►
Description
Timecodes:
00:00 - Intentions and distractions
2:02 - Agenda
3:07 - Gravity audit review/feedback
40:08 - CS videos on the TEC Youtube channel
46:08 - Manifesto
47:55 - Call recorders
53:08 - Zenhub issues
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/DDr5kYU
or say hello on Telegram http://t.me/CommonsStack
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/CommonsStack
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
Okay
and
my
intentions
for
the
goal
are
to
go
through
the
agenda
and
especially
now
that
you
are
here
one
my.
My
special
intention
is
to
go
through
the
gravity,
audit
and
yeah
and
see
how
how
it
went.
What
was
your
experience
and
and
see
how
we
can
help,
and
I
don't
have
instructions
at
all
and
I'll
pass
it
to
you,
ivy,
okay,.
B
Yeah,
my
intentions
are
the
same
as
yours.
I
want
to
go
through
the
audit
that
juan
submitted
to
us
and
get
his
feedback
on
the
process
and
see
where
we
can
also
improve
the
audit
process
from
on
our
side
on
our
part.
So
those
are
the
main
things
I'm
interested
in
and
yeah.
I
also
have
the
agenda
and
yeah
and
right
now
I
have
no
distraction
yeah,
just
some
dogs
barking
nearby,
but
I
can
yeah,
that's
it
and
you
won.
C
C
A
A
So,
okay,
that's
the
agenda,
so
we
are
going
to
first
review.
The
gravity.
Audit
then
also
libby,
show
me
interest
and
do
a
soft
audit.
So,
but
I
was
thinking
like
we
first
finalized
with
one
and
do
another
all
the
feedback
we
can.
So
then
we
with
all
the
feedback
and
knowledge
we
gather
we
should
conduct
on
boarding
and
so-called
audit
and
maybe
next
stream,
then
yeah
as
every
week.
We
should
fill
the
call
recorders
and
then
go
through
the
yeah.
There
is,
I
mean
libby
on
the
on
the
on
their
presentation.
A
We're
talking
about
the
I
don't
know
the
name
she
used,
but
basically
it
was
like
a
accountability
and
I
think
we
could
add
those
issues
on
github
and
to
a
better
distribution.
A
C
Now,
for
for
me,
it
was
a
good
experience.
It
made
me
notice
some
documents
that
I
had
that
were
not
updated
and
it
like
made
me
updated
or
update
them.
Also,
the
the
audit
also
made
me
think
on
the
next
steps
that
I
am
going
to
follow
because,
like
the
roadmap
that
I
have
done
for
gravity,
it
ends
with
the
graviton
trading
and
there's
a
lot
of
things
that
that
should
be
considered
for
the
next
steps
of
the
of
of
what
to
do
in
gravity
and
yeah.
C
It
also
made
me
feel
that
that
that
the
next
steps
shouldn't
be
like
said
by
me,
but
I
think
that
is
something
that
it
would
be
better
if
it's
built
within
the
group
of
people
that
that,
in
this
moment,.
C
Also,
like
I
had,
I
realized
that
there
are
some
people
that
have
participated
in
the
graviton
trains
that
I
haven't,
give
them
praise,
and
maybe
I
it
would
be
good
for
me
to
abort
them
and
to
tell
them
to
to
join
the
the
the
praise.
C
A
Oh
sorry,
I
was
saying
that
will
when
we
have
the
discord
price
channel,
it
will
be
much
easier
for,
for
you
especially
like
to
onboard
all
the
people.
That's
not
joining,
and
I
was
thinking
what's
your
score,
because
we
we
put
those
points
and
then
you
personally
should
add
here
and
then
depend
on
the
points
you
end
up.
Having
one.
B
I
was
reviewing
the
this
the
what
the
once
document,
what
he
sent
to
us.
I
realized
that
we
didn't
put
a
section
where
they
should
put
their
score,
so
I
was
looking
for
that
score
and
I
realized
that
one
didn't
put
it
anywhere.
B
So
I
thought
it's
something
that
we
should
add
in
this
document
like
put
a
place
where
they
should
put
their
scores,
but
I
wanted
to
also
ask
one
how
how
it
is
to
to
give
yourself
a
score.
Was
it
easy
to
compete
the
points
or
were
you
able
to
do
that?
Were
you
able
to
give
yourself
a
score
or
just
check
the
criteria.
C
No,
no,
I
didn't.
I
didn't
give
myself
a
score.
I
just
like
filled
the
document,
but
I
didn't
know
that
I
had
to
give
myself
the
score.
Well,
we
can
do
it.
A
A
So
if
you
have
the
manifesto,
you
should
have
all
the
points
like
you
have
four
points.
I
mean
it's
up
to
you,
but
the
thing
is
I
mean:
okay,
you,
oh
sorry,
but
if
you
have
and
then
if
the
manifesto
is
not
updated
and
for
example,
if
it
should
be
updated,
but
it's
not,
then
it's
when
you
decrease
your
points.
For
example,.
A
C
That
that
maybe
we
should
also
like
say
for
how
long
should
be
like
the
roadmaps
or
or
or
like
how?
How
frequent
do
we
have
to
update
the
manifesto,
but
I
think
the
audits
will
say
that,
like
three
every
three
months.
A
A
If
any
working
group
is
like
super
busy,
would
you
we
could
give
a
hand,
for
example,
this
weekend
I
was
working
on
on
comms
manifesto,
just
because
there
was
a
github
issue
and
I
volunteered
to
help,
but
I
think
that's
a
task
we
could
do
if
people
want-
maybe
maybe
not,
but
what?
What
do
you
think
guys?
A
Should
we
offer
like
that
service
somehow,
like
we
obtain
the
documentation,
or
that
would
be
too
much
work
for
us
that
I
mean
if
one
working
group
needs
to
have
that's
okay,
but
if
all
the
working
groups
we
will
take
all
the
documentation.
That
would
be
too
much.
So
I'm
not
100
secure
that
we
should
offer
that
service.
But
I'd
like
to
hear
from
you.
A
Okay,
I
was
thinking
that,
for
example,
you
have
your
manifesto,
not
updated,
but
you
don't
have
time
to
update
it.
Then
you
could
ask
transparency
to
update
it
for
for
you
just
for
help
and
because
this
weekend
I
was
doing
that
with
comms,
but
at
the
same
time
I
think
if
all
the
working
rooms
start
to
ask
help
from
us.
That
might
be
a
lot
of
work
from
us.
A
C
Well,
I
think
that
it's
good
that
the
that
the
working
group
leads
like
update
the
manifesto
themselves,
because
the
working
group
leads
are
the
ones
that
are
that
have
like
the
most
idea
of
what
do
they
expect,
and
sometimes
it's
also
just
good,
because
we
are
making
so
much
documentation
that
sometimes
we
forget
to
update
the
the
the
certain
documents.
So
this
is
very,
very
good,
and
I
think
this
is
also
like
a
constant
job
that
should
be
made
that
by
the
lead.
C
B
Yeah,
that's
what
I
was
also
thinking.
I
totally
agree
with
one
that,
I
think
is
the
leads
job
to
it.
You
know,
and
they
know
it
better.
You
know
so
it's
just
gonna
be
take
longer.
If
you
will
do
it
and
then
they
will
review
it,
because
we
don't
really
know
exactly
what
they
want
to
do
with
the
working
group.
So
it's
just
going
to
be
like
doubling
the
effort
you
know,
so
it's
instead
of
saving
us
time.
B
It's
like
it's
just
takes
the
process
becomes
longer
because
we
do
it
and
then
they
review
it.
You
know
we.
So
this
is
gonna
be
redundant
so
yeah
unless
they
ask
for
help
then
yeah
we
can
offer,
but
if
they
think
that
they
can
do
it
on
their
own,
so
yeah,
and
I
also
agree
with
what
one
said
that
is
our
job
is
to
constantly
remind
them
to
update
their
manifesto,
just
to
make
sure
that
it's
updated
and
it's
accurate
and
it's
transparent.
A
Then
we
could
just
keep
like
like.
It
is
right
now
like,
for
example,
let's
say
one
working
group
says
I
need
to
take
my
manifesto
and
they
put
it
on
github
and
someone
can
volunteer
and
someone
from
transparency
can
also
volunteer
if
they
want
like
yeah.
No,
it's
not
our
job,
but
we
can
help.
B
We
can
volunteer,
I
mean
if
you,
if
you
know
what's
going
on
in
that
working
group
and
you
you
know
that
you
can
add
value
to
their
team.
So
why
not?
So
it's
a
good
thing!
You
do
also.
You
know
it's
just
that.
I
don't
think
it's!
B
Oh,
we
should
put
it
in
our
to-do
list
like
oblige
ourselves
to
do
it
for
the
other
working
groups,
because
it's
their
you
know.
A
It
was
more
like
a
service
when
they
don't
have
time
to
ask
from
us
but
yeah.
It
makes
a
lot
of
sense
that
what
you
guys
say
like
it
should
be
them,
and
otherwise,
maybe
it's
out
of
our
scope
so
yeah.
I
totally
agree
with
you.
A
A
Bullet
I
mean,
if
you
didn't,
did
any
decision
as
a
group,
but
I
mean
the
idea
is
like
if,
if
there
was
a
like,
for
example,
when
you
started
the
gravitons,
you
did
a
vote
or
did
you
start
it.
A
Yeah,
but,
but
maybe
that's
because
like
it's
like,
like
the
fierce
working
groups
like
I,
I
guess
you
could
still
put
four
points
here
for
you,
because
the
idea
here
is
like
when
someone
is
like
when
you
take
decisions
just
to
ask
from
the
community.
That's
the
the
decision
process
made
by
soft
cops,
but
I
mean
when
that
what
you
did
it's
something
like
for
sure.
Everyone
will
vote
yes
and
also,
I
think
when
you
started
that
maybe
that
decision
process
was
not
even
make
it.
B
That's
also
my
question
was
the
voting
process
was:
was
it
already
in
place
when
juan
started
the
graviton
training?
Maybe
because
he
maybe
he
didn't,
go
through
the
process,
because
the
process
is
not
there,
yet
it
wasn't
there.
Yet.
You
know.
D
C
Think
that
yes,
yes
levy,
had
had
this
document
before.
Maybe
it
would
have
been
good
to
to
make
just
one
boat
just
like
to
to
give
legitimacy,
so
I
will
give
myself
a
three
because
it
would
have
been
good
if
I
just
like
made
a
a
a
poll
and
because
like
even
though
everyone
could
have
said
yes,
what
we
are
looking
is
to
have
like
evidence
evidence
so
so
yeah.
A
Another
thing
I
was
talking
with
and
grief
told
me
it's
like,
for
example,
when
we
were
adding
the
financial
statement
from
the
audit
I
was
thinking
like.
Should
we
vote
it
again
and
it
was
telling
me
like
no
like
no
way
it's
supposed
like
the
people
who
is
doing
it
like
they
already
trust,
and
we
already
did
about
one
thing.
So
there
is
also
not
to
overload
the
voting.
We
don't
want
to
vote
all
the
time.
C
Transparent
decision
making
or
see
transparent
decision
taking
because,
like
not
all
decisions,
should
lead
to
a
voting
process,
but
maybe
a
legitimate
or
a
transparent
decision
is
one
that
is
taking
like
putting
all
the
information
in
the
forum.
Even
though
we
didn't
like
make
a
vote
on
it.
B
A
Slash
like
both
are
good
like
if
you
do
a
boat
is
good,
but
if
you
are
showing
transparent
through
the
forum
post,
I
think
do.
Another
question
would
be
too
much
since
it's
like
for,
for
example
like
in
that
case
one
was
transparent,
putting
on
the
forum
but
didn't
make
any
from
post.
But
I
think
if
we
add
that
thing
on
the
same
question
that
he
can
have
the
points
and
it's
better
for
the
for
his
audit
and
all
the
audits,
that's
my
opinion,
but.
B
I
think
it's
gonna
be
confusing,
I
mean,
when
does
the
working
group
needs
to
go
through
the
forum
voting
process,
and
when
can
they
just
do
a
transparent
voting
process?
You
know
I
mean
how
will
we
identify
which
decisions
should
go
through
the
forum
voting
process
and
which
decisions
can
just
be
made
through
transparent
voting?
Maybe
in
the
in
the
meeting
or
in
the
I
don't
know,
so
that's
there
might
be
a
the
line
gets
blurry
between
these
two.
So
that's
what
I
wanted
to
know.
I
mean
yeah.
What's
what
should
be?
B
What
should
be
the
correct
way
of
making
the
decisions?
But
it's,
I
think
this
question
is
very
good.
You
know
because
it's
get
it
gives
them
one
or
the
the
working
group
lead
like
they
get
they.
It's
like
a
reminder
to
them
that
yeah
they
have.
There
is
a
forum
voting
process,
but
if
the
transparent
voting
process
is
okay,
it's
acceptable
and
then
so
be
it,
but
we
just
have
to
make.
B
I
think
we
have
to
add
description
which
decisions
can
be
made
just
through
a
transparent
voting
process
and
a
forum
voting
process.
You
know
just
to
make
a
distinction
and
to
be
clear
for
the
working
group
leads
what
process
they
should
follow.
B
I
think
it
should
be
discussed
with
the
softcup
because
they're
the
ones
who
who
created
this
informed
voting
process.
I
mean
they
they're
the
ones
who
promoting
it
or
I
don't
know
who
or
who's.
A
Going
to
the
the
good
thing
is
we
are
going
to
before
the
hatch.
We
are
going
to
do
an
audit
with
sofco,
so
I
mean
we
can
give
good
inputs
on
that.
I
think
would
be
great
if
we
just
take
a
decision
now
and
because
I
think,
if
we
start
all
the
time
asking
we
slow
the
process
and
since
levy
is
going
to
to
do
this
audit
anyway
before
the
hack,
because
she
showed
me
interest
on
doing
that
on
doing
so.
A
I
think
we
could
yeah
just
keep
working
and
when
we
review
it,
we
will
have
also
his
feedback
and
yeah
that'd
be
awesome
and
she
can.
C
I
I
wrote:
does
the
team
legitimate
its
decision
by
following
the
voting
process,
because
maybe
I
think
that
the
voting
process
is
to
legitimate
decisions,
like
maybe
a
decision
can
be
taken
by
by
a
group
working
group
lead,
but
the
the
the
voting
process
is
a
mechanism
to
legitimate
and
to
and
to
give
force
on
that
decision.
C
So
I
I
just
think
that
the
word
legitimate
like
gives
a
little
bit
of
this
scope,
that
we
are
trying
to
to
to
say
that
the
decision
can
be
taken
by
the
working
group
lead,
but
it
it
has
to
be
like,
like
approved
by
the
group.
C
I
I
am
going
to
share
my
screen.
I
I
I
I
am
making
it
in
in
the
yeah.
C
A
Yeah,
I
I
think
I
I
think,
for
example,
right
now,
that's
good,
like
juan,
is
editing
like
his
document
and
then
we
have
that
feedback,
and
then
we
discuss
it
like
let's
say
when
we
have
like
all
the
feedback
from
all
the
previous
audits,
then
we
we
think
all
this
feedback
before
the
heart
and-
and
we
make
like
the
final
audit
for
postcards-
that
can
also
be
keep
improving
in
the
future,
of
course,
but
like
to
have
the
best
out.
A
B
Yeah,
I
think
it's
a
good
idea
to
just
just
leave
it
like
this.
I
mean
let
them
give
their
feedback,
you
know,
but
we
don't
revise
the
checklist
yet
the
whole.
You
know,
let's
revise
the
questions.
Once
we
have
feedback
from
softcup
and
onboarding
working
group,
then
once
we
have
their
feedback,
we
can
revise
the
questions
and
go
through
each
of
them
again,
because
this
is
not
a
real
score.
Yet
you
know
it's
just
like
yeah
we're
testing
it
and
we
see
where
we
need
to
improve
like,
for
example,
yeah.
B
This
is
a
good
point.
What
one
gave
us
that
this
question
is?
Quite
maybe
it's
very
it's
too
strict
or
or
maybe
there's
a
loophole
in
this
question,
because
they
can
make
decisions
without
going
through
the
voting
voting
process
right
and
it
can
be
it's
it's
still
transparent.
Even
if
they
don't
go
through
the
war
forum
voting
process,
they
made
the
decisions
in
a
different
method.
So
we
have
to
talk
about
it
in
the
future.
B
If
we
should,
if
it's
how
much
score,
they
can
get,
it's
still
being
transparent,
but
they
didn't
go
through
the
forum
voting.
B
C
Also,
what
is
the
total
of
of
what
is
the
max
number?
What
is
the
total
of
points,
because
it.
B
D
C
Hundred
percent,
but
I
am
trying
to
like
zoom
and-
and
I
think
like
it,
doesn't
like-
give
a
hundred.
B
D
B
For
example,
if
there's
if
the
total
points
could
be
15
and
then
if
you
get
15
out
of
15,
then
you
get
100
percent,
it's
just
to
be
like
a
percentage.
So
if
you
get
8
out
of
15,
then
you
will
have.
I
don't
know,
I'm
not
good.
In
math
yeah.
C
C
But
that
is
my
question
like
what
is
the
the
total
of
points
available,
because
here
I
have
nine.
B
A
B
Think
the
first,
I
think
the
first
big
questions,
the
manifesto.
I
think
we
gave
this
10
points
each.
So
it's
gonna
be
nine.
B
This
eight
out
of
ten
the
contributors,
four
three
three
it
is
contributors,
is
out
of
ten
also
and
then
the
decision
making
four
three
three
ten
also
maybe.
D
C
B
A
D
B
C
Think
it's
a
fair
score
because,
like
I,
I
am
lacking
certain
points
that,
if
they
are
necessary
for
for
have
a
a
green
transparency
score
like
on
the
financial
statement
like
I
am
not
a
hundred
percent
clear
of
them
and
also
because
yes,
I
think
that
there
are
some
things
that
I
can
like
improve
with
the
impact
hours.
C
So
so
yes,
so
I
think
it's
a
fair
score,
but
how
would
you
like
to
my
goal
would
be
to
improve
it
for
the
next?
For
the
next
audit.
A
I
think
this
is
something
that,
like
I
mean,
the
thing
is
maybe,
for
example,
let's
say
we
schedule
a
call
and
we
are
with
you
there,
but
you
are
mostly
taking
the
decisions
it's
like
just
to
let's
say,
for
example,
if
you
say
yeah,
I
will
do
it,
then
maybe
you
don't
remember,
or
I
mean
if
you
say
you
do
it
by
your
own
and
that's
totally
fine,
but
that
that's
a
great
feedback
to
what
we
should
offer
to
set
up
a
call.
C
Sorry,
like
we
can,
we
can
schedule
a
next
meeting
with
you
guys,
because
there
are
some
things
that
I
I
need
to
like:
consult
with
grief
and
with
the
gravity
working
group
and
like
all
the
people,
because
I
I
don't
want
to
be
like
just
myself
taking
decisions,
and
I
think
that
for
these
next
steps
that
we
are
going
to
have
it's
very
important
to
have
the
participation
of
the
whole
group
and
to
have
like
a
clear
review
and
a
clear
path.
C
Especially
on
this
point,
because
this
is
something
like
I
have
this
idea,
but
it
hasn't
been
like,
like
talked
with
all
the
group,
and
it
hasn't
been
like
said:
how
are
we
going
to
materialize
all
this.
C
D
C
Like
like,
maybe
we
can
schedule
a
call
like
follow
to
follow
up
wha
wha
what
we
have
to
do
like
on
on
march
on
the
15th
of
march.
I
think
it
would
be
a
good,
a
good,
a
good,
a
good
point
to
have
like,
like
a
follow-up,
the
16th
of
march,
because
ideally,
the
the
hatch
will
be
on
the
week
of
the
8th
to
the
12th
of
march
and
the
15th
of
march.
The
first
monday
after
the
hatch
and
for
gravity
is
very
important.
C
What
we're
going
to
do
after
the
hatch,
because
on
the
11th
of
march,
we
end
up
the
graviton
trainings,
and
my
idea
is
that
all
the
gravitons
that
have
finished
the
graviton
trainings,
then
we
can
have
like
a
a
group
meeting
to
decide
what
are
going
to
be.
The
next
steps.
A
A
A
Well,
I'm
going
to
prioritize
what
we
want
to
talk
before
the
top
of
the
hour.
So
I'd
like
first
to
hear
from
you
ivy
and
regarding.
B
B
Yeah
before
we
proceed
with
that,
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
and
wrap
up
the
our
conversation
about
the
audit,
so
just
to
clarify
the
next
step
would
be
just
to
proceed
with
the.
Are
you
just
going
to
send
the
documents
to
on
boarding
group
and
the
softcup
group
the
same
the
original
checklist
that
we
had.
D
A
Hello,
hello:
we
hear
you
now
fantastic.
B
All
right,
okay,
so
yeah,
I
was
trying
to
say
something
that
before
you
proceed
with
the
with
the
next
topics,
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
the
next
step
for
the
audit.
So
the
next
step,
we
will
just
proceed
with
onboarding
and
softgov
audit
using
the
previous
checklist
that
we
made,
but
we
will
just
add
this
labels
for
the
score
in
the
total
score.
So
they
also
know
how
what's
the
maximum
score,
they
can
get.
You
know,
but
we
will
just
revise
the
questions.
B
B
Okay,
I'm
just
gonna
check
this
better.
You
can
check
the
form,
improve
the
format
creative
with
the
score.
Then
I
can
send
it
to
you.
A
A
Be
great
yeah,
and
now
I
I'd
like
to
talk
about
the
tc
videos
to
promote
common
stock
and
well.
I
just
want
to
know
if
you
have
an
updated
regarding
what
you
told
me
last
week.
B
Yeah,
it's
still
the
same.
I
started
creating
this
common
stock
playlist,
but
I
realize
it
takes
time
because
I
have
to
check.
Add
the
url
one
by
one.
If
you
can
go
to
the
you
can
go,
can
you
share
screencast?
I
can't
if
you
can
go
to
the
youtube
or
youtube
channel.
I
already
created
this
playlist
common
stack.
B
Okay,
yeah,
you
can
see
the
playlist
that
I
created
the
one
for
a
common.
B
A
B
D
A
I'm
not
seeing
it,
maybe
you
read
it
on
the
comments.
Youtube
channel.
B
B
Yet
complete,
so
it's
a
still.
It's
still
a
work
in
progress.
Once
I
completed
this
playlist,
I
can
send
it
to
you
and
tell
you
which
ones
will
go
to
what
video,
which.
A
A
That's
what
I
wanted
to
clarify
okay
and
then
it's
like
since
we're
in
youtube.
I
mean
it's
not
in
the
agenda,
but
regarding
what
we
were
talking
on
legal
there
is,
let
me
see
if
I
can
find
it.
A
Yeah
I
mean
on
this
video
if
you
see
because
we
change
it
with
some.
A
The
license
and
distribution
is
creative
commons
and
it's
attribution
it's
not
from
youtube
standard,
but
I'm
not
sure
if
we
should
do
that
from
every
video,
because
it's
going
to
be
like
or
man,
I
don't
know
if
there
is
an
option
to
make
it
all
the
videos
this
way,
because,
for
example,
you
want
this
video
and
it's
safe,
listen
to
it
from
youtube
and
we
should
change
it.
But
do
you
know
if
we
can
do
it
from
all
the
videos
and
not
to
go
like
one
by
one?
B
B
All
of
them,
but
it
doesn't
have
to
be
it's
not
urgent,
so
yeah,
let's
just
try
to
complete
yeah,
to
apply
this
setting
for
all
or
you
want
to
apply
the
settings
for
the
next
calls.
D
A
Okay,
so
next
point
wait.
B
A
Okay,
yeah,
I
think
I
think
we
you
can
do
it
aging
and
then
we
just
do
a
thing
thing
and
we
could
sing
about
like
different
topics.
We
were
discussing
now
and
we've
seen
like
I
like
thursday
with
last
sunday
last
week,
right
it.
B
A
So
we
can
work
on
it.
Yeah
like
we
can
work
easing
and
do
suggestions
and
comments
tomorrow,
for
example,
and
then
on
wednesday
we
sync
and
then
we
have
it
finished.
B
A
B
A
B
C
I
want
to
help
with
one
of
the
recordings,
but
my
problem
is
that
I
I
don't
know
if
my
computer
will
will
like
do
it
good,
because,
like
even
in
in
the
calls
it
gets
like
really
slow.
So
I
don't
know
if
that
will
affect
the
the
quality
of
the
video.
A
I
mean
you
can
always
try
and
I,
if
you
I
mean
I
can
be
there
and
have
your
backup
and
if
you
you
have
then-
and
you
then
see
like
this,
it's
good,
then
you
can
yeah,
do
it
by
yourself
and
I
don't
need
to
backup
you
which,
which
calls.
Would
you
want
to
try.
A
B
B
Thanks
one
so
yeah,
maybe
the
best
way
to
do
it
is
to
do
it
together,
the
first
time,
so
you
end
up
with
record
together.
You
know
so
if
and
then,
if
it
works
for
you,
then
you
can
do
it
by
yourself.
Moving
forward.
A
A
A
A
A
A
I
really
wanted
lady
to
be
here,
but
because
to
add
these
issues
from
accountability,
maybe.
C
And
seth,
I
I
also
like
want
to
comment
with
you
and
with
with
ivy
that
for
for
the
last
question
of
the
groud
of
the
audit
that
is
like
how
are
we
gonna
manage
the
funds
and
how
are
we
going
to
like
sustain
the
the
project?
C
I
think
that,
maybe
with
gravity
and
and
with
transparency,
we
can
make
like
like
a
package
for
for
other
organizations,
so
that
we
can
say
yeah.
We
with
this,
we
are
going
to
receive
help
in
conflict
management,
but
also
you're
gonna
receive
help
in
transparency
and
how
you're
going
to
receive
help
in
transparency,
like
with
the
with
the
audits
with
the
recordings
and
and
how
are
you
going
to
receive
help
with
the
conflict
management
with
tradings
and
with
the?
C
So
I
think
that
we
we
can
like
have
these
two
groups,
as
as
as
with
soft,
like
in
a
package
for
our
financial
sustainability.
I
think
that's
an
awesome
idea.
Thank.
A
A
So,
okay,
now
I'm
in
there.
B
I
think
it
should
be
yeah
now
that
one
mentioned
it.
I
think
we
should
put
it
in
a
roadmap
when
we
revise.
The
manifesto
is
that
this
plan
to.
A
So,
okay,
we
were
talking
about
adding
two
issues
here,
but
I
already
don't
remember:
I'm
thinking.
A
Yeah
I
had
to
contact
eduardo
and
libby,
I
mean
wait.
I
think
there
is
already
one
issue
for.
A
A
B
That
maybe
we
can
also
say
to
them
just
to
eduardo
and
bolivia,
that
if
they
have
suggestions
for
improvement
in
the
audit,
just
put
them
as
a
comment
and
don't
change
anything
in
the
checklist.
So
we
can
easily
see
what
they
want
to
change.
B
B
B
You
can
see
yeah
I'd.
C
B
Them
on
the
comment
section
yeah
I
mean
if
they
have
feedback.
Okay,
just
leave
it
open
and
I
can
edit
it
if
you
want.
A
Okay,
well
I
let
it
like
this
and
then
you
can
change
if
you
feel
it
and
I
want
it
to.
I
also
will
add
it
here.