►
Description
The Transparency Working Group promotes transparency, openness and mutual monitoring as a high-level ideal that we're moving towards at the TEC. The way that we get there is by empowering people to share this experience with the Transparency Audits and making information available to everyone.
We gather every Monday at 5pm CET.
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
I
think
it's
a
it's
an
important
topic
to
talk
about
as
a
team
and
I'm
interested
to
know
more
about
it
and
yeah.
I
don't
have
any
distraction.
I
pass
it
to
nt.
B
Thanks
ivy,
my
intentions
are
just
too
well
catch
up.
I
haven't
been
on
a
call
for
like
a
month
and
distractions.
Not
many.
I
just
have
a
a
light
headache,
but
yeah
I'll
pass
it
over
to
you
better.
C
Next
steps
for
the
for
some
of
the
working
groups
like
for
transparency
itself
and
maybe
about
the
the
forum
post.
If
we
are
still
gonna,
do
it
or
or
what
are
we?
What
are
we?
It's.
C
D
C
D
I
I
can
take
it.
Let
me
share
my
screen.
D
Bear
you
will
get
open
engineering
commons.
A
D
There
is
280k
voting,
yes,
22k
abstaining,
which
means
they
add
to
the
courtroom,
but
nothing
else.
So
it's
like
100
super
requirement
and
we
fix
the
quorum
so
unless
somewhere
blocks
it
in
the
last
moment
it
seems
it's
passing
and
the
last
the
next
things
is
like
yeah
doing
start
doing
like
for
at
the
end,
like,
I
think,
like
we
said
like
you
were,
and
drake
will
take
care
of
the
transparency
one
drake's
still
on
prague.
D
I
don't
know
break
if
break.
I
don't
know
if
I
pronounce
it
correctly
in
english
and
he
will
be
back
next
week.
I
mean
during
this
week,
but
for
the
next
transparency
call,
but
I
think,
like
you
guys
mentioning
like
you,
wanted
to
update
the
transparency
one
with
drake
some
bear
and
then
yeah.
C
Yeah
sorry
yeah,
we
we,
I
think,
the
document
it's
already
created.
I
think
it's
recommended
to
me
and
everything,
but
we
well
at
least
me.
I
don't
have
access
to
edit
it.
So
I
just
requested
it.
Okay,.
C
D
D
C
For
that,
no
no,
it's
all
good,
so
I
guess
like
we
can
yeah.
I
I
was
talking
with
rex.
We're
gonna
divide
the
work
like
he's
gonna
do
two
months:
I'm
gonna
do
two
months
and
I'll
get
back
to
him
and
I
guess
we'll
probably
have
it
done
for
next
monday
for
sure
I
don't
think
it's
that
much
of
a
work
yeah.
C
C
D
You
yeah
you're
welcome,
thank
you
man
and
also
on
the
same
lines
of
this
thing.
The
I'll
be
the
aiming
like
after
the
boat
passes.
I
I
will
wait
until
the
end
ldm
every
working
group
lead
so
make
sure
like
who
like
offer
them
like
a
demo.
D
If
someone
wants
to
pick
it
so
they
can
understand
and
then,
if
someone
is
not
picking
it,
so
we
will
do
it
what
it
will
be
done
by
us
like,
let's
say
like
she
says:
oh,
I
don't
have
time
for
that
because
in
the
world,
so
it's
like.
It's
not
a
requirement
voluntary
to
use,
but
we
believe
using
this
document
will
benefit
yourself
so
basically
like.
D
If
someone
doesn't
want
to
do
it,
they
will
still
providing
like
transparency
around
the
world
or
any
other
platform
they
want
like
like
stillwatch,
for
example,
they
were
using
the
discord
chat
so
basically
like
we
will
use.
We
will
pick
it
from
from
them,
but
if
the
working
groups
end
up
doing
themselves,
it's
better
because
you
know
something
like
we
could
call.
I
don't
know
operations.
D
Like
I
saw
like
the
one
that
you
undress
did
it's
like:
the
tickets
got
under
operations
and
you
know
this
is
case
mediation.
I
don't
think
that's
our
operation.
You
know
like,
if
gravity,
do
it
themselves?
It's
it's.
D
Exactly
so
yeah.
D
Gravity
but
all
the
working
groups,
like
you
know,
if
everyone
does
it
by
themselves,
it's
better
than
it's
also
less
work
from
us
and
yeah.
I
also
I
mean
it
sounds
like
a
race
is
not
here,
but
also
we
should
start
getting
the
master
done.
So
we
could
start
because,
like
we,
for
you
need
to
present
the
others,
so
it
that
should
get
done
relatively
quickly,
but
I
think,
like
yeah,
you
and
drakes
are
working
pretty
fast,
so
yeah,
let's,
let's
give
it
another
week
until
rex,
come
back
home.
C
Yeah,
yes,
so
I
think
in
the
meantime,
we
can
do
transparency
and
what
you're
saying
I
think
that
would
be
good
like
after
it
vote
passes.
If
we
can
start
contacting
the
working
groups
and
maybe
just
like
show
them
the
the
template
right
and
yeah
all
right,
and
maybe
for
the
groups
that
are
interested
or
if
they
are
maybe
like
hesitant
about
it.
C
D
A
Maybe
yeah,
or
maybe
we
can
also
like
jump
into
every
working
group,
call
and
then
ask
the
lead
to
if,
if
they
can
give
us
like
only
ten
minutes
of
the
time,
so
we
can.
I.
D
Feel
it's
better
like
in
order
to
do,
but
the
last
call
was
so
intense
that
I
decided
like
maybe
leave
it
there,
but
you
know
you,
you
could
use
one
store
calls.
Then
everyone
is
there
and
then,
but
also
it's
you
know
it's
pretty
simple
like
I.
Actually
I'm
I'm
talking
with
all
these
two
hours
in
a
daily
basis.
D
So
it's
just
like
pick
up
10
sec
10
minutes
of
some
calls
and
it's
done
quickly
and
then
we
also
are
not
wasting
time
from
everyone
in
a
in
a
call
like
if
we
have
to
do
it
like
you
know,
for
every
sock
off
comes.
I
feel
like
things
too
much.
A
Or
maybe
because
I
mean
if
it's
not
the
steward,
who
will
be
working
on
this
document,
maybe
you
can
just
set
one
hour
call
and
then
invite
all
the
person
that
everyone
who's
assigned
to
take
on
the
the
task,
because
I
don't
know
if
all
working
groups
is
it
gonna,
be
all
the
stewards
who
will
be
working
on
the
document
or
are
they
going
to
assign
it
to
someone
else?
Because.
D
C
It's
a
good
point,
because
maybe
it's
important
that
also
like
the
the
rest
of
the
members
of
the
working
groups,
kind
of
like
know
about
the
about
the
about
the
sheet,
even
though
they
don't
actually
use
it,
but
that
they
are
aware
that
of
how
it
works
and
the
information
that
it's
going
to
start
tracking.
I
don't
know.
D
Yeah,
but
I
I
what
I
really
envision
is
like
you
know
this
final
like
this
is
like
it's
just
gathering
information
like
you
know
the
that,
what's
going
to
be
more
relevant
as
a
community
is
going
to
be
the
master
one,
the
master
yeah
exactly-
and
this
is
the
one
we
will
promote
more.
This
is
just
gathering
data,
probably
things
that
are
there
for
groups
already
somehow.
No,
it's
like
people
know
what
they
use
in
the
money.
More
or
less
yeah.
D
Yeah,
I
think,
what's
what's
important,
is
like
as
a
community.
What
are
we
doing
as
a
community,
and
this
is
like
the
mastership
like
this
small
sheet-
is
like
just
to
gather
all
the
data
from
data
data
data
data
data
and
then
with
the
other
one
yeah.
We
have
like
the
master
sheet.
This
is
the
one
like,
especially
some
who
will
be
using
and
but
of
course,
it's
going
to
be
open
for
everyone.
C
Yeah,
okay,
yeah!
No,
it's
all
good!
I
agree,
then
I
guess
it's
just
like
if
you
think
it's
better
just
to
contact
like
each
steward
individually.
I
mean,
I
don't
think
it's
it's
kind
of
like
a
big
thing
or
we
have
like
one
call
or.
D
I
feel
like
it's
easier
like
because,
if
you
also
do
like
you
know,
you
may
set
up
a
call
as
I
suggested
and
then
oh.
D
This
call,
then
you
know
it's
like:
oh
it's,
it's
kind
of
like
you
know,
coordination,
work,
but
ads
work,
and
just
you
know,
I'm
chatting
with
juan
and
everyone
interesting
we're
doing
this
check
it
out
this
work
like
this
this
this
and
this
and
then
he
can
say:
oh
yeah,
we
can
do
that
and
we
think
it
would
be
beneficial
for
us.
Then
they
pick
it
and
they
say
no,
it's
also
fine.
It's
like
okay,
this
working
group
is
not
going
to
do
it,
so
we
do
it
for
them.
C
Here
I
don't
want
to
take
more
time
like
in
this
topic,
but
I
just
came
with
like
another
question.
So
what
would
it
happen,
for
example
like
for
in
a
working
group
like
this
two
art?
They
don't
want
to
use
it,
but
then
maybe
like
the
rest
of
the
members
of
the
group,
they
they
do
want
to
use
it
like.
How
would
we
know
that
or
like
on
the
opposite,
like
the
steward
want
to
use
them,
but
the
other
members?
Maybe
they
don't
want
to
use
them?
How
would
we
I
mean.
E
D
E
D
Could
jump
and
say?
Oh,
I
want
to
do
it
for
comms,
but
I
actually
want
to
say,
like
it's
not
paid
work
by
transparency
like
if
comms
is
doing
it,
they
take
it
from
their
budget.
It's
not
like
an
asset.
E
D
D
No,
no,
they
are
not
going
to
pay
us.
We
just
do
it
from
the
transparency
budget.
That's
why
the
community
paid.
But
if
you
know
it's,
we
can
do
it,
but
if
someone
do
it
by
themselves,
it's
better,
but
if
not,
we
are
going
to
do
it
and,
of
course,
if
we
do
it,
it's
going
to
be
from
our
budget.
A
D
D
Normally,
like
you
know,
it's
like
in
this
dms
for
multisigs,
like
steroids,
multisig,
and
then
they
paste
the
budget
there,
and
so
we
are
going
to
make
this
data
available
to
everyone,
and
you
know
the
one
who's
doing
it
for
transplant
steroids.
I
think
it's
done.
She
could
just
use
the
one
we
we
have.
She
could
say
no
and
that's
also
fine.
A
I
still
strongly
feel
about
having
like
just
one
dedicated
call
to
have
this
demo,
instead
of
just
doing
it
in
the
stewards
call,
because
I
feel
like
it's
kind
of
centralizing
the
task
among
the
stewards
and
if
there
are
other
contributors
who
want
to
get
involved
at
least
they
can
just
join
the
call
instead
of
having
let's
say
you
already
show
the
demo
in
the
stewards
column,
then
maybe
a
couple
of
other
contributors
want
to
learn
or
want
to
do
to
take
all
the
tasks
you
know,
and
then
you
just
have,
then
you
you
do
a
one-on-one
with
them.
A
Yeah,
I
think
the
first
step
is
just
to
confirm
with
the
stewards
who
will
be
working
on
the
task
and
if
there
are,
if
there
are
people
who
will
be
working
on
the
task
that
are
not
stewards,
then
you
can
yeah
open
a
have
a
on
a
dedicated
call
for
the
demo
alone,
not
just
for
the
stewards.
If
because
it
doesn't
make
sense
to
have
the
demo
among
the
stewards,
if
not
all
the
stewards
will
be
doing
the
task,
if
there
will
be
other
people
who
will
be
doing
that
too?.
D
D
A
D
C
Yeah
I
I
yeah,
I
don't
really
have
strong
opinion
right
now,
because
I
I'm
also
thinking
like
about
this-
that
it's
happening
around
the
community.
You
know
like
the
transformation
of
the
stewards
role
so
also,
how
is
that
gonna,
maybe
kind
of
affect
this
in
some
way?
I
don't
know
maybe
yeah
so
yeah
I
just
maybe
I
would.
C
I
would
say
that
I
I
agree
that
as
long
as
everyone
or
most
of
the
people
know
about
this
template,
I
think
that's
better
as
many
people
know
about
it,
then
then
I
think
yeah,
it's
better.
That's
that's
all.
I
have
to
say
right
now.
C
I
would
say
that
both
are
important
and
like
in
my
mind
they
are
kind
of
different
because,
for
example,
maybe
you
could
have
like
a
contributor
from
one
working
group
that
they
don't
really
care
about
the
finances
of
the
whole
tec
right.
Maybe
they
might
just
be
focusing
their
own
working
group
and
they
want
to
know
like
what's
the
the
the
status
of
their
working
group.
So
for
that
purpose,
I
think
this
will
be
really
helpful.
You
know
just
to
have
like
a
small
view
of
the
of
your
working
group.
C
I
think
that's
good,
but
then
maybe
for
contributors
or
for
investors
or
for
stewards
or
for
people
that
is
more
involved
around
the
whole
tc.
Of
course,
it
will
be
more
helpful
to
have
the
the
master
sheet,
but
I
think
both
will
have
kind
of
their
purpose
will
be
serving
kind
of
their
purpose,
and
I,
I
guess
we'll
just
let
each
person
decide
what
they
what
they
need
right,
yeah.
D
D
I
feel
like
we
make
it
clear
like
we
have
all
these
documents,
then
we
of
course
like
we
are
we
care
about
promoting
the
mastership
because,
like
what
we
are
working
for
right,
like
you
know,
that's
what
the
service
we
are
providing
to
the
community
among
other
staff,
of
course,
but
and
and
especially
for
example,
but
you
know
like
I
don't
think
like
we
like
we
can.
D
A
Yeah
I
mean
if
you
don't
it's
okay,
if
you
don't
do
the
jumping
to
every
working
group
call,
but
maybe
just
have
one
call
dedicated
for
the
demo
but
yeah
it's
just
like
an
hour.
D
C
C
The
one
thing
that
rex-
and
I
were
thinking
about
like
when
we
were
talking-
is
that
this
idea
of
via
actually
going
to
every
single
call-
I
don't
know
if,
if
it's
a
good
idea
because
like
if
we
think
that
it
will
take
us
like
five
minutes,
then
I
don't
think
it
would
be
a
big
deal
and
we
were
thinking
on
like
dividing
the
tasks.
So
he
could
do
like
half
of
the
calls,
and
I
could
do
half
of
the
calls.
C
D
C
Okay,
then
maybe
I
guess
we
could
still
maybe
wait
this
week
to
decide.
We
can
in
the
meantime
do
transparency.
I
guess.
D
E
C
Yeah,
I
was
saying
it
more
like
planning
to
ask
rex
if
he
was
still
up
to
doing
that
or
if
it
it's
just
better
like
to
to
do
what
you're
saying
like
usdm
the
people
and
and
that's
it
but
yeah.
I
I
get
what
you're
saying
so
yeah
I
don't.
I
don't.
I
don't
really
know.
D
E
C
D
D
D
July,
like
it'd
be
nice
if
we
got
it
like
the
second
week
of
july,
like
at
least
something
like
semi
finished,
so
we
could
use
like
one
week
for
advice,
process
and
getting
the
designs
with
efra
and
get
that
done
like
we
could
during
this
week,
still
doing
doing
some
small
changes
I
mean,
and
if
it
takes
another
week
it's
it's
also,
okay,
but
ideally
like
I
like
to
get
deadlines
sooner.
So
we
got
like
this
pressure
of
getting
things
done
and.
B
So
I
have
one
question
and
one
suggestion:
first,
the
suggestion:
may
I
suggest
that
we
use
clarity
instead
of
send
hub,
I'm
I'm
kind
of
biased,
because
these
months
I've
been
on
a
clarity
cohort
like
learning
with
the
clarity
team,
how
to
use
the
tool
and
whatever.
B
But
you
know,
I
really
think
it's
a
great
tool
I
think
bear
has-
has
been
using
it
quite
a
bit
as
well
on
sample.
I
think
he
may
be
able
to
share
some
insight
as
well,
and
then
the
question
is
so.
We
are
doing
an
audit
just
for
the
month
of
june.
D
Oh,
no,
no!
No!
It's
three
months.
We
did
the
first
one
january
february
and
march,
and
now
we
do
april
may
and
june.
D
So
the
audit
is
somehow
it's
going
to
be
like
copy
paste,
most
of
the
things
and
then
doing
changes
like
all
the
data
is
going
to
be
more
and
more
clean.
When
rex
finished
did
the
destination.
B
C
D
D
D
No,
I
I
just
wanted
to
say
20.
The
reason
I'm
using
sound
up
is
because
then
to
coordinate
with
the
steroids
is
so
easy
like
if
we
start
using
different
coordination
tools,
then
to
coordinate
with
the
star
wars
and
it's
harder
like.
I
know
some
points
doing
both,
but
I
feel
like
this
is
more
work.
C
Yeah
sorry
yeah,
I
was
just
gonna
comment
on
that
as
well
yeah.
I
I
think
I'm
kind
of
like
with
auntie.
I
support
that.
I
think
clarity,
it's
it's
pretty
good
and
it
has
a
lot
of
functionalities.
I
think
that
could
really
help
us
but
yeah.
The
only
thing
is
that
right
that
maybe
we
would
need
to
add
some
time
to
coordinate
senhof
and
clarity,
so
they
have
kind
of
like
the
same
stuff.
C
I
would
say
it's
the
way
I'm
seeing
it
like
in
samples
that
send
help
is
more
for,
like
the
community
like
show
what
we're
doing
and
clarity
is
more
like
for
organizing
within
the
group.
So
if
we
get
to
make
it
work
here,
I
think
I
think
it
would
be
great
because
it
will
make
easier
even
other
things
like
payments.
You
know
and
gathering
all
our
documents
and
all
all
our
information
in
one
one
place.
So
I
think
that
would
be
nice
also
like
to
divide
different
tasks
and
different
projects
within
the
working
group.
B
Yeah
also
because
I
thought
you
said
we
were
going
to
use
like
to
make
a
new
table
and
a
new
like
a
separate
accent
hub,
but
if
we
are
going
to
use
you
know
the
same
as
the
community.
I
think
it
works
as
well,
because
to
be
completely
honest,
it's
not
like.
We
have
a
huge
amount
of
work
to
coordinate
that
we
need,
like.
B
I
think
clarity
would
be
great,
but
I
mean
we
are
cool
also
using
the
the
common
set
hub,
because
you
know
it's
the
same
thing
and
we
don't.
We
don't
have
like
as
much
smart
work
as
other
working
groups.
A
To
to
experiment
on
that,
why
not.
B
Okay,
like
I
could
commit
to
you,
know,
to
take
care
of
the
clarity
base,
but
yeah
honestly
not
hard
feelings.
My
heart,
like
yeah,
not
what
no
hard
feelings
about
using
clarity,
because
we
don't
really
have
as
much
stuff
to
coordinate
so
yeah.
That's
whatever.
D
It's
like
coordination
is
set
up
itself
like
bear
knows
what
he's
doing.
I
feel
it
that's
work,
yeah,
that's
my
point
of
view
like
it
adds
work
and
we
don't
have
like
you
know.
We
have
that
easy
sword
which
we
also
need
to
take
anyway,
as
a
community
thing,
so
documentation
is
also
there.
I
feel
like
if
we
want
to
use
clarity
or
somehow
I
personally
don't
have
like
for
me.
It
doesn't
matter
like
both
are
good.
D
I
I
don't
mind
learning
a
new
tool,
but
you
know
I
really
like
to
be
on
the
same
with
the
rest
of
the
groups
like,
I
don't
think
you
know.
What's
I
mean
sample
is
doing
it.
That
is
great
for
like
if
they
are
doing
and
it's
working
for
them
that's
great,
but
I
would
feel
more
comfortable
like
doing
what
most
of
the
community
is
doing.
So
the
coordination
is
more
clean.
B
D
E
D
The
coordination
is
happening
with
general
magics
and
common
stock,
the
audit
recordings
and
and
yeah
that's
it
we're
not
doing
anything
else.
So
I
feel,
like
you
know,.
D
B
D
Oh
yeah
yeah,
that's
a
big
topic
yeah,
let
me
introduce
it
so
basically
I
mean
I
know
like
the
this
is
having
a
bad
time
with
the
money,
but
at
the
same
time,
if
we
risk
our
money,
we
should
also
have
some
benefit,
but
you
know
we
can
also.
We
could
absolutely
so
no
hard
feelings
like
if
someone
is
like.
Oh
dude,
I
need
this
money.
Don't
do
that
like.
D
But
basically
like
my
idea,
is
like
monitor
a
little
bit
like
the
the
market
and
because
right
now.
D
Falling,
let
me
check,
like
the
last
last
time,
yeah
one
one
and
two
and
1.2
k
it
23
23k
bitcoin
actually
had
22k
bitcoin,
the
celius
project
would
get
liquidated,
which
means
like
it
would
probably
dump
a
little
bit
more
so
yeah.
The
idea
is
like
he
monitoring
those
pairs
and
basically
like
with
the
transparency
money
by
the
by
the
deep
and
the
idea
would
be
like
doing
transparency
payments
instead
at
the
end
of
the
month,
like
at
the
end
of
the
project,
which
would
mean
like
the
money
would
be
like.
D
Is
like
you
know
the
english
word,
but
the
you
know
the
trade
is
having
time
like
it's
not
like
we
buy
today.
We
change
tomorrow,
which
is
like
you
know,
scalping
and
all
that
stuff
is
even
harder,
but
we
let
the
trade
evolve
and
yeah.
The
idea
was,
like
you
know
like.
If
we
get,
I
don't
know,
20
or
30
or
whatever
or
five
percent
of
profits.
D
We
would,
you
know,
get
half
of
the
profits
to
distribute
on
the
team
accordingly
for
everyone's
compensation
and
then
the
other
half
would
be
used
for
like
the
next
transparency
proposal.
So
we
would
have
like
some
carryovers,
and
this
is
like
the
good.
D
The
one
we
would
love
to
have,
but
then
you
know
before
deciding
anything
like
this
can
also
go
wrong.
Like
you
know
what,
if
we
bow
without
this
bitcoin
now
at
23,
okay,
and
then
it
comes
to
10k,
you
know,
like
salaries
would
go
to
half,
and
the
idea
here
would
be
like
paying
the
proportionate
part
of
everyone's
salary
on
bitcoin
or
ethereum.
D
So
it
would
you
know
it's
it's,
you
know
for
our
perspective,
it's
a
bit
unfair
because
we,
if
we
win,
we
are
paying
the
tc
half,
but
if
we
lose,
we
are
paying
the
risk
ourselves.
That's
something
I
came
up
yesterday.
Actually
I
was
thinking
and
I'm
not
sure
if
we
want
to
do
it,
but
I
I
wanted
to
talk
it
with
you
guys
and
see.
What
do
you
guys
think
I
don't
know
I'll
pass
you
20.
B
Okay,
well,
here's
what
I'm
thinking.
B
Convinced
of
the
idea
you
know
of
putting
the
money
that's
intended
to
intended
to
cover
operation
costs.
You
know
at
risk
what
I,
what
I
would
probably
support,
is
like
putting
the
x
die
on
something
like
agave,
which
is
like
pretty
low
risk,
and
you
know,
but
it's
still
you're
just
earning
some.
B
Some
deal
in
in
the
same
x
die
and
also
something
that
we
I
would
be
open
to
would
be.
You
know
when
sample
is
properly
running.
I
would
be
open
to
lending
some
of
the
funds
to
the
sample
tissue
management
so
that
they
can
take
care
like
so
that
they
have
a
professional
taking
care
of
that
business.
B
And
then
you
know
we
just
enjoy
the
the
outcome.
If
it's
you
know,
if
it's,
if
it
is
a
positive
outcome
but
yeah.
B
D
B
B
I
may
support
that,
but
currently
on
this
we
have
you
know
unless
we
we
understand
that
we
have
the
capacity
expertise
to
control
those
assets.
I
don't
really
support
that,
because
you
know
it's.
I
can
do
that
with
my
money,
but
I
wouldn't
feel
comfortable
doing
that
with
you
know
with
others
morning.
B
I
mean
yeah,
but
I
don't
know
if
we
all
have
the
same
risk:
tolerance,
yeah,
yeah,
okay,.
E
B
I
don't
know
if
maybe
bear
truly
needs
that
money
and
I
wouldn't
feel
comfortable
like
you
know,
putting
that
at
risk.
D
Yeah,
but
that's
that's
fair,
to
decide
right,
like
I'm
talking
personally
for
a
year
like,
I
think
you
should
talk
for
you
like
I
I
again
like
I'm,
not
fully
convinced,
and
I
would
somehow
do
it
because
I
I
really
think
like
you
know,
the
market
is
falling
through
very
long
time
and
it's
like
looks
like
an
easy
profit.
It
could
be
an
easy
lose,
so
you
know
no
financial
advice,
I'm
doing
it
with
my
own
money.
B
Yeah,
that's
basically,
where
I
send
them.
I
would
support
like
stable,
confirming
agave
or
maybe
curve,
but
not
nothing
more
than
that,
at
least
in
my
part
and
yeah
I'll,
possibly
to
ivy.
A
A
If
we're
maybe
my
question
is
like:
what's
our
safety
net
like
what,
if
we
lose
like,
how
can
we
make
sure
that
the
the
other
contributors
get
paid
fairly
for
their
contribution
if
we
lose
the
yeah,
if
we
lose
the
budget,
maybe
that's
my
conflict.
What's
our
safety
net.
D
I
mean
my
point
is
like
what
would
happen
in
three
months
like
maybe
like
the
community
cannot
afford
what
we
are
doing.
So
if
we
like
at
least
try
to
help
and
palliate
those
could
be
cool,
I
mean,
if
not
it's,
okay,
like
we
get
the
job
done
and
then,
if
the
community
doesn't
pass
it,
we
stop
working
on
it,
and
you
know
it's
fine,
but
yeah.
That
would
be
like
the
other
part
like
what
happens.
If
we
like,
I
mean.
D
And
they
still
pass
the
proposal,
but
I
feel
like
we
could
somehow
support,
but
again
like
it's
or
I'm
sorry
like.
Oh
sorry,
it
shouldn't
be
at
risk.
That's
probably
a
crazy
idea
of
mine,
so
yeah
I
mean
I
feel
like
the
sentiment
is
like
not
put
it
anywhere,
which
is
fine.
D
I
wouldn't
put
it
in
agave.
I
don't
trust
the
code
and
probably
yes
and
and
yeah
I
don't
know,
do
you
want
to
comment
there,
but
it
seems
like
we
are
not
going
to
do
it
anyway,
but
would
love
to
hear
your
thoughts.
C
Yeah,
I'm
sure
I
would
just
maybe
say
a
couple
of
things.
One
is
that
I
don't
know
how
we
would
like
play
out
like
having
kind
of
this
initiative
at
the
same
time
of
the
treasury
initiative
that
sampo
would
be
doing.
I
don't
know.
How
would
that
look
like,
like,
in
my
opinion,
might
look
a
little
weird
that
there's
like
a
big
treasury
initiative
that
the
tc
is
working
on
and,
at
the
same
time,
there's
like
individually
working
groups
trying
to
kind
of
like
do
their
own
thing.
C
So
I
don't
know
I
just
I
just
felt
it
would
be
a
little
a
little
weird
and
also
on
the
other
side.
I
guess
this
is
also
kind
of
like
more
of
a
question.
C
How
would
we,
because
we
were
we
were,
we
would
be
changing
like
the
motive
of
of
our
funds
like,
according
to
our
proposals
like
we
are
saying
that
we
were
gonna,
use
them
for
something,
and
then
we
would
like
end
up
using
it
for
something
else.
So
I
don't
know
if
that
would
be
like
a
process
of
changing
the
proposal
or
how
would
that
look
like
in
the
eyes
of
the
the
rest
of
the
community.
C
C
D
E
D
It's
not
a
transparency
matter,
I
mean
when
it
gets
approved
again
it's
set
of
currency
matter,
because
we
need
to
make
sure
to
report
everything
they're
doing
but
other
than
that.
I
I
also
like
I
do
not
believe
in
experts
like,
and
he
was
saying
like
some
people
is
managing
us
is
fun
good
for
them.
I
I
personally
would
not
give
my
money
to
anyone
and
that's
why
I
also
wouldn't
give
my
money.
C
D
E
D
If
we
want
to
buy
bitcoin,
it's
like
like
around
80
percent
of
the
transparency
team,
should
be
saying
yes
and
you
know,
and
then
to
get
it
back
to
the
eye
like
imagine
like
it
pumps
or
it
also
goes
down,
and
it's
like
okay,
good,
good
losses
right.
Any
decision
should
be
done
by
the
whole
team.
C
B
Yeah,
that's
probably
that's,
I
guess
kind
of
a
reason.
I
don't
really
support
it
because
you
know
see
what
happened
with
celsius.
B
If
we
had
to
wait
till
everyone
here
agreed
on
moving
funds
from,
I
don't
know,
ethereum
or
bitcoin
back
to
stable
coins
after
the
associate's
announcement,
we
would
probably
be
late
because
we
have
to
wait
to
for
everyone
to
agree
and
we
are
pretty
spread
out
in
different
time
zones,
and
that's
also
reason
why
you
know
well,
I
I
think
it
was
angela
that
said
that
on
the
last
week
last
week,
some
formatting-
you
know
that
sample
gideon
was
thinking
about
having
someone
five
hours
a
week.
B
Doesn't
sleep
particularly
not
the
crypto
market,
it's
24
7.,
so
we
would
it
if
we
are
going
to
take
a
must
own
a
lot
of
risk
and
that's
why
I
support
more
like
a
corporal
like
a
stable
coin,
yell
farming,
it's
precisely
because
we
would
need
to
have
someone
with
their
eye
with
their
eyes,
open
and
able
to
act
quickly
in
response
to
any
market
movement,
and
also,
I
guess
I
guess
my
conclusion,
like
you
said
like
we
could
sort
of
just
take
if
I
agreed
but
bear
didn't,
we
could
just
take
my
part
of
the
funds
and
invest
mine
and
leave
burst
alone,
and
you
know
if
we
end
up
doing
that.
B
D
Yeah
but
then
it's
weird
because
we're
mechanics
like
what,
if
people
is
not
giving
back
the
money
right,
it's
I
feel
it's
better
if
it's
an
emergency
but
yeah-
and
I
don't
know
it's
okay
like
we
are,
it
seems
like
we're
not
like
you
know,
there's
so
much
overhead.
That
looks
like
I
feel
like
people
is.
D
You
know,
like
lovely
profile,
which
is
great,
so
I
mean
I
feel
like
what
we
should
do
is
like
keep
using
the
money.
The
way
we
were
using
it,
and
but
I
don't
know
like
just
keep
in
mind
like
it
could
possibly
happen
like
you
know,
we
might
not
need
to
do
all
these
things
we're
doing
here
and
it's
it's
fine,
I'm
not
kind
of
saying
like
we
should.
You
know
we
should
pay
the
tc
to
get
those
things
done,
but
yeah
like
like
in
three
months
like
we
will
need
to
pass
another
proposal.
C
Maybe
something
interesting
that
I've
been
thinking
about.
It
would
be
also
like
to
kind
of
imagine
and
like
start
getting
creative
and
trying,
maybe
to
find
a
way
in
which
we
can
actually
make
transparency
sustainable
as
well.
Maybe
maybe
we
we
haven't
thought
about
it,
but
but
maybe
there's
a
way
to
create
some
kind
of.
D
Tc
I
mean
it's
like
I.
I
really
I'm
really
against
when
people
is
talking
about
making
working
groups.
Sustainable,
which
is
great,
you
know,
like
gravity
is
sustainable,
it's
good,
but
then
it's
people
talking
like
gravity,
should
get
their
service
with
tc
like.
I
don't
think
that
this
should
even
happen
like
I
feel
like
gravity,
is
its
own
entity
and
if
they
grow
enough
to
be
like
sustainable,
they
make
like
their
own
project
and
they
I
feel.
D
Relations
with
dc,
like
one
hive
and
tc,
but
it's
not
like
they
are
the
same
project
gravity-
will
use
gravity
token
for
all
their
things
and
they
could
even
totally
have
a
pool
gravity
tc.
But
you
know
if
transparency,
for
example,
it
becomes
sustainable.
Like
you
know,
and
again,
if
spicy
makes
self
sustainable,
that
doesn't
mean
we
will
not
charge
the
tc.
The
services
provided
to
etc
will
be
charged
to
the
tc
and
that's
it
like
if
we
make
recordings
for
the
tc,
even
if
aragon
pays
us
for
doing
recordings
for
our
one.
D
C
So
maybe
here's
like
a
question
that
I
would
that
I
would
have
like
I
would
ask.
So
what
is
that?
That
line
between
you
know,
like
kind
of
like
what
you're
saying
safety,
but
also
kind
of
like
giving
back
to
the
tc
and
not
much
in
value,
because
I
think,
like
all
the
service
that
we
provide,
is
the
value,
but
I
mean
more
like
in
the
economic
part
of
it.
C
D
C
D
Yeah
the
easy
mission
is
to
advance
into
the
engineering
field
and,
like
you
know
the
the
academy
like
we
founded
the
academy,
we
speak.
We
don't
expect,
like
the
academy
pay,
for
what
takes
the
years
like
what
we
expect
from
the
academies
like
the
advanced.
They
took
an
engineering
field.
They
get
people
like
rex
to
study
their
course
for
free
and
you
know
making
like
the
world
a
better
place
to
live,
but
we
do
not
expect
like
they
give
value
back
to
the
dc.
C
D
C
D
It's
just
my
opinion.
The
thing
with
conviction
voting
is
like,
at
least
at
the
beginning,
when
there
is
a
lot
of
money,
it's
so
easy
to
take
money
away
from
the
common
pool
like
at
some
point
I
was
talking
with
sam,
like
you
know,
like
I
feel,
like
operations
shouldn't
be
more
expensive,
that
the
revenue
generated
from
the
abc
like.
If
the
abc
generates
3k,
then
we
only
have
3k
preparations,
and
that
should
be
otherwise
like
this.
D
The
only
the
system
starts
to
making
unsustainable,
because
we
have
a
very
big
load
of
operations
and
I
think
that's
the
big
problem
of
the
tc,
and
you
said
another.
D
E
D
Oh
yeah,
the
other
thing
was
like
com
like
we're
like
we
are
doing
common
goods
and
as
if,
like
the
difference
between
our
common
goods
and
the
ones
that
the
governments
are
providing,
it's
like
they
make
people
to
pay
taxes.
That's
why
they
get
revenue,
and
here
we
only
have
like
the
abc
and,
I
think
like
we
should
be
more
careful
how
we
use
the
fund,
but
I
guess
like
now
it's
starting
to
be
like
a
bit
late.
I
feel
like.
D
D
Great,
so
I
guess
that's
our
transparency
call
it
was,
I
mean
I
feel
it
was
productive
anyway,
but
yeah.
It's
okay,
like
I
feel,
like
our
consensus
here,
is
not
to
push
this
stress
or
anything,
and
I
keep
doing
it
the
way
we
were
doing
until
now,
and
if
someone
feels
differently
at
some
point
just
raise
the
point
again
in
another
transparency
call,
but
I
personally
will
not
be
talking
about
that
and
thanks
everyone.