►
Description
Timecodes:
00:00 - Intentions and distractions
01:50 - Agenda
02:16 - CS Logo Video
07:02 - Audit proposal
44:00 - Recorders distribution
48:02 - Github issues
🙏 Thank you for watching! Hit 👍 and subscribe 🚩 to support this work
🌱Join the Community🌱
on Discord https://discord.gg/DDr5kYU
or say hello on Telegram http://t.me/CommonsStack
Join the conversation https://forum.tecommons.org/
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/CommonsStack
Learn more http://tecommons.org/
B
C
D
B
B
It,
yes,
I
can
download
it,
and
I
think
we
can
do
two
things
here.
I
can
actually
help
you
and
I
mean
if
we
have
to
do
a
lot
of
videos,
it's
better.
If
we
both
do
it
and
also
you
have
a
new
skill
and
I
can
like
I
use
premiere,
which
is
a
pretty
complete
program
and
yeah.
I
think
that's
a
good
program
actually
and
an
edit.
Is
it
it's
not
that
I
mean
we
can
do
it
and
and
if
you
don't
have
time,
I
can
do
it
myself
as
well.
D
B
D
A
D
A
B
B
D
B
F
B
E
B
D
B
B
B
Missing:
okay,
as
a
tech
is
a
value
driving
community.
We
believe
that
transparency
plays
an
important
role
in
exercising
integrity
in
our
community
transparency.
Working
group
has
been
documenting
the
calls
meetings
and
making
sure
that
the
project
updates
are
available
to
the
community
members
and
the
general
public
through
youtube
videos.
However,
we
feel
that
we
can
go
beyond
the
videos
to
promote
and
reinforce
transparency
and
integrity
in
our
community,
so
the
idea
of
transparency
audit
was
brought
up
in
one
of
our
weekly
calls.
B
Your
vote
and
feedback
on
our
proposal
to
conduct
transparency
audits
among
the
tech
working
group
are
much
appreciated,
so
our
first.
Our
goal
of
the
audit
is
not
to
impose
transparency
across
the
working
groups,
but
provide
guidance
on
how
all
of
us
can
be
transparent
with
our
actions
and
decisions.
B
If
you
have
yellow
transparency,
you
could
ask
help
from
us
like
what
am
I
missing
on
the
documentation
and
then
we
pro
we
provide
guidance,
but
we
do
not
impose
like
you
have
to
be
green,
it's
up
to
you
and
then
it's
it's
going
to
be
like
going
somewhere
like
we
have
like.
We
actually
are
going
to
use
the
the
forum
post
that
libby
created
for
the
tools
that
is
the
from
each
working
group.
D
C
I
think
that,
with
this
idea,
we
have
the
same
obstacle
in
in
gravity.
That
is
that
we
don't
want
to
impose
anything,
but
we
we
want
to
create
certain
type
of
rules
for
people
to
follow.
So
I
think
that
a
good
idea
would
be
to
have
three
principles
as
as
liby
is
doing
it.
So
in
soft
golf,
where
you
have
what
is
forbidden,
what
is
required
and
what
is
permitted
so
in
in
that
way.
C
So
I
I
am
trying
to
have
like
neutral
rules
where,
where
what
what
measures
is
not
like
a
criteria
but
a
behavior
that
has
repeated
once
or
twice
so,
maybe,
instead
of
of
having
like
people
saying
what
what
is
what
is
going
to
happen,
it
would
be
better
to
have
all
the
old,
a
very
good,
well-written
and
with
bro
of
the
clear
process
that
we
have
to
follow.
I
think.
B
B
I
don't
know
if
I
find
the,
but
we
were
following
the,
for
example,
a
checklist
and
on
the
checklist,
for
example,
we
are
going
to
have
like
roadmap
if,
if
it's
required
financial
statements
manifesto
and
like
the
basic
documentation,
we're
going
to
have
a
checklist
for
all
the
team,
all
the
working
groups
and
we
are
going
to
set
a
criteria
to
do
it.
The
same
for
each
working
group,
not
not
like
this
working
group,
one
one
criteria
and
the
other
working
group,
another
criteria.
B
We
should
use
like
the
same
criteria
for
everyone
and,
for
example,
the
idea
was,
if,
if,
if
someone
is
a
working
group,
reach
all
the
the
points
on
the
checklist,
then
it's
green
and,
for
example,
if
there
is
one
or
two
missing,
then
it's
yellow,
and
if
there
is
more
than
three
missing,
then
it's
red.
Something
like
that.
I
mean
we're
still
drafting
it.
It's
just
an
idea.
D
Yeah,
let
me
just
add
to
what
zep
said,
because
the
id
here
is
like
for
this
audit
like
what
he
said
it.
We
want
to
make
it
less
subjective,
so
we
would
be
like
we'll
be
asking
for
proof
or
documentation
that
would
that
will
prove
that
or
that
will
show
the
transparency
is
being
practiced
in
the
working
place,
for
example
those
documentations.
You
know
we
would
be
looking
for
documentations.
D
That
would
support
your
claims
like
that
you're
being
transparent,
like,
for
example,
is,
do
you
have
this?
Like
the
roadmap?
Do
you
have
this
funding
or
the
the
payment,
those
the
budget
so
those
kind
of
things
so
yeah?
We
will
have
this
checklist
and
yeah
like
what
he
said.
The
criteria
will
not
be
different
for
each
working
group
so
as
much
as
possible.
You
want
to
make
it
more
general,
but
of
course
we
would
consult.
D
E
Yeah,
I
I
love
it
guys,
I
think,
you're
on
the
right
track.
I
would
say
I
don't
know
necessarily
it's
the
permitted
like.
What
do
you
call
that
you
know
what's
required?
What
is
what
is
against
the
rules
or
something
I
mean?
Actually,
I
guess
a
little
bit,
but
a
lot
of
things
that
are
like
permitted
whatever's
on
the
criteria.
I
feel
like
the
criteria
is
the
most
important
piece
and
once
you
guys
have
that
nailed
down
it'll
probably
take
a
couple
iterations.
You
know
to
get
it
right,
but
that's
okay,.
B
Yeah,
that's
awesome
the
thing
I
think
the
the
criteria
that
one
was
talking
about
required
and
forbidden.
I
think
it
was
more
for
like,
like
some
working
groups,
I
have
to
require
some
items
that
I
mean
manifesto
has
to
be
required,
but
I
was
thinking
in
that
way
like
there
are
some
documentation
that
we
must
have,
and
there
is
some
some
documentation
that
we
maybe
don't
need
it,
but
it's
good
to
have
like
to
make
it
green,
for
example,
but
I
I
was
thinking
that
way
like
like
some
specific
documentation.
B
E
Yeah
absolutely-
and
I
think,
there's
going
to
be-
I
think
this
is
going
to
be
very
closely
attached
to
accountability,
because
you
know
relatively
soon.
Hopefully
there
we
will
actually
launch
and
all
these
working
groups
will
be
requesting
funds
from
conviction
voting,
and
so
this
transparency
working
group
will
be
a
way
to
like
understand
kind
of
like
an
easy
score.
That's
like
oh
yeah
see
they
got
a
green
and
transparency.
That's
a
good
sign!
You
know,
or
oh
these
guys
got
a
red
in
transparency.
B
E
B
True,
that's
awesome,
that's
true,
and
and
and
at
the
same
time
people
should
like,
like
was
like
ivy
was
saying
we
are
willing
to
to
help
people
to
get
green
like
if
someone
have
some
like.
I
see
it,
for
example,
on
sam,
sometimes
he's
so
focused
on
the
world
that
he's
not
focusing
on
other
stuff,
and
I
could
say,
hey
sam,
maybe
you
want,
I
have
you
a
bit
on
that
and
and
then
we
start
to
group
together
and
make
it
green
or
yellow
or
whatever
we
want
to
go
ahead.
C
And
I
think
this
also
complements
on
on
having
all
different,
multiple
mutual
mechanism
systems.
This
is
another
mutual
mechanism
system
and
I
think
it
complements
really
good
gravity
and
soft
cop,
and
it's
like
in
the
same
scope
that
we
are
having
that
we
are
addressing
the
other
group.
So
I
think
it's
very
good.
Yes,.
B
B
E
B
B
E
B
Okay,
the
next
is
what's
the
proposed
process,
the
detail
process
is
to
be
finalized.
Yet
after
we
gather
the
votes
and
feedback,
but
here's
the
general
process
that
we
are
proposing,
the
transparency
working
group
will
create
a
set
of
criteria
checklist
for
the
audit.
The
criteria
will
be
reviewed
by
experts
and
working
groups
representatives.
B
The
audit
will
be
done
by
a
questionnaire
forms,
so
the
participants
can
complete
it
at
the
company
in
time.
The
transparency
working
group
will
check
the
completed
audit
questionary
every
three
months
and
provide
feedback
on
transparency
level
of
the
participating
group.
Having
said
that,
the
working
groups
are
welcome
to
request
transparency,
checks,
anytime.
B
So
the
idea
on
the,
for
example,
this
third
point
is
like
we
are
going
to
review
the
documentations
of
each
and
updating
every
three
months
and
maybe,
for
example,
we
can
just
split
a
working
group,
for
example
this
month
we
do
legal
these
months,
we
do
gravity
this
month.
We
do
like.
So
it's
not
like
every
three
months.
B
Gonna
schedule
yeah.
We
should
organize
somehow
to
the
to
have
not
all
the
work
on
the
same
on
the
same
month
to
say
like
it's
better
to
have
it
split
it.
So
we
have
a
like
yeah,
it's
not
like.
We
are
doing
nothing
and
then
three
months,
oh
no.
There
is
a
lot
of
work
to
do
it's
better
to
have
it
like
split
it
somehow,
but
we
should
organize
that.
So
I
mean
right
now
we
are
drafting.
B
So
if
the
community
wants
it
or
not,
so
we
when
we
have
to
approve
of
the
community
they
want
it.
Then
we
start
to
work
on
that
and
any
vloggers
we
might
have.
I
don't
think
I
cannot
think
any
blocker,
but
I
was
thinking
on
that,
but
I
don't
find
any
I
mean
if
the
community
doesn't
want
to,
but
if
they
don't
want
to,
then
we
don't
do
it,
but
I
can't
think
any
other
vlogger.
Maybe
we
can.
E
B
Yeah
yeah
yeah.
What
I
was
thinking
is
like
not
to
have
them
all.
Together
I
mean
if
we
have,
let's
say
20
working
groups
and
we
have
to
do
it
every
three
months.
Then
we
split
like
one
month
with
one
one
in
I
don't
know
the
english
word,
but
we
do
33
of
the
working
groups
one
month,
one.
We
do
33
of
the
working
groups
month.
Two
we
do
33
like.
D
What
about
the
other
idea
that
I
have
that?
What
about?
Let's
like,
have
a
fix
like
we
do
it
every
three
months,
but
for
we
will
split
the
working
groups
among
the
weeks
so,
for
example,
the
first
week
we
will
assign
three
working
groups,
you
will
other
three
working
groups
and
then
the
second
week
will
audit.
I
mean
there
are
two
of
us
anyway
and
I'm
sure
that
other
there
would
be
other
members
who
would
be
joining
us
and
helping
us
with
the
audit.
D
So
I
don't
think
it
would
be
a
very
big
task.
For
us
I
mean
if
there
would
be
a
lot
of
working
groups,
but
we
can
just
like
split
them.
We
will,
let's
let's
say:
let's
we
will
have
the
audit
in
june,
so
the
first
for
the
first
week,
let's
assign
the
three
working
groups
and
then
the
next
the
second
week
there
will
be
other
three
working
groups
like
that.
D
Okay,
so
it's
like,
instead
of
because
I
my
idea
is
like
to
do
it
like
every
three
months
or
like
quarterly.
It's
like
gonna,
be
a
quarterly
audit,
so
we
don't
have
to
wait
like
we
don't
have
to,
because
if
we
do
it
like
in
every
month
there
will
be
only
two
working
groups
assigned.
So
it's
like
we
will
do
the
audit
for
the
working
group
like
only
once
or
twice
a
year,
but
it
would
be
great
to
do
it
more
often
like
a
quarterly
audit.
So
every
three
months.
D
So
if
you're
worried
that
we
would
not
be
able
to
finish
all
working
groups
in
one
month,
because
there
are
many
working
groups,
we
can
split
them
in
the
weeks.
It
doesn't
have
to
happen
in
just
one
day
or
in
one
week
like
for
the
whole
month.
We
have
three
weeks
in
a
month
four
weeks
in
a
month,
so
we
can
separate
the
we
can
audit
different
working
groups
for
those
four
weeks.
B
Yeah,
I
think
that's
that's
how
we
want
to
do
it,
but
let's
say
like
we
don't
I
mean
if
there
is
like
I
was
saying
before
like
if
we
do
33
of
the
working
group
each
month,
we
it's
like
more.
My
point
is
like
to
assure
like
we
have
the
more
time
possible,
like
let's
say
we
split
like
the
time
for
each
working
group.
B
At
the
same
I
mean-
maybe
maybe
in
the
maybe
we
find
like
some
working
groups
are
harder
than
others,
but
we
will
find
it
meanwhile
doing
it,
but
at
the
at
first
I'd
like
to
split
the
same
time
for
each
working
group.
So
it's
not
like
we
are
going
to
spend
more
time
on
one
working
group
or
other
from
the
before.
Maybe
in
the
future.
B
C
I
want
to
share
and
like
an
insight,
I
just
have
right
now
and
instead
I
think
that,
with
these
audits,
we
can
prevent
a
lot
of
conflicts,
and
I
think
this
is
amazing
because,
like
I
was
reading
that
there
was
this
conflict
in
aragon
related
to
transparency
and
that
some
core
members,
like
resigned
because
of
this
problem-
and
I
think
that
maybe
if
we
can
have
this
transparency
like
audit
transparency,
would
not
simply
be
taken
for
granted.
But
we
will
have
this
criteria.
B
Working
exactly
the
main
goal
is
like
yeah
to
be
transparent
and,
as
you
say
before,
like
if
one
working
group
is
not
being
transparent
but
maybe
he's
showing
results,
maybe
the
community
wants
to
fund
it.
But
it's
up
to
the
community
and
our
goal
is
just
to
make
like
we
provide
guidance
to
be
transparent
and
and
help
the
whole
community
to
want
to
like
the
mind
goal.
D
E
I
don't
think
there's
a
wrong
way
like
I.
I
think
it's
going
to
end
up
always
with
you
know,
having
probably
a
one
on
one
call
with
the
steward,
explain
them
what
you're
looking
for
ask
them
to
achieve
it
and
then
hold
them
accountable,
set
another
call
with
them
see
what
they
have
see,
what
they
need
help
with
and
then
and
then
the
audits
done.
You
know,
but
I
I
don't
I.
I
don't
think
that
there's
a
wrong
way
to
do
it
like,
and
I
don't
think
you
can
pick
the
perfect
way
right
now.
E
Yeah
yeah,
I
mean
you,
obviously
it's
good
to
have
a
plan
to
start
just
don't
be
attached
to
it
like
it's
the
right
plan,
because
once
you
do
a
few
you'll
be
like,
oh
my
god.
Well,
you
had
no
idea
that
it
would
take
this
long
to
do
that
and
and
it
and
this
would
be
so
easy.
Oh
okay,
you
know
and
then
and
then
you'll
reassess
and
who
knows.
E
Maybe
you'll
find
that
it's
easier
to
do
all
the
audits
in
one
month,
because
you
have
some
kind
of
group
classes
or
you
you
find
some
interesting
strategy
for
you
know
doing
something.
You
didn't
think
it
would
work
out
that
way.
So
I
I
really
think
that
once
you
just
once
you've
done,
you
know,
half
the
audits,
then
you'll,
then
you'll
have
a
pretty
good
idea
and
then,
once
you
finish,
the
audits
you'll
have
the
perfect
plan.
D
B
B
Soon,
as
possible,
I
mean
our
first
step
is
to
get
the
feedback
from
the
community.
If
they
want
or
they're
not,
and
then
we
start,
I
think
as
soon
as
possible
is
the
better.
So
the
fact
the
the
sooner
we
start,
the
faster
I
mean
the
I
mean
when
you
start
to
work,
is
when
you
get
in
that
snowball,
and
you
know
if
you're
working,
then
you
are
learning
and
then
yeah
for
me,
it's
asap,
but
but
we
have
to
follow.
D
C
Yeah,
but
a
minimum
viable
proposal
is,
is
the
way
that
I
have
been
like
working
in
gravity
and
I
think
it
has
gone
well,
and
I
think
it
would
be
like
really
great,
if,
like
for
the
hatch,
maybe
for
the
first
days
or
or
maybe
it
would
it's
possible
before
the
hatch.
We
can
have
like
this
first
audit,
so
we
can
like,
at
the
hatch
say.
C
Okay-
and
this
is
these-
are
the
changes,
and
this
is
what
comes
with
the
hatch
and
now
we
are
having
this
stand,
maybe
that
that
would
be
a
good
time
and
it's
like
two
two
months,
so
I
I
it's
like
yeah
one
month
and
a
half,
I
don't
know
if
it
would
be
too
too
hurry
or,
if
maybe
like.
We
can
start
this,
and
if
the
first,
in
the
first
moment
month
of
the
hatch,
then
release
the
transparency
like
report
or
something.
B
Yeah,
I
think
our
first
or
first
I
mean
I
think
we
could
also
start
with
tech,
since
sam
is
working
on
all
the
documentation
and
he
have
a
very
nice
feedback
and
we
could
start
with
them
and
see
all
the
points
we
have.
And
then
we
start
to
draft
the
checklist.
And
then
we
start
to
move
on
the
other
working
rooms
and-
and
I
think
we
could,
for
example,
do
together
like
two
or
three
like
let's
say
we
do
together
or
everyone
who
wants
to
join,
take
legal
and
gravity.
B
C
Yes,
yes,
maybe
like
start
with
one
or
two
groups
and
then
like
go
with
the
others.
It
would
be
like
a
good.
I
I
agree
with
with
what
reef
said
that
there
is
no
one
correct
way
to
do
it
and
that
what
you
find
reason
is
going
to
be
good,
and
if
it's
not,
then
the
community
is
going
to
to
give
feedback
around
it.
E
E
Work
for
every
working
group
so
definitely
want
to
start
with
her,
and
then
I
feel
like
juan,
is
very
well
organized
as
well
so
and
you
you
guys,
are
obviously
the
biggest
I
mean
the
most
like
transparency-minded
of
the
working
groups,
I
would
say,
and
then
and
then
from
there
it
doesn't
really
matter,
but
I
I
feel
like
they're.
Those
are
the
two
working
groups
that
will
want
to
have
the
most
input
on
how
the
transparency
audit
goes.
Everyone
else
will
just
be
like
yeah.
Just
tell
me
what
to
do.
B
D
E
B
B
B
D
B
D
C
E
B
B
D
A
D
B
B
B
B
B
Yes,
I'm
here:
okay,
okay,
I
was
confused.
I
don't
know
if
my
internet
was
not
here,
but
because
it's
going
down
and
up
well,
I
think
we
can
yeah
it's
no
way.
We
finished
that
in
eight
minutes,
so
I
think
we
can
just
finish
the
call.
I
think
that
was
a
great
call
with
a
lot
of
great
feedback
and
we
have
more
to
work
on
and
thank
you
so
much
guys.