►
Description
Timestamps:
00:00 - Intentions and distractions
00:44 - New weekly sync schedule (Monday, 3pm CET)
2:13 - Call recorders
3:24 - Transparency Medium post (update)
4:25 - Mutual accountability post (update)
7:06 - Brainstorm on methods to gather all the documentation in 1 place
12:37 - Updating the manifesto and roadmap
23:33 - Timing of audit
29:36 - Mutual accountability post (work session)
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
B
A
C
B
A
B
I
mean
maybe
just
to
have
an
announcement,
because
you
usually
send
this
announcement
before
the
meeting
right
that
the
transparency
is
happening.
I
think
maybe
it's
good
to
mention
in
the
telegram
channel
or
in
the
general
discord
channel
that
that
is
that
our
meeting
is
happening
at
this
hour
already.
A
A
B
A
B
Yeah
I
have
started
working
on
that.
I
already
drafted,
maybe
a
little
a
little
content,
but
I'm
planning
to
finish
it
this
week
and
I
think
one
also
said
that
he
wanted
to
help.
So
I'm
gonna
reach
out
to
him
within
the
week,
and
I
would
ask
him
if,
if
there's
any
content,
he
wants
to
add
and
then
one
it's
once
it's
done.
I'm
gonna
share
it
with
you,
so
you
can
add
something
else.
A
D
A
A
A
Okay,
that's
we
are,
I
mean
yeah.
We
did
it
that
when
the
thing
we
were
doing
the
the
last
day
and
I
olivia
added
a
lot
of
feedback
and
yeah-
I
mean
we
depending
on
the
time
we
have.
Maybe
we
could
work
on
here
and
just
finish
it
now.
Maybe
I
mean
there
is
a
lot
of
points
also
on
the
agenda,
but
depends
how
it
goes.
I
think
we
could
yeah
put
some
time
or
otherwise.
A
A
A
A
A
E
I
guess
well,
you
were
saying
like
hey.
Where
is
all
of
the
information
I
feel
like
all
of
the
information
is
on
the
forum
except
or
the
get
book,
or
it's
spread
across
google
docs
and
that's
the
that's
the
stuff
that's
loose
and
tragic,
but
most
of
that
stuff
is
on
the
forum
already
right,
like
I
don't
know,.
A
A
Yeah
exactly
and
especially
like
when,
for
example,
he
was
working
on
the
faq
and
yeah
the
the
only
way
he
was.
I
don't
know
the
english
word,
but,
for
example,
if
someone
has
to
give
him
feedback
on
what
he's
writing
he
feels
like
he
has
to
go
specifically
to
someone
and
say
hey.
I
want
your
feedback
instead
of
like
the
whole
community.
Looking
at
that
and
yeah,
just
like
the
community,
giving
the
feedback.
E
F
And
there's
the
advice
process
section
too,
that
we
could
like
guide
people
towards
there
when
we
hear
that
someone
wants
feedback
for
something.
I
think
we're
not
we're
not
using
that
enough.
Also,
and-
and
I
I
do
like
the
idea
of
a
library,
but
at
the
same
time
I
feel
like
it's
really
hard
to
keep
it
updated,
and
maybe
it
would
be
easier
to
just
like
search
in
the
forum,
but
we
can
talk
about
that
in
cons.
Probably.
E
A
E
Yeah-
and
I
mean
the
form
could
be
better
organized
like
definitely
the
tech
params
is
not
as
organized
as
I'd
like
it
to
be.
I'm
sure.
That's
just
always
going
to
be
the
case
with
everything
you
know
it's.
Never
it
can
always
be
better,
but
like
it
could
be
cleaner,
it
could
be
better
organized.
It
could
like.
We
have
all
these
headings,
but
some
of
them
are
not
right.
A
A
F
B
F
B
A
F
A
A
A
B
So
yeah
so
the
zap,
and
I
would
do
it
ourselves
first,
because
I'm
in
the
trial
audit,
we
actually
didn't
try
the
audit.
Other
working
groups
tried
the
audit
and
zeb
and
I
haven't
done
it
for
the
for
our
working
group.
So
what
you
would
do
is
answer
this
checklist
for
us
and
then
we
will
once
we
have
this,
we
have
completed
the
checklist.
We
will
post
it
in
the
forum
and
yeah
get
the
feedback
from
the
from
the
community.
B
So
if
something
is
something
needs
to
be
improved
during
this
process,
then
you
would
improve
it
before
rolling
it
out
again.
Finally,
to
the
other
working
groups,
we
just
want
to
show
also
everyone
how
how
the
whole
process
is
done
once
we
now
that
the
document
is
final
yeah.
I
wanted
to
know
if,
because
we,
as
I
mentioned
before,
that
we
have
revised
the
checklist,
so
can
we
just
go
proceed
with
it
or
should
it
also?
Should
we
post
it
again
in
the
forum
and
go
through
the
advice
process.
F
E
B
B
A
A
B
I
actually
want
to
focus
on
the
road
or
the
timeline
of
the
audit,
like
we.
I
know
that
our
target
is
to
finish
the
this
sprint,
the
audit
for
the
transparency
working
group,
but
I
also
want
to
plot
in
our
roadmap
when
we
start
to
when
we
target
to
have
the
audit
for
other
working
groups
as
well.
So
they
can
also
have
an
idea
and
prepare
for
it.
A
Document
that
dam
is
using
for
the
roadmaps
and
we
work
there
and,
yes,
we,
instead
of
having
dates
having
it
on
a
sprint
with
it.
I
think
it
makes
more
sense
because
all
the
working
groups
are
doing
it.
This
way,
yep,
okay,
anyone
know
where
I
can
find
this
document
I
feel
like
I
can
run
from
the
calendar
by
going
this
wash.
A
A
G
A
A
G
A
A
B
G
I
think
it
works
for
the
working
groups
that
are
more
active
because
it
gives
some
perspective
or
to
working
groups
that
are
like
very
into
a
bubble.
What
about
like?
They
are
very
hard
working
on
like
their
spec.
Probably
parameters
like
it
would
be
nice
just
to
have
like
that
perspective
and
self
self
reflection,
but
yeah,
because
I
feel
it's.
It's
also
an
exercise
healthy
to
do
before
the
hatch.
E
I'll
take
it
yeah.
I
actually
think
it
would
be
good
to
do
all
of
them
before
the
hashtag.
The
only
one
that
I
wanted,
just
like
the
ones
that
are,
I
feel
like
most
of
the
groups,
are
actually
ahead
of
the
game
doing
well,
so
the
only
one
that
I'm
like
a
little
you
know
concerned
with
is
common
swarm
so,
but
the
common
swarm
also
is
very
transparent,
like
we
have
so
much
great
documentation
and
all
that
stuff.
E
E
F
A
H
A
B
A
E
I
was
just
going
to
say
that
the
teams
that
are
the
most
ahead
right
now
are
legal.
Like
legal's
done,
I
mean
they
can
do
it
on
it.
Whenever
you
want
man
and
they
could
probably
use
it
as
an
opportunity
to
really
just
like
disseminate
their
stuff.
I
think
working
group
omega
isn't
doesn't
have
anything,
that's
critical
to
hatch
and
would
probably
appreciate
it
and
for
rams.
We
need
it
the
most
because
we
haven't
touched
our
manifesto
in
like
since
we
we
never,
let's
just
go
with
numbers.
H
A
Okay
yeah,
so
then
what
we
could
do
is,
for
example,
next
spring
we
do
params
and
yeah,
and
I
think
we
do
the
same
as
we
did
with
the
trailer
with
the
other
one.
We
offer
our
help,
but
we
also
let
them
do
their
own
if
they
want
yeah,
let's
then
decide
who
they
want
to
go
through,
but
yeah
and
we
will
do
the
full
process
and
then
we
go
through
advice,
process
and
and
then
yeah
in
the
advice
process.
A
A
A
D
A
A
A
A
When
we
say
here,
we
understand
that
each
individual
recognizes
acknowledge
and
contributes
to
or
values
principles
through
some
boundaries,
even
if
it's
not
complete
yet,
but
it
makes
sense
to
link
the
keyboard
here.
So
if
someone
wants
more
information,
they
jump
onto
the
book
word
where
we
have
yeah
all
that
information.
A
E
F
A
A
A
A
A
G
Right
just
before
we
start
you
start
reading,
shall
we
include
the
or
is
it
included
the
terms
and
conditions,
because
it's
also
a
form
of
accountability
method,
even
if
it
is
for
the
whole
community?
It's
also
for
internal
use.
I
mean
we
all
do
the
same.
We
all
fold
kind
of
the
same
terms
and
conditions
so
shall
we
put
it
there
or
we
just
don't
just.
F
Yeah,
I
sorry
it
was
actually
there
and-
and
I
made
a
comment
on
it
and
then
I
think
you
guys
delete
it,
but
maybe
we
can
understand,
because
the
thought
I
had
was
that
the
code
of
conduct
and
the
terms
and
conditions
they
are
like
the
metrics
for
mutual
accountability.
They're,
not
really
a
method
like
the
methods
that
we
have
are
like
the
meetings
being
recorded.
G
A
G
Yeah,
I
think
it
could
be,
as
libby
mentioned,
have
an
intro,
a
small
intro
that
says
the
following:
mozilla
accountability
methods
are
in
based
off
of
the
terms
and
conditions
that
you
can
check
here
and
that's
it
just
to
have
a
context,
because
otherwise
people
wouldn't
know
that
this
belongs
to
somewhere.
Maybe
bigger.
F
F
A
F
A
A
F
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
Maybe
I
will
I'm
sorry,
maybe
for
the
introduction,
it's
good
to
mention
something
why
we
are
doing
this
method.
I
mean
why
what
the
importance
of
neutral
accountability
and
why
we
are
doing
it
just
a
short
introduction.
Maybe
I
can
add
something
later
or
tomorrow
after
yeah,
maybe
just
a
little
content,
yeah
like
a
context
or
why
why
we
are
but
yeah
what
the
importance
of
mutual
accountability
in
these.
B
A
A
B
The
task
can
I
interrupt
before
the
meetings
being
recorded.
I
just
I
just
realized
that
the
last
statement
is
kind
is
contradicting
to
what
we
have
in
the
meeting
attendance
terms,
because
we
actually
discourage
them
to.
Maybe
we
just
have
to
make
it
clear
that
the
that
they
volunteer
to
record
the
calls
and
send
it
to
transparency
working
group
and
not
do
it
by
themselves
and
use
it
for
their
personal
use,
because
I
remember
that,
oh,
we
discourage
them
to
record
the
calls
for
personal
use.
B
A
A
G
Yes,
but
the
I
mean
this
community
members
also
encourage
the
volunteer
to
recall
the
calls.
It's
not
it's
not
a
way
to
mutual
accountability
like
it
doesn't
like.
I
don't
see
the
context.
This
is
something
that
should
be
on
top
of
the
meetings,
not
something
that
should
be
on
emotional
accountability,
section
because
it
doesn't
really.
It
doesn't,
has
nothing
to
do
with
accountability.
H
H
G
A
Actually
we're
on
the
top
of
the
hour
and
yeah.
I
know
you
guys
have
other
things
to
do
so.
I
think
we
could
close
it
here
and
maybe
when
me
and
you
leave
it
to
the
interview,
we
could
have
like
five
minutes
to
doing
the
last
touch
and
I'll
be
also
going
to
yeah,
add
something
there
and
yeah.
We
just
think,
and
I
think
it's
almost
ready
so
yeah.