the
the
token
Engineers
that
have
a
lot
of
momentum
and
passion
and
drive
and
have
a
track
record
of
successes.
So
I
really
I,
just
wanna
publicly
say
how
much
I
want
to
support.
Why
GG
and
the
efforts
that
he's
making.
C
H
B
B
At
least
this
one
hey
there,
we
go
okay,
so
I
I
need
this
mirror
board,
essentially
just
comparing
wow.
C
B
Okay,
so
I'll
just
zoom
in
a
little
bit,
so
the
biggest
difference
is
I
wanted
to
make
were
so.
First
of
all,
all
of
this
is
so
that
I
can
standardize
roles,
because
at
the
moment
we
have
nine
admins
and
we
need
zero
or
one
people
can
the
the
admin
role
gives
you
the
right
to
essentially
override
everything
in
the
server
and
Discord
themselves.
Tell
you
to
give
them
to
as
least
people
as
possible.
B
So
we
shouldn't
really
have
that
many
admins,
not
even
I,
need
to
be
an
admin,
so
that
will
get
reduced
to
one
but
anyway.
So
if
I
can
sync
roles,
let's
just
be
way
easier
to
manage.
So
that's
the
idea
behind
this
and
the
actual
differences
are
that
the
start
here,
I'm
trying
to
reduce
that
to
less
channels
and
to
have
specifically
a
guide
channel
that
will
include
calendar
verification,
the
guide
Etc,
so
that
we
have
a
single
point
for
people
to
go
to
now
that
we
don't
have
two
minutes.
B
The
other
differences
was
signing
working
groups
into
interest
groups
as
spun
off
gravity
is
their
own
category
and
rewards,
and
then
they
they're,
okay
with
it
and
last,
is
to
move
operations
to
its
own
to
its
own
section.
B
B
It's
not,
it
is
a
nuts
in
the
interest
of
everybody
to
see
everything
that's
going
on
in
the
Commons,
but
it
is
it
for
the
sake
of
transparency
still
useful
to
make
all
of
this
easily
accessible.
So
my
idea
is
to
have
gravity,
rewards
operations
and
archive
as
self-selectable
roles,
which
will
give
you
access
to
view
common
Etc
in
all
the
in
all
of
the
different
categories.
B
B
Enter
this,
you
see
the
you
see
the
the
guide
and
it
will
let
you
verify,
and
once
you
verify
you
will
see
all
of
this
welcome
Etc
and
the
access
roles.
And
then
you
will
also
see
the
community
stuff,
because
Community
doesn't
need
communities
for
everyone,
but
the
within
stock.
Here
there
will
be
an
access
worlds,
Channel
and
the
guy
who
point
to
that.
C
B
B
So
I'll
set
it
up,
but
it's
it's
only
visible
to
admins.
Basically,
at
the
moment,
if
you
click
on
can
I
make
this
code
bigger.
Yes,
I
can
whoa
right.
If
you
go
on
the
start
here,
Channel
and
you
just
click
on
the
dollar
sign,
you
will
get
the
rewards
roll
and
if
you
deselect
it
you'll
lose
that
role
and
I
can
just
assign
that
role
to
you,
Rewards.
B
And
yes,
the
idea
would
be
that
well,
Gideon
niche
Etc
do
a
simple
post
saying
right:
this
is
rewards,
bloody
blur
and
then
I
just
add
the
reaction
role
with
the
with
the
bots
so
that
people
can
join
it.
C
B
It's
it's
messy,
so
anybody
can
still
see
it.
They
just
need
they
just
can
opt
in
rather
than
not
be
able
to
opt
out.
So
the
the
if
you're,
coming
into.
B
To
I
think
it's
it's!
You
know
it's,
it's
overwhelming
really
to
see
this
many
channels
and
to
not
be
sure
where
to
go,
and
this
is
just
a
more
streamlined
approach
to
to
doing
things.
Yeah.
C
I
there's
some
some
servers
that
do
really
well,
but
they're
all
pretty
distributed
at
least
the
act
of
the
very
active
ones
are
I
would
say
the
you
know
the
disadvantage
I
would
see
to
having
requiring
people
to
access
self-identify
access
role
in
would
simply
be
many.
C
People
won't
do
that,
and
you
know
the
rewards
team,
for
example,
could
benefit
from
some
new
fresh
eyes
on
something
they're
doing
or
the
Ops
Team
could
or
even
gravity
Dow
could
so
it
just
it
is
for
me,
it
just
introduces
a
some
friction
into
the
openness
of
the
community.
C
B
If
because
otherwise
it
it
it's
it's
just,
it
doesn't
streamline
what
the
TC
is
for
anything
that
is
like
Services
related
I
mean
if
you're
coming
into
only
to
only
have
a
play
with
knowledge.
Sharing
then
getting
pinged
in
in
with
everyone
in
rewards.
It's
just
annoying
and
then
people
suppress
the
whole
server
right.
So
they
get
zero
notifications
and
they
fall
out
of
touch.
Oh.
C
B
B
H
B
H
C
C
Yeah,
there's
something
that
you
say
about
the
hearings
operations.
It
almost
seems
like
they
need
some
sort
of
like
heading
to
to
differentiate
them
to
differentiate
gravity
down
from
you
know,
operations
and
community
and
rewards
because
otherwise
you're
right.
It's
really
not
clear,
however,
how
these
top
level
channels
relate
to
each
other.
B
Yeah
because
I
mean
I
would
I
would
go
as
far
as
to
say
that
gravity
needs
their
own
server
nowadays,
but
that's
a
decision
that
they
need
to
take.
This
is
just
a
push
in
the
right
direction.
I.
C
Mean
what
I
would
see
is
I
feel
like
that's
like
we're
incubating,
like
maybe
there's
like
an
incubation
and
gravity
down
like
in
the
incubation
section.
You
know
something
like
this,
because
they
were
pretty
much
incubated
in
the
Tec
and
that
would
seem
to
be
like
the
right
categorization
for
Gravity
go.
H
C
H
G
B
H
B
I
agree
with
that:
I
think
that,
like
actually
like
being
a
quantifier
having
the,
for
example,
the
quantificate
quantification
reviews,
all
of
the
statistics
should
be
done
like
in
community
channels
really
but
having
their
separate
categories
and
their
separate
roles
also
gives
us
access,
and
this
I
didn't
mention
to
Patrick
Collins.
B
H
B
It
also,
for
example,
back
in
the
day
with
comms
having
five
different
calls.
B
C
H
B
Will
join
Omega
and
rewards
call
tomorrow
anyway,.