►
From YouTube: TEC Transformation Strategy and Planning 6 - TEC Coordination Team Proposal (FORK) - Review Session
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
Aligning
to
a
shared
single
agreed
path
forward
and
I
think
that's
a
component.
We
might
have
reached
that,
though
you
know
we
might,
we
might
be
there.
I
think
today's
call
will
be
telling
you
know
we'll
we'll
we'll
understand
better
and
then
I
also
think
that
I
guess
the
feeling
that
I
have
is
that
there's
like
the
loose
tie
of
the
cultural.
A
So
we
have
I
feel
like
it's
my
our
responsibility
to
say
why
we're
not
going
to
execute
it
because
it's
passed
so
in
theory
the
expectation
was
it
would
have
been
executed
by
now
and
we
agreed
not
like
to
hold
on
and
wait
and
analyze
other
possibilities
and
now
I
think
I
would
say-
and
maybe
that's
just
my
responsibility
to
do
to
to
write
something
that
says:
here's
why
we're
going
to
put
it
on
hold,
but
I
I.
A
B
Thank
you,
Tim
yeah,
I,
don't
know,
I'm
really
right
now,
I
feel
like
I'm,
really
really
trying
to
be
open
to
to
whatever
happens
and
whatever
shape
these
transformation
takes.
B
I
think
it's
important
to
prioritize
that
that
we
all
feel
good
with
whatever
decision
we
make
so
trying
to
trying
to
get
that
consensus
as
best
as
we
can
I
think.
That's,
that's
important
and
and
to
be
transparent,
to
be
clear
to
to
really
to
really
try
to
look
to
to
put
matisse's
Mission
as
a
priority.
B
I
think
that's
that
can
help
us
simplify
things
and
and
try
not
to
fall
into
just
a
loophole
of
of
ideas.
I'm
planning
with
with
no
ending
and
try
to
try
to
yeah
keep
the
the
efforts
happening
already
and
and
all
the
momentum
that
has
has
been
generated
lately
to
continue
that
and
push
it
forward.
So
yeah
I'll.
Do
it
at
that
I'll
pass
it
to
Nate.
That
I
think
he
also
knows
the
the
question.
C
Yeah
I
think
you
know
the
process
has
been
really
good.
In
my
opinion,
in
terms
of
getting
a
lot
of
input
from
different
people,
I
think
it's
it's
good
to
see
that
a
lot
of
people
care
about
the
direction
of
where
we're
going
I
think
we
do
have
a
little
bit
of
scope
creep
in
in
terms
of
what
we're
trying
to
to
resolve
at
this
moment
in
time,
and
so
I
think
channeling
that
and
understanding
what
this
proposal
is
and
is
not
is
something
really
important
to
Define
at
this
moment.
C
So
you
know,
because
other
things
will
will
form
and
we'll
be
better
understood
as
time
moves
on.
But
I
do
think
that
you
know,
let's,
let's
solve
this
small
small
issue
right
now
and
move
forward,
but
yeah
overall,
the
thing
the
process
has
been
good:
I'll
pass
it
over
to
Lily.
D
Thanks
Nate
I'm,
actually
very
excited
I,
think
we
created
so
much
momentum.
This
last
few
days
and
people
are
participating
in
the
proposals.
I
think
there
was
some
autonomy
built
to
last
week.
D
There
was
rex
that
proposed
something
and
they
and
I
and
Gideon
and
people
felt
like
Curious
and
involved
in
asking
questions
and
juanca
also
wanted
to
propose
something.
He
couldn't.
D
He
told
me
but
I
think
it
created
some
good
momentum
and
I
think
the
most
important
is
that
we
are
following
our
governance
process
that
until
we
change
it
is
the
one
we
have
and
we're
exercising
and
seeing
what
are
the
places
that
need
to
be
looked
at
and
yeah
I
think
I
think
it
could
be
a
little
bit
more
Dynamic,
perhaps
like
I
think
we
can
like
continuously
make
decisions
one
after
the
other
to
move
on
with
this
process
and
get
something
in
place
and
understand
that
this
is
a
transition
proposal
and
it's
okay
to
be
a
transition
proposal.
D
But
then,
when
we
settle
on
that,
we
can
build
on
something
else
and
then
from
there
we
go
yeah,
I'm,
really
happy
with
how
everyone
is
engaged
and
and
how
we're
we're
doing
this
and
now
pass
I
guess
everybody
has
been
getting
a
Griff
I'm.
Sorry.
E
Yeah
I
I
think
the
transition's
going
pretty
well
I
think
it's
going
a
little
slow,
I
guess
and
I
I
feel
like
yeah
when
I
participate
in
some
of
these
calls,
I
don't
have
all
the
contacts,
and
so
then
I'm
definitely
responsible
for
some
of
the
scope
creep
and
some
of
the
like
off
tangent
because
I,
just
you
know,
I'm
just
popping
in
and
then
I
don't
fully
understand
the
progress
but
I
I
think
that
we
can
speed
these
things
up
and
try
to
like
not
push
them
through,
but
I
feel
like
it
just
can.
E
That's
that's
my
main
thing
other,
because
I
think
everyone's
aligned
on
a
lot
of
things
and
if
we
can
just
like
focus
on
that
those,
then
we
can
get
those
things
done
and
then,
where
there's
issues
or
you
know
more
complexity,
can
we
address
those
one
at
a
time
and
maybe
those
things
take
more
time
but
but
yeah
I
think
it's
going
pretty
well
these
these
twice
a
week
calls
are
very
helpful
and
I
just
have
to
say,
like
I,
actually
need
to
pack
I'm
taking
a
trip
to
Toronto,
so
I'll
be
mostly
listening
during
this
call
and
not
actively
purchasing,
but
listening
I'll
throw
it
to
Gideon.
F
Yeah
thanks
Chris
lots
of
packing
these
days
packing
and
unpacking
so,
okay,
well,
I'll
I'll
give
you
my
take
on
it.
I
actually
I
almost
feel
like
just
saying
ditto
to
what
bear
said.
Yeah
I
feel
like
this
has
been
an
exercise
for
me
of
learning
to
let
go
and
and
just
trust
that
the
community
knows
you
know
what's
best,
and
you
know
so
it's
this.
It's
this
delicate
balance.
F
You
know
so
it's
you
know,
I've
been
in
a
lot
of
organizations,
and
this
is
definitely
the
most
challenging
one
I've
run
across
in
terms
of
like
figuring
out
how
things
how
things
move
but
I
think
that
we're
getting
there
and
I
think
that
what
what
we're
ending
up
with
is
going
to
be
a
better
solution.
So
that's
the
key
thing
you
know
and
I'm
really
looking
forward
to
like
actually
getting
moving
forward
and
and
starting
to
do
the
actual
work,
so
I
think
that's
that's
exciting,
so
Okay.
F
So
one
just
quick
question
before
we.
This
is
a
tangential,
but
I've
noticed
that
there's
a
lot
of
kind
of
like
very
detailed
stuff.
That's
going
into
the
stewards
Channel
right
now.
Rex
is
he's
on
fireman,
he's
just
like
totally
cranking
on
many
fronts.
Right
now,
and
so
the
question
is:
does
that
progress
do
does
that
conversation
belong
in
a
stewards
Channel,
or
is
that
clogging
things
up?
A
A
Actually,
really
enjoy
all
of
the
updates
in
the
stewards.
Channel
I.
Don't
know
that
it
needs
to
be
the
stewards
Channel.
It
could
be
any
show,
but
I
like
I,
think
it
actually
shows
the
momentum
and
excites
rather
than
is
like
I,
don't
look
at
it
as
noise
at
all.
I!
Look
at
it
as
like.
Oh
this
is
great.
There's
really
a
lot
of
momentum,
so
I
would
say
we
keep
it
there
if
yeah.
C
No
I
I
think
it
doesn't
really
matter
to
me,
but
I
think
it's
really
good
to
whatever
works
for
people,
and
this
seems
to
be
working
so
keep
it
up.
Yeah
I
think
we're
going
to
change
the
Discord
anyway,
at
some
point
and
so
I
think
it's
you
know
it's
kind
of
it
is
what
it
is
and
as
long
as
people
are
engaged
I'm
good
with
it.
F
Okay,
any
other
perspectives
before
we
move
on
five.
Four,
three,
two
one:
okay,
welcome
Mitch.
So
the
next
thing
that
we
wanted
to
do
is
I
just
wanted
to
just
first
before
we
go
any
further.
F
Rex
did
a
kind
of
a
interesting
graphic
yesterday
on,
like
the
state
of
the
fork
like
just
to
kind
of
like
portray
like
how
many
Forks
are
there
of
these
proposals
right
now
and
I
think
what
he
showed
was
that
there
are
really
two
at
this
point:
two
active
ones:
there's
Olivia's
fork
and
there's
my
Fork,
my
Fork
of
my
of
my
original
one.
So
that's
my
first
question
before
we
go
any
further.
Is
that
a
correct
understanding?
Are
there
other
ones
that
are
out
there
that
are
still
active.
F
Okay
sounds
like
Noah:
I
I
ended
up
taking
just
some
a
little
bit
of
background.
F
That
I
ended
up
taking
a
number
of
Rex's
comments
and
put
that
into
my
revised
fork
and
then
Nate's
Nate
ended
up
doing
a
lot
of
detailed
work
on
kind
of
like
compensation,
and
so
that
I
think
is
that's
something
that
he
he
agreed
would
be
something
that
we
would
come
back
to
later,
as
some
kind
of
like
a
kind
of
a
follow-up
set
of
work
that
we
need
to
do
around
that,
whatever
whatever
the
The
Proposal,
is
that
we
go
forward
with
that.
F
F
Agreed
to
walk
us
through
her
fork
of
the
proposal
and
and
then
take
questions
on
it.
D
D
This
is
what
we
have
no
I
think
they
were
and
they
yeah
they
didn't
make
it
I
said
I
just
felt
like
deleting
them
would
make
it
more
concise,
but
the
bulk
of
The
Proposal
didn't
change
because
of
them
yeah,
so
I
think
the
main
change
is
that
the
Tec
has
been
focusing
so
much
in
inward
operations
for
like
most
of
our
life
and
I,
think
it's
the
time
to
shift
to
a
more
out
facing
operations
so
for
our
operations
to
support
our
mission,
to
support
token
engineering
and
not
for
our
operation
to
kind
of
feed
it
itself
internally
and
and
isolate
us
a
little
bit
more.
D
So
yeah
I,
just
added
a
few
things
to
how
we
could
be
more
out
facing
to
the
Token
engineering
field,
and
this
means
well
here
in
the
in
the
team.
D
Something
I
changed
is
that
in
Gideon's
proposal
he
was
mentioning
to
have
the
the
roles
being
very
loosely
defined
like
the
for
the
people,
for
the
people
not
to
be
directly
attached
to
the
roles,
but
I
think
it
would
be
important
to
have
an
exercise
for
people
to
express
what
is
their
expertise,
what
is
their
or
of
the
ability,
what
are
their
skills
preferences
and
then
have
like
even
Loosely
defined,
but
have
each
person
having
their
own
role
to
ease
coordination
and
then
I'll
talk
more
about
in
the
end
of
this
document,
but
I
have
an
exercise
to
propose
for
that
and
also
I
added
the
role
of
a
token
engineering
and
needs
research
here.
D
So
having
someone
like
part
of
this
role
to
be
part
of
our
operations,
to
have
someone
always
looking
to
what
the
token
engineering
space
needs,
what
are
the
projects
that
are
popping
up?
D
Who
can
we
make
connections
with
how
to
strengthen
our
partner
relations?
What
are
some
needs
that
could
be
drawn
to
our
governance
process?
How
can
we
promote
something
that
is
happening
in
token
engineering
with
our
comms?
D
So,
having
someone
like
actively
looking
to
that
and
how
is
this
relevant
to
the
TC,
Mission
I
think
yeah,
just
what
what
it
just
said
approve
improve
the
TC's
ability
to
be
out
facing
the
token
engineering
community,
engage
with
projects,
professionals,
interesting
interested
people
to
bring
visibility
to
the
Token
engineering,
discipline
and
ease
coordination
between
peers
and
elucidate
the
access
to
the
TC's
Grant
process.
D
The
team
is
still
I
put
here,
undefined
because
I'm
talking
to
every
person
individually-
and
there
are
people
that
I
still
couldn't
have
a
hold
on,
but
Auntie
has
agreed
to
be.
A
part
of
this
team
bear
as
well.
Rex,
Gideon
and
I'll
have
a
talk
to
Nate.
D
D
The
change
would
just
like
make
it
more
explicit.
The
accountability
like
the
community
accountability
so
having
a
feedback
type
form
available
at
the
end
of
every
month.
For
the
community
to
provide
constructive
criticisms,
suggestions
and
acknowledgments
to
the
core
team.
That
of
course,
should
be
integrated
by
them
almost
like
an
advice
process,
but
something
that
happens
like
ritualistic
in
the
end
of
every
month,
and
then
people
have
a
sense
of
like
communication
and
it's
not
so
enclosed
and
also
what
I
wanted
to
propose
for.
D
Most
of
this
changes
so
again,
like
understanding
the
transition
character
of
this
proposal
and
and
then
I
would
like
I
didn't
put
myself
in
the
team
because
I'm
not
in
the
team,
but
I
would
like
to
commit
to
creating
a
session.
The
first
thing
after
this
proposal
passes
if
it
does
to
set
metrics
and
guidelines
to
to
be
developed
on
the
needs
that
were
the
priorities
that
were
already
identified
by
the
community,
including
the
priorities
that
are
added
in
this
proposal.
D
Like
this
connection
with
token
engineering,
so
understanding
how
success
and
failure
look
like,
but
this
very
much
based
on
how
each
person
wants
to
contribute
with
what
what
they
are
creating
with
so
defining
a
little
bit
the
roles
they
want
to
energize
and
and
also
create
accountability
measures
based
on
each
contributor.
So
they
say
how
they
would
like
to
be
held
accountable
and
we
can
have
rituals
for
this
accountability
so
how
each
person
would
like
to
be
held
accountable
would
be
present
in
this
feedback
type
form,
for
example,
yeah.
D
So
here,
just
added
a
very
minor
things
that
people
would
be
compensated
through.
Praise
I
removed
the
Bounty
from
Gideon's
proposal,
because
I,
don't
think
bounties
work,
I,
think
I
think
the
experiences
we
had
with
them
was
that
they
were
bad
for
our
culture
and
they
created
conflict
and
I.
Think
we
either
have
volunteers
that
are
rewarded
by
Praise
And.
F
Okay,
thanks
Libya
I
think
this
is
well
I
think
this
is
great,
but
let
me
turn
it
over
to
people
for
comments
and
questions.
B
Maybe
a
comment:
this
is
something
that
Tom
mentioned
yesterday.
I
think,
and
this
is
also
something
that
I've
been
thinking
a
lot
about,
that
I
think
it's.
It
might
be
a
minor
thing,
but
I
think
it's
important
and
it
has
to
do
with
the
with
the
vocabulary
that
we
use
I,
don't
know
for.
B
For
some
reason,
this
idea
of
core
team
are
the
word
core
and
the
word
operations
for
me
personally
didn't
have
a
really
negative
meaning
before,
but
not
thinking
more
about
it
and
and
trying
to
align
it
with
what
we're
trying
to
do
of
doing
things
differently
than
one
than
than
they
have
been
done
before.
B
I
think
it's
important
that
and
repeating
what
time
said
that
we
start
building
or
using
a
new
and
different
vocabulary.
Yeah
and
I.
Think
if
we're
gonna
use
this
like
we're,
gonna
take
this
theme
or
this
new
organizational
design
I
think
it's
important
to
to
take
into
account
that
so,
for
example,
personally
I
really
like
this
idea
of
coordination,
team
right
I
think
it
really
shows
what
this
team
should
do
and
won't
operate
the
hold
down.
B
G
Yeah
I'll
Echo
that
I
think
operations
is
one
of
their
responsibilities
of
the
coordination
team,
but
coordination
seems
to
better
embody
what
this
has
evolved
into.
It's
a
lot
more
than
just
operations
and
then
my
other
only
other
comment
was
going
to
be
I
agree
with.
Maybe
the
removing
of
the
word
Bounty
I
I,
think
bounty
has
has
lots
of
different
connotations,
means
lots
of
different
things
and
and
maybe
could
be
misconstrued
I
think
we
already
have.
You
know
the
the
intent
behind
it
is
like
hey.
G
If
we
have
some
stuff
that
needs
to
get
done,
that's
outside
of
those
coordination
team
responsibilities,
then
let's
make
a
proposal
and
pass
it
and
get
someone
to
do
it.
I
think
that
meets
that
meets
that
goal
or
requirement
for
that
so
I'm
I'm
on
board,
with
removing
kind
of
the
terminology
around
bounties.
A
Can
I
just
ask
I
know
that
we're
setting
the
an
hourly
rate
is
the
expectation
that
ours
will
be
measured.
I
mean
like
calculated
and
submitted
at
the
end
of
the
month,
or
is
the
expectation
that'll
be.
This
is
a
20
hour
per
week
role
or
you
know,
position
or
whatever
we
want
to
call
it
or
this.
This
work
stream
will
be
20
hours
a
week
hours
a
week
or
are
we
how
granular
is
the
expectation.
D
Yeah
I
was
thinking
for
the
roll
exercise.
Actually
I
felt
inspired
to
think
of
that
exercise.
We
did
in
the
common
stack
with
Kate
once
that
we
were
looking
into
like
what
are
the
roles
we
want
to
energize
and
then
people
understanding
how
what
they
can
commit
with
and
I
think
we
could
have
like
a
loose
time
estimate
of
that.
D
G
Yeah,
that
was
a
question
of
mine
too,
and
actually
maybe
a
clarification
question
on
the
budget
because-
and
maybe
I
just
didn't-
do
the
math
right,
because
I
was
just
doing
it
in
the
back
in
my
head,
but
that
budget
seems
to
account
for
slightly
higher
than
the
kind
of
stated
goal
of
you
know:
20-ish
dollars
an
hour
for
three
full-time
roles.
G
Split
between
six
people
was
kind
of
the
the
piece
I
heard
I
saw
or
21.,
so
the
four
or
the
168,
000
or
sorry
14
000
a
month
I'd
see
the
scrolling
I'm.
Looking
at
numbers
can't
do
math,
while
I'm
talking
that
seemed
to
be
slightly
higher
than
that
budget.
So
is
there?
Is
there
kind
of?
Is
there
buffer
in
there
for
people
to
contribute
more
hours?
Is
that
buffer
there
for
I?
G
Think
where
I
was
gonna
go
and
the
question
I
was
going
to
ask
is
like
in
relation
to
those
things
that
are
maybe
outside
the
scope
or
maybe
they
want.
You
know,
there's
a
skill
that
the
core
group
doesn't
have,
but
it's
not
like
a
full-on
project
proposal.
Is
there?
Is
there
like
buffer
in
there
to
go
to
ask
a
Community
member
to
say
hey?
G
Can
you
commit
some
time
to
this
and
and
we'll
put
some
of
these
funds
towards
it,
or
is
this
14
000
is
essentially
we're
gonna
we're
gonna
spend
this
for
sure
split
between
these
six
people,
yeah
kind
of
what
what
are
the
thoughts
around
that
or
is
that
still
to
be
determined
and
then
and
then
is
there?
Is
there
going
to
be
kind
of
a
specific
period
for
this
like?
Is
this
going
to
be
we're
going
to
try
it
for
three
months,
we're
gonna
have
it
indefinitely
until
it
doesn't
work?
D
C
I
just
want
to
say
that
that
I,
you
know
compensation
in
this
transition
process.
The
department
structure
it
just
it
just
will
how
we
decide
to
organize
the
compensation
scheme
or
model
that
we
choose
will
determine
how
we
structure
roles,
how
we
destructure
who's
who's
participating
in
in
what
and
how
and
so
I
I
do
think.
This
is
something
that
is
very,
very
important
to
discuss,
because
I
think
it
influences
everything
that
we're
doing
after.
D
Yeah
I'll
pass
to
Gideon
soon
to
talk
more
about
this
part
of
the
budget,
because
that
I
didn't
change
much
from
the
original
I
mean
I
didn't
change
at
all
from
the
original
proposal.
But
on
the
question
of
how
long
are
we
doing
this?
For
my
understanding?
Is
that
we're
submitting
this
proposal
to
snapshot?
D
So
it's
not
a
financial
proposal
because
we'll
be
using
the
remaining
funds
of
the
working
groups
that
are
dissolving,
so
the
time
frame
is
like
as
long
as
the
funds
last
kind
of
thing
and
I
think
this
needs
to
be
clear
and
more
clear
in
the
proposal
and
then
the
the
point
is
that,
after
this
transition
period
and
having
like
that
exercise
with
the
metrics
and
understanding,
a
small
roadmap
for
the
transition
will
know
like
after
this
period,
we'll
probably
have
a
whole
new
proposal,
because
there
will
so
many
there
will
be
so
many
things
defined
in
this
transition
process.
D
F
Yeah-
and
let
me
start
by
saying
one
other
thing
too,
I-
think
one
of
the
things
that
I
like
about
this
proposal
is
it
does
a
nice
job
of
not
overly
dictating
the
the
way
that
this
team
will
actually
work.
F
I
think
this
is
one
of
the
challenges
you
know
with
autonomy,
like
with
autonomous
teams
and
allowing
like
duocracy
to
actually
work
is
kind
of
defining
some
constraints,
maybe
or
like
a
boundary
boundary
conditions
for
the
team
to
work
within
and
then
allowing
the
team
to
have
some
flexibility
in
terms
of
how
it
actually
executes
against
that
and
I
think
that
the
way
that
Libby
has
framed
this
does
a
pretty
nice
job
of
that.
F
So
that's
going
to
be
one
of
the
things
I
I
really
want
to
pay
attention
to
is
we're.
You
know
as
we're
thinking
about
this,
so
this
is.
This
is
very
relevant
to
the
question
of
pay
and
the
that
168
000
died
in
the
my
original
proposal.
It
says
that
this
is
still
just
like
a
a
working
number
like
it
needs
some.
It
still
is
going
to
need
some
work.
F
I
I
very
much
see
this
as
a
transition
period
too,
and
that
actually
was
not
clear
enough
in
my
original
proposal.
So
the
way
that
Libby
described
this
I
think
is
very
accurate.
F
F
What
that
means
is
that
I
think
we're
we're
going
to
experiment,
at
least
in
the
original
Proposal,
with
like
kind
of
the
concept
of
a
base,
pay
that
I
think
all
of
the
team
members
from
the
conversations
I've
had
everybody
accepts
that
you
know
this
is
not
something
that
we're
locking
in
it's
just
so
that
we
can
that
we
can
get
through
this
interim
period
and
then
use
that
period
to
Define
a
better
way
of
figuring
out
pay.
F
I
mean
I,
wish
I
I
could
say
right
now
that
we
have
that
figured
out.
We
don't.
You
know
this
has
been
an
ongoing
problem
within
the
Tec
like
how
we
do
this.
The
right
way,
that's,
fair
and
yet
accountable,
and
so
it's.
F
My
answer
is
that
that
we
have
Bear's
been
doing
some
exercises
over
the
last
couple
days
and
looking
at
like
what's
left
from
the
existing
multi-6
and
how
long
of
a
Runway
that
gives
us,
and
but
we
didn't
get
too
fancy
in
terms
of
like
this
role
is
worth
this
much,
and
this
is
I,
think
that's
something
that
we've
got
to
work
on
in
this
interim
period
between
this
and
when
we
actually
go
when
we
run
out
of
funds
and
we
go
for
an
actual
proposal
to
conviction.
Voting.
G
So
do
we
have
a
rough
estimate
of
how
much
funds
we
have
because
I'm
just
back
in
the
back
of
the
napkin
21
an
hour
times,
you
know
40
hours
a
week
times
13
weeks
and
a
quarter
right
is,
is
just
under
11
000
per
person
or
pull
for
per
full-time
person.
So
that's
that's.
You
know
33
000
a
quarter
in
that's
under
the
42,
which
I
think
is
good.
That
are
that
that
would
be
under
that.
G
But
it
do
we
have
an
idea.
What
what
that
funding
bucket
looks
like
roughly,
is
it
50
Grand?
Is
it
150
Grand.
F
Yeah
I'm
happy
to
share
a
working
like
a
spreadsheet
that
I
was
using
to
come
up
with
that.
But
it's
basically
it's
it's.
It
amounts
to
three
full-time
equivalents,
but
it's
spread
across
multiple
people.
F
Part
of
it
is
this
idea
of
options,
Tec
options,
so
that
explains
about
12
000
of
the
difference
and
then
yeah.
So
the
the
total
was
like
120
000
a
year
plus
options
at
around
12
000,
and
then
some
extra
money
for
tools
and
services
that
ended
up
being
like
140,
000
and
I.
F
F
Are
we
saying
that
the
only
people
who
ever
get
paid
anymore
are?
Are
this
this
coordination
team
I?
Don't
think
that
that
would
actually
work?
So
that's
part
of
what
we've
got
to
figure
out
is
like
what
does
that
look
like
for
compensating
people
who
are
not
part
of
the
coordinating
team?
Are
we
relying
purely
on
praise
to
do
that,
and
if
so,
what
do
we
need
to
do
with
praise
to
to
reconfigure
things?
F
F
G
Yeah
I
think
that
makes
sense,
I
also
kind
of
agree
with
Nate
that
getting
that
defined
sooner
rather
than
later,
right,
I,
don't
know
when
we
say
this
interim
period.
I,
don't
know
what
that
means,
because
getting
that
defined
sooner
rather
than
later
is
100
going
to
impact.
What
that
interim
period,
Who's
involved
in
that
and
what
that
looks
like
so.
G
It's
one:
it's
I
think
it
definitely
warrants
more
discussion,
but
we
can't
we
can't
kind
of
put
it
too
far
down
the
road
map,
because
it's
going
to
impact
kind
of
it's
going
to
be
very
impactful
very
quickly.
F
Yeah,
so
let
me
I'll
tell
you,
I
mean
this
is
getting
a
little
bit
ahead
of
things,
but
since
this
question
has
come
up,
you
know
a
lot
of
this
is
going
to
depend
on
how
much
is
in
the
the
the
pool
that
moves
over
into
this
team
right.
So
we
know
that
there's
ten
thousand
four
hundred
die
from
sample
and
we
know
that
there's
about
9
200
die
from
communitas
the
big
question
and
there
might
be
some
coming
over
from
transparency.
F
It
just
depends
on
what
happens
with
the
a
project
that
they
have
outstanding
right
now
and
then
there's
like
you
know,
500
or
600
from
stewards.
The
big
big
question
is
the
marketing
multi-sig,
which
has
18
000.
so
depending
on
what
happens
with
that,
and
whether
some
of
that
funding
comes
over
to
pay
for
acid
lasers
time
and
some
of
nt's
time
for
doing
the
curation
service,
which
is
really.
E
F
Focused
on
Communications
now,
like
it's
really
focused
on
supporting
Twitter,
depending
on
how
much
of
that
comes
over,
will
determine
how
much
runway
we
actually
have.
F
That's
the
that's,
the
the
funds
available
question
and
then
there's
the
question
of
how
many
hours
per
week
and
what
we've
been
working
on
right
now
is
you
know,
because
we,
because
we
haven't
defined
all
of
these
roles
and
we
don't
know
who's,
going
to
be
doing
what
it's
kind
of
a
chicken
or
egg
thing.
F
So
what
we're
working
with
is
basically
hourly
wage
of
20
by
21
per
hour
and
then
weekly
hours
of
20.,
and
so
when
you
add
that
up
it
ends
up
being
about
10
000
die
a
month
in
this
interim
period,
and
so
I
think
this
is
probably
going
too
deep
for
this
conversation
right
here.
But
if
people
are
interested
in
this,
we
we
should
definitely
follow
up.
You
can
yeah
I
mean
I,
I,
guess
I.
F
F
Libby
I'm
gonna
just
turn
it
back
over
to
you.
If
you
have
other
things,
you'd
like
to
point
out
yeah.
C
So
I
I
just
want
to
add
one
more
thing
to
this,
is
that
for
the
proposal
itself
moving
forward,
perhaps
we
take
out
the
the
annual
budget
and
we
just
say
hey:
this
is
what
we're
focusing
on
for
payments
for
the
transition
process
and
period,
and
this
kind
of
interim
team
before
we
solidify
and
then
officially
go
with
the
the
budget
proposal.
H
D
D
Up
first,
this
is
stating
how
our
operations
are
changing
from
the
old
structure
that
we
had.
So
we
were
transitioning
from
the
stewards
to
what
like
we
didn't,
have
that
defined.
So
I
think
this
proposal
was
defining
that
a
little
bit
and
also
defining
the
direction
of
what
we're
going
to
be
focusing
on.
So
what
are
the
operations
that
are
going
to
be
covered?
D
What
is
the
intention
of
this
operations,
which
is
focusing
and
supporting
token
engineering
field,
and
also
setting
up
a
road
map
for
how
things
are
going
to
be
worked
on?
So
that's
what
I'm
proposing
we
do
in
this
exercise
right
after
this
proposal
passes
like
what
exactly
this
team
is
going
to
be
doing.
What
are
the
operations
that
are
going
to
be
addressed,
and
how
are
we
tackling
the
the
token
engineering
out
facing
nature.
F
F
Okay,
okay,
Lily.
Thank
you
for
sharing
that
and
for
fielding
the
the
questions
so
Libby
and
I
talked
yesterday
about
a
a
possible
process
for
bringing
these
things
together.
Libby
do
you
want
to
do
you
want
to
walk
us
through
what
we
talked
about
yesterday.
D
Yeah,
so
during
this,
the
transition,
how
we
can
move
forward
to
something
that
is
a
little
bit
further
than
a
transition
and
have
things
more
established
so
getting
and
I
talked
that
we
were
waiting
to
see
if
there
was
any
other
proposal
today.
But
if
the
final
ones
are
just
both
of
our
proposals,
we
could
probably
merge
them
together,
because
there
is
nothing
conflicting
from
one
another
and
make
one
final
proposal
and
then
answer
these
questions.
D
I
think
the
budget
question
is
the
more
urgent
one
for
us
to
understand
how
long
we
would
be
in
transition
phase
and
so
yeah
mapping
all
the
concerns
integrating
them
on
this
final
proposal,
submitting
it
to
snapshot
and
notify
stakeholders
that
this
proposal
is
happening.
Just
so,
people
understand
it's
more
of
like
a
symbolic
stack.
So
people
understand
that,
because
most
people
don't
even
know
that
the
stewards
don't
exist
anymore
or
where
are
we
going?
What
is
the
transition?
So
it's
important
for
everyone
to
be
aware
and
have
a
voice
to
say.
D
Yes,
I
agree
with
this
or
no
I
don't
and
if
this
passes,
and
then
we
have
this
first
session
to
understand
the
commitments
of
each
person,
that
is
in
the
team,
what
roles
they're
going
to
be
fulfilling
Loosely
and
what
is
and
then
the
next
steps
would
be
like.
Okay,
what
are
some?
D
What
is
the
road
map
for
things
we
need
to
achieve,
and
we
have
mapped
them
already
in
a
previous
session
that
we
did
that
exercise
of
the
priorities
of
the
TC.
So
we
have
not
only
priorities,
but
there
was
those
things
that
were
hearted
that
were
like
second
priorities.
So
there's
definitely
a
lot
of
things
in
the
pipeline
that
this
team
could
be
working
on
so
understanding
how
they
would
do
that
and
what
is
more
or
less
the
the
time
frame
and
then
creating
a
cyclical
governance
process.
For
that.
D
So
that's
something
that
came
from
the
insides
of
the
decision
making
exercise.
We
did
the
learnings
from
the
stewards
that
the
thing
that
worked,
the
most
in
terms
of
governance
in
the
Tec
was
the
collaborative
economics
process.
So
how
can
we
bring
some
of
the
things
that
work
there
to
the
structure
that
we
have
now
and
that's
basically,
education
and
ritual,
so
having
like
periodic
moments
where
this
team
will
be
sharing
with
the
community?
What
is
the?
What
are
they
thinking
about
those
priority
tasks?
D
How
are
they
tackling
it
if
the
community
has
any
feedback
and
then
introducing
this
space
of
like
people
jumping
in
to
say,
I
agree
with
this.
I
don't
agree
with
this,
but
following
mostly
on
advice
process,
in
the
sense
that
the
team
has
the
discernment
to
accept
the
feedback
or
not
we're
not
looking
for
consensus
just
offering
this
spaces
for
integration
and
yeah.
This
will
have
a
longer
transition
time.
So
when
those
money
is
about
to
finish
that
a
proposal
will
need
to
be
submitted
to
conviction.
D
Voting
for
funding
will
already
have
a
much
different
understanding
of
what
this
team
is
doing.
The
community
will
be
integrated
and
how
to
provide
feedback,
and
if
there
is
something,
that's
not
working,
we'll
be
clear
for
everyone,
and
we
can
change
that
and
the
proposal
to
the
common
pool.
So
the
main
objective
overall
is
to
connect
with
the
token
engineering
field
and
that
those
should
be
the
metrics
to
manage
the
success
of
this
team,
how
they're
doing
and
how
others
can
integrate
in
the
community.
D
So
hopefully,
by
this
time,
we'll
have
much
more
people
from
the
token
engineering
space
participating
in
governance
and
just
coming
to
share
content
having
their
content
promoted
and
our
Twitter
having
understanding
their
needs,
having
them
submitting
proposals
and
so
on.
F
And
if
I
can
just
I'm
going
to
just
piggyback
on
on
on
that
as
well,
I
think
so
in
in
the
simplest
terms.
Basically,
what
we're
saying
is
we're
going
to
go
through
this
process
of
merging
the
these
proposals,
we'll
put
it
up
for
the
snapshot
vote
and
then
based
on
how
much
runway
we
have
that
defines
I'm,
just
basically
repeating
this,
but
just
shorter,
the
that
defines
the
runway
and
at
the
end
of
that
Runway
we
do
a
proposal
for
conviction
voting
to
actually
do
a.
F
You
know
ask
for
money
to
keep
this
going,
and
so
what
Livi
is
also
pointing
out
is
that
there
are
a
bunch
of
processes
that
we
want
to
put
in
place,
for
you
know
defining
what
we,
what
this
team
is
working
on,
based
on
some
of
the
things
that
have
already
been
identified,
and
then
a
process
for
actually
working
with
with
the
community
and
basically
reporting
out
and
getting
feedback
on
that
and
I.
Think
the
one.
F
The
only
reason,
I'm
I'm
kind
of
saying
something
else
here
is
that
I
I
think
it's
also
important
to
understand
all
of
us
understand
and
have
patients
that
this
team
is
going
to
be
working
with
much
reduced
capacity
to
what
we're
used
to
right.
It's
it's
a
much
smaller
team,
so
that's
going
to
be
one
of
the
challenges
is
figuring
out
how
much
this
team
can
actually
bear
during
this
during
this
period
and
Libby.
Is
there
anything
else
you'd
like
to
add
on
it.
F
F
So
in
the
last
eight
minutes,
I
would
just
like
to
open
it
up
for
people
to
comment
on.
You
know
or
ask
questions
about
what
we
just
proposed
as
the
next
steps.
B
Maybe
I
would
I
would
say
I
would
ask
for
dates
like
how
long
do
we
we
take
to
first
I
think
emerging
the
two
proposals
into
one,
and
when
would
we
post
it
into
snapshot
when
we
we
decide
to
how
much
money?
Actually
it's
gonna,
be
depending
on
on
on
the
different
voltages
of
the
working
group,
so
yeah,
basically
just
like
deadlines
for
for
every
every
step.
D
Okay,
yeah
I,
think
budget
I
from
my
understanding
is
just
talking
to
people
right
who
are
in
this
multi-six
to
make
sure
of
with
the
final
amount
we
have,
so
that
could
be
done.
I'm,
hoping
all
of
that
could
be
solved
tomorrow.
That
Gideon
and
I
could
meet
tomorrow
to
merge
those
proposals
with
the
team
that
is
established.
D
I
also
hope
to
still
hear
from
Angela
today
on
that
front.
But
if
not
I
think
we
can
move
with
the
team,
we
have
and
perhaps
add
a
person
in
like
in
the
near
future.
If
that's,
if
that
makes
sense,
and
and
then
we
could
probably
submit
to
snapshot
on
Monday
I,
think
that
would.
I
F
I
have
one
perspective
on
that
is
I.
Think
that
there's
there's
a
bunch
of
work.
That's
just
happening
anyways,
so
Rex,
all
the
stuff
you're
doing
I
mean
things.
Things
have
not
stopped
right,
so
we
have
to
just
continue
doing
the
work
that
needs
to
to
like
this
shouldn't.
Stop
us
from
doing
work
right
that
we
should
be
pretty
clear
about
that,
but
I
don't
know
Libby
how
long?
How
long
does
the
snapshot
process
take?
F
F
Sure
so,
just
just
we'll
close
this
part
out
and
I
just
want
to
thank
Libby
for
all
of
her
work
and
pushing
forward
on
this
and
making
sure
that
we
have
a
good
process
and
for
everybody
you
know
just
all
of
the
work
that's
gone
into
like
providing
feedback
on
this
I
think
we're
going
to
end
up
with
a
better
process
so
and
a
better
proposal.
So
so
all
right,
we'll
close
it
out.
That's
what
we're
gonna
do.
So
that
feels
good!
That's
good!
A
And
just
in
our
last
few
minutes,
it's
really
about
you
know:
Gardens
has
been
testing
osmotic
funding
on
their
on
sorry,
Blossom
Labs
has
tested,
osmotic
funding
on
Gardens
and
Sam
has
asked
about
whether
the
Tec
would
be
interested
in
starting
to
use
it,
and
normally
this
is
something
that
we
would
bring
to
the
stewards.
A
So
it's
more
of
a
process
question
and
then
we
can
find
the
answer.
How
should
we
address
these
kinds
of
questions
now?
Where
should
this?
Where
should
this
come
to
and
then
yeah?
That's
it
just
short
like
it
would
require,
there's
no
cost
to
the
TC,
but
we
would
require.
We
would
want
to
vote
to
upgrade
our
Gardens
and
then
have
a
plan
for
how
to
use
it.
Piloting
with
the
operations
team
could
be
interesting,
and
then
you
know
some
suggested
funding.
A
Token
engineering
like
CAD
CAD
groups
or
our
other
token
engineering
groups,
could
be
an
interesting
way
to
use
it
as
well
and
I.
Think
people
need
to
also
understand
what
osmotic
funding
is,
which
is
using
superfluid
to
stream
funding
to
a
group,
and
so
it's
sort
of
like
conviction
voting,
except
rather
than
once
it
passes.
You
get
a
lump
sum
once
it
passes
a
stream
turns
on,
and
we
could
share
some
more
about
that,
so
that
we
can
make
a
more
informed
decision
but
process
wise.
D
I
think
that
that's
a
Tau
voting
proposal
right,
you
would
have
to
be
I
think
we
should
just
follow
our
governance
process.
Also
I'm,
not
sure
if
everybody
knows
that
the
governance
process
is
pinned
to
The.
Forum
I
saw
that
it
was
unpinned
by
somebody
recently,
but
it's
there
and
I
think
the
natural
process,
for
that
would
be
submitting
to
advice
process
in
the
Forum,
and
maybe
we
could
promote
a
community
call
and
really
like
really
promote
that
invite
everybody
to
learn
about
osmotic
funding.
A
Feel
like
it's
missing
the
step
of
getting
the
advice
process
of
a
smaller
group.
First,
like
hey.
What
are
this
like?
What
does
this
group
of
people
think
that
are
active
in
the
Tec?
Where
could
we
use
it
and
like
starting
to
shape
an
idea
before
it
goes
to
the
Forum
I
feel
like
that?
Jumping
to
The
Forum
jumps
over
that
one
step
that
we
used
to
have.
E
F
I
had
that,
actually
in
the
original
proposal
it
was
a
footnote
but
I
think
it's.
That
might
be
something
that
we
could
look
at
for
funding,
maybe
not
the
first
proposal
for
this
team,
but
maybe
a
second
one
down
down
the
road,
because
it's
I
I
guess
what
I
would
say
is
why
don't
we
put
that
into
one
of
the
issues
that
we're
looking
at
in
terms
of
like
budgeting.
H
I
think
what
that
what
would
be
nice
is
to
have
Sam
or
someone
from
one
Hive
in
just
have
like
a
brainstorming
station,
because
there
are
some
upsides
and
some
downsides
to
using
food
proposals
as
the
main
source
of
compensation
for
for
this
team.
But
there
may
be
hundreds
of
other
use
cases
that
we
may
want
to
incorporate
moving
forward
and
then,
after
that,
if
there's
any
advice
process
or
whatever
to
that
leads
up
to
the
proposal
in
this.
C
I
mean
if
it
costs
us
nothing
from
the
TC's
perspective,
then
yeah
I
don't
see
why
we
wouldn't
want
to
have
an
upgraded
Gardens
that
had
more
capabilities.
I
do
think
it's
like
a
really
good
future
for
common
pool
distribution
in
terms
of
setting
up
a
grant,
a
grant
type
system.
So
I
think
that's
really
nice,
but
yeah
go
ahead.
J
The
interesting
thing
like
I
was
with
Sam
in
Mexico
and
he
was
showing
me
osmotic
funding
in
action.
The
one
limitation
that
I
told
him
was
that
there's
no
cap
right.
It's
not
like
you
make
a
proposal,
and
it's
only
for
100k,
and
then
it
streams
it
it's
like
right
now.
The
current
implementation
takes
the
total
sum
of
the
common
pool
and
streams
it
so
there's
no
limit,
there's
no
limit.
It
just
keeps
going
and
going
and
going
until
until
their
the
requirements
aren't
met
or
the
common
pools
empty.
J
A
I
So
yeah
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
I
do
agree
with
Tom
in
this,
whether
it's
something
taken
specifically
by
the
common
Ops
Team
or
whether
we
do
sort
of
bridge
what
we
kind
of
yeah.
But
it
doesn't
make
sense,
given
that
it's
taken
us
so
long
to
come
forward
with
this
proposal
and
we're
a
team
of
10..
Imagine
if
we
try
and
scope
it
out
from
scratch
in
a
wider
Community,
it's
gonna
be
a
nightmare,
so
that
does
need
to
be
that
process
yeah.
That's
all
I
wanted
to
say.
F
Okay,
so
we
are
over
time,
but
I
think
we
just
I
think
we
put
that
into
the
bin
for
for
right
now,
just
something
that
we
got
to
figure
out
and
we've
got
to
build
a
bin
for
capturing
things
like
that.
So,
okay,
so
let's
wrap
it
up
here.
Thank
you.
Everybody
much
appreciated
have
a
good
day.