►
From YouTube: TEC Transformation Strategy and Planning 12 - Project Updates & Strategic Planning Conversation
Description
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
Field
and
so
he'd
he'd
like
to
work
with
us
in
doing
that,
and
then
the
other
thing
is
that
he's
very
interested
in
getting
clients,
and
so
he
was
interested
in
us
and
whether
we're
going
to
re-initiate
our
work
on
the
matching
service.
So
I
told
him
that
that's
not
an
immediate
thing,
but
that's
definitely
something
that's
we're
going
to
return
to
at
some
point.
So
that
was
cool
to
get
that
confirmation.
There
too
ygg
is
on
fire.
A
He's
I,
don't
know
if
anybody,
if
you're
SP
I
know
some
of
you
are
spending
some
time
in
the
labs
interest
group,
but
he
is
like
got
a
lot
of
ideas
that
are
percolating
over
there.
So
it's
definitely
worth
popping
over
there
to
just
see
some
of
the
stuff
he's
talking
about.
A
It's
really
cool,
so
one
of
the
latest
ones
and
there's
a
link
here.
But
the
token
engineering
python
library
is
pretty
cool
idea,
I'm
not
going
to
go
into
the
details
here,
but
it's
worth
it's
worth
popping
over
there
and
seeing
and
yeah
I'm
just
I'm
getting
kind
of
I'm
getting
kind
of
excited
about
the
interest
groups
like
it
does
seem
to
be
tapping.
A
Some
I
mean
we'll
see,
we'll
see
how
it
how
it
builds
actually
over
time,
but
I
think
just
us
allowing
space
for
people
to
come
in
and
just
unleash
their
creativity
and
start
building
some
kind
of
natural
connections
with
folks
yeah.
It's
we're
starting
to
get
some
signs
that
there
may
be
some
some
real
interest
here.
So
that's
cool
any
thoughts
or
comments
about
any
of
that.
B
Yeah
I
have
a
few
first
with
prime,
though
I
think.
That's
that's
really
great.
When
I'm
wondering
enough,
it's
not
necessarily
because
of
primed
out
it's
I.
Guess
these
Global
interests
of
interest
groups,
because
ecosystem
development
seems
a
bit
Broad
and
I'm,
not
sure
if
we
are.
B
If
Our
intention
is
to
open
this
space
for
any
any
kind
of
interest
group
to
come
up,
I
I
thought
maybe
I'm
wrong,
but
I
thought
they
were.
They
were
supposed
to
be
like
very
talking
engineering
oriented-
maybe
that's
not
the
case
or
maybe
there's
there's
some
overlap
in
ecosystem
development.
I
I
just
don't
know
about
ecosystem
development
in
general,
but
I
guess
that's
a
conversation
to
have
like
how.
How
far
can
we
go
with
interest
groups?
B
That's
one
and
then
with
ygg
I,
I
love
the
idea,
but
I'm
I,
don't
know
I.
Think
I've
I
haven't
had
any
conversation
with
ygg
outside
outside
the
the
open,
Labs
Channel,
but
he's
proposed
a
few
things
and
he's
also
expressed
the
intention
of
doing
something
like
with
not
much
overhead
or
nothing
too
serious.
B
What
he
proposed
yesterday
seems
like
a
a
big
project,
and
so
I'm
like
where,
where
where
is,
he
is
really
standing
on
and
because
I
I
guess
a
project
like
that,
like
a
te
library
for
python,
would
require
a
lot
of
input
from
Sargon
and
all
the
all
the
more
expert
guys
in
the
field
and
more
commitments,
such
Etc
I'm,
just
not
sure
I,
know
he's
he's
changing
Minds,
quite
a
quite
a
bit
and
that's
good
stuff,
but
if
we
can
make
it
happen,
it's
so
cool.
A
Yeah
I'd
be
interested
in
other
people's
perspectives.
My
my
take
on
it
is
that,
with
the
interest
groups,
you
know
maybe
for
the
next
little
while
we
we
just
allow
things
to
be
a
little
bit
more
open-ended
and
flexible,
just
to
see
what
emerges
rather
than
trying
to
over
prescribe
in
the
beginning.
A
Getting
people
doing
like
really
random
stuff,
then
I
think
you
know
I
mean
part
of
this
will
be
caught
in
the
application
itself,
because
Bears
put
together
like
a
simple
process
for
just
applying
to
set
up
an
interest
group,
so
I
think
that's
that's
part
of
the
way
we
catch
it
just
make
sure
that
it
actually
is
aligned
with
the
mission
and.
A
Stuff
yeah.
A
D
Yeah
I
think
on
the
ygg
stuff
I
think
it
seems
like
a
great
project
for
the
Tec
right.
I
think
you
know
the
ask
was
big
and
so
I
think
maybe
and
I
think
Gideon.
It
was
you
who
kind
of
put
like
hey.
Maybe
maybe
we
do
some
smaller
Milestones
to
kind
of
get
started
or
do
some
exploration
or
do
some
initial
work
around
it,
for
maybe
it
was
I
think
it
was
one
of
his
other
proposals
to
that.
D
D
I
think
would
be
a
good
idea
and
maybe
that's
part
of
the
advice
process
right.
He
just
floated
the
idea.
I.
Think
I
think
you
know
some
discussion
around.
It
is
good,
but
as
for
the
actual
project,
I
think
that
makes
a
lot
of
sense
from
a
from
a
common.
You
know
Common
Goods
type,
development,
piece,
aligned
with
token
engineering,
so
I
like
the
idea,
but
maybe
you
know
split
it
up
into
some
initial.
D
You
know
research
phase
with
a
smaller
proposal
to
get
it
started
and
to
your
point
that
might
build
some
momentum
around
the
industry
or
in
the
industry
with
some
of
the
other
folks
right,
invite
some
of
the
other
folks
and
build
some
momentum
to
to
get
broader
engagement.
E
Yeah
I
think
you
know
one
of
the
original
proposals
he
had
put
out.
There
was
kind
of
attacking
some
of
our
big
fundamental
dependencies
that
we
had
with
questions
around
the
bonding
curve
and
the
migration
of
it
to
potentially
a
a
new
chain
and
I'm,
not
sure
if
that
still
stands
in
his
mind
in
terms
of
priorities,
I
know
I
mentioned
it,
but
I
I
do
think
it's
it's
really
important
on
the
priority
list.
E
If
that's
something
he
is
he's
looking
to
do
in
terms
of
getting
funding
for
a
project
to
to
focus
on
I
I
would
definitely
back
that
type
of
initiative.
C
F
F
I
I
would
say
that
we
do
need
other
token
Engineers
to
actually
you
know,
have
a
look
at
it
see
if
it
would
actually
be
useful,
rather
than
like
spending
like
90k
straight
away,
but
given
the
token
engineering,
Academy
ygg
a
couple
of
other
proposals
which
I
know
are
already
in
the
works,
that
sort
of
are
turning
towards
the
same
idea,
it
seems
like
a
strategic
move
for
the
dec
is
going
to
be
to
start
asking
money
from
everywhere,
like
now
and
kind
of
reflowing
being
that
re-granter
and
US
starting
to
to
the
coordination
team,
starting
to
move
toward
that
sooner
rather
than
later.
A
Yeah,
you
know
the
there
was
one
post
that
ygg
had
in
there,
where
he
kind
of
laid
out
the
three
things
that
seem
to
be
brewing
in
this.
On
the
front
of
actual
doing
token,
engineering
and
yeah
one
was,
you
know,
moving
the
ABC
over
to
different
chain.
Other
is
the
gardens
2.0
and
then
there's
this
Library
idea,
and
it
does
seem,
like
it's
gonna,
be
hard
to
fund
all
three
of
these
things.
A
So
there's
going
to
have
to
be
some
conversations,
probably
about
like
how
we
prioritize
so
now
we'll
get
we're
going
to
get
into
in
a
sec.
This
strategic
planning,
but
I,
think
that
you
know
we
need
some
ways
to
be
able
to
talk
about
these
kind
of
like
where
the
overall
priorities
are
and
make
sure
that
the
projects
I
I
think
it
would
be
great
if
the
projects
that
were
funding
also
fit
in
with
the
overall
strategy.
C
F
I've
had
conversations
with
others
they're
looking
to
do
the
same,
and
it's
like.
Okay.
Now
everyone
wants
every
second,
you
know:
I
saw
some
money
from
the
TC.
What
do
we
do
then?
B
When
a
small
thing
you
said
about,
you
know
priority
prioritization
and
now
Rex
with
all
the
interest
I'm
just
wondering
whether
if
we
should
try
to
maybe
not
now
I,
don't
think,
there's
much
time
before
the
end
of
the
year,
but
tried
in
January
to
actually
start
having
more
regular
conversations
with
our
advisory
network.
Let's
say
and
started
to
start
to
formalize
that,
because
it's
going
to
be
hard
for
us
to
understand
to
graphs
to
grasp
the
reality
of
the
ecosystem
and
prioritize
whatever
we
want
to
do.
B
F
Ty's
ideas
and
fully
funded
by
us,
but
maybe
I,
don't
know
but
50
50
with
block
science
I,
don't
know
something
like
that
in
order
to
actually
dampen
the
like.
If
we
can
get
to
that
point,
but
yeah
it
needs
it's.
It's
not
gonna
pass
as
it
stands
whatever
we
do,
it
needs
a
lot
more
clarity,
but
that's-
and
that
comes
with
time.
G
Sounds
like
a
great
use
case
for
the
proposal.
Inverter
I
want
to
just
throw
in
a
few
like
two
cents
to
because
you
know,
YG
has
a
reputation
in
the
Tec
he's
been
a
steward
for
a
very
long
time,
starting
the
the
Tec
labs.
G
So
you
know
I
I,
just
read
through
I
hadn't,
seen
it
until
now,
I
hadn't
read
through
the
labs
I'm,
seeing
the
proposal
for
this
Library,
which
sounds
really
exciting.
I
would
tend
to
agree
with
the
sentiment
on
this
call,
though,
that
it
seems
as
if
it's
not
in
the
and
in
a
ready
to
to
be
submitted
for
for
proposal
and
I
also
think
it's
unusual
for
us
to
sort
of
fund
a
salary
for
a
year
in
advance.
G
So
that's
something
I
might
not
be
sure
would
be
the
right
way
to
go,
or
it
would
be
a
what
would
pass
in
in
the
TC.
But
in
general
you
know.
Ygg
is
full
of
enthusiasm
very
well
connected
and
is
really
able
to
manifest
things
happening.
G
He's
had
a
number
number
of
different
courses
in
the
the
Tec
in
his
labs
and
has
had
wide
audiences
and
you
know,
drew
a
lot
of
attention
to
the
work
that
he
was
doing
here.
So
just
really
just
a
testament
to
his
reputation
and
his
ability
to
bring
in
lots
of
people
from
different
areas,
not
just
for
people
in
Tec,
but
to
bring
people
from
different
areas
to
come
and
then
do
research
on
the
TC's
Discord.
G
But
it's
super
super
interesting
and
he's
very
high
energy,
as
you
guys,
as
everyone
knows,
he's
super
high
energy
and
has
lots
of
ideas
and
is
just
one
of
the
people
that
executes
well
on
on
the
ideas
that
he
has
yeah.
E
H
And
I
don't
know
about
the
the
structure
of
the
funding,
but
this
idea
of
having
like
a
python
Library,
oh
talk,
engineering
tools
is
amazing.
I
know
that
some
of
the
of
the
things
that
we've
developed
are
like
a
mile
or
not.
Like
am
I
a
small
step
for
becoming
usable
for
everyone
and,
for
example,
the
config
dashboard
only
needs
a
small
tweaking
to
work
with
different
hedge
funds
and
with
a
different
Supply.
H
G
A
A
It
does
seem
based
on
some
of
the
stuff
that
Rex
is
saying,
I.
Think
that
we're
all
saying
you
know
the
common
pool,
we're
gonna
things
may
get
tight,
because
we've
got
the
academy
funding
the
academy
and
we've
got
this
the
operations
team
and
then
we're
gonna.
A
You
know
we're
gonna
be
getting
some
more
requests
for
public
good
support,
so
I
am
hoping
that
we're
going
to
be
able
to
as
part
of
the
strategy,
really
concentrate
on
how
we
make
the
common
pool
stretch
and
I
think
there
are
a
lot
of
ideas
on
that
front.
But
that's
becoming
clearer
to
me
that
that's
like
that
has
to
be
a
central
part
of
our
strategy.
Is
the
common
pool.
B
A
We
ready
to
move
on
to
the
next
topic:
okay,
so
next
topic.
This
is
just
a
small
project,
but
acid
and
anti
and
I
are
working
with
Stefan,
who
is
the
consultant
who's
working
with
the
giveth
Galaxy
on
Twitter
strategy
and
one
of
his
recommendations?
We're
making
a
few
changes
to
things,
but
one
of
the
things
he
thought
would
be
really
good
is
like
a
pin
to
tweet.
That
is
just
explaining
what,
in
the
head
of
token
engineering
actually
is
I,
and
we
all
seem
to.
We
all
thought
that
that
was.
A
That
was
a
good
idea,
and
so
the
challenge
is
I.
F
A
We,
this
may
be
a
longer
term
project.
It
would
be
great
I
have
this
desire
to
actually
open
that
up
to
the
crowd
longer
term,
like
really
get
Come
Away,
with,
like
a
really
great
definition
of
what
token
engineering
is
by
like
Consulting
people
like
zargum
and
others,
Trent
and
Angela
and
others
to
come
to.
A
With
like
a
crowd-sourced
definition
and
explanation
of
what
token
engineering
is
I
think
that
would
be
a
really
great
thing
for
the
TC
to
have
as
part
of
our
like
a
medium
post
or
something
but
in
between
then
and
now.
I
think
it
would
be
great
to
just
have
like
a
simple
thread
on
Twitter
explaining
just
like.
Basically,
what
token
engineering.
C
A
We're
not
going
to
go
into
that
here,
but
what
I
wanted
to
do
is
just
open
it
up
and
see.
If,
if
there
are
folks
here
on
the
call
I
know,
NT
is
going
to
be
involved
in
that.
But
if
there
are
folks
on
the
call
who
would
be
interested
in
helping
out
with
shaping
that,
please
say
so
right
now
and
we'll
we'll
rope
you
in.
A
Or
if
you
have
people,
you
think
we
should
consult
and
and
get
advice
process
on
for
that
tweet
thread.
A
A
Channel
for
feedback
once
we've
got
something.
A
Okay,
so
for
these
calls,
what
I'm
thinking
is
that
we
change
the
the
pace
of
these?
This
is
building
on
some
of
the
stuff
that
bear
was
talking
about
earlier
a
couple
weeks
ago,
in
terms
of
like
the
pattern
of
our
coordination,
one
of
the
things
I've
been
noticing
is
that
these
calls.
A
A
This
coordination
call
and
combine
it
with
sample
call
that
comes
right
after
this,
as,
like
a
two-hour
focused,
call
that's
really
much
more
about
implementation
and
execution
like
really
getting
into
the
details
of
actually
doing
the
work,
coordinating,
also
reviewing
existing
projects
that
kind
of
stuff,
so
both
calls
will
be
open
to
everybody,
but
if
you're
short
on
time,
and
especially
if
you're,
not
in
the
the
active
contributors-
I
mean,
if
you're
not
in
the
coordination
team,
but
you
really
want
to
help,
but
like
you're
limited
on
time,
the
idea
would
be.
A
This
call
would
be
the
first
priority
like
where
we
really
want
everybody
to
to
plug
into
and
we'll
try
to
build
more
attendance
for
these
calls
and
keep
them
focused
on
the
higher
level
objectives
and
new
ideas
and
then
reviewing
the
existing
ideas
that,
like
the
status
of
projects
and
then
take
the
Thursday
time,
combine
it
into
one
session,
that's
two
hours
and
really
focusing
more
implementation
and
getting
a
set
up.
So
that,
like
we're
reviewing
past
projects,
we're
getting
we're.
You
know
the
focus
is
reviewing
projects.
A
It's
getting
projects
that
are
in
the
works
unstuck,
if
they're,
if
they're
stuck
giving
space
for
people
who
are
running
projects
to
brainstorm
with
the
with
the
rest
of
implementers
and
then
also
kind
of
teeing
us
up
and
planning
for
the
following
weeks
and
making
sure
that
these
calls
are
are
well
organized
and
we've
got
the
right
agendas
and
stuff
set
up
and
well
basically,
just
organized
so.
E
C
A
Okay
seems
like
General
consensus
there.
So
that's
what
we'll
do?
A
C
A
Demo,
let
me
just
say
the
last
thing
I
wanted
to
talk
about
is
strategic
planning,
so
we're
going
to
we've
still
got
a
handful
of
things,
we're
working
on
that
we
promised
as
part
of
The
Proposal
for
the
course
coordination
team.
So
those
things
we
we
still
got
another,
probably
a
month
or
so
of
work
in
like
terms
of
like
getting
our
accountability
structures
there's
some
stuff.
Probably
there
were
just
a
number
of
questions.
A
We've
talked
about
before,
like
integration
with
praise,
the
stewards
like
what
is
the
future
of
stewards,
although
that
may
end
up
stretching
a
little
bit
longer
so.
C
A
D
D
A
Of
the
things
that
I've
been
thinking
about
and
Bear's
been
thinking
about
this
with
me
and
starting
to
kind
of
float
this
with
others
is
that
the
thing
that
we've
all
been
kind
of
longing
for
for
a
while
now
is
we've
been
calling
it
like
a
road
map
but
I.
D
A
It's
really
a
strategy
for
the
Tec,
and
so
when
we
pull
together,
the
funding
plan
for
the
coordination
team,
probably
in
February,
is
when
we'll
start
to
run
out
of
funds
for
this
team.
A
I
would
like
to
make
strategic
planning
like
one
of
the
big
deliverables
that
we
do
in
that
initial.
Basically,
we're
thinking
about
a
season
of
the
coordination
team,
so
starting
in
probably
late
February
early
March,
with
a
little
bit
of
pre-work
before
then
doing
doing
a
strategic
plan
for
the
Tec
and
and.
B
A
That
you
know
in
a
way
that's
not
just
like
a
small
team
people
of
people
like
coming
up
with
a
strategy
but
like
putting
in
place
some
processes
where
we
can
actually
go
out
to
the
field,
to
the
stakeholders,
the
broad
set
of
stakeholders
of
the
Tec
and
build
some
sustainable
processes.
While
we're
doing
this,
that
will
allow
us
to
get
ongoing
feedback,
so
you
can
think
of
this
as
kind
of
like
this
advisory
network
actually
starting
to
build
that
out
and
building
in
some
feedback
loops
so
that
we
get
that
continuous
feedback.
A
The
other
thing
I
wanted
to
mention
is
that
in
my
last
work,
my
last
job,
one
of
the
we
ended
up
using
this
technique.
That
was
really
helpful
for
us
in
terms
of
focusing
for
for
a
mission-driven
organization.
C
A
Of
change
is
a
really
powerful
tool
for
focusing
the
collective
energy
of
a
network
of
people
and
so
series.
The
theory
of
change
approach
often
goes
hand
in
hand
with
another
set
of
tools
called
logic
models.
A
These
techniques
are
really
very
popular
in
the
non-profit
world
and
the
topic
world,
where
you
know
you've
got
to
think
about
how
change
happens
in
the
world
and
how
structure
change
and
how
you
make
sure
that
you're
actually
having
impact
in
the
work.
So
it's
a
it's
a
it's
a
great
set
of
tools
for
thinking
about
that
and
so
I
will
over
the
next
month
or
so
we'll
be
pulling
together
just
some
resources
on
that
just
simple
stuff.
A
So
we
all
understand
what
that
process
looks
like
and
can
assess,
I
think
it's
like
I,
said
I
think
it's
a
very
valuable
set
of
tools
and
I've
done
it
once
it
was
it's
hard
work,
but
it's
super
rewarding
because
at
the
end
you
end
up
with
a
very
clear
shared
picture
of
not
just
what
matters
most,
but
actually
The,
Logical
structure,
the
set
of
assumptions
that
will
help
you
to
understand.
A
Like
you
know,
if
we
do
this,
then
that
will
lead
to
this,
and
that
in
turn,
will
then
lead
to
this,
and
so
it
kind
of
helps
to
structure
in
a
logical
framework
what
things
the
organization
has
to
do
in
order
to
achieve
a
specific
set
of
desired
outcomes.
A
D
A
Like
you
know,
I'm
assuming
this
is
something
that
everybody's
going
to
want
to
be
involved
with
and
so
I.
You
know,
I
guess
well,
I'm,
just
gonna
assume
that
but
thoughts
and
comments
on
that.
I
Yeah
I'm
just
gonna,
like
definitely
second,
that
I
I
would
agree
that
coming
up
with
a
strategic
plan
should
be
one
of
the
or
probably
the
most
important
priority
going
forward,
because
it
will
also
Define
the
how
how
we
go
about
the
different
initiatives
that
start
coming
up
and
how
do
we
align
them
with
the
overall
objective
that
the
TC
and
the
vision
that
the
TC
has
right.
I
So
for
me,
that's
like
the
umbrella
that
will
cover
everything
we
do
and
and
then,
if
we
can
come
up
with
a
way
of
of
doing
it,
like
collectively
I
think
that's
just
gonna,
be
like
super
Innovative
and
super
super
yeah.
It's
gonna
be
like
a
really
rich
full
experience
for
everyone.
That
I
think
will
allow
us
also
to
create
a
sense
of
ownership
and
belonging
of
the
TC,
because
we
will
share
that
same
purpose
and
that
same
way
in
in
which
we
will
achieve
whatever
we.
Whatever
we
do
right
so
yeah.
E
I
Just
second,
second,
on
that
and
and
yeah
it's
it's
great
excited
for
that.
E
Foreign
yeah
I,
agree,
I,
think
there's
a
really
it's
a
big
conversation,
I
think
is
really
important.
E
Is
this
kind
of
balancing
between
wanting
to
fulfill
our
mission
by
advancing
token
engineering,
and
you
know
making
sure
that
the
the
commons
is
you
know
maintaining
the
longevity
of
the
commons
and
making
sure
it's
sustainable
in
the
long
term
and
I
think
we
lean
towards
token
engineering
very
hard,
and
we
really
haven't
put
as
much
thought
into
preserving
and
maintaining
longevity
of
the
commons
as
much
and
so
I
think
that
a
strategic
roadmap
towards
that
would
be
very,
very,
very
beneficial
for
us.
C
F
Just
I
understand
this
correctly,
so
we
had
a
I,
remember:
anti
kind
of
set
out
sort
of
a
road
map
a
couple
of
weeks
back.
What's
the
difference?
Is
this
a
higher
level
than
was
set
out
or
a
continuation
of
300?
Those
steps-
and
you
know
if
I
was
actually
making
the
making
that
roadmap
can
click
concrete.
A
F
A
Would
say
is
that
that
the
things
that
NT
were
was
outlining
were
some
really
interesting
ideas
like
the
conference.
It's
a
really
interesting
idea.
A
This
is
yeah.
This
is
bigger.
This
is
basically
coming
up
with,
like
a
frame
that
helps
us
answer
these
big
questions
about
like
who
are
the
stakeholders?
Who
really
are
the
people
we're
trying
to
serve?
What
is
the
change
that
we
really
want
to
see
in
the
world?
You
know
five
years
out,
you
know
what
does
that?
Look
like
the
TC
wildly
succeeds.
What
will
that
look
like
what
will
shift
in
the
world
as
a
result
of
us
being
successful?
A
So
it's
laying
that
out
and
then
it's
also
laying
out
a
process
for
us
to
be
able
to
get
feedback
from
you
know
not
just
it's
not
just
like
the
you
know,
four
five,
six
people
on
the
coordination
team,
like
that's
not
good,
like
we
can't
I,
mean
I,
think
we
need
to
be
able
to
move
quickly,
but
we
need
some
kind
of
like
bigger
container
through
which
we're
getting
feedback
from
the
field
about
what
people
actually
really
care
about
like
what
what
will
be
the
things
that
move
the
needle
in
terms
of
change
when
it
comes
to
token
engineering.
F
Does
that
make
sense,
I
mean
I'm,
not
sure
whether
we
should
be
looking
really
at
five
years,
but
but
I
guess
that's
sort
of
like
an
idea,
rather
than
it
spending
much
time
on
that.
F
A
So
there's
a
saying
of
being
able
to
walk
and
chew
gum
at
the
same
time,
and
so
we
have
to
be
able
to
do
that.
We
have
to
be
able
to
keep
going
and
executing
on
the
stuff.
A
We
know
that
we
need
to
do
and
even
taking
the
stuff
that
we're
doing
right
now
and
stretching
that
out
a
little
bit
to
be
able
to
say
like
okay,
we
we're
going
to
try
a
few
new
things
that
are
just
extensions
of
what
we're
doing
right
now,
but
at
the
same
time
we
also
have
to
be
able
to
to
answer
these
bigger
questions.
I
mean
we
need
to
be
able
to
say
pretty
clearly
you
know
when
we're
working
on
Twitter,
who
exactly
are
we
trying
to
attract?
A
We
don't
really
have
clear
answers
to
that
right
and
that's
that
causes
us
to
make
changes
and
not
know
where
to
invest
our
long-term
resources.
So.
A
May
be
rex
that
this
is
like
an
exercise
that
not
everybody's
going
to
want
to
participate
in
I
totally
get
that,
and
so
you
know
we'll
we'll
figure
out
ways
to
make
sure
that
we
can
keep
moving
forward.
We
have
to
and
not
get
stuck,
you
know
operationally,
but
then.
F
A
F
Yeah
I
mean
the
thing
with
the
thing
with
Twitter
specifically,
is
that
the
approach
is
upside
down.
It
isn't
trying
to
find
the
target
audience
and
tailor
to
them.
It's
doing
a
plethora
of
content.
Seeing
what
sticks
and
from
what
sticks.
You
find
your
target
audience
and
it's
like
the
the
process
for
Twitter
is
upside
down.
F
F
A
Don't
know
at
this
point
but
Rex
I
mean
I
I.
Think.
A
I
think
it's
fair
to
say
that
you
know
we're
they're.
A
Philosophies
on
how
to
plan
and
and
how
to
actually
make
decisions
and
what
we
have
not
tried
in
the
TC
at
least
since
I've
been
here,
is
laying
out
some
kind
of
vision
of
like
I
mean
there's
a
vision.
Actually
the
vision
is
really
cool.
A
The
mvv
is
I.
Think
is
really
great.
It's
just
the
thing
that
we
many
people
have
been
asking
for
over
the
last
several
months
is
a
road
map
and
we've
been
missing
that,
and
so
not
everybody
like
you,
may
not
value
a
road
map,
but
I
think
there
is
like
a
strong
desire
from
a
number
of
people
to
know
where
we're
headed,
and
so
one.
F
Thing's,
a
road
map
and
the
other
is
a
framework
for
a
roadmap,
so
we're
talking
about
a
framework
for
a
roadmap
which
I
mean
till
the
framework
for
the
roadmap
is
set
out
like
is
that
going
to
block
the
roadmap
or
is
it
is
it
necessary
to
have
such
a
concrete
framework
or
can
both
of
those
also
be
done?
In
parallel?
Can
we
set
out
an
initial
roadmap
I
love?
F
What
we
already
are
using,
what
we
already
know
as
we
set
up
this
framework
and
then
amend
that
roadmap
as
we've
as
we
make
this
Vision
more
concrete
or
is
that
also
is
that
gonna
be
like
double
the
work.
G
Okay,
what
I've
been
hearing
yeah,
you
know,
I
I,
think
there's
a
few
things
that
are
sort
of
conflating
right.
This
idea
of
how
we
want
to
do
strategic
planning,
which
you
know
I'm
not
familiar
with
theory
of
change,
but
I-
think
that
if
that
is
the
way
that
you
know,
if
that's
something
we
can
try,
I'm,
always
up
for
trying
new
idea,
new
ways
of
developing
strategy,
so
I
think
it's
very
interesting
to
give
that
a
try
but
I
I.
G
Also,
you
know,
there's
a
few
things
like
the
when
we
were
first
talking,
I
was
thinking.
Oh,
are
we
talking
about
the
stakeholder
mapping
that
Libya
was
discussing
to
sort
of
like
get
to
know
the
needs
of
token
Engineers?
You
know
I
personally
feel
like
we
know
who
our
Twitter
audience
is.
We
know
who
the
token
Engineers
are
there.
We
want
to
speak
to
I,
don't
think!
That's
I,
don't
think.
That's
really
what
we
want
to
get
at
I!
Think
it's
more
of
hey.
What
are
token
engineering?
G
What
is
token
engineering
really
need,
and
how
can
the
tecs
really
support
this
field?
And
you
know,
Olivia
proposed
doing
a
stakeholder
interview
and
trying
to
get
some
sort
of
you
know
current
mapping
of
what
the
priorities
are
for
working
token
engineers
and
different
projects
objects,
but
I
I,
guess
I,
don't
have
any.
You
know
at
a
very
interesting
conversation
with
Christopher
recently,
and
we
were
talking
about
mvv
and
he
put
on
my
radar,
something
called
what
is
it
called
like
it's
the
central
idea.
G
This
is
sort
of
like
central
idea
for
how
board
meetings
can
evaluate
the
organizations
they're
working
with
better
and
I
think
that
this
is
a
little
bit.
What
maybe
Rex
is
even
coming
to
you
know
it's
not
really
about
the
Mission
Vision
value.
It's
like.
Why
does
it
exist?
Who
does
it
serve?
How
should
it
you
know
how?
How
will
it
flourish?
How
will
it
make
money
and
manage
risk,
and
where
is
it
going
and
all
of
these
things
sort
of
conflated
into
like
the
Strategic?
That
is
this.
G
That's
the
Strategic,
Direction
and
I
think
that
we
need
some
methodology
to
agree
on
to
get
to
this
strategic
Direction.
Where
We
have
this
final
results
where
we
are
aligned
on
how
we're
getting
there,
and
my
personal
feeling
is.
If
we
give
this
a
try,
the
theory
of
change
a
try
to
get
there.
You
know
it
might
be
a
smaller
group
that
really
wants
to
dig
into
that
stuff,
but
I
think
it's
I
think
it's
a
good
idea
to
have
some
methodology
to
figure
out
how
to
get
there.
F
Right
I
mean
I
I,
know
I'm
sounding
very
sort
of
pessimistic
of
it
all
as
always,
I'm
a
very
pessimistic
man.
It's
just
inspires
I,
don't
want
to
drag
anyone
else
down
in
this
I
I
support
doing
this
I'm,
just
ask
just
ask
for
like
have
some
sort
of
the
road
map
for
the
road
notes
spent
too
much
time
on
it,
but
like
it's,
it's
a
very
big
picture.
F
So
unless
we
stick
some
stick
some
some
times
on
this,
it's
just
gonna
we're
just
gonna
spend
till
next
February
till
we
have
something,
and
by
that
point
we'll
need
to
like
yeah
and
probably
don't
want
to
spend
that
much
time
like
not
till
February.
We
do
want
to
spend
enough
time
so
that
it's
it's
useful,
but
not
so
much
so
that
it
undermines
the
road
map
itself.
A
Understood
I
I
I
Rex
I
mean
it
sounds
like
I'm
arguing
with
you.
I
am
a
little
bit
but
I
I,
understand
I,
understand
the
sentiment
like
better
to
do.
80
20
like
get
it
80
there
and
not
perfect,
but
wrap
it
up
like
and
then
move
on,
and
then
you
know,
like
then
figure
out.
What's
the
next
thing
right
and
just
keep
moving
so
I
want
to
make
space
for
others
just
in
case.
Other
people
have
other
comments
on.
G
And
I
just
want
to
add
something
again:
sorry
there
and
it's
more
about
this
I
think
there
is
a
real.
The
real
piece
of
work
to
do
is
that
what
Libya
suggested
is
to
go
out
and
survey.
What
the
real
needs
are
for
token
engineering
and
like
as
our
mission
is
to
support
that
I'd
say:
that's
the
thing
we
really
don't
know.
G
You
know
we
can
build
a
road
map
about
what
we
think
we
want
to
do,
but
until
we
go
out
and
we
talk
to
everyone
and
we
pull
in
the
priorities
and
then
we're
like
okay,
these
are
the
things
that
we
can
help.
Support
I
feel
like
that.
There
is
work
to
do
before
we
have
a
railroad
map,
and
that
is,
like
my
credit
to
Libya.
She
really
identified
exactly
what
we
need
to
do.
I
I
think
the
the
intention
is,
the
total
opposite
is
to
have
these
higher
level
strategies,
higher
level
vision
and
objectives
to
be
able
to
land
it
into
everyday's
activities
and
operations,
but
that
everything
we
do
every
day
every
week
is
aligned
to
that
bigger
to
that
bigger
goal
and
and
when
I
say
be
your
goal,
I
I,
wouldn't
I,
wouldn't
just
stay
on
the
level
for
what
are
the
needs
of
talking
Engineers
I.
Think
for
me
a
pretty
clear
example
of
like
of
of
like
a
symptom
that
we're
still
missing
something.
I
Is
this
a
small
project
of
for
the
Twitter
thread?
That
is
what
is
token
engineering,
really
I.
Think
that's
one
of
the
signs
that
that
are
saying
you
know.
Maybe
not
everyone
fully
understand
what
is
talking
engineering,
you
know,
so
maybe
there's
still
some
higher
level
strategy
to
figure
that
out
than
to
be
to
be
able
to
make
it
understand
by
everybody
and
to
to
do
that,
I
think
I
would
go
even
higher
into
this
level
is
to
why
are
we
doing
talking
engineering?
I
What
problem
are
we
trying
to
solve
as
token
Engineers
or
as
a
TC?
What
what
actual
problem
in
the
world
are
we
trying
to
solve
if
we
are
able
to
Define
that
to
really
make
everyone
share
that
same
purpose
of
the
of
the
of?
Why
token
engineering
exists,
then
everything
else
becomes
way
easier
and
it's
way
easier
to
align
and
to
find
the
people
that
we
are
trying
to
help
and
the
needs
that
we're
trying
to
cover,
and,
but
you
know,
I
feel
that
these
two
two
higher
level
questions
are
still
yet
to
be
defined.
I
I
feel
that
a
lot
of
people
already
have
some
sort
of
definition,
but
that's
kind
of
like
the
problem,
because
we
all
understand
different
things
by
it
and
we
all
have
like
different
reasons.
Probably
why
we
think
token
engineering
exists,
but
part
of
the
TC,
at
least
for
me
I'm
part
of
this
strategy.
The
intention
of
it
is
to
be
able
to
figure
those
questions.
First,.
B
If
I
may
just
interpret
it
very
quickly
before
we
end
I
think
it's
a
matter
of
making
compromises,
because
there's
there's
a
lot
of
things
we
know,
but
we
just
haven't
looked
at
like,
for
example,
what
Tom
said
about
the
the
Twitter
like
the
I
I,
don't
remember
that
they
were
but
like
the
target,
we
know
what's
the
target,
we
may
not
have
it
on
a
document,
but
we
know
what's
the
target.
B
What
happened
is
that
is
that
until
now,
no
one
has
ever
looked
at
the
analytics
of
Twitter,
for
example,
and
same
with
everything
once
you
start
to
interact
with
a
few
people
outside
the
TC,
you
clearly
view
the
Necessities
what's
happening:
what's
what's
what's
the
the
whole
ecosystem
up
to
and
it's
a
matter
of
of
defining?
How
do
we
capture
that?
B
But
it
start
to
capture
that
because
everyone
else
is
moving
while
we
are
while
we
are
thinking
about
how
to
and
it's
important
to
think
of
the
how-to,
but
we
also
have
so
we
we
really
need
to
to
be
able
to
deliver
to
be
a
bit
more
agile
on.
How
do
we
do
stuff?
B
Because
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
that
stuff
is
there
it's?
If
and
if
it's
not
someone
else
is
going
to
do
it.
B
I
guess
I
was
going
to
say
another
thing,
but
I
forgot,
yeah,
just
use
I
think
we
can
I
think
we
can
work
on
a
few
things
in
in
the
meantime,
but
I
think
it's
it's
important
to
have
to
have
to
map
out
the
necessities
of
the
ecosystem
and
also
to
understand
what
is
everyone's
sort
of
expectations
here
or
what
is
everyone
sort
of
excited
about
and
then
just
try
to
put
everything
together
into
these
strategic
plan?
I'm
gonna
start
working
towards
it.
Okay,.
A
So
we
need
to
wrap
up
it's
now
a
minute
after.
Thank
you,
everybody
for
participating,
I'm.
Sorry,
we
did
not
get
to
the
showing
your
the
website
for
Gravity.
H
Can
we
do
that
next?
Tuesday?
Is
that
okay
sure,
but
I
do
want
to
speak
just
10
seconds
about
the
give
power
Lounge
that's
brother
Community,
who
is
also
deploying
a
new
step
of
their
protocol,
and
it's
really
big
and
I
I
pasted
their
partner
support
guide
so
that
we
can
like
all
retweet
and
also
deposit
our
give
power
in
one
of
the
projects
that
are
there
and
yeah
on
the
on
the
roadmap.
H
I
think
it's
super
important
and
I
think
that
we
won't
get
the
roadmap
in
this
call
with
the
amount
of
people
that
we
have
and
that
what
time
and
Levy
says
of
having
like
a
stakeholder
survey
and
a
token
a
token
holder,
signaling
will
be
super
important
on
this.
That
my
take.
A
H
I
paste
it
in
the
agenda:
it's
it's:
a
git
power,
launch,
partner,
support,
guide
and
yeah
from
the
DC.
We
haven't
reposted
retweeted,
so
yeah,
who,
who
has
access
to
that,
can
do
it?
Okay,.
A
Thank
you
all
right.
Everybody
have
a
good
rest
of
your
day,
slash
night
and
we'll
we'll
talk
so
so
going
forward.
This
will
be
the
main
call.
Tuesdays
will
be
the
main
call
and
of
course
people
are
are
welcome
on
Thursdays
too,
but
it'll
be
a
lot
more
focused
all
right.
Take
everybody.
Thank
you.
Thank.