►
From YouTube: W28 Transparency WG: Decision tracking document, CS videos, transparency of funding flows
Description
The Transparency Working Group promotes transparency, openness and mutual monitoring as a high-level ideal that we're moving towards at the TEC. The way that we get there is by empowering people to share this experience with the Transparency Audits and making information available to everyone.
We gather every two weeks on Mondays at 3pm CET.
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
B
People
taking
care
of
their
privacy,
which
is
important
since
we
are
going
to
monitor,
addresses
so
it's
hard,
like
you
know,
link
addresses
to
names
which
it's
something
we
don't
want
to
and
yeah.
Like
also
think
on
the
other
topics
and
yeah,
I
do
not
have
any
distraction
I'll
pass
it
to
yv.
C
Thanks
up
yeah,
my
intentions
are
to
give
you
an
update
on
just
to
let
you
know
about
the
one
hike
tv
call
and
I
also
added
a
an
item
to
our
agenda
about
the
common
stock
videos
being
on
our
youtube
channel.
So
yeah.
Those
are
the
two
things
I
want
to
talk
about
and
I
pass
it
tiwanka.
D
Hello,
seti,
hello,
ivy.
No,
my
intention
is
to
sync
with
you.
I
haven't
been
to
a
transparency
call
in
some
while
so
yeah.
I
want
to
see
how
I
can
help
and
give
any
feedback,
but
yeah
just
to
be
with
you.
So
yeah.
That's
my
intention
and
I
don't
have
any
distraction.
B
Yeah
thanks
for
joining
juan
yeah,
actually
our
license
punch
call.
It's
also
been
a
while,
since
we
are
doing
bi-weekly
and
last
call
was
a
party
so
yeah
last
school
was
november.
22.
now
we're
in
november
20.,
which
is
okay,
like
I
feel
like
yeah.
We
are
in
the
flow
we're
in
the
mood
okay
decision
tracking.
I
just
added
it
here
like
just
to
make
sure
that
we
double
check
like
we
didn't
have
is
the
decision.
B
B
B
Scrolling
down
like
in
laser
tag
is
the
last
one,
and
I
think
this
is
updated.
Like
laser
tag
is
also
the
last
one
here,
oh
wait.
No,
we
need
to
add
laser
tag.
B
B
As
I
was
also
saying
like-
and
there
are
some
you
know
like
sam-
is
making
some
and
passing
some
proposals
on
the
hatch
though,
but
it's
just
technical
stuff,
I
don't
know
if
we
want
to
add
it
like,
like
you
know,
if
we
can
add
all
the
stuff
that
sam
is
doing
or
not
like
yeah.
I
would
love
to
hear
like
your
opinions,
like
both
of
you.
B
C
I
think
these
are
test
votes,
they
are
testing
the
isn't
it
just
they're
doing
the
test.
A
C
A
B
B
C
I
think
we
can
just
spell
it
out.
B
If
they
do
not
look
to
the
link-
and
they
just
look
here,
then
it
looks
weird
like
it
looks
like
we
pass
a
proposal
with
a
59
when
it's
weird
right
like
we
need
like,
or
perhaps
at
least
until
until
that
time
it
was
88.
B
And
after
that
I
think
it's
still
88,
but
I'm
not
sure
like
we
should
check
on
on
the
pram's
proposal.
Perhaps
yeah
still
88
percent.
B
Yeah,
I
think
that's
it.
Should
we
move
to
the
next
point.
B
B
C
B
B
C
B
Okay,
that's
one
thing,
then:
okay!
Well,
this
is
the
transparency
working
I've
just
added
here
like
just
to
say
like
I,
if
you
have
any
news
from
fabio,
he
replied
to
me
saying,
like
he's
very
busy
with
his
balancer
right
now,
but
in
a
week
he
will
be
more
free.
I
know
he
says
something
to
you.
C
B
B
B
C
Oh
so
he
gave
he
gave
a
value,
an
estimate
budget
for
it.
Then
I
think
we
can
put
that
into
our
proposal,
since
he
already
gave
a
number.
A
B
B
B
Okay,
next
thing:
yeah
I
mean
the
tv
show
how
it
went.
C
Yeah
I
was
there
tam
eduardo
and
mitch,
so
tam
introduced
the
tec
and
then
mitch
talked
about
the
dashboard.
I
talked
about
transparency
and
eduardo
about
communitas
for
transparency.
I
covered,
I
covered
the
youtube
practices
in
the
transparency
audit
and
then
I
I
sent
twelve
some
links
to
those
to
those
information,
so
he
can
also
present
it
in
the
during
the
post-production.
C
I
think
it
will
go
out
around
first
week
of
january,
if
I
remember
it
right,
yeah
and
yeah
I'll.
Let
you
know
when
it's
when
it's
being
reviewed,
I
think
he
will
send
it
to
tom.
B
C
Yeah
yeah,
I
was
on
a
call
with
the
common
stock
team
earlier
and
this
we
yeah
it.
This
is
one
of
the
issues
assigned
to
me
and
I
realized
we
haven't
been
been
doing
it
for
a
while
now
yeah.
B
C
A
C
What
we
talked
about
is
like
I
remember
we,
you
do
remember
that
we
have
this
common
stock
playlist
on
the
youtube
channel,
and
aside
from
that,
we
also
do
this
little
screen
at
the
at
the
end
of
every
call
yeah.
So
what
we
agreed
on
is
he
will.
We
will
not
have
the
playlist
anymore,
so
it
won't
be.
C
It
won't
confuse
people
between
tc
and
common
staff,
so
we
can
make
the
common
stock
playlist
on
private
now,
but
we
can
keep
doing
the
cs
videos
at
the
end
of
the
tc
video.
So
I
will
start
updating
that
issue
again
and
tag
you
which
videos
should
go
wherever
because
right
now
in
the
the
common
stack,
we
only
have
the
we
only
have
the
sprint
review
calls.
C
We
don't
have
the
comments.
I
remember.
In
the
past
we
had
simulator
meetings,
common
simulator
meetings
that
goes
to
that
go
to
the
common
swarm
calls,
but
we
don't
have
those
anymore.
C
So
what
we
have
now
are
the
sprint
review
videos
in
the
ama,
which
is
only
every
month
so
yeah,
I
think
it's
it's
just
going
to
be.
This
is
the
sprint
videos
that
will
go
to
the
at
the
end
of
the
community.
Call.
B
B
B
B
C
C
B
C
C
C
Maybe
you
have
to
move
at
the
the
next
page
yeah.
I
will
just
make
this
private
now,
where
is
it
here?.
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
Yeah
I
mean
educate
people
like
to
protect
their
privacy
on
their
addresses
like
on
the
blockchain.
Everything
is
transparent
and
it's
pretty
easy
to
you
know
link.
Oh
this
guy
did
that.
So
you
know
like
okay,
the
transparency
though
oh
look,
two
people
is
getting
paid
for
transparency.
Now
that
must
be
except
an
eye
right
and
ivy,
and
then.
B
B
B
Yeah
to
try
to
save
I
mean
we
do
not
obligate
anyone,
but
the
thing
is
like
okay,
maybe
juan
when
I
use
another
address
to
get
paid
from
gravity,
otherwise
people
will
start
seeing.
Oh,
this
is
one
he's
donating
this
amount
and
get
going
he's
doing
you
know,
then
it
gets
pretty
easy
to
see
everything
that
one
alice
is
doing
so
yeah
just
educate
people.
C
C
This
part
can
be
a
part
of
it
like
we
can
say
that
we
are
encouraging.
We
strongly
encourage
the
contributors
to
to
use
different
wallet,
addresses
for
the
or
the
fund
that
they
receive
for
being
compensated
and
for
the
for
holding
tech
tokens
and
also
for,
if
they're,
holding
governance
tokens.
If
we
will
have
governance,
tokens.
C
And
the
other
idea
that
I
have
for
for
this
one
and
then
the
other
thing
that
I
think
of
is
like
for,
since
the
the
the
funding
proposal
will
be
submitted
every
three
months.
Why?
Why
don't
we
request
them
like
to
for
every
time
they
submit
a
new
proposal
or
renew
the
proposal?
C
They
also
include
a
short
report
or
a
short
summary
of
how
the
previous
fund
were
spent
on
the
contributors
like
which
contributors
received.
How
much
I
don't
know
if
it's
gonna
be
a
good
practice
order.
B
C
Yeah
yeah,
I
think
we
can
it's.
It
will
be
also
easier,
you
know
and
the
community
will
be
maybe
able
to
monitor
who
are
getting
paid.
You
know,
and
they
will
be
aware.
Oh
this
person
is
a
part
of
this
working
group
he's
getting
paid
for
it.
C
So
if
they
have,
you
know
it
can
also
promote
like
if
they
have
questions
about
the
working
group
they
know
who
to
reach
out
to
so
we
are
being
transparent
with
the
the
funding
of
the
contributors,
and
we
are
also
being
transparent
with
what
these
contributors
are
doing.
You
know.
B
C
Right
now,
like,
I
think,
for
example,
for
comms
offered
for
teams
or
comes
working
group-
I
maybe
I'm
not
updated,
but
the
last
time
I
checked
it's
like
they
just
put
a
role,
but
they
didn't
put
the
name.
Who
is
doing
that
role
so
like
in
the
initial?
In
our
initial
proposal?
We
we
only
put
we
break
down
the
tasks
because
we
don't
have
like
regular
contributors.
C
You
know
anybody
can
jump
in
and
do
this
task
and
get
paid
for
doing
this,
because
we
we
are
funding
the
we
are,
compensating
the
action
that
they're
doing
and
it
doesn't
matter
who
that
person
is.
Who
is
doing
that?
So
in
the
initial?
In
the
first
proposal
of
we
have
this
tasks,
but
we
don't
put
the
names
yet
because
nobody's
doing
that,
but
in
the
next
proposal
they
can
put
a
report
a
a
reference
to
the
yeah,
a
short
summer
that
in
their
in
their
previous
in
the
previous
three
months.
D
Maybe
yeah,
I
want
to
comment
on
that.
What
I
was
saying
and
yeah
that's
a
problem
that
most
of
the
working
groups
are
having
and
like.
I
asked
like
how
could
we
sort
that
out?
Like
yeah,
we
are
creating
roles
but
like
we
haven't
really
specified?
D
Who
is
going
to
take
those
roles
and
like
maybe
something
that
grief
told
me,
is
that
we
could
even
go
through
a
hiring
process
like
not
so
formal
but
like
maybe
opening
the
the
vacancy
or
the
space
for
the
people
to
to
to
to
request
those
roles,
not
because
otherwise
it
would
be
like
okay,
I
like
x
or
y
people,
so
I
am
saying
that
I
will
work
with
them
just
because
so
what.
D
B
Do
you
think
that's
bad,
like
imagine
like
a
comment
like
we
go
to
one
hive
and
we
say
we're
going
to
implement
gravity
and
okay.
The
people
who's
going
to
work
is
myself
ib
and
sep
right,
because
are
my
friends
because
whatever-
but
this
is
the
team
who's
going
to
do
that,
and
I
think
this
should
not
be
a
bad
thing
like
a
as
long
like.
B
Like
if
you
say
it's
going
to
be
the
three
of
us,
I
don't
see
a
problem
but
and
then,
if
you
know
like
imagine
like
okay,
durga
dash
can
do
better
than
me
and
then
maybe
they're
gonna
build
a
team
and
then
they
also
propose
like
the
same
thing.
But
then
it's
up
to
the
community
to
vote
like
yeah.
Who
is
actually
going
to
do
it
right.
C
Yeah
for
me,
I
also
think
that,
because
if
we
do
the
hiring
process,
what
it,
what
if
we
don't
hire,
I
mean
I
don't
want
to
hold
off
a
proposal
just
because
we
haven't
identified
the
person
who
would
do
the
task
yet
because
we
can
have
the
funding
and
we
know
what
we
need
to
do
in
the
next
three
months.
But
we
still
have
to
look
for
that
person
to
do
that
task
and
like
what
zeptin
said,
I
feel
like
as
long
as
the
work
gets
done,
with
a
good
quality
and
yeah.
C
It
doesn't
because
some
tasks,
you
know,
for
example,
the
recording
of
the
calls
you
know
if
zap
team
is
won't
be
available
and
somebody
wanted
to
jump
in.
We
don't
have
to
go
through
the
process
of
hiring
them.
You
know
if
they
do
the
recording,
then
they
get
compensated
for
it.
C
So
yeah
I
don't
know,
and
then
my
ideas
like
for
the
transparency
of
contributors
like
we
can
make
a
rep
and
a
report
in
the
next
proposal
like
who
did
what?
Because
in
the
initial
proposal
we
don't
know
yet
we
will
be
doing
those
tasks
and
then
we
can
in
the
next
proposal
we
can
already
give
names
who
did
what
and
then
yeah
that's
what
I
think.
D
Yeah,
I
I
I
think,
like
what
happens,
is
that
they're,
like
the
different
working
groups,
are
having
like
different
scopes
and
like
gravity,
is
also
going
to
be
functioning
with
a
lot
of
bounties,
as
I
understand
that
transparency
is
will
be
doing,
but
maybe
like
there
are
other
working
groups
that
are
going
to
have
like
more
table
roles
and-
and
maybe
like
I,
I
still
wonder
like
how
are
they
going
to
choose
that
like,
for
example,
the
guides
like
there
are
going
to
be
two
guides
from
the
community's
working
group.
B
Yeah
I
mean
I,
I
think
it's
up
to
you
know
the
store
like
of
the
working
group
like
if
those
things
this
is
the
bright
person
or
tongue,
then
that
person
do
that,
and
you
know
like
I
and
then
imagine
like
okay,
say
I'm.
As
I
said
the
most
thing,
I
think
those
guys
are
bad
and
you
know
dominator
suggesting
it.
I
can
always
say
like.
Oh,
I
think
the
guy
should
be
this
this
this
and
that
and
then
do
the
proposal
myself.
I
mean
I
know
like
it's.
B
It's
going
to
be
harder
because
they
they
had
a
reputation
as
communities
to
us
communities.
But
the
thing
is,
you
know
like
it's
always
up
to
the
community
to
vote
like
if
everyone
comes
just
something,
but
then
community
do
not
vote
on
them,
then
it's
not
going
to
pass.
But
if
you
know
but
for
me,
is
the
the
one
who's
typing
the
proposal
who
decides
the
team
and
yeah
and
then
it's
up
to
the
community
to
say
yes
or
no
to
give
those
funds.
B
D
Going
outside
or
our
main
topic,
yeah,
no,
no
but
yeah.
I
I
I
was
thinking
that
that
having
hiring
processes
could
like
help
on
on
transparency
on
those
roles,
because
otherwise
it
would
be
like
yes
as
you're
saying
like
okay,
because
I
am
the
steward
of
the
working
group
I
get
to
decide
like
yeah
the
group
that
will
make
this
and
and
like
or
make
it
transparent,
maybe
yeah
we
could.
We
could
even
open,
like
yeah,
make
it
available
for
for
anyone
who
who
wants
to
to
to
be
on
that
role.
B
C
So
do
you
suggest
that
we
already
specify
who
would
be
the
contributors
yeah
in
submitting
the
proposal.
B
And
we
are
doing
it,
but
the
thing
is
like
okay.
I
think
this
is
transparent
enough,
like
those
names
are
in
the
proposal
and
then,
as
one
was
saying
like.
If
there
is
a
bounty,
then
whoever
is
taking
you
know
doing
it,
then
they
proclaim
that
about
it
and
yeah.
My
intention
here
is
like
create
some
good
practices,
so
the
world
community
know
who's
doing
what
and
in
order
they
getting
compensated
for
doing
yeah.
C
Maybe
for
the
regular
tasks,
it's
easy
to
put
a
name
to
the
contributor.
I
mean
yeah
for
those
regular
tasks.
We
already
know
who's
doing
what,
because
they're
we
are
already
assigning
them
right,
but
but
for
the
bounty.
C
How
to
do
it
like?
Where
can
we
put
the
those
that
report
like
do
we
do
do
we
do
a
financial
report
call
every
three
months
for
the
working
groups
see
because
you
know
in
companies
they
have
this
financial
planning
financial
reporting.
You
know
yeah.
D
C
Know
if
we
can
do
that
as
well
like
we
have
this
one
call
every
three
months
to
for
every
working
group
to
present,
who
were
the
contributors
that
got
funded
or
do
we
do?
We
want
to
be
transparent
before
funding
the
contributors
or
after
the
contributors
get
funded?
What
do
you
think.
B
B
C
So
yeah,
so
one
of
the
guidelines
should
be.
The
working
group
should
include
in
their
proposal
who
will
be
doing
the
work.
B
Yeah
I
mean
I
also
want
to
create
some
guidelines
like
after,
like
you
know,
like
I
don't
know
like
working,
I
don't
know
if
they
are
going
to
be
paying
weekly,
monthly
or
bi-weekly
or
whatever,
like.
I
think
it's
up
to
every
working
group,
but
the
thing
is
like
yeah
when
they
are
when
they
are
paying.
Maybe
there's.
B
B
C
How
about
this,
like
every
you
know,
amount
one
is
doing
this
weekly
updates
for
the
working
groups
right.
Maybe
we
can
do
something
like
that,
but
more
on
contributor
funding,
the
contributors,
and
we
do
it
like
every
every
three
months.
C
And
do
you
also
want
to
make
a
comparison
between
like
what
was
the
proposed?
What's
what
was
in
the
proposal
and
who,
who
got
paid
or
like
the
running,
like
the
remaining
fund,
that
they
have.
B
B
B
B
B
C
Requesting
compensation
there
you
know
it
can,
then
I
don't
know
if
you
can
have
something
like
to
know
from
which
working
group
they're
requesting
compensation
from
like
it's
just
one
channel
with
all
the
compensation
requests.
But
I
know
how
we
can
separate
each
compensation
from
for
different
working
groups
if
there's
a
way
to
to
identify
from
which
working
group
they're
requesting
compensation
for
yeah.
B
C
The
thing
with
this
two
different
chess:
you
can
see
that
unless
you
join
the
thread
for
me,
for
example,
I
don't
see
this,
I
don't
see
this
thread
from
parties,
but
if
you
want
the
whole
community
to
be,
we
want
to
be
transparent
about
those
compensation
requests.
You
know
I
mean
I
don't
have.
B
B
But
the
thing
is
like
the
communities
working,
the
communities
know
and
we
as
a
transparency,
also
know
more
or
less
if
they
are
doing
like.
We
could
just
add-
and
probably
one
say:
oh
no
we're
not
doing
that
and
then
that
that's
that's
you
know
he
didn't
want
to
do
that.
So
that's
fine,
but
we
can
just
ask
hey.
Are
you
doing
that?
Can
I
join
just
to
pull
out
the
data
for
the
audit
and
he
can
say
yes,
no
whatever,
but
it's
not
up.
You
know.
C
C
Yeah
yeah,
I
think
that
couldn't
work
for
each
working
group
if
they
want
to
do
that.
But
what
I
was
what
I
had
in
mind
before
this,
but
I
think
you
have
a
better
idea
but
just
to
share
what
I
had
in
my
earlier
one
section.
For
the
whole
I
mean
not
for
every
working
group,
just
one
section
for
compensation
requests
and
then
they,
when
they
request
you,
oh.
C
Yeah,
but
if
we
put
that
in
in
as
a
main
channel
under
community
calls,
they
don't
have
to
look
for
the
thread
that
that's
right.
C
B
C
Get
flooded,
I
mean
the
the
other
links
that
we,
the
other
information
we
share
in
transparency,
might
might
not
be
seen
if
people
start
typing
their
compensation.
I
mean
it's
more
organized.
You
have
a
separate
channel
for
compensation
requests,
I
mean
either
we
do
the
threads
for
each
workings.
Yeah.
C
In
the
in
the
community
we
have
general.
B
C
It's
the
same
thing:
if
we
put
the
compensation
request
for
each
working
group,
they
will
only
also
look
into
that
if
they
want
it,
but
the
thing
is,
I
wouldn't
know
that
it
exists
that
this
a
thread
exists
until
someone
tells
me
that,
but
if
we
just
put
it
as
them
as
a
one
of
the
main
sections
in
the
channel,
I
already
know
that
it's
there
and
I
will
look
into
that.
If
I
want
to
you
know
we
don't
it's
not
it's
not
like
hidden.
C
Oh
no,
just
under
the
like
the
last
section
general
same
level
with
this.
C
And
then
but
the
thing
I
think.
B
C
I
think
I
think
we
should
type
it
yeah
like
okay,
yeah,
some
ideas,
but
the
thing
with
that
is
it's
hard
to
find
for
each
working
group
unless
we
have
a
tool
to
separate
or
to
label
or
recommend
to
know
that
this
is
for
this
working
group.
C
That's
why
I
said,
I
think
mean.
B
B
A
B
A
C
Maybe
you're
2
p.m
or
3
p.m.
Wait
is.
B
C
B
Practicing
the
funding
flow
yeah,
those
guidelines,
yeah
yeah,
if
you.
D
D
And
yeah
that
that
was
a
great
proposal.
The
new
one
from
tom
and
christopher.
B
I'm
also
working
on
on
another
one
with
yeah
a
lot
of
people.
It's
actually
there
tom
grief,
durgadash,
paul
and
lauren,
nothing,
nice,
nice
and
it's
you
know,
kind
of
the
same
big
open
prize.