►
From YouTube: W46 Transparency WG: Funding Proposal, Survey, Dune Improvements & Data Standardization
Description
The Transparency Working Group promotes transparency, openness and mutual monitoring as a high-level ideal that we're moving towards at the TEC. The way that we get there is by empowering people to share this experience with the Transparency Audits and making information available to everyone.
We gather every Monday at 5pm CET.
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
I
do
not
have
any
distraction
right
now,
I'll
pass
it
to
rex.
B
So
my
intentions
is
to
kind
of
well
be
here
at
the
first
trans.
It's
the
first
transparency
meeting.
I
go
to
so
kind
of
see
how
the
ball
rolls
here
meet
some
of
the
other
guys
that
I
haven't
been
able
to
meet
and
maybe
discuss
how
we're
going
to
do
the
standardization
pieces.
C
Yeah,
thank
you
guys,
hello,
everyone,
so
yeah,
my
intention.
I
think
it
would
be
basically
the
same
thing
as
rex
and
also
see
if
there's
any
other
transparency
issue,
that
there
has
to
be
talked
about.
So
so
yes,
just
listen
in
and
participate,
and
I
don't
have
any
distractions,
so
I
will
pass
it
to
friendly
amendment.
D
Hi,
I'm
sorry,
I
just
came
here
my
what's
the
is
there
a
question.
Is
this
like
a
self-intro.
D
Oh
intentional
discussion
for
the
call.
Thank
you.
My
name
is
hazel.
This
is
my
first
time
here.
I
just
want
to
learn
more
about
the
transparency
working
group,
I'm
potentially
interested
in
joining
in
their
working
group
and
or
like
making
contributions
to
it.
I
just
got
on
board
to
tc
last
week
and
transparency
as
a
practice
is
something
I'm
really
interested
about
like
like
as
a
philosophy.
So
I'm
just
here
to
learn
more.
E
Thanks
zeb
yeah.
My
intention
mainly
is
to
talk
about
the
transparency
survey
and
yeah
and
also
see
where
I
can
support
ezab
on
the
things
that
we
have
to
accomplish
in
the
working
group
yeah
distraction.
I
have
a
lot
of
other
things
to
do
as
always,
and
but
I'll
stay
focused
on
this
call.
But
during
this
call
I
pass
it
back
to
you
is
empty.
A
Cool
yeah,
like
the
the
first
thing
like
we
are
almost
done
with
the
funding
proposal,
choose
yeah.
I
don't
know.
Rex
you
have
an
update
on
on
the
budget
for
the
the
data
standardization
and
the
work
stream
there.
That's
the
only
piece
missing
right
now
to
present
this
budget
to
the
community.
B
Okay,
so
this
kind
of
thing
of
asking
for
it
is
kind
of
new
to
me.
So
what
what's?
What
are
you
expecting
what's
missing
from
this
piece.
A
Yeah,
what's
missing
is
like
you
know
what
what
what's,
what
we're
going
to
do
to
standardize
the
data
and
yeah
and
present
a
budget
to
the
community,
so
they
can
approve
or
disapprove,
but
then
also
say
more
or
less.
Who
are
we
going
to
use
those
funds?
We're
asking
for
okay.
B
B
So
we
need
to
kind
of
do
the
scope
of
work,
and
then
we
can
so
we
can
narrow
down
the
budget
from
that.
Is
that
what
you're
saying.
A
Yeah
I
mean
we
would
also
start
working
without
the
budget,
but
since
the
transparency
working
group
is
doing
the
proposal
right
now,
I
feel
it's
like
the
right
moment
to
go
it.
You
know,
okay,
make
it
together,
so
we
we
use
the
conviction
from
the
transparency
working
row
right
and
then
it's
easier
to
pass
the
proposal
otherwise
like
if
we
make
it
like
as
a
separate
work
stream
might
be
harder
to
pass.
A
But
that's
it.
That's
the
only
reason
like
that.
I
think
we
should
make
it
together.
Okay
yeah-
I
don't
know
like.
Maybe
we
can
sit
down
during
this
week
and
get
that
done.
B
So
I
think
that
yes,
so
we
can
put
it
sit
down
and
now
maybe
is
there
like
a
particular
day
where
this
needs
to
be
presented.
So
we
did
before
that
or
no,
but.
A
No,
I
mean,
since
it's
have
to
go
to
advice,
process
first
and
then
on
conviction
voting.
Ideally
we
have
it.
You
know
during
this
week
we
accomplish
it
and
we
don't
need
to
wait
for
the
next
monday.
I
think
that's
something
like
I.
I
already
made
this
proposal
talking
with
ivy
and
the
only
thing
here
missing
is
like
your
works
work
stream.
A
A
Yeah,
let's
pick
a
date
right
now.
This
is
thursday.
Yeah
third
is
good,
which
time
maybe
yeah.
So
what
about
at
the
same
time
that
orientation
right
after
the
okay.
A
A
F
F
A
Okay,
cool,
okay,
great
okay,
yeah
transparency
survey,
that's
yours!
Ivy,.
E
Thank
you
zap,
because
I
have
this
issue
on
zen
hub.
That's
been
open
for
so
long
already,
and
we
haven't
really
progressed
on
that.
I
think
it
was.
The
initial
plan
for
this
survey
is
to
create
it
before
we
do
the
audit.
So
we
know
what
the
community
wants
to
see
around
the
transparency
in
the
in
the
t,
the
tc,
so
I
want,
but
now
the
audit
is
done.
E
I
wanna
know
if
we
still
want
to
do
the
survey,
because
I
feel
like
it's
important
like
we
are
only
seeing
transparency
as
from
the
inside
right,
but
we
don't
know
how
the
outsiders,
or
like
people
outside
from
our
transparency
working
group,
how
they,
how
they
see
transparency
in
general
in
tec,
is
there
something
that
they
want
to
see
more?
Is
there
something
that
we're
not
communicating
more
around
the
cec
so
yeah?
E
I
don't
know
how
we
want
to
construct
that
survey
if
it
should
be
because
the
initial
purpose
of
this
is
for
the
audit
right,
but
now
that
the
audit
is
done,
what
will
be
the
purpose
of
this?
The
main
purpose
of
this
survey
and
what
you
want
to
yeah?
What
you
want
to
know
about.
A
Yeah
I
mean,
in
my
opinion,
like
we're
getting
feedback
from
the
community
like
right
now
that
the
sample
working
group
kick
out
like
they.
They
are.
You
know,
okay,
this
data
is
cool,
but
we
want
it
would
help
us
like
to
show
it
in
this
different
way,
and
we,
you
know
like
as
soon
as
people
need
some
kind
of
difference
they
reach
out
and
and
we
change
the
way
we
present
the
data.
So
I
think
that's
that
should
be
okay.
A
So,
in
my
opinion,
like
we
could
just
close
the
issue
unless
you
think
you
have
like
some
goal
in
mind,
but
I
feel,
like
you
know
now,
like
the
sample
kick
out
like
you
know
they
are,
they
are
monitoring
like
us
like
in
somehow,
like
you
know,
muslim
monitoring
like
what
we
are
doing
is
something
that
someone
needs.
So
you
know
they
make
sure
like.
What
we're
doing
is
good
and
you
know,
then
the
community
is
aware,
like
what
we're
doing
is
not
good.
Then
the
sample
will
say.
A
Oh,
what
but
we
need
this
differently,
and
then
you
know,
then
we
just
sync
up
together
and
then
we
change
things
and
yeah.
I
think
I
think,
like
now,
with
sample,
kicking
the
project.
It's
like
they
are
our
monitors
in
some
somehow
like
they
check
what
we
are
doing
because
they
need
it
right
like
it's.
Other
works
are
even
if
we're
doing
it
like
they
are
not
fully
checking
it
just
because
they
don't
need
the
data,
but
now
someone
needs
it.
A
So,
in
my
opinion,
like
that's
good
enough
but
like
if
you
think
like
we
should
keep
it
or
do
it
something
like
yeah.
I
think
like
it's
great,
if
you.
B
Push
that
pretty
down,
I
think,
if
you
want,
if
you
still
want
to
do
a
survey
to
have
not
only
some
poi
but
the
broader,
the
broader
people,
you
can
add,
like
a
small
like
five
question:
open,
open
question
survey
at
the
end
of
the
when's,
the
next
audit
report
that
one's
in
you
could
add
like
a
very
small
kind
of
open,
open
answer
questionnaire
and
just
like
what
did
you
enjoy?
What
would
you
like
to
see
more
of
and
something
as
simple
as
that?
I'm
not
sure
whether
that's
an
alternative.
E
A
We
use
this
newsletter
to
distribute
the
audit
that
that's
the
marketing
group
doing
it
in
this
same
email
like
they
have
the
audit,
and
then
they
have
link.
Oh,
if
you
want
to
comment
or
give
feedback
to
this
audit
report,
just
click
this
link
and
we
send
them
to
a
type
form
or
something
with
questions.
E
So
yeah,
but
we
can
also
add
that
in
the
newsletter,
but
not
I
feel
like,
I
think
not
everybody
in
the
community
is
in
the
in
our
email
database.
E
So
I
think
it's
also
a
good
idea
to
put
it
on
this
board
or
in
or
in
the
forum,
if
you
will
do
the
survey,
but
I
like
the
idea
of
having
like
five
open-ended
questions
and
yeah
like
what
do
you
want
to
see
more
transparency?
What
is
missing,
or
what
do
you
like
the
most
you
know
we
don't
have
to
ask
only
about
the
what's
lacking
you
know,
but
maybe
what
they
also.
You
know
what
they
appreciate
from
the
transparency
working
so
yeah.
E
But
my
question
is:
where
do
we
want
to
post
it?
I
suggest
discord
in
forum
and
then
also
in
the
email,
but
if
you
have
other
ideas.
A
A
E
You
will
not
use
the
newsletter,
I'm
sorry,
not
the
newsletter,
but
in
the
the
in
the
audit
you
said
that
we
will
include
the
audit
in
the
newsletter,
maybe
at
the.
E
Yeah,
like
a
little
statement
like
if
you
also
have
feedback
about
transparency,
please
answer
the
type.
B
You
can
also
add
a
question
on
where,
where
did
you
hear
about
this
survey
or
where?
Where
are
you
coming
from
and
have
a
multiple
choice
and
like
where
these
people
are
actually
communicating
with
you?
That's
more
of
a
communications
thing,
I
guess
but
yeah
it
sounds
like.
Like
I
didn't
know,
there
was
an
email,
an
email
thread,
like
my
point
of
contact,
was
got
from
gideon
to
zepty
right.
B
A
Maybe
maybe
every
chapter
as
well,
the
newsletter
is
from
the
marketing
group,
it's
not
from
the
transparency
like
what
we're
doing.
Basically,
I
think
like
yeah,
I
think
actually
it'd
be
nice
like
just
to
introduce
to
friendly
amendments
what
we're
doing
on
transparency.
So
basically
we
started
like
just
recording
all
the
meetings,
and
then
we
started
you
know
taking
care
of
the
credential
management,
so
we
have
like
the
we.
We
all
did
like
basically,
who
have
access
to
what
and
like
we
use
a
credential
management
app.
We
use
lashlin
to
share
credentials
with
contributors.
A
We
have
like
some
kind
of
process
where
a
new
contributor
needs
access
to
something
like
like
imagine
like.
Okay
rex
needs
access
to
the
dm
dashboard
because
he's
going
to
apply
some
changes
and
then
we
make
a
poll
in
the
stores
chart
and
if
in
in
24
hours,
no
one's
blocks
it,
we
share
the
credential
to
the
new
contributor.
A
That's
one
thing
like
we
started
like
auditing
access
and
for
the
for
the
whole
commons,
and
then
the
next
thing
we
were
doing
is
like
making
like
this
audit,
and
then
you
know
with
this
audit
like
it
in
it
have
so
many
things
like
you
know,
multi-six
of
working
groups.
How
are
we
spending
the
money,
our
processes
or
decision
tracking
documents
we'll
have
it
here?
A
Okay,
so
yeah,
basically
like
we
monitor,
like
all
the
decisions
that
the
commons
is
having
advice,
process
single
choice
like
all
our
voting
mechanisms,
this
is
yeah
a
short
explanation
that
issue
made
of
what
every
decision
is
made
for,
and
you
know
the
rules
like
when
you
stop
voting
these.
D
A
A
Database
access
yeah
this
access
document.
This
is
like
okay,
who
have
access
to
medium.
So
it's
craig
grief,
jeff,
says
one
nate,
suganta
and
now
gibian
I
mean
with
we
updated
once
through
once
I
what
a
month
for
every
two
months
with
ivy,
so
it
was
not
updated,
but
yeah.
D
A
But
yeah,
basically,
you
can
see
all
the
documents
here.
I
see
like
the
the
dashboard
it's
not
here,
but
it's
also
not
the
document,
but
we
also
created
this
this
dashboard
just
to
monitor,
like
you
know,
the
stuff
like
we
had
include
then
after
in
the
audit,
like
you
know
the
prices
of
the
token,
how
much
holders
we
have
circulating
supply.
A
This
is
like
the
how
the
tokens
are
distributed
so,
and
this
is
cumulative,
so
you
know
like
50,
of
the
tokens
it's
held
by
16
people,
that's
also
because
we
also
have
so
little.
A
You
know
we
have
almost
hatches
and
very
not
much
people
yet
so
one
of
the
goals
right
now
is,
you
know,
increase
the
token
holders,
but
that's
something
like
samples
working
on
it's
not
like
transparency
and
goal
is
more
simple
yeah.
We
can
also
see,
like
you,
know,
data.
Basically,
like
one,
that's
cool,
it's
this
one
like
treasuries
of
the
the
decision
you
can.
You
know
what
transparency
have.
A
So
yeah,
that's
the
money
that
transparency
has
right
now
and
here
you
can
also
see
who
the
money
was
being
used.
Like
transparency
asked
for
like
16k,
then
you
know
all
these
distributions.
A
This
also
is
more
detailed
in
in
the
audit
report
like
we
make
every
three
month
like
you
can
see
like
you
know
this
80
dollars
where
they
came
from,
but
this
is
on
the
audit.
Let
me
like
I
can
find
the
link
on
the
forum
yeah.
Basically
like,
like
the
argument
yeah,
I
know
I
I
feel
like
it's
very
hard
like
for
me.
It's
easy
because
I
know
where
everything
is,
but
for
a
newcomer
and
actually
that's
something
like
that.
A
You
know
I
don't
know,
what's
your
pattern
or
your
intentions,
but
that's
something
like
we
could.
You
know
like
aim
to
improve
like
make
the
documentation
more
accessible
to
new
people
and
have
it
or
more
in
a
centralized
way.
Maybe
updating
this.
This
resource
would
also
work
but
yeah
what
what
it
was
going
to
oh
yeah.
So
basically,
like
we
have
this
section
on
the
forum
before
we
were
doing
all
these
for
working
groups,
but
we
thought
that
was
not
very
helpful.
A
So
we
decided
to
make
like
a
a
bigger
report,
so
we
have
like
yeah.
We
have
this
report
for
the
for
the
whole
commons
and
so
yeah
I
mean
I
don't
want
to
go
in
the
details
on
every
detail,
but
basically
like
yeah.
We
have
like
processes,
boats
and
you
know
this
is
like
an
overview
of
how
the
commons
is
using
the
funds
and
then
we
go
more
into
the
detail
of
each
proposal.
A
Like
you
know,
gravity,
okay
and
then
you
see
like
you
know
three
managers,
one
role,
education
activities
and
then
you
can
see
how
the
money
was
spent,
and
this
is
the
money
like
gravity
to
have
right
now
and
yeah.
A
All
the
all
the
working
groups
like,
for
example,
the
consignment
library
at
31
of
much
they
didn't,
use
any
phone.
So
we
also
put
that
here
and
then
basically,
like
all
the
working
groups,
then
yeah
we
made
a
short
video
15
minutes
explaining
like
the
dashboard,
so
people,
you
know
like
sometimes
it's
so
much
information,
that's
intimidating
to
people.
So
maybe
if
they
have
a
video
just
to
look
it
with
them,
it's
easier
and
the
governance,
tokens
and
yeah
these
resources
and.
A
A
You
know
like
and
we
are
a
democracy,
so
you
know
everyone
is
doing
their
best
and
if
you
see
something
like
oh,
I
think
this
could
be
better
this
way
than
you
normally
make
advice,
process
inside
the
working
group
or
in
the
forum,
or
you
know,
depending
on
what
you
want
to
change
or
do
and
then
after
advice
process
like
you
get
to
get,
you
know
you
can
do
it.
You
have
your
own
agency
to
do
whatever
you
think,
it's
better
for
the
commons
and
yeah
normally
for
funding.
A
A
Oh
great
and
yeah
also
feel
free
to
dm
me,
ivy
or
I
feel
anyone
is
if
you
dm
anyone
like,
I
feel
like
anyone
will
respond.
You
nicely
so
feel
free
to
ask
any
question
at
any
moment
and
yeah.
That's
it.
A
A
B
Okay,
so
at
some
point
we,
the
the
requirements
of
what
we're
doing,
is
still
a
bit
broad.
But
essentially,
what
we're
trying
to
do
is
not
work
from
the
kind
of
the
audit
reports
that
doing
dashboards
and
any
other
on-chain
information
that
we
can
find
to
kind
of
see
how
far
we
can
go
into
the
future
without
getting
any
funding
or
any
extra
income.
And
from
that
point.
B
Of
beginner
income
making
processes,
because
what
sample
is
about
is
basically
trying
to
find
also
alternative
sources
of
funding
for
the
tv
into
the
future.
Now.
B
I
think
we
we're
going
to
add
one
one
or
two
diagrams
which
we
thought
could
be
useful
and
then
export
that
data
into
an
into
an
excel
to
do
some
trends,
because,
as
as
far
as
I'm
aware,
dune
doesn't
have
trend
functionality.
B
I
don't
have
anything
to
show
on
the
doom
dashboard
today,
because
I'm
basic
and
still
at
work,
and
only
maybe
to
finish
like
half
an
hour,
so
I'm
going
to
get
people
who
work
without
me.
I
think
this
little
time
off,
but
on
the
data
standardization,
I
feel
like
that's
something
that
we
should
discuss
more
in
depth,
so
the
idea
behind
that
is
in
sampo.
B
Originally
we
wanted
to
analyze
kind
of
the
tec
spending
a
bit
further
than
the
working
group
level,
so
delve
deeper
than
a
kind
of
per
working
group
and
be
able
to
create
aggregates
for
how
much
money
are
we
spending
in
salaries
or
how
much
money
are
we
spending,
but.
B
If
you
kind
of,
if
you
grab
all
of
the
tables-
and
you
put
them
on
a
and
you
put
them
on
a
on
a
on
like
on
an
excel
and
then
so
for
in
order
to
do
kind
of
the
level
we
were
hoping
is
you
grab
all
of
the
tables
on
the
without
without
talking
to
any
other
working
group
and
just
doing
it
manually
ourselves?
B
It
would
be
that
grabbing
all
of
the
tables
from
the
audit
report
manually
creating
categories
for
the
for
the
inflow,
outflows
so
kind
of
going
from
the
description
and
creating
me,
it's
called
metadata,
like
standardized
tags
that
we
can
add
to
each
of
the
info
and
outflows
to
then
categorize
all
right.
So
the
tag
would
be.
B
Is
this
a
fixed
cost
or
a
variable
cost?
Is
this
spending
on
salaries
or
there's?
We
came
up
with
like
15
annik,
who
isn't
here
today
found
some
good
characters.
We
could
base
ourselves
off
of
I'll,
send
the
diagram
on
the
transparency
working
group
once
I'm
home.
B
So
yes,
it's
kind
of,
is
this:
a
fixed
cost
variable
cost.
What
type
of
spending
is
this?
Is
you
could,
even
if,
if
we
wanted
to
delve
deeper,
you
could
even
also
have
the
the
wallet
address
on
there
and
then
kind
of
see
that
would
help.
A
Instead
of
putting
others
like
what,
like
I
mean,
of
course
like
it
still
needs
to
be
a
vote,
but
just
putting
the
names
right
like
okay,
instead
of
saying
like
not
this
wallet
that
no
one's
easily
know
who
it
is
like,
okay,
we
say
step
is
making
this
amount.
I
was
making
this
amount,
and
you
know,
bear
ex
and
friend
is
making
this
amount,
and
you
know
then
it's
more
transparent
in
a
way
right,
because
others
is
like
yeah.
Some
privileged
people
know
which
everyone
address
is,
but
then
some
others
don't.
B
Yeah,
of
course,
so
you
could
have
so
this
I
think
we
need
to.
B
B
I,
whoever
else
wants
to
work
in
this
proposal,
to
determine
how
far
we're
going
to
go
with
the
scope
you
need
to
like
set
out
a
google
docs
and
grab
all
of
the
discussions
we've
been
having
in
private
together,
pull
them
all
together
and
put
them
into
something
cohesive
that
we
can
like
plan
out
and
maybe
do
it
in
three
weeks
or
a
month.
I.
A
Think
this
can
be
easily
done
in
a
you
know,
nice
cultural
proposal
there's
nothing
I
I
could
do
like,
but
what
I
need
to
know
is
like
you
know,
we
need
consensus
and
I
think
something
we
could
discuss
right
now
is
like
you
know,
having
like
you
know,
we
can
make
like
the
working
groups
work
in
a
way
you
know
like
make.
Okay,
all
the
working
groups
need
to
fold
this
gravity,
you
know,
or
you
know,
or
whatever
we
create
one
and
everyone
has
to
use
this.
A
Then
we
have
to
make
a
forum
proposal.
So
you
know
anyone.
Everyone
is
aware,
but
then,
as
this
also
adds
bureaucracy
on
our
working
group,
that's
something
I'm
normally
against
in
this
case
that
you
know
I
could
understand-
and
I
think
like
of
course
like
it
would
make
the
transparency
work.
So
simple,
and
you
know
that's
something
like
even
governments
are
doing
you
know
like,
since
we
are
creating
commons
for
public
goods.
A
That's
you
know
we're
like
kinda
doing
government's
job
right
like
in
in
the
commons,
not
in
the
transparent
group,
but
in
the
whole
government.
So
you
know
have
like
some
transparency
practices
can
be
healthy
for
the
commons,
but
I
feel
like
this.
This
is
a
topic
you
know
like
could
generate
this
discussion
and
yeah.
I
put
actually
hear
from
everyone
in
this
call
like.
What's
what's
your
position
like?
Do
you
think,
like
all
the
working
groups
should
follow
a
method,
so
it
we
can.
A
That
is
standardized
the
data
and
it's
easier
for
us,
or
do
you
guys
think
like
working
here?
Should
still
you
know
as
long
as
they
are
transparent,
that's
fine,
and
then
we
take
care
of
making
the
tables
for
us
ourselves
and
it's
a
job
that
the
transparency
working
group
have
to
do
and
not
everyone
in
the
community.
A
I
I
I'm
kinda,
I
think,
like
both
options
could
work
for
us,
but
I'm
happy
to
listen
from
everyone
like.
I
think
I
think
yeah
rex
you
could
start
because,
like
you
probably
have
like
yeah,
you
know
since
you're
working
on
that,
and
so
then,
let's.
B
See
your
opinion
and
then
yeah.
So
sorry,
if
I
like
talk
with
like
big
words
and
stuff,
but
yeah
standardizing
data
basically
is
just
giving
everybody
common
excel.
B
So
every
working
group
give
them
a
template,
an
excel
template
that
they
can
work
in
to
give
us
the
their
their
inflows
outflows
budgets
and
so
on,
and
having
kind
of
some
set
categories
within
that
excel
spreadsheet,
rather
than
kind
of
allowing
the
the
working
groups
to
kind
of
take
initiative
and
do
as
much
or
as
little
work
on
on
on
this
excel
spreadsheet
or,
however
else
they
do
it
from
what
I've
been
told,
and
please
do
correct
me,
I
believe
that
some
of
the
working
groups,
we've
seen,
do
very
great
work.
B
You
said
gravity
I've
seen
some
of
the
ones
that
bears
shown
me
are
pretty
good
and
but
others
such
as
the
stewards,
I
believe,
don't
even
have
an
excel
spreadsheet
by
themselves
and
they
post
their
spendings
on
discord.
B
B
How
much
time
are
we
going
to
spend
on
how
much
domain
specific
knowledge
are
we
going
to
need
to
kind
of
go
through
and
have
to
dedicate
some
time
to
each
of
the
working
groups
to
just
get
this
data
not
to
analyze
it
or
be
able
to
compare
it
to
the
on-chain
date
and
so
on?
B
So
that's
kind
of
my
opinion
as
to
why
we
should
carry
on
and
and.
B
Get
some
consensus
within
transparency
and
within
all
of
the
working
groups
as
to
how
best
to
approach
this.
C
Yeah,
thank
you
rex,
so
yeah
I
personally
I.
I
also
think
that
it's
worth
doing
this,
I
think
it
can
bring
more
benefit
to
the
overall
community
than
than
harm.
I
wouldn't
see.
C
I
wouldn't
see
like
much
more
of
extra
work,
probably
on
the
contrary,
I
think
it
will
make
things
easier
for
all
the
working
groups
and
the
contributors,
because
it
will
be
easier
for
them
just
to
to
record
what
they
are
doing.
You
know,
and
and
even
even
for
them
to
organize
themselves.
I
think
it
will
be
easier
for
them
to
know
how
much
money
they
have
have.
How
are
they
spending
it?
You
know
like
from
a
working
group's
perspective.
C
I
think
it
will
also
be
quite
helpful
to
have
that
clarity
and
yeah
and
for
transparency
and
for
sample
and
for
the
and
for
the
analysis
that
wants
to
be
done
on
all
of
these.
It
will
be
even
even
better
right.
It
will
be
easier
to
to
track
and
to
have
a
look
on,
and
I
also
think
it's
really
important
to
think
about.
C
You
know,
like
the
long
term
you
know
like
when,
when
the
tc
starts
growing,
more
and
more
like
rex
was
saying,
more
working
groups
are,
are,
are
joining
and
more
people
is
joining.
You
know,
like
that,
will
add
a
lot
of
complexity
to
all
the
finances
and
all
the
the
processes
that
we
take
on.
So
I
think
right
now
we're
in
a
really
good
moment
moment
to
to
tackle
that
and
to
like,
create
and
set
really
strong
bases
and
really
clear,
clear
procedures
in
what
we
do.
C
So
we
so
we
don't
get
confused
in
the
future.
You
know
so
that's
my
opinion.
I
will
pass
it
on
to
ivy
I'll.
Just
I
just
wanted
to
ask
you
accept
your
ex,
so
this
initiative
will
be
taking
will
be
taken
by
the
transparency
working
group
or
the
sample
working
group,
or
will
it
be
like
a
collaboration
between
the
two
or?
A
At
some
point,
like
I
was
chatting
with
kevin-
and
probably
you
know
like
the
approach
will
be
like
sample-
is
going
to
be
like
the
transparency
client
somehow
like
they
will
ask
for
the
data,
but
we
are
going
to
produce
the
data
so
basically
like
this
workstream
is
going
to
be
done
under
transparency,
but
sample
will
be
feedback.
You
know
like,
oh
probably,
for
the
next.
C
A
Yeah
and
basically
it's
a
work
stream
like
it's
going
to
be
done
by
me,
rex
and
probably
uber.
I
think,
like
you
are
so
very
involved
in
that
thing,
but
so
yeah.
Basically,
it's
like
we
and,
of
course
like
if
I
be
your
friend,
want
to
join
the
work
stream
you're
happy
to
welcome.
C
E
Thanks
there
for
me,
I
like
the
idea
of
standardizing
the
data
and.
E
And
I
I
like
what
bear
said
that
it's
it's,
it
creates
more
benefits
than
harm.
I
think
it's
easier
for
the
working
groups,
if
we,
if
they
will
have
this
template
and
it
will
help
them
help
them
be
more
organized
and
but
I
think
what
we
can
do
is
make
sure
or
consult
among
the,
because
I
know
that
different
working
groups
have
different
kinds
of
budget
right,
for
example,
I
think
soft
they
don't
do
hourly
compensation.
E
They
have.
I
think
they
have
like
fixed
project
compensation.
E
So
I
think
what
we
can
do
is
like
find
out
from
the
working
groups
what
exact
data
we
want
to
standardize
and
if
they
all
agree
on
those
data
that
you
want
to
yeah
include
in
this
process
and
yeah
probably
consult
with
the
groups
which
yeah
what
data
we
want
to
standardize.
It's
common
among
all
the
working
groups.
A
I
I
want
to
comment
something,
and
I
think,
like
another
thing
like
we
should
do,
is
like.
If
we
end
up
you,
you
stand
reciting
the
data
like
we
should
have
this
thing
somehow
in
the
proposal
for
conviction.
Voting
like
every
time,
someone
go
to
a
conviction,
voting
form
like
we
send
them
this
spreadsheet,
and
then
we
say
like
okay,
just
copy
the
spreadsheet,
and
you
know
paste
it
blah
blah
blah.
A
So
you
know
it's
in
every
proposal
so
because
otherwise
I
feel,
like
you
know
it's
very
hard
like
you
know,
there
are
people,
you
know,
for
example
like
omega
people
like
they
are
focusing
on
their
work,
and
sometimes
they
are
not
joining
like
all
the
calls
for
star
wars
and
all
these
things.
So
you
know
it
would
be
hard
like
for
the
transparency
working
group
just
to
contact
all
the
people
so
maybe
like.
We
can
also
put
it
into
the
into
the
proposal
and
I
also
think
yeah.
We
actually
need
to
do
that.
A
I,
after
hearing
like
saying
you,
know
another
way,
otherwise
one
scale.
This
is
the
way
to
scale
so
yeah.
That's
that's
true,
but
yeah
back
to
you.
E
A
B
But
one
thing
that
does
that
we
do
need
to
establish
is
so
I
understand
that
and
how
yeah,
how
we're
going
to
go
about
this?
What
are
the
steps?
What
goes
first
right,
because,
obviously
you
want
to
get
through
the
budget
proposal.
I
assume
within
the
budget
we're
not
going
to
so
kind
of
the
talking
to
the
working
groups
and
so
on
kind
of
getting
the
best
knowledge
on
on
how
it
would
best
benefit
them
to
standardize
stuff
and
how
far
we
can
go.
B
What
we
can
include
so
what
they're
doing
incorporating
this
new
standard
and
that
stuff
should
go
after
the
proposal?
The
budget
proposal
am
I
right
so
and
to
some
extent
the
s
this.
The
scope
of
work
needs
to
be
broad,
but
within
the
proposal,
but
it
doesn't
need
to
be
detailed
like
this
is
what
we're
going
to
be
doing
every
week.
Does
it.
A
Okay,
I'm
just
asking,
because
I
don't
know
no,
I
mean
yeah,
it
makes
sense
to
you
know,
have
the
details
like
it's
it's
better
for
the
proposal,
but
at
the
same
time,
like
the
you
know,
we
cannot
wait
so
much.
Neither
right
like
I
try
to
you
know
like
if
we
could,
in
that
call,
we
have
on
thursday
get
the
scope
and
just
publish
it,
and
you
know
like
then
also
like
we
will.
You
know
we're
actually
like
christmas.
We
can
have
something
yeah
and
also
like
if
we
end
up
with
carryovers.
A
A
I
mean
it's
not
a
big
deal
honestly,
like
you,
don't
need
to
know
every
penny
you're
going
to
use
like
as
long
as
you,
you
know,
don't
don't
waste
the
funds
or
do
something
bad
with
those,
but
that's
you
know
that's
why
why
you
know,
like
all
the
stores,
have
also
reputational
mistake
when
they
make
proposals
and
stuff
blah
blah
blah
so
yeah,
basically
like
as
long
as
we
use
the
phones.
Well,
and
you
know
it's-
we
don't
need
to
know
every
detail
just
before
like
I
feel
like
it's.
F
A
A
Like
it's
better
like
if
we
have
like
some
extra
fans
that
if
we
are
short
of
us
like
in
in
a
communications
per
perspective
like
it's
always
better,
just
to
say,
oh
look,
we
have
this
carryover
and
say:
oh,
you
know
what
we
need
more
funds.
I
think
that's
worse,
so
I
normally
prefer
just
to
ask
more
money
than
you
know.
If
we
have
an
estimate
of
using,
I
don't
know,
10
to
15
die,
then
we
ask
for
15
right
and
then,
if
we
end
up
using
only
10,
we
have
to.
C
C
So
if
we
let's
say
what
what
we're
saying
that
we
keep
asking
for
the
same
amount
of
money,
even
though
we
might
use
less
like
like
like
it
happened,
this
time,
does
that
affect
the
ability
for
other
proposals
to
pass
easier.
C
Like
I
don't
know,
if
I
explained
to
myself
well,
so
if
we
would
request
instead
of
16,
we
would
request
10,
let's
say:
would
that
make
a
difference
in
making
it
easier
or
harder
for
other
proposals
to
also
pass
like,
depending
on
the
amount
of
money
that
we
request,
because
in
my
mind
like
if
we
are,
if
we
are
asking
for
more
money,
then
we
probably
need
to,
and
we
are
not
worried
about
like
using
it
wrongly
or
anything
right,
we'll
just
have
it
there
on
in
the
group
right,
but
and
and
that's
fine
that
would
be.
C
E
Yeah,
I
think
I
just
want
to
say
that
I
think
not
directly
or
not
exactly
that's
how
it
works.
I
think
what
affects
the
proposal
is,
how
we
just
justify
the
amount
that
we're
requesting
and
it's
not
dependent-
it's
not
really
dependent
on
the
budget
that
other
proposals
are
requesting.
It's
how
we
can.
A
Actually,
I
mean
what
bet
was
saying
is
right
like
if
we
ask
you
know
if
we
ask
for
20k,
and
if
we
you
know
if
we
ask
for
20k
or
25k
like
if
we
have
for
25k
the
proposal
that
goes
after
us
is
going
to
be
harder
to
pass
yeah
like
for,
for
us
passing.
This
transparency
proposal
will
be
way
harder
than
the
first
one
with
it.
Just
because
we
had
more
money
and
the
more
money
the
commons
have
the
easier
it
is
to
pass
proposals.
E
Is
there
some
data
that
supports
that
claim
like?
Can
you
prove
it
like
it's
harder
to
pass
yeah
it's
because.
A
How
conviction
voting
works
like
you
need?
Because
it's
on
you
know
the
spending
limit
is
based
on
percentage.
So
if
you
have
10k
and
you
ask
for
1k
you're
asking
for
10,
but
if
you
have
5k
and
you
ask
for
1k,
you
have
you're
asking
for
20,
so
this
is
harder
to
pass
and
a
spending
limit.
I
think
it's
at
10,
if
I'm
not
wrong
and
then
the
conviction
growth
was
at
2.5.
I'm
saying
those
based
on
memory,
but
basically.
C
F
C
Yeah
yeah,
okay,
so
yeah.
So
knowing
that
I
don't
know
what
you
guys
think,
but
maybe
it
might
be
worth
cons,
reconsidering
the
amount
of
money
that
we
are
requesting.
Considering
considering
that
we
almost
spent
half
of
what
we
requested
last
time,
I
think,
if
that's
correct,
like
yeah,
I
think
so
I
don't
know
what
you
guys
think.
That's
just
my
opinion.
A
C
C
C
A
A
We
are
almost
five
minutes
before
the
top
of
the
hour.
I
just
wanted
to
know
like
if,
especially
like
bear-
and
I
have
been
like
regarding
your
work
stream.
It's
any
support
you
guys
would
need
from
me,
like,
I
know,
like
you
guys,
are
doing
like
yeah
the
recordings,
all
the
playlists
you
are
building
the
decision
tracking
the
multi-six
dogs
is
also
using
it
or
it's
me.
A
C
F
A
E
E
A
On
me,
no
no
it's
name,
but
the
last
composer
I
updated
was
the
legal
one,
but
there's
nothing
else.
Right
like
that
was
the
last
one.
Let
me
make
let
me
double
check,
but
but
it's
me
right
honestly,
like
I'll
I'll,
do
that
but
yeah.
If
I'm,
you
know
if
anything
like
you
know
like,
if
you
need
support
on
something,
let
me
know,
and
then
I
thought
so
be
nice
like
if
we
but
not
this
week,
because
I
have
my
drive
license
exam,
but
probably
next
week,
we'll
do
a
an
audit
on
the.
D
C
And
in
regards
for
the
data
standardization
work
stream,
what
would
be
the
next
steps,
then?
What
do
you
guys
think.
A
I
mean
if
you
are
interested,
you
should
join
the
call
with
me
and
rex
on
orientation
next
after
the
stream
planning
a
retrospective.
Sorry,
if
you
tell
me
your
email,
I
can't
send
you
an
invite
feel
free
to
join.
If
you
don't
want
to
join,
that's
also
fine,
but
if
you
are,
you
know
we
are
going
to
discuss
those
in
this
call.
A
Okay,
yeah
and
then
I
I
think
that
would
be
it
for
the
transparency
call.
Thank
you.
Everyone.
One
thing.
B
I
think
before
before
the
call
we
need
to
kind
of
start
kind
of
some
work,
so
we
don't
go
like
yeah,
not
knowing
anything
so
we're
going.
So
I
think
I'll
create
a
google
docs
and
start
adding
all
the
stuff
we've
spoken
about
and
feel
free
to
kind
of.
I
don't
change
anything
I'm
going
to
try
and
do
the
same
thing
I
did
for
the
for
the
one
full
that
was.
A
Really
good
yeah,
I
I
think,
like
you
like,
if
you
are,
if
you
want
like
you,
can
be
like
you
know,
like
the
manager
of
this
project
and
I'll,
be
there
just
for
advice
process,
and
you
know
support
you
on
anything,
you
need,
but
you
can
you
know
that
could
be
like
your
project.
Somehow,
if
you're
happy
with
that.