►
Description
The Transparency Working Group promotes transparency, openness and mutual monitoring as a high-level ideal that we're moving towards at the TEC. The way that we get there is by empowering people to share this experience with the Transparency Audits and making information available to everyone.
We gather every two weeks on Mondays at 3pm CET.
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
A
Okay
yeah,
my
intentions,
for
the
call
is
like
get
some
discussion
around
the
topics
on
the
agenda.
A
B
Next
up
yeah,
my
intention
is
to
catch
up
with
you
on
all
of
these
topics
and
yeah.
If
we
touch
if
we
still
have
time
to
touch
on
the
transparency
audit,
I
hope
we
can
get
some
feedback
from
eduardo
and
aman
and
whoever
is
going
to
join
this
call
so
yeah
distractions.
I
just
still
have
a
lot
of
things
to
do
today
and
getting
late
here,
so
I'm
kind
of
panicking
already
so
yeah.
I
pass
it
to
a
man.
D
Just
to
talk
about
a
little
bit
of
the
of
a
contribution
from
from
gideon
who
he
made,
he
made
new
commerce
audit
of
the
discord.
So
I
don't
know
I
think,
that's
someone
worth
sharing
here
and
distractions,
none
that
I'm
waiting
for
my
food.
A
Yeah
thanks
little
yeah,
so
there
are
many
points
like
I
just
wanted
to
just
to
share
some
regarding
yeah
we're
also
doing
revisiting
the
audit
with
ivy
and
yeah.
This
is
our
mainly
update
to,
I
feel
like
we
will
be
using
durian
analytics
and
we
can
talk
to
fabio
to
help
us
to
set
it
up.
So
what
that
would
help
us
is
like
it
would.
A
You
know
like
it's
like
a
platform
that
get
all
the
graphs
and
all
the
data
from
the
blockchain,
so
it
will
help
us
like
to
report
the
audit
and
that's
a
thing
like
fabio
can
just
do,
and
you
know
when
it's
done.
It's
automatically
getting
update.
So
it's
it's
very
nice
because
we
don't
will
be
bothering
him
all
the
time,
but
only
once
and
when
he
got
it
done
then
that
the
you
know
the
charge
update
themselves
with
the
data
provided
on
the
blockchain.
So
it's
it's
cool
and
then
yeah.
A
I
also
wanted
to
update
on
the
treasury
management.
We
started
a
discussion
with
mainly
with
tom
and
mitch
this
one
julian
levy
and
grief
also
show
up,
and
we
will
have
another
call
tomorrow
regarding
that,
if
you
guys
want
to
join
us,
it
would
be
very
nice
and
it's
on
the
calendar.
Let
me
and
then
the
document
we
were
working
on
is
also
I
you
should
go
on,
and
maybe
we
have
it
in
here
yeah,
it's
actually
it's.
A
The
call
is
tomorrow
at
this
same
hour,
so
yeah
it
would
be
nice
if
many
of
you
could
join
and
yeah.
Basically.
C
A
Discussing
like
for
the
the
first
binding-
and
we
are
between
these
three
more
or
less
yeah,
we
are
discussing
like
the
processes
and
what
are
we
going
to
hold
like
the
you
know
like
the?
How
are
we
going
to
hold
the
files
and
how
we
keep
a
comfortable
to
the
community
and
yeah
all
these
processes,
so
the
more
people
engaging
the
best
so
yeah?
If,
if
you
are
interested
in
the
topic,
please
join
tomorrow
and
yeah,
that's
for
it
then
listing
on
going
gecko
is
getting
hard
like.
A
So
it
shouldn't
be
a
big
deal,
but
I'm
a
bit
concerned
about
like
what,
if
other
commons
just
not
get
listed
because
they
decide
like
not
to
get
their
token
transferable
at
the
early
interact
with
the
bonding
curve
like
I
feel
we
should
somehow
do
something
like
to
facilitate
coin
gekko
or
coin
market
cap.
A
Whatever
of
these
platforms
to
yeah
list
our
token,
with
just
an
app
from
the
bonding
code,
like
the
price,
is
there
but
yeah,
I
mean
from
their
point
of
view
they
they
might
be
busy,
and
I
know
like
we
shouldn't
be
asking
them
like
how
to
solve
it,
but
let's
start
ourselves
yeah
and
yeah.
Probably
the
the
update
on
this
issue
is
like
okay:
we
need
to
get
autocad
transferable,
otherwise
coin
gecko
is
not
going
to
list
our
token.
A
For
the
moment
at
least
like
it's
going
to
be
easy,
because
honey
swap
actually
is
on
their.
A
D
No,
not
okay.
Regarding
the
listing
for
me,
it's
interesting.
What
is
the?
What
is
the
exchange
of
thoughts
that
leads
to
decide?
D
The
listing
part
like
who
like
is
this
a
consensus
from
coming
from
transparency
working
group?
Is
this
I'm
not
saying
this
to
create
a
process
for
listing?
I'm
just
saying
to
sort
of
what
information
goes
along
the
listing?
Do
you
think
about
also?
D
I
started
with
comms
about
okay,
once
it's
listed,
what
are
we
gonna
tell
about
it
to
the
people
like,
I
think,
they're,
the
things
that
the
things
that
are
externalized
in
the
organization
should
have
a
thoughtful
kind
of
insight
of
what
other
aspects
should
be
considered
when
you
are
doing
whatever
it
is,
could
be.
D
Listening
could
be
outreach
whatever
it
is
outside
the
organization
and
it's
like,
and
you
will
sort
of
take
the
brand
to
somewhere
else
how
it
will
like
benefit
impact,
and
I
think
I
don't
know
if
it's
a
working
group
decision-
I
don't
know
like
I
that
would
be
nice
to
have
just
a
little
conversation
about
how
these
things
will
proceed.
You
know.
A
Yeah,
I
agree
yeah
regarding
the
listing
of
coin
decoy.
It's
judy
started
working
on
it
and
I
made
myself
think
with
him,
so
we're
co-working
on
on
this
and
yeah,
basically
like
getting
our
talking
listing,
help
transparency
of
our
price.
So
you
know
everyone
can
just
go
and
check
on
gekko
host.
Is
he
doing
this
week
or
this
day
or
at
this
moment
correct
and
yeah?
A
It
really
gives
transparency
around
our
token
and
it's
not
and
when
it's
being
mine,
you
know
if
someone
is
selling
a
lot
or
buying
a
lot
and
manipulating
the
price,
we
will
see
it
there.
Otherwise,
if
it's
on
the
one
thing
or
from
our
interface,
it's
not
something
like
everyone
checks
daily
or
something,
but
if
it's
on
coin
eco,
it's
just
like,
oh,
like
at
least
I
have
this
daily
routine.
I
wake
up.
I
check
the
market
and
I
know
a
lot
of
people.
Don't
do
that,
but
it's
yeah.
A
A
C
D
I
don't
sorry,
I
don't
think
there
is
a
need
for
micromanagement.
I
just
think
that
there
will
be.
It
would
be
nice
to
understand.
Who
has
this
capacity
to
do
so?
D
Like
imagine,
imagine,
for
example,
we
get
listed
in
going
gecko
and
then
some
of
the
someone
someone
from
the
tec
or
someone
extended
from
the
tc
makes
an
analysis
of
the
coin
or
share
that
we
are
listed
and
then
what
information
is
provided
there
like
do
we
are
we
ready
to
sort
of
provide
information
about
the
token
our
processes
like
for
for
a
public?
That
is
not
necessarily
us,
but
someone
external.
D
So,
for
me,
it's
about
everyone
can
do
and
have
autonomy
to
do
things,
but
that
should
come
along
empathy
towards
not
having
tunnel
vision
when
you
do
something,
but
also
look
outside
and
thinking,
okay,
how
someone
else
can
benefit
from
it
or
how
this
pro,
how
this
thing
that
I'm
doing
this
process
that
I'm
doing
is
aligned
and
could
could
be
aligned
with
other
things
or
could
be
improved,
or
you
know
what
I
mean
like
as
as
much
as
I
think
that
a
lot
of
initiatives
are
really
positive.
D
There
is
always
this.
If
we
don't
think
I
don't
know.
I
feel
that
since
we
are
at
the
beginning
of
the
process,
we
should
be
really
like
clear,
like
the
typical
no
having
a
issue
in
github
for
this
listing
coin
gecko,
I
don't
know
there
are
some
things
that
yeah,
it's
just
a
scramble
paraphrasing
I'm
sorry
for
this
positively
iv.
B
Yeah,
I
kind
of
agree
with
what
eduardo
is
saying,
but
I
think
right
now
in
this
stage
I
think
zepty
and
trey
are
still
only
trying
to
protect
the
possibility
of
getting
our
token
listed
on
coin
gecko,
but
there
I
don't
think
there
has
been
a
decision
made
yet
of
listing
that
one.
I
think
right
now
at
this
stage,
is
still
trying
to
yeah
research
on
that,
how
work
what
would
be
the
requirements
and
getting
listed
if
it's
possible
to
get
listed?
What
are
the
qualifications?
B
B
I
think
I
actually
don't
know
what
could
be
if
there
could
be
risks
in
getting
us
and
getting
listed
in
coin
gecko,
but
it's
I
think
it's
good
to
look
into
that
as
well
like
check
the
pros
and
cons
of
getting
this
and
coin
gecko
analyze
the
risks
if
there
are
any
before
deciding
to
listing
yeah
getting
listed
on
coin,
I
don't
know
if
there
are
risks
but
yeah.
If
there
are
there,
I
think
it
should
be
presented
to
the
community
before
deciding
on
getting
listed.
D
Yeah,
I
think,
the
I
think
the
risk
as
the
risks
are
very
low.
It's
it's
about
being
prepared,
so
the
the
the
things
that
get
externalized
have
the
right
and
proper
documentation
and
the
right
proper
information
to
be
shared
in
the
correct
way.
It's
not
just
another
listing
it's
it's
also
they're.
They
work
for
a
year
been
put
it
publicly
being
listed
publicly.
So
it
means
they
need
a
description.
They
need
information,
they
need
resources.
D
Do
we
have
that?
And
you
know,
I
think
this
research
part
that
septimus
is
doing
it's
the
best
way
to
do
it
like
there
is.
I
don't
think
there
is
other
way.
We
need
to
know
how
we
can
list
it
if
it
is
possible-
and
I
think
that's
that's
correct-
I
don't
think
you're
what
you're
doing
is
wrong
at
all.
D
What
I'm
thinking
is
just
like
how
we
can
improve
the
process,
so
we
can
take
advantage
of
this
research
that
we
are
doing
and
coordinate
with
other
working
groups
if
it
is
needed,
you
know
so
yeah.
That's
my
thoughts.
A
Yeah,
I
I
agree
and
yeah
mostly
like
this
ongoing
echo,
is
like
it's
very
specific
data.
It's
not
like
something!
You
know
it's
like
the
price.
The
token
supply,
like
the
parameterization
of
our
token,
like
it's
like
it's
pretty
detailed.
So
it's
you
know
it's
pretty
hard
to
mess
up
unless
you
put
wrong
numbers,
but
if
you
follow
the
parameters
we
have
and
actually
will
require,
will
ask
for
those.
Otherwise
they
will
not
list
your
token
and
yeah
it's
it's.
A
I
mean
we
are
not
going
to
talk
about
our
culture
of
it
or
anything
regarding
that
on
on
these
switches,
the
price
of
the
token
and
the
price
it
got
24
hours
ago,
like
you
know
the
the
price
in
cut
release
like
yeah
this
charge
is
it's
it's
just
this,
and
I
also
think
right
now:
it's
because
we
still
do
not
have
a
comment,
but
when
we
do
in
the
future,
it's
going
to
be
easier
to
to
know
what
the
community
approved
and
what
not,
for
example
like
if
we
want
to
do
the
going
listing
like
people,
will
ask
for
money
for
doing
that
or
or
also
in
other
words
and
in
the
detail.
A
It
will
be
added
on
on
the
proposal,
so
people
will
be
voting
on
that,
and
I
feel
like
this
is
the
way
like
community
gives
you
a
preparation,
but
we
could
also,
I
mean
if
we
feel
we
need
to
work
on
advice
process.
I
feel
it
should
be
a
sentiment
from
the
people
who's
taking
it
on,
because
if
they
got
the
the
funds
to
do
it
because
they
they
say,
okay,
I'm
going
to
do
this.
A
Some
community
is
trusting
on
him
to
do
it
yeah
we
should
let
them
do
in
order
to
get
them
at
the
same
time
if
they
feel
they
need
some
kind
of
support
or
they
are
struggling
and
they
need
some
advice
process.
They
can
ask
for
it
then,
and
we
have
to
remember
like
we
also
will
have
celeste.
So
if
something
is
not
following
our
mission,
vision
and
values,
it
can
get
disputed.
A
If
such
a
correct
word
and
yeah
I
feel
like
this
will
help
a
lot
of
our
processes
when
we
have
a
real
doubt,
because
right
now
is
like
people
is
just
doing
it
and
some
people
is
getting
paid
by
common
stocks
or
whatever
and
yeah
it's
it's.
D
Yeah,
this
is
that
that
is
a
future
kind
of
basis
assumption.
I
think
this
part
of
this
process
that
these
processes
and
this
kind
of
awareness-
that's
the
word
awareness
about
externalities
how
we
externalized
something
from
the
organization
should
start
like,
should
be
always
present.
It's
not
about
advice,
process
or
or
micromanagement.
I
feel
it's.
It's
just
half
awareness
of
these
things
when
we
do
them
in
a
way
that
whenever
we
arrive
to
the
commons
point
or
when
we
become
a
commons,
all
these
things
happens.
D
A
It's
good,
it's
good.
Do
you
think
if
we
create
best
practices
when
sharing
is
something
like
like
something
in
those
yeah
yeah
exactly.
A
A
C
Yeah
sure
I
can
subtract
see,
I
haven't
written
a
proper
report
yet,
but
maybe
I
could
just
explain
my
thought
process
for
the
moment
because
I
didn't
know
what
kind
of
format
or
where
I
would
have
to
submit
so
I'll
just
talk
for
now.
I'm
hoping
that
would
be
okay,.
C
So
so,
okay
yeah,
I
looked
at
tc,
deep
down,
dx
tau,
uni
setup,
etc.
So
not
a
lot
of
dows
but
but
the
towers
I
looked
at
are
kind
of
very
different
in
character
and
the
amount
of
information
and
the
members
that
are
there
because
uni
swap
you
know
it's
a
very
big
thing.
C
Dx
tower
also
has
a
lot
of
aum,
but
it's
more
like
a
closed
environment
which
I
personally
felt
and
the
boats
are
pretty
new,
though
I
I
don't
think
they're
a
dao
yet
but
they're,
a
very
new
project
and
the
number
of
people
and
the
number
of
information,
a
lot
of
information
flowing
is
very
low
and
dc.
Of
course,
like
you
know,
we
are
also
in
our
starting
stages:
yeah,
not
a
lot
of
data
points,
but
still
there
is
variety
in
the
kind
of
places
that
I
looked
at
so
yeah.
C
The
first
thing
I
need
to
share
with
you
guys
is
when,
as
I
don't
remember
who
it
was
asked
to
write
a
report
on
transparency
by
looking
at
other,
I
thought
that
transparency
would
be
about
the
ease
at
which
information
or
okay.
Basically,
information
is
available
to
people
inside
a
doubt
and
mainly
by
people.
We
mean
you
know
beginners,
because
people
who
have
been
contributing
for
some
time
to
a
doubt
know
where
to
find
information
from
so
initially
I
thought
transference
would
be
about.
C
C
It
is
also
about
you
know
how
that
information
is
presented,
because
I
feel
like
a
lot
of
stuff.
The
standard
might
not
be
in
an
understandable
or
easily
digestible
fashion
for
a
newly
onboarded
person
to
understand
so
even
making
it
available
for
them
might
not.
You
know,
make
it
so
transparent,
which
is
something
I
feel
about.
So
in
the
analysis
of
transparency,
I
think
there
are
mainly
three
variables.
First,
one
is
the
kind
of
person
we
are
talking
about,
whether
he
is
the
beginner
that
he's
a
standard
or
the
discord.
C
Secondly,
he's
a
non-beginner
he
might
have
been
contributing
for
some
time,
and
the
next
variable,
according
to
me,
would
be
the
amount
of
information
you
know.
For
example,
unit
serve,
has
a
lot
of
information
flying
around
a
lot
of
proposals,
lot
of
voting
governance
decisions,
but
a
place
like
thc
has
a
letter
number
of
information
and
some
something
like
dx
tao.
Has
it
stays
somewhere
in
the
middle
and
the
third
information?
C
The
third
variable,
like
I
told
you,
is
the
method
in
which
the
documentation
or
the
things
are
presented,
so
what
I
feel
after
looking
at
these
dowses,
if
a
dowel
needs
to
be
truly
transparent,
it
should
be
in
such
a
way
that
a
beginner
who
just
joined
a
dowel
whether
it
is
a
dowel
with
a
lot
of
information
or
less
of
information.
C
So,
basically,
according
to
me,
the
real
gesture
transparency
or
to
really
boost
transparency,
we
need
to
focus
on
onboarding
on
showing
new
people
where
information
is
and
taking
care
in
which,
in
the
way
we
are
presenting
that
information
to
the
new
people.
C
So
let
me
just
give
you
an
example
of
two
ways
in
which
you
know
tec
can
be
better
in
this
sense.
The
first
thing
I
need
to
note
is
that
a
tc
already
has
a
pretty
awesome
onboarding
funnel,
because
I've
been
part
of
dx
tower.
I've
been
part
of
some
other
towers
and
the
onboarding
funnel
is
not
very
good,
especially
at
dxdaw.
C
I
felt
it
was
very
constructed
and
it
was
really
hard
for
a
new
contributor
to
join
it,
but
we
host
community
calls,
I
mean
not
orientation
calls
every
week
and
answer
doubts
and
everything.
So
I
think
the
onboarding
funnel
is
awesome.
Maybe
if
I
need
to
add
something
to
that,
I
would
suggest
that
in
that
orientation
call
if
some
of
the
steward
could
demonstrate
how
to
add
the
meeting
schedule
of
the
tec
to
everybody's
calendar.
C
That
would
be
great
because
I
had
some
trouble
in
that
and
I
missed
some
meetings
which
I
really
wanted
to
attend,
and
I
still
like
I
don't
know,
could
not
figure
out
how
to
add
it
to
my
google
calendar.
I
don't
know
why
that
it
seems
like
a
basic
thing
to
do,
but
yeah,
I
would
show
that
in
the
orientation-
and
the
second
thing
I
want
to
say
is
this:
you
know
there
was
this
report
on
some.
You
know
some
ctd
learning
module.
C
I
was
reading
through
that,
and
I
made
some
edits
to
it
and
in
that
there
were
some
links
were
provided.
You
know
in
our
tc
forum
about
what
conviction.
Voting
is
what
token
power
is,
what
augmented,
bonding
curves
and
all
this
stuff
right.
So
I
I
believe
that
this
is
the
place
where
these
the
person,
who
wrote
that
forum
or
the
post,
expect
other
contributors
to
go
to
and
read
the
stuff
and
understand.
C
You
know
what
is
technical
things
and
what
I
feel
is
you
know
they
are
good,
but
what
I
feel
is
you
know,
re-complex
understanding.
It
is
also
a
skill
and
not
everybody
might
have
it.
C
I
don't
want
to
sound
boastful,
but
I
feel
like
I
can
deconstruct
sentences
spending
some
time,
but
even
I
am
a
little
slow
in
that
I
might
have
to
read
it
two
or
three
more
times
so.
One
thing
I
would
suggest
here
is
that
whenever
we
write
a
complicated
stuff
in
the
forum
like
it
could
be
a
conviction
voting,
it
could
be
token.
So
I
would
suggest
that
we
provide
an
example
whatever
is
happening
at
the
end.
C
For
example,
there
is
a
really
long
and
it
is
a
very
inclusive
article
about
conviction
voting,
and
there
is
a
lot
of
stuff
like
that.
So
at
the
end
we
could
say
you
know,
for
example,
we
are
having
this
proposal
to
decide
on
this
and
suppose
there
are
five
people
in
the
tower.
A
votes
on
this
be
votes
on
this,
and
finally,
this
happens.
C
C
You
know
use
case,
I
mean
what
do
you
say,
example
cases
so
that
they
have
an
example
in
front
of
this
their
eyes
and
they
can
read
whatever
theoretical
thing
they
just
write
in
that
forum
and
connect
with
it.
So
out
of
the
three
variables
I
described,
I
think
understandable
documentation
could
be
achieved,
maybe
a
lot
more
by
exemplifying
at
the
end
of
every
you
know,
at
the
end
of
every
complicated
thing.
C
So
that
is
one
thing
I
would
like
to
add,
and
secondly,
all
the
dowels
I
looked
at
had
a
forum
for
discussion.
C
They
had
some
sort
of
a
voting
mechanism
and
they
also
had
disco
channels,
but
in
places
like
dx,
tao
and
stuff,
like
that,
only
the
people
who
are
really
into
the
working
groups
and
stuff
like
that
attended
the
meetings
and
voted
on
stuff
or
really
knew
what
was
going
on
and
one
of
the
main
reasons
for
that
is,
I
don't
think,
a
part-time
contributor
or
just
a
person
who
just
stays
there
in
the
tao
really
checks
the
forum.
C
So
I
think
if
we
could
somehow
boost
discussions
on
whatever
is
going
on
in
forums
in
discord.
I
think
that
I
I
do
know
that
that
would
be.
You
know
all
over
the
place
and
it
will
be
very
fussy,
but
maybe
if
we
could
figure
out.
C
Do
that
properly
or
you
know,
we
could
just
discuss
the
things
that
are
going
on
at
the
moment
or
create
separate
channels,
for
you
know
just
discussing
topics
in
forum.
I
think
that
would
be
great
to
onboard
or
get
the
attention
of
the
new
contributors,
so
that
are
two
things
which
I
would
like
to
suggest.
And
lastly,
I
I
was
talking
to
the
ceo
of
the
deep
dow
and
I
asked
him.
C
You
know
a
lot
of
information
is
going
on
and
as
those
grow,
the
amount
of
attention
that
you
need
from
people
to
vote
or
to
have
their
opinion
on
stuff
will
be
huge,
because
we'll
have
to
make
a
lot
of
decision
on.
As
though-
and
I
asked
him,
how
do
you
think
you
know
daoist
will
be
able
to
do
that,
and
he
told
me
he
was
looking
at
gamification
options
on
how
information
is
presented
to
people.
I
don't
know
if
you
guys
have
heard
of
it.
C
Probably
you
have,
because
you
are
in
this
space
I'll
just
share
my
screen
for
some
time.
I
hope
this
is.
C
C
So,
basically,
you
probably
have
heard
of
atlantis
world.
They
are
you
know
it's
a
pretty
cool
site.
Oh,
should
I
show
my
I
think,
yeah
see,
I
don't
know
if
there
is
this
demo
that
you
have
created,
and
you
know
I
think
this
will
be
really
good.
For
you
know,
on
boarding
new
people,
you
know
we
could
create
welfare
scenarios
like
this.
For
example,
this
person
can
go
inside
this
coin
and
see
what
is
happening
or
he
could
go
outside.
You
know
this
place
and
see
what
happened
here.
C
So
in
the
scenario
I
think
we
can
create.
You
know
separate
buildings,
working
groups
and
he
can
walk
inside
the
buildings
and
see
you
know
what
are
the
things
going
on
and
what
these
people
are
working
on.
It
might
be
a
better
visual
presentation
of
things
like
alocia's
pointer
in
one
of
those
meetings.
C
I
have
some
hope
in
these
gamification
scenarios,
especially
if
we
can
integrate
this
code
with
stuff.
They
will
boost
currency
to
a
bigger
extent.
So
maybe
in
some
time
we
could
talk
to
the
people
at
atlantis
world
and
see
it
will
be
useful
in
the
scenario
yeah.
These
are
the
things
which
I
mainly
had
in
my
mind
to
share,
so
please
give
me.
A
Yeah
thanks
thanks:
let's
fix
your
calendar
like
can
you
share
your
screen
and
go
to
the
forum
and,
let's
fix
your
calendar,
that's
the
first
thing
we
should
do
and
we
can
do
it
right
now.
D
I
agree
with
the
calendar
fixing
is
this
kind
of
things
that
we
have
assumed
everyone
understand,
but
it
doesn't
mean
it's
like
that,
for
example,
the
little
button
of
adding
the
calendar
to
your
to
yours,
the
plus
button
that
is
at
the
end
of
the
google
calendar
that
is
linked
everywhere-
that
little
button
is
almost
invisible
right
people
never
disabled
this
one.
C
A
D
C
D
That's
about
your
personal
settings
because
this
you
are
not
pressing
attending
or
they
don't
have
the
option
to
attending.
So
if
you
do
not
click
on
attending
you're,
just
viewing
the
calendar,
you
are
not
part
of
it
like
you're,
not
integrated
with
that,
so
you
can
either.
I
think,
add
it
to
your
own,
for
example,
that
one
yeah,
since
you
are
not
there
as
attending
you,
will
never
get
a
notification.
Go
click
in
the
in
the
three
points.
D
On
top
next
to
the
x,
there
yes
copy
to
adamdi,
okay,
and
then
you
should
get
the
notifications.
C
D
C
A
D
Yeah,
I
will,
I
will
let
you
know,
because
there
is
another
way,
but
I
will
take
a
look
at
it
and
then
get
back
to
you
and
how
to
do
it
properly
from
the
same
calendar
settings.
A
No,
but
but
then
you
also
talked
about
adding
examples
on
the
forum
post
and
I
didn't
underst.
Would
you
will
to
do
those
or
because
right
now
is
mostly
mitch
taking
care
of
those,
and
he
could
use
some
help?
Probably-
and
actually,
I
know
like
perhaps
want
to
get
some
help
on
the
cdd
process
yeah.
I
I
didn't
understand
like
like.
Do
you
think
it's
just
suggesting
you're
making
like
so
I'll,
give
it
to
mention
the
next
frames
cause
or
the
params
screw,
or
you
will
to
be
there
and
do
it
yourself?
C
A
Yeah,
I
I
think,
like
the
best
way
to
get
engaged
with
brands.
If
you
can't
attend
like
this
cold
tomorrow,
I'll
find
him.
I
could
tell
them
like
you're
interested
in
help,
and
then
they
do
this
huge
hack
session
on
sundays,
like
they
are
they're
like
four
hours.
A
It's
pretty
chill
like
they're
just
hacking
and
everyone
is
looking
at
their
things,
and
you
know
they're,
for
example,
you're
hacking
on
the
bonding
curve
and
you're
adding
examples,
but
you
for
some
reason,
don't
understand
something
and
you're
like
hey
whatever
grief,
do
you
understand
this
or
mitch
or
orbit?
Or
you
know
like
all
these
param
hackers
yeah?
This
is
the
best
way
to
engage,
but
yeah
tomorrow
call
if
you
are
able
to
join
that
is
so
cool
and
if
not,
I
can
just
tell
me
like
you're
interested
and
share
with
him.
D
I
do
I
don't
think
what
he
said.
What
aman
said
about
having
this
also
some
good
practice.
Well,
yeah.
We
I
mean
we
do.
I
mean
yeah
when
there
is
the
param
stuff,
we
did
share
on
twitter
and
there
were
problems
parties
where
we
sort
of
explained
the
parameters
to
everyone
in
that
hole,
but
it
was
chill
and
everyone
would
like
debate,
which
params
was
better,
which
paranormals
were
not
so
I'm
thinking
about
this
kind
of
good
practices
and
how
to
prolong
it,
but
that's
more
of
a
community.
B
Yeah,
I
think
also
we
already
had
that
feedback
in
our
previous
on
proposals.
When
we
did
the
premise
for
the
hatch,
I
think
they
got.
We
got
some
feedback
that
it
would
be
great
to
have
this
example
of
possible
scenarios
if
this
uncertain
parameters,
so
it
would
be
great
to
have
them
as
well.
For
for
the
comments-
and-
let
me
just
add
before
we
go
further
with
comments
comments-
I
just
want
to
add
about
the
adding
the
tc
calendar.
B
I
think
we
can
also
have
this.
We
can
actually
have
a
short
video
tutorial
of
adding
the
tec
calendar
to
their
personal
calendars.
I
think
it
would
be.
It
would
be
a
great
help
to
all
community
members,
because
I've
had
some
people
also
reaching
out
to
me
and
asking
for
the
tc
calendar
link
and
yeah.
I
think
it
would
be
great
to
have
a
quick,
a
short
video
tutorial
on
youtube
and
we
can
share
it
with
the
new
members.
I
think
with
them
a
lot.
C
D
Yeah
yeah,
I
agree,
I
think
it
could
be
added
to.
We
are
thinking
having
about
the
tec
kind
of.
D
Sub
menu
on
the
left
on
the
discord,
so
that
could
be
part
of
that,
like
lowering
orientation
or
enjoying
here
like
just
this
video
that
people
can
click
if
they
want
to
sort
of
add
their
link.
A
Awesome:
okay,
then
it
was
more
points.
B
I
think
we're
on
to
gideon's
of
contribution
that
you
are
the
ones
to
talk
about.
A
D
Yeah
two
things
the
first
one
is,
I
don't
know
if
you
have
seen
bankless
analytic
guild
report
on
community
growth.
It's
it's
a
thread
they
share
on
twitter
and
it's
a
spreadsheet.
I
will
share
it
on
transparency.
D
It's
quite
an
interesting
document.
Basically,
they
explain.
I
will
share
my
screen
because
then
it
will
be
better.
I'm
not
talking
nonsense
here
give
a
moment
here.
Let
me
know
when
you
can
see
my
screen.
D
I
say
no
okay,
so
they
have
this
analytics.
How
many
like
this
is
our
normal,
like
membership
growth,
the
interesting
ones.
Is
this:
how
many
new
members
successfully
activate
on
the
first
day?
How
many
new
members
retain
the
next
week
like
how
many
of
the
people
who
join
they
they
returned
or
not,
and
how
many
members
visited
and
communicated
like
how?
How
much
interactions
was
there
message
activity
so
these
three
this
tree,
how
many
members
visit
and
communicated
and
how
many
members
retain
the
next
week?
D
It's
highly
interesting
for
me
on
this
this
and
then
they
further
explain
other
stuff,
but
this
stuff
for
me,
is
really
relevant
in
the
sense
of
understanding
how
well
we
are
doing
it's
almost
like
an
audit
but
for
discord
and
how
how
well
how
well
we
are
communicating,
how
well
we're
interrogating
the
community
into
into
us
and
how
many
people
return
after
they
appear
in
the
server,
so
they
I
asked,
I
reached
them
out
and
I
asked
them
how
they
did
it
and
they
basically
told
me
that
they
used
all
the
data
that
is
available
in
discord
like
they
had
access
to
the
api
and
they
pull
out
all
these
data
from
there.
D
They
didn't
have
to
do
anything
else,
so
it
would
be
interesting
to
see
how
this
is
possible,
and
I
feel
this
falls
into
transparency
more
than
any
other
working
group,
but
this
will
be
really
useful
for
communities
in
the
sense
of
seeing
how
we
can
improve
things.
For
example,
if
we
take
a
look
at
message,
activity
and
voice
activity,
if
we
see
that
we
have
more
voice
activity
than
message
activity,
it
means
that
people
are
not
interacting
between
them.
They
are
only
coming
to
calls
you
know,
so
these
kind
of
things
are
quite
useful.
D
I
feel
I
don't
know
who
have
access
to
the
api.
Hence
the
reason
why
I
bring
this
up
in
this
call.
This
is
not
for
this
week
or
the
next
one.
This
is
more
for
once
we
have
the
onboarding
journey
sort
of
sorted
out,
but
this
is
something
that
we
could
have
in
the
loop
so
yeah.
I
want
to
hear
your
feedback
about
it.
A
Yeah,
this
is
awesome,
like
I
think
all
the
stuff
like
could
also
go
on
the
like,
where
okay,
the
next
one
on
the
agenda,
is
also
like.
Improving
the
audit,
and
let
me
share.
C
A
Me
and
ivy
are
working
like
making
a
big
audit,
and
we
could
include
like
this
core
activity,
forum,
activity
and,
and
the
intention
is
to
do
it
like
every
three
months
and
yeah
yeah.
I
think
yeah.
This
is
super
cool
everyone.
I
think
yeah.
I
think
transparency
should
yeah,
show
all
this
data
to
the
to
the
people.
What
I
do
not
know
is
like
how
to
pull
out
this
data,
but
I
guess,
like
admins,
got
the
powered.
D
Speed
right
so
yeah,
she
told
me
that
if
you
have
access
to
the
api,
that's
information
that
exists,
because
this
already
have
it.
I
just
don't
know
where
to
get
it.
So
that's
why
I
bring
this
information
up,
because
I
I
will
be
highly
interested
on.
There
are
things
that
they
do
not,
and
here,
for
example,
I
will
be
interested
in
which
is
the
which
is
the
the
channel
that
gets
more
information
in
which
channel
we
get
more
data.
D
We
wish
when
people
click
the
most,
but
they
don't
stay
all
this
information
should
be
available,
and
I
think
that
could
be
really
interesting
for
for
everyone
to
sort
of
see
have
this
visibility,
because
the
forum,
the
forum,
is
quite
easy,
you
just
change.
If
you
go
to
every
forum,
they
have
the
accountant
of
views,
they
have.
D
You
have
the
account
and
the
amount
of
views
amount
of
messages,
so
the
forum
is
quite
an
easy
one,
because
everyone
can
do
it
like
you
can
delegate
this
pulling
out
the
data
from
the
form
to
almost
anyone.
The
same
goes
for
telegram
because
it's
public
how
many
people
and
so
on,
but
this
one
is
more
tricky
because
it's
a
private
information
hold
on
the
server
so
yeah.
That's
it!
That's
on
one
side,
I
don't
know
if
someone
wants
to
comment
on
this
before
I
move
on
to
the
next
part
of
the
outlet.
A
A
D
Yeah,
but
the
one
that
takes
the
most
time
and
effort,
it's
a
discord
one,
because
not
everyone
have
not.
Everyone
have
access
to
it.
Whether
forum
and
telegram
could
be
or
twitter.
A
D
I
think
it's
just
like
sort
of
delegating.
You
can
open
this
for
contributors.
You
know
we
just
lay
out
what
do
we
need?
We
need
how
which
was
the
most
thought
forum
most
talk
posts
in
the
forum,
which
is
the
person
who
engaged
the
most.
You
know
whatever
this.
If
we
guideline
this
and
open
for
contributors,
someone
can
do
it
easily,
because
it's
public
information,
you
don't
need
to
access
the
as
an
admin.
A
B
B
I
think
the
data
that
eddy
wants
to
see
shouldn't
be
part
of
the
audit
report,
but
it
should
be
presented.
I
mean
we
should
present
this
data
in
another
report
like
what
we're
doing
with
twitter
analytics.
We
present
the
analytics
in
the
comms
call,
but
this
we
shouldn't
wait
for
the
audit
report
to
present
the
data.
B
We
should
this
data
should
be
presented
regularly
and
then,
as
part
of
our
transparency
audit,
we
should
make
sure
that
this
data
are
being
presented
to
the
community
community
regular
regularly.
You
know
this
data
shouldn't
yeah.
The
audit
shouldn't
be
about
presenting
the
data,
but
presenting.
A
A
Yep,
actually,
that's
something
that's
something
I
wanted
to
chat
with
you
I'd
be
like
like
I,
I
think
we
instead,
like
we
see
the
audit,
like
you
know
like
okay,
let's
see.
A
A
Yeah,
like
people
is
helping
you
to
be
transparent,
let's
say,
and
I
think
our
duty
should
be
like
help
the
community
to
be
transparent
and
yeah
just
give
a
hand,
not
not
not
monitor
them,
but
give
a
hand,
and
I
think,
sharing
all
these
things.
We
could
that's
the
way
you
facilitate
them,
and
I
strongly
feel
this
could
be
on
the
audit,
because
and
if
you
think
this
should
be
more
regularly,
we
could
even
do
the
audit.
D
Would
be
it
depends?
This
is
here
comes
the
context
like
if
we
are
talking
about
just
before
the
common
subgrade
and
after
the
common
subscript.
I
will
need
that
information
right
before
and
right
after
and
a
few
weeks
after
you
know
to
sort
of
see
how
what
things
can
be
improved
on
the
go
on
the
moment.
You
see
we
wait
three
months
until
getting
this
report
at
least
for
this
card.
D
Then
we
will
lose
the
time
into
a
judgment
and
the
people
who
came
into
the
server
would
get
lost
because
we
didn't
adjust
at
the
right
time.
So
I
think
that
transparency
is
important,
but
it's
also
important.
Accessibility
like
you
need
to
have
accessibility
to
the
things.
So
for
me,
transparency
working
group,
not
only
those
audits,
but
the
information
should
be.
D
You
know,
kind
of
blueprinted
and
like
if
you
do
an
update
of
this
card.
It
would
be
easy
if
you
just,
for
example,
you
you,
and
I
would
do
it
once
and
you
establish
the
template
for
that
audit,
and
then
you
can
leave
that
to
contributors
later
on
to
just
plug
in
the
data
or
to
get
the
data,
and
just
you
know,
share
it
with
communitas
or
share
it
with
whoever
you
want
to
share
with
so
yeah.
B
My
point
about
the
audit
zepty
is
like
because
we're
if
we
include
all
this
data
in
our
report,
it's
going
to
be
a
very
long
report.
You
know
what
I
mean.
I
think
it
we
can
just
like
put
the
link
to
the
document
where
this
data
are
stored,
like
if
we
have
this
information
presented
somewhere
in
our
audit
report.
We
can
just
put
that
link
there
and
not
discuss
all
these
things
like
you
can
see.
B
We
are
like
we
can
say
something
like
you
can
check
the
the
discord
analytics
in
this
link.
You
know
and
it's
being
presented
to
the
community
transparently,
something
like
that.
You
know,
but
not
include
every
piece
of
data
in
the
in
the
audit
report.
D
I
agree:
can
I
pass
to
the
next
part
before
we
finish
the
call,
because
it's
really
simple.
D
There
are
two
things
which
is
more
priority.
I
will
go
with
this
one.
This
is
the
update
for
proposal
on
a
snapshot.
I
don't
know
if
you
are
seeing
my
screen.
I
hope
you
are
yeah,
so
we
are
trying
to
do
an
update
on
the
on
a
template
for
the
snapshot
proposal,
so
we
can
sort
of
use
it
for
further.
This
is
an
this
is
a
sort
of
upgrade
from
the
proposal
framework
that
we
had
on
on
forum.
D
So
I
just
wanted
to
share
visually
this
with
you,
so
you
can.
The
link
is
on
sofkkov
discord
channel.
So
if
you
can
ask
transparency,
provide
support
or
add
or
change
or
modify
anything
from
this,
it
would
be
nice.
So
you
have
a
look
at
it.
That's
on
one
side
and
then
what
I
really
want
to
talk
about
is
this,
which
is
the
with
gideon.
Did
his
discord,
server
newcomer
audit?
D
He
did
it
by
himself
and
it's
basically
his
point
of
view
from
his
pov
from
a
from
a
newcomer
and
the
things
that
he
feel
could
be
improved.
We're
not
going
to
go
through
all
of
this
stuff
because
it's
a
little
bit
too
much,
but
also
to
you
to
take
a
look
at
it
and
if
you
want
to
provide
feedback
as
transparency.
That
would
be
nice
because
we
will
talking
about
this
later
on
today
at
8
pm
in
the
call
of
communitas.
D
D
That's
already
been
worked
out,
defining
what
could
be
the
onboarding
process
if
we
optimized
for
frequent
user
or
we
optimized
for
newcomers,
and
then
he
suggested
some
changes
on
the
submenus
and
to
have
about
tec
kind
of
channel,
which
is
just
a
fixed
channel
with
information
that
it's
that
is
not
paying,
because
we
are
pinning
messages
on
most
of
the
most
of
the
channels,
but
those
messages
never
get
seen
unless
you
click.
D
And
you
know
what
is
the
pain
message,
so
it's
yeah
it's
weird
and
then
the
other
thing
is
like,
for
example,
he
suggested
this
help
info
her
channel,
she's,
fine
and
then
the
nice
part
that
I
really
like
is
the
concept
of
a
community-wide
whatever
we
want
to
change
the
name
or
call
it
differently,
which
is
all
these
things.
Announcements,
dc,
voting
ideas,
cafemen,
priests,
praise
and
group
playlist
goes
into
the
community
kind
of
group.
D
A
D
Of
them
are
there
no
the
proposal
for
a
snapshot.
It's
in
softcuff.
A
D
Yeah
the
feedback
it's
about,
if
you
think
the
information
that
is
required
to
be
transparent
on
this,
when
someone
propose
is
here
or
do
you
think
we
are
missing
something
it's
not
about
the
phrasing
or
the
word.
A
Okay,
yeah,
okay:
I
can
look
into
that
and
I'll
also
compare
with
the
advice
process.
We
have
and
see.
If
something
you
know
if
something's
missing
from
that
part
or
yeah.
C
A
I
mean
yeah,
we
are
almost
finishing
with
this
score.
We
couldn't
talk
about
much,
but
I
think
in
this
four
minutes
it
would
be
very
beneficial
for
us
if
we
could
do
around
like,
for
example,
we
want
to
improve
the
audit,
and
you
know
we
want
to
do
a
like.
A
We
want
to
do
one
big
audit
and
not
too
many
small
audits
to
every
working
group
so
and
in
one
of
the
things
that
me
and
I
we
are
discussing
and
we
are
not
reaching
our
agreement
right
now
for
for
the
moment,
is
like,
for
example
like
there
are,
there
will
be
information
on
the
blockchain,
like
all
the
movement,
like
all
the
addresses
that
are
interacting,
with
our
token
are
doing,
and
we
we
have
some
discrepancies
like
we
think
we
should
show
this
data
and
report
it.
A
So
the
pros
would
be
like
it's
good
for
the
you
know,
especially
for
the
hatchet
like
how
the
hatches
are
behaving
and
it
could
help
like
common
stock
for
future
commons
and
then,
but
at
the
same
time
like
it,
could
be
going
inside
private
life
of
people
like
let
them
do
whatever
they
want.
With
their
tokens,
I
need
to,
I
mean.
A
They
can
do
whatever
they
want,
but
it's
like
yeah.
We
are
just
reporting
them
and
we're
not
putting
names,
because
we
don't
know
name
we're
just
putting
access
just
to
make
it
clear
but
yeah
it's
it's
going
into
the
private
life
of
people
and
yeah.
I
I
would
like
to
get
a
quick
round
on
what
do
you
guys
think,
like
it's
beneficial
like
give
this
data
to
and
make
it
easier
to
reach?
A
D
Yeah,
I
think
the
only
data
that
is
relevant
is
the
data
that
is
used
for
governance
or
the
data.
That
is
the
data
that
is
used
for
governance.
D
If
I
sell
like
I
could
get
a
nice
general
statistics
of
how
much
was
sold
and
how
much
was
buy
but
going
to
a
micro
view
of
a
group
of
people
doing
things
or
I
think
it's
a
little
bit
too
invasive
and
non-relevant
like
I
would
only
care
about
what
how
like
how
does
the
token
cover
the
governance
for
talking
like
talking
for
governor,
has
been
used
and
how
and
a
general
view
about
how
how
many
tokens
have
been
sold
or
sell
or
or
bad
or
whatever,
but
the
rest
of
the
scope?
D
A
D
Mean
it
has
to
be
public,
that's
a
different
thing
right.
You
can
do
that,
but
doesn't
not
necessarily
make
it
public,
because
when
you
do
a
mark,
when
you
do
a
market
analysis
which
is
basically
what
you
are
doing,
you
share
it
with
stakeholders
and
people
who
are
part
of
the
organization.
You
don't
share
it
with
people.
You
are
selling
your
your
soap
or
your
beer
because
they
will
feel
manipulated
and
so
on.
So
it's
a
danger.
D
C
You
know,
even
though
we
are
collecting
it,
nobody
knows
who's
selling
or
who's
buying,
and
I
think
I
don't
know
dc
token
holders
everybody
who
might
like
it
my
seriousness
not
to
display
it
in
you
know
our
forums
or
places
like
that,
or
maybe
we
can
maybe
make
it
into
an
api
and
integrate
it
with
into
the
dashboard.
You
know
we
could
do
how
the
token
analytics
and
stuff
like
that
there,
the
people
who
want
it,
can
go
to
the
dashboard
and
have
a
look
at
it
from
there.
C
C
That's
my
side,
but
I
I
don't
understand
eduardo's
arguments
like
where
that
is
coming
from.
Maybe
if
you
could
explain
that
to
me
and
that
would
be
great.
B
I
just
but
I'm
gonna
quickly
say
that
I
was
on
I'm
on
edwardo's
side
actually
in
this
discussion,
because
I
feel
like
yes,
the
this.
These
addresses
and
their
activities
are
available,
probably
in
the
blockchain,
but
reporting
them
intentionally
to
the
whole
community
like
telling
the
people
telling
the
community
or
telling
the
public
at
least
what
this
address
are
doing.
It's
just
it's
not
relevant.
I
mean
what
I
think.
B
What's
eduardo
suggested
that
it
can
be
done,
I
mean
if
the
point
is,
to
help
the
common
staff
or
the
tec
understand
the
behavior
of
this.
Of
this
addresses
it
can
be
done
up
privately
without
making
the
information
like
yeah,
like
saying
that
this
address
is
buying
a
lot.
This
address
is
selling
a
lot.
You
know,
because
it's
too
personal
for
me.
A
D
A
D
Like
yes,
but
it
is
the
same
as
I
go
to
the
street
and
I
see
someone
picking
up
his
or
her
nose
and
she's
doing
it
publicly.
D
What
is
different
is
me
going
to
a
person,
saying,
hey,
you
are
doing
this
and
I
think
what
photo
of
you
boy
you
are
doing
it.
Do
you.
Can
I
make
an
exposition
out
of
it?
It's
a
completely
different
thing.
Even
if
it's
public
it
doesn't
mean
people
should
it
is
public,
that's
transparent
by
itself.
The
fact
that
it's
public,
but
we
like
the
question,
is:
is
this
information
relevant
for
the
community,
or
is
this
information
relevant
for
common
stack
or
a
working
group
specifically
that
needs
to
know
this
information?
That's
a
different
conversation.
D
B
D
B
Just
just
quickly,
I
just
want
to
talk
to
the
ad
that
I
also
have.
I
mean
we
trust
some
people
in
the.
We
trust
these
people
in
our
community,
but
you
know
that
we
have
this
document.
You
know
edward,
that
we
have
this
documents,
hatcher's
document
and
their
wallet
address.
I
mean
some,
a
few
people
have
access
to
this
wallet
addresses
and
the
names
who
own
this
wallet
addresses
and
yeah.
D
Yeah
yeah,
you
can,
you
can
find
the
addresses,
but
then
we
if
people
are
aware
that
you
as
a
whale
for
example,
you
ask
a
whale,
have
this
a
bunch
of
tokens
and
then
we
link?
What
do
you
do
with
that
amount
of
tokens
and
then
we
make
it
public
for
some
reason
you
expose
yourself
to
things.
D
B
A
Yeah:
okay,
we're
almost
six
minutes
past.
I
know
you
guys
have
other
meetings
and
stuff
to
do
yeah.
A
We
could
just
grab
it
up
here
and
we
actually
can't
if
both
of
you
like
me-
and
I
are
going
to
have
a
work
session,
the
audit,
it's
it's
on
our
calendar,
but
if
any
of
you
want
to
join
like
it's
going
to
be
from
2pm
to
4pm
and
this
wednesday
city,
if
any
of
you
is
interested
on
this
topic
and
yeah
we're
going
to
continue
and
yeah
not
only
on
this
topic,
but
we
really
need
to
move
like.