►
Description
The Transparency Working Group promotes transparency, openness and mutual monitoring as a high-level ideal that we're moving towards at the TEC. The way that we get there is by empowering people to share this experience with the Transparency Audits and making information available to everyone.
We gather every Monday at 5pm CET.
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
So
oh
yeah,
like
basically
like
I
I'm
going
to
post
like
the
the
funding
proposal
for
advice
process
today,
probably
after
this
call
and
yeah
so
maybe
like
we
can
get
the
proposal
up
for
the
next
before
the
community
call
on
the
yeah.
It
would
be.
We
can
post
it
before
the
community
call
and
we
can
announce
it
there.
So
yeah.
We
can
have
like
the
proposal
already
on
conviction
voting.
A
A
Ivy
and
with
the
budget
we
had
like
previously,
it
can
get
like
all
data
conversation
and
the
sample
work
can
get
funded
from
there
and
it's
it's
fine,
it's
not
very
expensive,
so
yeah.
I
wanted
to
update
that
and
then
also
yeah
any
question
regarding
this
budget.
Like
is
basically
like
16k,
but
since
we
have
like
5k
it's
going
to
be
like
11k
around.
A
I
don't
know
if
you
guys
had
the
chance
to
read
it.
It's
this
dog
is
being
up
for
quite
some
time
but
yeah
unless,
like
there
is
an
objection
on
something
I'll
post
it
for
advice
process
for
the
community.
Today.
C
A
Okay,
I
think,
like
yeah,
we
can
talk
about
this
spreadsheet.
A
Yeah
this
document,
like
I,
was
watching
it
the
other
day
and
for
some,
like
you
know,
this
cat
cat
looks
like
it's
open
like
the
steroids
is
not
there.
I
mean
I
didn't
track
everything
but
yeah
just
looking
around
like
it
doesn't
look
updated
like
or
at
least
conviction
voting.
B
I
mean
entered
all
the
recent
votes
that
we
had
in
different
platforms,
but
I
would
need
your
help
in
updating
the
other.
The
other
columns
like,
for
example,
in
the
advice
process.
I
think.
A
We
can
yeah,
we
can
do
it
now,
okay,
so
the
last
one
I
mean
I
feel
like
this
is
like.
At
least
this
is
like
the
last
one.
A
A
B
Was
it
was
already
there
when
I,
when
I
checked
when
I
checked
it
last
week?
Okay,.
A
B
I
think
you
just
have
to
check
all
the
platforms
in
the
data
sources.
A
B
Yeah
yeah
and
then
yeah
for
your
wrong
choice.
You
just
have
this
check
snapshot
if
there
are
new,
newer
boots.
A
B
Then
for
the
yeah,
the
advice
process
is
updated.
I
updated
this
one
and
then
the
conviction
voting.
I
think
what
I
haven't
added
here
yet
is
the
stewards
funding.
A
B
I
miss
the
I
missed
the
marketing
part.
I
thought
that
because
when
I
saw
home
steam
dao,
I
I
thought
the
because
I
just
saw
that
the
one
in
the
the
one
in
the
gardens
right
now
is
for
animation,
video
production.
I
missed
it.
I
thought
this
marketing
team
is
the
same
as
that
one
so
yeah.
So
there
are
still
two
yeah.
It's.
A
Proposal
like
actually
it's
important
like
we
get
them
all
otherwise,
like
you
know,
when
you
make
oh
where's
the
money
right
like
if
you
do
all
the
accounting
and
if
you
miss
one
proposal,
then
you
mix
like
let's
say
like
we
don't
put
this
proposal
and
then
when
we
do
the
accounting
it's
like.
Oh,
where
are
these
966
dollars?
You
know
so
yeah
yeah.
D
A
All
the
proposals,
and
also
in
the
demon
actually
in
the
garden,
you
will
have
like
more
information,
but
in
the
evening
for
doing
the
account
you
know
to
do
the
accounting.
The
unit
is
better
because
it's
more
simple
and
you
can
see
all
them
here.
You
know
the
ones
that
are
you
know
this
one
is
active.
You
know,
okay,
our
active
proposals.
A
Right
now
are
those
three:
the
animation,
video
production,
the
star
wars
and
retroactive
funding,
and
then
all
the
others
are
executed,
and
then
yeah,
just
you
know,
make
sure
like
we
have
all
of
those
here,
but
then
there
you
can
also
get
there
on
them.
On
the
oh,
this
browser
will
pro
oh
yeah.
It
would
so
you
can
see
like
the
open
ones,
the
completed
the
remove
it.
The
challenge
and
yeah
well
like
remove
probably
yeah
this
one
from
star
wars,
and
I
don't
know
what
this
one
is.
B
A
Yeah,
I
think,
like
the
this
part,
is
good
to
you
know
if
you
want
to
get
some
information
like
it's
not
indian,
like
you
know
that,
because
in
this
decision,
tracking
ratio
was
putting,
you
know
who
did
the
proposal
either
they
probably
you
get
today,
yeah
yeah
the
date
amount
requested
yeah,
you
don't
see
like
the
amount
request
like
you
know
like
this
is
good
for
doing
like
the
counting
to
see
everything
is
correct,
but
this
in
this
source,
you
have
like
more
detailed
information
to
feel
like
this
dog.
A
Downloading,
I
think
it's
not
here
yeah,
it's
not
so
the
only
so
like
you
unit,
like
double
thing,
will
be
tracked
in
here.
So
yeah,
basically
like
it's
like
all
these
fees,
that
cliff
is
supporting
every
period,
I
think
is,
there's
still
more
left
but
yeah.
That's
it
once
we
have
like
all
this
in
this
dog
we're
good
to
go.
A
Okay,
so
yeah.
The
next
topic
is
data.
Standardization.
Do
you
want
to
do
the
pres,
the
presentation
rex?
I
also
had
the
meeting
with
grief
and
we
were
chatting
a
little
bit,
but
I
can
update
that
after
you
do
the
presentation.
C
D
This
is
what
we've
built
since
last
week,
we've
established
we've
tried
to
simplify
down
the.
D
One
of
the
working
of
gravitas
to
a
single
excel
and
we've
included
some
extra
categorizations
and
information
here
this
one
here
so
with
the
goal
of
just
having
one
place
where
the
working
groups
can
kind
of
fill
in
their
information
and
then
create
views
from
that
and
aggregate
we've
also
created
some
some
of
the
views
from
this
working
group's
data
so
works.
D
D
D
A
D
And
if
you're
and
another
thing
I'd
like
to
show
is
that
we've
added
some
validation
rules
onto
so
to
make
it
simpler,
you
know
if
they're
filling
out
by
token
they
can
click
on
here
and
well.
It's
got
all
the
different
tokens.
They
can
do
categories
already
preset
and
says
projects,
so
project
is
one
that
like
to
discuss
whether
to
keep
or
to
hide
it.
No,
because
I
think
that
it's
useful
in
future,
but
embarrassing,
that's
not
needed
yet.
So
I
don't
know.
A
Great
yeah,
this
is
amazing,
regarding,
like
my
chat
with
grief
like
it's
like
you
know,
we
have
the
agency
to
do
like
the
best
way
we
we
think
and
and
yeah
we
can't
agree.
Like
you
know,
making
everything
by
the
transparency
working
group
is
not
scalable,
as
you
say
before
rex,
but
right
now
there
is
also
not
so
much
working
groups.
A
So
what
what
I
think
that
would
be
a
good
solution
is,
like
you
know,
make
this.
This
template
open
and
you
know,
create
a
not
open
like
half
a
template,
so
anyone
can
feel
it
like
make
when
we,
since
we
are
going
to
make
a
snapshot
boat
like
to
show
transparency
around
how
much
every
person
is
making
on
the
dial,
and
we
need
to
do
a
firm
boat
for
that.
A
We
can
also,
you
know,
sneak
this
document
and
say
like
hey
and
in
order
to
make
transparency
job
easier,
like
it'd,
be
nice
like,
if
you
guys
track
your
your
your
things
here
and
then
you
already
have
it,
but
you
know
if
a
working
group
don't
want
to
do
it
as
long
as
if
they
provide
the
data
on
the
work
or
in
a
discord,
chat
or
wherever
they
want
like.
A
We
can
just
fill
this
data
like
you
did
here
for
gravity,
but
we
can
do
it
manually
like
by
the
with
the
transparency
people,
and
you
know
if
it's
in
any
moment
we
see
like
okay.
This
is
too
much
working
groups
too
much
people
we
can
attract
this.
Then
we
can
say
like
okay,
everyone
has
to
do
this,
but
for
now
like
people
is
busy
enough-
and
you
know
like,
if
you
tell
them
to
do
more
things,
you
know
probably
majority
will
say:
oh
yeah
I'll
do
it
and
you
will
not
have
any
problem.
A
So
you
know
we
can
make
it
open
like
you
want
to
do
it
to
it,
and
if
you
don't
and
it's
fine,
we
will
do
it
for
you,
but
because,
if
someone
is
not
doing
it
and
then
you
have
to
be
like
hey,
did
you
finish
it?
Oh,
it's
pretty
annoying
right
and
as
long
as
they
do
their
accounting,
it
doesn't
matter
how
they
do
it,
but
we
can
just
pick
the
data
from
there
and
and
type
type
it
by
us.
D
D
So
yeah,
okay
yeah,
we.
D
We
can
we
can
go
and
implement
it
with
it
group
by
group
and
and
kind
of
move
them
onto
this
if
they
agree
because
yeah
yeah
yeah
and
once
you
have
a
couple
groups,
we
can
do
a
an
aggregated
one
so
that
it
feeds
the
information
from
every
single
other
spreadsheet
just
straight
onto
one,
and
it
gives
us
the
quantities.
A
D
D
Seeing
like
who's
getting
what
you
probably
should
do
them
by
the
discord
hashtag
id,
not
this
because
yeah
like
then
say
you
do
this
right,
then
attribution
you're,
gonna
get
two.
D
A
B
A
D
D
C
D
No,
but
if
you
want
to
keep
it
simple.
F
Yeah,
no,
I
think
it's
I
think
it's
great
and
what
you
guys
are
saying
yeah.
I
think
your
working
groups,
they
they
don't
have
the
time
to
do
it
or
whatever
I
think
we
can.
We
can
do
it
so
yeah.
I
agree
on
that
yeah
and
I
just
think
we
might
need
just
to
maybe
work
on
a
little
details.
That
rex-
and
I
were
talking
about-
like
you
know,
like
the
date
format.
I
think
that
would
be
important
to
have
like.
A
A
Good
yeah,
definitely
it
it's
easier
for
everyone,
like
europeans
or
americans,
but
then
for
the
numbers
like
for
the
comas
like,
I
normally
use
a
coma
after
the
number,
but
people
use
a
dot
right
most
parts
of
the
world,
but
yeah
for
the
months.
Definitely
like
I
like
this
way
like
2022
february.
That's
that's!
That's
everyone's
understand
that.
F
Cool
okay,
yeah
yeah,
so
yeah,
I
don't
know
if
maybe
ivy
wants
to
give
more
like
a
general
comments
on
it.
I
I
I
for
me
we're
like
talking
about
like
the
project
column
and
maybe
looking
at
the
graphs
a
little
bit,
but
maybe
first,
if
you.
B
Want
can
you
put
the
link
in
the
document
because
this,
it's
too
small
for
me
to
read
on
this
on
the
share
screen.
A
Make
sure
like
this
document
is
finished,
and
then
we
have
like
an
empty
template
like
so
basically
like
we
can
make
the
phone
post
and
share
the
empty
template.
So
anyone
you
know
it'd
be
great
if
the
other
working
groups
do
it
for
us,
but
if.
A
F
F
So,
for
example,
for
the
project
column,
I
was
telling
rex
that
I
still
don't
quite,
for
example
here
for
gravity,
for
how
I
see
it
it
it
can.
It
can
be
like
a
sub
category,
but
this
moment
I
don't
really
know
what
could
we
add
there?
I
was
thinking
it
more
about
like
projects
like,
for
example,
in
omega
that
they
have
like
the
concealers
library
that,
for
me,
that's
kind
of
like
a
project
that
they
have
and
that's
their
only
like
funded
project
that
they
have.
F
A
F
A
Yeah,
I
mean
I
don't
have
a
strong
opinion,
but
I
like
what
versus
about
keeping
things
simple,
but
I
don't
know
I
love
to
hear
from
you
rex
like.
Why
would
you
think,
like
this
project,
that
it's
important
like
in
the
future,
I
know
like
you
said
right
now
is
not
so
important,
but
in
the
future
might
be,
and
it's
good
to
have
it
there.
If
it's
going
to
happen.
D
It
doesn't
bother
them,
but
I
know
some
of
the
working
groups
do
have
do
running
projects,
some
of
them
don't
so
and
as
working
groups
get
bigger,
they're
gonna
naturally
split
into
projects.
Well,
that's
why
that
one
is
there
as
a
future
proven.
D
B
Cool
yeah,
I
think,
oh,
it's,
this
column
is
a
nice
to
have,
but
it's
not
necessary
because
I
think
we
can
just
keep
it
simple,
like
the
information
that
we'll
be
presenting
as
much
as
possible
as
much
as
possible
is
like
similar
across
all
working
groups
like,
for
example,
the
category.
I
think
the
category
the
categories
are
the
same
for
all
working
groups,
but
projects
are
different
like
yeah,
just
maybe
like.
Maybe
we
can
just
keep
it
simple
and
remove
the
column
that
that's
not
similar
across
all
the
working
groups.
D
A
What's
that
like
an
empty
template
like
now,
this
is
like
the
job
done
for
gravity,
but
yeah
it'd
be
nice.
If
we
have
an
empty
one
that
all
the
working
groups
can
just
copy.
D
A
One
to
show
how
it
looks
right,
but
then
it's
also
having
you
know
and
a
second
one
like
it's
empty.
So
it's
like
people
only
typing
information.
There.
F
What
I
was
thinking
in
regards
to
that,
maybe
we
can
like
do
like
a
template
one,
but
like
with
fake
amounts
and
with
fake
discord,
handles
and
like
that
it's
filled,
so
people
see
how
it
actually
works,
but
that
they
can
remove
everything
and,
just
like
start
filling
their
own
information.
Just.
A
A
C
D
I
think
that
I
didn't
mention.
Sorry
is
another
thing
that
we
could
do
and
I
haven't
played
around
with.
Is
you
can,
instead
of
having
an
excel?
We
can
you
use
the
google?
What's
the
name
of
it.
D
D
That
would
populate
this
automatically
from
the
google
form
entry
and
give
the
other
things,
but
that
one's
like
I'm
impartial
to
that
one.
It
won't
take
too
long.
A
I
mean,
I
think
you
know
the
more
information
you
have
like
is
you
know
better
like
what's
it?
What
is
for
me
super
important,
like
it
gets
less
information
to
feel
by
the
people,
but
then,
if
we
use
this
data,
they
are
giving
us
like
the
to
get
more
information.
Yeah
great.
D
It's
it's
it's
not
about
kind
of
more
data
or
less
data.
It's
just
a
matter
of.
Do
we
want
them
to
have
to
use
this,
go
down
to
the
bottom
and
kind
of
fill
it
out.
I
don't
know.
A
A
A
F
Yeah
and
about
using,
like
the
google
form,
I
didn't,
really
know,
how
would
it
look
like,
maybe
at
some
point
we
can
like
give
it
a
try
and
see
if
it
makes
things
easier.
I
I
don't
quite
understand
like
what
would
be
like
the
the
difference
or
the
benefit
of
doing
it,
but
we
can
we.
B
D
Fight
yeah,
yeah,
okay,
I
can
show
you.
I
just
can't
find
the
button.
B
A
Yeah,
I
think
like
we
can
keep
it
simple.
Put
the
you
know,
like
the
working
groups
just
put
and
fill
it
like.
You
know
in
the
last
one
because
yeah
it's
the
easiest
way
and
then
every
year
like
they
make
a
new
dog
and
that's
it
yeah,
I
don't
know
like
do
you
think.
That's
good
good.
A
F
A
D
D
I
haven't
done
one
with
just
graphs:
I've
done
it
split
it.
So
our
phone
influence
details
is
kind
of
the
the
place
to
fill
out
yeah
and
then
our
influence
summary
gives
them
outflows
per
month
inflows
per
month.
Cash
flow
overview,
which
is
the
three
net
inflow
outflow
and
the
remaining
budget,
because
I
saw
these
were
the
ones
that,
with
gravitas
already
had
categories
graphs
are
the
ones
where
you
can
see.
Spending
spending
by
each
working
group.
D
F
F
Yeah
so
like
what
I
was
thinking
is
that
maybe
we
could
just
keep
all
the
graphs
like
in
the
first
half,
so
we
just
have
one.
My
idea
was:
maybe
we
we
would
be
creating
kind
of
like
a
dashboard
with
all
the
graphs
that
the
the
group
needs
and
here
on
this
tab.
Actually
I
don't
know
what
you
guys
think,
but
what
I
was
thinking
is
that,
like
the
inflow
and
outflow
graph,
it's
actually
showing
the
same
information
than
the
cash
flow
overview.
F
So
maybe
we
could
remove
like
the
first
two
and
just
keep
the
cash
flow
overview.
So
we
have
less
graphs
and
just
bring
the
the
one
that
shows
category
expenses
over
here.
So
then
we
will
have
like
three
graphs
like
super
neat
and
clear
and
and
kind
of
like
build
the
dashboard
for
the
for
the
working
group.
B
Can
we
also
add
the
currency
if
it's
like
absolutely
or
it's
easy?
I
know
that
they're
all
in
excite,
but
at
first
look.
People
will
be
wondering
if
we're
talking
about
tec
here
for.
D
So
the
cash
flow
yeah-
I
don't
know
you
see
here-
I've
added
I've
added
token
here.
So
the.
B
B
Yeah,
but
I
mean
the
graph
itself,
is
it
possible
to
indicate
there
in
the
graph
itself
like
let's
say
outflows,
those
are
numbers.
Are
they?
It
would
be
nice
to
say
that
these
numbers
are
in
x
cyber
into
ac.
D
D
A
B
That's
also
my
question:
what
if,
in
the
cash
flow,
there
is
some
tec
and
then
there's
some
x
example
they're
like?
Would
they
be
like
separate
drafts
or.
D
So
at
the
moment
I
haven't
created
graphs,
so
they'll
show
so
the
pivot
table
here
in
in
the
influencer
summary.
Let's
change!
If
I
order
the
tokens
by
descending
yeah
there
we
go
okay.
So
if
I
add
so
there
isn't
a
tc
one
at
the
moment.
But
if
I
go
and
change
this
git
going
grant
to
give
to
tc
on
the
inflow
and
outflow
summary,
it
does
show
here
the
information.
D
D
A
I
will
get
rid
of
the
graph
then
like
instead
of
getting
wrong
information,
or
I
think
like
we
can
just
get
the
I
mean,
that's
my
opinion,
but
yeah
I
think,
like
the
graphs
are
not
cool
if
they
are
like
potentially
misleading
information.
A
D
A
Yeah,
it's
because,
like
let
me
show
my
screen
this
other
browser.
B
So
I
also
have
another
question:
zepty
or
rex.
I
know
how
about
the
conversions.
Are
they
also
gonna
go
into
this
into
the
sheet
like
I
know,
the
the
stewart's
working
group
is
getting,
they
will
receive
xa,
but
I
think
the
outflow
will
be
in
cec,
so
I
don't
know
how?
A
A
F
More
complicated
actually
so
for
that
I
I've
also
been
thinking
about
this,
and
I
think
that
the
possible
solution
that
could
be
done
because
tokens
and
what
working
groups
start
having
like
in
terms
of
tokens.
In
my
mind,
it's
kind
of
like
an
asset.
So
probably
because
this
is
just
like
a
tracking
sheet
for
all
the
movements
right.
We
can
track
the
different
ins
and
outs
of
of
transaction,
but
maybe
what
we
could
do
also.
But
it's
also
kind
of
like
more
work.
F
It's
a
balance
sheet
that
actually
shows
the
different
assets
that
each
working
group
has.
So,
for
example,
I
was
building
one
for
gravity
and
in
the
asset
section
it
includes
like,
for
example,
the
amount
of
cash.
Then,
in
this
case
we
can
say
it's
xi,
but
also
the
other
different
tokens
that
they
have.
F
So
I
added
there
that
they
have
like
the
tdc
and-
and
you
can
add
any
other
token,
that
you
have
right,
so
that
could
be
a
way
to
keep
it
registered
all
the
different
tokens
that
they
have,
but
it's
kind
of,
like
yeah,
I
don't
know,
would
be
like
another
document.
Probably
in
my
mind
I
don't
know.
D
The
so
the
way
I've
built
this
out
is:
oh,
I'm
not
trying
my
screen
anymore,
okay,
yeah
I'll,
do
an
entire
screen
right.
The
way
I
pulled
this
out
is
so
the
influent
outflow
details
gives
you
a
category
and
in
this
case
it's
going
to
give
him
tc
given
x
day,
but
I
built
a
metadata
sheet
that
gets
those
three
tokens
with.
So,
if
the
yeah,
if
you're
getting
heath
from
the
coin,
grants
he's
there-
and
now
it
just
appears
here
if
they
had
a
numerous
assets.
D
This
spreadsheet
expands
to
that
already.
F
D
D
The
actual
data
here
you
can
see
tc
is
now
showing
up.
Ethereum
is
now
showing
up
right.
This
grand
total
one
needs
good.
I
need
to
change
that
to
change
the
way
the
pivot
table.
It
works
because
it's
just
adding
them
one
to
one
moment,
but
you
can
see
that
it
gives
you
info
outflow
and
then
the
total
balance
so
well
like
in
3
000.
There
you
go
ideally.
A
D
Total
the
grand
total
is,
is
working
properly
because
it's
saying
that
one
x
dies,
one
tc
is
one
ethereum
yeah
yeah
or
this
one.
I
need
to
take
it
out.
Basically,.
F
A
D
D
D
A
I
I
honestly
would,
unless
we
have
like
a
good
graph
data
input,
I
would
just
get
like.
I
don't
think.
Like
you
know,
photographers,
like
the
community
have
like
the
the
graphs
on
doom
right,
I
would
just
get
rid
of
those
like
if
those
are
not
being
like
unless
we
find
the
solution
right
like
if
we
find
the
solution
to
get
all
the
data
correctly,
that's
great,
but
then
we
also
need
to
work
on
another
sheet
like
it's
integrating
all
of
those
right
or
you
can
have
like.
F
A
F
A
F
F
A
B
Manageable
to
to
put
graphs
for
each
token,
I
don't
know
how
much
work.
A
It's
gonna
remember
that,
ideally,
this
gets
done
by
the
working
groups
themselves
and
you
are
asking
like
the
working
groups,
depending
which
token
you're
using
you,
should
create
a
graph,
and
it's
like
you
know,
adding
more
or
also.
Let's
do
words.
I
think
if
we
get
all
this
data
and
we
then
have
like
our
own
sheet-
and
we
can
manage
this
better,
but
this
one
like
it's
like
the
one
like
people's
using,
keep
it
as
simple
as
possible.
A
So
they
you
know,
and
then
we
can
play
with
the
aggregated
one
and
then
actually
sample
will
be
looking
at.
Their
great,
for
example,
will
not
be
looking
at
this
one.
F
D
A
F
No,
the
idea
of
creating
like
a
dashboard
here
in
just
one
tab
with
all
the
graphs.
I
think
that
was
gonna,
be
like
super
useful
and
helpful
for
working
groups
and
it's
all
visual
and
yeah.
I
just
think
that
it
was.
I
just
think
it's
really
worth
it
to
have
them
actually
those
three
graphs
for
me.
That
would
be-
maybe
I
don't
know,
what's
the
difference
between
these
two
racks,
but
one
of
the
differences,
this
one's
just
a
total-
and
this
is
just.
F
F
Dune,
I
don't
think
because
what
we
also
want
to
do
is
like
to
concentrate
all
the
info
in
one
document
right
like
I.
I
don't
think
it's
really
helpful
like
you
will
have
this
sheet,
but
then
the
working
group
has
to
go
to
dune,
to
look
at
the
graphs
and
find
them
somewhere
and
the
graphs
are
not
that
neat
and
they
are
not
that
clear.
I
think
so
I
don't
know.
In
my
opinion,
I
I
insist
like
our
clearness
is.
A
Sure,
like
medium,
are
clear,
like
all
the
information
in
them
is
accurate
here,
not
so
the
only
thing
I'm
trying
to
say
is
like
I
think
we
should
not
confuse
people
and
adding
workload
to
them
like
because
it's
not
going.
You
know
you
give
this
to
star
wars
and
they
put
their
info
in
there
and
they
will
see
graph
like
they
represent
nothing
to
them.
F
D
E
D
A
D
E
A
I
mean
I,
I
kind
of
really
like
the
graphs
are
great,
but
if
we
you
know,
we
either
make
this
that
it
works
for
all
the
tokens
or
we
don't
show
it
because
you
know
we
have
like
imagine
like.
When
working
groups
get
that
hit
on
ground,
they
will
have
pambala,
they
will
have
eve,
they
will
have
died,
they
will
have
to
die,
they
will
have
a
lot
of
tokens
right
like
and
it's
eventually
what
is
happening
right.
A
For
like
the
tcp
commons,
like
we
have
a
grants
and
there
is
a
lot
of
tokens
there
and
I
mean
in
the
dc
one
we
decided
just
to
you,
know,
sell
all
the
tokens
may
become
them
x,
die
and
then
send
it
to
the
common
pool
and
that's
it
so
in
this
case
it's
easy,
but
you
know,
gravity
can
choose
whole
tokens
of
other
projects
if
they
want
and
we
don't
like,
you,
don't
need
to
obligate
anyone.
F
Oh,
no,
exactly
that's
what
I
meant
like.
I
think
it's
important
to
consider
that
this
is
this
is
for
like
the
actual
operations
of
each
working
group,
so
I
don't
think
it
would
be
like
that
viable
to
have
the
operations
happening
in
different
tokens
right.
If
we
want
to
reflect
like
the
different
tokens
that
working
groups
have,
we
might
have
to
make
like
another
document
that
that
serves
that
purpose.
F
So
for
now,
just
like
focus
on
the-
and
this
was
something
I
think
we
were
talking
with
gideon
like
right
now.
We
want
to
focus
like
on
the
different
analysis
of
the
operations
of
each
working
group
and
if,
if
working
groups
are
operating
in
x-I
or
let's
say
it's
towards
operating,
I
guess
that's
fine,
I
I
don't
think
they
will
operate
like
in
five
different
tokens
right,
like
their
actual
operations.
D
Depends
on
work
agreements
with
themselves.
If
what
you're
telling
me
is
that
stewards
sell
tc,
so
they
in
reality
the
weight
should
work
for
students
before
they're
doing
is
selling
tc,
buying,
x,
diet
and
then
sending
x
day
out.
There
would
be
a
transaction
cost
of
nothing
to
turn
it
from
excited
tc,
so
you'd
have
an
inflow.
D
A
Yeah,
I
guess
that
worked
for
so
much
but
again
like
I
think
it
depends
on
work
agreements
like
if
you
know
eventually
like
I
it's
something
like
I'm
not
doing,
because
you
know
it's
like
a
small
project,
but
for
transparency.
I
at
some
point
I
was
thinking
you
know,
holding
some
bitcoin
holding
some
is
or
you
know
so,
some
tokens
that
generate
revenue
in
the
long
term.
So
we
also
have
some
inflows.
If
we
do
trust
me
management
and
you
know
well,
of
course
you
can
also
lose
money.
A
Just
for
the
dc,
like
everything,
we're
building
is
to
be
replicated.
So
if
we
create
a
that,
you
know
that
it's
good
for
everyone
in
every
commons
everywhere.
That's
what
we
want.
I
mean
we
are
trying
like,
of
course
like
we
don't.
We
are
not
solve
all
the
transparency
issues
for
all
the
dollars
in
the
world,
but
at
least
try
our
best
to
accomplish
that.
That's
our
goal
actually.
F
Yeah,
and
I
also
think
that
each
working
group
will
and
also
like
each
title,
what
you're
saying
safety
will
have
like
different
needs
and
there
will
be
have
to
be
some
kind
of
personalization
of
the
at
some
point
like,
for
example,
token
type
categories
as
well
might
change
you
know.
So
that
will
be
like
some
work
that
the
working
group
that
actually
uses
it
will
have
to
right.
A
E
D
D
D
A
Yeah,
I
mean
basically
what
honestly,
what
I
would
do
is
like
get
rid
of
the
of
the
charge
because
they're
giving
misinformation
but
like
if
there
is
very
strong
opinions
on
that
like
what
we
should
do
is
advise
process
on
the
community.
Like
I
don't
know,
if
any
of
you
want
to
open
a
forum
post
so.
B
A
Amazing
call
yeah
see
you
live.
F
Yeah,
so
just
real
quick
safety.
I
guess
we
we're
leaving.
Now
I
don't
know
how
about
you
guys.
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
maybe
something
we
could
do
is
to
actually
present
it
in
gravity
and
just
ask
them
like.
Is
this
actually
useful
for
you?
Do
you
think
it
provides
you
like
good
value,
good
insights
and
see
see
what
happens
because,
like
okay,
maybe
like
you're
saying
it
doesn't
work
for
every
working
group,
but
this
one
actually
that
we
just
built.
F
A
I
mean
if
the
working
group
wants
a
spreadsheet
like
they
can
create
themselves
like
we
are
like
you
know,
like
it's
also
important
like
right.
Now
we
are
bringing
the
transparency
hat
and
what
we
are
building
is
like
for
transparency
for
the
community,
we're
not
providing
accounting
services
to
gravity
like
it's.
Not
our
mission,
like
you
know,
and
you
know,
if
gravity
wants
some
accounting
system,
especially
for
them,
they
should
build
it,
but
our
goal
is
to
make
something
like
what's
for
everyone
and
then
especially,
for
example,.
D
With
you-
and
I
say
to
that,
I
say
first
of
all:
it's
three
charts,
so
it
really
doesn't
matter
because
it
takes
like
two
minutes
to
build.
Second,
every
working
group
is
using
xdi.
Others
are
going
to
be
using
other
things,
so
we're
not
going
to
build
the
other
charts
but
we'll
leave
the
x
dive
ones
here.
A
Listen
once
again,
we
know
we
can
get
all
this
data
from
the
from
the
community
and
in
in
and
when
we
have
like
the
final.
You
know
the
document
that
gathers
all
of
them.
We
can
build
the
graph
we
want
and
we
can
change
them
every
time
we
want,
like
you
know,
for
this
audience,
we
are
going
to
build
the
charts
this
way
and
we
present
them
and
for
the
next
audit.
Oh
look.
This
is
like
in
this.
There
is
a
lot
of
balance
in
tc
and
that
needs
to
be
included.
A
So
you
know
on
the
other
like
since,
on
the
audit
like
we
can
do
is,
like
you
know,
say
31
of
march,
like
the
dc
price.
What's
that
and
we
can
say,
like
you
know,
all
these
data
is
based
on
31
of
march
or
whatever
month
we
won,
but
we
can
get
all
the
data
there
and
play
with
the
graph
in
this
other
document.
Dude-
and
you
know
this
one-
we
actually
don't
need
it
like.
I
know
it's,
I
know
it's
cool
for
the
working
group.
D
To
see,
but
let's
keep
it
as
suggestions,
then
so
just
suggestions
of
some
of
the
things
you
can
do,
because
I
think
the
visual
and
seeing
this
isn't
going
to
catch
much
attention,
but
seeing
seeing
it
in
the
graph
form
does
and
it's
going
to
get
us
more
voice.
We
can
present
that's
presented
to
that.
I
suggest
this.
D
Let's
present
it
to
gravitas,
as
is
ask
them
if
they
ask
them
for
their
opinion
and
and
see
where
we,
whether
the
weather,
sorry,
whether
we
keep
these,
which
are
gonna
work
for
everybody
or
whether
we're
done.
A
B
D
A
A
A
But
basically
like
one
like
you
know,
I
don't
send
the
money
to
one
on
both
tc
and
then
send
it
back
to
the
gravity.
Emotion,.
A
D
A
F
F
F
So
we
would
say,
like
on
the
30th
of
april
aragon,
sent
3000
x
died,
then
on
may
1st
gravity
decided
to
take
a
thousand
die
and
spend
it
on
tec
right
so,
like
those
are
like
different
transactions
that
we
will
have
to
record
them.
The.
A
F
A
But
I
mean
you
know
what
what's
the
difference
like
around
sending
you
10
tc
and
sending
it
and
okay
aaron
says
no
to
that.
So
you
just
you
know,
because
it'd
be
transferred
between
performance
and
actually
you
know,
gravity
doesn't
need
to
be
transparent.
How
much
funds
they're
receiving
for
their
clients.
F
D
That's
that's
now:
that's
misleading,
not
the
charts,
like
actually
kind
of
not
showing
the
transactions
and
writing
whatever.
Like
the
moment
you
allow
for
that,
then
this
document
is
no
longer
useful,
which
one
so
this
document
we're
filling
out
here.
The
minute
you
stop
recording
the
transactions
as
they
are.
F
Yeah
but
like
so,
we
we're
we're
hearing
that
from
you
safety,
like
that's
the
thing
right
like
we,
we
are
not
looking
at
the
and.
A
A
A
D
We
supposed
to
ask
the
team
members,
but
what
exactly
happened
on
on
this
transaction?
Six,
two,
two
and
a
half
months
ago:
why
is
there
three
transactions
rather
than
one.
A
But
where,
where
you
know
like
you
know,
gravity
is
a
project.
This
is
another
like
there's
different
things.
What
gravity
you
know
when
gravity
gets
money
gravity
doesn't
need
to
send
this
money
or
give
any
details
to
tc.
A
And
but
gravity
yeah,
but
you
know
like,
and
it's
like,
I'm
a
member
of
the
ttc.
Do
I
need
to
report
everything
I
do
of
course
not.
The
only
thing
I
need
to
report
I
do
is
like
what
I'm
doing
with
the
tc
decimal
and
gravity
needs
to
be
accountable
for
what
they
are
doing
with
the
t
simon,
but
what
they
get
from
you
know
the
external
world
is
their
business,
not
ours.
A
F
F
F
Will
be
for
especially
for
the
multi
sake
of
gravity
and
not
for
the
tc
I
mean
yeah.
I
would
say
those
are
really
really
really
important
questions
to
clarify,
because
now
right
now,
I
can
think
that
at
least
like
my
feeling
around
the
community
is
that
the
tcu
was
kind
of
like
considering
gravity
as
a
possible
revenue
stream
for
the
tc.
Maybe
maybe
that's
not
the
case,
then.
A
F
A
A
We
should
like,
I
think
we
should
dm
juan.
I
think
you
you
can
do
it
yourself.
You'll.
Have
your
agency
like
to
send
the
idea
to
one
if
you're
really
interested
about
the
topic?
The
only
thing
I
I
would
actually
need
is
like
a
template.
You
know
an
empty
template,
so
then
I
can
make
the
form
post.
E
D
A
D
Thank
you
see
you
around.
That
was
great
and
yeah,
so
you're
gonna
be
a
gravity
right,
deceptive.