►
From YouTube: W22 Transparency WG: Improving the advice process, bot reminder, and Transparency Roadmap
Description
The Transparency Working Group promotes transparency, openness and mutual monitoring as a high-level ideal that we're moving towards at the TEC. The way that we get there is by empowering people to share this experience with the Transparency Audits and making information available to everyone.
We gather every two weeks on Mondays at 3pm CET.
Stewards: Ivy and Zeptimus
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/uM4ZWDjNfK
or say hello on Telegram https://t.me/tecommons
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tecmns
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
B
Okay,
yeah,
we
can
start
with
intentions
and
distractions.
My
intention
is
going
through
the
agenda.
There
are
a
bit
of
topics
I
added
like
they're,
very
short
like,
for
example,
like
next
week.
I'm
sorry
yeah
next
week
at
this
time,
I'll
be
I'll,
be
on
my
bike
actually
run
to
another
village
to
get
my
second
technique
test.
So
I
sorry
not
next
week,
but
next
then
the
following
one.
B
So
we
have
also
transparency-
and
I
was
thinking
well,
we
can
discuss
it
later,
but
we
can
either
change
the
time
or
maybe
do
it
like
next
week
or
the
next
one
yeah.
We
can
just
discuss
it
later
on
and
yeah.
My
biggest
focus
right
now
for
the
transparency
goal
is
the
advice
process
and
the
roadmap
I'll
pass
it
to
you.
A
Yeah,
I
don't
really
have
anything
to
add
to
this
agenda
just
to
yeah
sync
with
you
and
see.
What's
what,
since
what's
gonna
happen
in
the
next
days
or
this
week
or
the
next
two
in
the
next
couple
of
weeks
for
transparency
and
see
where
I
can
support
and
yeah,
I
think
that's
it
yeah
distractions,
just
that
I
have
aced
and
I
still
have
to
create
the
tweet
for
the
blog
for
nate's
blog
post
yeah.
I
think
we
can
start.
B
Okay,
awesome
yeah,
I
mean
man
is
not
here,
we
can
choose,
wait,
we
can
just
move
this,
maybe
hit
you
inside
a
lot.
Okay.
I
also
want
to
make
it
later.
B
B
B
B
Oh
well,
I
didn't
saw
that
that
thing:
okay,
yeah,
that's
cool,
okay,
okay,
yeah!
Next
next
point:
I
think
we
can
read
the
the
agreements
we
already
have
on
an
advice
process,
so
you
also
have
some
context.
B
And
yeah
basically
I'll
be
working
also
this
week
on
the
advice
process
and
I
will
check
also
the
agreements
and
for
advice,
process
and
and
this
group,
but
I
can
do
that
on
on
my
own,
but
I
yeah
I
just
wanted.
B
A
B
Yeah,
so
we
can
just
read
it
through.
Maybe
do
you
prefer,
like
I
read
it,
lonely
or
you
prefer
like
we,
each
read
it
like
well.
A
B
Wait,
I
was
muted,
sorry,
sorry,
yeah
and
then
I
feel
like
we
could
add
something
well
just
go
ahead.
A
Yeah,
I
feel
like
we
can
add
something
like
we
can
also
request
advice
through
a
one-on-one
discussion
or
like,
for
example,
in
the
stewards
what
we've
been
doing
for
like
he
said.
I
don't
know
if
if
it
can
be
considered
as
if
it's
valid,
if
the
advice
process
like
taking
the
advice
from
just
one
individual
but
not
publicly,
like
you
reach
out
to
this
person,
and
you
send
this
person
a
dm
and
gets.
A
Will
will
it
be
considered
as
a
valid
valid
process
if
we
request
advice
in
a
private
conversation
or
in
a
one-on-one
or
in
a
specific
chat
group
like
for
the
stewards.
A
B
Yeah,
like
actually
I'm
through
a
process
where
I'm
asking
like,
should
we
time
and
grieve
their
opinions,
the
only
one
to
give
me
an
answer
back
so
far.
I
was
grateful
for
the
moment
but
yeah.
The
idea
is
like
I'm
talking
with
them.
I
get
their
feedback
and
then
I'll
post
it
like
they'll
feedback
on
the
forum
post.
A
A
So
we
do
we've
been
doing
this
like.
I
will
write
something
and
then
I
will
get
your
advice
like
for
us.
We
discuss
these
things
and
then
we
get
each
other's
advice,
but
how
do
we
make
sure
that
when
we
reach
out
to
these
people
privately
like
it's,
I
think
it
comes
here
at
the
fourth
bullet.
It's
like
tagging
them,
but
if
they
basically
don't
respond
in
the
public
post,
we
we
can
try
to
send
them
a
personal
message
right.
A
Maybe
they
would
respond
like
I
mean
it's
not
wrong,
because
it's
it
can
be
like
a
more
proactive,
proactive
action.
You
know
like
if
you
chase
them
to
get
their
opinion.
Maybe
they
maybe
we
will
get.
We
can
get
their
attention
if
we
really
need
their
advice
on
something,
but
then
what
if
they
respond
to
us
in
the
private
conversation
and
not
in
the
forum
post,
so
how
do
we
make
it
more
transparent
or
would
it
be
considered
as
a
valid
process.
B
B
And
you
know
I
yeah
and
but
get
a
real
understanding
on
who
will
be
affected?
I
mean:
do
you
the
best
research
possible,
of
course
like
we,
don't,
cannot
make
perfect
decisions
but
and
ask
the
people
who
you
know,
for
example
like
if
we
want
to
manage
credentials
like
probably
the
most
affected
working
group
would
becomes.
A
A
B
We
can
do
yeah,
maybe
make
it
public,
maybe
forum
yeah,
like
you
know,
in
the
same
thread
where
you're
asking
for
advice
and
imagine
the
scenario
where
nobody
is
giving
you
any
advice.
You
do
your
own
proactive
advice
like
you,
you
reach
them
one
one
and
then
for
transparency,
say
you
post
it
on
the
on
the
forum
yeah.
But
of
course
you
you
have
to
get
their
consent,
yeah
yeah,
that's
true
and
and
yeah,
and
that
would
be
a
good
method
too.
To
get
the
advice
process.
A
A
B
A
That's
the
only
one
I
wanted
to
add
here
like
what,
if
there's
after
tagging
them,
what,
if
they
and
they
don't
respond,
then
we
chase
them
and
then
one-on-ones,
and
then
they
give
their
feedback
privately,
how
to
make.
How
do
we
make
it
transparent?
So
this
is
the
only
thing
that
I
wanted
to
point
out
here.
A
Then
that's
it,
we
don't
get
any.
You
know
we
we
it's
not
the
end
of
the
world.
If
we
don't
get
their
response,
but
I
mean
we
yeah
yeah,
I
mean
it's
there.
If
they
don't
give
their
advice
and
then
the
other
members
of
the
community
speak
up,
then
we
can
take
it
from
there.
I
mean
we
get.
We
we
give
our
best
to
get
their
advice,
but
if
they
yeah.
A
Else
we
can
do
we,
I
mean
we
can't
delay
a
proposal
just
because
they
don't
we
don't
get
their
their
feedback.
You
know,
I
mean
they're,
not
like
the
core
people.
B
But
what
about?
If
someone
is
on
vacation,
you
know,
and
it's
affect
you
know
like.
Oh
imagine,
if
someone
wants
to
you
know,
oh
it
was
on
vacation.
That's
it
that
that's
the
time
to
do
this
and
then
oh,
oh
two,
you
were
not
here.
I
was
asking
you,
but
you
say
nothing,
so
I
had
to
proceed
right.
A
Yeah,
that's
true:
maybe
it's
a
case-to-case
basis,
maybe
what
a
case-to-case
basis
like
if
this
proposal
will
directly
affect
and
will
have
a
huge
impact
on
this
person
or
in
this
group,
and
we
didn't
get
their
advice.
Maybe
we
can
propose.
We
make
another
proposal
to
extend
this,
to
extend
the
discussion
for
this,
since
these
people
are
not
available.
B
A
A
Not
meeting
the
courtroom
to
make
decisions
and
discuss
it's
just
my
opinion,
your
opinion
and
it's
just
that
there's
just.
B
A
B
A
Actually,
one
thing
that
I
noticed
in
our
transparency
channel-
I
was
just
checking
it
today
that
we
don't
get
updates
on
this,
bought
this
the
bot
announcement
that
the
transparency
call
is
happening.
A
I
just
saw
it
today,
but
I
think
vivei
v
isn't
back
yet
so.
A
Yeah
he's
on
vacation,
but
I
know
I
just
checked
it
today
I
mean
I
was
trying
why
there's
no
like
reminder
that
the
transparency
call
is
happening
in
an
hour
or
30
minutes.
Usually
other
working
groups
get
it
right,
but
I
checked
transparency
channel
and
the
last
time
it
was,
I
think
it
was
seen,
should.
A
Would
maybe
we
can
just
open
an
issue
and
assign
it
to
him,
so
he
doesn't
think
that
it's
urgent,
because
yeah
I
mean
I
don't
want
to
bother
him
as
well
since
he's
on
vacation.
A
B
B
A
You
haven't
created
it,
maybe
it's
you
can
see,
it
picks
up
there.
B
A
What
I
was
trying
to
say
so
for
when
we
post
this
in
the
forum,
it
doesn't
have
to
be
like
we're
proposing
specific
actions
right,
maybe
we
can,
when
you
put
when
we
post
this
in
the
advice
process,
maybe
we
can
have
a
question
like
like
yeah:
that's
why
we're
putting
it
there
to
get
their
feedback
like
for
bullet
number?
Four?
How
do
we
make
make
this
conversation
more
transparent
if
they,
just
if
this
ex,
if
these
experts
and
individuals
respond
to
us
privately?
A
A
Come
up
with
suggestions
now
in
this
call,
but
that's.
A
Posting
in
it
in
the
advice
process
in
the
forum
to
get
people's
id
or
suggestions
how
to
deal
with
it
like
if
we
tag
them
and
then
they
respond
to
us
privately,
how
can
we
make
it?
How
can
we
make
this
more
transparent,
like
we're
open
to
you,
yeah.
B
Actually,
there
is
a
small
team
working
on
the
tc
agreements
like
on
all
of
those,
and
ideally
we
will
have
it
all
of
them,
reviewed
like
by
by
this
week
on
friday,
and
I
think
annamarie
is
leading
it.
Maybe
she
can
have
some
insights
how
to-
and
at
least
a
small
group
of
people
is
checking
them.
B
It's
not
like
me
and
yulon
at
the
end,
like
we're
doing
it
alone
now,
but
then
we're
also
going
to
sing
with
anna
marie
and
the
tc
agreements
team
like
it
started
last
week
and
yeah
the
the
scope
is
having
for
this
week,
but
I
don't
feel
the
team
is
big
enough
to
have
it
ready
for
this
week,
but
yeah,
that's
not
on
our
concerns.
Right
now
and
yeah,
maybe
like
we
can
give
it
the
brainstorm
and
have
our
ideas
there
and
then
maybe
we
do
a
big
post.
A
Yeah,
I
think
that's
a
good
idea
that,
like
because
there's
there
are
not
so
many
people
joining
this
call,
one
thing
that
we
can
do
is
join
in
other
written
groups
call
who's
gonna.
Who
can
give
you
can
give
feedback
on
this,
and
then
that's
where
we
can
raise
this
topic.
B
A
Exactly
is
what
exactly
are
they
working
on
the
tc
agree,
tac
agreements?
What
are
these
agreements?
Is
it
like
the
code
of
conduct
or.
B
Yeah,
but
basically
what
what
they're
doing
is
you
know
we
have
all
those
agreements,
agreement
for
the
hearts
of
gravity
advice
process,
for
you
know
all
of
those
and
what
they
are
doing
is
they
are
going
one
by
one,
reviewing
them
and
see
if
what
they
are
saying
is
still
accurate
with
our
culture
of
it,
and
you
know
we
because
we
both
like
especially
after,
like
the
price
and
all
of
this-
so
maybe,
like
you
know,
price,
maybe
needs
some
changes
so
yeah.
B
No,
but
the
the
thing
is
like
you
know,
it's
not
like
five
minutes:
it's
not
a
five
minute
topic,
yeah,
it's
true!
It's
it.
It
should
take
almost
like,
if
not
the
whole
top
of
it.
A
B
A
B
A
Yeah
yeah,
I
agree
that
we,
of
course
we're
supporting
this
initiative,
but
my
point
is
like
I
think
the
feedback
from
the
soft
gov
working
group
call
is
more.
You
can
get
more
insightful
opinions
or
feedback
from
them
because.
A
More
how
to
build
the
culture
rather
than
the
agreements
then,
rather
than
the
people
working
on
the
agreements
I
mean
when
we
seek
opinions
or
feedback
from
this.
I
think
the
people
who
know
more
about
governance
is
in
the
soft
hall.
I
mean
I
mean
it's
just.
B
A
B
A
A
We
can
ask
olivia
if
we
can
have
time
to
discuss
it
as
well
in
their
call.
It's
like
remember
when
we
have
some
topics
we
want
to
discuss
with
the
stewards
you
we
reach
out
the
team.
B
A
B
Yeah
but
leave
it
on
vacation
right
now,
so
I
like
this
soft
call,
is
going
to
lead
by
suga,
which
might
be
I
don't
know.
I
don't
know
what
are
the
plans
to
have,
but
we
could
ask
her.
A
Yeah,
definitely
I
mean
it
doesn't
matter
who
leads
the
call,
but
it's
this
topic
I
think,
falls
under
government.
So
it's
where.
B
B
B
B
Okay,
yeah,
I
mean
we're
ready
a
half
of
the
call.
Maybe
it
would
be
interesting
to
check
like
the
roadmap.
B
B
So
yeah
my
suggestions
regarding
the
roadmap
would
be
a
wait
until
the
price
system
and
sing
with
chewie
what
his
idea
for
comes
yeah
from
there
take
some
decisions,
but
I
don't
know:
if
that's
you
know,
too
lazy
or
too.
You
know
like
waiting
for
others
to
lose
stuff
and
then
take
decisions,
but
I
feel
we
could
support
helping
on
the
escalating
these
other
processes
like
instead
of
you,
know,
waiting
that
to
happen
and
then
make
a
decision.
B
A
B
A
Not
it
doesn't
really
make
sense
to
work
on
something
then
we're
just
gonna
redo
it
later
on,
because
we
started
like
we
started
something,
that's
not
sure.
Yet
it's
like
making
a
plan
and
then
later
on,
we
have
to
delete
this
plan
erase
all
these
plans
because
yeah,
it's
everything
is
unclear.
Where
do
we
start?
But
I
think
one
like
what
you
said
it's
best
to
ask
the
right
people.
A
What's
like,
like
the
price
system,
like
you
said
I
mean
I,
I
honestly
don't
know
right.
I
am
honestly,
I'm
totally
clueless
so
it's
gonna
yeah.
B
A
We're
gonna
use
for
this
for
funding
and
yeah.
I
I
don't
know
I
don't
know
where
to
start
as
well,
but
instead
of
but
I
agree
instead
of
waiting,
it's
it's
good
to
ask
people
the
questions
that
we
have.
So
we
can
start
doing
something
yeah,
but
I
don't
know
who
to.
A
B
And
it's
it's
like
not
only
for
this,
but
you
know
imagine
like
okay,
we
get,
we
get
compensated,
but
the
price
system.
Okay,
imagine
that
scenario,
and
then
we
also
asked
for
money
to
the
transparency
now,
but
just
for
paying
contributors
that
are,
you
know
like
we
need
something.
So
we
have
money
to
make
things
happen
and
ask
for
help
to
some
experts,
but
we
also
are
going
to
praise
them
right.
So
are
we
going
to
compensate
them
twice
like.
B
But
yeah,
but
the
thing
is
yeah
you're
praising
because
you
you
you
know.
Imagine
like
I
don't
know
like
gives
you
something
like
super
cool
for
transparency
and
you're
paying
him.
But
at
the
same
time
you
want
to
pray
that
you
know
you
you
find
yourself
in
the
community
call
and
you
see
like
this
thing
was
super
cool
and
then
you
just
practice
because
you
feel
it
right
and
that's
why.
But
then.
A
That's
why
the
reward
system
is
being
changed
right,
I
mean
they
for
the
paid
contributors.
They
don't
get
the
full
amount
of
the
impact
hours
right
and
when
it
comes
to
when
it
comes
to
monetary,
but
but
we're
giving
them
the
75
for
governance.
So
I
think
it's
okay.
If
we
praise
them
because
they
don't
get
the
full.
B
But
that's
not
correct
that.
That's
not
correct,
because
with
the
price
my
head
on,
like
people
were
getting
paid
or
not,
and
the
compensation
was
kind
of
similar
and
then
like
this
reward
system.
That
live
is
suggesting
it's
it's
totally
different
from
the
one
we
had
before
and
then
grief
was
doing.
Very
cool
suggestions,
like
maybe
like,
like
libby,
was
saying
like
having
a
lot
of
people
quantifying
like
15
percent
people
and
then
also
have,
and
then
grief
was
saying.
B
B
But
then,
like
we're,
not
talking
about
directing
anything
to
anyone
in
here
which
is
okay,
I
mean
I
I
I
don't
see
it
as
a
wrong
thing,
but
the
thing
is
like
it's.
I
feel
it's
important.
It's
not
to
double
compensate.
A
B
A
A
So
I
feel
like
we're.
Not
really
I
mean
if
we're
just
gonna
talk
about
transparency,
we
don't
have
to
rush
our
roadmap
because
both
of
us
are
getting
compensated
right.
I
mean
we
don't
need
really
funding
for
the
two
of
us,
but
for
the
other
contributors
in
the
future.
That's
where
we
need
the
funding
for.
B
Yeah
yeah,
but
the
thing
is
like
the
idea
is
like
also
you
know,
like
these
working
groups
be
autonomous
and
independent,
so
you
know
like
the
idea
is,
like
you
know,
like
a
common
stack,
do
not
need
to
fund
a
tc
activity.
Yeah,
like
you
know,
tc
have
their
own
money.
So
why
should
common
stock
fund
tc
when
tc
have
money
like
for
now
it's
cool
because
it's
helping
right
like
to
make
it
faster
and
more
nice
with
more
support
from
the
community?
But
the
thing
is
in
the
future.
B
I
mean,
if
you're,
making
a
system
where
you
have
someone
putting
money
in
all
the
time
and
then
the
system
is
is
working.
You
cannot
say.
Oh
the
system
is
working
because
it's
not
like
it's
someone
else
putting
money
in
right
like
the
idea
is
like
they
see
some
fun
itself
by
their
own
like
their
own.
B
A
A
B
A
A
A
To
do
it
before
the
e-commerce
upgrade,
I
mean
I'm
thinking,
because
in
the
work
agreement
that
tim
and
I
are
working
are
drafting
it's
like
there's
a
statement
there
like,
but
it's.
This
is
still
in
discussion.
I'm
not
it's
not
final!
Yet,
but
there's
a
discussion
there,
like
after
the
comments
upgrade
the
contributors
like
the
contributors,
the
tac
contributors
will
get
like.
A
A
A
The
com,
once
we
finish,
the
commerce
upgrade,
we
still
have
four
weeks
to
create
our
funding
proposals
and
I'm
sure
that
maybe
a
week
before
the
commerce
upgrade
or
a
few
weeks
before
the
commerce
upgrade
things
will
be
clearer.
B
Yeah
that
makes
sense
yeah.
Maybe
we
can
just
get
back
to
it,
but
also
on
the
like
the
thing
where
why
we
were
putting
this
it's
because,
on
the
on
the
screen
review
yeah,
there
were
people
talking
like
the
only
working
group
that
has
a
proposal
is
cons
and
on
the
things
that
could
go
better.
A
A
Yeah,
so
it's
if,
if
we
can
get
their
feedback
as
well,
then
we
know
that
okay,
maybe
we
can
have
a
consensus
that
it's
not
a
priority
or
this
sprint.
You
know,
but
at.
B
A
We're
at
least
it's
being
discussed,
you
know,
but
it
doesn't.
We
don't
have
to
really
make
a
decision
on
yeah.
I
think
it's
something
that
we
can
discuss
with
the
other
stewards
and
see
what's
what's
stopping
them
from
creating
this
road
map
or
this
funding
proposals
and
see
where
we
can
step
in
as
well
and
yeah.
A
If
we
know
their
concerns,
what's
why
they
haven't
started
anything
yet,
then,
because
we
have
to
see
where,
where
the
blocker
is
coming
from,
like,
what's
blocking
them
from
creating
the
funding
proposals
and
like
why,
why
is
comms
doing
this
and
why
other
working
groups
are
not
doing
this?
What's
yeah.
B
A
Stopping
them
we
have
to
know,
what's
stopping
them
first
before
we
can
think
of
a
solution
or
suggest
I
mean.
A
A
So
I
think
we
can
discuss
this
in
the
stewards,
call
and
yeah
ask
them
why?
What's
the
blocker
for
creating
funding
proposals,
I
mean
it's
not,
it
doesn't
mean
that
we
have
to
addre
address
those
bloggers
as
soon
as
possible,
but
at
least
we
have
an
idea
yeah.
A
B
Okay,
so
yeah
then
like
the
on
the
next
transparency
call
I
I
would
I
won't
be
here
so
maybe
we
could
either
make
a
transparency
call
by
next
week
or
maybe
do
two
weeks
after
or
like
or
yeah
or
maybe
we
can
do
a
work
session
like
for
next
week
and
and
then
skip
the
thing
since
we
are
doing
works
edge,
we
can
sing
during
the
work,
sess
or
yeah
or
yeah.
B
I
would
like
to
hear
your
opinions
on
how
to
like,
I
I
won't
be
able
to
make
it
at
the
3pm,
since
I
will
be
yeah
I'll,
be
on
a
bike
moving
to
another
village
to
get
my
my
test
for
the
drive
license,
so
it's
one
hour
of
of
travel
going
there
and
then
one
hour
coming
back
and
yeah.
I
yeah
at
this
and
it's
going
to
be
5
p.m.
City.
A
Think
it's
okay
to
skip
this
call
like
because
santi
has
done
it
like
they
skipped
two
weeks
of
no
legal
working,
no
legal
calls.
If
there's
nothing.
If
there's
nothing
urgent
to
talk
about,
and
then
we
can
play
it
by
ear
like
if
next
week
something
comes
up
and
then
you
and
I
can
sync
together
if
there's
something
that
we
have
to
work
on
well,
you
know
because
right
now,
based
on
our.
B
A
On
our
gen
on
our
agenda,
there
is
nothing.
The
only
thing
that
we
have
to
work
on
is
the
advice
process
post
right
and
I'm
pretty
sure
we
can
work
on
that
this
week
or
next
week
before
your
yeah
yeah,
yes
or
we
can,
we
can.
We
can
keep
it
in
the
calendar
for
now
and
then
next
week.
A
B
B
B
A
See
next
yeah,
let's
see
next
week,
if
some,
if
anything,
comes
up,
then
if
not
nothing
urgent
that
comes
up,
you
can
just
skip
the
call,
since
it's
only
usually
just
you
and
me,
but
yeah.
If
there's
something
that
needs
to
be
discussed
with
the
members
or
I
can
open
the
call
and
then
wait
for
joiners
and
yeah.
A
B
A
B
So
yeah
there's
no
there's
no
more
agenda
topics.
If,
if
we
don't
have
anything
else
to
discuss,
I
think
we
can
close,
but.
A
B
I've
probably
annamarie
can
post
it.
I
will
I
mean
there
are
some
things
I
need
to
do
on
the
chromebook,
but
it's
going
to
be
answered
on.
It
is
not
a
topic.
It's
like
would
really
create
the
topic
for
the
managing
credentials
and
yeah.
We
were
working
on
other
processes
and
yeah
yeah
choose
that.
A
Okay,
so
yeah,
just
let
me
know
if
there's
anything,
I
can
help
you
with
on
this
document.